having to see over and over again one of my friends popular post, where I am more interested in what is happening with my more boring friend.
This is one of the things that eventually forced me to shutdown Facebook for good. I got sick and tired of seeing the same posts over and over. Then I'd switch from "most popular" to "newest", and what do know? There were tons of posts that I never saw because Facebook declined to include them in my feed.
Just let me see what I want to see, not what you think I should see.
49 other states didn't want it? And yet the article says this is following Delaware, Massachusetts and Oregon who passed similar laws recently. Do you want to revise your opinion after reading the article or persist in your ignorance?
This is nothing, I once got a Navy Achievement Medal (one step down from a Commendation medal) for setting up a mail alias on my own domain for my reserve unit to use for group communications, and for installing and updating anti-virus software on the unit's laptops. It all literally took me half an hour to complete.
And if the super-strong cable also does Ethernet, you wouldn't even have to raise it back, unless gravitational escape velocity also applies to electricity.
Since electrons have mass they're susceptible to gravity. So no, you couldn't get any kind of signal out of a black hole.
The 4th Amendment says the government can't search our private effects without a warrant. The NSA has been doing just that. If some asshole in a robe says that's legal that says more about just how broken our government is than whether it really is legal or not.
You have the basic question wrong. Snowden revealed classified information. It isn't a question of true or false, it is a question of who is legally allowed to see it. He compromised American intelligence operations, and those of allied nations. Snowden broke trust, and people are confused about it.
.
Snowden alerted the American people to illegal actions that circumvent the Constitution. I don't care how classified it was. The Constitution and our civil rights are far, far more important than what some bureaucrat thinks we ought to know.
Snowden arrogantly undermined democratic principles and acted like a vigilante.
You're fucking high. You should be tarred and feathered along with the assholes who have been shredding our Constitution, you fucking bootlicker.
No, we don't all know that. Because he didn't pursue his crusade using any of the procedures that would grant him that protection. Not even close.
True, but only because the previous NSA whistleblowers were all silenced and screwed over, too. What's the good of playing by the rules when the powers that be won't do the same?
Snowden, like other government workers (even contractors), took an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. By revealing the depth of the spying done on American citizens by our own government he upheld that oath. Whether he "went through proper channels" is bullshit and academic. He did the right thing and we should give him a ticker tape parade while tar-and-feathering the real traitors, the people who create the surveillance state and those who still support and defend it today.
Snowden fulfilled his oath to protect and defend the Constitution from domestic enemies. If doing that is against the law we're even more fucked than any of us have realized.
So yeah, he broke no laws by releasing that data. The people he blew the whistle on are the lawbreakers, they're the ones who belong in Leavenworth.
I know, it's crazy. I started hanging out here before my oldest son was born; he'll be 16 next month. I finally got a login around that time. One of my life's regrets is not getting one as soon as I found the site, it probably would've been a five-digit one.
I've had an account at/. for over 15 years; you don't even have an account. So shut the fuck up and go to Techdirt if you don't like it./. has never been solely about "science and technology". It's always had a very strong political part to it, and this cock up at US Customs plays to that part of the site.
Sears made that change 100 years ago, there's nothing saying Amazon won't, also.
Remember, Sears started as the first Amazon, but using catalogs instead of a website. That they forgot their beginnings is why Amazon was able to take such a huge and early lead.
Are you fucking kidding me? I've been coming to/. for 15 years now, and government crackdowns on free speech online have been a core part of their coverage that entire time.
If you don't like then create an account, go into your preferences, and turn off Your Rights Online (YRO). Otherwise, shut the fuck up and go away.
Are you high? David Duke was never a candidate for President. He was a candidate to become a candidate, but didn't make it out of the primaries. Unless you consider Lyndon Larouche to have been a candidate for President on the Democratic Party ticket.
Slashdot Mirror
having to see over and over again one of my friends popular post, where I am more interested in what is happening with my more boring friend.
This is one of the things that eventually forced me to shutdown Facebook for good. I got sick and tired of seeing the same posts over and over. Then I'd switch from "most popular" to "newest", and what do know? There were tons of posts that I never saw because Facebook declined to include them in my feed.
Just let me see what I want to see, not what you think I should see.
49 other states didn't want it? And yet the article says this is following Delaware, Massachusetts and Oregon who passed similar laws recently. Do you want to revise your opinion after reading the article or persist in your ignorance?
This is nothing, I once got a Navy Achievement Medal (one step down from a Commendation medal) for setting up a mail alias on my own domain for my reserve unit to use for group communications, and for installing and updating anti-virus software on the unit's laptops. It all literally took me half an hour to complete.
Here I thought this would be about talking to single ladies at couples clubs.
Since electrons have mass they're susceptible to gravity. So no, you couldn't get any kind of signal out of a black hole.
No it doesn't beg the question, it raises it.
The 4th Amendment says the government can't search our private effects without a warrant. The NSA has been doing just that. If some asshole in a robe says that's legal that says more about just how broken our government is than whether it really is legal or not.
.
Snowden alerted the American people to illegal actions that circumvent the Constitution. I don't care how classified it was. The Constitution and our civil rights are far, far more important than what some bureaucrat thinks we ought to know.
You're fucking high. You should be tarred and feathered along with the assholes who have been shredding our Constitution, you fucking bootlicker.
True, but only because the previous NSA whistleblowers were all silenced and screwed over, too. What's the good of playing by the rules when the powers that be won't do the same?
Snowden, like other government workers (even contractors), took an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. By revealing the depth of the spying done on American citizens by our own government he upheld that oath. Whether he "went through proper channels" is bullshit and academic. He did the right thing and we should give him a ticker tape parade while tar-and-feathering the real traitors, the people who create the surveillance state and those who still support and defend it today.
Snowden fulfilled his oath to protect and defend the Constitution from domestic enemies. If doing that is against the law we're even more fucked than any of us have realized.
So yeah, he broke no laws by releasing that data. The people he blew the whistle on are the lawbreakers, they're the ones who belong in Leavenworth.
Hear, hear. If I had points you'd get one.
The actual title should be "thank goodness $SECURITY_THREAT made use realize our security was worse than crap".
Well if they're using Perl in their security software no wonder they got hacked...
I know, it's crazy. I started hanging out here before my oldest son was born; he'll be 16 next month. I finally got a login around that time. One of my life's regrets is not getting one as soon as I found the site, it probably would've been a five-digit one.
Such a party already exists; it's called the Libertarian Party.
It doesn't have to, you anonymous idiot.
I've had an account at /. for over 15 years; you don't even have an account. So shut the fuck up and go to Techdirt if you don't like it. /. has never been solely about "science and technology". It's always had a very strong political part to it, and this cock up at US Customs plays to that part of the site.
Don't like it? Too bad, we won't miss you.
I'm pretty sure his name is Mel.
An article about a service failing and no comments about whether Netcraft confirms it or not? Slashdot, you've changed.
The Constitution authorizes Congress to establish post offices, it doesn't require them to.
Sears made that change 100 years ago, there's nothing saying Amazon won't, also.
Remember, Sears started as the first Amazon, but using catalogs instead of a website. That they forgot their beginnings is why Amazon was able to take such a huge and early lead.
Whatever you say, Voltaire.
All these words are yours except for Europa. Oh, and this one about 25,000 light years away - you don't get that one either.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Damn, and I really like how "Europa" sounds, too. Guess I'll have to make do with just plain old "Europe".
Are you fucking kidding me? I've been coming to /. for 15 years now, and government crackdowns on free speech online have been a core part of their coverage that entire time.
If you don't like then create an account, go into your preferences, and turn off Your Rights Online (YRO). Otherwise, shut the fuck up and go away.
Maybe so but thankfully the rest of us don't have to click it.
Are you high? David Duke was never a candidate for President. He was a candidate to become a candidate, but didn't make it out of the primaries. Unless you consider Lyndon Larouche to have been a candidate for President on the Democratic Party ticket.