Slashdot Mirror


US Customs Destroys Virtuoso's Flutes Because They Were "Agricultural Items"

McGruber writes "Flute virtuoso Boujemaa Razgui performed on a variety of flutes, each made by himself over years for specific types of ancient and modern performance. Razgui has performed with many U.S. ensembles and is a regular guest with the diverse and enterprising Boston Camerata. Last week, Razgui flew from Morocco to Boston, with stops in Madrid and New York. In New York, he says, a US Customs official opened his luggage and found the 13 flutelike instruments — 11 nays and two kawalas. Razgui says he had made all of the instruments using hard-to-find reeds. 'They said this is an agriculture item,' said Razgui, who was not present when his bag was opened. 'I fly with them in and out all the time and this is the first time there has been a problem. This is my life.' When his baggage arrived in Boston, the instruments were gone. He was instead given a number to call. 'They told me they were destroyed,' he says. 'Nobody talked to me. They said I have to write a letter to the Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C. This is horrible. I don't know what to do. I've never written letters to people.'"

894 comments

  1. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you afraid of Hubbard?

  2. And great quotes... by fred911 · · Score: 0, Troll

    " I've never written letters to people"

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:And great quotes... by Barny · · Score: 1

      No, seriously, this isn't a troll.

      How the fuck do you get so far through life without writing a letter? It is a basic skill and required to even get a job for most of us.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:And great quotes... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but who responds to "We have accidentally destroyed your priceless collection of flutes. Write a letter." with "OMG, I have to write a letter!?"

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    3. Re:And great quotes... by Archtech · · Score: 1

      More to the point, WHY would he write a letter? What would it accomplish? He is not going to get his instruments back, and the only likely result of writing to the bureaucrats is a reply explaining in tedious condescending terms why they were right to do what they did.

      Bottom line: any government can do whatever it pleases to anyone within its borders. (Some aren't limited to their own borders, of course). Read Hobbes' "Leviathan", a very realistic description of state power, whatever you think of its theoretical value.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    4. Re:And great quotes... by seebs · · Score: 1

      Depends. I have very, very, rarely written letters other than email, and in context, it sounds very much like the agency people have a specific standard of letters in mind, which is not necessarily documented, but which you have to comply with in order to get a response...

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    5. Re:And great quotes... by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      ask your future kids, they'll probably never have a clue what you're talking about. WTF is a postage stamp dad?

    6. Re:And great quotes... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Depending on the situation, he may receive financial compensation. While it won't replace the instruments, it's better than nothing.

    7. Re:And great quotes... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Same sort of guy who trusts something precious and irreplaceable to checked luggage, or who brings things into the country without checking customs regulations. The guy badly needs somebody to interface with the normal world for him.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. The unexpected hazard... by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never thought of flutes as an "invasive species."

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or band camp

    2. Re: The unexpected hazard... by ruggerboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly you haven't seen the infestation of pan flautists across malls and tourist attractions. The music is just too damn soothing to resist!

    3. Re:The unexpected hazard... by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I never thought of flutes as an "invasive species."

      You never saw the swarming of the Zanfir commercials... I still get shivers to this day.

    4. Re:The unexpected hazard... by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For the benefit of our (musical) flute/fife fans, a few pieces with a prominent role for flute/fife:

      Bourée
      Inca Dance
      Gary Owen - Used in this scene from They Died With Their Boots On
      Petruta Küpper Einsamer Hirte playing

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:The unexpected hazard... by gargleblast · · Score: 4, Funny

      Me neither. My sister played one. I always thought they were weapons of malleus destruction.

    6. Re:The unexpected hazard... by cold+fjord · · Score: 3

      No time, too busy collecting Boxcar Willie and Slim Witman records. Are you saying there is someone I missed?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:The unexpected hazard... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it was local or what, but I remember some late night commercials here in Chicago for a Mills Brothers collection that used to have be singing along. It was one of those really long late-night commercials. I can still harmonize with "Glow Worm" from those commercials.

      Also, there was a really good one for a Fats Domino set, and it used old black and white footage of the Fats from the 50s. He definitely found his thrill on Blueberry Hill.

      I don't know if it's just me getting old, but in the pre-cable days, television had a charm about it that it completely lacks today. I wrote recently here about the huge film libraries that local stations had and played after the late news show.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. You think being a feminist is abnormal and unhealthy? And you think all feminists are lesbians? I don't think you know what the word means.

    9. Re: The unexpected hazard... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      whatever. the flutes were destroyed similar to how the X-ray machine makes iPads evaporate. he should check ebay.

    10. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *head explodes*

    11. Re:The unexpected hazard... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention the great Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    12. Re:The unexpected hazard... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Floyd Kramer! FLOYD KRAMER for Christ's sake!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    13. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yankee Doodle Dandy.

    14. Re: The unexpected hazard... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      You have to be prepared. This is why I always walk around with bagpipes.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    15. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes and yes, yes, and whatever.

    16. Re: The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ^^^That.

    17. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like that first link he posted? Sheesh, even Cold gets something right occasionally. BTW, your sig displays a striking ignorance of the state of affairs in most of the world.

    18. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richard Clayderman?

    19. Re:The unexpected hazard... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      but I remember some late night commercials here in Chicago for a Mills Brothers collection that used to have be singing along. It was one of those really long late-night commercials. I can still harmonize with "Glow Worm" from those commercials.

      Shine little glow worm glimmer glimmer. Yep, I remember that.

      I don't know if it's just me getting old, but in the pre-cable days, television had a charm about it that it completely lacks today.

      Indeed...I want the OLD WGN and WFLD back.

    20. Re: The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep. The same place my relatives chocolate gifts went. They swore up and down they would destroy them, no doubt about it.

    21. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never thought of flutes as an "invasive species."

      Yet another mighty fine example of manky wanky yanky stupidity really really pathetic .

      The very childlike USA needs isolating from the rest of the world and i mean completely isolating no goods or supplies in or out 12 months of that will have them on their knees begging to be allowed back in ..

    22. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think that after 12 months of peace and quiet from all the complaining and begging from the rest of the world that the US would want to open its doors to the world and wankers like you again? You seem to overestimate yourself greatly.

    23. Re: The unexpected hazard... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Aye, ye never know when they'll be needed!

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    24. Re:The unexpected hazard... by slick7 · · Score: 2

      I never thought of flutes as an "invasive species."

      Especially when playing songs of freedom and justice.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    25. Re:The unexpected hazard... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That is the very first thing the parent mentioned. Bourée is a Tull piece

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    26. Re: The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are on to something there. /. listen to this guy!

    27. Re:The unexpected hazard... by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Bourée is a Tull piece

      To be exact, It's a Bach Piece arranged by Tull.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    28. Re:The unexpected hazard... by messymerry · · Score: 1

      i remember in '66 when Star Trek first came out and my best friend was the only one in the neighborhood rich enough to own a color tv. All the kids would gather at their house entranced by the amazing sci-fi stories rendered in glorious colors. It was a great time to be a kid, walking to and from school every day, stopping by the creek to watch the tadpoles growing up, sleeping with all the windows and doors open. Yup, Ima geezer!!!

      --
      Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
    29. Re:The unexpected hazard... by neoritter · · Score: 1

      The flutes are made of wood (reed). It's entirely possible that there could be larvae of invasive insects in them. Not defending the destruction, but it's not as stupid as it sounds.

    30. Re:The unexpected hazard... by epyT-R · · Score: 0

      From what I've seen, women who want 'equality' while having society prop up their old chattel privileges under the guise of fighting 'patriarchy', are the ones most often calling themselves feminists. These women are often irrationally jealous of men, but are too passive aggressive to admit it (although some do), so they resort to toxic identity politics to 'punish' them however possible. This has held true for feminist friendly politicians, lawyers, judges, employers, and school teachers/university professors who've affirmed openly that they're feminists. I've also met men who've been the same way. ..and no, not all of them are lesbians. many also marry men and cuckold them, then divorce and take their paychecks. The current crops of 16-27yo girls will have sex with men, have an 'oops' on-purpose pregnancy, and then extract money via child support. This is supported by feminist lobbied law that twists 'her body, her right, her choice' into 'his responsibility.'

      I am not the one who wrote these laws, or lobbied for them, so stow your assumptions and your fallacious shaming language.

    31. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a bit more info on this. At first I was miffed at Customs until i found out he also brought back a bunch of green bamboo in the same bag. He should have been smart enough to keep his precious instruments separate from the green bamboo. The green bamboo was rightfully destroyed.

    32. Re:The unexpected hazard... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      My father kept saying that he didn't want to buy a color TV "until they perfect them". I think he finally broke down and bought one in the '70s, because we knew someone who worked at the old Sylvania plant. The thing was as big as mini cooper. Took up half the living room and had a built-in record player.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    33. Re:The unexpected hazard... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's just me getting old, but in the pre-cable days, television had a charm about it that it completely lacks today. I wrote recently here about the huge film libraries that local stations had and played after the late news show.

      I don't mean it unkindly, but yes, it's just you getting old. I grew up in the 60's, and I know what you mean, but I think you're remembering the intimacy and familiarity created by a very limited number of viewing choices. I also enjoyed lots of second run and older movies on late night tv, along with commercials every 10 minutes.

      But today I can probably watch any of those movies I can think of, and all the newer stuff, without commercials and on demand. It's like conflating the content of a book with the experience of holding it in your hand and turning pages. For me, at least, the medium is irrelevant, and it's the content that matters.

    34. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      You're right, but I think with increased choice has come increased dreck, and it's become difficult (pawing through the mess), or expensive (available only via premium subscription) to find something worth watching. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    35. Re:The unexpected hazard... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest change has nothing to do with my advancing age.

      There was a time when local TV stations were able to cheaply license enormous film libraries, which they could then just broadcast for next to nothing. So, late at night when there weren't as many advertisers, you'd get two or three movies, starting at 10:30pm and sometimes going to 5am. Then again, at 9am during the summer there would be a morning movie.

      Starting in the 80s, there was a copyright landgrab. Movies that were public domain were taken out of public domain and copyrights were extended indefinitely.

      Make no mistake: the copyright maximalists have taken a great deal of our shared culture away from us. Copyright was never meant to become permanent, which it is has become. The idea of copyright has been perverted into another mechanism of taking from the poor and giving to the rich.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    36. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never thought of flutes as an "invasive species."

      what you do not get is that the us customs are quite often, if not by rule , a bunch af flat headed idiots, that said and it goes for a large number of americans, most just bend over and say "kick me again" ! just think about it, the NSA, finance scams, military abuce, corporate greed just to name a few, where is the outraged american public? busy trying to screw somebody else, and reverse the blame.

    37. Re: The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever. the flutes were destroyed similar to how the X-ray machine makes iPads evaporate. he should check ebay.

      I hope you're joking, though even as a joke it's less than lame. There will be no flutes like his on ebay. If you'd read the linked article you would have discovered that only about 15 people in the US play the kinds of flutes he made and which were destroyed by imbeciles.

    38. Re:The unexpected hazard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really *are* an idiot. You argue by vague stereotype and anecdote and treat it as incontrovertible fact.

  4. Saw this earlier by redmid17 · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Not sure why this is on ./

    The dude does have a very legitimate beef though, considering he's taken these around to probably dozens of countries and crossed several hundred borders with them. He apparently had some "raw" material with him to make new flutes, but that wood typically needs to be completely dry and aged. Either way the carved flutes were likely sealed and shouldn't have been destroyed without a very, very good reason, which I doubt the CBP had.

    1. Re:Saw this earlier by tlambert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not sure why this is on ./

      The dude does have a very legitimate beef though, considering he's taken these around to probably dozens of countries and crossed several hundred borders with them. He apparently had some "raw" material with him to make new flutes, but that wood typically needs to be completely dry and aged. Either way the carved flutes were likely sealed and shouldn't have been destroyed without a very, very good reason, which I doubt the CBP had.

      It think because it's about out of control security apparatus, so it's kind of topical?

      I guess they will start siezing wood furniture from Ikea now, since,, you know, wood is an agricultural product.

    2. Re:Saw this earlier by fnj · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not sure why this is on ./

      Were you trying to say you weren't sure why this is on /. ?

    3. Re:Saw this earlier by wvmarle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I really don't believe this story.

      I've never heard before of goods being destroyed without the owner knowing about it.

      It is destruction of evidence: these flutes were allegedly imported illegally (agricultural products, according to customs), which is an offense, maybe a crime. In such a case the illegal goods are normally confiscated and stored in secure customs warehouse for further investigations, but not destroyed. Based on the results of the investigation they may be returned (not illegal after all, or owner can provide the required paperwork and import license for a restricted item), or they're confirmed illegal imports and the owner is prosecuted.

    4. Re:Saw this earlier by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We were all about to respond "aren't you supposed to be on DotSlash?"

    5. Re:Saw this earlier by jythie · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is not even the first time this has happened. There have been a small but published number of other instances of musical instruments being destroyed without appeal. It is a flaw in the TSA`s procedures and a problem with how its authority is structured. If they were law enforcement they could not simply destroy things, but they are not.

    6. Re:Saw this earlier by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      Certain types of agricultural products are to be destroyed instead of stored as evidence. Invasive species and some other stuff are on that menu. In this case, they probably didn't see any criminal intent and/or it "had" to be destroyed, not kept.

    7. Re:Saw this earlier by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

      It think because it's about out of control security apparatus, so it's kind of topical?

      Yeah, I think an editor went a little knee-jerk. It's customs, not security. Customs has been pissing people off since the Union was founded.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Saw this earlier by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      My knee-jerk response was just like everyone else's here. However the story would be more informative if we knew what plant, exactly, these "hard to find reeds" were from - and what state they were in (e.g. Were they dried and cured as some posters here are assuming, or were they fairly fresh?).

      Having that information would help in making an informed decision rather than just reacting to what appears to be incompetence/malice on the part of some civil servants.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Saw this earlier by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      The instruments were definitely cured and dried. The rest of the stuff, who knows.

    10. Re:Saw this earlier by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Along with the concerns already mentioned, there is also a legitimate concern about the method of destruction. I'm pretty certain that TSA does not keep a yard debris chipper at each customs station. So what are the odds that these primitive artifacts were destroyed by distribution through craigslist sales, curio shops, or to fill somebody's Christmas shopping list?

      This whole thing stinks. It definitely has relevance to slashdot: we are talking about persons with no understanding of a technology being put in positions where they can destroy the artifacts of that technology. Would I have trouble taking my collection of slide rules and 1970 era hand calculators through customs? I guess probably so.

      --
      Will
    11. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      " It is a flaw in the TSA`s procedures..."

      This was customs, it had nothing to do with the TSA whatsoever.

    12. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess they will start siezing wood furniture from Ikea now, since,, you know, wood is an agricultural product.

      Since when is Ikea furniture made out of wood?

    13. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this has been done to the likes of Gibson Guitars. So this case is not unique.

      Still, I'm not sure on what basis the "agricultural product" was removed and destroyed. How the hell did they know what those reeds were made with or where they were from?

    14. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ikea furniture would never be mistaken for wood, it is after all just pressed wood waste com-posit, 75% plastic.

    15. Re:Saw this earlier by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the flutes were infested with termites. That might warrant their destruction.

    16. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why this is on ./

      Because /. is sort of an underground site. Where people have more vast knowledge then the dip-shits on Yahoo or Google. Razgui should be able to get some help.

      However instead all I have seen are two bit shit jokes, /. standards are slippin'..

      I still do not understand why your messiah EFF doesn't get involved or some "free" group to file a class action suit against the TFA. This is the only way this will stop, everyday there is something they're doing and some violation of rights, so much so, there are more then enough people to drastically change how these dictators and send a message this stuff will no longer be tolerated.

      What are are the sayings? the freest country, and, only in america...

    17. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "United Breaks Guitars" wasn't a TSA/customs issue. Are there any others you care to cite? I don't think so.

    18. Re:Saw this earlier by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

      The bigger concern is that nearly all non-digital musical instruments (and some digital instruments) contain agricultural products by such a loose definition. Almost every oboe, clarinet, stringed instrument, etc. worth more than a hundred bucks is made out of wood. Even brass instruments and metal woodwinds (e.g. saxes and flutes) use cork for pads, for stops on keys, for tunable joints, for the ring at the top of trumpet valves, for water key/spit valve corks, and so on (though in some cases, it may be a synthetic cork). Even the felt used in various parts of the instrument may be made from agricultural products.

      What this effectively means is that the United States government has declared all musical instruments to be illegal contraband that may not be transported into the United States. Musicians around the world would be advised to avoid travel to the United States and its territories for any reason, or if you cannot avoid travel to this country, arrange to rent an instrument after you get here. It simply is no longer safe to carry your own instruments across the borders of this country until Congress passes a law explicitly forbidding these acts of grand theft.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    19. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but Slashdot isn't libertarian news, it's tech news. This has exactly 0 to do with tech, it should not be on here.

    20. Re:Saw this earlier by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      Actually they sort of do. All major airports have industrial grinders to destroy confiscated items, though it's primarily for foodstuffs. For wood they probably hauled it away to a bigger (and proper) chipper.

      CNN (Unfortunately they don't have a picture of the grinder).

      Ginep. Mangosteen. Guava. Eggplant. Nance fruit. Ginger. Jocote. Grapefruit. Watermelon.

      These aren't the offerings of some international supermarket. They're seized produce, destined for Customs and Border Protection's grinding machine.

      Some items that need more inspection get sidelined to a nearby U.S. Department of Agriculture laboratory. Bigger items - beef, sugar cane or bags of food banned from coming into the United States - are hauled away. Everything else goes through an industrial kitchen grinder in a back room in the International Terminal.

      Tonight, agriculture specialist Lauren Lewis does the honors. It's 6:40 p.m., just past suppertime.

      Slipping on black gloves, she takes each piece - garlic, onions, rambutans, carrots and more - and feeds it into the whirring machine.

      With that, what might have been someone's post-flight snack is reduced to mush.

      All in the name of safety.

    21. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Destruction of evidence" only matters if you plan to bring charges against someone. The flutes weren't stopped because it's a crime to bring them into the country, but because according to the brain-dead border regulations, *anything* made of vegetable matter is a Potential Biohazard. There's no crime in importing it, but you do have to declare it and run the serious risk that some moron will take it into their heads to chemically sterilize it. If you don't declare it - yes, technically that is a crime but it's rarely charged. Instead - well, this happens.

    22. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't shred these things if they are agricultural, you incinerate them to destroy any possible pests they may carry. Chipping them would make them MORE dangerous, not less.

      On that same note, I don't buy the story for a second.

      Something that important ... you take in a carry on, EVERYONE KNOWS THAT. No person puts his important goods in the checked baggage.

      --BitZtream

    23. Re:Saw this earlier by elbonia · · Score: 1

      When did Ikea start using wood?

    24. Re:Saw this earlier by elbonia · · Score: 1

      It's not a flaw in TSA's procedures since it was US Customs that destroyed the flutes. US Customs is a law enforcement agency so the last part of your theory is also incorrect.

    25. Re:Saw this earlier by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      And what about your clothes? They could be made of cotton, wool, silk, leather or rubber; all agricultural products.

    26. Re:Saw this earlier by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      I guess they will start siezing wood furniture from Ikea now, since,, you know, wood is an agricultural product.

      It's also a good reminder that you should never take anything you cannot afford to lose through US customs. Electronic equipment is (sometimes understandably) under fairly constant scrutiny, and like hand crafted musical instruments, any sort of custom electronics part could easily get destroyed.

      It's worth constant reminders that you cannot ever trust US customs.

    27. Re:Saw this earlier by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Likewise, then, Slashdot isn't electronic-file-clerk news, so IT stories should be omitted. Unless there's something interesting and technological involved. Which there usually isn't.

    28. Re:Saw this earlier by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Informative

      This was customs, it had nothing to do with the TSA whatsoever.

      Customs has been a division of the Department of Homeland Security since 2003, which is the same happy family as the TSA, Immigration Services, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (you know, that group that likes to illegally seize people's domains for the copyright cops), and others. I think the only decent division of it is likely the Coast Guard. Other than that It's become a nice little beehive of government out to control people in the name of fighting "the terrorists".

    29. Re:Saw this earlier by bob_super · · Score: 2

      I don't have my phonebook, can you remind me the number for rent-a-Stradivarius?

    30. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's utterly ridiculous.

      Thousands of guitarists fly into and out of the US every day, you never hear of guitars being confiscated and destroyed.

      It sounds like some little fascist in the customs house thought because the instruments were unusual and uncommon, that they were "foreign made" and their xenophobia went into overdrive, probably exasperated by the musician having a "foreign sounding" name, and they decided to exact some racist fury upon his flutes.

    31. Re:Saw this earlier by meerling · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By that kind of loose definition, you're clothes (cotton, wool, silk, etc) are 'agricultural products', unless of course you're wearing all 100% polyester or other synthetics. Of course, that also means they can now confiscate your leather briefcase, and so many other items they've been wanting to steal for ages.
      I'm sorry, did I say steal? I meant to say confiscate and 'destroy'.
      (I know they aren't supposed to do things like that, but it actually happens a lot.)

    32. Re:Saw this earlier by meerling · · Score: 2

      It's not tech news, it's techie news. So it's all about tech and everything that interests techies, and out of control security & customs is right up that alley. After all, if they start stealing/destroying flutes because they can't tell the difference between a musical instrument and contraband fruit, how long do you think it will be before they use that excuse to steal your computer/tablet in it's leather case because it's obviously a contraband animal being smuggled in?

      And in case you forgot Slashdots tag line, it's "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters"
      Think about it.

    33. Re:Saw this earlier by meerling · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Really? Guess you don't travel across borders very often. It happens on a regular basis. Also, there are lots of incidents of 'confiscations and destruction of confiscated goods' that are the agents taking a liking to something, and then taking it home. It happens, I've seen it happen, and I've even talked to a retired agent that told me a bunch of stories of this exact kind of theft and lies. Whatever agency was involved will even go along with the whole official excuse just to try and pretend they did nothing wrong so they don't have to make an apology and reimbursement. Of course, that makes the situation worse on a legal standing with much greater possible repercussions, but it's a bitch to sue them and get a criminal investigation into it.

      IMO, the musician should sue them for the instruments, and the loss of income since he's definitely not going to be able to participate in at least 2 concerts. After all, it's not like he can just go down to the pawn shop and pick up that exact type of rare hand carved flute. And no, the metal ones or different types will not sound/play the same, just ask a musician trained in wind instruments. (It's kind of like if your Cellist loses their cello, it's not like a bass guitar is a comparable substitute. I know, those are string instruments, but the idea is the same.)

    34. Re:Saw this earlier by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the flutes were infested with termites. That might warrant their destruction.

      Well, they did have holes in them, so that might explain it.

    35. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't believe this story.

      I've never heard before of goods being destroyed without the owner knowing about it.

      It is destruction of evidence: these flutes were allegedly imported illegally (agricultural products, according to customs), which is an offense, maybe a crime. In such a case the illegal goods are normally confiscated and stored in secure customs warehouse for further investigations, but not destroyed. Based on the results of the investigation they may be returned (not illegal after all, or owner can provide the required paperwork and import license for a restricted item), or they're confirmed illegal imports and the owner is prosecuted.

      Not anon Pete N

      three little words suit this one " Load Of Bollocks".

    36. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/vacation/sample_declaration_form.xml

      He would have signed something similar to this....

      The fact that he has been able to bring them in and out of other countries leads me to believe that he either did not declare them, or did not get checked, both of which are problematic situations.

    37. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They announced a while back they would do this with some instruments (guitars) made with certain kinds of wood.

      Seriously... I'm a conservative constitutionalist... and even I am starting to get sick of my country.

    38. Re:Saw this earlier by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank you Clippy!

    39. Re:Saw this earlier by isorox · · Score: 1

      I learned one musical instrument at school. It was a single piece of metal, bent twice, and suspended by a string. I used another piece of metal to hit it. I wasn't very good at timing, but otherwise I was perfect.

      No wood involved.

    40. Re:Saw this earlier by qubex · · Score: 2

      They’ll strip us naked and then charge us for indecent exposure.

      --
      "Place me in the company of those who seek Truth, but deliver me from those who believe to have found it."
    41. Re:Saw this earlier by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      It's usually made out of wood. Sawdust is still wood.

      (Seriously though, you can buy plenty of solid wood furniture at IKEA if you're so inclined. Laminate and particle board stuff is labeled as such, so if you buy it thinking that it's solid wood, I'm inclined to say it's your own fault.)

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    42. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole thing stinks. It definitely has relevance to slashdot: we are talking about persons with no understanding of a technology being put in positions where they can destroy the artifacts of that technology. Would I have trouble taking my collection of slide rules and 1970 era hand calculators through customs? I guess probably so.

      Slide rules are terrorist tools. Honest citizens would not try hiding their explosive calculations from NSA-controlled computers. It is well-known that slide rules were used for designing atomic bombs. So it makes good sense that you should not be allowed to carry them into foreign countries without a government clearance.

    43. Re:Saw this earlier by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Yea, here we got one where when searching a Cello case they closed it improperly and snapped a 19th century bow.

      http://www.artsjournal.com/slippeddisc/2013/02/exclusive-how-us-security-agents-broke-my-cello-bow-by-alban-gerhardt.html

      > I finally received the cello, fifteen minutes after the suitcase. My fatigue disappeared at once after opening my cello case: the cello seemed alright, but my beloved Heinrich-Knopf-bow stuck half in its mounting

      > The TSA (Transportation Security Agency) in Washington, DC, not trusting the X-Ray-image felt the need to open the case. They took the cello out in my absence, put it back in, carelessly detaching the bow partly from its mounting and finally slamming the case shut, in the process breaking the bow

    44. Re:Saw this earlier by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It's usually made out of wood. Sawdust is still wood.

      (Seriously though, you can buy plenty of solid wood furniture at IKEA if you're so inclined. Laminate and particle board stuff is labeled as such, so if you buy it thinking that it's solid wood, I'm inclined to say it's your own fault.)

      Are you telling me that the $6, ~6.5lbs side table I just bought isn't solid wood? The nerve!

      --
      Eat the rich.
    45. Re:Saw this earlier by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      you're clothes

      No, I am NOT clothes. Though I do wear clothes.

      Or did you mean "YOUR clothes"? If so, never mind.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    46. Re:Saw this earlier by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      I guess they will start siezing wood furniture from Ikea now, since,, you know, wood is an agricultural product.

      Since when is Ikea furniture made out of wood?

      Something almost, but not completely unlike wood?

    47. Re:Saw this earlier by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      By that kind of loose definition, you're clothes (cotton, wool, silk, etc) are 'agricultural products', unless of course you're wearing all 100% polyester or other synthetics. Of course, that also means they can now confiscate your leather briefcase, and so many other items they've been wanting to steal for ages.
      I'm sorry, did I say steal? I meant to say confiscate and 'destroy'.
      (I know they aren't supposed to do things like that, but it actually happens a lot.)

      Back when alligators were a threatened species, alligator luggage was very definitely going to get seized. Briefcase and all.

    48. Re:Saw this earlier by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      And what about your clothes? They could be made of cotton, wool, silk, leather or rubber; all agricultural products.

      Hey! I wear only the finest polyester.

      It sets off my disco medallions.

    49. Re: Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the RPGs... the Relative Path Gremlins

    50. Re:Saw this earlier by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      1. It is not security but customs. It is the same rules they use to take fruits and meats away from travelers.
      2. There is no wood in Ikea furniture.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    51. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you can't scan an image of someone's naked body, do it the old fashion way.

    52. Re:Saw this earlier by JWW · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet the string was made of cotton. You're risking things for everyone with that biological hazard there.

    53. Re:Saw this earlier by Convector · · Score: 1

      I'd also be confused if this site were in my current directory.

    54. Re:Saw this earlier by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I guess they will start siezing wood furniture from Ikea now, since,, you know, wood is an agricultural product.

      Since when is Ikea furniture made out of wood?

      MDF does contain some wood.

    55. Re:Saw this earlier by scubamage · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at solid wood ikea furniture right now. A lot of what they sell is fake, but they do have a significant amount of solid wood as well.

    56. Re:Saw this earlier by scubamage · · Score: 1

      /. is NOT tech news, it's "news for nerds, stuff that matters." Read the site title. Also, check out firehose, the way it is determined what articles make it to the front page. The fact is, most of the nerds (using the term lovingly for my fellow /. users) who read this story on firehose wanted it greenlighted, so it must have mattered to them. Therefore, both objectives of the site, according to its title, are met.

    57. Re:Saw this earlier by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      By that kind of loose definition, you're clothes (cotton, wool, silk, etc) .....

      Well, they say clothes make the man, but this is taking it a bit too literally.
      ..ba-dum -tiss..

      (yeah yeah, grammar nazi, I couldn't resist :) )

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    58. Re:Saw this earlier by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Coast Guard's military through and through. They're not rent-a-soldiers.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    59. Re:Saw this earlier by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      the United States government has declared all musical instruments to be illegal contraband

      Well, I would hope that it meant that one asshole did something stupid and is going to be disciplined for it. But, unfortunately, you never know anymore..,and that isn't gonna get this guy his stuff back.

    60. Re:Saw this earlier by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      This has less to do with Security than it does with over regulation to the point of removing ALL ability to use judgement. Absence of judgement is just as bad as bad judgement, as the results are nearly identical. There will ALWAYS be off cases where following absolute rules results in horrible consequences, just as allowing judgement in the first place.

      To me, this is just another example of the horrors of "zero tolerance" laws, like the ones that toss a six year old out of school for biting a pop-tart into the shape of a gun.

      I often speak against over regulation in my Libertarian rants, and this is exactly the kind of things that I mean about over regulation. And in this case, I can here the proponents of over regulation say "we need a new regulation to avoid these matters", and they won't understand, that they aren't solving the problem, but simply moving it to a different place in the decision making chain.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    61. Re:Saw this earlier by omnichad · · Score: 1

      it's not like he can just go down to the pawn shop and pick up that exact type of rare hand carved flute

      Unless he can figure out which one they sold it to.

    62. Re:Saw this earlier by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      I think you have strong feelings about customs stealing things, and built this post around that. Because destroying what looks like decorative bamboo to an untrained eye is not anywhere close to what you described.
      People tend to put the most specious arguments together when it seems obvious in their own head.
      I'm wondering if I missed the satire because it is so absurd, yet here you are at +5 so the satire was lost.
      Do you really think a clarinet or violin would be seized and destroyed based on one story of decorative bamboo?

    63. Re:Saw this earlier by ultranova · · Score: 1

      By "metal", you most likely mean iron. Iron ore is a product of the initial oxidization of the oceans by the first photosynthesizing organisms, which the modern plants descend from. Therefore, it is clearly an agricultural product.

      Also, since iron nucleus are formed inside stellar furnaces by nuclear fusion they can be considered a form of nuclear waste. Are you trying to kill Mother Earth just for your musical enjoyment, you maniac?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    64. Re:Saw this earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is Ikea furniture made out of wood?

      Well it looks like wood, could possibly float, and might eventually burn. Therefore, IKEA makes furniture out of witches.

    65. Re:Saw this earlier by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Please, just tell me the remainings are incinerated after grinding. Because that's completely stupid, as it won't protect your terrritory against external plages.

    66. Re:Saw this earlier by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Because destroying what looks like decorative bamboo to an untrained eye is not anywhere close to what you described.

      JFK customs inspectors removed and smashed eleven handmade flutes (or thirteen, according to some stories). That's not the level of destruction that should ever be allowed without multiple sign-offs by supervisors and speaking to the owner of those items to determine whether the items fall into one of the many, many exceptions to U.S. import laws (which they did). Anything less than that level of care clearly crosses the line into gross criminal negligence territory.

      Do you really think a clarinet or violin would be seized and destroyed based on one story of decorative bamboo?

      This same airport, back in 2006, seized and destroyed a grand piano valued at over two hundred thousand dollars and severely damaged a second one. This is not just a single story. U.S. Customs has a long history of destroying things.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    67. Re:Saw this earlier by Sanians · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty certain that TSA does not keep a yard debris chipper at each customs station.

      No, but they do have incinerators.

      However, this does remind me of when I was about 6 years old and some kid offered to trade me a bicycle lock for something. Using six-year-old logic, I decided that since I really wanted the bicycle lock, I had to trade something I really liked for it, and so I grabbed my favorite toy and made the trade. Not much later I discovered the lock had actually been stolen when it was taken from me by the parents of the kid who owned it. I went to the kid I traded with and demanded my toy back. He told me that he had rolled it down the stairs and it had broken. So I went home.

      It wasn't until years later when thinking about it that it occurred to me that the toy wasn't broken. ...or, well, it may have been by that time, but it more than likely wasn't when I asked about it. That's the tricky thing about liars. When you're someone who doesn't lie, and everyone you know is similarly honest, it's all too easy to forget that not everything everyone tells you is true. (Perhaps that's the issue with the elderly. We're constantly told that intelligence doesn't decline with age. Perhaps the problem is that, with age, people become so good at avoiding bad people that they begin to forget to expect the things bad people do. That's probably especially easy when you're retired and the only people you see are your kids and grandchildren who wouldn't lie to you about anything.)

      Anyway, I'm sure what happened here was that some asshole discovered some very valuable flutes while examining luggage, then noted that the luggage would not be examined again until it had sat around the airport for a while, then flown far away, and even then possibly not unpacked for days, and so he realized he could take the flutes and by the time anyone noticed they were missing he could simply claim that they were incinerated hours or days ago. Hell, perhaps to delay the discovery further, he replaced the usual "call this number to contest this confiscation" note with a bullshit "write to this phony address" note he'd created himself.

    68. Re:Saw this earlier by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      come on, paper and cardboard were once wood.

    69. Re:Saw this earlier by ale2011 · · Score: 1

      It think because it's about out of control security apparatus, so it's kind of topical?

      Yeah, I think an editor went a little knee-jerk. It's customs, not security. Customs has been pissing people off since the Union was founded.

      There was a post on laptop stripping in New Zealand, last month. So this is the agricultural equivalent, in case someone had thought hackers are treated worse than musicians.

    70. Re:Saw this earlier by mikael · · Score: 1

      There were 11 neys and 2 kawalas which were made of bamboo. Bamboo can't be imported into the USA unless it has been fumigated by a certain process (T404-d) to kill the Khapra beetle (cabinet beetle) upon arrival at the port of entry.

      This beetle has been found 100 times in imports in 2011 compared to three to six times a decade ago:

      https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/1359/~/importing-bamboo-into-the-us

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khapra_beetle

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  5. Surely not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another whistle blower!

  6. Serves him right! by CajunArson · · Score: 3, Funny

    He's obviously a denialist and he got off easy.

    The wood that he unscrupulously and capitalistically exploited for his burgeious profit contraption could have reduced ALGORE'S carbon footprint if he hadn't murdered it for his own selfish amusement. I'm just disturbed that this 1%er scum wasn't thrown into our enviromental reeducation camps for his crimes against science.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:Serves him right! by Redmancometh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your sig doesnt contain proper scientific notation and it angers me.

    2. Re:Serves him right! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's because it's not scientific notation; it's engineering notation and perfectly proper.

    3. Re:Serves him right! by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      Did not know that was a thing.

  7. Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and recognize this for what it is. Fascism.

    1. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oddly I was going to say something similar. Right along with tossing in a Gestapo and STASI remark, since both of those governments organizations, did exactly this type of thing.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Gestapo and STASI only wished they had the ability to do what the NSA does.

    3. Re:Eventually people will look up... by thepainguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Beware of people whose only marketable skills are their loyalty and their ability to follow rules to the letter.

    4. Re:Eventually people will look up... by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Imagine the Gestapo with today's technology. It's coming.

    5. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was going to say it wasn't Fascism. But It is. I was going to say it was just overly complicated rules in-forced by under trained, under paid people who can't understand them while having irreversible consequences. But I realized that pretty much sums up Fascism.

    6. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you an idiot? No they wont! Think hard about this. You have Phil Robertson make some ludircous comments on gays, african americans, and Japanese. What happens? Americans phone in by the hundreds of thousands to complain how his freedom of expression is being infringed upon. You have a friggen news network espousing how this is some big left wing conspiracy.

      Americans WILL NOT and I repeat WILL NOT recognize this as Fascisim. They will recognize this as an oops moment in the fight against [fill in the blank].

      IMO the only solution is to leave the country because in my lifetime this is not going to get better. Do me a favor and watch Running Man with Arnie. While some things are over the top, many things are spot on.

    7. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and recognize this for what it is. Fascism.

      Hardly... It's called a customs inspection. Every country in the world has such restrictions. It's one of the basic tenants of national sovereignty.

    8. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      I was going to say it wasn't Fascism. But It is. I was going to say it was just overly complicated rules in-forced by under trained, under paid people who can't understand them while having irreversible consequences. But I realized that pretty much sums up Fascism.

      And it is somehow unique to fascism?

    9. Re:Eventually people will look up... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Were you trying to be ironic or was that an accident?

      Liberty and equality aren't just for the people you like. Making exceptions for "bad people" or excuses for "corporations" ARE the kind of nonsense that lead to Fascism.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Beware the people with the uncanny ability to seek out and use those types of people.
      They're the dangerous ones.

    11. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's also MSNBC's recent disgisting flows of raw sewage, yet you're oddly silent about them. Martin Bashir or Melissa Harris-Perry ring a bell?

    12. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yup, and come the revolution they will be first in front of the wall.

      What I don't get is the almost PETA rabidness of some who have posted above blaming this person. Do society a favor and see if you can win a Darwin Award with your inherent stupidity.

      As an artist in my own right, I have no clue how long it took him to find all these reed's, dry, carve and seal them into musical instruments that could then be used to convey the proper sound for a piece of music composed in the time of Herod or before. What I do know is that they will not do that to me for free. There would be a payback that would make the front page.

      This is the same stupidity that has been harassing the Gibson Guitar people for the last decade, but they did know about the import restrictions on Rosewood, and had the permits, but some ass hole didn't get the fucking memo. Repeatedly.

      I face much the same thing when I have to fly because I am a television broadcast engineer, who often has to pack up his tools and go someplace to resuscitate a tv station or their transmitter. I can't take my tools, several thousand dollars worth, with me to the job via anyplace that takes me past a TSA checkpoint, so now the stations who need my talents have to send their corporate airplanes to come and get me and bring me home. Or I have to drive, which could be a 5 or 6 day each way trip to some of the places I have been since I retired 11 years ago. That is bull shit, the finest stuff, which if applied to an Iowa cornfield and matched by 30+ inches of rain, will grow 220 bushels to the acre.

      So when do we take our country back folks? Seriously, I'd like to see it on my watch, but since I'm on my 80th circuit around this star, there might not be much time left for me to watch.

      So sign me "Seething mad at the magnitude of the idiocy, Gene"

    13. Re:Eventually people will look up... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The Gestapo and STASI only wished they had the ability to do what the NSA does."

      The NSA and other Alphabet Agencies only wish they had the authority to do what the Gestapo and Stasi did.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    14. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. This is just the stupidity of one customs employee. And is hardly unique to america. Every country has some sort of customs inspections on stuff coming into it. If news from.. I don't know France... was as popular as US news I'm sure we'd hear stories of their employees screwing up as well.

      When a custom employee destroys flutes of some musician about to give a concert because that concert is critical of the government then you have fascism. Till then this story matters only to one person; the poor guy who had his flutes destroyed.

      P.S. Next time you have something important stick it in your carry on for god's sake. I trust the bag handlers even less than I would trust customs.

    15. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is not unique. it is a necessary precondition.

    16. Re:Eventually people will look up... by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Imagine the Gestapo with today's technology. It's coming.

      Imagine, or turn your head and look?

    17. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They don't need the authority. They just do it and don't tell anybody.

    18. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are right liberty and equality are not just for the people you like. I always say democracy is the right to be an idiot.

      HOWEVER... What Phil Robertson said has nothing to do with liberty and equality. It has to do with racism, ignorance and slander. That is not allowed in a society that treasures freedom of speech. You can argue that you don't approve of gay people. You can argue that you dislike gay people.

      However, you may not say gay people engage in behavior that is similar to beastality, or terrorists. You may not wrap that clause in terms which indicate that these are the words from God! And other people may not re enforce those comments by saying, "oh but that is what the good book says and thus it is right."

      Even the new Pope has backed off of these harsh terms. The new Pope does not approve of being gay, but the Pope does realize gay people are humans and they do have a soul.

      I was born in Germany, but grew up in North America. I asked the older generation of Germans, "so why did Germany do these evil things?" Answer because it started in small pieces. It started with smaller "innocent" comments. And then it just snowballed. Phil Robertson is heading down that path. Sure he is not saying kill the gays. However, somebody who listens to Phil might have that crazy idea that maybe gays should be put into an area with a fence around (oh wait that has been said already). Then maybe somebody might want to take that a step further....

      Sounds crazy, yes, but did anybody believe that Hitler would pull off that level of evilness? I am sure nobody did...

    19. Re:Eventually people will look up... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...and recognize this for what it is. Fascism.

      Do you mean "authoritarian police state" or fascism?

      I know, Sex Pistols and The Young Ones, but say it with me: "Authoritarian Police State". To not call it by its proper name is to give it a pass.

      You have to admit that you live in an police state before you can do something about it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    20. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and recognize this for what it is. Fascism.

      But we should give this government even more power and resources? Right?

      We MUST make everyone "pay their fair share" of taxes, right? Because this government deserves even more power?

      And while we're at it, let's turn over health care - 1/6 of the largest economy in the world - to this same government, too.

      What could possibly go wrong?

    21. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Ironically it will probably be China first, followed by Russia, then rest of Europe. The tide is likely to keep rising.

      Two bombs in Volgograd, Russia, kill 32 and leave dozens injured

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    22. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, makes perfect sense.

      Gestapo: Murder you and everyone you know.
      TSA: Threw some flutes in the garbage.

      Oh those monsters....

    23. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Imagine. There isn't genuine, notable political repression by the state in Western Europe or the Anglosphere.... yet. There is in parts of Eastern Europe and China.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    24. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      If people were being "disappeared" in the US I expect we would hear something about it.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    25. Re:Eventually people will look up... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      You know, the corporations could make the government their bitch via campaign contributions/lobbyists, and the result would be.... fascism. As opposed to what you're saying, which is... also facism. See, there's more than one way to get there. And they *both* suck.

      --
      C|N>K
    26. Re:Eventually people will look up... by lakeland · · Score: 0

      What I find really scary is that you were modded insightful instead of Godwin's law being invoked. Could you imagine a comparison between TSA and the Gestapo not being labelled flamebait even a couple years ago?

    27. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      it is not unique. it is a necessary precondition.

      So "overly complicated rules in-forced by under trained, under paid people who can't understand them while having irreversible consequences" sums up things that aren't fascist as well.

    28. Re:Eventually people will look up... by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Yes. Great post lost in the nebula of anonymity.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    29. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, makes perfect sense.

      Gestapo: Murder you and everyone you know.
      TSA: Threw some flutes in the garbage.

      Oh those monsters....

      Sure it does.

      Gestapo: Detain, search and murder anyone who gets in the way, take artworks and musical instruments, including those considered heretical and destroy them as needed(or send them off to their betters for gain).
      TSA: Detain without warrant, search without warrant, take artworks, and musical instruments without remuneration, including those deemed heretical by letter agencies, and dispose of them, or "keep them" as witnessed by the reselling of said items.

      And you forgot the STASI, who: Detained without warrant, searched without warrant, operated a vast intelligence agency that spied on everyone, and did several things already mentioned. Sounds almost like some of the letter agencies in the US doesn't it?

      The difference between the three, is that the TSA doesn't have the "right to shoot someone" without due process. And I'd put that as a "yet" but you can see the trend in some of the flappy headed politicians, especially after the large scale anti-gun pushes. An armed population is a dangerous population to such ideas after all.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    30. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Imagine the Gestapo with today's technology. It's coming.

      Easy enough to imagine, just look at what the STASI accomplished without today's technology. While wholly disgusting, it's was a remarkable achievement.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    31. Re:Eventually people will look up... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Beware of people whose only marketable skills are their supposed loyalty and their ability to equivocate the following of rules to the letter. The ones who actually followed rules to the letter would have died long ago in the shower from lack of common sense.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    32. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the corporations could make the government their bitch via campaign contributions/lobbyists

      Could? You're a bit late to the party.

    33. Re: Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? People go disappearing every single day. That YOU dont pay attention to that fact is your fault, not the governments.

      Now whether or not the government is behind any of it, remains to be seen.

    34. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and come the revolution they will be first in front of the wall.

      The way things are going there won't be enough walls. Maybe we should do like the Israelis and build our own Berlin Wall.

    35. Re:Eventually people will look up... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Haven't heard of any US agencies using Zersetzung yet.

    36. Re:Eventually people will look up... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no actually what he said what it isnt right to judge people based on what they do, thats up to god. You dont have to believe in god, I dont, but you are twisting what hew said if you see anything anti gay or bigoted. hell he specifically said he doesnt judge, its up to his god. He never said gay people engage in behavior similar to bestiality or terrorists, he simply said they were all types of sins, in other words (in his eyes) no different than sloth or any other sin as he believes no one sin is worse than another.

      if you are going to be outraged about what someone said, at least get what they said right

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    37. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Phil Robertson is not headed down that path. He tried to destroy no one. It's the groups that tried to destroy him, and society in large that is headed down that path.

    38. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Haven't heard of any US agencies using Zersetzung yet.

      No? You haven't been paying attention... Lots on this, the majority of the media on the other hand have simply ignored it especially the left leaning media.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    39. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Both. Although, the economic component is not as applicable in this case.

    40. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      In Fascism, corporations are the willing bitches of the State. Everything is of the State.

    41. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 4, Informative

      How exactly have you gone ten years without hearing about rendition. The U.S. especially JSOC and SOCOM, have been snatching people all over the world since 9/11 and making them disappear. Many of them have been rendered based on the flimsiest of evidence or have even been totally the wrong people because of mistaken identity. These people have been disappeared in to secret U.S. prisons abroad and to states like Egypt for interrogation and torture where they have no access to the Red Cross, lawyers or family. They actually totally disappear. Try reading Jeremy Scahill's Dirty Wars.

      There is also an issue with the U.S. using drones and cruise missiles over large swaths of the globe to conduct summary executions of individuals based on often flawed intelligence, and frequently killing large numbers of women and children in the process. At least three of the executions have been U.S. citizens, including a 16 year old boy.

      Just because they are Muslim does that mean they don't count in your book?

      --
      @de_machina
    42. Re:Eventually people will look up... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      There isn't genuine, notable political repression by the state in Western Europe or the Anglosphere.... yet.

      *cough* prohibition..

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    43. Re:Eventually people will look up... by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      lol...you have a pretty fucking low bar for fascism. But I'm guessing you're one of those folks who classifies anything stupid that the US does as fascism since that's how you view the country.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    44. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Phil Robertson. Just because you may disagree with the oppressed does not mean he is not being oppressed.

    45. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Or repressed, whatever.

    46. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      This was the topic I responded to: "If people were being "disappeared" in the US "

      As far as your grievances go, I understand that many people are opposed to the US defending itself against al Qaida, and the measures taken, but that is a different question than what I responded to.

      The use of drones or cruise missiles does not constitute "summary execution," but is attacking members of an enemy force at war with the United States. You may not like that, but it is true. Bin Laden declared war on the United States on behalf of al Qaida in 1996, the US Congress authorized military action against al Qaida in 2001 after 9/11.

      The fact that US citizens have joined al Qaida renders them no protection on the battlefield any more than the hundreds of thousands of Americans fighting for the Confederate States of America in the Civil War. There were shot and killed all the same without arrest, charges, trial, conviction, or sentencing. War is war, not a matter of the criminal justice system.

      Muslims are fine, as long as they are peaceful. If they take up arms to attack the country they may be killed just like German Christians were killed in WW1 & WW2, Chinese atheists in the Korean War, and so on.

      You may be gratified to know that the prisoners detained at Guantanamo Bay received regular visits from the Red Cross.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    47. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, at least Gestapo *SOMETIMES* tried to preserve some rare artifacts due to Hitler's obsession with antiques, but this guys......

    48. Re:Eventually people will look up... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      ICE is not TSA though they are both under DHS.

      As for murder? Well, just wait until someone resists. You will find that, just as in the case of the Bostom bombing, not only will direct suspects be killed under strange circumstances where witnesses and evidence contradicts official stories, but people who knew the suspects are also killed. Kind of sounds like what you're saying of the Gestapo.

      You're either being intentionally deceitful or you're wilfully ignorant of what has been going on.

    49. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always have trouble with the word irony - but as I understand the term I was not being deliberately ironic.

      It is the kind of thinking which leads to fascism. I see it as pure authoritarianism rather than right-wing and, as I understand it, the conservative nature is essential to meet the definition of fascism. However that's a fairly minor point.

      So overall I agree with the AC I was responding to but that wasn't really what my post was about. I was saying 'look how far we've come in the last few years'.

    50. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go die in a fire, you damned bigot.

    51. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 5, Informative

      There was a well known case of an innocent Canadian who was on a flight connecting through New York City who was seized at the airport and rendered to Syria where he was tortured. He was apparently targetted because he was mentioned as a refernce on an apartment application of someone under suspicion. No one really knows how many other people have been rendered out of the U.S., you only know if they are released at some point and speak out.

      There have been well publicized cases in Italy and Germany. A number of CIA agents were tried and convicted in absentia by Italy for kidnapping because they rendered someone off the streets of Italy consulting the Italians.

      There was a person rendered from Europe who had the same name as a suspected Islamist, but he was completely innocent and was completely disappeared for months, his family didn't know what happened to him, until the mistake was discovered months later and he was released.

      One of the three U.S. citizens executed by drone was Anwar Awliki's son. There is no evidence he ever had anything to do with Al Qaede. He was 16 years old, though at the time he was killed the U.S. claimed he was 21. The U.S. claimed they were targeted someone else from Al Qaeda when they killed him but that person was no where near the drone stoke. The boy was at an outdoor barbecue with cousins when he and all the innocent people around him were killed by a drone strike. They were disappeared in a way, they were turned in to small peices of meat and bone and were buried in a communal grave because they couldn't be identified.

      Early in the dirty war in Yeme the U.S. didn't have enough drones so they used cruise missiles from a submarine loaded with cluster bombs to level a village. There may have been one suspected Al Qaeda affiliate in the village, but thats not even certain, nearly everyone killed were innocent bystanders, many women and children.

      The dirty wars are certainly killing a lot of Al Qaeda affiliates. They are almost certainly killing a larger number of innocent civilians which will fuel new generations to hate America.

      --
      @de_machina
    52. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This issue has been ignored by the media because the Treasury IG was asked by Darrell Issa "to narrowly focus on Tea Party organizations" according to a spokesman for Russell George.

      The problem with these kinds of comments is that they hurt your credibility, and damage your overall argument. In other words: stop, you're not helping.

    53. Re:Eventually people will look up... by tmosley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As in, it's been thrusting violently in and out of your anus for the last 13 years, and now it is reaching its "crescendo".

      This makes people want to never, ever, EVER travel to the US. The NSA has now made it so that no-one wants to do business, much less purchase technological devices (one of our largest exports) ever, EVER again. Our government is destroying our economy, completely and totally, and on multiple fronts. I don't know that even bureaucrats can be this fucking stupid.

    54. Re:Eventually people will look up... by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Yes. Most authoritarian political systems are like that. Some are not. Khmer Rouge didn't have any actual rules, for example. Just "kill whoever you want" and "do stupid shit". Sort of like our last two administrations with their drone assassination programs.

    55. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US government is totally and completely fucked and out of control.
      The ONLY solution is to overthrow it, violently.
      Seriously. USAizens, take action now while you still can.
      Or your grandchildren will be the ones shedding blood, if not sooner.

    56. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama plz go.

    57. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in the article does it even mention TSA?

    58. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is another great story from Scahill's book that shows how flimsy and flawed the intelligence JSOC has been using to execute people is.

      An informant apparently figured out he could finger just about anyone and JSOC would sweep in and kill them without even minimaly checking the intelligence. He told JSOC there were Al Qaeda or Taliban at a certain compound. In reality people there were a police commander and his family there. He wactually worked with the U.S. and was having a christening party with music(which should have been the first tip it wasn't Taliban or Al Qaeda since they shun music).

      JSOC swept in, shooting first and not asking questions later. The police commander and another man were shot when they stepped out and tried to tell the people with night vision and lasers they were in the wrong place.

      Three women then stepped out to try to help the two men and they were shot. About this time JSOC figured out they'd made a mistake. They dug their bullets out of the women with their knives while they were still alive. The official line from NATO for several days was the two dead men had stabbed the women as part of an honor killing and JSOC killed the men to protect the women. This lie quickly unraveled when journalists started investigating. Eventually the JSOC commander, McRaven, had to come to the family beg forgiveness, slaughter a sheep and buy them off with cash.

      The basic point here is once you start extrajudicial killings based on often flawed intelligence, and you are accountable to no one, you can literally get away with murdering just about anyone, anywhere and there is next to nothing anyone can do about it. The main failure in this case is they failed to keep journalists away from the victims. They also probably should have used a drone strike since all they leave behind are small peices of meat so its often hard to tell what happened or even who was killed.

      --
      @de_machina
    59. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the TSA doesn't have the "right to shoot someone" without due process

      But the alphabet agencies will ship people to third world countries to have this done by proxy.

    60. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You need to stop, because you're making all the Anonymous Cowards look ignorant.

    61. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      GP commenter said 'in the US.' Renditions are happening outside of the country. It's sort of a technicality, but it makes their comment correct.

    62. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There was a well known case of an innocent Canadian who was on a flight connecting through New York City who was seized at the airport and rendered to Syria where he was tortured. He was apparently targetted because he was mentioned as a refernce on an apartment application of someone under suspicion. No one really knows how many other people have been rendered out of the U.S., you only know if they are released at some point and speak out.

      You'd lend strength to your argument if you'd provide citations and links to what you typed.

      No, I'm not saying what you claims are untrue. I'm just asking you to provide more than your anecdotal mentions.

      Personally, I think we should stop doing that shit.

    63. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Thirty-three and a third revolutions per minute.

      Yeah! Spin, baby, spin.

    64. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine the Gestapo with today's technology. It's coming.

      You don't need any technology to go door to door fucking with people. Please stop these pointless comparisons to police states.

      In a police state you don't get to talk about how bad the invasive surveillance is, and you don't need gadgets or fancy databases to break into peoples houses, judge them on the spot and make neighbors rat each other out.

    65. Re:Eventually people will look up... by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Gestapo: Detain, search and murder anyone who gets in the way, take artworks and musical instruments, including those considered heretical and destroy them as needed(or send them off to their betters for gain).
      TSA: Detain without warrant, search without warrant, take artworks, and musical instruments without remuneration, including those deemed heretical by letter agencies, and dispose of them, or "keep them" as witnessed by the reselling of said items.

      And you forgot the STASI, who: Detained without warrant, searched without warrant, operated a vast intelligence agency that spied on everyone, and did several things already mentioned. Sounds almost like some of the letter agencies in the US doesn't it?

      The difference between the three, is that the TSA doesn't have the "right to shoot someone" without due process. And I'd put that as a "yet" but you can see the trend in some of the flappy headed politicians, especially after the large scale anti-gun pushes. An armed population is a dangerous population to such ideas after all.

      Yeah, other than the mass killings they're virtually identical.

      You can see the problem when a Republican calls the ACA Fascist or Communist, but calling the TSA Gestapo or STASI? Suddenly it's perfectly rational.

      You're not convincing people, you're playing to the crowd while making all of us who agree with you in criticizing the TSA look ridiculous.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    66. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The Khmer Rouge were doctrinaire Stalinists. With an Asian twist, of course. And they were acting in an environment where the entire rural population of their country had evacuated into the cities because of US bombing of the countryside. The people were being fed by US Aid until the communists came to power and the aid was cut off. Mother Theresa could have been put in charge and thousands still would have starved.

      The K.R. didn't act stupidly. They acted the way any loony cadre-style organization would after achieving political power when a situation like that was dumped in their lap. Which doesn't change the fact that they were ruthless evil people. But it explains things a lot better than 'they did stupid shit.'

    67. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Zoning laws are also fascism (or more accurately dirigism, which is closely associated with fascism) which we've tolerated for decades, despite their history of oppressing the poor and minorities.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    68. Re:Eventually people will look up... by zakkie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe not on its own people (although there are examples of US citizens being killed by drones without any semblance of due process), but Iraqis, Afghans, Pakistanis and Yemenis are killed by US drones daily without any judicial process. That it doesn't happen on US soil is, as far as I'm concerned, immaterial.

    69. Re:Eventually people will look up... by jklovanc · · Score: 2

      By your standard every police force andborder agency in the world is the Gestapo as they have these powers and sometimes use them.

    70. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wonder which part of "There is another great story from Scahill's book" was not clear to you?
      Posting anon to save points to mod down Cold Fjord.

    71. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Drone attacks aren't an example of political oppression but of war fighting, primarily against al Qaida. Attacks in war do not involve courts and charges.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    72. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already seen it, but I'm not allowed to challenge the government on it because I can't prove it.

    73. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Your.Master · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read all about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/maher_arar

      Yes, it's a wikipedia cite, but that article itself has 118 citations for whatever particular aspect you need.

    74. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently don't moderate in an ethical fashion.

    75. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is another great story from Scahill's book that shows how flimsy and flawed the intelligence JSOC has been using to execute people is.

      Again, a lengthy story with no references provided. Please back it up somehow. You'd do your cause a favor by not just saying stuff without citations.

      Try reading the book mentioned earlier in the thread and cited by him:
      http://www.amazon.com/Dirty-Wars-The-World-Battlefield/dp/156858671X

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    76. Re:Eventually people will look up... by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So when do we take our country back folks? Seriously, I'd like to see it on my watch, but since I'm on my 80th circuit around this star, there might not be much time left for me to watch.

      What do you expect us to do with our lives that you did not do with yours? It's not like we haven't seen how the Civil Rights movement ran its course, the Privacy Rights movement will probably play out quite similarly. The racists who fought against abolition of slavery raised their children, who would die ~30 years after them and continued the tradition of hate into the 1900's; When those sewn deep with the seeds of hate had died or had a foot in the grave, and the following generation had grown up with the unignorable repression still in place did the Civil Rights movement succeed. You see, it only takes a few bad apples to spoil the bunch.

      Now our enemy is not hate, but fear. Fast cars and Fast food kill 400 times more people every year than 9/11, but our government used the event as to manufacture consent for a "War on Terror" instead of a war on the far more dangerous Automobiles, Happy Meals, The Flu, Bathroom Falls, Lightning, etc. Now using the systems built on your watch our governments can fabricate and plant evidence in our homes remotely. They're so scared they even lie to congress to "protect" we the people from even knowing the extent to which their safety net smothers us. They've been proven liars now so no evidence they present can be assumed legitimate, and enemy spies use our data stores as treasure troves, as Snowden demonstrated was far more than feasible -- Yet they will still fear, and demand to protect us. Who do you think taught these scaremongers this fear that they seek such protection? It was your generation got us in the state we're in now. I'm sorry, but the fearful watchers of the world don't get to see things change for the better because they they watched in grateful fear when things were changing for the worse in the name of protection.

      When our children grow up and you & your children are your age, that is when we'll be able to make permanent changes about this: When the ones who have lived with the knowledge and unignorable proof of their despotism grow up and take the reigns. It's not like we haven't seen how these parasitic cold-war spying systems kill their hosts, how the body must become resistant to the euphoric power-high and overdose on the despotic poison the fear drug is laced with. When the state of the system itself becomes more fearful than any pathetic threat. After your generation dies, and the scared little tyrants you raised have become as powerless as you.

      If you my accusation unfair, then you hypocritically ignore how unfair it is to grow up our children in brave homes with little freedom of privacy; They will end the mess you wrought. Your only hope to see the change is that enough of the more technically and politically inclined folk grew up knowing about the ugly Omnivore and its descendants, and about what the counter intelligence programs did to silence civil rights and anti-war movements. Unfortunately we were shunned, ridiculed, name called and bullied as Nerds and Geeks. Our children on the other hand...

    77. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The topic of the story was, "US Customs Destroys Virtuoso's Flutes Because They Were "Agricultural Items""

      I'm not sure how you got to rendition, the CIA, and Anwar Awliki, but obviously the moderators enjoy the sparks flying from the axe grinding. I guess it's a colorful show. It's actually kind of impressive that you got not only two posts out of that, but two +5 posts at that. I guess somebody must really be starving for the two minute 'merica hate.

      Maybe I'll have more to say later to address your points.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    78. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a lot of people are forgetting the merits of border control and quarantine.

      It is bad that he wasn't consulted, however, every traveler should be well aware of the quarantine policies of any country they're entering (They're written on that little card you sign when you're about to land).

    79. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quote: (http://www.gq.com/entertainment/television/201401/duck-dynasty-phil-robertson?printable=true)

      “Everything is blurred on what’s right and what’s wrong. Sin becomes fine," Robertson told GQ's Drew Magary about immorality. “Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men ... Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers -- they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”

      How on earth did I twist what he said? This is EXACTLY what is wrong in that you are not reading what he said. He said you start with homosexual behavior, and then morph out of beastiality. Yes that is a comparison where he equates one with the other.

    80. Re: Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read your phrase again... And in that phrase you have just reaffirmed the problem...

      What you should have said...

      It is a fine line to not allow racism and ignorance in a free speech society. Yes there are reasons, and many countries have called this hate speech and made a crime, but the reality is that just because you ban it does not mean it goes away. For a free speech society to work it needs to ensure that those who are racists are called out to be racists. The mistake that was made in Germany is that during the Nazi time there was no way to respond to the racists without fearing loss of life.

      This says the exact same thing, but I am intelligent and you are an ignorant racist SOB! So again thanks for making my point... Which is that you can go down that route as you are just spouting crap without making this into an intelligent conversation. You are misled to believe to have freedom without actually being able to do a discussion about it. SAME CONDITIONS as many other countries who went down that road. THANK-YOU!

    81. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality TV show suspended by network after "star" makes racist, homophobic, and paedophilic comments. Z0MG that's the same as deathcamps!!!!1!one!

    82. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Threni · · Score: 1

      No, you have to understand that the vast majority of people killed by drones are innocent people, including children. And the `terrorists hiding amongst them` line is bullshit, morally, legally and just as a point of fact. Kids playing in fields, wedding parties etc. There were no "terrorists" there other than the ones flying the drones. This isn't going down well in those (and other) countries, by the way. The people ultimately supporting the drone program through paying taxes, (re)electing presidents who continue these actions etc cannot claim to be `blameless civilians` forever when there are attacks against them.

    83. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Tom · · Score: 1

      That is actually factually true. I live in Germany, and former Stasi-Officiers are on record for saying exactly that in interviews after the Snowden leaks.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    84. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Create enough obscure and topical laws. Then apply as needed. Most laws aren't enforced until someone with power makes a huff. This is fascism. Creating the preconditions to control the population arbitrary through the court system.

    85. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    86. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they rendered someone off the streets of Italy consulting the Italians.

      I think you a word there.

      AC

    87. Re:Eventually people will look up... by xenobyte · · Score: 0

      The dirty wars are certainly killing a lot of Al Qaeda affiliates. They are almost certainly killing a larger number of innocent civilians which will fuel new generations to hate America.

      Well, what did they expect?

      When Al Queda declared war on America and attacked WTC twice (1993 and 2001) they went straight for a 100% civilian target with 100% guaranteed innocent civilian victims so I really cannot accept them whining about civilian victims when America strike them back. They could of course reduce their losses significantly by not hiding behind women and children, but as terrorists are cowards by nature (especially the so-called muslim martyrs) this is to be expected.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    88. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Threni · · Score: 1

      A general in a US-backed dictatorship approves of US actions? That changes everything!

    89. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does sound a lot like the way the Gestapo operated.

    90. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good riddance to any Awliki

    91. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gun nuts like to present themselves as the last thing remaining between an all powerful state and tyranny. they are deluded fucks.

    92. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Pakistan is a sovereign nation with major portions of the population and government that range from not friendly to actually hostile to the US. They also held elections not long ago, and the government changed according to the vote. Calling it a dictatorship doesn't really reflect either the reality or complexity of the Pakistani situation.

      But I'm sure you'll protest that your source must be "golden." After all, activists and Islamists tribesmen have never been known to exaggerate or lie, have they?

      The vast majority of people killed by the drones aren't simply innocents even if occasional mistakes are made in targeting. Of course the Taliban has been caught laying about "wedding parties" too.

      It is unfortunate that al Qaida decided to go to war and persuaded so many Muslim people to go along with them. I trust there is a reason why you can't condemn them for both making war and hiding among the innocent villagers you describe?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    93. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      ...and recognize this for what it is. Fascism.

      So, who's in charge of this fascism? Is there someone in charge of the executive branch?

      Did anyone, you know, warn Slashdotters about him? Any chance we could hold him accountable?

    94. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a sig I saw on another forum,

      "Unless you're over 60, you weren't promised flying cars. You were promised an oppressive cyberpunk dystopia. Here you go."

    95. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nah, I've watched the progressive loss of our freedoms since the 1940's. And I've railed against it since. Dec 7 1941 was an eyeopener for me when I saw my father & grandfather crying after we'd heard the evening news on Grandpa's battery powered radio. They understood what it meant. But we rallied, did without, and whuped their butts in about 5 years and change, then taught them how to do business. 9-11, had it not been the demolition job it was, should have resulted in our ruling the middle east. But the stage was already set when Truman flew in and fired Mac because he wanted to stop the Mao driven Chinese on their side of the river. That, quite likely would have been one we lost fair & square.

      But Ike was right, when he warned us, everything we've done since has been designed to entrench the military as a standing, and uncontrollable draw on the treasury.

      One thing is glaringly obvious today, and that is that the present tyrannical situation could be a major source of energy just from the likes of Thomas Payne, Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson's spinning in their graves. Its intolerable to me, but my kids grew up with it, as have their kids, and now my great grandchildren. And it makes me sad because of the things I got to do that they will never be able to do until our Constitution and Bill of Rights are restored to be the final law of the land. Like T. Jefferson said, "the tree of liberty needs refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants from time to time, and God help us if we go 20 years without it." The much needed reset, will not be bloodless. Will I live long enough to see it? I'd toss a quarter and call it heads, but some SOB would invent a law that says he can legally catch it and run while its in the air.

      Sigh....

    96. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a pity the US government persuaded many to go to war.

      Does that also mean people are free to kill innocent Americans "by accident"?

      Lucky also the US has never been caught lying like those foreigners.

      There are plenty of Americans I'd consider hostile, does that give me the right to demand you turn them over and start killing people if you dont comply?

      Of course not, your whole country is one big double standard.

    97. Re:Eventually people will look up... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      While this is pretty crappy news, people need to understand that this kind of thing is not new and did not start with 9/11. It also has nothing to do with the TSA as some commentators are wrongly purporting. This is US Customs.

      You just hear about it more often now due to the internet. US Customs has been inspecting bags on inbound international flights for decades, and they have pretty much carte-blanche to seize and destroy whatever they want.

    98. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine the Gestapo with today's technology. It's coming.

      Overly dramatic much? It's not like the US has secret courts or assassinates journalists or.. uh.. oh shit. Nevermind.

    99. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and come the revolution they will be first in front of the wall.

      I've seen this prophecy since at least 1980. It was a common theme among the socialist and Marxist revolutionaries in the 1910s-1930s. It only seems to happen in places where the CIA or KGB were driving events.

      It's clear that nobody really gives a shit. In fact, it seems like most Americans revel in the growing tyranny, soothed by the notion that it's worse for the criminals or secure in the hope that they will one day be among the privileged. The majority are reassured by rules, even if they seem arbitrary, and by authority figures, even if they seem capricious, because their existence implies order and security.

    100. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Oh no! Phil Robertson was suspended from a TV show for nine days! The horror!

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    101. Re:Eventually people will look up... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The difference between the three, is that the TSA doesn't have the "right to shoot someone" without due process.

      Sure they do. They just take you off to a secure room, and they shoot you somewhere en route where there's no camera, and claim that you went for one of their firearms and it was necessary to kill you. They'll get off scot-free and you'll go into a box.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    102. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why you've been moderated troll, but here's a link for you.

    103. Re:Eventually people will look up... by khallow · · Score: 1

      It's not like we haven't seen how the Civil Rights movement ran its course, the Privacy Rights movement will probably play out quite similarly.

      From what you wrote, I take it you haven't actually paid attention to how the Civil Rights movement played out. Reverse discrimination, the core legislative tool of that time, still ended up being racism, but sanctioned racism against an approved ethnic group. Current problems have nothing to do with people getting raised wrong by racist parents and a lot to do with the failure of modern tools intended to prevent racism.

      Now, how can the Privacy Rights movement fail in that way? There's no easily identifiable group against which we can practice reverse spying. Quota systems? Runs into the Fourth Amendment.

      Now our enemy is not hate, but fear. Fast cars and Fast food kill 400 times more people every year than 9/11, but our government used the event as to manufacture consent for a "War on Terror" instead of a war on the far more dangerous Automobiles, Happy Meals, The Flu, Bathroom Falls, Lightning, etc.

      This is disingenuous. Automobiles don't kill more people, if we don't work hard to keep them from doing so. They can't escalate. As a result, insentient causes of death are a different quality than deliberate, sentient ones.

      For example, the Washington, DC area had 10 murders in a 20 day period in 2002 from two people acting as a sniper team. If they had been allowed to continue their activities at that death rate for the last eleven years, we'd be around 2000 deaths by now. That's assuming that the team didn't escalate their activities to more destructive and lethal means (they had already escalated from seven murders in the previous eight months).

      Sure, it was a vast overreaction to the 911 attacks, but any causing of death which involves people and for which the killers expected to gain, always requires more attention and resources than a cause of death that just happens because of the potential for escalation. As I've said before, it would have been a terrible idea to wait till Al Qaeda figured out how to profit from these sorts of attacks or build up the logistics so that they could frequently and routinely cause 9/11 scale harm.

    104. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There was a well known case of an innocent Canadian who was on a flight connecting through New York City who was seized at the airport and rendered to Syria where he was tortured."

      That would be Maher Arar, in case the person expressing skepticism wants more details.

    105. Re:Eventually people will look up... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      instead of a war on the far more dangerous Automobiles, Happy Meals, The Flu, Bathroom Falls, Lightning, etc

      Judging by the results of the Wars on poverty, drugs, and terrorism, your proposal would simply result in MORE cars, flus, and happy meals.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    106. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just impressed someone eighty years old, has the desire and makes the effort to read slashdot!

    107. Re:Eventually people will look up... by stdarg · · Score: 0

      The dirty wars are certainly killing a lot of Al Qaeda affiliates. They are almost certainly killing a larger number of innocent civilians which will fuel new generations to hate America.

      So? These people already hate America. Better to demonstrate force than to appear weak in front of your enemies. People need to know that if your friend is a terrorist or if your dad is a terrorist.. you are in danger.

    108. Re:Eventually people will look up... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Arguably its not. Fascism would be some central power (technically a commercial power, but that's not really required), who issued a mandate that flutes must be destroyed in customs in order to take power over all international flute players.
      No this is some mindless desk jokey who saw the reeds and destroyed them without thinking.

    109. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      That's what someone who supports an all powerful state would say.

    110. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      I don't think the TSA is allowed to carry firearms, yet. They only get to grope and detain you against your will at this point.

    111. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people are all out of your f*ing paranoid minds. Don't you recognize garden variety stupidity when you see it?

    112. Re:Eventually people will look up... by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Yeah, forcing EVERYONE out of the cities (not just the people originally from the countryside), killing everyone with an education, and having people build earthworks dams with no planning doesn't count as "doing stupid shit".

    113. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Yes, we could. But unfortunately he was just re-elected. Maybe if we held the person who is in charge of the NSA, TSA and the IRS accountable for their actions, we'd start to get somewhere. But you can read the hundreds of posts above, and people seem to be reluctant to even mention his name. How things have changed.

    114. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Actually oppressed as it is societal.

    115. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Hey idiot. If the State starts going door to door, people recognize it for what it is. If the State has technology to monitor everything without neighbors tattling on neighbors, or having to go door to door, it can achieve it's objectives much more carefully and silently. Right now, we get to talk about how invasive the surveillance is. Right now, Barack Obama could give a rat's ass about what we say about it, he just continues to do it anyway, and pretends to not be responsible. All this talking about it, what has it accomplished? Nothing. Why should the State fear us talking about it? If you talk about it publicly you get branded a racist, audited by the IRS, and destroyed. The surveillance continues, and the juggernaut grows larger.

    116. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I face much the same thing when I have to fly because I am a television broadcast engineer, who often has to pack up his tools and go someplace to resuscitate a tv station or their transmitter. I can't take my tools, several thousand dollars worth, with me to the job via anyplace that takes me past a TSA checkpoint, so now the stations who need my talents have to send their corporate airplanes to come and get me and bring me home.

      Although it's certainly a shame that wealthy telecommunications firms have to pay a tithe to continue delivering the circuses that American powerbrokers depend on to keep the people sedated, I'm a bit more concerned with the way the TSA's madness interferes with basic scientific research by non-governmental agencies. Since 9/11 you can't send a case of test tubes any real distance, which has put a major crimp in the investigation of new instances of corporate pollution, particularly in third world countries where there isn't any access to high-end analytical machinery and samples have to try to cross national borders. My wife's lab lost thousands of samples before they gave up and returned to 18th century methods of analysis in the field (which can't detect everything that's going on). Wealthy organizations with corporate jets, of course, don't have these problems, they just have higher expenses. A small price for them to pay, since it hinders the kind of basic science that might interfere with their operations!

      I think it's clumsiness and not malice, but the former gives the same result as the latter, unfortunately.

    117. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're all going to end up like North Korea!

    118. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity

    119. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, how can the Privacy Rights movement fail in that way? There's no easily identifiable group against which we can practice reverse spying. Quota systems? Runs into the Fourth Amendment.

      There's actually a very easily identifiable group: politicians and government officials. Many people are willing to make an exception if whatever Constitution breaking thing is applied to the people working in/for government. People just don't call it reverse spying. They call it open and transparent government.

      "If you got nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, right Mr Politician?"

      It goes beyond just spying. Some people also want to limit the very freedoms of politicians, such as putting limits on campaign funding, or that a politician cannot take certain jobs in the private sector after they leave public office.

      Such suggestions usually follow a slippery slope, as you can't just restrict the politician, but also the people he works with. So to hell to "corporations are people", we gotta limit lobbying, or private donations, and all sorts of other things!

      But you're right that things won't turn out like the Civil Rights movement. It'll turn out more like McCarthyism. The Feds are the new Reds, and the people will go to excessive lengths to root out all the scary big government (but in the process become just as if not worse in their witch hunts)

    120. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a fucking break.

      I'm not a fan of the NSA, but this dudebro rage over the national security state has reached new heights of utter fucktard stupidity. You let me know when you find the fucking gas chamber showers, wouldya?

    121. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When things get to where we are actually in danger of a fascist police state takeover, everyone will be laughing and ignoring the evidence because of shrieking chicken little fucktards like you.

    122. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      using the book he got the stories from is hardly a collaborating citation.

    123. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge AQ doesn't really complain about this because it plays directly to their benefit. Our country is the one that always preachs about being on the moral high ground, except we seem to fail at actually keeping that ground. Other groups and people who point this out are then usually accused of siding with the terrorists, which is so obvious of a logical failure as to not need more explanation.

    124. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware of people whose only marketable skill is posting Franklin-esque feel good quotes.

    125. Re:Eventually people will look up... by eepok · · Score: 1

      This is not fascism. This is poorly trained workers with insufficient procedures to remedy concerns.

      To call this fascism is to diminish the horrors that actually come with fascism.

    126. Re:Eventually people will look up... by eepok · · Score: 1

      Yes, they searched travleres bags for agricultural items, were wrong about their findings, and destroyed many flutes. That's why the Gestapo and STASI were so hated and feared-- their prejudice against woodwinds.

      OR... Or they were the shady underbelly of genuinely oppressive megalomaniac regimes.

      Totally the same thing.

    127. Re:Eventually people will look up... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      That isn't zersetzung.

    128. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You are wholly ignorant of the cause of the war with al Qaida. They seek imperialist conquest of the world, including the regions formerly governed by Muslim empires, including Europe. You do realize they want to put Spain back under Muslim rule? Name your country, they want to rule it too. It may take time, but they are patient. In the case of Europeans they being helped by the native European population that is simultaneously pursuing self-extermination with a birth rate of only 1.3 children per woman and wholesale abandonment of Christianity. If you are young you will likely see either civil war or accommodation of Muslim law in your lifetime unless trends change.

      Kill innocent Americans by "accident"? Don't be stupid, they kill innocent people by design, by choice, on purpose! It would be a massive improvement if they would only kill civilians by accident.

      Make your own choices, but understand there will be consequences. You may not have the wisdom to make good choices.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    129. Re:Eventually people will look up... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe we *are* headed toward fascism, but in *this* case it seems more likely we have an incompetent customs inspector.

      The rules actually state that it is permissible to import manufactured items without a permit as long as the plant material in them is thoroughly dead and incapable of propagating. Items made of certain materials like bamboo are subject to inspection and possible fumigation if they are found to be infested. The only exception is bamboo garden stakes, which are low value items that are intended for an application with a very high risk of transmitting agricultural pests. It makes no economic sense to spend money to fumigate a garden stake when a traveler can purchase a replacement at a garden store for $0.25.

      This is in fact quite sensible policy. Had the NYC customs inspectors followed it, Mr. Razgui's instruments would have been inspected then released. The question is, why didn't the inspector do his job properly?

      Now for a fact that hasn't been widely reported. Mr. Razgui was also transporting new, green reeds for making flutes along with his finished flutes. There are not allowed into the country without a permit, and *should* have been destroyed. So my guess is that the customs inspectors found bag full of reeds, and noting some of them were green just destroyed the whole thing. This wasn't proper, in fact it was careless and lazy; but it wasn't quite the act of incomprehensible cultural vandalism depicted in the media.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    130. Re:Eventually people will look up... by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%! I'd like to add to your point as well. It's not simply governmental rules and regulations that are standing in the way of America being great, but it's this exact example here of people in places where they are simply itching to use any and all authority possible to define themselves as 'not the other half of society that's getting fucked'. It's this very concept that both sides keep supporting! Why do we keep supporting this fascist ideal? Listen to Pink Floyd's "Us and Them" and "On the Turning Away" again. Until people can find a reason to feel for each other, and not be scared of boogie-men, the world will only get worse and worse to live in. Unless you're elite, of course.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    131. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 1

      LOL, YOU are the one who went off topic with

      "If people were being "disappeared" in the US I expect we would hear something about it."

      I was just pointing out how naive or misleading your point was.

      --
      @de_machina
    132. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      using the book he got the stories from is hardly a collaborating citation.

      Dude, you said:

      Please back it up somehow. You'd do your cause a favor by not just saying stuff without citations.

      ...and that's what you got, he backed it up. If you expected the kind of exhaustive source checking you get from a professional historian you should not be looking for it in slashdot posts.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    133. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Well then you're both stupid. A government could be described as such with continued crackdowns of the same type. In this case, it seems one automaton had a strict interpretation of rules, and rather than admit that they could have bent the rules, the decision makers backed the rules.
      You can't count on a lack of previous enforcement indicating a future lack of same.
      And, without multiple cases that I don't know about because I don't follow the handmade flute material importing scandals, it makes no sense to use this as the opening for relabeling a government.
      Before you argue male sure you got your facts straight, thenproceed.

    134. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to miss the point. U.S. indiscriminant killing of civilians is insuring this will be a perpetual war, which I suspect is what a lot of malevolent people in and around Washington D.C. want. This forever war spanning the entire globe gives them a blank check to do just about anything, anywhere, anytime and justify it by saying its necessary to keep American's safe. If the screw up and kill the wrong people they just lie, cover it up, and move on to the next set of executions. They can also spend unlimited quantities of money. After the Soviet Union fell DOD and Intelligence needed a new enemy to justify their enormous budgets. Now that they have one they will milk it forever.

      You can't win a guerrilla war by working off an org chart of your enemy commanders and killing large numbers of civilians as collateral damage as you go after them. The French tried exactly this strategy in Algeria for years. They did take out a lot of boxes on their org charts but the brutality that went with it insured there was always a fresh supply of people who hated the French with a passion and constantly replenished the boxes on the org chart.

      There is absolutely nothing wrong with targetting Al Qaeda and Taliban but you need to A) make sure the intelligence and targetting are rock solid and B) do everything possible to limit collateral damage. For example you kill them in vehicles on an open road instead of leveling an entire village full of innocent people.

      Or you send in special operators to snatch and identify them. Unfortunately after 10 years they've realized that secret prisons are really messy from a human rights perspective so they've decided to use summary executions instead which is why they killed an unarmed Bin Laden at point blank range.

      For long periods in Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen JSOC opted for high mission rate based on bad intelligence over low mission rate and high quality results. They created whole new generations of Jihadi's as a result of that poor decision.

      The "hiding behind women and children" is a silly propaganda line. You expect them to stand out in the middle of a field and put a bullseye on their chest so the drones can target them cleanly. They are facing an opponent with vast military superiority. They are going to blend in to villages and hide in mountains. Anything else would be shear stupidity and they aren't stupid.

      --
      @de_machina
    135. Re:Eventually people will look up... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      No, the person I replied to did that. And you didn't really demonstrate that people being "disappeared" in the US is a real, meaningful problem. (See: Argentina's dirty war)

      You didn't just make a mistaken point, but sharpened a whole workshop of axes there. Quite impressive really.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    136. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 1

      I'll say again you should read Scahill's book. Awliki's story is far more complex than it appears or U.S. propaganda painted it. Awkliki was actually very moderate before 9/11. He supported George W in 2000 because he was socially conservative and liked the hard line Republican stance on gays and other social issues. He was also the goto Muslim for U.S. media after 9/11 because of his moderation and appeals for calm.

      His story then gets very murky after 9/11. There is at least some evidence the U.S. tried to coerce in to being an informant. In particular they may have snared him in two staged prostitution stings to pressure and discredit him. They hounded him relentless post 9/11 and he was dismayed at the brutal treatement Muslim's were getting in the U.S. He tried to return to the U.S. and was held at the border and then was suddenly released by the FBI to enter the U.S. He apparently went directly to someone the FBI wanted him to help implicate and he didn't even know. He was probably be coerced in to being an informant. He then fled the U.S. to never return because he didn't want to be an informant. When he returned to his ancestral home in Yemen the hounding continued under U.S. direction, he was imprisoned by Yemen for a time, and his radicationlization accellerated.

      He was most definitely very radical when he was finally executed, but there is at least a 50/50 chance he was radicalized only because of 10 years of hounding and pressure applied by the U.S.

      Still the fact that you think its OK to execute children based on the actions of their parents show just how morally challenged you and the U.S. government have become.

      If U.S. citizens are guilty of something, try them in absentia in a court of law, put your evidence on the table and if you can convince a judge and jury then you have justification to act.

      If you let the executive branch act as judge, jury and executioner you are opening a Pandora's box that all Americans will live to regret.

      --
      @de_machina
    137. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 1

      The key point is I'm NOT the one who took this thread off topic, you were doing it before I did so don't pin it on me.

      I think I made it pretty clear that in at least one case the U.S. has someone disappear from the U.S. I've also made the probably even more disturbing point that he U.S. has managed to bestow on itself the power to not only make people disappear in the U.S. but anywhere on the planet, which is far more disturbing and surpasses the powers of any previous police state.

      JSOC is operating in at least 100 countries and they are accountable to no one other than maybe the White House and the SecDef occasionally. They are operating as judge, jury, torturer and executioner. There are no checks or balances and they are FREQUENTLY either making serious mistakes or serious errors in judgement.

      There is a big difference between collateral damage on a declared battlefield and indiscriminate killing of civilians where the whole world is a battlefield and innocent civilians have no where to hide.

      --
      @de_machina
    138. Re:Eventually people will look up... by isorox · · Score: 1

      An armed population is a dangerous population to such ideas after all.

      No you're not. The USA is an armed society, yet as soon as a crinimal killed 3 people in Boston you all cowered in your homes while the militarised police went door to door searching and showing off their equipment. When the armed forces were shooting up downtown miami (they were blanks, but noone knew that at the time) you just hit. Where were your glorious armed militia? Don't bring up Athens, the federal government and a militarised police force were not involved.

      As long as Americans have bread and circuses (tax breaks and american idol), you'll be happy. If you ever weren't, there's nothing you can do.

    139. Re:Eventually people will look up... by isorox · · Score: 1

      I face much the same thing when I have to fly because I am a television broadcast engineer, who often has to pack up his tools and go someplace to resuscitate a tv station or their transmitter. I can't take my tools, several thousand dollars worth, with me to the job via anyplace that takes me past a TSA checkpoint, so now the stations who need my talents have to send their corporate airplanes to come and get me and bring me home.

      Really. I'm a broadcast engineer too, and my work takes my all over the world, from Kabul to New York. I never have problems with my tools, or any expensive equipment, as long as the really expensive stuff (say a spectrum analyser, or cheaper stuff like mixers and matrices) is on a carnet. There's a few countries where a back hander is needed to ensure a camera gets through correctly, although I don't get involved there as that would be illegal, but the U.S. is not one of them.

      However props to you for still working, and keeping on top of technology, in your 80s. The move from analog to SDI must have come in past your normal retirement age? And nowadays more and more broadcast technology is computers and networking.

    140. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that if a friend of yours is a terrorist, unbeknownst to you, you are OK with the U.S. government executing you without a trial.

      You may not know this but Bin Laden's father is an affluent, respected owner of a multi billion dollar Saudi construction company. As far we anyone knows he disowned his son and had no ties to terrorism. By your reasoning the U.S. should still execute him and all of his relatives?

      You either have rule of law or you don't. Rule of law says you are accountable for your actions not the actions of people you happen to know or share a blood line with. Rule of law says you produce evidence of someone's wrong doing to a judge and jury and they decided if the evidence warrants punishment.

      --
      @de_machina
    141. Re:Eventually people will look up... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Man, what tools do you have that you can't make it past the checkpoints? For me, the standard policy is for mechanical tools to go in the checked baggage (screwdrivers, wrenches, wire cutters, etc.), but everything else (o-scope, spectrum analyzer, soldering iron with tip removed, etc.) to go with me. Never had a problem, although sometimes it takes longer to get checked.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    142. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just stupid. This is incompetence and blindly following rules rather than thinking about what one is doing.

      The Gestapo and STASI were well-organized and effective groups who made great progress towards an very evil genocidal goal. The NSA and TSA are a bunch of bumbling idiots with lots of moderately effective but very expensive technology which they employ very poorly, resulting in close to zero progress towards an arguably less evil goal of keeping Americans safe from terrorists (a.k.a. freedom fighters in some places).

      And yes, I'm as worried as the rest of you that some secret part of the NSA is quite effectively using that technology and data for nefarious purposes, but I've yet to see evidence of such. Save our tax dollars being siphoned off to pay for NSA/TSA/Contractor technology and salaries for which we receive no benefit. But maybe that IS the conspiracy.

    143. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Only occasionally in re work. I'm in the middle of doing our local AM'er, whose daytime transmitter let out a quite considerable and stinky quantity of smoke at sign on time this morning. Domino effect, a gassy 807 effectively crow barred the medium high voltage supply, doing a truly excellent job of toasting a 10 kg 10 Henry choke in the power supply. Old gates transmitter, all the worlds spares are up in PA someplace, and locked up by the current blizzard, so it could be Monday before I have the stuff to revive it. But he has a 50 watt nighttime box that sounds great, so he will survive till I can get the 1kw Gates revived yet another time.

      As far as the digital, I missed that for the most part, we were still doing analog when we had a turkey dinner and I was given the obligatory Rolex watch at the end of June 2002. But I am still there often enough to be well aware of some of its problems, 50% of which have originated in a $15K Apple video server we bought 4 of, all with $0.12 bushing fans. All of which have now been replaced with in house built linux boxes with very high Iron contents. Our IT guy, who was a 17 yo when I walked in the door in '84, has turned into quite a computer whiz. 64 to 128 gigs of ram, and at least dual Zeons at 3.5Ghz or better. And up to 50Tb worth of drives in raid configs. 5% of the troubles we had from Apples coffee warmers. We do 4 digital channels out of there, and in a pinch, the newest server can do all 4, AND write two other programs into the raid array, all at the same time.

      I try to keep up, but with my "other" interests, (cnc machine tools on a small scale, woodworking, a legacy computer) the wet ram gets overloaded easier than it used to. That is not a pleasant realization . :(

      Cheers, Gene

    144. Re:Eventually people will look up... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That is war, albeit an undeclared one. A different thing.

    145. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Long enough I missed my flight Anything electronic, like my Hitachi v1065 scope, and to be drug out (it was wrapped in a 2 week supply of clean whities in a rollabout suitcase at the time) and plugged into prove it was what it was, even if the dipshit watching the xray screen had no f______ clue what it did. I had to take the batteries out of my camera and throw them away even after I had taken his picture. And damn I hate dealing with people whose measured IQ is less than the eyelet count in their shoes. To me, it was pure and simple that he had the power to harass, and was enjoying the hell out of it. IMNTLBHO, some village was missing its idiot.

      I am with a guy named Marion Morrison, I've been in the house he was born in twice, its a minor tourist attraction in Winterset IA, not far from where I was born, and whom you may recall as John Wayne, who once said that "stupidity should hurt", and this guy needed to hurt, bad.

      But this thread is about worn out.

      Cheers (or maybe not), Gene

    146. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascism isn't a set of economic principles, although certain libertarian groups like to imagine it is so that they can associate economic policies they don't like with the pariah status of the word fascism.

      Fascism is radial authoritarian nationalism with aesthetic elements of modernism and palingensis and the economic attributes cited by your link are incidental and not unique to fascist states or polities. It is a politics of otherization and violence.

      Bob Paxton, an actual scholar of Fascism without an ideological axe to grind, has written some really good books on the subject.

    147. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because they are Muslim does that mean they don't count in your book?

      I tend to not care much about what happens to the Criminally Insane, and yes that includes Christians and Jews alongside the Muslims.

    148. Re:Eventually people will look up... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Why don't you pack up your tools and equipment and send it overnight using your favorite shipping company? Sure, it's expensive, but has to be cheaper than a corporate airplane, and while I know Fedex/UPS can be pretty rough with packages, I would say you're a hell of a lot more likely to still get all your stuff, intact, than you are dealing with the TSA and baggage handlers.

    149. Re:Eventually people will look up... by tftp · · Score: 1

      Now for a fact that hasn't been widely reported. Mr. Razgui was also transporting new, green reeds [artsjournal.com] for making flutes along with his finished flutes. There are not allowed into the country without a permit, and *should* have been destroyed.

      They should have been quarantined, and the traveler should have been asked what to do - to destroy, to keep until he returns, to fumigate, or whatever else. Only destruction is a free option. But how can one destroy things that one does not own? What kind of loss can that cause? What if those reeds were containing a cure from $deadly_disease, and the scientist who collected them simply did not know of the rules? What if that scientist risked his life to get them, and got malaria, and was delivered to the USA barely alive, being unable to fill customs forms? All kinds of scenarios are possible; and what had, in fact, happened is one of those "not very welcome" scenarios, where valuable items were destroyed by JBTs simply because the customs officers had neither the duty to care, nor the desire to help a fellow human.

    150. Re:Eventually people will look up... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I really don't think Phil gives a shit. He's an old country boy that has more money than he needs or ever dreamed of having. If anyone had ever heard the stories of what he was like when he was younger they'd understand why he isn't worried about what A&E want.

    151. Re:Eventually people will look up... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Aren't our technical devices made in china?

    152. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Afghanistan/special-forces-apologize-afghan-civilian-deaths-sheep/story?id=10320603&singlePage=true

    153. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts:

      The US is disappearing people around the globe.

      The US doesn't differentiate US and non US in cases of intelligence gathering or killing people in a war.

      Even with your clearance level, you cant know all thats going on.

      Reasonable speculation:

      Since Americans are at war and scared of terrorists, are know to disappear people for torture and interrogations on flimsy evidence with little oversight. It's quite likely the US would keep on doing this as there is little way really for them to be caught.

      Personal attack:

      You seem prety keen to ask for "proof" all the time, when its verry obvious such proof would be quite hard to come by. Not having proof is not the same as something not happening. No-one asks you for proof that it didnt happen, as that is obviously an unreasonable burden, but asking for proof about very secret things is also fairly unreasonable.

    154. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are supposed to kill Americans on purpose, it's a war remember. Don't forget it's your team who is escalating the conflict throughout the globe. You're creating far more enemies than you are killing, that's hardly a long term strategy. I hope your not expecting sympathy or support from the rest of the world for your dead civilians as home, when its by your own actions that are causing the problem.

      If they are patient and willing to take their time, why is America so impatient? Why play into their hands and force the issue now? America is hardly going to turn Muslim. You think Spain will turn Muslim and the rest of Europe wouldn't notice?
      Seems the real reason to engage now is the same reason most governments get involved in this kind of thing, deflect public attention away from the problems at home and have some external enemy to blame. It can also help win elections, but thats a double edged sword, it can also lose them for you when the people have had enough. Best bet is to keep turning up the fear, the Muslims are taking over the world, there's a terrorist hiding under your bed right now!!

    155. Re:Eventually people will look up... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      again, he was just refering to different types of sin, he did not say gay people will fuck dogs

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    156. Re:Eventually people will look up... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      How did this become about the NSA? It's about border control confiscating plant matter to prevent ingress of parasites that might be present in it that would harm agriculture in the U.S.

      This case seems like they applied the regulations stupidly, but those are the same laws that prevent you from getting through customs with a bunch of small plants bundled into your luggage. It does make sense to regulate the import of non-native species.

    157. Re:Eventually people will look up... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      ICE is not TSA though they are both under DHS.

      As for murder? Well, just wait until someone resists. You will find that, just as in the case of the Bostom bombing, not only will direct suspects be killed under strange circumstances where witnesses and evidence contradicts official stories, but people who knew the suspects are also killed. Kind of sounds like what you're saying of the Gestapo.

      You're either being intentionally deceitful or you're wilfully ignorant of what has been going on.

      You are distracting yourself with fringe conspiracy theories instead of what "they" are actually doing. Good for you, that's exactly what "they" want. You're playing your part perfectly.

    158. Re:Eventually people will look up... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      9-11, had it not been the demolition job it was, should have resulted in our ruling the middle east.>/p>

      Thank you for calling yourself out. Now I can safely skip over your posts, since you clearly are bringing the crazy.

      Hint: being old does not make you wise.

    159. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      It does, but it also makes sense to notice when it's dried up and full of regularly spaced holes, like maybe someone's turned dead wood into something else.

      The problem is that since customs officials can't be expert on everything, they assume the worst as a default.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    160. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      All part of China's nefarious plan to take over the world.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    161. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      You have obviously not taken a good look at the videos. The demolition charges going off can plainly be seen below the main collapse. And why did WTC-7 fall hours later?

    162. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Reziac · · Score: 1
      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    163. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There are a zillion and one rants being published now by people most of us have never heard of; Amazon is full of 'em, to the point that by now I assume a wacko screed until proven otherwise. So it would have helped had the backed-up noted (and cited) the author's credentials.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    164. Re:Eventually people will look up... by tmosley · · Score: 1

      How did this become about the NSA? They made it about them. They are reading this right now. EVERYTHING is about the NSA now.

      The problem here is government over-reach and violation of rights, on quite literally every front. It has to stop, one way or another. Either they do it voluntarily (not happening), or they cause an economic collapse. Hope you're ready for that.

    165. Re:Eventually people will look up... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      This is plain; you are a nut.

    166. Re:Eventually people will look up... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Um, no.

      This was a story about outrage over ham-handed border security and perhaps overzealous agents destroying flutes under agricultural regulations designed to keep invasive species out of the country.

      Then the thread was hijacked and the NSA roundly thrashed.

      I agree the NSA is out of control, but to put it plainly, they're not involved in THIS post.

    167. Re: Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      No, the way to have a free speech society, is to have a free speech society. No special privileges for favored groups. No one gets more free speech than someone else. If you have a free speech society, it's not necessary to ensure any one group has the ability to speak out against another. All groups have the ability to speak out, as it should be.

    168. Re:Eventually people will look up... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      It does, but it also makes sense to notice when it's dried up and full of regularly spaced holes, like maybe someone's turned dead wood into something else.

      The problem is that since customs officials can't be expert on everything, they assume the worst as a default.

      I agree, I think this is EXACTLY the problem in this event. You have summed it up perfectly.

      I'm a little creeped out when people see something like this and immediately toss in their favorite objects of fascination, whether it's the NSA or 9/11 Truthers.

    169. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The "TSA culture" has made it worse, by promoting the Little Tin God mentality, abetted by today's worst-first reactions. But as someone said, never ascribe to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity (or, I'd add, ignorance).

      What's probably needed are regs to the effect that anything confiscated has to be held pending 1) notification to the owner, and 2) examination by a qualified person (akin to a legal expert, called in at need), but 3) it cannot just be destroyed and thus made Not Our Problem.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    170. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what you consider a jucidial process. When a soldier shoots an enemy combatant, they don't hold a trial first. That may be a good reason for opposing all war or government-sanctioned killing, but I don't understand why "drones" are singled out as an especially egregious technique. It's just a gun with a remote shooter.

    171. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're not stupid. They are trusting (perhaps naively) that their hiding among civilians will make the US spare them. The only reason they would think that is if they think we are more scrupulous than they are. And many Americans have decided that scruples are for losers. Those who hide amongst civilians are placing a bet that they will be morally harder to kill. And Americans are trying to set up a situation that makes the civilian population more and more reluctant to shelter these folks, because our reputation for scrupulosity is fading daily.
      I think it may be true that if one cannot, due to cultural/religious differences, win wars by winning hearts and minds, one can then only wins wars by having a reputation for not caring who dies.

    172. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      I love how tax breaks = Roman bread. You utterly failed at that analogy. Food stamps/welfare = Roman Bread.

    173. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Did you take another look at those videos before deciding that, or are you just repeating the "company" policy?

      Those buildings survive on the rental fees they generate. Neither of the 3 were even 50% occupied.

    174. Re:Eventually people will look up... by LienRag · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately after 10 years they've realized that secret prisons are really messy from a human rights perspective so they've decided to use summary executions instead which is why they killed an unarmed Bin Laden at point blank range.

      They claim to have killed an unarmed Bin Laden at point blank range.
      Ever saw the movie The Siege? Which, by the way, was shot a few years before 9/11...

    175. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 1

      You do realize the people operating those drones are hiding among civilians too don't you? They go home to the spouse and kids when they get off work. Would you be upset if someone lobbed a cruise missile full of cluster bombs in to those towns?

      --
      @de_machina
    176. Re:Eventually people will look up... by demachina · · Score: 1

      Scahill is a well known and respected journalist. His book has pictures of McRaven visiting the surviving family members and slaughtering a sheep to beg forgivness of the family. NATO and JSOC have fully admitted that it was a mistake, and that there was an attempt to cover it up. The fundemental problem they had covering it up was the targets were so amazingly, obviously wrong, a police chief and a prosecutor, there were so many witnesses who survived, journalist were on scene fairly quickly and the attempted cover up was so obvious it fell apart immediately.

      It would lead you to beleive that there are probably a significant number of "accidents" where the victims are not well known, there are no surviving witnesses, journalists can't reach the scene, or the victims are all pulverized by explosives and unidentifiable so they JSOC can get away with one coverup after another.

      --
      @de_machina
    177. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't know the name (or the incident). The Wiki link would have helped.

      I think any time there are black ops (and black ops have existed throughout history) there's potential and probability of such 'accidents'. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    178. Re:Eventually people will look up... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those "explosions" are dust-laden air being blown out of windows because a huge building is collapsing down on top of the floors where the clouds are blown out of the building.

      Seriously, you are crazy, deranged, a nutcase, wasting your time.

      Oh, and insulting the memory of the people murdered in the towers. That part I find despicable.

      I'm not responding on this topic again, because you have nothing sane to say. You are a loon.

    179. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maher_Arar oh when did HTML become case sensitive lol

    180. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Quite a few floors below the cloud of debris? And what pray tell is the source of the dust when the collapse is still 15 floors above the puffs of debris being blown out of the corners of the building? Where there were no windows?

      And make no mistake about my feelings for the 3000 that died that day. IMO there should have been murder charges filed for every one of them.

      Now, remember from what I have intimated in previous postings here as to what I was the last 19 years of my working life, the Chief Engineer at a TV station in WV.

      Our satellite truck was first on the scene at Shanksville, to find access to the site severely restricted by a crowd of "security" people who intended to block access and totally control the pictures the media may have been able to take and upload. Just that took more time to arrange the logistics of getting that many people to the site in the about 4 hours it took us to drive. They would occasionally trot out a "piece of evidence" like that bit of landing gear and a partial turbine wheel. Both of which weren't anything that was ever bolted into a 747. 20% of the correct size. Or smaller.

      The dirt damage to the hill wasn't anything like you would expect a 747 could do, and there was no debris visible from where we were allowed to take a camera. We packed up and left at the end of the 2nd afternoon, as our guys were by then in bad need of a shower & clean clothes. But our driver was just curious enough to see if he could drive around and see the site from a different angle. Not so much, but sitting in the trees on the far side of that hill was a small bulldozer, one about the right size to have carved up the other side of the hill in 2 or 3 hours work two days before.

      A rumor surfaced a couple months later that that aircraft's tail number was sitting in the back lot at Dayton AFB, but no one has managed a legible picture, so take that as hearsay.

      You can say what you believe about me, we have a 1st amendment yet... But please look at the evidence and reach your own conclusions instead of asking for yet another glass of TPTB official koolaid.

      FWIW, plug this into your calculations. Those buildings were loaded with asbestos, many tons of it and would have cost quite a few 10's of millions just to clear that hazard out before any legal demolishing could have been done.
      Food for thought.

      And I am far from convinced, with all the legal crap put in the way, the first responders & survivors who have since passed from breathing that stuff, none got anywhere near the medical attention they deserved. Generally I think the expression is "thrown under the bus".

      But like you, I am done. We are, within the limits of this media, incapable of changing the others already made up mind.

    181. Re:Eventually people will look up... by khallow · · Score: 1

      But you're right that things won't turn out like the Civil Rights movement. It'll turn out more like McCarthyism. The Feds are the new Reds, and the people will go to excessive lengths to root out all the scary big government (but in the process become just as if not worse in their witch hunts)

      You had me to this point. But this just isn't happening. Instead, for way too many people, government remains the tool of choice when they want to fix society or the perceived flaws in their fellow man.

      As to "witch hunts", the problem was that the witch or the red was a vague and ambiguous idea. Someone pulling a paycheck from a government is a lot easier to verify. Also, currently a large portion of the population pulls a check from a government either as wages, pensions, contracts, or entitlements. The "witch hunt" would probably have far more witches than hunters.

    182. Re:Eventually people will look up... by walter_f · · Score: 1

      "The NSA and other Alphabet Agencies only wish they had the authority to do what the Gestapo and Stasi did."

      They don't have it yet. (There are still obstacles left to be cleared on the way, Judges like Richard Leon* among them.)

      But they (the Alphabet Agencies) are looking forward to getting comparable authority eventually.

      * The Federal Judge who ordered December 16, 2013:
      "... for all the above reasons, I will grant Larry Klayman’s and Charles Strange’s request for an injunction and enter an order that (1) bars the Government from collecting, as part of the NSA’s Bulk Telephony Metadata Program, any telephony metadata associated with their personal Verizon accounts and (2) requires the Government to destroy any such metadata in its possession that was collected through the bulk collection program. ”
      —Judge Richard Leon,"

      "... However, in light of the significant national security interests at stake in this case and the novelty of the constitutional issues, I will stay my order pending appeal. In doing so, I hereby give the Government fair notice that should my ruling be upheld, this order will go into effect forthwith. Accordingly, I fully expect that during the appellate process, which will consume at least the next six months, the Government will take whatever steps necessary to prepare itself to comply with this order when, and if, it is upheld. Suffice it to say, requesting further time to comply with this order months from now will not be well received and could result in collateral sanctions."

      http://judgepedia.org/Richard_Leon

    183. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GESTAPO people had more brains than nowadays customs and immigration.

    184. Re:Eventually people will look up... by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Really, what happens if a broadcast engineer attempts to check a bag full of sophisticated tools on a commercial flight? Are you more worried about the TSA stealing/damaging your tools, than the private security companies who performed the same function before the TSA existed?

      Just wondering

      --
      That that is is that that that that is not is not.
    185. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      In my career, the TSA was a fact by the time I was being asked to go "put out fires" far enough away that flying was expedient. I served in that "fireman's" position for nearly a decade after I retired from the day to day trench warfare that trying to stay ahead of what was at times was the most destructive news dept personnel group ever collected, but which probably wasn't. But being the lone C.E.T. in the region, I learned that time IS money, and a laid up camera waiting for the factory to repair, at 3x the cost I could do it, was a money waster, with hidden costs in the ratings earned. So despite some legendary arguments with my GM's from time to time about the cost of said spares, in the end I won enough of those arguments that it got easier to "do it my way". But after the official dinner & Rolex presentation, I found myself being asked to go and fix some of the other facilities also owned by the same gentleman. But every time I flew, what I'd take along or try to, was more and more restricted each time. And each time it seemed like a balancing act to have enough tools to get right to work on arrival, or get thrown in jail with zero recourse against the arbitrary decisions of somebody on an ego trip, he's working for the TSA! One time, one of them threatened to confiscate a pair of 4" flush cutting diagonal cutters, without which you cannot clean up the bottom of a pcb after you have replaced a component on that pcb. Worth about a 30 dollar bill when you can find them, they cannot be found at the local radio shack or home depot. I talked him out of it, but why the hell should I have had to?

      Then again, time can be saved with a handy Cessna and with my wife of nearly 25 years being pulled down by COPD, leaving her alone for extended periods of time is not a good idea. So rather than 3 days driving each way to get to the UP from here, when the time there to effect a patchup repair generally only a day or 2, I've had the Cessna and its driver come and get me.

      I didn't consider that aspect of it until I was in Grand Junction, running that 4 station complex for almost 4 months while the commission was agreeing to the sale & the takeover logistics were being arranged, that I realized I had better not do that again for that length of time. But that, and a short summer in the UP while I rebuilt an old leaky, channel 8, 8 bay antenna that was destroying the transmitter with its high VSWR, were my last lengthy trips out.

      And now my physical condition is going downhill, the diabetes is getting worse, so there is no way I can do even a 6 hour days work.

      I was called up to our local AM'er yesterday because his transmitter let the smoke out of some stuff it shouldn't have, and by the time I had extracted the bad choke, about 10Kg worth, fried extra crispy by a gassy 807 tube, the "domino" that started it all, I had spent about an hour down on my knees. Today, muscle cramps, even though I'm eating tums & B vitamins like they were M&M's, are making it difficult to even walk around the house, let alone go out and shovel the approximately 1" of partly cloudy off the deck. That on the knees bit is also insulting the hell out of a knee I tore up back in September. I've had the obligatory 3 shots of Hyaluronan, at $150/copy, but the torn cartilage, if it heals, will be slow, the age, nearly 80, and the diabetes are both working against it.

      So the TSA is no longer a worry for me, I simply won't fly commercially again. But because of the TSA, the airline industry 12 years after 9/11/01 is probably half the size that it would be without their arrogance and screw you attitude they inflict on the passengers today. All these mergers are, pure and simple, the effect of the TSA bankrupting the industry, its dying gasp that I hope never gets to the final one. The bottom line is that all these 3 letter agencies are such a huge brain on the economy that they are THE major contributor to the USA's decline into a 3rd world country.

      To relate the diffs of 50 some years a bit, I h

    186. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's another similarity to the Deutsch Institutions: They'll all be gone when the money runs out and the country's government goes bellyup. Then all we'll have to do is feed ourselves!!! Better start stocking up on food people.

    187. Re:Eventually people will look up... by tibit · · Score: 1

      And damn I hate dealing with people whose measured IQ is less than the eyelet count in their shoes.

      I think it takes some social skill to have such people do your bidding. It can be done, even if they are in positions of authority. Scorn is counterproductive for you at that point.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    188. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      It does, and I can generally do it, until I run into somebody following a menu with zero common sense content AND an ego trip just because he/she is in a position of unlimited power to make my life miserable.

      It generally doesn't take me long to deduce that, at which point its best to just STFU. But never smile unless its your own joke because you can't let the idiot know he has won this round. Don't encourage them.

      What he/she fails to grok is that there are other, less freedom removing ways to get from point a to point b, and that I might just enjoy the trip since I may stop and smell the roses at my convenience. That's a bit inconvenient at 37k feet ASL.

      I've driven over halfway across this country several times in my old GMC pickup for exactly the reason that a 4 or 9 hour detour trip to check on some of my old friends in old stomping grounds I have lived in, and which I still have kids, grandkids, and great-grandkids living in, was entirely at my discretion. I even detoured some on my way home from saying goodby to my oldest daughter (only one left, the younger of the two had succumbed a decade back to cancer) who was dying of cancer, at the house daddy built in '46, and which I wired at around my 13th birthday, to intro myself to the people living in it now, mooched a PBR since that was what they were having, and to find that my wiring job had only been updated from the 4 screw fuses I had put in the attic 65+ years back, to a 100 amp service about 2 years back, located in a small front porch someone had added years before. Then I got back on a local road (I was born there in Iowa) and drove another 150 miles, mostly in the direction I was going, and stopped to see my first wife's next in line. Now widowed for nearly 20 years, and living with one of her children in the same house she's been in since she married a fellow at 16 yo in the '50's. And still built pretty much like her older sister, nice set of 40FFFF headlights yet at 70+ yo. If I was free, and she wasn't so jaded about her situation I'd have made the offer to take her home. But it was plain she did have a guy, so I left it at that. We did had a nice visit, caught up some on the family gossip, and I got back in the GMC and motored on back to WV.

      The fact that there will never be another engagement round with that industry, costing the industry an almost infinitesimal small figure just for me (but repeat for everyone else so impressed by it they follow suit), is totally lost on such a low functioning person.

      Benjamin Franklin was right. He that gives up a little freedom for security, will have neither. And the cost to run all these 3 letter agencies and a military machine that is a total failure at winning wars, is the 2nd biggest item in the budget. SS is the biggest, supposed to have trillions in its balance, but don't open the vault to count it, all you'll find is IOU's from the treasury.

      My daughters impending death leads to a ghost story about 2 days later, but I've already bored folks enough for one day, I need to go see about a script refill and a grocery list.

      Cheers anyway, Gene

    189. Re:Eventually people will look up... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Nice story. I'm so sorry to hear about your daughters. I do agree that bad bureaucrats are just bad, but it's upon us to manipulate them for our ends as much as we can.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    190. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      And if that is not enough to salvage this Republic?

    191. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they weren't stupid, they wouldn't be de-nogginizing their neighbors.

    192. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, it's a slippery slope! Watchout, else the TSA might start constructing the death camps. I'll try not to let the door hit me in the kiester on my way outta this thread.

    193. Re:Eventually people will look up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is everyone worried about rendition. The U.S. profitable prison system has been snatching people away long before rendition was ever a thought on Cheny's mind. In the US justice system, you have a 98 percent chance of being convicted. Everyone has a fair trial, where 'facts' distorted, ignored or alternativly made up, untill a jury is convinced that it really is a good idea to spend 200+ USD a day to keep you in jail for 5 years for stealing a twinkie. Yea, Gitanamo, whats the big deal. I would rather be in gitmo that rikers. At least with the omniscient NSA, you might be mistaken for a terrorsist and sent to a whole to die in an impersonal way. With the justice system, it is personal. The DA's job is to get convictions regardless of guilt. The prison stock holders demand more prisoners to fill the cells. A prison isn't full untill it is overfull I always say.

  8. Same as lost luggage... by moosehooey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He shouldn't have had them in his checked baggage, since it's well known that checked bags often get lost. If something's that important, it should be in your carry-on.

    1. Re:Same as lost luggage... by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      And how is this relevent to the discussion? So instead of having a pretty note in the suitcase he gets to battle the border in person? And that is an improvement how?

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, he should have declared them to be "guns", and carry them on in a locked case.

    3. Re:Same as lost luggage... by bloodhawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least if he is battling at the border to keep them and they really are critical to his life/career he can decide to not enter the country and keep them rather than have something so precious destroyed by forest gump with a badge.

    4. Re:Same as lost luggage... by circusboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      the unfortunate thing (that I have learned to my regret) is that certain things are not allowed in carry-ons and will be confiscated anyway. and you *have* to check them. any useful tools for example. I've nearly had pliers and screwdrivers confiscated, (and that was before 9/11.)

      one entertaining example (from 2004) was the day I traveled with a devil stick, (juggling toy,) that looks a bit like a disassembled pool cue. at the checkpoint they asked me if it was a pool cue, I said no and they said okay, but if it were a pool cue they would have had to confiscate it.

      now mind you it looked just like a pool cue, weighed about the same as a pool cue, made out of similar wood to a pool cue, but because it wasn't actually a pool cue, they didn't have to confiscate it. if it had been in checked baggage, it wouldn't have been an issue. but it probably would have broken.

      due to traveling with some odd juggling toys on a semi regular basis, I have taken to writing long, detailed notes to the TSA, explaining what all my props are and leaving it in the suitcase with the props. I have never failed to get a 'your bag has been searched note' and I haven't lost anything, (yet.) incredible pain in the ass.

      on the other hand, I was once driving back into the US from Canada, where I had bought a flute to play. (normal metal type of flute.) and I nearly got penalized and the flute confiscated for not declaring the flute as a 'commercial object'. oddly, they said nothing about the 10 packs of peanuts that it was sitting on when they found it searching my car. I'm beginning to think Customs just has a thing for flutes...

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    5. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Anything valuable goes as a carry on. The guy is an idiot.

      I see. And I suppose every band member that flies should haul on their precious collectible guitars and drum kits...and stuff them where exactly? Under the fucking seat? You think that idiot doing his best to shove his "carry-on" in the above-seat storage is going to mind your guitar neck and not snap it in two as he's doing his best WWE elbow-drop impression to close the fucking latch?

      Clearly you haven't flown lately, and dealt with the 15 cubic inches of space you are allotted in our flying cattle cars these days, or the idiots that abuse the shit out of them to avoid paying $25.

    6. Re:Same as lost luggage... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Clearly you're ignorant. They buy a seat for their valuable instrument. It's the policy of every airline that wants to exist 5 years from now.

    7. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This bag did not get lost. It was purposefully opened and some of these contents destroyed with no legitimate reason. It's quite different.

    8. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One tactic I've heard of in the US is to buy a part to a gun (something small and convenient like a grip or a trigger or something). Then get a nice big lockable gun case and place it and everything else you care about inside. Declare your "gun" at the counter (gun parts are treated the same as assembled weapons). They will direct you to someplace to have your luggage screened in your presence, and then you lock it up and keep the key (which doesn't have to be TSA-approved). The case will generally not be opened outside of your presence.

      You'll still need to pay any fees you'd pay for other checked bags (by weight/size/number/etc), but you'll avoid having your stuff go missing on you. While the TSA doesn't mind your valuables disappearing they don't like the idea of having guns used in crimes traced to them, so gun cases are exempt from the "we can cut/open any lock" policy. The airline probably feels the same way and will probably give the case extra care - even if just to make sure it is secured/etc.

      The reason you use a gun part and not a gun is that while parts get the special treatment from the TSA, they're usually exempt from local gun control laws (though obviously you need to check).

      None of this will do you any good for international travel though, which is what the original article pertained to. I'm sure there is lots of paperwork around importing/exporting weapon parts from the US, and that is probably nothing compared to what most other countries would impose.

    9. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm beginning to think Customs just has a thing for flutes...

      I think they call that penis envy. Or maybe they're just use to blow each others "flutes" and want something to practice on?

    10. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm beginning to think Customs just has a thing for flutes...

      This one time, at band camp...

    11. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One tactic I've heard of in the US is to buy a part to a gun (something small and convenient like a grip or a trigger or something).

      I've heard to buy a starter's pistol, but same principle.

    12. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....it should be in your carry-on.

      Yeah, so some a__hole with bags that he should have checked can smash the flutes as he tries to jam his oversized bag in the overhead compartment. Great idea.

    13. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, customs just has a thing for phallic looking objects.

    14. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Kunedog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One tactic I've heard of in the US is to buy a part to a gun (something small and convenient like a grip or a trigger or something). Then get a nice big lockable gun case and place it and everything else you care about inside.

      Here is a video explaining this:
      http://deviating.net/firearms/packing/

      and a video presentation of the same:
      http://vimeo.com/3923535

    15. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Kunedog · · Score: 1

      of course the first link should have said "webpage explaining this"

    16. Re:Same as lost luggage... by blindseer · · Score: 2

      The problem with that is that the TSA and airlines are not permitted to mark on the outside of luggage that it contains a firearm. The people that inspect the luggage do not know if a firearm is inside until they open it. So, keeping a firearm inside the luggage does protect you from one level of unsupervised inspection there is still the risk of another level of inspectors cutting open the case anyway.

      There is also an issue that a lot of airline and TSA personnel that don't know the rules. They will commit federal felonies by putting markings on luggage noting a firearm is inside, or opening the case when the owner is not present, or any of a number of violations of the law. That is because the law is so expansive that so few bother to learn it all.

      The only solution to this is to treat all bags as if they contain a firearm. There should be no locks that a TSA agent can open with a key. There should be no opening of luggage outside of the presence of the owner (barring emergency situations, such as it's on fire). The presence of a non-TSA lock is one indication that the case may contain a firearm. Since the law states that no marking should indicate the presence of a firearm the law itself is contradictory.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    17. Re:Same as lost luggage... by meerling · · Score: 1

      With 13 flute like instruments that I'm sure were properly padded and protected, there's no way in hell it qualify for carry-on.

    18. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Builder · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about the planes you fly on, but many of the airlines I use (and have to due to lack of alternatives) have quite strict carry-on limits.

      Virgin for example has a 6KG weighed limit - that's not a lot once you properly pad / protect things. And there are size limits too.

    19. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Now mind you it looked just like a pool cue, weighed about the same as a pool cue, made out of similar wood to a pool cue, but because it wasn't actually a pool cue, they didn't have to confiscate it.

      They have this idea that it's dangerous to apply their brains, and that everyone is more safe if rules are substituted for thinking.

      Although, as inconsistent and bizarre the regulations are, applying your brains to them at any length of time might constitute a workplace hazard.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    20. Re:Same as lost luggage... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The reason you use a gun part and not a gun is that while parts get the special treatment from the TSA, they're usually exempt from local gun control laws (though obviously you need to check).

      The only parts of the firearm which are controlled are the receiver and sometimes the barrel. You can have gun parts sent to any state unlabeled unless they have a serial number on them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Same as lost luggage... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      A similar sort of experience I have had: the signs all say "laptops must be removed from carry ons and placed in the tray" so I leave my kindle, and tablet in the bag. They aren't laptops. Of course I get hassled when it comes time for the scan, my bag is full of large electronics. I guess no one explained to the rule and sign makers that a laptop wasn't the only kind of large electronic device.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    22. Re:Same as lost luggage... by drewm1980 · · Score: 2

      I have family in the Chicago Symphony Orchestra. It's not cheap, but buying a seat (not to mention insurance) for your valuable instrument has been standard practice for decades. You have to be pretty bad at traveling to not know that anything you don't keep on your person will quite likely be thrown around, smashed, re-packed badly, lost or straight-up stolen.

    23. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "pack a starter pistol" tip has been around for awhile. Packing gun parts seems like a better idea, but won't you need either a local gun owner or federal firearms dealer license?

    24. Re:Same as lost luggage... by trawg · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea. I wonder if you could just /say/ you had gun parts to get this check, but not actually carry any so you don't have to deal with the local gun control laws at all no matter where you're flying. (Just take a weird piece of metal pipe or something and say its gun-related.)

    25. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I would prefer Forest Gump with a badge as I doubt he would be a dick like these guys.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    26. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm beginning to think Customs just has a thing for flutes
       
      Skin flutes in particular

    27. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because the law is so expansive that so few bother to learn it all.

      No, the law is so expansive nobody can learn it all

    28. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fly all over the world, but hardly ever on prop planes.

      Never heard of a carry-on weight limit. Never. OTOH, I just bring a netbook, smartphone, and hygine items onboard most of the time.

      The lowest weight I've seen allowed for checked luggage was 20Kg and for international flights my status/credit card doubles that weight (2 free peices). Flew a regional carrier (Scoot - SIN-BKK) last month and it had the same 20Kg limit. Fortunately, the Scoot-Biz ticket was US$130 total, so next to nothing for extra seat, overhead and weight limits. That part of the 777 cabin was 80% empty. I still can't get the taste of the "chocolate egg" looking thing out of my mouth. It was some sort of soy-nasty thing.

      I'm almost always around 30 lbs for a checked bag going for 14-30 days. 20lbs for a 21" carryon.

      For specialty items like guitars, violas, etc., airlines have a different fee structure to ensure those travel safely **inside** the cabin.

    29. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how is this relevent to the discussion? So instead of having a pretty note in the suitcase he gets to battle the border in person? And that is an improvement how?

      Either way he should have Declared them as musical instruments, instead of just tossing them into his checked luggage. You should always do this if you're going to travel with any item which has any sort of value, whether personal or otherwise. Anything not specifically Declared is considered to be "general personal belongings" just like your clothes and the assorted trinkets you bought from the tourist traps.

    30. Re:Same as lost luggage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking items as firearms in luggage does not make them impervious to theft, simply do an internet search on guns stolen form checked luggage, and you will see that it happens all the time to firearms that are properly declared.

      http://www.king5.com/news/get-jesse/Guns-stolen-from-checked-luggage-223226471.html

    31. Re:Same as lost luggage... by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to the "security checked" tape that they used to wrap around the suitcase to show that it wasn't opened in transit? Couldn't they inspect the case & seal it with the tape on the spot so that you'd be reasonably confident that the contents weren't tampered with in between?

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  9. Just one more way... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that going through US customs could ruin your life. DON'T DO IT.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Just one more way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...going through US. DON'T DO IT.

      ftfy

    2. Re:Just one more way... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Just one more way... ...that going through US customs could ruin your life. DON'T DO IT.

      The US has about 62 million visitors per year. I would expect that you could find the occasional horror story given the sample size and the vagaries of human behavior, especially when faced with a highly regulated activity such as crossing international borders.

      Are you suggesting there are none to be found in Europe in general, or your country? No occasional injustice or difficulty? Care to test that?

      Foreign visitors to U.S. hit record in 2011

      The number of foreign tourists hit a record 62 million last year, up 4 percent from 2010, the department said in a statement.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Just one more way... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US is one of few countries that allows border guards to search and seize your electronic devices on a whim, and where extraordinary rendition and torture are legal. It has an extremely minimal set of rights for people passing through borders. It's not just a decent country like any other where terrible mistakes sometimes happen against the rules of the system. According to its laws, in terms of entering and exiting the country it is an unusually bad shithole.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Just one more way... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      But I don't want to spend the rest of my life in a foreign land.

    5. Re:Just one more way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try taking Californian grown oranges back into CA and see what happens when you get stopped at the CA Border Controls...

      The US Legal Morass is just that.
      The jerks in DC just make things worse. The US is not governed by 'The People' but by special interest groups.
      Just take the suit brought against Obama care because it offered contraception. I heard the word 'insane' applied to it earlier today.
      Remember, just walking outside your front door is probably a criminal offence in some places.
       

    6. Re:Just one more way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judge rules search of electronics at border legal without probable cause.
      http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/01/01/139237/us-federal-judge-rules-suspicionless-border-searches-of-laptops-constitutional

    7. Re:Just one more way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. The way to avoud 60% of all things damn stupid is to avoid anything to do with the states. Just ignore them, maybe they will go away.

    8. Re:Just one more way... by houghi · · Score: 1

      If I fly to Canada and the plane does a detour (e.g. because of bad weather) from Europe, I do not have a choice. I would like to go to Canada, but I am afraid that I might end up in a country I do not want to be.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:Just one more way... by FragHARD · · Score: 0

      ...that going through US customs could ruin your life. DON'T DO IT.



      Exactly!!! why do think so many illegal....I mean undocumented workers avoid customs?
      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    10. Re:Just one more way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is one of few countries that allows border guards to search and seize your electronic devices on a whim

      You haven't traveled much, every sovereign nation is entitled to search incoming goods for contraband and ensure that applicable customs duties are paid.

      All sorts of agricultural pests and invasive species arrive with travelers or by shipping container.

    11. Re:Just one more way... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Only a few other hellholes will search the data on your electronics though.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  10. Inexcusable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When are people going to finally get fed up with these TSA assholes and DEMAND that Congress do something about them, like removing their Federal protection from being sued for their abuses.

    1. Re:Inexcusable by oscrivellodds · · Score: 1

      Um, I think this was Customs, not the TSA...

    2. Re:Inexcusable by jythie · · Score: 1

      Enough of the population is still scared enough of terrorists or secure enough in their "stuff like this doesn:t happen to middle class WASPs" bubble that the TSA does not worry them.

    3. Re:Inexcusable by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      This wasn't the TSA - it was US Customs.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Inexcusable by ApplePy · · Score: 1

      Ah, sir, the man who sexually assaulted you with the nightstick was not a policeman; he was a sheriff's deputy.

      I mean, I'm glad you're right, and that you're detail-oriented and all....

      --
      That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
    5. Re:Inexcusable by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Still part of the badly run Ubermonolith of Fatherland Security. It just has a different Horse Judge in charge of each of TSA, Customs, FEMA, etc.

    6. Re:Inexcusable by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Unemployment would shoot up 5% and believe me, these people can't get a job anywhere else.

    7. Re:Inexcusable by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I get the whole "US turning into a police state" meme. I agree with most of the points. But this is not an example of that - Customs has been a pain in the ass forever. Also, what happened here was done after any semblance of security. Customs inspects things AFTER they have been transported.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  11. Re:All the news that matters by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    and some that doesn't

    You mean the sheer stupidity of the civil servants doesn't matter ??

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  12. Visitors not welcome by OFnow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many musical instruments are made of wood. So I guess they are all at risk if the owners come to the US.

    1. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moral of the story, do not take viagra just before coming to the US.

    2. Re:Visitors not welcome by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And similar things have happened in other cases:
      Gibson Guitar got raided over wood, among others.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Visitors not welcome by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many musical instruments are made of wood. So I guess they are all at risk if the owners come to the US.

      Not to mention silk, cotton, and wool. Everybody get naked! All of a sudden I feel like going to the airport could be fun again. :)

    4. Re:Visitors not welcome by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story, do not take viagra just before coming to the US.

      Trust me... One "pat down" from the TSA and that wood is destroyed.

    5. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember polyester is a petroleum product that produces poisonous gas when it burns so that needs to be confiscated as well.

    6. Re:Visitors not welcome by jd2112 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many musical instruments are made of wood. So I guess they are all at risk if the owners come to the US.

      One of these days a customs agent is going to destroy a Stradivarius or other similarly rare instrument. Anyone who has a Stradivarius most likely is famous and/or wealthy, meaning they have (or know people who have) sufficient political connections to make said customs agent's life a living hell long after they leave government employment.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    7. Re:Visitors not welcome by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Visitors not welcome ... Many musical instruments are made of wood.
      So I guess they are all at risk if the owners come to the US.

      Well, that certainly seems more likely than the possibility that a customs inspector overreached, doesn't it? After all, no bands or orchestras ever come to the US from overseas, do they?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stradivarius are known because they are expensive. The truth is that it's nothing more than a status symbol since the Stradivarius really aren't that great.

    9. Re:Visitors not welcome by phantomfive · · Score: 3

      Interestingly, famous cello players have problems too. They typically carry their instrument with them (who would dare check in a Stradivarius), and usually buy an extra seat on the plane for the cello.

      But now some airlines are not allowing that, and even if you buckle up your cello, they won't let it fly with you. It's a tough problem for cello players.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that.

      I would hire a quality instrument from another performer or collector within the US. When you can't be safe with your possesions, the only option is to not have posessions.

    11. Re:Visitors not welcome by Alioth · · Score: 1

      They destroyed a Polish concert pianist's $200,000 custom built Steinway piano because they thought "the glue smelled funny".

    12. Re:Visitors not welcome by Tom · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh... no.

      When you think of "naked women", you think photoshopped models. Go to the airport and look around, and this time try hard to not overlook all the women of no interest to you (age, with children, etc.) and also all the fat, bald men.

      Now you have a much better mental image of what "everybody get naked" really means. If you're not puking yet, that is.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    13. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you actually saying that you would sooner blame the customs agent (the pawn) than the architects of the police state?

    14. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      unless you are into that sort of thing

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    15. Re:Visitors not welcome by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      When everyone is naked, the wall of flesh quickly fades into the background and you don't even notice such things rapidly. But you'll still notice a beautiful woman.

      Unless, of course, you're just an asshole. Then you may spend all your time giving people dirty looks for not looking the way you want them to.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Visitors not welcome by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would hire a quality instrument from another performer or collector within the US. When you can't be safe with your possesions, the only option is to not have posessions.

      Spoken like someone who has never played an expensive instrument. Neither have I, but I know an internationally famous cello player, and I have some idea of the issues involved. You can't just switch to any old instrument and expect your performance to shine. Even many of the supposedly fine instruments are actually crap. And if your playing style is vigorous, as is the style of the individual I am thinking of, if someone loans you some well-aged example of the instrument you might well destroy it by playing it too hard. Or, you'll have to cramp your style for fear of oblitering an instrument which costs as much as does an automobile.

      The correct answer is do not visit the United States of America, or other countries which are abusive to musicians, and make a strong public statement explaining why. This may affect income, but then, so will having your livelihood destroyed. Meanwhile, visiting the US when we are doing things like this is simply lending your support to our actions. It's an irresponsible thing to do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Visitors not welcome by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      And if you really want to experience what everybody naked looks like, just go to a nudist colony for a day or two. I guarantee you you will either:
      1. Stop caring whether people are wearing clothes, or
      2. Really wish people would put their clothes back on.

      That's because the people you'd probably like to look at naked are a significant minority of the population: They're the sex you're attracted to, relatively healthy body weight, and in the young adult age range. In fact, for most people 50% are of the sex you're not attracted to, about 55% are overweight or obese, and about 70% are older than 40 or younger than 18, which if you do some quick math means that about 93% of people you encounter you'd really rather not see naked.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    18. Re:Visitors not welcome by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      When you think of "naked women", you think photoshopped models. Go to the airport and look around, and this time try hard to not overlook all the women of no interest to you (age, with children, etc.) and also all the fat, bald men.

      Oh, come on, now. Unattractive (to you) naked people can't hurt you, and you're not being very nice villifying them. Just because you don't want to have sex with someone doesn't mean their body is offensive. Like sacrilegious comedy; if you don't like it, don't look.

    19. Re:Visitors not welcome by OFnow · · Score: 1

      "cramp your style for fear of oblitering an instrument which costs as much as does an automobile." Some individual instruments in the violin family are worth $millions.

    20. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your link,

      Delta said Mr. Harrell's account was discovered in an internal audit, and the company wiped out his personal account after determining he had been warned in 2001 but was still violating rules. Audits continue, but the spokesman declined to say how many other accounts have been terminated.

      Cellists say earning miles on their extra seats is important to defray high travel costs when orchestras around the world are struggling financially. Buying two tickets for a prominent soloistâ"especially if the tickets are $7,000 business-class international seats

      Which means the guy is talking shit.

      1. he was apparently warned about this
      2. he tried to circumvent their rules by using "account for cello"
      3. he "doesn't have money for tickets", but "business class international seats"...
      4. he pays "full price" - why? he says he doesn't have money, so buy two cheaper seats!

      Anyway, nowhere does it say he has problems with customs, meaning your post is offtopic.

      But now some airlines are not allowing that, and even if you buckle up your cello, they won't let it fly with you. It's a tough problem for cello players.

      [CITATION NEEDED] That was NOT part of your linked story! Read the link you post!

    21. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many musical instruments are made of wood. So I guess they are all at risk if the owners come to the US.

      Not to mention silk, cotton, and wool. Everybody get naked! All of a sudden I feel like going to the airport could be fun again. :)

      Or terrifying ....

    22. Re:Visitors not welcome by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "cramp your style for fear of oblitering an instrument which costs as much as does an automobile." Some individual instruments in the violin family are worth $millions.

      Right, I'm talking about the low end. Thing is, most of those older instruments are pretty fragile, and you wouldn't loan them out to begin with.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Visitors not welcome by Meeni · · Score: 1

      There's a machine for that.

    24. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Once I received a pat down and my wood exploded.

    25. Re:Visitors not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a vintage guitar without the 'proper papers' ? it may be confiscated in Customs. Give Gibson Guitars a call and ask them about wood and our govt. and how that is working out for them.

    26. Re:Visitors not welcome by NulDevice · · Score: 1

      Maybe he drives a Bugatti Veyron?

      My former violin teacher own a Guarneri- not even one of the famous ones,one by the famous Guarneri's son - and it was STILL worth more than his very expensive house.

      Beautiful sounding instrument, though.

      --

      ----
      "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."

  13. Re:All the news that matters by SuperNovaLovah · · Score: 1

    You mean the sheer stupidity of the United States Federal Government.

  14. If I ever come to the USA ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    ... I will make sure to come naked.
    I assume, however, this will be the worst thing you can do ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:If I ever come to the USA ... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Well, don't fly because the airlines treat you like cattle and you don't want to be mistaken for an agricultural item yourself.

    2. Re:If I ever come to the USA ... by circusboy · · Score: 1

      probably. people get so offended by nudity here... violence is easily accepted, but nakedness? simply a reason for violence...

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  15. So glad I'm not there by flightmaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Each and every day that I read /. I become even more relieved than the day before that fate smiled on me by not making me a citizen of the USA, and not giving me any compelling reason to visit.

    1. Re:So glad I'm not there by pauldl63 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Each and every day that I read /. I become even more relieved than the day before that fate smiled on me by not making me a citizen of the USA, and not giving me any compelling reason to visit.

      My sentiments exactly.

      --
      I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
    2. Re:So glad I'm not there by flightmaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you a typical USA resident? It would explain a lot.

    3. Re:So glad I'm not there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a football fanboy element to all the foreigners posting on this site bashing the USA whenever there's a story critical of our government. Of course, nobody ever bothers posting what country they are from, because it is pretty obvious that any country larger than Federated States of Micronesia gets more than enough bad press to support the same type of tit-for-tat.

      What I'm saying is, OK, don't come here then. We'll get along fine without your help.

    4. Re:So glad I'm not there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The foreigners don't seem too keen on posting stories about their dirty laundry either. If they did, it would take the edge off of their hypocritical smugness.

    5. Re:So glad I'm not there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is ZERO reason to visit the USA. It's FUCKED, plain and simple.
      You may be some second world EuroTrash or third world shitstain, but you have it far better than having to deal with the crap in the USA.

    6. Re:So glad I'm not there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each and every day that I read /. I become even more relieved than the day before that fate smiled on me by not making me a citizen of the USA, and not giving me any compelling reason to visit.

      Name a country you'd rather live in that doesn't have a bureaucratic customs process please, because I'm 99.99% certain we'll find stupid customs stories in your back yard too, friend, and yes, ports & harbors count.

      If this story is enough to dissuade you from visiting another country, do yourself a favor and don't travel by air _ever_ because the first time a flight gets delayed or you lose a bag you're probably going to explode and start calling everyone Nazis.

    7. Re:So glad I'm not there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all depends on your viewpoint. Bad things can happen anywhere in the world. As a result of the influence held by the US, the negatives are more highly publicized. One person who has some foul luck befall them can get on the internet and cause a sensation, while scores of others have no issue whatsoever.

    8. Re:So glad I'm not there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA has nukes and has a "defense" budget that's in the same magnitude as the rest of the world combined.

      My crappy 3rd world country (Malaysia) doesn't and is tiny. My country going to shit would just make everyone else (except maybe its immediate neighbours) laugh.

      The rest of us would prefer the USA to not become as crappy as my 3rd world country. So don't be surprised if many of us are critical when your country starts behaving like a crappy 3rd world country (with nukes).

      Lastly, you are NOT getting along fine. If you think you are, you are part of the problem.

    9. Re:So glad I'm not there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I come live with you?

    10. Re:So glad I'm not there by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Seriously? After your flamebait about being thankful you're not a U.S. citizen, you're criticizing someone for saying, "good, we're glad you're not here either"?

      Hey pot, let me introduce you to a friend of mine...

    11. Re:So glad I'm not there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're criticizing someone for saying, "good, we're glad you're not here either"?

      ...and calling him a "layabout whiner".

      Pardon me for not understanding American culture. Is calling someone a whiner a compliment in America? In other places that tends to lead to negative responses such as the GP's...

  16. You can keep your flute by approachingZero+ · · Score: 0

    If you like your flute.

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  17. Wood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Once I walked through an airport terminal with wood. I was on my way to Bangkok.

    1. Re:Wood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, one night in Bangkok makes a hard man humble.

    2. Re: Wood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can find a god in every golden oyster--

      and if you're lucky, then the god's a SHE.

    3. Re: Wood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Golden *cloister*, not oyster.

  18. Re:All the news that matters by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

    US no longer stands for "Uncle Sam." Now it's "Uncle Stupid." Leather luggage comes from cowhide, isn't that an agricultural item? Fucking morons in charge.

  19. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wow! That is breaking news right there. Why have you not submitted that article about how customs is the whole government now?

  20. Haven't been to the states since before sept 11th by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and I never once have regretted that decision. Wouldn't go to dubai either for similar reasons. Toxic culture. I do feel sorry to anyone living there and do hope you are armed.

    --
    -
  21. First the NSA. Now this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming 3.. 2.. 1..

  22. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You're hissy fits are getting annoying.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  23. Re:Obamaism IS Horrible by Killian35 · · Score: 1

    wat?

  24. Re:All the news that matters by taxman_10m · · Score: 0

    I also don't see why this is on Slashdot. Customs official opens a bag and doesn't notice that these reed looking things are flutes, promptly destroys the reeds. Guy should have kept these with him if he valued them so much. Shit happens. Not sure why this particular shit happening made it on Slashdot.

  25. Kinda sucks. by oscrivellodds · · Score: 1

    But what can you do? I know it's bad for the guy who plays the things, but I wouldn't want to shut down customs over it.

    1. Re:Kinda sucks. by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What can you do? Require that the owner is informed of a possible problem before any action is taken, and also require them to be present to witness and acknowledge in writing the destruction of any items. The first condition would vastly reduce mistakes, the second takes care of theft disguised as seizure. I know checked baggage doesn't always take the same route as the passenger, but if something is found in an en route search that doesn't pose an immediate threat to the aircraft the luggage item could be tagged (say, a big red sticker) and the matter dealt with at the final destination.

      The problem isn't that customs inspection is pointless, I think it actually does serve a valid purpose, so shutting them down is the wrong solution. The problem is giving civil servants the power to summarily destroy property more or less at whim and without consultation; that's a bug which can be fixed without nuking the entire system.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Kinda sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either the inspector who burned the flutes broke the rules, or every previous inspector who didn't burn the flutes broke the rules. Both can't be right. So shouldn't the agency be concerned? Shouldn't they do more than fob off the guy with "Write a letter to a different agency"?

      If there is no possible response to a clear failure like this, short of being shut down entirely, then that should serve as a warning that they should be shut down entirely and a new customs system created.

    3. Re:Kinda sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "Unaccountable Security Apparatus" don't you understand?

    4. Re:Kinda sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Good solution.

      That was easy.

  26. United States Destroys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing more needs to be said.

  27. agriculture item???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they start destroying cotton based clothing? Leather soled shoes?

    Frog in boiling water is where we are at.

    The TSA are just so comically stupid and useless.

    If your worthless and you know it, join the TSA.

  28. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Progman3K · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If somebody with any say at Slashdot is reading this, please do the right thing and get the focus back to where it used to be, on science and technology. There are many, many other places we can go to read and bitch about the day-in, day-out shenanigans of American politics. Slashdot shouldn't be one of them.

    You... I like you

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  29. Has he checked Ebay? by ebonum · · Score: 3, Informative

    TSA agents have been know to do unscrupulous things.

    1. Re:Has he checked Ebay? by jythie · · Score: 2

      That is actually a rather disturbing but realistic possibility. It does not help that the TSA has "cover your ass" at its core, so even if the people responding were not involved in theft, they are still likely to play along with the "destroyed" story.

    2. Re:Has he checked Ebay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a dope. You apparently don't know that the TSA and Customs are two separate entities? No, you wouldn't. But around here the hivemind will celebrate your stupidity with an up-mod. Pro tip: you would have been at +5 by now if you had put something anti-NSA or pro-Snowden in it, but you probably know that already.

    3. Re:Has he checked Ebay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is dead, it has the worst moderation of any forum on the Internet outside of China.

      In fact, the function and thinking capacity of the mods here is very similar to those employed by China, and their numbers are probably similar as well.

      Stick a fork in it, Taco! Your creation has become THIS - take a good look.

    4. Re:Has he checked Ebay? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you've seen it mentioned elsewhere, but just in case: TSA != US Customs.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  30. Re:All the news that matters by Patent+Lover · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wooden pencils as well. As a side note I was once sent to Ag inspection for mentioning I had some sea salt. Customs people aren't the brightest bulbs on the tree.

  31. Very weird story by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He should definitely be compensated.

    1. Re:Very weird story by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Razgui says he had made all of the instruments using hard-to-find reeds.

      How does one compensate for a dozen of instruments that were hand-made by the player from rare materials? You can't go to the nearest store and rebuy the lost instruments. How long will it even take to make them again? Can the player even do it?

      Worse still, will the Customs destroy a Stradivari violin just because old Antonio neglected to attach a US-approved sticker that lists all used woods and where they were finished?

    2. Re:Very weird story by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I doubt that customs ever does that.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, had to respond with this:

      http://boingboing.net/2009/04/28/us-custom-officials.html

    4. Re:Very weird story by jd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rare materials. Well, rare reeds can be harder to find than gold, so let's put a $1000 raw materials price per ounce of reed used.

      Time. Hand craftsmen are incredibly rare. Those skills are expensive. IT can charge $120/hr for skills twice as common. Using that as a guideline, let's say $240/hr for the skills.

      If we assume it takes one year to make a flute, then the combined cost is roughly half a million per flute, so $6.5 million so far. I will assume QA would mean some flutes have to be made again from scratch. Let's assume a 50% rejection rate at the virtuoso level, which doesn't seem unreasonable given you're making the best of the best with uncontrolled materials. This raises the price to $9.75 million.

      But provinence matters. These instruments had established history, the main reason a Strad is worth ten times anything with identical acoustics. We don't have enough history to bump the price up that much, but doubling sounds fair. This gives us $19.5 million.

      I would start by taking the money out of the TSA official's paycheque and bank account, with the remainder seized from TSA funds. If the funds are insufficient, continue to the next department up.

      I would further require the TSA to publish a public apology as a full-page announcement in every newspaper, artisan journal and music journal. Finally, I would require all TSA officials involved in any way with the harassment to serve 250 hours community service.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Very weird story by tippe · · Score: 1

      Finally, I would require all TSA officials involved in any way with the harassment to serve 250 hours community service.

      What a great idea. In my dictatorship, as punishment, I'd make each of them spend 250 hours -- nay, 750 hours -- hand-carving identical flutes to the ones they destroyed (off the clock and unpaid, of course). By my count, that's about 6 months of solid work, if they put in 4 hours every single day (probably still a fraction of the time Razgui put into making his own instruments). After they were done, their work (regardless of quality) would be thoroughly destroyed right in front of them. It would be both a punishment and a lesson in appreciating other peoples' passions and work, all rolled into one.

    6. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes about 15-30 hours of work to make a flute. http://www.baroqueflute.com/faq.html

      So, $1000 + 7200 = $8200. But, actually, I think the labor estimate is kind of high. These guys make flutes for like half of that price: http://www.baroqueflute.com/models/Palanca.html

      I imagine they could make a flute using custom material for similar labor prices.

    7. Re:Very weird story by modecx · · Score: 1

      How does one compensate for a dozen of instruments that were hand-made by the player from rare materials?

      For each of the people responsible and their immediate superiors: Eight hours per week of volunteer work at the local elementary schools for the next twenty years, consisting of listening to the 3rd grade music class practice Mary Had a Little Lamb on their flutes, while hand-carving flutes for the next year's class, with no chance of parole. And they have to like it. If the 3rd graders suspect, in the least, that their performances aren't thoroughly enjoyed...30 lashes in public with the cat-o-nine-tails.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    8. Re:Very weird story by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Most other countries expect compensation for such mistakes. Read "Blowback" by Chalmers Johnson. It describes all the blatant and stupid shit done to local civilians by US soldiers and operations in military bases around the world without compensation. It makes you ashamed to be an American.

    9. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of this is exactly what will happen... Just not to the TSA, to the next person who publicly embarrases them.

    10. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds about right. Stupid goons touching things they should not touch.

    11. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was refused due process. Someone should be impeached.

    12. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could probably arrive at a figure based on the time and expense required to travel back to the place where these rare reeds grow, find them, cure them and make replacement instruments, plus the loss of earnings incurred during all this time. Could add up to a sizeable amount.

    13. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 million * 13 instruments = 260 million.
      I suspect the TSA official's paycheque won't cover it.

    14. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's customs, not the TSA.

    15. Re:Very weird story by wickerprints · · Score: 1

      Fine the relevant agencies 100 billion dollars. It would all be for naught anyway--it comes out of the taxpayer's wallet, and nothing gets changed in terms of policy. That's the problem with government agencies: when there is political support for their mandate, even if they are guilty of egregious overreach in their authority, they can waste unlimited amounts of money without being held accountable.

      Now, if instead the politicians' and employees own personal bank accounts were to be emptied every time the public deems they have done something wrong, THAT would change Washington overnight in a heartbeat. But who is the "public?" How do we hold these power-hungry thieves accountable? By "elections?"

    16. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered how the RIAA came up with their numbers...

    17. Re:Very weird story by EngnrFrmrlyKnownAsAC · · Score: 1

      An acknowledgement of wrongful confiscation and sincere apology would be a start.

      Of course, he won't get either.

      --
      Howdy howdy howdy
    18. Re:Very weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only did they take away his property directly, they deprived him of the opportunity to use/profit/sell that property. They also deprived the community of its sense of security. There are other costs other than the direct cost, and in my opinion, they should count as a multiplier. He not ony did not have the property, he had the experience of someone forcibly destroying his lifes work for the sake of bureaucracy. Like Penrose finding that toilet paper companies were wiping the worlds butts with his great achievement, the Penrose tiling.

      I suggest that there should be a pain and suffering multiplier, a lack of opportunity to do something else multiplier, and a this is an offense to the community of musicians, the community of artisans, and an offense against culture multiplier. I think that you should take that ~$20 Million, and multiply it by at least 3x if not 5x. The punitive damages should start there, in my personal opinion.

    19. Re:Very weird story by Reziac · · Score: 1

      As a little added spice, remember that 'community service' isn't free -- in some locales you have to pay for each hour. It's only about the same as minimum wage, but still, an out-of-pocket penalty for stupidity, in this case wholly justified and then some.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  32. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You're hissy fits are getting annoying.

    And your misuse of the apostrophe is even more annoying.

    If you are going to complain, you'd better make sure your own
    house is in order first, sonny boy.

  33. Tip: Do not use foreign sounding names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always fly with a normal sounding name or face the consequences. Morroco? Never fly Out of Afrika. Never fly into Amerika. Problem averted.

  34. Re:All the news that matters by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    It's not clear that these obviously looked like musical instruments to a person who isn't accustomed to seeing various kinds of flutes. Bundle of reeds with notches in them. Customs probably thought they were bongs.

  35. The way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I reed the story he should have flute to a different city.
    New York has all kinds of problems.

  36. Something is missing from the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "who was not present when his bag was opened"

    This is not how US Customs works - each passenger needs to take their own bag through customs, and if there are problems then the owner of the item is there to discuss it with the customs officer.

    There are situations where this doesn't happen (eg, a delayed/lost bag), but the article doesn't mention that.

    I'm not saying that this didn't happen, but there's clearly more to the story than the article states!!

    1. Re:Something is missing from the story... by circusboy · · Score: 1

      however, the TSA does it's searches when you are not present. they may, at their discretion, summon customs, or any other federal agency they may feel is appropriate. given that the article points out that the seizure occurred on a stopover, this is not too surprising.

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    2. Re:Something is missing from the story... by Malc · · Score: 2

      I think you might be wrong. I've opened my case to find a letter telling me that it had been opened and searched en route.

  37. Destroyed... by Kardos · · Score: 2

    ... or stolen?

    1. Re:Destroyed... by Eskarel · · Score: 0

      They were destroyed in front of him, as is standard operating procedure for customs, no thefts.

    2. Re:Destroyed... by atam · · Score: 2

      Even if you don't want to read the linked article, you should at least take a quick look of the summary quoted in Slashdot:

      'They said this is an agriculture item,' said Razgui, who was not present when his bag was opened. 'I fly with them in and out all the time and this is the first time there has been a problem. This is my life.' When his baggage arrived in Boston, the instruments were gone. He was instead given a number to call.

    3. Re:Destroyed... by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      You must be reading a different article..."who was not present when his bag was opened"..."When his baggage arrived in Boston, the instruments were gone". Pretty clear he was NOT there, and didn't find out until he got into Boston and opened up the bag!

    4. Re:Destroyed... by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

      'They said this is an agriculture item,' said Razgui, who was not present when his bag was opened.

      Am I missing your extremely subtle humor, or would you like to try again?

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    5. Re:Destroyed... by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      There's been about 15 versions of this article, most of which are full of manufactured outrage and no facts. I'd read a previous one stating he was there and others saying he wasn't. Some articles say they knew it was flutes and it was to do with rosewood, some have said he had raw bamboo. The point being that this is just an excuse for a bunch of people to get their knickers in a twist about the big bad government. Those same people would of course be saying the government can't do anything right if an invasive species was brought in.

      The fact that he's gotten through customs without any troubles a hundred times before doesn't make importing what he was importing legal, doesn't mean he had the right paperwork and doesn't make the customs agent in the wrong, but that's not important because we have to get angry about the big bad government.

    6. Re:Destroyed... by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      I'd read an earlier version of this article which said he'd been present. He's an idiot who took materials through customs without the right paperwork and got caught, it sucks for him, but it's just how it is, when you cross an international border you need to know whether what you're carrying with you is going to cause any problems and that goes doubly so for anything you can't replace.

  38. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're hissy fits

    No, I'm rubber. And you're glue!

  39. Re:All the news that matters by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

    No. I sounds like one exceptional moron decided to go on a power trip. This is like that bitch at the American Airlines counter that can decide that you aren't flying today.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  40. Fast food workers with police powers by hessian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's what happens when you hire fast food workers into bureaucratic roles and give them absolute power over other people.

    1. Re:Fast food workers with police powers by NoKaOi · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what happens when you hire fast food workers into bureaucratic roles and give them absolute power over other people.

      That is seriously not fair. You are pretty lumping a whole group of hard working, well-meaning people in with a job position that is at the absolute bottom of society. You really should have more respect for fast food workers.

  41. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How appropriate. You fight like a cow.

  42. Problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... government has absolute power, but the people who work there tend to be power mad crazies like Eric Holder, morons like the drones in US customs or low life fucktards like the NSA.

  43. Why I Stay Away by rueger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I lived and worked in the US for a few years prior to 9/11, and travelled to many parts of the country. I still have a lot of good friends down there, and surely there are a lot of places that I'd love to visit again.

    The problem is that since I moved back to Canada there have been a seemingly endless series of stories like this. Whether it's Mahar Arar being grabbed and shipped to Syria for torture and imprisonment; Jacob Appelbaum being detailed by US customs with no reason and no explanation; innocent people who are having their laptops and phones seized and copied with no warrant or explanation, or who are quite simply harassed at the border on the whim of any customs agent. - it just seems to be happening more and more each year.

    Being innocent (whatever that means to Homeland Security) is no protection. All it takes is one renta-cop with a bad attitude.

    To my American friends: I am honestly terrified by the thought of crossing your border, and I am not alone.

    1. Re:Why I Stay Away by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Canada has problems just like this. In fact it's so bad a lot of e-commerce companies won't do business there.

      http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110321/00490713569/zappos-gives-up-canada-due-to-customs-problems.shtml

    2. Re:Why I Stay Away by hubie · · Score: 1

      It also depends upon where you are seeing these endless stories. If you are mainly seeing these stories for the first time on this site, that might have more to do with a selection bias. Those are the kind of stories that quickly and easily make it on this site these days. I would be hesitant to say that those kind of things are happening more often, rather, those kind of topics are the kind of things that become easily showcased on this site; not so much tech stuff anymore.

    3. Re:Why I Stay Away by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Canada is the one who ratted out Mahar Rar, right? And you are also aware that your government allows the US to route these people through your country?

      http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/02/13/graphic-the-extraordinary-renditions-54-guilty-nations/

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    4. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To my American friends: I am honestly terrified by the thought of crossing your border, and I am not alone.

      The problem is that when many Americans read this they think "Good...if the innocent are frightened to come here, imagine how the terrorists feel."

    5. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron.
      Twit.
      Idiot.

      The e-commerce sites gave up becasue the Canadian Customs would not let there products through and made them pay for return shipping. They did not seize and destroy the products you stupid, stupid twit.

      The lack of thought put into your attempt to connect the two types of incidents means you are deserving of the insults.

    6. Re:Why I Stay Away by rueger · · Score: 1

      Very aware. But it's one thing for our own spooks to wrongly accuse someone; it's something entirely different to pull them off of a plane, ship them to Syria, and torture them for several years in a prison.

      Besides which, it's not a fucking competition.

    7. Re:Why I Stay Away by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      Apparently reading comprehension is lacking in Canada just like in the US. The point is that you don't get to play self righteous when your country (and dozens of others) knowingly play ball in these operations.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    8. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been to Hong Kong, Macau, Japan, Korea, mainland China, Taiwan, and Canada. The only place where I got a lot of questions was when I went to Canada. I am from the United States. Seriously Canada, do you have a lot of people from the US trying to illicitly visit your country or something?

    9. Re:Why I Stay Away by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only place where I got a lot of questions was when I went to Canada...Seriously Canada, do you have a lot of people from the US trying to illicitly visit your country or something?

      Yes, to get away from post-911 fascism.

    10. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that since I moved back to Canada there have been a seemingly endless series of stories like this. Whether it's Mahar Arar being grabbed and shipped to Syria for torture and imprisonment; Jacob Appelbaum being detailed by US customs with no reason and no explanation; innocent people who are having their laptops and phones seized and copied with no warrant or explanation, or who are quite simply harassed at the border on the whim of any customs agent. - it just seems to be happening more and more each year.

      Being innocent (whatever that means to Homeland Security) is no protection. All it takes is one renta-cop with a bad attitude.

      To my American friends: I am honestly terrified by the thought of crossing your border, and I am not alone.

      Maine doesn't know what Syria is, (is that next to Mexico or something?) but smiles and nods while she tends to the long line of your countrymen over to buy lower taxed cigarettes.

    11. Re:Why I Stay Away by jklovanc · · Score: 2

      There are three reasons cited in the story;
      1. limited due to distribution agreements with the brands we sell in the United State
      2. general uncertainty and unpredictability of delivering orders to our Canadian customers
      3. other logistics constraints
      Yet you concentrate on the Canada customs without actually looking into what they mean.

      Zappos also won't ship to any other country in the world. Perhaps the issue is that Zappos does not know how to deal with any customs agency. The uncertainty may be caused by the fact that not all shipments are inspected and many of those that are have screwed up paperwork.

    12. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a big difference between unpredictable delays (which is what zappos appear to have suffered from) and arbitrary seizure of potentially unique and irreplaceable goods.

    13. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anarchduke · · Score: 2

      Unfotunately, that doesn't have a thing to do with Canada's customs. "Product selection on canada.zappos.com is limited due to distribution agreements with the brands we sell in the United States." This sounds more like a problem Zappos needs to solve for themselves and not try to blame on Canada.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    14. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except Canada apologized and took responsibility. The US still denies wrongdoing and dismissed all of his court cases on grounds of "National Security".

    15. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is your link anything like the original article?

      The original article is about a musical instrument being destroyed without any sort of oversight at an airport.

      Your article is about a single company that decided to stop shipping to Canada due to crappy selection offered here.

    16. Re:Why I Stay Away by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      To my American friends: I am honestly terrified by the thought of crossing your border, and I am not alone.

      Don't feel alone I am terrified at the thought of crossing my country's border as well, even as a citizen. Every country it s so much simpler, two simple questions of work or recreation and how long I am staying, then get the simple stamp on the passport and walk on through. The last time I came back to the US was from Israel and had gone through their proper security. Didn't even have to take off my steel toe boots when going through security there. I get here and have my stuff rummaged through, get searched, questioned why I was in Israel, and go for additional screening.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    17. Re:Why I Stay Away by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      It isn't unique to Zappos.

      What does the article say????

      Because of problems with customs and other issues, many of the big e-commerce players wouldn't ship to Canada,

      Sorry. Your attempt to revise what the article actually says does quite get off the ground.

    18. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being innocent (whatever that means to Homeland Security) is no protection.

      Innocent? He was violating custom rules. You need to declare wood and show it to them when you enter the country. I've flow allover the world and pretty much every country has agricultural customs and many of them are more strict than the US. All banned products will be seized and burned. I always declare any questionable item, because failure to declare gets you in extra trouble. When I have to transport scientific stuff that might cause an issue, I get permits before traveling. I don't just hide it in my luggage and cry when it gets taken.

    19. Re:Why I Stay Away by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      One example is not "many". I tried to do a Google search for issues with Canadian customs and could not find any. Again you miss the "and other issues".

    20. Re:Why I Stay Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problems largely due to demands by the USA. I honestly wonder sometimes just what kind of dirt the NSA has on Harper and crew to get them to toe the line so well. I wonder about Obama too, for that matter. Even Hoover never had this much power.

  44. Tragic, but almost understandable ... by MacTO · · Score: 5, Interesting

    An important sentence was left out of the summary, which explained that customs mistook the instruments for pieces of bamboo. Judging from the photo accompanying the article, the confusion is almost understandable. It looks like a home made instrument that may or may not have been prepared properly given restrictions on agricultural products. (Example: they may not have been concerned about the bamboo per se, but rather invasive insects that may be in it since the reeds may not have been treated.)

    The moral of the story is to verify that the stuff that you're taking across the border is actually legal for import or export. After all, it could have been much worse for this man. I would imagine that charges could have been pressed if they so desired.

    1. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Correct. I have imported bamboo items back to Australia from Japan but they were carried as hand luggage. Australia has some of the toughest quarantine conditions in the world, with good reason, but our Customs department simply said they would fumigate the items. They forwarded them 24 hours later to my hotel at no cost to me. No one should pack anything doubtful in checked luggage. US Customs may still have seized his bamboo if it was carry on luggage but this person seems to have been a bit clueless.

    2. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by geekmux · · Score: 4, Informative

      An important sentence was left out of the summary, which explained that customs mistook the instruments for pieces of bamboo. Judging from the photo accompanying the article, the confusion is almost understandable. It looks like a home made instrument that may or may not have been prepared properly given restrictions on agricultural products. (Example: they may not have been concerned about the bamboo per se, but rather invasive insects that may be in it since the reeds may not have been treated.)

      The moral of the story is to verify that the stuff that you're taking across the border is actually legal for import or export. After all, it could have been much worse for this man. I would imagine that charges could have been pressed if they so desired.

      (From TFA)

      "Razgui, who’s been performing with The Boston Camerata since 2002..."

      Perhaps another important sentence you overlooked. Had I been flying back and forth, performing in the same city for over a decade, I would have ZERO reason to suspect any wrongdoing. And assuming someone should know better is like assuming someone should know the 2014 tax code before they go shopping at the mall.

    3. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Australia has some of the toughest quarantine conditions in the world, with good reason, but our Customs department simply said they would fumigate the items.

      Well, that would have been a great solution here. Just fumigate the musical instrument that's operated by putting the end of it in your mouth! That sounds perfectly safe...!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by shentino · · Score: 1

      They probably would have if he started anything.

      The fact that charges are at the discretion of the agents is even more disturbing.

    5. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by shentino · · Score: 1

      The guy being an idiot is no excuse for abuse of power by border agents.

    6. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by McGruber · · Score: 2

      An important sentence was left out of the summary, which explained that customs mistook the instruments for pieces of bamboo.

      Actually, US Customs does allow bamboo to be imported, per this page: Importing Bamboo into the US It says:

      Is bamboo allowed to be imported to the US?

      In general, bamboo that is not thoroughly dried and is therefore still capable of propagation is prohibited entry into the United States.

      Bamboo that is thoroughly dried and split or cut lengthwise (rendering it incapable of propagation) will be inspected upon entry and released.

      Unsplit dried bamboo canes/stakes/poles also are allowed entry into the United States after inspection: however, if the bamboo canes/stakes/poles are intended for garden or nursery use, the shipment must be fumigated (T404-d treatment extended to 24 hours) upon arrival at the U.S. port of entry.

      Bamboo furniture, bamboo cloth, and other manufactured products made of bamboo do not require fumigation and will be released upon inspection.

      For more information on Bamboo products, see Table 3-22 in the APHIS Miscellaneous and Processed Products Manual.

      If you have further questions regarding requirements for importing agricultural products, please contact the USDA/APHIS Customer Support Center at (301) 851-2046.

      His flutes should have been allowed as "unsplit dried bamboo canes".

    7. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Perhaps another important sentence you overlooked. Had I been flying back and forth, performing in the same city for over a decade, I would have ZERO reason to suspect any wrongdoing.

      "I got away with driving drunk all those other times! It's so unfair that you're arresting me this time just because you happened to catch me!"

      >And assuming someone should know better is like assuming someone should know the 2014 tax code before they go shopping at the mall.

      Anyone who doesn't know about the problem of invasive species in this day and age is simply uneducated or, to repeat myself, American.

    8. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No true. In Australia if you bring a prohibited item (like a wooden product) in hand or carried luggage they will give you the option to fumigate it or irradiate it. If it's posted in, you'll get a polite letter telling them they've withholding it and giving you the above options. Unlike US customs officers, the Australian ones aren't morons. They wouldn't destroy it and send you a note later on, because they would be slack-jawed, drooling inbred dumb.

    9. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      An important sentence was left out of the summary, which explained that customs mistook the instruments for pieces of bamboo.

      [...]

      The moral of the story is to verify that the stuff that you're taking across the border is actually legal for import or export.

      Do you see your mistake? The stuff in question _was_ "actually legal". Customs made a _mistake_. One, apparently, with no checks or balances to prevent it.

      No, the moral of the story is "power corrupts". It doesn't even have to be intentional, that just speeds things up.

      After all, it could have been much worse for this man. I would imagine that charges could have been pressed if they so desired.

      Again, no. Because if they were going to charge him with a crime, they would have had to preserve the "evidence" rather than simply destroy his means of livelihood without chance of appeal.

      Well, in theory, once upon a time, anyway. These days, with all the revelations about what the US government does in the dark, I'm not so sure.

    10. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bootlicker

    11. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by MacTO · · Score: 1

      In light of McGruber's comment, yes I see my mistake. However, the "power corrupts" bit is likely going too far. Incompetence and a lack of proper checks and balances is a more likely explanation in cases such as this.

    12. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      His flutes should have been allowed as "unsplit dried bamboo canes".

      Had he actually declared them and they were fully dried, then probably yes. Hiding fresh bamboo cutting in your luggage and not declaring them isn't likely to get an automatic exemption when they find it though.

    13. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      So what? Who cares if it is bamboo? You shouldn't be destroying stuff from people without consulting them. At a minimum they should have given him the option to return to where he came from and keep the stuff (painful but better than losing it).

      You can't just take someone's stuff and destroy it. TSA can, but they shouldn't be able to.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    14. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by sjames · · Score: 1

      They could have taken the revolutionary step of asking him first. Then they could have taken the unheard of step of reasonably giving him the chance to just leave and take his flutes with him if they decided they were forbidden.

      All it would require to make both options occur to the TSA would be a sense that they worked for the people, not the other way around. Instead, they project the Cartman like "respect my authoriti!"

    15. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Perhaps another important sentence you overlooked. Had I been flying back and forth, performing in the same city for over a decade, I would have ZERO reason to suspect any wrongdoing.

      "I got away with driving drunk all those other times! It's so unfair that you're arresting me this time just because you happened to catch me!"

      Yeah, he "got away with it" because US Customs never "pulled over" his plane and inspected his baggage and saw those flutes repeatedly during the decade-plus of regular travel to & from the US to perform.

      Moron. You'd make a great ICE or TSA agent. Birds of a drain-bamaged feather and all...

    16. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      (checks McGruber's comment) It's a mistake either way. Either it's not bamboo, and they applied the wrong rule, or it is bamboo - but a handicraft, see http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/downloads/miscellaneous.pdf - and they applied the wrong rule (also, the CBP website cites the wrong table; table 3-22 is broomcorn and broomstraw, it should be citing table 3-57 instead).

      Re "power corrupts", that's why I added "It doesn't even have to be intentional, that just speeds things up". Corruption occurs at both the individual and organisational level, the latter doesn't actually require malice on the part of the former (incompetence and/or unaccountability can accomplish it too), and there is a feedback loop.

      Or to put it another way, "sufficiently advanced incompetence can be indistinguishable from malice in its consequence to the victim". And this sort of thing has happened before (e.g. a concert pianist travelling to the US had their piano destroyed because it smelled funny according to the agents involved).

    17. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      I would think "manufactured products made of bamboo" would be an even more appropriate fit. I don't know of any breeds that naturally grow their own carved finger-holes and mouth-pieces.

      And if we follow the actual APHIS manual cited and linked by that CBP webpage, it turns out the CBP webpage incorrectly cites Table 3-22, which applies to broomcorn and broomstraw, rather than Table 3-57, which applies to bamboo.

      As I commented in another post, sufficiently advanced incompetence can be indistinguishable from malice in its consequence to the victim. It's not like customs hasn't screwed up like this before.

    18. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      "Razgui, who’s been performing with The Boston Camerata since 2002..."

      So what? Boston is in the US and Canada has different laws.

    19. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by GoCrazy · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you would blame a guy who has carried dried bamboo (not against US Customs) in and out of the US before rather than a US agent who couldn't exercise reason to distinguish plantable bamboo from a flute.

      --
      No beer and no TV make Homer something something
    20. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not understandable.

      I live in a reasonable country. A few years ago, my mother, abroad, send me a piece of dried meat (which she didn't know was illegal to import).

      Customs send me a curt, but clear letter explaining what happened and stating my options: I could not keep the package. I could have it shipped back at my expense, destroyed, or phone a specific number to try and explain "special circunstances". I had X days to reply before the luggage was destroyed.

      That is a reasonable response, not "oh, this looks like agricultural imports, we will just burn everything without checking with the owner first".

    21. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by pz · · Score: 1

      An important sentence was left out of the summary, which explained that customs mistook the instruments for pieces of bamboo. Judging from the photo accompanying the article, the confusion is almost understandable. It looks like a home made instrument that may or may not have been prepared properly given restrictions on agricultural products. (Example: they may not have been concerned about the bamboo per se, but rather invasive insects that may be in it since the reeds may not have been treated.)

      I'm not an insect biologist, but I'd be surprised if 10+ year old bamboo has any remaining viable insect life when kept as a musical instrument (rather than, say, being left outdoors). The photo from the linked article does not look like something that was freshly cut.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    22. Re:Tragic, but almost understandable ... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      It doesn't explain why U.S. Customs saw a need to destroy the item. Usually it is handled by the USDA which can quarantine the items in question. Even if quarantine isn't an option, why did the U.S. Customs perform the duties of a USDA/PPQ officer?

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  45. Cotton and wool are agricultural items by khym · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do they strip naked anyone who's wearing natural fiber?

    --
    Give a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day, but set him on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Cotton and wool are agricultural items by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      Nobody is stripping me of my "natural fiber". Unless they want to see the not so proverbial shit hit the fan.

    2. Re:Cotton and wool are agricultural items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do they strip naked anyone who's wearing natural fiber?

      Don't be ridiculous. They'll still do it if you wear synthetic.

    3. Re:Cotton and wool are agricultural items by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

      I don't think I would wear anything into the US made of hemp

  46. Re:All the news that matters by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    US no longer stands for "Uncle Sam." Now it's "Uncle Stupid." Leather luggage comes from cowhide, isn't that an agricultural item? Fucking morons in charge.

    I guess soo it will be the UF... Who knew that Tarrence and Phillip would be so prescient?

  47. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the fucking morons who will be making your healthcare decisions.

  48. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well then, explain how this article relates to science and technology. What's that? It doesn't? Shut up then.

    If you go through US customs, the tools you use to do your job may not make it with you. Like your phone, laptop, textbooks, thumb drives, or hand made wooden flutes.

  49. America is falling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A failing elitist society is going to make quite a noise on the way down.

  50. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You're wrong. Slashdot is just for science and technology stories. The "somewhere else" you refer to is the place for irrelevant submissions like this one. So get your ass back to reddit, nancy.

  51. Look on the bright side by PNutts · · Score: 0

    It could have been his skin flute.

  52. Dear Boujemaa Razgui, by shinzawai · · Score: 0

    Shut up slave! Don't question our authority!

    Yours Sincerely,
                                                  The USA empire.

    1. Re:Dear Boujemaa Razgui, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. The problem with these text-only interfaces is that we couldn't see the self-satisfied smugness on your face as you clicked "Submit". Probably a little chortle to yourself on your original and, and I mean this sincerely, HILARIOUS post. You probably looked around the room wishing someone was there so you could chortle "heh heh heh" Beavis and Butthead style and impress them with how TOTALLY ironic you were.

    2. Re:Dear Boujemaa Razgui, by shinzawai · · Score: 0

      Well played AC. noagendashow.com

  53. Re:All the news that matters by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wooden pencils as well. As a side note I was once sent to Ag inspection for mentioning I had some sea salt. Customs people aren't the brightest bulbs on the tree.

    In this particular case, you are giving Customs people way too much credit for comparing them to something as bright as any light bulb.

    Rocks more come to mind. You know, like the ones rattling around in the idiots head that could not identify a handmade instrument.

    Why in the hell do we put up with such incompetence? Do we not pay enough into the TSA to not hire utter morons? A man's livelihood was destroyed in a matter of hours. Someone should be held accountable, and NOT be able to stand behind some bullshit policy that prevents terrorists from importing rare wood, or whatever the hell we were attempting to prevent here with total destruction.

  54. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That reminds me. Say "Hi" to your mom for me.

  55. Writing letters is a waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The people who work in border control are called "Officers". This means that they apply some rules, regulations or laws and have discretion in how they do that. Their bosses have no right to question those decisions and cannot order these officers to change any decision that they have made. The only way to get a decision reversed is to go to court. I'm not sure which court to go to but a US lawyer would be able to tell you that. Suing them is a possibility to get some cash back to help you replace the lost goods, but if you want the decision reversed and your immigration record to be cleaned then you need to appeal the officers decision in the correct court (probably a Federal court of some sort) and get a judge to rule that the officer was wrong and should not have done this. Then in the future you could include a copy of that court ruling in every one of your instrument cases.

  56. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You make much over-use of the "we". You do not speak for me or for the reasons why I come to slashdot. Take your doltish, bigoted views and STFU.

    I read slashdot because I am interested in science and technology, and because I am also interested in anything others with similar interests find interesting. I do not use slashdot as a mirror that would let me pimp and preen in what I already know; I also value its use as a periscope that looks around corners I am unaware of to show me things of interest I would never otherwise see.

    This story has value on slashdot.

    --
    Will
  57. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I disagree. What goes on at customs is relevant to all of us, and any calibrations of the people involved, such as this one, are good to have. I hope this gets some nice front page coverage in NY Times and similar papers, but if they follow form, they may treat it as yet another atrocious act by the government, which they may wish for political reasons to cover up.

    I do hope that Mr. Razgui gets compensated hugely, the guilty agent gets fired, and stern policy warnings about this kind of thing get promulgated. Alas I cannot hold my breath for such.

  58. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, Sarah.

  59. Re:All the news that matters by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    /. has for the longest time covered articles about politics, civil rights and stupidities of the government.

    This in my view isn't a story about customs protecting agriculture but rather about a civil servant removing equipment which belonged to someone and without notice or recourse destroying that equipment.

    I guess it's not as fun sounding as the TSA confiscating a laptop and not having due process to get it back, but what's really the difference?

  60. Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's not what he said.

    The GP is pointing out that people - at least the loudest ones - are concerned about bullshit and have no concept of what real freedom is.

    I am just as disgusted over this "outrage" over what some reality TV 'star' (I don't care what he says or thinks and I have no idea what the big deal is) and yet, those same people who are all outraged over the Duck whatever guy on either side say NOTHING about the abuse of our own government.

    AND I'd like to point out that freedom of speech is to protect us from the government curtailing our speech.

    Is peanut gallery getting outraged over the US Custom's abuses?

    Nope!

    They are all pissed of what the Duck guy said or are pissed at his network for censoring him - which IS well within THEIR right as his employer.

    1. Re:Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THANK-YOU... That is exactly what I was hinting at...

    2. Re:Huh?! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      to be fair you have no idea how many of those who are bitching about this issue bitch about other issues. Ive been bitching about this issue, and I bitch about, well everything, its what I do lol

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Huh?! by Bartles · · Score: 1

      I'm pissed at the special interest groups that tried to destroy him for having the temerity to disagree. It's OK to criticize GLAAD, you know. It doesn't make you a homophobe or a bigot.

    4. Re:Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes it does.. just like criticizing Israel makes you a Jew-hating anti-Semite

  61. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stuff that matters is part of the slogan so they can post non tech stories sometimes. Seriously, get the fuck over yourself. You do not own /.

  62. To soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.coindev.org/asi-tfp.jpg

    HAHA

  63. Re:All the news that matters by geekmux · · Score: 1

    It's not clear that these obviously looked like musical instruments to a person who isn't accustomed to seeing various kinds of flutes. Bundle of reeds with notches in them. Customs probably thought they were bongs.

    It's clear that these morons obviously looked like regular employees when hired. TSA isn't accustomed to determining the difference. Bunch of idiots with politicians behind them. Americans probably thought they had brains.

  64. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny, last time I went to the states they nearly refused to let me in because of an "Arab" stamp in my passport. Well I did fly Emirates, and I did have a free hotel in Dubai since it was a 9 hour stopover the first time.

    By the way I feel safer travelling through Dubai than the USA. The culture may be toxic but at least it is a local and well known culture. Don't want to end up in jail, don't pretend western laws apply in Dubai.

    The sad thing is the same comment about western laws these days can be applied to the USA.

  65. Morocco = Arab country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to make it clear, Morocco is an Arab country and he has probably an Arab name. Not saying whether it's right or wrong, but I guess that's the kind of thing Arabs can expect after 9/11. It's not the Americans' fault that these camel-lovers like to blow themselves up, just saying..

  66. Bamboo and reeds contains pests by HighOrbit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to work in a port. We once received an automobile from Thailand in a 20 ft shipping container. The auto was tied down with ropes and the ropes were tightened by twisting with shafts of bamboo (which, by the way, is about the crappiest way to tied down a car and very non-standard). When we opened up container, the bamboo was riddled with holes from some kind of Asian woodborers that had chewed their way out during transit. Anyway, we had to call the Department of Agriculture inspector (this was before the ag inspectors were merged into customs) who had us fumigate the whole container.

    So the moral of the story here is, based on experience, if I opened a box with reeds full of holes originating from a foreign land , I'd burn it too.

    1. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You didn't burn the car, you fumigated the container. Why would you destroy the instruments before checking?

    2. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by evil_aaronm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you know if the holes were made before leaving the foreign port, or during the trip? If not, you're just like the knee-jerk agents in this article. Did you check with the owner of the vehicle? If not, why not? That's kind of the point to this article: some faceless bureaucrat, who will never be held responsible, just decided to trash someone's property. Couldn't they have asked the guy about it before assuming the worst and destroying something priceless? Don't you see a problem with that?

    3. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bought some nice wood carvings into Australia a few years back. Customs noticed. They quarantined the items at the airport and said I'll get them back in a month after they had been fumigated due to what appeared to be signs of worms in the wood. They were couriered to my door 3 weeks later.

      THAT is how things are supposed to work, without the wholesale destruction of property that occurred in this case.

    4. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2

      Honestly, when it comes down to keeping an invasive creature out, I say gassing the container was the proper thing to do anyway.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to work in a port. We once received an automobile from Thailand in a 20 ft shipping container. The auto was tied down with ropes and the ropes were tightened by twisting with shafts of bamboo (which, by the way, is about the crappiest way to tied down a car and very non-standard). When we opened up container, the bamboo was riddled with holes from some kind of Asian woodborers that had chewed their way out during transit. Anyway, we had to call the Department of Agriculture inspector (this was before the ag inspectors were merged into customs) who had us fumigate the whole container. So the moral of the story here is, based on experience, if I opened a box with reeds full of holes originating from a foreign land , I'd burn it too.

      I currently work in an air cargo facility. I've had CBP have me help them while they looked for 15-20 just to see if 1 wooden skid that the freight was on had markings that indicated it was heat treated. Every skid used has to have those marks, and any shipment using wood has to have documentation that is was heat treated and adheres to US, Canadian, and Mexican laws. Having seen this firsthand, I am really not surprised that CBP destroyed the flutes, however if I didn't work where I do it probably would never have crossed my mind that they would do it.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 2, Informative

      If this really is a website for nerds, I can't let this pass. Woodborer? Bamboo is a grass, not wood.

    7. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You called the experts in instead of wanton destroying spree

    8. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The concern is legitimate. Plenty of invasive species have arrived in a variety of materials (wood, soil, etc.). Nobody's questioning the fact there's a legitimate risk here. But you don't handle it by "confiscate and burn first, ask questions later". For some small items in a suitcase, you seal the material in a plastic bag and contact the owner.

    9. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by HighOrbit · · Score: 2

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinoderus_minutus Apparently, nobody told the bugs they were chewing a woody-stalk grass instead of a woody-stalk tree.

    10. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by sjames · · Score: 2

      Why not just fumigate?

      Or seal it up air tight on the grounds that it might be more valuable and less harmful than you thought and then talk to the owner?

      The only reason that comes to mind is a sincere (and deeply misguided) belief that you are better than the peons and they should willingly lick your boots on command.

      'Civil servants' (note, neither word applies) like that should be horse whipped daily until they change their minds.

    11. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Of course he didn't, his job is to keep invasive species and banned substances out of the US, it's a job that needs to be done and to be perfectly honest if it comes between the choice of even destroying the car or for that matter this idiot's flutes vs letting in some invasive species to potentially decimate entire industries and ecosystems, fuck the importer.

    12. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, daily beatings must continue until morale improves. (ours, not theirs)

    13. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Tell the woodborers that.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    14. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't burn the car, you fumigated the container. Why would you destroy the instruments before checking?

      They probably did destroy the "shafts of bamboo" as well. What's your point?

    15. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by EligibleToModerate · · Score: 1

      The same line of thinking has been applied to unwanted humans. Won't someone think of the ? Please, keep us safe master overlord!

    16. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The holes were not bored out by some invasive species.

      So what's YOUR point?

    17. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK...obviously...many gullible and naive people are believing the tripe they read. As someone who actually knows what really happened to Mr. Boujema's "Flutes" I can relay the truh (if anyone is still interested in hearing the truth, and nothing but he truth?)
      Mr. Boujemaa's story was blogged on "Broken Disk", the author of the Blog did not bother to research Mr. Boujemaa's fallacious and libelous allegations.
      The entire incident was related to me by the CBP Agricultural Specialists who seized and safeguarded Mr. Boujemaa's "Flutes".
      First of all, Mr. Boujemaa was not present when his luggage was inspected. From what I was told, his bags were inspected as "left over baggage".
      What was found in his bags was a crate containing raw, green, unprocessed sticks of Bamboo, NOT FLUTES. Bamboo in its raw stated is prohibited under 7CFR for several reasons: It is a grass, which is often infected with Ustilago spp, a Fungal Rust. Additionally, there are other insect pests and plant pathogens that can infect not only Bamboo spp but other grasses. Cereal Grains such as Wheat, Oats, Corn, Barley, Sorghum,....One doesn't have to be an Einstein to realize that the USDA stringently regulates the import of raw agricultural products that can cause great ecological and economic damage to our agricultural and natural resources. Additionally, Bamboo, when planted can easily become an invasive species. Just ask any avid gardener who planted ornamental varieties...they spread quickly and can overtake a garden in a matter of years.
      Mr Boujemaa's allegations that CBP Officers destroyed 11 flute are false, defamatory, and libelous.
      What's more shocking and disappointing was that irresponsible journalists were duped into spreading Mr. Boujemaa's story, which again, is totally false.
      Stating that raw, green, propagatable Bamboo is a flute is tantamount to someone chopping down a fresh tree and stating that it is a chair or kitchen table.
      Well that's the truth...CBP acted correctly, professionally, and under the empowerment of Federal CFR's which cover the importation of Raw Bamboo...7CFR-319.37.

    18. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by eepok · · Score: 1

      This is the most important post in this Slashdot discussion. The situation isn't a symptom of "fascism" as many are asserting above. It's an issue of *best* protocol not being followed.
      Such errors in training and follow-through are going to happen in *any* form of government where people are involved.

      This is an HR and policy issue, not a macro-governmental philosophy issue.

    19. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Doesn't matter. The point is the holes were there.
      2) No. Because people lie, and how would the owner know whether or not the deckhands doing the rigging knew if live invasive species were on the ties or not? How would the rigging crew know or care?
      3) No. If your job is security, you worry about the security first and damn good intentions or hope that it's not a protected or invasive species.

      How would this grab you: What if the flutes appeared to be made of Ivory? Or Jade? Would you just ask the owner, "Hey, this doesn't happen to be freshly harvested Elephant Tusk, is it?"

      There's all kinds of materials that you cannot bring into this country. Some for safety, some for health/wildlife, some for economic reasons. If your items might be mistaken, it's your lookout to make sure they're properly declared.

      What the artist failed to do: Include a statement or declaration in the checked bag (checked bag for this stuff? Mistake number one, BTW,) stating exactly what the objects are and the materials they are made of, and the dates on which he crafted them. (And if he didn't follow standards to make sure that invasive species couldn't infest the material, then they deserved to be destroyed anyway.) Coupled with a declaration statement, if they were really that valuable.

    20. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      Your question after #3 is kind of the point: they never bothered to ask the guy. The whole thing is "shoot first, ask questions later," and that's what's wrong with it. Before destroying the guy's priceless instruments, couldn't they have at least asked about it?

      As to your "mistake #1," since when is it not safe to assume that stuff you check in is going to be Ok? Lost luggage is one thing - shit happens, and he decided the risk was acceptable - but agents going through your stuff and actively destroying it? Since when is that Ok? Obviously, never, else this article wouldn't be news.

    21. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by russotto · · Score: 1

      The rest of the government will close ranks around the customs workers. They will be unpunished, he will be uncompensated. That distinguishes simple error from arbitrary exercise of authority.

    22. Re:Bamboo and reeds contains pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      had been fumigated []

      THAT is how things are supposed to work

      Yeah, especially for pipes. Moron!

  67. Re:All the news that matters by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why in the hell do we put up with such incompetence? Do we not pay enough into the TSA to not hire utter morons?

    Absolutely not! TSA agents are mostly people who couldn't pass the US Postal Carrier exam. Several people I knew who were not "bulbworthy" were getting jobs at the TSA shortly after 9/11. They have a very low bar for entry.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  68. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    he might be saying that the US is just too far gone for anything else to work.

  69. SUE THE F@%K OUT OF US CUSTOMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Find a good lawyer who is an expert in this area and sue the big Jesus out of US customs. These lousy f@%ks think they are above the law and use this to abuse passengers whenever they can. They will confiscate your work computer, camera, tablet and phone, and not tell you when you can have them back (with scratches on the edges and spyware installed). What they do is the only bit of power they will ever have over you. So they aren't afraid to be vulgar, rude and abusive. When you deal with them, you will quickly understand that you have put yourself in situation of being their bitch. This practice has to be stopped and it will only happen when genuine people stand up and take action. Otherwise evil triumphs.

  70. Well.. by A+well+known+coward · · Score: 1

    Its his own damn fault. Flying while brown...... What did he expect? Fair treatment?

    /trollin'

  71. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do feel sorry to anyone living there and do hope you are armed.

    Why? So he could have shot the border control official? And then shot the security guards, followed by the police, SWAT, army, etc? What problem would be solved by being armed?

  72. not just flutes: grand piano seized by TSA twice by przemekklosowski · · Score: 4, Informative

    Polish pianist Kristian Zimerman had his Steinway grand piano seized by the TSA twice: the fist time around they destroyed it, the second time they just detained it for a week: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krystian_Zimerman
    No, they didn't confuse it with a vegetable---apparently Zimerman recently modified his instrument and the piano smelled of glue. As a result he ended up travelling with just the mechanism, fitting it by hand to the boxes at concert halls he plays in.

  73. Should've carried them on by ghack · · Score: 1

    I don't really agree with most of this comment- but I do agree he should have kept them with him.

    Wife and I learned the hard way when we had a bunched of stuff stolen out of our luggage flying from ORD to IST- if something has monetary and/or sentimental value, always keep it with you.

    Turkish airlines sent us $100 check for the $500+ stuff that was stolen.

  74. More like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Turn your head and cough.

  75. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

    If you were my wife, I'd drink it.

  76. 4th Amendment by njhunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why do we as Americans give up our 4th Amendment protections if we fly?

    1. Re:4th Amendment by TitusGroan8856 · · Score: 1

      the 4th has never applied to international borders.

    2. Re:4th Amendment by isorox · · Score: 1

      Why do we as Americans give up our 4th Amendment protections if we fly?

      Because you've already given up your 1st, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 10th.

      You'd probably give up the 3rd if you had the chance given your fawning over the military.

    3. Re:4th Amendment by EngnrFrmrlyKnownAsAC · · Score: 1

      We interrupt this post for a breaking news flash:

      Americans no longer need to enter an airport to have their 4th amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure suspended. Pretty much any activity will do, including but not limited to: being within 100 miles of the border, conducting business with any commercial entity, or communicating by electronic means such as telephone, SMS, email, Facebook or in-game chat.

      --
      Howdy howdy howdy
    4. Re:4th Amendment by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      This is customs, not the TSA. Flying has nothing to do with it. Coming into the country does.

      The courts have long held that it is reasonable to search arbitrarily at border crossings, and the Fourth bans "unreasonable" searches.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  77. Only the Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the American people willingly get curb stomped by their government in the name of security.

    1. Re:Only the Americans by mtthwbrnd · · Score: 1

      Wanna bet? Try Canada and Australia! Truly servile people living under the jack-boot of a police state.

    2. Re:Only the Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have offered a number of examples of the Australian customs procedure. The concerned item is quarantined and you are notified. You can have the item fumigated and returned, or destroyed if it's something you don't care about. You can also appeal the decision, through the agency, then the ombudsman, then through Federal courts.

      This is in spite of Australia having some of the strictest quarantine rules in the world.

  78. Re:All the news that matters by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Let me guess: you're one of the three or so remaining people who believe that the government is "here to help you?"

  79. Re:All the news that matters by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Lets just face facts, friend.

    The US Army conducts an IQ test as pre-employment screening to determine which job(s) you may apply for, assuming you cross a minimal threshold, and you may hold an infantry position with the lowest acceptable score. Time and trial have taught the military that lower scores make better better soldiers at positions like 8 hour foxhole guard duty.

    There exist occupations, within the military and without, where greater cognitive ability is a distinct advantage.

    But there are some that ain't.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  80. Re:All the news that matters by lakeland · · Score: 1

    They were most likely destroyed under a policy intended to curb illegal deforestation. So not terrorism for a change...

  81. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your inability to use the word "You're" correctly is getting annoying.

  82. Isn't that illegal? by mtthwbrnd · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Surely they do not have the authority to destroy, rather than confiscate, private property? Well, Obomber has probably given them immunity from everything in some executive order somewhere. Travelling these days has been made completely sh1t by the government (aka the companies who make huge profits from the airport security theatre).

    1. Re:Isn't that illegal? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Criminy. All kinds of diseases, both plant and animal, insect pests, you name it have come in to contaminate local agriculture this way.

      For example:

      In October 1967, a farmer in Shropshire reported a lame sow, which was later diagnosed with FMD. The source was believed to be remains of legally-imported infected lamb from Argentina and Chile. The virus spread and, in total, 442,000 animals were slaughtered and the outbreak had an estimated cost of £370 million.

      YOU BET you have to destroy this kind of stuff immediately. A small bit of something infected can turn into a national disaster, and has in the past.

    2. Re:Isn't that illegal? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      You'd think so, but from what I've learned Agriculture and DEA are the two agencies where you absolutely have to have your ducks in a row before the box gets onto US soil. For other transgressions you might have it sent back or you might have it held up, but mess up with DEA or Agriculture/Fish-Wildlife and the package could actually be destroyed.

      It is amazing how painful customs can be. In some cases if you don't put the right declaration on the outside of a box (such as "not for human use") they might send it back and make you fix it and ship it again. For most issues though the package just sits in limbo until you file the right paperwork.

  83. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The relevancy is this: if a musician can't get a set of flutes through Customs without having them ruined, what happens when we travel with our laptops and other techie devices?

  84. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    If more of you code gnomes were employed and using company-approved breaks to surf /. there wouldn't be a need to reach a wider audience.

    No offense?

    None taken.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  85. Have you learned yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do not do business with the usa if you value your data.

    Do not visit the usa unless you have a very good reason. A concert is not a good reason.

    If you MUST visit. Anything valuable should be sent fedex. Sure still a chance it will vanish. But theres alot less chance of it encountering monumental stupid at our borders.

    And don't even think of visiting if you're any shade of brown.

    We're a police state now. And a really dumb one at that.

  86. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The ASVAB is not an IQ test... But nice try

  87. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    +1 wordsmith.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  88. Yup, a bunch of sticks tied together in a bundle.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The guy was carrying a fasces, he must have been a Fascist.

  89. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right on! I would only want to add that the agents need Red Formans' giant foot in their a$$es. And Yes, I'm posting as Anon Coward. NSA already knows who I am!

  90. Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All countries have strict controls on import of agricultural goods. It's an absolute necessity in this day and age when import of a couple of insects can wipe out a whole native species.

    For example several important species of trees in the US have been lost this way. The Ash are right now being decimated by the emerald borer from China. It's likely that this insect will wipe out the entire genus of Ash trees in North America.

    http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/sports/2012/10/21/ashes-continue-road-to-extinction.html

    http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/science/2013/08/25/1-decimation-of-ash-trees-provides-valuable-lesson.html

    So one guy had his flutes mistaken for agricultural products. Not really that big a deal in the big picture. This is one case when you really want to err on the conservative side because making a mistake in the other direction is a really bad thing.

    It isn't a case of human rights, illegal searches or ethnic profiling or anything like that.

    As far as I'm concerned this is just another misplaced slashdot article.

    1. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You really are a government cheerleader, aren't you? It's a huge fucking issue when someone is wronged by the government.

    2. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      It's a much bigger huge fucking issue when an entire genus of trees is wiped out.

    3. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 1

      But it IS a big deal.

      Imagine the inverse of the situation, the person screening fails to recognize something that's on a select agent list and lets it in. This is their job to know what they're looking at and doing. Not to just act carelessly.

    4. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't a case of human rights, illegal searches or ethnic profiling or anything like that.

      As far as I'm concerned this is just another misplaced slashdot article.

      I think that destruction of valuable personal property is sort of a big deal. Why does customs have the right to destroy personal property with no apparent recourse? Or do they?

      It may sound strange, but I absolutely consider the sanctity of personal property as something of a human rights issue. When you destroy or steal someone's valuable property, you are in essence stealing someone's life. In the most abstract sense, this man had to exchange a portion of his life energy in exchange for that property, and by taking it from him, you're also robbing him of his sacrifice. Our lives are the most precious things we have, and if you look at monetary exchanges in terms of people exchanging portions of their lives in exchange for purchasing power, you can understand a little bit as to why personal property is more important that you might have previously thought.

      It's very easy to say that one person's misfortune isn't a big deal when it's not YOUR misfortune. ANY personal loss isn't a big deal in the "big picture", because the world's big picture is pretty damn big. Let us know the next time something bad happens to you, and I hope I'm not nearly as callous as you sound right now.

      The excuse of "but look what could happen if..." could be used to justify nearly any sort of human-rights abuses in the name of safety. We must always balance the issue of the greater societal good with the rights of the individual. In this case, the government clearly overreached its bounds in the name of what are undoubtedly valid concerns over agricultural protection issues. As such, we shouldn't be blaming the individual or shrugging our shoulders, but looking for ways to improve the system.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    5. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by ApplePy · · Score: 0

      Are there still ash trees in China? Yep.

      Something eats or otherwise controls the emerald ash borer. We just haven't imported *that* creature yet.

      Consider the kudzu, running rampant in the southeastern US. Now they've realized they need the bugs that eat the kudzu, too.

      So... while it certainly looks bad right now, there's no real cause for alarm. The ash is not going extinct, Chicken Little.

      Eventually, everything makes its way around the planet, and there isn't a damn thing we can do about it but make sure stuff stays in balance.

      --
      That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
    6. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      It's possible to test and fumigate the flutes without destroying them, but that would be too hard. I'm fine with them destroying the raw bamboo if it didn't pass muster. I doubt that carved, sealed flutes wouldn't. Kind of hard for bugs or larvae to live in sealed wood.

    7. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by sjames · · Score: 1

      They should have simply sealed the flutes up in an airtight container and sent them back where they came from.

    8. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Zealand (my country) has possibly the strictest customs controls in the world.

      That being said the owner of the item(s) is given the option of having the item(s) treated (fumigate at the owners cost) or allowing them to be destroyed.

    9. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So one guy had his flutes mistaken for agricultural products. Not really that big a deal in the big picture. This is one case when you really want to err on the conservative side because making a mistake in the other direction is a really bad thing.

      Or, you know, quarantine the suspected product to find our whether it really contains pathogens. But your plan of just destroying everything not made of metal or stone is good, too.

    10. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one thing to hold the objects until they can be scrutinized. If the chief goal is to prevent outside species from entering the US, that is certainly possible. Flutes have a very small space to search.

      It's another thing entirely to outright destroy objects due to suspicions.

    11. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The emerald borer is a pest in the general class of wood boring beetles. Because these pests dig in under the tree bark there is no effective biological control for this general type of insect. People are looking of course, but the prognosis is very grim.

      Generally what happens with this type of infestation is that almost all the plants die. The economic damage has already been in the billions of dollars.

      I imagine that someday a GMO ash will be developed incorporating resistance characteristics from the Chinese ash, much like resistant elm trees have been developed. The native species are pretty much doomed. Sorry.

      As far as Kudzu goes, insect control is not a practical recourse. It's digging and herbicides, or goats. Eight per acre is supposed to be good enough. Interestingly it looks like a different pest, Asian rust may contain Kudzu. Unfortunately this rust also devastates soybeans so it isn't exactly something you want.

      It's unbelievable how much false and misleading information there was in your post.

    12. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should the sanctity of your private property allow you to release biological weapons (emerald ash borers) that destroy all of my private property?

    13. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      When it comes to something like biological pests the damage they can cause is so huge that it far outweighs the personal possessions or freedom of movement of any one individual. It's why movement of individuals can be restricted by medical authorities in cases of communicable diseases as well.

      It's not a matter of IF. It's a matter of past events that have shown these precautions are absolutely necessary. Mad cow disease in England. Medfly infestations destroying citrus crops in CA and FL. FMD in Europe. Asian soybean rust, longhorned beetle, Dutch elm disease and emerald borer beetle in the US. These restrictions apply to humans as well. My wife had to pass a TB exam including X-Rays before she was allowed to immigrate to the US.

      I'm not saying there isn't an opportunity to improve what is being done. But the idea that personal property rights can legitimately interfere with the rights of a community to protect itself from real dangers is wrong.

      The big thing to realize is that with any human right there is no absolute. One of those cases is the right to property when that property represents a threat to the entire community.

    14. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of the powderpost beetle?

      "Powderpost beetles feed on deciduous trees, including certain hardwoods or softwoods depending on the species. Some hardwoods are naturally immune if they have low starch content or if their pore diameters are too small for the female beetle's ovipositor to lay her eggs in.

      Wood preservatives can be used to prevent beetle infestation. Common treatments may use boron.

      Items that can be infested by powderpost beetles include wooden tools or tool handles, frames, furniture, gun stocks, books, toys, bamboo, flooring, and structural timbers."

      I don't know what the actual regulations and threat assessment is. But just waving hands and saying this agent clearly over-reached without any information more that "Oh Noes my flutes are destroyed" is a bit much.

    15. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      When it comes to something like biological pests the damage they can cause is so huge that it far outweighs the personal possessions or freedom of movement of any one individual. It's why movement of individuals can be restricted by medical authorities in cases of communicable diseases as well.

      It's not a matter of IF. It's a matter of past events that have shown these precautions are absolutely necessary. Mad cow disease in England. Medfly infestations destroying citrus crops in CA and FL. FMD in Europe. Asian soybean rust, longhorned beetle, Dutch elm disease and emerald borer beetle in the US. These restrictions apply to humans as well. My wife had to pass a TB exam including X-Rays before she was allowed to immigrate to the US.

      I'm not saying there isn't an opportunity to improve what is being done. But the idea that personal property rights can legitimately interfere with the rights of a community to protect itself from real dangers is wrong.

      The big thing to realize is that with any human right there is no absolute. One of those cases is the right to property when that property represents a threat to the entire community.

      Of course, I don't disagree with that assertion. That's why I talked about balance. We absolutely (as a society) need to protect against dangerous elements crossing our borders in any form. And yes, there are extreme cases when even individual rights must be trumped for the greater societal good. I'm just saying that any time that occurs, it should be done with the utmost care, and with proper safeguards.

      From what I can infer, custom agents are allowed to destroy personal property they deem potentially dangerous with no contact with the owner of said property. All I'm suggesting is that this seems like a policy that needs changing. A plastic ziplock bag, a storage area, and a tag, followed up with a notice to this man that he violated customs rules and needs to talk to an agent before he can retrieve the item, or it will be destroyed in a week, say... that would have changed the picture completely. Yes, it would have been a hassle, but just a minor one, and more importantly, not an irrevocable one. Hell, I wouldn't have had a problem with fining the man some reasonable fee for the expenses incurred, since technically speaking, he's at fault for not declaring the items.

      I just think it was unnecessary for the flutes to be destroyed without even talking to the man first. Am I being unreasonable here? Does the agency require the power to destroy items at will without an interview in order to safeguard our borders?

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    16. Re:Yes it's hard cheese BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it isn't. Freedom is more important.

  91. "No, no. No adventures today." by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    Where's your sense of adventure?

    Frodo and Samwise walked from the Shire to Mordor (even though it's clear at the end one of those fucking eagles could have carried the both of them) , and you refuse to have the TSA Experience story to share with your grandchildren?

    That's just selfiush.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:"No, no. No adventures today." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not much use reaching Mordor only to be eaten by the Nazgul. LOTR has some holes, like any other long story, so why people insist on that one?

    2. Re:"No, no. No adventures today." by tmosley · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but one can simply walk into Mordor. Not so much with the US.

    3. Re:"No, no. No adventures today." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nazgul were hundreds of miles away, near the Shire, looking for Frodo and the Ring. If the damn Eagles had swooped into the Shire (or even Rivendell, or even Lorien), picked up Frodo and headed for Mt. Doom, the whole thing would have been over in a few days, long before the Nazgul had a clue what was happening, not to mention being able to head back to Mordor.

      Personally, I blame the fact that the Fellowship hung out at Rivendell for over two fucking months before setting out.

    4. Re:"No, no. No adventures today." by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Sitting on a ranch in south Texas, it appears the recent emigrants from other Americas have taken advantage of the eye's preoccupation with other goings on.

      They may experience more civility dealing with the Border Patrol than I get flying to Vegas.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  92. Re:All the news that matters by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

    I believe the phrase you want is "bright as pitch."

    --
    Not a sentence!
  93. Violate rules by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Get slapped down. If you don't read the rules first, don't blame others.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Violate rules by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      What rule did he violate?

      [Interesting also that your principle apparently doesn't apply to the inspectors and officials themselves.]

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  94. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They were most likely destroyed under a policy intended to curb illegal deforestation. So not terrorism for a change...

    Illegal deforestation? That's some thin ice you're standing on given the medium involved (bamboo).

    Given that he's traveled to and from Boston since 2002 to perform with the same group without incident, I'd say that the destruction may have been influenced by the overall paranoia across all agencies due to the threat of terrorism. Apparently they think they're going to catch evil men importing AK-47s due to the rare wood stocks...

  95. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


    Take your doltish, bigoted views and STFU.

    Bigoted? Maybe limited-perspective but I'm still trying to find the bigotry in GP. Maybe you object to the use of the word bitch describing the discussion of such a topic. Unless you have canine relatives, however, I don't see that even that can be construed as bigotry. The GP is simply stating an opinion about article selection.

    It seems that lately people inject forms of the word bigot as an attention-grabber when the word usually is a better description of themeselves - the ones attempting to place the label on others.

  96. Reputations by halhibben · · Score: 1

    The airport at Boston has one of the worst reputations for respecting the public, and they continue to earn it.

  97. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've learned the hard way, if I want stuff to arrive in a reasonable condition, buy a cheap plastic Coleman cooler from your store of choice (if you can sit on the cooler without it collapsing, it is good enough), put your stuff inside, well padded, then seal, box, and ship the cooler via your freight delivery service of choice. Yes, it might be opened, but it likely will not get lost unlike most stuff from plane baggage carriers.

    Of course, bicycles and larger items will not fit, so you are on your own there.

    The company I work for has moved to Citrix XenApp desktops for remoting in, so for remote users, all the computer needs is a Citrix client. This allows the computer to run Windows 7 with BitLocker and a TPM chip, with the user logging onto an account they don't have admin access. This way, if a laptop gets seized, there is no data that can be taken. If modified or tampered with, it will be obvious (the new Dells use Secure Boot and TPM chips to ensure that the OS doesn't get tampered with.) It isn't 100%, nor NSA-proof, but it would stop some overzealous LEO from slapping their own keyboard logger on a device because they didn't like the hairstyle of someone.

    If large amounts data has to be sent, it gets sent encrypted with BitLocker via a freight service, and the key is sent via USPS registered mail. That way, if the employee's phone and data is seized at an airport and the employee made to enter passwords [1], there is no access to any data. Of course, the drive and registered mail can be seized, but that actually takes a lot more work than just a stop and search at a checkpoint.

    As for flutes and such, one is far better off insuring them with a specialty company and having them shipped separately than taking the risk of some goons destroying them.

    [1]: With the RIPA act, the UK can order someone to log onto the domain and give them full access to any contents stored there, so if one is a domain admin, it can mean complete, total compromise of the enterprise. This is solved by two accounts, one user account, one admin account, and the admin account gets locked when the employee leaves.

  98. Re:All the news that matters by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    It is not an IQ test but an Aptitude test. They find out what they think you would be best at then try to fit you in there. The army has learned that stupid soldiers aren't good soldiers.

  99. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a current civil servant, not TSA, TSA agents are not considered to be civil servants in the way current civil servants eg. IRS, SSA, FBI etc. are considered. They don't qualify for many of the job protections that other civil servants do among other things. They occupy the office next to mine in a federal building. TSA is generally viewed in a negative manor.

  100. Re:Shit happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no way they could have been insured for their proper value. Neys are very difficult and temperamental instruments; the embouchure required to play them takes tremendous practice, and each ney is unique. Insurance could cover the cost of replacement, but it wouldn't compensate for the lost bond between player and instrument.

  101. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by Swampash · · Score: 1

    I have actively avoided visits to the USA in the past ten years. Tradeshow? Regional conference? Send someone else.

  102. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Herp derp I so cool I didn't do this thing since before it was dangerous wow I cool.

  103. Re:All the news that matters by Froboz23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    TSA Public Relations representative Grebnedlog released the following statement regarding the incident: "We look for things. Things we need. Things that make us go. We need help. We look for things."

    TSA Enforcement Officer Mongo added, "Mongo like candy."

    --
    Take off every Sig. For great justice.
  104. If he carried it .... by kawabago · · Score: 1

    They probably would have burned him too, just to be sure.

  105. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

    Yes, we have it so horrible here. Woe is me.

    --
    Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
  106. Re:All the news that matters by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    You have just insulted billions of fictional Pakleds.

  107. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 for Star Trek TNG reference.

  108. Re:All the news that matters by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

    And at the very top, the boss of them all, is Barack Obama. Why isn't anyone else naming him when this shit happens? What has he done to rein in these abuses? Nothing.

  109. Just theft? by potpie · · Score: 1

    I think it's more likely that a bag handler or TSA agent flat out stole the flutes, and the "agricultural product" excuse is just some run-around style bureaucratic ass-covering. One of our agents stole your things? Oh actually it's because of [MADE-UP REASON], and you need to contact [RANDOM OTHER AGENCY] to deal with it.

    --
    Esoteric reference.
  110. Re:All the news that matters by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Funny

    The army has learned that stupid soldiers aren't good soldiers.

    So those too stupid for the Army are sent over to the TSA, right?

  111. Re:All the news that matters by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Yes, but -2 for insulting the Pakleds so horribly. The Pakleds are like Einstein compared to the TSA.

  112. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't know what to do. I've never written letters to people.'

    Huh!?! what?!? is this guy a moron or something... is he a three year old? Grow a pair and be a man. Hire a lawyer and sue their ass and stop whining in the press.

  113. Is was CUSTOMS not the TSA that seized the flutes by fluffy99 · · Score: 2

    Apparently no-one even read the title, and immediately jumped to the assumption that TSA is at fault. TSA doesn't inspect inbound international luggage, that's the job of Customs, Border Patrol (CBP). Customs has very clear restrictions on bring in plants, timbers, etc and obviously they felt the raw flute making materials qualified under those restrictions.

    http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/id_visa/kbyg/prohibited_restricted.xml#PlantsandSeeds
    http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/permits/index.shtml
    http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/newsroom/fact_sheets/agriculture/olympic_ag.ctt/olympic_ag.pdf

    Had he known about the restrictions and he declared them, it wouldn't have been an issue.

  114. Re:All the news that matters by QQBoss · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I question this thread even being on /. in the first place, from personal experience, the concern was for the possibility of wood boring beetles or other insects hiding in the wood. I once brought back from China 4 sets of large, disassembled picture frames. If it hadn't been one of the first flights back from Asia after 9/11, the inspector would have summarily destroyed them, but he was apparently feeling sorry for all of us on the flight and took me and the frames to the side. He looked up and down each piece looking for any indications of what could indicate any kind of infestation (given that they were solid wood, any penetration should have been visible to the naked eye). Not finding any, he let me continue on with my frames. But if he hadn't had a week or so off, I am quite certain I would have left frame-less and not quite as pissed as this guy has every right to feel.

    Given that the inspector knew he would have had to have had the hollow tubes X-rayed to do a proper inspection followed by fumigation almost certainly led him to take the short cut and summarily destroy them. However, the fact that they were (probably) not freshly made musical instruments to anyone with a modicum of intelligence should have led the inspector to do a more detailed inspection, at an absolute minimum questioning the guy about the provenance of the wood sticks.

  115. Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Its an American prerogative. Sue the hell out of them. Bring conductors and other musicians in with you. There are lots of other musical instruments that aren't made of metal: Stradivariusviolins are all made of wood, and therefore agricultural too! When the TSA or DHS or whoever the hell they are starts turning them into toothpics and firewood, not only will they (finally) lose their jobs, but the US will receive a big fucking black eye. Its not about terrorism, its about ass-hattedness. This isn't safety, this isn't security, this is about dumb-ass. This is just stupid. "I don't know what that is so I'm going to break it." They could have siezed it and told him its in a secure locker. But no, the decided to break it. Clearly they don't know from musical instruments if it bites them in the ass. But usually people carry musical instruments in a special travelling case that doesn't look like a grain shipment. They could have asked a question. Fuckups guess. Smart people inquire. The TSA or DHS or whoever the hell they are have shown which they are.

  116. Re:Is was CUSTOMS not the TSA that seized the flut by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    http://www.artsjournal.com/slippeddisc/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/266x198xboujemaa-neys-300x224.jpg.pagespeed.ic.0cUyxS4qkI.jpg
    A picture of what the finished flutes (nays) looked like, and a list of what else was in the case

    Boujemaa adds some specifics of the case:

    What was in the case? they called Bamboo case
    1) 11 nays (flutes) made by me some of them in Canada some in US
    2) material to make new nays in the case
    3) flight AA 0095 Madrid to JFK
    4) time : 12/22/2013 (notice : on 12/23/2013)
    5) Reason : nays from plants which is agricultural items (so l can’t play nay)

  117. Why on SlashDot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How is this story something that should be discussed on a technology website?

  118. sheep look up? by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    people should read more john brunner, beyond that i don't have an opinion here.

  119. Re:All the news that matters by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

    > So those too stupid for the Army are sent over to the TSA, right?

    Are you saying TSA stands for The Stupid Army?

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  120. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're wrong, Will Woodhull. I do speak for you. This story is not relevant for Slashdot, even if you incorrectly believe otherwise.

  121. Re:All the news that matters by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

    President Obama responsible, the buck stops there? That's racist! You must be a jackbooted Thuglican... /sarc

    Oh for the days when Presidents took responsibility for the actions of their Administrations...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  122. Re:All the news that matters by humphrm · · Score: 5, Informative

    In most U.S. ports, it's not Customs that makes the decision to inspect, it's actually ICE.

    In the olden days, back when I worked as a contractor for Customs, entry into the U.S. went like this:
    1. You went to Immigration Control first. Pre-ICE (US Immigration Control) checked your passport and entry form, OK'd you to enter, and then you reclaimed your baggage (whether you were traveling onwards or not).
    2. You then had to clear Customs, which looked at your itinerary (e.g where you'd been), your bags (i.e were they bulging, smelly, etc.) and your face and non-verbal cues to determine if you warranted a further inspection. If you did have something questionable, there were actually expert (!!!) customs agents available to determine compliance.

    Today, it goes like this:
    1. You go to Immigration (ICE) first. Based on your facial expressions, non-verbal cues, and passport history, they determine if (1) you're OK to re-enter the US, and (2) if you need further "assistance" with customs. They make a mark on your entry form, which you later turn in to a customs agent, to indicate if you should be further "assisted". The decision regarding inspection and possible seizure of goods is left almost entirely with ICE, who specialize not in Customs enforcement but Border Control.
    2. You move on to Customs Enforcement, which looks at your ICE-noted entry form and either inspects, detains, seizes, or lets you go based on ICE notes on your entry form. If ICE didn't mark your entry form for further scrutiny, you move through Customs very quickly.

    The reason for the change? Efficiency. Most people re-entering the US don't need any re-entry assistance, and Customs agents are otherwise very busy. Giving ICE the job of determining 90% of Customs work saves time for travelers and money for the government. But the downside is that most ICE agents aren't trained to sniff out the difference between a guy with handcrafted musical instruments made of foreign raw materials from a guy bringing foreign raw materials into the US with the intent of defeating embargoes and/or tariffs.

    The point is, it's not Customs that are dim, it's ICE... and as long as it saves most travelers some time at the desk, it probably won't change.

    --
    -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
  123. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by russotto · · Score: 1

    The relevancy is this: if a musician can't get a set of flutes through Customs without having them ruined, what happens when we travel with our laptops and other techie devices?

    We're fine, unless we have a Moto X with a wood back. Then, to the crusher it goes.

  124. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider myself a music nerd as well as a computer nerd. I have worked in audio recording engineering for a software company and have many friends who do the same. I have also worked with music software programming. Where exactly should the nerd line be drawn to appears your personal view?

  125. Re:All the news that matters by rochrist · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jesus god. Obama didn't do this. His 'administration' didn't do this, unless you're stupid enough to believe that each president fires every Tom, Dick and Harry working in the government. And, no, I don't believe that Obama suddenly put into place a policy that ordered that all hand made musical instruments made out of bamboo should be summarily destroyed.

  126. Re:All the news that matters by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a second cousin who plays with a big name orchestra in Denmark or somewhere, (upright bass) Anyways, he, and most other big time orchestral music people say that If you travel with your instrument, you buy a seat for yourself, and one for your instrument, and it comes on the plane with you. NEVER trust it to baggage handlers, or any other person you can't see. It never leaves your line of sight. (like the article says, that object is your living, it is your life, treat it as such.)

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  127. It amazes me that people trust their livlihood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to a checked bag while traveling

  128. Re:All the news that matters by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Why are you afraid of Hubbard?

    Well the book series "The Invaders Plan" would be a start.

  129. Fuck everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope someone bombs the US or starts killing off our worthless leaders. This country has no honor and it's impossible to live in this shithole and still maintain any dignity. Burn it all down.

    1. Re:Fuck everything by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the voice of reason, AC. I'm hoping you're just an angsty teen. If not, I'm hoping you're just a juvenile angsty adult.
      Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.

  130. Re:All the news that matters by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    made from REEDS, not trees.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  131. Re:Is was CUSTOMS not the TSA that seized the flut by redmid17 · · Score: 1

    Which would be applicable if they hadn't also destroyed his ACTUAL FLUTES. Those weren't raw materials. They didn't destroy the rest of his luggage, so it clearly wasn't a pest/sanitation issue.

  132. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the way I feel safer travelling through Dubai than the USA.

    The Arab terrorists don't tend to target the rich Gulf Arabs much - professional courtesy, and it would hurt their fundraising.

  133. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do we not pay enough into the TSA to not hire utter morons?

    Money is not a magical wand that somehow guarantees competence--as obviously shown--and further trying to add *more* of it when it failed doesn't make much sense--unless you presume the TSA is either (a) failing to pay at least minimum wages or (b) said pay isn't enough to life off of. But that speaks more about the minimum necessary to live and actually finding *anyone* willing to work, rather than competence per se.

    But, you know, carry on with the idea that money is anything other than a means of value exchange that short circuits the need for direct barter. Because I'm sure that firing people is probably next on your list of suggestions, as if it's a punishment to not continue paying for worthless activities. Unless you really think that "accountable" means anything from a legal perspective, anyways--ex post facto is really great for bureaucrats. Way too much legislation is not written with punishment included but just a presumed mandate that rules will be followed with some hand-waving of fines or presuming that people will be fired. Works for CEOs, right?

  134. Re:All the news that matters by dbIII · · Score: 1

    There's the bit in the summary about the flutes travelling through a lot of airports so they are likely to have passed a lot of inspections previously.

  135. Re:All the news that matters by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

    Atypically an army is only as intelligent as it's leader, this one is chocking the economy to death, nuff said.

    You'd think they might come up with a better way to say they don't like the guy rather than destruction of personal property. But nope, refer to previous statement.

  136. Doubleplusgood short dictionary by dbIII · · Score: 1

    You don't have to be a German Nazi from the 1930-40s to be a fascist. There have been others. I suggest try looking at a dictionary instead of assuming that only Nazis were fascist. If you want to get a bit of a clue consider Italy before WWII or Greece after it.

    1. Re:Doubleplusgood short dictionary by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of what fascism is. It's the dipshit I was responding to who doesn't.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    2. Re:Doubleplusgood short dictionary by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Italy is really the better model for where we're headed. They were much more interested in the economic side of the ideology.

    3. Re:Doubleplusgood short dictionary by Bartles · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I'd expect a fascist to say.

    4. Re:Doubleplusgood short dictionary by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I'd expect a moron to say.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
  137. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Garridan · · Score: 1

    It seems that lately people inject forms of the word bigot as an attention-grabber when the word usually is a better description of themeselves - the ones attempting to place the label on others.

  138. Hmm. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I do ever visit America again, and I can't possibly imagine why I would want to, but if I do, I'm washing any clothes that were in my bag (and subsequently meddled with, and man handled) immediately on arrival. I would also have to do a cleanse after leaving too, to get the 'merica out of my liberty tree-hugging clothes and toiletries.

    cowardfully yours,
    anonymous coward

  139. Pied Piper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was deemed a threat to the NSA pied piper

  140. oh, ummmm, not so bad.... by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    ... thought we might see some world class, monumental stupidity, like burning flutes from 2000 - 6000 BC.

  141. All they have to use is drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the execution of suspects and innocents has to go through the air force or xe right now outside the US or otherwise. Not really that big of a deal. Once the TSA has drones, I assume they will keep them armed and have the same rights to murder as interpreted by the executive fuhrer.

  142. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Garridan · · Score: 1

    If your laptop is made of wheat, they may keep you off the plane because of some passenger's gluten intolerant anyway. But if, like mine, your laptop is made out of sweet sweet petrolium, you haven't a worry in the world. These ag-baggers won't pay your luggage any mind.

    Also, seriously: laptops and other valuables go in your carryon. Luggage inspectors have fast fingers. Lost my favorite knife to one of those bastards. I wish for the day that I could carry a damned pocket knife aboard a plane again.

  143. The U.S. government is EXTREMELY corrupt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. government is EXTREMELY corrupt. Only the rich matter.

  144. Re:All the news that matters by cusco · · Score: 1

    If Fatherland Security keeps confiscating my 2-ounce bottle of hot sauce because they think it could be used as a weapon there's no way will you get a dozen half-meter long sticks through security in your carry on.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  145. FYI, this was US CUSTOM SERVICE, not the TSA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think there is a clear distinction between the two, but it is not apparent among the comments I've read so far. This needs to be noted.

  146. Re:Yup, a bunch of sticks tied together in a bundl by kumanopuusan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yup, a bunch of sticks tied together in a bundle

    That sounds more like a faggot to me.

    --
    Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
  147. Re:All the news that matters by cusco · · Score: 1

    Have you looked up images of kawalas and nays? They're really, really obviously flutes, there's not much doubt possible about what they might be. I can't help but notice that his flight originated in Morocco, and the TSA twits likely figured they could get away with abusing any passenger with an Arabic-sounding name.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  148. Re:All the news that matters by JohnVanVliet · · Score: 2

    candygram for TSA ... candygram for TSA....

    --
    "I don't pitch OpenSUSE Linux to my friends, i let Microsoft do it for me
  149. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by JohnVanVliet · · Score: 1

    " I do, however, dispute its relevance here at Slashdot."

    well
    RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU PLAY AN INSTRUMENT !!!!
    I am betting that more than half of us here do .

    --
    "I don't pitch OpenSUSE Linux to my friends, i let Microsoft do it for me
  150. Re:Is was CUSTOMS not the TSA that seized the flut by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    and immediately jumped to the assumption that TSA is at fault. TSA doesn't inspect inbound international luggage, that's the job of Customs, Border Patrol (CBP)...

    Paddle them all and let God sort em out.

  151. Re:All the news that matters by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    It's not clear that these obviously looked like musical instruments to a person who isn't accustomed to seeing various kinds of flutes. Bundle of reeds with notches in them. Customs probably thought they were bongs.

    What is clear is that ICE inspectors didn't give a flute.

    They were worried about the bamboo being capable of taking root and growing, but a rooted flute is hard to toot.

    Just ask Courtney Love.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  152. Re:All the news that matters by Patent+Lover · · Score: 2

    This was Customs. There was no notation from ICE on my form. The customs guy wrote on my form.

  153. Re: All the news that matters by chaboud · · Score: 2

    Wait... This leader is killing the economy by using a wedge or block to prevent movement? Chocking?

    Oh, I see. It makes more sense if you say it while being a complete idiot.

  154. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. has for the longest time covered articles about politics, civil rights and stupidities of the government.

    This in my view isn't a story about customs protecting agriculture but rather about a civil servant removing equipment which belonged to someone and without notice or recourse destroying that equipment.

    I guess it's not as fun sounding as the TSA confiscating a laptop and not having due process to get it back, but what's really the difference?

    Due process is you declare them on entry, this is how every country works.

  155. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, those with the lowest scores have traditionally gone into artillery, followed by quartermasters. Infantry actually scores above average.

  156. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do understand that the 'C' in 'ICE' stands for Customs, right? Customs and la migra merged as part of the post-9/11 panic-based legislation.

  157. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well then, explain how this article relates to science and technology. What's that? It doesn't?
    Shut up then.

    If you go through US customs, the tools you use to do your job may not make it with you. Like your phone, laptop, textbooks, thumb drives, or hand made wooden flutes.

    Well no shit, first your bag would have to survive the airline's luggage sieve, then customs bureaucracy, THEN a few turns around the buffet line, *cough* I mean luggage carousel.

    Why would someone put things they WANT in checked luggage?... is this News for Morons, Stuff that Makes Sense?

  158. This one time, in Band Camp by maroberts · · Score: 1

    I wonder if he's gettin' kinda antsy?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  159. Re:All the news that matters by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    Why in the hell do we put up with such incompetence? Do we not pay enough into the TSA to not hire utter morons?

    Absolutely not! TSA agents are mostly people who couldn't pass the US Postal Carrier exam. Several people I knew who were not "bulbworthy" were getting jobs at the TSA shortly after 9/11. They have a very low bar for entry.

    Heartbeat? - Or may zombies actually qualify?

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  160. Monolith by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    The TSA is not a single entity. Sometimes several people make mistakes in a row. "The TSA" does not make these decision; people who work for the TSA do and people make mistakes. There are many references to the fact that he has been crossing the border for several years with no problem. That would be relevant if there was only one inspector but there are hundreds. Different inspectors under different circumstances may see things differently. We also don't know the whole story. Perhaps the agricultural inspector, who's job it is to protect the US from insects, saw a bug come out of one of the flutes and overreacted.

    All this righteous indignation over something that is in all probability a mistake is just stupid and a weak reason for jumping on the "bash the TSA" bandwagon. This is one incident. If it happens many time there may be an issue. I think Hanlon's razor is probably applicable here.

  161. Re: All the news that matters by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

    Wait... This leader is killing the economy by using a wedge or block to prevent movement? Chocking?

    Oh, I see. It makes more sense if you say it while being a complete idiot.

    Damn spelling Nazi sympathizer! [Choking /. doesn't have edit features]. In 2004 I told HP to stuff it when they wanted me to fly internationally, told them get someone from W Hollywood that enjoys getting probed or spending an entire day at the airport. I can cover 800 miles a day in my car, I have no idea how the airline industry has survived this long adding increased cost of fuel. They've rooted crypto so I.T. also appears to be an industry taking a pounding as well. Automotive industry? Not really a big seller if the people are being squeezed at every other angle. Banking and finance? Bankers took the bailout money and ran, twice. Housing? The bubble popped. It has all been a pretty good thearter of destruction, now if 9/11 brought about all this crap then we should have stayed with a surgical strike, or maybe a tactical nuke, no worries though, looks like Russia might be exploring that option.

  162. Re:All the news that matters by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    He had to pick someone, and the geico cavemen were getting rebellious.

  163. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by hantms · · Score: 1

    Funny, last time I went to the states they nearly refused to let me in because of an "Arab" stamp in my passport. Well I did fly Emirates, and I did have a free hotel in Dubai since it was a 9 hour stopover the first time.

    Nearly refused, really? Or they just asked you about your last visited country, which is a routine question? (And if you filled in London for example and your passport shows entry for a day in Dubai, then it's common to ask about it.)

  164. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't know what these unusual things are which I've never seen before. Should I call in the owner or should I just arbitrarily destroy them? Hmmm, decisions...."

  165. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stupidest ones might not be best suited fot demnding front line duty, but there sure as hel lare psitions where any sign of intelligence is a bad thing.

  166. Re:All the news that matters by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    You do understand that the 'C' in 'ICE' stands for Customs, right? Customs and la migra merged as part of the post-9/11 panic-based legislation.

    So? Your luggage/goods are now first going to what used to be Immigration first an then to what used to be customs. Same result until they train the immigration people to be competent at filtering stuff they find in luggage. Classifying a bunch of flutes as 'agricultural items' and incinerating them is the worst kind of failing grade, rookie mistake.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  167. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by N1AK · · Score: 0

    More than half of us do a lot of things that doesn't every news item related to them should be on /.; I travelled in a car today but I don't want to see every car 'news' story on here ;)

    All that said, I think this story is a good one for /. the fact that some extremely valuable items were seized and destroyed without discussion with the owner at customs is stuff that matters.

  168. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Well then, explain how this article relates to science and technology. What's that? It doesn't?
    Shut up then.

    If you go through US customs, the tools you use to do your job may not make it with you. Like your phone, laptop, textbooks, thumb drives, or hand made wooden flutes.

    Right, because you might walk back out of the US with NSA secrets hidden in your wooden flute.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  169. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by corbettw · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had an account at /. for over 15 years; you don't even have an account. So shut the fuck up and go to Techdirt if you don't like it. /. has never been solely about "science and technology". It's always had a very strong political part to it, and this cock up at US Customs plays to that part of the site.

    Don't like it? Too bad, we won't miss you.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  170. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by corbettw · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have to, you anonymous idiot.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  171. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is obviously wrong, but don't you think that this was caused either buy the guys last name or else because he had recently been in Morocco?

  172. Border Police at Cirith Ungul by emj · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that Shelob the giant spider is better than TSA.

  173. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did he say he was a police officer? No he did not. So STFU.

  174. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes sense, not. Artillery bombards the enemy far behind the front lines. Infantry gets to meet the enemy in hand to hand combat.

    Who is the smarter here? (IMO it is not smart to try to die in a war)

  175. Re:All the news that matters by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Yup, but them was furrin inspections. Furriners is all comnersts and tairsts. We don't trust them furriners. Number one! Number one!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  176. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Nearly refused, really? Or they just asked you about your last visited country, which is a routine question? (And if you filled in London for example and your passport shows entry for a day in Dubai, then it's common to ask about it.)

    No asking about it and grilling you for half an hour then claiming they don't "buy the story" are two different thing. I get asked about all sorts of things at many airports around the world. In this case it wasn't even an airport it was a simple border crossing at Canada. I've never had so much lip service from an idiot border guard in my life. I've also never needed to announce my intention to pass into a country which freely issues tourist Visas 48 hours in advance, and I also know of no other country which staples a special piece of paper in your passport and then removes it when you leave, not to mention finger printing. Tell me again why I should carry a plane ticket showing how I got into the previous country when I go to the next one? Because that's what the border guard said I should be doing so they can "verify" my "story" about the "curtesy hotel" in one of the busiest transit hubs operated by one of the most popular airlines in the world.

    I was in the USA for 10 hours, and over an hour of that was the border crossing. Land of the free my arse. The Canadian border security is quite good, with expert use of probing questions. Australia is good. Most of Europe doesn't give a shit, and neither did England last time I was there though that was a long time ago.

  177. Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming 3.. 2.. 1..

    It's sad when you can't even do a lame overused meme properly.

  178. Re:All the news that matters by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    If they at least inspected your salt then they were better coordinated than customs at Houston when I went through there back in 2005. I told them that I'd been on farmland, but instead of disinfecting my shoes they x-rayed my suitcase.

  179. Mass murder done by a different arm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or did you think that the entire STASI popped out for the killings, rather than have experts and specialists for that work?

    The TSA just pass the murdering on to specialists who are given a different arm to operate under.

    So, no, no different.

    1. Re:Mass murder done by a different arm. by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Or did you think that the entire STASI popped out for the killings, rather than have experts and specialists for that work?

      The TSA just pass the murdering on to specialists who are given a different arm to operate under.

      So, no, no different.

      Ok, which arm of the TSA or US government is going around killing Americans?

      I'll say that I'm not actually sure the Stasi was in the business of killing Germans. But even so the comparisons are inaccurate, the spy apparatus in the US is rarely about pushing a particular political ideology, rather it's about control (the motive is to stop terrorism but it's a very slippery slope).

      --
      I stole this Sig
  180. Re:All the news that matters by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You said atypically, so we're talking about an unusual situation, not the usual one, right?

    So normally the intelligence of an army is completely unrelated to that of its[1] leader, is that what you mean? If you think the Kenyan stole the flutes, why don't you just say so?

    [1] no apostrophe, see?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  181. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably mistook it for a skin flute and stole it.

  182. I know you meant 'enforced' but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I like your phrasing. In-forced, indeed.

  183. Re:All the news that matters by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Absolutely not! TSA agents are mostly people who couldn't pass the US Postal Carrier exam. Several people I knew who were not "bulbworthy" were getting jobs at the TSA shortly after 9/11. They have a very low bar for entry.

    It's not their fault. TSA agents are just pawns in the game of life.

    --
    No sig today...
  184. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    It's the word "Your" that he's unable to use correctly.

    --
    No sig today...
  185. America -the land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahahahaha

  186. Fascism? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are half the people commenting here Alex Jones fans or something? "First they come for your flutes, then tomorrow it's your children!". You paranoid idiots. Get some perspective.

  187. Jesus Miracle Church Rescue Foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for visiting our website

      we hope the following links will assist with any inquiry you have.

    Mailing Address:
    34490 Ridge Rd
    Willoughby Ohio 44094

    Phone number:
    1-440-278-4568

    Customer Service, Products or Partner Relations Inquiries:
    info@jmcrfoundation.org

    Jesus Miracle Church Rescue
    He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.

  188. Re:All the news that matters by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's WORSE than that. My eldest daughter went to a TSA Hiring Event. She was told she scored TOO HIGH on the qualifying exam. . .

  189. yeh customs officers are not the sharpest tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but still tools all the same.

    my direct experience was about 10 or so years back and was the confiscation and destruction of a scale model of a Shinkansen (bullet train) I bought back from Japan. the Customs note explained that they ".... believed it contained contraband food goods, specifically chocolate because some parts of Asia had incidents of bird flu" but not Japan, and why the hell they thought an official JR scale model, sealed in its box, was "chocolate" and having inspected what was obviously plastic and metal and electric motors still believed it was "chocolate" really does not speak well of the level of intelligence of these officials.

    my second, indirect experience of customs incompetence was a friend who, when his band came went from Australia to tour North America, US customs confiscated and destroyed his vintage 335 Rickenbacker because it contained Brazilian rosewood on its fretboard, this despite the fact the guitar was over 40 years old, well before the ban came in to place (and technically exempt), Ironic given the that the guitar was made in the US, and had made many trips back there with its various owners over the years (the case was a veritable museum piece of stickers and tags from long gone airlines)

  190. Paging Mr Dewey Paging Mr Dewey by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    I think this guy should start calling lawyers and unless it can be shown that the written law requires that Preserved Plant Materials must be destroyed at the border Sue The Airport Sue the Airline and the TSA.

    My question is why were the flutes not keep in holding and then shipped back (after he paid for the shipping)?

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  191. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stupidity of the government for the TSA or for hiring retards who are trained by retards. I think this news better make some national waves and embarrass Obama who underwrites every stupid thing as important to the safety of Americans. Personally I think that stupid Nigger should have to hunt down the rare reeds and fabricate a lifes work by hand. Then ship his sorry ass to some cotton field in Egypt, where he can fullfill his place in society.
    Im tired of the world blaming the people of the several states for what our Repubmocratic dictatorship does. It has nothing to do with the will of the people of the united states. Save us!

  192. Krytian Zimmerman's Piano, too! by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 2

    They did the same thing to Zimmerman a few years ago; he's one of the leading concert pianists on earth. Customs took his piano and destroyed it! Clueless! http://www.omg-facts.com/Interesting/A-Famous-Concert-Pianist-Had-His-Piano-D/53381 and http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=46850

    1. Re: Krytian Zimmerman's Piano, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the Snopes page all the way to the bottom? His piano was delayed for five days in customs; later a false rumor exaggerated the story until it appeared that customs destroyed the piano.

    2. Re: Krytian Zimmerman's Piano, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read it? It clearly said that one piano was destroyed shortly after 9/11, and another one was delayed for 5 days in 2006.

  193. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    For once I can say it and it's actually probably true: you must be new around here!

    It's: News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters - not, Science and Technology News for Nerds, Nothing else Matters.

    Political discussions are plenty nerdy and they matter. With that said, I am a nerd and to me this matters. You must also consider the livelihood of Slashdot itself. An article like this can get 500+ comments, a pop-sci article gets 100 - 200 comments, ultra-pure hard-core science stories top off at 50 comments. Slashdot needs a balance and by your story posting logic, this place would be a ghost town. Get over yourself.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  194. Re:Gestapo and Stasi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Police state instruments such as the Gestapo, Stasi, and many others of more modern history understand that the technology is not the most feared nor the most useful tool.

    Instead, make it law for everyone to watch and inform on everyone.

    Teachers inform on children who have repeated what spouses have said in private confidence.
    Neighbors inform on neighbors, and those who fail to corroborate get a visit in the small hours of the night.
    No one is safe saying anything to anyone.

    The security organizations don't need technology to record what actually is being communicated; they simply assume that wrong things are being said and arrest, detain, and make people disappear on a regular basis. Much cheaper than what the NSA does and much more effective at keeping people in line.

    No massive and expensive data centres. No embarrassing questions from political hacks. Just a wonderfully useful way to employ the sociopaths who would otherwise be busy with unapproved antisocial behaviour.

    . . . and the streets become very safe.

  195. Re:All the news that matters by flyneye · · Score: 0

    I can verify that. I worked with a slow-headed veteran, pre 9/11, who quit and hired on to the TSA.
    A simple soul with a good heart and work ethic. He became so disgusted with the TSA , he quit after 2 months.
    He was tired of seeing old ladies hassled and normal people reduced to tears, while obvious Muslims waltzed through, unscathed.
    Even he could see the total crap that made up the widespread philosophy of Hillarys Political Correctness promoted by the Repubmocrat regeim at the time.
    I cant believe that ignorant cunt ran the country and may try again. What gall!

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  196. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Parent is wrong, this was CBP, not ICE. CBP secures the boarder, ICE is law enforcement/investigations inside the U.S.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Immigration_and_Customs_Enforcement
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Customs_and_Border_Protection

  197. Re:All the news that matters by flyneye · · Score: 1

    I just spotted your post, beneath a reply I was leaving and couldnt help but notice the irony.
    My uncle did testing for police dept.s over several states.
    If you crossed a minimal threshold for intelligence, you were excluded from hiring. No SHIT!
    If you are smart, they dont want you. Smart people tend to think for themselves and make judgement calls.
    Police have no desire to hire individuals with these qualities.
    This has been going on for decades.
    Further, deviations in the MMPI battery of tests, were ignored and merely kept on file in our county. We hire the unstable as well, here, as evidenced this year by 3 cases of jailers raping inmates (all male). A fourth case in a nearby county , as well. A rash (more than 5) of drownings of people running from cops over a 3 month period in separate cases. A conviction of a training officer from the local cop school, for murdering his wife, with the kids in the house, then burning the house to cover it up. And of course the usual stories of police corruption found everywhere.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  198. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    If some gluten-intolerant passenger eats your laptop, he (and the other passengers) have even bigger problems than Customs.

  199. Why transport them in the cargo hold? by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    I mean, seriously, I would never give stuff like that away to be handled by packet tossers (not only because of customs, but also because of accidential damage). I would always carry it in my hand luggage.

  200. Re:Shit happens by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    Well, that's because the USA is steadily getting more evil.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  201. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by jrumney · · Score: 1

    I also know of no other country which staples a special piece of paper in your passport and then removes it when you leave

    Paper departure records are starting to die out and be replaced by computer records, but they were very common outside of Europe up until recently. The staple is so you don't lose it, admittedly I've only encountered that in US and Japan, most other countries just slip it into your passport.

  202. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    depends on how valuable....err dangerous to import and must be obliterated without documentation...your items are.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  203. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, Corbett W., what's your full name? What's your full home address? What is the name and address of your spouse, if you have one? What are the names and addresses (last known, if they're deceased) of your parents? You'd better provide this information, otherwise to us you'd just be some sort of an "anonymous idiot". Oh, and please provide us with scans or copies of all of your tax records and employment records, too. You've got nothing to hide, right? You don't believe in anonymity, right? So we can expect to have this information available to us within a day. Remember, if you don't provide it, you're just a no good Anonymous Coward.

  204. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he would rather reduce "obvious Muslims" to tears ?

  205. Write stupid fucking comment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Get slapped down. If you don't show he's actually violated a rule (rules to raw materials don't apply to finished products) then you're just being a fucktard.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by nurb432 · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you need to be removed from the country too. Or denied access if you are one of those people coming to suck off our resources.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to be removed from the country too.

      How did you get to be such a social reprobate? Jingoism is an illness, not an aspiration.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      How did you get to be such a social reprobate?

      Just sick and tired of pinheads like you who cant even follow a simple directive ( read my signature again, if you are capable )

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Just sick and tired of pinheads like you who cant even follow a simple directive

      You don't get to issue directives to me. You can deal with replies, or you can fuck off. There's no third option.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes i do get to issue demands of you. You have the option to ignore them and pay the penalty, but i can still make demands.

      I can also beat you with a bat, if i find you.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    6. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can also beat you with a bat, if i find you.

      It is not in fact clear that you can do so. It may be that I can sodomize you with your own bat, if you try.

      It is however clear that if you try to do so, you're committing a premeditated crime. Thanks for leaving an evidence trail. That will come in handy if you should go completely off the deep and and show up at my house, and I wind up having to blow your back out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      i never said it wasn't a crime to do so, only that i could. You totally missed the point i was making about 'violating orders with actions', but i am not surprised.

      Since no crime is actually intended, the only evidence trail here is that you are stupid.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    8. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It is really unsurprising how poor your reading comprehension is. There is an if..then statement in my comment that you failed to grok. Please don't try again, I don't want to be responsible for letting the smoke out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Write stupid fucking comment by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Yes i saw it, and the statement was to clarify there was never any criminal intent, nullifying your comment completely, or was that too much for your pea brain to handle?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  206. Avoid US by rjmonna · · Score: 1

    When do people finally learn to avoid the US? You don't want to be a foreigner there, because you practically have no rights (and you will be harassed if you're not a white person). You also don't want to do business with the US, because your data will be stolen and used against you. We're trying to avoid US services more and more. Our government investigates a 'national cloud' to avoid these issues.

  207. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You put up with it because (for the most part) it doesn't affect you. It's well documented how little the average American travels, much less travels out of the US, so "the majority" aren't that fussed about it. Further, as an American you get a little extra priority getting through the border controls. For all of us foreigners, and for those Americans that look like foreigners, we have to put up with all the morons you hire for border control. It's a good reason for the rest of us not to come to the US, or transit through it. Shame really, there are some good things to see and do in the US, either on a trip or on a few-hours-stop-over.

  208. Don't check anything important. by Jaywalk · · Score: 1

    As a frequent traveler I've found that the first line of defense is to not check anything important. For some stuff, like liquid or knives, you don't have a choice, but otherwise I keep my valuables close. Between ham-fisted baggage handlers and bone-headed bureaucrats I want the chance to at least argue if they're going to do something stupid with anything more valuable than my dirty socks. In fact, I generally manage to get everything into my carry-ons and rarely check anything at all.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  209. Unfortunate, but not Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I do empathize with him, it is quite possible he is in the wrong and CBP is OK. Specifically, if he did not declare them for inspection, the CBP is likely in the right for finding and dealing with them in a secondary inspection. Note that he connected through NY and it was only in Boston where he found them missing. Likely he did not declare them while transiting through NY and they were caught in the screening after he went through the CBP an rechecked his bags. Unfortunate, however, if I were traveling with expensive items, I would make sure I knew and followed the proper procedure. Now, the article is short on details so there is a lot of speculation involved so we cannot know exactly who is in the right here.

    A quick search turned up:

    https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/1166

    To Quote:
    Can I bring or send an item made from wood to the U.S.? What if the object has feathers or bone?

    Finished, manufactured, or naturally weathered products including carvings, driftwood, furniture, picture frames, and musical instruments, and plywood are allowed into the U.S., but you need to declare them so the items can be inspected by CBP. Wood that has bark attached is prohibited from China and is subject to a higher level of inspection from all countries (Miscellaneous and Processed Products Manual, Table 3-161, Pages 152-154)

    Objects that have feathers are allowed if the objects are fully finished and the feathers are clean, dry, and free of skin. (APHIS Animal Product Manual, Table 3-7-13, Page 272)

    Bones that are fully finished and ready to use such as buttons, knife handles, and souvenirs are allowed as are tanned hides of domestic species (APHIS Animal Product Manual, Table 3-4-6, Page 218 and Table 3-7-3, Page 262)

    APHIS Animal Product Manual can be found at aphis.usda.gov.

    Please note that all items made from wood, feathers, or bone may also be subject to endangered species regulations. See our Q&A entitled: Endangered species, CITES, endangered wildlife, plants, exotic skins, animals Answer ID 64.

    If you wish to receive automatic updates to this Q&A, select "Subscribe to Updates" on the left side of this screen.

  210. You want more and bigger government? This is it! by felrom · · Score: 1

    The next time you're rooting for another new government program that you hope will allow you to shed some more of your personal responsibility, remember this story. When you keep supporting politicians and policies aimed only at growing the size and power of the government, you end up with stories like this, and like the NSA spying, and like the roadside gloveless anal cavity searches, and crashed MRAPs on the I-10.

    If you want the madness to stop, you have to start taking responsibility for yourself, and telling the government that you've finally decided that you know how to live your life and take care of yourself better than the government does.

  211. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The irony is that most of the posters attacking the USA, calling them Nazis (as in Godwin's Law) and vowing never to visit, refuse to reveal their home countries. At least some of the AC's in response, have identified themselves as citizens of the USA.

    Cowards without a country (nor a real name), that's pretty low.

  212. I've lived in a police state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a police state: it's plain fascism. Don't get fooled by word games.

    In a police state the police still serve, this is not the case in the US.

    With facsism the enforcement system has become the ruler. The "police" does not serve the law but are "the law". The US has already gone beyond this simple fascism.

    Your congress does not matter. Your president does not matter. Your courts do not matter. Your meatbags with badges do not matter. Your weapons do not matter. Your money does not matter. Your knowledge, proficiency, talent, experience and creativity does not matter. Your righteousness does not matter. Your dreams do not matter. Your situation does not matter. Your intent does not matter. Your complaints do not matter. Your likes and dislikes do not matter. Your opinion does not matter. Your death does not matter. Justice does not matter. Freedom does not matter.

    This new beast already has a blasphemous name. People call it "America". All of humanity lives under its shadow now.

    Feel free to call it Babylon. It does not matter.

  213. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Ah, the moron "Pseudonyms aren't any better" brigade. Ignoring the fact the comment was pointing out idiocy, not anonymity as a subject of derision.

  214. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish more people knew this. I have known for years that there is a maximum threshold of intelligence to be a city cop. Unfortunately, so many people assume that cops are well screened and intelligent. They must not talk to many cops. The reality is the entire system is designed to encourage jack booted thugs.

  215. They were stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And sold on eBay. I bet he didn't even check eBay.

  216. Re:All the news that matters by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    "So those too stupid for the Army are sent over to the TSA, right?"
    --
    No, they go to Congress.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  217. Re:All the news that matters by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    You sir, do not understand what the term "due process" means.

  218. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You toss phrases like "obvious Muslim" out there and then turn around and call someone an ignorant cunt? I almost choked on my tea.

    Are you a troll or just an ignorant cunt?

  219. Speaking as an American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone want to come to this country anyhow?

  220. Re:You want more and bigger government? This is it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blah blah internet libertarian retard.

    There is no difference between big government and big business. We could privatise the whole government tomorrow and give it an ownership interest in all US soil, and effectively nothing would change. Even if the whole US customs service were privatised, the contract you agree to when flying through the US would include a little, "You accept that we can take and resell^Wdestroy anything," clause, and what are you gonna do about it, punk? Private postal/courier services ruin shit way more often than public, except perhaps in Italy, and they're just as good at finding a reason not to pay out, because, well, their 20 pages of small print is more carefully written than your understanding, and even if it isn't, go ahead: take them to court.

    There is either power or a power vacuum quickly filled. The only question is who holds the power. The problem here is bad government.

  221. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the rest of the world... it's important.

    It proves to us over and over again that we must stop buying USA technology, avoiding the USA cloud, routing around the USA Stasi ^h^h^h^h^h NSA and avoid visiting.

    I welcome our new Slashdot overlords to print TSA article after article, as only that was have we any hope of reclaiming technology from the most evil race on the planet in the last 60ish years.

  222. maybe they are in ebay now ? by gitano_dbs · · Score: 1

    maybe not incompetence or fascism, maybe its just greed.

  223. Re:You want more and bigger government? This is it by felrom · · Score: 1

    You make the false assumption that we either have to give all our power to the government or to "big business." I advocate neither of those. Reclaim your power as an individual; that's the only place that power comes from to start with.

  224. Re:Is was CUSTOMS not the TSA that seized the flut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Customs has very clear restrictions on bring in plants, timbers, etc and obviously they felt the raw flute making materials qualified under those restrictions.

    Customs says

    Some plants, cuttings, seeds that are capable of propagation, unprocessed plant products and certain endangered species are allowed into the United States but require import permits and other documents; some are prohibited entirely.

    Notice the phrases "capable of propagation" and "unprocessed." Are you arguing that a varnished length of reed with mouthpiece and finger holes cut in it, probably wrapped carefully in cloth and placed in a case, could reasonably be mistaken as a cutting capable of propagation? Because I'm pretty sure the reason this is a story is specifically because none of the rest of us think that one could mistake a flute-shaped piece of wood as an incipient tree. A flute seems almost as likely to sprout roots as a baseball bat and as reasonably classified as an "agricultural product."

  225. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    I don't see anything about the article that claims to be science and technology. Its waving the US flag in the corner of the summary and therefore is about things in or by the US. Notably, this site is "News for Nerds" not "science and math only."

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  226. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Been here a while myself.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  227. Re:All the news that matters by RoLi · · Score: 1

    The whole point of affirmative action is to *NOT* hire the best candidate.

  228. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    Notably, if he'd stop surfing anonymously, Slashdot has a feature to hide articles of types that you don't find interesting.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  229. Re:All the news that matters by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

    google "hemlock wooly adelgid" or "emerald ash borer". no sympathy for people who attempt to import agricultural products without the proper documentation. and if any of those flutes were made from endangered species, the guy deserves prison time. How hard is it to fill out the proper forms when you're importing potentially restricted items?

  230. Re:All the news that matters by torkus · · Score: 1

    I can't comment about your specific state but, tin hats aside, the police ARE expected to use some intelligence and make judgment calls.

    Looking at NYPD who are notorious and noteworthy all the same. Part of the police test/interview they will ask something like "if you pulled your mother over for speeding what would you do/would you give her a ticket".

    Yes is the wrong answer. You're *expected* to use your judgment and enforce laws to the best effect, not the strict letter. If giving mom a dirty look and asking her why she'd do something so silly while you're on duty would make her drive safer...that's far more useful than writing a ticket. Same reason cops look the other way over lots of stupid chickenshit stuff.

    With that said I fully understand no one would write their mother a ticket because cops wink wink nudge nudge...but the underlying point stands.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  231. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

    Fifteen years? Frickin' hell.. Has it been that long?

  232. Re: take our country back by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    sounds like the t-bagger rants about jack-booted govt oppression, but somehow i doubt they'll support a moroccan:-[

    i'm webmaster for bostoncamerata.org, the medieval music group mr. razgui has performed with:

    http://bostoncamerata.org/blog/over-a-quarter-of-a-million-people-have/

  233. "My life" in checked baggage? Srsly?!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had anything that was "my life" I damn well wouldn't put it into checked luggage. It would be in carryon, highly protected AND insured.

    So, did he have $10,000 insurance for "his life"?

    He travels more than I. I only spend about 2 months overseas annually, on vacations. When I travel, especially overseas, my check luggage has clothes and power adapters that can easily be replaced. Nothing "important." I say this as someone who has never lost any luggage during travel - only once did my bag not arrive with me during air travel and once on a bus (don't get me started). Besides that. my bags arrive when I do, amazing after 25-40 hrs of travel, let me assure you. Just for fun, figure out how to get from your home town to Pohkara, Nepal and think about the chances for baggage to be lost.

  234. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

    The irony is that most of the posters attacking the USA, calling them Nazis (as in Godwin's Law) and vowing never to visit, refuse to reveal their home countries

    Irony how? And you do know that all that Godwin's law states is that as a discussion goes on, the likelihood of mentioning Nazis, Nazi Germany, etc increases - and that it is only the corollary that actually attempts to make use of the law to set forth any judgements - illogically too, IMO - about such uses?

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  235. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did your MOS start with an 11 or a 35?

  236. Disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That customs person needs to be fired.

  237. Re:All the news that matters by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

    last time i checked, wood/bamboo/reeds etc are agricultural products. when you don't declare things to customs and fill out the proper forms, that's called smuggling. guy deserved what he got, end of story. the u.s. is bound by international treaties in such matters.

  238. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by corbettw · · Score: 1

    I know, it's crazy. I started hanging out here before my oldest son was born; he'll be 16 next month. I finally got a login around that time. One of my life's regrets is not getting one as soon as I found the site, it probably would've been a five-digit one.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  239. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    I never thought I'd see it, but here it is: two legs good, four legs better. Amazing. Someone insists that Slashdot is a politics site and moreover has been all along, when prior to CmdrTaco's retirement it never really went for politics. Now, there are plenty of mainstream politics stories with no tech connection. It wasn't always like this. But Orwell would have wrote it if it weren't true.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  240. Re:All the news that matters by steelfood · · Score: 1

    I pick things up and take them away.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  241. Re:All the news that matters by Notabadguy · · Score: 2

    Yes. 11B. Infantry. I turned down a full ride to Michigan State to enlist in the army. Despite an ASVAB score that meant I could choose any MOS that I wanted, I chose Infantry. I even chose the maximum enlistment period (six years). My basic training had a population mix of high school graduates, GED holders, enlisted NCOs from other MOSes that wanted to switch to Infantry, college drop-outs, and a couple college graduates.

    Several years later, I got an early out of my enlistment to attend USMA, and finally got a college degree. Several of my classmates were also former Infantrymen. During my tenure at West Point, I saw other Infantrymen attend, some of them decorated veterans; one a medal of honor recipient.

    There are stupid people in all walks of life; having an 11 or 35 designator doesn't make you one.

  242. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you declare any natural fibres in your clothing? The leather in your suitcase or your watch band?

  243. Re:All the news that matters by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    If your bottles of hot sauce can't be used as a weapon then it really isn't hot sauce. Considering the stuff I have walked through with it is really a crap shoot, my old SLR camera with the metal body 20 questions, wipe for explosives, and off to get patted down. A handful of shotgun shells forgotten in a coat pocket sent through the x-ray machine walk right through unaware.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  244. Re:All the news that matters by Iceykitsune · · Score: 1

    It is illegal to bring untreated wood into the US because of invasive insects

    --
    GENERATION 24: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  245. Re:All the news that matters by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    "as an American, you get a little extra priority getting through border controls".
    I call bullshit on that.
    I'm an American, I travel internationally at least once a year.EVERY time I've hit customs in the US, the lines have been seriously longer for US citizens than visiting foreign citizens.Probably because that's the largest group of people passing through US border control.
    I contrast this to the countries in Asia I usually visit, where what you state is completely true. Especially Japan.
    Just last year, flying to Canada: Into Canada, Canadian line shorter, "other" line longer.
    Flying back to US: US line longer, "Other" line super short. I get jacked on both ends.

  246. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't expect Customs to apply rules for agricultural products overbroadly to electronic devices. The one situation does not inform the other in this case.

  247. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

    Amen!

  248. Re:All the news that matters by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    So you're alleging now that the TSA isn't part of the Department of Homeland Security, part of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government?

  249. Re:All the news that matters by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    No, those are the ones too stupid for TSA.

  250. Customs everywhere does creepy stuff. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    I have a British friend who once traveled through Korea, stayed one day, and left. My friend had bought a lot of deodorant, since she was living Japan, and couldn't get any there that she liked there.
    When going through Korean customs, she actually had the customs agent tell her, in English, that she was confiscating all her deodorant because she wanted it. She then went on to explain that if she complained, she would miss her flight and possibly be put in jail.

  251. Don't check important items by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    Don't put important stuff in your checked luggage such as flutes that you earn your livelihood with. At least if you have them in your hand luggage you can put up an argument. Maybe you'd have to go so far as returning to your country of origin rather than submit to having them confiscated, but at least you'd still have them. Not to mention the possibility of having stuff stolen by the baggage inspectors; there have been plenty of those sorts of stories.

  252. He's an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is horrible. I don't know what to do. I've never written letters to people.

    Seriously? He's an idiot. Maybe some Federal agency should rendition his ass, then he'd know what horrible really is.
     
    "I've never written letters to people". Baby Jesus weeps.
     
    Captcha: redneck. You just can't make this shit up.

  253. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wasn't aware that Obama created the TSA, hired all the agents, personally wrote and oversaw their policies. Of course, we're talking about Customs, not TSA. Who are also part of Homeland, but I'm /pretty/ sure they significantly predate the Obama adminstration.

  254. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wish for you is that you get everything you deserve.

  255. Right on, Octagenarian!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great letter and spunk is abundant also in others of your age group--not just the "young punks" getting outted by uniformed idiots! Even my 85 yr. old mom's behaving like a worked up member of the cast of "Network" and I'm proud of her! Everyone's waking up to noise, lies, chemtrail smog spread like jam on our GMO tainted grain belt. Our elders now paint signs of impending relief for our struggle's victory, even as they're incarcerated for doing so. Thank you for your lucid reflection and thrive on another couple of decades, will ya? We need your spirit!

  256. Re: take our country back by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

    "i'm webmaster for bostoncamerata.org, the medieval music group mr. razgui has performed with:"

    Unforch, I surmize you are 200% correct. But I would like to thank you for bringing yet another of our "governments" (insert laff track here(but push wrong button & get sob track instead)) completely arbitrary, and asinine to me, abuses of power.

    I have no clue how long it will take him to replace those, but I hope he can. Unfortunately I'd also imagine we will never again get to hear him, in any US venue. I sure as hell would never again set foot on US soil, for any reason.

    Cheers, Gene

  257. just one of dem dere coincidences... yeah... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    *cough* *cough* soma

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  258. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have bamboo fiber underwear. Very soft, breathes well and durable.

    Should I declare my underwear to get it destroyed... ridiculous!

  259. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been thinking of them as the "Transportation Stupidity Agency" since they came into existence.

  260. Re:All the news that matters by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    So, in your weird little world, if a new boss is hired at a company, and his employees do something stupid which costs the company business and customers, he shouldn't fire them because their division was around before he was hired, even though he's their boss?

    You Obamabots really are a stupid lot.

  261. Some of them are excellent by hessian · · Score: 1

    In this message I admit I'm basically a schlep.

    Our local Taco Bell, which is a frequent hessian dining facility, has excellent management and attracts top of the line fast food workers.

    They're not all interchangeable.

    Unlike the sullen zombies at our local Burger King, McDonald's and KFC (but not Subway, Starbucks or Taco Cabana, which are also well managed) these workers have a positive attitude, seem to not mind the job, and are genuinely helpful and do a good job of making the food.

    The difference is management, which is both realistic about the nature of people and the nature of the job. The TB managers eliminate a lot of busywork and keep their staff active at a reasonable pace but don't push them too far. I see managers jump in and make food all the time.

    I don't think every fast food worker is this way -- see above for the description of the zombies at BK and McD's -- but for some, with good management and possibly higher salaries, this works out for the better.

    As far as why someone might take this job, the simple answer is that it is low-stress and inoffensive. You can make enough money to live without ever having something that keeps you up at night worrying.

  262. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Most other countries have abolished the process in favour of stamping the passport, you know the thing the passport was designed for?

    Why do I need a separate piece of paper for the USA which contains, all the things in the front of my passport + the date which is normally written onto the passport stamp, and why should I then need to carry it inside my passport?

    Who came up with this system? The department of redundancy department?

  263. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite a lot of stuff comes from natural products... shoes, jackets etc. are leather... that agricultural too? Methinks not... this is just overreaction and bureaucratic letter-following by thick people, "The flow chart told me I should destroy them...". And the sad thing is that they'll be protected by it. I eagerly await the next Van Gogh to be destroyed on entry "because some of the paints have egg albumen in them".

  264. Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this real ..happening in most advanced country of the world..Please stop this nonsense US

  265. Re: All the news that matters by iamhassi · · Score: 2

    No. Army has learned that a test can determine what role is best. Those with low scores are given bullet catcher infantry roles. Those that score best are given roles that are more mentally demanding like nuclear submarine engineer. It's not IQ, but it does say a lot about what kind of mental tasks a soldier can complete.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  266. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More likely "Too Stupid (for) Army".

  267. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

    Agreed, been a reader for around 15 years only recently started posting, it's the wide scope of articles no matter how loosely based on the slashdot tagline that keeps me coming back. dont like it, dont read it. easy.

  268. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are not going to see an ICE agent at the airport unless you are really really bad. They handle deport ions of illegal aliens who have been here awhile and several other functions. The customs and immigration functions at the airport are handled by CBP Officers while agriculture (meat, plant, dairy products, etc) are handled by Agriculture specialists. TSA is an entirely separate agency but both are under Department of Homeland Security, as is the Coast Guard, Secret Service, FEMA, ICE and several others.

  269. Re:All the news that matters by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, do you work for Customs by any chance? Might explain your post.

  270. Re:All the news that matters by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, of course. we have a minimal requirement of intelligence and judgement, or we would never be able to cross the street with any certainty of safety. We have to be able to tell if food is spoiled. Simple things that allow us to maneuver our environment. When we begin increasing the intelligence factor, we also increase the creative and analytical factors. This allows us to make judgements based on philosophy and personal preference. An apparent lack of peers fosters a situation where a superior mind can feel free to act independently. In order to create a more ideal situation, we would need a majority of superior minds to peer and wind up with a problem like herding cats, unless those in charge are also required to meet higher benchmarks.
    Sooooo, in the end, rather than raise the standards for a standard issue policeman, due to the price it would command. We fill the squadcars with the most abundant livestock available. The common shmoe. Oh we still screen them for honesty and purity over and above the MMPI. Have you ever had a confrontation where you felt vindicated in destroying your foes property? , can net you tales of slashed tires or keyed paintjobs, revenge sex and even theft. Naturally that is the end of the line for the candidate. But sometimes a smart one slips throught, gets his stride and makes the news.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  271. Re: It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by steveg · · Score: 1

    Personally, I do believe in anonymity.

    But I don't believe that the opinion of an anonymous idiot carries any particular weight.

    If you say something worth reading, that might be different. If you've *ever* said anything worth while, that might buy you some slack. But how would we know?

    --
    Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  272. Re: All the news that matters by flyneye · · Score: 1

    I think he would rather have given equal treatment to all and be effective.
    The mindset exemplified by your question is the same Clintonization that brought us paradoxially ineffective methods of security under the auspices of being politically correct.
    I suppose if youre not part of the solution, youre part of the problem.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  273. Re:All the news that matters by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Uhm, yeah, thats not working out so well.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  274. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im an obvious Muslim, teabagging you.
    While there are Muslims out there, you couldnt tell from a Wiccan, there are still many who publicly wear burqua in the U.S.
    This makes it obvious you ignorant cunt. Kinda chickenshit of you to call me out as an A.C.

  275. It's What the Body Wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dood. Thass a plant"
    "No my good sir, these are musical instruments..."
    "It look like wood. It agreekulturel. We destroy."
    "no. No! I have labored many hours on rare reeds to create this magnificent instruments."
    "Reed is wood. We take. Must destroy."

    Welcome to Idiocracy.
    Or something like that.

  276. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Periscopes don't usually look around corners That would be gonoscopes.

  277. The most terrifying words in the English language by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    We're from the government, and we're here to help.

  278. Re:Haven't been to the states since before sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, last time I went to the states they nearly refused to let me in because of an "Arab" stamp in my passport.

    You are simply lying.

  279. Customs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REALLY?????? OMG

  280. Re:All the news that matters by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    I am 73, and do not look like an 18 year old. I purchased a case of beer in Vermont, and at the cash they asked me to prove that I am older than 18. What ever happened to common sense? Did common sense die with the George Bush era?
    The lad had to enter a birthday into the computer system. Wow. What was wrong with 2 January 1900. That would make me 114 and I could then safely take home that case of Bud. I could however buy super toxic cigarettes without a second thought from the cashier.

    Hey Vermont, wake up and teach common sense in the schools.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  281. "I don't know that even bureaucrats can be this.." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not stupid in the way you think, they intend to destroy our USA. We are infidels in need of destruction.

  282. The truth comes out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is an old thread, but the truth about this finally comes out.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/musician-s-bamboo-flutes-destroyed-at-u-s-customs-1.2482370

    The relevant part of the article is here:
    "But the border agency told As It Happens that it "discovered fresh green bamboo canes approximately three to four feet long" in unclaimed baggage that belonged to Razgui. Fresh bamboo is prohibited from entering the U.S., the agency said.

    Since the purported "fresh bamboo" and Razgui's instruments were in the same container, he lost his entire collection of 13 flutes—and with them, his livelihood."

    So he was transporting his flutes plus fresh green bamboo in the same case. The entire thing was his fault and not that of customs officials.

  283. An understandable and sad mistake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inflating it beyond that and getting hysterical is childish.

    Predictable knee-jerk reactions aside, the US Dept. of Ag. has a serious job to do, and preventing invasive species from destroying the North American ecosystem IS part of that job.

    As other sensible people have pointed out, this is an issue of the system being flawed, addressing the specific flaw and fixing it should be the focus.

    Not acting like this is an example of the police state we live in when there are much more serious and profound examples of it all around us that hardly anybody is talking about.

    Holding this up as an example of THAT is actually a much greater problem than this specific rare and unfortunate incident.

    I hope attorneys and engineers step-up to offer assistance to Mr. Razgui, I can't imagine a more interesting project than assisting him in replicating and replacing the destroyed instruments.

  284. hmmmm by DimaVolodin · · Score: 1

    How did the guy pass the customs separately from his luggage?

  285. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out where the saudi reigious police get their training. I have heard that in the early days of private contractor TSA it was similar. If you want to actually try to solve that particular problem without being yourself a worse problem...

  286. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry. He was obviously British. Drinking tea and coming late to the party.

  287. Re: All the news that matters by Kelsen · · Score: 1

    Correct. Neither is the GATB. RFT!!! Dave Kelsen -- "SATAN, SATAN! It's the main megafurnace! She's losin' power and the temperature is dropping fast! I'm not sure if I can hold her!" -- Scotty in Hell

  288. Success! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    The world is now safer that terrorist woodwinds have been stopped in their tracks.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  289. Re:All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, US customs and TSA are two separate agencies.

  290. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends on what you're trying to accomplish. It's working swimmingly for the fascists in charge.

  291. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it is. it contains a measure of 'g' (general IQ) as well as several other dimensions.

  292. US Customs Abject Bovine Ignorance by chilizard · · Score: 1

    As this story spreads you can bet a battalion of Attorney types gathering. What I find most disturbing, under logic like this A Stradivarius is also an agricultural product, Remember the former Nazi quote "I was just following orders"......once again common sense proves to be uncommon, Just My Take,,,

    --
    "In Every Life The Time Comes To Grab The Bull By The Tail And Face The Situation" W.C.Fields
  293. Not Always Right by tepples · · Score: 1

    You really should have more respect for fast food workers.

    Especially when you look at Not Always Right and see what $#!+ they have to go through.

  294. A few questions... by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    In the war on terror, "smart," high-precision, low-yield weapons are used. There are certainly civilian casualties, as you point out, but the number of civialian casualties is orders of magnitude lower than in World War II, when the U.S. intentionally firebombed large residential neighborhoods in Germany and Japan, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians. (e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Tokyo )

    Given that information, I have a few questions for you.

    Tom Brokaw wrote a famous book about the WWII generation titled "The Greatest Generation." Do you agree with Brokaw's characterization? Do you believe the current generation of warriors is even greater than the WWII generation, because it kills orders-of-magnitude fewer civilians? Why or why not? If current tactics amount to "U.S. indiscriminant killing of civilians," how would you characterize the tactics used in WWII? Will future generations of Afghans and Yemenis hate America less than current generations of Japanese and Germans do, because of the far-less-deadly tactics used today? Why or why not?

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  295. What's great about it? by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Mistakes are made by all sides, in every war. To the extent that an organization feels ashamed of its mistakes, it is likely to attempt coverups as well. (There's no need to cover it up, if you have no remorse about it.) By characterizing this as a "great" story, you seem to revel in, or celebrate, the mistakes made by our side.

    To the extent that the story is true, I would call it a "tragic" story, not a "great" story.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  296. Re: All the news that matters by lucien86 · · Score: 1

    So you've already forgotten that 9/11 happened under Bush. As I recall it Bushes tampering with the FBI anti terrorist division was blamed as one of the things that allowed 9/11 to happen. Political correctness is annoying yes but both parties were/are equally guilty surely.

    --
    Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  297. You all miss the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He hand made them himself. Knew how each one sounded, felt and fitted his hand. He then hand crafted the reeds using special wood and who knows how or when he will get more. Lets just hope he was coming off a tour and has time to replace those one of a kind flutes each carved one at a time.
    We've all had our projects we took pride in. How would you like it if you got home and found a note on your door saying We destroyed it, call or write for more information and wait months for any answers.

  298. Re: All the news that matters by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Dont mistake me for a Repubmocrat. I wouldnt have anything to do with the ONLY party responsible for 9/11. Sorry , still no case for political correctness.
    Your mislaid point earns you a bunny. http://www.mentalfloss.com/sites/default/legacy/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/400pancake_bunny.jpg

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  299. Re: All the news that matters by flyneye · · Score: 1

    And later a parting on the right will be a parting on the left and the beers grown warmer over night.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  300. No, I was one of the three remaining people who... by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 1

    still believed Slashdot was worth reading...
    past tense intended.

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  301. Re:All the news that matters by rbunts · · Score: 1

    Do you find asking people 'Can I super size that for you' is just far too hard to remember, is 'Hi welcome to Walmart' just too intellectually challenging for you, good news TSA and now the US Customs Service have a career path to senior management for you.

  302. Re:All the news that matters by Leofcwen · · Score: 1

    So, to curb 'illegal deforestation' these bright sparks encouraged it because he now needs to take the resources required to make some more. Smart move there.

  303. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are you?

  304. Re:All the news that matters by Si · · Score: 1

    which costs the company business and customers

    Please explain how the actions of this employee do either.

    --


    Why is it that many people who claim to support standards have such atrocious spelling and grammar?
  305. Re: All the news that matters by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Hu Woo.

    Hu Woo, who, who?

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  306. Murica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't even know what agricultural is

  307. Musicians travel with their instruments by Ellie+K · · Score: 1
    Virtuoso musicians don't check their instruments as luggage. Even if their instruments are big, like a cello, they get a seat for the instrument.

    ...Razgui, who was not present when his bag was opened. 'I fly with them in and out all the time and this is the first time there has been a problem. This is my life.' When his baggage arrived in Boston, the instruments were gone.

    If his instruments were his life and he is a virtuoso musician, he would have kept his flutes with him on the airplane.

    --
    tempus fugit
  308. Re:All the news that matters by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Rocks more come to mind.

    Stop being insulting to rocks. I study them more closely than most people and I understand their vivid and distinct characters and behaviours better than most people do. They'd be deeply upset to be compared to these "customs officers", whose customs seem to be those of boorish thuggish humans, not like restrained thoughtful rocks.

    When was the last time that you met a rock that would take this sort of action without thinking about it for a millennium or several?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  309. Engineers who do Real Things... by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Bravo... may all of us be as capable as you, and posting gems like this to Slashdot, at age 79. I mean, being able to spell hyaluronan correctly is, in and of itself, quite a feat.

    It's been said that one way to ensure good behavior of all passengers is to issue a piece to every adult passenger. Would having a few amateur air marshals on every flight prevent more trouble than it causes? Finding out would be a good experiment.

    Now if I may pick your brain... is there some inexpensive signal strength meter I can carry with me up onto the roof when pointing a residential TV antenna? As I understand it, the pros use fancy, expensive spectrum analyzers. Is there a sub-$100 solution that you can recommend?

    (I'm a fan of taking advantage of those free over-the-air signals. It's surprising how many people aren't even aware that those signals are there for the taking... they seem to think that when the cable-TV networks were built out decades ago, over-the-air broadcasts were discontinued.)

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  310. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by McFly777 · · Score: 1

    I've had an account at /. for over 15 years; [. . .] /. has never been solely about "science and technology". It's always had a very strong political part to it, and this cock up at US Customs plays to that part of the site.

    15 years? ... Newbie.
    (but I agree with you. Some people just need to relax a little.)

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  311. Re:It's not a relevant topic for Slashdot. by loccohombre · · Score: 1

    n00b

    --
    "It's expensive, stupid, last only seconds - but makes your mouth hurt for days - it's BEE IN A BALLOON" - Kibo 3/1/95
  312. Re:All the news that matters by mikael · · Score: 1

    I think it is more the Khagra beetle, and the Khagra Reed (Phragmites Karka). The beetle likes grain plants as much as reeds.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  313. Re: All the news that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are hired specifically because they are idiots. It is much easier to control and/or convince an idiot than it is to explain yourself to someone with half a brain. It's scarier to think the half brained people are the smart ones.

  314. It is time to find an incredibly good attorney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do NOT need to be a victim of these federal morons. The fact that they were so utterly stupid that they do not know that many woodwind instruments have REEDS that are made from PLANTS. If you find a very good attorney you may be able to obtain a very huge monetary settlement given the quality and rarity of these instruments. PLEASE talk with many musicians with whom you have performed. You should certainly be able to obtain the names of a number of very high quality attorneys.

  315. Cam anyone actually stay ON TOPIC anymore when pos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I find utterly enraging is reading the comment sections that are filled with posts made by Americans who seem to be utterly unable to focus on an article or story and provide an on target response. You friggin morons go off in 45 different directions as soon as one person posts something you take issue with.
    What a bunch of brain dead opinionated poorly educated losers.

  316. Re:All the news that matters by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Are you saying TSA stands for The Stupid Army?

    And I always thought it meant Travel Suppression Agency