Domain: 66.218.71.225
Stories and comments across the archive that link to 66.218.71.225.
Comments · 11
-
Forget Bart's, Get Super WinPE 2004
Barts CD is nice, but this is better. Here is the description of SuperWINPE 2004. I don't know Bart personally, but he may have just ripped off SuperWINPE.
-
Re:Another review of Dell's digital jukebox...
-
Debunking the lies.
If the govt announce that by 2006, they were going to publish everyone's name and SSN, and if you currently use SSN as a validator, you need to change now or face fines of $100k/day, maybe we could do something about this.
You are verry evil and think stealing $100,000 fiat US dollars (see goldismoney.info forums) by most-anticipated use of military force will solve problems. I suppose, as usual, you will respond to requests on howto re-inforce the collection of this fine by use of the same STANDING ARMY held over our heads that is also used to infringe upon the allegedly un-infringible 2nd Ammendment to the Constitution for the united States of America? Or perhaps, that you ignore that a State cannot diminish the rights of "We, the People" because States are Public corporations that are subserviant and created by mankind and thus no groups of mankind operating under a fake/artificial name (ie McDonalds, Levitz Furniture, Arco Gas) can compel contracts (steal) or diminish the unalienable rights from "We, the People"? But you forget, the standing army used to protect us only applies to "citizens of the United States" (from the Act of 1871, to create a government for Washington D.C., aka United States Corporation), thus a Security Agreement must exist by the forming of the three-party agreement (contract) of an alleged "citizen of the United States" to be Secured by the U.S. Military (just another corporation)? That explains why there aren't any "We, the People" remaining in these united States of America, and that only exists the alleged United States and the alleged non-state private corporations operating as "State of *" fictions and that the Emergency War Powers Act does not allow the existance of anything but "citizen of the United States". If you think I'm wrong, then perhaps you should read this page of cornell law of the United States corporate code and I quote the pertinent information,
(* means my emphasis, ** means my quote)
TITLE 28 > PART VI > CHAPTER 176 > SUBCHAPTER A > Sec. 3002.
Definitions...
(2) "Court" means any court created by the Congress of the United States, *excluding the United States Tax Court.
(**Congress didn't create the United States Tax Court, and as well all the courts are financed by the Federal Reserve System! Congressman McFadden discloses the Federal Reserve is a private corporation and as well discusses the fraud!)
(3) "Debt" means -
(A) an amount that is *owing *to *the United States on account of a *direct *loan, *or *loan *insured or *guarunteed, by the *United States; or
(B) an amount that is *owing *to the *United States on account of a fee, duty, *lease, *rent, , *service, *sale of real or personal property, *overpayment, *find, *assessment, *penalty, restitution, *damages, *interest, tax, bail bond forfeiture, reimbursement, recovery of a cost incurred by the United States, or *other source of indebtedness to the United States, *but *that *is *not *owing *under the *terms of a *contract *originally *entered into by only *persons *other than the United States; ...
(**Anything outside of the United States is not debt! The use of Federal Reserve Notes, aka fiat money, is an adhesion contract that constructivly declares you are received it as a loan from the United States! It is debt money! Gold and Silver are exempt of being used as debt money, as they are Lawful Money!**)
(8) "Judgment" means a judgment, order, or decree entered *in *favor *of *the *United States in a *court *arising *from a *civil or *criminal proceeding *regarding a *debt.
(13) "Security Agreement" means an agreement that creates or provides for a *lien.
(15) "United States" means -
(A) a Feder -
UNITED STATES is a corporation
Exhibit A (UNITED STATES corporation aka UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT)
Exhibit B (Trafficant's admittance of the UNITED STATES coproration aka U.S. GOVERNMENT)
Exhibit C (united States of America and UNITED STATES historical foundation)
Exhibit D (uSA vs US, Republic vs unlawful Democracy)
It was not difficult to google this information. Also of note, Familyguardian.tzo.com appears to be the greatest reference to this verry date, with genuine recognition to google. -
UNITED STATES is a corporation
Exhibit A (UNITED STATES corporation aka UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT)
Exhibit B (Trafficant's admittance of the UNITED STATES coproration aka U.S. GOVERNMENT)
Exhibit C (united States of America and UNITED STATES historical foundation)
Exhibit D (uSA vs US, Republic vs unlawful Democracy)
It was not difficult to google this information. Also of note, Familyguardian.tzo.com appears to be the greatest reference to this verry date, with genuine recognition to google. -
UNITED STATES is a corporation
Exhibit A (UNITED STATES corporation aka UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT)
Exhibit B (Trafficant's admittance of the UNITED STATES coproration aka U.S. GOVERNMENT)
Exhibit C (united States of America and UNITED STATES historical foundation)
Exhibit D (uSA vs US, Republic vs unlawful Democracy)
It was not difficult to google this information. Also of note, Familyguardian.tzo.com appears to be the greatest reference to this verry date, with genuine recognition to google. -
UNITED STATES is a corporation
Exhibit A (UNITED STATES corporation aka UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT)
Exhibit B (Trafficant's admittance of the UNITED STATES coproration aka U.S. GOVERNMENT)
Exhibit C (united States of America and UNITED STATES historical foundation)
Exhibit D (uSA vs US, Republic vs unlawful Democracy)
It was not difficult to google this information. Also of note, Familyguardian.tzo.com appears to be the greatest reference to this verry date, with genuine recognition to google. -
Whoa there!
jpsowin,
You are making a mistake in your judgment. A mistake altogether; people who follow Jesus do not judge, that's what Jesus will do when he returns. You claim the personage in your reply is a sinner. You imply that it is not true that we are all sinners. Again, only an implication. Above all, the personage you reply to is not aware of being a sinner; thus does not know right from wrong, hence has no will to repent from any transgression imposed upon others. As a animal? Deep down, they don't know they are wrong. We both know we are sinners, that doesn't mean the personage you reply to accepts being a sinner. The person you reply to denies Jesus, neither does that person know any Christ to forgive sin or any transgression of any kind in that matter; being in great danger to what or for what service does the person you reply to offer? They will not read the Bible, this is an evil generation. There is no shame aware of, in the referenced evil generation. The person you are replying to is enjoying belief in nothing, is not ashamed, and expressly does not look to Jesus Christ; a false Christ has conspired to taint the Son of God; is why the persion you reply to is acting as though. Don't be bothered, people as such are cannon fodder for their own undoing. You have been tricked! You have been trolled by the influence of a devil, brother! The person you replied to is of another venue and sin is not possible, acceptance of a mark of the beast; only commerce through fiat money.
Be careful, Brother/Sister jpsowin! Evil walks around us! Don't let any markings of the body affect your spiritual relationship with the Father in Heaven. The strategy you need to seek in the moment of confronting such a personage is that of Truth. The personage you responded to is in direct harmony with nothing (an atheism) that hath masqueraded with one of Satan's devils. Yes, Atheism is a Church, run by one of Satan's devils! They believe in nothing, what better lie can be manufactured in order to create direct opposition to the Father in Heaven?
My adversary is every demon sent at me, at the moment it is the UNITED STATES (corporation). For Satan's demons operate under color of law to fool God-fearing people into thinking the united States of America is the United States (corporation) to deprive me of my Church (Bible is my Constitution)! Know now, the united States of America lay vacant, the treachery and deceit of the UNITED STATES hath been built ontop of the original united States of America wherefore the false doctrines act to d -
Whoa there!
jpsowin,
You are making a mistake in your judgment. A mistake altogether; people who follow Jesus do not judge, that's what Jesus will do when he returns. You claim the personage in your reply is a sinner. You imply that it is not true that we are all sinners. Again, only an implication. Above all, the personage you reply to is not aware of being a sinner; thus does not know right from wrong, hence has no will to repent from any transgression imposed upon others. As a animal? Deep down, they don't know they are wrong. We both know we are sinners, that doesn't mean the personage you reply to accepts being a sinner. The person you reply to denies Jesus, neither does that person know any Christ to forgive sin or any transgression of any kind in that matter; being in great danger to what or for what service does the person you reply to offer? They will not read the Bible, this is an evil generation. There is no shame aware of, in the referenced evil generation. The person you are replying to is enjoying belief in nothing, is not ashamed, and expressly does not look to Jesus Christ; a false Christ has conspired to taint the Son of God; is why the persion you reply to is acting as though. Don't be bothered, people as such are cannon fodder for their own undoing. You have been tricked! You have been trolled by the influence of a devil, brother! The person you replied to is of another venue and sin is not possible, acceptance of a mark of the beast; only commerce through fiat money.
Be careful, Brother/Sister jpsowin! Evil walks around us! Don't let any markings of the body affect your spiritual relationship with the Father in Heaven. The strategy you need to seek in the moment of confronting such a personage is that of Truth. The personage you responded to is in direct harmony with nothing (an atheism) that hath masqueraded with one of Satan's devils. Yes, Atheism is a Church, run by one of Satan's devils! They believe in nothing, what better lie can be manufactured in order to create direct opposition to the Father in Heaven?
My adversary is every demon sent at me, at the moment it is the UNITED STATES (corporation). For Satan's demons operate under color of law to fool God-fearing people into thinking the united States of America is the United States (corporation) to deprive me of my Church (Bible is my Constitution)! Know now, the united States of America lay vacant, the treachery and deceit of the UNITED STATES hath been built ontop of the original united States of America wherefore the false doctrines act to d -
Whoa there!
jpsowin,
You are making a mistake in your judgment. A mistake altogether; people who follow Jesus do not judge, that's what Jesus will do when he returns. You claim the personage in your reply is a sinner. You imply that it is not true that we are all sinners. Again, only an implication. Above all, the personage you reply to is not aware of being a sinner; thus does not know right from wrong, hence has no will to repent from any transgression imposed upon others. As a animal? Deep down, they don't know they are wrong. We both know we are sinners, that doesn't mean the personage you reply to accepts being a sinner. The person you reply to denies Jesus, neither does that person know any Christ to forgive sin or any transgression of any kind in that matter; being in great danger to what or for what service does the person you reply to offer? They will not read the Bible, this is an evil generation. There is no shame aware of, in the referenced evil generation. The person you are replying to is enjoying belief in nothing, is not ashamed, and expressly does not look to Jesus Christ; a false Christ has conspired to taint the Son of God; is why the persion you reply to is acting as though. Don't be bothered, people as such are cannon fodder for their own undoing. You have been tricked! You have been trolled by the influence of a devil, brother! The person you replied to is of another venue and sin is not possible, acceptance of a mark of the beast; only commerce through fiat money.
Be careful, Brother/Sister jpsowin! Evil walks around us! Don't let any markings of the body affect your spiritual relationship with the Father in Heaven. The strategy you need to seek in the moment of confronting such a personage is that of Truth. The personage you responded to is in direct harmony with nothing (an atheism) that hath masqueraded with one of Satan's devils. Yes, Atheism is a Church, run by one of Satan's devils! They believe in nothing, what better lie can be manufactured in order to create direct opposition to the Father in Heaven?
My adversary is every demon sent at me, at the moment it is the UNITED STATES (corporation). For Satan's demons operate under color of law to fool God-fearing people into thinking the united States of America is the United States (corporation) to deprive me of my Church (Bible is my Constitution)! Know now, the united States of America lay vacant, the treachery and deceit of the UNITED STATES hath been built ontop of the original united States of America wherefore the false doctrines act to d -
Freenet is under corporate control, not 100% free.
Don't believe me? Look at its whois DNS founding; regulated by a corporation (DNS Trust) that is in-turn regulated by the FCC.
You can't have "Freedom of Speech Networks" when the FCC says what you can and can't do on their secured internet.
I don't mean to hand this to anyone in a snide way, I want freedom of speach, but here is a google'd cache of the uSA/US scandal that only a few are aware of points out the obvious fundumental facts in the historic paper trail.
Case in point: you can't have freedom of speach when the chosen government (FCC) regulates what can and can't be done in said "freedom of speach."
Anyone with any more URLs to share? I gave two good ones above. Check them out!