Slashdot Mirror


Live Windows Bootable CDs for Sysadmins

WhoDaresWins writes "Ever wonder how to make a Knoppix-like live Windows bootable CD (or DVD)? Well its now possible using Bart's Preinstalled Environment (BartPE) bootable live windows CD/DVD. It's basically an expansion of the Microsoft's own Windows PE (Preinstallation Environment) idea which is a minimal Windows (XP/2K3) based bootable live CD with a command prompt and the ability to run some basic Windows GUI. Bart's PE allows anyone to make a bootable CD using their own Windows XP/2K3 media with Bart's PE Builder. What's more many people have contributed quite a few plugins that allow you to use the BartPE discs as quite a nifty system administration tool and with some work an almost usable quick system."

337 comments

  1. Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Read subject.
    Like, 8 years ago?

    1. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by MattyCobb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why didn't we have this sooner? ....Like, 8 years ago? Would you REALLY want to see bootable Microsoft code from 8 years ago? eh!? answer me that!!!

      --

      Matt
      You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
    2. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by KReilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am not sure I would use this that often. I mean, the great thing about live linux cds is they are packed with utilities that can help with diagnostics. This is just a stripped down version of windows. Can anyone think of alot of uses for this that would beat out knoppix? Cause I can't.

    3. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by neonstz · · Score: 5, Funny
      Like, 8 years ago?

      Because the windows source wasn't released until now. :)

    4. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by dasunt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can anyone think of alot of uses for this that would beat out knoppix? Cause I can't.

      Knoppix is Linux. Linux writing to NTFS is a VERY BAD IDEA. Windows tends to use NTFS now. Windows gets viruses which REALLY SCREWS UP THE SYSTEM. Windows needs to have viruses removed, but the installation cannot be trusted, or else there isn't a licenced copy to put on it.

      Congratulations, BartsPE as a A/V plugin.

      That's only one use, but its a damn common task for Microsoft Windows.

      BartsPE > Knoppix for virus removal.

    5. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just had a HD meltdown and I'm too lazy to get my user/pass mailed to me. So I'm AC.

      I just tried BartPE and I'm impressed - even though it didn't work for me. You're only right in that the 'core' is stripped down - but you can add massive functionality via plugins. For example, you drop in some Adaware dlls and exes and suddenly you have a bootable Windows CD with an up-to-date malware removal tool.

      Some of the other plugins already configured (just add the files) are: a browser (offbyone), SSH/telnet client (putty), VNC (tightvnc), etc, etc, etc. I think I saw about 50 preconfigured plugins and the website keeps a running list of user-contributed ones.

      I'm getting halfway through the boot process but a system failure message pops up. I used an old crappy CDRW (drive and media) and I'll likely try again with better hardware in the morning.

      All in all, I can EASILY see myself using BartPE. Knoppix too, but the latter sure doesn't help much with a pooched Windows install.

    6. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by chengmi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People tend to go with things that are familiar to them.

      A lot of people are familiar with the Windows GUI, so a Windows live-cd would be popular among this majority of people.

      Personally, I think the live-cd concept is great but impractical. I like the fact that changing an OS is as simple as changing a CD, but the sound of my very loud cd drive spinning all the time is unbearable.

      What really needs to happen is for us to find a way to make an operating system (with a sufficient number of features) fit on a USB drive. Either that or make large USB drives cheaper. =P

    7. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Trejkaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could always use the Captive NTFS driver instead of the one which is risky to use for writing.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    8. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      >Knoppix is Linux. Linux writing to NTFS is a VERY >BAD IDEA. Windows tends to use NTFS now.

      Linux writing to NTFS partitions is safe by now. At least the kernel 2.6.1 menu config states:

      "While we cannot guarantee that it will not damage any data, we have so far not received a single report where the driver would have damaged someones data so we assume it is perfectly safe to use. ...

      Note: While write support is safe in this version (a rewrite from scratch of the NTFS support), it should be noted that the old NTFS write support, included in Linux 2.5.10 and before (since 1997), is not safe.

    9. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ummm.. because Windows *DID* have this quite a few years ago?

      Windows PE is just an extension of the XP embedded tool system, which is just an extension of the NT4 embedded tool system available since about 1998.

      NT embedded has always been able to boot from a CDRom and run a complete system, MS just formalized this into something called "Windows PE" that Bart copied (actually, about 2 years ago).

    10. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      "Stripped down" means that it doesn't have stuff like "Background Intelligent Transfer Service".

      You can run pretty much any utility you want from such a bootable CD.

    11. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      the great thing about live linux cds is they are packed with utilities that can help with diagnostics. This is just a stripped down version of windows.

      This is not "just a stripped down version". It DOES contain "utilities that can help with diagnostics". More, since you have to burn your own disk (the author can't redistribute the MS files needed) you can add other stuff than the default utilities.

    12. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, after "soviet russia", "all your base", SCO owning Linux and countless others, here's the latest running joke on Slashdot:

      But the question is - is this a good thing, or is it whack?

    13. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by LittleBigLui · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Current c't magazine includes a knoppix cd with new-fangled "use original windows NTFS.SYS via wine" drivers. So writing to NTFS in linux is no worse idea than writing to NTFS in windows :)

      --
      Free as in mason.
    14. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Shhhhh.....
      You are going to have the "Linux is the one true god" people looking up unpaid parking tickets on you from 12 years ago.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    15. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by AC-x · · Score: 1

      What really needs to happen is for us to find a way to make an operating system (with a sufficient number of features) fit on a USB drive. Either that or make large USB drives cheaper. =P

      30 quid for an IDE to USB2 caddy too expensive? :)

    16. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get thee to filedonkey or sharereactor and search for "khauyeung".
      You will be enlightened. :)

    17. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      30 quid for an IDE to USB2 caddy too expensive? :)

      Just too bulky.

      They condensed Windows 98 to 5 megs, there's gotta be a way to boot it from a flash drive

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    18. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      8 years ago? I was running Microsoft OSes off live bootable disks more than 20 years ago.

    19. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Uhh.. assuming WINE implements Windows API perfectly without change, I suppose. It sounds okay, but would you trust a seriously big clients seriously valuable data to it? Not me...

    20. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we did.. kinda

    21. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by damiam · · Score: 1

      I've heard some horror stories about Captive too. At this point, I wouldn't trust anything other than Windows to write to NTFS.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    22. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by bayerwerke · · Score: 2, Informative

      We did.

      http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/11/206/

    23. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by damiam · · Score: 1

      Linux (including lightweight GUIs) has been able to boot off of USB pendrives (with BIOSs supporting such things) for a while now.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    24. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Avihson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "or else there isn't a licenced copy to put on it."

      So where does the license for the bootable cd come from? Am I going to be busted by the BSA for carrying a rogue copy of windows around and using it on PCs when the original license is running on another?
      In Enterprise size installs this is no problem, but what about the freelance MCSE out there busting his tail working on small/medium lans and stand-alone installs?

      Right now, a friend in that line of work carries copies of all his utilities and worries about uninstalling them after he is done using them. I felt the same way when I used PartitionMagic to configure for dualbooting before I found the latest GParted.

      With a bootable Linux, either Knoppix or ones built on other distributions, there is never a licensing issue. The writing to NTFS is an issue at this moment, but in time that too will be a thing of the past.

    25. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knoppix HD-install IS virus removal for your PC.


      friends don't let friends use windows.

    26. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would you trust a big client's seriously valuable data to a Windows partition in the first place? Just use JFS.

    27. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by JW+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      my sysadmin has Win98SE on a 128mb usb drive, and it comes in handy all the time. plus it has room for about a thousand good programs.
      i've seen win98 with full GUI fit in 4.6mb, and NTFS4DOS allows you to read/write NTFS partitions easily&safely. you don't even need a 64mb drive.

      --
      just like the humble blood clot... turboporsche@telus.net
    28. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Bart's PE for about 6 months and it is extremely useful. I'm what amounts to a sysadmin for several families and a small school. I use it on a weekly basis. Antivirus, Ad Aware, File manager, command line, and a bunch of useful sysadmin utilities. It beats trying to boot into 16 bit DOS and using it to do things. Prior to his PE work, Bart made tools to create bootable DOS CDs. While not as useful as the PE builder, the DOS CDs made sysadmin life easier.

      The really useful part about Barts PE is that the file manager works on NTFS volumes without requiring passwords on unencrypted volumes (which are most in my world). Prior to Bart's PE, I would have to keep a Win2K hard drive in my kit and put it first in the IDE chain and boot from it if I wanted access to the files on an NTFS volume from within WinXP or Win2K.

      It's a great tool and it will surely save your ass. If you use it, contribute to the cause.

    29. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Hmm... and I thought Captive used the same driver as Windows.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    30. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      It's not WINE, it's a WINE-like method of wrapping the native Windows NTFS driver so Linux can use it.

      The only writing done is via the Windows native driver.

      I haven't heard anything bad about Captive yet (which is not to say there might not be any) and there are testimonials on the developer's Web site that it works.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    31. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does. That doesn't mean it works right.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    32. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by LittleBigLui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously big clients with seriously valuable data better have a serious backup strategy anyways, but after i've seen MS Office refuse to open its own documents until they were opened in OpenOffice and saved out again (losing enormous amounts of obviously unneccessary bytes in the process), i have not much trouble trusting data to WINE + NTFS.SYS that was previously trusted to the "real" windows + NTFS.SYS.

      Of course, if i got my hands on valuable data that is "the only copy", the first thing to do would be mounting that friggin' thing read-only and copy it over to another disk.

      --
      Free as in mason.
    33. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      So where does the license for the bootable cd come from?

      You need 1 license for windows (say, about $100), and one for the A/V software (say, about $50).

      Since it stays on disk, there is no worry about having to uninstall the software when it is done.

      Sure, you can just keep a spare computer around to plug NTFS drives into, but isn't it easier to carry a CD with you?

      Just my $.02

    34. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      *shrug* I guess nothing says Windows works right either. It's not like it has never corrupted one of my hard drives.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    35. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Snaller · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That didn't make sense. Have you taken your pills today??

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    36. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by gandalphthegreen · · Score: 1

      I usually just boot off of my Norton Utilities disc to disenfect. Interestingly enough, I had to do that immediately after installing XP pro because of some trojan that made it keep rebooting during software update...

    37. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can anyone think of alot of uses for this that would beat out knoppix?"

      %systemroot%/sol.exe

    38. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by FS · · Score: 1

      I can think of one great reason to use this over Knoppix. If I use my Linux box I can't get to my online bank because they don't trust anything but IE. Sure I can modify my user agent string but that sometimes breaks other things. If this works as it looks, I don't need to have a VM of Windows on my PC anymore just to do banking or browsing.

    39. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by 00420 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, but you can only write to files if you're not changing the file size. You also cannot rename or delete files.

    40. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by sLaSh_N_bUrN_(.Y.) · · Score: 1

      How about this:
      http://rz-obrian.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de/knoppix-usb/

    41. Re:Why didn't we have this sooner? by carpus · · Score: 1

      Well put. Windows, full-featured - even with several hundreds of dollars of software bundled in - couldn't compete with the tools and power of Knoppix.

  2. As long as it supplies fdisk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we can get that Windows OS out of our hair... ;)

  3. Damn by platypussrex · · Score: 1

    I was going to sleep in tomorrow, but now I'm going to have to give this a try instead! If this works, it will be a huge timesaver.

    1. Re:Damn by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      So, in other words, if it works you could have slept in anyway.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  4. Knoppix without the good stuff? by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Troll

    Lessee:

    1) It's Windows. Forget "open".

    2) It's Windows. Forget "stable".

    3) It's Windows. Forget "drivers" without a dozen driver install disks...

    4) It's Windows. Forget "Source code".

    5) It's Windows... most apps won't run without registry editing and all kinds of other crap.

    Oh, and did I mention... It's Windows?!?!?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by fferreres · · Score: 3, Insightful

      5) It's Windows... is it legal?

      6) It's Windows... does it have a virus that could spread?

      7) It's Windows... so you already have it preinstalled on the network (94% of the times)

      8) It's Windows... does the license allow you to use it on other machines?

      9) It's Windows... can you use share it?

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    2. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by t0ny · · Score: 2, Troll
      Lessee:

      1) It's Windows. Forget "open".

      Who gives a fuck. People working in an office (or even an overwhelming majority of home users) dont get paid to fuck with the source code, nor would most of them even want to. Only programmers care about that shit, and at least 99% of computer users are not programmers.

      2) It's Windows. Forget "stable".

      If Win2k or XP are unstable, your computer is a piece of shit. Your poor choices in hardware arent Microsoft's responsibility; stop buying Packard Bell.

      3) It's Windows. Forget "drivers" without a dozen driver install disks...

      A. d00d, turn off the 8-track; drivers come on CD's these days
      B. Again, get out of the 60s. On Win2k/XP you rarely need drivers which arent provided (especially XP).

      4) It's Windows. Forget "Source code".

      A. I beg to differ
      B. See statements regarding #1.

      5) It's Windows... most apps won't run without registry editing and all kinds of other crap.

      I dont have to edit the registry, or anything else, to get my applications to run. And if you do, than whoever put together your install package is a retard (I should know, Ive put several install packages together). But actually, isnt getting applications to run on Linux a bit of a chore, depending on your distro?

      All in all, a pretty weak troll attempt. I give it 2 out of a possible 10. You are going to have to try way harder than that around here.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    3. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by boaworm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Re 1:Who gives a fuck [about openness]

      I could have agreed with you if we were talking different versions of "free" beer/libre. When using a closed product like MS Windows, you dont know from one day to another if the whole licensing process will change, whether they will extend support or just quit an entire product line etc. If they do quit, there is no way you can continue to patch your systems.

      Re 3:drivers come on CDs these days

      The grandparent poster did not say anything about floppys, and I totally agree with him. I have two PC systems, on with an Asus A7V and one with an ABit KT7 mainboard. NEITHER are usable without the latest versions of VIA 4in1-drivers. The built-in drivers that ships with Windows are old and outdated already at the time of shipment.

      I wouldnt score your trolling much higher than grand-parent.

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    4. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lessee...

      1. It's Windows. Forget "open".
        Only programmers care about that shit, and at least 99% of computer users are not programmers.
        I've had managers who wouldn't touch closed-source apps because they didn't trust them and/or couldn't extend them. I've had non-developer colleagues who wouldn't touch closed-source apps because they cost money whilst open-source was a free-download away (and "why pay for something you'll only use once?", and "if it's closed source will people develop plug-ins for it?")
      2. It's Windows. Forget "stable".
        Ah, the joys of being able to choose your own hardward. I told my boss I wanted a beowulf-cluster of SPARC-stations. She laughed at me. Seriously, back in the real-world, some of us don't get any choice about the hardware we use. Seriosuly, back in the real-world most of us don't get any choice about the hardware we use. If open-source software can be stable on the same hardware as a closed-source BSOD-generator, which should I choose?
      3. It's Windows. Forget "drivers" without a dozen driver install disks...
        I run XP at home on the GF's laptop. I've got numerous driver install CDs. Strangely, I never received the one magic CD you hint at, the one with all the drivers for the hardware I've not bought yet. OK, XP comes with a lot of generic drivers, but every new piece of hardware I buy comes with a driver CD for Windows. Strangely, Linux typically "just works".
      4. It's Windows. Forget "Source code".
        A. I assume you're joking. Firstly, MS didn't license (eg. with the GPL) their leaked source code, so no one legit will touch it lest they "contaminate" themselves or open themselves up to prosecution. Secondly, it's only a fraction of the complete source.
        B.See statements regarding #1.
      5. It's Windows... most apps won't run without registry editing and all kinds of other crap.
        I've installed very few apps on XP that didn't edit the registry. Sure, I didn't do it by hand - the installer did it, and I pray that the uninstaller will also do it (I live in hope...) Fixinf Registry foul-ups after botched uninstallers run amok terrifies me because like many Windows users I don't feel comfortable editting the Registry. Firing up vim (or Emacs, I suppose... ;) and hacking a config file, however...different story. Easy to backup, easy to restore, easy to understand, etc.

      Yup, a pretty weak troll attempt. Try harder.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    5. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I'd say he makes a couple of good points, even if he didn't intend to.
      I agree with the source code arguments, though open source software tends to get bugfixes earlier, which /is/ a concern. Nevertheless, if you're using this boot CD, you're probably using Windows anyway, so it truly /doesn't/ matter.
      However, "open" means more than just the source. It's also about protocols, interoperabillity, etc. To me, that's more of a concern, even as a non-programmer Linux user.

      Driver install disks? If you're doing an install of the operating system (which is what WinPE is all about, as opposed to BartPE) you actually need disks with drivers on them. At least, for storage controllers, etc. on Windows 2000 or before. BarPE seems to try to get around this, but the originall troller^Wposter probably didn't read anything about it :)

      Registry editing...well now this /is/ an issue with BartPE (I suspect) because somehow you have to get the registry settings for your application into the registry on your bootable CD. Presumably this can be done, and I suspect that a large part of the BartPE plugin's work is doing this.

    6. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by noyren · · Score: 1

      >If Win2k or XP are unstable, your computer is a >piece of shit. Your poor choices in hardware >arent Microsoft's responsibility; stop buying >Packard Bell. I repair a LOT of computers, and you have no idea how often I've had to turn off ACPI. To remove that during install you have to use undocumented stuff (press f5 when it says press f6 to install third party drivers). 3) It's Windows. Forget "drivers" without a dozen driver install disks... >A. d00d, turn off the 8-track; drivers come on >CD's these days >B. Again, get out of the 60s. On Win2k/XP you >rarely need drivers which arent provided >(especially XP). yeah, and those are really easy to use when your booting from cd... 4) It's Windows. Forget "Source code". >A. I beg to differ [iht.com] >B. See statements regarding #1. let me get this straight, your backing up a "windows does not release source code" with the source code leak?..... And your forgetting an important point here, anyone ever tried to install windows on a computer and then for example switch chipset/motherboard? Making a generic windows install is as far as I know impossible. Most will work on one hardware configuration and fail horribly if you try it on another. (or you'll end up with 10 of one device in the device manager or something charming like that).

    7. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by noyren · · Score: 2, Informative

      >If Win2k or XP are unstable, your computer is a >piece of shit. Your poor choices in hardware >arent Microsoft's responsibility; stop buying >Packard Bell.

      I repair a LOT of computers, and you have no idea how often I've had to turn off ACPI. To remove that during install you have to use undocumented stuff (press f5 when it says press f6 to install third party drivers).

      3) It's Windows. Forget "drivers" without a dozen driver install disks...

      >A. d00d, turn off the 8-track; drivers come on >CD's these days
      >B. Again, get out of the 60s. On Win2k/XP you >rarely need drivers which arent provided >(especially XP).

      yeah, and those are really easy to use when your booting from cd...

      4) It's Windows. Forget "Source code".

      >A. I beg to differ [iht.com]
      >B. See statements regarding #1.

      let me get this straight, your backing up a "windows does not release source code" with the source code leak?.....

      And your forgetting an important point here, anyone ever tried to install windows on a computer and then for example switch chipset/motherboard?

      Making a generic windows install is as far as I know impossible. Most will work on one hardware configuration and fail horribly if you try it on another. (or you'll end up with 10 of one device in the device manager or something charming like that).

      *fixed, damn I hate html default, heh*

    8. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an a7v8x-x series mobo, and I don't even need drivers for 98 to run stable MUCH LESS xp I'm sort of lazy when it comes to driver updates in that I get the joy of living on 14.4 internet out in the middle of a digital void but my system runs great I havn't had a single crash in about 3 months even while at lan parties where they normaly happen the most, so my friend your trolling goes right about where the others are a measly 2 out of 10....

    9. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      People working in an office (or even an overwhelming majority of home users) dont get paid to fuck with the source code, nor would most of them even want to. Only programmers care about that shit, and at least 99% of computer users are not programmers.

      Yeah, and people not working in capitol hill don't get paid to fuck with laws, nor would most of them even want to. Only lawmakers care about that shit, and at least 99% of citizens are not lawmakers.

      Just because you're not involved in creating something doesn't mean you shouldn't have input, especially if you're going to be the user of said product (which most computer users are).

    10. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) It belongs to Microsoft. They paid to develop it. They paid to market it. They pay HW makers to get it supported. Get over it.

      2) I've had a W2K server box up (as in turned on continuously, running as a mail, file and print server) for over a year. It was brought down by a hardware failure, not the OS.

      3) You've never installed XP. If I have to install drivers, at least I don't have to compile the fucking things, or wait for months for a Linux version.

      4) What's the big fucking deal with this? Of all the Linux heads, how many actually look at the source code, let alone actually do something with it? Not many, is my guess.

      5) You're delusional, or just a fucking idiot who can't run a program as the authors designed it. There are no other explanations. Never breed.

      I know I've been trolled, but fuck it. This kind of shite really gets up my nose.

      One last thought... how many Linux fanatics would there be is it WASN'T free?

    11. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every insurance company I have contacts in is switching almost everything to Windows as we speak. A couple of my friends who do small time computer programming businesses use Windows exclusively now. I myself have found myriad uses for it. Windows rocks, get on the boat before you get shipped off to India. At least you could research who uses Windows before mindlessly blasting it.

    12. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      3) It's Windows. Forget "drivers" without a dozen driver install disks...

      Think about that for just a moment. If you compare the Knoppix variant that came out when Windows XP came out, were there drivers for todays hardware in it? I guess not. Knoppix is very well maintained version of Linux, where the maintainer takes time to integrate as many drivers as there are.

      If you have the time, you can build your own Windows CD with all of todays drivers already built-in (to do this, search for Sysprep and PNPDriversPath or smth like that) and you won't ever have to insert a disk or download a driver from the net.

      5) It's Windows... most apps won't run without registry editing and all kinds of other crap.

      Huh? What are you talking about? I have set up my new box 2 months ago, and until now, have managed quite well without ever doing any manual registry tweaks. By the way: The only reason I use Windows and not Linux as my primary OS is Cubase SX, which does not run on Linux.

    13. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      6) It's Windows : Remember DirectX

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    14. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      1) Looks like you and your manager are part of that 1%. Most other people do not care as long as it works. And yes, that includes mission-critical business stuff. Corporations trust that Microsoft will continue to support their products or make future ones backward compatible. Microsoft's track record shows very few instances of them breaking backward-compatibility (although I am sure you can find a few examples).

      2) You work with what works for you. If you can't choose hardware and Windows runs crappy on what you have, then use another OS. If you like Windows a lot but it runs crappy on certain systems, buy other systems that will properly run it. We have a variety of brands and models of computers in our office, and Windows runs most satisfactory on them. We use Linux as well... where it makes sense.

      3) Strangely, Linux typically "just works". So does Windows XP. For most uses, the default Windows XP drivers are adequate for a wide range of hardware. The number one reason to upgrade the drivers on Windows is for bleeding edge games support...

      5) Easy to backup, easy to restore, easy to understand, etc. Tell that to my mother... most users aren't capable of, or interested in, editing config files. But most of them are able to install and administer their Windows box on their own. (Viruses and security aside, but that is another matter. We're talking about installing the OS and applications here).

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    15. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I have an Abit KG-7. the KG7/KT7 boards ARE TOTAL SHIT. If you find a driver combination that doesn't cause a random crash or lockup, let me know. Because after I've never found it. After dealing with this board, I vowed to never buy a VIA chipset again.

      He wasn't even trolling. The fact that he's currently +5 troll just demonstrates the Slashdolt mentaility, mod down anything you don't want to hear. Re. 1, he already aswered it. the vast, vast, VAST majority see Windows as the lesser of two evils compared to learning a new system. Re. 3, for MOST systems, you don't need a driver disk of any kind to get a working system. We just have bad hardware. I've gone through the same thing in Linux for boards that are too new.

    16. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      1. not my current manager - previous managers, in a number of differnet workplaces. Typically government (UK) where cost and privacy are issues, but also in a small start-up where licensing was a bigger issue.

      2. Agreed, but the ability to dictate exactly what hardware you get is a rare luxery - typically, I've used hardware chosen without much thought for what I need - hardware chosen by a procurement system that relies on large deals to get cost savings, and can afford to ignore the increased costs for certain departments or users.

      3. I've bought a Panasonic Camcorder. It came with a driver CD, and I couldn't connect it to XP (firewire and USB2) without it. Maybe I just didn't try hard enough. Maybe I was just spoiled by Linux, where I didn't have to try at all.

      5. Fair point. I woldn't recommend Linux to a number of my relatives ;) The original point was that Windows applications usually do arcane things to the registry, and that that could cause problems. I accept those problems on Uncle Bob's PC - I just reinstall Windows when the registry becomes clogged up with cruft. But reinstalling an OS isn't an option at many places I've worked at - you need to keep the system running and that requires easy-to-edit config files, not the nightmare that is Windows' registry.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    17. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) It's Windows. Forget "open".
      so, most ppl dont give a rat's ass

      2) It's Windows. Forget "stable".
      My XP runs for a month without needing a reboot

      3) It's Windows. Forget "drivers" without a dozen driver install disks...
      My XP has had drivers built in for everything I've plugged into it, hell even my 98 does. Last time I checked, Linux has horrid driver support

      4) It's Windows. Forget "Source code".
      You mentioned that before, again, most ppl dont give a rat's ass

      5) It's Windows... most apps won't run without registry editing and all kinds of other crap.
      Every app Ive ever used runs without registry editing, what the hell are you trying to run?

    18. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this guy, unlike the parent, he's intelligent

    19. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by yanestra · · Score: 1
      3) It's Windows. Forget "drivers" without a dozen driver install disks...
      5) It's Windows... most apps won't run without registry editing and all kinds of other crap.

      Hey, moderators, he said something useful! Why modding him down?

    20. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that useful? I can count the number of times I had to edit the registry to make an app run on the fingers of my third hand. Which is to say zero times. Now, the number of conf files I've had to edit and libraries of the required version to track down and compile and install to get a Linux app to run... fuck, if onyl I had a penny for every one.

    21. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Funny, I get a kick out of plugging absolutely anything in my XP-laden mega-notebook and doing whatever just seconds later. Webcam, network, camcorder, relatives' bargain-bin kodak digicams, outboard dvd burner, midi keyboard... everything just works transparently and I don't even need to fish the net for drivers.

      On the other hand my linux install was an absolute headache to get working on this thing. I know my Debian damn well, but when it comes to supporting all these little toys that I've come to take for granted, it is just a nag. Download this, patch that, bootload this, make more room on /var.. blabbity blah it's a pain in the ass.

      I guess I'm not nearly as hardcore as most linux folk. I use windows for daily work stuff, and Linux for everything server-side. The linux on my notebook is for apache mod development and various C/perl/php coding endeavours. I tried running an X desktop but it's just too much hassle and tweaking when all I want is to get my work done as quickly as possible.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    22. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You might be a geek with no writing skills if you use numbered lists in a forum.

      2) Read 1.

    23. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by t0ny · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and people not working in capitol hill don't get paid to fuck with laws, nor would most of them even want to. Only lawmakers care about that shit, and at least 99% of citizens are not lawmakers.

      But the difference is that Jane in Marketting cant change anti-fraud laws on her PC, rendering the US Legal system incapable of booting.

      Nice try at an analogy troll, but you need to pick a better example.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    24. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by TechniMyoko · · Score: 1

      They're modding him down cause he was blatantly wrong/trolling

    25. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      I dont have to edit the registry, or anything else, to get my applications to run. And if you do, than whoever put together your install package is a retard (I should know, Ive put several install packages together). But actually, isnt getting applications to run on Linux a bit of a chore, depending on your distro?

      You must never have tried to install Oracle 9i on a Pentium 4 or a Xeon machine from a CD. Fact of the matter is, you need to edit the registry to even install the damn thing.

      I agree that getting things to run on Linux are difficult sometimes as well. Such is the nature of hardware. To say that one or the other is trouble-free is ludicrous.

    26. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... whoever put together your install package is a retard (I should know, Ive put several install packages together).
      You should know doubly then; you're also a retard.

    27. Re:Knoppix without the good stuff? by J3r3miah · · Score: 1

      "I've had a W2K server box up (as in turned on continuously, running as a mail, file and print server) for over a year. It was brought down by a hardware failure, not the OS." Dude, you sure it ran for over a year continously? By default, there is a bug in the TCP/IP that will reboot a computer if it has been up for 365 days. (there is a solution but it didn't comeout till sometime ago.. and to patch your machine, you would have had to reboot it anyway.) I have the TechNet KB number on my laptop's IE favorites.. will look it up and post it.

      --
      God is real unless declared as int
  5. Slashdot... Bring you the news a year late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been available for over a year....

    1. Re:Slashdot... Bring you the news a year late by croddy · · Score: 1

      for $199, I'd have expected something like this would be included in the retail box. too little, too late methinks.

    2. Re:Slashdot... Bring you the news a year late by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      Yep, and when I tried it, it was booting for almost a year. (I tried it after first Slashdot post about Windows PE)

      And for what, almost none of drivers worked (running VGA mode, without any king of my 1GBit network, not seing SATA..., even my camera didn't work, well if someone asks, I don't use it too much so I se the waste space like my USB drive for necessary little things), I got one ughly button with mostly empty menus, running File browser was much faster, took only two minutes. Btw, did I mention that I throw it away because of questionable legality, like embeding proprietary software like antivirus, at least in usable version.

      2 points
      1. Who has time to use such slow solution? I haven't
      2. Very, very far away of knoppix

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    3. Re:Slashdot... Bring you the news a year late by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      at least they only have done it once :)

  6. The only thing by Viceice · · Score: 0, Troll

    It'll be so bloated it'll take the same amount of time to boot as it would take to install windows proper.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:The only thing by Endive4Ever · · Score: 5, Informative

      Be careful about throwing stones. I remember using the Yggdrasil 'Plug and Play Linux' bootable CD back in 1993. It booted and ran rather nicely on a 486DX-33 with 16 megs of RAM.

      The current Linux systems are bloatware pigs, just like Windows.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:The only thing by elronxenu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I beg to differ. I'm running Debian Woody on, among other things, a 486SX notebook computer (that's SX as in no math coprocessor!) with 8 megs ram and about 200 megs of hard drive.

      Though it's not fast, it runs correctly and it is modern code which is being maintained for security bugs. The kernel is 2.4.24 and I can use it with my pcmcia wifi card just fine.

  7. This is old... by insmod_ex · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Seriously, PE Builder has been flying around for a very long time. Plus you can just download a Windows PE off of many IRC servers. Nonetheless, Windows PE/PE Builder has saved my balls many times. Almost lost my porno on one incident.

  8. Very useful by caston · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm a self-employed call-out computer tech (and yes that is the only way I could get work ;) and I use Bart'sPE very often in my job and find it a very useful tool.

    You come for the NTFS support and stay for the win32 API. By far the other most useful things are the virus scanner and the networking support. You can easily detect all nics that XP will support outof the box or create a plugin if it doesn't

    It's great for fixing Windows machines that won't boot. While I would prefer to use Knoppix and systemrescuecd BartsPE is usually more suited.

    --
    Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    1. Re:Very useful by Slack3r78 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with you completely. I had heard about Bart's PE before, but finally taking the time to put together my own build a few months ago was one of the best things I've done in a while. It's really amazing how many machines that are barely even running can be brought back to life simply by popping PE in and running an AV and spyware scan. The networking support is also a lifesaver - it makes recovering data from a crashed install a simple matter of a second machine and a crossover cable rather than having to tear the machine down and install the harddrive in the second machine (a real pain when the machine in question is a laptop). Really, I think the comparison to Knoppix is a bit unfair as Knoppix is supposed to be a demonstration of what desktop Linux is like. Bart's PE, on the other hand, is a very stripped down version of Windows with system administration tools as it's sole driving focus. It's much closer to say Knoppix STD than it is to vanilla Knoppix.

    2. Re:Very useful by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      Can this be used for disaster recovery. For example can I make one with support for my tape drive and install veritas on it. That way I can reinstall the OS from scratch on a new machine.

      Hell does it support ntbackup?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    3. Re:Very useful by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Indeed. While in slashdot, a windows cd might be flamebait, I've seen how truly useful knoppix is (fresh windows install, no NIC driver, need knoppix to download it), and I know such a CD will be useful with veritas, antivirus, networking tools, ad-aware, bunch a nic drivers etc. Our company uses common software across all computers, and everyones personal files reside on a common shared folder. So to keep someone running with a crashed harddisk, a customized version of such a CD can be useful (what if some virus crashes ALL workstations?, we can keep running temporarily on these CDs).

      My only rant is it doesnt seem to work with windows 2000.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  9. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "New hardware has been detected. Please reboot for the changes to take effect..."
    "Windows is shutting down"
    "Write configuration failed. The volume E: is read-only"
    ***
    "Loading Windows"
    "New hardware has been detected. Please reboot for the changes to take effect..."

    1. Re:Yeah... by chrispl · · Score: 1

      Well? Anyone know how it overcomes this? RAM drive and "virtual reboot" maybe?

      --
      What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
    2. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP kernel. It doesn't need reboot as often.

    3. Re:Yeah... by chrispl · · Score: 1

      I installed XP today and I had to reboot 3 times (workgroup name for example) I dont see how this would work without saving the configuration in some way.

      --
      What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
    4. Re:Yeah... by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes it uses a RAM Drive as well the support built into Windows XP onwards for booting of readonly media as part of the components in Windows XP used in XP Embedded. XP Embedded basically just uses the same XP components but with different config (registry, ini file etc). See this -
      http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/xpehelp/ht ml/xetbswindowspreinstallationenvironment.asp
      for more information about WinPE and its related XP Embedded technologies.

    5. Re:Yeah... by danheskett · · Score: 1

      It's not for desktop use.. it's for recovery use. The comparison with Knoppix is completely inane. Disregard that.

    6. Re:Yeah... by TechniMyoko · · Score: 1

      Sorry but XP doesnt reboot when you change the workgroup name.

  10. Uhhh how is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this different than the startup disk that Winternals has had for years. Disk recovery, basic network and disk access. All sounds the same to me. http://www.winternals.com

  11. It's finally come? by BenSpinSpace · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To be honest, it feels more like a disappointment than a relief. I'm sure people can identify: we've all faced our horrible problems in the era of Windows 95 and 98 (and others). The operating system seems to completely crash and will only boot up to a screen that tells us some vital file is missing. Or perhaps we have that horrible old floppy disk with a few core programs on it, all of which are near useless. DOS is our only way to go... unless of course the floppy drive is broken. (Happened to me once... rendered the computer seemingly quite useless to me, with my level of knowledge at that time). Do you know what it's like remembering my MSN searches from 5 years ago, when I checked if a Windows bootable CD was a plausible thing? After all of those years, and all of those trials... suddenly, it's here. I happen to think that Windows XP is a fine operating system, and with Norton & Ad-Aware, most bad things are kept off my system anyway. Even the horrible "Your computer has started up in 640x480 with 16 colors, no sound card registered, no video card recognized, and no monitor apparently ever installed for NO APPARENT REASON WHATSOEVER" situation rarely comes up. And NOW we have bootable Windows? It's a silver lining with a cloud, if you ask me.

    1. Re:It's finally come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can boot Windows 95 and 98 from CD as well. There's just a lot of busywork involved in setting it up. And it probably won't work as well on significantly different hardware.

  12. Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by ganhawk · · Score: 1, Troll

    I tried bratPE. But it does not contain the windows GUI.It just contains one start menu like thinge. Sure its based on XP and you can use it for fixing disks etc. But it cannot be used for applications like browsing or desktop applications.
    But hey WinPE is command line based !

    --
    Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
    1. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a plugin for PE called XPE which uses the explorer shell. Takes a while to boot up though.

      The only problem is that SSL doesn't work yet within Internet Explorer.

    2. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by 0x1337 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you sure? No, I haven't tried BartPE - and won't, since I am done with MS stuff forever now and my net pipe isn't wide enough to download an ISO.
      But - two years ago I played around with the WinPE disk which was a REALLY cut down version XP. Sure it had a gui - win32 stuff was there allright since it could run cmd.exe in a window et all. Sure it has a GUI - if you mean that it doesn't have explorer, then just say that. Misinformation is bad. I could use many other alternative "window managers" (if you can call them that, they don't really manage windows - the win32 library shit does that.) WinPE wasn't very well put together - opening up notepad, I could go to "Desktop" and find weird non-existing entires, bah, whatever. It matters not anymore.

      Sorry folks, the only way you will bait me back to the world of Windows is if someone makes a REAL POSIX layer running on top ntoskrnl (The NT Microkernel) (with an option to not load the win32 layer, obviously, whew)
      I hate to go on a MS bash, but seriously - way to go MS. First you hire CMU and VMS guys, with whom you write an interesting kernel based on Mach and VMS. Then - you implement all your flaky win16-->32 stuff on top, make a half-assed "posix" layer, and OF COURSE never publicise the ACTUAL kernel (ntoskrnl) INTERFACE. (Thats the Nt... and Rtl... funcs if you care)

      Imagine an ntoskrnl-based system with Hurd build around that and not around Mach. Or imagine a UNIX -like environment running on BSD-services running on top of ntoskrnl. Way to go MS - stifle creativity, advancement, technology.

    3. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by __aatgod8309 · · Score: 1

      Way to go MS - stifle creativity, advancement, technology. ...and competition though interoperability or open standards?

    4. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by ganhawk · · Score: 1

      I dont have access to WinPE (thanks to microsoft licensing) and my comment about WinPE was based on the faq from Bart's site.

      What is the difference between BartPE and Microsofts WinPE?

      * Start-menu; Bart's builder gives you a simple, dynamic and powerful start-menu (Nu2Menu, see screenshots). Microsoft's builder does not give you a start-menu, it uses a command prompt.


      So I guess that is wrong as you seem to have actually used WinPE. And no, I was not trying to spread Misinformation.

      --
      Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
    5. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by 0x1337 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes - if you boot WinPE, you will see some background (moon and blue mountains, something like that)- and then you will see a CMD.EXE Window open up. Thats GUI, since it just drew a window :-D.

    6. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by bheer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Way to go MS - stifle creativity, advancement, technology.

      I'm choosing to reply instead of moderate, because this is a *huge* pet peeve of mine. I've always thought NT-the-kernel was pretty elegant (especially compared to some *cough* Unix clones).

      Actually, the actual Nt_ interfaces *are* documented, but (afaik) incompletely, and without source it's really of very limited utility.

      In their quest for One True API (Win32 and now WinFX) they do seem to have killed off all innovation on top of one of their most technically impressive assets.

      I had hoped the MSDN academic alliance and shared source licensing would encourage some work, but as long as MS adopts a more liberal download-from-website model for source licenses, innovation on top of the NT kernel is likely to remain a pipe-dream. (When the competition (Linux) is available nicely cross-referenced, you'd have to be crazy to fill out the paperwork for an NT source license.)

    7. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by bangular · · Score: 1

      >Actually, the actual Nt_ interfaces *are* documented, but (afaik) incompletely
      You are correct sir. Yes! Really though, the basic rule of thumb is, everything MSDN doc related is well documented for basic things, but advanced things are imcompletely documented, documents are out of date, or not documentated at all. A perfect example was of a defragmenting program for NTFS. NTFS at the time (or maybe even still today) was not fully documented, so this defrag product was corupting files on people's hard drives. It was later found out that an undocumented feature/bug was the culprit (was a 3rd party defrag program).

      I know a few people who've ripped their hair out for a few hours trying to figure out why certain things weren't "acting" right only to find out it was something incompletely documented.

    8. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sorry folks, the only way you will bait me back to the world of Windows is if someone makes a REAL POSIX layer running on top ntoskrnl (The NT Microkernel)

      You mean like this? Interix, part of SFU, provides a complete System V unix running atop the microkernel (alongside Win32). No, you can't disable Win32, but it certainly provides a complete POSIX layer.

    9. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used WinPE. Once you have the command window open (and yes, it's running inside the GUI), you can launch true GUI apps.

    10. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Various peeps have shells and browsers running. The Slashdot hive-mind needs to expand this. PE is FAR more than a boot disk.

      http://windowspe.narod.ru/
      http://pierre.50megs .com/
      http://erdbuilder.by.ru/
      http://cdnet.boar d.dk3.us/2/
      http://www.911cd.net/forums/
      Search P2P for 'khauyeung"

    11. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      I don't see how it would cripple creativity and advancement? Did it hinder Linus et al from making Linux? No. Did it hinder Theo de Radt from making OpenBSD? No. Did it hinder a lot of other projects? No. Innovation is creating something entirely new. Improving a product... Well, if you had just tried to go about that instead, I'd maybe have agreed with you. But if you need someone elses kernel etc to make something, the odds are that your idea wasn't innovative at all.

      And as for POSIX? Personally, I think it's way too much cruft and bloat.

      As for competition, if everyone agrees on doing soemthing in just one way, you won't have any advancement of technology, really, since specs commitees etc will bog down quite a lot

      Let us take an example from the CPU market... If we'd only go with IA32 or x86-64 as a standard, we'd be locked into that(Never mind that, for economical reasons, we already are, and many Linux proponents want that to happen, judging by comments on Slashdot etc... So much for advancement of technology...).

      As for the freedom aspect... Microsoft has excercised their freedom to say no. Sure, RMS, ESR and a whole bunch of other fanatics might not like that someone says no to them, but freedom isn't just you getting things from someone because you want it, freedom is also for the other part to say no if they don't want to.

    12. Re:Cannot be used for general purpose like knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like you need to read up on GUI since you are misinformed.

  13. New plugin announcement! by Trillan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to announce the new Blue Screen of Death plugin. This plugin makes a blue screen of death a simple click away. Remove the unpredictability of not knowing exactly when your system will die!

    Warning: Does not remove other blue screens of death.

    1. Re:New plugin announcement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue screens of death are a tired cliche. No one has them anymore. The only people who still experience them are Linux users who use pirated Windows. Maybe that's why we only hear Linux users make this joke???

    2. Re:New plugin announcement! by mgv · · Score: 1

      I have a Mac OS X system and a Windows XP system. The Windows XP shows black screens of death (which seem to have replaced blue screens) momentarily (the PC reboots automatically after one) from time to time, but they're mercifully rare since the service pack. Back when I was running Windows 2000, I saw frequent blue screens of death.

      You will kindly note that the article is about Windows 2000, not Windows XP.

      I do not run Linux. If I had a spare computer around, I might, but I don't.


      If you have virtual PC for OSX, you could do a linux install on that ...

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    3. Re:New plugin announcement! by Trillan · · Score: 0

      If you have virtual PC for OSX, you could do a linux install on that ...

      I don't -- yet. I think I'm getting it in about a month.

      It'll be kinda cool -- two varieties of kernel panics, a blue screen of death and the momentary black flicker of death all from one computer. None can match my geekiness... eat your hearts out, !@#$ers!!

      Seriously, though, good suggestion. :)

    4. Re:New plugin announcement! by parksie · · Score: 1

      That's still the BSOD. You just didn't see it because XP defaults to "Automatically reboot" when one occurs.

      System Properties->Advanced, and turn it off. Next time it happens, you'll see it.

    5. Re:New plugin announcement! by Plug · · Score: 1

      Sysinternal's Blue Screen Saver

      Now emulates startup screens too!

    6. Re:New plugin announcement! by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Oh
      My
      God

      Too good to be true! Thanks!

  14. Bart's pebuilder meetup day by caston · · Score: 3, Informative
    One thing I would like to mention is that there is also a meetup site for Barts Pebuilder:

    http://pebuilder.meetup.com

    Also don't forget the slashdot meet.

    http://slashdot.meetup.com

    --
    Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
  15. Useful! by johannesg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    With the increasing use of Linux on the desktop, this could be really useful for people who want to double boot into Windows, but do not want the hassle of having to repartition their drives.

    Needless to say, this is good news for Microsoft as it may increase the acceptance of Windows as an alternative to Linux on the desktop ;-)

    1. Re:Useful! by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With the increasing use of Linux on the desktop, this could be really useful for people who want to double boot into Windows, but do not want the hassle of having to repartition their drives.

      I find it very interesting that this post was marked "Funny", rather than "Insightful". Personally, I'm interested in looking into it for precisely this reason. I would love to be able to configure a bootable CD with the Windows tools I occasionally need and carry it around rather than wasting HDD space on a Windows install.

      One obvious problem, though... there's no way a CD would be big enough. Can this be used to build bootable DVDs?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Useful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is barely used as a desktop,

  16. It's a neat idea, by foxtrot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but then I get to thinking about hardware drivers and wonder how the heck they did it. One thing Linux has gotten pretty good at over the years is handling a billion zillion hardware drivers so that you know you've got the right ones for installing a system. I've never had good luck in Windows when upgrading the hardware if I leave the old driver in place.

    You might be able to get away with a basic set of simple drivers (Basic IDE, sound blaster, NE2000...) but then you lose any sort of performance you might have once had... I'd like to know how this thing actually works.

    1. Re:It's a neat idea, by lvdrproject · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ... Heh. That's a new slant on that subject. Never heard that before. 'One thing Linux is better at than Windows is drivers.'

      News to me indeed. :/

    2. Re:It's a neat idea, by Ulven · · Score: 1

      It suprised me that linux detected all my hardware on this machine, while windows missed the monitor and graphics card, neither of which are old.

      Linux even found my P800, which windows didn't.

    3. Re:It's a neat idea, by bitspotter · · Score: 1

      I was favorably impressed when the Unreal Tournament 2k3 demo CD came out on a bootable Gentoo Linux installer cd. It made sense that game demos could be released in a clean-room software environment, making support easier.

      Of course, there's just one thing holding back many people I know form switching to Linux: GAMES. If the right sound and graphics support could be developed for bartspe, windows game demos could be run right off a bootable cd, without needing to have windows actually installed at all.

      It was an exciting idea, until I thought about the licensing issues...

    4. Re:It's a neat idea, by bitspotter · · Score: 1

      not to mention the security boost a read-only boot source adds...

  17. ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by erf007 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A co-worked of mine once showed me a CD platform he uses regularly. Something called ESCD (?) I am not 100% sure about the name of it.

    I had just inherited a new notebook from a co-worker that had just left. I needed to make sure that all the corporate information on the notebook was accounted for. Unfortunately this was one they had built up themselves and noone had the admin passwords to the local machine. Enter ESCD.

    Using this nice little CD I was able to boot to a linux environment, read the NTFS partitions and make changes to the password files with a nice little menu to step me through it.

    A couple of quick changes later and I was able to log in to the machine as the local computer admin and receover all information that had been stored on there. Was quite funky.

    1. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by insecuritiez · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are probably thinking of ERD commander from Winternals http://www.wininternals.com/products/repairandreco very/erdcommander2002.asp?pid=erd

    2. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by Achmed · · Score: 5, Informative

      How about Offline NT Password & Registry Editor - saved my life more than once.

      http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/

    3. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me how blaze you are about what you just said. You were able to "Root" a windoze box simply by booting from a linux CD and following a few prompts ... If its that simple to gain access, why bother with passwords in the first place...

    4. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative


      Unless your file system is encrypted then it is better that you assume that anyone with access to the hardware can have access to any data on the disk.

      Otherwise you are living in a dreamworld.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    5. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by Hadean · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe you're thinking of the once popular Russian made "Emergency Boot CD"? I can't find a working website for it anymore (unofficial site here.)

      I still have a copy of the CD. It was quite a useful CD, especially since it had some tools/programs that were obviously not supposed to be on there, like Symantec tools ;-)

    6. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try "Hirens Boot cd" a warez disk that does all this.

    7. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by insecuritiez · · Score: 1

      Yeah I've used it too. It has only had about a 75% success rate with me though. Sometimes I'll reset the password and still won't be able to log in for whatever reason.

    8. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by v1sor · · Score: 1

      You probably mean EBCD (Emergency Boot CD).

      The website is currently down, but there is a lite and a pro version (and both are free).

      Do a Google - you're sure to find a link. ;)

    9. Re:ESCD (?) as a rescue platform by erf007 · · Score: 1
      EBCD sounds right actually! Don't know where I got the 'S' from....

      EF.

  18. Re:solitaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solitaire's source is now available. Why don't you build your own?

  19. PXE Boot Images by VoidEngineer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ah, this stuff has been around for like 4 years, at least. We were using this kind of technology at the University of Chicago back in 1999 with WindowsNT images. (The department I worked in was responsible for supporting all of the public-use workstations throughout campus, and we naturally relied on disk imaging technologies.)

    If you buy a product like Altiris LabExpert or Norton Ghost and are very clever, you can jury rig an entire operating system environment onto a CD.

    Oddly enough, we stumbled on how to do this kind of thing while researching Wake-Over-LAN and PXE technologies. Apparently, the system BIOS just needs to be smart enough that it can look at something other than a PCI/IDE/SCSI hard drive for information with which to load a kernel into memory. If your BIOS is PXE enabled, it's smart enough to tell the system bus to look for a kernel on the network card (in the case of a Wake-On-LAN network boot) or on a CD drive (in the case of a CD boot).

    FYI, PXE is Intel's Preboot Execution Environment specification, and is therefore working at the hardware level underneath Microsoft PE (Preinstallation Environment).

    Nonetheless, the hardware capabilities which have allowed Windows to be booted from a CD have been around since 1999, at least, as they are part of Intel's PXE specification.

    Just my two cents...

    1. Re:PXE Boot Images by ostiguy · · Score: 1

      PXE is not this. PXE is a network card thing. PE is a windows based installation platform thing that MS cooked up for big customers

  20. Can it edit an already installed winxp registry? by Xaer0cool · · Score: 1

    I used partition magic 8.0 to create a partition for my new fedora install, and it did that just fine... but it messed something in the windows registry so that now when I boot to xp it starts booting, then stops with some error about 'xmnt2002.exe' failing autocheck... Online help forums say I need to edit the registry but I cannot do that from any where else... or can I? will this enable me to do it? does anyone else know how to fix this?

  21. Last i heard of this by DaLiNKz · · Score: 2, Informative

    was on a Windows trading website (they trade old/new beta's of windows software for tinkering).. This little project isn't very legal at all, if anything, this attention its getting may get them a nice little memo for Microsoft. They are basically stripping down a piece of the new installer for windows and turning it into a small OS for simple applications.. I mean, a good idea and all and sounds fun but its just going to piss off Microsoft..

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
  22. Almost usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...an almost usable quick system.

    Almost usable...doesn't that describe all versions of Windows, stripped down or not?

    1. Re:Almost usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but it's the quick part that's innovative.

  23. Re:Can it edit an already installed winxp registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Have you tried booting into the recovery console? If that's possible, you can use the console registry tool, reg.exe, to make changes.

  24. Licensing? by TheMadPenguin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about MS licensing? what are the limitations of distributing something like this? Knowing Microsoft It can't be free..... can it?

    "Fear the penguin"

    --
    Linux with kernel panic...
    MadPenguin.org
    1. Re:Licensing? by TheMadPenguin · · Score: 1, Informative

      Maybe I spoke too soon... looks like this is not an MS product, but even still, how does this all tie in to the Windows OS? Or is it even a form of Windows OS? I am tired and confused ;)

      "Fear the penguin"

      --
      Linux with kernel panic...
      MadPenguin.org
    2. Re:Licensing? by Chrome-Dragon · · Score: 1

      To create your ISO image for burning you have to insert your copy of windows XP from which it extracts your legally owned copy of the PE. Then his software adds a functional layer on top of that. Good stuff I'm loving using my copy at my company.

  25. hi, this is bill gates by b17bmbr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "i think if you read the eula, you can use my software on only one comptuer at a time. you can not install it on one computer and boot it into memory on another. i would like to introduce you to our team of lawyers. don't let their horns or fangs fool you. they are really nice. (ha ha ha ha). i might also remind you that there are specific ways in which you may use my software, all of which you agreed before you even opened the CD (thinks to himself: damn, i'm clever). if it isn't specified, and you don't have a license to do this, then you may not."

    and this is another reason i use linux.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  26. It's not meant to be a full system by Sancho · · Score: 5, Informative

    Among other things, the PE environment (or at least, the ones made with PE builder) are limited to 6 processes. They also reboot after 24 hours (intentionally, no less!), resolution is limited to 800x600, 16 bit color, etc. What this tool is really good for is scanning for viruses, doing repairs that otherwise would be difficult (or impossible) under your normal operating environment, etc. In fact, one thing I just saw PE builder used for was to flash a firmware on a machine that only had Linux on it.

    1. Re:It's not meant to be a full system by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 5, Informative

      No its definetly not limited to 6 processes (both WinPE and BartPE). Also you can use a commandline resolution utility like SetRes.exe to set a higher resolution. Basically it will set it to the highest possible VESA mode that your video card supports. There is however a limitation of 24 hours with WinPE. If you use XPE plugin with BartPE it almost allows you to have quite a Windows like environment with a working browser and all. If you take the time to cusomise your BartPE with all the app plugins you need then it can a quite useful thing.

      And Oh yes I submitted this story so I should know something :)

    2. Re:It's not meant to be a full system by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Interesting on the processes...both Microsoft's site and Bart's site list this as a limitation. Seems pretty odd that it's not actually a limitation. Er, I did mean to say "concurrent processes".. could that be what it actually is?
      As for resolution, well I hadn't thought of a commandline util, that's pretty slick. I hate working in 800x600 :)

    3. Re:It's not meant to be a full system by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      It seems funny that they mention a "24 hour" limitation for an installation environment. Last week someone re-installed a big Windows server and he had to reboot the thing at least 24 times to complete the installation of all software. The times between boot were always less than 24 minutes, often more like 24 seconds!

    4. Re:It's not meant to be a full system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's right? The poster or the faq?

    5. Re:It's not meant to be a full system by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Just 24 hours? That'd extend he normal time between reboots to what? 8 hours?

    6. Re:It's not meant to be a full system by smchris · · Score: 1

      They also reboot after 24 hours (intentionally, no less!)

      Well, that's a feature, isn't it? Better intentionally than unintentionally with Windows.

    7. Re:It's not meant to be a full system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      By default, it IS limited to 6 processes. That is, unless you search for a hacked version of several of the files. Bart removed the information he once posted about this said fix, as well as all links to said files that others have posted.
      For the same reason he reworked how he created BartPE. Because windows once came after him. He changed how he used certain things, such as his implementation of the registry. So he is not currently infringing on anything Microsoft. Everything he has done so far has been legit, atleast in the current version. However, that cracked file that removes certain limitations of Windows PE would break that. So he leaves them be.

      And just because you submitted the story doesn't mean you know EVERYTHING. :P

  27. Go live, windows... by mm0mm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If Microsoft will ever release Kinoppix-like full-functional live CD version of Windows with a set of most frequently used apps, that will make many windows users' lives much easier. All viruses and worms that screw up your system by overwriting system configuration files/registry and by installing junk (e.g. spyware) on the hard disk will be history --as long as applications are allowed to run only from the CD-Rom. You can still keep custom icons and all junks (e.g. your mp3s and appz collection for file sharing) on hard disk, while everything in C:\Progra~1 and \Windows dirs will remain as they are supposed to be on a CD. Works just like XboX, I guess. Forget customization: security is more important than your custom wallpapers, don't you think?

    Only and the biggest problem with Win-Live CD is that YOU CAN'T PATCH IT! and the fact is MS loves patching your PC. So after all, Win-Live is just another dream. How unfortunate.

    Meanwhile, Windows live-CD will allow me to get rid of fat32 partition on my machine. no more dual-boot necessary....

    1. Re:Go live, windows... by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      Or they could simply change their default security policy to not give users and viruses/trojans they download the access to screw with these files in the first place.

    2. Re:Go live, windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If Microsoft will ever release Kinoppix-like full-functional
      > live CD version of Windows with a set of most frequently
      > used apps, that will make many windows users' lives
      > much easier

      It's called a XBox. Of course, currently it is only targeted at those users who only play games, but that could easily change

    3. Re:Go live, windows... by ctr2sprt · · Score: 4, Informative
      That's not a problem with "Win-Live CD," it's a problem with anything that installs on any readonly medium. All patches are applied by making a copy of the image, applying the patch, and then making a new disc of the patched version. And Windows supports that just fine.

      If all you want is read-only access, use NTFS. Explicitly deny write permission to the Everyone pseudo-group. Deny supersedes permit, as it should, and not even Administrators can bypass it automatically. They have to take ownership of the file and grant themselves the permissions they need. It's about as secure as mounting writeable hardware readonly (or nosuid or noexec) in Linux.

    4. Re:Go live, windows... by pe1chl · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem with using this technique is that some Windows programs require write access in unexpected places. Admittedly this is becoming less of a problem, but there still are older programs around that store configuration data and/or temporary files under their C:\Progra~1\Progname subdirectory :-(

      Worse, when they do and they cannot perform the write, the error information is often useless.
      The program fails in an unclear way (like, nothing happens when you click something) or an error message like "cannot create file" (without filename) appears.

      We run Windows 2000 Pro, and ordinary users of the system have no write access to anything on C: except their profile directory. This often results in lengthy debugging sessions and searches on the Internet to resolve problems. Even Office 2000 has problems running on such a system (the orgchart program does not work when C:\WinNT is not writable).
      Similar problems arise when programs try to write to the registry.

      There have been many times when I wished there was a tool like "strace" on these boxes so that it would be possible to quickly determine what the application tried to do, and why that failed.
      (actually, an strace for Windows appears to exist. next time I have to debug something like this I will try it)

    5. Re:Go live, windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Surely you must know about the sysinternals's filemon and regmon tools?

    6. Re:Go live, windows... by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      >the biggest problem with Win-Live CD is that YOU CAN'T PATCH IT!

      Wrong. Windows already supports patching install CDs (a process called slipstreaming where you can copy your original install CD, add the current service pack files and a fix rollup, and then burn a new, up to date install CD - just google it for more info). I've done this plenty of times with my consumer versions so it's not even limited to enterprise/admins. There's no reason they wouldn't provide the same capability with a live offering.

    7. Re:Go live, windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont you have to recompile Linux's kernal every week?

    8. Re:Go live, windows... by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      security auditing. It's under the "policies" thing. Set it to log all failures and It will write fails to the event log under the "security" section .

    9. Re:Go live, windows... by mountiealpha · · Score: 1
      security auditing. It's under the "policies" thing. Set it to log all failures and It will write fails to the event log under the "security" section .
      If the disk is read-only, then how would Windows write to the system log? Or should the SYSTEM built-in groups's permissions be left intact in this case?
    10. Re:Go live, windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if they upgraded their "Emergency startup disk" to Emergency Startup CD or DVD with crucial utilites to restore the machine.
      XP system restore is useless if you cant get into safemode

    11. Re:Go live, windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several utilities, produced by SysInternals, that will tell you which registry entries a windows program tries to write to or read from, and which files the program tries to write to, read from, create or delete. And there are several other utilities to help keep your windows programs in line. Its great in figuring out what programs want to do. As I have little experience in linux, it appears its close to what strace does.
      However, these programs are separate. The registry viewer is one program, the file viewer is another. But they are still nice. And free.
      http://sysinternals.com/
      The above are also the same people that created ERD, which does almost the same thing as BartPE. :D

      As for programs writing to certain places you have no idea about, that is why you need to check out http://tinyapps.org/
      It has a list of quite a few windows applications that are very small. The website also lists if the program writes to an .ini file, or the registry, or whatnot. It also has an 'award' for files that are totally self contained. Files like that, are great for an OS like BartPE, where its a read only atmosphere.

    12. Re:Go live, windows... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      SYSTEM should always have write permissions to everything. Otherwise, bad things happen.

    13. Re:Go live, windows... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Only and the biggest problem with Win-Live CD is that YOU CAN'T PATCH IT!

      That's no big deal; you don't patch a Live CD anyway; there's no point. You
      just get the latest version.

      I would expect the *big* problems with a Windows Live CD to be in terms of
      hardware support and the expectations of applications. With regard to the
      former, Microsoft has for a LONG time now relied on the hardware manufacturers
      to supply almost all of the drivers. It is almost impossible to build a
      complete system entirely out of hardware that will work with Windows without
      installing manufacturer drivers. Microsoft (or whoever was licensing Windows
      to produce the Live CD) would have to license all the drivers from the vendors
      of the hardware. No individual driver would be a problem (vendors would want
      their product to work with the Windows Live CD), but there are a *lot* of them,
      and tracking down agreements for all of them would be a significant pain. I
      would expect such a project to take at least a year.

      The other problem is worse. LOTS of applications won't run on Windows XP
      unless you log in as a user with Administrator privileges. (This is *one*
      of the reasons OEMs all ship with a passwordless Owner account and no
      non-privileged user accounts.) There are assorted reasons why apps don't
      work without Admin privs, but mostly it boils down to their having been
      designed, a couple of versions ago, for Windows 98, where that stuff just
      doesn't matter. Judging by the number of applications still in use today
      that do various highly-deprecated things (use the DOS API, require to be
      installed in C:\APPNAME, store the user's documents in the application's
      directory under Progra~1, and assorted other schenanighans along the same
      lines) it seems unlikely that the apps will all be capable of running in a
      tightly controlled environment any time soon. Of course, I'm mostly not
      talking here about general-purpose apps like word processors, but more in
      terms of field-specific custom stuff, like library automation software,
      hospital software, accounting software, and so on. The general-purpose apps
      are mostly somewhat better behaved, and so for scenerios where nothing very
      special is needed the bootable Windows Live CD might be practical within a
      few years. I won't be holding my breath though.

      Heck, I'd be happy just to have a bootable Windows CD that's usable as a
      rescue system. Something along the lines of Knoppix but with regedit and
      other Windows-specific things. If it would run on all the hardware Knoppix
      runs on, I'd be ecstatic. If I could afford the thing, that is. Windows
      really ought to ship with such a thing in the box. Well, the Pro edition
      should, anyway.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    14. Re:Go live, windows... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Is this required to allow worms that exploit a leak in a system process can install themselves properly?

  28. Re:Bootable Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Bootable Windows"

    As opposed to all those that won't boot?
    Well, this IS something new!

  29. I browsed microsoft.com but couldn't find by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any word on when they plan to leak the source?

    1. Re:I browsed microsoft.com but couldn't find by danimrich · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should probably ask Mainstay.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    2. Re:I browsed microsoft.com but couldn't find by imroy · · Score: 1

      Erm, that's Mainsoft, not Mainstay.

    3. Re:I browsed microsoft.com but couldn't find by danimrich · · Score: 1

      you're right.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
  30. Re:What is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No shit, I've seen posts like that for the past few weeks, what is it?

  31. Source Code for BartPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Anyone got the source code for this? /just kidding

  32. Re:How is this a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...2) It's Windows. Forget "stable"....

    Tell me how this post is a troll?


    Yeah, I agree. Your original post should have been modded down as "redundant" instead. Let's file a claim to the /. editor.

  33. Bart's fixes some of the crippledness of Win XP. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Interesting


    The Winternals product costs maybe $300. Bart's is free.

    Also, it doesn't matter if Bart's is new. What matters is that more people need to hear about it.

    I wish Bart's was better documented and easier to customize.

    Note that Bart is doing for Microsoft customers what Microsoft should have done. Microsoft provides PE only for its biggest customers. Everyone else gets a crippled version of the OS.

    Even if you have Bart's Windows XP is still crippled: "Microsoft Windows 2000 and Windows XP have crippled file systems." The file system cannot copy some of the files that are necessary to the operating system. Microsoft provides no way of making functional backups of its newer operating systems! (Yes, I know about Sysprep and NTBackup and third-party methods. Microsoft technical support agrees with my statement.)

  34. Bart's incorporates the user's Windows XP files. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Informative


    When building a Bart's CD, the program just finds the user's own Windows XP operating system files, and incorporates them into the Bart's CD. No knowledge of the NTFS file system is required, because the actual, real NTFS file system is included.

  35. fascinating reading... by tloh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've skimmed the homepage with great interest. There is definitely the potential for an even greater tool than has already been created by this guy. But considering what folks are capable of doing, how are the guys at Redmond going to respond? With the recent code leak in the news, it could be very easy for Gates & Co to pull an SCO or something else in the spirit of control and intimidation to stop users from doing what they consider to be "unacceptable" use of the Windows EULA.

    What's more many people have contributed quite a few plugins....

    Bart addresses the bureaucratic legalities of using the original install media further down on his web page but when push comes to shove how solid is his position when his own code and that of his contributors are concerned?

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:fascinating reading... by tloh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      just read some of the other comments that were submitted around the same time I did mine. It seems many are confused about the nature of this software and the relationship of this software package with Windows. At the very bottom of the webpage, it is revealed that although "BartPE" uses GNU software, the authors' original contribution in the package is provided under a propriatary /a> license. It seems BartPE is free beer but not free speech.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    2. Re:fascinating reading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >how are the guys at Redmond going to respond?

      Truthfully, I couldn't fucking care less. And XP is my primary OS. (Yeah, boo, hiss, whatever, fanboy.)

      I built an XP boot CD 2 years ago, with Office, Visual Studio, Photoshop, Pagemaker, Mozilla and Eudora. I used Norton Ghost and stripped out quite a bit of crap that MS thinks needs to be in XP, and heavily (really heavily) modded the registry (once you change everything such that ALL personal/program info is on a different partition from the OS, 90% of the shit in the registry is unneeded). Persistence and continuity are provided by keychain USB.

      I've made 2 other versions of this disk, one for gaming, one for 3D modelling.

      I own every piece of software on those CDs, and they can go fuck themselves if they think there's anything wrong with that. (Of course, unlike Bart I didn't tempt them by publicly releasing my stuff). Refactoring the OS and the software let me fit everything I need on one disk, which is with me always, so I am never without the tools I need to do what I want to do.

      And if by chance this country does get more fascist and somehow MS sues me: great. I haven't had a job since Bush fucked the economy, and I hear they get cable and free dental in prison. Bring it on. Until then, fuck the bozos.

  36. Stop! by christophe · · Score: 4, Funny

    This man released something which involves making a copy of the copyrighted intellectual property from Microsoft! We must stop him, or Windows will be available on P2P networks very soon, and terrorists will use it to destroy the world!

    (This 'copy is bad' nonsense works both ways, right?)

    --
    Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).
  37. Re:What is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    sid is the story id. formkey is a random string that is needed to make posts. A new one is created everytime someone clicks "Reply to This". My guess is a script is parsing each story looking for these formkeys and generating either trolls or posts intended for karma whores. If you noticed the original poster's homepage, it links to anti-slash.org. They specialize in disrupting Slashdot, through the use of "jihad" tactics. These karma whores will make posts that are generated from anti-slash's extensive +5 score database. Later they'll use these accounts to spew trolls, flamebaits, and crapfloods.

  38. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you read the page linked to you'll see that he belives it is completely legal. He steps through the various versions and acknowledges that some of them was in fact illegal in some way or another, but he says that this latest version is completely legal.

    OTOH, I am sure that some random guy won't have much of a chance against a horde of MS lawyers if they decide they want to shut him down.

    1. Re:RTFA by Peyna · · Score: 0, Redundant

      People who evade taxes think they're following completely legal steps as well; but instead have just been misled by others who have just been luck enough not to get caught yet. You could still be liable for many things, even if you take this guy's word that it's completely legal and it turns out otherwise.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:RTFA by Wtcher · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bart had had his tool shut down by Microsoft before. In fact, he had to redo some work and submit it to Microsoft for them to okay it; I'm assuming that approval hasn't changed, assuming his continuing work is also very much original.

      --
      ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
  39. Dell Server Assistant by pe1chl · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Dell Server Assistant CD, a CD-ROM you get with any Dell server, is a booting CD that loads Windows NT and then runs a GUI program that lets you select a disk layout, an operating system, parameters for the operating system (system name, IP address etc) and then prepares an unattended installation file for that operating system. It asks for the OS installation CD, copies it to the disk, and hands over the installation process.

    This CD uses some commercially available software kit, the name I now cannot recall, to load a Windows NT system into RAMdisk and let it run from there.
    Unfortunately there is no apparent way to exit the installation GUI and go to the NT desktop.
    This CD has existed for many years, and I sometimes wondered if we should make the effort to "hack" it and use it as a system repair tool for NTFS based systems.

    I don't think this CD is anyway related to Microsoft WinPE technology, but I wonder why it does not stop and say "we must now reboot for the changes to take effect" all the time. It runs on a wide range of Dell servers and I don't think they are completely hardware compatible in the strict sense that Windows often requires.

  40. Re:Bart's fixes some of the crippledness of Win XP by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Even if you have Bart's Windows XP is still crippled: "Microsoft Windows 2000 and Windows XP have crippled file systems." The file system cannot copy some of the files that are necessary to the operating system.
    Huh? Did you read this answer as part of the old slashdot article you are quoting? There is nothing crippled about the Windows File Systems. The SID's are security identifiers working in the way they are meant to be.
  41. Re:Can it edit an already installed winxp registry by Sancho · · Score: 1

    Haven't done this myself, but presumably you could use RegEdt32 and just load the hive that you want to edit.
    I've done this on a normal windows installation, so as long as you have RegEdt32 and any required files, I don't know why it wouldn't work.

  42. ERD Commander by trezor · · Score: 4, Informative

    As far as I am conserned... ERD Commander from Winternals has allways been my tool of choice.

    You can boot up a stripped version of Windows. Unlock admin-accounts. Access local-net, make backups of documents on an otherwise f**ked up harddrive... And yes, there is a command prompt.

    And no, I am not affiliated with Winternals, but ERD Commander has been around since NT4.0-days, if I remember correctly.

    Maybe this is some kind of free tool, unlike ERD Commander, but it isn't news.

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    1. Re:ERD Commander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAYBE if you looked at what has and is being done, you'd have in informed opinion!

    2. Re:ERD Commander by jerky42 · · Score: 1

      Isn't News?

      We can have all kinds of items about beta releases of esoteric distros (bioinformatics) and a free tool that might help most of the people around here isn't news?

      (Remember way more than half of the people on Slashdot are using windows)

      --
      The strong do what they can, while the weak suffer what they must.
    3. Re:ERD Commander by trezor · · Score: 1

      What I ment, but which might not have been too clear, was that the mere concept of a bootable windows-cd with full repair-kit functionality is actually nothing new.

      I'm all for free software, but this was being hailed as something conceptionaly new and groundbreaking. Which it is not, it's just free.

      As for sysadmins working professionaly for large user-groups, the benefits of having this kind of software by far outweights the expenses.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    4. Re:ERD Commander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont get out much, do ya?

    5. Re:ERD Commander by CoolHnd30 · · Score: 1

      yeah my boss shelled out like $1400 bucks for a couple copies of this. The last computer that we had come through with a fscke'd up HD, the erd wouldn't see anything on the drive. We booted up Knoppix, and were easily able to copy and rescue all data on drive. I said that was $1400 well spent.

    6. Re:ERD Commander by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Bart's PE Builder actually lets you include ERD Commander as a plugin to your PE Build. This way, you get all the tools available with that, as well as networking support, AV and spyware scanning, and you can throw in other tools such as Nero and Ghost as well. It's an incredibly useful tool that I use just about every day and has saved me more time in fixing customer's machines than I care to think about.

      So Bart's PE isn't really a replacement for ERD Commander so much as it lets you build many tools into a single, minimal runtime environment which is extremely useful for system diagnostics. If you like ERD Commander, you really should check this out because it allows you to not only have the features available in ERD Commander, but a good deal more as well.

    7. Re:ERD Commander by ahaning · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you just need to unlock accounts (if, say, you forgot Administrator's password), try this. There are bootable ISOs and floppy disk images.

      It's not the most intuitive thing to use, but it is pretty easy if you follow the command prompts. It could probably be extended to include more tools like KNOPPIX.

      Actually, something with that, KNOPPIX, and MemTest86 would be really nice and alleviate the need for 3 CDs for performing diagnostic tests on wonky PCs.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    8. Re:ERD Commander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone stated here, you can include ERD as a plugin with BartPE. You can still use the tools included with it.
      However, BartPE is not ERD. Nor the other way around. Though both seem to be built around Windows PE. The only limitation I really find to ERD is that it requires an instance of Windows already installed on your PC. So if you go to some place where the user has linux installed, or no hard drive at all, ERD will not load. ERD is more for windows recovery. Whereas BartPE can be used for recovery, or for web surfing, or any number of other uses.

  43. Re:How is this a troll? by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

    I thought VD usually happened after someone scored...

  44. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - LINUX ZEALOT WITH RHETORICS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Yeah, and the whole point of this article is that not every distribution of windows requires you to install everything...

    You point was... again?

  45. We had this sooner by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why didn't we have this sooner?

    First of all, lets understand you're talking about Windows in general and not WinXP eight years ago. Well, the answer is you could. I saw a number of write-ups on how to make a CD that would win Win95 right from the CD. Let me add that, because of the driver issues and such you did have to build it for the system you were configuring for (at least if you wanted to use anything other than the minimal VGA drivers) and you might have to ignore a few error message that it spit out while it booted, but it could be done. You wouldn't be able to make a CD you could carry anywhere, but some people were making CD"s that could boot like Knoppix for a classroom environment (without the obvious "cheat" of just installing from CD to hard drive and then running from hard drive). Finding the information is proving a bit tricky, but I should have it somewhere. When and if I find it, if someone doesn't beat me to it, I'll post what I have or a link to same.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:We had this sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we did have this, i know when quake 1 came out I mad e about half a dozen cd's that booted win95 and autoran quake. Now that impressed my computerscience class!

  46. How to do it on a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    OS 9 and older...
    put any Mac installation CD in, restart while holding down the C key.

    OS X
    use Carbon Copy Cloner. This is just a GUI for the UNIX utilities built in. After making a clone CD, follow OS 9 instructions.

    1. Re:How to do it on a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Man this is near pathetic...
      Windows wasn't able to do this before? I thought it was only because I never cared to actually tried it and that it was actually doable but, man, we are in 2004! This feature as been built into the Mac OS since system7 (or 7.1, not sure), this feature as been accessible to some Linux distributions for quite a while now (since I do not know Linux as well as the Mac I don't know exactly since when...), just think Knoppix...

      You know what is bad in all this, most Win ITs and other dumb human will still suggest Windows as the "only viable" OS to their boss so they keep their job. Some will even "believe" that the next version will be stable and secure, like they stupidly did for the past 9 years, Windows might be running on more than 90% of the worlds computer and that just tells me that there are a majority of people in the world that are undereducated or mentally very feeble. I mean, CEOs of fortunne 500 companies, who are considered business gurus are still believing their IT after all those years, they think it's normal to have 5-10 guys to manage your email and your incredible database using bandwith of MB per seconds. The same guys dissmiss anyone telling them that they run their studios, entirely, using more than 10 protocols from over 30 companies, managing GB of data per second 24 hours a day with NO IT, because the studio guy owns Macs and their IT told them Macs were not good, now tell me those CEOs are intelligent beings... all they have is money and a lot of people to tell them what to do with it,
      puppets...

  47. Usable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    > with some work an almost usable quick system

    I can't even get an almost usable system after installing Windows :)

    Fuck this. Go for Knoppix. It's $500 less expensive.

  48. No, he missed the point. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    WhoDaresWins,

    It constantly amazes me to get answers like the one you quoted. First, the person who answered has a serious anger problem.

    Second, he missed the point. He was warned in the Slashdot story, but he missed the point anyway. Microsoft provides no way to make a functional backup of a Windows XP boot partition. That's a fact. Microsoft technical support agrees with this.

    Third, did you read the answer to the comment you quoted: #7455912? Apparently not, because larien (5608) gives a complete answer and bigpat (158134) criticized the original poster for his anger.

    Fourth, he talks about Sysprep. He apparently doesn't realize that Sysprep is not available to most users of Windows XP. He also assumes that the user is attached to a domain. Most aren't.

    I think that an OS with no full backup method does not meet the need for Fitness for Merchantibility. That legal standard may not apply to Windows XP, but it should, in my opinion. In another field, the manufacturer would not be allowed to provide an incomplete product.

    The sociology of his answer is more interesting than what he said.

    Thanks for writing the story about Bart's and getting Slashdot to publish it. I already knew about Bart's, but the some of the comments were useful to me.

    1. Re:No, he missed the point. by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 4, Informative
      He apparently doesn't realize that Sysprep is not available to most users of Windows XP
      Huh? Who said everyone cannot get sysprep? Look here to download the Win2K sysprep and here for the Windows XP sysprep (part of XP support tools). It is also available on each and every Windows XP CD at \SUPPORT\TOOLS\DEPLOY.CAB\sysprep.exe. BTW I thought the question was about creating Windows images so sysprep is quite useful since anyone can use it. I'm now wondering how much you have really explored these aspects of Windows.
      As regards the complete system backup, well have you tried using the bultin Windows backup utility to do an Automated System Restore? From what I can gather it allows you to do a complete automated system restore from a backup by booting off the Windows CD and it actually writes partition layout and other information to a seperate floppy (or some other media) and the system part of the backup can be written out to a network/external disk or DVD etc. I haven't tried it but I have heard some people talk about it. I'm assuming they were able to use it to good effect. You might want to check it out. AFAIK that should do what you are looking for.
      BTW just because that person was angry or he had an attitude problem doesn't mean that everything he said was wrong.
    2. Re:No, he missed the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the title says for Sysadmins. if you dont have access to sysprep, then I doubt you're a sysadmin. also basically this is a recovery cd, not a primary OS.

  49. There's a matter of $$$. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not everyone wants to give Winternals $300. Especially since the capability should be supplied with Windows XP, without having to pay more.

    1. Re:There's a matter of $$$. by new500 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everyone wants to give Winternals $300. Especially since the capability should be supplied with Windows XP, without having to pay more.

      That may be so, but equally it's interesting that MSFT has not absorbed such fuctionality, and has not killed off the market for what is an excellent 3rd party app with a half assed bundled replacement.

      If you really need ERD, you can feel pretty good about paying them their license dollars (which IIRC are a fair bit more than $300).

      These are non-trivial tools, and payback for a client is awesome, considering the popular culture of Crash > Format > Reinstall that is ingrained in everyone who ever talked to "support" about a crashing Windows system. (My personal advice is usually to get better hardware with better tested drivers, but that's a long term help, not a quick fix)

      Now, if *everyone* who licensed Windows needed the functionality of ERD, this might be different. Embrace, "extend" away . .

      Meanwhile, at a pinch, as just posted on /. there's a workable alternative to toting far lighter wallets. Incidentally the Winternals guys were on the 'phone to me at an unholy hour of the night to help me when I was unfamiliar with their tools. YMMV.

      I only agree with you - partly - in that If I license 2003 Enterprise for all the totemic expense that is, I ought to get something like this. But not for a desktop. Rightly (or even aprocrafully) (sp?) it is better to just make the system more stable overall.

      Just idle randoom thoughts. Usual disclaimers apply.

    2. Re:There's a matter of $$$. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Everyone who uses windows needs ERD.

    3. Re:There's a matter of $$$. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That may be so, but equally it's interesting that MSFT has not absorbed such fuctionality, and has not killed off the market for what is an excellent 3rd party app with a half assed bundled replacement.
      That would just draw attention to how fucking shyte windoze is, no?
  50. german article in c't by ^ZuLu^ · · Score: 3, Informative

    There has also been an article in german's well-known c't magazin that covers the process to create your very own live-windows-xp-cd. Just look at c't 02/04 p.180 and following.

  51. Look into avast! BART CD by g2racer · · Score: 1

    About 6 months ago, I had an older Windows NT 4.0 server go bad on me, so I did a bit of research on these Win PE boot CDs. While I use PeBuilder now, one of the first ones I found was the avast! Bootable Antivirus & Recovery Tools (BART) CD. It's commercial, but you can download a trial. It's quite slick, it's got avast! antivirus, a registry editor, and TCP/IP support.

    Just another option...

  52. What a rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why can't Windows developers come up with something new, instead of copying Linux all the time?

    1. Re:What a rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't Linux developers come up with something new, instead of copying Unix all the time?

    2. Re:What a rip off by Inuchance · · Score: 1

      They tried that once, and all they accomplished by doing that was some talking paper clip.

  53. Re:How is this a troll? by foobsr · · Score: 1

    FYI --> VD := Valentines Day.

    (taxonomical guideline for moderators: this is a mountain troll)

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  54. Speaking of ram disk drivers... by bangular · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has a free publicly released ram disk driver. It's a complete piece of crap. It has like an 8MB limit. That's far too small to do anything with. And to resize it you have to reboot. There are some other commercial 3rd party ram disk drivers out there, but they are expensive (usually over 100 dollars, sometimes over 500). Windows should have an included ram disk driver. It's an EXTREMELY useful tool for both servers and desktops.

    Get some damn common.

    1. Re:Speaking of ram disk drivers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a complete piece of crap. It has like an 8MB limit. That's far too small to do anything with.

      Interestingly enough, Microsoft provides the source code for their ramdisk driver. If you don't like the limits it imposes, why don't you modify the source? That's what open source advocates always say.

    2. Re:Speaking of ram disk drivers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have to buy the ddk in order to recompile it.

    3. Re:Speaking of ram disk drivers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Try this instead:
      AR RAM Disk
      Freeware...

    4. Re:Speaking of ram disk drivers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      MinGW has the required DDK headers and libraries. It's a free download.

  55. Bart himself.... by darth_silliarse · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...has spent years since DOS 3 booting and rebooting a computer to get it just right? I would have given up by now

    --
    I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born - Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:Bart himself.... by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

      I spent nearly the same amount of time reinstalling operating systems on my computers... and not just DOS/Win... some of us are just obsessed like that.

      'Sides, it's a good feeling to reinstall or reboot knowing you just added a .0195% increase in efficiency, or a new utility/feature that will prove useful in the long run.

      *shrug* Kinda the same thing as adding a fancy whorl on a table or desk; it's not so much required, as it just seems like a way to up the coolness factor.

  56. it's costs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    but it's rather indispensable to me.... www.wininternals.com sell an ERD (Emergency Recovery Disc) it's a bootable CD that boots into WinXP and gives full access to NTFS partitions. With tools for changing passwords (unknown ones) and file recovery. It has pulled my nuts out of the fire in teh past.

  57. I'm surprised they haven't done this themselves by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    I mean, an OS on a CD is the ideal natural form of the whole "one OS media per machine" approach. Put the CD in any machine you please, but it'll only be in one at a time. The natural use supports rather than fights the whole single-machine-license thang. And it's convenient enough, most people wouldn't see this as a "bug".

  58. Interesting. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0


    Interesting. I don't think Sysprep was part of the retail CDs. Maybe it is now. I didn't know it was possible to download Sysprep. I was told by a Microsoft technical support person to use only the Windows 2003 Server version of Sysprep, since earlier versions have bugs.

    Microsoft technical support people never suggest using ASR for a full functional backup of a Windows XP boot partition. MS tech support says there is no way to back up a Windows XP partition without 3rd party tools. I've been told this repeatedly by several Microsoft technicians. If ASR works, why do Acronis (my favorite), Ghost, PowerDeploy, and other 3rd party programs exist?

    1. Re:Interesting. by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 1

      Why do you have to rely on Microsoft technical support people for everything? You can find out a lot of things about Windows on your own. Why do I get the feeling that you admin a Windows machine only half heartedly and just want to believe that things aren't possible on Windows without really looking for solutions. If you had even bothered to do a simple search on google for sysprep you would have found that its freely avalable. In fact I just checked that even Win2K CD comes with sysprep in exactly the same location. You didn't even bother to check those CDs. As for 3rd party tools for backup being available. Well there are lot of tools that come builtin into Windows that offer the basic functionality and if you want more sophisticated functionality then you look for 3rd party tools. ASR could be quite okay as a simple backup tool and yet leave a market for more sophisticated ones. That doesn't change anything.

  59. Re:Can it edit an already installed winxp registry by Rgb465 · · Score: 1

    Youd think so, but no. I have yet to find a registry editor which allows you to manually point to an alternate hive.

  60. Re:Can it edit an already installed winxp registry by Sancho · · Score: 1

    So what exactly is it doing when you open up Regedt32 and choose "Load hive" ? I guess I don't understand the distinction....

  61. Make the CD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that makes Knoppix (and the like) so nice is that you just download an ISO and burn it. This sounds like I have to build something myself. (Not surprisngly though since it would be illegal to distribute a prebuilt ISO.)

  62. no he missed the point by g0hare · · Score: 1

    The whole point of SLashdot is to bash MCSE's and Windows, while not knowing anything about a version of Windows since 98. IF you know about sysprep, riprep, RIS, SUS, how to slipstream a service pack into the seup, group policies, administrative templates, or any of that, why you must be a loser.

    You must suffer bannination

    --
    Vote Quimby!
    1. Re:no he missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right.

  63. Great tool for converting Linux users! by hingo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, this could be a great tool for converting Linux users to WinXP!! Now they can try Windows without installing it and when they start to like it, they can switch to a WinXP installed on the harddrive.

    This Live-Windows-CD is also great, if you need to use Windows but all your friends have Linux and in your office there is only Linux etcetc... Don't worry, now you can keep this CD in your pocket, and use Windows on any computer!

    Oh wait... did I just get something backwards?

  64. Is it good for windows newbies? by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Funny
    Cool, now we can finally try this Windows thing that I hear lots of people talking about - without having to re-partition our hard drives!

    If it's good, maybe it'll take some market share from BSD.

    1. Re:Is it good for windows newbies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSD has market share? Not last time I checked.
      And considering Windows already has 95% Market share, thats not even remotely funny

    2. Re:Is it good for windows newbies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Welcome back to Slashdot, Bill. Calm down now... He was only joking. We know you get sensitive when people make jokes about Windows, but deep down we really do love you for just being you.

    3. Re:Is it good for windows newbies? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      No we don't. You're fibbing to the man.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    4. Re:Is it good for windows newbies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      m0d thi5 ROFL!

  65. What the hell were you thinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've had a W2K server box up (as in turned on continuously, running as a mail, file and print server) for over a year.

    Running an unpatched Windows server for a year is about the stupidest thing you can do. If I ever let our Windows servers go unpatched that long I'd be fired (and with good reason.)

    Even if you can get a Windows box to run for a year, it doesn't mean that you should. Yes, it's impressive since not many people have done it, but you need to pay more attention to security. We don't need a bunch of nimda2 factories all over the net because Windows admins are trying to get unix-like uptimes out of their servers.

  66. Linux writing to NTFS is a VERY BAD IDEA: NOT!!!! by sofayam · · Score: 5, Informative
    That problem seems to have been solved, maybe not with great performance but at least safely usable for emergencies. Its called "captive" and works by emulating a windows kernel and reusing the windows drivers. For more info look at:

    http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/

    (haven't used it myself but CT, the local german computer mag, says it's OK and they seldom miss a trick)

    --
    sofa -- so good
  67. BFD! by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    is a minimal Windows (XP/2K3) based bootable live CD with a command prompt and the ability to run some basic Windows GUI.
    So, what's it good for?

  68. Get a CLUE! It's solutions not technology! by jarich · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You might care about the great religion of open source and free software, but the world does NOT.



    They care if they can edit the word processor docs. They care if they can use their spreadsheets and read their email. They want to browse web. Office secretaries don't want to change the world. They want to get their job done.



    Open Source is a Good Thing but end users care about SOLUTIONS not TECHNOLOGY. Change your tactics.



    Don't tell your friend that this is better cuz it's 'open'. Tell them it's better cuz it's free, it's portable and it's faster on the same hardware.

  69. Retrospect from Dantz :We *did* have this sooner? by coats · · Score: 2, Informative
    We did have this earlier, but had to pay for it as part of the Retrospect Professional backup/utility package from Dantz: see http://www.dantz.com/index.php3?SCREEN=kbase&ACTIO N=KBASE&id=27814

    It even allows you to prepare a boot CD for one machine from a backup-set, hosted by another...

    --
    "My opinions are my own, and I've got *lots* of them!"
  70. Altiris Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please also keep in mind that Altiris is part of the wonderful Canopy Group who are behind the fine folks at SCO. Myself, I wouldn't buy water from these guys if my guts were on fire.

  71. only a basic GUI? by oglueck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well... Knoppix runs a full-blown Linux with a full-blown desktop. Windows just can't compete... *lol*

    1. Re:only a basic GUI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      knoppix is also incredibly slow, as it tends to run kde. it also runs from a cd. it's about 50 times slower and/or less responsive than Bart's WinPE.

  72. They described how to do this with 95 in 1999. by bayerwerke · · Score: 2, Informative

    They described how to do this with Windows 95 in 1999.

    http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/11/206/

  73. The information is at this link, c't magazine 1999 by bayerwerke · · Score: 2, Informative

    The information is at this link, c't magazine 1999.

    http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/11/206/

  74. works great by larsu · · Score: 1

    I use this at the computer service place where I work, and it's wonderful. It has modules for Ad-aware and McAfee, so it fixes most windows problems in about 10 minutes. It also has network support, and norton ghost, so you can backup the whole system to the network very easy.

  75. VERY old news by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    I have been using this to make slipstreams of XP Pro for me and my friends since SP1 came out.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  76. ASR and Sysprep are mutually exclusive. SUS... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0


    Now its coming back to me. (I couldn't think clearly at 4:34 AM.) ASR and Sysprep are mutually exclusive. SUS only works if you are attached to a domain. ASR doesn't work if there if the hardware to which you restore is different than that from which you made a backup, as it will be if something fails several years after installation (or even months, sometimes), because you won't be able to buy hardware similar to the original.

    There should be a large, large protest about this. The copy protection built into Windows (the registry) prevents saving all your installation and configuration work. This is not a problem with Linux, for example. Copy protection is fine, but not when it prevents your right to make a backup of your own installation and configuration work, which may easily be worth more than the cost of Windows XP.

    1. Re:ASR and Sysprep are mutually exclusive. SUS... by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 1
      ASR and Sysprep are mutually exclusive.
      Of course they are mutually exclusive. One is used to create generic system images and the other is used to create system backups. By definition a system backup is unique to a system but images can be generic. I don't see why there should be a probelm due to that.
      ASR doesn't work if there if the hardware to which you restore is different than that from which you made a backup
      Again who told you this? Did you ever try it? (I doubt it) There should be no problem if the hardware changes, Windows plug and play will detect the new hardware. In fact I have taken a hard disk from an older system and attached it to a completly new system with new motherboard, CPU, optical drives, video card etc and still Windows booted off the old systems disk and detected all the new hardware, installing drivers it had and asking for ones it didn't. I don't see why restoring from ASR would have any problems. In fact this would be the same no matter what backup tool you use since the hardware could still change under you. The point of a backup is to save your data so you don't care if the device drivers are different when your hardware changes since the OS can handle that.
      There should be a large, large protest about this. The copy protection built into Windows (the registry) prevents saving all your installation and configuration work.
      "Large, large" protest about what? Microsoft provides tools to make images and backups and if you haven't ever tried to use or understand them then its not Microsoft't problem. And what registry copy protection are you talking about?! You can take a backup of a registry all you want. The ASR tools makes a backup if the registry quite fine. See this KB article on how to backup the registry fully. At this point I have my serious doubts as to how well you really know about Windows technologies. You just want to believe that things are hard on Windows do you without looking for answers and trying anything?
    2. Re:ASR and Sysprep are mutually exclusive. SUS... by valenti · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you are thinking more clearly at 11am ...
      SUS is Software Update Services (a method of automatically running Windows Updates) and doesn't have much to do with ASR, Sysprep or bootable Windows.

      And SUS does work with non-domain computers, you just have to push some registry entries to the clients instead of using group policy. I'm pretty sure the Microsoft white papers on SUS document the registry entries, but they can certainly be found near the top of a Google search.

    3. Re:ASR and Sysprep are mutually exclusive. SUS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People so easily accept Microsoft making things hard for customers. Microsoft should have published something like Bart's CD many years ago.

  77. OMFG DUDE!!! Where do you work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had managers who wouldn't touch closed-source apps because they didn't trust them and/or couldn't extend them. I've had non-developer colleagues who wouldn't touch closed-source apps because they cost money whilst open-source was a free-download away...

    Are they hiring?

  78. Bart's got other neat stuff, too... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    Besides Bart/PE, he's also created SCSITools, a very handy SCSI diagnostics package that, from what I've been able to tell, rivals the functionality and usefulness of the much higher-priced 'niche market' packages.

    My one regret is that he didn't include Windows 2000 Pro in his list of supported systems for the bootable CD's. I may try it with such anyway, just to see what happens.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:Bart's got other neat stuff, too... by thebagel · · Score: 0

      Windows 2000 will not work as it does not support the kernel switch required (/minint or something like that). Only XP and 2003 work (possibly Longhorn; I'm not sure). But it's a sure thing that 2000 and prior do not work.

  79. Free disk imaging? by TClevenger · · Score: 1

    Anybody have a free solution for imaging machines with a Sysprep'd NTFS image from a network? Cheap company doesn't want to pay for Ghost. Thanks.

    1. Re:Free disk imaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the computers are identical down to the exact disk drives you can boot knoppix and copy the raw disk any number of ways: swap drives and
      dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb
      or the equivalent over the network piping though ssh between 2 knoppix-booted machines, or to an intermediate server holding the image in a file. It is horribly slow compared to ghost because it copies the whole drive even though most may be unused, but it doesn't take a lot of human time.

  80. Not a difficult problem by madmaxx · · Score: 1

    I'm actually surprised that someone hasn't marketed this before. Last year while building an embedded system with Embedded XP, we built a few bootable XP CDs with various levels of the OS. A few years before that we did the same thing with 2000. And before that we had done it with NT too. We found that the CDs were a simple way to test our platform, without writing an eprom (or later to a DOC). We had no interest in marketing it as they were working in a vertical marketn (weren't interested in mass-marketing).

    --
    mx
  81. At last!!! by s88 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've also discovered a way to use my ladder to remove nails from the wall.

  82. Re:The information is at this link, c't magazine 1 by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    Great reference, thanks. This isn't where I saw it, but it looks like the same information as best as I can remember it. It does end up with a CD that boot windows and runs from the CD. I do think the information was available even before 1999, but I would be hard pressed to come up with an exact date.

    Of course, pre-Win95, Booting Win 3.0 would have been even simpler (no registery to deal with), but back then computers couldn't boot from the CD (and few people had CD writers).

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  83. Ok... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    Most Linux live CD's have all the functionality of a full OS install. Why would we use a stripped-down hardly-useful Windows CD instead?

    Why is this news?? Microsoft products playing catchup to Linux is oooooold news.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  84. I wonder what will happen.... by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    wonder how long until the guy gets interrogated for "stealing the win2k source code" for this.

    seriously, he may or may not, but microsoft's on a witch hunt atm, and this guy releases this.

    That and they might be pissed for not thinking of doing this sooner.

    prolly more than likely get sued, then after they win, they'd come out with a live cd distro.

    on another note, this could prove useful to those who dont know shit about linux and want to repair XP or other windows builds.

  85. Too difficult by bucketoftruth · · Score: 1

    Y'know how windows users always complain about how difficult it is to install and configure linux. This bootable Windows CD has totaly lost me. Why do I have to download all this other crap just to get it to work on any system? The only thing this has over knoppix (presubaly) is native NTFS support. There's nothing I haven't been able to do to a windows machine with knoppix except write to NTFS.

  86. Works for me by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    I have been using Bart's PE disk for a few months now. It is esy to use and is a fantastic resue tool that has pulled my butt out of the fire more than once.

    We run Windows 2000 with NTFS and every once in a while the OS blows up on a machine. We gotta get the data off before we re-image it. The data can be worth thousands and our customers don't seem to back up too often.

    I use Bart's PE disk and a USB hard drive, Boot using the PE disk and access the borked drive, pull all the data I can find and copy it to the USB drive then reimage the computer and put the data back on. It has never failed to work.

    We can turn around a borked machine from anywhere in the country in three days (one day in-house and two days in the mail). Our customers are very happy and Bart's PE disk has made our lives a lot easier.

    I'm thinking of writing something for Bart's disk that would automate the process so I can express them the disk, the hard drive, and an ISO of the standard image and let them do it themselves.

    1. Re:Works for me by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I do pretty much the same thing with Knoppix, but I usually transfer over the network with either Samba, scp or ftp depending on the situation. Or I'll throw in a backup hard drive on the secondary IDE.

      I'm going to check out Bart's for defragging NTFS, though. My current plan--not yet tested--is to boot into Win2k/xp recovery console, copy all files w/acls to another disk, format the original reserving about 4x the default MFT size and copy everything back. I'll see if Bart's will be better or faster than the recovery console.

      I have a multiuser Win2k PC with an MFT in 867 fragments!! Man that thing is slow. I downloaded a trial copy of Diskeeper and even it can't defrag this MFT. I could probably just reimage it, but I'm looking for a longer term solution because this is a periodic problem. And I don't want to license a defragmenter for every damn PC; what happened to the old days when you could buy a defrag utility disk and use it on one PC at a time? (Furthermore, why can't a multiuser OS keep from fragmenting itself into oblivion?)

    2. Re:Works for me by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've used Knoppix to and it works just as well (but), I work for a larger company and our IS Security team advised me that using Knoppix or PE Disk to access the network was a no-no. They are very paranoid. I've been "advised" that using the USB drive is okay as long as I perform a anti-virus scan before I put the data back on the computer and before the computer goes on the network.

      Because of this "advice" I've elected to use Bart's PE disk as they will probably feel a little better about something MS Windows based than Linux based. I guess you could call it a political decision.

    3. Re:Works for me by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I work for a larger company and our IS Security team advised me that using Knoppix or PE Disk to access the network was a no-no.

      Heheheheh. I also work for a larger company and understand the mentality; luckily I'm not aware of an anti-LiveCD policy, but that's probably because they don't know they exist.

      Funny that they're scared of LiveCDs but allow everyone else to run Windows, IE and Outlook* with Administrator privileges.

      <sarcastic rant>

      "What? Software that doesn't work right? Try making them admins and see if that fixes it. It did? Oh good."

      My IS group apparently decided to disable certain ICMP transmission over routers. I haven't been able to ping accross subnets for several months now. Now that's security!

      </sarcastic rant>

  87. Try FreeBSD mount_smbfs by Helevius · · Score: 1
    Right now I'm downloading the newest FreeBSD live CD distribution, FreeSBIE, to /mnt, which is a Windows XP share mounted using mount_smbfs. (The Windows box has the household's only CD burner at the moment.) I'm using FreeBSD 5.2 REL with a stock kernel. SMB is enabled automatically via the smbfs.ko kernel module. I read and write to this Windows share all the time.

    Helevius

    1. Re:Try FreeBSD mount_smbfs by M-G · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight....

      You have an XP box with a share configured. You have a FreeBSD box which has that share mounted over the network. That just means you're using the SMB protocols over the network; XP is still handling the actual reading and writing of the files on disk.

      The issue being discussed is the case where you've booted to Linux, and want to read/write a locally mounted NTFS volume. Comparable to you burning your FreeSBIE CD, booting it in your XP box, and then mounting that XP drive read/write.

    2. Re:Try FreeBSD mount_smbfs by Helevius · · Score: 1
      You are entirely correct. I should have mentioned mount_ntfs, which has these caveats in its man page:

      WRITING There is limited writing ability. Limitations: file must be nonresident and must not contain any spaces (uninitialized areas); compressed files are also not supported. The file name must not contain multibyte characters.

      Helevius

  88. I love Bart PE by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use it to defrag my windows system. Delete the hyberfil.sys and pagefile.sys and the defrag goes much smoother and faster.

    I discovered it about two months ago. It's fantastic. There are plugins for antivirus software so if you suspect that a machine is infested you can clean it out.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  89. Forget Bart's, Get Super WinPE 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barts CD is nice, but this is better. Here is the description of SuperWINPE 2004. I don't know Bart personally, but he may have just ripped off SuperWINPE.

  90. Apple's been doing this forever by unborracho · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is it just me or haven't you been able to boot from the Mac OS CDs for years? I even remember Norton Utilities for Mac booting into its own Mac OS that ran from the CD. I'm actually surprised that Windows hasn't implemented this feature, because back in my Mac days, it saved me from having to format my hard disk quite a few number of times.

    --
    "You had this look that of an angel, it was such a bad disguise" --Dishwalla
  91. Now runs Linux... by Phishcast · · Score: 1

    We just got a couple Dell PE2650s and 1750s where I work and I noticed that the Server Assistant CD now runs under Linux rather than NT. You can even switch to alternate consoles and tinker around if you like.

    1. Re:Now runs Linux... by mountiealpha · · Score: 1
      I noticed that the Server Assistant CD now runs under Linux rather than NT. You can even switch to alternate consoles and tinker around if you like.
      Not only that, but you could also install RedHat Linux using the Server Assistant CD that came with our server, in addition to Windows NT/2000.
    2. Re:Now runs Linux... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      But that was also possible with the NT CD...
      Interesting that they now use Linux.
      Does this mean they have write support for NTFS?
      Or is the setup proceduring converting from FAT to NTFS?

  92. BIOS flashing? by grahamdrew · · Score: 1

    Anybody know this could be used to run a Win32 based BIOS flashing app? The last few BIOS updates Dell's put out for my Inspiron 5150 have been apps that run within windows, and one fixes and issue with battery charging that's been driving me nuts. I haven't been able to use them, since I run a full linux shop. If it could work, I'll barrow my roomate's machine for a bit, burn a disc, and give it a try.

    --
    // Dumps core here
    1. Re:BIOS flashing? by watermodem · · Score: 1

      try from bioswriter-0.2-4mdk.src.rpm.
      I don't know if it will flash bios but it
      looks like it might (-f option).

      /usr/sbin/bioswriter -h
      BIOS Writer 0.2
      Copyright (c) 2000, Michael Jennings

      Usage:

      POSIX GNU Description

      -h, --help (bool) display usage information
      -v, --version (bool) display version
      -r, --read (bool) read BIOS settings (default)
      -w, --write (bool) write BIOS settings
      -s, --start (int) starting offset into BIOS memory
      -e, --end (int) ending offset into BIOS memory
      -c, --count (int) byte count for read/write
      -f, --file (str) filename to read from/write to

      Option types:
      (bool) -- Boolean option ('1', 'on', 'yes', or 'true' to activate,
      '0', 'off', 'no', or 'false' to deactivate)
      (int) -- Integer option (signed number)
      (str) -- String option (be sure to quote strings if needed)

      NOTE: Long options can be separated from their values by an
      equal sign ('='), or you can pass the value as the following
      argument on the command line (e.g., '--file foo.bin'
      or '--file=foo.bin'). Short options must have their values
      passed after them on the command line, and in the case of
      boolean short options, cannot have values (they default to
      true) (e.g., '-f foo.bin' or '-r').

    2. Re:BIOS flashing? by grahamdrew · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly the upgrade I'm dealing with is a self-contained windows executable. It looks like that app will only accept BIN images. If I had a simple BIN image, I could just set up a DOS boot cdrom, and all would be good.

      I did try setting a disk up last night, but Dell's BIOS flashing app requires you to have the AC and battery in to flash, and for some reason it isn't detecting correctly (even though both are in and my screen's brightness kicks up as soon as I pop in the AC). It probably has something to do with WinPE not having a full ACPI implementation or something. I'm trying to find some command line parameter to disable that check, but I've had no luck so far.

      --
      // Dumps core here
  93. You don't work on computers much, do you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retard!

    Windows is 90% of the problem.
    The other 10% of the problems I run into are
    OTHER software packages that create data that
    are PROPRIETARY in nature and screw you silly
    if you don't have the 'origional' windows
    running with the proper registry keys.
    (like... when your M$ OS decides to take a healthy shit)

    Soooo many problems people have, soooo much money
    I have to charge them.
    I'd be ever so much happier, and the users would be
    ever so much richer if they'd just dump
    the proprietary shit.

    'Course I'd be poorer and It would give me an excuse
    to get out of the computer business (Which I really wouldn't mind at this point)

    Windows blows and is fucking everything up that
    it's installed on..... get rid of it now or you
    will eventually pay the price.

    1. Re:You don't work on computers much, do you? by TechniMyoko · · Score: 1

      Ill bet youd have to charge them a lot more if they used linux. If they cant fix a windows machine I doubt they could use linux at all

    2. Re:You don't work on computers much, do you? by t0ny · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Yes, Ive been supporting Windows since Win95. If you cant get Windows to run stable, the problem lies between the chair and the keyboard.

      I've seen it happen, Ive done it myself: Windows CAN run without crashing!!! If you work in IT, than you should probably quit and go sell shoes; you arent cut out for this job.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  94. But Wait by briansz · · Score: 2, Funny

    All of you who want to use this ala Knoppix better be prepared to violate some EULA's and make some code changes. From TFA:

    # Q: Does PE Builder remove the 24 hour time limit? A: No!

    # Q: Does PE Builder remove the "can only start 6 processes" limit? A: No!

    You can run 6 or fewer processes for 24 hours or less. On second thought, maybe that's not all that different from regular Windows........

    knoppix@cool-dual-beast:~$ uptime
    12:57:34 up 9 days, 21:49, 1 user, load average: 0.50, 0.38, 0.34

    Guess Knoppix has this one beat.

  95. Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Finally?"

    Prototypes of this were done as early as 2001 folks ... they even had WinPE available as of 2002... Why is it that Slashdot, in it's oft-admitted-but-bashfully-trying-to-hide linux zealotry often publishes articles about the 'evil empire' technology "finally arriving" without checking up on facts, et al.

    When the real linux movement takes over, I hope it's not staffed with the 'glory-days-are-still-here-isn't-linux-cool' types I see here often. Do some research, STFU a little bit, and enjoy the ride dudes.

  96. I'd kill for a Norton Utilities version of this by unassimilatible · · Score: 1
    Norton is worse than any worm or virus when installed on your system (just try to get rid of it). But I'd love it if Norton would ship with a bootable GUI emergency CD like they do for the Mac.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  97. STOPPIT WITH THE LIVE CDs! by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Now we will NEVER know how many Linux desktops and/or users are out there! Getting statistics of current Linux vs. Windows desktops would be like gauging the population of Manhattan/any major metropolitan area: it would balloon upwards during the day, and drop down drastically at dusk.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  98. Chicken and egg... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    I've seen this before. Many of the "new features" that people liked so much about XP had been in Linux already for _years_. Some basic UI features that I depend on every day (like virtual desktops) are _still_ not in Windows (or OS X), or are so buried that I would never find them unless I worked for Microsoft -- probably not even then.

    And yet, many people look at Linux and seem to think that we copied everything. This is true of some things, of course (think OpenOffice), but it makes me wonder -- how long until people start thinking that Knoppix is a ripoff of this Windows livecd?

    And don't think this hasn't happened before. Remember the Microsoft Hall of Innovation...

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Chicken and egg... by ub3r · · Score: 1, Informative

      you can get virtual desktops by installing one of the power toys that you can download from windows... just like what i use in suse

  99. You are disagreeing with Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are disagreeing with Microsoft in what you say. Who should people listen to when considering Microsoft products, you or Microsoft?

  100. :Old: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where you been?!

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=8084375&sid= 94 171

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=8284380&sid= 96 856

  101. USB drive not supposed to be a HDD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those of us at Damn Small Linux forum have been fiddling with putting DSL on the hard drive, just like it was running from the CD. It's great, really. I got tired of hearing my CDROM drive spin, so I got into putting DSL on the drive, to speed it up, and quiet the CDROM. We have been advised that although it is possible to boot from a USB device, those things have limited read-write ability, and should not be treated like a hard drive, rather like a big floppy. I do like to keep my restore tarball and it's control file on the USB drive, it's only used once to load your own web browsers, files, wallpapers, etc. and then once to backup anything you want added to the tarball. You can take the drive out of the USB port after the restore, if you don't intend to backup when you shutdown. Here is my howto on putting the DSL live cd on the HDD.
    All that is required is a small 60 mb partition for /knoppix and filetool.sh, and a 30 mb partition for the tarball and the control file, filetool.lst. I often put this on a slave hdd.
    ---
    Not too portable, but gives you some practice working with this kind of distro.

  102. Nordahl's password recovery tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although a fine utility, it does not work on Windows AD Domain Controllers. ERD Commander is the only package that I know of that will allow you to reset a Windows Domain Admins password.

  103. google search for: cd030225.iso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cd030225.iso
    Patch your hive or clear your password

  104. and why is that? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    it's because oracle are trying to be clever and shipping a "universal installer CD" that's meant to work on any OS they support. in their eagerness to take their platform independence to a tedious conclusion, they broke the fuckign thing.
    sometimes, the easiest solution isn't the worst solution...

  105. troll by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    are you trolling? or just stupid? patching 2000 boxes does not necessarily mean rebooting: that's what "hotfix" means. a year or two uptime's fine with regular patching...

  106. Use BitDefender Live to take care of viruses by bigmoosie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BitDefender Live (www.bitdefender.com) is a antivirus program that is multiplatform. It works on linux desktops & servers, windows desktops & servers, palm pilots, yahoo messsenger, and on and on. When windows is messed up it can quarentine the virus, say to a thumb drive so if the infected file happens to be explorer.exe its not completly deleted.

    I love this program, it does wonders at a university with lots of mindless stupid users.

    ~ryan

  107. bart the great by netahoy · · Score: 1

    have used this pre packaged installer before.. its good for sure.. and a life saver for sysdmins. Must try the network bootable floppy maker and the corp boot cd maker! cheers

    --
    Amit Agarwal a.k.a Netahoy http://www.netahoy.org/
  108. WinPE & Cygwin by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Cool. Now I can boot WinPE and have all my cygwin tools available.

    No, seriously, the best reason I've found to use this (over Knoppix or similar Linux/BSD's on a CD) is support for Windows-only hardware, like every wireless card I have.

  109. Eureka! by J3r3miah · · Score: 1

    I can't believe it worked! I got windows to run of a CD!

    this is what I did..

    1. I downloaded bart's boot CD..
    2. then I used my windows 1.1 (5x1.44) floppy disk set to install windows in a folder under the bart's boot cd folder..
    3. burned the cd using bart's instructions
    4. booted to dos thru the cd, went to the windows folder and executed "win"

    5. posted this message (from another computer)

    Note: for some reason, I got my video card messed up.. couldn't decided to go for a XGA or a EGA and it corrupted that microsoft logo that shows on a blue screen in the beginning.

    now I will attempt administration!

    --
    God is real unless declared as int
    1. Re:Eureka! by J3r3miah · · Score: 1

      forgot to add: "from dos to windows in 2 seconds"

      --
      God is real unless declared as int