Slashdot Mirror

Why were there no aircraft fuselage fragments at the Pentagon "crash site" on 9/11?

Will people please stop with this one ? It's not like there is no evidence for this.

A link provided by the site you gave makes an equally compelling contrary argument.

I never said it did or didn't happen, I'm saying there are more secrets than truth. In this case something is definitely amiss. That 757 did 1/10th the initial damage the twin towers ones did, the wings don't even leave a mark on the building, then 99% of the plane vanished into thin air. How many eye witnesses, circumstantial evidence, and withheld surveillance footage does it take to bend the laws of physics?

The options that come up when you consider what it could have been if not a 757 are pretty horrific. I almost prefer that those truths not come out.

"The hijacker-pilot who flew into the Pentagon, Hani Hanjour, had a total of four driver's licenses and ID cards from three states."

Cool ... I didn't know cruise missiles were given names and issued driver's licenses these days.

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

This site: http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/e rreurs_en.htm

Okay, this is getting offtopic. But anyway...

Along the same lines as the flash animation:
Hunt the Boeing!

Also, do a search for WTC 7, a building which "collapsed" hours after the Sept 11th attacks, under what most certainly was a controlled implosion.

"That's funny. Did you know that Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin are all still alive, eating shoes to survive in my basement? It's just as real as your living hijackers. Fucking trolls..."

Actually, it's seems that it's not that far-fetched... After reading his post, I did a search, and found some VERY interesting links.

Ofcourse, one should take everything one reads on the internet with a pinch of salt. But when the evidence of a hoax is evident even on the official photos, posted on the official government sites, and clearly shows that it simply couldn't have happened the way the gov't say it does, what should you belive?

Check out this for a starter.

If that makes you interested, and maybe even doubt the official story, check out these then:

Physical and Mathematical Analysis of the Pentagon Crash.
The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism.
9/11 - ARE AMERICANS THE VICTIMS OF A HOAX?

the damage is limited to a hole the size of my living room

the damage is limited to a hole the size of my living room

the damage is limited to a hole the size of my living room

the damage is limited to a hole the size of my living room

9/11, 3-4 stolen lear jets evading 1-2 F-16s, ground hugging L-39s, heat seaking shoulder mounted SAMs aimed at elevators climbing the cable, Sharks with friggin laser beams (mounted in van filled with salt water) ... ?

What in the hell are you alking about? There weren't any planes in restricted airspace on 9/11/01.

Unless you actually believe the blatant department of defense lies about what happened to them on 9/11?

Remeber, the pentagon was attacked with a car (well, truck, actually) bomb.
That what's the news said on 9/11.

I don't know what really happened that day, maybe you can clear things up a bit.

Troll?

What about this?

Hell go look for 9/11, norad, conspiracy, whatever in google and you'll find a dozen websites talking about the same things, asking the same questions. I'm not stating an opinion here.. Something is seriously wrong with the way the WTC was investigated and I think these investigations are certainly related to the shuttle disaster.

I mean why is it that we make the shuttle a front page report, along with Iraq, for months and months while the 9/11 attack was only front page long enough to get support to attack Afghanistan?

Since i don't moderate would anyone else mind moderating my parent post up to something readable? If you think its relevant at all..

good deal of military brass were nixed when the pentagon got nailed... explaining that one away could be kind of tough

fnah. not THAT tough.

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/e rreurs_en.htm

Doesn't even look like a Photoshop job, to me.

Please respond with your comments!

Well, check THIS out.

That said I sometimes sense a faint smelling of "put that catastrophe on the patriot's bandwagon too, even if it's completely unrelated". (Is there a short term for this, besides 'manipulation' or 'propaganda' ?)
Anyhow, I recently stumbled over a rather interesting puzzle. Again, this is not meant to laugh over victims, but -

The more I ponder over all this the more I believe it was not the smart terrorists that made the buildings collapse - it was our ignorance [who possibly would have a reason to...], cost consciousness (saving at the wrong places [firehose turned off]) and sheer arrogance that finally knocked the towers down. Sad, very sad for all that suffer now. And very, as not to say extremely, useful for those making political|financial profit of it.

Only the taliban soldiers are singin' "Guantanamera, guajira Guantanamera..."