Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: cslacker.com

Stories and comments across the archive that link to cslacker.com.

Comments · 9

  1. Re:Fuck 'em. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1 · on Facebook, Zuckerberg Sued Over IPO

    I have bought a bag of mixed nuts in a pub where the allergy information on the back stated "May contain nuts. Product manufactured in an environment which handles nuts."

    You don't say!

  2. Rock beats paper by BrunBoot13 · · Score: 0 · on Can You Beat a Computer At Rock-Paper-Scissors?

    I've never been comfortable with the idea that paper can somehow beat rock: http://www.cslacker.com/images/funny/signs/billboards/paper_vs_rock/. Also, there are strategies for winning the game consistently: http://i.imgur.com/F2r3V.jpg.

  3. Re:A filter method doomed to fail? by deniable · · Score: 1 · on Australian Enterprises Block Sex Party's Political Site

    lemonparty.org seems legit though http://www.cslacker.com/images/file/mediums/lemon_party.jpg (note -- the first link is NSFW, the second one is SFW)

    Actually, the only link is safe. lemonparty.org on it's own is NSFW.

  4. Re:A filter method doomed to fail? by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1 · on Australian Enterprises Block Sex Party's Political Site

    lemonparty.org seems legit though
    http://www.cslacker.com/images/file/mediums/lemon_party.jpg

    (note -- the first link is NSFW, the second one is SFW)

  5. Re:So... by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1 · on Australia Air Travelers' Laptops To Be Searched For Porn

    For some reason, this is the first thing that popped into my mind. So sorry ...

  6. Re:not sureprised by schon · · Score: 4, Insightful · on Did Microsoft Borrow GPL Code For a Windows 7 Utility?

    Copyright infringement IS stealing

    No, it isn't. Here is a handy guide illustrating the difference.

    it just has a different legal definition.

    And you know *why* that is? Because *IT'S NOT THE SAME*. If copyright infringement *WAS* the same as theft, we wouldn't need a special law dealing with it - it could be covered by theft laws. The fact that it isn't should tell you something.

    It literally fits the non-legal definition.

    No, it doesn't. It fits the propaganda term. Just because some media trade groups misapply a term as an act of propaganda does not make it so.

  7. Re:just great. by schon · · Score: 5, Funny · on Element 114 Verified

    Here ya go. This one's guaranteed to never need updating. :)

  8. Still not right by schon · · Score: 5, Funny · on New Graphical Representation of the Periodic Table

    If you're gonna go and change it, why not make it correct while you're at it?

    Teach the controversy, people!

  9. Re:AJAX Won't Deliver... by neoform · · Score: 2, Interesting · on AJAX Buzzword Reinvigorates Javascript

    yeah, well i'm developping a web forum using all JS..

    http://www.cslacker.com/

    works fine in IE, Firefox and Safari.. but IE's retarded CSS handling makes things dicey..