Slashdot Mirror
Domain: jasker.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to jasker.com.
Comments · 15
-
The Solution to our energy problems..
Everybody knows that we don't have to worry about depleating oil wells any longer. Now that the world has the Jasker this is a moot point.
Hey.. did I mention that drunk Irishmen are a renewable resource as well?
mod me neyah. -
Failed BattleBots entryDid anyone look at the picture?
Didn't I see this thing falling off of a ramp on Comedy Central last night?
-
the device
Did any one else think "battlebot" when they saw the amazing device?
-
Power Supply
-
But it has a really nice case
The shiny metal case it comes in looks like an overclocker's wet dream.
-
Building a submarine...
Their view of the thing seems to be along the lines of "Hey, some guy claims he saw the Loch Ness Monster and he's building a submarine to search the lake."
And I'm sure that would cause at least some curious people to follow him and get a look at the submarine that he's building. Except apparently Routers just took the guys word for it and didn't get a very good look at the machine. From the article, "In a demonstration for Reuters, a prototype -- roughly the size of a dishwasher -- was run for around 10 minutes using four 12-volt car batteries as an initial power source."
Size of a dishwasher, eh? Anyone get a good look at the picture of this "prototype?" If you didn't check the link out from the slashdot article, Look here for a look.
Funny, but the grass sure looks pretty big around that machine that's the size of a dishwasher. If that thing was the size of a dishwasher, I would think that the blades of grass wouldn't be that distinct in the photo. Looks more to be about two feet long and a foot / foot-and-a-half wide. I guess that they just have small dishwashers in Ireland!
Yea, the guy claimed he found the Loch Ness Monster and said he's building a submarine to search for it. Only thing is, when someone asked to see the submarine, he was shown a picture of a pop can painted silver. -
From the Jasker.com website...
From http://www.jasker.com/article2.htm:
This invention is achieved by the application and utilisation of a capital energy source to create a prolific income energy system, with the consequential composition being a "controlled loop, self-generating module", that produces instant and constant mechanical drive power and or instant and constant electrical power. This invention is mankind's first income energy reservoir from a capital energy source.
Sounds like the company is trying to cover their a$$es here by stating that their device is just a glorified battery!
Quantum mechanical proof that this device is impossible: the commutator of the Hamiltonian of a system with itself is zero. A non-zero result could only be obtained by an improperly defined Hamiltonian. (dE/dt = [H,H]=0 Q.E.D.)
-
Has anyone looked at the official website?I have a standard trick to writing essays, and it involves writing complete b*llocks. And I'm quite good at it, so I can spot it when I see it. Looking at the Brief Description on the official Jasker website, I spotted rather a lot. I quoth:
This [electricity genreation] is accomplished, by utilisation of existing and proven state of the art technologies, combining novel features and innovative assembly techniques.
Which are what?The credibility of the system is definitively established and can be interpreted and demonstrated as being "the practical application of accepted techniques".
By whom, and which apps and techniques?There are no stages in the operation of this invention that require any constituent component to perform at anything other than that being, within its capability or in accordance with its specification.
This is grammatically broken imo. If it holds any meaning, then I think it says "Nothing does anything it shouldn't."All the parts for this invention are in practical and productive everyday use. The methodology technique is accomplished by the innovative application in logical sequence of specifically selected constituent components whose performance compliment each other and function in co-operation.
This has to be one of the single-most badly constructed paragraphs of complete cr*p I have ever seen for quite some time. My translation: "It uses bog-standard components which work together."Attainment is determined by the systematic mathematical application in the defined mode, of the accurately selected operational segments.
Again, broken. First question that springs to mind is 'What is the defined mode?' Try dropping the comma and it makes slightly more sense. My translation: "We use maths to work out how to make this thing gain energy." Being a Maths undergrad, I am a little insulted.In reality the achievement of this invention adheres strictly with known, accepted and proven physics principles. It is emphasised there are no new discoveries disproving accepted physics laws. To reiterate there are no physics heresies, no physics contradictions and no ambiguous claims.
In short, this is a lie, as has been previously pointed out by otherThis invention is achieved by the application and utilisation of a capital energy source to create a prolific income energy system, with the consequential composition being a "controlled loop, self-generating module", that produces instant and constant mechanical drive power and or instant and constant electrical power.
More b*llsh*t, although slightly better crafted than previous paragraphs, imo. My translation: "We put in energy, it uses it, but spits out more. So we get surplus."This invention is mankind's first income energy reservoir from a capital energy source.
To be taken with a handful of salt. My translation: "We think it works, and we think it's the first one to work." In summary, a load of badly-formed b*llshit, about as insubstantial as a pea in the path of a steam-roller. -- From Phil Mod me to death if you like, but I'll die a martyr. At least in my dreams. OK, so I won't but I like to pretend -
Has anyone looked at the official website?I have a standard trick to writing essays, and it involves writing complete b*llocks. And I'm quite good at it, so I can spot it when I see it. Looking at the Brief Description on the official Jasker website, I spotted rather a lot. I quoth:
This [electricity genreation] is accomplished, by utilisation of existing and proven state of the art technologies, combining novel features and innovative assembly techniques.
Which are what?The credibility of the system is definitively established and can be interpreted and demonstrated as being "the practical application of accepted techniques".
By whom, and which apps and techniques?There are no stages in the operation of this invention that require any constituent component to perform at anything other than that being, within its capability or in accordance with its specification.
This is grammatically broken imo. If it holds any meaning, then I think it says "Nothing does anything it shouldn't."All the parts for this invention are in practical and productive everyday use. The methodology technique is accomplished by the innovative application in logical sequence of specifically selected constituent components whose performance compliment each other and function in co-operation.
This has to be one of the single-most badly constructed paragraphs of complete cr*p I have ever seen for quite some time. My translation: "It uses bog-standard components which work together."Attainment is determined by the systematic mathematical application in the defined mode, of the accurately selected operational segments.
Again, broken. First question that springs to mind is 'What is the defined mode?' Try dropping the comma and it makes slightly more sense. My translation: "We use maths to work out how to make this thing gain energy." Being a Maths undergrad, I am a little insulted.In reality the achievement of this invention adheres strictly with known, accepted and proven physics principles. It is emphasised there are no new discoveries disproving accepted physics laws. To reiterate there are no physics heresies, no physics contradictions and no ambiguous claims.
In short, this is a lie, as has been previously pointed out by otherThis invention is achieved by the application and utilisation of a capital energy source to create a prolific income energy system, with the consequential composition being a "controlled loop, self-generating module", that produces instant and constant mechanical drive power and or instant and constant electrical power.
More b*llsh*t, although slightly better crafted than previous paragraphs, imo. My translation: "We put in energy, it uses it, but spits out more. So we get surplus."This invention is mankind's first income energy reservoir from a capital energy source.
To be taken with a handful of salt. My translation: "We think it works, and we think it's the first one to work." In summary, a load of badly-formed b*llshit, about as insubstantial as a pea in the path of a steam-roller. -- From Phil Mod me to death if you like, but I'll die a martyr. At least in my dreams. OK, so I won't but I like to pretend -
New idea?Here's the quote from the jasker.com website:
"THIS INVENTION EFFECTIVELY GUARANTEES THE CONTINUITY OF MANKIND".
No, that would be sex.
No sig, sorry.
-
can we intentionally slashdot the guys site?...
everybody click the 'inventors' site NOW!!!
-
Deja vu?Compare this compression hoax from last week:
ZeoSync Corporation has significantly changed the history of compression theory in that we are now capable of introducing a multi-dimensional variable that allows for the intentional randomizing of patterned information sequences, and the encoding of single-bit-variances. This process allows for the transmission of only accelerated sequences without the traditional transmission of non-reducible sequences. This improvement allows for the transmission of hundreds of times the information across the same limited bandwidth channels and storage devices.
with today's free energy hoax:This is accomplished, by utilisation of existing and proven state of the art technologies, combining novel features and innovative assembly techniques.
Wait a minute... I've just got past the horrible grammar, and there's NOTHING in that description which is not true of my computer!The credibility of the system is definitively established and can be interpreted and demonstrated as being "the practical application of accepted techniques".
There are no stages in the operation of this invention that require any constituent component to perform at anything other than that being, within its capability or in accordance with its specification.
All the parts for this invention are in practical and productive everyday use. The methodology technique is accomplished by the innovative application in logical sequence of specifically selected constituent components whose performance compliment each other and function in co-operation.
Attainment is determined by the systematic mathematical application in the defined mode, of the accurately selected operational segments. In reality the achievement of this invention adheres strictly with known, accepted and proven physics principles. It is emphasised there are no new discoveries disproving accepted physics laws. To reiterate there are no physics heresies, no physics contradictions and no ambiguous claims.
Conclusion: Mr "Jasker" has invented a computer... 50 years too late.
-
Holy Marketspeak, Batman!
Has anybody read this page? Wow, it's clearly a hoax just by the language. Here's a bit:
The credibility of the system is definitively established and can be interpreted and demonstrated as being "the practical application of accepted techniques".
There are no stages in the operation of this invention that require any constituent component to perform at anything other than that being, within its capability or in accordance with its specification.
All the parts for this invention are in practical and productive everyday use. The methodology technique is accomplished by the innovative application in logical sequence of specifically selected constituent components whose performance compliment each other and function in co-operation.
This is part of a brief description of the device. It's all like that. -
It must be true: they quoted Al Gore!
Check out the utter bollocks here.
Even just reading that page is enought to realise that it's just quackery! -
Another clue...
He quotes AL GORE! (The father of the internet.) That should have been a clue.
