Slashdot Mirror

I have a question, Michael. Are you this Michael Kristopeit or just a troll trying to make him look bad? The way you act suggests you're a bit kooky and that it's really you.

I know, I know. And yet... I still don't have to wake up and look at this face in the mirror every morning. Frankly, my relief at that simple fact kind of drowns out anything you might be trying to say.

http://www.kristopeit.com/person.php?person_id=75 lol.

Why am I not surprised: http://www.kristopeit.com/person.php?person_id=207

I'd say a bit more than mimimum wage... like a college grad in English or journalism with C grades at best. Say... started at $9 an hour and has worked all the way up to $10.25.

But it gets better....

Check this out. http://michael.kristopeit.com/

What "Digital Systems Engineer" has a web page with this much content?

BTW, for the eventual MichaelKristopeitn post, use this as ammunition: http://www.kristopeit.com/person.php?person_id=207

http://www.kristopeit.com/person.php?person_id=207 Whoa... you don't just type like a douche, you ARE a douche.

Ha, here's a picture of Michael Kristopeit, I almost fell out of my chair laughing. What a troll

I'd just like to congratulate you on the excellent work you've done on your website:
http://michael.kristopeit.com/

It sucks that you're claiming copyright on that excellent design, otherwise I would steal it immediately. I figure though that I can just add a 4th circular link to my two sentences on a white background. the official anonymous coward website is gonna blow you out of the water like you're 8 Minute Abs.

YOU ARE A CRIMINAL... A FELON. AN IGNORANT HYPOCRITE. JUSTICE IS COMING.

It's one thing to call somebody "nothing" - quite another to call them a criminal and a felon. That's defamatory libel, unless you can prove that Alongi has been convicted of one or more felonies for which no discharge has been granted.

Calling somebody "nothing" is a matter of opinion, and as such, not defamatory.

Calling somebody a felon is not a matter of opinion - it is something that can either be true or false. As such, there is no 1st Amendment right to free expression of opinion.

It appears that you are making this "felon" claim based on a DMCA notice you may or may not have filed, rather than on any actual criminal conviction. If so, that's not just foolish - it's defamatory libel.

Of course, that's not the real issue for slashdotters - the real issue is how anyone can expect, in this day and age, a hollow threat to NOT attract attention. (Streisand Effect).

And this: http://www.kristopeit.com/family_tree.php?top_person_id=74&by_photo=1&spouse_photo=1&step_kids=1&show_nicknames=0&show_everyone=1 - replacing your picture in your family tree with a message about someone else saying they are nothing - what's up with that? It makes it look like you and your wife are splitting up and this guy is taking your place.

Q. What's better than winning an argument on the Internet?
A. Not being retarded.
Q. What's better than winning two arguments on the Internet?
A. ICE CREAM!!!

Instead of getting all upset over the picture link, you could have done like any real slashdotter - checked the url, and if it came from slashdot, do a redirect to goatse or tubgirl or some such. It's one line of php.

The reason I'm interested in this sort of thing is because I've been threatened with law suits and/or DMCA notices 3 times so far this year - and my response each time was to publish the threats and make fun of them. In all 3 cases, the supposedly infringing material is still up, but now firmly linked to the person in question.

I don't know if clone will take the same action - but it's usually the best cure-all for these sorts of threats.

Unfortunately, the only way for you to remove your defamatory postings here is to delete your account. It's something to consider.

in contemporary usage, is a work created to mock, comment on, or poke fun at an original work, its subject, author, style, or some other target, by means of humorous, satiric or ironic imitation.

When this fucks this... this results.

in contemporary terms, is it still a parody if you are mocking yourself?

should have checked those link URLs, stephen... stephen alongi made an obvious error in his linking to an image that states he is nothing. why would he allow that to happen? a very amateurish mistake. i would not trust stephen alongi to do any web based development for me. i wouldn't trust stephen alongi with anything. he is a demonstrated thief willing to commit felonies at his whim. he is a menace. ignorant and hypocritical.

clone53421 is stephen alongi.

STEPHEN ALONGI IS NOTHING.

When this fucks this... this results.

http://images.google.com/images?q=kill%20it%20with%20fire

In the meantime, I suppose you have some excuse for deliberately and knowingly posting malicious, false, and defamatory statements about an organisation. You're lucky I don't work for them.

hmmmm... so this fucks this, and that means stephen alongi is nothing? i'm very confused.

Pics of the papers or you're just a scummy fucking liar.

Clown.

A user of the tinypic.com distribution service offered by photobucket.com recently posted an image with embedded images that infringe upon copyrights held by me, Michael Kristopeit.
The image which infringes on my copyrights, and also calls for my murder, can be located on your distribution network using the following URL:
http://i49.tinypic.com/2i9grgz.jpg (printout attached)

The top right portrait image located under the words "THIS RESULTS." has only been authorized for distribution by kristopeit.com. Redistribution of the image has never been authorized. kristopeit.com includes a copyright notice on every page attributing all rights to Michael Kristopeit.
A page on kristopeit.com which includes the specific image infringed upon, including the copyright notice, can be located using the following URL:
http://www.kristopeit.com/person.php?person_id=1 (printout attached)

I request the offending image be removed, and for all relevant information pertaining to the user who infringed upon my copyrights, including the IP address used to post the offending image, to be provided to me so I can compare it against the kristopeit.com web server access logs and pass the information on to relevant authorities.

* "I hereby state that I have a good faith belief that the disputed use of the copyrighted material is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law (e.g., as a fair use)."

* "I hereby state that the information in this Notice is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that I am the owner, or authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyright or of an exclusive right under the copyright that is allegedly infringed."

Thank You,

Michael David Kristopeit

When this fucks this... this results.

http://images.google.com/images?q=kill%20it%20with%20fire

In the meantime, I suppose you have some excuse for deliberately and knowingly posting malicious, false, and defamatory statements about an organisation. You're lucky I don't work for them.

What's the matter... don't want anyone to see your fugly hick parents or your own fugly self?

Oh my god, I just used your copyrighted work in a commentary of my own. On Slashdot, none the less! Better file some papers.

Hmmm and I think Mr. Kristopeit has interesting information himself.

http://domains.whois.com/domain.php

Edrugtrader.com

Pic..

http://www.kristopeit.com/person.php?person_id=1

Hope your (Micheal's) marriage with Rachel is working out with all these anger issues he has going on.