Slashdot Mirror


Google To Discontinue Google Labs

kai_hiwatari writes "Today, Google has announced that they are closing down Google Labs. They say this will help them prioritize their product effort. Google says closing Google Labs means ending many of their experiments. However, not every experiment will be gone. Google will be incorporating the Labs experiments they have decided to continue in other product areas. Android apps such as Google Goggles, Google Listen etc. will continue to be available in the Android Market."

165 comments

  1. Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is the single most disappointing announcement Google has ever done.

    1. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by GodInHell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Worse then the death of Wave? /snark

    2. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every company has to cut back. Google finally realized it would have to cut something. It finally came down to deciding between the innovations of Google Labs or company wide lunch. Now we know which had more perceived value.

    3. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      you sound like a swell guy.

      looking at your other comments only confirms this.

      keep up the good work buddy.

    4. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      So... does this mean they're reducing their R&D efforts? Either way, that's the end of an era.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      and looking at your comments made me start thinking schizophrenia was never defined really well

      p.s. sorry, just couldn't resist since you posted as AC;)

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    6. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A loss, yes, but its hardly Bell Labs. I would like to see more corporations fund research, but when its research into better AJAX APIs, meh.

    7. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      if google with nearly infinite pockets can't 'justify' r/d, we are all doomed.

      how can a small co innovate if one with deep pockets either can't or refuses to?

      or, maybe its just greed at this point? really hard to believe they could 'not afford' to keep it going.

      btw, is this going to be layoffs?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Michael Kristopeit is a sand nigger aka "dune coon".

    9. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      how can a small co innovate if one with deep pockets either can't or refuses to?

      Small companies have always been better at innovating than big companies, because big companies have investors that want a secure rate of return, while small companies tend to be funded by people with more risk tolerance who are willing to except greater risk for greater potential return.

    10. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Necessity is the mother of all invention.
      Hard work is the unsung father.
      Accidents (that is odd) are the crazy uncle everyone loves, but nobody wants around.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    11. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by dudpixel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was wondering if this means the employees "20% time" to work on any project of their choosing will also soon be scrapped.

      That would be the beginning of the end for Google if it were to happen...

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    12. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by antdude · · Score: 1

      To me, it was Google shutting down Google Video. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    13. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by byrtolet · · Score: 1

      I think this is the single most disappointing announcement Google has ever done.

      I totally agree. I think this is the end of "good" Google.

    14. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It makes sense, Google was never quite clear if they wanted to be a business or a research university. Now that the flush of overflowing capital is shrinking it's time to get serious.

    15. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a question, Michael. Are you this Michael Kristopeit or just a troll trying to make him look bad? The way you act suggests you're a bit kooky and that it's really you.

    16. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Ofloo · · Score: 1

      I think that is relative, .. all depends whether you use that service or not. I think this as positive, google has been doing so many things lately, it hardly left any room for anyone else or any thing not google.

    17. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by RDW · · Score: 1

      "Small companies have always been better at innovating than big companies"

      Not always:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Labs#Discoveries_and_developments

    18. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree

    19. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone is trying a little too hard to cover the fact that they were born a dickless freak.

  2. No, not the axe!!! by GodInHell · · Score: 0

    Boo. :(

    1. Re:No, not the axe!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google's been doing this to a number of good things recently. The one that I missed was Google Maps' real estate search layer. Yes, there are alternatives; no, they're not quite as awesome. Now Google Maps' driving directions don't tell you how long traffic could make your trip.

      They're under no obligation to make the Internet a better place, I suppose, but it makes me sad.

    2. Re:No, not the axe!!! by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      I used to use Google maps like twice or thrice as much when you used to be able to filter by rating.

      I also very much miss the 4 column format for iGoogle. How is that now that everybody has widescreen displays, that's when they get rid of the best format to view on them?

      Google doesn't give a shit about anything either. There will be hundreds of people in their feedback forums going "give it back we used that" and they don't even explain anything or make even the pretense of an apology. They just ignore them all. I'm pretty much a Google whore, but their attitude of 'fuck you if you're inconvenienced' is really antithetical to anything approaching customer service.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    3. Re:No, not the axe!!! by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      4 columns for igoogle is back! It's been back for weeks or months, at least. I'm a huge fan, and was also very upset when they went to 3 columns max. With about 15 tabs with 100+ feeds on each one, it was rough with 3 columns.

    4. Re:No, not the axe!!! by LibRT · · Score: 1

      To change to 4 columns: in iGoogle: Options-->iGoogle settings. Scroll to bottom. Click "Export" button next to "Export iGoogle settings to your computer:" This will download an xml file to your computer. Open the xml file using gedit or somesuch and do a find and replace, replacing all instances of "THREE_" with "FOUR_". Save as iGoogle-settings-modified.xml (or whatever name you wish). Go back to Options-->iGoogle settings and click "Choose File" under "Import iGoogle settings from a file:" Select your modified xml file, click "Upload" and you're good to go.

    5. Re:No, not the axe!!! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      To change to 4 columns: in iGoogle: Options-->iGoogle settings. Scroll to bottom. Click "Export" button next to "Export iGoogle settings to your computer:" This will download an xml file to your computer. Open the xml file using gedit or somesuch and do a find and replace, replacing all instances of "THREE_" with "FOUR_". Save as iGoogle-settings-modified.xml (or whatever name you wish). Go back to Options-->iGoogle settings and click "Choose File" under "Import iGoogle settings from a file:" Select your modified xml file, click "Upload" and you're good to go.

      Simples!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  3. The day the labs died... by dlingman · · Score: 2

    I can almost hear Don McLean in the background - very, very faintly...

    1. Re:The day the labs died... by lennier · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can almost hear Don McLean in the background - very, very faintly...

      And they were singin',
      I, I'm feeling lucky today
      I boot my Chrometop to the desktop but the Wave's gone away
      And Google boys turn off their Goggles and say
      This'll be the day I get laid

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    2. Re:The day the labs died... by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I never use Google Groups
      Or Alerts to remain in the loop
      And what is Google Desktop?
      Oh I seldom use Google Maps
      There's Bing or Mapquest for that crap
      Will they shut it down and stop the endless flops?

      --
      Be relentless!
    3. Re:The day the labs died... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, one of the cleverest jokes I've seen on Slashdot :)

  4. Pity... by Ibiwan · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...I actually used Sets on a fairly regular basis. Check out it out before it's gone!

    --
    -- //no comment
    1. Re:Pity... by joggle · · Score: 1

      Very cool. Tends to work well for words, but not numerical sets (unless the numbers are model numbers, like 777, 747, etc).

      Also got an interesting result when trying to do a search for small towns such as Llano and Burnet (in Texas). One of the results was "associated press", likely because there was an AP article recently about the drought in Llano.

    2. Re:Pity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really cool. Tried some narrow topics like gastrointestinal disorders (gastroenteritis, colitis, diverticulitis) and it returned all GI syndromes.

    3. Re:Pity... by Xest · · Score: 1

      I just tried it, and entered Dog, Horse, and Goat, then clicked small set.

      It all looked great until the second last entry and so I have to ask, what the fuck kind of animal is a "various"?

    4. Re:Pity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a way to get the code/algorithms? Cannot find a link to the repo...

      thanks

  5. 20% Time? by Spigot+the+Bear · · Score: 2

    Isn't the whole point of the "20% time" over at Google that people can just work on whatever they want, useful or not? Labs seemed like a great place for this sort of work to live, whether it became a "real" product eventually or not. I'm not really sure I understand the logic behind closing it down to "focus" on their main products. If that's their goal, they should eliminate the 20% time completely.

    On another note, does this mean all the labs in Gmail, etc are going away as well?

    1. Re:20% Time? by zget · · Score: 5, Interesting
      As someone else here commented, Google has been changing rapidly recently: http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2339084&cid=36825878

      I also was able to meet with some (middle management) people at Google and their attitude reminded me very strongly of MS's behavior 15 years ago: They don't listen to what others say and what they say often implies: "We're the smartest people on the planet, the world revolves around us, if you don't want to work with us and use our stuff, you're just an idiot." So it think I can conclude that Google sees themselves as "winning" the way that MS saw themselves winning in the late 90's.

      You can see the same change with all the "privacy is not important" and the recent Google+ product. I think we are really seeing a turning point here. Google has finally passed the point where it has, after a long time, accepted it's not the small geeky company it once was and is now just driving for profits. The scary thing is, they have got in a great position to exploit that now.

    2. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hope not. There are some great Gmail labs that have become a regular part of my Gmail interface.

    3. Re:20% Time? by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      and working at google begins to suck in 3 2 1..

    4. Re:20% Time? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, they are a pubically traded company that needs to grow every quarter in compressed 8 to 12 week time frames to boast its share price. Like most companies the need to cut costs and increase productivity.

      The employees need to work 20% harder the same price and you can do this by having them focus on products which generate income. It is a business and not a fun place to experiment with cool toys.

      The worst situation would be for the Wall Street investors to march in and hire efficiency experts who will then demand to force layoffs, hiring freezes, and benefit cuts, etc. This will foce the top talent to leave and kill morale and productivity. Look at what happened with HP and IBM? Need I say more? No one who is bright would ever consider working there now. Google is in trouble. Apple is suing them to death and its ad revenue is not generating that constant income increase every 8 to 12 weeks to boast their share price.

      They need R&D of course, but they need to keep expanding and the best thing to do is increase productivity to keep its stock price highest.

    5. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fortunately for us, a little company called Apple stands in their way.

    6. Re:20% Time? by dunezone · · Score: 1

      I think we are really seeing a turning point here. Google has finally passed the point where it has, after a long time, accepted it's not the small geeky company it once was and is now just driving for profits. The scary thing is, they have got in a great position to exploit that now.

      Google is maturing if not reached maturity. They did their experimenting but now the bottom line is whats most important. They will focus on the entities they have created that can bring in revenue and will only invest in new entities that have strong potential to grow such as Google+.

    7. Re:20% Time? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      20% time went away long ago.

      --
      Posted from my xoom.
      The 3.2 update seems to have fixed the browser somewhat so posting to slashdot is now possible though not pleasant with per character lag over 1 second.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    8. Re:20% Time? by ustolemyname · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean the privacy oriented Google+ product? The one that has a user interfaces that forces users to manage their privacy, and enables them to do it well?

    9. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, just call them DoubleClick and be done with it. That's what they are.

    10. Re:20% Time? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      let us know in a year or two how well this privacy stuff wroks on google.

      I'll wait. I have a lot of time...

      come on - we both know the bait/switch that exists on 'free web services'. you can bet that what you have today is will eroded away with some explanation of a 'benefit' to you (or maybe they'll just be very blatant).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:20% Time? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      The changes appear due to Larry Page (one of the founders) having this year taken over from Eric Schmidt as CEO. Obviously he'd not have done it if he intended to run the company the same way, and he's made a number of moves in the direction of more focus.

    12. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently involved with a project with Google. Christ, their PM's and BA's have a true 'holier than though' attitude.

    13. Re:20% Time? by brim4brim · · Score: 1

      Force you to monitor your privacy to the world while they have full access behind the scenes.

    14. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right; it will work better, the way all Google products have improved (sometimes significantly) in privacy controls over the last 2 years.

    15. Re:20% Time? by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but on those grounds their terms are similar to facebook, except they WON'T license your work to third parties.

    16. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (middle management)

      Having worked in many such firms, this right there is telling the whole story.
      A company has become this perverse thing big companies are, when it gets something called a "middle management",

      Because then, the anonymity starts to creep in. Things stop being personal, and you don't need to be personal with everyone else in the company anymore.
      And that's when people start to lose this "We're a bunch of friends, doing this awesome thing." attitude, that is key to a successful company. They stop having their heart in it.
      People lose their sense of the direction they want to go in. Resulting in a beast without a head, running faster and faster... until there's a wall or cliff in the way.

    17. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just now catching on to that? This happened years ago.

      The problem is wanting to protect your privacy by being an AC, and the fact that it appears most anti-go ogle posts get modded to oblivion, means you just get big G fanboys posting how great it is being data mined.

    18. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's already happend with Google Groups.

      Used to be one could remove their posts with providing a sworn statement including their personal information and digital signature. Then they quietly switched to requiring a court order for a while. Now they won't remove posts from old e-mail addresses, saying there is no way they can verify old e-mail addresses. Current e-mail addresses need a Google Account in order to remove posts.

      Sure that won't happen with Google+? Remember, it took them nearly 10 years to change the post removal on policies in Google Groups. Well, I won't take that chance, I won't join Google+. Good luck to those who do.

    19. Re:20% Time? by OverZealous.com · · Score: 1

      a pubically traded company

      Ewww - that's makes them sound like an STD. At the very least, you should probably wash your hands before returning to work.

    20. Re:20% Time? by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      You should have tried 20% TaskForce projects, they work great. You bank up a quarter's worth of 20% time (1-2 weeks) then use it all at once to work in small groups at a shared location. My new team started up this spring, and was originally based on a 20% TaskForce from last fall.

      So no, 20% time is not dead, but you do need to get off your ass to use it. Just like vacation time, nobody can force you to use it, and if you don't make use of it you lose it.

      Of course, 20% time to work on something completely random with no possible purpose for the company doesn't exist, but it never existed anyway. That's what you call "projects in your spare time" and it works much the way it does in other semi-flexible companies. I'm glad the company lets me use equipment and resources (within reason) for random projects like that, but expecting them to pay me for that time is unreasonable.

  6. So no more 20% personal time? by microbee · · Score: 1

    How about free lunch?

    1. Re:So no more 20% personal time? by Spigot+the+Bear · · Score: 1

      Google has decided to eliminate this "lunch" you speak of, as it was detracting from their core products.

    2. Re:So no more 20% personal time? by creativeHavoc · · Score: 3, Informative

      While many were left wondering, Google tells me that the company has no changes to announce with regards to the 20 Percent Time program; killing Labs doesn’t mean the discontinuation of the one day a week Googlers get to spend on “projects that aren’t necessarily in [their] job descriptions.” “We’ll continue to devote a subset of our time to newer and experiment projects,” Google representative Jason Friedenfelds tells me.

      http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/20/20-percent/

      --
      insight through the mind
  7. Google Sets by slshwtw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use google sets from time to time when I can't remember something, like the name of a product or company, by generating a list from items I know are similar.

    1. Re:Google Sets by Kraftwerk · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Google Sets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately in that case a Google search of descriptions of the company usually leads you to the name too.

    3. Re:Google Sets by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      I still use Google Sets as well... if there was one thing to keep from Google Labs, that would be it. I'll have to try the spreadsheet trick mentioned below though!

      In other news, I'm surprised they still have my fan logo posted on their site from the late 90s when Google was in beta...

    4. Re:Google Sets by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Just in case you didn't already know, yours is by far the best one on there ;)

    5. Re:Google Sets by multi+io · · Score: 1

      Are you sure they're going to shut it down? That's the question I've been asking myself -- whether they're also going to shut down the labs web sites such as Google Sets, rather than just Google Labs as a department / organizational unit within Google. Those are two different things after all, right? What harm would it do to Google to leave existing labs websites up and running as they are?

    6. Re:Google Sets by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Haha, thanks! Back when I submitted it, I thought Google was going to temporarily use fan logos for their homepage logo... As a result, I made sure that what I submitted was at least somewhat readable. :^)

    7. Re:Google Sets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, how did "mutant elves" make it into that set?

  8. Huh? by sts2nihon · · Score: 1

    How are they going to get feedback from their users? Monitor Twitter?

    1. Re:Huh? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Usual pattern for Google is to get lots of feedback then ignore it. So you could view not getting the feedback in the first place as a sensible cost saving measure.

      --

      Posted from my xoom.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    2. Re:Huh? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      How are they going to get feedback from their users?

      Release things that would currently be released as "labs" offerings either as "experimental features" in a selectable beta version of an established product, or as limited release independent products that have a roadmap to being full self-sustaining products.

      They've actually done a lot of that while Labs was alive, and I'd expect that to continue.

  9. Nooo! by Slartibartfast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've always *loved* Google Labs! It's where I first bumped into "suggest," and a whole bunch of other really cool features that have eventually been rolled into the final product.

    I'm very, very sad. Used to be a Red Hat Labs that suffered the same fate; I guess that sort of paradigm just doesn't have enough energy for the long run.

    *sigh*

    1. Re:Nooo! by vlm · · Score: 1

      I've always *loved* Google Labs! It's where I first bumped into "suggest," and a whole bunch of other really cool features that have eventually been rolled into the final product.

      I'm very, very sad. Used to be a Red Hat Labs that suffered the same fate; I guess that sort of paradigm just doesn't have enough energy for the long run.

      *sigh*

      Bell Labs?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Nooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that sort of paradigm just doesn't have enough energy for the long run.

      It does, but the MBAs prefer getting fat and happy cats and then the next revolution happends and the cycle begins anew.

    3. Re:Nooo! by robathome · · Score: 2

      You mean the arm of Alcatel-Lucent that decided they will no longer do pure science, and concentrate on product-oriented R&D?

      --

      At 3 A.M. you can see people's auras; at five you can see their contrails...
    4. Re:Nooo! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      Would you suggest Google start laying off people and implementing hiring freezes instead to boast its share price to pay off Apple? Believe me Wall Street loves doing this to companies and making them lean. They see numbers on spreadsheets and not the morale and productivity on an individual basis drop, or the top talent leaving.

      If Wall Street hires an efficiency expert and they see 20% wasted time you can bet they would flip! The pressure would be on the CEO's to resign or cut costs aggresively in such a situation.

      It sucks but if you sell you soul to the devil you eventually need to pay its dues. I plan to start a web business myself and I can tell you now I wont allow 20% personal time for my employees. My investors will have a fit and replace me FAST. Maybe if I become big and do not have Wall Street breathing down my neck it would be different.

      WIth billions in royalities to Apple and Google not driving the revenue increases it once did something must give. If you do not like it stay private and never go public.

    5. Re:Nooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that it doesn't have enough energy, but that shareholders don't have that kind of foresight. Bell Labs could never exist today in the U.S., no matter how big the company, because pure R&D only provides results down the road and corporations can't see past the next shareholders' meeting.

    6. Re:Nooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      HOW ABOUT LESS TIME?
      Seriously, it isn't rocket science. Less time, more collab and support, bham, problem solved.

      Why have I seriously not attempted a job at Google? They'd love me there, I am ALL about efficiency.

      Some of those "lab projects" became some of the biggest projects they now host.
      To kill off the innovation machine is an absolute insult against Google itself!
      What the hell are you guys doing over there?
      Stop being so sore-assed over Wave failing already, it had no focus behind it, ALL the other projects do.
      Better yet, develop a framework for focusing on MAKING things more successful.

      Eh, whatever, not like it matters, the blade is already touching the neck and beginning to cut.
      Lost a huge amount of respect for you guys, you are killing innovation and potential profit.
      If only you put someone smart behind the Labs system...

    7. Re:Nooo! by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

      Sop you know what? Keep 51% of the stock in "friendly" hands and say "Screw you. You can either wait for results, or get out of the way", and having 51% means they shouldn't be able to do jack shit to you.

      Alternately, buy back all your stock as quickly as possible - though it mignt take years - and not be a slave to Wall street.

      Sorry, I'm not exactly happy with the whole short-sighted money-grubbing attitude at wall street. I don't think we'd lose too much of value if the entire industry vanished overnight.

    8. Re:Nooo! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      I've always *loved* Google Labs! It's where I first bumped into "suggest," and a whole bunch of other really cool features that have eventually been rolled into the final product.

      I'm very, very sad. Used to be a Red Hat Labs that suffered the same fate; I guess that sort of paradigm just doesn't have enough energy for the long run.

      *sigh*

      This is probably going to be unpopular, this being Slashdot (wait for the troll mods!)

      Microsoft Research. The minds that brought you some really awesome stuff. But on the flip side... Songsmith.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    9. Re:Nooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I've nothing against (most) *any* R&D facility, but what I do think is that MS doesn't really believe in it. My *OPINION* is that they sit there and say, "Jeepers -- we've got $30 billion in the bank. Might as well have an R&D lab, and who knows?" But the number of projects that have come out and truly altered anything? Well... Bing, maybe? [It *was* pretty cool.] I'm not sure what else you mean by "really awesome," I'm afraid. Good compiler design after stealing away the brains of Borland, maybe? I dunno.

  10. Google Labs to be replaced by... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Google Beta!
    or will it be Google Alpha?

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Google Labs to be replaced by... by game+kid · · Score: 1
      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  11. Only part of original not quoted by TFA . . . by wrencherd · · Score: 5, Informative
    . . . is this:

    We’ll continue to push speed and innovation—the driving forces behind Google Labs—across all our products, as the early launch of the Google+ field trial last month showed.

    It's a lot faster just to read the orig.

    1. Re:Only part of original not quoted by TFA . . . by syousef · · Score: 1

      . . . is this:

      We’ll continue to push speed and innovation—the driving forces behind Google Labs—across all our products, as the early launch of the Google+ field trial last month showed.

      It's a lot faster just to read the orig.

      Who on earth needs to read a whole stack of marketing BS. They're doing a bad thing for short term profit. It's that simple. All the doubletalk is meaningless and only serves as a rationalisation or explanation for morons.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  12. Killing off the autonomous vehicle project? by Animats · · Score: 2

    Does this mean the end of Google's self-driving cars?

    1. Re:Killing off the autonomous vehicle project? by recharged95 · · Score: 1

      Maybe not since their cars have gotten so much press lately.

      But it could likely mean the end of their flying bots aspirations .

    2. Re:Killing off the autonomous vehicle project? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Labs is just a website, typically for hosting <=20% projects, and doesn't reflect the organization of projects or R&D internally.

      We've simply been told that: If you want to launch something externally, either integrate it with an existing product, or convince us that it's worth a full-time team.

      While I'll miss some of the things in labs which don't get integrated, I can't say it's an unreasonable policy. Running any web service has nonzero ongoing engineering support cost, and with all the existing products it's hard to justify a lab that cannot fit within any of them.

  13. Google Code Search by Etrigoth · · Score: 2

    Oh please don't let them take this offline!

    --
    When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.
    1. Re:Google Code Search by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      http://www.koders.com/ not as good but almost there

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    2. Re:Google Code Search by Bamfarooni · · Score: 0

      Code search isn't part of labs. If it doesn't have a googlelabs.com address, it's probably not affected by this.

    3. Re:Google Code Search by Bamfarooni · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Maybe I'm wrong. Says right there on the logo that its in labs. Huh.

    4. Re:Google Code Search by Etrigoth · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I will check that out.

      However, I have noticed improvements in CodeSearch recently, perhaps the'll save this one ...

      --
      When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.
    5. Re:Google Code Search by slackbheep · · Score: 1

      I just double checked http://www.google.com/transliterate/ which has been handy when I'm on a pc that's only got english language packs installed, but that seems to be doomed as well :(

  14. What does this mean for 80/20? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought a lot of labs were from the 80/20 projects. So does this mean that 80/20 is going away?

  15. End of cool ideas ? by nerdyalien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I doubt this is the end of Google generating cool ideas/apps. As long as they keep on hiring new guys with brilliant imagination, they are safe. But this announcement sounds like they are moving towards more big corporate style work flow, where all cool ideas are channeled towards an existing product. I see some similarities with Microsoft here, where most research is geared towards an existing product.

    Potential downfall is, some ideas/apps/products are better off alone. For an example, whole Xbox Kinect was exceptional as a hardware device. But as it was bundled with the gaming console, we missed out all the other cool stuff it can do (hacks we saw on youtube). Quite lucky they released a SDK. Sometimes, I wish they released Kinect as an separate ubiquitous hardware.

    1. Re:End of cool ideas ? by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      go read about Microsoft research. They contribute a lot to fundamental computer sciences; this is not product oriented unless you consider things like research on monadic programming a product.

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    2. Re:End of cool ideas ? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 0

      As long as they keep on hiring new guys with brilliant imagination,

      uhm, no. they don't hire *creative* types. they hire those who have advanced degrees, who are math-heads and algorithm-heads. those are usually NOT the creative types, they are very mechanical and can code someone else's idea but they are usually not inventors.

      been thru the interview circuit and know what google looks for. they want machines that are in human form. if you think on your own, you are NOT hire-worthy.

      but if you can recite obscure algorithms from college, you are one of them!

      no wonder they can't design for the real world. example: gmail - only nerdlings would create such a POS user interface. is seriously quite bad by all design standards (HOW many buttons and clickables do they have hidden and scattered all over the screen?) and, HOW much damned javascript do they need to be a mail user agent, anyway? ever view it? quite interesting how bad it is, really.

      google was once a great search engine but now they are spammed and their search is no better than the others.

      I just don't see the greatness of google anymore. significant decline during the last 2 or 3 years. shame, but everyone go gets that large starts to suck. everyone, even the great google.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:End of cool ideas ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yandex is the new google

    4. Re:End of cool ideas ? by Ofloo · · Score: 1

      As long as they keep hiring guys like bill gates who buy or steal idea's they'll be rich, sorry google is in this area no different then Microsoft ! Most of their idea's are bought. They are all about getting your private information then to sell it to the highest bidder, .. I don't really know why every one likes google so much, .. I use it too though, .. but still, ..

  16. Killing Innovation? by Rotag_FU · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope this is not the case, but it sounds like they are killing off their central idea birthing grounds? When Google first started developing an OS for cell phones it would have seemed like a crazy stretch for a search engine company, but Android is successful today. How many new "crazy" ideas will never see the light of day that could create future critical technologies for the company by this decision to "prioritize their product effort"? It is important for a tech company to have focus, but it needs at least a small group of innovative people to have the opportunity to let their ideas run wild in order to create the next big thing or they will eventually just stall and hand over technological innovation to a smaller, hungrier company. To me this seems almost as stupid as when Xerox decided that the core ideas at Xerox PARC in the 70's weren't worth productizing and basically gave them away to Apple.

    1. Re:Killing Innovation? by wdef · · Score: 1

      ... it sounds like they are killing off their central idea birthing grounds?

      No. You forget that everything is about 'apps' and the 'app ecosystem' now. App sales = money. Google labs != money. Why provide lab extensions for free when someone can sell an app for money? That is where they are heading.

    2. Re:Killing Innovation? by Microlith · · Score: 4, Informative

      When Google first started developing an OS for cell phones it would have seemed like a crazy stretch for a search engine company, but Android is successful today.

      Android, from day one, was a product like any other. It was not born in the Labs, it was purchased.

    3. Re:Killing Innovation? by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      I think you could have seen them developing a mobile OS when the bought the mobile OS company that was making android...

    4. Re:Killing Innovation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google purchased Android from another company. It didn't come from Labs.

    5. Re:Killing Innovation? by JonySuede · · Score: 0

      Android was bought when Google bought Android Inc. This is not a labs product, it was innovation like most other big corps innovate...

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    6. Re:Killing Innovation? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Why would Android be a crazy stretch for a search engine and advertising company? Android supports their core business by extending Google services everywhere. They don't make money off Android directly, that's why it's open source.

      Sounds to me like they're consolidating their projects and experiments and focusing on the ones which can drive and support their core business (advertising), which is what any sensible corporation does.

    7. Re:Killing Innovation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds as if what's going on is the same thing as ATT killing Bell Labs and Lockheed Martin killing LM Skunkworks. In both cases quasi-independent R&D groups were "aligned with business objectives" (i.e., reorganized to be tightly controlled by top-down directives from bean counter "top management".) I saw from the inside what happened at LM: technical development decisions were based on chasing the funding fad de jour - people making technical decisions didn't have a clue about technology. Both ATT and LM are no longer truly technically competitive, but now sustained only by their hereditary place at the corporate feeding-troughs.

  17. I don't know whether this scene from work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is funny or depressing...

    An email came through and a coworker died last night. Everybody read it and then went about their day.

    This announcement came on Slashdot and I just heard three people exclaim "Noooo!!!"

    I am still undecided whether that is a sad state of affairs or funny....

    1. Re:I don't know whether this scene from work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am still undecided whether that is a sad state of affairs or funny...

      More reaction from a website that reports that a software company is stopping some experimental area of their development than a co worker dying? ...

      Yeah hilarious.

      If you are still undecided then you are an arse.

  18. Disheartening by selex · · Score: 1

    That fact that I logged in instead of just posting anonymously should be a clue.

    Google Labs brings me lots of fun things to play with. This sucks. I use Mytracks and Fusion Tables all the time. Not to mention the addons for Maps, Gmail, Calendar and all those extras.

    Thats what made Google products great was that the Google staff could work on their weird projects.

    Selex

  19. Replacing lab extensions with apps by wdef · · Score: 2

    On the surface this is just plain dumb. But lab extensions like Tasks should just be a default part of gmail anyway and hopefully will be. My guess is this is about superseding the labs concept with apps which can come from anywhere and are easy to monetize.

    1. Re:Replacing lab extensions with apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as these "apps" are not just for mobile devices. I have never used any Google product anywhere but on the desktop.

    2. Re:Replacing lab extensions with apps by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      On the surface this is just plain dumb. But lab extensions like Tasks should just be a default part of gmail anyway and hopefully will be. My guess is this is about superseding the labs concept with apps which can come from anywhere and are easy to monetize.

      Supposedly the "Gmail labs" and "Calendar labs" aren't going away - it just the truly separate projects that are currently hosted under the "googlelabs.com" domain.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  20. Of course by Exitar · · Score: 3, Funny

    No time for innovation. All resources must be used to better clone Facebook.

  21. Bean counters take over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is this the beginning of the end? The bean counters take over and start cutting projects when there is no bottom line in site? I worked for Ma Bell during the golden age and when Bell Labs was one of the premier research labs in the world. Where is it today? Funding cut, only projects with a clear bottom line 'researched'.... I hope that Google isn't headed in that direction anytime soon....(they will get there someday though).

  22. Just a few more nails, and I can bury "The Cloud". by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    I've always been wary of "cloud computing", esp. when it's powered by a hybrid "thick-client" connected to a remote data repository... Applications anyone? At least with a client side service (eg: mail reader app) I can continue to use the features I like (such as gestures, goggles, nibbles, etc.) beyond the external "support" lifetime -- Without wondering if a feature will disappear tomorrow.

    As an avid Google Labs user, I find their lack of support disturbing.

    Furthermore, my plotter does not work with Windows7. The MFG no-longer supports it, so they won't recompile the driver, or give out the source so that I may do so. XP's EOL is 993.0488278587964 from now. This tells me that not only will I be using G'Linux / FLOS Software in the near future, and insist on hardware driver source-code, but that "The Cloud" I use must be built from my own servers, or not at all.

    I think I'll call my globally accessible private personal network "The Closet"; I suspect many will identify with this terminology in terms of privacy for multiple reasons.

  23. Kugelmass apologia by epine · · Score: 2

    I'm reading the final book of the Baroque Cycle right now. Who let you out of the book? You sound just like a Tory scrivener.

    Of course, if you're so easily lead by the nose into the "fear and greed" school of business, of course your backers will be quick to exploit this. You've lashed yourself to the bilge pump. Happy treading.

    In every business, there's a right balance between short term necessity and vision for the long haul. Many small businesses have been scuttled by hard nosed investors who inhaled too much (or too little) coinage fume while the world was changing around them, to paraphrase 3000 pages.

    1. Re:Kugelmass apologia by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Weigher! To the Tower!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  24. Bell Labs, Xerox PARC, ... Google Labs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ehhh... google "Age of Austerity". This is just another victim. Trade long-term profits for short term cost cuts.

  25. Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll be drafting more untested stuff directly into the live site that then breaks randomly?

  26. Phone Googlemaps App? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess they will work the labs section on googlemaps into the actual application on phones? Its not even like its been a while since the last new update added to it which was finally the ability to download and cache parts of the map so you can load them later quicker and without needing service which is such an amazing feature. There are also a few other older options on the menu as well that were useful as well. Hopefully they decide to keep those options and just reorganize the application and put them under settings or something because it would be a real shame to lose those options.

  27. Google Body by smcdow · · Score: 1

    Well, that's a bummer.

    I just started using Google Body a couple of months ago, and it's fantastic.

    Especially if you're about to have shoulder surgery.

    Don't want to see this site disappear...

    --
    In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    1. Re:Google Body by Chuby007 · · Score: 1

      google body is still on android... :D

  28. And thus begins the long decline. by reiisi · · Score: 1

    When a company is concerned about its children (employees and customers), it grows. When it is concerned about its investors, it stifles itself.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:And thus begins the long decline. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godwin in Three...Two....one....
      I hear the Nazi's were pretty happy with IBMs work as well.

  29. Google could use a little more professionalism by rmcd · · Score: 1

    I liked labs, but I like great *finished* software even more. In my experience Google is great at rolling out early versions of cool software but often failing (or taking ridiculously long) to add critical features that would really make it complete.

    If Larry Page is telling the troops that they now have to finish that final 10%, I'm all for it.

    And for those complaining about innovation: G+ isn't innovative??

    1. Re:Google could use a little more professionalism by QJimbo · · Score: 1

      And for those complaining about innovation: G+ isn't innovative??

      No, it isn't. It's Facebook with circles, and the same underlying privacy issues.

    2. Re:Google could use a little more professionalism by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      And for those complaining about innovation: G+ isn't innovative??

      No, it isn't. It's Facebook with circles, and the same underlying privacy issues.

      Not to mention that Google+'s "circles" isn't all that new - it's just better promoted than Facebook's "lists". Functionally I don't think there's a significant difference.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Google could use a little more professionalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      G+ innovative?
      Ill give you that the little circles animation is neat when compared to Facebook's "add to list" button but other than that, it really don't bring all that much to the table.

    4. Re:Google could use a little more professionalism by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I don't know what it's like now, but when I tried it (some significant amount of time after it was introduced) Facebook's implementation was awful - namely, it notified the people in your lists that you added them to that list - including informing them what the list was called. As far as I can tell, no one actually uses this feature on facebook.

      Google+ has a fundamentally different approach - it essentially forces you to use this feature, and it makes it simple and easy to manage and to be sure that you're sharing each thing only with whom you want to.

    5. Re:Google could use a little more professionalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you call ripping off Facebook and combining it with email. Your answer is yes.
      That's like so innovative.

    6. Re:Google could use a little more professionalism by spiralx · · Score: 1

      FB hasn't notified anyone about me adding them to a list in the three or four years since I started using it, nor have I ever received such a notification. G+ does only require 2 clicks to publish to a particular group rather than FB's 3 clicks though, although on FB you can use exclude friend lists and/or users when you publish as well as include, on G+ you can only include.

  30. You miss the point by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Google doesn't give a crap about user feedback - look at their forums, full of people begging for enhancements (like searching for partial words in gmail, being able to zoom fontsizes, not into pages in chrome etc etc etc) and they don't give a crap.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  31. It's NOT AS BAD as it sounds folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From the (updated) blogpost http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/more-wood-behind-fewer-arrows.html

    "Update 3:36pm: To clarify: we don't have any plans to change in-product experimentation channels like Gmail Labs or Maps Labs. We'll continue to experiment with new features in each of our products."

    So only standalone labs are going for the chop, the ones that incorporate into products are safe.

  32. Ads == money by tepples · · Score: 1

    App sales = money. Google labs != money. Why provide lab extensions for free when someone can sell an app for money?

    Putting relevant ads on the pages of Google web applications == money. If by "app sales" you're referring to taking a 30% cut of Android Market application sales like Apple does on its own App Store, Google decided early that this revenue stream isn't all-important. Otherwise, it 1. wouldn't have added the "Unknown sources" checkbox that lets end users install third-party app stores from .apk packages, and 2. would have spearheaded a viable Android-powered competitor to iPod touch, some sort of "Nexus Player" that's cheaper because it doesn't come with 3G and GPS.

  33. This is why I won't use Google+ by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2

    Google is far too willing to pull the plug on their ventures for me. I used to use the GOOG411 service, but they killed it. And I'm concerned that if I put a lot of time and energy into Google+, they'll kill it too.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:This is why I won't use Google+ by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Fair point, but that's modern life. Nothing stays still, things are constantly evolving. Things are born and die off. Just look at MySpace now.

    2. Re:This is why I won't use Google+ by creativeHavoc · · Score: 1

      If they kill it, you can easily download all your content and use it to move into a new service.

      --
      insight through the mind
    3. Re:This is why I won't use Google+ by Black+Mage+Balthazar · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty convinced that GOOG411 was just a large scale voice recognition training program for Google Voice Actions on Android.

    4. Re:This is why I won't use Google+ by sts2nihon · · Score: 1

      They claim also that it was used in the development of the iPhone search app, but the voice recognition in that app is nowhere near as good as that of GOOG411. Bing 411 isn't as good, but it's available.

    5. Re:This is why I won't use Google+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is far too willing to pull the plug on their ventures for me. I used to use the GOOG411 service, but they killed it. And I'm concerned that if I put a lot of time and energy into Google+, they'll kill it too.

      LK

      From the start, GOOG411 was designed to beef up their speech recognition algorithms. Wild assumption here, but I'm sure the majority of people that used the service are tech savvy and (own smart phones (by now, at least); think of voice search as GOOG411, only with much more useful information returned.

      PS The Google+ comment strikes me as a rather odd leap of logic. It's not like anybody could've invested much time or energy into using GOOG411, nor did they take the huge step of integrating it with their core services.

    6. Re:This is why I won't use Google+ by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Once bitten, twice shy.

      I don't care what the motivation was. Who's to say that Google is in it for the long haul on Google+? It could be like Wave. It could be that they're using it to learn about interpersonal communications for the purpose of creating a new AI. Either way, I don't care. I will pass.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:This is why I won't use Google+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has bet the whole farm on Google+'s success.

  34. Google Maps "Measure" by Crock23A · · Score: 1

    I use "Measure" found on the android app Google Maps. It is very handy for measuring walking distances on the fly.... because I walk a lot.

  35. Nigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I typed in nigger and it returned: rape, crime, arrested, and murders.

    http://labs.google.com/sets?hl=en&q1=nigger&q2=&q3=&q4=&q5=&btn=Large+Set

  36. inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's been a good run, but like all corporate entities, the bean counters eventually take over. This is probably the best news Google's competitors have ever heard. I can imagine lots of cork-popping of champagne bottles tonight.

  37. Google .... typical Jewish company by Dainsanefh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And that comes after the blowout quarterly earnings report last week. Penny Pinching is part of their DNA.

    --
    Twitter: @dainsanefh
  38. 2012 is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew there was some truth in it. This is proof.
    Google is becoming evil.
    The Dark Side is taking over.
    The Apocalypse is coming.
    Next year, they will land in great spaceships.

  39. Google Labs going ... Google Directory gone ! by dbu · · Score: 2

    Google Labs is going and, in other news tonight... Google Directory is already gone!
    http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2011/07/google-directory-no-longer-available.html
    It really sad that Google feels it has to trim so many projects and services

  40. Re:Just a few more nails, and I can bury "The Clou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as it isn't a water closet. Water can do bad things to servers.

  41. a sad day by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if this applies to all technologies that are not search engines or google+, but they have great datacenters, and cloud computing, they have the best picture album maker, they have a slew of great things to make life easier for everyone, i wonder what they will nix, and what they will keep....maybe making it available through the app store or google+ to get people interested???

  42. Soulless management now has the reins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This move is a really dumb mistake. Whoever pushed for it should be fired for the sake of the company.

  43. They just don't get it by Chuby007 · · Score: 1

    Google does not understand that because of that opening they show ( even if it's fake ) they have the people on their side, and we nerds/geeks are the force that drive others towards tech stuff, easy as this, if 10 regular guys see the "local nerd" using a tech product, most likely some of them will use it, specially if the "local nerd" is a bit of a fanboi. Now we are the ones that made android big, by sales pitches, making freeware, adding to it etc, google provided, or "kinda" provided the OS, and a few utilities. Now we saw the same exponential growth with google plus, because WE pitched it. If WE start seeing google as just another evil company, we will stop our google love, move to better places, or just do our own stuff, now I'm kinda scared to do stuff even for android, who knows if google will stop seeing it profitable and just can it, the same thing I think now when I use google app engine, will it be there tomorrow ? will it suffer the same fate as: Lively, google wave , google health, google green, google translation api, now google labs ? So really like 1 year ago I thought to myself, kool I'm going to save all my documents on google docs, all my pictures to Picasa, all my videos to Youtube, and just keep all that in the cloud and forget about backups and I know google will be here much much longer than I'll ever be, and well I'll pay for the addional Space I'll need. Now really, how do I know, Docs will be here tomorrow ? Picassa ? Youtube ? I have to say that now I'm hesitant to start adding to G+, I have no idea if it wll be there tomorrow, at least with Facebook I know something, FACEBOOK is the only product they have and they are not going anywhere. Thank you Google.. :(

  44. so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they figured it's cheaper to outright buy successful start-ups than support projects doomed to fail 99% of the cases. Smart...

  45. maturity by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Some people think that R rated movies are "mature". Some think that X rated movies are even more "mature". I tend to see both as people letting there interests slip from understanding to stimulus, not because of what such movies generally contain, but because of what they generally don't (That's one of the problems with a single dimension to ratings systems, but that's wandering too far afield.)

    I disagree with your definition of mature.

    Slavers often talked to and about slaves who gave in and quit trying to escape as if those slaves had "grown up" in some sense.

    I and my fellow teachers often treat the students who are trying their hardest to understand what's going on, and therefore testing all sorts of limits, as children, and treat the quiet students as more "grown up". And this after we have been imploring them to use their own minds.

    Investors are not all-knowing, nor do they really have the best interests of a company's customers or employees, or even the company itself, in mind. This is especially so in these days where accountants have (deliberately) forgotten how to account for long-term value, and intangibles such as keeping the general market in good condition.

    Sometimes investors need to be told to shut up and let the people they invested in do their job. What do the investors mean? Is investing in a company only investing in the profits the company make? I don't think that's investing in the company at all.

    Shoot. As long as the investors were running Apple, they were running it into the ground. When enough of Apple's investors saw what was happening and brought Steve Jobs back, and gave him back the reigns, he turned the company back around. (You do understand why the first year or two he took only a token salary?)

    Money is fertilizer. People treat it like it's gold. Well, gold is not that big a deal, either, but money is fertilizer. It tends to get wonky when too much of it sits in one place for too long. And then even worse things happen.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  46. Maybe they will finally make Google Tasks usable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they will finally make Google Tasks usable! And add reoccurring tasks!

  47. cached maps by dioden · · Score: 1

    I recently visited Berlin. Just before gerting there I found the single best google labs function ever: the ability to download maps into the android maps app. It was a lifesaver when using mobile internet would cost €3 a MB.