Slashdot Mirror

Maybe it's just me, but I don't think FRAUD is "funny". We are seeing the same kind of "hushing" and censorship that has been used to quiet skeptics of both climate change and intelligent design. Someone needs to hold these allmighty scientists criminally responsible for their lies regarding the risks that the LHC truly represents to all of us.

Man's technology has exceeded his grasp. - 'The World is not Enough' Zealous Nobel Prize hungry Physicists are racing each other and stopping at nothing to try to find the supposed 'Higgs Boson'(aka God) Particle, among others, and are risking nothing less than the annihilation of the Earth and all Life in endless experiments hoping to prove a theory when urgent tangible problems face the planet. The European Organization for Nuclear Research(CERN) new Large Hadron Collider(LHC) is the world's most powerful atom smasher that will soon be firing subatomic particles at each other at nearly the speed of light to create Miniature Big Bangs producing Micro Black Holes, Strangelets and other potentially cataclysmic phenomena. CERN physicist Alvaro De Rújula in the BBC LHC documentary, 'The Six Billion Dollar Experiment', incredibly admits quote, "Will we find the Higgs particle at the LHC? That, of course, is the question. And the answer is, science is what we do when we don't know what we're doing." And CERN spokesmodel Brian Cox follows with this stunning quote, "the LHC is certainly, by far, the biggest jump into the unknown." The CERN-LHC website Mainpage itself states quote: "There are many theories as to what will result from these collisions,..." Again, this is because they truly don't know what's going to happen. They are experimenting with forces they don't understand to obtain results they can't comprehend. If you think like most people do that 'They must know what they're doing' you could not be more wrong. Some people think the same thing about medical Dr.s but consider this by way of comparison and example from JAMA: "A recent Institute of Medicine report quoted rates estimating that medical errors kill between 44,000 and 98,000 people a year in US hospitals." The second part of the quote reads "...but what's for sure is that a brave new world of physics will emerge from the new accelerator,..." A molecularly changed or Black Hole consumed Lifeless World? The end of the quote reads "...as knowledge in particle physics goes on to describe the workings of the Universe." These experiments to date have so far produced infinitely more questions than answers but there isn't a particle physicist alive who wouldn't gladly trade his life to glimpse the "God particle", and sacrifice the rest of us with him. This quote from National Geographic exactly sums this "science" up: "That's the essence of experimental particle physics: You smash stuff together and see what other stuff comes out." Find out more about that "stuff" below; http://www.sanescience.org/ http://www.lhcfacts.org/ http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/anon1.htm http://www.lhcdefense.org/ http://www.lhcconcerns.com/ Popular Mechanics - "World's Biggest Science Project Aims to Unlock 'God Particle'" - http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/extreme_machines/4216588.html"

Man's technology has exceeded his grasp. - 'The World is not Enough' Zealous Nobel Prize hungry Physicists are racing each other and stopping at nothing to try to find the supposed 'Higgs Boson'(aka God) Particle, among others, and are risking nothing less than the annihilation of the Earth and all Life in endless experiments hoping to prove a theory when urgent tangible problems face the planet. The European Organization for Nuclear Research(CERN) new Large Hadron Collider(LHC) is the world's most powerful atom smasher that will soon be firing subatomic particles at each other at nearly the speed of light to create Miniature Big Bangs producing Micro Black Holes, Strangelets and other potentially cataclysmic phenomena. CERN physicist Alvaro De Rújula in the BBC LHC documentary, 'The Six Billion Dollar Experiment', incredibly admits quote, "Will we find the Higgs particle at the LHC? That, of course, is the question. And the answer is, science is what we do when we don't know what we're doing." And CERN spokesmodel Brian Cox follows with this stunning quote, "the LHC is certainly, by far, the biggest jump into the unknown." The CERN-LHC website Mainpage itself states quote: "There are many theories as to what will result from these collisions,..." Again, this is because they truly don't know what's going to happen. They are experimenting with forces they don't understand to obtain results they can't comprehend. If you think like most people do that 'They must know what they're doing' you could not be more wrong. Some people think the same thing about medical Dr.s but consider this by way of comparison and example from JAMA: "A recent Institute of Medicine report quoted rates estimating that medical errors kill between 44,000 and 98,000 people a year in US hospitals." The second part of the quote reads "...but what's for sure is that a brave new world of physics will emerge from the new accelerator,..." A molecularly changed or Black Hole consumed Lifeless World? The end of the quote reads "...as knowledge in particle physics goes on to describe the workings of the Universe." These experiments to date have so far produced infinitely more questions than answers but there isn't a particle physicist alive who wouldn't gladly trade his life to glimpse the "God particle", and sacrifice the rest of us with him. This quote from National Geographic exactly sums this "science" up: "That's the essence of experimental particle physics: You smash stuff together and see what other stuff comes out." Find out more about that "stuff" below; http://www.sanescience.org/ http://www.lhcfacts.org/ http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/anon1.htm http://www.lhcdefense.org/ http://www.lhcconcerns.com/ Popular Mechanics - "World's Biggest Science Project Aims to Unlock 'God Particle'" - http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/extreme_machines/4216588.html"

Funny. Do you know what you get when you mix high energy colliders with Professor Otto Rossler's charged micro black hole theory? Answer: A golf ball

Do you know what you get when you mix high energy colliders with Professor Otto Rossler's charged micro black hole theory? Answer: A golf ball

Quote "...systematically dismantles the notion... cosmic rays... black hole... neutron stars... created at the LHC... any meaningful timescale."

The report has not yet been externally validated, but an internal validation of the report by CERN's SPC Committee contains the not so reassuring statement about the certainty of the primary safety argument:
"but this argument relies on properties of cosmic rays and neutrinos that, while highly plausible, do require confirmation, as can be expected in the coming years." - Quote from CERN's SPC Committee

But I did not see a recommendation to delay collisions until the confirmation they state is required... I have read collisions could begin in two months.

As for "any meaningful timescale", Dr. Otto E. Rossler writes "â¦after 50 months the earth to a centimeter would have shrunk. It would be nothing more there, not only no more life, there but also the earth would be⦠a small black hole."

M.B. Dion of society du jour writes in The ATLAS Experiment... Madness Or Invaluable Insight?: âoeSo is ATLAS just an intellectual version of something Evel Knievel may have attempted in the lab?â I can imagine Evel Knievel telling a co-pilot about to jump the Snake River Canyon with him, "I can't tell you there is no risk, but I assure you that it is perfectly safe". LHCFacts.org

Physics would truly be weird if this was true that anti-matter might fall up. First of all, there is no evidense that anti-matter is anywhere near that weird. It is just a form of energy, just as matter is a form of energy. Though some people do not understand that basic notion. When you combine matter with anti-matter you get energy. In terms of energy, adding matter and anti-matter is similar to adding 1 + 1 and getting 2. Not adding 1 and minus 1 and getting 0. That is a very important difference, and that is part of the reason that the notion that anti-matter might 'fall up' is just not credible. But that is not the reason for my post... The following comments were posted this week on a related blog that helps put some of the conversation surrounding the Large Hadron Collider Safety controversy in perspective I think. From a June 2008 blog by Martin Meenagh Quote: âoeBy what means can an Hawaii Court, even if it is a federal one, assert any authority over a facility outside the USA?â I am not a lawyer, but the case has world wide implications, some court must take jurisdiction. Quote: âoegoing to do anything but make Europeans and Canadians determined to go ahead anywayâ A few very credible scientists believe that CERN is basing their theory of safety on at least one flawed assumption. If the following reasonable and plausible assumptions prove to be correct, then the uncomfortable truth is that the probability of destruction of Earth is actually closer to 100%, though only mother nature currently knows for certain due to our limited understanding of the physics involved. A. LHC Creates black holes as CERN Predicted (1 per second) [1] B. Micro Black holes do not evaporate as LSAG accepts is plausible. [2] C. One or more micro black holes are captured by Earthâ(TM)s gravity as LSAG accepts as plausible. [3] D. Micro Black holes grow exponentially as Dr. Otto E. Rosslerâ(TM)s paper predicts and calculates. [4] If the reasonable and plausible assumptions above prove correct, and Europeans and Canadians are determined to go ahead anyway, then that would be an unfortunate situation. The entire world is in this together after all! Quote: âoeThere is a world issue here. In libel, in risk assessment, and in extradition casesâ Yes, there are also potentially issues with respect to freedom of speech, corporate deception, and mis-representation of facts designed to confuse or mislead the public as to risks involved. The lawsuit also alleges on page 15 of AFFIDAVIT OF LUIS SANCHO IN SUPPORT OF TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: [5] Quote: âoeCERN has neither asked mankind to validate these experiments, nor has it been open and clear about those risks to the public. On the contrary it has systematically hidden evidence, and hence it is, in my opinion and hopefully that of this Court, liable of criminal negligence and occultation of proofs, as it carries about what amounts to a potential global genocide.â Quote: âoeWould you have any links that you could send any readers and myself to as a short cut?â I would suggest LHCDefense.org for the legal focus. Sincerely, JTankers Administrator, LHCFacts.org References: [1] http://doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/2003/2003-001/p1.pdf [2] http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0304042 [3] http://lhc2008.web.cern.ch/LHC2008/documents/LSAG.pdf [4] http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/OTTOROESSLERMINIBLACKHOLE.pdf [5] http://www.lhcfacts.org/?cat=9