Domain: mozilla.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to mozilla.org.
Comments · 17,579
-
Re:Google's Fault? How about FF?Since you have people doubting on you, I can prove Firefox doesn't strip anything from the URL.
Unzip the file "content/browser/safebrowsing/sb-loader.js" from "chrome/browser.jar" in your Firefox directory. This contains the file that handles submitting URLs to Google. It's in the core Firefox distribution, and Bonsai clearly fingers Firefox as adding it so the blame lies completely with Firefox.
(Or you can just use their online code browser.)
Anyway, search for "getReportPhishingURL" - this is the URL phishing reports are sent to. Note the following lines:var pageUrl = getBrowser().currentURI.asciiSpec;
Those two lines add the current URL of the currently active page DIRECTLY without modifying it at all.
reportUrl += "&url=" + encodeURIComponent(pageUrl);
So, yes, Firefox doesn't do ANY URL filtering at all, and this can be verified by checking the code base. -
Re:Google's Fault? How about FF?Since you have people doubting on you, I can prove Firefox doesn't strip anything from the URL.
Unzip the file "content/browser/safebrowsing/sb-loader.js" from "chrome/browser.jar" in your Firefox directory. This contains the file that handles submitting URLs to Google. It's in the core Firefox distribution, and Bonsai clearly fingers Firefox as adding it so the blame lies completely with Firefox.
(Or you can just use their online code browser.)
Anyway, search for "getReportPhishingURL" - this is the URL phishing reports are sent to. Note the following lines:var pageUrl = getBrowser().currentURI.asciiSpec;
Those two lines add the current URL of the currently active page DIRECTLY without modifying it at all.
reportUrl += "&url=" + encodeURIComponent(pageUrl);
So, yes, Firefox doesn't do ANY URL filtering at all, and this can be verified by checking the code base. -
Re:Extension to MozillaOf course you could have posted it on the web so that anyone who is interested and has time of their own could take a look at merging it to trunk. But no, you'd rather bitch about it and take your toys and go home instead of sharing. Actually he said Probably they were right because the "bug" states it is "Assigned To: Nobody; OK to take it and work on it"
:-) and you can see his work as bug 332016. Although if Mozilla is taking Adobe's ActionScript engine to replace their own it may soon be obsolete. -
Re:Firefox, Thunderbird, and now Seamonkey?
It should be pointed out that when you speak of Mozilla as an entity (as in "they host", "Mozilla doesn't", etc) you are speaking of the Mozilla Corporation, which is only a small, though important subset of all that Mozilla is. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/
-
Re:Spell Checker
What browsers need is a way to lauch an external text edit for editing form fields.
MOFO has extensions that allow this.
-
Re:Total crap
Recently when SeaMonkey installed with my linux distro... I started the browser... clicked on the icon in my menu to open another one and... that crap was still there !
From TFA (specifically, the release notes):
- [Linux] When launching SeaMonkey, already-running instances are detected (Bug 122698)
If this is your only problem with SeaMonkey, upgrading to the new release fixes it.
-
Re:Firefox, Thunderbird, and now Seamonkey?
Actually, Mozilla has almost everything to do with SeaMonkey. They developed Mozilla 1.8, which SeaMonkey is still based upon. They host the source code, bug database, and releases. The core of SeaMonkey is shared with Firefox and Thunderbird so most Mozilla development directly improves SeaMonkey with no extra effort. SeaMonkey remains an official Mozilla project. SeaMonkey simply isn't a Mozilla product, which means that Mozilla doesn't drive SeaMonkey-specific development or provide support.
-
Re:memory leak fud ..
...they really need to fix the memory leaks.
There we go with the FUD again. 68 core memory leak bugs have been fixed in the past year. Core bugs are bugs that are common to all Gecko products such as SeaMonkey and Firefox. Yes, there are memory leaks, but they are being fixed. There's no need to keep complaining. -
Re:Numbering System?
SeaMonkey 1.5 will be the next release. As per MozillaWiki:
The current working title for a release from that work is "SeaMonkey 1.5" (subject to change) with a release expected in 2007. (This work takes place on "Mozilla trunk".) -
Re:Disable/Uninstall Components?
-
Re:How about Firefox + Adblock?
It's called Flashblock.
-
Re:Amd64 rules (sure intel 64 does as well)
64 bit support being paid attention to by Adobe... Right now there is no x86_64 version of Adobe Flash Player for any OS.
And btw. The piece of code that is the major stumbling block for a x86_64 build of Flash Player has been open sourced... http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tamarin/ -
Firefox has more than 100mil downloads...
Firefox surpasses 100M downloads (dated October 19th, 2005)
-
Re:Any vacancies in the i-still-hate-flash dept.?
"I am not going to remove flashblock from firefox any time soon"
Hum ... I've said this before and I'll say it again: If you're relying on Flashblock (the Firefox extension?) to block Flash on any old site that means you're allowing javascript on any old site. Know what I mean? If you want to block Flash on untrusted sites then use the javascript blocker, Noscript - it has this capability, along with blocking Java as well. -
Any vacancies in the i-still-hate-flash dept.?
I am not going to remove flashblock from firefox any time soon, I don't expect for flash to become any less annoying and inefficient because of this new release.
-
Re:FUSE?Lazy? You're doing it the hard way. It would have taken you less time to type it into your Firefox Wikipedia Lookup Extension or your Google home page/Wikipedia widget than it did to post that comment.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_in_Userspa ce:Filesystem in Userspace (FUSE) is a Free (GPL and LGPL'ed) Unix kernel module that allows non-privileged users to create their own file systems without the need to write any kernel code. This is achieved by running the file system code in user space, while the FUSE module only provides a "bridge" to the actual kernel interfaces. FUSE was officially merged into the mainstream Linux kernel tree in kernel version 2.6.14.
FUSE is not limited to, but particularly useful for writing virtual file systems. As opposed to traditional filesystems which essentially save data to and retrieve data from disk, virtual filesystems do not actually store data themselves. They act as a view or translation of an existing filesystem or storage device. In principle, any resource available to FUSE implementation can be exported as a file system. See Examples for some of the possible applications.
The FUSE system was originally part of the A Virtual Filesystem (AVFS) project, but has since split off into its own project on SourceForge.
FUSE is also available on FreeBSD, OpenSolaris, and Mac OS X.
And from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ntfs-3gNTFS-3G is an open source, freely available NTFS driver for Linux. Unlike the NTFS driver included in the Linux kernel, its support for writing files has very little limitations: files of any size can be created, renamed or deleted on NTFS partitions, with the exception of compressed and encrypted files. ntfs-3g cannot yet modify Access control lists and permissions. NTFS partitions are mounted using the "FUSE" userland file system framework.
NTFS-3G is free software licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
There you go. -
Re:Too bad Flash 9 isn't released for linux yet
i believe it autodects your OS based on your user agent, you insensitive anonymous coward. why are you in windows??
Maybe he uses the user agent switcher to work around broken websites, you insensitive... logged in user -
Re:I Would Have Signed Up...
Unfortunately its become a modern-day whitepages, which is all I ever use Myspace for. I ran across something that made visiting the site more tolerable: a firefox plugin. Using the Greasemonkey plugin https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/748/ and one of several scrips from http://userscripts.org/, all that annoying media is disabled, making for a somewhat more normal experience.
-
Re:i think it's great
ToolbarMS: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3292/ 2.3 months = 2 months and about a third of a month. just quicker to write.
-
Re:I Would Have Signed Up...
An add-on for Firefox:
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/722/ -
Re:I Would Have Signed Up...
What's "noscript"?
An extension for Mozilla based browsers that disables JavaScript, Java etc except for sites you specifically whitelist.
See https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/722/ -
Firefox's multimedia cousin
Joost, formerly known as The Venice Project, gets most of its "cool factor" in the geek circles from being built over the Mozilla XUL Runner. In other words, its client is based on XUL, SVG, JavaScript and XPCOM, just like Firefox, as outlined in this article.
-
Technorati has a standard...
The rel-tag microformat is an attempt to standardise tagging. It relies on other microformats to define what it is you are tagging. There isn't a 'photo' microformat at the moment, so you can't do a web-wide search for photos tagged 'fireworks' for example. If you're interested in the semantic web it's worth checking out microformats. You can download a plugin for firefox that reads microformats. Go and have a look at Flickr with it, or any other site that implements microformats. If people have tagged something with a 'geo' tag giving long. and lat. then it will bring up a Google Map showing the location. If they've included a 'hCard' around their contact details you can add it to your address book.
-
Re:Then they're broken!
> As a side note, that's what Firefox does when it encounters an XML file it doesn't have a stylesheet for.
You mean unless nsFeedSniffer.cpp decides otherwise? -
Re:You gotta be kidding me...
) The 2001 deletion of Netscape Developer. This lost a ton of Netscape copyrighted Javascript documentation. Unless I'm mistaken, this has been (quite some time afterwards) transfered to the mozilla fundation, and can be accessed at http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/JavaScript Cheers,
-
Re:Roaming user
As usual links form slashdot to bugzilla bounced so copy and paste the url
Vote and comment here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24934 3
"Roaming should be useable with Firefox. I added support for it a year ago, but
it probably bitrotted." -
Re:What's up with the code names, anyway?
Just so you know, FF2 used to codenamed Bon Echo.
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bonecho/releases/2 .0a1.html -
related to bug?
Sounds similar in "symptoms" (the freezing and the 15-20 second period) to this Firefox bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3668
4 9.
I take it that you can't reproduce the problem in IE or Opera?
What's they cpu usage? Does it freeze all firefox windows or just the Yahoo window? -
Stylish and CSS ad blocking...
My solution in situations like this is to build custom Stylish rules for sites like that. Even if they change the id a whole bunch, they're pretty much constrained to a certain number of xhtml structures, and I doubt they'll be changing that a lot. So do something like: #ad_space div>div{display: none;} (replacing the selectors with an actual path to the frustrating elements). There are also lots of scripts for stylish at http://www.userstyles.org/
-
Preferred abbreviation is Fx, not FF
...and this is why! Well, this probably isn't why, but nevertheless...
http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/faq#spell-a bbreviate -
Re:Looking forward to Bookmarks improvements!
probably why it was never deemed important enough to implement the store-your-bookmarks-on-an-FTP which has been discussed for so long
You are most likely referring to "Roaming Profiles" which has been implemented in Mozilla SeaMonkey. It lets you store bookmarks and other things from the profile on remote servers. Few faithful followers still prefer the SeaMonkey suite over Firefox due to this and some other features which were not implemented in Firefox when they initially decided to focus on Firefox development. Firefox has mostly caught up though in terms of features due to extensions and updates since 1.0
In short if you don't want a 3rd party solution to storing your profile remotely, try SeaMonkey:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ -
Final Fantasy 3?
Whoa, you can customize Final Fantasy 3? US or Japan? FF3 US is still my favorite out of the series...
Oh. You're talking about Firefox? Please don't use "FF" to abbreviate Firefox, which is one word. Use "Fx" or "fx", instead. See also http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/faq#spell-a bbreviate -
Re:features
I'd like to have the ability to save sessions rather than having to bookmark all the tabs and re-opening them again.
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2324/ works for me. -
Messenger features?
I understand that Firefox wishes to be more than a web browser. But looking at the FFX 3 requirements page I find one very weird requirement:
P2/HIGHLY DESIRABLE features:
- Adding a Serverless open Source Messenger as a default toolbar
Honestly, WTF? Is this really a feature that should be in something that mainly is a web browser? I would understand if there was a need to add a general Kademlia DHT API to easy delivering information, but isn't a chat application something that should be covered as an extension. Typically a chat application runs constantly while a web browser (or "information broker") generally isn't running constantly. I fail to see the logic behind this.
-
Re:SQLite
SQLite is not a new feature in Firefox 3. It is already available in Firefox 2.0.
-
Re:I wonder if...
Mod Parent Up!
It seems to be common to misuse FF as the FireFox abbreviation. Indeed, I can produce countless IRC logs of instances when users bash each other for using incorrect abbreviations.
Often, the FF acronym is associated with Final Fantasy, (FFVI was released in America as FFIII for anyone who doesn't get the reference).
For the record, the proper abbreviation is Fx.
-
Re:Detachable tabs?
Tab To Window does what you want. https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2062/
-
Re:That old saying about SMPT
No, they removed e-mail functionality to avoid cluttering up the 'Tools' menu.
-
love the wording
Security / Privacy Context UI redesign (the lock icon sucks; needs more detail)
http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3/Firefox_Requireme nts#P1.2FMANDATORY_Features -
Re:IE8?3-4 years? You mean, 8? Meanwhile, the Firefox devs plan on releasing a new version number every year.
Issue one major release every year (Fx 3 in 2007, Fx 4 in 2008, etc.) since it helps drive upgrades and adoption
http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3/Firefox_Requireme nts#Release_Roadmap -
Not only for development
Not only does Firebug provide excellent tools for debugging web applications, but it also has facilities for modifying web pages on the fly. Sometimes there is an annoying div on a webpage that I want to get rid of while reading, so I open the Firebug console and set its display property to none. There may be other extensions that provide similar features (Adblock Plus, Nuke This); however, the JavaScript console in Firebug is the ultimate tool for running your own code on 3rd party web pages, for those who know Javascrpt, that is.
Furthermore, the JavaScript console can be very helpful for those starting to learn JavaScript, like how the Python console is for Python beginners. -
Not only for development
Not only does Firebug provide excellent tools for debugging web applications, but it also has facilities for modifying web pages on the fly. Sometimes there is an annoying div on a webpage that I want to get rid of while reading, so I open the Firebug console and set its display property to none. There may be other extensions that provide similar features (Adblock Plus, Nuke This); however, the JavaScript console in Firebug is the ultimate tool for running your own code on 3rd party web pages, for those who know Javascrpt, that is.
Furthermore, the JavaScript console can be very helpful for those starting to learn JavaScript, like how the Python console is for Python beginners. -
You can take your AJAX and shove it up your ass!
Nobody wants AJAX. Nobody. It has been an absolute disaster for web users. Firefox has been patched no less than 100 times because of the holes it creates. The web browser gods are angered by this morphing of static pages into insecure applications. Enough's enough, web monkeys. It's time to burn the AJAX witch!
-
DetailsI've got into the habit of saving Microsoft's advance notifications using the wonderful Scrapbook extension.
Here's the original:
- Three Microsoft Security Bulletins affecting Microsoft Windows. The highest Maximum Severity rating for these is Critical. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer and the Enterprise Scan Tool. Some of these updates will require a restart.
- One Microsoft Security Bulletins affecting Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Visual Studio. The highest Maximum Severity rating for this is Important. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer and the Enterprise Scan Tool. These updates will require a restart.
- One Microsoft Security Bulletins affecting Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office. The highest Maximum Severity rating for this is Important. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer. These updates may require a restart.
- Three Microsoft Security Bulletins affecting Microsoft Office. The highest Maximum Severity rating for these is Critical. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer. These updates may require a restart.
I was surprised to find, following the TFA, that eWeek got hold of this last Friday. -
Re:Some websites still only work in IE
Surely if you just need one website, it would be easier to install and use IE Tab than use Wine to emulate IE7.
-
Re:Noscript is one of the best reasons to run Fire
I wonder whether Firefox's RefreshBlocker add-on would prevent this annoyance? I haven't often run into the problem myself, so I can't say I've tried it.
-
Re:Ultimate Firefox Add-Ons for Privacy/Security
a much better link
-
Re:This is so Trued.appendChild(r.createContextualFragment("Like this"));
I had already seen everything in your comment except createContextualFragment. Google "createContextualFragment" brought me this description which states: "This method is not part of a specification." Therefore, it is just as nonstandard as innerHTML.
So should I conclude that there is no W3C-approved way for a JavaScript program to call the HTML parser through the HTML DOM?
-
Ultimate Firefox Add-Ons for Privacy/SecurityAs someone who actually AM worried about impending javascript exploits carrying trojans, I have within my Firefox the following Add-Ons (which comes pretty close to perfect security), but still requires a modicum of user awareness during web surfing.... The following Add-Ons are good for Windows, Linux and supposedly MAC OSX. Other useful support Add-Ons are: For Linux users, I also have this useful add-on:
-
Ultimate Firefox Add-Ons for Privacy/SecurityAs someone who actually AM worried about impending javascript exploits carrying trojans, I have within my Firefox the following Add-Ons (which comes pretty close to perfect security), but still requires a modicum of user awareness during web surfing.... The following Add-Ons are good for Windows, Linux and supposedly MAC OSX. Other useful support Add-Ons are: For Linux users, I also have this useful add-on: