Domain: newsfilter.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to newsfilter.org.
Comments · 10
-
Re:Offensive content?
I can't say I've ever seen content that I was offended by, aside from something directed at me personally
Let's see, there is the famous 3 guys, 1 hammer video. The participants in this video (except for the victim) did it for entertainment.
Here is a video of a woman being stoned to death in Pakistan, presumably for committing adultery.
Here is a leaked photo of Michael Jackson, dead on a gurney.
If the comments on this video are any indication, most people are offended by the actions of this family court judge.
Here is a woman crying while being gang raped.
Perhaps none of these things offend you. I think they offend most people. -
Paying for porn doesnt mean better qualitySeen several people here think that free porn is of lesser quality or whatnot
hell even http://video.google.com/ with safesearch turned off nets thousands of full length titles free when you go to left and sort by length.
and of course with http://motherless.com/ No site can compete with motherless, it is the reigning king of all smut for now, every topic imaginable from full length amateurs, webcam rips from stickam teens, to as crazy and wild as you can imagine, even some you would think would be illegal, but motherless has been around a few years now.
places like http://motherless.com/ - http://wide6.com/ - http://newsfilter.org/ - http://www.tubegalore.com/ and http://video.google.com/ with safesearch off sorted by length
anyone that pays for pr0n is a idiot
:Pplus video.google.com beats all competition in 1 aspect. http://video.google.com/ with safesearch off has EVERY Traci Lords video which you won't find on normal sites
So I think Google and Motherless wins hands down.
hehe
-
Re:It's just part of the bigger pictureCorruption starts from money, the Republicans have the vast majority of corporate support, the corporations don't care about *you* only your money...
Here we go again on the whole "Republicans have all those RICH people donating huge sums of money so they're controlled by a wealthy few whereas the pure as snow democrats only have grandma sending in half of her social security check". It's a falacy that the Republicans are the party of few large donations and the democrats have to scramble for lots of little handouts from the poor. I'm too busy to dig through all the source material myself today so I'll just copy paste from a blog I found while Googling; if I'm citing someone who's incorrect somebody else can call me on it since this guy cites his sources....
Which party gets the most donations from large contributors?
The following are the top 10 contributors who have given the most to Democrats and Republicans since 1989:- American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees: $36,759,024, 98% to Democrats
- National Assn of Realtors: $27,869,023, 47% to Democrats and 53% to Republicans
- Assn of Trial Lawyers of America: $25,453,541, 89% to Democrats
- National Education Assn: $25,251,541, 94% to Democrats
- Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers: $23,804,055, 97% to Democrats
- Service Employees International Union: $23,386,475, 96% to Democrats
- Laborers Union: $23,123,307, 92% to Democrats
- Communications Workers of America: $23,009,674, 99% to Democrats
- Teamsters Union: $22,689,508, 93% to Democrats
- Carpenters & Joiners Union: $22,654,447, 91% to Democrats
If the realtors association wasn't covering its bets by splitting contributions, the list would be solid blue!
But what about individual contributors?
According to statistics from the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, Republicans raised more than Democrats from individuals who contributed small and medium amounts of money during the 2002 election cycle. Democrats far outpaced Republicans among deep-pocketed givers:- Among donors who gave more than $200 but less than $1,000, Republicans enjoyed a substantial $68 million to $44 million edge over Democrats.
- The margin was closer among those individuals who gave $1,000 or more: The GOP took in $317 million, compared to the Democrats' $307 million.
- But among the fabulously wealthy, the Democrats cleaned house. Donors of $10,000 or more gave $140 million to Democrats, while only $111 million went to Republicans.
- Among those individuals who gave $100,000 or more, the Democrats raised $72 million compared to the Republicans' $34 million.
- And when it comes to the millionaires' club -- those kicking in $1 million or more -- the Democratic Party skunked the GOP, $36 million to $3 million.
Needless to say, despite the near-parity in overall amounts -- $384 million to the Republicans vs. $350 million to the Democrats -- the number of individual donors to the GOP exceeded those to the Democratic Party by more than 40 percent.
[Source: Washington Times, December 18, 2002]
So the next time you hear a liberal say Republicans are the party of billionaires, you'll know what the truth is. - American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees: $36,759,024, 98% to Democrats
-
These should of Won....
http://prague.tv/galleries/funny-pics7/freebsd.jp
g /http://submissions.newsfilter.org/uploads/wow_bsd
. jpg/http://www.licklinux.com/pub/geekary/geekages/2/f
r eebsd.jpg/http://www.licklinux.com/pub/geekary/geekages/2/c
h ickdigopenbsd.jpg/http://www.licklinux.com/pub/geekary/geekages/2/o
p enbsdlogo.jpg/http://www.licklinux.com/pub/geekary/geekages/2/s
d sf_jpg.jpg/http://www.licklinux.com/pub/geekary/geekages/2/s
e xylittledevil.jpg/http://www.licklinux.com/pub/geekary/geekages/2/w
h ite_freebsd.jpg/ -
Re:How will it look like?
There's a picture if it here. That's actually a prototype, but it should give you a general idea.
-
Re:And being Indian ...
Wasn't it the Babylonians who invented it??
-
Re:And being Indian ...
-
Goatseman's wife discovered!!!
-
Re:Incomplete testing
Asbestos, yes.
DDT, you need to read up a bit. -
CHECK OUT THOSE TITS!