Slashdot Mirror


Secret Codes Protect Ancient Torahs

An anonymous reader writes "A story on Wired News reports the problems Jewish synagogues have protecting their Torahs from theft. The Torah scrolls, containing the five books of Moses, are hand lettered over the course of a year, are often hundreds of years old, and can sell for $50,000 or more. But Judaic law "dictates that not one character can be added to the 304,805 letters of the Torah's text", which makes them untraceable and easily sold on the black market. Rabbinic authorities have recently approved two computer-based systems to make the scrolls traceable: one takes a digital fingerprint of a Torah, a second makes microperforations in the parchment that yield a unique identifier."

679 comments

  1. Masoretes by scottjpearson · · Score: 0, Informative

    The Masoretes would be proud of the preservation. I've seen the Dead Sea Scrolls digitally enhanced, so this should be very doable.

  2. Non kosher torahs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oy!

    1. Re:Non kosher torahs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      oh

    2. Re:Non kosher torahs? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      come on, mod parent up, that's one of those perfectly placed comments :)

    3. Re:Non kosher torahs? by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Correction. Oy vey. :-p

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  3. OSS? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wonder if Open Source Software is going to be used for the security measures. I'm sure the thieves will want to know if they have the real thing instead of a cheap copy left lying about to be stolen. I'm sure the price for an authentic copy will just go up in value now.

    1. Re:OSS? by Vertdang · · Score: 1
      Authentic copy?

      My head just asplode

      --
      Statesmen serve to better the country and help the people.
      Politicians serve to better themselves and help friends.
    2. Re:OSS? by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is about as real as somebody complaining about OSS being used In Syria, China, Cuba, and North Korea, while ignoring the fact that each of these countries are currently based on MS Windows XP. And to make matters interesting, these were sold by MS directly to the countries.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes you wonder who the hell buys these things. If they know they're authentic, why does that make it more of a collector item? It's a holy text for crying out loud.

    4. Re:OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you wipe your ass with OSS toilette paper? Grow up, idiot.

    5. Re:OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up, idiot.

      Not just idiot, but fat fucking idiot!!! (Hint: View his webpage)

    6. Re:OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just idiot, but fat fucking idiot!!!

      Who's more idiotic: the idiot who replied or the idiot who replied after him?

    7. Re:OSS? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yes, all you have to do to produce a cheap copy to leave lying around to be stolen is spend a year hand lettering it on parchment hundreds of years old.

      Then of course there is the issue that Torahs aren't "left lying around." You don't just stick one on the shelf like a King James Bible. If you find one in the authentic location, it's authentic. It's not just a good idea, it's God's law.

      The remaining question is, how do you suppose anyone is going to use software to authenticate the scroll if. . .they don't have the reference? And what has that got to do with OSS anyway?

      This basically boils down to comparing jpegs. If you give me a peice of paper with a signature on it and I take a picture of it, I can't tell you if the signature is genuine, but at a later date I can tell you if it is the same piece of paper, and I don't even need software at all to do this. Software just makes it easier.

      KFG

    8. Re:OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelt "Heroin" in your "Wolves of the Calla" review. Just letting you know!

    9. Re:OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or as bad as making shit up to support a personal hatred for Microsoft. Trade embargos make it very illegal to sell to countries like Cuba and North Korea. If Microsoft was "directly" selling to those countries they'd be up on charges by now. While you'll find Windows XP on the school computers in North Korea, it's not certainly not a version intended for them - they are forced to use the English version, pirated or bought anonymously through a third party seller.

    10. Re:OSS? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Thanks! It's been corrected.

      This reminds of a Saturday Night Live skit where a TV anchor was interviewing Stephen King who was typing away while talking. He stopped typing for a long moment and then started typing again. The anchor guy asked what happened and King replied that he forgot the rule about whether i should come before e or after. ;)

    11. Re:OSS? by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 2

      You can base countries on MS Windows XP? What was sold by MS directly to the countries? Who is complaining about OSS in Syria, China, Cuba, and North Korea? How does any of this make matters interesting, or relate to "matters" at all?

    12. Re:OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think, perhaps, *you*

    13. Re:OSS? by poor_boi · · Score: 1

      You actually need Windows CE (Country Edition) with Nuclear Power Plus! Plugin.

    14. Re:OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me, me, I win! I win! I are the more idiotest.

    15. Re:OSS? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Troll

      And what has that got to do with OSS anyway?

      If you mention "OSS" early on a new posting, it'll get all kinds of replies and mod points. So far I got a few intelligent responses, got crap flooded, my "Fat Albert" fan club responded, and someone asked what's going on. Mod points for being insightful and overrated. So far this has been a good experiment. ;)

    16. Re:OSS? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I just love Anonymous Cowards... they make the best fans! :P

    17. Re:OSS? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Makes you wonder who the hell buys these things.
      Probably other synagogues that don't want to pay the price of a new one already. Like a variation on the infinite hotel theorem.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Oh Well by joeybagadonuts · · Score: 5, Funny

    So much for looking for a signed copy...

    1. Re:Oh Well by utnow · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of the story of the US spending billions to develop a pen that will write in space, while the russians simply used a pencil. Somehow I simply can't see ANY God (no matter what religion) seeing this as a good use of resources... 1. Let people read what he had to say in the first place. Stop worshiping the books/scrolls and get on with the big picture. 2. Your options are to put a serial number in there somewhere, or to develop a system of digital fingerprints and microperforation ids... For some reason you went with the latter. And we thought microsoft was the king of rediculous unnessicary software. ;)

    2. Re:Oh Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Oh Well by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I want the one autographed by moses!!

  5. Re:Only the Jews by peculiarmethod · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bet you think you're the first person to question God.

    Grouping all religions into one blanket statement is useless, as well. The evolve, just like organisms. And as we know, not all of anything "suck".

    Even vacuums break at some point.

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
  6. However by MiKM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't solve the problem of theft. If one is stolen, it might take years to recover it, if at all. Once it is recoevered, it isn't in pristine condition anymore. More attention should be focused on solving the problem itself than making it easier to apprehend the criminals.

    1. Re:However by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the point is to help prospective buyers know if they are buying a "hot" item or not. If it can't be authenticated, or the seller is unwilling to authenticate it, then it makes it harder to sell.

    2. Re:However by Erwos · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Once it is recoevered, it isn't in pristine condition anymore."

      Assuming we're only talking about problems from bad storage conditions, they're almost always fixable. Since fixing a Torah always cost less than writing a new one, this isn't as big a deal as you'd think. And, if they're going to sell the thing, you'd figure they're going to take at least a little care of it.

      Torahs "go bad" from everyday use. My family, for instance, has a sefer Torah that we have on loan to a local synagogue. Every so often, they find a letter that's chipped off a bit (the ink is the worst culprit), and it has to be taken and repaired. It's not a big deal.

      I think what I'm saying is, "pristine condition" is pretty unusual. Most synagogues will settle for
      just "kosher", and be happy with it.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    3. Re:However by muszek · · Score: 1

      Once stolen copy may be identified at some point in the future, it's riskier for thieves and buyers to get involved. More risk, same money/fun --> folks are less interested in . Unless the price goes up, of course.

    4. Re:However by katz · · Score: 1

      Man, your argument is full of more holes than a Hamas terrorist in Tel Aviv. It's obvious you're trolling (especially given your previous post here was moderated down to -1). But anyway, when you say "Jews have an anti-death penalty", are you referring to Talmudic Law or secular Israeli law?

    5. Re:However by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      It doesn't solve the problem of theft. If one is stolen, it might take years to recover it, if at all. Once it is recoevered, it isn't in pristine condition anymore.

      How are you going to pursuade a synagogue to buy a stolen Torah? It kind of goes against the purpose of the exercise.

      There are some private collectors but most of those are going to be observant.

      The point is not so much recovery as to ruin the market for stolen Torahs. An antique copy might be worth $50K but a stolen one is going to be worth very much less.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    6. Re:However by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative
      If just a few people ID their scrolls, then yeah, it's only good for recovery. (And recovery is very very unlikely -- there's no Torah Police to go around inspecting everybody's scrolls.) But if these IDs become universal -- and they probably will, given the amount of money involved -- it will suddenly become very hard to fence an "hot" scroll.

      Pre-theft security and post-theft security are hardly mutually exclusive. People who own expensive gems do keep them under lock and key. But they also x-ray them, just in case. Up until now, synagogues have been limited to just one kind of security, while both are valuable.

      I'm a little suprised that no Slashdotter has commented on the irony of widespread theft of the book that's the original source for the "Thou Shalt Not Steal". Which would have allowed me to point out that the Christian Bible (of which the Jewish Torah is the first 5 parts) is the most widely shoplifted book!

    7. Re:However by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      A stolen bible?
      Man, someone is going to Hell for that one.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    8. Re:However by randito · · Score: 1

      Do jews believe in Hell?

    9. Re:However by wyldeone · · Score: 1

      Definitely. Nothing worse than, on your Bar Miztvah, finding that the ink of a large portion of your parsha has blurred.

      --
      In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.
    10. Re:However by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Interesting
      " Every so often, they find a letter that's chipped off a bit (the ink is the worst culprit), and it has to be taken and repaired.

      Can you enlighten me as to the type of ink this is that chips? Does it act more like a paint than a dye? What kind of material can a Torah be made of?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    11. Re:However by arose · · Score: 1

      I was just spreading your word lord.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    12. Re:However by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do jews believe in Hell?

      Sort of.. the jewish idea of hell is more-or-less compatible with the Christian(catholic predominantly) idea of purgatory. Hell for the Jew is a tormented but temporary place for their souls, but not permanent/everlasting punishment for their "crimes" against God. Some will have to endure greatest punishment in the jewish "purgatory" but they will always be released. Their souls are to be "recycled" or reincarnated yet again until they reach perfection (another matter for discussion)... the latter dogma I mentioned as you might notice is diametrically opposed to the conventional christian understanding of the human spirit & soul.. (ie. you're damned to hell for ever lasting time unless you repent and accept jesus..)

      Chrisitanity and Judaism don't have much to do with each other, except for their common history and father figures. Their philosophy and belief set is as different as Buddhists are from Christians. Luckily Jews are not born into sin like Christians are... this gives them so much more latitude in their life :)

    13. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it sure as hell ain't pig skin......

    14. Re:However by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      And recovery is very very unlikely -- there's no Torah Police to go around inspecting everybody's scrolls.

      Apparently, there is!

      But experts say Torahs are stolen more often than you'd think. Geoffrey Haber, rabbi at Temple Emanu-El, learned the hard way in 1998, when a burglar swiped two scrolls from his synagogue in Englewood, New Jersey. They were recovered by an NYPD Torah-theft task force in a sting operation after the thief, a maintenance man working in the neighborhood, tried to sell the scrolls to a New York rabbi, claiming they were part of an inheritance.
    15. Re:However by Parlyne · · Score: 1

      There is no canonical conception of hell in Judaism. However, at various times and in various places there have been quite a few different ideas of hell in folk Judaism.

    16. Re:However by wass · · Score: 1
      Because not every Torah is tracked, and a synagogue buying a Torah wouldn't specifically know that a Torah is stolen or not.

      For example, there are a number of Torahs recovered from Shtetls long since wiped out through the Pograms or by the Nazis. My hometown synagogue has one such Torah.

      There is a family that goes to one of my relative's synagogues, and they helped save a Torah just before the Holocaust. Back in Europe just before it was too late (I don't remember which country) the Rabbi and some members of the synagogue took the Torah from the ark, wrapped it up securely, and buried it somewhere in the town. Some years after the Holocaust the survivors dug that Torah up and it's now being used in a synagogue somewhere.

      --

      make world, not war

    17. Re:However by kfg · · Score: 1

      More attention should be focused on solving the problem itself than making it easier to apprehend the criminals.

      If I can pick it up, I can steal it. The only thing that keeps your TV safe from me while still being of any value to you is that I don't want to steal it.

      How do you propose to make money that theives don't want to steal, without making it valuless?

      The government of the Netherlands once offered a prize to anyone who could invent a bicycle that couldn't be stolen. No one ever claimed the prize, because the only way you can make it merely difficult to steal is to make it not a bicycle.

      Because I can pick it up.

      KFG

    18. Re:However by thegameiam · · Score: 4, Informative
      " Every so often, they find a letter that's chipped off a bit (the ink is the worst culprit), and it has to be taken and repaired.

      Can you enlighten me as to the type of ink this is that chips? Does it act more like a paint than a dye? What kind of material can a Torah be made of?


      I can't tell you the composition of the ink ('cause I don't know it, it's not a secret or anything), but it does act more like a paint.

      The scolls themselves are made of sections of parchament, i.e skin from a kosher animal (cow, sheep, etc) which has been specially treated and scraped on one side. The Sofer (Scribe) has to draw lines to serve as letter guides, and then fill in the letters, in order, in a particular font called Ashirit (lit. "Assyrian," although the history of how that Hebrew font came to be called that is long and complicated).

      -David Barak
      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    19. Re:However by Hungus · · Score: 1

      Be very careful how you phrase things, as theology can vary widely just on nuances. The goyim were grafted into the tree of Messiah the "church" did not replace the remant of believing Jews. As ofr an explicit eschatological reference for ethnic Israel I think you would be hard pressed to find one. I spent 25 pages this last semester arguing that very pount.

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    20. Re:However by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      No jews don't believe in hell, sorry. They speak of death in idioms but there are other places in the old testament that make clear they know people are dead in the scientific sense. It is not compatable with purgatory unless you think being unconscious and utterly destroyed means something else.

      "Let the wicked...be silent in the grave" (sheol [Ps. 31:17]) - (i.e. they will not be screaming in agony).

      Jeremiah 51:39 (New International Version)

      But while they are aroused,
      I will set out a feast for them
      and make them drunk,
      so that they shout with laughter--
      then sleep forever and not awake,"
      declares the LORD.

      (speaking of the destruction)

      The bible makes clear that the jews know the dead are dead/unconscious/non-existent.

    21. Re:However by kfg · · Score: 1

      You are saying that this system was invented to aid theives in marketing their stolen goods and that Rabbis are cooperating in the plot?

      Dude, the theives don't have the "password". The only one who can provide authentication to the prospective buyer is the Rabbi. The system is for the Rabbi to prove that a "random" scroll is his property.

      Look. Here's how it works. I have a 100 year old violin. It has scratches and other unique markings on it. I take a close up picture of those scratches. Now if my violin is stolen and the police call me up to say they've recovered a violin and ask me to ID it I have documents that can show incontrovertably that it is mine.

      How does this aid the thief in selling my violin?

      How would a prospective buyer know that the violin isn't a repro and the photo ID that the seller shows him of the violin to "authenticate" it aren't simply photos the thief himself took of the repro?

      I'm damn sure not going to go along with the thief to tell the prospective buyer, "Yup. That violin's authentic and hot alrighty. I'd pay top dollar if I were you."

      KFG

    22. Re:However by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Chrisitanity and Judaism don't have much to do with each other, except for their common history and father figures. Their philosophy and belief set is as different as Buddhists are from Christians.


      I don't know about all that. Christianity and Judaism are quite similar in a larger sense. They both have a singular, vengefull god. They both have a concept of sin. They both have a god that's all powerfull. Both have an afterlife. The similiarity between them is far greater than between any other two major world religions. Buddhism doesn't even have a god, has no concept of evil, and really has a completely different concept of the world.

      --
      AccountKiller
    23. Re:However by MostlyHarmless · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To muddy things up, though: Judaism is not very big on literal readings of the Bible: partly because there really isn't such a thing, and partly because of a strong oral tradition (i.e. the Talmud) that interprets things, sets out laws, etc. So it is true that certain bible verses discount the possibility of an afterlife; however, one probably could find verses suggesting the opposite if one wanted to. And all that doesn't have very much to do with what Judaism itself thinks about it.

      In regards to *that* -- commentaries speak all the time about "this world" and "the world to come", but there isn't a single, universally-accepted theology about what that's supposed to mean. The grandparent was essentially correct in that there is a traditional Jewish view of a sort of purgatory; however, there are a half-dozen other ideas as well. Compared to Christianity, Judaism simply doesn't focus on the afterlife as much.

      --
      Friends don't let friends misuse the subjunctive.
    24. Re:However by babble123 · · Score: 1

      No jews don't believe in hell, sorry. They speak of death in idioms but there are other places in the old testament that make clear they know people are dead in the scientific sense.

      Uhh... except when, say, your spirit is called up from the grave by a medium .

    25. Re:However by trb · · Score: 1

      Torah parchment (klaf) is made from the skin of kosher animals. The ink (dyo) is made from a mixture of ground nuts, gum, and salts, mixed with water.

    26. Re:However by weighn · · Score: 1

      so what you're saying is that its about controlling supply and limiting who can profit? Sounds like the "war on drugs".

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    27. Re:However by ThePlissken · · Score: 1

      You are so wrong it's not even funny. It saddens me that people have so little understanding of the other religions we share this world with.

    28. Re:However by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Personally, my favorite is that everyone gets the same afterlife: listening to Moses teach the law. For good people, it's heaven, and for bad people, it's hell. ;)

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    29. Re:However by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Ouch! Didn't your shul have a second Sefer Torah? If it's blurred, how could it be kosher for you to read from?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    30. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Current inks used for the writing of Torah scrolls (as well as mezuzas and tefillin pachments) are made from a blend of ferrous sulfate and tannic acid, which react chemically to produce a black color, and a bonding agent (gum arabic). This type of chemical ink will eventually turn a reddish-brown or rusty color, which eventually invalidates the item for ritual use; this tends to occur after 100 years or more, depending on use and environmental conditions. Prior to the invention is chemical inks, sofrim (ritual scribes) used inks in which the black color was the product of carbon, blended with a bonding agent. Since carbon based inks are chemically stable, they do not suffer from discoloration; the very old Torahs (500+ years) which still exist are written in these inks. As chemicals inks are easier/cheaper to make and superior to write with, sofrim switched to them several hundred years ago (well after they had become the most popular inks for general use, probably around the 5th century).

    31. Re:However by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      What you stated doesn't mean anything, witness the fact that they knew about death, there is plenty more evidence then the following...

      "For the living [b]know that they shall die: but the dead know not anything, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. As well their love, as their hatred and their envy, is perished long ago; neither have they any more a portion for ever in anything that is done under the sun" Eccl. (9:5-6).[/b]

      If the dead can't know anything, they can't be in purgatory or talking to other people now can they? It's that simple.

    32. Re:However by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      I believe he meant the following: prospective seller has a scroll and a potential buyer wants to check if it's authentic. The buyer scans (more likely pays the authorizing company to do it) the scroll, gets the pattern and checks the database. If it's been stolen the he'd see so right away.

    33. Re:However by droopus · · Score: 1

      Now that isn't to say God doesn't have a purpose for the Jewish RACE ...

      Oh great, white power assholes on /. now. Free clue: Judaism is a religion, not a race. Only lunatics on alt.revisionism and Holocaust deniers ever call Jews (like me) members of a different "race." Judaism is no more a race than Jainism, Shinto or Christianity. I'm as white as George Bush, but according to Leuchter-lovers, I'm as nonwhite as Jesse Jackson.

      My paternal grandparents were murdered in the Shoah. We who are alive, sane, and above the age of, say, eighteen, have no doubt whatsoever that a horrible crime called the Shoah took place in Europe during WWII. There are still people alive, albeit quite old, who experienced and survived it firsthand. But to listen to these psychotic deniers, they are merely liars, addled or "members of the Zog conspiracy." We laugh at them, of course.

      But the deniers have the advantage...all they have to do is wait. Wait till all the witnesses are dead. Wait till all of us are too old and feeble to be taken seriously. By the time my five year old son is an adult, I suspect that a much larger percentage of the population will be unwilling to believe that a crime of such horrific magnitude could ever have taken place (even though it is the most documented single event in history) and people like the AC above will have a much larger pool of people willing to believe their lies and crap science.

      Think of it...do we really know much about the slaughter of the Crusades, the Hundred Years War, the early-longbow feudal era when battles such as Potiers left the battlefields knee deep in knights' blood? Nah, too long ago for us to care.

      That's what people will eventually say of the Shoah. And sheep like the AC above, who thinks Jews are a "race" are the kernel of such thinking. How the hell did he get modded Informative?

      "Ignorant" would be more like it.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    34. Re:However by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      has no concept of evil

      Depends which school you're talking about, Buddhism has about as many internal differences as those between Christianity and Judaism. I'm going to butcher terms right now because I'm too lazy to look up the proper spellings for the correct ones. There is Traditional Buddhism (mostly what the Buddha preached, granted the modern version seems far removed) and Mahayana Buddhism (stresses compassion, helping other and has major philosophical differences). The later divides into Tantric Buddhism (in Tibet, allows the breaking of rules and taboos under certain conditions), Zen Buddhism and Mahayana itself.

      In terms of practiced Buddhism there is a strong view that gaining "merit" (ie: karma) is a good thing, and there are actions which provide merit and those which take it away (and some rules as to what one should do). And much of Buddhism has gods, many of them in fact, as well as a concept of hell (and again, there are numerous texts describing exactly what actions will lead to what hell). In the Mahayana pure lands school there is even the concept of "heaven" besides that of nirvana. In some areas Buddhism has evolved into basically a psuedo-Christianity including "churches", "priests" and "sermons."

      It's important to note that Buddhism as a whole has no concrete text and over the centuries as it spread more and more works were added (both as commentary and as claimed "canon").

    35. Re:However by kfg · · Score: 1

      If you bring my stolen violin to a dealer qualified to authenticate it (and they will all know about the theft within hours of my being aware of it myself. It's an Internet thing) you will not get it back, and stand a chance of being arrested for possesion of stolen property.

      Conventional channels of authentification are not open to prospective buyers of unique stolen items, particularly if there is only one source of authentification, and they know that.

      "Is this scroll stolen?"

      "Why yes, yes it is. Thank you very much for returning it."

      See? You only check the database if you don't want to buy a hot item, not if you specifically do. The database is part of the law enforcement system.

      You only intentionally purchase stolen unique items if you, or your private expert, has the qualifications to perform the authentification "in house."

      KFG

    36. Re:However by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      I really have no idea what your point is anymore. The original poster, at least from my point of view, was saying this was a method to PREVENT the sale of stolen goods, as buyers could verify a given objects validity and NOT buy it if it was stolen. You analogy seems to perfectly justify that point, the scrolls can now be checked by a dealer to see if they are authentic just like your violin. This seems to have been a problem before due to the lack of any real "marks" to distinguish scrolls easily.

    37. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> It doesn't solve the problem of theft.

      Right. What we really need is a powerful deterrent, like say, taking the thieves and cutting off the end of their schlong. Noe that would make an impression.

    38. Re:However by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 0

      how is the christian bible the most widely shoplifted book? im pretty sure counting the ones people take from motels and hotels placed by the gideons everywhere dont count as shoplifting LOL.... as a more serious aside, the Torah (i wasn't aware there was another kind lol) is NOT the first 5 parts of the bible... its the other way around, judaism by far predates christianity. The Christian Bible shares the "5 books of Moses", and labels them as the Old Testament. This is something many people seem to forget. To me the interesting part of this is how "the church" chooses to pick and choose which things it "likes" from the old testament and observes.

      Example? Notice how bible belters will shout to death about genesis being to exactly how it is, to the T, and refuse to acknowledge evolution.. well if you follow it so precisely then how come i have never heard of a christian: keeping kosher, or the sabbath no power thing come to mind, but just about any jewish custom taken from the torah would do

      --
      "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
      EdelFactor
    39. Re:However by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well most synagoges store them in some form of safe and probably have some sort of security system, though that has to be turned off before shabbat or a holiday.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    40. Re:However by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      Hey shit for brains... I happen to be Catholic and I can tell you: in every church I've been to the rituals aren't "hollow" as you say. We gather to hear one reading from old testament, one from the new testament, one from the Gospel, then the priest tries to tie the three together w/ common daily experiences, then we retell the story of the last supper and break bread and drink wine together. It is VERY uplifting and not "hollow" at all thank you very much.

    41. Re:However by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Where does the belief in the transmigration of souls and a general ressurection in the time of the messiah come from then?

      The first, I can see perhaps seeping in from surrounding cultures. But the second?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    42. Re:However by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I tell ya - as a Christian the bible-belters give us a bad name. I know not a single person that doesn't believe in evolution. Taking a thrice translated text thousands of years old's English approximation as 100% infallible seems just steeped in insanity to me. The gist is fairly clear: "don't be evil" seems to be the crux of it. I try not to get it too twisted beyond that... I have been getting interested in Judaism the more I jam to Matisyahu - the hasaidic reggae genius. Damn that guy rocks my socks off!

    43. Re:However by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Can you cite a source that Judiasm believes in more than one ressurection or rebirth?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    44. Re:However by Jafar00 · · Score: 1

      Well said. These days there seems to be too much focus on aprehension and prosecution than prevention of the causes.
      For example, Patriot Act, "War" on Terror etc..

      --
      RebateFX.com - Spread rebates for Forex traders
    45. Re:However by dfn_deux · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I would generally tend to disagree with the premise of your argument based on a few simple reasons...

      1. "Race" is not any sort of scientifically recognized term for subdividing within a species. So arguing that one thing is a "race" and another is not is ultimately a fruitless endevour...

      That's because most human variation falls within, not between populations. About 85% of all genetic variation can, on average, be found within any local population, be they Swedes, Kikuyu, or Hmong. About 94% can be found within any continental population, consistent with what the Rosenberg Science study found. In fact, there are no characteristics, no traits, not even one gene that turns up in all members of one so-called race yet is absent from others.
      2. Nearly all of my Jewish acquaintences draw a distinction between those people who are "ethnic jews" and "religious jews". Which seems to account for a strong self identification as being a distinct "ethnic group" not necessarily defined by a religous dogma or other codified belief structure...

      By slightly over 3 to 1, Israeli Jews choose the ethnic Jew (43%) over the religious practitioner (13%). However, another 32% of Israeli Jews find both equally Jewish. Therefore, even in Israel, a country with strict adherence to Jewish law, nearly half of Israeli Jews would consider someone without a Jewish mother as Jewish. The question of "who is a Jew" has been the center of debate recently, with the Orthodox establishment only recognizing someone as Jewish who was born to a Jewish mother (or converted by a Orthodox Rabbi)


      Normally I wouldn't even stick my foot in the door at commenting on a thread such as this which is guranteed to draw more flames than most, but I'd be hard pressed to believe that anyone can really come up with any evidence contrary to either of those two points. I mean heck, even the Israeli "right of return" is based largely on blood lines (Jewish mothers have Jewish children, regardless of their religion...) and not faith...
      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    46. Re:However by ars · · Score: 1

      What that section means is that the dead don't care about the doings of the living. Also all the things that they did while alive don't have the same (emotional) meaning as they once did.

      But they do exist in a spiritual way, they just have other things on their mind.

      --
      -Ariel
    47. Re:However by ars · · Score: 1

      Not really, Chrisitanity has the devil for example, Judasim doesn't belive he exits. After all how is it possible for there to be an evil force that is independent of God? Nothing can be independant of God.

      Of course this whole consept caused major arguments inside Christianity who could not understand how a 'Good' God can create evil.

      And your other arguments are weak: singular God? What about the trinity? Just about every religion has a concept of Sin (even if it's as weak as "it's better not to do this"), so it's hardly a comparision.

      Afterlife? Again almost all religions have some concept of a soul, or some part of the spirit that lasts after death.

      You have not mentioned anything that is similar between Judasim and Christianity that is not also found in most (or at least some) other religions.

      --
      -Ariel
    48. Re:However by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "What that section means is that the dead don't care about the doings of the living. Also all the things that they did while alive don't have the same (emotional) meaning as they once did.

      But they do exist in a spiritual way, they just have other things on their mind."

      No it means what it says, in all translations it says the dead are INCAPABLE of knowing, you can't have consciously aware spirits with thoughts if they are INCAPABLE of knowing now can you? It goes onto say that their very memories and knowledge perish, in all bible translations they come out saying the same thing: The dead are gone, this is why Jeremiah 51:39 describes the destruction of a people as "sleeping the sleep of forever, or sleeping perpetually to never awake". It's perfectly understandable that such prose refers to non-existence.

    49. Re:However by ars · · Score: 1

      It's like a paint (is a paint, it's written with a quill) - it must have a raised letter feel to it, and it must be black, but other then that there is no specific rule on what you make it from.

      Just some traditions on what's been done so far.

      Obviously it needs to be able to write clear sharp letters with no holes, or jagged edges.

      Also it's important that it can be removed (by scraping with a razor usually) in case of an error.

      --
      -Ariel
    50. Re:However by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know it happened.My grandfather served in germany in WW2 and i looked in his face as he told me about freeing those in the camps.How the men had to be careful not to give them but a little of their rations because the living skeletons were so starved that rich food could cause them to go into shock.Their bodies had gone so long without that the rich G.I food could overload their systems.They had to slowly nurse them back to health starting with light broth and slowly working up. My grandfather was a truly honorable man.If you would have seen his eyes when he talked about what he saw--Then You'd know it happened too.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    51. Re:However by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      or the sabbath no power thing come to mind

      I agree with most of your post but I've always thought that the 'no power thing' was an odd interpretation of the law.

      You're not supposed to work on the Sabbath. What do Jews define as work? Anything that was involved in building the temple, which includes lighting fires.

      The 'no power' thing is an attempt to update the old tradition. But is flipping a light switch really 'work' in the same way that starting a fire is?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    52. Re:However by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Buddhism doesn't even have a god

      One of the fundamental teachings of The Buddha was that we are all God. That the differences that we see between each other are all just part of the delusional mind. But nobody goes to Hell. They just get born into a lower life the next time around, which makes it much harder to become Buddha.

      At least if my understanding is correct anyway.

    53. Re:However by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Aren't you overreacting? I'm in no way a Holocaust denier (how could I be, I live a few km away from what used to be the Warsaw Ghetto), but I think the notion of the Jew as an ethnic group, not a religious one, is not absurd. There certainly was a distinct Jewish ethnic group in Poland before the war, with its own language, culture, clothing, sometimes separated sharply from other groups -- isn't that enough for you? I think the name "race" is not really appropriate, because it implies some genetic difference. While there well may be (I heard one group of the Jews -- sephardic or ashkenasi -- has increased propensity to get Creutzfeld-Jacobs disease, for example), they are, I think -- I'm not a professional in this area -- too small to call Jews a "race". Hitler did it, but for totally different reasons. Maybe that's why you react so strongly to this term. But calling Jews a "race" in no way embraces the denial of Holocaust by itself.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    54. Re:However by kfg · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. I can see that is what he very likely meant. Perhaps I've been up too late and sniffing too much varnish (it's methanol based) and was unduly influenced by another post claiming that the ability to prove the authenticity of a scroll would be a boon to the potential buyer in his being able to know he was getting the genuine article.

      Ok, here's the thing, in any handmade and/or natural material item there are always marks to distinguish them easily. In the case of a Torah it's simply that nobody has bothered to make note of those marks before.

      If you bring me two violins, machine made, "identical" in every respect, I will, at a later date, be able to tell them apart with absolute certainty, so long as that's what I knew was needed before you originally showed them to me. They have "fingerprints," it's simply a matter of bothering to take them.

      Not that anybody would bother with violins like that, not even the owner in all likelyhood. They aren't worth it. If it gets stolen go to the store and pop another hundred bucks on a new one "just like" it.

      Two handmade violins are even more discernable. And cost more than a hundred bucks.

      Violins are quite commonly stolen as a matter of opprotunity. A Strad cello was stolen from a front porch (I bet the owner doesn't leave it there again) and recovered in a dumpster. The thief stole it because it was there and because he could. When he realized what it was he ditched it because he couldn't sell it without getting arrested. He was hoping to get a few hundred from a pawn shop, not 20 years for stealing millions of unnegotiable dollars.

      But the pros don't work like that. They have the buyer, who knows he is getting stolen goods, lined up ahead of time. It isn't a business done "on spec." It's to order.

      And such is the case with most Torah thefts.

      Now if a guy comes to me with what he claims is an old violin I can authenticate that by simple physical inspection. The same, as the article notes, is true of Torahs. The question is which violin/Torah. Provenence. It isn't a question of whether the violin/Torah is legit, it is whether the seller is legit.

      But the two are tied. I already know who owns every known Strad, and multihundred year old Torahs aren't just lying around in attics by the millions like factory violins either. Some random guy comes to me with an authentic Strad and I know almost for certain that it's stolen (although in the case of a Strad I likely know from whom just by looking at it).

      But if someone is willing to buy while looking the other way about the issue of provenence (and exactly where is a Torah likely to come from?) there's very little that can be done about it. The buyer is the issue if the buyer has no inclination to check it for being stolen in the first place.

      KFG

    55. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Torah (i wasn't aware there was another kind lol) is NOT the first 5 parts of the bible... its the other way around,

      Er, technically, "A is B" means the same thing as "B is A".

    56. Re:However by Fizzl · · Score: 1
      Er, technically, "A is B" means the same thing as "B is A".
      ...and A is A...

      Hi, Ayn Rand! :)
    57. Re:However by pla · · Score: 1

      I'm a little suprised that no Slashdotter has commented on the irony of widespread theft of the book that's the original source for the "Thou Shalt Not Steal".

      I think most Slashdotters still haven't gotten over the idea that someone would waste a year, writing in a non-permanant ink, on dried animal parts, just to have a copy of a book they could pick up for a few bucks at any Borders.

      Let's see... That comes out to a write speed of 7*10^-9. Even IP-over-Pigeon could saturate a medium that slow...


      And, unlike a lot of "hand made" things that people will pay an obscene amount for lower quality work, you can't even call it "art", since the goal consists of producing an exact copy of the mythical original...

    58. Re:However by znu · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's more fun for the bad people, because they don't feel guilty about whispering and passing notes.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    59. Re:However by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Not really, Chrisitanity has the devil for example, Judasim doesn't belive he exits.

      That doesn't mean Judaism doesn't have a concept of evil.

      And your other arguments are weak: singular God? What about the trinity?

      The trinity is only different aspects/parts/whatever of the same god. Christians still believe in only one god.

      Just about every religion has a concept of Sin (even if it's as weak as "it's better not to do this"), so it's hardly a comparision.

      "it's better not to do this" isn't the same thing as sin. If you water any two things down enough they start looking the same. Take it down to the level of "it's better not to do this" and that's exactly what you've done. The concept of sin between christianity and judaism is largely the same. That's just not plain true between other religions.

      Afterlife? Again almost all religions have some concept of a soul, or some part of the spirit that lasts after death.

      Again, water the comparisons down enough, and everything is similar.

      You have not mentioned anything that is similar between Judasim and Christianity that is not also found in most (or at least some) other religions.

      The Genesis creation story is the same. I'd say that's one that's not in all other religions. They share many of the same literature. It's funny how Christianity shares no books with Buddhism. To say Christianity is as different from Judaism as it is from Buddhism is just preposterous. Obviously you're going to get much of the same structure if one religion evolved from another.

      --
      AccountKiller
    60. Re:However by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you mean by god. If you mean guy who creates the physical world, is all knowing, all seeing, etc, etc.. then no. I think that's what most people mean when they say the word god.

      If you mean control of yourself, then maybe yes. I don't think that's a very common definition of the word god though. I find the whole "we're all gods" buddhism definition to be misleading. I only seem to hear that definition from Christians who want to dismiss buddhism as wrong, invalid, etc.

      They just get born into a lower life the next time around, which makes it much harder to become Buddha.

      Buddhism is extremely varied. Probbably more so than all the sects of Christianity. Christians at least all believe in one god, in Jesus, ten commandments, etc. Christianity relies on texts, and that tends to limit belief creep. Of course that didn't stop the Mormons from getting some new texts, but then again a lot of Christians don't think Mormons are Christians.

      --
      AccountKiller
    61. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was also raised as an Irish Catholic and let me tell you the church practises are hollow, especially while hungover.
      Most youth only attend mass at special occasions like Easter and Christmas, and then usually to keep some older church-going relative happy.

    62. Re:However by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I find the whole "we're all gods" buddhism definition to be misleading.

      Not Gods. God. The idea is we are a manifestation of the same, not individual gods.

      Christians at least all believe in one god, in Jesus, ten commandments, etc. Christianity relies on texts, and that tends to limit belief creep.

      That view doesn't conflict with Buddhism though. From the perspective of Buddhism, its very likely that Jesus was the Buddha known as Siddhartha Gautama. Buddhists believe that the teachings of the Buddha are self evident, and you don't need any text because you already know the answers.

    63. Re:However by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Ah, good, and I suppose only you know which is the right religion and are of course qualified to tell other people that theirs is "nothing but hollow rituals". Did you speak personally with God and got told personally which religion He considers true and which isn't? No, really. Or is it the usual "my religion is right because it's mine, but yours is damend to hell for "? (Basically "mine is right and yours is wrong, because we're already established that mine is right and it says yours is wrong.")

      Well, _my_ religion is that it's all a MMO game, and God is a game designer. Probably started it all as a college assignment, since, hey, noone but a student gets everything done in the last 7 days.

      Had two players and one map (Eden) in the beginning, and even those two abused bugs to get an unfair advantage. Players, huh? You tell them "leave that tree alone, 'cause it does funny things to your stats", and what do they do? Right. Any MUD or MMO admin could have told you what they'll do. Should have just banned their sorry ass, if you ask me.

      Skip forward, past some player-wipe (the flood), Jesus aggroing two groups (the Jews _and_ the Romans) and getting nailed for it (noob;), and such, getting a big expansion pack (America), and here we are.

      So of course, since it's my religion it's right, and yours is of course wrong because mine says so. You've twisted and perverted the words of the Game Designer, and made hollow rituals out of it. You won't be saved (to tape, weekly.)

      See how stupid the whole "my religion is right and yours is hollow rituals" pissing contest is yet?

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    64. Re:However by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I agree, the most vibrant part of the Church I used to attend was the bar & social club ( you had far more chance of meeting any of the priests in there ), although myself and a lot of my class at school used to, have to, attend Church on Sunday it was for us all an entirely pointless exercise.

    65. Re:However by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      Firstly, it would help if you used the more common term "The Holocaust" (capitalized to distinguish it from normal everyday holocausts such as those that you might pass on the way to the grocer's), rather than the more obscure term "Shoah", which sounds like a redneck response to the question "Hey! Want to go out and get drunk?".

      Secondly, please remember that ten million people died in the Nazi concentration camps, not six million.
      It wasn't just Jews, but Gypsies, various Christian sects, the "mentally challenged", Slavs, etc., who were marked for death.
      So while the world should "never forget" about the six million Jews who died in the concentration camps, it also should not forget about the four million non-Jews who died there.
      "Genocide" (put in quotes because, as you wrote, Judism is not a race, but a religion, contrary to Nazi (and other) propoganda) was being practiced against more than one group.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    66. Re:However by mforbes · · Score: 1

      Where does the belief in the transmigration of souls and a general ressurection in the time of the messiah come from then?

      From other mythos that were popular in the last two thousand years. The Hebrew Bible is far from being the only source of Christian ideas. Look at Zoroastrianism, for example. (I'd provide a Wiki link, but Wikipedia seems to be down atm)

      --

      Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
      Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

    67. Re:However by Kyojin · · Score: 1

      Of course that didn't stop the Mormons from getting some new texts, but then again a lot of Christians don't think Mormons are Christians.

      True. Mormons, although they believe in Jesus, believe they can become Gods. This is completely against Christianity and Judaism, as it is in fact the original sin. The original sin was man going against God thinking, somewhat foolishly, that his own way was better than anything the Creator could do. Believing that one could become a god is one way of saying to God "I want to do things my own way".

      Probbably more so than all the sects of Christianity.

      Many Protestants would claim that Catholicism is not Christianity, for many reasons. One of these reasons is the worship of Mary, who was only a human and not God. Another is their belief in purgatory, which is not mentioned in the Bible, and takes away from the significance of Christ's redeeming sacrifice. Purgatory would suggest that the death of Christ our God was not sufficient to pay for our sins, which is completely false. This is central to the Christian belief.

      Many "sects of Christianity" are close to Christianity, but fall short on one or more very important beliefs, and cannot be called Christianity.

    68. Re:However by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. So is Judaism really Christianity 3.1, or is Christianity Judaism XP?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    69. Re:However by ArieKremen · · Score: 1

      The english site of Ha'aretz http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/583841.html has a piece describing a visit a rabbi and a reporter pay to the Dalai Lama. It starts of with finding similarities between judaism and buddism, and in the end list a few, obivous differences.

      --
      -- Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
    70. Re:However by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      though that has to be turned off before shabbat or a holiday.
      Reminds me of the Asterix story where the Romans defeat the Britons by starting the battles just before tea-break time, or on weekends.

      Maybe someone needs to realise that the concept of what constitutes 'work' may have changed somewhat between the subsistence stage and the leisure age, and needs some revising?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    71. Re:However by slackerboy · · Score: 1

      Example? Notice how bible belters will shout to death about genesis being to exactly how it is, to the T, and refuse to acknowledge evolution.. well if you follow it so precisely then how come i have never heard of a christian: keeping kosher, or the sabbath no power thing come to mind, but just about any jewish custom taken from the torah would do

      It's called The New Testament, and it's what differentiates Christianity from Judaism. You see, this crazy Jesus guy came along and said "this is my blood of the new covenant" (Mathew 26:28). This was in contrast to the old covenant of Moses and all of the kosher rules, etc. Christians are not bound by the Jewish law. (Although much of the Ten Commandments follow from Jesus's first and second commandments (Mark 12:29-31)).

      Now, the people that believe the letter of the bible over the message of the bible...Well, they just don't get it.

      That's enough theology for me for one day.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    72. Re:However by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I went to a Catholic school for 12 years and whenever we talked about major world religions we always grouped them into Abrahamic, and eastern religions. (yes I know African, Native American, and various aboriginal religons don't fit either, but they're generally not considered major world religios)

      The point is that there are many similarities between Judiasm, Christianity, and Islam whether we want to admit it or not. Some major similarities are they are fiercly monotheistic, believe in a moral authority, and personal and intervenint God, have a holy book (Bible, Koran, torah,) tied to historical figures, and value the community.

      Most eastern religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Shinto, Taoism, etc.) tend to be more mystical, tend to either be polythiestic, ornature worshiping, concerned with this world (as opposed to an afterlife,) and tend to be more strongly rooted in oral traditions and either mythical figures (Lao Tse) or so old that the origins are sketchy at best (hinduism). They also tend to not venerate personages.

      Now clearly these are sweeping generalizations, and exceptions will abound. However the western religions are much more similar to each other than the eastern religions, and vice versa.

    73. Re:However by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      But both these ideas were Jewish (or shared by the Hebrew peoples) before they were Christian. I realize a lot of Messianic ideals came into Judiasm during the time of Cyrus the Great at the end of the Babylonian captivity (book of Daniel?) The Magi (Zoroastrians) were formed Cyrus's preistly caste. But I'm not sure where the textual support for these ideas comes from in Judiasm. I do believe they have texual support in the Jewish law texts, though. But I'm not sure where.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    74. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, and I'm sorry some people went a little overboard. I'm Jewish, and I don't consider Judaism to be exclusively a religion without any ethnic/racial components. It is certainly a religion, but that does not preclude that Jews share similar genetic traits. Saying that that distinguish Jews "racially" from other Europeans should not deem one "racist" (in the sense of "bigoted against certain races").

    75. Re:However by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1
      Not really, Chrisitanity has the devil for example, Judasim doesn't belive he exits.

      Satan is described in the Hebrew sciptures. In Genesis - he's a serpent who plays a role in the fall of man. In Job - he goes before God to accuse Job. In Ezekiel 28 - he is described as a fallen angel. in Zechariah 3 - he is described as an accuser.

    76. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't belittle my people, you fat Fu*k!

    77. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I have to ask. Who the hell is buying stolen Torah's? I doubt these are being purchased by Rabbis, and wouldn't a devout Jew face some kind of Old Testament retribution from God, or something?

      I would guess that if a strip of bacon gets you on the express elevator to hell, buying a stolen Holy book would have to fast track you to hell.

      I just don't see where these would go. Most are not ancient, so collectors of ancient works wouldn't be interested. To a christian, its just a roll of jibberish. To a muslim, it's toilet paper. So who buys them?

      I am not trying to spark a flame war, I really just wonder who buys these things?

    78. Re:However by msdschris · · Score: 1

      Having seen one repaired (very minor correction) I was supprised to find that the rabbi who repaired the sefer was using an ink pen (not sure what type).

    79. Re:However by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
      There certainly was a distinct Jewish ethnic group in Poland before the war, with its own language, culture, clothing, sometimes separated sharply from other groups -- isn't that enough for you?

      By that definition the Amish of Pennsylvania and Ohio are a distinct ethnic group. They have their own language, culture, most certainly clothing and are sharply separated from other groups.

      However, I defy you to find anyone who classify the Amish as a distinct ethnic group.

      Besides, it is has been shown that jews are genetically similar to palestinians and other groups of the region. Which of course makes sense since if one uses the biblical story of the egyptians using jews, and others, as slaves, it would logically follow that the jews were people already living in the region and thus would be genetically related to the overall arabic population (I'm using arabic in the widest possible term even though the Iranians would, given the chance, slit my throat for calling them arabs when Persian is the more correct term).

      The only reason jews are jews is not because of genetics but of religion. Or maybe you would like to think that the jews were spontaneously created rather than adopting their ways for religious purposes?

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    80. Re:However by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      -Uhh, torah inspector.

      -Okay. Here you go. I believe that's all in order.
      [everyone hands in their torahs]

      -Oh, I can't believe that worked!
      [runs away]

      -Wait a minute. That's not the torah inspector...

    81. Re:However by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
      Authentication is hard, given that many old torahs were hidden in Russia and eastern europe.

      I have a friend who visited the village in Russia where his grandfather is from. After speaking with him for a while, they took him out and showed them a woodshed where they had hidden a Torah scroll, which they brought out once a year.

      The family moved to Israel and my friend eventually bought the scroll, which needed extensive repairs, and it's used in our synagogue today.

      It's not clear how you would authenticate the ownership of this scroll. There was no record of ownership and it was hidden for decades in a woodshed in the Russian countryside.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    82. Re:However by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

      Well, there is "Ha-Satan" in the book of Job... but other than that small mention, there is no personification of evil in the christian sense. Of course, there is the inclination to evil...

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    83. Re:However by MidnighToker · · Score: 1

      if you remember the story of Jacob and Esav then when Esav tricks his father into giving him his brothers blessing, it says that Issak (his father) saw chinum (hell) opening up before him. Jews also sit 'Shiva' for the dead. 7 days of prayers to help the spirit leave hell and arrise to heaven/to be born again.

      --
      Spelling, punctuation and grammar just get in the way of an incoherent rant.
    84. Re:However by cshark · · Score: 1

      Actually CPT, Jews don't believe in hell.

      There's one line with one alegorical reference to it in one of our books. You guys built a whole religion on it.

      Moses never even mentioned hell.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    85. Re:However by MidnighToker · · Score: 1

      a single source? urm... no. But i went through a Lubavitch (the really orthodox jews that wear all the black) primary school, and this was a point that was brought up on a couple of occasions. [quote] There are some mystical schools of thought that believe resurrection is not a one-time event, but is an ongoing process. The souls of the righteous are reborn in to continue the ongoing process of tikkun olam, mending of the world. Some sources indicate that reincarnation is a routine process, while others indicate that it only occurs in unusual circumstances, where the soul left unfinished business behind. Belief in reincarnation is also one way to explain the traditional Jewish belief that every Jewish soul in history was present at Sinai and agreed to the covenant with G-d. (Another explanation: that the soul exists before the body, and these unborn souls were present in some form at Sinai). Belief in reincarnation is commonly held by many Chasidic sects, as well as some other mystically-inclined Jews. See, for example Reincarnation Stories from Chasidic Tradition. [/quote] -found the bit above by typing in "judaism resurrection" into google and clicking the first link.

      --
      Spelling, punctuation and grammar just get in the way of an incoherent rant.
    86. Re:However by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      Quoting parts of the bible proves nothing. It is a collection of separate works artificially assembled into a larger whole with only perfunctory attention to synchronization among the parts. In short, you can find support for virtually anything if you look hard enough. This is why "fundamentalists" are so pathetic.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    87. Re:However by cshark · · Score: 1

      The market for a hot torah couldn't be all that big. The only people that are interested in having them in the first place are synagogues; which means that you're locked into a very finite number of clients who would be interested in it in the first place. Narrow that down to clients that are interested in something cheap, and would be willing to go through unconventional channels to get it, and that number drops again.

      Finger printing sounds good, but it's obviously a lot of work for a problem that cannot be wide spread by it's very definition.

      Safer Torahs are freaking heavy. Even if someone did steal one and get something for it online or elsewhere, shipping a hundred lbs of parchment isn't cheap, assuming the thieves are savvy enough, with enough inside knowledge of the Jewish community to know how and where to offload it in the first place.

      If you're going to steal something, why not go for something with a wider more goyish appeal. There's always jewelry, cd's, computers, money, identities, etc, something small, light, and voluble?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    88. Re:However by r_j_howell · · Score: 1
      True. Mormons, although they believe in Jesus, believe they can become Gods. This is completely against Christianity and Judaism, as it is in fact the original sin. The original sin was man going against God thinking, somewhat foolishly, that his own way was better than anything the Creator could do. Believing that one could become a god is one way of saying to God "I want to do things my own way".

      Not exactly, We (speaking as a Latter Day Saint) believe that we can become Gods by conforming so closely to God's will that we become indestingushable from him. Not that I want to argue with you about what "Christianity" is . You seem to have a much narower view than most. I tend to lump anyone who professes a belief in Jesus as Chritian, whether I agree with them in all theological particulars or not.

    89. Re:However by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      I think most Slashdotters still haven't gotten over the idea that someone would waste a year, writing in a non-permanant ink, on dried animal parts, just to have a copy of a book they could pick up for a few bucks at any Borders.

      i dunno, they quickly got over the idea of a 3 Mhz computer that took a year to build, when the owner could have bought a better one just as easily

    90. Re:However by cecille · · Score: 1

      Our synagogue now has a scroll that was at one point stolen from a synagogue during the holocaust. The synagogue it came from most likely isn't around anymore (we don't know exactly where it is from). It's no longer kosher anyway, so it's not useable, just on display, but no one really has any idea where it's come from. At any rate, yes, it is a stolen torah, but it's not like we were looking for cheap torah goods...it's a religious artifact. Although we'd love to determine where it came from...some way to track it would be great.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    91. Re:However by cecille · · Score: 1

      I think that probably the biggest market for stolen scrolls isn't where some guy is looking for hot torahs...it's probably where the buyer is being lied to. Getting or buying inherited or old scrolls isn't abnormal - I know our synagogue has an old one. It's kind of nice, actually - it hold its history not only because of its contents and traditional preparation, but also because it has a history of its own.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    92. Re:However by hawk · · Score: 1
      Stealing the Word of the Creator, however, would certainly seem to have some inherent punishment . . .

      :)

      hawk

    93. Re:However by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Actually IMHO he makes a much better point than you acknowledge. Its not just evolution, its the fact that many bible beaters pick and choose which parts of the OT to acknowledge.

      For example the OT is very clear on what it thinks of homosexuality, and what the consequences are. 700 club viewers love this and will spout off on it all the time. However, within 10 pages are dictates against eating pork, wearing 2 types of natural cloth (e.g. linen and cotton), eating meat and drinking milk, and many, many other rules that the same fundemenatlists feel free to ignore.

      Your new covenant argument has some merit, but what parts of the old law do we embrace, and which parts are over-ruled?

    94. Re:However by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      No it really doesn't. Just think 3000 years ago the Torah mandated that even slaves would get one day a week off of work. How many free folks work 7 day weeks today? Or spend their weekends running from here to there trying to catch up with lives that are too busy during the week. I want a day when I can turn the computers off and not pick up the phone. I can spend one day a week spending time with my kids or with my neighbors in a social setting.

      On shabbat I don't worry about the bills that I may not be able to pay on Sunday or work or much of anything else. Of course if we were to be attacked on Shabbat (as happend on Yom Kippor 1973) we would respond normally, in fact in that case it probably was a bit faster than normal as the roads in Israel were empty of trafic and they didn't have to spend anytime tracking down reservists.

      You should also realize that in this case "Work" is a translation of a technical term in Hebrew which is much more specific.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    95. Re:However by droopus · · Score: 1

      Firstly, it would help if you used the more common term "The Holocaust" (capitalized to distinguish it from normal everyday holocausts such as those that you might pass on the way to the grocer's), rather than the more obscure term "Shoah", which sounds like a redneck response to the question "Hey! Want to go out and get drunk?".

      Hehe, that's funny. I guess I use Shoah automatically, but you're absolutely right. Consider the audience. I'll do so in the future.

      Secondly, please remember that ten million people died in the Nazi concentration camps, not six million.
      It wasn't just Jews, but Gypsies, various Christian sects, the "mentally challenged", Slavs, etc., who were marked for death.
      So while the world should "never forget" about the six million Jews who died in the concentration camps, it also should not forget about the four million non-Jews who died there.
      "Genocide" (put in quotes because, as you wrote, Judism is not a race, but a religion, contrary to Nazi (and other) propoganda) was being practiced against more than one group.


      Oh absolutely, I agree completely. Indeed, it's almost a truism to think that only Jews, and only six million (or so) died in the camps. Actually many more people did, but my post was in response to an obvious Holocause denier-in-training, and those tend to be anti-semites, who sadly tend to be Christian Identity (who I don't consider Christians) or some other wacko sect. I was keeping in context with the tone of the article (Torah scroll thefts) and Judaism in general, but you are absolutely correct, many more were murdered in the camps than just Jews.

      In fact the country hit hardest by WWII was the then-USSR, who lost 20 million people (10 million of whom were military.) The losses in WWII were staggering, but I was only focusing on one group who were particularly hard-hit. Your post is spot on.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    96. Re:However by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      I'm a little suprised that no Slashdotter has commented on the irony of widespread theft of the book that's the original source for the "Thou Shalt Not Steal". Which would have allowed me to point out that the Christian Bible (of which the Jewish Torah is the first 5 parts) is the most widely shoplifted book!

      Isn't the Christian Bible also the all-time best seller?? If it's also the most widely shoplifted book, that kinda makes a mockery of anyone's "gotta protect our copyright" arguments...

    97. Re:However by hawk · · Score: 1
      It's more like Christianity is the X running on top of FreeBSD.

      :)

      hawk

    98. Re:However by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      pfft, many people don't even have an understanding of their own religion (Jesus=good / not_Jesus=Bad), why expect them to understand anything of anyone elses?

    99. Re:However by coopex · · Score: 1

      Can anyone who's read the Torah comment on whether these verses were accurately translated from Hebrew to Latin/Greek to English?

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    100. Re:However by coopex · · Score: 1

      Iran's President Mohammad Khatami issued a brief statement today saying, "I call upon all true Iranians to find smooth wombat and slit his throat. Also, I recommend http://www.falafel-bymail.com/ for all your falafel needs."

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    101. Re:However by hawk · · Score: 1

      >the book that's the original source for the "Thou Shalt Not Steal".

      Nah. That was taken from some stone slabs. And even then, it's reported that the guy who chiselled them plagiarized from Someone on the mountain who hadn't copyrighted it properly . .

      hawk

    102. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A stolen bible? Man, someone is going to Hell for that one.

      Probably not. Now someone sneezing in the same room as a Koran....that's grounds for an entire region to kill each other and burn down their own houses.

    103. Re:However by spun · · Score: 1

      LOL! I've just found a new faith ;-)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    104. Re:However by spun · · Score: 1

      I think your understanding is partly flawed. We're not all God in the sense that none of use are all knowing or all powerful, and we are all subject to the laws of cause and effect. We are all parts of an interconnected whole, but the 'I' that is commonly understood is not the whole. Sure, on one level you could say 'I' am the whole but this is still based on an artificial distinction between self and non-self.

      Reincarnation was only grafted on to Buddhism in order to get Hindus to accept it more readily, in more advanced texts it is understood that reincarnation is all about karmic moments, the formation of attachments from one moment to the next based on judgments made in this moment.

      There is no personal, individual soul to be reincarnated. No distinction between self and non self. No free will or lack of free will. Delusional mind is belief in the illusions of duality, this versus that, or equally it is withdrawing from discernment and a belief that differences are unimportant.

      Discerning is not judging. You can entertain thoughts without beliving them to be true in an absolute sense, and there ARE differences, denying the differences is just as foolish as placing too much importance on them. Thus is Buddhism known as the middle path.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    105. Re:However by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I think the copyright on the Bible has lapsed. Even the Bono act doesn't cover stuff that old!

    106. Re:However by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      And Christianity and Islam are more similar to each other than Christianity and Judaism.

      Most people don't want to acknowledge that Muslims belive in all of the "Christian" prophets. They just have more.

    107. Re:However by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > It is VERY uplifting and not "hollow" at all thank you very much.

      For you. Great. For a large number (I believe, but no one can prove, the majority), they are there because they were told to go there by their parents, so they just got into the habit. If Catholic mass was such an uplifting and wonderful experience, why are the numbers of priests and nuns declining so extremely rapidly?

    108. Re:However by MostlyHarmless · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Can you elaborate how his random snippet talking about communing with the dead means less than your random snippet talking about death being eternal? And explain why neither one is allegorical or poetic language?

      --
      Friends don't let friends misuse the subjunctive.
    109. Re:However by Curtman · · Score: 1

      We're not all God in the sense that none of use are all knowing or all powerful, and we are all subject to the laws of cause and effect.

      The left hand doesn't know what the right is doing, only the mind knows what they are both doing. Apples are not the tree, but they are as much part of the tree as the leaves, or the branches. Its in this way that we are all God I think.

      We are subject to the laws of cause and effect, but what those laws are isn't clear. If those laws are a construct of our own mind, then there exists the possibility that coming to believe you are capable of something makes it so.

      Reincarnation was only grafted on to Buddhism in order to get Hindus to accept it more readily

      That is your opinion. Reincarnation is one interpretation of what Samsara is. Many Buddhists believe in it, many don't. It doesn't really matter if it literally means reincarnation or not I don't think. I find it helpful to rationalize what we call "instinct", to believe that there is a soul of some kind of which some part persists between incarnations.

    110. Re:However by denttford · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      I really didn't want to get into this, but this thread has a fundamental flaw which is causing people to talk past each other.

      Scratch that, it has two.

      Historical, traditional, Rabbinic (pick one, each bears its own semantic weight) Judaism is orthoprax - i.e. centered around "right" action. The Orthodox in general are not orthodox; particularly in questions of "theology" - a word foreign to Judaism - which, incidentally is another word that did not have a proper analogue until a couple of hundred years ago in Hebrew. The point of all this, is that there is a fair amount of variety in beliefs (or even the degree of belief needed) amongst Jews that do not cause fundamental schisms. Weaken or strengthen religious requirements - well, then poof - you just created a new community.

      An example would be monotheism, an innovation that is strongly associated with Jews. Well, in practise, yes, everyone (everyone being defined as rabbis who produced written texts - because of the primacy of texts) has to concede to the Halachic (loosely defined as the bounds of the the praxis mentioned above) requirement of a "belief" in one God. Defining his nature is a task left to the interpreter - opinions defining God as a detached Aristotelian entity of some kind, or a undefinable infinity who yet has a means of directly interfacing with man, whether there are 7 elements in this interface/subordinate entities/vessels (pick one, choose one) or 10, whether this undefinable universal mass retracted a bit and thus allowed for the creation of this structure, and the world, which He (sorry, just a convention) nevertheless permeates in some fashion, or whether all of the above is bunk and you should just worry about the spaces of sand between heated plates of an oven which might allow for it to be immune from ritual impurity and the opinions thereupon are

      1. Often found on the same shelf
      2. Held by the same person at different points in their lives, and occaisionally in one day
      3. Utterly irrelevant if the person is tithing, not eating improperly slaughtered meat, not lighting or extinguishing candles on the Sabbath, or carrying past 2000 cubits of the city limits (and certainly not from private to public domain)


      Christianity - itself a dangerous term, referring to a vareity of religious traditions - which is often condensed into "Protestant" and (Roman) "Catholic" in the States - ignoring a significant number of churches outside of those traditions - nevertheless, Christianity often divides on dogmatic terms - of course they may have ritualistic implications, but it is the belief that defines, demarcates, and sanctifies. In other words, while it may be possible to identify actual dogma within a Christian relgious structure, I would hesitate to say the same can be done in any Jewish community, even one with a common level of "relgiousity."


      And the second flaw is that people (including some claiming to be Jews) somehow think quoting Hebrew Scriptures (or worse, "Old Testament") especially without recourse to a standard Hebrew text indicates positions held by Jews in some fasion or another. It doesn't work that way when approaching the question from a historian's perspective (you might want to quote thinkers contemporary to the period you wish to describe) or speaking internally within the community (at best, a biblical citation is a jumping off point for citing a later commentary - once a talmudic citation, these days, usually medieval). Hell, the Dominicans figured that one out in the 13th century - google Pablo Christiani.

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    111. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is to help prospective buyers know if they are buying a "hot" item or not.

      You're right, that is the point of the technology.

      But in many cases the buyers probably already know it is hot, and simply don't care as long as the price is low enough.

    112. Re:However by RWerp · · Score: 1

      By that definition the Amish of Pennsylvania and Ohio are a distinct ethnic group. They have their own language, culture, most certainly clothing and are sharply separated from other groups.

      If the language they are using is so different from English as Yiddish was from Polish, we could start thinking of them as a different ethnic group. I urge you to read a little about the richness and potential of Jewish culture in pre-war Poland, before you criticize what I wrote.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    113. Re:However by RWerp · · Score: 1

      The difference is, Jews were the only group the Nazis wanted to destroy fully, down to the last man.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    114. Re:However by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "7 days of prayers to help the spirit leave hell and arrise to heaven/to be born again."

      Can you help me out ad post some passages which deal with re-incarnation?

      AFAIK the only type of re-incarnation is with a new body in the spirit world... not the current one... but I am very interested in any passages that deal with re-incarnation in this world... thanks!

    115. Re:However by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > The market for a hot torah couldn't be all that big.

      No, not a lot of people want one (or at least want one bad enough). However, those that do want one bad enough may spend LOADS of money to get one, especially anonymously.

      Also, I highly doubt someone would sell such an item on EBay -- they most likely have handshake 'connections' they can go through.

    116. Re:However by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Another comment: it seems that calling someone a "Jew" may carry two different meaning. One -- confined more or less to Europe and Middle East -- means ethnicity, second -- more common in the USA -- means religion. Hence the confusion and turmoil on /. In Poland, we sometimes write "zyd" (Polish for a Jew) when we mean religion, and "Zyd" when we mean ethnicity (although this is not popular, since antisemites write "zyd" always, to show their hate, and thus normal people write "Zyd" just in case someone might get offended). In English, the ethnic and religious denominations are both written with a capital letter, so there is no distinction (which in this case would be quite useful).

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    117. Re:However by RWerp · · Score: 1

      In fact the country hit hardest by WWII was the then-USSR, who lost 20 million people (10 million of whom were military.)

      If take the percentage of population lost as a measure, than it was not the USSR but Poland.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    118. Re:However by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Gods by conforming so closely to God's will that we become indestingushable from him."

      Have you read all of the books in the mormon religon? Like pearl of great price and D&C? I believe one of them speaks about God having spiritual children on a planet in deep space, and the highest level one can obtain in the mormon church is to also become a God and have spiritual children... you haven't read this yet?

    119. Re:However by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Although we'd love to determine where it came from...some way to track it would be great.

      The problem with lost information is that it's lost... forever. It can only be tracked from now on.

    120. Re:However by spun · · Score: 1

      We are subject to the laws of cause and effect, but what those laws are isn't clear. If those laws are a construct of our own mind, then there exists the possibility that coming to believe you are capable of something makes it so.

      A good point. I just wanted to point out that there are laws of cause and effect that we are subject to. In my understanding, everything is mind, or information, or awareness. Beginning with undifferentiated awareness, which of course contains differentiation as it contains all things. Natural laws are a form of differentiated awareness. They may be amenable to change through other forms of awareness. Whether they are or not is really unimportant, though. Everything arises from the specific conditions that are around it, including all forms of differentiated awareness such as belief. Your belief in your capabilities is not yours, per se.

      That is your opinion. Reincarnation is one interpretation of what Samsara is. Many Buddhists believe in it, many don't. It doesn't really matter if it literally means reincarnation or not I don't think. I find it helpful to rationalize what we call "instinct", to believe that there is a soul of some kind of which some part persists between incarnations. (emphasis mine)

      Very good point. Buddha himself was said to have remained completely silent on the point when questioned by a famous holy man, indicating (to me, anyway) that he thought it wasn't important, either. And in my opinion, Buddha would be the first to say, "If you find it helpful, go with it!"

      Certainly, if what we are is a product of conditions, and we are a part of the chain of cause and effect, then something of what we are came from the humans who came before us, and something of what we are will become a part of the humans after us. Call it what you will :-)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    121. Re:However by kieronbm · · Score: 0
      "Which would have allowed me to point out that the Christian Bible (of which the Jewish Torah is the first 5 parts) is the most widely shoplifted book!"

      Odd, since you can get a (single) Bible for free from a number of sources...walk into any church in america, tell them you don't have a Bible and would like one, and just see how fast they run to give you one!

    122. Re:However by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Our synagogue now has a scroll that was at one point stolen from a synagogue during the holocaust. The synagogue it came from most likely isn't around anymore (we don't know exactly where it is from). It's no longer kosher anyway, so it's not useable, just on display, but no one really has any idea where it's come from. At any rate, yes, it is a stolen torah, but it's not like we were looking for cheap torah goods...it's a religious artifact.

      That is an entirely different question. It is one thing to buy a stolen torah from the theif, quite a different thing to recover one, even if it is not possible to return it to the original owner.

      The point here is to remove the incentive to steal by reducing the value of a stolen torah to as near zero as is possible. It is the same principle that is behind VIN numbers on cars, a stolen car is added to a registry of stolen vehicles and it is impossible to register a vehicle that is on the registry. That is why stolen cars have to be shipped out of the country.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    123. Re:However by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      cite your source... I don't believe numbers of priests are declining.

    124. Re:However by ross.w · · Score: 1

      It depends. The original Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic texts are public domain Some older English translations like King James and some 19th century translations are also public domain, and you can easily get copies of these in .txt and other formats. NKJV, NIV and other more modern translations are still subject to copyright.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    125. Re:However by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 1

      check out andersOSU's post he expands on what my message is, as I think you missed my point entirely. I 've heard of the new testament believe it or not. How ironic it seems to me you missed the message of my message and instead focused on the letters, or those that werent there I know that what seperates them is the new testament, but it had no relevance to what I had to say. Obviously not 'bound' by jewish law, but it always seemed erie to me how they'd pick certain things from the OT and embrace them, but ignore others. If you'd like a better example, what about the ten commandments? I don't read and memorize the new testament, but where exactly do they fit in there? I agree with you whole heartedly anyone who is only looking at the text themselves is entirely missing the point of religion, the works themselves, and pretty much life as a whole. But if people actually thought for themselves, well I won't even go there.. as to the no power thing, i could explain if you really want, but this is slashdot, not jewdot (now theres an idea) if you want the details of it, go read about them somewhere or ask a rabbi. i was just trying to highlight something rather thats a very very obvious jewish custom that is straight from the bible, and straight from genesis, not far after the whole creation part, and that quickly came to my mind. Whether i choose to accept believe or adhere to that is a seperate unrelated issue and one that has no bearing on the thread or the point i was trying to make. as a total aside, and apologies as this is rather offtopic, what in the world does it mean for my post to have been modded as "overrated" ?

      --
      "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
      EdelFactor
    126. Re:However by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I don't believe numbers of priests are declining.

      That's one of my issues with the religious. People believe things, and never bother to check whether their belief has any basis in reality. Been on the Internet long? Heard of Google? Been alive long? Heard of statistics? The US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos063.htm

      > The shortage of Roman Catholic priests is expected to continue,

      Ah, so there IS a current shortage.

      > In recent years, the number of ordained priests has been insufficient to [...] replace priests who retire, die, or leave the priesthood.

      And it's not new.

      If you want non-US, see this: http://www.futurechurch.org/fpm/cardinals/facts.ht m

      Seriously, can't you be bothered to look for one freaking second? You know, just because you don't like what someone has to say, it doesn't mean they are wrong.

      Grrr, Slashdot is REALLY pissing me off...
      > Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.
      > It's been 56 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
      I've been trying to post one fucking message for 30 minutes now, and this shit has been going on for at least two days. This is goddamned annoying.

    127. Re:However by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      fair enough... I was just basing my opinion on a conversation I had with a newly ordained priest. I guess he must have come from a large "class" of new priests or whatever because he said that he thought there was plenty of new blood entering the priesthood. Thanks for looking up for me... please take a few deep breaths tho'... I'm concerned for you. As an aside... I believe that if they would finally let priests marry and let there be female priests we would NEVER have to worry about having this discussion again. Alas, they did not elect me as new pope...

  7. Bo-ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oy, these Rebbes today, so unimaginitive. Whatever happened to REAL anti-theft devices for holy artifacts, like the one on the Ark of the Covenant that melted your face off?

    1. Re:Bo-ring by spiz21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The following packages will be removed: 1) Bigotry"... kind of ironic that you yourself have made the remarks of a bigot. Just thought I'd let you know

    2. Re:Bo-ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He re-installed. While its not manditory, all your new freinds have it, and will install it bit by bit when you aren't looking...

    3. Re:Bo-ring by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously, the Christians havn't done an apt-get update in a while, or they'd be upgraded to Koran 1.0. It's a total rewrite of the previous Bible and Torah software for the purpose of cleaner code and bugfixing. So far, it's also avoided the rampant forking problems that plagued most versions of Bible.

      Note: It's a joke. Laugh. I'm not Christian, Muslim, or Jewish; I'm just carrying this conversation to its logical conclusion.

    4. Re:Bo-ring by dstech · · Score: 1

      "2) Tolerance 0.90 beta"

      Apparently, there are still a ton of bugs running that one on your platform. I recommend an upgrade to an open solution, particularly something that comes with an onboard Historical Context Translator.

    5. Re:Bo-ring by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      meh, koran 1.0 is highly unstable and unmaintainable, progress is slowed and there is a high frequency of random explosions and corruption. rather wipe the system and try a smaller and more streamlined system like Discordia 1.0 beta.

      Hail Eris
      All Hail Discordia

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:Bo-ring by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      Heck, I'm an evangelical, and I found it funny! (the fork joke especially made me lol)

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    7. Re:Bo-ring by DaemonDazz · · Score: 1

      Would that be 'kolerance' or 'gnulerance' ?

    8. Re:Bo-ring by tezza · · Score: 1

      I don't think Koran 1.0 is in the stable branch. I'd wait for it to get merged first, but it's going to be a while.

      --
      [% slash_sig_val.text %]
    9. Re:Bo-ring by haggar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not true: there are two known forks, sunni and shi'ite. These two versions are, unfortunately, incompatible and, if in proximity of each other, can cause the death of the users. Examples include Iraq and Pakistan.

      --
      Sigged!
    10. Re:Bo-ring by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Wow, you guys really are in the dark ages. LDS has a whole new system built on top of the old ones. It's really where the development is occuring this millenium. Get with the program, will ya?

      (I'm Jewish by birth, agnostic by life experience; If I've offended someone I've probably done it unintentionally, but will gladly take any credit)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    11. Re:Bo-ring by oren · · Score: 1
      Obviously, the Christians havn't done an apt-get update in a while, or they'd be upgraded to Koran 1.0

      Things are a bit more complex. We have:


      Testament 1.0 (aka "Old")
      |
      Testament 2.0 (aka "New")
      |...|
      | Koran 1.0 (fork)
      |
      Testament 3.0 (aka "Mormon")


      Testament 1.0 is like an original UNIX system. It wasn't meant to be an end-user system; it has a steep learning curve and demands a lot from its users. A stubborn minority of purists stick with its CLI interface and the POSIX api to great effect. Lately, some people (Reform) try to continue active development, with others (Orthodox) viewing this as potentially creating a new fork.

      Testament 2.0 is like the addition of window system and, later on, desktop environment. There are two main camps (like KDE and Gnome) whose philosophical differences seem obscure to an outsider (I'll leave the reader to decide which side is which :-). While 2.0 builds upon and is, in theory, compatible with 1.0, in fact it is a whole new way of doing things and removes many of 1.0 restrictions ("thou shall not make icons", for example :-). Its adopters tend ignore 1.0 users or look down at them as relics of an ancient age.

      Koran 1.0 is either a fork of the Testament line, or a whole new system (depending to whose PR you believe) - think of it as Windows. While there is some testament 1.0 (POSIX) compatibility (enough to win DARPA contracts :-), Koran users view the Testament line as obsolete and have been known to convert users at any means necessary (the point of a sword, monopolistic power). These practices have gained immense popularity for the Koran fork. Testament 2.0 users view Koran 1.0 users as a notch below testament 1.0 users - at best, misguided souls who need to be shown the light; at worse, barbarians who should be taught better.

      Testament 3.0 is like OS/X. It shares the 1.0 core with 2.0, but it is so different from 2.0 that some people view it as a different fork. It is more user-oriented than 2.0 (for example, it used to allow plugging in extra wife devices, like Koran 1.0). However, 2.0 remained the most popular version, and is some variants were undergoing active development (Vatican 2).
    12. Re:Bo-ring by Dannon · · Score: 1

      Westerner that I am, I've never really heard anywhere what the real differences between sunni and shi'ite are. I have been told that in some parts of the world, the differences are so virulent that a sunni will tear up a shi'ite's Koran, and vice versa, even though it's the same Koran, just for the insult value. For the life of me, I can't make sense of it.

      I have been told that it's a good idea to "Keep on the sunni side, always on the sunni side...."

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
    13. Re:Bo-ring by cshark · · Score: 1

      It seems though that Koran 1.0 seem to have several systemic architecture issues that have been known to cause OS problems with the end user after downloading. I believe this problem stems from the fact that it is a much newer code base, and is not as mature as other Bibles. You have to remember, Koran 1.0 has only been out of beta for 1200 years. The necessary hardware support is missing in many cases for peripheral devices as simple as the brain, hands and eyes, etc.

      My thought: Koran 1.0 is not ready for the main stream. While it may have many of the features one would expect from a Bible, it does not have the hardware support, maturity, and wide spread usage that other Bibles do. Now I'm not saying that Koran 1.0 won't get there. History has proven that upstart Bibles can gain wide spread acceptance. Christianity 3.7a or Buddhism 6.5 are excellent examples of this.

      I fear that in it's current state, Joe Bible Reader just won't understand Koran 1.0.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    14. Re:Bo-ring by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      I was refering to their holy book itself, actually, which Muslims have obsessively (religiously? heh) kept exactly the same since it was compiled, not too long after the death of Muhammed. They're not even overly keen on translations; they encourage them as a method of being introduced to the Koran, but for real study they tend to insist on reading it in the original Arabic. The language itself is important to them, for they believe that it was delivered to Muhammed directly in Arabic, so it ought to be read that way whenever possible.

      This is in markedly different from Christianity; though Christians (or a big chunk of them, anyway) also believe their book to be word-for-word divinely inspired, almost none of them read it in its original language. Worse, they can't always agree on which books are part of it and which aren't. Muslims, whatever other differences they may have, have practically no difficulties of this sort.

      So, to get back to my analogy, it's more like the Sunni and Shi'a are running the same program, just using different documentation :)

    15. Re:Bo-ring by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      That's reasonably good advice, in general, as there are *way* more Sunnis than Shi'ites. Sunnis are kind of mainstream Islam, with Shi'ites having some differing beliefs about a certain cleric from way-way-way back in their history who's supposed to return from some mountains one of these days to do such-and-such, blah blah blah. Also, and perhaps more importantly, they disagree about who's the legitimate leader of the Muslim community.

      There were actually a couple of big-ass wars that precipitated the whole thing, full of trechery and backstabbing and dramatic battles and all kinds of fun stuff. I'd give you a Wiki link, but Wikipedia seems to be in a maintenance window right now :( Anyway, just look up "Shi'ah" or "Shi'ite" or whatever, they should all get you to the same place, and read up on its history. After you read about some of the events of the wars, you'll start to see why the divisions in Iraq fall in the places that they do, and why some of the sites in southern Iraq are so important to the Shi'ites. Interesting stuff.

    16. Re:Bo-ring by cshark · · Score: 1

      Koran 1.0 has had dozens of forks over the years.

      The current major Koran forks are:

      Sunni
      Shi'ite
      Sufi
      Kahrijite
      Wahhabi
      Ismail i
      Zaidi
      Fatimid
      Nizari
      Alawis
      Druze
      Baha'i

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    17. Re:Bo-ring by haggar · · Score: 1

      I didn't check the others, but Druze and Baha'i are not islamic sects or "forks".

      --
      Sigged!
    18. Re:Bo-ring by haggar · · Score: 1

      Well, in that sense the Torá has also not had any forks. And the same goes for the Bahaí writings in their original languages (Farsi and Arabic). There are translations, just like for the Qur'án and the Torá, but the writings in their original languages are kept faithful to the original. (I might have not used the best wording here - I am not an english speaker, sorry)

      --
      Sigged!
    19. Re:Bo-ring by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Your English is fine. Especially for Slashdot :-) I take it from your placement of accent marks that you're a native French or Italian speaker? Certainly, your English is better than my (nonexistant) Italian, and probably better than my French. No complaints here :-)

      On to the meat of your comment:

      Yeah, I was mostly playing on the perceptions by Christians that their religion is a successor to Judaism, or "Judaism 2.0", if you will, while Muslims tend to see themselves as believing in the 3rd, final, and completely perfect revelation from God, which is an extension of Christianity and Judaism--Judaism 3.0, then. They all share a common heritage, while Baha'ai and others are not part of that lineage, so it wouldn't make sense to make them part of this extended metaphor. I wasn't commenting on the validity of any religion, and only excluded others because they didn't fit said metaphor.

    20. Re:Bo-ring by cshark · · Score: 1

      Bahai could go either way, although recently they've gone more unitarian than anything. Probably right about Druze.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    21. Re:Bo-ring by haggar · · Score: 1

      Unitarian? Both ways? I don't know what you're talking about, and I think you don't, either.

      For informations about the Baha'i faith, check this link.

      --
      Sigged!
    22. Re:Bo-ring by haggar · · Score: 1

      Yes, your description of the heritage that is common to Judaism, Christianity and Islam, is, in my view, accurate.

      However: one of the principles of the Baha'i faith is that all world religions have a common source (that is, God) and are, therefore, equal in truthfulness and value. They appeared at different points of time, when humanity needed a different "social program", but the moral teachings are, in all of them, identical. You can identify the ten comandements, in one form or another, in all religious teachings.

      Baha'is therefore consider the Baha'i faith to have the same heritage as the other religions. Even more, since the Baha'i faith originated from within an Islamic philosophy and environment, you can even more clearly trace its heritage to the Judeo-Christian and then Islamic line.

      The misconception that the Baha'i faith is an islamic sect, has caused great harm and many Baha'is have been and still are, killed, imprisoned and generally their lives are made miserable in islamic countries. Their condition is worst in Iran, where they have been subjected to the worst atrocities and tortures. They still are, but the world community (the UN, the media, the politicians) is turning a blind eye to this atrocity. It's part of being politically correct, I guess.

      --
      Sigged!
  8. How will it look like? by DegeneratePR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone have an idea how the Torahprints will look like?

    1. Re:How will it look like? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Hand write something on a piece of paper. Now scan it. Kinda like that.

      KFG

  9. Basic Cryptography by WAR-Ink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Braille MD5 sums. No doubt this idea was the Holy Grail of cryptography.

    But, a character is a character, whether it is holes punched in paper or pen and ink. I think this is cheating.

    Or perhaps this is just religious dogma getting in the way of the greatest idea in secruity codes since Leonidas scrapped off the wax.

    1. Re:Basic Cryptography by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Whether you believe it is the word of God or not, their "religious dogma" kept the jewish civilization alive, and the people united even after being forcibly removed from their homeland for centuries. How many civilizations can you say that about?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Basic Cryptography by WAR-Ink · · Score: 1

      Every American Indian tribe ever.
      The Australian Aborigines.
      Dozens of tribes in the South American rain forests.

    3. Re:Basic Cryptography by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Most american indian tribes are extinct.

      All of your examples still live in their homeland.

    4. Re:Basic Cryptography by WAR-Ink · · Score: 1

      Most American Indian tribes live on reservations and run casions far from there homeland.
      Most Aborigines are only in comparitively recent times getting some rights back.
      And the South American rain forests are being burned to the waterline.

      Just because their homeland is part of another country doesn't mean they haven't been displaced.

      But this discussion is about something completely else.

    5. Re:Basic Cryptography by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      And take a look at how messed up most American Indian civilizations are now. Drug use and alchoholism run rampant. Very little social stability. Did we as Americans do this. Yup. But worse has happened to the Jews. Yet culturally, they have remained very united. Love them or hate them, we all have a lot to learn from them.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:Basic Cryptography by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Maybe the proscription is merely God's way of ensuring the message can be liberated from the clutches of a priest class, from time to time. It's *supposed* to be stolen, and taken to a distant land, where it cannot be traced.... All part of a divine plan to spread the word, and to prevent a class of high priests from suppressing it!

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:Basic Cryptography by WAR-Ink · · Score: 1

      Scripture Manifest Destiny?

    8. Re:Basic Cryptography by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      The Gaelic diaspora. Whilst the forced Clearances by sassanach sheep farmers reduced their native culture to a reflection of what it was, quite a few remained a coherent society when moved to such places as America, Canada, Australia.

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    9. Re:Basic Cryptography by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what you said, but for some odd reason 'Riverdance' music is running through my head.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    10. Re:Basic Cryptography by hey! · · Score: 1

      Ok, how about the Parsis? Oldest monotheistic religion there is.

      In any case, it's kind of a loaded question; the only religions that could satisfy the premise are those that have a tribal aspect. Are buddhists or muslims a "people"?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:Basic Cryptography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But worse has happened to the Jews"

      And exactly what was worse? ( I could have missed your point so bear with me)

      Is killing untold millions of native Americans not quite so bad as killing millions of Jews?

      Is killing untold millions of Africans not quite so bad as killing millions of Jews?

      Etc...

      We have documented evidence of what happened to numerous groups of people and it's all equally bad.

      How is one groups mistreatment worse than another groups mistreatment?

    12. Re:Basic Cryptography by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I am not discounting any group's treatment. However, "Christians" beat the shit out of the Jews for centuries. Atheists beat the shit out of them in Russia in communist countries. Then the Nazi's took it to a whole new level.

      Did the Europeans who colonized the United States treat native americans like cattle for a couple centuries? Yup. I am ashamed of that part of our heritage. But the length of time pales in comparison to the jews.

      Not trying to downplay anything. Both are examples of the ugly side of mankind. My only point was that the Jewish focus on the Torah combined with their emphasis on education is what kept them alive. The very thing the original post in thethread was mocking.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    13. Re:Basic Cryptography by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      MD5 sums?

      You do realise that the content of all torahs are all identical don't you. Otherwise they would be pretty heretical. All torah checksums would therefore be the same. Pretty dumb way to authenticate them if you ask me.

      Interestingly enough, if my memory serves me, things similar to MD5 hashes were used by scribes (Jewish, Christian and Islamic as well as probably others) for centuries to verify that they had properly copied their scriptures (usually recorded seperately).

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    14. Re:Basic Cryptography by Elyscape · · Score: 1

      The holes punched are incredibly small, as TFA says. This leads me to believe that they're not really visible by the naked eye. That is, they're not Braille or anything. Additionally, I believe that the rule is simply that you can't add a single letter (or, I imagine, odd symbol thing) because that would be changing the word(s) of God. Minitiny holes that you can't really see don't seem to fit under this category, IMO. I think the rule more outlaws things made in ink, like sketches and letters and whatnot.

      --
      I own itburns.net. What should I put there?
    15. Re:Basic Cryptography by Kiffer · · Score: 1

      Damn straight... thats why they get to come back from their 2000 year exile and get a free country in the middle east! screw the people who've been living there in the meen time, they were there first, so they get it back now cause of all the mean things that happened to them, yes horrible things happened in germany and russia and in other places too, but horrible things happened to many other groups and they get sweet fuck all.

    16. Re:Basic Cryptography by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      What is truly amazing is the presence of terms such as "sassanach sheep farmers" and "Riverdance" under a subject titled "Basic Cryptography". You got to love /. :P

    17. Re:Basic Cryptography by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Every race have endured beatings. You make it seem like Jews got the worst. At least their suffering was documented.

      Try the Aztecs, they were wiped out to the point where no one is left to tell the story from their side.

  10. Thank jahweh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    At least they didn't flush it down the toilet!

    1. Re:Thank jahweh! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      now i have to burn my eyes out... how dare you use the name of god on slashdot. That's worse than in vain!!

    2. Re:Thank jahweh! by rsd1s1g · · Score: 1

      for this guy's sake, I *really* hope he's kidding..

      --
      I wanted to buy a candle holder, but the store didn't have one. So I got a cake.
  11. Related by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There is a tiny town in Israel, iirc called svadt, that has an artform called microcalligraphy which is not practiced anywhere else in the world. They are able to fit the entire Torah onto a single page, they they make the torah into a design.

    This is the first example that was found by Googling for microcalligraphy. I wonder if this technique could also be used on those works of art, which are extremely rare and expensive but also quite beautiful.

    1. Re:Related by Xshare · · Score: 1

      That kind of torah wouldn't be kosher, most likely.

    2. Re:Related by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Wow, far out, man!

      It's like... ASCII Art in Calligula, instead of Lucida Console!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:Related by tdmg · · Score: 1

      Sure Sure. First of all, it's not kosher, because you can't make an accurate copy so tiny (with all the crowns and such). Also, they don't use a quill when doing their work, they use other tools, and you really need the quill. However, there is a form of microscanning in Israel so that you can put the whole Tanach (Jewish Bible) on a slide. I had a Tanach professor that kept one of them in his breast pocket.

      --
      "Man, I am so unbelievably stupid."
  12. Only $50,000? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that's all their worth.

    I mean, aren't these old manuscripts we're talking about here? Or are these modern rewritings?

    Seems they could solve the problem by simply keeping them in a safe and using the buddy system, etc.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Only $50,000? by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      I suspect the article is about newly created copies.

      It is a mitzvah to copy...

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    2. Re:Only $50,000? by thegameiam · · Score: 5, Informative

      The price represents about a year's labour for a Sofer (Jewish Scribe) and the cost of the parchament and ink itself. The cost of the materials is something like $5-10K, while the rest is the labour.

      Most Sifrei Torah (Torah Scrolls) are not particularly ancient, although scrolls which are a couple of hundred years old are quite common.

      -David Barak

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    3. Re:Only $50,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      -David Barak

      by any chance did you learn that tidbit about the Sifrei Torah at Camp Harlam?

    4. Re:Only $50,000? by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      What does it take to get certified as a Sofer ?

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    5. Re:Only $50,000? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      At 300k characters and one year to produce, thats a bit over 1k per day (allowing one day off per week.) Even hand calligraphed, that isn't a lot.

      Are there rules saying certain bits have to be written on certain days? (Which would raise its own questions: can a scribe work on several copies at once? What if they're sick and can't write a bit on the appointed day?)

      Or is the calligraphy just a whole lot more challenging than I thought?

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    6. Re:Only $50,000? by cdwiegand · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, although of course no work on Shabbat (fri sundown to sat sundown), and many of the holidays, however, it takes a few years to really get down the art (not that I've done that, but I did look into becoming a Sofer at one point), and mistakes are bad (at the very least, they take time to scratch/shave off, and if you make a mistake in G-d's name, then that whole page is wasted and has to be specially buried). I mean, it takes a year, and you'd get bored real quick, and make mistakes. And I don't think it's forbidden to work on more than one - I've known a Sofer who worked on a Torah for a while, then to break the monotony did some ketubot (marriage contracts) and mezuzot (the parchments that go into those little cylinder-like things on the doorways).

      --
      . Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
    7. Re:Only $50,000? by elsilver · · Score: 1
      It is a mitzvah to copy...

      Oh, man. Wait 'til the **AA hears about this.

      (Just wanted to make sure this discussion remained firmly in /. territory, and didn't go and get all serious and religious on everybody.)

      E.

    8. Re:Only $50,000? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I wonder where the heck they sell them? It doesn't sound like something a guy in a bar on a Friday night would try to sell you, claiming it fell off the back of a truck. ("It should cost much more, but for you, only $50,000! It's a steal!")

      How many end up on eBay? (The Cthurch of Scientology usually blocks private sales of e-meters on eBay with a DMCA copyright notice. I don't see how copyright trumps the first sale doctrine on a physical object like an e-meter, but I haven't had Elronic training.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:Only $50,000? by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      lots and lots of training, and apprenticeship to a known Sofer. For people to rely on one's work, the Sofer has to be observant, well educated, and upstanding in the community.

      -David Barak

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    10. Re:Only $50,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The calligraphy isn't terribly challenging, but it is slow and must meet numerous precise requirements. The hebrew letter 'bet', for example, requires approximately 7-9 separate strokes to complete, depending on technique; even the simplest letters take at least 3 strokes and the most complicated letter can take a dozen or more. Basically the sofer "draws" the letters rather then writes them. This is all according to the calligraphic tradition of ashkenazi (northern european) jews; the calligraphic tradition of sefardic (mediterranean and middle-eastern) jews is simpler, more akin to writing, and is accordingly faster and so less expensive. In addition, once a torah is written, it must be checked for accuracy and adherence to the requirements of halacha (jewish law).

    11. Re:Only $50,000? by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1

      That has to be the typo of the year, dude. Cthurch of Scientology... Sounds rather lovecraftian. Didn't know that they worshipped the Old Ones now.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    12. Re:Only $50,000? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Typo? Oh...! Yes, I can't see why I'd confuse Commodore Elron Hubbard with Captain Obed Marsh. And famous Scientologists never have to be hidden away when they gradually show the Innsmouth look and start acting strange.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    13. Re:Only $50,000? by msdschris · · Score: 1

      It takes a little more preperation than just sitting down and writing...
      A few simplistic pages
      http://www.torahtots.com/torah/sefertorah.htm
      http://www.mezuzahdoctor.com/CERTSCRIBS/CERTSCRIB. htm

    14. Re:Only $50,000? by trauring · · Score: 1

      Sofers spend years studying the laws related to writing holy documents, before even writing a single letter in a simpler document. Torahs are incredibly complex. Imagine writing over 300,000 letter where not a single letter can be malformed and no two letters can touch. Any minor error renders the document invalid.

    15. Re:Only $50,000? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      Fair enough - I can see this taking a year.

      I remember when I was about 15, and had done some programming in BASIC. Someone told me that professional programmers averaged about 6 lines of code per hour. I couldn't belive such a low number. Now I've been a professional programmer, it seems quite reasonable.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  13. Compressed data in headers as added characters? by metachor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you consider the text of the Torah to be the body of a message being transmitted, then would not an included digital fingerprint or series of microperforations be additional data included in a header (in this case, for authentication purposes)? I know that a digital fingerprint or a series of microperforations are not precisely the same thing as adding more Hebrew characters to the body text of the Torah; but is it not conceptually possible to represent the pattern of data included in the fingerprint or the perforations within the same Unicode scheme as Hebrew characters are represented? Thus in effect would these unique authentication identifiers actually transgress the rule against adding more characters?

    Max Cohen would be ashamed.

    1. Re:Compressed data in headers as added characters? by Kvan · · Score: 1

      This is religion: it doesn't have to make sense, just be approved.

      --

      "A *person* is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."
      - 'K' in Men in Black.

    2. Re:Compressed data in headers as added characters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "Character" is a Hebrew character. And you can't just add another human language, that would be unclean. Obviously, no two pieces of parchment are identical on a microscopic level. This method simply increases the differenced between parchments to the point where they can be easily distinguised. But arguing that this is a "character" is a stretch, even if we're talking about the plain English definition of "character".

      If you were to actually represent these perforations with a character, at that time you'd be in violation of the law. It would be no different from simply examining the parchments themselves, distinguishing them at length, and then conceptually giving them characters. Actually giving them characters would be wrong, but Judaic law doesn't consider differences in the parchment they are printed on to be characters, any more than identifying marks and moles on a person's body are characters.

  14. Amazing, two systems of justice... by John+Seminal · · Score: 0, Troll
    But Judaic law "dictates that not one character can be added to the 304,805 letters of the Torah's text"

    Jews have laws this tough on protecting their culture, yet they bomb the palestinans without mercy, often killing innocent bystanders and not giving a crap. Sure, they say "it is just payback", but who exactly are they paying back? Screw it... they all look alike.

    Is is like the "special" law Jews have. No matter how bad the crime, they can never give the death penalty to another Jew. But they can slaughter non-jews at will.

    Look at the guy who killed Rabin, he got a jail sentance because he was Jewish. BTW, the reason Rabin was assasinated was because he was close to peace, he was ready to make peace.

    What makes Jews so special?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by copeland3300 · · Score: 1

      How does this have anything to do with the topic at hand? Personally I'm offened, as a Jew, and a reader of slashdot that you would use this topic to start on your own agenda. Additionally, your arguement is totally faulty. If you weren't such an ignorant bigot, you might learn that the ONLY person who has ever been put to death in Israel was a Nazi war criminal. Other than him, there is no death penalty for any crime in Israel. Also, who all looks alike? Go find a soapbox somewhere else.

    2. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting


      > What makes Jews so special?



      Well... there's this I guess...

      http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/03/science/03gene.h tml

    3. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly do not fully comprehend the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. It is not simply the purely evil Jews that you describe, versus the Palestinians, it is more like citizens of the State of Israel versus refugees who were expelled from Arabs countries (and murdered by their loving Arab [Black September] brothers). The Palestinians are entitled to life and freedom much the way any other person would expect. Unfortunately there is a minority of fundamentalists (on both sides) that will do anything to avoid peace. Your rash, uneducated, generalizations show nothing more than a childish rant.

    4. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately there is a minority of fundamentalists (on both sides) that will do anything to avoid peace

      Soooo, you've never seen tv footage on the 6:00pm news of masses of palestinians shouting death to Israel and the USA?

    5. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As an Orthodox Jew I have to agree that the State of Israel does have two forms of justice and unfortunately while the media portrays (getting it wrong of course) Israel as a reflection Judaism - in reality it's the farthest thing from basic Jewish beliefs. A not so well known fact on this subject (unless you happen to know a little history, which unfortunately most people don't) - up until the founding of the State of Israel the nearly unanimous position of Orthodox Rabbinical community is that the whole concept of nationalism (Zionism) prior to the arrival of the Messiah was and is completely wrong. Unfortunately now, while a large proportion of Orthodox Jewry believe Zionism is wrong, they don't speak out - meanwhile Israel gets a free bite at the apple to kill as many Palestinians as desired and the US protects them politically, financially and militarily. Bottom line, the State of Israel should have never been created, it has nothing to do with Jewish beliefs that Jews have been following for the last 2000 years and innocent people - men, women and children, both Jews and Palestinians are being killed as a result - on top of all of this it makes all Jews look bad.

    6. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by griffeymac · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well.. a Nazi war criminal and, well, Rachel Corrie....

      http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/invest.html nice bulldozer...

      At least people feel good about themselves when they go to bed, I guess.

    7. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You do realize that said refugees were first expelled from Israel? The jews of Israel, for the most part, came there in the last 100 years.

    8. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Those masses of people do not contradict the claim that they are a minority. They are just well organized.

      If everyone in New York would suddenly agree (as if they could agree) to protest it would be a crowd a couple orders of magnitude the size of those protests you are talking about. Yet it would still be a tiny minority of the US, much less the world.

      Though I have no idea if they really are a minority. From the news I hear though

    9. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by gomoX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, they are teh 3vil!!
      For fuck's sake. To a palestinian, you are a foreign bastard who took his territory and gave it to the Jewish people, the same Jewish people he's in war and kills your people since you can remember. Of course they're shouting death.

      And you know what's wrong with them, besides war crimes and unbelievable suffering and pain? Lack of perspective. Peace can't be achieved because most can't see any further than this.

      So do you, as far as I can tell. Please, this people are not lunatics, no one is. They have been raised by a different culture, but it's not a bad one. Fanatics are just as bad there as in the US, except they don't have the FBI to kick their asses whenever they feel like it. They live in a society mandated by inertial hate they got from previous generations.

      To a palestinian, you are much more of a son of a bitch than he is to you. It's just that they gather on the streets to shout it instead of reelecting their badass president to "kick some ass" and having the senate give him unlimited military budget.

      Think about it. Pretty much everything happens for a reason.

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    10. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Punboy · · Score: 1

      As a Jew, I am offended by such a statement as well. And how any self-respecting moderator could have modded it "Funny" or "Insightful" is beyond me.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    11. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      What you mean the big D9's? Yeah it's usually a very bad idea to get infront of several ton's of moving equipment especially if you have a chance of falling and being crushed to death when an op can't see you.

      Surprise. There's a reason why you don't go wandering around on construction and work sites either. On top of that perhaps you need to question who she was staying with...they were 'questionable' at best.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe if you want people to listen, you could cite a slightly less biased source...

      Besides, I was not aware that being killed by a bulldozer WHILE STANDING IN FRONT OF IT LIKE A FUCKING MORON constituted an execution.

    13. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you wait for a year or so - there will be rebuttals and articles pointing out fallacies and flaws in the research very soon.

      It is a cute idea, but it doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

    14. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean this person?

      http://www.omjp.org/Feb1503GazaReuters.jpg
      http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/rachel-corri e-flag-02.jpg

      Such a peaceful, loving, terrorist sympathizer. She was not a citizen of Israel and was impeding an Israeli military action. She willingly chose to put herself in front of one of these:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:D9-idf_pic214.j pg

      I don't think anyone can reasonably claim that these things have perfect visibility of something as tiny as a human standing in front of them.

      Whether the driver saw her and continued anyway is not something you or I can know, since we weren't there. Even if he did, I'd say he was justified since she was impeding a military action in a country she's not a citizen of.

    15. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then why didn't the IDF reveal the full text and findings of its investigation? Sorry, but construction equipment is usually designed so that the operator can see where he or she is going and what he or she is doing. Your apologetic excuse makes zero sense.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    16. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you in theory, if the terrorist groups were not the ones winning the 'elections' and promising to soak the ground in Jewish and American blood.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    17. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      I used to feel pretty good about Christians back when they stood for things like Santa Claus, family holidays and classical European vocal music. Then some total scumbags started claiming that Christianity was about opposition to freedom, equal rights, and science. The problem was, a lot of Christians defended these scumbags just because the scumbags claimed to be Christian. I have no respect for such people.

      Back to the question at hand. Ethnic homelands are pure evil. Nazi Germany was evil, apartheit South Africa was evil and the herding native Americans onto "reservations" to take their land was evil. There has never been a good ethnic homeland and there will never be a good ethnic homeland. You can't have a "whites only" drinking fountain that doesn't discriminate against black people and you can't have an ethnic homeland that doesn't deprive people of priveleges based on their ethnicity.

      Oh, you say Israel isn't an ethnic homeland? Then change the name to something neutral like "Harmonia" and renounce that ridiculous Jewish "Right of Return". I mean, WTF?, do I have a "Right of Return" to Europe because some of my ancestors from hundreds of years ago lived in Europe? Of course not! It's totally ridiculous. And don't even get me started on "settlements" that outright steal land from people solely because they're not the right ethnicity.

      "Oh, but we were persecuted!". Yeah, Jewish people have a right to not be persecuted and every country in the world should accept refugees of ethnic persecution but there IS a difference between suffering and winning the lottery! Yeah, some Jewish people suffered and they have/had a right not to suffer but that doesn't mean that all Jewish people suddenly entitled to get more than everyone else. Get real!

      So there are some totally evil scumbags claiming that setting up an ethnic homeland (for people from Europe and the USA who think they're Jewish) in the Middle East is somehow a good idea. OK. There are scum in the world and that's a reality. But what really pisses me off is people who mindlessly support this ethnic homeland because of some kind of misguided religious affiliation and who dismiss anyone who points out the horrific realities of what they are advocating as "hate-filled".

    18. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by griffeymac · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. Mind you, I think she was acting quite inappropriately, at best. Claiming that the Israelis have never killed anyone is ridiculous, and that was the point I was trying to make. Not only have they completely persecuted Palestinians for years and years and years, they're dumb enough to get caught running over some girl with a bulldozer.

    19. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      ISRAELITES
      Desmond Dekker and the Aces
      (Desmond Dacres & Leslie Kong)

      Get up in the morning, slaving for bread, sir,
      so that every mouth can be fed.
      Poor me, the Israelite. Aah.

      Get up in the morning, slaving for bread, sir,
      So that every mouth can be fed.
      Poor me, the Israelite. Aah.

      My wife and my kids, they are packed up and leave me.
      Darling, she said, I was yours to be seen.
      Poor me, the Israelite. Aah.

      Shirt them a-tear up, trousers are gone.
      I don't want to end up like Bonnie and Clyde.
      Poor me, the Israelite. Aah.

      After a storm there must be a calm.
      They catch me in the farm. You sound the alarm.
      Poor me, the Israelite. Aah.

      Poor me, the Israelite.
      I wonder who I'm working for.
      Poor me, Israelite,
      I look a-down and out, sir.

    20. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by slyguy135 · · Score: 1
      What complete nonsense. It's sad that this is even being posted on this topic when the connection is marginal at best, but there you go. The capacity of human beings to proudly flaunt their ignorance and prejudice seems to be without limit.

      Some info. Yes, there are sects of ultra-Orthodox Jews who are anti-Zionist, but most are either non-Zionist, living in Israel and studying there, and in a lot of cases even voting and taking welfare money, or actually quite like having a state for the Jews, which they realise is not quite the same as the one they believe the Messiah will grant them, and so don't complain.

      As for regular Orthodox Jews, to claim that "a large proportion of Orthodox Jewry believe Zionism is wrong" is disingenuous in the extreme. You know all those settlers that think the occupied territories should be annexed by Israel? Most are religious. Was there a U-turn in opinion in 1948? I don't think so.

      Oh, one last thing. Next time you make inflammatory, false remarks about history, politics, or indeed anything at all, why don't you post in a non-anonymous way? That way I might not completely lack any respect for you. Just a thought.

    21. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So - what about the targeted killings in Palestine?

    22. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the casualty figures, there is more Palestinian blood on the ground, than Jewish and American combined.

      I never understand this point of view from the supporters of Isreal. The horror and disgust that abounds when a "terrorist" pulls a "suicide bombing" in Isreal. Six people get killed, the world is shocked at the barbarism. Then Isreal retaliates, and uses a multi-million dollar helicopter gunship, to fire a half-million dollar missle into an apartment block, killing 20 people (they were only targeting one person, the rest are as innocent as those half dozen on the bus), and no one thinks that is barbaric.

      I just don't get it. Would it all be OK if the palestinians were using laser guided missles to take out there prime target (ooppps, sorry about the other 20 deaders)?

      And for those in the US who don't understand the demonstrations, or the tactics. Its time to put the shoe on the other foot for a minute. Suppose that after WWII, the decision had been made to give New Jersey to the Jews. So all you poor chumps in Jersey, time to get the fuck off our land. I don't care how long you have lived here, I have a book from 4000 years ago, that says we used to live here. Oh, none of you dirty christians can be citizens, oh, and the interstates are off limits to you. Oh, we also don't want you to work in any of our businesses, because you are "dirty" in the eyes of god. God help you if you piss us off, because our cops will shoot to kill, even if your just demonstrating.

      Now, what would you do? Would you be mad? Would you fight back, or would you just crawl off to the next state. Never mind that your forefathers were among the first to inhabit the state in ACTUAL recorded history. Forget, that your ancestral homeland has been "donated" to a Jewsih family (no compensation for you).

      To really bring it in to focus, suppose the US was not the superpower that it is today. Now the new superpower has decided to give Jew Jersy (that just came to me, no offence) a couple of billion dollars a year in weapons, so they can make sure that the evil US doesn't interfere with the functioning of Jew Jersey. Just to keep everything calm, Jew Jersey decided that there is nothing wrong with asasinating certain US figures, because they don't agree with the existance, or the expropriation of their brothers land in Jersey.

      So, what do you do? Do you demonstrate? Do you fight? Do you get so mad that your blood boils with hate, and frustration?

      This is not a flame, I don't want to see terrorist bombings, in Tel Aviv or New York. I don't want to see suicide bombings, or missle strikes. The problem is, the longer we all perpetrate the myth that muslims hate us "just because", and they want us all dead "just because of our freedoms", the longer this will go on. Some Muslims might hate us for no reason, but most have a very good reason. We have been playing with their futures for 60 years. The vast majority of their daily grief, is DIRECTLY related to policies that WE forced down their throats. For what? Peace, stability? Not.

      Is there a solution, who knows. But I do know that the current process is NOT going to solve anything. I also know, the longer the rest of the world pretends that this conflict is one sided, the worse it will get.

    23. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      How did that even get modded insightful? The IDF can't under code due to the on-going legal rambling that's been on going. Surprise. Btw have you ever seen one of these things? You can't see out of them because they are covered with bullet proof armor and bullet proof glass, giving the snipers very small spots to shoot through.

      And contrary to popular belief, they don't use them to simply 'destroy' houses, but in hot-sapper operations as well to remove bombs that these terrorist scum put along the roads.

      Wait...you've never heard of them doing that either? Why am I not surprised.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    24. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a picture of Rachel Corrie.

    25. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

      On top of that perhaps you need to question who she was staying with...they were 'questionable' at best.

      So, what then - she had it coming because of whom she was associating with? There's Israeli justice for you.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    26. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was the Ottoman Turks' territory and they gave it up...

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    27. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, the shiksa had it coming. you lie with dogs, you get fleas. in her case, she consorted with terrorists, and was rightly killed.

    28. Re:Amazing, two systems of justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is no death penalty for any crime in Israel

      Yeah, right.

  15. Pardon my Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But can't the identification be before the holy part so while on the same physical object are different things. The law is against the alteration of the law and not a name. The Christian Bible has the same warning, as does the Koran, and they both have ID in the beginnings that does not detract from the laws.

    1. Re:Pardon my Ignorance by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Which christian bible? KJV? NKJV? NIV, TNIV, NLT? Or do you mean the original texts?

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    2. Re:Pardon my Ignorance by gtkuhn · · Score: 1

      I guess that goes to show who's been following their commandments. I was surprised at the number 304,805 characters. Do Christians or Muslims know how many words are in their books? If the Bible had not been altered so often, perhaps there would be fewer sects of Christianity.

    3. Re:Pardon my Ignorance by snoyberg · · Score: 1

      For our "everyday use" Bibles we're absolutely allowed to add in as much as we want. Those are the books you'd want to compare to a King James Bible or a Koran.

      On the other hand, a Torah has very special laws associated with it. It's not intended to just be opened and studied, it's a holy object that is treated with reverence. Therefore, the laws are quite different.

      I hope this cleared things up without being too ambiguous; going into all the details would require many hours (days) of study and much more bandwidth than Slashdot would like.

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    4. Re:Pardon my Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes they do know. 304,805. The Torah is part of both Christianity and Islam as well.

  16. What is considered an addition to the text? by magarity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    not one character can be added to the 304,805 letters of the Torah's text", which makes them untraceable and easily sold on the black market

    Just a few quick questions:

    Is putting some kind of ownership label on the inside cover really 'adding to the text'? I don't think anyone would mistake "From the Library of Hiram Goldstein" as part of the actual text. Can you buy a Torah at the bookstore? If so, does it have publisher's information? Further, 'character' is pretty specific to alphabetic writing. I wonder if a Chinese idiograph or Egyptian hieroglyph count as a 'character'?

    1. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Erwos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Is putting some kind of ownership label on the inside cover really 'adding to the text'?"

      There are huge, hand-written scrolls. There's no inside cover, and, no, you can't buy them at the bookstore. They cost 50 grand new, for crying out loud!

      -DMZ

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    2. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by magarity · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you buy a Torah at the bookstore? If so, does it have publisher's information?A quick check of Amazon.com shows a Torah with searchable online samples. The inside cover page says "Second Edition Newly Corrected". Whups! That doesn't bode well!

    3. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by thegameiam · · Score: 5, Informative
      Can you buy a Torah at the bookstore? If so, does it have publisher's information?A quick check of Amazon.com shows a Torah with searchable online samples. The inside cover page says "Second Edition Newly Corrected". Whups! That doesn't bode well!


      "Torah" means multiple things, thus the confusion.

      1) = Pentatuch = Text of the 5 books of Moses
      2) = "Teaching" or "Law" = the contents of all of Jewish Law
      3) = shorthand for Sefer Torah = scroll containing (1) written on Parchament (skin of a kosher animal) by a Sofer (Jewish scribe) using special ink with the pieces of skin sewn together with Gid (sinew).

      #3 is what TFA discusses. What you found in the bookstore is a bound copy of #1.

      -David Barak
      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    4. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by ajs · · Score: 1

      If you have mod points, and were wondering what that "informative" label was for, see parent posting....

    5. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Umanity · · Score: 1

      Remember: THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A TORAH AND A SEFER TORAH SCROLL...

      Hmmm...Think about it for a second...

      PS: A Torah laid out into portions is called a CHUMASH. A Torah laid out into a book form is called a Pentatuch {for five, as in five books of Moses}. A Sefer Torah is a scroll kept on two wooden pegs and rolled out to read.

      --

      Michael A. Uman
      Sr Software Engineer
      softwaremagic.net

    6. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "There are huge, hand-written scrolls. There's no inside cover, and, no, you can't buy them at the bookstore. They cost 50 grand new, for crying out loud!"

      But, they are in the form they are in, to facilitate an anachronistic ritual theatre. They are treated as if the medium has some relevance to the content.

    7. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by refactored · · Score: 1
      Strange I thought it already had something like this in the text. I mean somewhere along the line somebody already added something like "Thou shalt not steal".

      Perhaps instead of microdots they need to add a more specific admonishment. "Thou shalt not receive stolen goods, even if it is a Torah".

      Nah. If they don't read the first, they won 't read the second, nor the microdots.

      I think the Gideons have the right approach. Make'em cheap, make 'em available, and maybe, just maybe, somebody somewhere will actually _read_ them.

    8. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by entrigant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Further, 'character' is pretty specific to alphabetic writing. I wonder if a Chinese idiograph or Egyptian hieroglyph count as a 'character'?

      You don't get around religious doctrine on a technicality... you don't say to god "well you didn't say no hieroglyphs!" Besides these are rules these people willingly abide by, and their intent is to abide by the spirit of them. What is the point of following a religion if you just tear it to shreds because it isn't written in legalise?

    9. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    10. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by RealityThreek · · Score: 1

      Well said. Wish I had mod points.

      --
      :wq
    11. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IIRC there is a great Jewish tradition of getting around dogma on technicality, such as a prohibition against counting people in attendance at the synogogue(sp?) and so it is "not 1, not 2, not 3"

      Reference 1 Reference 2

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    12. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by coaxial · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Further, 'character' is pretty specific to alphabetic writing. I wonder if a Chinese idiograph or Egyptian hieroglyph count as a 'character'?

      You're incorrect. "Character" is generic, "letter" is not. As seen in "Chinese characters". The term "glyph" is equally generic.

      Chinese characters aren't strictly pictograms or even ideograms. Some characters combinations of other characters where some parts of the compound character are used hint at the proper pronouciation.

      Also not all words, are represented by a single glyph. The word "da4", which means "big", can be combined with "xiao3", which means "small", to create "da4xiao3" which means "size". (The numbers after the syllables indicate the tone.) Some characters must be used in combination with others, because the individual character has no intrinsic meaning.

      Further complicating matters is when Western words are transliterated into Chinese. (Japanese and Korean words sometimes have Chinese characters already associated with them. It appears to me that in the few cases I know the words also have a common ancestor, but I'm not a Asian linguist.) While the meanings of the individual characters or even the combination of characters carry little weight, care must still be used lest you transliterate "George Bush" to "Robot Monkey Carburetor", or even worse, "Butt Fucker". For instance, the fast food chain "Subway" is transliterated to something that sounds like "sa ba wei", and means "10,000 Tastes" or something like that, instead of "di4xia4tie3" which means "underground train".

      Explaining why creating nonsense words that bear a striking resembelence to English words in order to prevent saying something stupid in a non-English langauge is left as an exercise to the reader. Please note, that the "Mexican Chevy Nova" story is a myth. It assumes Spanish speakers don't have enough command over their native langauge to distinguish between "nova" and "no va", unlike English speakers ability to distribuish between "notable" and "no table". Futhermore the myth hinges on the listener to have ignorance of the fact that the Mexican government sells gasoline under the brand name "Nova".

      Thus concludes your linguistic lesson.

    13. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by coaxial · · Score: 1

      To answer your question, I believe the spirit of the law is to prevent changing the text of the Torah. I would think anything that is clearly demarked would be okay, as seen in bound copies of the Torah available at your local Jewish bookstore. Of course I'm sure there are those that would disagree, just how some Jews believe that driving a car or even tearing toilet paper on the Sabbath violates God's commandment to not work on the Sabbath.

      The Koran has a similar text restriction about it. Only the Koran written in Arabic is considered the true Koran. The reason is that Koran itself is miracle. Mohammed was illiterate, yet he was able to write the Koran in a single sitting as God dictated it to him. The Koran is considered the actual words of God, any translation could result in a slight change in meaning or emphasis and therefore change the meaning of God's words. Therefore, translations do not count. The Torah and the Bible on the other hand are simply oral histories written down and so have a long tradition of multiple translations. That is why it is said Musilims revere the Koran more than Christians revere the Bible.

    14. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by babble123 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't get around religious doctrine on a technicality.

      You realize that this is Judaism we're talking about, right? The religion that gave us the eruv and the kosher for Passover rolls?
    15. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      He's not kidding about the price. My synagogue commissioned a Sefer Torah last year (we donated one of our old ones to a new synagogue in Israel).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    16. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      Technically, the Torah's authenticity depends on who you ask. Some Jews, the more Orthodox, would say that the Torah is G-d's word, no questions asked. Some of the more Conservative might say that the Torah is G-d's word, but having gone through Moses. Some of the more Reform might say that the Torah was written by people, but divinely inspired to do so.

    17. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Yes, and many if not most religions do this too. This is the primary reason I believe they are all full of shit. If it's the example you gave or the ever raging argument about wether or not god hates gays. The entire concept of changing the religion to suite your lifestyle instead of changing your lifestyle fo suite the religion defeats the purpose of the whole thing. So many people think, "well I like this religion except for this part... so lets just read it differently to change gods intent because he OBVIOUSLY did not mean THAT!" Such are the problems when the head of your religion isn't real I suppose. Anyways this is verging on rant territory if it isn't already there. I could write a book on this crap...

    18. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      You don't get around religious doctrine on a technicality.

      He, he... you haven't been much around a shomer Shabbat home, have you? :) If you can tape the light switch on a refrigerator so you don't "work" on Sabbath, other things could possibly be "worked around" as well. Think of it as adapting to the situation rather than cheating.

    19. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well Jewish thought has always said that the Torah is a miracle and was given as is by the Holy one, blessed by he, on Shavout 3000+ years ago in the desert to Moses and the Jewish people.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    20. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by N1KO · · Score: 1

      I imagine many of the non-jewish posters (such as myself) don't see a major difference between reading a book and reading a scroll.

      The importance of the scroll or the number of characters it contains isn't exactly obvious.

    21. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Torah scrolls are read from on a weekley to daily basis.

      Plus due to their way of creation, it's all out impossible to make them cheap and easily availible. Christians are happy to send you theirs for free, just in the hopes you will read it and be convinced, because it has little value (they've got thousands more). Jews treasure each and every one, and actually read from it on a constant basis because it belongs to them.

    22. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, consider that one of the methods suggested is making microperforations in the parchment... makes one wonder what kind of coding system they are using that they know God won't consider it as characters.

    23. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by ars · · Score: 1

      To answer your question about the number of characters it's because Torash scrolls are exact to the letter, identical with those that Moses wrote thousands of years ago.

      For a while there were carefully checked torahs that were compared with the originals and vetted as identical, then others copied, and double checked from those, etc.

      The back tracing has been lost, but the torah scrolls are still identical.

      As for a scroll vs. a printed book, the scroll is far more holy, since it was hand writen with the proper intent of making a holy scroll (if an athiest write a torah scroll it has no holyness at all). A printed book has the intent of the printing machine I suppose :) But they are useful as day to day books, and are still holy, just not the same.

      --
      -Ariel
    24. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by ars · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this link would be useful. They are about 3 or 4 feet tall, in case there is no sense of scale from the photos. BTW you can add a label to the wooden rods the scroll is wrapped on, just not to the scroll itself. But it's easy to remove the scroll from the rods, so it's not useful for ID.

      --
      -Ariel
    25. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > You don't get around religious doctrine on a technicality... you don't say to
      > god "well you didn't say no hieroglyphs!"

      Well, apparantly `microperforations` (I guess they could have said `small holes` but it doesn't make them sound as knowledgeable) are allowed...so why not just use them to mark each one, like a bar code?

    26. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by DrXym · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      If dogma is there to be subverted, why bother with it at all? Either the dogma is meaningless and should be tossed aside or it should be obeyed completely and not dodged. Evading what dogma says by jumping through some silly hoop just makes the religion and its adherants look stupid.


      Even that first link does it saying G-d instead of God. It's plain ridiculous.


      This isn't just a Jewish thing. All organised religion are as guilty of ignoring dogma and inconvenient bits of their teachings when it doesn't coincide with what reality.

    27. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by UES · · Score: 1

      "I imagine many of the non-jewish posters (such as myself) don't see a major difference between reading a book and reading a scroll."

      Here is the simple answer, minus the terms in Hebrew which may be confusing to non-Jews:

      1. A Torah Scroll (henceforth "Torah") is both a book to be read and a sacred object. It cannot be constructed in a novel way without violating Jewish religious law and traditions. This includes differences in format (it has to be a scroll made from certain materials, the ink is from a certain formula) as well as text (no changes permitted whatsoever, it is always in Hebrew written in a certain way). Every element of construction is done in a specific way that is unchanging.

      Furthermore, there are specially trained people who write the scrolls. Torahs frequently have special covers (it's kind of a sheath) made of expensive materials as well as having decorative and functional objects attached to it like pointers, metal scroll endcaps, etc. This all adds up to a very expensive object, and you can't buy it in stores. It takes the better part of a year to write a Torah, and yes, this is subject to religious law and tradition too.

      There are protocols for handling the scroll (who holds it and how), reading from it (you use a special pointer to keep your place in the text rather than touching it with your hands), and how it is cared for. Showing respect for the scroll as sacred object is important for Jews. Dropping the scrolls, for instance, is offensive. Defacing them is considered obscene to religious Jews. Torahs are stored in a special case at the front of a Synagogue. There are special prayers said when opening and closing the case.

      Torahs are read weekly in a ritual fashion at religious services. There is a designated weekly portion to be read. There is a Jewish Holiday devoted to the time when the text begins the yearly cycle again. It is a happy holiday. There is drinking involved. Bar Mitzvahs are a big deal because part of the ceremony is that you get to read from the Torah Scroll from the first time. It is considered an honor to be called up to read from the scroll (there is even a special term in Hebrew for this honor.)

      2. Anyone can buy bound books that contain the text of the scrolls, you probably know it as the Old Testament (there are some differences between Bibles, but let's keep it simple.) These books often contain translations and annotations, which explains things like "Revised 2nd Edition". There are often commentary texts added as well. Religious Jews won't deface or disrespect these books either, but it's O.K. for lay people to stack it on their bookshelves. They are printed in a conventional way and can certainly have bookplates attached or you can write your name on the inside cover. It is not a sacred object any more than a Gideon Bible is. This is different from a Qur'an, which is a sacred object in any format but may be printed like a conventional book.

      Hope this helps while Wikipedia is down for maintenance.

    28. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      I don't know enough about the subject to provide much detail in this response, but.... Several hundred years ago they added all sorts of new markings to the Torah in order to disambiguate similar words since the original Hebrew is written entirely in consonants. Slightly later there were more markings added under some of the characters which act as a checksum to ensure accuracy when copying. It seems that talmudic (?) law may have some say in what can be done to a Torah and have it remain Kosher...

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    29. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are huge, hand-written scrolls. There's no inside cover, and, no, you can't buy them at the bookstore. They cost 50 grand new, for crying out loud!

      I believe the term you mean to use is "for Christ's sake"

    30. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      You don't get around religious doctrine on a technicality...

      Really?? I thought the biblical Pharisees were all about technicalities. Just one example - as I recall from religious studies in school, ritual washing of the hands was reduced to dipping one's little finger in a bowl of water and letting a drop of water run down to one's elbow and back.

      OK, so I don't have any facts to back that up, and it was taught by a Church of England chaplain, but I don't think he had any particular axe to grind with regards to other religions. He was also a pretty good physics teacher, allowing us to charge each other up to 50,000 volts with a van Der Graaf generator and then light bunsen burners with the static discharge. He also blew up a couple of coffee cans, so he can't have been all bad... :)

    31. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by ars · · Score: 1

      You are mixing up a chumash and a torah scroll. The added marking (called vowels, or diacritics) are never written in a torah scroll, only in a printed chumash.

      The torah scroll is hand written and is unchanged from the original, the chumash is a printed book, and has lots of extras.

      The vowels were known for thousands of years, and without them you can't even read the torah (since some words will seem alike). But they were never written down for most of that time, people memorized them.

      --
      -Ariel
    32. Re:What is considered an addition to the text? by dbingamon · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Torah text cannot be changed but the the break in a sentence for each line can be and Rabbis have for centuries used this method to identify a Torah's origin.

      The are rumors of the Torah written by Avishua (Abisha), a Grandson of Aaron, this Torah is kept by the Shomronim (Samaritans). The left edge of the the text aligns the letters in such a way to produce a message supposedly written by it's author.
      There are a write-up on this in Biblical Archaeology Review a few years ago.

  17. Well known to us Jews by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Yeah well, it's known as the first compression method...

  18. Torah Identification by leed_25 · · Score: 1, Interesting


    I suppose that you could add a chemical signature to the ink.

    1. Re:Torah Identification by thegameiam · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nope, sorry. The formulation of the ink is specified by Jewish Law, and has remained the same for a few thousand years.

      Besides, individual signatures added to ink wouldn't scale in any case.

      -David Barak

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    2. Re:Torah Identification by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Could you add an RFID to the scroll?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    3. Re:Torah Identification by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Kind of like how dollar bills work. Maybe there are restrictions on the inks however.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    4. Re:Torah Identification by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Even so, there must be some variations that can be used. I found this by googling : powdered gall nuts, copper sulfate crystals, gum arabic, and water. There will be some variations in all of those items. The gall nuts in particular, must have some chemical variations depending on where they are grown, likewise water varies a bit from one region to another.

      So, you basically want two inks. Not a completely different ink for each book. Just two inks. Then, you can use a binary code, alternating between the two (both valid, but slightly chemically distinct) inks. If you are lucky, the two inks will show up slightly different under UV. If not, you need a small sample from each of the first 32 (letters | pages | paragraphs) to get the unique 32 bit ID. A few bits to identify the individual, a few bits to identify which torah (his first, second, third, etc.)

      There must be some soil additive in which you can grow gall nuts so that they glow (more | less) under UV. Then, anybody with a portable UV light and an internet connection can look for the glowing pattern and look it up in some hypothetical torah registry.

    5. Re:Torah Identification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Sofrim (ritual scribes) switched from carbon-based inks to chemical (copper or iron sulfate and tannic acid) inks several hundred years ago. While carbon-based inks retain their color indefinitely, the reddish-brown or rusty discoloration of torahs, mezuzot, etc. written with chemical inks --"ink rot"-- is now a common problem. Most items written with current chemical inks will not last for much over 100 years. Any knowledgeable sofer or bal magia (a checker of sofrim's work) is familiar with this issue. If you want to see a authoritative halachic (jewish law) source for this, consult Keset HaSofer, rosh siman 3.

    6. Re:Torah Identification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly they need embedded RFID tags.

    7. Re:Torah Identification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like a good idea because there would be no way to defeat it without scratching off all the ink, but from the sound of the article, the major problem is theft of antique Torahs, not ones being currently produced. For a labeling system to be worth while it has to be widespread, so that everyone who is in the market for a Torah would check the registry before buying. A system like what you describe won't achieve that.

    8. Re:Torah Identification by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Of course, when they recently checked "pure" spring water up in the mountains it had over 70 modern contaminants including "rocket fuel".

      So the formula probably is different because of a lot of contaminants that did not exist 200 years ago.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:Torah Identification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole concept of items, recipes, law that is totally unchangeable because it's "holy" seems ...dated.

  19. Just like diamonds by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I bought a diamond for an engagement ring, it came with a gemprint; a card showing the stones unique identifer when light is passed through it. No two diamonds are exactly the same, so light will not pass through two diamonds the same way. Very similar to what they're doing with the torah scrolls.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Just like diamonds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gemprint for diamonds is just bloody amazing! With enough market penetration the concept of untracable diamonds will disappear (imagine... getting a ransome paid in diamonds will be like asking for $100 bills with sequential serial numbers).

      Also there have been a number of cases where a recovered stolen diamond was returned to its rightful owner... because of the gemprint. Just too frigging cool.

    2. Re:Just like diamonds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It would make a lot more sense if diamonds were genuinely rare.

    3. Re:Just like diamonds by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Diamonds are the greatest shell game of the modern era, and a triumph of marketing. DeBeers is a genuine illegal cartel, and up until they settled an anti-trust over industrial diamonds in 2004, had great difficulties acting directly in the U.S.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  20. They should enlist Slashdot's help! by FlyByPC · · Score: 1, Funny

    Contemplating stealing a holy text should lower the prospective thief's Karma enough that all you'd have to do would be to filter the entrance to the synagogue, yes? Easy enough to do on the forums!

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:They should enlist Slashdot's help! by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if you're God I bet you won't listen to prayers at -1.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  21. And what about everyone's favorite? RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this sound like a good case for RFID?

    Stick on a few transponders

  22. Inaccurate - at best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First of all Svadt isn't so tiny and second of all I highly doubt microcalligraphy is done only there - I have several prints that are made up of microcalligraphy and this has been done for quite a few years now - somehow I doubt the idea and skill only stayed there.

    1. Re:Inaccurate - at best... by pHatidic · · Score: 1
      somehow I doubt the idea and skill only stayed there


      That is what they said when I was there. I guess I agree that svadt isn't tiny, but all I really remember from it was the micro calligraphy and some random guy who made crazy things out of paper mache.

    2. Re:Inaccurate - at best... by davebarz · · Score: 1

      I was there last week. Definitely not tiny. Probably between 100,000 and 200,000. And they do the microcalligraphy all over Israel.

  23. This is how it starts... by xMonkey · · Score: 1, Insightful

    15000 years from now, after the current civilization has been forgotten, some archeologist is going to dig up one of these, and discover the 'secret codes,' and see them as evidence of God or even aliens.

    1. Re:This is how it starts... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Far less time for it to be a best seller.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:This is how it starts... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Nah, the Dan Brown one had more, and bigger, holes in it.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  24. Uhhh...Amazon has them... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 2, Funny


    ...for just $14.95. No Lie. I'm going to stock up!

    See!

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:Uhhh...Amazon has them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      lame, mod parent down, has affilate link to try to make money off of people clicking it.

      here's the real link:
      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0827 600151

    2. Re:Uhhh...Amazon has them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess some Arab should buy one and flush it
      down the toilet, while he's contemplating how
      Rumsfeld, Feith, Wolfowitz and some other Jews are
      treating Arabs & Islam...

  25. Jokes only Hebrew speaking Jews will get... by Avogadros+Letter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey... at least now they'll have a Safer Torah!"

    <bah-dum-ching! />

    "... and if they got away with it, they'd be getting Loot of the Frum!"

    <boo hissss />

    --
    $ touch .signature
    1. Re:Jokes only Hebrew speaking Jews will get... by payamchee · · Score: 1

      How about you not reply as Anonymous next time, eh?

    2. Re:Jokes only Hebrew speaking Jews will get... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      OK, that's 6.023 * 10^23 lashes with (chicken) noodle (soup) for you!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Jokes only Hebrew speaking Jews will get... by jbuhler · · Score: 1

      Now that the thieves can't simply sneak in and make off with the torahs, they will presumably resort to armed robbery, or "torah-jacking".

      Just imagine a masked gunman barging into the sanctuary in the middle of the service and shouting, "Gimme loot, chasidim!"

    4. Re:Jokes only Hebrew speaking Jews will get... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

      Hardly true...

      Frum is Yiddish...

      Non-Hebrew speaking Ashkenazi Jews will get it, while your Hebrew speaking Sephardis may not. :)

    5. Re:Jokes only Hebrew speaking Jews will get... by ars · · Score: 1

      For the non-jews: "Gimme loot, chasidim!" Sounds just like the words "Gmiloot Chasadim" which means works of charity and kindness.

      --
      -Ariel
    6. Re:Jokes only Hebrew speaking Jews will get... by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
      Only a Hebrew-speaking Jew will get it?
      mole-lashes?
      molasses?
      moehl-lashes?

      /Catholic married to a Muslim, speaking English & a little (very little) Farsi.

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    7. Re:Jokes only Hebrew speaking Jews will get... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the parent poster's user name (Avogadro's Letter).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  26. My career advice: stay away from crime, genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't the theif simply use an RFID sensor and check for one on the scroll before re-selling ?

  27. Re:Only the Jews by popo · · Score: 2, Funny
    Fortunately for all of us, you'll probably mate with someone just like you.

    ...Its a Darwin joke.. you wouldn't understand.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  28. As long as you don't change anything: by failure-man · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be easier to, I don't know, use a modern book version that would be too cheap for anyone to bother stealing? Sheesh, dogmatists . . . . .

    1. Re:As long as you don't change anything: by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      If that worked they would do it with Bibles, and people steal those left and right.
      Not sure what they do with them once they steal it, though, cause they sure as hell aren't reading them.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:As long as you don't change anything: by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      They should switch to the Book of Mormon instead. The Morman Church will give you one for free if you call them and ask.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    3. Re:As long as you don't change anything: by failure-man · · Score: 1

      In my experience you don't even need to do that much. They have a mini version that they hand out once in awhile, and if they don't actually get to hand it to you they jam one under one of your windshiled wipers.

    4. Re:As long as you don't change anything: by failure-man · · Score: 1

      I wonder if somebody beat me to my favorite bar concept, what with the unwritten rule about free drinks for stolen bibles and jesus fishen . . . . . .

  29. Micro-perforation sounds like characters to me... by loggia · · Score: 1

    I had the same thought. Micro-perforations are still a form of characters.

    Why not make some of the required Torah characters look slightly different in their appearance as a form of encoding? Seems like this would be easy to do and not violate the mandate of adding any characters.

    Unless that sounds like characters encoded into characters. Hmm. Somehow this is reminding me of The Nine Billion Names of God.

  30. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a sad little delusion.

    Get a grip, deal with reality. Stop running away to your make believe.

  31. Holes make a Torah unkosher by Yonkeltron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The very act of putting holes (however small) that are not used for binding pieces of parchment to the other ones, might render a Torah unfit for use! As an observant Jew, I'd be a little bit skeptical about reading from one...

    --
    Keep the faith, share the code
    1. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about tweaking the spacing of the holes used in the binding process?
      Maybe a little binary encoding by skipping some of the holes.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by Sloosh13 · · Score: 1

      What if the binding holes were uniquely placed or spaced systematically in order to identify the individual torah?

    3. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA: "The system is legal under a rabbinical ruling issued in the 1980s that says it's kosher to make small perforations in a Torah"

      And the article also states that this method has in fact been in use since 1982. Which kind of makes me wonder how long ago something would have to happen for the article submitter to no longer use the word "recently."

    4. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by cdwiegand · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that a) not all Rabbis will recognize that ruling (in Judaism, there is no pope or other central organizing figure - there are organizations, heirarchies, but in the end none of them is TRULY authoritative, although I've been hearing about a sanhedrin, and if that was established, then it would be pretty authoritative), and b) not all Jews will recognize what those Rabbis rule. In Judaism, you're SUPPOSED to question authority, and not just swallow it down. It'll be awhile (give it a few hundred years) for it to be either globally accepted or rejected. Halachah changes SLOWLY..

      --
      . Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
    5. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by thegameiam · · Score: 4, Informative

      The halakha (Jewish Law) works like this - the text must be readable, and printed correctly. There can't be any holes inside the margins; however, holes or tears outside the margins are parmitted, although they're not mehudar (nice).

      My synagogue, Kesher Israel has one particular Sefer Torah which has about a 2" tear over one of the columns at about Parshat Pinhas (Numbers 25:10 - 30:1), which is quite apparent every time we read it - it'd be quite hard to fix, so we're waiting until we can take that one out of circulation for a few months...

      -David Barak

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    6. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points? Sheesh. Someone mod this up.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As an observant Jew, I'd be a little bit skeptical about reading from one...

      OK, so I'm entirely too Scando-Anglo in my heritage (considering the topic), and specifically not religious... so this will seem, well, cheeky (at best).

      How does any modification to the physical nature of the book/scroll, other than a change that actually alters the words therein, change the message? Meaning, Shakespeare is still Shakespeare whether in paperback, parchement, or HTML. Aren't the (apparently never changing) 300k-some characters in the Torah, well, the same every time? I understand that handling a carefully loved artifact can help put on into an introspective mood, but surely one with invisible changes (microscopic holes) isn't damaging to your spirituality - isn't content king, as it were?

      Now, all that being said, how about high-res digital images of a few of the pages? If they're hand made, no two are exactly the same, and matching a high-contrast calligraphic image against a database would surely be no harder than matching digitized finger prints, right?

      Anyway, I guess I'm just scratching my head about the "unfit for use" part. Surely the things Moses said and did, for example, aren't any different if the very same words telling the story are on a piece of paper with microscopic holes you can't even see? And, aren't whatever cultural and contemporary spiritual lessons one is supposed to glean from reading those words what really matter? I'd always thougth that "observant Jews" (as you put it) would be more about the message than the medium. But then, I suppose this is really a larger-scale, lukewarm semi-rant about orthodoxy and dogma in general - no need to pick on any particular flavor, but I saw your comment and thus you win my rant-prize for the evening.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    8. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by jhw3 · · Score: 1

      I'm with David. As long as the text is clear and undamaged everything is kosher IIRC. It's hard to keep a Sefer Torah free of tears. I'm not surprised that the Parshat Pinchas in your synagogue's Sefer Torah is torn. Considering how many times a year it is read from (several dozen I'd think) plus rolling damage etc.

    9. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by jhw3 · · Score: 1

      What about "signing" the Atzei Hayyim? For those of you who are wondering what I'm talking about, the scroll of a Sefer Torah is wound on two wooden staves, about 18"-24" tall. These are known as the "Trees of Life" (Atzei Hayyim in Hebrew). As the Torah is read from, the reader "spools" the parchment from one of them to the other to go forward (or back if need be) in the scroll. The parchment is, IIRC (haven't read from the beginning of Genesis or end of Deutoronomy in a scroll for a while) tied on to the Atzei Hayyim. What about marking, perforating, or otherwise "signing" parts of the Atzei Hayyim? It is very laborious to detach and re-attach the scroll, making it discouraging to "swap" them, and the "signature" on the Atzei Hayyim could be in an obscure place. I'd think this would be a better (and less halachically problematic) solution.

    10. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How does any modification to the physical nature of the book/scroll, other than a change that actually alters the words therein, change the message?

      I am not jewish but I think I can answer this one.

      The Rabbis wanted to insure that the Torah remaind unaltered and true. Damage to the scroll could change the content. Obviously a large tear could remove words (content), but even a small hole could damage the content. For example a small hole could turn a U into a J.

    11. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The laws of writting a kosher Torah are quite complex. For example with 6 exceptions each page must begin with a specific letter "Vav".

      There are complex laws for how a Torah is written, read etc. If you drop one of the floor everyone in the room is required to fast for 40 days (generally Monday and Thursday for the next 20 weeks). This is an object for us that is increadably special to us.

      I should point out that most Jews I know also own at least one printed version with commentary etc. In my case its a Hebrew/English translation but as I live in Israel many folks have a Hebrew only version.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    12. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by jayed_99 · · Score: 1
      this method has in fact been in use since 1982. Which kind of makes me wonder how long ago something would have to happen for the article submitter to no longer use the word "recently."

      Judaism and halacha operate on a very long timescale. For instance, in any good book about Jewish prayer services there will be a number of statements like, "Relatively recently, in the early 1600s, some additions were made..." Things change slowly in these parts.


    13. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by tezza · · Score: 1

      Hey Jews didn't even believe what G-d dictated. He's of the opinion that we're a stiff necked people. Who'd disagree, nu? Deut 31:27

      --
      [% slash_sig_val.text %]
    14. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you really telling me that if I drop a Torah in a room, I can make all the religious Jewish people in that room fast for 40 (nonconsecutive) days?

      Very cool :)

      I think I've just found a foolproof weightloss program for the religious Jewish. I could be rich :)

    15. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well that is rather assuming they let you pick it up in the first place. Sifri Torah* are rather closely guarded as things go.

      * one Safer Torah, two Sifri Torah.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    16. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by haggar · · Score: 1

      Don't be upset by my questin, I am just trying to verify something I noticed a while ago: you watch or/and listen to quite a bit of BBC news broadcasts, don't you?

      I am guessing that from your frequent usage of "surely".

      --
      Sigged!
    17. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I noticed a while ago: you watch or/and listen to quite a bit of BBC news broadcasts, don't you?

      I am guessing that from your frequent usage of "surely".


      Heh! Actually, no, I only rarely watch the BBC's news broadcasts. I do, though, find the word "surely" to be a useful rhetorical device, as it allows you to begin a sentence with an assertive tone that puts the reader (in the case of slashdot, usually someone that isn't thinking the way I am about something) in a bit of a defensive posture. "Surely, since A=B and B=C, then A=C" translates loosely to "Of course you can't disagree about what I'm about to say about A, B, and C." I believe I picked this up watching too much Monty Python as a child.

      I used to worry about sounding pretentious when I deliberately use somewhat more formal or subtle prose in a geek-oriented message forum, but I've seen that taking the high(er) road, tone-wise, often helps to filter out the complete jackasses who communicate only through references to maternal heritage, things scatalogical, or by calling me "stoopid." It's actually pretty amazing how quickly - even on Slashdot - you can draw other, more rational people into a thread just by sticking to a more thoughtful style of prose. There's no question that when I'm tired, or have somehow fallen into a troll's trap, that I'll shoot from the hip with some ill-considered response, but that's not very constructive (though it can feel pretty good!). Anyhow, if there's ever a British tone to my rhetoric, then I'll consider myself lucky, in that I know of no other place with a greater collection (and history of) orators, rhetoriticians, and talented communicators. That British schools still seem, at least more than their US counterparts, to hold their students to that traditional standard, is a delight. It must come from growing up on the same island that spawned Shakespeare. And the Spice Girls, of course.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    18. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by RCanine · · Score: 1

      I think it's hard for non-Jewish and non-Hindus (like me) to understand the idea of purity and sanctity in the same way that these two faiths do. Especially Christians in the US, where many would print their book on toilet paper if they thought it would be read first. Aside from keeping the text accurate, in order to be practiced properly, nothing of religious use should be said to be "spoiled"--even the person, hence the rules regarding which foods and materials are clean and unclean. Of course the strictness of this varies, but its an extra facet that you will not see in many other faiths.

    19. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by haggar · · Score: 1

      Okay, first of all apologies, and I got it wrong about you being a BBC viewer.

      I have to say that I find the use of "surely2 and "very, very much" to be a sign of bad style, or even lack of style. In fact, when I realized how these are overused by BBC journalists (who, I guess, probably have a high opinion about their ways of expression), I made a conscious decision to remove unnecessary superlatives and such, from my English. My assertion is enough to get the message across, "surely .." and "... very, very much" and "... indeed" don't increase the truthfulness or accuracy of my statements.

      English is not my mother tongue, however, my father is a (italian) writer and poet. Perhaps I got a half of that elusive literary gene. Not enough to help me create something new and sellable, unfortunately.

      --
      Sigged!
    20. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by tzuriel · · Score: 1

      Although you are correct about the message being important, the scroll itself has inherent sanctity as well. According to Jewish law, if the scroll itself does not conform to the complex group of laws that govern it, the scroll is not even considered a Torah. It will still carry certain aspects of holiness, but it will not be usable for the obligational public readings.

    21. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Like any linguistic/cultural "tic," devices like "Surely," or "certainly" are of course much abused and are inserted into a lot of sentences just because the speaker feels like they're sounding more authoritative or important when they utter that phrase. I like to think that I only use it when I actually mean it.

      Too much use, and these become un-heard (meaning, we tune them out entirely when we hear them... like, "ummm" between words).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    22. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      It will still carry certain aspects of holiness, but it will not be usable for the obligational public readings.

      Well, then you can see how someone not raised in that tradition might find that a little baffling. One could come to the conclusion that there's an object being worshipped, rather than a state of being (or a spiritual/philosophical goal) being embraced. I'd have thought that it was more of a "holy is as holy does" rather than the provenance of a particular object having anything other symbolic meaning. Can it be that people truly don't consider their behavior or thoughts or relations to be appropriately worthy because of the nature of the hardcopy that's read from during a ceremony? I'm not being glib - I'm just trying to distill this down to the basics so that I understand it. The boundaries between symbols of history or symbols designed to remind one and inspire one towards purity/integrity of character seem easily confused with the investment of mystical power into a particular collection of paper and ink - the object itself.

      Does anyone ever ask "why" to these things? Meaning, if a social custom obliges one to read certain specific words aloud - is the physical material upon which the words are written in any way going to alter the meaning or import of the words themselves? The same words are the same words, aren't they?

      I'm truly not trying to be a smart-aleck here, but because I just can't convincingly put my mind somewhere that reason won't take it, I've got to hear someone else explain the thought process. I find this arena (slashdot) to be an interesting venue for such things because people using this site are usually technologists of a sort, and thus can't get through their day without cold reason helping them work through what are ultimately unyielding, irreducible binary issues. So people that can put away their daily exercises in hard logic and then turn towards two printed copies of exactly the same words while considering one "not usable" - well, it's hard for me to reconcile. I certainly understand the urge to mark serious occasions with symbols of the gravity, joy, or tradition that they represent (and hence the appreciation of, essentially, Genuine Antique Written Material - it's nice to know that, say, Great Grandpa in the Old Country used exactly the same book when he got married - it connects one to history a bit), but I can't imagine, then, that anything other than perhaps the very first original of anything would be any more significant than any copy, made by any person or mechanism. The concepts, myths, stories, truths - what have you - should be just as valid regardless of the binding, the fiber in the paper, or the way the ink got on that paper.

      That being said, I'm actually pretty sentimental, and do have certain family heirlooms that make certain events just feel right. But certain family concepts are going to be true no matter what I jot them down on, or whether or not I digitize them. Damn us cold-hearted atheists! We're an annoying bunch, aren't we.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    23. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by tzuriel · · Score: 1
      I certainly understand how this would be confusing to someone unfamiliar with this lifestyle. I guess it's important to draw a distinction between the Torah as text and the Torah as a ritual object. The law describes in quite specific details how the ritual object must be created, right down to the ink and quill that are to be used and the type of parchment and thread that is permissible. The concepts in the text of the Torah are the same no matter what form they take, as long as they are verbatim quotes of the original. However, the ritual object must follow certain guidelines to be valid. There are design requirements that must be met in order to allow that object to be used in the rituals for which it is needed.

      Someone who does not live this lifestyle cannot be expected to understand this based on a few comments on Slashdot. Faith is obviously more complicated than that.

      I appreciate your openness and sincere attempts to understand. I can direct you to a couple of places where those much more knowledgeable than I can explain this. http://www.aish.com/literacy/concepts/Sanctity_of_ Torah_Scrolls.asp http://www.aish.com/literacy/concepts/Writing_the_ Torah.asp

    24. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by jbb1003 · · Score: 1

      Ma pitom?! 40 days? One day would suffice in my (orthodox) congregation.

    25. Re:Holes make a Torah unkosher by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      If you drop one of the floor everyone in the room is required to fast for 40 days (generally Monday and Thursday for the next 20 weeks). This is an object for us that is increadably special to us.

      So Jews would understand the complaints leveled by sections of the Muslim community against the US Armed Forces "disrespecting" copies of the Koran?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  32. Re:Micro-perforation sounds like characters to me. by WAR-Ink · · Score: 1

    Any alteration of the writing on the document would, in theory constitute a "new" message.

    I was thinking more along the lines of them contacting the US Treasury department. They are pretty much experts at making paper "unique and identifiable". Something as simple as black fibers embedded in the paper making a barcode. In this case, "not one character" is added as it is already there.

  33. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes we all wish life was like the movies.
    your either team A or team B.
    If your from team A, team B is wrong and vice versa.

    Pretty easy to say everything that is good must be god and everything bad must be the devil.

    If you were a god, would you really want people to worship you.

    If it were me, i wouldnt want any credit for something i do thats good, helping its self is its own reward. There for we can say that the bible is written by man as its self important and egotistical.

    At the end of the day, your going to defend what you feel is right and what makes you feel safe, unfortunatly for you, it doesnt mean your right.

  34. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Duh huh, duh huh... uh huhuh... eee aaaa

  35. Sell to whom? by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who would pay $50,000 for a stolen Torah? Surely somebody that would place that much value on a book would actually have read the book and be attempting to follow the laws therein, especially the one about "Thou shalt not steal" -- or encourage others to steal! I can't beleive people could buy this without the provence of them documented, and then claim they just didn't know it was stolen.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Sell to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? I've read the Old Testament, and I certainly don't live by what it says. Reading a book doesn't mean I give a shit about its contents. Maybe if I was materialistic and there was some baroque ritual for copying the Old Testament I might steal a SUPER SPECIAL HAND SCRIBED OLD TESTAMENT. I mean, why do people collect rare coins? They have no intrinsic value; they're only valuable because people want them. Well stolen "holy" books can be valuable for the same reason.

    2. Re:Sell to whom? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Who would pay $50,000 for a stolen Torah?

      Someone who had their Torah stolen by someone else? It's a vicious circle.

    3. Re:Sell to whom? by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming (and that's a dangerous practice) that the buyers are unaware of the illegality of their purchase.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    4. Re:Sell to whom? by snoyberg · · Score: 1

      That's usually the case. There's no "documentation" that goes along with a Torah. That's exactly why this system is being considered.

      Of course, I'm sure if you dig hard enough (and I'm sure someone already is) you'll find a case of someone who knowingly bought a stolen Torah...

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    5. Re:Sell to whom? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would guess that the thief uses an especially dastardly and cunning ruse, something along the lines of avoiding saying "Would you like to buy this stolen Torah" and saying something like "My client has a Torah for sale" instead.

    6. Re:Sell to whom? by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      Trade in historiographic materials, religious relics, and artwork is huge business. Collectors with more money than brains will pay millions of dollars to own an item they can never admit to owning (since it would be admitting to possesion of stolen property and they'd have to give it back).

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

  36. Hmmm by 30hertz · · Score: 1

    Why didn't they put 'thou shalt not steal' on it originally - like they did - helpfully - on some other texts?

  37. This Gentile says Mod Parent Down -1, Troll by LouisvilleDebugger · · Score: 1, Informative

    Parent comment is a slap in the face of human culture, Jewish or no, religious or no, and it has no place on Slashdot.

    --An 'If I Were a Rich Man'-singing " non-Jew.

    Don't feed this troll, just mod them down, please.

    1. Re:This Gentile says Mod Parent Down -1, Troll by popo · · Score: 3, Funny


      > We all have a right to our opinion


      Ah good.


      My opinion is that you're an uneducated ass.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    2. Re:This Gentile says Mod Parent Down -1, Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be missing something really obvious here, but as far as I can tell, your comment has no parent comment. It is posted at the top level, so that the only thing that could be considered its parent is the story itself.

      Am I right about this? I'm starting to see it a lot on slashdot, and I'm never quite sure if I'm missing something about the user interface or if people are just clicking the top-level "reply" button out of carelessness (or ignorance of the distinction between it and the comments' "Reply to This" links) and then making comments about the parent comment that they believe exists when in fact no parent comment does exist.

      Either one of those two, or the slashdot code has a bug regarding parents of comments, which I should definitely allow as a possibility.

      Does anyone know what's actually going on with posts like this?

  38. Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who else read Torah scrolls as Trolls.

  39. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll


    That's fine. I'll take my hedge fund money to Canada and let you pay my social security checks you uneducated little worm.

    And tell your little pathetic god to solve that problem.

    he can kiss my rich royal ass and so can you.

    Ta ta. Dipshit.

  40. Re:Only the Jews by theskipper · · Score: 2, Funny

    And if I can help only one ignorant slashdotter spell "flamebait" then it's worth it.

    We'll work on spelling "troll" next article...

  41. The Discussion on this Board by popo · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    The discussion on this board only proves in spades that the Palestinian Israeli conflict isn't the result of politics....

    Its the result of stupidity.

    And apparently there's plenty to go around.

    Right wing Christians, anti-semites, devout Jews, propagandists, and finger pointers spouting agendas, inflammatory flamebait and half-truths.

    Realize, please, all of you, that none of you represents a solution.

    That at least would be a good first step.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:The Discussion on this Board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Uh.. yeeaeah that was total flamebait you warmonger...

      Huh?

      Thanks for the voice of reason.

    2. Re:The Discussion on this Board by griffeymac · · Score: 1

      This is the most sensible comment that has been posted thus far.

      When "the world" realizes that we're all just human beings, and can get over all of this religious sillyness, perhaps then we can evolve into a more mature and understanding society.

      Until then we settle for "I'm going to blow you up because (this is what you believe) and (this is what I believe)."

      It's interesting that so many religions think it is okay to kill people, well, just because they don't agree with some rules that are posted in some book...

    3. Re:The Discussion on this Board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll. Even after obviously looking down upon others who you deem bad, to make yourself feel morally righteous, you still get a person to say you're right and sensible. Nice troll indeed.

    4. Re:The Discussion on this Board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what exactly is bad about this discussion? no one represents a solution to what?

      i'd like some examples, please.

      the reasonable people are talking about what could work to safeguard a ver holy book....you do realize you're on the internet, right? do you seriously think a forum like this is going to be devoid of trolls.

    5. Re:The Discussion on this Board by compm375 · · Score: 1

      Religion is not silly, and eliminating it will not solve the world's problems. The majority of the world practices some sort of religion. The majority of the world believes their religion can coexist with others. There are few extremists who misread religious texts. All religions I know of are based on some sort of morals and generally want their followers to be good people. Without religion the world would not be better. Since we are all "just human beings" there will always be extremists, whether they are religious extremists or not. To remove these people we would need to destroy beliefs completely. Obviously that is impossible as long as humans have brains. So the only way to get real peace would be to kill everyone.

    6. Re:The Discussion on this Board by Rostin · · Score: 0

      You realize that religious people have been murdered in the pursuit of getting rid "this religious sillyness" don't you?

      How about you take your own advice? Instead of denigrating a way of thinking that the majority of people in this world find valuable (as though you have all the answers!), realize we're all just human beings, and that ideologies of any kind (even humanism) can be dangerous.

    7. Re:The Discussion on this Board by griffeymac · · Score: 1

      I never for once said to remove religion from the world. But I do indeed think that it is silly that people of one religion will kill people of another religion just because of religion. And I think that the Israelis, no matter how badly they have been mistreated in the past, use the fact that they were persecuted as an excuse to murder Palestinians over and over and over again. But whatever. "Believe" what you want.

    8. Re:The Discussion on this Board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting that so many countries think it's ok to kill people, well, just because they don't agree with some rules that are posted in some document...

    9. Re:The Discussion on this Board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But I do indeed think that it is silly that people of one religion will kill people of another religion just because of religion."

      I think you will find this is quite uncommon. People of one religion will kill people of another religion, but more often than not, there are reasons that go much deeper than mere religious differences at work. These are difficult to understand, so the conflict is pigeonholed by the observer.

    10. Re:The Discussion on this Board by compm375 · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, I guess I misinterpreted "get over all of this religious sillyness". Even so, Israelis are not killing Palestinians because they have an excuse to do so. There is a huge amount of terrorism coming from the Palestinians and Israel needs to protect itself. Study the history a little closer. I think you will find that the Israelis have been trying a lot harder to make peace than the Palestinians.

  42. Re:Micro-perforation sounds like characters to me. by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    its not paper, its the skin from a kosher animal.

    WHich really, though, opens up a better alternative - take a microscopic sample from the parchement, and then do a DNA-fingerprint of it. Put fingerprint in a database. Viola.

  43. Re:So what?! by Umanity · · Score: 1

    You are a troll. You know nothing about which you are talking about, and sound like an idiot.

    Who said anything about Torah desecration in this article? It has to do with tracing stolen Torah scrolls. This is not a Bible, or a Quran, or whatever. The Torah scroll must be kosher in order for it to be used in all Jewish rituals. Again, nobody is claiming it was desecrated or flushed or anything... Is it, or isn't it according to the word of G-d? Simple as that...

    Who is expecting you to fall over, not me, not the Jewish community, who is? And you must think alot of yourself to call other peoples beliefs 'fairy tales'. You must be one SMART DUDE!!!

    Check your facts before you open your dumb mouth...

    --

    Michael A. Uman
    Sr Software Engineer
    softwaremagic.net

  44. Carved in stone by T1girl · · Score: 1

    It's not very PC to call religious folk "loony" -- after all, if the Jews had fallen in with every popular idea, where would they be today, and where would the Bible be -- but you make a good point. We can transcribe every document onto multiple formats today. Still, some last better than others. My family has black and white photos from the 1940s and 1950s that still look good today; we have color photos from the 1960s that are fading and VCR home movies from the 1980s that none of us can look at because our VCR is busted, and we've moved to DVD.I've seen TV programs about all the trouble it takes to keep the original Declaration of Independence from crumbling. What remains? It's hard to beat the Rosetta Stone for one of the most useful and enduring documents ever written/carved.

    Handmade documents deserve a certain aura of respect. Have you ever seen the Book of Kells in Dublin? Think of what it took to make an illuminated manuscript. I have worked on
    Web sites and several newspapers, and they are ephemeral. What remains?

    The only written communication Jesus is recorded as making was something he wrote with a stick in sand. Wouldn't you like to know what he wrote?

    1. Re:Carved in stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not very PC to call religious folk "loony"

      Except for Christians, apparently -- they're fair game. Just ask the ACLU.

    2. Re:Carved in stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [i]The only written communication Jesus is recorded as making was something he wrote with a stick in sand. Wouldn't you like to know what he wrote?[/i]

      No.

    3. Re:Carved in stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only written communication Jesus is recorded as making was something he wrote with a stick in sand. Wouldn't you like to know what he wrote?

      No.

      And here's a better question - who gives a shit about being PC? Besides the loony Christians who started the entire process.

    4. Re:Carved in stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only written communication Jesus is recorded as making was something he wrote with a stick in sand. Wouldn't you like to know what he wrote?

      Your question is in regard to a myth. The chances are very good that he was illiterate, and never wrote a damn thing.

      On the other hand, I would dearly like to know what Jesus actually said during his life, because I'm sure that the people who wrote all manner of things about him after his death bent the truth in so doing. It would be very interesting to see how far modern-day churches have moved from his ideology.

    5. Re:Carved in stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I would. And while we're at it, anybody know a good site for David Koresh lyrics? I'm really into the ramblings of nutjobs who think they're god.

    6. Re:Carved in stone by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "On the other hand, I would dearly like to know what Jesus actually said during his life"

      I'd be just as interested in knowing if he ever built anything as a carpenter, what kinds of wood were available, whether there were abundant hardwoods in the region at the time, and what kind of tools he used. I wonder if he had a chalk line or an iron hammer, or a serrated saw.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:Carved in stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Just ask the ACLU.

      What exactly has the ACLU said on the matter?
      Plenty of negative misinformation is attributed to them, of course, but what have you got to support your argument that's credible?

    8. Re:Carved in stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Plenty of negative misinformation is attributed to them, of course, but what have you got to support your argument that's credible?

      Your asking a christian this question. Support? Argument? Credible? Palease.

  45. Always best to stay a release or so behind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, the code may be the same, but only because they destroyed all the copies but one.

    And it STILL hasn't stolved the problem of a rift among the developers. Several of them got into fights over who really owned the source code and they've been having bitter IP disputes over it ever since as to who the true heir to it should be.

    Besides, they still haven't worked out some of those jihad problems. So it's always best to stay one release or so behind and keep with something more stable. Granted, that doesn't mean problem free, but most (but not all) of the really violently horrible errors are gone from it by now and it's considerably more peaceful. Whereas this new version completely takes over your system and violently refuses to uninstall, no matter whether you've changed your mind or not. And changing your mind afterwards can be *really* painful with all those fatal exception errors and such.

    Just a friendly warning :)

    1. Re:Always best to stay a release or so behind... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Haha, touché.

  46. But barcodes are a new message as well. by loggia · · Score: 1

    But barcodes are a new message as well.

    I guess they'd have to go with the digital fingerprints. No alteration, period. It sounds like a very promising method...

    1. Re:But barcodes are a new message as well. by WAR-Ink · · Score: 1

      But the threads where their first. They would be embedded in the parchment that the torah is written on.

      I didn't invent dogma, I only circumnavigated it.

  47. Re:Micro-perforation sounds like characters to me. by cdwiegand · · Score: 1

    Except that the skin is from multiple animals. (not multiple KINDS, but more than one animal). Have you ever seen a torah scroll? They're HUGE (and I don't think I'll volunteer to be the holder - it's always the brawny guy who has to do that at my shul).

    Although, your idea has merit - just collect samples from pages X, Y, and Z, and make that into a database..

    --
    . Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
  48. Torah! Torah! Torah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Torah! Torah! Torah!

    Err, humm, yeh!

    Well *I* Thought it was funny!

  49. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    You *do* realize that the Torah is the same as the first five books of the Christian Bible right?

    Calling the Torah "toiletpaper" is the same as calling the Bible "toiletpaper".

  50. Quick! by ilikejam · · Score: 1

    Someone should call RMS. The Ancient Torahs aren't compatible with the FDL

    --
    C-x C-s C-x k
    1. Re:Quick! by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Sure they are, you can even add pieces and make your own document! You just can't call it by the same thing

      The "original" Christians did it, the Catholics did it, the Mormons did it, the Christian Scientists did it..

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Quick! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      It's public domain, and also the Author also claims ownership of Everything.

  51. Re:Only the Jews by fishbowl · · Score: 1, Insightful


    >Religion sucks.

    Religion begins as a set of prescribed and proscribed behaviors which, overall, would have been observed as increasing the size of the tribe.

    What better way to get people not to shit where they eat, or to understand that fucking leads to babies, or to instill a basic system of law and order, than to make the people believe it dogmatically. It does not necessarily even require a God -- an oral system with medicine people and storytellers can work just as well.

    But once you have your peasant class believing in a divine mandate from a supreme deity, then your behaviors that are codified into law will start to enforce themselves, over many generations, without a need for a managed political heirarchy.

    Unfortunately, a system that begins innocently enough (wash your hands before delivering babies, don't eat raw pork), can be amended to enforce a corrupt political ideal.

    I'm not saying that happened in any particular religion, but I'm satisfied with the basic premise that it could have happened.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  52. Sell to Yew. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    All the commandments are inter-woven;

    "Thou shalt not steal" is equally applicable as "Thou shalt not kill." I always thought killing is same as stealing life.

    The trend I see today is people blaming the tool or weapon used to kill someone; or saying a martyr isn't the tresspasser violating the no-killing commandment. We all should be thankful the CIA or whoever it is has not yet decided to telefrag all of us with mooshy Oranges by that secret technology they're concealing. So they install non-trustworthy dictators in a weak state on a hurt country, let them kill eachother ye ol' fassioned way, and with a telepathic suggestion to a bigger asshole they send brute-force attacks to all the ports of that country. I'm not impressed, but the cadence I've uncovered with country and politics is beautiful.

    --
    without prejudice
    1. Re:Sell to Yew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, if you actually beleive any of the stuff you just spouted off, you need to seek psychiatric help, and soon!

  53. Re:Only the Jews by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Insightful



    "And the educated have always had more sex, money, power and influence."

    I'm quite certain the uneducated have more sex. Those in the ruling classes always have more societal structures in place, that are aimed at *preventing* sex.

    The money, power and influence parts, I won't argue with. But peasants definitely have more sex.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  54. Secret codes eh? by rune2 · · Score: 1

    Where was Da Vinci when they really needed him?!

  55. Did anyone... by stupidcomputers · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read this as "Secret Codes Protect Ancient Torrents"?

  56. Sequels by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    "The Bible Code" ... "The Torah Code"...

    1. Re:Sequels by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      "the torah code" would be a prequel. "the quran code" would be the sequel. of course this is relative to "the bible code". all of them would be prequels if relative to "the da vinci code" since he came after all 3.

  57. Use the digital fingerprints for DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the Big Guy would think of that...

  58. high resolution photo by clockwise_music · · Score: 2, Informative

    Could you just take a really high resolution photograph of it? Doesn't everyone have different handwriting? Or are all of them meant to look the same?

    1. Re:high resolution photo by neomac · · Score: 4, Informative

      While each scribe, called a "sofer" (long o) has unique calligraphic penmanship, the form of the letters are highly detailed and specific to the calligraphy of writing a Torah. To go from one Torah to the next you would see no difference in the way each letter is formed.

    2. Re:high resolution photo by twohorses · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know about "no difference". Some sofers make nice even letters. Others start the line well enough but then buncheverythingup as they get to the end. Others realize they're going to get to the end of the line too quickly and stretch out some letters (which is allowed) to the point where they're hard to read. And on one torah I read from, the sofer went crazy with the crowns. We called that the 'trippy torah'. Here's a link to a sofer's site with lots of pictures and explanations: http://www.bayit02.freeserve.co.uk/index.html

  59. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    FEAR IS YOUR ONLY GOD!!

  60. The Talmud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Discuss.

  61. I don't see how holder of "nurb432" tresspassed. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    I've read my Holy Bible through and through. All the commandments, testimony, and truth that can be absorbed is written on my heart.

    If I was in a forest with my backpack of different Bibles, and with a horrible case of God the Father knows what coming out of my ass every hour, I would joyfully use that Zondervan Press NIV Holy Bible to whipe on my ass. That musta been why God sent it to me, amidst more concistent Bibles. The reason is I compared their bastardization of Isaiah 14 and Revelation 22 to the King James 1611 Authorized Version transcription of those. Also, KJV 1611 AV is true public domain, whereas Zondervan Press NIV is corporate copyright on scriptures that amounts no less than theivery. I'll whipe my ass on that Zondervan Press corporate Bible any day, and I'll be singing my favorite Psalm 127 as I do it.

    --
    without prejudice
  62. Re:So what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing a religious person does, is to throw away reason with everything involving their religion. Religion is based on faith, and can't accept any reasoning that goes against it.

  63. RFID by thegameiam · · Score: 2, Informative

    You couldn't add an RFID to the scroll itself, although it might be possible to add it to the Atzei Hayyim (wood staves) on which the scroll is wound.

    -David Barak

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  64. Re:Torah Torah Torah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the Germans bomb Pearl Harbor?

  65. Really wanted to mod this up! by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    +1 insightful/underrated. Why is it such a taboo to criticize bullshit cultural relics?

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:Really wanted to mod this up! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Because calling the book, that billions of people believe is the essential of their faith, millions of whom are survivors of millennia of attempts at genocide to destroy it, "toilet paper" is not criticism. It's not really even an insult to the "relic", because the relic isn't conscious, can't receive insults. It's just a disgusting insult to those people, without criticism.

      I don't believe in the god described in that bible. I don't believe in the religions that are based on it. I do believe in respect for other people. I especially believe in criticism of archaic beliefs and blind faith. But calling a venerated part of the lives of millions of people "toilet paper" is an attack on those people, without any "criticism" of the book. It's not taboo, it's just an asshole move. BTW, note the difference between this post, or even your own, and the one you're defending. Ours have a fact, an idea, some kind of specific, relevant point. The other is just an obnoxious insult.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  66. So flushing down a Torah would be really bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to make sure we're not going to be insensitive about this: flushing down a Torah would be like really really bad?

  67. perforation watermarking, or ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... or they could change the stupid law which prevents them from putting an identification on the Torah in the first place.

    I think this is an example of just going too far in the slavish devotion to tradition. Much like the automated elevators they have in Israel, which - on certain days - travel to every floor so the occupants don't have to push the floor button, which means they don't have to use a machine, which means they don't have to do work. If that's not going to extremes, I don't know what is!

  68. Oy! A young goy has broken the code by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    1. Re:Oy! A young goy has broken the code by BarneyRabble · · Score: 1

      And you might not get your Red Rider BB Gun, either for Chaunakah either Ralphie.

    2. Re:Oy! A young goy has broken the code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The least you could have done was to look up the quote.

  69. That's what I'm saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I think the decline of Judaism occured when the really cool curses stopped happening. What happened to threats like "if you touch this, you will surely die." or "if you go into the holiest of holies and you're not a priest, you're dead shit."

    I for one miss religions that had hardcore swift divine justice. Nowadays, all they have are threats of the after life, or bad karma, or whatever equivalent. Big deal. I wanna see fire come from the sky, locust plagues, etc... otherwise your religion is boring.

  70. Not just ancient but any Torah by gelfling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    $50,000 or more is for a Torah that is used every day. A truly ancient e.g. more than 5 or 6 hundred years old scroll or a Torah from eastern Europe before 1800 would literally be priceless. Pick a large number, double it, add 4 zeros, double it again.

    Theft is not a huge problem but it is a problem because scrolls are so expensive and some shuls simply can't afford them. So they look for one of questionable provenance. Also scrolls do wear out and have to be buried and replaced eventually.

  71. Re:Micro-perforation sounds like characters to me. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    what about those chemical barcode flakes? years ago i saw something about them being used to mark explosives for tracking, microscopic flakes which contain different patterns of colors when inspected under a microscope, just spray them on with an adhesive? I'm not Jewish so would that be acceptable for a Torah scroll?

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  72. oh absolutely! Talk about extensibility! by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    What could be more extensible than the original five books of Moses? They've been extended to dozens or hundreds of fully realized religious texts, and their internal objects are in reuse through metaphore in nearly every spoken language and nearly all literature.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  73. The troll got modded below your browse threshold. by LouisvilleDebugger · · Score: 1

    That confused me too. If you want to see the parent article, click the child's article number so you're just viewing that, and hit the "parent" link.

  74. Re:Micro-perforation sounds like characters to me. by frizzbit · · Score: 1

    Except that DNA analysis requires a sample of the parchment to be destroyed. When you have a several-hundred-year-old document you cannot afford to remove a little bit off it each time you want to test its authenticity. And given that the sample could easily be contaminated by anyone who might have handled it you may need quite a large sample.

  75. Re:Only the Jews by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

    when Christ went to eat with the publicans and sinners

    If you feel a need to make a distinction between sinners and publicans, you obviously don't know many publlicans.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  76. Price by thegameiam · · Score: 1

    The $50K value is for a new one. People pay less for older or damaged ones, and for the same reason that people will try to pay $300 for a "brand new iMac G5" you'll get people who will pay $20K for a Sefer of unknown provenance... :(

    -David Barak

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  77. My Jewish roomate once said by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1

    hell was having to spend all eternity with his nagging mother. Of course, I think everybody thinks their ethnic peoples have the most nagging busy-body mothers!

  78. Re:Only the Jews by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I bet they believe the words are from God too.

    Can you prove otherwise?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  79. Physical security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've noticed some increase in security at "temples"* over the past few years. A big one in this area now checks the trunk of cars coming into its parking garage, and they now have guards around. Unfortunately there are still some ill-informed/confused/misguided/self-hating/treaso nous Jews around who have problems with the idea of Jews being armed to defend themselves, so I have yet to see (openly) armed guards at a temple/schul/synagogue, at least not outside of Israel. It seems like better physical security might not be a bad idea these days. Protect the Torahs, the building, and the worshipers.

    *I put "temple" in quotes because according to some interpretations there have only been two temples, and both have been destroyed, except for one remaining wall in Jerusalem.

    1. Re:Physical security by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately there are still some (...) Jews around who have problems with the idea of Jews being armed"

      Certainly not these jews.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  80. Black Market? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    A Black Market for Torahs? That has to be one of the strangest things I've ever heard of...

    Of course it would play nicely into my Cops parody skit Rabbis

    Yitzak 511, we have a non-kosher bagel in progress on the corner of Sherbrooke & St. Denis, please send backup for a minyan.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  81. Small size by isny · · Score: 1

    304,805 letters? That's only 1.15e-15 libraries of congress!
    Ok, so I made that number up. What's the real number?

    1. Re:Small size by snoyberg · · Score: 1

      I don't know the exact number, but I remember very specifically that it was over 600,000 (there's meaning to that number). I don't know where this ~300,000 comes from.

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    2. Re:Small size by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      5. No, 3!

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  82. All this time, money and effort... by cr0sh · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I am all for protecting and insuring against theft (or other damage) intellectual works and histories, products of the human mind. Which, ultimately, is what the Torah is. We, as rational human beings, should never destroy any work of the mind, whether valueless/depraved, or priceless and inspired - because in the end, it is who we ultimately are, and serves as a "roadmap" of sorts, for future generations.

    The Torah, and other religious works, should be saved in some form.

    However, with that said, if we are ever to advance beyond our current barbarisms, we must realize these works of religion for what they are...myths. Religion has inspired many people to do good. Within most of the worlds "great" religions, and most of the lesser ones, lie messages of peace, hope, and goodwill for our fellow man. However, some of the darkest periods in history were results of, or were instituted by, so-called "religious" people, acting upon supposedly "higher" orders, or so they thought.

    Mod me down as "flamebait" if you wish, it doesn't change the facts of the matter...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:All this time, money and effort... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with what you have said about preserving intellectual works (except possibly some of the stories I wrote in highschool...), I do not think all religion is myth. Most everyone knows that there have been quite a few bad things that have happened in the past because of religion. This is no reason to dis-credit it thou. Pick any one thing, and you will find people who have mis-used it to gain power. Religion is no different. Like the malicious kiddies who write worms to down millions of computers, giving the rest of us hackers a bad rep, there are people who find ways of twisting religious texts for their own gain.
      And, as far as there being "higher" power, just take a look around, and tell me this all happened by "chance".
      - David Wolever

    2. Re:All this time, money and effort... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me (looking all around):

      "It's all just chance (guided by natural selection and other principles of emergence and self-organization)."

      The failure of your imagination places no constraints on mine.

    3. Re:All this time, money and effort... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      However, with that said, if we are ever to advance beyond our current barbarisms, we must realize these works of religion for what they are...myths.

      Yay! It's nice to hear from a fellow enlightened soul. Oh wait... how come you don't bother to prove either of those statements? Oh and if you want to complain about the wars done in god's name, you should see what has been done in the name of survival of the fittest. (Hint: it involves germans who thought they are the best race)

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re:All this time, money and effort... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you could fairly well sum this up more this way:

      Over the years, CATHOLICS have caused many wars in the name of religion...

    5. Re:All this time, money and effort... by epaga · · Score: 1
      Hmm, the only reason you mention for seeing all religion as myth is that

      some of the darkest periods in history were results of, or were instituted by, so-called "religious" people, acting upon supposedly "higher" orders, or so they thought.

      I find it not very logical to blame the religions and faiths for things that "so-called" "religious" people did, often out of political rather than religious reasons.

      That's like someone claiming to be me, wearing my clothes, who commits a murder, and you blame it on me, cause hey! - he had my clothes, he said he was me!

    6. Re:All this time, money and effort... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How completely and utterly irrelevant...

    7. Re:All this time, money and effort... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with your argument is this: You can't have it both ways.

      Either religious people accept that their religions have caused massive amounts of pain and suffering in addition to the good they have done, or...

      They don't really get to claim that their religion has done any good at all - I could equally claim it was good done by individuals doing it for political rather than religious reasons, and just cloaking it under the guise of religion.

    8. Re:All this time, money and effort... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      In all fairness the one thing religion can definitely be said to be is stories handed down from generation to generation, i.e. myths.

      Also the poster didn't give his opinion on other causes for war but then there are a lot of thing he didn't give an opinion on, I am sure the poster is just as much against wars and death for any reasons.

    9. Re:All this time, money and effort... by ezeri · · Score: 1

      They don't really get to claim that their religion has done any good at all - I could equally claim it was good done by individuals doing it for political rather than religious reasons, and just cloaking it under the guise of religion.

      I would agree with the or. Thats the whole point of christianity, mankind is screwed up. And in a sense I agree with the top as well. The "religion" has caused massive amounts of pain and suffering, ie people who doing what they do best, ignoring God, and then doing things in his name, have caused alot of pain and suffering. But thats still man doing it to man.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now. - Ed Howd
    10. Re:All this time, money and effort... by rbarreira · · Score: 1
      Don't give in to fallacies, they are the dark side. Many horrible things are made in the name of religion, and they only get done because the people doing them are backed up by the religious hierarchies. I don't want to sound like an idiot but judging from your post it seems you have never heard about the Inquisition.

      The point is - powerful entities (and religious entities are powerful) should act responsibly. Many times, they don't.

      That's like someone claiming to be me, wearing my clothes, who commits a murder, and you blame it on me, cause hey! - he had my clothes, he said he was me!

      No it's more like - someone wearing clothes you gave him/her, does all sorts of horrible things while you support his actions.
      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    11. Re:All this time, money and effort... by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Actually, the reason why so many horrible things are done in the name of religion isn't because there is inherently a flaw in the concept of religion, it's because there is a tendency in religious matters for people to simply do what they believe they are supposed to do, without trying to make sure that is _really_ what they are supposed to do.

      There are a few prominent religions actively encourage the believer to "test the spirits" as it were, to ensure that a command that might appear to be from God actually is. So the problems with these religions comes when you have people who only believe some parts of such theology, proclaim to represent the view of that theology, and yet don't actually put the entire thing into practice. In actuality, if people did this, this world would be a much nicer place to live.

    12. Re:All this time, money and effort... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      First off, I wrote a little too much in haste - I don't believe that everything written in every work of religion is a myth - there are more than enough references in most of them which have historical backup. This isn't to say that every word written in these works should be taken as "The Truth" - these stories all need to be looked at in a critical and reasoning light, to sort the meaning behind them, metaphors, etc - from the mythic elements. Much like any good mythic tale, truth is mixed with fiction to such an extent that without careful reasoned reading, the reader can be left confused at best, or a "believer" at worst. Neither one of these states makes tales of Zeus, Yaweh, or Santa Clause any more true, though.

      As far as wars are concerned, and as a child poster surmised - I personally think that wars and acts of violence are completely irrational. If you take a "simple" war, between two armies, and remove any one man from either of those armies - providing those men are acting rationally, and not emotionally - if you ask them, "Should you be fighting against each other?", they will probably look at you, at each other, and tell you "No - I don't want to kill him". How often have you heard in news stories, in interviews with "the common man" about an on-going war - and inevitably, such a common man from each side will say to the reporter "I just want to left alone and in peace to care for my family"? This is all each of us want, and only irrational madmen want anything different. Strangely enough, these very people for some whacked reason, sometimes rise to the "top" - and lead armies against other nations, causing destruction, strife, loss of life and limb, untold sufferring, and untold loss of massive resources of all kinds, all in the name of some ideal or dogma, which when you rationally look at it, most of the time it makes no sense at all, or was based on a pack of lies. As a group, many go along with it though, despite the irrationality, and it is maddenning to me and others why this is, because we see this, and we are called "unpatriotic" or worse. Simply because we see and attempt to understand the reasons behind the irrational, and we attempt to educate those around us, in a sometime futile attempt to stop the irrational actions we are caught up in. Currently, the greatest of this is being caused by the United States and the Middle East, with Iraq at the center. Elsewhere, it is among the Middle East itself, with Israel and Palestine, or India and Pakistan. How about the insanity with North Korea, Japan, and others? This is only a small sampling, it isn't limited to a few countries, a few races, a few beliefs/religions/dogmas - it is something that is ongoing, and seemingly intrinsically human. But why?

      I, and every other human being, understand and struggle with agression and anger, small and large. I can't tell you the number of times during which I have felt angry over stupid and small things, sometimes to the point of breaking things over it! On reflection, after cooling down, I say to myself "That was stupid, and not productive", and I vow not to become so irrational again. Sometimes I don't - but sometimes I do - and I continually wonder why, and I realize that this strange human urge is probably at the base of many of our conflicts between one another.

      That doesn't make it right. War and violence tend to be irrational actions or reactions to misperceived wrongs or misunderstandings, and we, as supposedly rational human beings should strive to break from our animalistic bindings and work to erradicate these irrational predispositions we have, or we will ultimately destroy ourselves.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  83. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference being most people feel the need to force their view of religion on others to prove they're not wrong and there for continue to feel safe in their shell of protection.

    Those of us who are still able to be nice people and make a positive influence on the world without religion are open to unlimited possibilities with minds that are not narrowed by the beliefs of those centuries ago.

  84. "Books of Moses" not by Moses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out they were written by a few people, which explains the redundancy. Check out "Who Wrote the Bible?" by Richard E. Friedman to see what scholars have learned.

  85. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God just told me those are not his words. Can you prove otherwise?

  86. sinner by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're so sure of your insane lies portraying Jews as atheists that you post as Anonymous Coward. It's obvious that it is you who does not believe in god, or at least not in a righteous one. You speak in god's name, but don't even have the courage to use a flimsy Slashdot user ID. Anyone else reading your racist lies should immediately be able to tell what you are. And that the "future purpose" to which you allude, the popular racist fantasy of the gory sacrifice of Jews in an apocalypse, is the hallmark of the rest of you deranged Christian Taliban buying up such godporn as the sick "Left Behind" series. Which goes right along with your giveaway line slandering Catholics. Every generation has its excuse for people hating Jews, rather than themselves, for "betraying god". Yours are not new, but they're still disgusting. When you admit the truth, that you're covering up your fear of burning in hell by finding a surrogate in the Jews, you'll have at least a chance at salvation. Without that, you're just a sick fool lying about things you can't understand.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:sinner by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      Wow...

    2. Re:sinner by sosume · · Score: 1

      So what's wrong with being an atheist? I denounce the existence of anything called 'god' and I am *darned proud* of it. Religion is the the people's opium..

      My obeservation is: the more religious, the more ignorant, and the more these people want to exercise control over others.

    3. Re:sinner by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      It's good to see an informed representative take the side of the Holy Church every once in a while in this sesspool of perdition that is Slashdot.

      Now, if you can do me a favor, I realise you're probably NAMOI (Not A Member Of Inquisition), but since you're obviously knowledgeable about these things, can you venture a guess as to what kind of afterlife I can expect if my idea of heaven is a big hot tub, bubbles, five Playboy bunnies, chocolate cake, whiskey and a cocker spaniel?

      PS: I'm intentionally witholding the gender of the cocker so people don't think I'm a sick bastard or something. If it's relevant I can message you privately.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    4. Re:sinner by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I'm a non-believer, an atheist with little respect for the religious due to my opinions on violence, bigotry, tribalism etc etc.
      I do now have a lot of respect for you though. Some of the weird 'rapture' related stuff that comes out of modern american christianity is grade-A discriminatory bullcrap designed to make the small minded feel superior. Glad to see that some people with faith are still sane and outraged by this sort of stuff.

      Much respect.

    5. Re:sinner by geniusj · · Score: 1

      I am atheist as well, however I suppose it wouldn't be right to portray jews as atheists just as it wouldn't be right to portray atheists as monotheists.

    6. Re:sinner by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      While i don't find there is anything wrong with being an athiest, and I'm certainly not compelled to evagilize to you, I do have a problem with athiests who think that everyone who does belive is fooling themselves.

      Athiests calling religious people ignorant is no less than bigotry. Your image of Pat Robertson representing fiecly religious people, is no different than a Christian holding bin Laden as the image of Islam.

      Pre-conceptions lead to hate regardless of who you're stigmatising.

    7. Re:sinner by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't believe in god either. I think people who do are either lazy, foolish, brainwashed, afraid of themselves or the world, or some combination. But the fact is that most Jews, like most people, believe in god. The poster is a racist asshole, attempting to portray Jews as hypocrites within a sinister framework that justifies killing them. The current "Left Behind" series of apocalyptic "evangelical" Christian fiction novels has god burning Jews where they stand as the apocalypse begins. It's a sick fantasy that validates the Nazi genocide that almost destroyed the Jews only two generations ago. And it contributes to the people who would do it again today. I won't stand for it. Just being superstitious doesn't justify extinction - not at the hands of even more superstitious murderers, anyway.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:sinner by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      If you meditate hard enough, and extirpate all doubt that poodles might somehow thwart your afterlife, you can have your little fiesta. Or pay by the hour in a West Hollywood motel.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:sinner by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the note. To be clear, I have very little faith in anything but myself. I'm superstitious only to the point of speculation, rarely decision - I don't think faith really works that way. In fact, I think that faithful certainty is possible only in the absence of proof, or proveability, and I have too much of that to have too much faith. But that doesn't mean that racist fantasies from one rabidly superstitious person, which dehumanize another people by denying their own superstitions, is acceptable. If peopel want to argue about how their own superstition is "true", that's OK, if silly. When that argument denies that others lack superstitions entirely, as justification for killing them, that's unacceptable. Especially when exactly that denial and killing happened en masse in Europe only two generations ago, and nearly succeeded. And nearly succeeded in taking most (if not all) of the rest of us with them.

      I hope this hasn't decreased the respect you kindly mentioned. But of course that's secondary to my actual motivation: sanity.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:sinner by Abreu · · Score: 1

      It's a sick fantasy that validates the Nazi genocide that almost destroyed the Jews only two generations ago.

      Well, my beliefs state that those who do not accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour will be lost, however my beliefs also state that murder is a sin, even if its to murder someone who does not share my beliefs.

      No true christian would support killing of jews, just as no true christian would support killing of muslims. A true christian would not support the death penalty, as Jesus taught that all of us are capable of redemtion. ...of course, "true" christians are rare today.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    11. Re:sinner by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      True christians like you are all too rare. And all too silent - present company excepted, obviously - when fake Christians steal Jesus' best lines to promote exactly the kind of sins that would have made Caesar and the Pharisees cackle with envy. I wish that truly compassionate christians, who truly love all people, who put the responsibility for their salvation on the sinners themselves and god, would get as galvanized as the fake christians. Because these fake christians are on the march, and making it harder than ever for people with a conscience to think of Jesus without thinking of hatred, killing and hypocrisy.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:sinner by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Your image of Pat Robertson representing fiecly religious people,

      The difference here is that there is a large number of Christians, a majority even, who DO consider him representative of their 'faith'. The majority of Muslims do NOT consider OBL represenetative of theirs.

    13. Re:sinner by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      First of all I don't think that a majority of christians see Pat Robertson as representative of their faith.
      Second of all there are definately a large number of Muslims who do consider bin Laden to be representatice of their face. (no where near a majority though)
      Third thats all irrelevent because looking down your nose at someone different than you is still bigotry.

      I also have a problem with fundementalist (anything actually, but in this case) Christians who are intolerent of others because of their preconcieved notions or divine mandate. This is the same reason I have a problem with the poster stating that more religion leads to more ignorance.

    14. Re:sinner by Nursie · · Score: 1

      the respect was for the sanity, not necessarily the faith based position you spoke from. There are some sick "memes" (for want of a better word) going around christian fundamentalism IMHO, all to do with binding the congregation further to the church (and the church to their money no doubt) based on both scapegoating and a sort of superiority/exclusivity complex.

      So yeah, good sentiments regardless of whether you're a practicing/faithful jew or not!

    15. Re:sinner by Hungus · · Score: 1

      Gotta argue with the death penalty, there is a significant difference in scripture between the rights and responsibilities of the govt (which G-d put in place) vs. the individual. The death penalty is part of this.

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    16. Re:sinner by RWerp · · Score: 1

      What? The larget Christian denomination is Roman Catholicism, which currently considers Benedict XVIth, previously known as Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, as a representative of their faith (no quotes needed). Do you any problem with that?

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    17. Re:sinner by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      God didn't put the Govt. in place...

      If you are talking about old testament, God wanted to be the "President" or "king" of his nation but the people rebelled and insisted on self governing, God allowed them to do so.

      IF you are talking about New Testament, Satan is the controller of all governements and principalies of the earth, this was given to him by God.

      If you are talking about murder (killing another person) then both Old and New Testament say this is forbidden (although the old testament does allow for retribution killing, say if I kill you, your family can have me put to death, but the NT expressly forbids killing others...)

    18. Re:sinner by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Do you any problem with that?

      Yes, the idea of a Pope even EXISTING is against Christ's teachings. And the idea that Peter was the "first pope" is laughable. The thought that someone can become more divine than another person is evil (ie, saints). ESPECIALLY when that status is decided by someone who can change the rules for applying that label. IMO, Catholics are the most deluded, unchristian, organized group of Christians.

      On another topic, trying to post, I got this:
      Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.
      It's been 29 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.


      WTF???? This has been going on all day.

    19. Re:sinner by Abreu · · Score: 1
      The old testament did provide for death penalty, as well as other "eye for an eye" type of punishments, however this was abrogated by Jesus (as told in John 8:6-8)

      But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." 8Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.


      also, read carefuly His words on punishment and retribution (Luke 6:27-38):

      27"But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. 29If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. 30Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. 31Do to others as you would have them do to you.
      32"If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' love those who love them. 33And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' do that. 34And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' lend to 'sinners,' expecting to be repaid in full. 35But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. 36Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.
      37"Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. 38Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
      --
      No sig for the moment.
    20. Re:sinner by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > looking down your nose at someone different than you is still bigotry.

      Looking down your nose at a rapist is still bigotry?

    21. Re:sinner by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Sainst and popes are no more divine than you and me.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    22. Re:sinner by hesiod · · Score: 1

      How, then, do they reconcile the ideas of the inherent sinfulness of humans and the "infallibility" of the Pope? Especially when popes have contradicted each other.

      Secondly, one of the requirements to be called a saint is that they had to have performed two miracles. A "normal" person does not perform miracles, only a god.

    23. Re:sinner by RWerp · · Score: 1

      What popes did contradict each other while reaching for the "infallibility" doctrine?
      Also, the sentence "the saint made a miracle" is a shortcut for "the saint prayed to God for one". Really.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    24. Re:sinner by Hungus · · Score: 1
      Romans 13:1-5 says otherwise and while I am sure you are a fine person when the Bible explicitly states something in contradiction to your belief, please don't mind me when I take in as more authoritative thatn you on any given subject.

      New American Standard Bible (NASB): Romans 13:1-5

      1) Every (A)person is to be in (B)subjection to the governing authorities For (C)there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.
      2) Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves.
      3) For (D)rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same;
      4)for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an (E)avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil.
      5) Therefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also (F)for conscience' sake.

      Cross references:
      A Romans 13:1 -> Acts 2:41
      B Romans 13:1 -> Titus 3:1; 1 Pet 2:13
      C Romans 13:1 -> Dan 2:21; 4:17; John 19:11
      D Romans 13:3 -> 1 Pet 2:14
      E Romans 13:4 -> 1 Thess 4:6
      F Romans 13:5 -> Eccl 8; 1 Pet 2:13, 19
      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    25. Re:sinner by Hungus · · Score: 1
      Context context context ... that sermon was in the people not to the govt. in addition to mu comments here I also ask you to make note of john 19:10-11
      10) So Pilate said to Him, "You do not speak to me? Do You not know that I have authority to release You, and I have authority to crucify You?"
      11)Jesus answered, "You would have no authority over Me, unless it had been given you from above; for this reason he who delivered Me to you has the greater sin."


      and Acts 25:6-12
      6After he had spent not more than eight or ten days among them, he went down to Caesarea, and on the next day he took his seat on the tribunal and ordered Paul to be brought.
      7After Paul arrived, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem stood around him, bringing many and serious charges against him which they could not prove,
      8while Paul said in his own defense, " I have committed no offense either against the Law of the Jews or against the temple or against Caesar."
      9But Festus, wishing to do the Jews a favor, answered Paul and said, "Are you willing to go up to Jerusalem and stand trial before me on these charges?"
      10But Paul said, "I am standing before Caesar's tribunal, where I ought to be tried. I have done no wrong to the Jews, as you also very well know.
      11"If, then, I am a wrongdoer and have committed anything worthy of death, I do not refuse to die; but if none of those things is true of which these men accuse me, no one can hand me over to them. I appeal to Caesar."
      12Then when Festus had conferred with his council, he answered, "You have appealed to Caesar, to Caesar you shall go."


      it should be noted that in the case of Paul the Caesar he was appealing to was nero ... lest anyone say there was a good roman caesar at the time.
      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    26. Re:sinner by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      Matt4:8-9
      [8] Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;
      [9] And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

      Rev13:2-7
      [2] And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
      [3] And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
      [4] And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
      [5] And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
      [6] And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
      [7] And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.

      So like I said, Satan has the power and authority over the nations and kingdoms, which was given to him by God.

      When God's laws are contradicted by the laws of nations... which would you follow?

    27. Re:sinner by Hungus · · Score: 1

      1)The adversary (ha satan) offers many things he cannot provide, 2) Rev 13 is talking nothing about Govt anything besides wich, do you really want to argue eschatology with me? Because I can do that quite well, since being a conservative realized (bealeian) eschotologist (aka amillinial conservative) in a dispensational seminary I have plenty of practice :)

      Satan is bound from decieving the nations, Christ's Kingdom is now ( heck even the progressive dispy's give me that one eg Bock and Blaising).

      In regards to your last question well its obvious isn't it? Christianity has a history of martyrdom. When the Govt requests something we cannot do we then face the consequences and know that just like our fore-runners in the faith we will either be provided with teh grace to endure for teh time or know our real hope is in the resurection and go to our death.

      If you really want to talk about it there are some cogent forums and I wouldn;t mind continuing, I just don;t think /. is the place. Up to you though

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    28. Re:sinner by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Sweet, I must be a saint! I never knew...

    29. Re:sinner by RWerp · · Score: 1

      The fact that both Einstein and me wrote "E=mc^2" does not mean that I'm also a physics genius.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    30. Re:sinner by hesiod · · Score: 1

      The fact that someone can talk to themselves and wonderful things happen to occur soon after, does not make them a saint.

    31. Re:sinner by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Of course not, what do you think?

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    32. Re:sinner by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "If you really want to talk about it there are some cogent forums and I wouldn;t mind continuing,"

      Yah post it up, ill check it out...

    33. Re:sinner by Hungus · · Score: 1
      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    34. Re:sinner by hesiod · · Score: 1
      > what do you think?

      I think the statement you made earlier...
      the sentence "the saint made a miracle" is a shortcut for "the saint prayed to God for one.
      ...says a lot. Praying for something to happen and causing it to happen are wildly different things, and it seems that the Catholic church is remaking the rules as they go. Same with the "infallibility doctrine." At what point did he become perfect only when he said he was? Originally, he was supposed to be ALWAYS infallible, it seems that was the point of having a Pope to make decisions...

      It's an attempt to have one ("perfect") authority so that different priests/diocese don't teach very different ideas about the same thing. Of course. But he was given that authority based on his inherited "perfection" of speech, he was not magically granted that perfection after becoming Pope.
    35. Re:sinner by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I do not dispute that Christians must obey their goverments to the best of their abilities, you are right in this respect, and you are interpreting the verses correctly.

      However I dont see how a christian can support the death penalty in this day and age.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    36. Re:sinner by Hungus · · Score: 1

      If you mean that given a choice in the matter Christians should choose not to apply the death penalty I whole heartedly agree with you. On the other hand I recognise it as a right of the govt to use.

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    37. Re:sinner by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      I don't know what all of your words mean, not that it really matters...God doesn't hide his truths from those who would seak it, so i doesn't take a school to teach you his wisdom..

      Are you really trying to say that God setup the rulers pol pot, lenin, sadam hussein, george bush, etc? Then i'd say maybe you have been reading too much dogma...

      I think the passage from revelations is relevant because in that book Satan is cast from heaven and tries to swallow up jesus, but it frustrated and then sets to rule the world...

      And Christ's kingdom doesn't even start until he returns... so me thinks you are a little over-taught and unable to examine your beliefs or just misinformed...

    38. Re:sinner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      page not found...

  87. Single Page by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    Sure, its on a single page alright.... its a scroll!

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  88. Personal versus synagogue use, and printed copies by wheatwilliams · · Score: 1

    If I understand the tradition correctly, an individual can buy and use an inexpensive printed, mass-produced copy of the Torah, even a bi-lingual one that puts a page of Hebrew next to an English translation. No problem.

    But a synagogue or temple has to own a hand-written exact copy of the Torah on parchment rolls, for use in worship services. The rabbi is to read to the congregation from a perfect hand-made copy of the Torah. If he wants to elaborate on it, or translate it into English or whatever is the local language, fine, but he always needs to quote the real thing in the original language from an authoritative copy.

    In contrast, in Christian churches, the pastor or priest can read to the congregation from whatever translation or paraphrase of the original Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic that the congregation wants to use. The congregation will never hear the original Hebrew and Greek, and it's not considered important that they learn those languages. The exception is the Greek Orthodox Church, in which the Old and New Testaments are read aloud in a Greek translation (old testament) and in the original Greek (new testament).

    In the Catholic Church, worldwide, for hundreds of years they only used a translation of the old and new testaments into Latin. Only forty years ago they decided to use translations in whatever the local language of the congregation is.

    In the Hebrew tradition, there are a small number of scribes whose careers consist of making new perfect hand-written copies of the Torah for new synagogues and to replace worn-out ones, which are solemnly destroyed once it is confirmed that they are replaced by a proper hand-written replacement.

    In this fashion the Jews have made sure that the original text of the Torah has not changed at all for several millenia. The very oldest fragments of written Torahs only differ from the ones made in this generation by a few alternate spellings of place names.

    It doesn't make much sense to us in the information age, but it's worked for thousands of years, and there is no similar body of literature or group of documents from antiquity which has survived intact, without editorial changes or typos, like the Torah has.

    All of the works of philosophy and theater written from 3,000 to 2,00 years ago in ancient Greece or the Roman Empire which we have today are known only from copies that date to the late Middle Ages and early Renaissance. And these copies have obviously suffered some alteration and editing by the scribes that copied them thousands of years after they were composed. We have no way of knowing or proving if the words of Socrates that we find printed today bear any actual resemblance to what Socrates wrote 2,500 years ago (or however long it was). Not so the Torah!

    This is quite an achievement. That's why the tradition of hand-copying the Torah and only accepting perfect copies for corporate worship and study will continue.

    You gotta respect those Jews. They got it right and they kept it right, across millenia and unbelievable historical, political and cultural changes, and a diaspora that took them out of Palestine and all over the globe.

  89. bi-got by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    You really should come out here to NYC to explain that bit to me. Let me know when you'll be dropping by with your "real god", and we'll see how well it works for you. Because I can see all kinds of bugs in your install of "christianity" - especially that "tolerance" vaporware.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  90. Yes, a troll, but... by Urusai · · Score: 1

    a slap in the face of human culture? That would be daytime television. Fight the real enemy--Dr. Phil.

  91. An Obvious Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the 28 anti-semites!!

  92. Nope!!! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    The 3.5- by 8-inch template resembles an IBM punch card, with eight holes arranged so their position relative to one another describes a unique identification number in a proprietary code.

    Though maybe after this /. article there will be a huge underground movement to break The Code -- (the "Da Vinci" part semi-assumed ;-) )

    Paul B.

    1. Re:Nope!!! by dissolved · · Score: 1
      The 3.5- by 8-inch template resembles an IBM punch card

      I found a slight irony in the IBM connection after reading Edwin Black's book about IBM and the holocaust.
  93. I thought it was funny, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the Somethingawful photoshops. That was a great photoshop. The Cask of Amontillado photoshop was also good.

    Attention Fortunado! Amontillado!

  94. Re:Basic Cryptography (too early in the AM) by Kiffer · · Score: 1

    um it's like 5am here... I did'nt read the post I replied to very well...
    Personaly I dont know what got the jews through their terrable ordeals, maybe it was religion, maybe it was the fact that they are a people with strong famaly ties ... the fact I dont agrea with many things to do with Israel has nothing to do with the general plight of the jewish people, and also nothing to do with the thread in general.

    I'm going to bed now.

  95. no, you're not ignorant one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its morons who live in Kansas who believe in devolution, or these idiots who believe in 3,000 year old fiction that's about as real as anything L'Ron Hubbard wrote.

    You want to ignore the giant elephant in the room? Fine. But stop spreading fairy tales unless you're prepared to include the tooth fairy as well.

    This discussion is as logical as talking about Santa Claus, the bogeyman or some 900 year old dude who got his wee-wee sliced at 100 and who split the water in two.

    Why is it ok to laugh at idiots like Travolta and Cruise but we humour the simpletons who take these fairy tales seriously?

    Fsck! We have a whole state dedicated to just one sect (Utah), so I guess I shouldnt be surprised, we have a high tolerance for imbecility in this country.

    dom

  96. Biggoted Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the comments here prove the American race is biggoted and narrow-minded. Just like the desecration of the Qou'ran by American war mongers we see the imperialist views of this race imposed on others.

    1. Re:Biggoted Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Some of the comments here prove the American race is biggoted and narrow-minded. "

      There is no American "race", and Americans have nothing like a monopoly on being jackasses.

  97. jewish? by calyptos · · Score: 1

    kinda off subject, but why is moses always affiliated with the jewish? I mean, christians believe in the old testament too.

    --
    http://illhostit.com/ - Webhosting
    1. Re:jewish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not called the Old Testament in Judaism.... plus the books are in a different order. Only a messianic jew would call it the old testament, and well, they're NOT really jews now are they.

    2. Re:jewish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But even Jesus was jewish.

    3. Re:jewish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is George Washington always affiliated with the U.S.A.? I mean, people in other countries think he was great, too. And Ghandi. Why do people call him Indian? I mean, lots of non-indians got into the non-violence thing, too. He was a hero to lots of people.

      The answer, of course, is that Moses *was* Jewish. Washington was American. Ghandi was Indian.

    4. Re:jewish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do me a favor. Go read the Gospels--you know, all that bit about love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek, the meek shall inherit the Earth, God is love, etc.

      Now read 2 Kings, especially chapters 10 & 11, and tell me it's the same God.

    5. Re:jewish? by mirqry · · Score: 1

      Because he was jewish, and helped the jews escape from Eygpt?

    6. Re:jewish? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      When Moses was around, Judaism was the only game in town for God's chosen people. Whereas now, God's chosen people have several different flavors of religion to choose between.

      Note: not trying to be funny - different religions have different ideas about who the "chosen people" are, even if the "god" in question is technically the same god...

    7. Re:jewish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a messianic jew would call Rebbe Schneerson the Messiah, and well, they're NOT really jews now are they.

  98. Re:Personal versus synagogue use, and printed copi by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

    Minor issue: it wasn't the land of Palestine. That's a British name. It was the land of Israel in the Torah, and since nobody has been able to prove something that is older, that is the name that should be accepted. The Romans scattered the Jewish people (IIRC), thus starting the diaspora. Around 5,000 years later the British came up with the name Palestine and it has stuck in our modern minds...

  99. BAN TORAH LIKE MEIN KAMPF ON Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well-poisoning Christ-killers

  100. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went back in time and wrote the goddamn Torah myself... can YOU prove otherwise?

    I can't believe "can you prove otherwise" was modded up... for fuck's sake.

  101. Loophole by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    not one character can be added to the 304,805 letters of the Torah's text

    So just add two or more characters. One character wouldn't be that helpful in uniquely identifying the scroll anyway.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  102. Re:So what?! by griffeymac · · Score: 1

    Funny, I thought people with blind faith sounded like idiots. Especially those who claim to be such wonderful, generous, helpful-to-all folks like I was expected to be when I was raised. That person may "sound like an idiot" and not be "one SMART DUDE" and have a "dumb mouth" but at least maybe he'll make it into the Kingdom of Heaven.

  103. Re:Torah Torah Torah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget it. He's rolling.

  104. What about DNA? by sga.busboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From what I've read, the scrolls are made from animal skins. Couldn't you just start a DNA bank of the skins? That would eliminate the adding character issue.

    1. Re:What about DNA? by MxReb0 · · Score: 1

      At first, I thought you had a really good idea, and it may be possible, but I don't think that there would be any DNA left after the treatments the scrolls go through.
      Do you think there is cow DNA in your car's black leather seats or tree DNA in your bleached white paper? I do not.
      I am not saying that the parchment is devoid of organic material (I have observed Torahs to be smelly), but I don't think cells are intact.
      Probably something strong in skin like keratin is all that's left.

      --

      MAKE YOUR TIME
    2. Re:What about DNA? by snoyberg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Torah scrolls are very long, must longer than one animal. Also, it's possible to replace a segment of a Torah, so if we by convention started taking the DNA of the first segment, someone could just have that replaced.

      Which I guess might make sofrim (scribes) a bit suspicious when they keep having to write the creation story...

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    3. Re:What about DNA? by laika$chi · · Score: 1

      The problem is that to check it later, you'd have to scrape some off. That's intentionally damaging it, which is forbidden.

  105. dictates that not one character can be added... by Kiyooka · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...dictates that not one character can be added to the 304,805 letters of the Torah's text..."

    how about two? :)

    1. Re:dictates that not one character can be added... by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how about two? :)

      I know you meant that as a joke, but I really have to wonder how the use of "microperforated parchment" counts as magically less of a violation of the rule than your own suggestion.

      If you take it literally, then your own suggestion would work just fine. If you interpret it to mean "don't add any more information", the suggested fix violates the rule just as much. If we allow something in between the two, it seems silly to need to resort to microperformations - Why not a plain ol' watermark (with no characters in it, of course, just a low-contrast picture)?

      And if we want to resort to high-tech, since apparently god doesn't object to the use of science to circumvent his rules - They make these things out of dead animals. Animals come right from the factory with a unique ID already encoded into every single cell in their bodies...

    2. Re:dictates that not one character can be added... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Animals come right from the factory with a unique ID already encoded into every single cell in their bodies...

      Interesting point, but since they've been dead so long, hasn't the DNA been damaged... a bit?

  106. OT: Speaking of Races by johnnyb · · Score: 0, Troll

    Since we're on the topic of races, I thought I'd point out a few things (these are very offtopic, but when I learned them I found them interesting):

    1) the original concept of races was what we would presently consider cultures -- the Irish race, the French race, etc.
    2) the evolutionists were the primary ones who taught race as a biological concept. The Origin of the Species was subtitled something likeThe Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for life.
    3) eventually Darwin and others classified a few major "races" of man: australoid, mongoloid, negroid, and caucasoid, each being a varied amount of evolved from our simian ancestors, with the australoids most like animals and caucasoid being the highest evolved creature.
    4) The law which was in contest during the scopes monkey trial DID NOT outlaw teaching evolution. The only thing it outlawed was teaching the evolution OF MAN (which was, as you can see, very racist). The specific book that was in contention taught those races, AND taught that white people (caucasoids) were the highest evolved of them.
    5) If you ever wonder why our parents and especially our grandparent's generations were so entrenched in racism, it was it was taught as part of evolution in their biology textbooks. In fact, the Bronx zoo even had a Pygmy from Africa on display in a cage with a monkey to demonstrate "primitive" ancestry. Likewise, Australian aborigines were often hunted for their skulls to be sold to museums.
    6) It turns out that the Bible is right, and that human ancestry can be traced back to a biological bottleneck about 6,000 years ago, known as mitochondrial Eve.

    It's too bad that many people, including many in the Church, decided to believe man over the Bible in this area (which teaches we are all relatives), and to see how much destruction this has caused to lives worldwide.

    On the subject of Torah's, I always thought that the way that they were made was cool -- you often had three different people writing it: one writes the consonants, one writes the vowels, and a third writes the margin notes (called the masura). Sometimes this is done by one individual, but I just think it's interesting how the different layers are laid down.

    1. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by droopus · · Score: 1

      Good post, and very interesting info about Darwin. Thanks. B)

      Thought I'd point out something interesting in return. Actually, only consonants are written in Hebrew, something dustily remembered from my years in Hebrew school (which of course, like most typical NY Jews, ended the day I turned 13.) There are two ways of describing vowels in written Hebrew: the use of sub and superscript dots, dashes and "Ts" (kinda Tetris symbols) (a system which Torah scrolls do not use) and ...context.

      There's a great web page that describes it better than I could:

      http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~hr/bible/hebvow.html

      But yes, how Torahs are made is amazing, from the preparation of the skin, to the ink, to the sewng together of the sections. And, it's a true master/apprentice skill, one of the few left. To combine that with modern high tech is way cool, no?

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    2. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by grimJester · · Score: 1

      6) It turns out that the Bible is right, and that human ancestry can be traced back to a biological bottleneck about 6,000 years ago, known as mitochondrial Eve.

      This is not true.

    3. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      Almost all of this is wrong.

      The Origin of Species hardly mentioned humans at all. The word "races" was used at the time to mean a sub-species of animals. That is the sense in which Darwin used it. The first edition of the book barely mentioned humans at all - later additions contained perhaps half a dozen passing references.

      Darwin was undoubtedly a "racist" by modern standards - but by the standards of the time he was fairly enlightened. He was, for example, vehemently opposed to slavery.

      The idea that the Scopes trial was about a law opposing racism is hilarious. In case it has escaped your notice, racism and segregation were entrenched in Tennessee at the time and for forty years after (at least). The legislators who passed the Scopes law were the same people who enforced segregation for another forty years. Do you want to guess how many were Christians, and how many "evolutionists"? You may want to look up the "Hamitic hypothesis".

      The idea that the roots of racism lie in the theory of evolution is completely ahistorical. But in any case, your logic is faulty. Even if Darwin was an appalling racist and his ideas were supported by racists, this would have no bearing on the evidence for/against evolution. Newton was a nasty piece of work - should I disbelieve gravity?

      But I'm sure you're not deliberately lying - presumably you've never read the original sources or studied the period and are just regurgitating what you've read on creationist websites. If you are open-minded, I'd urge you to read these more critically in future.

    4. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      "The idea that the Scopes trial was about a law opposing racism is hilarious."

      Why do you think Clarence Darrow was interested? Racial and sexual equality were his main fights.

      "In case it has escaped your notice, racism and segregation were entrenched in Tennessee at the time and for forty years after (at least)."

      You don't think perhaps the legislators were trying to slowly remove racism, perhaps by first removing it from the biology textbooks? Remember, the only part of evolution it forbid teaching was the evolution of man.

      "The idea that the roots of racism lie in the theory of evolution is completely ahistorical."

      I did not say that. What I did say is that evolution firmed up the idea of biological roots of racism. It made it part of biology rather than ideology, which made it very difficult to remove from the public mind.

      "Even if Darwin was an appalling racist and his ideas were supported by racists, this would have no bearing on the evidence for/against evolution."

      My point was not on the general theory of evolution, but specifically on Darwin's idea of evolution. It's amusing that the "completely sure" arguments used in the scopes trial are now almost all completely discreditted, but it still remains for many as a show of why the Bible is wrong and evolution is right. My point was that the Bible was correct against Darwin's ideas and it will also eventually prove out to be correct against this generation's ideas. It's when man believes that his ideas are better than God's that we tend to have problems. In fact, this is one of Jesus's main points.

      "If you are open-minded, I'd urge you to read these more critically in future."

      I have read them critically, investigated their claims, and debated with others to thoroughly make sure that I'm on good ground, and I think I am, though I am open to correction. So far, your argument has simply been "I don't think so, racism was already there", which doesn't answer the argument at all.

    5. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      The wikipedia article does nothing against what I said except to give a different date for the genetic bottleneck.

      Note that the Wikipedia entry assumes the existence of precursors to Mitochondrial eve, but that is only resting on the assumption of evolution. Mitochondrial Eve would look the same whether or not Eve herself had ancestors or not, or whether or not she was the only person alive when she was born/made. The existence of her ancestors and contemporaries flows from the theory of evolution only, and not from data.

      As for the date, we've found that human mitochondria mutates faster than previously thought, throwing previous molecular clocks off, and putting mitochondrial even at about 6,000 to 6,500 years.

      While the existence of mitochondrial eve was predicted by both theories, the existence of a recent mitochondrial Eve was predicted by the Bible and came as a surprise to evolutionary theory.

    6. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      "Why do you think Clarence Darrow was interested? Racial and sexual equality were his main fights."

      Hello? Clarence Darrow was defending Scopes. What on earth is your point?

      "You don't think perhaps the legislators were trying to slowly remove racism, perhaps by first removing it from the biology textbooks?"

      Is this a joke? Completely implausible in the context of the time and place.

      You continue to abuse logic. There is no logical connection between the truth of a theory and the morals of its propounders.

      You make a false dichotomy between religious belief and accepting evolutionary theory. The Pope, the Anglican Church and the majority of other Christian denominations disagree with you.

      You snip my criticism of your misunderstanding of the title of The Origin of Species. Nobody who had read the book could have made such a mistake.

      Are you a troll, or just regurgitating material third hand?

    7. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by johnnyb · · Score: 1
      Hello? Clarence Darrow was defending Scopes. What on earth is your point?

      Sorry, I meant William Jennings Bryan. From here


      Among these issues were women's suffrage, direct election of U.S. senators, monetary/trade (tariff) policy, America's role in world peacekeeping, direct income tax, civil and worker/s rights.


      Is this a joke? Completely implausible in the context of the time and place.

      Maybe you should read what Gould had to say on the subject. He agreed both that they were teaching racism as science and that Bryan's opposition was to a large extent on racial grounds.

      You continue to abuse logic. There is no logical connection between the truth of a theory and the morals of its propounders.

      I agree with your statement as you formulated it. However, there _is_ a connection between how you view the world and how you view morality. It is inescapable. Notice that I was not criticizing Darwin's morality per se, but the fact that he codified his morality as scientific fact.

      You make a false dichotomy between religious belief and accepting evolutionary theory. The Pope, the Anglican Church and the majority of other Christian denominations disagree with you.

      I stopped caring what the Anglican church had to say when they started promoting Ashera worship on their homepage. The Catholic Church actually isn't officially evolutionist, though they do not regard evolution as heresy. Personally, I don't care much about establishment, and more about the meaning of the scriptures.

      You snip my criticism of your misunderstanding of the title of The Origin of Species. Nobody who had read the book could have made such a mistake.

      You are partially correct. When you read the follow-on works, however, it is obvious that he applied the same ideas to the human races.

      Are you a troll, or just regurgitating material third hand?

      Why do you insist on pretending that people who disagree with you are disingenuous or stupid?
    8. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Note that the Wikipedia entry assumes the existence of precursors to Mitochondrial eve, but that is only resting on the assumption of evolution. Mitochondrial Eve would look the same whether or not Eve herself had ancestors or not, or whether or not she was the only person alive when she was born/made. The existence of her ancestors and contemporaries flows from the theory of evolution only, and not from data.

      Now that is an outright lie. We have tons of skeletons of humanidae much older than 6,000 years. The dates are firmly established by isotope measurements. Feel free to provide any proof that the half-life period of carbon 14 is much shorter then we have previously thought.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    9. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      We have tons of skeletons of humanidae much older than 6,000 years.

      That's assuming the dating methods are accurate. If the flood hypothesis is correct, then that would have removed a great deal of C12 from the biosphere, making the C14 from the atmosphere much more prominent in the biosphere, and giving much older dates to everything before that point. Given that the flood occurred about 4,500 years ago, that fits the recorded dating very well.

    10. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Flood? What flood? The flood you're talking about must have covered the whole planet without leaving a trace in the biological records. There's no record for that.

      If what you said were true, we should see a sharp drop in the amount of fossils dated "just before the flood". Is there any?

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    11. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by RWerp · · Score: 1

      s/biological/biological, historical and geological

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    12. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of a shame that the two of you are the only ones that seem to find this interesting to discuss, personally, I have been discussing this same thing my whole life with my father who is a mega-bible thumping evangelical.

      The thing is, the basic premise of the original post (in the 'speaking of races' thread) - although a little misinformed - seems to be that the bible is at least thematically correct on a number of points.

      The thing that I don't really understand is how some people can be open minded enough to accept part of science which requires the bible to be read sort of alegorically or metaphorically, yet nit-pick the hardest to defend items as devine doctorine. A guy named Usher (if I remember correctly) was the first one to add up all the dates in the bible to say when things happend - which is where we come up with the 6000 odd year date... Which actually gives not only an exact year, but also day and time.... However, the contention there is that that was when the _universe was created_. This really appears to fly in the face of even the original contention. Add to that that this is based on geneologies of certain books of the Christian bible - which as we know is a cannon of selected writings - in fact, different sects of Christianity have different cannons. On top of that the fact that anyone tried to do that with geneological records in the bible is a little silly given that the language in many of the geneologies admittedly only mentions important individuals in the lineage. Christ, for example, is traced all the way back to Adam in what would appear to be less than a handful of generations. In other words, "Son of" and "Decendant of" are essentially the same thing.

      Likewise, everyone talks about Eve, but in fact, early writings say that the first woman was not Eve, but Lilith (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith), but that has been demonized for a whole lot of reasons...

      The flood story is similar: Why argue specifics and give on other items as allegorical? It seems to me that there is much agreement that there is a common flood narative in a large part of the world - just about every major religion has one. Ok - so there was a flood... Why argue against science to say something like that God hid the archeological or geological evidence and that somehow the amount of water in the water cycle changed, etc - and then try to _use_ science to defend your contention when it suits your purpose.

      There seems to be some fear that this somehow negates the possibility that there is a God or cheapens the bible, etc... But that's sort of silly and a bit akin to how they felt about Gallileo's ideas about the universe, or original ideas that the world was 'round': Now that you know that those things are not true and can prove it scientifically - they don't really challenge your faith... Do they?

      It seems like an extremely illogical way to approach life...

    13. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by johnnyb · · Score: 1
      If what you said were true, we should see a sharp drop in the amount of fossils dated "just before the flood". Is there any?

      Apparently there is. I haven't read the article, but if you look at the abstract of "Time, Life, and History in the Light of 15,000 Radiocarbon Dates" it says:


      When the published dates are corrected for a basic scientific error in the method, they not only point to a recent creation, but they show an unmistakable world-wide disappearance of man and animals for a long period about 5,000 years ago.


      I'll see if I can dig up a copy from someone.
    14. Re:OT: Speaking of Races by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Sorry, forgot to give you the link to the abstracts.

  107. Re:Micro-perforation sounds like characters to me. by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

    Actually the Talmud dictates exactly how the characters are written, to the extent that even in a few places a letter is written larger or smaller.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
  108. Rules about the Torah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are strict rules about how the torah is written for good reason. Otherwise, someone would be able to alter it, and then politicize it as many have done with various bible "translations".

    Even adding details can cause problems. Since once something is considered holy, every detail starts to matter. Someone could easily add a "stenographric" addition, and then reinterpret that as a bible code serving some political end. Preserving the original in its original form makes it more difficult to manipulate the text. People can always go back to the source text, and find out what it really says.

  109. pdf? copies? by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    since these aren't the originals anyway, why not just put them in pdf or make some kind of high-quality prints? is the text not the most imporant part? it's like paying thousands for picaso painted by someone else. perhaps it's a system to make sure the haves are always truly "holier than thou". many religions have a lot of built-in things to ensure power for the religious elite. i guess these guys never heard of guttenburg.

    1. Re:pdf? copies? by MxReb0 · · Score: 1

      Obviously, we have Torah in printed book (also every Christian Bible contains it as the first 5 books) and digital versions. There is no issue of depriving have-nots.
      The scrolls are a traditional way to adhere to our ancient past. The Law is meant to be "Loved with all your mind, with all your heart" These traditions are ways of showing love, respect, and adherence.

      --

      MAKE YOUR TIME
    2. Re:pdf? copies? by snoyberg · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not entirely about that text. At the risk of making this sound "barbaric" as was implied above, Rambam (Rabbi Moses Maimonidies) says that a Torah written by a heretic is to be burned because it lacks the holiness necesary.

      In an ideal world, everyone would write their own Torah (it's one of the commandments after all). Since this isn't feasible for most people, we end up having designated scribes for the job.

      And believe me, being paid $40,000 a year doesn't seem like a "built-in thing to ensure power for the religious elite." And all of our other texts (Tanakh, Talmud, Rishonim, Shu"t, Acharonim, etc) are printed by machine.

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    3. Re:pdf? copies? by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      when i said "religious elite", i wasn't refering to the scribes. i was refering to those who can afford such a holy luxury. it's not unlike the pilgrimage that muslims are supposed to take to mecca. there r a lot of poor muslims who cannot afford this. to be fair, the quran sez you have to only if you can afford it. but this doesn't stop the ones who can from granting themself the title of "haji" and granting themself automatic religous superiority.

    4. Re:pdf? copies? by ars · · Score: 1

      Erm, the scrolls are usually owned by the community: AKA the synagoge.

      No elite going on here.

      The only individual who HAD to own one personally was the king, (he was required to take it with him everywhere he went to remind him of it's contents) and I think Kings have sort of a built in Elite status......

      --
      -Ariel
  110. Re:Only the Jews by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually,Xmas is wiccan.Look up yule.The catholics stole it when they were converting pagans and added a christ element.I had to write this as my sister is a wiccan and hates when people think it's a christian holiday. I think all religion is for scaring peasants,Personally. And thanks for getting rid of the craptcha.As someone who has trouble seeing those things,I thank You.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  111. Talmudic law is case law. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    This is one of the most tired and twisted criticisms I've heard of Judiasm. You're not the first to put it forward.

    Do you understand the difference between law and case law? It exists even in the modern American legal system. When you have a law, different judges will end up interpreting that law slightly differently.

    Because one of the purposes of law is to establish uniformity of judgements, each ruling sets up a precedent, which can be cited for future cases. In American law, if there are enough divergent precedents the Supreme Court will agree to hear a case in order to set a ruling which will prevent further diverse rulings by the lower courts. Jewish law worked similarly.

    The talmud ( or so called 'oral law') which was being written down at the time of Jesus is case law. Jesus was not protesting the Talmud, per se. He was protesting those rulings in the talmud which 'annulled the written law.'

    In other words, Jesus was a 'strict constitutionalist' who railed against judges that 'legislated from the bench' and wrote legal interpretations which violated the mosaic laws.

    For example, lending at interest was prohibited under mosaic law, but Hillel effectivly allowed it. Mitigation of severe punishments was also common in the Talmud. For example, "an eye for an eye" was interpreted as demanding commesurate monetary compensation. You couldn't actually poke someone's eye out, it was ruled, because that could kill them and their blood would be on the hands of the court. There are also some very out there metaphoric interpretations of the old testament in the Talmud (like arguments that the ancient Egyptians suffered 50 or more plagues pursuing the hebrew peoples towards the red sea.)
    But the Talmud is ultimatly the work of learned men and it shouldn't be taken for more than that.

    Destroying case law doesn't solve anything. You'll still have a diverse range of legal judgements, or else you'll have no law at all.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Talmudic law is case law. by RWerp · · Score: 1

      The talmud ( or so called 'oral law') which was being written down at the time of Jesus is case law. Jesus was not protesting the Talmud, per se. He was protesting those rulings in the talmud which 'annulled the written law.'

      You seem to hold the view that Jesus rallied against Talmud because he wanted a strict adherence to the Old Testament. It's not true, he in many places said quite clearly that he brings new moral laws and rules which are set to replace the old ones.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    2. Re:Talmudic law is case law. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Yes "I don't come to destroy the law, I come to change the law." etc. And in some cases, he deliberatly increases the strictness of the law, limiting marriage to one man and one woman or urging people not to use their right to sue one another.

      But in the places where he doesn't explicitly try and recast Mosaic law, he tends to be faithful to it. (allowing picking corn on the Sabbath, which is in accordane with mosaic law, but not, if I understand it correctly, Talmudic law)

      http://forum.jerusalemperspective.com/viewtopic.ph p?t=238&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

      My view is not so much that Jesus wanted a strict adherance to Mosaic law, but that in disputes between the Talmud (then the Mishna) and Mosaic law, he typically favors Mosaic law, though he did not oppose the Mishna. He did seem to urge distrust of it. What does distrust mean, considering that Jesus claimed that those who know Moses know him?

      More specifically, my view is that every time you create a ruling, you create case law which is both falliable as well as inevitable. I've read countless criticisms of this process, but the alternative is worse.

      Of course, I'm not a Talmudic scholar by any means, so take anything here with a grain of salt, or better yet an entire Kosher dill.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Talmudic law is case law. by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      " Yes "I don't come to destroy the law, I come to change the law." etc."

      Mor specifically he said "I don't come to destroy the law but to FULFILL it".

      Thus meaning fulfilling the old testament (old agreement) and establishing a NEW testament (new agreement) which can be basically be summed up as "Love thy lord God and love they neighboor as theyself" (not exact quote).

      He did try to explain the laws originally given down by moses (from him) which explains your quote about moses and why he approved of some laws but not others (sabbath was given for men, not men for the sabbath).

  112. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it digitally signed ?

  113. Ah, a Jewish slashdot post... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    This should make for some great arguing. :)

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  114. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an uneducated turd-head little kid. Wicca was invented in the 1950s by Gerald Gardner, fantasy author, and is a watered-down version of the Golden Dawn system.

  115. Both these methods are crude and unnecessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a lesson from the chinese, who still use the (multiple) thousand year old tradition of using chops. Chops are stone stamps engraved with a calligraphic rendition of person's name used to sign important documents. They are easy to make and impossible to copy, because high magnification images of the chop's imprint easily capture the engraver's movements and tiny chips and imperfections in the engraving. Perfect reproductions cannot be reproduced at this level of magnification, since each has a specific (literally set in stone) geometric relationship with the other errors. Simple image comparison software can identify the differences as well, since engravings do not produce gradients which trouble edge detection software.

    The same software could be used on hand lettered torahs, where subtle soakings of the ink and paper anomalies could be imaged at extremely high resolution and saved. Making sure you got the same scroll back would be trivial, because even though someone might be able to fake paper that is the same age, and use the same ink, they cant get fibers of the paper to be in exactly the same position, and they cant ensure that the microscopic blotting of the ink is the same, much like you could never produce two inkblots on a piece of paper that couldnt be discriminated with high magnification light microscopes.

    1. Re:Both these methods are crude and unnecessary by laika$chi · · Score: 1

      Obviously you didn't read the article. Maton Ot, the second registry, does this very thing.

  116. Musical Notes by myg · · Score: 1

    Actually, I remember from my Bar-Mitzvah that I had to sing my parshah. Although I know how to read Hebrew I didn't know how to read the musical notes which most Torahs carry.

    For those unfamiliar with semitic languages such as Hebrew, the vowels are somewhat optional and are not part of the normal string of consonants. Instead, they are little marks made in various locations around the consonants. For example, a dot to the left of a character in the middle is an "ewwww" sound. Move the dot to the top of the letter and its an "oh" sound.

    In addition to these vowels are various musical notes which tell you how to sing that particular passage (as a canter would). If I understand the history correctly the vowels and musical notes are not part of the "characters" (consontnats) of the Torah.

    Perhaps minor variations in the musical notes could be used to signify the Torah -- or would that invalidate it. I guess one other important thing to mention is that there is some built-in redundancy in the vowels and (if I remember correctly, it was almost 20 years ago) in the musical notes. For example, a bar under a letter is an "ah" sound but so is a T-shape under a letter (althoug there may be a subtle difference in pronounciation that I'm not aware of).

    A bit like a stream of data can be encoded in the less-significant bits of an image.

    And for anybody interested in the non-Roman alphabets, http://www.ancientscripts.com/ is a good place to start.

    1. Re:Musical Notes by warrenb10 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the vowels and musical notes aren't in the expensive scrolls we're talking about here, they're in the printed books.

    2. Re:Musical Notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know anything about the musical notes, but I can tell you a bit about the vowels. There is a difference between the bar and the T-shape under a letter, but it isn't recognized by modern Hebrew. In the older Hebrew (which I grew up learning), the bar makes an "ah" sound, while the T-shape makes an "aw" sound. Also, about half the letters that sound like a "t" in modern Hebrew sound like an "s" in older Hebrew. For example, I say "Shabbas" instead of "Shabbat" and "bas mitzvah" instead of "bat mitzvah."

    3. Re:Musical Notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also, about half the letters that sound like a "t" in modern Hebrew sound like an "s" in older Hebrew. For example, I say "Shabbas" instead of "Shabbat" and "bas mitzvah" instead of "bat mitzvah.""

      This is because the letter is "tauf" and pronounced with a "t" in Sephardic Hebrew (spanish/north african/arabia), while a "sauf" (pronounced "s") in Askenazi Hebrew (eastern europe, i.e., those who spoke Yiddish).

      Most Americans are Ashkenazi. However, Israel "officially" adopted Sephardic pronunciations, as did modern Hebrew schools in America. Thus, you'll say "Shabbat" instead of "Shabbos"

  117. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If God wanted these things protected, surely He would cast a thunderbolt or whatever at the thief?

    As He is God, He would ensure the thunderbolt would only get the thief and leave the Torah intact.

  118. Not GPL compatable either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about the right to make derived works?

    1. Re:Not GPL compatable either. by Abreu · · Score: 1

      There are several derived works, wikipedia is down today, but some of those are the many variations on the christian Bible and the Quran.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Not GPL compatable either. by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      airport codes

      SQL: San Carlos Airport - which just happens to be right near Oracle HQ, and is where Larry Ellison parks the jet.

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  119. Re:Personal versus synagogue use, and printed copi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In the Catholic Church, worldwide, for hundreds of years they only used a translation of the old and new testaments into Latin. Only forty years ago they decided to use translations in whatever the local language of the congregation is.

    That's almost right, but not quite.

    St. Jerome translated the Old and New Testaments into the Latin Vulgate. This is the official version of Scripture for the Catholic Church. It is held to be "without doctrinal error". That means that St. Jerome might have screwed up a verb or noun, but the teachings in there are 100% correct and unaltered. Remember that the Catholic Church is not Fundamentalist, and by definition upholds Scripture and Tradition (just as the Jews do) whereas Protestantism upholds Scripture Alone; therefore an exact translation of Scripture is more important to Protestant denominations than Catholicism or Orthodox Christians.

    The Catholic Church has almost always had translations into other languages - for example the Douhay-Rhiems which is contemporaneous with the King James Version. Even during the heydey of the Tridentine Mass (i.e., the Latin Mass), the Priest read the Gospel and reading in Latin during the prayer portion of the Mass, then before the Homily (i.e., Sermon) he would read it in the local language for the people to understand.

    What changed 40 years ago was the language of the Mass was no longer restricted to Latin - a bad decision IMNSHO, but that's a topic for another day.

    The thing to remember is that the Hebrew Alphabet is holy unto itself - a gift from G_d and used as part of Creation, as are the words of the Torah itself. They are inherently holy - something direct from G_d. The words of the Christian Bible, on the other hand, are not of the same class. They are stories, teachings, etc. that are inspired by God. There is no reason for the Christian Bible to have exact duplication of the characters unless you are of a Fundamentalist system of belief.

    Though it is interesting that Apocalypse (Revelation) follows the Jewish tradition when it warns not to alter a letter of the text.

    "19And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. - Rev 22:19

    I don't mean this as a shot, but there is one version of the Torah and one version of St. Jerome's Vulgate. When you look especially at Protestant Bibles, there are thousands of translations. In that sense, the Jews and the Catholic Church (as well as most Orthodox Christian Churches) have accomplished the task of protecting the meaning of their religious documents for centuries.

    Berashith will always mean what it has, and In principio will always mean what it has (both mean "in the beginning"). It will never mean "5000 years ago" as some modern pseudo-Darwinist translation may say. It can have no other meaning in those languages. Partially because original Hebrew and Latin are dead languages and no new meanings can organically come from those words.

    So, I agree and salute to the Jews for being true to their faith with regard to the holy words of God.

  120. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Gardner worked with Aleister Crowley on it, and Crowley stole his system from The Golden Dawn and Masonic rituals.

    But Yule was certainly a pagan holiday (not Wiccan).

    In actuality, neo-Pagans and Wiccans have stolen more from the true Pagans (which no longer exist in reality - look at the Cult of Mithra for example) and claimed it as their own than the Christian religions ever did.

  121. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    although you're part right, Yule (and Modresnacht, Thorrablot, Widvinterblot, and the other's around that time) are Pagan, but they aren't wiccan.

    Paganism and Wicca aren't interchangible terms, Hel, Wicca doesn't even fall under the Pagan umbrella. (neopaganism != paganism).

    Though Xmas IS a christian holliday, it just assimilated some of the old traditions (like decorating a pine tree on Modresnacht, for example, or the relative timing over the other festivals at that time of year, and yeah, that's where the bunnies and eggs come in on easter, etc). That's how the old ways survived, and that's not rally something to get pissed off about, imo.

  122. Re:Um, where is this? by sillybilly · · Score: 1

    Yeah, how about taking a digital copy of the Mona Lisa and storing it on your computer? There are tons of digital copies. But the original is still precious to us all. Here too we're dealing with objects that represent value beyond the intellectual content alone, where the intellectual content has been digitized and backed up a million ways. Each physical vehicle is unique, kind of - not kind of, exactly - like antiques. And where tradition means a lot, jumping on the latest and greatest storage medium such as a dual layer blue laser DVD that emits a hologram may not be regarded so highly, especially if you find out that the ink in the DVD degrades after 10 years, but too late when you threw away your parchment 10 years ago thinking you got something better.

  123. YRO: Secret Codes Protect Ancient Torahs by msormune · · Score: 1

    These secret codes are preventing me from making a backup copy of these Ancient Torahs! The torahs are no doubt very fragile and may be unreadable in any second. Yeah, I'm sure the original manufacturer promised they would last for a few thousand years but after that? I demand these ancients reveal their data encryption schemes to the general public! There's probably DRM evilness of some sort lurking there also. This is Slashdot after all and my rights as a athei^D^D^D^D^D religious believer of whatever are being violated.

  124. Pen vs Pencil by Nice+Coder · · Score: 1

    Theres a reson the us used pens instead of pencils. Its because when you write with pencils, small shards of (conductive) grafite fall off. These then go around and around and around the space craft, until they find some rather nice control to short out..... (Pencils in space == Bad karma)

    1. Re:Pen vs Pencil by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Which is why the Russians used chinagraphs, which will have a core of non-conductive, low melting point wax {not graphite} and will write on anything.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    2. Re:Pen vs Pencil by moeffju · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, both NASA and the Soviets used Pencils. Lead pencils, without Graphite. And Snopes is your friend: http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/spacepen.asp

      --
      follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/moeffju
  125. Money money money, so typical of the elders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - This posting only serves to reinforce the common belief that jews are all about the money, money and money. Emphasize 50k USD Torah, while the Bible says: you got it free, you shall give it free (the Holy Spirit that is). File swappers and torrentors are the true sons of Jesus, who give free what they got for free, while RIAA is a cabal hungry for money.

    - If the Torah must be hand written, its contents will neccessarily mutate by every rewrite because human hand and eye is fallible. So after some 8000 years they claim it should be full of garbage. Gutenberg was wiser than them.

    1. Re:Money money money, so typical of the elders by jbb1003 · · Score: 1

      It's true that there are mistakes in every hand-written Torah, when it is first written. However, it is written without the vowels and cantillation marks of the Masoretes. Consequently, whenever anyone reads from it, they have first to learn the text. If anyone reads aloud from a scroll and makes a mistake they are corrected, and they have to say the correct text before continuing. This means that mistakes will eventually be corrected - once a mistake is found, the scroll cannot be used until it has been fixed.

      The consequence of this is that an old regularly used Torah is very error-free. A subsequent copy will have errors, but will also detect errors in the original, because the scribe will be intimately familiar with the text. Consequently the contents mutate at every rewrite - but are corrected throughout the lifetime of the scroll, and the mutations *do not necessarily propogate*.

    2. Re:Money money money, so typical of the elders by laika$chi · · Score: 1

      Now there are even fewer errors - new torahs from reputable sofers are computer checked. Each page is scanned and compared to a master - every error is flagged.

  126. Why is Moses jewish? by sita · · Score: 1

    kinda off subject, but why is moses always affiliated with the jewish? I mean, christians believe in the old testament too.

    Yes. But the jews don't believe in the Old Testament. They believe in the Hebrew Bible (as well as the oral law, of course). Now, there is a not so subtle difference between the Old Testament and the Hebrew Bible. The name "Old Testament" implies it has been replaced by the new shiny "New Testament" and is no longer valid. Jews don't believe that. God's convenant with Abraham has no exit clause!

    Having said that it is quite confusing to see a large cathedral in Amsterdam named after the lawgiver of Israel and his brother the high priest (Moses en Aaron kerk (sp?)).

    1. Re:Why is Moses jewish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Christians don't believe that the Old Testament is no longer valid. They believe that the covenant has been *extended* to include people from all nations. And they believe that the only way to God the Father is through Jesus, the Messiah, a Jew. In the New Testament, Jesus actually is quoted saying that he has not come to change a single iota of the Scriptures! In that case, you can hardly call them no longer valid for Christians.

    2. Re:Why is Moses jewish? by superyooser · · Score: 1
      The name "Old Testament" implies it has been replaced by the new shiny "New Testament" and is no longer valid. Jews don't believe that. God's convenant with Abraham has no exit clause!

      This is a heresy introduced into Christianity by Marcion. He is responsible for the insidious separation between "Old" and "New" "Testaments" and the contrived dichotomy of "Law vs. Grace." 2 Timothy 3:16 says, "All Scripture is God-breathed," and the Tanakh makes clear that God has always shown grace to the humble.

      Christian Origins

      It is ironic that perhaps one of the most influential of figures in Church History is also one of the most reviled heretics: Marcion. [...] Marcion's teachings departed from traditional Christianity in a number of ways. Most dramatically, perhaps, Marcion rejected the idea that the Old Testament God and the New Testament God were the same being. Up until then, the traditional Church had considered the Old Testament to be sacred and assumed that Christianity was a fulfillment or continuation of Judaism. Marcion's rejection of that idea affected many different doctrines and beliefs.

      CenturyOne

      "In the middle of the second century, the Hebrew foundations of Christian faith were attacked by the first great heresy that challenged the church. Some of the ideas of this heresy so permeated the church's corporate psyche that it has not yet fully recovered its spiritual and scriptural equilibrium.

      Marcion, son of a bishop of Sinope in Pontus, (there is some question about this) joined the Syrian Gnostic Cerdo in Rome in developing a dualistic view of sacred history which postulated the existence of two gods, the good and gracious God (Christ) and the Demiurge (Jehovah of the Jews). Marcion taught an irreconcilable dualism between gospel and law, between Christianity and Judaism. The Demiurge and his religion were seen as harsh, severe, and unmerciful, and they were cast into Hades by Christ, the good God. Marcion invented a new canon of Holy Scripture which included only an abridged Gospel of Luke and ten of Paul's epistles, some of which he edited. He wrested the words of Jesus in Matthew 5:17 to declare, 'I am not come to fulfil the law and the prophets, but to destroy them.' (Actual text of Mat. 5:17: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." (NIV) -superyooser)

      In Marcion's view, Christianity had no connection whatever with the past, whether of the Jewish or the heathen world, but had fallen abruptly and magically from heaven. Jesus, too, was not born, nor did he die. His body was a phantom to reveal the good God, and his death was an illusion. This Christ was not the Messiah predicted in the Old Testament; he was a totally new and unforeseen manifestation of the good God of Greek dualism. Because the rest of the apostles were Judaizing corrupters of pure Christianity, Christ called Paul as the apostle to preach the truth of Marcion's extreme antinomianism and anti-Judaism. [(Context from first linked article:) Significantly, Marcion also took a scalpel to Paul's letters, eliminating as many positive references to Judaism or the Old Testament as possible. "Marcion dealt with the text of Paul's letters in the same way as with the text of Luke's gospel: anything which appeared inconsistent with what he believed to be authentic Pauline teaching was regarded as a corruption proceeding from an alien hand." See also the book Paul the Jewish Theologian - superyooser]

      While the church officially denounced the heresy of Marcion (his own father excommunicated him) and affirmed monotheism, the authority of the Hebrew Scriptures, and the deity, humanity, atoning death, and resurrection of Jesus, Marcion's extreme antinomianism

  127. Bad hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some hardware just does not run well using either of the three code distributions. Experts suspect it has to do with malfunctioning empathy circuits and quite possibly an erroneous preemtion logic.

    Though a lot of good hardware is produced and can run all three version of the code well, every once in a while a few will get past the DNA QA and end up being installed in central server rooms, thus causing major downtime and risking the whole human enterprise.

    Some have suggested a more decentralized configuration to avoid the effect of bad hardware and stricter empathy and preemption testing especially for any existing legacy server rooms.

    Currently the Facist, Crusader and Osama Bin Laden platforms are the biggest threat.

  128. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why there are 1 million comments to this article. Most of the comments don't have anything to do with the article.

    Also, from what I understand (I'm a protestant) the letters have different numerical values, and the sums have special meanings. Isn't this why no characters can be added?

    But still, every Torah can't look exactly the same? Even if the characters are the same?

  129. Is this 2005? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe religious nonsense like this is still going on. What is so broken about mankind's self confidence that we can't take credit for our own actions? Why do we neeed to seek justification in the arms of a cult - one that everyone can see is simply invented to control the masses?

    And why is the stigma of pointing out the obvious (Namely that God doesn't exist any more than the tooth fairy and Santa) so strong? (Strong enough to make me post anon, anyway.)

    1. Re:Is this 2005? by cecille · · Score: 1

      the funny part is that people who are strong athiests fall back on the same types of arguments as strong religious types.... God's existance, or the lack of it is not obvious in any way...it is a belief. Without solid proof in one direction, we cannot say for certain whether or not God really exists because we have no solid proof either way. If we did, and it was really so obvious, well...argument over, we'd all know for sure. But the fact is that we don't have facts and proofs, we have beliefs and ideas, which differ from person to person and religion to religion. If it is your belief that there is no such thing as god, then fine...that is your belief and you are entitled to it, and I'm sure there are good reasons for it...but don't pretend this is some obvious truth that everyone should suscribe to, because beliefs about the nature of god are rarely obvious and are speculation on both sides of the road.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    2. Re:Is this 2005? by chawly · · Score: 1

      Santa doesn't exist ? Now you've ruined my day. But who fills my stocking then? The tooth fairy exists - she left a shilling under my pillow just 51 years ago; being a Scot, I remember this well. And why did my mother instill the habit of going to church on Sunday ? You can't fool a Scottish mother. Come on, eh. Stealing is not a good thing to have happening. Good idea to do what can be done to stop it. Smile

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  130. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yule was a pagan (not wiccan) holiday.
    But, can you honestly tell me that 'christmas' as its celebrated throughout the world today (not today... dont be pedantic) bears ANY resembalence to the 'wicken' festival.

    I dont remember reading about them spending £thousands on gifts, commercialism and watching lots of crappy TV whilst getting drunk.

  131. Holy books by shrik3 · · Score: 1
    How does the book (or scroll in this case) become more holy if it's old? Isn't it the text that counts?

    Defining older copies as more holy seems a lot like idol worship to me, and that is (IIRC) kinda forbidden

  132. Dangers of not ID-ing your scrolls by kahei · · Score: 1


    If you don't ID your scrolls you will have to either sell them to a shop, or just read them at random to find out what they are. In either case you risk wasting a valuable scroll!

    I only hope the Jewish community bears this in mind before it's too late.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  133. Re:So what?! by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Precisely. Science is based on the presumption that every observable phenomenon can be understood and explained. This runs very deeply and so tends to be disregarded, as we tend to disregard the very foundations of mathematics: because if the most basic presumptions did not hold, too many other things would also fail. Organised religions -- especially the dogmatic, monotheist ones -- tend to be based on the presumption that some observable phenomena cannot be understood {"it's all part of God's Great Inexorable Plan"}.

    Of course a scientist is exhibiting faith; but the difference is that faith in science is corroborated over and over again by reproducible experiments {and scientists are only too ready to modify their theories when they are contradicted by new observations}, whereas faith in religion is largely uncorroborated except by "holy texts" specific to the religion in question.

    This is why science and religion in their purest forms can never be truly reconciled: all hinges on the question "Can everything be understood?".

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  134. Idiot by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, you have to belive in non existant deities and follow the rest of the sheep to be educated?

    Moron.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  135. Why don't they just photocopy it? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Seems like the sensible solution to me.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Why don't they just photocopy it? by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Even if you could photocopy onto parchament (2'x3' sections of animal skin), doing so would make the Sefer (scroll) unfit for use in a public synagogue service.

      -David Barak

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  136. Why is this needed? by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    Why is this needed? How hard can it be to find a stolen Torah? It isn't like 17 year olds are going to be carrying them around like iPods. The only people who would want them would be Rabbis who have the intelligence to detect and the morality to not take advantage of a theft.

  137. What is the Bible by zoney_ie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except you're missing the whole bit about that people don't generally do well in not being evil, at least in some small ways, and hence need something further (Jesus Christ) to be OK with God rather than just trying to be good.

    And it's reasonably generalising to treat the Bible as one thing. It's a collection of books with a very varying style and purpose. There's everything from Jewish law (important for historical reference, nevermind other issues) to a Music book (most Christian hymns are derived from Psalms, nevermind that some of the closest scriptural links with the New Testament are with the Psalms) to prophecy, history (the whole careful detailing of Israel's relationship with God is/should be very instructive to Christians) and theology.

    I think "don't be evil" is fairly indistinct even as a "gist" of the Bible. Perhaps you could have a subtitle of "Man and God" to guess some of the subject matter, that'd be at least someways more accurate.

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  138. Photo Solution by SeanDuggan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Actually, if you RTFAed, one of the techniques listed does essentially that, albeit also analyzing the photo to determine handwriting style. The problem faced, apparently, is convincing the jury to consider this as true evidence that the two scrolls are the same. Handwriting analysis has been in courts (and public consciousness) long enough that people generally accept that you can show that a particular set of whorls and jots is characteristic of a particular author. Digital photographs... the precision involved in these scrolls means that the text is practically identical between scrolls, at least until you start getting on a very high level of magnification. Theoretically, the background could be analyzed, but I don't know how certain it is that the animal skin would remain looking the same over a few months or years of exposure to the ambient environment.

    I wonder whether they could do a DNA analysis of the animal skin... I would imagine that for any given scroll, it's probably composed of a number of different individual animals and the mix is probably not the same for any given scroll. The catches would be a) DNA testing is not horribly cheap still, and b) DNA testing AFAIK, is still a mildly destructive process with dead materials.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Photo Solution by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      You are missing the fact that these are handwritten copies of an identical text by different people. They are not different writings of the same person. As such, though the letters themselves may be "identical," the spacing, size of letters, and especially the lengths of the lines differ. So you could in actuality just measure the lengths of a finite number of lines very accurately to create a fingerprint for each work. The odds of these being identical in two versions is vanishingly small.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    2. Re:Photo Solution by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Some are written by the same scribe. A scribe will not write just one Torah in his lifetime. So proving that a particular scroll was written by a particular scribe does little to prove that it is the scroll in question.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  139. "Thou shalt not steal" 1000 years older than torah by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The earliest form of the Torah was the Mosaic oral traditions from 1200 B.C.E. It was not final form until the sixth century B.C. during the prophets and captivity. Hamarabi has the oldest written law from 2200 B.C.E. including punishments for theft.

  140. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The words are from a sacred gigant tomato.

    Can you prove otherwise?

  141. In addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In addition, you gotta remember that Moses was not just affiliated with the Jews, he was one... this question is funny, because the Christians agree to this, he was Jewish, as were all the people who would become Christians later

  142. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Those 'publican meals are like $1000 a plate. Jesus must have been fucking loaded! Maybe he just saved up so he could meet the majority whip and Laura Bush.

  143. Legal Proof by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    The next question would be whether the jury would buy this. One of the consequences of a jury-based legal system is that it doesn't matter how right you are if you can't convince the jury to accept what you're proposing. Now admittedly, probably all that needs to happen to get that to occur is to get one of these CSI or Law/Order shows to introduce the technique.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Legal Proof by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      As far as juries are concerned, the best method would simply be to photograph the original before it's stolen and then superimpose a photo of the allegedly stolen copy over the photo of the original. One wonders why hitech solutions are even considered when visual identification can be used so successfully.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  144. I'll wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard the next major release will provide all the features of the older versions plus greatly improved interoperability. Everybody should upgrade as soon as there is a stable release.
    (Except those running Atheism 1.x of course)

    The Jihad problem still won't be solved though, but at least as a human I don't have to care about this anymore.

  145. Nice law! by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

    Wish we had that law for christianity!

    The bible is re-wrtitten every time one ass of a leader (pope) decides it doesnt fit his thinking!

    1. Re:Nice law! by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Actually, there is no basis to that myth.

      In the past 200 years, hebrew texts of books of what we now call the Old Testament that are older than the the concept of popes in the first place have been discovered, and can be compared with the versions that we have today to discover that the Old Testament has remained virtually completely unaltered for at least the past 2,000 years. There are minor differences, but nothing that has changed any meaning.

      Likewise, several older New Testament manuscripts have also been uncovered, and comparing them to the modern texts we have also reveals only a very small number of changes -- certainly nothing of any theological significance. The biggest difference I know of that was discovered between the oldest discovered texts and the ones that were available when good ol' King James had his bible printed was that the gospel of Mark appeared to have had a few paragraphs added onto the end of it in later versions (and those paragraphs can be logically concluded to have been written by an unknown author). One could conspiracy theorize that this sort of thing is happening all over the place, but there's no evidence to support that outside of the book of Mark (and it's worth pointing out that the scope of that particular change doesn't even affect the theological message being presented anyways, so the argument is moot).

      The fact that there have been so few changes to the bible is not conclusive evidence of its divine origins, however... there is a much simpler and far more down-to-earth explanation: Us.

      The religious works were preserved from generation to generation so faithfully because they were _profoundly_ important to those people, and as a result peoople took such extreme amount of care in copying the work that the likelihood of transcribing errors occurring was orders of magnitude less than what it would have been for most other types of works, pre-Gutenburg.

    2. Re:Nice law! by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

      There is no evidence to make us think otherwise!

      Nobody alive today knows what's been rewrote in the bible,, i'm not talking about the old or the new testament,, but the Bible. The spanish inquisition did happen and they were not about open mind but censorship,,,damn even the sixtine chapel was painted over so the genital of the characters woudlnt show, imagine what they would do to a book!

      Unless they find a 2000 year old bible or text, it's still a book that you need to take lightly and not literraly, but even if we had the real thing they'd still be fools to misunderstand what's written there.But in that case all religions are alike, they take what they want when it fits their fool crusade of what's right and wrong.

    3. Re:Nice law! by mark-t · · Score: 1
      That's the point... we _HAVE_ found 2000+ year old copies of books of the Old Testament (in Hebrew usually). Nothing of substance has been changed in any of the books that we currently know as the Old Testament in over 2,000 years.

      Of course, as I said before... this doesn't point to evidence that the work is "Holy", it only points to the fact that people _THOUGHT_ it was holy, and in turn placed an utmost importance on retaining its integrity. It's a difficult task, but certainly not impossible.

    4. Re:Nice law! by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

      Those 2000 years old text arent available for us to read usually, we read the transaltion in english/french etc..etc.. and that's where it gets tricky,,,who says it hasnt been messed with?

      I believe that the coran ot the torah could be untouched , they dont have the pope and his minions like Christians do, so some believers eat whatever is being fed to them!

      But i'm getting Offtopic here! i just wanted to comment on the fact that there are actual laws so you cant add anything in the book and i'm probably sure they respect it.the Bible has been going around many different religions and they have made whatever they wanted out of it.

    5. Re:Nice law! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Well, there are enough people that are fluent in hebrew and other languages that unless they are all part of a conspiracy to keep the ancient texts secret from all everyone else (not an impossibility, I grant you, but nevertheless still a conspiracy theory), that any one person who messes with it would get corrected by someone else (again, because of how personally significant the content of the work is to people).

  146. For sale ... by eck011219 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Torah, first edition. Some wear and tear to tablets. Shipping not included. Call 555-1234, ask for Indy.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  147. Re:Personal versus synagogue use, and printed copi by Asterisk · · Score: 1

    You are mistaken. When the Romans dispersed the Jews from what was then known in Latin as Syria Judea, they renamed their newly-annexed province Syria Palestina.

    The term, IIRC, is a reference to the ancient Philistine people, and the region had been described by the name in a few Greek sources. The Romans deliberately chose a name with no direct connection to the Jews to reflect their conquest of the same.

    When the British acquired the territory from the Ottomans after WWI, they called it by the long-standing Latin name.

  148. Re:Only the Jews by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

    And whilst you're at it don't forget Easter which, in Europe, was originally the time for worship of the goddess Oestre.

    Which also explains why there's an "easter bunny" as Oestres sacred symbols were the moon and the hare. The moon was revered for its influence on females (also explaining why Oestrogen is so named) and the hare was revered as a symbol of fertility (because it's one of the few animals that can get pregnant again before giving birth to the currently gestating foetus(es))

    And thence also comes the idea of Easter being the time of the Earths rebirth which is why, when the Christians subsumed the Easter festival, it became the time of the year when Jesus died and was resurrected.

    So the moral of the story ? Reocurring symbols one and all Kids. Same ideas different deitys. Dig a little deeper under almost every "Christian" feast day/celebration and you'll find some earlier foundations of an entirely different nature.

    But having said all this Oestre was undoubtedly overlaid on an ever earlier God/Goddess etc. etc.

    But next easter whilst you enjoy your "easter eggs" and "bunnies" do spare a thought for an old European goddess.

    Praise "Bob" (and leave Chthulu out of it) !

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
  149. Jewish Angels by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

    Jewish though on Angels is very different from Christian. The most important thing to understand is that as far as Jews are concerend Angels don't have any free will. They exist only to do what G-d tells them to do. So the idea that one of them could "Fall" or defy G-d makes no sense. The Satan (its a title not a name in Hebrew) is an angel who tests people but he does it at G-d's command.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
  150. Re: The Devil by Abreu · · Score: 1

    Not really, Chrisitanity has the devil for example, Judasim doesn't belive he exits. After all how is it possible for there to be an evil force that is independent of God? Nothing can be independant of God.

    Just curious, what about the entity called "Satan" in the book of Job?

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  151. Re:Only the Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually,Xmas is wiccan.

    Since Wicca didn't exist until the 1950s, it would be quite an impressive accomplishment for the Wiccans to have used their leet time-travelling powers to go back and invent Christmas before the Christians had the idea.

    Wicca isn't ancient paganism, and Yule isn't Christmas.

  152. Truth and Lawyers by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    As a lawyer's son, my response would be that the defense lawyer would surely hear of the photograph of the original being submitted for evidence and he would provide a photograph that was substantially similar, and submit it as a counterpoint. No matter how good of a photo you make, there will always be light differences in lighting and material angles. Heck, if these scrolls are hundreds of years old, I would be surprised if there were any way to get them to lie entirely flat that didn't also risk damaging the scrolls.

    {shakes his head} Please don't think I'm attacking you in all of this. I agree that photographic evidence is something which should solve a lot of problems. Problem is, it doesn't. Truth of the matter is, law pretty much comes down to how good your lawyer is at presenting the case and how good he is at dismantling the other side's case. Evidence and testimony play a part, but in the end, it comes down to the lawyers and the whims of the jury.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  153. I'm not anon by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    And I'm saying out loud that I agree with every God-damn thing you said!

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
  154. DNA? by chuckw · · Score: 1
    Since these things were made out of animal skins there's got to be some sort of genetic residue left over from the original 'er owner.

    Clearly most of the DNA will be destroyed over time and in the process of processing the skin to make the parchment. However, I can't imagine that there wouldn't be enough genetic matter left over to uniquely identify the document.

    ..Chuck..

    --
    *Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
  155. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are printed on parchment, which is made from animal skins which have DNA, it seems to me that G-D already did the work for them, they just aren't looking in the right place.

  156. Re: The Devil by ars · · Score: 1

    Someone else mentioned this briefly, but I'll expand on it, Satan is very very different then the devil.

    He's just an angel with no free will, who was ordered by God to test people and act as a prosecutor. However he has no ability to act on his own, and he isn't even "evil" in the christian sense of the word.

    He has even been described as working under protest of sorts: i.e. he actually does not want the person to fail the test, it's just that he was ordered to test the person, and therefore he will do his best at it. Even if it's not what he really wants.

    Poor guy in a way, he an angel like all the others, but because of his job everyone hates him and tries to avoid him. (I'm majorly personifying here.)

    The fallen angels that someone else described are not satan, they were angels who told god during the time of Noah that they could do a better job of living in the world. So God dropped them down to earth to see how they do - and they did really really badly. They had no ability to control their impulses. The giants mentioned there are all descended from them.

    --
    -Ariel
  157. Re:Only the Jews by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    God just told me those are not his words.

    Can you prove that he did?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  158. Re:Only the Jews by poolmeister · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Spoken like a true Christian...

    ...Is anyone sensing the effect of US government brainwashing here... or is it just me?
    Isn't the moral of Christianity to 'love thy neighbour', 'do unto others...' and all that?
    When did "deny, hate and gain control of those who don't look or think the same way as you do" slip into the bible?

    I think the 'Anonymous Coward' (apt don't you think?) has been watching a little too many TV "evangelists" or GW Bush propaganda for his own good.

    --
    CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
  159. Re:Micro-perforation sounds like characters to me. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    write your name on the back!!!!

    Seriouly though this is ridiculous... the Text of the book is different than a label on the text identifying it's owner... this is where the whole jewish thing jumped the shark a very, very long time ago with all sorts of work arounds to very simple rules. [and that started happening BC!]

    They could always add picture too! I mean the thing says nothing about pictures... how stupid are they?

  160. Religion today isn't about what faith you follow.. by StormKrow · · Score: 1

    ...it's not even about what G-d you pray to.

    Religion today is simply a roadmap of how to behave towards one another, and a set of tennants on how to live one's life.

    The Jewish faith is rich with history and tradition, and it gives a lot of people purpose. Just like programming, inventing, or music gives others purpose.

    Protect the Torah is obviously something that is important to the Jewish community, just as anti-virus software is important to the computer community. You would think that as enlightened as the computer community claims to be, we coud forego the anti-semitic comments.

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  161. Stolen Bibles... by Tiggs23 · · Score: 1
    I worked for Barnes & Noble some years ago, and during that time found out that the Bible is the most-often stolen book. I theorized that these thieves must be rationalizing it to themselves, thinking that the "Word of God" should be free, or some such...and was told that that was almost word for word what a shoplifter had said when caught. Sad that they don't think about all the hard work put into manufacturing and publishing those books, the result of which they're stealing, and therefore braking a Commandment.

    Disclaimer: I am an atheist.

    --
    "The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me." --Ayn Rand
  162. So you can read it. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    You can stick it up your ass, fuckface.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  163. Re:Only the Jews by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    There is on thing in life that is very certain. Death.

    Religion explains 3 things to people. Where we came from. Why we're here. Where we're going after.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano