Domain: pandaboard.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to pandaboard.org.
Comments · 7
-
Re:Misleading and/or overblown?
Not sure what the board they're demonstrating this on is actually intended for either.
-
Re:Still x86 though
There is already pandaboard.
It's just that ARM is not yet nearly as fast as the average x86 processor.
-
Beagle or panda
Beagleboards are 149.00USD and Pandaboards are 179.00USD you then just need an SD card 4G or better. I run a pandaboard myself for some D-Star ham radio stuff.
-
Sounds Familiar
Call me dumb, but the Vita definitely sounds like a tweaked Pandaboard ( http://pandaboard.org/ ) to me...
-
Re:WANTED: 1U low-power rack server
Take a look at the PandaBoard, if you want a low-power, dual-core ARM server, although you'd have to use CF + USB for storage, not SATA. Note, however, that VirtualBox is x86-only. If you want virtualisation, you're currently pretty limited on ARM. There is a Xen port, but it's not really packaged for end users yet.
-
Pandaboard: more memory & costs less
As a further alternative, there is always the Gumstix. But, overall, the Pandaboard looks like a much sweeter deal: for $174 you get a dual-core ARM A9 board with 1GB, DVI output, Bluetooth, and all the goodies. I think I'll get one really soon now.
-
Re:Serious Hardware in 1997...
'you kidding ? That thing suck 3.0A 5V DC (http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/t-dreamplugdetails.aspx#component), that's fraking 15W, same as my core2-based laptop in low-power mode, without the LCD turned on. It just has an ARM926EJ-S core [on the market for *years*...] on steroid, previous model required fan-cooling and had heat dissipation issue. Not to say that it uses a 16bits bus to access the RAM
... If I got $200 to spend, I'd rather prefer an OMAP4-based board featuring a Cortex-A9, ala http://pandaboard.org/.