Slashdot Mirror


Building 2011's Sub-$200 Computer

adeelarshad82 links to PC Magazine's recent account (updating a similar quest detailed last year) "to see if a decent PC could put together for less than $200. Turns out that between some great deals, an AMD processor, and a Linux OS, it can actually be done." They actually come out with a decent-enough system for that money — but omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating.

394 comments

  1. Don't even have to build it yourself by steevven1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can get an eeePC netbook for $199 RETAIL at Best Buy...Best Buy!!! I know this is talking about desktops, but it just doesn't seem that surprising...

    1. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but to be fair, a netbook can't really compare. An Atom's cool for low-power uses, but it's such a slow, dated design you can barely run a functioning computer off it. Even the integrated 6100 GPU on this build is better than Intel's crappy offering on there.

      You have to compromise somewhere considering you get a screen, wireless, keyboard and trackpad/mouse (none of which are otherwise covered in this buildup) for that price.

    2. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by dbet · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I managed to run World of Warcraft off of a Dell 10v. And I regularly watch 1080p video on it.

    3. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using an Atom D410 running Lubuntu, it's the only system i've got and it's a perfectly capable desktop.

    4. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Just a few days ago, there was an HP desktop on woot.com for $299. 3Ghz AMD II 64-bit, 4gb ram, 1tb HDD, Windows 7, and Optical drive. There is really no reason to make big sacrifices to save a few dollars.

    5. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

      $299 according to their web site.

    6. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or you can get a bottom-end eMachines dual core 15.4" laptop for $230. It ain't fancy but, unlike the article's $200 desktop, it includes monitor, optical drive, input devices, and even a UPS. And it comes with an operating system that will have support for or be supported by whatever peripherals or software the user wants to add without having to call their weird nephew for help.

    7. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      My experience dates back to second-generation Atoms (I had a first-generation 10" EEE PC) and I'll say they were barely functional. It's certainly able to do most common tasks, just bog slow with it.

      Bear in mind your D410 is a dual-core CPU, whereas I'm fairly certain a $199 EEE PC won't be (looking at Amazon, even $250 doesn't net you that). They did get multithreading in with say the N455, though, which is a step forward I guess.

      My entire point was just to say that even the best Atom gets blown away by the Athlon in the setup presented here.

    8. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why do you need it to be fast? Most people only use a computer for browsing. If a computer was fast enough in 1990, it should theoretically be fast enough today assuming that you don't load it down with bulky and badly written OS and applications. Now if only we had programmers left who cared about efficiency...

    9. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by brim4brim · · Score: 1

      I just installed Linux Mint Debian Edition and put Enlightenment as window manager. Now I'm running Eclipse and doing Android programming no bother on it though I'm using my phone rather than the emulator which was taking too long to start up.

      But you'd be surprised what you can do with a 200 Euro laptop when you ditch the bloat of most modern desktop environment. I still have all the auto-mounting, wireless management, update manager etc.. through the systray gadget which loads all the gnome systray stuff and the ability to use nautilus or any other gnome app I want though Enlightenment does pretty much everything I need in 30MB or so of memory.

      Gnome is pretty much unusable on Eeepc I have, the system monitor uses 25% CPU and I'm disappointed in how it is bloating. We need Gnome lite :P

    10. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Seriously. I paid $400 for a new laptop last christmas. I got a dual core AMD with 4 GB RAM and 320 HD. Now that It's back to school season I'm just browsing the deals, for that same $400 I can get a 6GB RAM, Intel i3 dual core, and 640 GB hard drive. To get the equivalent of what I have now, I would only have to pay $250-$300. This is why tablets are overpriced. Anything decent is $500, but for $400 you can have a notebook with some pretty amazing specs.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    11. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Browsing isn't what it used to be. For many people, browsing means playing Farmville on Facebook, which will eat up a lot of CPU and memory. And no, Zinga programmers don't really care about efficiency on your computer, only on their servers.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obviously not poor. There are people who $100 means a lot to.

    13. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

      My "nettop" is decent. 64-bit dual-core Atom processor, nVidia graphics, etc. And yes, it was about $200 at Best Buy at the time. Of course, that was when they were still allowed to ship XP, it doesn't have enough RAM for later versions of Windows. Runs KDE 4 on Mageia 1.0 just fine.

    14. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 2

      This is honestly true - an optimized set of applications, and even a real low power chip(like the ARM ones in smartphones) is plenty for browsing and such. However, then we run into things like Flash, which sucks the life out of almost anything.
      Honestly, once we get hardware-accelerated decoding of VP8 available on Linux, and a proper plugin for FF/chrome which allows it to be used with HTML5 video... then that will be less of a problem as *most* youtube videos have webm versions..
      But until then... *sigh*. You either need to run it with a small window, or have a powerful CPU...

    15. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...And for $700 you can build a top-of-the-line, amd-based gaming machine off Newegg that will run just about everything you throw at it. But that, like your couple of builds, are *still* way above what was managed with the $200 machine.

    16. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      And I regularly watch 1080p video on it.

      Yeah, and nowadays, setups whose display has a vertical resolution of 768 are marketed as "high-end".

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    17. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by timeOday · · Score: 2

      If a computer was fast enough in 1990, it should theoretically be fast enough today

      For home users, I see little overlap between what computers were used for in 1990 vs now. Most people who own a home computer now did not even own one then - adoption was about 15% at the time.

      Even since 2000, although Internet was catching on, the main application of the Internet - video - had barely started catching on.

    18. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In 1998, I remember using a 1995 100MHz Pentium which couldn't execute Flash (required 120MHz minimum); I had to later set up another desktop along that one, a 133MHz and, with XFree86 as server in one and client in the other, we could run XFCE (3.0) and watch videos (probably Youtube).

      That should be around 2000; those were the days, we just needed to choose a wm (I loved Afterstep, wm2/wmx, flwm, Ouroboros etc.). I then started using Xfce, because KDE (1.0 or 2.0, can't recall) was too heavy. I think one could say "the circle is complete", as KDE4 is too heavy for some of my PCs and I've been using things like LXDE and Icewm.

      I do have modern machines that are slow (low-power), but we now have things like Flashblock and Flashgot.

      Thanks everyone for these last 20 years (almost 12 for me), it's been fun. I believe that's all I ever wanted: for IT to be fun...

    19. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran World of Warcraft using wine on Xubuntu on a 500MhZ AMD Barton Core with 384 megs of RAM -- I don't remember the video card specs but they were below the minimum requirements (64 megs of vram maybe)?. An Atom is overkill.

    20. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      This is why tablets are overpriced.

      No, it's not.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    21. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      what's more, pages with html5 and fat javascript tend to be even more CPU and memory hungry than flash. they make 3GHz, not-pentium-4 computers struggle.

    22. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by faclonX · · Score: 2

      We've needed Gnome lite for years, I remember back in the earlier days of Gnome 2 memory use was deplorable then, and its not gotten any better. Along with the Gnome dev team constantly stuffing their opinions down the user's throats saying "Its for your own good, we're the devs, we know better than you." I remember when they decided it was a good idea to make the default action for Nautilus to be spacial, that pissed EVERY gnome user I knew then, and still know including myself off to high hell. The Gnome team has claimed in the past that they have cleaned up bloat, and made it faster, but I really beg to differ. The only reason I'm using Gnome still is because KDE blows, and my distro of choice hasn't implemented Gnome 3 yet. I know when it does, I'm switching to XFCE, I'm sick of the Gnome team and their shit. The bloat, and assuming they know better than me is getting old, and I can't stand it anymore

      (We also need slashdot lite, I'm sick of this stupid AJAX shit, let me just post)

      --
      It had to be done... It had to be said...
    23. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Nope... The D4nn is a single core CPU, with Hyperthreading. The dual core version is the D5nn, also with Hyperthreading, I'm typing this on one (Atom D525, 199€ nettop with 2GB RAM and 320GB HDD). It's a fine little machine, but don't expect too much of it. I'm running Ubuntu on it and Flash games are unbearable. Flash video seems to be fine though. Of course, Adobe is to blame as my Core2Duo at work has the same troubles, except the problems are fewer, or more quickly resolved. (Browser locking for several seconds. Killing the plugin makes it run again, so it definitely is the plugin) While Linux can make weaker hardware function fine, once Flash is involved, performance goes through the drain. The same machine running Windows XP with the Flash plugin would run the same games fine. I have tested this myself.

      Anyway, the Atom is a fine choice for basic web surfing, and office tasks. It's also a nice choice for a home server. They are best coupled with Windows (XP) due to the Flash performance issue. If Flash on Linux were better, I'd say they make perfect "daily use" machines.

      These Atoms sometimes can surprise with what they can do. I have VirtualBox running on my D525 with an XP Pro guest machine. Works just fine... (Well, okay, it's for occasional tests... nothing fancy or heavy use) I was surprised to find out that that CPU doesn't have hardware virtualization, yet it works.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    24. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      $200 for a machine with multiple components that can generally be bought separately is hard price point to break because you start running into the minimum profitable price point for each component.

      For instance, go look at 3.5" hard drive prices on NewEgg, sort by price, see whether you can find any below $40 (there is one, the rest are all $40+). That's because for the manuf, the materials that go into making the drive prevent the retail cost from being lower then the $35-$40 price point. Plus there's the money required to stock this thing and move it from the manufacturer to the dealer. And the retailer doesn't want to deal with items that have to be picked and packed where they only make a few pennies on the item. Even in the 2.5" segment, you can't generally find a drive for less then $35-$40.

      Laptops suffer the same issue, nobody wants to make & support a unit that sells for much less then about $250-$350.

      Cases, $20-$30. Motherboards bottom out at $40. CPUs $40-$45. PSU $10-$15 (cheap cases generally don't include that). DVD drive $20 or so. RAM is about $15. Video cards (unless you find a $40 motherboard with video) are about $30. Plus the OS license (which drives the cost up another $50-$100).

      Puts a minimum price at around $250 or so, plus S&H and taxes. But you're left with a really shitty PSU that will probably fry something a year down the road, a case that is a PITA to work with, and a video card from a decade ago.

      I prefer not to skimp on the case. Get something good and it will last you through multiple builds, it will be pleasant to work with, it will keep your stuff cool, and it will not be a noisy POS because it will use 80/120/160mm fans. (Which is why I own a lot of Antec Sonata cases.)

      PSU is what keeps your PC innards running properly and protected from the nasty stuff on the line voltage (sags, surges, blips, etc. if you don't have a filtering UPS unit). Plus, they sometimes fail spectacularly and the better units do so in a way that protects the innards. Not wise to go bottom of the barrel here, but you don't have super-expensive. Instead of the $40 PSU, go with something in the $60-$70 range that is 80+ efficiency and 450-550W rating.

      I always end up around $350-$450 for a basic PC that won't go out of date right away. Minimum of 2GB/4GB RAM, dual-core CPU, good case and PSU, a budget motherboard (but not low-end), etc. And it will have a small amount of expansion possibilities such as 2 DIMM slots open, 1 PCIe 16x slot, maybe 1-2 PCIe 1x/4x slots and room for additional HDs. If you can get away with Linux, you can shave $50 or so off the build cost due to not having an OS license.

      Office PCs tend to be more in the $450-$550 range. The higher cost for Windows Professional license, plus a touch more RAM or a tri/quad core CPU drives that up. And the software licenses for office apps, productivity apps, etc. will double that cost at a minimum.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    25. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      "...are *still* way above what was managed with the $200 machine"
      No, they aren't. TFA price did not include display, OS, any way of obtaining or loading the OS, keyboard, mouse, camera, microphone,... it wasn't really a working computer, and worse, with only 2GB RAM, it's barely even web-capable. My 2-year-old Lenovo dual-core laptop was $400 with all that listed above, DVD-RW, SD slot, 3GB RAM, Wi-Fi, multi-hour UPS, etc. (though admittedly only 250GB HDD rather than the 500GB of TFA.) You would have to spend at least another $200 over the TFA's setup to get just the stuff that I use every day on my laptop.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    26. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Now if only we had programmers left who cared about efficiency..."

      If only my aunt had a dick she'd be my uncle.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    27. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      I actually am using my old EEE as a home server ;)

      It's a fine computer, just fairly barebones. I got it with XP, but Linux is more suitable overall, Flash issues or not. XP would struggle to boot and Firefox took ages to start up (this was before Chrome started picking up extensions and other such desirable features, it'd probably be a better fit nowadays). Both LibreOffice and plain old MS Office (2007) also took ages to load.

      My hacked-together #! Linux with X turned off works just fine as a FTP/BitTorrent box though.

    28. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      I've got a relatively new ( 8 months) Asus Seashell, I'll never buy one again. Tooooooooooo slow, and I don't even play games. Bite my shiny metal ass.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    29. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I still have my EEE 701 4G in active use (has 2GB RAM, though). It runs Debian Squeeze with LXDE and iceweasel as a browser.

      I think those small netbooks make nifty home servers, but I do have to say that I'm very happy with my Soekris net5501-70 as a home server. The only moving part is the 1TB 2.5" SATA disk and the machine is inaudible, which is important as I live in an apartment and a noisy computer on all the time is a no-no with the wife. Those netbooks fans sometimes make a lot of noise, but you might be lucky.

      Why didn't you just go base Debian installation, which would have given you a machine without X in the first place? My server runs OpenBSD, which simply doesn't come with X unless you explicitly install it,

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    30. Re:Don't even have to build it yourself by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

      To be fair... 2GB is *plenty* web-capable. Even 1GB is plenty on Linux, provided you don't open *too* many tabs at once.

      Also, OS was taken care of - Ubuntu. And yes, it'd run perfectly fine on that box. I know you may not consider it a real OS, but...
      As far as loading the OS, you have a point, but most people *would* have an old box around, or at least a friend with a PC from which to load it(bootable USB stick).
      Screen's a problem, though around here you can find free CRTs, and even in-good-shape used LCDs are !ess than $50.
      Keyboard and mouse are a problem, but you can usually pick up a set for $5, if you don't have a friend with a spare set for free.
      Camera and microphone? Um... No need. I've almost never used my webcam, and you'd probably not be using a microphone either unless you're gaming. If you decide you need one of those, they can be had for $0.99 off ebay(which, surprisingly, are actually very good!)

      You seem to be thinking in terms of a nice, complete system verus a bare-bones box, which may very well be used as a replacement for an old, failing box. In which case, you'd probably have all the extra bits handy. Also, remember that ram and the like can be upgraded easily in the future, so there's no need to put a lot in a bare-bones system.

  2. re: optical drive by ZankerH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating.

    It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

  3. Optical drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, like if you had used your optical drive in the last few months.

    Seriously, why would one want an optical drive in a PC these days?

    1. Re:Optical drive? by HJED · · Score: 2

      To instal Windows? To install most versions of Linux? To install a large number of commercial products (E.g. Photoshop)? To boot from a live CD when having boot problems? To install the free stuff that comes with computer Magazines?To play BD movies (I don't live in US and I prefer not to pirate everything)

      --
      null
    2. Re:Optical drive? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      To run any of the numerous games or software packages which use the CD/DVD for DRM?

    3. Re:Optical drive? by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      - Why would you install Win...s for?
      - Most (if not all) Linux distro will support to be setup from USB.
      - The computer is shipped with Linux, not windows, so how do you exactly install Photoshop on it?
      - If you have a problem, then boot on a live ... USB key!
      - Is there still some "free stuff" CD with magazines? Oh, sorry... is there still some (paper) computer magazines?
      - If you need to play BD films, why don't buy a TV BD player and play on that? We're talking about a computer here, not a TV set...

    4. Re:Optical drive? by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      How many games for Linux are shipped on CD/DVD?

    5. Re:Optical drive? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      The OP said nothing about running Linux. I quote:

      Seriously, why would one want an optical drive in a PC these days?

      Even then, plenty of Windows games run on Linux.

    6. Re:Optical drive? by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1
      From the summary:

      "Turns out that between some great deals, an AMD processor, and a Linux OS, it can actually be done."

      And I don't think you'll buy a Linux laptop just to run (plenty of) windows games on it. It doesn't make sense.

    7. Re:Optical drive? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      umm i just ripped a DVD i bought last night so i could put it on my portable player. So not months for me.

      The last music CD i bought went thru the same process about 2 weeks ago.

      Until music/video/software only comes on flash, there is still use for optical drives. And no, it being online isnt a substitute, some of us want a physical item for our purchase that can be stored away, and not rely on it being available 'in the cloud', or our current device whenever we want it. Between stupid DRM and companies going bust, no thanks.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    8. Re:Optical drive? by Rudolf · · Score: 1

      And I don't think you'll buy a Linux laptop just to run (plenty of) windows games on it. It doesn't make sense.

      Is that the purpose of WINE? So you can run an OS you like but also run Windows games? Makes sense to me.

    9. Re:Optical drive? by HJED · · Score: 1
      First off OP was referring to optical drives in general not just on the PC in the article.

      - Why would you install Win...s for?

      -There are still a fair number of things you can't do without windows, see my other post in the thread for details

      - Most (if not all) Linux distro will support to be setup from USB. & - If you have a problem, then boot on a live ... USB key!

      USB drives are more expensive then CDs and people don't always have blank ones lying around, it is also more complicated (to hard for Joe Average) to put an image on a USB drive and you often have to change BIOS settings

      - The computer is shipped with Linux, not windows, so how do you exactly install Photoshop on it?

      -WINE? Again OP was not referring specifically to the computer in the article, or you might decide to install Windows on it

      - Is there still some "free stuff" CD with magazines? Oh, sorry... is there still some (paper) computer magazines?

      Yes there is, at least in Australia where I live

      - If you need to play BD films, why don't buy a TV BD player and play on that? We're talking about a computer here, not a TV set...

      People often use there computer to play films nowadays, I certainly do.
      I also forgot to mention before, what I use my optical drive for is burning CDs for backing tracks or school projects (I don't like lending USBs they tend not to come back)

      --
      null
    10. Re:Optical drive? by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      If you have plenty of games to run, you're aren't betting on running them on an API emulator. You'd get the original OS and run the games on that one.

    11. Re:Optical drive? by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      So let me recap. You need a CD rom because:

      - You need windows, but we were talking about a Linux machine.
      - You need software for windows to run on your Linux machine.
      - You need to read CDs from magazines, which are burning free stuff that, by the way, you will find on the net.
      - People are stilling your USB keys (I don't see "average Joe" using Linux, but never mind).
      - You (or "average Joe") is/are too dumb to press F11 at boot time (sic!).
      - You don't have a BD player for your TV, but still would like to play BD.

      All the above are specific to you, and don't cover the general case of using a computer with Linux.

    12. Re:Optical drive? by HJED · · Score: 1

      First off OP was referring to optical drives in general not just on the PC in the article.

      Please read the full post before insulting people, at least read the first line.

      - You need windows, but we were talking about a Linux machine.

      See above + user may want to install windows or a different linux distro (see above for why most users won't install from a flash drive and why this is expensive.

      - You need software for windows to run on your Linux machine.

      reading comprehension...

      - You need to read CDs from magazines, which are burning free stuff that, by the way, you will find on the net.

      Often magazine CDs contain special offers such as software that you would have to pay from if you downloaded them.

      - People are stilling your USB keys (I don't see "average Joe" using Linux, but never mind).

      I certainly hope they are not stilling my USBs. If you mean stealing then yes people often take USBs are just forget to give them back, this is inconvenient whereas a CD is cheep enough to be given to someone without expecting it back.

      - You (or "average Joe") is/are too dumb to press F11 at boot time (sic!).

      Really last time I checked on the various computers I use you have to press a random key of the makers choice (usually TAB, Delete of a F* key) then go through three pages of menus to change the boot order. Whilst I can do this easily (although it is a waste of time) most users would not be able to do this if they can figure out how to put a disk image on a USB in the first place and they have enough flash drives to leave one with a recovery image on it all the time (as supposed to a CD which is much cheaper; users buying one of these computers may not have access to a second computer to flash the flash drive from if something goes wrong)

      - You don't have a BD player for your TV, but still would like to play BD.

      Ain't nothing wrong with that, it is also convenient to be able to play BD on the computer.

      All the above are specific to you, and don't cover the general case of using a computer with Linux.

      People tend to need things for specific reasons, a number of my points do apply to linux (including proprietary software under WINE as I said before).

      --
      null
    13. Re:Optical drive? by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      Please read the full post before insulting people, at least read the first line.

      I didn't insult anyone. Stop the paranoia (see here, I've written paranoia, I didn't write you are actually a compulsive paranoiac). Please quote the insult.

      Contrary to what you wrote, I did read and understood your words, but I just don't agree these are valid arguments. Can you live with that fact? For example, I don't think people setup Linux just because they need to run things under WINE. I tend to think they would use what's available on the archives. I know a quite fair number of Linux users, and not even once in my life, I saw one that were using a proprietary application with WINE. NOT EVEN ONCE! So if you think that's an argument, then this must be a personal thing specific to yourself. Last thing, no need to tell that "user may want to install windows", even if you repeat it again that this is your point, it's not the one of the OP, which wanted to setup a Linux machine. I do read you, I do understand, but you are still off-topic, even if you repeat yourself and point to me as if I didn't understand you. The same goes for people not giving you back your USB key, reading stupid advertisement CD from useless magazines, or the fact that it's not harder to boot on a USB key than it is to boot on a CDROM (people who can't choose a boot device at boot time wont be smart enough to setup ANY operating system anyway, whatever boot device you will use...).

      P.S: Did you see how painful it was to read me repeating myself and re-phrase what I already wrote? FYI, I just did that on purpose since you seem to like this style...

    14. Re:Optical drive? by HJED · · Score: 1

      You (or "average Joe") is/are too dumb to press F11 at boot time (sic!).

      Is considered an insult by most people who read English The OP said:

      Of course, like if you had used your optical drive in the last few months.
      Seriously, why would one want an optical drive in a PC these days?

      My post was in reply to this question, which is referring to all PCs not just those that run linux

      No people don't setup linux just to run things under WINE that would be rather stupid. They do however use WINE to run proprietary windows apps, such as MS Office (which is usually installed from a CD) and Windows Games (which often have CD based DRM). This is the whole purpose of WINE which is apparently a very popular application with a big following and which I have seen used by a number of users.

      As 'stupid magazines' still sell with CDs on them I would assume I am not the only one who uses them, generally in most forms of writing where you are expressing a point of view you use specific examples to strengthen your argument. This is one such point.

      I don't need to repeat myself again on the ease and cost of CDs vs. Flash drives, however you would be surprised how easy it is to install an OS these days compared to knowing how to change BIOS settings. FYI I have no problem with this, but I know many users who would.

      At this point I'm beginning to wonder if English is your native language as you don't seem to understand it very well, otherwise you must be trolling.

      --
      null
    15. Re:Optical drive? by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      No people don't setup linux just to run things under WINE that would be rather stupid. They do however use WINE to run proprietary windows apps, such as MS Office (which is usually installed from a CD) and Windows Games (which often have CD based DRM). This is the whole purpose of WINE which is apparently a very popular application with a big following and which I have seen used by a number of users.

      No, people don't do that. Linux users use OpenOffice. As for games, we have a different experience, but none of the people I know running Linux are interested by games using WINE (some use PS3 / Wii though... which are a much better platform if you ask me).

      I don't need to repeat myself again on the ease and cost of CDs vs. Flash drives, however you would be surprised how easy it is to install an OS these days compared to knowing how to change BIOS settings. FYI I have no problem with this, but I know many users who would.

      I don't know how others are getting their USB keys, but for me, I got about a dozen that have been given for me as company gifts (various conferences and all). I never saw anyone giving CDRW as gifts. Even if you didn't have it as a gift, then it's really cheap: it starts at 2 USD for a 2GB!!!

      http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=12464357480 (and no, I'm not Chinese...)

      So yes, continue your rant about CDs being cheaper if you like, but you're being either a fool (considering the price of the reader and the fact that CDs breaks so fast), or extremely stingy. FYI, 15 Yuan is a bit more than 2 USD.
      I guess absolutely everyone using a computer holds at least one USB key anyway. These days, the smallest you will find is 1GB, which is really enough for setting-up an OS (the Debian netinst for example needs less than half of that). The only point with CD, is when you have DRM attached with it, but it's slowly fading away: if you are a company selling software and don't have the option to have your product bought online, you are 10 years in the past and will soon discover that you are loosing money fast... even worse if your competitor really is selling online.

      At this point I'm beginning to wonder if English is your native language as you don't seem to understand it very well, otherwise you must be trolling.

      What a jerk! At this point, I have no doubt that you are an intolerant USA native.

    16. Re:Optical drive? by HJED · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm English living in Australia and as you don't seem to understand my points I must assume there is something wrong, however looking at your post history it appears that you just don't understand that people have the need to run windows apps on linux. As someone who uses linux as there primary operating system I hate to break it to you but your wrong.

      Also I'm talking about USBs you buy in the shops not dodgy ones from China (and you price does not include shipping abroad), in Australia (where I live) flash drives cost about $10 - $15 for a 1 or 2GB compared to CD-RWs that cost about 5c each.

      --
      null
  4. So they just trolled Newegg by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    So they comparison shopped a bunch of parts, and editorialized about every one. Big deal - go to Newegg, hit the sales, and don't overindulge and this is an easy project. How is this even news?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  5. no, it's time. by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating"

    Optical disks? How quaint! :)

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:no, it's time. by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      While I can't imagine installing an optical drive in a computer an external one is handy for software that still ships on optical media as well as ripping the occasional cd or dvd. I use my external drive less and less but I know if I didn't have it I'd have to borrow someone else's sooner or later.

    2. Re:no, it's time. by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Optical disks? How quaint! :)

      You do realize people still buy software, and that it still comes on optical disks.

      Not everyone has a broadband yet.

      Optical discs aren't even close to dead yet.

      Maybe you don't need one, that's just fine, good for you.

    3. Re:no, it's time. by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "You do realize people still buy software, and that it still comes on optical disks."

      This is a Linux system they built, though. Shrinkwrapped software is very rare, verging on nonexistent, for that OS.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:no, it's time. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      There's still other types of software: CD, DVD & BD.

      Although for a "cheap" system, removing the optical drive is at least an understandable trade off versus more expensive products.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:no, it's time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Optical disks? How quaint! :)

      You do realize people still buy software, and that it still comes on optical disks.

      Wait, people still buy software?

    6. Re:no, it's time. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      This is a Linux system they built, though. Shrinkwrapped software is very rare, verging on nonexistent, for that OS.

      Good point. Frankly the whole article is a bit sketchy though... I mean... they assume you have a keyboard, mouse, and monitor already... doesn't that imply you already had a computer previously?

      Doesn't that imply you had software for it? Software you might want to use on the new one? In which case going with linux was a bad move...

      On the other hand... if your dismantling your old desktop to build a new one... perhaps you have an optical drive amongst the parts too...

      [And now I have to futz around for a few minutes because apparently I can type comments faster than slashdot is willing to accept them... Its been 4 minutes since you last post? good god... if i took 5 minutes per email I'd never get anything done... WTF]

    7. Re:no, it's time. by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      People still use dialup too, I certainly wouldn't be putting a dialup modem in a modern computer by default either though.

    8. Re:no, it's time. by walshy007 · · Score: 2

      Doesn't that imply you had software for it? Software you might want to use on the new one? In which case going with linux was a bad move...

      You are assuming the former computer was running windows, some people have been using linux exclusively for well over a decade.

    9. Re:no, it's time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand... if your dismantling your old desktop to build a new one... perhaps you have an optical drive amongst the parts too...

      Should've spent the time fixing the typos....

    10. Re:no, it's time. by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Translation: "I don't have decent broadband in the backwater where I live, so I have to select the special 'ship me a CD' option and pay extra when I buy software.... [whine, whine, whine]"

      I don't have any stats handy, but the percentage of software that is distributed on optical media has been plummeting in recent years. The software that isn't available for direct download is dwindling fast. Yes, I buy software, and I buy most of it online, and download it on the spot. My broadband is kinda sucky too, but I deal with it. Like the floppy disk 10 years ago, the optical disk has become optional. It's handy to have an external drive sitting around Just In Case, but it's an accessory, not a necessity. In fact, I recently built a new system from that hardware up, and the only thing I used an optical drive for, was to load Windows. Once I had an OS with a functional TCP/IP stack, the optical drive was superfluous.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    11. Re:no, it's time. by Astronomerguy · · Score: 1

      I've kept an external one for 5 years now and it comes in handy. I recently acquired a lightly used 4-year-old HP Proliant rackmount server that has no DVD/ROM and I have no USB sticks available. Having the external drive let me install ClearOS and get a damned useful router/gateway/ftp/web server running in a few hours. I also have a basement closet full of a huge variety of old/new cables, components, etc etc. you never know when you'll need that old widget.

    12. Re:no, it's time. by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to post the statistic showing that few linux installs are actually done on USB sticks. This whole "DVD? how quaint!" thing is a slashdot non-sequitor:

      Unless you follow Fedora 10+ or Ubuntu 9+, you're stuck with UNOFFICIAL tools and documentation for something you all consider mainstream. ISO CD-burning instructions is the only thing officially documented on the largest distros, let alone the mom-and-pop ones many overseas locales endorse.

    13. Re:no, it's time. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      You are assuming the former computer was running windows,

      If you've got a spare monitor, keyboard and mouse... why yes I am assuming that they were running windows previously. Are you really suggesting that the odds are that I'm wrong? Lol.

      some people have been using linux exclusively for well over a decade.

      Sure. And some people might have found a working monitor keyboard and mouse in the company recycling room too. But we can leave all such statistical outliers aside don't you think? Most people with spare peripherals including a monitor, keyboard, and mouse had a computer running windows.

    14. Re:no, it's time. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      On the other hand... if your dismantling your old desktop to build a new one... perhaps you have an optical drive amongst the parts too...

      I know where you're coming from, but I find optical drives are one of the few parts in the computer that can actually just die from either wear or neglect. I've certainly been through more drives than computers. Often the death is not complete but when your 52 burner takes half an hour to copy a CD to the computer maybe it's worth spending $20 on a new one.

    15. Re:no, it's time. by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      You are already looking at outliers, most people simply buy their computers rather than build them.

      So in other words... your argument comes down to 'this article is crap because it isn't what most people would do' when what most people would do is simply buy a pre-made already set up pc?

      Not to mention how many of those people who run windows actually use it more than just a web browser and email client? of typical end user needs what would not be filled by linux in your opinion? talking specific non-outlier packages that serve needs linux can't do.

      But back on the subject of mouse and keyboard though, they are cheap as chips, and people can still use their tv as a display device if they wished.

    16. Re:no, it's time. by awshidahak · · Score: 1

      I don't even have an external dvd drive and I've only borrowed once in the last two years.

    17. Re:no, it's time. by swalve · · Score: 1

      Jesus, your electric bill must be crazy running a Proliant for something like that. And noisy! All those tiny 1 inch fans screaming.

    18. Re:no, it's time. by swalve · · Score: 1

      You are right, these people are just computer hipsters.

    19. Re:no, it's time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same goes for quality software for that OS. LOLzzzz
       
      Linsux is for faggot and shitballs. I say flush them both down the toilet and be done with it. Stop sucking that Linsux cock and you'll be fin.

    20. Re:no, it's time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is a Linux system they built, though. Software is very rare, verging on nonexistent, for that OS."

      Fixed that for you.

    21. Re:no, it's time. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      You are already looking at outliers, most people simply buy their computers rather than build them.

      Outliers within outliers.

      Even among the group of people that build their own computers, its still heavily skewed towards people who own windows. The number of people who are exclusively linux is -that- small. I'm a linux user myself, but I don't personally know anyone who is linux exlclusive.

      Not to mention how many of those people who run windows actually use it more than just a web browser and email client?

      Nice try. We're talking people who build computers from parts. They do more than browse the web.

      But back on the subject of mouse and keyboard though, they are cheap as chips, and people can still use their tv as a display device if they wished.

      If they are cheap as chips then include them in the budget. And as for the TV... you need an HDTV if you want to be able to read the screen... if you've got an HDTV... maybe you can afford more than $200 for a computer.

      In any case, if you just want to browse the web, send email, and use a TV as a monitor... I'd by a console.

    22. Re:no, it's time. by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      Nice try. We're talking people who build computers from parts. They do more than browse the web.

      So.. you're saying someone who is building a $200 pc, intends to use it as a high-end gaming/cad/other-niche-use machine?

      I cannot think of a low-end use that would be ill suited for linux. as I mentioned before I wanted names of specific items that would be troublesome.. because something tells me heavy autocad users aren't going to be trying to run it on a $200 machine.

      if you've got an HDTV... maybe you can afford more than $200 for a computer.

      Just because you have the money, doesn't mean you _need_ to waste it.

      In any case, if you just want to browse the web, send email, and use a TV as a monitor... I'd by a console.

      To buy something more expensive and less capable? No thankyou.

    23. Re:no, it's time. by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      Good point. Frankly the whole article is a bit sketchy though... I mean... they assume you have a keyboard, mouse, and monitor already... doesn't that imply you already had a computer previously?

      Doesn't that imply you had software for it? Software you might want to use on the new one? In which case going with linux was a bad move...

      I recently got a new computer (it was called a 'nettop') for just under £200. It did come with a keyboard and mouse, but I have spares so that wasn't essential. I did have two screens with my existing computer, but rarely used them, so used one of the screens for the new nettop.

      It came with a variation of Linux on it (Limpus I think, its a special version of it that is more user friendly and less like a usual desktop), but I replaced it with Ubuntu (handily I had a USB optical drive from when I wanted to use CDs/DVDs on my netbook that didn't have one).

      I got it for a number of reasons. Firstly, I wanted to use Linux more, outside of a VM. Secondly, my existing computer was spending a lot of CPU time on a virus scanner and firewall (the fan whirring slightly bugged me). Thirdly, I couldn't think of that much that I specifically needed a high powered Windows computer for (I mainly used it for web browsing).

      Since getting the nettop, I have had very few problems moving to using it exclusivly. Most of my previous usage was on the internet, so there has been little to no change there (I used to open 20 bookmarks at once, but that slowed down the browser a lot, so I separated the bookmark folders into two folders so I open less at a time). There is one game I play that is Windows only, but I would only play that occasionally, and can still use the old computer if I do want to play it. I had a couple of issues getting Ubuntu set up right on it (had to change a driver to stop it from freezing on shutdown), but most worked straight away. I did turn off the new Unity interface because it was fairly slow to use (it is a low power machine). When I was first using it for a while, I wasn't sure whether it had a fan or not because it was almost silent when running. The start up time is about 20 seconds for a computer with less powerful hardware than my Windows computer, which takes a few minutes to boot up (oh, that is 20 seconds from off to usable, when my Windows computer takes a few minutes to boot, then a few minutes to load various other programs). It is also low power so I am saving slightly on my power bills, which is nice.

    24. Re:no, it's time. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      So.. you're saying someone who is building a $200 pc, intends to use it as a high-end gaming/cad/other-niche-use machine?

      No, I'm saying they do more than browse the web. If you can't think of anything in between browsing the web and hard-core gamer plus autocad, that's not really my problem.

      I cannot think of a low-end use that would be ill suited for linux.

      There is a difference between being ill-suited for linux, and well suited for linux. Just because you can get by on linux doesn't make it the best tool for the job.

      My wife likes intellivision games, so we bought the "intellivision lives!" emulator. You pop the disk in and it runs.

      On linux, sure we can get it working, and I even did...I installed jzintv from the tarball copied the intellivision BIOS and ROM files from the CD to the appropriate folders, fiddled with some command line switches to get the screen and sound the way we wanted and then created some bash scripts to launch the particular roms my wife enjoys.

      Did linux work? Sure it did. Would I say it was the best tool for the job? Hardly.

      Now I enjoyed doing it, that's what makes me who I am, and that's why I have linux on a laptop for the family to use. But Windows would be simpler and easier, and if I didn't specifically enjoy fiddling with linux on it, it would make more sense to put windows (back) on it.

      Just because you have the money, doesn't mean you _need_ to waste it.

      In my opinion, building a computer from scratch for $200 is the waste. All that research and scrounging around and mail-in-rebates, and the time taken to find the parts and assemble them, install and OS, etc. What was the point? It makes sense when building a high performance gaming system... but a $200 box to do low-end things?

      Face it, that's what someone does because someone LIKES doing it. Normal people who want a decent computer for $200 buy a used one on craiglist... this one took one minute of searching...

      Dell Vostro Intel Core2 Duo - $200
      Dell Vostro 220 Desktop (Tower Only) ... excellent condition, Business Vista 64-bit just installed, complete with drivers and antivirus, activated!
      Intel Core2 Duo CPU E7300 2.66GHz, 2GB RAM, 160GB Hard Drive. You provide monitor, keyboard & mouse, you're ready to go!
      Two (2) DVD Drives, one is DVD-ROM and the other is DVDRW so it's easy & fast to do copies, etc.

      I can probably talk him down to between $150 and $180, no taxes... "for low-end use" it will be perfectly fine.

      re consoles:
      To buy something more expensive

      Xbox 360 starts at $175
      Wii starts at $150
      PS3 starts at $250 which is only a bit more, but you get a blu-ray player out of it too.

      and less capable?

      Why? Were they planning on running AutoCAD or some other niche use? I only suggested consoles in response to the argument that were just browsing the web and sending email with the unit attached to the TV. What "capabilities" are you looking for now?

    25. Re:no, it's time. by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      Xbox 360 starts at $175 Wii starts at $150 PS3 starts at $250 which is only a bit more, but you get a blu-ray player out of it too.

      Not here they aren't, just checked the latest prices here for the lowest end models and they were the following (all prices in AUD, USD in brackets after it)

      Xbox 360 4gb flash model - $345 (362)
      Wii - $198 (208)
      Ps3 160gb model - $348 (365)

      On a side note, the ps3 when it launched here hit $1000

      TV. What "capabilities" are you looking for now?

      The ability to play hd movies, yes the xbox360 and ps3 can play _some_ formats, but it is hard to argue that the pc can't play more.

      Some kind of ergonomics, out of the people you know how many have their xbox/ps3 set up at a desk with a monitor/keyboard and mouse? Unless you think using the internet with an xbox/ps3 controller is easier and more efficient form of input than mouse/keyboard. Also even if they did, you are at the behest of microsoft/sony as to when you can get browser updates and features and the like. Not to mention the fact they seriously lack power in comparison, I've seen farmville bring some quad core machines to their knees before, you really think an xbox or ps3 could handle it, let alone a _wii_?

      Normal people who want a decent computer for $200 buy a used one on craiglist

      People will usually take new over second hand .. they ask their resident computer guy what their best options are for that kind of money, because they have no idea what the hardware specs etc really mean and trust their expertise. Said computer guy asks a few questions on what the machine is going to be used for, then discusses the trade-offs of going different routes if they are asking for something that is overly pushing it budget wise. Parts are then ordered and machine made.

      Computer guy installs the os and enables the functionality they want, in such a way that it is literally a point-click away. Spends two minutes showing them the simple ways of accessing the required functionality, and then all is well.

      But Windows would be simpler and easier,

      After putting family (over the age of 60) who had never touched a computer before on to linux on an old p3 machine, they find it a dream. A couple of years later they acquired a brand new windows laptop and asked me to put linux on it, told them to wait a bit and see how they like the installed os first (it functioned to their needs and less work for me) after a year they still preferred using a p3 733 instead of a core 2 duo laptop just because they disliked the windows interface and found linux easier.

      And in so far as support, the only support calls I've had have been in regard to the windows machine. The linux machine might take an extra half hour to set up, but the lower incidence of support required gets that time back over time.

      Windows only makes sense if you don't know what you're doing with linux, and I think the article is rather obviously targeted to those who are capable of getting theirs and others needs from linux.

  6. Build a desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this, 2005? It's not worth the hassle to build a desktop PC any longer.

    In fact, I haven't used a desktop in several months.

    1. Re:Build a desktop? by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is if you want anything with serious horsepower. Sure, a commodity PC will work fine for most things but if you want 8 cores and 64gb of ram with multiple video cards you'll be better off building it yourself.

    2. Re:Build a desktop? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      It is if you want anything with serious horsepower. Sure, a commodity PC will work fine for most things but if you want 8 cores and 64gb of ram with multiple video cards you'll be better off building it yourself.

      And I doubt an "Under $200" computer that the article talks about is going to be serious horsepower.

    3. Re:Build a desktop? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      And there's a lot to be said for making it to your exact specs. My sister likes to sew, and one time I asked her if she made dresses because it was cheaper. She looked horrified and said that it was usually more expensive, but she ended up with clothes that fit perfectly and had the detailing and adjustments she wanted. That's pretty much the same rationale for building your own computer.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:Build a desktop? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      This is especially true if you are going to use linux. Hardware support is better than it used to be but it's still good to pick and choose hardware that's linux friendly.

    5. Re:Build a desktop? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      And there are all sorts of other considerations. For instance, I have a webserver that handles a small number of hits, but where each hit is pretty expensive in computing time. I chose a CPU with a small number of fast cores over a larger number of slower cores to optimize page load time. Similarly, I bought smaller-but-faster hard drives over larger-but-slower because I was more interested in quick looks of small files than bulk storage of huge files. A million little decisions like that sometimes make it a lot easier to build to order than to find something premade that would fit the bill.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  7. Still x86 though by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until these sorts of things are possible with commodity ARM (or other architecture) chips as well, especially for overall power consumption.

    1. Re:Still x86 though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get today's multi-core x86 computers, where most of the power draw is not from the CPU. Yes, those exist provided you run them at a slower speed than maximum.

      HEre's your ARM,

      http://www.slashgear.com/25-raspberry-pi-computer-runs-quake-iii-30175129/

      Frankly, I'll stick with x86 and supported peripherals for now. Things like llano APU from AMD provide cheap CPU and great GPU and very cheap overall. Why would I go back 10 years in performance so I can run an ARM?

    2. Re:Still x86 though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already pandaboard.

      It's just that ARM is not yet nearly as fast as the average x86 processor.

  8. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here Here.

    Get a fucking USB one if you are stuck on them.

  9. Re:Decent Computer? by suso · · Score: 2

    And it has Linux on it? Crap, at least get Win XP.

    That's right, if you want crap, get Win XP. That was too easy.

  10. Re: optical drive by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    I use mine mainly to rip audio CDs.

  11. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My optical drive broke down about 3 years ago. I've never had to replace it. So I agree, for some, it might not be needed at all.

  12. Cheating? Hardly. by Nimey · · Score: 1

    I've used my optical drive probably twice this calendar year, once to install an old game and once to install MFC printer s/w that's not available for download. For the most part I can do without one.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  13. I omit optical drives in $1xxx builds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Optical drives are dated and obsolete. I boot a live CD via USB then grab the stage3 for an OS install. Backups are done via the network.

    I wouldn't put an optical drive in if budget weren't an issue. The few watts it consumes while plugged in are a terrible waste of power for something never used.

    Who even wants to load an OS via optical? Talk about slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow.

    Once you install via USB you'll never go back.

  14. Re: optical drive by Nos9 · · Score: 3

    Because the people that put out content for the computer ship on them. A cheap 4G mem stick is ~$4, to press 4.7G DVD costs them pennies. Until there is a useful way to allow customers to DL onto their own memory sticks, optical will stick around.

  15. Re: optical drive by DesScorp · · Score: 3

    but omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating.

    It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

    Because they want to.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  16. what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 2

    Probably more important than an optical drive

    1. Re:what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you're right, that IS cheating not to have those. A new usb keyboard and mouse from several place on eBay can be had for $11. But the monitor is a killer, for young eyes could squeak by with a 15 inch that sometimes is under $100, but at my age that's going to cost unless buying used or refurbished. I'm on a 23" widescreen samsung now that was $250 refurbished with warranty. but there goes a cheap computer budget.

    2. Re:what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      They are also completely interchangeable after market parts.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by Issildur03 · · Score: 1

      I just bought a 21.5 LED on Newegg for $99.

    4. Re:what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying you don't already have one?

    5. Re:what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that we're talking about a computer that has to be self assembled, most components can be described that way.

    6. Re:what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I bought a 24.7" Asus VE247 LED backlit monitor for $170.

    7. Re:what about a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Except no "self assembly" is required in this case and the internal parts on a PC are not nearly as interchangeable.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  17. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can unequivocally say no. We sell a lot of little desktop computers without an optical drive. They come with Ubuntu usually and maybe 1/3 of our customer base gets one. They are extra. The minimal configured systems are without keyboard, mouse, monitor or optical drive and run $249. People are not renting DVDs any longer and most have never watched a DVD on the computer in the first place. Some areas have a higher than usual younger user base (Portland) and there is more demand for an optical drive (or at least there was) in these region. Elsewhere though most people do not watch movies on the PC.

  18. Re: optical drive by Killer+Orca · · Score: 1

    I know I did not even blink about missing an optical drive from my latest build. Even MS supports creating a boot-able USB drive with Windows 7 on it! Granted you need an existing copy of windows but still. I cast my vote firmly in the fewer moving parts camp.

  19. Re: optical drive by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is this "Audio CD" you speak of? Is it like an Audi TT?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  20. Re:Decent Computer? by one+cup+of+coffee · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I've got to say, at this point there's no contest as far as basic functionality goes, and for doing the things that "most people" tm do on their computers most of the time. Linux is clearly superior to Windows. I dare you to take a dual boot challenge.

  21. Re: optical drive by antdude · · Score: 1

    Too slow and USB3 are expensive at this time.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  22. Re: optical drive by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    Not including the optical drive seems like future proofing to me :-p.

  23. Re:All recent Computer architectures are dogs. by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Funny

    your spelling is about as good as your thinking.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  24. Cheating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating

    Why? Even if you can get a DVD burner for under $20 - if the goal is to build a sub-$200 computer, and you can install all your software without one, then why intentionally eat up 10% of your budget on something you don't even need?

    1. Re:Cheating? by froggymana · · Score: 1

      > omitting an optical drive in a full-size desktop computer build seems something like cheating

      Why? Even if you can get a DVD burner for under $20 - if the goal is to build a sub-$200 computer, and you can install all your software without one, then why intentionally eat up 10% of your budget on something you don't even need?

      You're right! Its not like you need a monitor, mouse or keyboard. People can read the VGA signals with their tongues and input via their brain.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  25. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahoy there, matey! Abandon ye olde music acquisition ways and say arrrrrrrrgh.

    Yo ho, yo ho......

  26. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    It's what recordings that aren't available in the iTunes store come on.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  27. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

    When I built my last PC (less than a month ago) I neglected to include an optical drive (which was actually an oversight). I've since had to order one because I can't play DVDs, I can't install games from disc (not everyone has unlimited 100Mbps internet), I can't rip audio CDs and it's hardly practical to keep all the various recovery and install CD images on USB sticks (cheap as they are, buy 20 and they soon add up - plus you can't put them in a wallet).

    While blank DVDs cost a hundredth of the price of equivalent flash memory, optical media is not dead. I would happily pay £15 for a SATA DVD+/-RW drive for that convenience.

  28. Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lifesp by scottbomb · · Score: 1

    I've bought 4 USB thumb drives over the past 5 years and so far, 2 have failed. These little bastards weren't cheap either. I've also got CDs I burned about 7 years ago that still work fine. Not ONE failure. Therefore, everything gets backed up to DVDs.

    The car stereo also doesn't play MP3s (2007 model, factory stereo) so I can either A: spend about $200 on an aftermarket mp3 adapter or B: burn CDs.

  29. Re: optical drive by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    "Optical drive"? Is that the slidey thing you put those sort of shaving mirror thingies into? I remember we used to use something like that in the olden days.

  30. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

    Possibly because, just because it's 2011 doesn't mean all past cds/dvds are magically converted into usbs.

    Dammit archaeologists, it's 2011! Why are you still reading clay tablets!

  31. Re: optical drive by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Because I have close to 100 CDs and 30 DVDs. Yeah, I'm old school. Ripping them onto my hard drive would take up too much space.

  32. How about a server? by siddesu · · Score: 1

    Kind of tangentially on-topic (wink-wink), but ... I am planning to upgrade my home server machine, which has been humming not so quietly since 2003. Sadly, I have not much dabbed in PC hardware since then -- do you guys know any online references with example configuration for decent, quiet machines to use as a starting point? My basic requirements are ecc registered ram, a terabyte or so of some kind of raid, a quad CPU and a well-supported video running Linux and, very occasionally, an odd windows instance in VirtualBox. TIA for any opinions.

    1. Re:How about a server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      been doing this since VirtualBox vsn 1.*

    2. Re:How about a server? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      ECC is rare and so will command a higher motherboard price, you need an Intel "pro" motherboard or a single CPU socket C32 board with the cheapest opteron. one example : http://www.wiredzone.com/Supermicro-H8SCM-F-Motherboard-mATX-w--1x-Socket-C32(1207p)~10020354~0.htm

      on the plus side it has two great network interfaces rather than one crappy one.

      I would like to see VIA Nano X2 and X4 motherboards with ECC support on the market

    3. Re:How about a server? by nojayuk · · Score: 1

      A lot of modern lower-end mobos will work with ECC memory but I don't know if they actually use the ECC functionality or just run it like it was non-ECC. The manual for the Asus M4A87TD/USB3 mobo, to choose one at random, says it accepts ECC and non-ECC memory but there's no further details on functionality.

    4. Re:How about a server? by canistel · · Score: 1

      Anything in your home does not need ECC, server or desktop or laptop etc. It's a huge increase in cost with no benefit to you. Much better off spending the extra money on faster harddrives. I would recommend a recent quad core AMD chip, AMD's high-end chips are not as capable as Intel's, but dollar for dollar you get more performance out of AMD.

    5. Re:How about a server? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Nowadays, the memory controller is located in the CPU, so ECC support is more about the CPU now than it is about the motherboard and chipset. Because of this, if you want ECC and don't want to pay through the nose your only option really is AMD because Intel only enables ECC support on their expensive Xeons which also tend to require equally expensive server/workstation motherboards.

      With that said, you can't always just grab any old AMD-compatible board and some ECC memory and expect it to work, because the ECC functionality requires some extra traces that the motherboard manufacturer may just decide to omit. But if an AMD-compatible motherboard is advertising that it works with ECC memory my guess is that it should work.

    6. Re:How about a server? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Thanks, guys, for the hints, but I was just looking for pointers to sites with sample configurations.

  33. Re: optical drive by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    I've used a 3.5" floppy drive more recently than I've used an optical drive.

    Slow Down Cowboy!

    Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

    It's been 6 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

    Dear Slashdot Janitors,
    Is there a reason why you make it so unpleasant and troublesome to contribute to your site?

  34. Re:All recent Computer architectures are dogs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When students were grown in schools to design computers, rather than processors designed in companies the tried and true method of market success,
    this is when the industry failed into the hands of educators.

    So many better architectures, waiting to be minitiarised for more efficiency from prior fabricatio nmethods, are going to be ditched in favor of these shitty designs now.

    We all could have dreamed about the reality of a VAX on your wristwatch, a cluster of 21264 Alpha systems on a 5-plug UPS power strip, a UltraSPARC 3 PDA, or a SGI MIPS -based Heads-up-Display, but no: we get shitty chinese ARM's and everyone worships Apple Compooters Corpse for Jobs queefing a Tablet out his droors that is just as slim as he is from cancer!

    You've proven that educators have failed, at least in one case.

  35. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Only 30 DVDs? That's not going to take much space at all. Certainly not much at all by modern HDD standards.

    Even the drives that come in cheap low profile machines (nettops) are probably large enough to accomodate all of that.

    30BD's would be another matter though.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  36. Re:Decent Computer? by vux984 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've got to say, at this point there's no contest as far as basic functionality goes, and for doing the things that "most people" tm do on their computers most of the time. Linux is clearly superior to Windows. I dare you to take a dual boot challenge.

    I'll take that dare... here's where linux breaks down for "most people" tm:

    1) Itunes - sure there are plenty of great media players and what not for linux... but if you have an ios device whether its a new ipod, ipod touch, iphone, or ipad (and literally tens of millions of completely normal people do, they need itunes).

    2) TurboTax etc... yep its just one week a year. But millions of completely ordinary people do their taxes with this type of software.

    3) Miscellaneous Toys - from the child friendly Barbie photo manipulation software that came with the Barbie camera to setting up your new Logitech universal remote to an AppleTV to programming a Lego Mindstorms creation with LabView. This affects far more people than you might think.

    4) Video games - Believe it or not, lots of perfectly normal people play everything from World of Warcraft,to Left4Dead, to the copy of Bejeweled or Riven they picked up at Walmart for $7 as an impulse buy.

    5) Peripherals - Printer fax scanner copier combination devices in particular still suck with linux. Getting printing going is usually relatively straightforward, but anything else is a complicated crapshoot.

  37. They trolled Newegg? by Khyber · · Score: 2

    I built a better system (WITH A VIDEO CARD AND OPTICAL DRIVE, PCMAG) for $189 on Pricewatch.

    AND YOU CAN GAME ON IT.

    But you forget about monitor pricing.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  38. I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by sottitron · · Score: 1
    1. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Include shipping on that and your >$200.

    2. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      Your CPU: 2.8GHz single core
      Their CPU: 3.4GHz dual core

      For the extra seven bucks, loss of a dvd drive, their computer's performance beats the pants off yours.

    3. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you got a DVD and saved $8 in exchange for a dual core CPU at 0.6Ghz faster clock and 340GB of hard drive space.
      Basically making the choices they talked about, but explained why they did not make them....

    4. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      I had to leave newegg for a cpu to do it but here is what I did in ten minutes:

      CPU ADO3800IAA5CU AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor 3800 2.0GHz AM2 OEM $21 + unknown shipping from a vendor called StarMicro I picked up from pricewatch.

      Foxconn KS188-ISO450 Black / Silver SGCC MicroATX Mini Tower Computer Case 350W Power Supply 39.99+9.99 shipping, newegg

      Foxconn A76ML-K AM3 Ready / AM2+ / AM2 AMD 760G Micro ATX AMD Motherboard $49.99 newegg, free shipping. Cheapest I could find with onboard video supported by free software. Yes, I try to be RMS pure.

      Kingston 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model KVR800D2N6K2/2G 24.99, newegg with free shipping

      Seagate Barracuda ST3500413AS 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive $39.99 with free shipping

      Thermaltake CL-P0503 70mm Rifle Bearing CPU Cooler for AMD 65W Series $9.99, newegg and free shipping

      That gets me $195.94 + the unknown shipping on the CPU for everything delivered and I didn't play any stupid rebate games doing it.

      The point of I did it in less time that I took paging through the PCRag story. Slight exageration, but they are still lame. I could probably shave enough off enough to squeeze in an optical drive and still deliver under the $200 limit just by going with Nvidia graphics. Compromise on the HDD and it is trivial. Computers are cheap.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    5. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had a real video card, too.

    6. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      Ok, this got me looking at prices for the first time this year. Damn.

      A more realistic goal would be a complete system. I just built one for $350 just shopping newegg with a 20" LED backlit monitor, DVI connection to a motherboard with same, and better Radeon 4250 graphics, better AMDX2 250 Regor 3.0GHz and DDR3 memory and an optical drive + decent Logitech keyboard and optical mouse. This stuff is seriously cheap now. Moved the goalposts to $400 and put it all in a real case with a real power supply. When you are really building a computer, NEVER skimp on the power supply. You lose every time when you do that.

      All I can say is there is no longer a reason for anyone who isn't a hardcore gamer to spend over a thousand on a desktop PC anymore. You can go nuts and stay under that mark now. Dual monitors and RAID1 on the main drive? Why not and there will still be plenty left over to stuff RAM, more faster cores and offboard video in and still stay under a thousand.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    7. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      I know, it kind of astonishes me how the costs have come down. When i built my "current" PC (can I still call it the same PC after replacing video card, monitor, CPU motherboard, and adding RAM?) it cost me about $1,700, and that was about standard for a good but not top end gaming PC. $800 was for budget machines. Now, top end (not very top, but still) is about $800 and the $1.7k budget is for people who want the near-ultimate stuff. Astonishes me, since usually lowering prices only apply if you want crappy or dated technology (look at digital cameras. All the ones in the $100-150 range are pretty much crap). Now you can get genuinely good stuff for quite cheap. I actually think AMD might have caused that. Their processor line forced Intel to not only innovate, but lower prices to compete. Same with the ATI-AMD merger. Even hardcore gamers shouldn't really spend more than a thousand now a days.

      I should add that the low prices of the internals makes monitors seem very expensive by comparison (about a third of the value of my PC is probably in the 24" monitor alone), making this whole $200 PC somewhat moot. Oh, and I got lucky on power supply: bought a pretty cheap one, and it hasn't failed me yet (been almost five years yet and it's been abused all to hell from being shipped around.)

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    8. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      When you are really building a computer, NEVER skimp on the power supply. You lose every time when you do that.

      Depends on what the computer is being used for. I have an HTPC that fills in a double role as a network fileserver... its specs are as follows:
      Mobo: MSI MS-9818 Mini ITX
      CPU: P8400 dual core
      RAM: 4GB DDR2
      HDD: 500GB 2.5" (currently waiting on a 1TB drive that I've ordered as an upgrade)
      Video: onboard Intel GMA4500
      LAN: onboard dual gigE
      WLAN: Intel 5100 A/B/G/N, installed to the mini-pcie on the mobo

      It's powered by a 60W DC brick, and according to the kill-a-watt, there's about 25W to spare under load. I had the option of buying an 80W brick when I built the system, but I really didn't need it, and I won't need it... the 1TB drive I've ordered uses less power than the 2-year old 500GB drive that's in there right now.

      Power consumption is going way down in hardware these days. Yes, the above system is using a laptop CPU, but it's also 2 years old. You can, if you look, find a desktop CPU that draws less than the 25W TDP that my P8400 claims, but even if you're not trying, you're unlikely to build a system that'll tax any semi-decent 300W power supply. Don't buy a $20 korean market special, but you don't need to buy that $400 PSU either. For most cases that cost more than $40 or so, the PSU that comes with it will be adequate, for most users. :)

    9. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > For most cases that cost more than $40 or so, the PSU that comes with it will be adequate, for most users. :)

      It isn't about the wattage. You want a solid power supply, that won't crap out on ya in subtle ways. And getting one with the 80% efficiency rating is a pretty good idea these days. But while everyone these days cares about green, most still don't know to get one with Power factor Correction.. Which becomes more important when you buy the other part I consider 'part' of a real PC setup, the UPS. You get back some of the money spent on the power supply in a smaller rated UPS which can deliver the same runtime into the smaller more balanced load as a larger UPS into a crappy supply.

      Ever had a machine that was just unstable? Even with the penguin? Swapping the clunker pack in 500W power supply that came free with the case for a quality (a pimped out gamer product may or may not be quality) power supply, even one rated at only 320W if the box isn't stuffed, cures about half of those cases. If the power supply doesn't it fix swap motherboards. Assuming you already ran memcheck for a day before swapping anything of course.

      The problem is a quality power supply looks almost exactly like a piece of crap. Adding some lights doesn't make it quality, neither does putting black wrap on the wires. We users lack the test gear to discover for ourselves so we must depend on reviews or reputation of the vendor. If you can afford PC Power and Cooling of course you go for it, Otherwise I have had good experience with either Antec or Enermax's better stuff, get one of their products with the 80+ and PFC ratings and you probably won't go wrong.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    10. Re:I tally $184 - not even looking for deals by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Ever had a machine that was just unstable? Even with the penguin? Swapping the clunker pack in 500W power supply that came free with the case for a quality (a pimped out gamer product may or may not be quality) power supply, even one rated at only 320W if the box isn't stuffed, cures about half of those cases. If the power supply doesn't it fix swap motherboards. Assuming you already ran memcheck for a day before swapping anything of course.

      Actually, no. I haven't. I have never had a system that was just unstable like that. Even when I was running Windows 9X on all of my systems, my systems were generally stable and solid, except when I ran into a badly written driver. Bad power supplies do happen, no doubt, but most of those woes can be solved by simply having something with an actual brand name on it, and by building your system to the rated sustained power rating on a PSU, not the rated maximum power rating. If you have a 135W CPU, a 55W GPU, memory/hdd/optical that's rated at another 20W, then you need 210W minimum sustained, and will be better off with a 230W or 250W sustained output power supply. If you're buying a 300W power supply thinking it'll be enough, you could be sorely mistaken, because the sustained output may only be 200W. If your power supply in this theoretical machine is only capable of 200W sustained, then you're going to have problems once all of your hardware starts spinning up at the same time. The sustained output is supposed to be printed on the label of your power supply, and if you don't see it, then perhaps you should buy a new PSU.

      It's funny that you mention Antec, actually, because in 25 years of working with PC's, the only power supply I ever had fail was a 550W Antec that claimed to be 80% efficient.

      And as far as the cases go... most people who build their own are enthusiasts, and most of the cases people like that buy are Thermaltake, Antec, Cooler Master, or the like. You're unlikely to find a shitty power supply in any of the above, because all of the above make high end power supplies for enthusiasts.

  39. Re: optical drive by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Even MS supports creating a boot-able USB drive with Windows 7 on it!

    Somehow, I had missed that little bit of "trivia". I have to say, "About time!" I remember my early days with Windows, trying to work around a bad CD-rom in some cases, or a scratched up CD in others. And, trying to get someone's driver installed by way of the floppy drive which was often full of lint and dust. Yes, it's about time that MS actually SUPPORTS a boot-able USB. Take all my headaches, multiplied by all the people worldwide who had to work around that limitation, and you most certainly have billions of hours of wasted time!

    Of course, these days, I don't spend much time fixing people's trashed out computers. I guess that's why I wasn't aware that Microsoft had come out of the stone ages.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  40. Re: optical drive by stms · · Score: 1

    It's because they want to distribute software to you with an optical drive. It's not that big a deal in the Desktop space (its just so they can rip you off an extra $50). The real problem with it is in the laptop market you could fit an extra 2-hours+ of battery life in the space or a descent discrete graphics card or even a more robust cooling system that could add years of life to your laptop. It's ridiculous that you can't even find a 14-inch or larger laptop without a optical drive.

  41. Re:Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lif by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Realy? I've fond hard drives to be cheap and effective.
    1TB of storage is a monsterous stack of DVD's or a small hard drive. 2TB is even worse.

    As far as hard drive reliability, make 2 or 3 copies. 3 2TB hard drives is pretty easy to handle, DVD's pretty darn difficult.
    I don't have a blu ray drive, but I dont' see it being momumentally better.

    Optical is dead, and flash drives aren't reliable.

  42. Press F2 to continue... by CaptCanuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Missing:
      - keyboard
      - mouse
      - network cable
      - monitor?
      - USB key to install from
      - Friend to copy OS onto your USB key
      - taxes (for those lucky to have them)

    I think the real cheat is any budget that involves a mail-in rebate.
    The article starts out about financial difficulties and then provides a price that doesn't reflect the walk home price. 3-6 weeks you might make that money back IF you are lucky that the rebate was honored.

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
    1. Re:Press F2 to continue... by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Missing:
        - network cable .

      Seriously? You are going to ding them for not including a network cable?

    2. Re:Press F2 to continue... by nzac · · Score: 1

      They are quite obviously saying you can replace your old box for this price but then I don’t get why you can't cannibalise the old box for the optical drive. Maybe the motherboard has no IDE and the editor wanted a better title/intro.

    3. Re:Press F2 to continue... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I've used the same keyboard for the better part of 10 years, and just now replaced my 3rd Logitech mouse. There was nothing wrong with them. Why replace them?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Press F2 to continue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumpster diving and curb shopping? (If not easy enough or legal where you live, try thrift stores. Not quite free there, but damn cheap.)

      In that case you can omit the case too. It's not like we need eye-candy here, just something to put the motherboard in. And then it's likely you could snag a working optical and perhaps floppy drive right along with it. As long as the old computer you pick up off the curb has a case that's not too proprietary, a typical ATX or mini-ATX board should fit no problem. You'll probably have to ditch the old power supply if its in there though. You'll need a 500W or greater power supply as many older PCs needed less. Power is important because you don't want a computer going on the blink because running video with the browser open and having the drive spin up.

      Finding an ol' chunky CRT shouldn't be too hard either. If you get one sitting out fresh and not banged up, it might be useful. If left out in the weather too long, then it's likely junk if not obviously smashed up. If you go to a thrift store carrying computer stuff, they'd probably be happy to give an old monitor away to you just to free up the space. Just because it's old and heavy and takes up room doesn't mean it isn't good enough for the job. Some of those old CRTs still render color better and refresh faster than the budget priced LCD monitors. Of course you'll have to settle for 3:4 over widescreen, but meh... This is more or less a freebee here.

      For keyboard and mouse, I'd still go to the store. Since who want's to deal with mystery funk and sticky or dead keys? $50 would get you a decent enough wireless keyboard and mouse combo. Hard to go wrong with Logitech or Microsoft offerings at the office store.

    5. Re:Press F2 to continue... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Then write a different article. I also re-use hard drives, power, case and some other things. Basically the only things that are really replaced are CPU, motherboard and memory.

      Looking at that I could have a 'new PC' for 80EUR. That is including 21%TVA. Or 94USD without taxes.

      (As comparison: On the top end I would pay 770EUR for a CPU, mother board and memory at the same store. Here I also would need to buy a video card. That could bring it up to 1250EUR.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Press F2 to continue... by kenh · · Score: 1

      After reading the article, I went to one of my favorite retailers microcenter.com and put together an i3-2100 system w/ 4 gigs of ram (not 2, as in the article), 500 gig hd, and chassis w/power supply for a couple bucks under $200 BEFORE tax, $205 after tax.

      The key is that the retailer has a $9.99 MSI motherboard bundle that makes the i3-2100 CPU and MSI MB together cost $110, and they had a sale on a 2x 2 Gig DDR3 DIMM kit for $19.99. No rebates.

      I built a personal system with the same CPU & MB, but with 8 gigs of RAM (didn't need it, but hey, it was $35!) and I runs very nicely, doesn't feel at all like a compromise system to me (but I'm not a gamer). My system clocked in at $250, but I added the larger RAM and an optical drive.

      --
      Ken
    7. Re:Press F2 to continue... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      shipping UPS only, 1 gram? 9$ please

    8. Re:Press F2 to continue... by yellowstone · · Score: 1
      I think it's a fair assumption that anyone willing to assemble a computer from parts is going to have stuff like spare keyboards, mice, and what-not lying around. And who doesn't have a USB drive anymore? Also (at least where I live) the library has publicly accessible computers (although a library card is required here). You may also need to get your distro via torrent, depending on available bandwidth, restrictions on duration you can use the computer, and the distro size.

      I think the real cheat is any budget that involves a mail-in rebate.

      Yeah, no argument there.

      --
      150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    9. Re:Press F2 to continue... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I'd find these build guides if they stuck to a price range, but excluded stuff that you can cannibalize from your last PC.

      I have n PCs in my house. When one gets old I want to upgrade it - I don't want to have n+1 PCs in the house. A typical PC upgrade requires a motherboard, RAM, CPU, and often a power supply. If it is a gaming setup it might require a new video card. I usually spend $300 on upgrades and get VERY modern systems because I spend it on the stuff that actually needs to be replaced, not another fancy case.

      If you need to include a monitor, case, hard drive, etc, and you're spending only $200, then you're really shooting yourself in the foot. You're well in the region where marginal cost of improvements is very low and it is worth spending more.

    10. Re:Press F2 to continue... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      At this point it's not unreasonable to expect anyone assembling a PC will have access to plenty of other scrounged parts and/or working computers. People throw away good PCs and PCs with salvageable parts every day.

      Even an old Windows 98 machine is more than sufficient for downloading all the distros you might wish to sample.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:Press F2 to continue... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Curb computers aren't generally too useful nowadays, if you're considering rebuilding them into new computers. The power supply is almost certainly a 20 pin, and probably also lacks the extra 4-pin most boards require so it's useless. The hard drive and optical drives are IDE, and many inexpensive boards are SATA only too, so chances are they are also useless. Ditto for the floppy drive. The video card, if it has one, is almost certainly AGP and is therefore useless. At best you'll get a ATX case with a fan or two that you can reuse. If anything, curb computers are more useful just to use as-is if it works, or for parts to fix other curb computers if it doesn't. Though by now any curb collector probably has more IDE/AGP/DDR era machines than they know what to do with by now.

      On the other hand, curb CRT monitors generally still work if fresh and everything still have a VGA port so they can still be useful. Curb LCDs usually are dead but most are easily repaired if you can resolder bad caps.

  43. Re: optical drive by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    You must be rather young. You obviously don't remember the good old days, back when this site first started and was overrun with spam and trolls.

  44. Why I use optical discs by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 2

    I'm currently on a bit of a "get legit" roll when it comes to my media. All my software is acquired legally via the net so that's OK, it's just stuff like movies and music that I still require an optical drive for. Why?

    1. I like my music in FLAC format. There are very few digital music stores which sell in this format. My favourite by far is http://bandcamp.com/ but they don't have much mainstream/big-artist stuff.

    2. Even if I didn't have a preference for FLAC, there aren't any legal digital music stores around which service my needs with at least a high-bitrate MP3. I don't want to use iTunes because I don't want to deal with AAC (I can convert them but I don't want a dependency on iTunes anyway). Amazon still hasn't, for whatever reason, opened an MP3 store here in Australia yet despite promising to open up to the world many years ago.

    3. You can forget about any legit digital movie stores selling non-DRMed stuff either.

    So what do I do? I buy music CDs and rip them to FLAC. I buy DVDs and use HandBrake to convert them, or just play them directly with VLC. Both of these cases require an optical drive, and until such a time occurs that physical sales of media are completely abolished, I will continue to do this. UNLESS... a suitable online store apears in my area which sells non-DRMed music AND video of what I want, in my preferred format. At this rate that's going to take a very long time (if ever), so I do what I can to stave off piracy.

    1. Re:Why I use optical discs by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      you're in the market for prying optical drives from discarded and dead computers, then. you can even put two of them on the low end mobo's IDE port, and avoid the loud and fast models.

    2. Re:Why I use optical discs by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      You filthy pirate scum!

    3. Re:Why I use optical discs by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Do you really believe iTunes is required to play AAC files?

      How many songs can you fit on your portable music player in your precious FLAC format?

    4. Re:Why I use optical discs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there aren't any legal digital music stores around which service my needs with at least a high-bitrate MP3. I don't want to use iTunes because I don't want to deal with AAC

      Just curious, what software or devices are you using that support MP3 without supporting AAC?

    5. Re:Why I use optical discs by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 1

      I should have clarified - I don't like how the iTunes store only sells AAC files. I know I can play them in other players (player of choice in Winamp), I just prefer having to deal with MP3, FLAC or in rare cases, OGG. I don't currently have any AAC files, and in keeping a known set of popular and open-source codecs I reduce the likelyhood of dealing with any issues down the track

      As for a portal media player, don't really use them anymore. I either listen to music on my media center/main computer or burn then to a CD and play in my car, which lacks a USB port. For these reasons the space gained by other formats is not important.

    6. Re:Why I use optical discs by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 1

      I should have clarified - I don't like how the iTunes store only sells AAC files. I know I can play them in other players (player of choice is Winamp), I just prefer having to deal with MP3, FLAC or in rare cases, OGG. I don't currently have any AAC files, and in keeping a known set of popular and open-source codecs I reduce the likelyhood of dealing with any issues down the track.

      As for a portable media player, don't really use them anymore. I either listen to music on my media centre/main computer or burn then to a CD and play in my car, which lacks a USB port. For these reasons the space gained by other formats is not important.

    7. Re:Why I use optical discs by tepples · · Score: 1

      A lot of digital audio players from the "PlaysForSure" era support only MP3 and WMA, not Vorbis, not AAC.

  45. Re:All recent Computer architectures are dogs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The force is strong with this one. And by "force" I mean "drugs".

  46. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Internet?

  47. Sooo... by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    Get a $15 optical drive then.  Whatever.

    You do realize optical drives are shit, right?

  48. Re: optical drive by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

    So it's where the Pirate Bay stores its torrents?

    --
    SSC
  49. vga only in 2011 and the old GeForce 6100? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    you could of gotten a amd board with a newer ATI chipset with DVI for about $15 more and for like $30 more a AM3+ board.

  50. a brick by pbjones · · Score: 2

    It fails because you need to load an OS from somewhere, from something, so you need to include the cost of the USB stick and time/cost of downloading Linux. I didn't see the cost of HD cable either. CPU Heatsink? Minor stuff but it all adds up. 2 GB of ram? pfft. Why have a HD at all? boot from USB and use Network storage.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:a brick by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      I've done it that way for fun but usb boot/system disk and internet storage are too dang slow.

      but you don't need to worry about install media, just borrow from your local bsd or linux evangelist. I loan out cd or usb stick, and have done installs for friends and coworkers on their personal machines. wish I had some stickers of dead microsoft colored butterfly men that I could put on case of my laptop every time I kill a windows install. hmmm, that could work as a web page too....

    2. Re:a brick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All retail CPUs come with a heatsink for the past several years, so that's straight-up bullshit. Motherboards usually come with at least 1 PATA (in the old days) or 2 SATA cables -- the particular one they chose clearly includes 1 PATA and 1 SATA cable.

      USB sticks are incredibly cheap -- you can probably bum a 256MB off your friends for free (if you can find anyone who still has one that small), worst case you pay $5 for a 1GB or 2GB. That's way more than enough room for a net-install, or adequate for a disk-install -- and still doesn't push it over $200.

      Time to download? Now you're just being an ass -- they're not counting time to assemble it, time to pick up components locally, time to order components online, or time to sit around smoking weed while waiting for the UPS truck to bring your goodies. Why would they count time to download the OS?

    3. Re:a brick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a sub $200 computer he can use the stock heatsink

    4. Re:a brick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why be dependent on a fucking CLOUD? What if it's a cloudless day and the SUN is shining? What will you do then?
      I'll tell you what I do, I pump my solar panel energy into a fucking commercial grade chip...

      Transcend Ultra Speed Industrial Flash memory card - 512 MB CompactFlash Card - 1 x CompactFlash Card - type I
      $13 online
      Transcend - CompactFlash - 512 MB
      Transcend's Industrial CF cards are specially designed to meet the strict demands of high-end equipment and machines that run at extreme temperatures. The operating temperature range of Industrial CF cards is much better than normal CF cards, with full functionality down to -40ÂC and as hot as 85ÂC (normal CF Cards are only rated at -25ÂC to 85ÂC). Aside from their excellent temperature flexibility, these cards are exceptionally resistant to shock, vibration and dust, while consuming less power and maintaining ultra fast data transfer speeds. Their superb compatibility and durability makes them suitable for use in standard PCMCIA-ATA equipped devices such as industrial PCs, embedded systems, medical instruments, factory automation systems, network infrastructures and other industrial equipment. In addition, Industrial CF cards can even be used as bootable disks in place of conventional hard drives that cannot withstand the harsh conditions of an industrial environment. Transcend uses SLC (Single-Level-Cell) NAND Flash chips in its industrial CF cards to assure the highest level of quality, durability, and long-lasting data retention. The Ultra Speed card supports Ultra-DMA modes 0-4 and dual channel operation to ensure maximum compatibility at the highest speeds possible. Transcend's Industrial CF cards achieve extraordinary average read/write speeds of up to 42MB/30MB per second while maintaining industrial-grade stability. With its built-in Error Correction Code (ECC) to ensure data accuracy, resistance to severe conditions and superb transfer performance, the Ultra Speed Industrial CF card clearly lives up to its name.  less⦠more Â
      512 MB capacity - $13 new

      Of course you'll need the CF to IDE adapter, from the slow boat in China. For $2 you can get one, just takes forever to get here.

      You also could use SHITTY CF cards and just replace them as you burn them up.
      Hard drives aint going away any time, if anything these retarded over priced and financed netpads are .

    5. Re:a brick by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I don't think I have ever bought a HD cable or a HeatSink Fan. These are basics that just seem to be included in everything you buy. I even bought a really really cheap Atom powered MicroITX board recently and the bag for the cables was bigger than the bag for the motherboard.

    6. Re:a brick by thue · · Score: 1

      > cost of the USB

      You only need to use the USB stick once, to install linux. Thereafter, you can download whatever you need from inside Linux. Surely you can borrow an USB stick from a friend, if you don't own one already.

      Since Ubuntu fits a single CD, you could buy a 2GB USB stick for $6: http://www.newegg.com/Store/SubCategory.aspx?SubCategory=522&name=USB-Flash-Drives&Order=PRICE

      > time/cost of downloading Linux

      This is getting silly.

      > CPU Heatsink?

      The included CPU includes a heatsink at the price they specify: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103953&Tpk=Athlon%20II%20X2%20270

      > I didn't see the cost of HD cable either

      Every motherboard I have bought has included SATA cables in the box. According to http://www.techemporium.com/ssproduct.asp?pf_id=1018895174 , the selected motherboard includes 2 SATA cable.

    7. Re:a brick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I booted from USB drive for... ohh, a good few years when I was a kid.
      My very first laptop, her hard drive finally caved. Saved a bunch of files before it completely failed. Heads I believe, still have it sitting in a box in hopes of recovering other stuff when I get around to it. The disc itself will still hold the information for a long ass time.

      USB flash drive (think it was 128 or 512MB), 1gig RAM. It started off as disc-based Slax.
      Used another flash drive for storage, as well as backing files up to digital download services, encrypted. (regularly downloading them to keep them alive)
      Even using things like Imageshack to store pictures. Anything and everything was my storage place.
      Made backups of them every so often to optical when I could afford a rack.
      Eventually got a new drive for it. But I miss those days, they were simpler times.
      Being forced in to watching my storage constantly wasn't bad, because these days I feel I have downloaded too much crap.

    8. Re:a brick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CPU heatsink comes with the CPU, and the motherboard nearly always includes SATA cables.

    9. Re:a brick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heatsink will usually come with the CPU. SATA cable will usually come with LGB.

    10. Re:a brick by Hydian · · Score: 1

      There is no cost for an HD cable or heat sink. If you'd built a pc in the past 10 years or so, you'd have found those parts bundled in with your motherboard and (retail...nobody does OEM anymore) CPU. As far as the flash drive cost....really? Should they include the cost of electricity, heat, etc for the place they built it in? How about the gas required to drive there? The flash drive is not a part of the computer, and it isn't consumed in the process, so its cost should not be counted.

    11. Re:a brick by kenh · · Score: 1

      The HD cable comes with the MB.

      The CPU heatsink comes with the retail pack CPU.

      If you shrink the HD to 320 from 500 Gig, you free up an estimated $10 to cover cost of a 4 Gig USB key to install from.

      --
      Ken
    12. Re:a brick by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 1

      AMD CPUs come with adequate stock coolers, especially the 65W range. Both motherboards I've purchased in the last 3 years each came with 2-3 SATA cables (as well as old school ribbon cables).

      I put together a quad core Athlon system with 4 GB of RAM (integrated sound/video) for less than $300 ($400 including a 20 inch LCD 1900x1080 monitor) over 2 years ago, so it wouldn't surprise me at all that a halfway decent system could be had for $200-$300 (including monitor).

    13. Re:a brick by pbjones · · Score: 1

      yep, sorry, Motherboards usually come with cables. Unless you buy retail pack CPUs, you don't usually get a heatsink, which is usually the way I buy them. And no-one said CLOUD, you can just have a Single Linux-box or Net storage box which mounts as part of the file system.

      --
      There was an unknown error in the submission.
    14. Re:a brick by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Do you count the screwdrivers and the food or drink consumed during the build? How about the total time spent on both shopping and building? lolll

  51. Re: optical drive by Hatta · · Score: 1

    I don't have an optical drive in my desktop. When I want to burn a CD to playon my Sega Saturn I have to boot up an old P3 box. That's about all I use it for.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  52. Re:Decent Computer? by HJED · · Score: 1

    You forgot:

    6) Docx support, whilst I prefer open office to MS Office in general. In OO/LibreOffice Docx support is terrible (Images in wrong place, different table sizes, no word art, etc). Nb. from my experience the same isn't true the other way round, open office documents usually display fine in word.

    Disclaimer: I dual boot ubuntu with Gnome 3 (btw Unity is reason 7 if we are talking specifically about Ubuntu) and Win 7. For programing, internet browsing and file operations linux is generally better. I also use LibreOffice when I am creating documents (but not for opening or editing documents created in Word). However I generally haven't found good replacements for Windows Live Photo Gallery (although digikam get close in terms of functionality, but with a terrible UI), Photoshop (I have tried gimp), MS Power Point and movie editing software in general (I've tried a large number of linux movie editing software on a reasonably high spec system and they all seemed to crash at random intervals).
    Win 7 is also more visually appealing.

    --
    null
  53. Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with a by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with a case for under $30 much less a under $30 psu.

  54. Optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think about it, USB sticks are probably a good flat-out replacement for CDWRs/DVDWRs. They're faster, more convenient, and hold more. You can put them on your keychain. Just go with it, drop the optical, replace with USB.

    1. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I'm too lazy to go out and buy an external hard drive. Because I don't have an abundance of 4GB USB thumbdrives lying around. Because backups are good, redundancy is good, and sometimes I want to free up space on the hard drive (by thinking a 25%-full drive will be a little faster than a 50%-full drive). Because a lot of computer products and games are still selling on CDs/DVDs. Because downloading 4GB of anything online is not feasible due to low download caps and satellite internet. Because I still have some 50 blank DVDs lying around and that seems like a heck of a value for storage.

      At least I have a USB external optical drive. But all that's done is made me wish computers came with more than 4 USB ports.

    2. Re: optical drive by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      I have not put an optical drive in any of the computers I have built for myself or family for a couple of years now.

    3. Re: optical drive by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I've got 1 USB DVD burner that I swap between computers as needed. I don't use it a whole lot, but sometimes it's nice to have a CDROM or DVD for moving files around or short term back ups.

      But, most of the time I use it to rip my CDs and DVDs to disk.

    4. Re: optical drive by hedwards · · Score: 1

      MS may support it, but I burned myself a DVD anyways. Sometimes you really do need something to be on a WORM disc, I'd hate to think what would happen if I forgot what was on the disc and reformatted it.

      That being said, we've hit the point where it's sufficient to have on external optical driver per household.

    5. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

      Because the lightning fast internet connection that (I'm assuming) you have isn't available in every household on the planet.
      It's hard to feel 2011 when you have a 1997 internet connection at home.

    6. Re: optical drive by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      People also have boxes of CDs and DVDs. You don't need a burner but you definitely need a reader.

    7. Re: optical drive by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I would not mind having more external optical readers. But I've found that most of them are junk. Expensive, loud, and hot compared to internal drives. But if you do have a nice external drive then you don't need on one your new computer.

      The drive is not there for movies or music, but for archived backup disks you created in the past, old applications, old games, etc.

    8. Re: optical drive by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Too slow and USB3 are expensive at this time.

      What kind of optical device is going to saturate USB2's 60 MB/s? I'm curious as didn't think they were able to reach those speeds.

    9. Re: optical drive by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But the point isn't the space, but that you have the disks for archive. They're cheaper and more reliable for archive purposes than a hard drive.

    10. Re:Optical drive by pz · · Score: 2

      Except when you want an archival copy of something.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    11. Re: optical drive by colinrichardday · · Score: 2

      With all of the features, each DVD would be 3-4 gigabytes, so 30 would be 90-120 gigabytes. That would be quite a bit of my Linux partition.

    12. Re: optical drive by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      "Optical drive"? Is that the slidey thing you put those sort of shaving mirror thingies into? I remember we used to use something like that in the olden days.

      It's the slide out thingie that you set your coffee mug on.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    13. Re: optical drive by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      What content are you talking about? Last time I checked, all I needed for my Linux distro was available from Internet. Oh, maybe you were talking about content for that non-free operating system starting with "win" and ending with "dows"? But that's not the default on that computer, so why should we care?

    14. Re: optical drive by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      In the 80s I had boxes of floppy disks. I don't regret that I don't use them anymore, even though I believe I must still have these boxes somewhere.

    15. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you got those from the rest of the internet?

    16. Re: optical drive by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 2

      100 CD + 30 DVD (if they are all full, and all your DVDs are 9 GB, which I both don't think reflects reality) would add up to 340 GB. I really hope that this new computer has an HDD bigger than 340 GB, otherwise, many people will complain about it!

    17. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dl dvd capacity: 8.5GB (and most DVD movies DO take up that much space)
      cd capacity: 700mb (pretty much every audio CD is this size)
      30 x 8.5 + 100 * .7 = 350GB

      Easy to get a HD that size.. but that's a lot to rip (at 2mb/sec (realistic avg for a DVD drive) = at least 48 hours (no breaks for sleeping))

      Plus - 350GB is a lot of data to store and backup...

      I probably wouldn't bother. A DVD drive is $20.. I think my time is worth more than $0.41/hour. Maybe yours isn't though.

    18. Re:Optical drive by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Except when you want an archival copy of something.

      Or when they suddenly stop working, as many USB sticks I've used have done.

    19. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! I do nothing but troll, post flamebait, offtopic garbage, and personal attacks and I have no cooldown timer at all (and my account still manages to have Excellent karma)!

    20. Re: optical drive by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 2

      60mb/sec? I've never gotten over ~20, even in linear-read from a drive I know can do 80.
      Still, even a typical SD card is usually a bit faster than a CD due to less seek time. Which is important for installing or booting.

    21. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      long term backup of important data? no it's not impervious but it sure beats hd insta-death so long as you keep them in a sane environment.

    22. Re: optical drive by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I remember the good old days. Spam? Nope - that's a relatively recent phenomenon (and the lameness filter doesn't do anything for the CleanMyPC or discount shoes posts). Trolls? Yep, and they were fucking hilarious. Far more interesting than the average post, that's for damn sure.

      As a great troll once said, Putting a lameness filter on slashdot is like putting a shit filter on your asshole.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    23. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like the difference between a raw CR2 image from a nice camera displayed on a deep color display vs a low resolution 8bit colorchan jpeg.

    24. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux user here. Movies, games through wine, and music are my top reasons for clinging to my optical drive.

    25. Re: optical drive by antdude · · Score: 1

      That is why I still prefer internal disc drives especially when it comes to burning discs.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    26. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "Audio CD" you speak of? Is it like an Audi TT?

      Yes, both are flat and rounded.

    27. Re: optical drive by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Similarly, I mainly use mine to timeshift netflix DVD's.

      Even if you are extremely efficient in turning them around the day after you receive them, "unlimited videos 1-at-a-time" actually means "2 videos per week." Keep each one at home for a couple days on average, you're down to 1 per week.

    28. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So like Gnutella then?
      Actually, what's the point of gayTunes again? (Protip: It's still MAFIAA, and hence hurting artists and culture.)

    29. Re: optical drive by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I know you're kidding a bit, but I'll answer your point anyway.

      I still have several USB external R/W DVD drives for situations where people were too cheap to invest in them for laptops, desktops, or servers. DVD and CD drives are still handy for accessing media you've not bothered transferring to ISO images, or burning CD's or DVD's for others when they don't want to deal with the security risks of a USB memory stick that can be too easily rewritten or used to walk away with data. So for me, at least, I don't need such a drive because it's an unnecessary expense.

    30. Re: optical drive by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      Local backup is useful, especially for data you don't care to publish or have anyone overwrite. Fiscal data and GPG keys, for example, can be usefully stored on permanent media.

    31. Re: optical drive by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      You mean like teh bittorrents

    32. Re: optical drive by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While you can't put usb sticks in a wallet, you CAN put sdcards in one. Specifically one made for trading cards.

      I would love to see sdcard media get sold in bulk packs like cdrs are. There is a slight problem with capacities not rounding evenly with optical formats... (640-700mb cdr : 1gb sdcard. 4.5gb dvd : 8gb sdcard. 9gb dvd : 12/16gb sdcard) but the form factor is much smaller, you can store waaay more data in a similar sized wallet, and they are less easily destroyed by frequent handling.

      Yes. I KNOW they are more expensive. I also remember when cdrs cost over a dollar a pop. These devices don't have to be blazing fast to replace optical media, and while I know it won't be a popular subject with the demographic here, it WOULD work quite well with software firms, because sdcards have to be able to support special hardware drm features to be spec compliant. (This means that your spiffy boxed 3d game you bought off the shelf can chug slowly on install, use your fast sata drive at runtime, and use the sdcard as a dongle to verify game purchase, all in the same package. I am surprised that no software house has tried it yet.

      The cards themselves don't need to be fast really, so cheap organic semiconductors, like those used in flexible displays that can exceed amorphous silicon speeds could be used to make the bulk pack cheapo ones.

      Like any product, as long as it remains a niche, specialty product it will be expensive, but when it becomes a widespread multi use product, economies of scale drive down the price. I can easily see flash going that way, especially for slow but cheap sdcards.

    33. Re: optical drive by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Mental retardation? Of course that is explained as they are using a full-size desktop computer like some sort of Walmart shopper. I have a usb dvd drive I use for those rare times I need one.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    34. Re: optical drive by germansausage · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear

    35. Re: optical drive by iamhassi · · Score: 2

      My optical drive broke down about 3 years ago. I've never had to replace it. So I agree, for some, it might not be needed at all.

      Then you're not a gamer. Not every game is available on Steam.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    36. Re: optical drive by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Did you burn these disks yourself? If so, I have news for you about that word "reliable" you keep using. Burned CD/DVD failure rates within 5 years are over 30%.

      ARCHIVING 101 is the class paying attention? Good! Let's begin. To store data, for any period of time, be it long or short, here is the formula you must use. KEEP IT SPINNING, IN THREE PLACES. Class dismissed. Meaning, copy your shit to a hard drive or three and keep them live, with regular integrity checks. If one shows sings of wobbling, clone the data and get a fresh drive in place. There is no other reliable backup methodology. ENTROPY DEMANDS IT

      Also, in this day and age, this solution is dirt cheap. Aren't we in a thread about $200 machines?

    37. Re: optical drive by EvilAlphonso · · Score: 0

      And it may come as a surprise to you, but not every computer user is a gamer

    38. Re: optical drive by billstewart · · Score: 2

      Hear hear for your correction of the bogus "here here" - people are really loosing their hold on English grammer.

      But yes, you do need to read CDs or DVDs on a computer, and USB drives are really just fine for that, plus you've probably got one left over from some previous computer by now.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    39. Re: optical drive by DogDude · · Score: 1

      It's a thing that holds good sounding music, as opposed to the compressed, lossy garbage that most people download online.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    40. Re: optical drive by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You mean Vinyl? Yeah I've seen those in history books.

    41. Re: optical drive by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 3, Informative

      CD / DVDs aren't at all a reliable media for backups. I wouldn't recommend anyone to do that, especially for financial data. If you need a backup, do it with a USB hard drive for the local one, and also send an off-site backup over the wire. That is, at least 3 copies (if you include the one you are working on).

    42. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 7 and UNetBootin.

      Nightmare of my life. I ended up manually updating the SysLinux on the USB key, and writing a proper command using the CHAIN.C32 module. And when I got to that point I experience a well known issue. You cannot under any circumstances format or create new partitions on any drive if you USB key is mounted.

      That includes drives prepartitioned with GParted, Windows or anything. It will not allow you to do anything unless it can manually set the 100MB partition is uses.

      So that's a day down the drain tinkering with that. From now on I just burn the MSDN .iso to a DVD, takes 5 minutes. Ubuntu (yes, I'm a scrub) and any other Linux will install/boot nicely from USB.

    43. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My optical drive broke down about 3 years ago. I've never had to replace it. So I agree, for some, it might not be needed at all.

      So what are you using as your beverage coaster since then?

    44. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear for your correction of the bogus "here here" - people are really loosing their hold on English grammer.

      And speling. ;-)

    45. Re: optical drive by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      If you're a hardcore gamer, then buying an optical drive in your computer is a no-brainer. There are games you can only get on optical media, and there are old games that you'll never find online. Plus there's a degree of nostalgia that you can't really get through services like Steam.

      If you're not a gamer, the decision is tougher. I have one computer that still has an optical drive in it, which gets used for backing up audio cd's and dvd's to the network hard drive so I can play them on other systems (including the HTPC). I will never go to itms to buy music, and I prefer not to pirate stuff I'm actually going to use, so I still need an optical drive for those backup purposes. Said optical drive is in my gaming machine, which these days only gets turned on to do such a backup, or for the occasional game of Civ. 99% of my computer use is on an ultraportable Linux-based laptop that doesn't have an optical drive, and I find I don't miss it. I would never be able to do without one entirely, but there's really no reason I couldn't use an external drive that's off/in a drawer most of the time.

    46. Re: optical drive by Oidhche · · Score: 2

      If it's not on Steam, it's on Pirate Bay.

    47. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. USB optical drive for those odd occasions, just like my USB floppy drive. (and Zip drive, can't forget him... oh I wish that idea worked out)
      They work perfectly fine for every use you'd ever need for them. (Well, some might not have burning capabilities, just need to find the right one of course if you need that)

      No need for an in-built drive now, it is a waste of money and space. (and resources)

    48. Re: optical drive by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      DVD is MPEG2 video. If you're ripping it, you can convert it to MPEG4, dropping the extra audio channels you don't want, and the subtitles, and cut it to about half that size without any loss at all. Other codecs will allow even more compression... I have found that I can safely rip my DVD movies to about a 1GB MKV (using h.264) without noticing significant loss of quality on my 42" 1080p tv.

    49. Re: optical drive by GauteL · · Score: 1

      "You must be rather young. You obviously don't remember the good old days, back when this site first started and was overrun with spam and trolls."

      Says the person with a six-digit slashdot id.

    50. Re: optical drive by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      Try FLAC audio.

    51. Re: optical drive by Tom · · Score: 1

      my thought exactly. I used mine about twice this year. It's nice having one around in case you need it, but one per home instead of one per computer is good enough.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    52. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, what does one use an optical disc reader for other than:

      0) Installing a Microsoft OS.
      1) Rescuing music and movies stored on ancient media like CD's or DVD's.
      2) Watching Blu-ray movies.

      Given that we're talking about a Linux OS, (0) and (2) don't apply. Linux /can/ still be installed using CD's and DVD's but that goes for floppy disks too. If your interested in (1) then I'll point out that, in fact, there's no vinyl record player or cassette player here either, a clear case of cheating!

    53. Re: optical drive by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Available from which major online store?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    54. Re: optical drive by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      35€ USB optical drive covers all my needs. I can use it on all machines I own (and those that I don't own) and it rarely to never gets any use. The last time I used it, I think was to burn a Ubuntu ISO for a machine that didn't support PXE boot.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    55. Re: optical drive by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

      They're using Linux for the PC, I think gaming has already been discounted (at least mainstream disc-based gaming).

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    56. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't play games on this computer. The graphics are weak.

    57. Re: optical drive by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      The Pirate Bay?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    58. Re: optical drive by I_Lost_My_Puppy · · Score: 1



      "loosing their hold on English grammer." Really?

    59. Re: optical drive by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      My laptop has a 320 gigabyte hard drive which is partitioned roughly in half between Windows 7 and Linux.

    60. Re: optical drive by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      It's 2011, dammit, why do people still use optical drives?

      Because they still have CDs, DVDs laying around that are not available in electronic file format yet? (Until they get ripped.)

      DVD/CD writers are about $18-$20. Not a huge expense for something that gives you a lot of flexibility like creating CDs/DVDs or reading one of the zillion CDs/DVDs created in the last 2 decades.

      That being said - I don't have an optical in my laptop any longer. I do still have a USB DVD drive that I can attach when needed, but I don't need it on a day to day basis as the desktop has an optical drive. (Not because the laptop doesn't have room for the drive, but because I prefer to have a 2nd internal SATA drive in that location. Thinkpads allow you to do that with a simple item that replaces the optical drive bay with a SATA drive slot.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    61. Re: optical drive by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Five years? I try to rotate my backups more frequently than that. As far as I can tell, I've never had my own burned discs go bad. Do you have a source for that claim?

      Also, wouldn't entropy affect a hard drive more than optical media? If you can afford three hard drives, you can afford quite a bit of DVD-RWs.

    62. Re: optical drive by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      That seems like a lot of work.

    63. Re: optical drive by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      OH! I remember those, now. Black, with all the ridges!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    64. Re: optical drive by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      CD / DVDs aren't at all a reliable media for backups. I wouldn't recommend anyone to do that, especially for financial data. If you need a backup, do it with a USB hard drive for the local one, and also send an off-site backup over the wire. That is, at least 3 copies (if you include the one you are working on).

      If you're going to backup to CD/DVD, you have to definitely make at least 2 copies. And you need to include some sort of parity / ECC / recovery data to increase the odds that you can read the files. And stay away from the cheap media (paying a few extra pennies per disk goes a long way). Then you do generational backups and ensure that a particular piece of data is on at least 3 generations before you stop including it in the backups.

      I have decade old CD/DVD recordable discs that are still readable. Some of those have sat in a car year after year (in the shade, but still in temperatures that ranged from 0F up to 140F due to being in a confined, sun-baked car with no ventilation). The ones that start to show errors, I just use dd_rescue to make an ISO of what is still readable, pull one of the PAR2 files off of the disk, then use QuickPar or par2 command line to reconstruct the files from the raw data.

      (Opticals, being so cheap and easy to use, are great for things like read-only snapshot backups of small content like your filed taxes every year. Toss the paper receipts, paper copy of the filing, plus a CD-R or DVD-R in a paper sleeve into the envelope and shove the whole thing in a drawer. Heck, there's probably enough room on the disk to include that year plus the previous 7 years.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    65. Re: optical drive by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      You can get 512MB SD cards, in bulk, for about $4/card. Also 1GB SD for about $4/card.

      Licensing costs, manuf costs and packaging / shipping are fairly significant factor in that. Unlike CD/DVD where you can fit 100 in a tall cake box, the SD cards aren't as easy to handle in bulk.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    66. Re: optical drive by dcp · · Score: 1

      Says the person with a 5 digit id.

    67. Re: optical drive by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      There are limits to their reliability and lifespan: but they are _cheap_ compared to duplicaton costs of a lot of paper documents. The format for CD's and DVD's has, fortunately, been quite stable, and PDF format for the documents is also reliable for being able to read them. It's far safer in my experience to have an organized CD of a year's paperwork and put a spare CD in an offsite location than to try to preserve the paper trail, keep it searchable and legible in local file cabinets. And replicating the paperwork becomes labor intensive and expensive in simple printing costs.

    68. Re: optical drive by rocket+rancher · · Score: 1

      Similarly, I mainly use mine to timeshift netflix DVD's.

      Don't be disingenuous. Why do you need to timeshift *physical media*? I suppose you are going to scrub all those DVD rips from your hd when you drop your netflix subscription, as well? Go fuck yourself, you asshat pirate. You are giving *real* pirates a bad name.

    69. Re: optical drive by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      All the packager needs to do is pack them in a clear polybag type wallet that is 4 x 4 pockets in size, and include 8 such wallets in a rectangular cardboard box. My quick and dirty geometry skills shows that I could reasonably stuff 128 of them in approximtely the same size box used by a 10 pack cdr box. The biggest cost would be slipping the cards into the pockets of the cheapo polybags.

      Current packaging is expensive, because they use blisterpacks that also include a rugged clear plastic case. You don't want that in a bulk pack.

      Licensing costs would be the hard one to deal with. Corporate drones don't like to renegotiate licenses.

    70. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My UID is 666, your argument is invalid.

    71. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I was speaking of non-piracy.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    72. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Buy your originals from Amazon and use shiny happy tools to get it in whatever format you like.

      It's not like DVDs where the good tools are limited by the DMCA.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    73. Re: optical drive by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I bought 235 gigs of backup for 9.99$ at the grocery store. lets see you do that with flash memory

    74. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You can buy them at Frys. Try getting out more.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    75. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Of course he's going to scrub them. You end up with a lot of clutter otherwise.

      There's really no good reason not to take him at his word.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    76. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I still have Linux install disks from the 90s. This includes stuff like the Loki games. If this stuff had followed the App Store or Steam model than they would likely be long gone by now. Physical media means that you have a token of ownership and a means to preserve content indefinitely.

      Clueless idiots with no grasp of math like to drone on about floppy disks but clearly don't quite get the scope of the situation.

      Optical media is by no means small at this point. It's still big enough to be larger than some of the proposed replacements.

      That's something you couldn't say about the floppy when certain people were actively trying to suppress it.

      Optical media is cheap enough to be disposable and that's something that none of the alternatives have going for them.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    77. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Everything you just said about duplication and error correction is true for ANY backup medium.

      The particular backup media doesn't alter basic industry best practices.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    78. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Like I said. You can easily end up with a low profile machine with that much space. I have a couple of them. ...as far as ripping goes: it is no great bother. You make it sound like you've got to sit there and push the bits around manually. All you do is just put the disk in and run a command. The rest is done by the computer. You aren't wasting any of your own time. Even if you are ripping a 11 season DVD collection, you're still just changing the disks whenever you want.

      350G is NOTHING to store and backup. You can get bus powered USB drives much larger than that.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    79. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It's fortunate you have a digital slave to automate that all for you.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    80. Re: optical drive by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      They might be cheaper. For any serious bulk, they're terribly inconvenient.

      Ideally, you would only ever use the media ONCE.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    81. Re: optical drive by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Didn't 6 digit UIDs start around 1999? 7 digit about 3 or four years ago?

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    82. Re: optical drive by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I think an optical disc is the most proper format for archiving stuff. Flash memory is purposed only for live systems and is prone to ESD shocks and maybe data degradation in general. But of course a built-in optical drive is not needed, an USB one shared with all computers is the best solution.

    83. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because gamers play _every_ game.

    84. Re: optical drive by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 1

      I have an ancient samsung cdrw, it must be 15-16 years old now, that I just move around if the need to read cds the old skool way arises.
      Never had any dvd reader of any kind.

    85. Re: optical drive by cffrost · · Score: 1

      FLAC department, aisle 104: https://thepiratebay.org/browse/104

      The prices are fair; it is only asked that you seed.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    86. Re: optical drive by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to use the MS USB key creator software. It needs an ISO image of the disk and will then create a bootable flash drive that will install Windows. I've used it and it works quite nicely.

      One thing I appreciate that MS has finally done is configured Win7 to allow the usage of any Win7 install Media to activate so long as you have a legal key as I did on Monday with a new system from Walmart (nuke em first then clean install to get rid of all the preloaded garbage).

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    87. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeding FLAC isn't exactly cheap.

    88. Re: optical drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can buy [vinyl records] at Frys. Try getting out more."

      The nearest Frys is over 400 miles away from me. :(

      And that's pretty close.

    89. Re: optical drive by sylvandb · · Score: 1

      Don't really need an existing copy of windows. Just something you can use to partition and format the usb drive, copy over the windows files, then boot the Windows stuff.

      Usually if you partition and format with Windows, it puts enough code in the MBR and boot sector to boot windows. There are multiple ways to get that or replace it with free equivalents.

    90. Re: optical drive by tepples · · Score: 1

      I've used a 3.5" floppy drive more recently than I've used an optical drive.

      But with most modern computers coming with a BIOS that can boot from a USB flash drive, PC applications available as an Internet download to anybody in urban areas of developed countries,* and streaming movie rentals becoming available in more countries, the number of PC users who regularly need to use optical media is getting smaller. There are SDHC cards and USB flash drives nearly as big as a single-layer DVD (4 GB) and SDHC cards and USB flash drives as big as a dual-layer DVD (8 GB), big enough for any mainstream operating system you can think of.

      Is there a reason why you make it so unpleasant and troublesome to contribute to your site?

      There were a few days when Slashdot would require waiting an hour between comments after having made enough in one server day. I'm glad those days are behind me, but here's something to try: get 50 or so of your comments moderated up, and you'll have "excellent" karma like mine and can post once every two minutes or so. That and keep several reply forms open in tabs.

      * Steam, Netflix, Mac App Store, and the like aren't practical for users unserved by cable or DSL, whose residents rely on wireless broadband (satellite or 3G) plans that typically have a data transfer cap lower than 10 GB per month.

    91. Re: optical drive by tepples · · Score: 1

      Not every game is available on Steam.

      Or Impulse. Or GOG.

      But you still have a point: Not every game is available on PCs at all. A lot of games unavailable on PCs have multiplayer modes suited for gamepads, a 32" monitor, and a sofa more than for a LAN party.

    92. Re: optical drive by tepples · · Score: 1

      The particular backup media doesn't alter basic industry best practices.

      Other than perhaps that optical's reliability is such that it might require more parity data and more independent copies than flash or HDD would.

    93. Re: optical drive by tepples · · Score: 1

      People are not renting DVDs any longer

      Have they all switched to Blu-ray Disc? Or have they all switched to iTunes Store, Netflix Instant Watch, Amazon Prime, and other online video rental services that eat a healthy chunk of a plan's monthly cap? They probably have, given that most of them are probably urban or suburban, and cable and DSL reach most urban and suburban areas.

      Some areas have a higher than usual younger user base (Portland)

      OR or ME?

    94. Re: optical drive by tepples · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to think what would happen if I forgot what was on the disc and reformatted it.

      That's why I label any disc, flash drive, or memory card that has data that I want to keep. I keep a rotating backup set of my programming project repository on a pair of 4 GB SD cards, with homemade labels taped on: "Pino backup bravo" and "Pino backup charlie". (There was an alpha, but it got lost in a move when it was the off-site backup at a relative's house.)

    95. Re: optical drive by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      For some, they might be able to do everything over the net or use a USB optical drive on rare occasions. I use mine quite a bit. For starters, I archive any music I buy on line. I also periodically archive any code I've written. The CD players in my workshop and my wife's car only support ordianry CDs (not even a line in jack!), so I burn things for those. I also pick up the occasional game on fixed media as well. And lastly, since storage has gotten cheaper, I'm re-ripping all of my CDs at a higher bit-rate. I don't need the archives very often, but when I do, boy am I glad they're there.

      On a related note to the article, I rebuilt all of the PCs at my office late last fall. Windows is licensed separately, so that wasn't an issue, but I spent about $250 upgrading all of them to i3 processors (which for a non-gamming non-development/graphics desktop is positively luxurious) and related equipment. For a business desktop, they are flat out pimpin' and I really couldn't conceive spending more than that. Possibly upgrade the RAM from 2gb to 4gb, but there, we're only talking $17/unit and I don't really care about my users enough to justify that. :)

    96. Re: optical drive by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      No, titties come on something called a DVD.

    97. Re: optical drive by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      History books? Yeah, I've seen those on the Internet.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    98. Re: optical drive by Rudie · · Score: 1

      Grammar

    99. Re: optical drive by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      According to Google the closest Frys is 14197 miles away, involves 3 major kayaking events and some 80 toll roads.

      I think I can source them more locally :)

  55. ARM is a good architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ARM is a good architecture. It offers the 16 registers recommended, and fast interrupt registers, for quick processor mode changes (helpful for micro kernels). Its 32 bit instructions have conditional instructions to avoid small loops. ARM pioneered the high density code instruction set with Thumb. Today, MIPS is copying the ARM's past innovations.

  56. Re:Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lif by scottbomb · · Score: 1

    Good point. I have already started using an HD for backups but I still back up to optical too, just in case the HD dies. It certainly is a chore to make several DVDs to back up several GB of files but at least if one or two go bad, I have more backups. If a HD goes bad, I'm screwed.

    However, even more to your point, the price per GB falls every year and capacity increases. Behold HD size in rough terms:

    1985: top-of-the-line HD had MAYBE 10MB. It also cost about $5000.
    1995: about 8-10 GB. Cost: I honestly don't know.
    2005: about 500 GB.... around $120.
    Today: 2TB... $90.

    Imagine 2020... or 2030... holy shit. I can see the Fry's ad now: "100 PB for $120. While supplies last." [Factoring in the estimated inflation].
    But what the hell does someone do with 100 PB? As is the case with CPU speeds, we will eventually hit a ceiling. Except in this case, the ceiling will be what is practical vs. what is possible. I can't imagine someone ever using that much HD space except for perhaps a company that never destroys old customer data.

  57. Re:Decent Computer? by retchdog · · Score: 1

    crossover office is $40-70 and works well in my experience.

    it's not that much more $$$ in addition to microsoft office and if you're pirating that, then go ahead and pirate crossover too.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  58. Re:Decent Computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys, we have a heretic amongst us who will not suck Linux cocks. Get the pitchfork and torches out!

  59. Re:Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with by cjackson0 · · Score: 1

    Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with a case for under $30 much less a under $30 psu.

    Get off your horse. One of the best power supplies I ever owned was free after mail-in rebate: a 500 watt no name brand.

  60. Re:Decent Computer? by HJED · · Score: 1

    I have used WINE for MS Office (which I did not pirate) in the past and it has worked reasonably well (although still a pain, which is why CrossOver Office exists) however it would not have been easy enough for an average user (don't know if CrossOver Office fixes this). If I ever switched to a none dual boot system in the future I might get it (at this point in time there are often stupid little things I need Win 7 for).
    In general linux seems to be slightly less stable then win 7, I do however use Ubuntu as my primary OS.
    It is good for power users (who can debug computer problems such as weird file permissions and edit config files) and I would suggested it for that class of users, however I would not suggest it to Joe Average.

    --
    null
  61. But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is do you really want to be a cheapskate on something you are going to use hours everyday?

    1. Re:But.. by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Not everyone is slashdot users that go home and spend hours in their mother's windowless basement on the computer. Most real people just want to check their email / facebook / watch a couple of youtube videos / copy photos off their camera.

  62. Re:All recent Computer architectures are dogs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And by "is" you mean "are".

  63. Re:Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lif by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

    But what the hell does someone do with 100 PB? As is the case with CPU speeds, we will eventually hit a ceiling. Except in this case, the ceiling will be what is practical vs. what is possible. I can't imagine someone ever using that much HD space except for perhaps a company that never destroys old customer data.

    You lack imagination then. I can easily think of someone using that much without even breaking a sweat, like e.g. many people like to keep a pristine collection of their music files as FLAC files, and those tend to take a lot of space. Similarly, many people like to keep 1:1 copies of their movies and animation and TV series, and even at 1080p those tend to eat space like crazy. And just think about it: in 2020 1080p will be really low resolution and movies will likely weigh in at about 200Gb even with reasonable compression.

    And think about it, sometimes people have computers serving the whole family. I too have a home server with 2.5Tb storage at the moment, and it's starting to get full, and it's only serving 3 PCs. With a moderately-sized family it could get filled up pretty fast with everyone storing their stuff there.

    I do give you that that text-documents and Excel spreadsheets don't use that much space, but many people use their PCs for much more than just using those kinds of files.

  64. I built a desktop for $199 six months ago... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    From www.tigerdirect.com I bought one of their "kit" computers with an AMD Quad Core CPU, 2gb of Ram, a 500gb HD, a DVD r/w, and Ubuntu. I added a kb with a touchpad that I already had around the office and "viola!" a sub-200 desktop *with* optical drive. I haven't done a thing to it since... and I'm posting from it now.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  65. Re:Decent Computer? by retchdog · · Score: 1

    crossover makes it a one-click operation.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  66. Re:Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lif by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    But what the hell does someone do with 100 PB?...
    ...I can't imagine someone ever using that much HD space except for perhaps a company that never destroys old customer data.

    It seems to me I remember sometime along in the early 90's arguing with my wife about whether to put a 40MB HD in our new comp, or an 85MB HD. The wife couldn't imagine ever filling up 40MB, much less 85 MB.

    Pretty much same argument happened a few years back, arguing over whether to put a 250GB HD in a new comp. That time, *I* was the one who couldn't imagine ever needing that much space.

    And in the same way, our grandkids will wonder how we ever managed to limp along with ONLY 1 PB of HD in our comps....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  67. Beagle or panda by oki900 · · Score: 2

    Beagleboards are 149.00USD and Pandaboards are 179.00USD you then just need an SD card 4G or better. I run a pandaboard myself for some D-Star ham radio stuff.

  68. Re:Decent Computer? by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

    1) Itunes - sure there are plenty of great media players and what not for linux... but if you have an ios device whether its a new ipod, ipod touch, iphone, or ipad (and literally tens of millions of completely normal people do, they need itunes).

    My dad uses Winamp to sync his iPod. He wants to manage his music the way he wants to do it, and not the way Apple tells him to do it. Now granted, Winamp is Windows software, and while I don't know of or care to find similar software for Linux, saying it requires iTunes is false.

    2) TurboTax etc... yep its just one week a year. But millions of completely ordinary people do their taxes with this type of software.

    TurboTax doesn't do anything particularly funky with respect to Windows. I see no reason why this couldn't run on WINE. You could argue that most people would have no clue how to run an application through WINE. You could also argue that it's trivial to learn to just prepend 'wine' to the command line, and not much more difficult to make an icon in gnome/kde to do so.

    3) Miscellaneous Toys - from the child friendly Barbie photo manipulation software that came with the Barbie camera to setting up your new Logitech universal remote to an AppleTV to programming a Lego Mindstorms creation with LabView.

    Lego RCX units and Harmony remotes can be programmed on Linux using 3rd party software. Technically, Harmony remotes are programmed on the Logitech servers, through a web application, and the only thing the software is used for is to transfer the profile to the device. LabVIEW offers OSX and Linux versions of all but their bottom end interfaces, and what is someone doing worrying about a $200 computer when they're going to use it to interface with IO boards that start at that price and go way way up? The AppleTV is itself a computer, capable of accessing the iTunes store directly. It has no need for interaction with a PC. If you're talking about streaming content to it, well then there are mechanisms for doing that in Linux too.

    4) Video games - Believe it or not, lots of perfectly normal people play everything from World of Warcraft,to Left4Dead, to the copy of Bejeweled or Riven they picked up at Walmart for $7 as an impulse buy.

    A quick check puts some 5000 games and applications on the Platinum and Gold compatibility list for WINE. Yes, people will be afraid of things like WINE, but suck it up and put out a little effort if you want to avoid that $100 Windows OEM license. WOW, L4D, and Bejeweled are all on the Platinum list, meaning it works perfectly out-of-the-box with no special configuration.

    5) Peripherals - Printer fax scanner copier combination devices in particular still suck with linux. Getting printing going is usually relatively straightforward, but anything else is a complicated crapshoot.

    I can't speak to other print companies but HP offers the HPLIP drivers, with support for some 2000 different pieces of hardware. Using it, I had absolutely no trouble getting printing or scanning working on my all-in-one unit.

  69. Re:Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with by Renegrade · · Score: 1

    Ever measured the power drain on that? Don't forget to factor in power factor. My old Athlon XP system (which was stripped down of various high-drain performance parts when it became a server) has more draw than my i7 potato cooker thanks to it's no-name 350W supply's 0.67 power factor vs. the 0.98 or so power factor of the i7's high end PSU. Never mind that the voltage from the cheapy PSU varies quite a bit and is actually out of tolerance on the 5V side. I'd replace it, but that machine is due for retirement anyhow as it's now a backup to a backup server...

    I do a bit of consulting on the side, and most system failures are caused by no name, came-with-the-cheap-case power supplies. It's like the good old C64 era all over again: most of those died due to the epoxy-filled craptastic power supply being wildly out of spec.

    PSU test results:

    AMD Athlon XP 2500+ - 110W @0.67 PF = 164W
    Intel i7 920 - 130W @0.98 PF = 133W

    This is fully powered up (no sleep states) but not doing any heavy workload. Heavy workload flips those around, of course, but the older PSU is still using an extra 50% power for nothing other than heating the mains wires.

  70. Re:Decent Computer? by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since moving to Linux 2 years ago, both Windows and OS X are crap.

  71. Re:Decent Computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Itunes - sure there are plenty of great media players and what not for linux... but if you have an ios device whether its a new ipod, ipod touch, iphone, or ipad (and literally tens of millions of completely normal people do, they need itunes).

    My dad uses Winamp to sync his iPod. He wants to manage his music the way he wants to do it, and not the way Apple tells him to do it. Now granted, Winamp is Windows software, and while I don't know of or care to find similar software for Linux, saying it requires iTunes is false.

    Great. Now please provide instructions for syncing up the music on my ipod touch using winamp? And perhaps you didn't notice it, but the GP said NEW ipods, not just ipods. I'm not familiar with any of the most recent regular ipod devices, but since he specifically singled out NEW ipods, I'm assuming that means they now work much like the touch/iphone/etc and no longer work with 3rd party software

  72. Re:Decent Computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Libre office has out of the box docx support, next!

  73. Re:Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with by dnorf87 · · Score: 1

    Not only the power factor issue, but that "500w" power supply has a whole 18 amps available on the +12v rail. A whole 216 watts of power available. Go ahead and try to find even a decently built 350w with less amperage on the +12v rails. It won't be easy. I've seen far too many generic power supplies failing, taking other components out with them. I've seen MANY more cases of this than brand name power supplies taking out the motherboard when it fails, even if it was defective on the first power up. A little research on power supplies can go a long way.

  74. I call shenanigans by Rix · · Score: 1

    If you take out the mail in rebate (which they probably won't honour, and even if they do it will be six months later), it clocks in just over $200.

  75. On a budget, the used marked is your best friend by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 1

    I understand the fascination with the latest and greatest technology, because I was a willing participant on the upgrade treadmill for many years. But I realized that the best price to performance ratio is actually in used gear.

    For the $191 the authors of the article spent on brand new items I could have built a system that is at least twice more powerful, and with better components all around. As an example, I found a Phenom II X4 955 with OEM heatsink for only $4 more than they spent on their Athlon II X2 270. I have many more examples, but the general trend is a used previous generation component will be about twice cheaper than a new current generation component.

    When buying used there is the issue of limited availability and timing, since you do need to check your local deals sites daily to find what you need. But even in the worst case scenario I was able to build a system from scratch within a week or two, without compromising on components quality. I may not have been able to chose between Sapphire, eVGA or Asus when buying a new video card, but when saving hundreds of dollars over the brand new prices it suddenly doesn't matter that much.

    One thing the article got right was their choice of processors. If costs are not an issue and the overriding criterion is performance, then Intel is your only option. But AMD is by far a much better value as a platform. Most reviews I've seen are comparing the price and performance of the CPUs themselves, but that is only part of the picture. When you add the motherboard and RAM to the equation, an Intel platform becomes significantly more expensive. When the Core i series was released, the cost of the Intel CPU, motherboard and DDR3 RAM was roughly twice more than an equivalent AMD setup with DDR2 RAM, even though the overall performance difference was under 10%.

    At that time I chose an AMD Phenom II X4 945 because ironically it was faster than an Intel Core i7 920 when playing Bethesda games (Oblivion and Fallout3 at that time).

  76. My $250 system build from Micro Center! by dnorf87 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've done quite a few system builds using this AMD bundle deal that Micro Center has had going on for some time now. Every single system works flawlessly, even the ones with the Powerspec case/power supply (more business if the PSU does fail, and I haven't seen one take a motherboard out yet.)

    Phenom II X2 560 Black edition: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0347369 $87.99
    Biostar A780L3G AM3 760G mATX Motherboard: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0351634 $FREE
    Western Digital Caviar Blue 500gb SATA 6.0gbps: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0352164 $49.99
    Micro Center branded 2x2gb of DDR3 1333: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0353218 $19.99
    PowerSpec TX-381 Micro ATX Computer Case: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0330536 $24.99
    Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 500w PSU: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0295037 $37.99
    Samsung 22x SATA DVD-RW drive: http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0293049 $21.99
    Grand Total of $255.10 after tax.

    You have an overclockable dual core CPU (I wouldn't push too far with the stock heatsink and with that motherboard, but a little bump to 3.6 GHz shouldn't be an issue.), better graphics than the system in the article, twice as much system memory (4gb vs. 2gb), an optical drive, an actual decent power supply, a case with a handle on it, and I could probably go on, but i'd hope you all get the point. A whole $45 more before tax, not including the lame $8 mail in rebate for the power supply. Definitely worth every penny, and this is all something you could pick up and have together in a couple hours assuming you have a store close to you. Most would likely pay $40+ for the convenience alone. I also didn't shop around too much. Better might be possible.

    1. Re:My $250 system build from Micro Center! by kenh · · Score: 1

      Another nice option would be to swap out the AMD 560 CPU & MB bundle and instead use Microcenter's i3-2100 & MSI MB for $110 (MB is $9.99 when bought w/ CPU). Also, if you go with the same power spec case w/ power supply and forgo optical drive, you can still hit $200 (+/- couple dollars). Maybe even with enough left over for a 4 gig USB key to boot OS install from.

      --
      Ken
  77. Used is the way to go. by JeremyMorgan · · Score: 1

    I'm typing this from a G4 laptop I threw Debian on. It has everything I need for a "modern" OS and I do web development on it. Paid $200 bucks and couldn't be happier. Well I could, but for the price you can't beat it. If people really want to get the best hardware for cheap, hit up craigslist and put Linux on something, it's the best bang for your buck.

  78. Play your cards right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore netbooks and Ipads and crap and you can get yourself setup with a basic video editing workstation.
    The question is do you really want to keep buying throwaway mobile toy electronics, or set the path for a base level video editing workstation? Forget about the ARTICLE for a minute. Ya know? Fuck $200. Save your money till you have $300, or $400 . Quit mortgaging your life away.

  79. I seriously hope you guys don't do this. by partyguerrilla · · Score: 1

    >Optical media
    >2011

  80. Re:Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lif by froggymana · · Score: 1

    Isn't that why you would also want to use a filesystem such as ZFS for better file integrity along with putting several of the drives in RAID so that you can just replace one if it fails.

    --
    "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  81. Sure! better get a single core and a real PSU by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Never skimp on the PSU, it will make your hardware less durable, sound worse quality, will behave badly with power micro-outages, take down your PC in a thunderstorm instead of only it failing and so on.

    You should cheap out on the rest, even get a Sempron if it's what it takes, as it's worth former $1000 CPUs such as Athlon FX 57 and Pentium 4 Extreme Edition. It even unlocks into Athlon X2 with a simple BIOS setting. You profit from not having to run an antivirus and adobe, java, quicktime etc. updater.

    Regarding optical drive : get an used one from the trash, even the one from your Pentium 166 will install ubuntu just fine (and is better at ripping damaged CDs). Even the case can be scavenged from the pentium 2/3 era and will be a bit higher quality and easier to work with.

    You should get a $40 PSU, not a $30 PSU + case. a 400W or 350WFortron / FSP group one is rock solid and will run your PC stable for a decade. Those a real watts too :).

  82. Print version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.pcmag.com/article/print/287106

    Why don't you fuckers just put these in the summary?

  83. Re:On a budget, the used marked is your best frien by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I agree. Buying a new computer is a worse deal than buying a new car. I just got a refurbished HP laptop with 6 GB RAM, 750 GB HD, 17" monitor, and Intel Core I5 for less than $400. Equivalent desktops can be gotten for less than $200.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  84. Gimme You Gold Bitchez, Intranet blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tehe money you save in energy will be initially (did I say initial, I meant instantly) lost in getting new fans with no noise! , when you FIGURE it out that you need the smaller than normal fan, and it uses even LESS watts, and costs less and the dude that sells them is legit then your stoked. Maybe you even dare try to provide your own power to it? Whoever made these racks, did a brilliant job. Unlike the Brilliant banksters. There's your trend hint for the day

  85. Re:Decent Computer? by vux984 · · Score: 1

    My dad uses Winamp to sync his iPod. He wants to manage his music the way he wants to do it, and not the way Apple tells him to do it. Now granted, Winamp is Windows software, and while I don't know of or care to find similar software for Linux, saying it requires iTunes is false.

    We were talking about "most people" tm, remember. That you can get some limited functionality out of the device without itunes in some cases with other software is completely irrelevant.

    TurboTax doesn't do anything particularly funky with respect to Windows. I see no reason why this couldn't run on WINE.

    "Normal people" tm don't install WINE or even know what it is. All they know is the CD doesn't work, and the TurboTax support line is telling them Linux is absolutely not supported.

    Lego RCX units and Harmony remotes can be programmed on Linux using 3rd party software. ...and...
    5000 games are on the platinum list...

    "normal people" tm just know the bundled CD doesn't work, and the support line can't help them.

    I don't disagree in the slightest that a lot of this stuff can be made to work, and even made to work well. I might be able to do it. but my Mom isn't going to be able to do it. WINE is not "trivial". Running windows applications on linux is not a unified experience... the folder paths inside the application don't match the ones outside - for example, there can be font issues for another.... And if you have any trouble, support can't help you.

    "I can't speak to other print companies but HP offers the HPLIP drivers, with support for some 2000 different pieces of hardware. Using it, I had absolutely no trouble getting printing or scanning working on my all-in-one unit."

    Network scanning or just via the USB cable? What about faxxing? Does the automatic document feeder work? What about duplexing? When you say you had no trouble getting it working, is that because you like me know what your doing... or could my mom do it too with no trouble?

  86. Good for linux! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    the geforce 6100 is still supported by the latest proprietary nvidia drivers. it's very slow but will run your quake 2 and quake 3, tux, 2D opengl games which are the only ones easily running on linux anyway.

    1. Re:Good for linux! by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      no its not, its supported by the legacy driver. and thats it

      hell my geforce7800GT wasnt even supported by the current driver, legacy only

  87. Built this in 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This CPU and memory amount cost a bit more in 2009, but I think I spent under €300 overall (including the HDDs).

    Nowadays I would want to equip a new PC with at least 4GB, particularly since the additional cost is about €30-€40.

  88. Re:Decent Computer? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Sorry to burst your bubble. They have not changed, so they were crap before. You have changed.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  89. Re:Decent Computer? by couchslug · · Score: 0

    "in 2014 hundreds of millions of XP boxes go EOL."

    By then they'll be so obsolete it will be time for fresh hardware for those who care, or yet another clean install for those who don't care about EOL (most users).

    "And then guys like me will simply strip or dump all those XP boxes and you won't gain shit."

    Good, more boxes for me to reload with XP and sell at the flea market. (Tried Linux, no one wants them.)

    To end users, "Windows" IS the computer. They have time invested in learning it, and don't NEED to learn anything different. They don't give a fraction of a fuck about what anyone else thinks they should do.

    I prefer Linux, but consumers and non-geeks could care less.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  90. optical is the new floppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    optical drive in a modern machine what do you want next a floppy?
    i dont own a computer with a optical drive and there is 6 machines in my house.

  91. Re:Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > in 2020 1080p will be really low resolution and movies will likely weigh in at about 200Gb even with reasonable compression.

    Hmm. Thought experiment: Normal high def movies today still tend to be under 10 GB. Let's round way up to 20 GB. The next resolution will be "4K" - double in both directions, so 4x the pixels. That only gets us up to 40-80 GB and assumes compression doesn't get any better than the current h264. Current optical disc tech (blu ray) is supposed to handle 100 GB per disc - that'd be four layers instead of today's 1-2 layers, so it'd easily handle 40-80 GB movies but not 200GB movies.

    And 4K is a ridiculously good resolution. Most people today already sit too far from their HDTV to fully perceive the top high def resolution. At the same distance, they'd need a 4K TV of double the diagonal length to perceive the same percentage of quality of a 4K video. 70"-120" TVs? Oh dear. Time to completely redesign the living room again.

  92. Re:Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lif by PwnzerDragoon · · Score: 1

    640GB ought to be enough for everybody.

  93. reuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy one that has been already used. Why not? With 200 buckets you can get a good PC (better then this) and recycling instead of throwing away new e-waste.

  94. two words by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    two words, raspberry pi

    http://www.raspberrypi.org/

    An ARM Linux box for $25

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    1. Re:two words by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      No, they will end up shipping units for at least double that, if at all, everyone misjudges how much it actually costs to put a product into retail in unit 1 vs case lots. And remember they don't even include a case, power brick or USB hub in that price. Plus the $25 Model A is pretty crippled, only 128MB RAM and no ethernet. So start with the Model B which will end up shipping at closer to $70, add a case and power brick for another $20, a USB hub so you can connect a keyboard AND a mouse and you are up to a hundred dollars. Not such a bargain anymore is it. eBay has ARM based Google G1 phones new in the box closing out for a hundred or so right now that have a decent ARM cpu, the 128MB ram of the base Model A plus a display and keyboard and lots of radios, WiFi and BT being the most useful for a tinkering project that repurposes the hardware. No you don't get the HDMI port which is a bummer.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  95. Re:Decent Computer? by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

    It looks like he changed for the better.

  96. Apple axed the optical drive first... by cynop · · Score: 0

    ...In their 2011Mac Minis . With app stores pushed to the consumers, Optical Drives seems to fade away. Even Microsoft is supporting natively the .iso files in win8, another nod to a system with no optical drive.

  97. Re:Decent Computer? by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

    I manage over a dozen boxes with Ubuntu on them. The only hardware that ever caused me headaches are printers. Everything else Just Works.

    And even printers are nowhere near as problematic as on the Windows side: I recently connected a new printer to one of those computers: Lexmark E260. The biggest (and only) problem was deleting the old printer and renaming the new one. Both easily done with GUI. The drivers were installed automatically.

  98. Re:Decent Computer? by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Notice how none of the Linux zealots can stand the truth? i could line links up all damned day showing everyone from giant corps like Walmart to little shops like mine running away screaming because Linux is a fiddly CLI heavy bitch, but will they listen? Oh fuck no, they still have raging hard ons for the days of the PDP11 when everyone that used a computer was a programmer and neckbeards were the rage. i mean for the love of God RMS still calls everyone "hackers" like he is at a computer club meeting in 75. Wake up and smell the last 20 years of computing folks!

    As for your point about being "too old"? bullshit, total bullshit. frankly once PCs reached around 2GHz they became "good enough" for all your basic web tasks which is what I'd say a good 60% to 70% of the people out there only use a PC for. Add to that any AMD AM2 or Socket 775 out there can be trivially upgraded to a dual core (hell I can get Pentium Ds all day long for less than $20 that frankly kick ass for all basic tasks and even MMOs) and there frankly isn't a reason to shitcan them except for the license issue. I'm sure many of the smaller shops will just load "Win 7 Razr1911" and call it a day but I run a legit shop.

    But as for why nobody wants Linux? I'd argue because it is a fiddly little PITA that is why. Linux has the reputation of being a difficult to use OS FOR A DAMNED GOOD REASON and that is because it IS a PITA to use fiddly little OS. As I said look at the 80% hardware there should NEVER be a failure of that hardware, ever. Hell Windows has carried OOTB drivers for the 80% hardware since Win2K and you know what? it actually works!

    Compare this to Linux where Linus' constantly going Goatse on the kernel and insane release schedule means broken driver after broken driver. And before anyone says bullshit i'll be happy to post a HUGE list of "update foo broke my driver" links if you'd like, the forums are literally overflowing with them. it is simple XYZ math folks, you have X amount of guys qualified to do driver work, you have Y times tens of thousands of drivers, and you have Torvalds Z breaking shit left and right. Even if the guys qualified to fix drivers never slept and did nothing but fix drivers 24/7 they would NEVER keep up, it is simply mathematically impossible.

    Most likely all these machines which could be running Linux, as for that 60%+ there is not a damned thing they do that wouldn't work perfectly on Linux, simply will either have pirate Windows loaded or EOLed XP, and that is a damned shame. So much work by the community pissed down a rathole by Torvalds ego. you have great DEs, plenty of software, versions that will run on anything from a 300Mhz with 128Mb of RAM to a supercomputer, but until you get rid of the damned CLI horseshit and drivers are "write once, use for years" so that they aren't constantly breaking? Linux simply won't go anywhere. look at the numbers folks, it is below the margin for error. it was below the margin for error four years ago, it will be below the margin for error four years from now if things don't change.

    Give the people what they want, all GUI, easy to use and manage, with no driver breakage constantly? Watch them beat a path to your door. Continue with this CLI neckbeard fixation, with the constant driver Goatse, and expecting the world to do things YOUR way and calling them trolls or idiots when they won't? enjoy your 1%. You already have the "fight teh powerz!" types, and the power users have no problems with Windows, so no growth there. you NEED the home users, see the giant 50 foot neon sign screaming CONSUMERS and get in the game, or don't be surprised when nobody pays attention to you.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  99. Re:Decent Computer? by walshy007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not this hardware abi driver interface bullshit again, you bring it up all the time.. and it is addressed all the time. ( I think this is the third of fourth time I've replied to you on this topic on /. alone, usually long write-ups but don't have the time today)

    While this is old, it is something you may find interesting. In short, you don't want a fixed abi, what you want, are stable drivers.

  100. Re:Decent Computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice troll, dude.

  101. Re:On a budget, the used marked is your best frien by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    In June I got a brand new Dell XPS L502x with 4GB RAM, 500GB RAM and Quad Core i7 and a 15" 1080p screen (NVidia graphics, but of the "bad" Optimus kind).... For 525€ (Always count 1$=1€ when the dollar is weak). How did I do it? Pure luck. I've been subscribed to their newsletter for ages as you pretty much always can get 5% off. If you need a computer, that 5% is at least 5%. Sometimes they do this action "scratch ticket style". You get a code, and this code will give you 5%, 10%, 25% or 50% off. I never expected they would actually give anyone 50%, but I amused myself setting together a laptop I'd think would be nice, but for which I would never have paid full price. I entered my code and to my astonishment, I got the 50% off.

    I bought 3 machines. One for my sister, one for my brother and one for me. I could have ordered up to 5, but my credit card wouldn't have let me. (Max 2000€/month)

    Now, I agree you had a good deal, but you can get nifty *new* stuff cheap too...

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  102. pioneErs by eyenot · · Score: 1

    Great, because, people living in poverty who need affordable computing also typically have permanent residences, consistent (running) AC power, and not enough to carry around during the busy day already -- they need PCs.

    This will be worth reading when it's about laptops.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    1. Re:pioneErs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming from poverty, put any computer you are giving to a poor person in the oldest, beige-est, heaviest PC form factor you can find... Then epoxy some lead plates in the bottom of the case. Theft by family members/interlopers is the biggest problem for poor people and old-looking machines that take two people to carry are safest.

      That being said, put whatever guts you want in, just use deb stable with no visual effects when others are around and everyone will assume it is ancient and worthless. Can't run windows games, weighs a ton, beige case, even the pawn shops won't take it.

  103. Re:Optical still wins when it comes to $ & lif by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    And just think about it: in 2020 1080p will be really low resolution

    Pure bullshit.

    1080p isnt going away any time soon. Hell, its not even the standard resolution yet (that would be 720p)

    Also, over the past 10 years the number of pixels per inch has gone DOWN towards lower densities, not UP towards higher densities. ~150 pixels per inch was fairly typical on mid-to-high end CRT's but then the LCD craze happened and nearly everyone is now running only 100 pixels per inch or less ('cept in niche cases like hand held devices)

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  104. Shocker of Shockers by retroworks · · Score: 1

    Over 50% of worldwide PC sales fit this price and description. "White box" manufacturing, aka the "Good enough" market, overtook name brands way back. This is news to the wealthy OECD nations, I guess, but sales in those countries are now less than half of worldwide sales, and white box PCs are about 35% of sales even in the USA.

    --
    Gently reply
  105. pfft. Sub $200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For kicks, I just spec'ed up a Mac Pro on the apple store. Under $20130.00 fully optioned. (I didn't buy it though)

  106. Re:Decent Computer? by walshy007 · · Score: 1

    And I just wound up 'fixing' a windows xp home theatre pc using linux.

    The machines tv tuner card drivers had severe problems, and both the on-board video and tv tuner card did not have windows 7 drivers.

    Linux was installed, everything appeared perfectly and as a bonus it now functions as a mythtv backend allowing new functionality the owner is really pleased with.

    What use is windows when perfectly good hardware can be deprecated by the vendors at their whim (the motherboard was made late 2006, driver support discontinued 2008)

    In regards to wireless, what chipsets are you purchasing that aren't supported? last I checked between the ath5k, ath9k, rt2x00 drivers the overwhelming majority of common hardware has been handled elegantly. I can just plug in a nintendo wifi usb stick and bam wireless is there, same with my pci ar2431 board. No bullshit, plug and play.

    Circa 2005-2007 I would have wholeheartedly agreed with you linux wifi support was more than questionable. These days actually being hard-pressed to find hardware that doesn't "just work" out of the box is a testament to how much it has improved.

  107. Raspberry PI by Lando · · Score: 1

    Frankly, the Raspberry PI looks like a decent system that after adding monitor, keyboard, and various other usb items would make a great computer system for under $200. I plan to pick up several of these when they come on the market and it doesn't appear that they are vapourware like many items from other companies in the past.

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  108. What? When was the last time you used linux? by novar21 · · Score: 1

    1) Itunes - sure there are plenty of great media players and what not for linux... but if you have an ios device whether its a new ipod, ipod touch, iphone, or ipad (and literally tens of millions of completely normal people do, they need itunes)."

    Umm - my daughter uses I-Tunes on her Ubuntu machine. She's 17, and had no problem installing it and getting her ipod working.

    2) TurboTax etc... yep its just one week a year. But millions of completely ordinary people do their taxes with this type of software.

    LOL - been doing my Turbox Tax on the web under fedora and ubuntu for years. Cheaper than buying the CD's at the store. I have access to all of the forms and everything. Plus I dont have to waste space on my machine with software I only use once.

    3) Miscellaneous Toys - from the child friendly Barbie photo manipulation software that came with the Barbie camera to setting up your new Logitech universal remote to an AppleTV to programming a Lego Mindstorms creation with LabView. This affects far more people than you might think.

    Dont use any of those. Dont have any need, so I cant say if this is true or not.

    4) Video games - Believe it or not, lots of perfectly normal people play everything from World of Warcraft,to Left4Dead, to the copy of Bejeweled or Riven they picked up at Walmart for $7 as an impulse buy.

    I run 3d games all the time under Fedora. I used to use Ubuntu for games, but recently changed to gaming under Fedora. I run imprudence as well as others.

    5) Peripherals - Printer fax scanner copier combination devices in particular still suck with linux. Getting printing going is usually relatively straightforward, but anything else is a complicated crapshoot.

    I have an HP8180C. It prints, copies, scans. Never had any issue under Fedora or Ubuntu. I have a wireless Logitec mouse and keyboard connected to my Ubuntu machine. Never had any problem, Anything I connect to these machines works just fine. I also burn DVD movies under Ubuntu. Hook up my digital camcorder to my firewire port on my laptop running Ubuntu. Copy off all of my daughters high school events and burn them to cd's or DVD's for her and my wife.

    I really wish people would stop with these old worn out generalizations. If you dont like Linux, fine dont use it. But please dont tell people that it wont work for anyone. It works fine for my family and many of my neighbours and friends.

  109. Re:Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with by swalve · · Score: 1

    Power factor has nothing to do with power consumption.

  110. Sub-$200 is not a good focus by RanceJustice · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure that we should be focusing on the sub-200 spot at all. The greatest gains are in the 250-550 range; exponential power increases over something at the extreme low-end and newer tech too. I am assuming this is "building an inexpensive PC for anyone" focused more than "building for the extremely impoverished" which really shouldn't even be thought of in terms of retail - either donated/refurbished foundation hardware, and laptops at best, provide for that resource.

    As others have shown, the article's box is really not that great and for the same or a little more you can do a lot better. Just buying bundles and sale items from Newegg, Microcenter/Fry's can do MUCH better. Also, its important to note that bargain basement is not always the best way to go, especially with components like PSUs. I also believe we need to start defining what "The Computer" requires. There's been more debate than ever on the nature of including an optical drive or not in this thread, and clearly including a modern LCD monitor (20", widescreen) is going to easily put a few hundred more dollars to the cost of the build. Finally, I think we need to start taking second-hand components into consideration. Here are my opinions on the "questionables"

    1. Keyboard and Mouse - Depends. If a first-time buyer or intended as an "always on" PC (no switching existing inputs for maintenance) these are necessary. Thankfully, they're also inexpensive. A cheap optical mouse can be had for as little as $5-10 today. Likewise, keyboards. Spending a little more on each will provide powerful 5-7 button mice and ergonomic keyboards. This should probably be considered after the system is otherwise built and if necessary, equipped with the leftover money and to the user's specs (ie. if this is going to be a HTPC, then wireless may be a good option if available)

    2. Optical and/or USB storage - One or the other is mandatory, but it really depends on again the user's situation. Where are they getting their OS? If this is their first PC they have no way to write a Linux distro to a USBkey, but they CAN get a free or ultra low cost disc from one of the linux burning programs. Internal are cheaper, but external are far more flexible - these days I have a single, external DVD SuperMulti DL (Which doesn't require an AC adapter) drive that I use whenever I need to install something from disc (save for the one that came in my laptop). There's also the consideration that typically discs "Just Work" even in Linux, but there can be some annoyances getting a USB drive or SD card flagged, formatted, and mounted properly to replicate a disc. Is there an equivalent of something as easy as "Linux Live USB Creator" on Linux itself? If you opt to go without optical, there needs to be a software way to ensure that USB or cards can replicate optical in every meaningful way. Of course, this may become impossible if you have a user that often buys media on disc, unless they wish to start getting said media from elsewhere.

    3. Monitor - Its hard to justify that a monitor is absolutely required in this day and age, when most households have one or more "monitors" of their own - TVs I see monitors as separate component and for most users it works out this way. Sure, its nice to be able to give your desktop PC its own discrete monitor, and you can do it at a relatively affordable price, but it isn't necessary at time of build for MOST users. Some will already have another monitor from an older PC and many who are not technically inclined think you "have" to upgrade the monitor - that's how big box stores tend to sell PCs. Learning that they can use the perfectly fine on they already have usually makes many users happy. In the case of those that don't have a discrete PC monitor yet, but have relatively modern TVs in the house, this is an easy issue to solve. This group makes up a larger percentage of users than one would think - there are homes with 1990s PCs w/14" CRTs or no PC at all, but equipped with one or more 480p compli

    1. Re:Sub-$200 is not a good focus by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      My last build was under $400 - $297 for a kit off Newegg that included a 1TB drive, a quad core processor, a case with a 400 watt PSU, 4 gigs of RAM, and plenty of room for future upgrades. Oh, and an optical drive. I had an existing copy of Windows 7 from my previous PC (which was re-downgraded back to its old XP license and turned into the HTPC) and I tacked on a fairly nice low-power graphics card for $70. This system scores 6.0 on the Windows benchmark, with only the HDD holding it back (so my next upgrade is going to be a SSD to run the OS off.) It runs my games flawlessly and handles my dual monitors with ease. A similar box, without the video card, would have cost me $800 from Best Buy.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Sub-$200 is not a good focus by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Also, the "rich man's shoes" was eloquently rephrased by Terry Pratchett as the "Vime's Theory of Economic Injustice" in one of the earlier Discworld novels.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    3. Re:Sub-$200 is not a good focus by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Of course, even many Costco or WalMart few-hundred dollar HDTVs tend to include HDMI.

      Some have VGA and/or DVI as well, and they have built in speakers. You're limited to 720p with the 19" models though... I have a 1080i/720p (actually 1440x900) that I got at wal-mart back in 08.

  111. Re:On a budget, the used marked is your best frien by swalve · · Score: 1

    The pitfall is things like memory bus speeds and does it have SATA, USB3, PCIe, etc. I like me some used shit, but for performance, it is rarely worth it.

    Although, I was just working on a Compaq Professional Workstation 8000. 1500mb of RDRAM and dual Xeons of some kind, with 15k rpm SCSI 160 (or 320?) drives. Thing is nearly 10 years old, and runs Windows 7 with no static at all. Of course, it was a $10,000 computer when it was new.

  112. Re:Decent Computer? by novar21 · · Score: 2

    Network scanning or just via the USB cable?

    I have both USB and Network scanning (wireless) just fine. No special actions necessary. Just asked Fedora to find the unit.

    What about faxxing?

    yup, not a problem.

    Does the automatic document feeder work? What about duplexing?

    Yes, the automatic document feeder works. Yes, duplexing works.

    When you say you had no trouble getting it working, is that because you like me know what your doing... or could my mom do it too with no trouble?

    My wife and daughters have no problem adding software or hardware to our linux boxes. My wife is not a computer tech, nor are my daughters.

    Now, I dont think anyone is in any position to state that your mom or anyone else can do something without trouble. My Father uses linux. My Mother uses linux. They are in their late 60's early 70's.

  113. Just paid $350 for a new laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acer Aspire 4743Z-4861 at costco on sale for under $350 (including an add-on cheapo mouse).
    P6200, $GB RAM, 500GB HDD, DVD burner, 14" HD LED, Win 7 standard.
    Removed bloatware, added productivity software, and it's the perfect gift for the mother in law.

    Desktops are great for serial system builders (like me) because a few key components can be reused (case, monitor, drives, etc), but commodity machines are the way to go if you're starting from scratch.

  114. Bad computer for someone needing a budget comp. by eepok · · Score: 1

    I ignore the potential for this as a home server as most who have home servers recycle old parts/systems to make them.

    Instead, I have to consider for whom this $200 computer would be made... and that is typically someone who doesn't already have a computer. That said, this is not a "computer" as most people know it.

    There's no keyboard, no mouse, and no monitor. And without an optical drive, there's no ability to watch DVD movies, install software (questionable need with Ubuntu, though), or rip music CDs to MP3s. You may say, "But you can stream the movies you want from Netflix!" And you would be right... but if the person's in need of a $200 budget PC, would the person be paying for cable/dsl internet AND a Netflix subscription? Or would s/he be more immediately concerned with watching the DVDs on hand already?

    It's all based on opinion and experience, yes, but my experience says that anyone who needs a budget PC needs the entire system, not just the tower. Instead of setting an artificial budget and then bending the rules, why not just make the best full system you can with as little money as possible? Because that would be useful. (Tom's Hardware does this from time to time.)

    1. Re:Bad computer for someone needing a budget comp. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Very rarely has the price of the monitor EVER been included in the price of a computer.

      In 30 years of home computing, with the possible exception of the occasional AIO machine it's always been just "the box".

      In the old days, you could just hook your computer up to a TV and things have come full circle in that respect finally.

      If you have a modern TV, then you already have a monitor. The keyboard and mouse are 10 bux, 20 if you want wireless.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Bad computer for someone needing a budget comp. by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Even if you own a big ass gaming rig maybe you want something dirt cheap for the HDTV in the basement or maybe for the kids homework. Hell put a capture card on that rig and you got a mythbuntu server ready to go. Some other example, media server, file server, DNS server, seed box you name it!!!

  115. Big Manufacturers do it all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am pretty sure that if you paid $500 for a desktop computer at a major retailer, then the manufacturer probably built it for less than $200. With retail markup and Windows 7, the thing gets sold for $500 off the shelf. So, this op is basically drawing attention to the fact that if there is little or no retail markup and no Windows 7 cost, the parts of a crappy desktop computer can be bought for $200 or less. Yes. OK.

    Find an single-core AMD cpu on sale somewhere
    track down a refurbished 20 GB pata hard drive or boot from USB stick
    Get the oldest AM2 motherboard, preferably out of the "returns/incomplete" bin from a major retailer
    Go buy practically any broken computer from the Salvation Army and plunder its case and powersupply and optical drive
    Install Linux

    In short, the op is narrowly focused on WHERE you can shop for cheap computer parts. Of course you can build computers for MUCH less than $200 if you extend your search for parts to thrift stores, refurbished parts tables, etc. The convenience factor of just buying a Major Manufacturer's Pre-Built Computer is worth something, though.

  116. 23" monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newegg always has a bunch of monitors on sale, I just looked and there's a 23" 1920x1080 Acer for $139.99 with free shipping. http://www.newegg.com/emailpromo/

    1. Re:23" monitor by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you all mention sweet deals, but they blow the budget totally. A $300+ system just isn't impressive.

  117. Re:Decent Computer? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    2) TurboTax etc... yep its just one week a year. But millions of completely ordinary people do their taxes with this type of software.

    And those people are idiots. They pay money when most of them would qualify for free web file and file the equivalent of the 1040A short form.

  118. Re:Decent Computer? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    Yes the OP is flaming and a bit trollish with thye offtopic ranting about the CLI but there is a solid nugget of truth in there. Drivers ARE breaking a lot.

    Let me give three examples.

    1. A desktop box I own with a Highpoint PATA RAID card. It works fine with RHEL3 or 4 and Fedora up through somewhere before 8. I manually butchered the GPL driver from Highpoint into loading into Fedora 9 & 10 but along that release's update stream they put out a kernel version bump that I couldn't figure out how to patch the driver into so I rolled back the kernel and have been stuck on F10 since. Every release I boot the DVD and check and nope, the regression is still there. Since it is a PATA controller it is doubtful it will ever work again.

    2. My current Thinkpad X200s. It was a current production machine when Fedora 12's update train broke docking on it forcing another kernel rollback and freeze. Fedora 15 finally fixed docking at the cost of GNOME3, hell of a choice ain't it: break docking, break the desktop or run a machine without security patches. What to do, what to do. Fedora 15 with XFCE was my solution.

    3. My boss's Thinkpad running Ubuntu lost the second monitor while docked during an update of xorg this week. Yup, rollback again and freeze. For one update cycle? A year? Who the hell knows. Of course since the current Ubuntu is the last to have GNOME2 it probably won't matter until the desktop suicide mission is resolved.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  119. Re:Decent Computer? by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

    So you fixed OLD SHIT by using Linux, what a fucking surprise. You wanna dumpster dive? linux works great...ohh until you update the thing then you are royally fucked. Have you run apt upgrade yet? bet you haven't, bet you won't either if you have a brain as the entire thing will fall down like a house of cards.

    And waste your mod points, go ahead and throw that tux blankie on your head and go "Leave poor wittle Linux alone!" and maybe you mods and the britney guy can do a tag team thing. Won't change reality. You don't think Linux support sucks? Step right up folks and take the hairyfeet challenge!

    Just go to Walmart.com, Staples.com, and Bestbuy.com, the 3 largest retailers in the USA. Write down all the PC devices on sale or under $100, then go to...lets say Ubuntu forums, since Ubuntu is the most popular ATM. Look up how many devices on sale RIGHT NOW are supported. Go ahead, I'll wait.....You're looking at MAYBE 30%, and that is if you count "support" as an assload of CLI commands that may or may not work depending on whether they have gone from firmware a to firmware f without changing the box (which they do ALL the time).

    As long as Torvalds is in charge you're fucked, end of story. That douchebag acts like it is still 1993 and the kernel is his personal playtoy, not the core of a multibillion dollar ecosystem, its just him and his little friends on IRC except....it ain't 1993 anymore jackass! Your driver model sucks, support for new hotness is terrible, the 6 month upgrades break more shit than they fix, do you REALLY want me to pile on the links of people screaming because the 6 month broke their shit? because this thing could get longer than war and peace, last i looked at the forums we are talking 1000s of posts, which for an OS with only 1% share if pretty impressive in its levels of fail.

    You don't like what I'm saying? Then FIX IT. Demand the kernel be forked or Torvalds "pursue other interests" and get someone in there that makes driver stability job #1, freeze the 6 month upgrade horseshit and replace it with a solid, well thought out 5 year cycle, demand that those who have software in the distros FIX THEIR BROKE SHIT instead of just releasing yet another one, seriously look at the bug trackers, its fucking embarrassing.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  120. Re:Decent Computer? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    How is it flaming? Because the Linux zealots here refuse to accept a single post that isn't "Gee Biff, isn't Linux doubleplusgood? Why it sure is Kim, and RMS smells like cotton candy!"

    NAME A SINGLE THING that isn't true, just one. Broken drivers? You yourself admit that one. CLI heavy? For the love of God they have a term link on the desktop in a good 90% of distros for crying out loud! look on this very forum you'll find a Linux zealot that has taken HALF a quote from me and think it "proves"...something, hell if I know what. But the FULL quote bears repeating until the Linux faithful "get it".

    As far as users are concerned THERE IS NO CLI in Windows or OSX, it doesn't exist. You could rip out CMD tomorrow on every single copy of Windows on the planet and 90%+ wouldn't even notice that is how little it is used. same for OSX. And before someone brings up Powershell that is SERVER TECH and I have yet to actually see it in the wild on a home machine, even once. I mean you can run a DB server on XP too, that don't mean anybody with any sense actually does it.

    Look I have EVERY RIGHT to be royally pissed. i'm tired of being lied to, tired of having smoke blown up my ass, tired of having a bunch of basement dwellers telling me "Use distro X!" when I've already tried damned near a dozen, tired of NOTHING EVER CHANGING. You know what the definition of insanity is? Doing the same thing and expecting a different result. It has been TWENTY YEARS and Linux is STILL at 1%, it was below the margin for error 4 years ago, guess where it will be 4 years from now? same place.

    Like it or lump it folks, but you can't change reality. Neckbeards have gone the way of paneling on cars, 99.9995% of the world is NOT made of programmers, the word is CONSUMERS in giant 50 foot neon, the CLI horseshit and 6 month breakage has been declared a giant DO NOT WANT, yet you continue to do the same tired BS and wonder why retailers like me won't carry your OS? maybe it is because you ignore your customers or insult them?

    But don't worry, you stay on the same path. The world will ignore you, retailers like me won't touch your OS with a 50 foot pole, but you can sit there typing CLI crap you copypasta from some forum and acting like that connects you to the PDP11 using neckbeards of old. See if the world cares. Look at your numbers! If an OS with a $1000 barrier to entry gains while your FREE PRODUCT don't gain shit? Then dammit how big of a fucking cluebat do you need to be whomped upside the head with? UR DOIN IT WRONG

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  121. Re:Decent Computer? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Did you even read what you posted to? read it it is a RELIGIOUS TEXT with the writer going on about how basically they wouldn't be able to Goatse the kernel anymore! Well boo hoo, you can't Goatse the kernel if you actually had to support anything, my heart bleeds.

    And if you think he is right and I'm bullshit, riddle me this? if that approach would work WHY HASN'T IT BEEN DONE? i'll tell you, because like me riding a purple pony with She Ra it is a complete and total fantasy, that's why. you might as well say "Well if we could place a hardware fairy into each copy of Ubuntu, a little neckbeard that would pop out and fix the drivers whenever they break, we wouldn't have no problems with broken drivers!" which is true, but completely impossible.

    Look at the facts...Windows, BSD, Solaris, OSX, OS/2....what do they have in common? A Stable ABI. Do you honestly think that your kernel hackers are so fucking brilliant they know better than the kernel teams of ALL those OSes? Arrogant much? Sadly that is what it comes down to, arrogance and religious dogma. The RMS camp says 'ZOMG If you had a stable ABI you'd lose the 4 freedoms ZOMG!" while ignoring that Nvidia already puts out binary blobs, as do others, it just makes supporting your OS a bigger pain in the ass. And as you found out letting the kernel devs do it can easily end up with fucked and abandoned hardware, they simply don't have enough hours in the day.

    But don't take my word for it, mark this post and come back in a year and watch it come true! linux will gain NO SHARE in the next 12 months, they will gain NO SHARE in the next 24 months, they will gain NO SHARE in the next 36, in short Linux is a dead end in its current incarnation. The masses simply won't deal with the fiddly driver breaking CLI heavy bullshit, like it or lump it. Give the people what they want, give the reatilers a product that is easy to support, watch your numbers rise. Don't? I hope you enjoy where you are at, because you sure as hell ain't going anywhere.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  122. Citation Needed by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Where do you buy this mythical $230 dual core 15.4" eMachines laptop? Used on eBay or Craigslist? Their current model eME443-BZ602, is $329.99.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  123. AMD E-350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I'm late to the party but I'll play this game too. Mine meets to sub-$200 challenge and it has discrete video, HDMI out, optical audio out, 4 GB RAM, SATA 6.0GB/s and will play 1080p video without a hiccup. Throw XBMC on there and you have really nice HTPC.

    Part list permalink: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/14YG
    Part price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/14YG/by_merchant

    CPU: Integrated with Motherboard
    Motherboard: ASRock E350M1 Mini ITX E-350 Motherboard ($99.99 @ Amazon)
    Memory: Corsair Vengeance 4GB (1 x 4GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($18.99 @ Newegg)
    Hard Drive: Samsung Spinpoint F3 500GB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($39.99 @ SuperBiiz)
    Case: Apex MI-008 Mini ITX Tower Case w/250W Power Supply ($39.99 @ Amazon)
    Total: $198.96
    (Prices include shipping and discounts when available.)
    (Generated 2011-09-03 17:30 EDT-0400)

  124. Re:Decent Computer? by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Contrary to your experience, I don't have many driver problems at all with older hardware. Since older hardware is cheap/free, anything I DO have problems with goes on a Winbox.

    However, the reason Windows users don't want Linux is SIMPLY that it's not Windows. They wouldn't give a shit if it worked perfectly. That's not on their radar, at all, ever. I can set up nice stable Linux machines all day but users HAVE their invested YEARS of experience in Windows and don't want to throw that away.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  125. Re:Decent Computer? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    So you are saying Linux is for dumpster divers? Is THAT what you are saying? Because I have to agree with you there as the ONLY PC I EVER saw survive a 6 month upgrade with 100% working drivers was a circa 1999 733Mhz P3 with really old Intel shit. You know what? it ended up in the dump as nobody wants shit that old, not even Goodwill! I can't believe you had the balls to admit that though, bravo good sir!

    As for Windows? bullshit, utter bullshit. hell most people would even know if you changed their OS out tomorrow as long as the icons were in the same place. i work for consumers 6 days a week and you have NO idea how many times I've been told "I have Windows" but they have no damned clue if it is Win98 or Windows 7, they honestly don't know.

    Lets take a look at some facts, shall we? Now for SMBs and SOHO Linux is right out, as QuickBooks/Quicken is God in those markets, and for a good reason i might add, as a single QB Girl (And it is ALWAYS a girl, they must have a union or something) can run the whole damned company with a copy of QB and an expense sheet, but consumers? In my shop I have got to learn their habits quite well, you tell me what they are doing that doesn't work on Linux....they use Firefox, they go to Facebook, they check their webmail, they watch Youtube and if they are guys or females under 30 they also go to Porntube and the like.

    Now is there a SINGLE thing on that list that couldn't run just as well on Linux? Nope not a one. But here is the catch...since I would have to charge MORE for Linux because I'd have to give out lifetime support (And NO, home users won't buy support contracts. Just ask Best Buy how much they howl and scream at even being offered extended warranties) it simply makes no sense. Now if Linux would fix the driver breakage and kill the damned terminal bullshit? Then I could offer the Linux boxes for less and price WILL WIN for a huge number of consumers. this is why Dell can sell tons of $300 laptops even though we both know they are plastic POSes, and why when I get in a load of 4 to 6 year old laptops I sell at $100 each I have them all sold in less than 24 hours. price trumps all for a large majority out there.

    When the Linux community accepts that CLI should have remained in the 80s where it belonged and drivers shouldn't constantly break then and ONLY then will Linux gain share. of course when that happens I'll be riding a purple pony with She Ra because I have never met a more delusional elitist bunch in my whole damned life! I swear I even had one tell me I should encourage my customers to "Embrace the POWER of CLI" like it was the God damned force!

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  126. Re:Decent Computer? by HJED · · Score: 1

    Yeah and have you actually used it, because I have and it doesn’t render correctly (images, tables, word art, etc) as well as converting automatic tables of contents to links

    --
    null
  127. Re:Decent Computer? by walshy007 · · Score: 1

    Did you even read what you posted to?

    Of course, but did you read what you posted to elsewhere in this discussion? This link in particular. You try to make it come off as a thing _against_ the development style of linux, when if you actually read it it simply provides great insight into the evolution of successful software over time.

    read it it is a RELIGIOUS TEXT with the writer going on about how basically they wouldn't be able to Goatse the kernel anymore! Well boo hoo, you can't Goatse the kernel if you actually had to support anything, my heart bleeds.

    All I'm hearing is "I don't have anything solid against this so I'm going to call it like a religion and compare it to a man with a messed up anus." A bit childish don't you think? If you want to attack it come up with technical points against it.

    And if you think he is right and I'm bullshit, riddle me this? if that approach would work WHY HASN'T IT BEEN DONE?

    erm... it has been, or you wouldn't be bitching about it would you? lol

    Look at the facts...Windows, BSD, Solaris, OSX, OS/2....what do they have in common? A Stable ABI.

    What else do they also have in common? Crappy out of the box (and in the case of solaris, os x and os/2 just in general) support for hardware, nowhere near as much code re-use between similar drivers, the deprecation of fully functioning hardware because a vendor now says you need a new device even though the old still runs and suits your functions perfectly, ridiculously long release cycles. The list goes on.

    The RMS camp says 'ZOMG If you had a stable ABI you'd lose the 4 freedoms ZOMG!"

    The rms camp don't even come into this, this is 'we will not fuck over what is best for the kernel in the long run just to temporarily pander to some companies that don't want to play the game and make it better for all'. It is out of pragmatism and what will result in the technically best kernel.

    And as you found out letting the kernel devs do it can easily end up with fucked and abandoned hardware

    Still rocking those MFM hard disks I see? I'm sure since you're running late 70's hard drives that using a kernel a year or so old to still get support of them shouldn't be too much of an issue. I can forgive getting rid of support for 30+ year old devices that realistically are impossible to get, and that can simply use an older version to get support.

    But don't take my word for it, mark this post and come back in a year and watch it come true! linux will gain NO SHARE in the next 12 months, they will gain NO SHARE in the next 24 months, they will gain NO SHARE in the next 36, in short Linux is a dead end in its current incarnation.

    Linux is a kernel, and last I checked, Android/media centres(i.e. wdtv)/routers/servers etc etc are flourishing. But more to the point, from a kernel development perspective why should they care about those who don't use it?

    The sole aim of linux is to be a useful, quality kernel. Who defines quality? Those using it. I think you will find it _very_ hard to argue that linux does not serve a whole range of people far better than any other kernel presently in existence. It scales from your mobile phone to top 500 machines. On any architecture that is powerful enough to run it (even some microcontrollers). With better in-built hardware support than any other os presently.

    The masses simply won't deal with the fiddly driver breaking CLI heavy bullshit, like it or lump it. Give the people what they want, give the reatilers a product that is easy to support, watch your numbers rise. Don't? I hope you enjoy where you are at, because you sure as hell ain't going anywhere.

    The masses already use linux. Whether it be on their phone, their router, or their pc. But again more importantly, so long as I can use it for the needs I (or those I choose to support) have, why should I give a shit what other people use?

  128. Re:Decent Computer? by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Good deal. Things are getting better, and your post is evidence of that.

    But I'd still cringe if someone said "hi, I bought a new multi-function printer... now make it work with linux".

    If you research first, and buy intelligently, sure... but to just wander into a Staples or Costco and come home with something and expect it to work... we're not there yet, your experience notwithstanding.

  129. CD-DA is like FLAC torrents by tepples · · Score: 1

    Compact Disc Digital Audio is like FLAC torrents on The Pirate Bay, except with no risk of becoming the next Jammie Thomas.

  130. Re:What? When was the last time you used linux? by vux984 · · Score: 1

    And where do they go for help? Let me guess: you are the center of your own little linux universe??

    Its not a bad thing, I am the center of one too... but remove yourself from the universe and one by one your family, friends, and neighbors will run into problems they can't fix, unless one of them happens to have the nerd-gene too. But "normal people" tm don't... to use linux they need someone like us in their sphere of friends.

    Umm - my daughter uses I-Tunes on her Ubuntu machine. She's 17, and had no problem installing it and getting her ipod working.

    Really? Just downloaded and installed right? Everything works perfect...

    http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=21302

    What works
    Apple Account login, Album Art Work Gathering, Album and Song view's, MP3's MP4's WMA's, visualization, equalizer, iTunes store, ping, genius

    What does not
    iPhone etc.,cd's, Radio, Podcast, Preferences

    What was not tested
    N/A

    Additional Comments

    doesnt respond repeatedly, but soon response. distnoted.exe every so often encounters a fatal problem but still runs itunes

    The "what doesn't work" is pretty substantial... iphones "ETC"? preferences? Podcast? Yeah, that sounds terrific. And the additional comments to the effect that the program stops responding repeatedly, and reports application crash errors... yeah.

    All followed by a page of comments complaining of all kinds of problems.

    Linux is great at things its great at. Running windows applications is not one of those things. It ranges from usable to useful.

  131. Which brands of optical media? by tepples · · Score: 1

    And stay away from the cheap media (paying a few extra pennies per disk goes a long way).

    Where should I learn which brands are good? I'd try Google, but I haven't found a way to use Google to gauge reliability of a review; it's likely to turn up reviews that smack of undue influence from advertisers.

  132. Re:Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with by madhi19 · · Score: 1

    I got to agree the first advice to anybody who building a rig should always be "Don't cheap out on the PSU!" and if you did use a cheap PSU put getting a good PSU on top of your upgrade priority.

  133. Things are going to get even cheaper soon. by madhi19 · · Score: 1

    With Nvidia and other players getting in on the CPU market I predict a serious price war. The CPU market could look a lot like the Ram market soon. Lots of players = very small price.

  134. Re:Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with by toddestan · · Score: 1

    The no-names like that are a gamble. Some of them are perfectly fine - I've had some that have run no problems for years, and others of them are garbage. And you really don't have any way to know without buying and seeing what happens. Generally I don't want to gamble with my power supplies, so I'm willing to spend a few extra bucks to get a decent one.

  135. Re:Decent Computer? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    So your reply is...bullshit,bullshit,bullshit and bullshit, correct? I gave you my answer as to ABIs, give me a single reason why EVERYONE ELSE ON THE PLANET is wrong and you are right. Give me a SINGLE EXAMPLE of the magical never break drivers that are called for in that religious text. Hey if that technique works there must be thousands of those that exist, yes? the kernel hackers have had the code FOR YEARS NOW so they must have the 80% in never break quality yes? but guess what Sparky THEY BREAK CONSTANTLY which shows that kernel dev was talking out his ass. Do you REALLY think he is smarter than the entire kernel teams for OSX, Windows, OS/2, Solaris, BSD, etc? I repeat, arrogant much?

    And did you even read the post above me? How the guy had enterprise hardware and is stuck with an old kernel because guess what THE DRIVERS ARE BROKEN for ALL the new kernels? Care to tell HIM he should throw away thousands of dollars in hardware? It is THIS arrogant elitist horseshit without the code to back it up that helps keep people as far away from your shitpile OS as possible! With Windows you get a MINIMUM of 8 YEARS of support, often longer. Your OS? You can't even give me a 100% guarantee the stuff you have running now will continue running in 6 months! Yep, sure gonna lure the masses with that level of QA buddy. And oh yeah all those OSes are complete shit, even though most have quite huge numbers, why they just don't know how sweet the Linux koolaid is do they daddy-o? Doesn't matter that their drivers actually WORK and CONTINUE WORKING because CLI gives you gonad powers!

    Which brings us to the two bad jokes of your religion, the "Linux is a kernel" and "CLI gives you gonad powers" jokes. you DO realize I can replace every. single. argument. that you have made with the appropriate Linux TM yes? Do you know why that is? Because after all these years you've been coming up with the same tired old horseshit about how it is everyone's fault but yours, how if people would only "embrace the power of CLI" like it is the God damned force that the world would be hearts and flowers. But you know what? NUMBERS DO NOT LIE and you have NOTHING to show for damned near 20 years of work! Read it and weep fucking JavaME is kicking your ass! Don't feel even a little bit ashamed at such shit numbers? or do you think being a dead end with less numbers than a shit cellphone OS just makes you "leet" and connects you to the neckbeards of old, when IRL all you do is copypasta into a term ?

    I'll repeat this until it sinks in, i'll even highlight it, Do you know what the definition of insanity is? It is doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome and that is EXACTLY what you and the community have been doing for damned near a decade now. What were your numbers 3 years ago? why they were at 1%. What will your numbers be 3 years from now? I bet my last dollar they'll be 1%. It don't take Kojak to solve this case, and it isn't some conspiracy by Gates and the Illuminati, nor is it payoffs to the OEMs that ended over a decade ago.

    Now it is the fact that YOU DON'T LISTEN, not to your customers, nor to the OEMs, nor to the retailers. Wanna read something sad? Dell the current number 3 OEM, even though they only offer Linux on a token amount of frankly outdated hardware, has to run their own repo at considerable out of pocket expense. Why is that? Because if they don't the DRIVERS DIE HARD. And you sir have NO excuse nor argument that can justify that, none at all. That is just typical shitty QA from Canonical and typical Linus Goatse bullshit. But I'm sure you'll say dell is "doin it wrong" or that every retailer and mom&pop shop on the planet should pay programmers to run their own repos so they can bless their customers with your sacred cow. But i

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  136. cheap by anonieuweling · · Score: 1

    Try do do a very similar build and see the pricing in other currency....

  137. Re:What? When was the last time you used linux? by novar21 · · Score: 1
    Sorry to hear you cant find a workable solution. I don't monkey with my daughters machines. She takes care of her own stuff. For your benefit and my curiosity I asked her how she did it. She sighed and said just go out to you tube dad and watch the videos. She said that there are many and its not hard. She is happy. It works for her. Maybe you should write Apple and let them know about your disappointment in them.

    I also asked her if she gets her system issues taken care of via you tube, and I got another exasperated teen response and eye roll - " Ahh Dad, Google is your friend... DUH".

    I laughed and went back to my daily routine. She wants to be a teacher when she gets out of school. I hope her attitude improves before then - LOL.

  138. Re:What? When was the last time you used linux? by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Since when is "follow a youtube video tutorial" that you presumably have to locate yourself the definition of "no trouble at all"?

    To me that sounds more like "I didn't work, so I had to go look for a solution..." worse the solution was involved enough that someone made a video tutorial out of it..."

    She is happy. It works for her.

    Lets see, it runs pretty mediocre and several features simply don't work. She's happy and it meets here expectations... thing is though... her expectations are pretty low. When she can accept without blinking that having to watch a video tutorial just to get it working poorly that's a pretty clear indicator of where her expectations are.

    Furthermore she sounds pretty tech savvy to me though, ... "normal people" tm? Not so much.

  139. Re:Decent Computer? by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

    Oh, most definitely. I've had more fun messing with the internals of stuff than I ever used to have; I've learned Python and just find it great for coding in, and, above all, the "everything is a file" methodology is *really+* nice - Nothing like messing with raw disks the same as with files, and vice-versa.

  140. HP Tablet by dudeman500 · · Score: 1

    99 Bux

  141. Re:Decent Computer? by walshy007 · · Score: 1

    Do you REALLY think he is smarter than the entire kernel teams for OSX, Windows, OS/2, Solaris, BSD, etc? I repeat, arrogant much?

    The projects have different needs and priorities, and different needs tend to yield *gasp* different methods of solution.

    Your argument is akin to "hey, you are doing things differently, you therefore suck". I can only imagine what that kind of effect that attitude would have if it were to be adopted in science where any differing hypothesis from the first must be ridiculed because it isn't the same as other peoples, regardless of merit.

    I'll repeat this until it sinks in, i'll even highlight it, Do you know what the definition of insanity is? It is doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome and that is EXACTLY what you and the community have been doing for damned near a decade now. What were your numbers 3 years ago? why they were at 1%. What will your numbers be 3 years from now? I bet my last dollar they'll be 1%. It don't take Kojak to solve this case, and it isn't some conspiracy by Gates and the Illuminati, nor is it payoffs to the OEMs that ended over a decade ago.

    Why do you think I give a shit about market share?

    Dell the current number 3 OEM, even though they only offer Linux on a token amount of frankly outdated hardware, has to run their own repo [theinquirer.net] at considerable out of pocket expense.

    If you read that article the video chipsets specific driver wasn't in mainline so dell were shipping their own drivers with the 8.04 ubuntu install it was shipping with, when updated to 9.04 of course these drivers weren't in mainline and so no automatic support, and thusly the creation of the external repo. The only lesson learned here is dell are silly for not getting their driver in mainline.

    But instead they'll just do as I have done in my shop, which is refuse to sell or support your OS

    Again, why should I (or anyone else for that matter) care about that?

    You seem very emotionally invested in how evil and horrible linus is, combined with an obsession for market share, distribution and support methods which are inefficient and of no real concern to the development process (and a severe hindrance to it if your recommendations were to be followed)

    Relax.. and grow up.

  142. Re:Don't like the idea of useing a cheap PSU with by Renegrade · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_factor

    Cheapass power supplies with crappy PF are putting a higher load on the utility company for no purpose. The power factor is basically how far out of phase the return power is from the grid's phase.

    Your actual drain is your current * voltage divided by the power factor.

    180W (1.5A @120V) with a 0.67 power factor is 269W of loss at the plug.
    180W (1.5A @120V) with a 0.98 power factor is 184W of loss at the plug.

    Why would companies spend thousands just to correct the power factor if it had nothing to do with actual load?

    The figures I used previously were for real life systems measured directly at the plug with a kill-a-watt meter.

    There are other factors involved that aren't measured there (like the efficiency during transformation and rectification), but there's no way the Athlon XP 2500 is a higher power consumer than an i7 920. Also, the high end PSU is rated at over 80% efficient in those jobs too.