Domain: raging.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to raging.com.
Comments · 20
-
Re:I remember using Webcrawler before google...
You are remembering raging.com, still up-and-running today.
-
Re:About Face!
Altavisa used to be pretty clean, eg this 1998 version. I've often suspected that Google's initial popularity was due to Altavista's desire to be a 'portal' (remember them?) and the subsequent cruft that invaded their front page. They even tried to backtrack with Raging (and isn't that minimal now?) but I suspect people found Google was also a better search engine, rather than simply cleaner, and never went back.
-
Re:I don't know much about Overture...
Come on, people. Alta Vista has had text-only search for ages, and for at least a few years they've had raging.com which is just as aesthetically pleasing as Google. I find myself trying Google first and then going to raging.com if the topic i was looking for doesn't pop up in the first few Google pages (assuming Google has any results at all). Alta Vista picks up different results, and i'm sure lists a few pages that Google doesn't - mainly older pages that were around before Google existed and never got linked into the main spidering network.
-
Re:Google Easily Explained
raging.com is Alta Vista's minimal search, and it's just as fast and sleek as google, AND it doesn't assume just because you come from 203.x.x.whatever you're automatically interested in Australian content.
True! raging.com redirects me to http://www.altavista.com/web/text?raging=1, which redirects me to http://de.altavista.com/web/text?raging=1, so it assumes that I'm interested in German content, not Australian.
Then again, I have a German IP address.
-
Re:Google Easily Explained
3. Google loads quickly and does not attempt to invasively control your machine with javascript or other methods.
This is not true, as many Canadian users have known for a while and many Australian users such as myself have just discovered. Google now redirects the front page (www.google.com) to a country-specific front page based on your IP address. Sure, it's a nice service to have local information available (the paid advertisements down the side change to local advertisements, amongst other things), but it really sucks that you're forced to use it. Most users don't know to change their bookmark to http://www.google.com/intl/en/ to return to the "real" Google, so they're stuck with it. This was the number one reason why i changed from Alta Vista to Google in the first place, and now i'm really wondering whether i should stick with it. raging.com is Alta Vista's minimal search, and it's just as fast and sleek as google, AND it doesn't assume just because you come from 203.x.x.whatever you're automatically interested in Australian content.
-
Re:Even Cleaner (Text Search!)
http://www.altavista.com/web/text
Well, I'm not Google, but: http://www.raging.com beats it by 11 bytes. (They go to the same place
Beat that Google (-: :)
Shaun
-
AltaVista Lite
AltaVista has actually had a "lite" version without the heavy commercial portal thingie for quite some time.
The link is/was: www.raging.com
But now I can see it has changed to point to the same renewed interface as www.altavista.com. -
Re:a lament for text-only altavistaMaybe it's time to switch back
:)Check out www.raging.com. Altavista search; nothing but text.
-
Pay? Oh you *will* Pay!Google is in prime position to be the first major micropayment site. It's the one site people would be willing to pay 1 or 2 cents per page
... for several reasons:- Unique No search engine comes close in terms of quality search results.
- Useful Regardless of net trends and fads, searching will always be a popular task, for just about every application (business, technical, entertainment).
- Unbiased Google has a strong reputation for delivering fine results first, rather than sites who've paid for "featured" links.
- Up-to-date As we saw in yesterday's story on Alta-Vista, the old-time search engines aren't keeping up. In contrast, google keeps stuff fresh. Any webmaster knows how frequently the google robot hits their sites.
- Usable No BS portal stuff, no "Search for 'Syntax Error: Cannot create HitException'". Just clean, fast, results.
Some sites are coming close in terms of some of these things (e.g. Teoma, Vivisimo, and Alta-Vista's Raging. Hoppefully, new sites will continue to give google a run for their money. But right now google is way ahead and continues to improve without adding unnecessary complexity. Considering how much people pay for net access, which will consist of frequent google visits, I think many people would pay $5-10/month for google if google started charging for general access.
-
Re:why i don't love anything but google...
AltaVista just started to look like all the others- commercialized, pushy, and annoying.
Ahh yes, everyone and their mom wants to be a fucking portal. If you still like Altavista's search results (I don't) you should look at www.raging.com.
-
Example from Plastic.com -Yet to be published Book
Plastic just ran a thread regarding an article on the subscription side of Inside.com. It was about an as yet unpublished book by UK physicist Sir Martin Rees titled "Our Final Century?" as of the date I checked, there was nothing to be found on that book on the three search engines that combined have never let me down before: GOOGLE (Web & groups), RAGING (secondary web search) & DOGPILE (Print news). Part of the the problem is likely to be how current the story was, so my back up was to hit the big UK media sites BBC.co.uk, thetimes.co.uk, etc. but these also drew blanks.
-
Re:Hurray! (?)
AltaVista used to be pure, then went the portal route.
AltaVista did, at one point, fall from the purer faith. But then the clean, portal-less look of Google showed them the way, and they repented with Raging Search. Raging is exactly the same database and search engine as AltaVista, but with a Google-esque minimalist look. I can't imagine why anyone still uses AltaVista's front door when you actually your work done going through their back service entrance.
-
Re:Before we get the trolls ranting about search..
If you like Altavista, you may like to try Raging Search. It's made by altavista, using the altavista engine and database, but without all the stupid portal crap - just like the Google interface.
Using a combo of Raging and Google, I can find most things that I want with very few troubles at all. -
Re:Altavista's answer to GoogleI just tried out Altavista's Raging.com to find the url for the Scottish Highland Games in Pleasanton, California next weekend. On Google, the actual site is the 4th listing. On Raging.com the site is listed 45th! I also didn't see a "search within results" link. I think Raging.com has a ways to go before it's a replacement for Google.
Of course, this is one data point, but it's still a pretty bad failure for a random search. (I'm emailing a friend about the event.) It's also disappointing that Google has 3 listings within directories above the actual website - I don't think that would have happened a few months ago.
-
Re:Commercialism
Here, use this. Screw Google. >;)
-
AV is not the whole story (but close)
AV is bloated but their technology is first rate.
While I've been a Google fan since way back, I have to say that AV's frills-free raging is my engine of choice these days.
-
Re:Google
If you liked Altavista' search, but you don't like wading through all their portal crap, try http://www.raging.com/, which
has the Altavista search without any extra fluff.
-
Raging influenced by Google?
Raging seems to be heavily influenced by Google. I wonder if there was a deal between the two that fell through, or if AltaVista simply wanted some of the "all we want is a search engine" market....
Either way, google is just want I need, and all I have on my home page. -
Lynx support at raging.com is coming!
I sent a message to the webmaster, and I got this reply:
Thanks for your feedback. You are not the only person who has requested that we support Lynx and other text-only browsers at Raging Search. We are currently working on this, and we expect to have text-only support for Raging Search coming very soon. Please keep using the site.
Thanks again for your support,
Josh Hornik, Product Manager, Raging Search.
Well, I think we should give them some time. Joshua answered a friend of mine in the same way: "Our thinking was to send text-only users to AltaVista, which has a search that is meant specifically for text-only browsers." "We are currently working on text-browser-enabling Raging Search. The work (optimizing pages for text-only browsers and making sure no functionality gets lost) should be done soon." Even better!
-
Raging.com excludes Lynx users
A superfast, minimalist search engine? Sounds perfect for Lynx, but no:
We're sorry. Raging.com does not support text-only browsers. For a superior text-only search, please visit AltaVista.
I've already expressed my disappointment to webmaster@raging.com.