Domain: roman-empire.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to roman-empire.net.
Comments · 8
-
Re:Down already
Yeah, it's not like the idea of public libraries is thousands of years old or anything.
-
Re:Just release the controller for GameCube...
Right guy, wrong battle.
"But by the battle of Cannae all Hannibal's elephants had died." from http://www.roman-empire.net/army/cannae.html
Still, extending this back to Nintendo, would that make the Wii controller their elephants? -
Re:asterisk
Isn't it frustrating when no one gets your reference?
-
Re:Always the way
-
Re:What happened to the naming convetion?
-
Re:What's Left?
That's a good question. Well if we outsource much of our production and harvest much of our resources from other countries, we'll become something of a "soft" economy where the core of our economy is consumer services and products that we don't even make.
Think England, which doesn't have all that many resources, or production, or space, but has ideas and capital that it uses to produce externally. So we'll eventually just be working to provide enough services to sustain the society and working as managers trying to come up with new ideas for our businesses.
The problem is that ideas are renewable, and our arrangement will work only so long as none of our outsourced employees come up with anything.
But I think I've heard of this before, when the Romans grew soft in their power and control, relying on their satellite colonies for certain vital production and everything. Obviously, times were different and the example is slightly different, but I think it still works. But we all know how that ended up. -
Obviously what we need is a new political party:
Blue is the obvious choice to add to our existing red (democrat), white (Republican) and green (Green) parties.
So who's ready to get the Blue party rolling?
Vote Blue: the party for Nerds and Geeks! -
Re:real FPShooter simulationPersonal homepage, of
I'm an Assistant Professor of Classics at Bates College in Lewiston, Me. and teach in the Department of Classical and Romance Languages and the Program in Classical and Medieval Studies.
Offhand, I tend to put a LOT of trust into the homepages of UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS as written on UNIVERSITY WEBSITES with what look to be COURSE NOTES on the subject. Fine, a little more research. Adding the word 'heavy' to the original google search returns this:Next in line, after the training for marching and fitness, came the training of handling weapons. For this they primarily used wickerwork shields and wooden swords. Both the shields and the swords were made to standards which made them twice as heavy as the original weapons. Evidently it was thought, that if a soldier could fight with these heavy dummy weapons, he would be twice as effective with the proper ones.
Emphasis mine. But don't take my word for it. Go find a real, live professor, or somebody with a degree in military history.