Slashdot Mirror

The difference is that Chrome doesn't use Microsoft's shitty, buggy code.

Yeah, Chrome, the browser with the most reported vulnerabilities (twice as many as IE in 2015) is an example of non-shitty, non-buggy code? And, to the people that think Google patches quicker than MS, they are actually much worse, with 24% of vulns unpatched and IE only 13%.

http://phys.org/news/2014-03-w...
http://seclists.org/cert/2012/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://slashdot.org/submission...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://soylentnews.org/article...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

http://phys.org/news/2014-03-w...
http://seclists.org/cert/2012/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://slashdot.org/submission...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://soylentnews.org/article...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

http://phys.org/news/2014-03-w...
http://seclists.org/cert/2012/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://slashdot.org/submission...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://soylentnews.org/article...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

http://phys.org/news/2014-03-w...
http://seclists.org/cert/2012/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://slashdot.org/submission...
http://soylentnews.org/article...
http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

http://phys.org/news/2014-03-w...
http://seclists.org/cert/2012/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://slashdot.org/submission...
http://soylentnews.org/article...
http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

http://phys.org/news/2014-03-w...
http://seclists.org/cert/2012/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://secunia.com/advisories/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://securityevaluators.com/...
http://slashdot.org/submission...
http://soylentnews.org/article...
http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

If you can settle for just updates, filehippo's update checker works well to get quick links to the original installers (also of older versions) for programs you have already installed:
http://filehippo.com/download_... (The newer versions are supposed to be sucky).

Secunia PSI 2.0 is also good: http://secunia.com/vulnerabili... -- 3.0 was more noob-friendly, last time I checked (Yes, I realize the irony of purposefully installing older versions of programs created to update software to their latest version).

They don't help in installing or uninstalling software and only Secunia supports automatic updates for some programs, but keeping programs up to date under Windows using these tools is at least acceptable.

Right. What would you consider a "non faulty OS, Linux? Then I guess Torvalds should be shot because when it comes to bugs here they come! . Oh and don't forget which OS it was that gave us heartbleed. Was it Windows? No no no no, was it OSX? No no nooo no, was it Linux? yeah yeah yeah yeah! BTW you should try to play the "how many year old Linux bug" game, its fun and easy! Simply type into any search engine " (X) year old Linux bug" with (X) replaced by a random number, see how far back you can go! I doubt you will be able to top 20 years old but single digits are easy peasy!

Anybody still on XP deserves what they get, they got 12 years of support, which just FYI is 10 years longer than the average Linux distro LOL, unless you consider the bi annual death march to be "support", and they have had more than enough time to switch over to a newer version of Windows. They can't even use the hardware excuse as the average XP box is a power piggie P4 and for less than $100 you can toss that P4 board for a Bobcat or jaguar board that will run rings around the P4 while using less power under load than the piggie P4 does at idle. they can even keep their old IDE drive using a $7 IDE to PCI converter so there really is no longer any excuses, anybody who hangs onto a thirteen year old OS (XP was released in 2001 and has more in common with NT4 than it does with a modern OS like 7/8) that is three and soon to be four versions behind? Deserves what they get.

Out of the hundreds of boxes I moved to 7, how many problems did I have? A grand total of THREE, and one of those doesn't count since the software in question (Quickbooks 07 IIRC, may have been 06) was "broken by design" and tied to a VERY insercure version of Flash (V7) and would refuse to install if ANY version of Flash other than 7 was on the system, but it took less than 30 minutes to turn the XP install into a VM and run it on Win 7 via Virtualbox. The other 2? A scanner from 2000 that was so low res a $35 all in one printer gave the guy a 300%+ increase in quality and an old ATI IGP that ran but was flaky, it cost a grand total of $8 to replace the IGP with an HD2400. That system was a first gen C2D with 2GB of RAM and was recently traded back in on a new quad, I turned around and sold it to my landlord who runs it 6 days a week and it purrs like a kitten. If a 8 year old system can run Win 7 so well the customer who buys it in 2014 says "I just love this machine,it runs my stock software and surfs like a dream" there really is no excuse, let XP die already.

Oh and just for shits and giggles I tried the "hairyfeet challenge" using that box before I reloaded Windows, since it would probably be considered high end of the XP era hardware and thus would give Linux a performance advantage over some dusty P4, result? Ubuntu crapped the video first update, PCLOS crapped out on the second, no point in continuing after that since it had already failed the test.

Right. What would you consider a "non faulty OS, Linux? Then I guess Torvalds should be shot because when it comes to bugs here they come! . Oh and don't forget which OS it was that gave us heartbleed. Was it Windows? No no no no, was it OSX? No no nooo no, was it Linux? yeah yeah yeah yeah! BTW you should try to play the "how many year old Linux bug" game, its fun and easy! Simply type into any search engine " (X) year old Linux bug" with (X) replaced by a random number, see how far back you can go! I doubt you will be able to top 20 years old but single digits are easy peasy!

Anybody still on XP deserves what they get, they got 12 years of support, which just FYI is 10 years longer than the average Linux distro LOL, unless you consider the bi annual death march to be "support", and they have had more than enough time to switch over to a newer version of Windows. They can't even use the hardware excuse as the average XP box is a power piggie P4 and for less than $100 you can toss that P4 board for a Bobcat or jaguar board that will run rings around the P4 while using less power under load than the piggie P4 does at idle. they can even keep their old IDE drive using a $7 IDE to PCI converter so there really is no longer any excuses, anybody who hangs onto a thirteen year old OS (XP was released in 2001 and has more in common with NT4 than it does with a modern OS like 7/8) that is three and soon to be four versions behind? Deserves what they get.

Out of the hundreds of boxes I moved to 7, how many problems did I have? A grand total of THREE, and one of those doesn't count since the software in question (Quickbooks 07 IIRC, may have been 06) was "broken by design" and tied to a VERY insercure version of Flash (V7) and would refuse to install if ANY version of Flash other than 7 was on the system, but it took less than 30 minutes to turn the XP install into a VM and run it on Win 7 via Virtualbox. The other 2? A scanner from 2000 that was so low res a $35 all in one printer gave the guy a 300%+ increase in quality and an old ATI IGP that ran but was flaky, it cost a grand total of $8 to replace the IGP with an HD2400. That system was a first gen C2D with 2GB of RAM and was recently traded back in on a new quad, I turned around and sold it to my landlord who runs it 6 days a week and it purrs like a kitten. If a 8 year old system can run Win 7 so well the customer who buys it in 2014 says "I just love this machine,it runs my stock software and surfs like a dream" there really is no excuse, let XP die already.

Oh and just for shits and giggles I tried the "hairyfeet challenge" using that box before I reloaded Windows, since it would probably be considered high end of the XP era hardware and thus would give Linux a performance advantage over some dusty P4, result? Ubuntu crapped the video first update, PCLOS crapped out on the second, no point in continuing after that since it had already failed the test.

Right. What would you consider a "non faulty OS, Linux? Then I guess Torvalds should be shot because when it comes to bugs here they come! . Oh and don't forget which OS it was that gave us heartbleed. Was it Windows? No no no no, was it OSX? No no nooo no, was it Linux? yeah yeah yeah yeah! BTW you should try to play the "how many year old Linux bug" game, its fun and easy! Simply type into any search engine " (X) year old Linux bug" with (X) replaced by a random number, see how far back you can go! I doubt you will be able to top 20 years old but single digits are easy peasy!

Anybody still on XP deserves what they get, they got 12 years of support, which just FYI is 10 years longer than the average Linux distro LOL, unless you consider the bi annual death march to be "support", and they have had more than enough time to switch over to a newer version of Windows. They can't even use the hardware excuse as the average XP box is a power piggie P4 and for less than $100 you can toss that P4 board for a Bobcat or jaguar board that will run rings around the P4 while using less power under load than the piggie P4 does at idle. they can even keep their old IDE drive using a $7 IDE to PCI converter so there really is no longer any excuses, anybody who hangs onto a thirteen year old OS (XP was released in 2001 and has more in common with NT4 than it does with a modern OS like 7/8) that is three and soon to be four versions behind? Deserves what they get.

Out of the hundreds of boxes I moved to 7, how many problems did I have? A grand total of THREE, and one of those doesn't count since the software in question (Quickbooks 07 IIRC, may have been 06) was "broken by design" and tied to a VERY insercure version of Flash (V7) and would refuse to install if ANY version of Flash other than 7 was on the system, but it took less than 30 minutes to turn the XP install into a VM and run it on Win 7 via Virtualbox. The other 2? A scanner from 2000 that was so low res a $35 all in one printer gave the guy a 300%+ increase in quality and an old ATI IGP that ran but was flaky, it cost a grand total of $8 to replace the IGP with an HD2400. That system was a first gen C2D with 2GB of RAM and was recently traded back in on a new quad, I turned around and sold it to my landlord who runs it 6 days a week and it purrs like a kitten. If a 8 year old system can run Win 7 so well the customer who buys it in 2014 says "I just love this machine,it runs my stock software and surfs like a dream" there really is no excuse, let XP die already.

Oh and just for shits and giggles I tried the "hairyfeet challenge" using that box before I reloaded Windows, since it would probably be considered high end of the XP era hardware and thus would give Linux a performance advantage over some dusty P4, result? Ubuntu crapped the video first update, PCLOS crapped out on the second, no point in continuing after that since it had already failed the test.

Opera's STILL showing itself to be "bulletproof & bugfree" -> http://secunia.com/advisories/...

Or maybe no security researcher bothers to analyze it anymore.

Opera's STILL showing itself to be "bulletproof & bugfree" -> http://secunia.com/advisories/... + it has every feature you can think of NATIVELY BUILT-IN (vs. other browsers using plugins & their associated overheads + security issues)...

* I'm no "CHOPERA" man, I like & still use the last TRUE Opera, in its last builds for 64-bit Windows as shown above, & those are my reasons why...

APK

P.S.=> It IS "the Superior Warrior" out there in the way of webbrowsers, even now...

... apk

"I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches." - by cbiltcliffe (186293) on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:09PM (#44667275) from http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4117625&cid=44668899

26 vulnerabilities in Linux 2.6/3.0 core http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/ and here http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40714/ : Your tactics used against you were your undoing. You couldn't find bugs in Windows Server 2012 so you went after older XP. APK did the same to you with older Linux kernels only. He found way more problems in Linux you can't fix + he also showed what to do with the old XP ones you noted, fixing them (or avoiding them by other means). You couldn't do the same for 26 security bugs in Linux. You fail. Quit projecting your own issues of mental imbalance - You showed enough of that in this huge fail of yours, moron.

"I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches." - by cbiltcliffe (186293) on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:09PM (#44667275) from http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4117625&cid=44668899

26 vulnerabilities in Linux 2.6/3.0 core http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/ and here http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40714/ : Your tactics used against you were your undoing. You couldn't find bugs in Windows Server 2012 so you went after older XP. APK did the same to you with older Linux kernels only. He found way more problems in Linux you can't fix + he also showed what to do with the old XP ones you noted, fixing them (or avoiding them by other means). You couldn't do the same for 26 security bugs in Linux. You fail. Quit projecting your own issues of mental imbalance - You showed enough of that in this huge fail of yours, moron.

"I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches." - by cbiltcliffe (186293) on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:09PM (#44667275) from http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4117625&cid=44668899

26 vulnerabilities in Linux 2.6/3.0 core http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/ + here http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40714/ : Your tactics used against you were your undoing. You couldn't find bugs in Windows Server 2012 so you went after older XP. APK did the same to you with older Linux kernels only. He found way more problems in Linux you can't fix + he also then showed what to do with the old XP ones you noted, fixing them (or avoiding them by other means). You couldn't do the same for 26 security bugs in Linux. You fail. That's no rewrite of history, you moron: You're "history", since that's you failing on the grounds you yourself used. Hilarious. You're incredibly stupid.

"I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches." - by cbiltcliffe (186293) on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:09PM (#44667275) from http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4117625&cid=44668899

26 vulnerabilities in Linux 2.6/3.0 core http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/ + here http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40714/ : Your tactics used against you were your undoing. You couldn't find bugs in Windows Server 2012 so you went after older XP. APK did the same to you with older Linux kernels only. He found way more problems in Linux you can't fix + he also then showed what to do with the old XP ones you noted, fixing them (or avoiding them by other means). You couldn't do the same for 26 security bugs in Linux. You fail. That's no rewrite of history, you moron: You're "history", since that's you failing on the grounds you yourself used. Hilarious. You're incredibly stupid.

"I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches." - by cbiltcliffe (186293) on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:09PM (#44667275)

from http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4117625&cid=44668899

26 vulnerabilities in Linux 2.6/3.0 core http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/ and here http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40714/ : Your tactics used against you were your undoing. You couldn't find bugs in Windows Server 2012 so you went after older XP. APK did the same to you with older Linux kernels only and found way more problems in Linux you can't fix, but he showed what to do with the old XP ones you noted, fixing them (or avoiding them by other means). You couldn't do the same for 26 security bugs in Linux. You fail.

"I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches." - by cbiltcliffe (186293) on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:09PM (#44667275)

from http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4117625&cid=44668899

26 vulnerabilities in Linux 2.6/3.0 core http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/ and here http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40714/ : Your tactics used against you were your undoing. You couldn't find bugs in Windows Server 2012 so you went after older XP. APK did the same to you with older Linux kernels only and found way more problems in Linux you can't fix, but he showed what to do with the old XP ones you noted, fixing them (or avoiding them by other means). You couldn't do the same for 26 security bugs in Linux. You fail.

You're using nearly a decade worth of 2.6 kernel releases, covering at least 40 distinct releases, to compare to a single product release from MS? And you call ME a fail? I think you need to go take a few statistics classes, because you are completely off your bat shit insane rocker if you think this is even in the same universe as a sane comparison.

Let's take a look at the 5 Secunia releases for 2.6 in 2013, shall we?
This is from the page you linked to in your "open sores" rant, BTW:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=cri&period=2013&prod=2719

One of them not critical at all, and the others "less" critical. For Secunia, "less" critical means it's hardly a vulnerability at all. It cannot result in your computer being taken over, it cannot result in any serious information leakage, and it can't do anything without the user doing something to cause it.

Similarly:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=fro&period=2013&prod=2719

NONE of them are remotely exploitable.

What they can do:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=imp&period=2013&prod=2719
Half of them can DoS your computer. Really. A local DoS. So I can lock up my own computer and prevent myself from accessing it. That's not even a vulnerability as far as Microsoft is concerned.

BTW, do you notice how much more readable this is than one of your screeds? That's because I use knowledge and logic, rather than foaming at the mouth fury when I type my posts. How many keyboards do you have to replace because you've either pounded the keys into oblivion, or soaked it with spittle to the point where it doesn't work anymore?

I imagine you like this typing most of your posts:
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/257866_o.gif

I always thought that image was funny because it was so far over the top. Then I ran across you on here, and found out there are people who really are that passionate about being stupid.

You're using nearly a decade worth of 2.6 kernel releases, covering at least 40 distinct releases, to compare to a single product release from MS? And you call ME a fail? I think you need to go take a few statistics classes, because you are completely off your bat shit insane rocker if you think this is even in the same universe as a sane comparison.

Let's take a look at the 5 Secunia releases for 2.6 in 2013, shall we?
This is from the page you linked to in your "open sores" rant, BTW:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=cri&period=2013&prod=2719

One of them not critical at all, and the others "less" critical. For Secunia, "less" critical means it's hardly a vulnerability at all. It cannot result in your computer being taken over, it cannot result in any serious information leakage, and it can't do anything without the user doing something to cause it.

Similarly:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=fro&period=2013&prod=2719

NONE of them are remotely exploitable.

What they can do:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=imp&period=2013&prod=2719
Half of them can DoS your computer. Really. A local DoS. So I can lock up my own computer and prevent myself from accessing it. That's not even a vulnerability as far as Microsoft is concerned.

BTW, do you notice how much more readable this is than one of your screeds? That's because I use knowledge and logic, rather than foaming at the mouth fury when I type my posts. How many keyboards do you have to replace because you've either pounded the keys into oblivion, or soaked it with spittle to the point where it doesn't work anymore?

I imagine you like this typing most of your posts:
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/257866_o.gif

I always thought that image was funny because it was so far over the top. Then I ran across you on here, and found out there are people who really are that passionate about being stupid.

You're using nearly a decade worth of 2.6 kernel releases, covering at least 40 distinct releases, to compare to a single product release from MS? And you call ME a fail? I think you need to go take a few statistics classes, because you are completely off your bat shit insane rocker if you think this is even in the same universe as a sane comparison.

Let's take a look at the 5 Secunia releases for 2.6 in 2013, shall we?
This is from the page you linked to in your "open sores" rant, BTW:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=cri&period=2013&prod=2719

One of them not critical at all, and the others "less" critical. For Secunia, "less" critical means it's hardly a vulnerability at all. It cannot result in your computer being taken over, it cannot result in any serious information leakage, and it can't do anything without the user doing something to cause it.

Similarly:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=fro&period=2013&prod=2719

NONE of them are remotely exploitable.

What they can do:
http://secunia.com/advisories/graph/?type=imp&period=2013&prod=2719
Half of them can DoS your computer. Really. A local DoS. So I can lock up my own computer and prevent myself from accessing it. That's not even a vulnerability as far as Microsoft is concerned.

BTW, do you notice how much more readable this is than one of your screeds? That's because I use knowledge and logic, rather than foaming at the mouth fury when I type my posts. How many keyboards do you have to replace because you've either pounded the keys into oblivion, or soaked it with spittle to the point where it doesn't work anymore?

I imagine you like this typing most of your posts:
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/257866_o.gif

I always thought that image was funny because it was so far over the top. Then I ran across you on here, and found out there are people who really are that passionate about being stupid.

"I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches." - by cbiltcliffe (186293) on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:09PM (#44667275) Homepage

What's that? See here (26 vulnerabilities in Linux core) http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/ and here http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40714/ in older builds!

(Funniest part here = That is the 'technique' you used & it's funny how I turn THAT very "trick" on you with ease, by showing FAR MORE holes on "your end" in "Open 'SORES'").

Clue: That's more than the entire body of Microsoft vulnerabilities you put up from older builds of their wares! I didn't even look @ dev tools, browsers, or anything else either that ships with Linux for Pete's sake... lol!

(I didn't have to look much further, & were I to dig up browsers & dev tools? I'd find even more odds are, but as is?? You're WAY behind still)

---

On MS old stuff you found "bugs" in? Ok:

(The IE browsers = easily freely upgraded to IE 11 too mind you + Patch Tuesday fixes them as we go every month for both old browsers & OS builds!)

Additionally - Most of your 'holes' in old wares by MS aren't remote (bulk are local exploit only), & IF/WHEN they are? Easily fixed, by hand, no coding needed!

---

E.G. #1 of 2 -> The 1 'remote' DAO one in Windows 7?

Easily fixed: Use ADO instead! Besides - it's more scalable & modern anyhow! Heck - there's even RDO too, OR, custom middleware drivers (e.g. Oracle has/had OO40 for example)!

Plus as was noted earlier in reply to you:

E.G. #2 of 2 -> The Environment variables fix is easy if you can type from System Icon %environment% strings, and oddly enough, the ONLY app that exploits it is SAFARI!

(Does Apple even make that anymore? Bad coding on their part!)

---

* Lastly, seeing such a "fine showing" on Linux @ NASDAQ lately this week -> http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-08-22/after-nasdaq-shutdown-its-time-for-electronic-markets-to-shape-up-or-face-regulators ?

APK

P.S.=> You fail, badly - So much for "Open 'SORES'" & Linux's 'great showing' @ NASDAQ this week (not) - Falling over 3x in a ROW, & Lol, for longer than that stock exchange has EVER gone down!

... apk

"I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches." - by cbiltcliffe (186293) on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:09PM (#44667275) Homepage

What's that? See here (26 vulnerabilities in Linux core) http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/ and here http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40714/ in older builds!

(Funniest part here = That is the 'technique' you used & it's funny how I turn THAT very "trick" on you with ease, by showing FAR MORE holes on "your end" in "Open 'SORES'").

Clue: That's more than the entire body of Microsoft vulnerabilities you put up from older builds of their wares! I didn't even look @ dev tools, browsers, or anything else either that ships with Linux for Pete's sake... lol!

(I didn't have to look much further, & were I to dig up browsers & dev tools? I'd find even more odds are, but as is?? You're WAY behind still)

---

On MS old stuff you found "bugs" in? Ok:

(The IE browsers = easily freely upgraded to IE 11 too mind you + Patch Tuesday fixes them as we go every month for both old browsers & OS builds!)

Additionally - Most of your 'holes' in old wares by MS aren't remote (bulk are local exploit only), & IF/WHEN they are? Easily fixed, by hand, no coding needed!

---

E.G. #1 of 2 -> The 1 'remote' DAO one in Windows 7?

Easily fixed: Use ADO instead! Besides - it's more scalable & modern anyhow! Heck - there's even RDO too, OR, custom middleware drivers (e.g. Oracle has/had OO40 for example)!

Plus as was noted earlier in reply to you:

E.G. #2 of 2 -> The Environment variables fix is easy if you can type from System Icon %environment% strings, and oddly enough, the ONLY app that exploits it is SAFARI!

(Does Apple even make that anymore? Bad coding on their part!)

---

* Lastly, seeing such a "fine showing" on Linux @ NASDAQ lately this week -> http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-08-22/after-nasdaq-shutdown-its-time-for-electronic-markets-to-shape-up-or-face-regulators ?

APK

P.S.=> You fail, badly - So much for "Open 'SORES'" & Linux's 'great showing' @ NASDAQ this week (not) - Falling over 3x in a ROW, & Lol, for longer than that stock exchange has EVER gone down!

... apk

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

Here - chew on these now - they're security advisories from a reputable & respectable enough source:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

* QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

That's just great. Now how about these?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1175/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/13223/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43073/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17277/

I think that the lesson here might be that if you're not on the very latest release of a Microsoft product, even if what you're running is still supported, you'll be low priority for security patches. Latest release gets patched promptly, but previous major release doesn't.

QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

?

APK

P.S.=> This ought to be good for a laugh in watching you completely avoid answering the question above based on those products from Microsoft (which are pretty much all you need to create just above any business system no less)... apk

QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

?

APK

P.S.=> This ought to be good for a laugh in watching you completely avoid answering the question above based on those products from Microsoft (which are pretty much all you need to create just above any business system no less)... apk

QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

?

APK

P.S.=> This ought to be good for a laugh in watching you completely avoid answering the question above based on those products from Microsoft (which are pretty much all you need to create just above any business system no less)... apk

QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

?

APK

P.S.=> This ought to be good for a laugh in watching you completely avoid answering the question above based on those products from Microsoft (which are pretty much all you need to create just above any business system no less)... apk

QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

?

APK

P.S.=> This ought to be good for a laugh in watching you completely avoid answering the question above based on those products from Microsoft (which are pretty much all you need to create just above any business system no less)... apk

QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

?

APK

P.S.=> This ought to be good for a laugh in watching you completely avoid answering the question above based on those products from Microsoft (which are pretty much all you need to create just above any business system no less)... apk

QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

?

APK

P.S.=> This ought to be good for a laugh in watching you completely avoid answering the question above based on those products from Microsoft (which are pretty much all you need to create just above any business system no less)... apk

QUESTION: How many unpatched security issues are there in those tools from Microsoft?

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42761/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/40664/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/42480/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/43263/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/32977/

?

APK

P.S.=> This ought to be good for a laugh in watching you completely avoid answering the question above based on those products from Microsoft (which are pretty much all you need to create just above any business system no less)... apk