Domain: sf.ca.us
Stories and comments across the archive that link to sf.ca.us.
Comments · 15
-
Re:A twinge of sadness at this passing
Next to free for me. I just paid for a yearly account on the Well and a small monthly amount (I don't recall exactly how much, but it was pretty cheap) for PC Pursuit.
-
No speculation involved
In lawsuits that were originally filed in 2003, attorneys for the plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of red light photo enforcement systems primarily because they involved payments to private, for-profit contractors based on the number of citations paid
http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/cityattorney_page.asp?id=37933
Are you too lazy to do a little googling before you accuse someone of bs? -
you can't do that
-
You see you don't have to live like a refugee
-
The Well
The last time I used gopher was in 1996 for The Well.
-
Re:More badly-researched rhetoric on voting machinIf you're in California, then that's pretty interesting.
Note page 15 of this PDF'd election manual. (The document is an election workers manual from the County of San Francisco, I've worked polls in Santa Clara County myself.) Note that it does not state that ID is illegal to ask for, but does say that "Voters are NOT required to provide proof of identity or residence."
I will add that many voters do bring their voting booklet, or present an ID, and it definitely helps poll workers when you do that, it's somehow just slightly quicker to look something up when you have a nicely printed version fo what you're searching for, particularly with hard-to-spell names.
Here is the text of a proposed law, from February 2003, to require IDs to be checked by precinct workers.
I can't, in the few moments I've looked today, find an explicit prohibition, although I believe I've seen one, I'm willing to drop the assertion that it's directly illegal until I can find direct proof of that statement. I will note, however, that if it's not required, it'd be a pretty bad idea to demand it of voters, since it'd be a direct opening to charges of discriminatory, selective checking of IDs.
On the other hand, a mistake by a polling worker on this point is far more likely to be a mistake than a serious attempt at fraud, poll-workers don't get a ton of training.
-
What's his point?Frankly I just don't see what he is whining about. An example: in his article he gives a link to a unsurprisingly glowing biography of the Mayor of San Francisco. He complains about a lack of information about the office itself, but if you actually go to the Mayor's home page there is a ton of information! You get the Mayor's budget proposal, his schedule, his address, phone number, e-mail, links to offices under the Mayor, transcripts of speeches, etc. What exactly was he expecting, pictures of the Mayor in compromising situations?
His main point seems to be that government web sites should be dedicated to organizing grass roots groups. First of all, the idea of the government organizing grass roots groups is oxymoronic. It is also a pretty dumb idea. I can just imagine the paranoia if the government tried to monopolize all of the grass roots organizations by hosting them on government web sites. "I spent the last 5 hours typing up my opposition to the mayor's speech when my computer crashed and the whole thing was lost. Then I got to thinking, who controls the web site? (The mayor.) Was it really a mistake that my post was lost?"
This guy, Plotkin, should go back and dig up some real abuses to complain about. Lacking that, this article just sounds like a big long whine.
-
What's his point?Frankly I just don't see what he is whining about. An example: in his article he gives a link to a unsurprisingly glowing biography of the Mayor of San Francisco. He complains about a lack of information about the office itself, but if you actually go to the Mayor's home page there is a ton of information! You get the Mayor's budget proposal, his schedule, his address, phone number, e-mail, links to offices under the Mayor, transcripts of speeches, etc. What exactly was he expecting, pictures of the Mayor in compromising situations?
His main point seems to be that government web sites should be dedicated to organizing grass roots groups. First of all, the idea of the government organizing grass roots groups is oxymoronic. It is also a pretty dumb idea. I can just imagine the paranoia if the government tried to monopolize all of the grass roots organizations by hosting them on government web sites. "I spent the last 5 hours typing up my opposition to the mayor's speech when my computer crashed and the whole thing was lost. Then I got to thinking, who controls the web site? (The mayor.) Was it really a mistake that my post was lost?"
This guy, Plotkin, should go back and dig up some real abuses to complain about. Lacking that, this article just sounds like a big long whine.
-
this was old news in 1992
When did Bruce Sterling write The Hacker Crackdown? Ten years ago? This isn't exactly news. Incidentally, read Sterling's book if you haven't already -- it covers the early days of hacking AT&T unix systems, phone phreaking, the history of the US Secret Service and more. The EFF has it in a dozen-odd formats, there's an ebook version for the PalmReader, and just for grins you can even get it of The WELL's Gopher server(!).
-
Re:Bah, none of those are dead. ;)
Electric buses (which the Municipal Railroad calls trolleys) are used extensively. There are 173 miles of overhead lines for these busses (source). In addition, there is an under- and above-ground light rail system which serves many parts of the city. The system is underground along market street, and above ground everywhere else. Finally, surface street cars are operated on Market street. This is known as the "F" line, which employs many historic street cars retired from other cities' transit systems.
-
A lot more on active gophers...On MeatballWiki, we have collected a bunch of links to active gophers as well as some papers and quotations about it.
My personal favourite gopher is the WELLGopher.
Finally, be warned about using gopher in current browsers. Since no one cares about gopher any more, the existing clients are rather crashprone.
-
Living without privacyI've given up on privacy.
- My business web site has my name, address, phone number, business license number, Dun and Bradstreet ID, and valid E-mail addresses. I have a listed phone number. I'm required to do this by the California business and professions code.
- Back in my aerospace days, I used to hold a high-level security clearance from one of the three-letter agencies, which meant periodic lie detector tests and a thorough background check.
- I was involved with a major company during the IPO phase, and had to report my financial transactions to the SEC, which published them. So my financial history is a matter of public record.
- I was an expert witness in a major court case that resulted in some prosecutors losing their jobs. This got me some publicity.
- Most of the technology I've developed over the years is described in Internet RFCs, free software, published papers, or patents. I prefer to use trade secrets as little as possible.
So it's possible to live without much privacy. Once in a while I have to deal with some jerk. They usually lose. That's life.
-
But did you send it to the mayor?I agree with your rant. I live in San Francisco and am greatly discouraged by the dwindling night life. It is pervasive through every club scene in the city.
I was at the hearing in support of Jamie. Have you actually emailed your rant to Mayor Willie Brown? If not, then please do. I'm sure my email address has been blocked by now given how many rants I've sent him.
;)- tokengeekgrrl
-
But did you send it to the mayor?I agree with your rant. I live in San Francisco and am greatly discouraged by the dwindling night life. It is pervasive through every club scene in the city.
I was at the hearing in support of Jamie. Have you actually emailed your rant to Mayor Willie Brown? If not, then please do. I'm sure my email address has been blocked by now given how many rants I've sent him.
;)- tokengeekgrrl
-
Probably Census Bureau's Metro AreasThe article mentioned statistics from the US Census Bureau. In that case, I'm guessing they break it up the same way... "San Francisco" on their list would mean San Francisco and San Mateo Counties (the Peninsula); "San Jose" means Santa Clara County (South Bay, Silicon Valley); and "Oakland" means Alameda County (East Bay). Those seem to match their 1.5 million population numbers for SF and SJ.
At first when I saw SF was #1, I thought, "Groan. They must have lumped San Jose in as part of San Francisco again." (It's mildly annoying considering San Jose is the bigger city but far and away lesser known of the two. People outside the area seem to always call the whole Bay Area "San Francisco", even though SF is really just the 6x8-mile city at the tip of the peninsula.) But I see they did separate them after all - their criteria was weighted in favor of the (rather nebulous) hosts per capita figure. I can believe that SF's financial district and the peninsula cities could dominate that. So at least they had an explanation for how their numbers turned out that way. San Jose was highest in the categories you'd expect for Silicon Valley... users accessing the Net from work and
.com domains per thousand licensed businesses.FYI... for more info, here are the pages for San Jose, San Francisco and the Assoc of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).