Slashdot Mirror


Top off Your Parking Meter with a Cell Call

dstone writes "Vancouver, Canada has just become the first major city in North America to allow motorists to feed their parking meters with their cell phone. Drivers call a number on each meter, the system recognizes them by Caller ID, they enter how many minutes they want, and that's it. The system sends them a reminder text message before their time is up and they can extend their time remotely. The catch? The company contracted to provide the service, Verrus, makes their money through a 30-cent 'convenience fee.' Less pockets full of change, less parking tickets, seems like a step forward."

430 comments

  1. Wrong Number? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So do you trade parking meter stickers with Lexus guy then?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Wrong Number? by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I paid for my parking like this 2 years ago in Vancouver. This is old news.

    2. Re:Wrong Number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's where I first heard about this.

      Old news.

    3. Re:Wrong Number? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you're thinking of private lots (where this has been available for years). This is the first roll-out that covers all of the coin-meters on the sides of the street.

      It seems like a good idea, however the cynical side of me also wonders that if in addition text messaging the owner of the vehicle when the payment is about to expire, it might also be text messaging the parking enforcement officer for the area to keep an eye out in areas with lots of meters that are expiring at the same time so they know where to concentrate their "efforts"...

      It would also be nice if they could do this as a straight text message by phone instead of by voice. Could be a lot faster...

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    4. Re:Wrong Number? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Informative

      I paid for my parking like this 2 years ago in Vancouver.

      And you still didn't get a ticket?

      You must have an expensive cell phone bill ...

      But, it is mostly new to the US, I guess. I think Japan had it quite a long time ago, just like how with DoCoMo you can pay for vending machine purchases with your cell phone since at least the early 90s.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:Wrong Number? by general+scruff · · Score: 1

      I wonder, If this becomes popular/widespread, what are the chances that someone figures out how to access a bluetooth cellphone, get it to call your parking meter, and get FREE*AS*IN*BEER parking!
      Hmmmm, time to get out the antenna rifle... =)

      --
      As a rule, I never trust dark brown ketchup.
    6. Re:Wrong Number? by Demolition · · Score: 1

      Vancouver's municipal government began investigating pay-by-phone meters a few years ago and included the existing meters on several streets as part of the pilot project. Perhaps m0rph3us0 works or shops on one of those streets.

    7. Re:Wrong Number? by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1
      It seems like a good idea, however the cynical side of me also wonders that if in addition text messaging the owner of the vehicle when the payment is about to expire, it might also be text messaging the parking enforcement officer for the area to keep an eye out in areas with lots of meters that are expiring at the same time so they know where to concentrate their "efforts"...


      If they're doing this, chances are the meters are already wired, and probably already doing just this. That's regardless of whether you subscribe to the phone payment service.
    8. Re:Wrong Number? by Qybix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada has been using a private company to manage the cell phone payment for parking in public areas of the city starting in October 21, 2005. For more information please see link below...

      http://www.city.saskatoon.sk.ca/org/municipal_engi neering/parking_services/index.asp

      The companies website can be see at:

      http://www.new-parking.com/

      Qybix

      --
      Qybix ----- I do not have a belief system; I'm an Anti-theist and proud of it! Saying that not believing in anything i
    9. Re:Wrong Number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just dig out some old porn-dialer malware and adapt it to dial all the meters in the vicinity in which you live/work/play and email everyone anonymously about the new security patch from Microsoft. Would the meter software even know if the calls coming from cell phones or not? May payments can even be Skyped? No doubt someone will come up with an interesting hack for this.

    10. Re:Wrong Number? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how parking tickets are a major revenue source for many cities, I don't know how widespread this will be in the US. Some cities, most notably San Francisco, have instituted want amounts to street sweeping scams to generate revenue. Los Angeles does this, too, but not to the same extent.

      Still, two years is an awfully long time. I wonder how he keeps the battery from going dead.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    11. Re:Wrong Number? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Scam or not, one time I was moving my car at 3am or whatever time it was and this fleet of street sweepers came barreling over the hill, nearly crushing me.

      So they really do streetsweep.

      I still prefer not to have a car in SF though. Nothing but an albatross. An albatross that costs $30/night to park.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    12. Re:Wrong Number? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

      lots of meters that are expiring at the same time so they know where to concentrate their "efforts"

      So then...I can play "make the cops run around" by just getting a bunch of my friends on opposite sides of the street to buy only 15 minutes at a time and renew within the last 7 seconds?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    13. Re:Wrong Number? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Vancouver's municipal government began investigating pay-by-phone meters..."

      Paying for things by phone?? I dunno if I'd like that. I like to have my cell phone bill as one of those 'utility' bills that is a constant amount every month to budget on. In my plan I have enough anytime minutes, so that I never run over. My LD is free, and nights and weekends are free...starting evenings at 7pm. This covers all my conversational needs....and I do all my text messaging via the picture mail on the phone or web mail...no charges for either of those. (I found out the normal SMS messaging costs).

      So, I would get a little messed up budgeting for a variable phone bill...I like to keep my variable costs monthly to one or two credit cards...mostly Amex which I pay off fully..and keep a decent running total of it in my head.

      No..I like using the phone for communicating, I've got plenty of other methods for payment, old fashioned CASH is rapidly becoming my favorite method these days.

      Besides...it would suck if you meter was about to run out, and your phone battery died...you're kind of fscked at that point...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Wrong Number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Lol. This feature has been used in Estonia for years now. Nobody made any international news about it then.

    15. Re:Wrong Number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been parking like this in the Netherlands for years now. What's the big deal?

    16. Re:Wrong Number? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Then Verrus will become a (mobi-phonic?) VIrus...

      heheh... slashdot image word: "specie"

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    17. Re:Wrong Number? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      If you mean that street sweepers actually barrel down the street, then yes. If you mean that they actually do any street sweeping, beyond moving the dirt around, then no, they don't really street sweep. The only good thing about it was a chance to meet your neighbors when everyone got up early to move their cars. I became friends with a Cambodian family this way.

      IIRC the L.A. Times article I read, the street sweepers often didn't even show up, but parking enforcement did. I think it was the area between Hollywood Blvd and Franklin, between Highland and La Brea. It's about as densely populated as your typical SF neighborhood.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    18. Re:Wrong Number? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Enforcement without sweeping borders on criminal.

      It's true that sweepers often aren't very good. I've seen some that put tons of dust in the air - that doesn't seem helpful in the least. There used to be some in Santa Barbara that were surprisingly effective, but they used quite a bit of water.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  2. Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by OYAHHH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If,

    I'm not way off-track one of the purposes of a parking meter is the annoyance feature. Keeps a set of rich guys from pumping quarters in it all day long without any negative consequences for them.

    This tech enables that sort of behavior.

    And then the poor slobs get to walk a half a mile just to get to the courthouse.....

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
    1. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, here in Calgary CANADA, there's been a big hubub recently about people parking all day at parking meters and just paying the fine. It was cheaper to pay the $25 fine than to pay $28 for eight hours of parking.
      Apparently a secretary for couple of law offices would regularily just walk into city hall with a list of license numbers of the partners and pay off all the fines on-masse

      City of Calgary is considering raising the daily fine to $300 now

    2. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by BoiseAlf · · Score: 1

      It might be easier to track. You can only use the same cell phone to top-off the same meter once. The annoyance factor then changes as people would have to borrow other people's cell phones and thus charge their friend/co-worker's meter account - now they have to keep track of how much $$$ they owe them...

    3. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, it would provide plenty of work for the caller-id-spoofing industry.

    4. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Yeah. This sorta thing is just lazy. Seriously. Like getting groceries online.....that has to be one of the things I still don't get. Just get your ass to the store.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    5. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by danzona · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here in Chicago, most parking meters have a time limit for parking. So it will say 25c / 30 minutes, 2 hour limit.

      In Chicago, it appears that enforcement of this is half hearted (compared with places like Carmel where they use chalk to mark the tires to enforce the time limit).

      Anyway, it would not be hard for the cell phone parking meter to enforce the time limit. So after 4 quarters, the parking meter won't take any more money and the driver has to move.

      Wouldn't it be great if the parking meter could tell that you hadn't paid or moved the car and then issued the cell phone an instant meter violation charge? I believe that is $50 in Chicago. Plus a 30 cent convenience fee.

    6. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Like getting groceries online.....that has to be one of the things I still don't get

      You know what I don't get?

      Arrogant dumbshits that think just because something is of no use to them, that it can't be of use to anyone.

    7. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Amouth · · Score: 1

      where i live the do the chalk thing too.. i walked out just intime to see a cop making my tires.. i have him holy hell about vandilizing my car.. caught him completely off gaurd - he really had no excuse.. jsut said he was sorry and i left.

      it was all in good fun though.. i am glad they ticket people.. i just hate it when the see a meeter with like 2 min on it and jsut stand there and wait for it.. i had one like that (diffrent cop) they stuck the ticket to the windshield as i was turnning the car on.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    8. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by frakir · · Score: 1

      Keeps a set of rich guys from pumping quarters in it all day long without any negative consequences for them.

      I hope the next feature added will be automatically issued parking tickets when someone exceeds their time... sort of 'convenience ticket'. That is what you will eventually get when you disclose your id/cell number in advance in a ticket gamble.

    9. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by NosTROLLdamus · · Score: 0
      You're right, they have time limits on parking meters for a reason. I've seen ones that won't even let you put more change in until ALL the time elapses. It says "Hey, other people have shit to do as well."

      How long until we see cell phones that do this auto-magically? Just put in the meter number, and the amount of change to dump in every hour. If you could do that, I see no reason to not make the meter last all day, surely you could implement a system in a digital meter that charged more the longer you wanted to park, and it wouldn't be a bonus only to people with cell-phones.

      Also, I noticed you've been modded "overrated". Looks like some people disagree with you, but want to escape the meta-modding. Sorry.

    10. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by abigor · · Score: 0

      I order my groceries online via spud.ca. It's a fantastic service and it saves me loads of time to do more interesting and fulfilling things than walking down to the market. I guess you have lots of empty hours to kill. Have you considered a hobby?

    11. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by dirty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We had that problem in Philadelphia, so they just increased the ticket price rather than actually deal with the cost of parking in the city.

      --

      -matt
    12. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I did that a few years back in Boston. i had to spend three days in the city. A legal parking spot for those days would of run me $45. Chancing a parking ticket was $15 a ticket. well I moved every day and was in a slightly different spot every night. I got one parking ticket on my last night.

      Big deal. I can live with that. I don't know if they have changed the price since then though.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    13. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by admdrew · · Score: 3, Insightful
      i have [sic] him holy hell about vandilizing my car..
      it was all in good fun though..

      Congrats, asshole. Way to ruin a guy's day while he was doing his job. We've all been pissed about parking tickets, but the onus is on the owner of the car to make sure the meter is paid, not the person in charge of writing tickets. Why should you expect leniency from a cop who probably has to do that all day? To him, your car is no more important than the thousands of others out there.

    14. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Well it works out nicely as an annoyance. I work part time for my friend's kitchen installation business and when we're working in the city (Manhattan) parking is frustrating. Being able to stay at a job for more than an hour before I have to go fill up the meter would be so nice.

    15. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Bookswinters · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Inconvenience is a major feature of parking meters, as they are largely designed to dissuade people from parking curbside long term. Case in point, check out these parking meter fees near Times Square in New York:

      1 hour: $2; 2 hours: $5; 3 hours: $9

      Notice how the pricing is scaled to deter long term parking. These machines DO NOT TAKE BILLS, so you must carry huge amounts of quarters with you.

      Conclusion: If cell phone payment methods become widespread in the US, I expect either sharp rate increases or maximum time limits before you must return to the machine to compensate for the removal of inconvenience.

    16. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know a semi-disabled person that gets groceries delivered to their house. Not all people who use the service are "lazy" - you should think a little beyond your own realm before posting comments like that...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    17. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      rather than actually deal with the cost of parking in the city

      Yeah, cause we wouldn't want to let a market determine the cost of a service, now would we?

      I both live and work in the city, and I'm pleased to see any increase in the barrier to outsiders bringing their cars into town. I'm especially pleased to see harsher penalties for flouting parking laws, because residents (the people who provide the most support to cities in cash and other ways) deserve the chance at parking that these laws provide, by keeping spots turning over.

      Don't like the cost of parking? Leave your goddam car outside city limits, and use the excellent regional or urban transit system. When I lived outside Philadelphia, I did. Now that I live in the city, I walk two miles to work. Muuuuhhaaaahaaaaaa!

    18. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey, that asshole chose to be a meter maid. If he didn't realize there may be a negative perception of his job duties, he has no business in law enforcement. All they do is issue fines, not help people like real cops (occasionally) do.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    19. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by jelloshotgun · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's still $15 in Brookline.

      --
      Sometimes I feel like +1 Reasonable should exist.
    20. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anthracks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Boston has become Nazis with regard to parking. It's nice if you live there, since there's half a chance now you can actually park on your own street. But the last time I parked illegally (about a year ago, before I had a local permit), they towed my car and I had over $100 in fines! It's definitely worth it to spend an extra few minutes cruising for a meter than chancing the "resident parking only" areas. Plus all the meters are free from 8pm-8am, and all day on Sundays.

      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    21. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 4, Funny

      Grocery store! You lazy slob. Grow your own wheat.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    22. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by colinbrash · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's just annoyance, I think most (all?) meters have a limit, beyond which you must move your car (or get fined). I don't think I've ever seen a meter that didn't have a maximum time limit.

      So this idea certainly wouldn't work anywhere I've been, unless they changed the law. Though, granted, I've only ever been two or three places where they seemed to actually enforce a maximum time limit...

    23. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by SparkEE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He gave "have him holy hell about vandilizing" his car with the chaulk. So, it isn't about the guy doing his job, is about the method that was employed. How is it okay for the meter person to draw on your tires like that? If I spent time cleaning my tires and wheels just to have chaulk on them for NOT VIOLATING anything, I'd be miffed also. Granted, I'd probably just forget about, but I understand where the GP's comming from.

      In Boston, they use the big yellow locks on the wheels (can't recall the name) for serious parking offenses. That kinda bugs me too because they must really destroy the wheels. Gives me real incentive to just use a gargage.

    24. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by bunions · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes him an asshole? Because he took a job giving out tickets to people who knowingly break the law? How old are you, twelve?

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    25. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Defending a meter maid?? Are you serious?? How old are you - eight?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    26. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Vip · · Score: 3, Informative

      The $300 fine is for businesses, like paper shredding companies. General public would have a $40 fine.

      The City of Calgary is also going with catching drivers who stay at the meter too long.

      There's also talk of using a similar parking meter system as described in TFA.

      Vip

    27. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by riflemann · · Score: 4, Informative

      They have a solution to this in many European cities:

      Wheelclamps.

      To Mr RichBastard, paying a fine is no deterrent. Mr RichBastard having to wait an hour or two for the guys with the wheel clamp keys is gonna re-think his parking strategy.

      Especially when they (purposely) take their time coming to unclamp you.

    28. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by HoboMaster · · Score: 1

      En-masse. It's French. Just posting for your edification. Doesn't really bother me, I just figured you might like to know.

      --
      Remember kids, tin foil doesn't work, so use LeadHat.
    29. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In LA we call that "getting booted". The metermaids here are terrible.

    30. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0, Troll
      Congrats, asshole. Way to ruin a guy's day while he was doing his job. We've all been pissed about parking tickets, but the onus is on the owner of the car to make sure the meter is paid, not the person in charge of writing tickets.

      Personally, I wouldn't give a rat's ass if half of all the cops in the US *lost* their jobs and starved on the street. This country is overpoliced as it is, and the laws are becoming more and more rigid (mandatory life sentences, etc). Then, if I saw one begging, I'd throw a steel washer or one of those knockout plugs from an electrical box into his cup :)

      If cops/meter maids get enough abuse, they may even quit their jobs voluntarily and find something more productive to do...

      -b.

    31. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be great if the parking meter could tell that you hadn't paid or moved the car and then issued the cell phone an instant meter violation charge? I believe that is $50 in Chicago. Plus a 30 cent convenience fee.

      That'd probably be illegal, since the parking violation is a *fine* rather than a charge. The law guarantees due process to people accused of an offense, even if it is too small to merit a jury trial in most places.

      -b.

    32. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by BigDumbAnimal · · Score: 1

      Two Words:

      Oxyacetylene Torch

    33. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by admdrew · · Score: 1
      Defending a meter maid??

      Amusing, to be sure, but according to the original post, it was a cop, not a meter maid. Where I live there are both; I'd imagine that sometimes there are regular police that are put on traffic duty.

    34. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      I'm not way off-track one of the purposes of a parking meter is the annoyance feature. Keeps a set of rich guys from pumping quarters in it all day long without any negative consequences for them.
      yes, that's exactly it. that's the same reason that in many places it's illegal to put money in someone else's meter even as a good samaritan gesture
    35. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by admdrew · · Score: 1

      First, have you ever had your tires chalked? Chalk is used because it's non-damaging and is relatively easy to wipe off. Second, the chalk is used when there is a violation; in this case it was a 'parking limit' that the OP was going over.

      The locks you mention are wheel clamps, often used to keep a car stationary if a tow truck is not available at that moment.

    36. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most meters that I've seen have a note on them that gives a maximum number of hours, something like "$0.25 per half hour, maximum 4 hours" and which is seldom if ever enforced. THIS system could simply tell you to fuck off if you call to renew past the deadline, AND let the traffic cops know when it expires so they can come ticket you for it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Okay now granted, it's not going to hurt anyone if there's a chalk mark on my tire, but since when is it okay for the police to break the law in order to make it easier to track me? Marking my possesions is known as vandalism. Many people actually wash and shine their tires, then they have some asshole come along and draw on them. Why is that okay? Our cars are required to have two different unique registration numbers so that we can be tracked, are you seriously telling me they need to chalk my tires, too? That's bullshit, pure bullshit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I've seen ones that won't even let you put more change in until ALL the time elapses. It says "Hey, other people have shit to do as well."

      Uh no, that's not what it says. It says "the person who designed this and the person who bought it from them are both fucking retards". Let me share a scenario with you: Someone budgets 30 minutes and is in and out in 5, maybe they left their wallet at home or something. I need an hour, and I get there with 25 minutes left on the meter. I now have to go find another meter, because otherwise, I'm getting a parking ticket.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    39. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      They're called Auto Boots.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    40. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Actually, the chalk is not used when there's a violation, it's used to track violators. If you've chaked three hours ago, and there's a two-hour limit, anyone with the chalk in the same spot has been there the whole time.

    41. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Did you just say that Phili has excellent public transit?

    42. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by operagost · · Score: 1

      I both live AND work outside of that bastion of corruption! MUHAHAHAHAHAA!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    43. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by isorox · · Score: 1

      Actually, here in Calgary CANADA, there's been a big hubub recently about people parking all day at parking meters and just paying the fine. It was cheaper to pay the $25 fine than to pay $28 for eight hours of parking.

      in London UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, it's £50 (CAD$100), and you risk a tow-away, which runs the fine over the $500 mark, and results in you having to trek across town to get your car back.

      That's after you pay CAD$16 a day to enter the city.

    44. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Icculus · · Score: 2, Funny
      Three more words (or 2 if you count a hyphenated word as one):

      Angle-grinder Man

    45. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by alienw · · Score: 1

      Heh. There's a good solution to that problem. An angle grinder :)

    46. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Cry me a river. Chalk on tires blows off as soon as you drive away. And post a citation of the law you claim it violates (its not vandalism if it doesn't even stay on). If you care so much about your car, don't park it on the street. What are you going to do when someone drives by a little too close and knocks the mirror off, which I've seen happen to MANY parked cars on streets? Its not like the driver who did it is going to leave you a note or anything.

    47. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by toleraen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the laws are becoming more and more rigid (mandatory life sentences, etc).

      You're blaming the freakin' meter maid for mandatory life sentences?! While I agree that the police might be given more rights than they should, you're talking about the person that's hired to make sure your dumbass is fairly paying for general road repairs! What, do you blame the janitor for having to wash your hands after taking a crap at work?

    48. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Chalk on tires blows off as soon as you drive away.

      Not if it went on wet, like on wet tires. Then it doesn't come off until you wash it off (or drive a WHOLE bunch.) Shows how much you know: jack shit. It's not even true when it's dry, either: they just MOSTLY come off right away. The faded smudge will remain for a long time, and be very visible on cleaned tires.

      If you care so much about your car, don't park it on the street.

      Sometimes, there's nowhere else to park. Also, there are lots with meters. Which again, shows how much you know.

      What are you going to do when someone drives by a little too close and knocks the mirror off, which I've seen happen to MANY parked cars on streets?

      Probably fix it. However, that's an accident. It's stupid, and destructive - but we're talking about someone deliberately defacing my property, which is entirely fucking different. Try to stay on topic, please.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1
      Two Words: Oxyacetylene Torch

      I'll see your Oxyacetylene torch and raise you the Criminal Damage Act of 1971 (the wikipedia article doesn't mention the punishment but it's up to 10 years in jail).

      That's not to say I don't hate the bastards with a passion but (aside from melting your tyres) an oxyacetylene torch is not the answer.

    50. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The chalk is used to mark down intervals that the car was in that particular parking place. Say the cop goes down the street every half hour. He marks all the cars. Then the next time he goes down that street he marks the cars again. Then a third time. And a fourth. Then on the fifth time, even if the meter still has time, because somebody is running out and feeding it quarters, he knows that the car is in violation of the two hour time limit.

      The problem is is that even though chalk is fairly innocuous a substance and cleans off somewhat easily (not perfectly though, a scuff in your tire can hold chalk really well.) For some people, such as myself, we wash out cars regularily and take the time to actually clean the brake dust out of the wheels, scrub the mud of the tires and put on tire shine to keep it looking good. I have the same right to keep my car clean and gleaming as anyone else does to wear a business suit or dress like a goth.

    51. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by zaphod_es · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh what joy to get towed in Boston and only pay $100

      Come to London http://www.westminster.gov.uk/transportandstreets/ parking/controlledparkingzones/incorrect.cfm and this is the deal:

      Initial fine £100 (US$182) This is discounted by 50% if you pay within 14 days
      Not long after being ticketed you are likely to be clamped and the release fee is £65
      And then they will tow you for only an additional £165

      That adds up to £330 ($500) and somehow there always seems to be an extra charge - and that does not count the damage done to your car. If you are a stranger driving in London be afraid, be very afraid!

    52. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by DavidTC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Pssst, you don't need to explain where London is. Even us Americans know.

      If you do explain, feel free to put London, England, or London, UK. You don't need to put 'London UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    53. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they go around chalking more often. Like every hour. So when they make the third mark they know you've been there too long. Although I guess it obviously would vary based on how many cops there are.

      And while I rarely side with the police on stuff like this, honestly, that's about the easiest and least privacy-invading way to prevent mistakes. Yes, they could go around writing down all the plates, or just photographing the cars, or even have video cameras up, but I'd rather have chalk. They could stick notes on the car, but that's just pointless litter when most people will be gone after one of them. (If they mark the tires, they presumably mark a specific place on them, so if you move the car, the mark's not in the right place. Or they could just use different colors on different streets.)

      Plus, now there's an opening for 'The Anti-Chalk', a superhero who goes around erasing the marks off cars so people don't get tickets. ;) Which would be, like, the most trivial superhero job in the universe. Damp-Cloth Man. You could rig a wet-nap to the side of your shoe or something.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    54. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by ericdano · · Score: 1

      However, disabled people have been able to do that BEFORE the online stuff. You should think a little BEFORE you post comments like that.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    55. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by NosTROLLdamus · · Score: 0
      Oh, I've run into that scenario, but it was six minutes, but these meters, in my city, are located in spots where it's high volume "get in, get out" type of buisnesses, and these meters are not common fare.

      I'd rather have a meter go unused for 15 minutes than have some guy parking there all day, so a person who needs to run in and out can do so. Of course, they could always make it "thirty minute parking" and put up a sign, but I'm guessing they like the tickets from people willing to take the chance.

    56. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by ericdano · · Score: 0, Troll

      Interesting and fulfilling things like Troll Slashdot? It takes 15 minutes to shop at the store. And hell, I live in walking distance as well.

      Oh, but you are Canadian. I know what you are talking aboot. You live in some frigid area where it's like 50 miles to get to any place that has more than 50 people living together in a thing called a city.

      Yeah, ok, in your case I can see how it can take HOURS to shop.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    57. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      If they did that, I'd demand a jury trial where they demonstrate that the car wasn't in my possession at the time.

      What? If someone loans me their car, I can drive it somewhere, park it, and put money in the meter. If they loan it to me while it's already legally parked, I can put more money in the meter.

      The burden of proof is on them to demonstrate that the owner didn't loan it to me during the thirty seconds I fed the meter. Remember, he could have agreed to my borrowing his car at any point in the past. The fact I wasn't in possession of the key could easily be an oversight on our parts.

      Oh, and both me and the owner will be able to take the fifth, as the state is trying to fine both of us, me for feeding his meter and him for letting the meter expire. We don't have to lie, they have to prove that at no point in the past did he ever agree I could use his car during that time, without using either of our testimony. Have fun with that.

      People need to stand up to this idiotic law.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    58. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, actually, I called them retards, but actually, they're quite intelligent - they're just assholes. They've stumbled onto a clever way to milk more money out of people by fucking with them, and they're not too shy to take advantage of it, because they have no qualms about shitting on people.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    59. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It should be first few fines $25, then add $100 per incident during the next 12 months.

      And yes allowing people to pay without physically going to the meter basically turns convenient metered parking into a parking spot for the rich. Which really makes you want to walk by an area like that with your keys out.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    60. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Guess what, kid (there's no way you could be an adult): they're going to keep chalking your tires whether you like it or not. What are you going to do about it? I know you're the smartest guy on earth and all, but it doesn't seem like you thought this through. I know, it sucks, why can't everyone just be as smart as you and then life would be easier, right?

    61. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by abigor · · Score: 1

      You think trolling Slashdot is interesting and fulfilling? I sure don't. Bashing online delivery because it doesn't suit your probably-unemployed circumstances is just dumb, that's all.

      "Oh, but you are Canadian. I know what you are talking aboot. You live in some frigid area where it's like 50 miles to get to any place that has more than 50 people living together in a thing called a city."

      Spud.ca only delivers to the Vancouver metropolitan area, which has something like 2 million people. Despite your lame musical pretensions, you really do seem awfully thick.

    62. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Guess what, kid (there's no way you could be an adult):

      For what it's worth (maturity and age are typically not all that well-connected) I'm 29 years of age.

      they're going to keep chalking your tires whether you like it or not. What are you going to do about it?

      That's a good question. I'm still thinking about that one. I think mostly my plan is to look for a country where as few people as possible have your attitude that people should roll over and let the system fuck them around, and move there. Yes, THIS is a very tiny, mostly unimportant example of that fucking, but it is still a valid one. It demonstrates the establishment's lack of respect and concern for the citizenry. Your comment demonstrates your lack of commitment to freedom.

      I know you're the smartest guy on earth and all, but it doesn't seem like you thought this through.

      I know you think you're smarter than me - and you may be right, for all I know - but right now you're only being an ass. I started out by asking a [mostly rhetorical] question about where do they get off vandalizing my car when their job is to uphold the law and serve the public interest, and I got a bunch of pure bullshit back. Well, you've handed me bullshit, I'm doing my best to make shit-ade.

      I know, it sucks, why can't everyone just be as smart as you and then life would be easier, right?

      Well, yes and no. If we didn't have stupid people, then we'd have smart people working their whole lives making burgers at McDonalds because there wouldn't be any jobs that everyone but the stupid is vastly overqualified for. There is a substantial chance that I would end up working there, because I am less driven to go run around in a rat race and pour my sweat into job-finding, so my life would likely be harder.

      Is that a suitably smart-ass response to your asshole question?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    63. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by dhollist · · Score: 1

      In Ann Arbor, Michigan they will ticket you every two hours if you leave your car in a designated 2-hour parking spot. It's kind of gratifying to watch peoples' reaction when they return to their car and find 4 or 5 parking tickets under the windshield wiper, since they thought they "had it all figured out" that the $10 expired meter fine is cheaper than feeding the meter or using an off-street parking structure.

      Also, the first ticket is usually for an expired meter ($10) and the subsequent tickets are for going beyond the posted time limit ($25 each). Needless to say, it can get expensive. Just ask this guy who obviously got a few tickets [flickr.com] himself.

    64. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      How/why is that even relevant? All I stated was not everyone who shops for groceries online is "lazy". As a matter of fact, people who are not "lazy" value their time greatly. If you can save some time by shopping online, you free up time for more valuable things. So really, only the truly "lazy" waste their time by going to the brick-and-mortar grocery stores. So there!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    65. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by peragrin · · Score: 1

      odd enough that is where I was on brookline. I forgot the address though.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    66. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Notice how the pricing is scaled to deter long term parking. These machines DO NOT TAKE BILLS, so you must carry huge amounts of quarters with you.
      Er, the United States has had dollar coins for a long time now...I've even received some as change from vending machines....

      -A confused Canadian

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    67. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by wadevondoom · · Score: 1

      If I am not mistaken, this is illegal in Canada. You cannot put a "boot" on a vehicle here. Something to do with unlawful confinement or some malarky like that. This is not to mention that the company who hands out the fines is a private company. bad enough they can have you towed. They took away their customer service phone number and now have concentrated on making it a collections deprtment. There is very little recourse to plead your case anymore. If the parking dudes say you are guilty then you are guilty and god help you if you dont pay. They get pretty nasty. My wife got some calls for them for a ticket that must have fallen off her windshield (wink sure honey).
      Being a Vancouver resident, I hate driving downtown at any time. One of the worst places to try to drive or park. I park my car elsewhere (for cheaper) and take the Skytrain downtown. Its a small area. You can walk anywhere downtown very quickly or hope a bus. The train costs $2.25 to $4.50. Waaaaaaay cheaper than parking costs. The worst part of driving downtown is the pedestrains who have no compulsion to move out of a vehicle's way red light, green light or otherwise. It is normal to see 10 people crossing the street when they have a red light.

    68. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by dhollist · · Score: 1

      Yes, we have useless $1 coins that most parking meters and vending machines won't accept.

    69. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by mfrank · · Score: 1

      So, if the neighbor kids play hopscotch on the sidewalk in front of your house, you call the cops on them?

    70. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      Removal of inconvenience? I think you mean "to compensate for the deprival of convenience for other people".

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    71. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by really? · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is some law against damaging them things.

      Now, depending on the "boot" and on your wheels, there are other ways. My brother, has a BUNCH of booths - as in more than 20 - in a corner of his yard. He drives a Nissan SUV with BIG ass off road tyres. If he returns to his car and finds it "booted", he lets the air out of the tyre, and bends a small piece of the booth. He then removes the boot, bends back the small piece, re-inflates the tire with a small electric pump he always has in the back, throws the boot in his car and drives away. I asked him why he didn't just leave the boot behind, and he said "I wouldn't want anyone to take it and sell it for scrap metal." Once every few months he loads all the boots in his car and "dumps" them at the gate of one the smaller police stations in the town, since in the country he lives in right now it's the cops that put the boots on. He thinks this is funny.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    72. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      Indeed, it's only fair what with having all of those frenchmen and being forced to live in igloos. Here in the land of milk, honey and/or massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons I suspect there will be no great rush to implement this. The cities make far more cash handing out tickets than they do collecting fiddling small change from the parking meters. Heck, why do you think the meters have 2 hour (or less) caps on them?

      If I am not mistaken, this is illegal in Canada. You cannot put a "boot" on a vehicle here. Something to do with unlawful confinement or some malarky like that.
    73. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by really? · · Score: 1

      So, if the guy who parked before me, leaves with a some minutes, let's say 15, on the meter, I have to wait till the meter goes to zero before I can put in my money? Doesn't sound right to me.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    74. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't have a sidewalk.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    75. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by s13g3 · · Score: 1

      Two Words:

      Oxyacetylene Torch


      One word:

      Felony

      --
      "Inveniemus Viam Aut Faciemus" 'We will find a way... Or we will make one!' --Hannibal of Carthage
    76. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Germik · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, in Cambridge at least, if you leave your car parked in a 1-hour zone for over three hours, you could walk away with over three tickets. I haven't looked into the technicalities of this, but it seems that they ticket you for each violation of the 1-hour limit on the spot.

      Anyone know for sure about this?

    77. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Mr RichBastard having to wait an hour or two for the guys with the wheel clamp keys is gonna re-think his parking strategy."

      You know...I've wondered if by now aren't there places on the internet that will sell you clamp/boot 'keys' that you can buy and take the damned things off by yourself?

      No, I've not googled for that yet..just thought of it...but, even though I'm sure it is against the law to remove one yourself...I mean, it isn't like they keep watch on the booted car. Just wait till no cops around, and take it off and leave the boot by the side of the road and drive off, eh?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    78. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by penguinstorm · · Score: 1

      Fines should scale, and it should be possible to refine.

      Overstaying a meter by an hour should have less of an impact than overstaying a meter by, say, a whole day.

      If a ticket's issued at 1300hrs, hit it with a double fine ticket at 1500hrs and then tow the friggin' car at 1700hrs.

      --
      Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
    79. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Actually, the chalk is not used when there's a violation, it's used to track violators. "

      Wow, this whole thread is interesting, I've never heard of 'time limits' on public parking...much less having a cop use chalk in some way to mark your tires to see if you moved or not...

      I take it this is more of a NE US coastal thing? I've been in plenty of busy cities in the south, with meters downtown...but never seen such radical behavior by cops on how long you stay there feeding the meters...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    80. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Same thing at my college. You could buy the parking permit, or you could just park illegally, get a $7 fine, ignore it, it takes literally 3 weeks for the cops to notice it was an old one, issue another. By the end of the year you save $50 and got to park where ever the hell you felt like and not restricted to certain lots + saved money

      In the case of my new college, it is a campus security ticket, so I just throw those in the garbage since they have no legal authority.
      I tell the guard he might as well not waste his time

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    81. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      You obviously have an impaired sense of humor. Please schedule an appointment with a comedian immediately.

      --

      Enigma

    82. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Not a coastal thing, they do it all over the Chicago area too. Evanston in particular is rather overzealous when it comes to parking fines. We've frequently had people move their cars, and still get a ticket because the chalk line didn't move enough. People in my company grudgingly accept the 2-hour-shuffle, since the only other alternative is paying over $150 a month for a spot in the parking garages six or seven blocks away.

      It makes me glad I sold my car and use public transportation to avoid the hassle. I'd probably end up strangling someone if I had to move my car every two hours on a busy workday and I got trapped in a meeting.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    83. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by pthisis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, this whole thread is interesting, I've never heard of 'time limits' on public parking...much less having a cop use chalk in some way to mark your tires to see if you moved or not...I take it this is more of a NE US coastal thing?

      No, it's all over the US. In the South, I've seen it in Raleigh, Fayetteville, and Atlanta.

      The issue is that metered parking is there for people to, say, go out and get lunch or a haircut or whatever. If you're an employee who's going to be there all day, parking a block or two away isn't a huge deal.

      Normally areas are marked "2 hour parking" or whatever. The traffic cops come around and mark the tire treads (_not_ the sides of the tires--they want the chalk in a spot where it wears off as soon as the car moves) with chalk periodically, and if they come back and see a car they'd previously marked has been there for over 2 hours they ticket.

      I'd lived in areas that did it for _years_ before someone pointed it out to me.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    84. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a similar situation in Philadelphia, PA.

      Parking in a garage is usually around $18... and the parking ticket for an expired meter is $20. No incentive to go to the garage, once you know that.

    85. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

      There are several places in Vancouver (at least) where there is a time limit on how long you can use a parking spot, including metered spots. This new system prevents you from going over that time limit, and it also saves you from parking there when it is not allowed (e.g. during rush hour), by not allowing you to feed the meter.

      Personally, I think its about time!

    86. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Keeps a set of rich guys from pumping quarters in it all day long without any negative consequences for them.

      It must be tough being that persecuted. You may find yourself a lot happier if you spend less time looking for conspiracies under every rock...

    87. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by ghoul · · Score: 1

      At my college campus security puts a hold on your record so until you pay the fines u cant register for next semester

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    88. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by snilloc · · Score: 1
      (Writing from an insignificant town in Central Pennsylvania)

      "Downtown" parking is metered.
      Other relatively high traffic areas have one or two-hour limit signs.
      Residential areas often have 12 or 24 hour limits, just to make sure some homeless person doesn't park his/her VW Microbus on the street for a year and a half.

      And of course, street sweeping night - no parking between 10pm and 6am on whichever day they sweep the streets.

    89. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Roduku · · Score: 1

      ...and that's why all our $1 coins have been sent to Canada

    90. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by isorox · · Score: 1

      You don't need to put 'London UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND'

      The OP clearly wrote Calgary (which even us Brits know where that is), then wrote the country, in capital letters.

      I did the same.

      England is not a soverign nation. The OP didn't write Calgary, Alberta (not the same thing, but close).

      The UK is a common abbreviation of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but it's not the offical name. I just wanted to make clear which London I was on about, the OP might have assumed I was on about London, Ontario, for example.

      Doesn't hurt to remind people the realy name of the country (ruled by the decendent of a Scottish King)

    91. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by sparklefairy · · Score: 1

      I think you're right about Cambridge; luckily I have a resident permit now. The tickets I've gotten in Boston (Allston/Brighton - yuck) for being at meters were all in the $25 range. In Cambridge and Somerville you don't get towed for not having a resident sticker if you are not at a meter, but you get a $40-50 ticket.

    92. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, do you blame the janitor for having to wash your hands after taking a crap at work?

      I sure do. If he would refill the toilet paper, I wouldn't have to use my hands!

    93. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to have the emotional maturity of a twelve-year-old, you insensitive clod!11!

    94. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn how to spell the word "you", you stupid piece of shit.

    95. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      In the same city, they'd probably arrest you for drawing on the sidewalk with chalk.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    96. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      The US technically has dollar coins, but you so rarely encounter them that people don't even know what they are if you try to spend them.

      The ONLY place I've ever received a dollar coin is from a veding machine at the post office. Now that you can get stamps from an ATM, why go to the post office?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    97. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Heck, why do you think the meters have 2 hour (or less) caps on them?

      I don't know where you live, but near me the cap is generally set to the same amount of time you're legally allowed to park in the spot. Technically, in those spots you're not supposed to go 'feed the meter', and if you do you could get a ticket anyway.

      The cap is so you don't stay parked in the same spot too long so the rest of us can have a chance at a place to park.

    98. Re:Kinda defeats a parking meter feature by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      I respectfully disagree, what you are suggesting is merely a side-effect of a law that ensures city revenue, much like arbitrarily set speed limits (aka:speed traps) ensure county and state revenue. It may be legally correct, but that does not make it any less amoral.

      Example: You are legally obligated to interact with the ever-helpful government officials. They are located downtown, but for some strange reason there are no publicly accessable parking structures nearby. Good thing this never takes more than 2 hours...

      I don't know where you live, but near me the cap is generally set to the same amount of time you're legally allowed to park in the spot. Technically, in those spots you're not supposed to go 'feed the meter', and if you do you could get a ticket anyway. The cap is so you don't stay parked in the same spot too long so the rest of us can have a chance at a place to park.
  3. convenience fees by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    There aren't a lot of convenience fees that I wholeheartedly support, but 30 cents to not have to run out to my parking meter sounds like a winner.

    1. Re:convenience fees by BunnyClaws · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Very true. I would be happy to pay the extra 30 cents for the convenience of not having to look for change. I never have change on me. Now what I would really like is for vending machines to take debit cards because once again I never have change on me. I am all about convenience which is the reason I pay an extra dollar for milk from Walgreens instead of going to the grocery store.

      --
      "Anything tastes good if you deep fry it."
    2. Re:convenience fees by hkgroove · · Score: 1

      Yes, so would I and many more others, too. However, the problem isn't the idea, it's going to be the implementation costs vs. the city governments that love dishing out parking tickets and wheel boots (Pittsburgh, for instance) to make the easy revenue. I usually see no less than 4 meter maids at any given time walking down the street and watch them hover near the meters with less than 2 minutes to expire.

    3. Re:convenience fees by BunnyClaws · · Score: 1
      However, the problem isn't the idea, it's going to be the implementation costs vs. the city governments that love dishing out parking tickets and wheel boots (Pittsburgh, for instance) to make the easy revenue. I usually see no less than 4 meter maids at any given time walking down the street and watch them hover near the meters with less than 2 minutes to expire.
      This may make paying your parking meter easier but it doesn't guarantee everyone will pay. You are still going to run into issues like forgetting your cell at home or the battery is dead and not having change on you. There are still going to be plenty of chances for the city to fine people for not paying. Now if this results in a less parking tickets the city will be able to lower their overhead by not needing to pay as many meter maids. Either way I think the city is going to get a profit from this.
      --
      "Anything tastes good if you deep fry it."
    4. Re:convenience fees by code+addict · · Score: 1

      I wish it was that cheap. Typical meter charges in Vancouver are usually something like $1 = 15 minutes.

    5. Re:convenience fees by SparkEE · · Score: 1

      The city isn't supposed to be looking for a profit from the parking meters. Meters are typically priced to balance between just enough to annoy you and make you not park too long, and enough to cover the cost of maintaining and patrolling the meters. The way the city benefits from the meters is that they induce more flow throughout the streets, helping businesses see more customers because there is a place to park and run in. The city gets the tax benefits of the boost in consumer business.

    6. Re:convenience fees by hkgroove · · Score: 1

      Pittsburgh hiked parking rates and parking taxes and at the same time shimmied many of the $0.25 per 15min meters to $0.25 per 7.5 min to balance their budget. I've heard the meter-maids speak of quotas as they ticket cars, especially when they're working in tandem.

      They're getting more money per each driver and their increased meter-maid presence (at least it's seems so since) to enforce it seems as if they want to take advantage it with a $15 or $25 dollar ticket - most of them do end up on the ground it seems.

      Downtown Pittsburgh doesn't have the quick shopping / restaurant district to attract those who "park and run in" with street parking (of which there is very little) for any benefit from taxes - at least not on the scale you're implying. Half of downtown is abandoned and unless you're downtown for work (like myself) there's absolutely no reason to be downtown during the day. Which is pretty sad to think about.

      You're almost always forced to park in a garage and pay $3 or 4 (compared to $2.00 for an hour at a meter) due to the limited parking.

    7. Re:convenience fees by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Denver got a new mayor who campaigned partly on improving downtown parking. After making the meters less expensive and expanding free parking times/days the city had to make up a multimillion dollar budget deficit from the change.

      The city had raised parking prices and instituted ticket quotas in an attempt to balance the budget a few years back. It seemed to drive people away from downtown, worsening the problem.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    8. Re:convenience fees by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Any city official that decides that ticket quotas is the way to raise revenue doesn't deserve any votes.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  4. According to the Rastafarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vancouver is Babylon - the city of greed and excess. I think they have something there.

    1. Re:According to the Rastafarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no two people speak the same language, and finding someone who was born here is like finding hen's teeth.

    2. Re:According to the Rastafarians by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I knew Stargate was filmed in Vancouver, I didn't know if Babylon 5 was though.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  5. Who to call when the meter won't accept ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who to call when the meter won't accept ? THAT IS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW.

    1. Re:Who to call when the meter won't accept ? by colinbrash · · Score: 1

      Ghostbusters?

  6. Nothing to see here, move along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this whilst travelling over 2 years ago.... I think it was in NZ

    1. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and we've had it in Finland for quite some time now, it's not only parking meters, but all kinds of tickets, movies, soda machines,..

  7. Competition by wlkrt0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So does this mean that every city in Canada will be able to use a different service provider?
    While it would be feasible to maintain an account with several providers in different cities, it seems like a government-sponsered portal would make more sense than required accounts to be created directly on the company site. Maybe this won't be an issue since most of one's parking would be in one city; just a thought.

    1. Re:Competition by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      In Canada parking fees and such regulation are a municipal matter - neither the provincial nor federal governments have any place getting muddled in it. Unfortunately that probably means accounts everywhere. I live in Richmond (a 'burb of Vancouver), and there are quite a few separate municipalities in this area where I regularly park, so I'll probably keep pumping those quarters.

    2. Re:Competition by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      I remember reading once that the very first Parking Meters were installed in Albuquerque New Mexico about 100 years ago. It was a temorary meassure to pay for some needed street repair. The streets are still broken.. and the meters are still there...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, if you live in Richmond (or White Rock or Seattle) you can use the same service - it's all the same company. I think it's everywhere at Impark and Diamond parking lots in Vancouver too.

    4. Re:Competition by kevinl · · Score: 1

      According to http://www.ionet.net/~luttrell/history.html, the first parking meters were installed in Oklahoma City on July 16, 1935. They were intended to solve the problem of people who worked downtown taking too many parking spots all day.

    5. Re:Competition by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      from your cited site: Although it is sometimes disputed, Carl C. Magee, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is generally credited with originating the parking meter. He filed for a patent for a "coin controlled parking meter" May 13, 1935. The patent, #2,118,318, was issued May 24, 1938

      Carl Magee was from Albuquerque. Hence the dispute. He built one there first. He took out the patent after the move to OK City.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    6. Re:Competition by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Like they say, there's no such thing as a temporary tax.

  8. "Convenience" fees! Heh. by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember the first time (too many years back, now) that I experienced Convenience while I was in line at a McDonalds grabbing a burger on my way someplace. I told the cashier I wanted a Diet Coke as my combo drink. She handed me the now-expected empty cup and told me that I would be getting the drink from the "Convenience Center" across the store.

    "Convenient for who?" I asked. And she told me, unblinkingly, that it had in fact really made their job a lot easier.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by preppypoof · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i find the free refills and mixable drinks pretty convenient...

    2. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I find it convenient to not have to wait in line for a refill of my drink as I am leaving, but maybe I'm just strange.

    3. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      It's McDonalds. How many fucking free refills of coke did your fat ass get? Multiply that by about the 52 billion served and you see what the problem is. People who expect to be waited on for 6 bucks should go fuck themselves.

      Nice, thoughtful response, there. Let's see... how many refills? None. I essentially never do that - usually I prefer to have the cashier hand me my food in a bag, my drink in a cup, and I walk out. Places like McDonalds used to do that all the time, even after the "billions and billions served" signs started replacing actual numbers. I don't expect to be waited on for $6, I just found it funny that a place in the restaurant actually labeled "Convenience Center," is really just a speed booster for their own operations. Why not just call it "self service," and be honest about it? It's the slippery use of the language that's annoying, not the pouring of the drink.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "McDonaldsisation" is actually what I've heard that referred to. And it's not limited to your soft drink :

      - You get your cutelery yourself
      - You get straws yourself
      - You clear up after yourself (disposing in the trash

      And then on a wider levels

      - At the coffee shop, your add your own extra (milk, sugar, etc.)
      - At the supermarket you collect your own groceries (compare this to the grocers at the market, or of the '40s and '50s)
      - You server yourself gas (if you're not in NJ)

      However, these are by no means negative. You get to choose exactly what you want, prices are cheaper and queues are shortened.

    5. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      I find it convenient to keep an empty McD's cup in the car. So when I get a burger there, I don't even inconvenience them with the effort of having to ring up the drink. I also keep the large popcorn bag that cost $4.85 but has .25 cent refills @ the theater that I go to (that they never charge for) very convenient after I just paid $9.25 to see a movie. If they want me to sit through commercials, my popcorn is essentially subsidized (sp?) anyways. Yes, I am that cheap and just slightly enough anti-establishment ;-). Though not anti enough not to go there...

    6. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and with all that put on the customer, some actually have the balls to leave out a tip jar.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    7. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by eggsovereasy · · Score: 1

      And you have to scan your own credit card?

      I find it humorous that at Krogers (grocery store) you have to scan your own credit card, but they can print your check for you? Why would you spend time making it more convient for me by printing my check, but at the same time make me scan my own card?

    8. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Last time I was in Ontario, Canada (2003), it was normal to have to pay a nickel or a dime for a grocery bag and to have to bag one's own groceries.

      It took a while to get used to implied free refills on soda in fast food restaurants in the U.S.: for a while I'd throw out my empty cup and go to buy another one if I was really thirsty, having been brainwashed in Canada that anything not explicitly permitted is forbidden. Not surprisingly, the cashier would usually think me an idiot for throwing out my old cup. Sometimes they'd get mad that I wanted a replacement, not realizing that I was prepared to pay a second time. Only when I was reassured that, yes, the availability of self-serve soda implies free refills, did I believe it.

      Thankfully, I am now filing I140 and I485, having received an LC. Hopefully the brainwashing of my socialist upbringing will start to fade with time.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    9. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by NosTROLLdamus · · Score: 0
      It's there to get you away from the counter as fast as possible. They don't have to hear someone get pissed off because they put too much ice in their drink, or that they want 1/4 cup lemonade 3/4 cup coke.

      In the person waiting in line's mind, generally once you get the food your "wait" is over, so it helps to make it seem like things are moving faster, even if you wait to get your cups of ketchup and your soda over at the "convience center".

    10. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't claim you're anti-establishment as some sort of justification of your con jobs. Your actions are the ones driving companies to do the shit they do.

    11. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by vistic · · Score: 1

      I don't think that makes you cheap at all. Movies are ridiculously overpriced.

      One thing though, the movie ticket money pretty much all goes back to the movie studio, not to the theater itself. The theater I worked for in high school claimed they only got about $0.25 from every ticket sold, and they essentially made all their money from food... which had to cover the cost of employees, electricity, equipment, supplies, the building itself, movie reels too I guess.... This is why movie theaters don't want you bringing in outside food or drink, and why they usually try to suggest you buy candy or get a bigger tub of popcorn.

      So it's not fair to say that the cost of the popcorn is subsidized in the movie ticket price.

      But then again, popcorn is REALLY cheap... we used to throw out at least two huge garbage bags full of popcorn every night... sometimes employees would load them into their cars and take them home to munch on for the next month or two.

    12. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      Never heard of that check printing thing, but scan your own credit card while the register and bag monkeys do their thing and you get out of there 5 seconds faster!

    13. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Because if you pay by check, the store doesn't need to pay the credit card companies their fees and percentages for accepting credit cards. You didn't think that credit card compaines let stores accept credit cards free, did you?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    14. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      My all time favorite stupid "convenience" type fee is how Ticketmaster (last time I looked at least) actually charges more for you to download and print out your own tickets than for them to mail them to you!

      Second would be being charged to electronically file my taxes. For the past several years I have owed the IRS, so there is no way I am going to pay extra so they can get my money sooner.

    15. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 1

      I guess that's why we don't have free refills here in Europe.

      --
      -------
      Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
    16. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Hopefully the brainwashing of my socialist upbringing will start to fade with time.


      The "all you can drink" refillable sodas is more socialistic than the "pay for each refill." Those that drink a lot of soda are being subsidized by those that only drink one and leave. Ironically, captalism has driven the industry to such socialistic measures. :)

      Anyway, "convenience centers" (or serving your own drinks) doesn't bother me. As mentioned, you get to prepare your drink exactly like you want it, you get to refill as many times as you'd like, you don't spend as long in line waiting for them to prepare drinks for the customers in front of you, and McDs can serve more customers more quickly. Isn't it great when something works out for everyone?

      If you want your drink filled and ready-to-go, use drive-thru! Then not only do you have to not be bothered to fill your drink, your lazy butt doesn't even have to get out of the car.

    17. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1
      having been brainwashed in Canada that anything not explicitly permitted is forbidden
      So obviously the inverse is "If something is not explicitly forbidden it is permitted."

      Interesting idea. I was raised in the states but have never given much thought to this concept either way. If I want free refills in the coffee shop for example, I kind of quietly sneak over to the coffee station and get more. I am going to consciously test this out now, though, and shamelessly act like it is assumed these things are OK if not forbidden. I wonder how people will react? That could make for a fun social experiment!

      Not sure if I am up to wandering into a restaurant kitchen just because there is no sign, but we'll start with baby steps.
      --
      blah blah blah
    18. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by David_W · · Score: 1
      Why would you spend time making it more convient for me by printing my check, but at the same time make me scan my own card?

      I think it's not so much for credit cards as it is for debit cards. Since they have to enter their PIN, it's (conceivably) more private to have that PIN pad there, and integrating the scanner just seems simpler at that point. (And then from there, having the credit runs use it too...)

      Also, most places will still scan your card when you hand it to them, if you like.

    19. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by CellBlock · · Score: 1

      They'll print the check because most people are notoriously slow at writing checks. I worked as a grocery store cashier, and some old lady taking a few minutes to scrawl out a check was not uncommon, so, as an option, we can print it up in 15-30 seconds. Not only is it better for that customer, but it's better for everyone behind them, too.

    20. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anthracks · · Score: 1

      That's kind of a mixed list. With respect to the coffee shops, unless I'm in a huge hurry I much prefer to put in my own cream and sugar. It doesn't seem to matter if it's a neighborhood shop or a Starbucks / Dunkin' Donuts...they WILL get your order wrong at least half the time. Or at least vary dramatically in their interpretation of "a little" or "a lot". Maybe that's how they get us to accept these "convenient" cost-cutting features. Make the regular service so mind-bogglingly incompetent that doing everything yourself is much faster and less frustrating.

      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    21. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does the Convienience Island have to do with you stealing shit? Your attempts to justify your behavior as a result of some corporations actions are ridiculous. You are still responsible for your actions.

      A for the snotty little stab at my perception, at least I can recognize when I 'm being a theiving douchebag. If you want to really vote with your dollar, your gonna have to go without.

      Your popcorn wasn't subsidized by advertising at the movie theater. The advertising was put there to create a new revenue stream becuase the theaters were losing money. Probably because a large amount of people justify their deceitful behavior with some sort of magic logic where they are the good guy screwing over the evil corporation.

      You are a factor buddy, face it.

    22. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... it's a DIET coke (or can't you read)? That means 0 calories (*). There are plenty of stupid things people have managed to live on alone (the guy that ate nothing but Big Macs comes to mind) but it is actually impossible to even survive just drinking diet cokes, never mind get fat. The average person will die inside of a month of doing that.

      0 calories = no weight gain = weight loss after ingestion (*)

      Now, I'm not discounting the multitudes of bad health affects that drinking diet coke (especially in excess) has; there's plenty, a few of them have even been proven by actual MDs. But not a single one of them includes weight gain directly form drinking it (however, there are studies that show drinking diet drinks induces hunger, so if you're eating with the diet drink, you'll probably eat more, indirectly causing weight gain as a result of the diet coke).

      (*) - You can try to feed me any bullshit you like, but you'll never convince me that a drink with zero calories doesn't, in the human body, BURN calories, assuming it is cold.

    23. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by lotsotech · · Score: 1

      I suppose it's just subjective then. It's more convenient for me to get refills without waiting in line. Plus, I can easily alter my ice level. Not to mention I frequently mix 25/75 with regular and diet.

    24. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by format1337 · · Score: 1

      This whole thread of comments is off-topic so off we go. Every Subway I have been to has a 'self serve' drink station and now they get this great idea to charge for refills. It is something like 45 cents regardless of size.

      I think that if I have to refill my own drink then I should not have to pay for it. It is not like it costs that much! The cups at McDonalds are actually more expensive than the drink inside. But then again I never had a problem with paying for refills at 7-11...

    25. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Last time I was in Ontario, Canada (2003), it was normal to have to pay a nickel or a dime for a grocery bag and to have to bag one's own groceries.

      Wow. I've lived in Ontario all my life (28 years). Not a single store, except two incredibly discount chains (Valdi [out of business], and Food Basics), charged for bags, ever (not even convenience stores that would give you the evil eye for a 35 cent pack of gum and a bag). Those two stores mentioned would instead provide you with boxes, and would require you bag your own. Of course, they were typical discount chains: Almost everything in cans, very little if any fresh food, sometimes a freezer section (sometimes not), mostly generic brands, *very* cheap prices.

      All other stores even bagged groceries for you.

      Sorry about your poor experience.

      Mine comes from the 401 area (I've shopped at many stores [groceries included] in cities along the 401 corridor, from Windsor, to London, to Kitchener, to Guelph, to Brampton, to Toronto, even Pickering) so perhaps if you were way up North YMMV.

      Usually the big name grocery stores that would provide the most service (bags, bag boys, etc) would be Sobey's, Ultra, and Zehrs. There's others, but they only had very small local names, so it's unlikely you'd hear of them outside the city they're in (ex: "Central Meat Market"). Same good service, though.

      Virtually all restaurants in Ontario with table service have offered free refills since, oh, around 1999 (there were lots before that, but not to the point of it being expected). Many (although not all) fast food chains offer a single free refill also. *That* is definitely not as common.

    26. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      You're right, he's not cheap... he's a thief. He's not 'getting even with the man,' he's 'causing other people to pay more.'

      If I caught him doing that, I'd say something to the management of the business he was robbing. FFS, if he doesn't want to pay the price they are offering, he shouldn't take the product. THAT would be sticking it to the man, depriving them of business from an individual moral high ground.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    27. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by m-wielgo · · Score: 1

      Ticketmaster does that because it can make a lot more money that way. People don't always buy tickets weeks or months in advance. Some people buy the night before or the same day, and can't wait for tickets to arrive by mail.

      Some people need to receive their tax refunds sooner than others... So they'd rather pay a little bit more to file electronically and receive it 2-3 weeks earlier.

    28. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The "all you can drink" refillable sodas is more socialistic than the "pay for each refill." Those that drink a lot of soda are being subsidized by those that only drink one and leave. Ironically, captalism has driven the industry to such socialistic measures. :)

      Nah, if you actually drank enough soda to make your soda break even on cost, you'd go into sugar shock and die.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    29. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to have to pay a nickel or a dime for a grocery bag and to have to bag one's own groceries

      Hey, if you're too stupid to go to a competing store ("competing" meaning one *not* owned by Loblaw's) then it's your own damn fault.

      having been brainwashed

      s/brainwashed/stupid/

      It's been 20 years since I've been to a restaurant or fast-food chain that didn't have free soft drink refills. If you managed to find (and frequent) one of the last ones that did, it's your own damn fault.

      Don't assume that everybody is as stupid as you are.

    30. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      If you were talking about shoplifting in a store, I could see that as being a factor but this is a service industry argument.

      And this guy's petty cons don't amount to much - a drink doesn't cost the company much and neither does the popcorn (a tiny fraction of retail). If it were a big deal, then guess what, free refills would be done away with and those items would be charged for every serving (in fact, none of my theatres give free refills for anything. even a spilled drink).

      I wish I could have more pity for theatres losing money, but they are losing money because of the real shitty movies lately (I think there is only 1 semi-worthwhile movie out these days every two months) along with their cash grabs. Food is too expensive and the ads in the beginning ridiculously long. If they slashed their prices in half (or more in some very ridiculous cases), they probably could more than make up for it in volume (my theatre charges $5.00 for a small popcorn and $3.00 for a drink, funny I know that as I haven't bought a damn thing in years). I can buy DVDs without the ads for less.

      Theatres are harming themselves by taking their audience for granted. Not the few petty con artists taking advantage of the system.*

      *The biggest "con" I pull in a theatre is walk out of a shitty movie halfway and walk into another in order to find a decent film. But, as I go to Yahoo movies to see what crap fests I'm going to ahead of time, even that happens less - the net result is that I just don't go to the theatre in the first place as I'm too depressed over what's being offered. But then, I'm one of those idiots who believes I should get some quality for my money.

    31. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Well, the point is valid, that some soda-drinkers will get more for their money, and others less.

      But, this does not make it socialist: it is not enforced en-masse by a government. Patrons are free to take their business elsewhere if they think they are paying too much for soda while others get a free ride.

      In fact, there are many situations where subsidizing those that otherwise can not, or will not, go along, with the prix du jure makes sense. I'd rather have poor kids go to a summer day camp than wander the streets looking for trouble, and I'm glad that many organizations that run such camps offer subsidies based on "need", where the organization decides what qualifies as need. Certainly this increases the cost for everyone else. But, it keeps the rascals from causing trouble.

      But, no one is forced to put their kids in that particular summer camp, or pay an "inflated" price to accomodate the subsidy.

      Socialism would establish such camps as state-run, and force their fundung.

      One could argue that public schools fall into the socialist camp, and to some extent they do. However, in the U.S. at least, they are funded out of very local property taxes and it does not take much effort to replace the taxing body if they become exorbitant, or to move to another county that taxes less or more effectively (in terms of services provided for taxes collected). "Voting with one's feet is practical". Not so, when the tax exists on a national level.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    32. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I find it humorous that at Krogers (grocery store) you have to scan your own credit card, but they can print your check for you? Why would you spend time making it more convient for me by printing my check, but at the same time make me scan my own card?

      The card has to be swiped. The check just goes in a machine that runs it through for them. It's too much work, their union probably won't let them :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by renehollan · · Score: 1

      I'd think the barrier between the customer area and coffe preparation area serves to imply "forbidden".

      --
      You could've hired me.
    34. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It only makes sense to have the customer touch up their coffee themselves. Only they know how much cream and/or sugar they want. And they may have trash cans out, but it's your option whether you actually use them or not. I usually do, but if the McDonald's or what have you gave me even-crappier-than-usual service, I just leave it out as a sort of anti-tip.

      Oh and, Oregonians aren't allowed to pump their own gas, either, FWIW :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by vistic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thief? Give me a break.

      Well the popcorn refills where I worked at were "same visit only"... but I'd say about 75% of the people who got popcorn refills were bringing in bags that were clearly from weeks ago (sometimes they'd have movies on the bag from a year ago). Honestly, we the employees didn't much care and just gave them the refill. The managers only sort of cared.

      I actually was really annoyed by an AMC employee a few months ago. I was buying tickets for me and a friend... and I got the student discount on mine, but she refused to give me a discount on the other one, too. So I just bought one and then went to a different counter to buy another student ticket. But she saw me and made a big fuss about it saying "Don't sell him a student ticket! He just bought one from me!"

      She didn't HAVE to go out of her way to make a fuss about it. But she did.

      It was ridiculous to me, because that ticket money (which was still about $6.50 or more) wasn't even going to them, it was going to the movie studios and MPAA. Plus, I just don't know how she could care so much to be such a dick to me about it... she's only making minimum wage, and this is likely going to be the worst job she ever has. Back in my day at the movie theater I wouldn't have cared. And usually, most people who work there don't care, and just give you the student discount even if you don't show them your college ID. But oh no, not her. She took her job SERIOUSLY.

      And by the way, how irritating of you to be the kind of guy who goes out of his way to report people who are getting popcorn refills from past days... do you have no happiness in your life?

      I can imagine being the guy behind the counter, knowing full well this guy's popcorn bag is old, but being nice enough to refill it anyway so he can enjoy a movie and be happy. Then along comes another customer (in this case, you) making a big fuss about how this guy is a thief and how you know his popcorn bag is old, etc. It really doesn't make anyone's day better.

    36. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by renehollan · · Score: 1
      My experience relates to almost all supermarkets in the Whitby, ON area in 2003-2004.

      Boxes, recycled from use as product packaging (instead of bags) were available for free and one could box one's own groceries. However, (a) the boxes were some distance from the cachier area (10-20 feet), (b) there was little room in the cachier area to box, (c) the time it took to find suitable boxes caused a backlog in the line, and (d) many boxes were either too large to fit back in the grocery cart, or too small to be of use.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    37. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Your popcorn wasn't subsidized by advertising at the movie theater. The advertising was put there to create a new revenue stream becuase the theaters were losing money. Probably because a large amount of people justify their deceitful behavior with some sort of magic logic where they are the good guy screwing over the evil corporation.

      Actually, the theaters are losing money because people would rather buy the DVD. Know why that is? Because it costs $8+ per ticket and probably about the same amount for snacks per person if they want a medium popcorn and drink. So let's see, for $32 two people can go to the movies, or for $15 any number of people can watch the movie any number of times at home. With disparity like that it's not even that many movies before you've paid off your home theater system, especially if you have a family.

      Movie theaters priced themselves out of existence, plain and simple. It's actually gotten to the point where a majority of movies make more on DVD sales than theater tickets. Interestingly, this has led to a decrease in movie budgets on average; while the blockbusters still cost as much to make as ever, they're like sports cars; they're not where you make the majority of your money, they're just there to enhance your brand. Often they actually make more profit on second-tier movies than they do on blockbusters, because those movies apparently appeal to DVD buyers more than they to do theatergoers, even if the budget is lower they make more money. (DVD duplication is dirt cheap in quantity, too.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Especially when these people are in the freaking express lane. I swear, they may as well have 75 items in their card if they're writing a check.

    39. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Well, if someone's dumb enough to tip for fast food, I'm sure the restaurant would love to have their money.

    40. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by vistic · · Score: 1

      I remember being at Del Taco... and they asked me what size drink I wanted. I looked over at the drink fountain and asked him, "it's free refills right?" He said yeah. So I asked why would anyone *not* get a small? He laughed and said he had no idea and had wondered that before.

      I guess some people pay double for drinks for the convenience of not having to get up and walk ALL THE WAY across the room to the drink fountain to get a refill. Then again, they could just sit closer to it, I suppose.

    41. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Hey, if you're too stupid to go to a competing store ("competing" meaning one *not* owned by Loblaw's) then it's your own damn fault.

      Well, lesse.

      The discount grocery stores were generally worse in terms of price, selection, and bag charges.

      The few stores that bagged groceries free of charge were either few and far between, or charged high prices (no doubt to compensate for the cost of bags).

      But, why should I suffer the inconvenience to have to find a store in Ontario that bags groceries and has reasonable prices, when it is almost impossible to find one in the U.S. that doesn't bag for free, even the discount stores?

      I continue to be amazed at the general good level of customer service in the U.S. Recently, I picked up a 6-pack of Deshutes Inversion I.P.A. at an Albertson's supermarket and only found it was lacking a bottle when I got to the cashier. After being asked if I intended to only buy 5 bottles of beer at the single bottle price, and answering in the negative, someone was dispatched to retrieve the sixth bottle from the other end of the store. Granted, one can find lousy service anywhere if one looks hard enough, but my experience has been that service in Quebec (where I lived from 1961-1997) and Ontario (2003-2004) has generally become horrible: I've been rebuffed for asking for purchase receipts for pete's sake, when it is du rigeur to receive them anywhere I've been in the U.S (1997-2003, 2004-present).

      Now, it is possible to find "bag your own groceries" areas in supermarkets, but (a) I've always seen them in the self-serve checkout lines (which are often preferable because the lines tend to go faster), and (b) there is no charge for the bags.

      The bottom line is that something which is inconvenient to the customer appears to be becoming ubiquitous in Canada, and continues to be rare in the places in the U.S. I've lived (suburbs of Chicago, Dallas, and now Seattle).

      The only correlation I can see is the growth of customer inconvenience in Canada appears to tied to the continued adherence to socialism.

      It will be interesting to see if these differences reverse themselves as Canada continues to have a balanced budget whereas even the right-wing has gone spend-happy in the U.S. (Nah, what is more likely is that the loony will continue to rise against the U.S. dollar).

      --
      You could've hired me.
    42. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      Actually, I like to do the "all day" movie ticket. Get in there with the matinee price, and have the entire schedule for movies already lined up. Finish one movie and then walk on down the isle to my next... Yes sireeee, I am CHEAPCHEAPCHEAPCHEAPCHEAPCHEAP. Start off w/ a .25 cent refill popcorn during the adds and refill again after the shift change, otherwise they may catch on (however unlikely). It's a science I tell you, sticking it to the man. Gotta get my own theme song.

    43. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by vistic · · Score: 1

      If you have bad service, I suggest paying by American Express since (as I recall) their network fees are about double what Visa and MasterCard are.

    44. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      I am fully aware, and I don't give a shit. I learned it by watching business F*CK any one and everyone every which way they can for red cent. DMCA, Broadcast Flag, Out of Wack Copy Right law, F'd up patent system all purchased by big business through Congress. If it is ok for us to go to Iraq, and lets face it, it is about oil. Then the moral bar has been lowered so much that it really doesn't take much to step over it. I sure as hell am done trying to put it back were it should be. Actually, I like to do the "all day" movie ticket. Get in there with the matinee price, and have the entire schedule for movies already lined up. Finish one movie and then walk on down the isle to my next... Yes sireeee, I am CHEAPCHEAPCHEAPCHEAPCHEAPCHEAP. Start off w/ a .25 cent refill popcorn during the adds and refill again after the shift change, otherwise they may catch on (however unlikely). It's a science I tell you, sticking it to the man. Gotta get my own theme song.

    45. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Socialism would establish such camps as state-run, and force their...


      FUNDUNG !

      Yes, it's fundung... more fun than a barrel of deer droppings.
    46. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're paying more than a few cents for sugar water, it's clear you don't care about prices.

    47. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      And by the way, how irritating of you to be the kind of guy who goes out of his way to report people who are getting popcorn refills from past days... do you have no happiness in your life?
      No, I resent thieves who drive up the price of goods for the rest of us. Who do you think ends up paying for loss in the end? Sure, the marginal cost of popcorn is low, but it pisses me off when amoral asses can't do without popcorn. As to not making anyone's day better? A million incidents like that add up to more affordable goods for those who opt to do the moral thing and PAY for the popcorn/soda/CDs they consume.

      Thief? Give me a break.
      No, it's theft. Period. It's wrong. Just because the employees and the managers are too lazy or too hassle-advertent or [$REASON], doesn't justify the action of stealing anything. Is there a sliding scale for theft? Is it not wrong if you're only stealing a little bit? The correct response in terms of the best benefit for EVERYONE, not just the asses stealing, would be for people who refuse to pay $4 for a small popcorn (myself included) simply not buying the popcorn... at any price. All those quasi-refill popcorns screw up the pricing model, and people who are honest enough to pay get the raw end of the deal.

      In short, theft is immoral no matter the value of the item, and theft hurts honest consumers.

      But feel free to rationalize your actions all you want -- either way I can be content with the fact that I know I've done what's right.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    48. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by vistic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think I mentioned this a few posts up... but movie theaters generally throw out a couple of huge trash bags full of popcorn at the end of every day. Knowing better, I can honestly say that someone getting a free refill on popcorn is absolutely not going to increase popcorn prices for anyone else at all.

      And in any case, I don't think a thing like this is worth being a dick about to other people and ruining their day. You've lost perspective.

      You're the guy that makes employees' lives hell, but then we go back the break room and share stories about this horrible customer who made a big deal about something, and that at least helps make things a little better.

    49. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by GeeksHaveFeelings · · Score: 0

      Just go for a refill afterwards, and you'll feel better.

    50. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      I like the fact that if you go to Flowers.com, there is "service fee" of like $8. They don't tell you what it is for. Remember, there is a delivery fee and taxes outside of that. I just google for a local florist and save myself $8. At least they did it last time I tried to ordered. Won't go back to them any time soon.

    51. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Those that drink a lot of soda are being subsidized by those that only drink one and leave.

      Um, no. People who drink one soda and leave have spent 1.25 cents for 4 cents worth of product. Someone who sits there and drinks three full cups has spent 1.25 cents for 12 cents worth of product.

      No one's 'subsidizing' anything. Anyone who goes 'I only buy soda at places where there aren't free refills, because I don't want to pay for other people's free refills' is delusional. The actual way to save money is to not buy insanely overprice soft drinks at food places.

      To put it another way: When you buy just a drink and leave, they spent 4 cents on the drink, 2 cents on the cup, 2 cents on AC/heat/door repair/floor waxing/other building upkeep, and 10 cents on paying the person who gave you the drink.

      As the other guy pointed out, anyone who drinks more soda than they paid at a fast food place for probably died halfway there.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    52. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Gah. When I said '1.25 cents', I meant '125 cents'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    53. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 0, Troll
      And in any case, I don't think a thing like this is worth being a dick about to other people and ruining their day. You've lost perspective
      I think you've got it backwards. You've never gained perspective, which is why you don't see the value. Extrapolate that action to a million similar actions, whether it's popcorn or soda or any consumer item. Where does that leave us?

      As an employee of a movie theater, why should you complain about doing your job? How is it 'making their life hell' by bringing to their attention something that is part of their job? Is laziness and unwillingness to fulfill job requirements the reason that it makes their life hell?

      Knowing better, I can honestly say that someone getting a free refill on popcorn is absolutely not going to increase popcorn prices for anyone else at all.
      Obviously you've never worked in pricing, or taken a microeconomics class that discusses pricing in depth. If you're working for a chain store, those refills are accounted for, as are full-price sales -- and both sets of data are used in the pricing model. It's not about how much popcorn is thrown away (a full bag of popcorn costs about $.25, IIRC, so it's meaningless) it's about how much to charge to maximize revenue. When employees don't ring up the refills, they really skew the demand curve -- since people buying refills signifies that the full price is too high, and the chain could likely increase revenues by lowering the price. When the fraudulent refills are rung up, they also skew the demand curve -- though without seeing the numbers who knows how it would affect the curve, and thus the optimal pricing.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    54. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Ventriloquate · · Score: 1

      Sure it's easy to sympathize with this view but that simple fact is that you are breaking the rules. In the long run i'm sure that not too many people care about re-using those popcorn bags or getting discounts for your friends but the rules are there for a reason. It's be nice if we could all live in a happy world where everyone broke the rules and do as they please, but, unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.

      _____________________________________________

      America's Greatest Moral Lesson: Don't get caught.

    55. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      Says you!

      --
      blah blah blah
    56. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by renehollan · · Score: 1
      No one's 'subsidizing' anything

      That isn't strictly true.

      When we think of a subsidy, we generally think of enabling someone to purchase something below cost, and, indeed, one would have to consume an unhealty amount of soda to eat into the fast food franchise's profits.

      However, lets assume that the franchise wishes to earn a particular gross profit on soda, on average. Their soda revenue is proprortional to the number of customers served, but their soda expense is proportional to the amount of soda consumed. Let's say the average soda consumption is two per person, and that half of the customers consume one, and other half consume three. If the three-soda customers cut back to one soda, the soda expense has been halved, and the soda revenue remains the same. To maintain the same gross profit margin, the franchise can cut the price of "all you can guzzle soda" for each customer by the cost of a soda.

      The one-soda customer now realizes a savings: his soda costs less by a few pennies. The three-soda customer is now paying almost triple for his soda than before (not quite triple since the price has been reduced).

      Because the franchise anticipates multi-soda customers, it must price its soda appropriately.

      In effect, the fewer-than-average soda consumers subsidize the cost of the more-than-average soda consumers. But, because price is so much greater than cost in this case, we do not consider it a subsidy in the traditional sense.

      However, if a fast food franchise tried the "all the soda you can guzzle" deal, charging only a dime per soda where their costs were a nickel, they would quickly have to raise the price for all significantly to accomodate the multi-soda belchmeisters. At this point, the soda-misers would very definately feel the economic effect of the soda-gluttons.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    57. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      I never held that the cost of popcorn was subsidized in the movie ticket price, I stated that the adds that I forced to watch do.

    58. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      "McDonaldsisation" is actually what I've heard that referred to. And it's not limited to your soft drink

      Interestingly, I've never been in a McDonald's where you get your own soft drink. It's always been poured by the person behind the counter.

    59. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by yarbo · · Score: 1

      In the states, very few soft drinks actually use sugar. Most use High Fructose Corn Syrup.

    60. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      I sure as hell am done trying to put it back were it should be.

      Way to be. This is what makes you an ass.

    61. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I recognize that DVDs are killing Theaters - much like really powerful home gaming systems killed Arcades. While the financial loss of this guys behavior is minimal, it still isn't justified. And his attitude is what businesses point at when they try to justify their behavior.

      The kid doesn't want to change shit, he just want to do whatever the hell he wants and feel justified for it.

      I don't go to the movies unless I already know that I'm going to enjoy the show, which is to say I barely go - but I don't have a problem with changing movies if the one your in sucks. One ticket = one movie. Or you could ask for your money back.

    62. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      If you tip at a non-chain (hell maybe at a chain too, I don't know) you will often get better service.

      I've been waved to the front of long lines, been given free stuff, and been treated extra nicely just because I toss occasional coins and the rare bill in there.

      Maybe it's since I worked in service jobs during high school and remember how good a tip made me feel, and how far a buck goes when you're making minimum wage. Maybe I'm just cannily selfish. Your call.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    63. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      The statement I was refuting was based on this kids beleif that he has the right to steal shit. Yeah, DVD's are the reason Theaters are dying - I would be a fool to say otherwise, but that's not really the point of what I'm arguing.

      This guy has no justification for his behavior. IF you think they suck, just don't go. If you go and you rip them off, don't say you're doing it in your crusade against the man. Because while it may not be the major contributor, it is a factor. And this attitude is what businesses point to as justification for their behavior.

    64. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      If you cant walk into a room and tell who the chump is, it is most likely you.

    65. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      True that. Where I work we have those machines that print the cheques. Difference is it isn't an option, you HAVE to have a printed cheque done. (In a similar vein, you have to use a PIN pad now, signatures are only allowed if you have some form of disability that stops you from working the pad) It doesn't really minimise the wait though, because half the time the printer gets pissy about which way the cheque is inserted and it won't print.

      Also, now I think about it, this minimises fraud (if someone wrote the wrong sum on a cheque, we wouldn't notice til we notice the missing order of magnitude).

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    66. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      I bet you cut yourself too.

    67. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      And that theme song will be along the lines of "He's not quite Frank Abagnale/He does however get cheapass popcorn and Coke/Too bad he's too cheap to afford dates, parties and friends/And that prostitutes don't do 25 cent refills/The tightarse fucking cunt".

      What it lacks in rhyme and rhythm it makes up for in the lyrics.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    68. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      In case you couldn't tell in my cousin post, I agree with you wholeheartedly. He probably has 20GB of downloaded MP3s as a "protest" as well...

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    69. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I certainly don't disagree with your point, but at the same time, what do the theaters expect when they are straight fucking people over for five bucks on a bag of popcorn that cost them thirty-five cents to make? Another doomed business model, thanks to the publishers.

      On the other hand, what would you do if you were crusading against the man? There's two things. First, you'd decrease your work output and monetary incoming to as little as possible. If you're not creating value and you're not paying taxes, then you're not helping to maintain the current order. Second, you'd steal all you could, because this is a capitalistic society and the only thing that changes the behavior of large organizations is monetary influence.

      I'm not saying that he's altruistic, but I am arguing that if he really IS against "the man" then yes, stealing is probably the best way to make a direct, immediate impact.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    70. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      But oh no, not her. She took her job SERIOUSLY.

      Probably because she was scared of losing it.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    71. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by vistic · · Score: 1

      Nope, not a manager in sight. She just took it too seriously, and was probably the least popular person on staff.

      Besides, losing a job at a movie theater is a blessing in disguise. The people I feel sorry for are the ones who end up working there for years.

    72. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      The problem is "the man" isn't an entity. Its a bunch of little entities. If you really wanna stick it to "the man" you should selectively choose where to spend your money, do something that would actually cause "the man" to go out of business, and definitely not play good dog/bad dog by purchasing one thing and stealing another.

      And if he refused to generate income for himself, at some point the taxpayers would be paying for him in some way, shape, or form. That's not screwing the man, thats screwing your fellow citizens.

      This kid could use his energies doing something positive, not going all out for himself because he feels justified. Because in reality, what he's doing isn't making any difference at all. So its value as a crusade is none. In fact, I would argue he is just like them, screwing over someone else for his personal gain.

      Ghandi screwed over the man. Malcom X and Martin Luther King screwed over the man. The men who signed the Declaration of Independence screwed the man. Actions exhibited by this kid don't add up to shit in a toilet compared to what you really have to do to screw over "the man."

    73. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by pthisis · · Score: 1

      In the states, very few soft drinks actually use sugar. Most use High Fructose Corn Syrup.

      High fructose corn syrup is more than 55% fructose, and much of the remainder is glucose, both of which are sugars.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    74. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      My point was that the price of a soda is completely unrelated to the cost of providing that soda, and thus providing more soda or less soda has no effect on the price. The price of soda is exactly at the point that people are willing to pay for it.

      There is absolutely no incentive to provide a cheaper product.

      In fact, there already is a cheaper product. It's called a 'small'. You'll notice it's about 10 cents cheaper, despite the fact that it only has about one cent less drink, and of course it can be refilled just as much.

      However, all this is moot, because the mere policing of 'no refills' would cost more than the few cents that is saved in costs. (That is, assuming you have both. If you just have just no refills, you'll piss a lot of people off.)

      Any difference in price would be a gimmick.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    75. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      After reading my responses to you, and looking over this post of yours, I decided that maybe a more eloquent explanaition was in order. Trust me, I have no love for this so called "man", but your behavior isn't fighting against shit. It's just self enabling.

      DMCA
      This wasn't an issue before people started pirating left and right. Content providers didn't give a rats ass about backups. They didn't care that you might rip their CD's to play in your own mp3 player. Once people started redistributing the content en masse, they got pissed. They came up with DRM schemes. The scheme was intended to stop piracy, an unfortunate side effect was that it also prevented legitimate use in the process. Looking at the order of events, these companies never would have tried this shit had people not abused the freedoms of the media vehicle. Blaming a company for protecting its interests is ignorant as hell. You need to look at the original reason for the behavior.

      Out of Wack Copy Right law
      I agree somewhat here. Public domain timelines should be maintained. Yet, if no one actually payed for the shit, it would enter public domain - the companies holding it wouldn't have a reason to pay into holding it.

      There is also the extreme counter argument. What if a content creator, lets say a writer, wanted to control his ideas so he could PREVENT big business from profiting off his work posthumously? If you remove the estate holders right to control copyright, you take thier only weapon away. I'm not arguing all applications of copyright law are great, I'm arguing that you have to respect them if you would later like to invoke them for the right reasons.

      F'd up patent system all purchased by big business through Congress
      You get no argument out of me here.

      If it is ok for us to go to Iraq, and lets face it, it is about oil.
      Oh, how little you understand. This isn't about oil. It's also not about fighting terrorism or any shit like that. Take a look at a map. If you can find Iraq you will notice that it is centered in the Middle East and has most of its major cities close to Iran, while the west is empty. This is an IDEAL staging area. This is about POWER. Being in alliance with Isreal, which has the West side of the Middle East Covered - you can effectively exercise control over this part of the world using the two countries as staging areas. Possible oil pricing is a positive byproduct.

      Then the moral bar has been lowered so much that it really doesn't take much to step over it.
      What the hell does this have to do with personal responsibility and accountability? Nothing. The behavior of the world around you does not dictate to you your behavior, nor should it. To buy into the idea that you are just doing what you saw others do reveals that you understand this behavior is for shit. If you want to be an ass, then fine - I'm way to entrenched in personal freedom to dictate behavior. Just don't try to justify it the way you do. You aren't doing a thing except fucking over those who choose to use civil disobedience as their prefered method. You are actually fucking over your own cause.

      I sure as hell am done trying to put it back were it should be.
      My original response to this statement was weak. Attacking you doesn't do anything other than fuel your fire. Maybe an education lesson is in order.

      If you want to change things, you have to look past what you get out of it - because the answer is nothing. You will get nothing out of your endevors. Your children, or the children of those whom you love, will be the ones to benefit from your actions. If you really want to change things, you have to accept this is truth. True change cannot be a derivative, nor can it be the motivation, of personal gain.

      Maybe you should actually try LEARNING about things before you accept a prepackaged diatribe to spout off in response to your trivial actions. Because, in reality, you are a tool of the man if you beleive the shit you do and behave the way that you do.

    76. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by renehollan · · Score: 1
      My point was that the price of a soda is completely unrelated to the cost of providing that soda

      Well, not completely, but mostly. That does not mean that the "big gulpers" are not subsidized. But it does mean that the subsidy is trivial.

      However, all this is moot, because the mere policing of 'no refills' would cost more than the few cents that is saved in costs

      Hmm. That hasn't stopped the government from policing controlled substance abuse. And I've seen places where this is tried (usually some kid is singled out for taking a second refill).

      The way you (try to) make an inefficient system effective is to make the penalties disproportionatly harsh when compared to the transgression, and make a few examples out of people. The resulting fear serves as a deterrent. YMMV, of course. And, it would be a stupid business decision.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    77. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by VdG · · Score: 1

      Tesco (biggest UK supermarket chain) have introduced self-service checkouts. You scan the bar-codes on your goods, weigh your own fruit and veg and pay by cash or card, (no cheques), with no staff involved.

      I guess they have advantages to Tesco: fewer staff required, and those lanes are always open. But as a customer they're really not worth the extra time and hassle unless all the normal checkouts are very busy and you've only got a few items.

      They have some weird restrictions, too. In particular, the goods have to go into a bag on a pressure-sensitive plate. All very well if you're using a new carrier bag from the dispenser but a lot of trouble if you're re-using an old bag; even worse if you're putting it in a ruck-sack or satchel. I'm not sure what the point of this is as I can't see how it's to their advantage.

    78. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      DMCA This wasn't an issue before people started pirating left and right. Content providers didn't give a rats ass about backups. They didn't care that you might rip their CD's to play in your own mp3 player. Once people started redistributing the content en masse, they got pissed. They came up with DRM schemes. The scheme was intended to stop piracy, an unfortunate side effect was that it also prevented legitimate use in the process. Looking at the order of events, these companies never would have tried this shit had people not abused the freedoms of the media vehicle. Blaming a company for protecting its interests is ignorant as hell. You need to look at the original reason for the behavior.

      Actually if you look at betamax vs. vhs (or sony vs. jvc). You will find the driving force behind that litigation is that VHS allowed you to record broadcast. Gasp, the sky was falling. So nothing new here. Despite the "piracy" that the media conglomerates like to harp on, they still have made record profits despite. I guess region coding wasn't a mechanism aimed @ lining their pockets, but rather rampant piracy? So DRM hasn't stopped a crook from doing what they are going to do. Look @ Canada, they are doing away with their gun legistlation laws, becuase CRIMINALS don't bother. The only thing draconian measures do is screw the paying customer. There were already laws in place to handle copy right infringment. And guess what w/ RIAA sueing ppl on the P2P networks, it is working. The broad cast flag is another concern. At least I have HDTV tuner w/o that in the hardware.

      Out of Wack Copy Right law I agree somewhat here. Public domain timelines should be maintained. Yet, if no one actually payed for the shit, it would enter public domain - the companies holding it wouldn't have a reason to pay into holding it. There is also the extreme counter argument. What if a content creator, lets say a writer, wanted to control his ideas so he could PREVENT big business from profiting off his work posthumously? If you remove the estate holders right to control copyright, you take thier only weapon away. I'm not arguing all applications of copyright law are great, I'm arguing that you have to respect them if you would later like to invoke them for the right reasons.

      Copy Righted materials naturally (with some worthwhile exceptions) pass into the Public Domain. It doesn't matter if ppl pay or don't pay. "It's a Wonderfull Life" was a perfect example. Until Vivendi found a song on the movie sound track that they could extend the copy rights on and pull the movie out of the public domain. The biggest infringer of Copy Right is Disney and the subsequent purchase of Senator Hollings. For a company that got its start making cartoons on stories out of the public domain (Pinocchio, Dumbo, Snow White, Cindarella...) it all smacks of bitter irony. This was an example of WHY the public domain used to work, and soon as it was time for Disney to contribute back to what helped get it started. Corporate greed.

      Oh, how little you understand. This isn't about oil. It's also not about fighting terrorism or any shit like that. Take a look at a map. If you can find Iraq you will notice that it is centered in the Middle East and has most of its major cities close to Iran, while the west is empty. This is an IDEAL staging area. This is about POWER. Being in alliance with Isreal, which has the West side of the Middle East Covered - you can effectively exercise control over this part of the world using the two countries as staging areas. Possible oil pricing is a positive byproduct.

      Actually, you should read the book "Osama bin Laden: His war on America". Very informative. I will disagree on your slightly anti-zionist tack on this one. Isreal was returned to a strip of barren wasteland that can fit into the square mileage of lake Michigan, and made it prosper. I don't believe we did it for them. Just allowed them to protect themselves. Saddam pissed of a Texa

    79. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      Aside from you not understanding what Anti-zionism is, you haven't disagreed with anything I have said. You have only given examples reinforcing my arguments.

    80. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am fully aware of what Anti-zionism is you fuktard. Check out Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Zionism#Defining _anti-Zionism
      What an idiot.

    81. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thats why you applied it in a situation where I at no point opposed the existence of Isreal.

      BTW, Karma Whore much? Posting as AC so you can flame is weak.

    82. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by nxtw · · Score: 1
      This whole thread of comments is off-topic so off we go. Every Subway I have been to has a 'self serve' drink station and now they get this great idea to charge for refills. It is something like 45 cents regardless of size.


      I'm sure this varies by franchise, but at the nearest Subway, the cups are positioned so that you could easily just grab a cup without paying--or you could grab a large instead of a medium. If the staff member happened to care that you were stealing, it'd be difficult for them to notice when they're busy. (some won't even bother to ring up a drink if no one else is around.)

      If they are supposed to charge for refills, no one has ever cared enough to say anything.
    83. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Not everyone is California. 98% of cashiers are not unionized. Funny my groceries are cheaper in those stores too.

    84. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah well, I'm planning to get the hell out of California in the fairly near future. On one hand, I appreciate how California leads environmental standards; in general I think that California is too soft on emissions but also stupid enough to legislate ridiculous equipment requirements and bullshit up-your-ass-with-a-flashlight inspections that have nothing to do with anything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    85. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the time the guy behind me in the checkout queue was badmouthing credit cards and how it took longer than cash. Just then, the cashier was handed a big bag of cash and spent the next 3-5 minutes sorting it in to her drawer.

      Rich

    86. Re:"Convenience" fees! Heh. by yarbo · · Score: 1

      but it's cheaper than refined sugar (in the US) and arguably worse tasting and worse for your health.

  9. more lazy people by jtaylor00 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Less pockets full of change, less parking tickets more people too lazy to walk down the street and burn off that big mac to put more change in the meter.

    Granted, there are some instances when this would be nice, but I think most people would use it because they are just plan lazy. Convenience, less exercise, and more food has made this nation very plump.

    Also, why would a city want to risk losing that much revenue from all those tickets?

    1. Re:more lazy people by dispatch · · Score: 1

      Also, why would a city want to risk losing that much revenue from all those tickets?

      This is a good point, one I was also wondering. The university I graduated from relied very heavily on these types of fines and I would imagine if this technology took a bite out of that this loss would be shifted else where (tuition)... of course it was all students paying for it but now even kids w/ out cars would have to pay a share :).

      I suppose cities that get involved in this can just charge the company implementing it an (extra) liscencing fee but that seems like it would cause an increase in the "conveinece fee"...

      --
      There's no place like ALT+HOME
    2. Re:more lazy people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Also, why would a city want to risk losing that much revenue from all those tickets?

      Oddly enough, unlike private corporations, some cities do actually do things to benefit their citizens....even if they lose money on it. (they just raise taxes)

    3. Re:more lazy people by abigor · · Score: 1

      The city in question where this is happening, Vancouver, is well-known as having pretty much the skinniest population in North America. So it would seem there isn't much to your asserted correlation between coinless meters and getting fat.

    4. Re:more lazy people by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      The university I graduated from relied very heavily on these types of fines and I would imagine if this technology took a bite out of that this loss would be shifted else where (tuition)... of course it was all students paying for it but now even kids w/ out cars would have to pay a share

      Heaven forbid that those who use a particular service, actually have to pay for that service instead of palming it off onto the wider community. And I say that despite having a student debt of my own.

    5. Re:more lazy people by jtaylor00 · · Score: 1
      (they just raise taxes)

      So in the end they wouldn't be doing something to benefit their citizens. They are just pawning parking tickets on the rest of the citizens in the city. I don't want to pay for some guy who can't keep money in the meter. Would you want to pay for someone else's speeding ticket?

      And oddly enough, private corporations actually do more to keep customers than governments do for their citizens benefit. If a corporation ticks off a customer, they lose business (and word of mouth business). If you don't like what a city is doing, you have to move.

    6. Re:more lazy people by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      The city in question where this is happening, Vancouver, is well-known as having pretty much the skinniest population in North America. So it would seem there isn't much to your asserted correlation between coinless meters and getting fat.

      That's true right now, sure. But the program has only just started. Wait till you see what a bunch of fatsos crop up in Vancouver a year from now.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    7. Re:more lazy people by CaveMike · · Score: 1

      Also, why would a city want to risk losing that much revenue from all those tickets?

      Automated, electronic payment makes it easier to raise prices by minimizing consumer's resistance; in much the same way that gas prices can increase a little bit at a time. As long as the increase isn't too quick or doesn't cross a psychological line (e.g. $3 per gallon), consumers won't care too much. This should be a concern for automatic toll-booth systems (iPass, EZPass, etc.) as well.

      Consider the pros and cons -- Cons: a) decreased revenue from fines and tickets, b) additional overhead to operate the electronic system (partly passed on to the consumer via the convience fee). Pros: a) decreased overhead of parking cops and the ticket infrastructure, b) Opportunity to raise prices perioidically with little consumer awareness.

      Since their is a net reduction in overhead, presumably there is a sweet-spot where consumers and providers can both get more for their money. The trick is keeping the providers in-check with regard to raising prices.

    8. Re:more lazy people by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      more people too lazy to walk down the street and burn off that big mac to put more change in the meter.

      Most of the downtown parking spaces in my city are for 1 hour meter only. I go to meetings in there, usually lasting more than the max hour I'm allowed. Does it make me, and most of the people I know lazy. Mayby I'm too lazy to interrupt a meeting to go put a change on meter when I can just open my phone and press 'continue parking'.

    9. Re:more lazy people by abigor · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, fair enough. Who would have thought that the fine line between fat and skinny was the two metres between the car door and the parking meter?

    10. Re:more lazy people by jtaylor00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it just means that you are using a parking spot for more than its original intended time period. The whole point of parking meters is to provide short term rotating parking that many people can use throughout the day. By forcing you to go back to the actual meter to pay, it makes you be more efficient at running errands downtown.

      Now, putting simple economics into play, one event might eventually result of these types of meters. If I work downtown, I can either 1) pay $20 to park in a garage, or 2) tap a button on my phone every couple of hours to pay for parking. #2 even done 8 times a day is $2.40 in 'convenience' fees plus say $0.25 per hour. So ballpark at $5 for the whole parking day. Now, no one would use a garage, opting instead to park on the street - it's cheaper. People complaing about everyone using spots for 8-10 hours a day. Result: $0.25 per hour turns into $2.00 - $3.00 per hour. Suddenly, a convenience for some turns into a 1000% hike in prices for everyone else.

    11. Re:more lazy people by jtaylor00 · · Score: 1

      Please don't confuse rising gas prices with the simpilist of economic concepts: supply and demand. Think about what it takes to obtain and turn oil from the ground into usuable gasoline. Then factor in world wide supply and demand and all the taxes on gasoline. I do recognize the opportunity for slowly increasing prices for automated payments. Gas is not one of them.

    12. Re:more lazy people by CaveMike · · Score: 1

      OK, I won't. The comment is not about the causes of rising gas prices and whether the causes are simple or complex. It is only about consumer's reaction to such increases (how ever they come about). Moderate increases fall under the radar of most consumers. People don't get upset until the prices increase quickly or cross an imaginary comfort level. I think this is a similar process as to the price of a lot of things: automated tolls, automated parking meters, cost of a coke in a vending machine, etc.

    13. Re:more lazy people by jtaylor00 · · Score: 1

      Oh for sure. Very agreed with you there. Subtle increases outside of inflation are extremely easy to miss. You nickel and dime yourself into debt.

    14. Re:more lazy people by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      No, it just means that you are using a parking spot for more than its original intended time period
      This wasn't the case you were trying to prove on the original parent post. Not using something like it is supposed to be used isn't lazynes, it's using the shown oppurtunities to suit your needs.

      If I work downtown, I can either 1) pay $20 to park in a garage, or 2) tap a button on my phone every couple of hours to pay for parking. #2 even done 8 times a day is $2.40 in 'convenience' fees plus say $0.25 per hour.

      On my area normal fees for garage are 15-25 for a 8 hour, but not quite sure about your math in following #2 option. You gotta be kidding for price of $0.25, try more like 3 for hour. With those prices few extra cents for redial is nothing.
      So yes, if I plan to stay more than few hours in downtown, garage is the best option; cheaper, guarded and out of rain. For 1-3 hours, I rather be lazy.

    15. Re:more lazy people by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      Depeding on whether or not you went to a state funded university, the loss couldn't be shifted from tuition. In the university system of georgia, parking & transportation is required to be an independant service from the university, and cannot recieve funding from the university (of course, YMMV).

    16. Re:more lazy people by Kumagoro · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing the point of tickets. The Government doesn't issue tickets or make laws to make money, tickets are punishment for breaking the law. Taxes are for funding.

      Also, it isn't the Government's responcibility to make sure you get your daily excercise. By your logic the Government might as well disallow cars from entering the city center. Plus, this is Canada, not America. Our obesity stats are going up but we can't possibly compete on that front.

  10. Is there a top-up limit? by heauxmeaux · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I thought repeat metering (constantly plugging the meter) was prohibited?

    One of the major reasons we have meters in the city I live in (TacosCornhole, ND) was to promote high turnover parking in the urban areas - to make it more convenent for shoppers and the like.
    My nuts smell like WD40.

    --
    Beat 'Em and Eat 'Em
  11. Sounds like wasted VC money by blackmonday · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sounds like a good idea on the surface, but how many transactions do you need to rack up for this system to pay for itself?

    1. Re:Sounds like wasted VC money by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Many large cities are now using "intelligent" parking meters that are network-connected anyway so that cops can easily download a list of which spaces are supposed to be open, and which are supposed to be empty. There's usually one meter per block/street, and to pay, you walk to the meter, enter your parking spot number, and deposit the money. Some meters let you use a debit card as well. You also get a receipt, which is incredibly useful when fighting a parking fine for all parties involved.

      In other words, adding functionality like this will most likely be a software-only investment, and thus, be reasonably inexpensive.

      That said, I hate the 'intelligent' meters, as the ones I've used are terrible at reading bills, forcing you to use quarters, and even those it has trouble with. This becomes problematic for train stations that have a multi-dollar parking fee, and has been the cause of many missed trains for me.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:Sounds like wasted VC money by Danga · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good idea on the surface, but how many transactions do you need to rack up for this system to pay for itself?

      According to http://www.bcpassport.com/vital/driving.html#meter there are more than 6000 parking meters in Vancouver and they are in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. every day of the year, I would think there would also be a mixture of 30 minute, 1 hour, and 2 hours meters.

      So, lets say that they each average being used 5 times a day (probably a low estimate) by people using the pay by phone service. That would be 5 * .30 * 6000 = $9000/day and $3,285,000/year. That is not too bad for just one city and if you start getting a lot more cities to use the service it could be a huge cash cow.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  12. Choose your payment method: by telso · · Score: 5, Funny

    To use a washer, text the word "SLUG" to 91111.

  13. Sounds Familiar by Billosaur · · Score: 1

    In Africa, they're using cellphones for personal banking, which is a pretty good way to move money without the hassle of checks an credit cards. I'm not sure I like this 30 cent fee, given that most parking isn't all that expensive.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Sounds Familiar by admdrew · · Score: 1

      Where I used to work in Minnesota, parking cost $2 per hour, only allowing you to put in a max of 2 hours at a time. There was no total limit, but every two hours you had to walk back to the meter and pump some more quarters in. I would've gladly paid 30 cents every two hours to save the 15 minutes required to get to and from the parking ramp.

      ...although, it was nice to have extra sanctioned 15 minute breaks :)

    2. Re:Sounds Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be the small percentage of Africa that doesn't primarily move their money via gullible westerners who fall for email spam?

  14. Oh really? by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    I would rather be rid of scum charging me with a phone call.

  15. Scare quotes by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why the scare quotes around convenience fees? Is the submitter implying that the cell phone company should graciously provide this service for free? Or perhaps the fee isn't really a fee?

    Either way, editorializing in the summary is silly.

    1. Re:Scare quotes by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      That it's not really convenience or such, I believe.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:Scare quotes by bunions · · Score: 4, Insightful

      being able to put more time on your parking meter without running out to the curb in the rain sounds pretty fucking convenient to me. I pay a fee for convenience. Therefore it is a convenience fee. I don't see how this is confusing for anyone.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    3. Re:Scare quotes by penguinstorm · · Score: 2

      The cell phone company is not providing the service.

      The concept of a "convenience fee" for a solution which is:
      1) Technologically more advanced
      2) Cheaper for the solution provider to operate (no meters to empty etc.)
      3) Not, frankly, all that convenient given that I have to make a call, have a credit card etc.

      is a bit of a misnomer.

      I love paying those "convenience fees" at banks, while they fire staff and save more money. It's great!

      --
      Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
    4. Re:Scare quotes by kongjie · · Score: 1
      The price should be the same; presumably, this will allow the city to cut labor costs involved in collection of change from meters.

      If a lot of people end up using the non-change system and the convenience fees are still charged, it will effectively mean that the parking meter charges--apart from fees--have been raised, since the city will be getting the same income with less expense.

      In other words, these convenience fees are shifting collection costs from the city to the consumer.

    5. Re:Scare quotes by bunions · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They still have to empty the meters. People can still pay by coin in case they (gasp) don't have a cellphone.

      it's pretty convenient if you remember that it rains pretty much all winter long in Vancouver and that you can get pretty wet standing there digging around for dimes as opposed to getting inside and then phoning in.

      It's not a misnomer at all. It is more convenient for you and the city (or someone) has to pay more in credit card processing costs.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    6. Re:Scare quotes by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      The price should be the same, this will allow the city to cut labor costs involved in collection of change from meters.

      But it's not the city collecting your money from the meters, it's the company providing the service. They pay to the city for time that you have parked. It's still citys duties to collect money from the meters from those who use cash. And give you ticket if you have overstayd.

      City is propably charging less from the company than from you, but thats just business.

    7. Re:Scare quotes by kongjie · · Score: 1
      I understand that; what I'm saying is that if this payment model becomes widely accepted and used, then there the city will eventually need fewer meter collectors. In that case, the city is saving money by reducing labor costs but not passing the savings on.

      Dispensing parking tickets has nothing to do with collecting money from meters. It's a different labor pool. Paying tickets by cell phone will not reduce the labor cost of parking enforcement, unless it makes feeding the meter so convenient that people get less tickets.

      My assumption is that collecting parking meter fees by cell phone is more efficient than sending someone out walking the streets with a box to collect quarters. So rather than letting the cell company charge the consumer 30 cents, part of the cell phone company's expense should be taken out of the parking revenues.

    8. Re:Scare quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a service charge. Corporations, particularly banks, like to disguise their service charges with friendlier, optional, convenient-for-you-our-valuable-customer terms. Such as "convenience fee". Ticketmaster, for example, charges a "convenience" fee if you order tickets online. Imagine if every online store did that, in addition to shipping and handling charges. Imagine if McDonald's had "convenience fees" if you opted to have your take out order put in a bag. It's pointless marketing babble everyone can see through. Well, everyone but you.

    9. Re:Scare quotes by elFisico · · Score: 1

      Is the submitter implying that the cell phone company should graciously provide this service for free?

      no, but one could expect the phone company to charge only their real costs in this case of public interest and not the over-inflated cash-cow-rate for sms that regular customers have to pay...

  16. GREAT by Chris+whatever · · Score: 1

    I think it's great because lot's of people pay for longer parking at higher rate because they cant have more than 2 hours in a park meter.

    I know i would like it to only have to use my cellphone siting on my ass somewhere and just feed my meter.

    1. Re:GREAT by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      I was recently driving into Boston for dinner, meeting people at the restaurant at 6pm. The meters are 2 hour max until 8pm, after which they are free. I got there at about 5pm. So instead of being able to be early for my dinner arrangement, I had to make sure I got back to the meter at the stroke of 6pm to feed 2 hours worth of quarters in to make sure it would last until 8pm, and thus last for as late as I needed. If I could have fed that meter via cellphone, I could have done it from right outside the restaurant very easily.

      Now this does go against the point of the metered parking, which is temporary, 2 hour maximum...but the fact that it is free after 8pm is something that a parking garage can't offer. 2 hours at a meter is also significantly cheaper than 2 hours in a garage, so it's better any way you slice it (plus the garages here are all very-low-clearance, and I don't fit)

  17. Meter stuffingt = bad by dotmax · · Score: 4, Informative
    In a lot of [U.S.] cities, running out to stuff another wad of quarters in the meter will get you a ticket, the concept being that metered parking is temporary parking. Curbside metered parking is designed for people who are going to get-in/get-out. If you're going to be somewhere all day you should either be using a parking garage or alternate transportation. In theory.

    This scheme seems like a bullshit technological antisolution that would only make the current street parking situation worse,

    1. Re:Meter stuffingt = bad by Ocular+Magic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it was strictly for get in/out quickly, wouldn't they just paint the curb green with a "XX minute parking" label on it?

    2. Re:Meter stuffingt = bad by petershank · · Score: 1

      You're falsely assuming everybody is trying to cheat and stay all day.

      Here's the problem it solves:
      The meter costs a quarter per 15 minutes, with a one hour limit.
      I expect to need only 5 or 10 minutes, so I insert only one quarter.
      After 10 minutes, I realize I will need about 40 minutes instead, but I can't leave what I'm doing to return to the street and insert two more quarters.
      I could, however, use my cell phone to pay two more quarters, and then leave after 34 minutes, making everybody happy. Apparently, I could even request a refund for the six unused minutes, if doing so would be worth the effort.

      Of course, the best solution would be for the meter to somehow "sign me in" when it somehow confirms I've take up the space, "sign me out" when it somehow confirms I've left, and charge me for the 34 minutes I actually used.
      (or a huge fine if I had stayed past the limit)

    3. Re:Meter stuffingt = bad by RexRhino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In theory, meter parking is designed to make sure that parking is temporary... but in reality, it is simply a revenue grab by the city. It is just not polite for the government to say "WE WANT MORE MONEY!!!! GIVE US MORE MONEY!!!", so every tax/fee needs a respectable sounding reason to exist.

      There are other examples of this:

      1. If they REALLY wanted to curb speeding, they would make all speeding tickets be for $10,000 and 30 days in jail, and speeding would stop overnight! Speeding fines are calculated to be as high as possible, without actually detering speeding, in order to maximize profits.

      2. Same thing with cigarette tax: Presumably they want to discourage smoking - but if they wanted to do that they could place a huge tax on cigarettes, maybe $50 per pack or something. The trouble with that, is that everyone would quit smoking if they had to pay $50+ a pack. So they make the cigarette tax as high as possible without actually discouraging smoking, to maximize profits.

      If you want the government to actually discourage behavior, the last thing you want the government to do is make a profit from that behavior. That is why all the brothel owners in Nevada are trying to get the state to pass a special extra-high prostitution tax - they know that once the government gets used to having that money, they won't want to give it up and therefore prostitution will always remain legal! The best way to make sure something will last forever is to give the government a cut of the profits!

    4. Re:Meter stuffingt = bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have revealed the inner workings of this country! You, sir, are truly a godsend!

      How can we get the Govt. to make oodles of $$ from actually being reasonable with and nice to its citizens?

  18. Uh huh. Except... by penguinstorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) It bills to your credit card
    2) I don't have a credit card
    3) I don't like The Man tracking my activities, right down to where and when I park

    Just a thought.

    --
    Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
    1. Re:Uh huh. Except... by mopslik · · Score: 1
      Just a thought.

      Here's another: those w/o a credit card can still use change.

    2. Re:Uh huh. Except... by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      I don't like The Man tracking my activities

      The Man is only interested in collecting the convenience fee, and could give two craps about where you parked your car - just as long as you pay.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    3. Re:Uh huh. Except... by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      I don't like The Man tracking my activities

      But you carry the required cell-phone?

      --
      Rod Taylor
    4. Re:Uh huh. Except... by 5KVGhost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I don't like The Man tracking my activities, right down to where and when I park"

      You're concerned about The Man knowing where you park your registered motor vehicle, license plate clearly visible as required by law, on a public street? As you enter and exit your vehicle in public view. Yep, that's some highly sensitive and privileged information right there.

    5. Re:Uh huh. Except... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As with all these systems (street cams, ez-pass, etc) the value to 'The Man' comes in after the fact.

      "Who was parked at 3rd & Main last tuesday at 2PM?"
      If you willingly give them the data for them to store, it will be easy to find out.

    6. Re:Uh huh. Except... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      While your paranoia is admirable, you are missing something important:

      If you want the man to believe you are somewhere, you have the perfect way to establish an alibi!

      On a more serious note though:

      1. I don't think it uses a credit card, I believe it shows up on your cell phone bill.
      2. How do you pay for plane tickets and whatnot without a credit card?

    7. Re:Uh huh. Except... by pthisis · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I've never had trouble paying for plane tickets with cash. If you do it the day of the flight, expect to be flagged for additional screening.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    8. Re:Uh huh. Except... by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      I think he's more concerned about the company having a nice database of every single parking meter purchase with various relevant data logged that any employee of the company could potentially call up at any moment. Load up the caller ID data, do a reverse phone lookup on whitepages.com and get the person's address, etc. etc.

      Not to mention there being some definite record in some company's database of where you were between 7pm and 9pm on Sunday night, or whatever... Hmm, how long before the police get all buddy-buddy with this company to conveniently obtain this data?

      I'm sure the company could take it even further by having automated cameras aimed at each parking spot to take a snaphot of the vehicle (and potentially the owner) when the transaction is made.... I mean, implementing this completely "Big Brother" technology would be 100% trivial. You could do it with parts from your local Radio Shack or computer store...

    9. Re:Uh huh. Except... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      ""I don't like The Man tracking my activities, right down to where and when I park"

      You're concerned about The Man knowing where you park your registered motor vehicle, license plate clearly visible as required by law, on a public street? As you enter and exit your vehicle in public view. Yep, that's some highly sensitive and privileged information right there."


      The essential difference is that paying via cellphone allows very cheap tracking, while having people regularly scan every parking meter and record the license number is much more costly. These privacy issues are all about automation and near-zero cost of implementation, not whether the information can be (legally) obtained regardless of cost.

  19. Fffft, old news by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We in the old world have been having this system for about 2 years now.

    Without convenience fee.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Fffft, old news by Duncan3 · · Score: 1
      We in the old world have been having this system for about 2 years now.
      We're always 5 years behind in the US when it comes to technology. 2 years behind is progress!

      Without convenience fee.
      Yea, we're also used to be being screwed.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    2. Re:Fffft, old news by toomz · · Score: 1

      Not only that, we've been using this in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan since October. Boo-urns to the poster's arbitrary use of the phrase 'major city'

      http://www.city.saskatoon.sk.ca/org/municipal_engi neering/parking_services/index.asp

      --
      If a chair is thrown in a forest, and there are no witnesses, did Ballmer still do it?
    3. Re:Fffft, old news by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

      >We in the old world have been having this system for about 2 years now.

      Yes, indeed - a system like this has been in place in Copenhagen, Denmark for about two years.

      >In Soviet Russia, the government controls the commerce.

      In Soviet America, commerce controls the government.

      --

      - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

  20. would never work in nyc by pretygrrl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    seeing as how tickets have become a major source of NYC's revenue, under billionaire Bloomberg's helm. Funny how NYC local politics are still just that -- local politics, even though we are bigger in size and tax revenue than many of the world's nations.
    the city has become ridiculously dependent on parking tickets - at a $110 a pop, with $20 increases every three weeks for late payments, im suprised meter maids aren't murdered in the street by rioting mobs!
    some truly amazing things have been happening, like people running out to meters w. a minute to spare to see the meter maid w. the ticket prepared already, just waiting for clock to chime! amazing.
    all in all, brilliantly simple. whether or not this system gets adopted i guess depends on what a city's objectives are w. regard to parking meters. If, as in the case of NYC, they are largely traps for motorists, then I don't see this getting much use.

    --
    Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
    1. Re:would never work in nyc by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      seeing as how tickets have become a major source of NYC's revenue, under billionaire Bloomberg's helm. Funny how NYC local politics are still just that -- local politics, even though we are bigger in size and tax revenue than many of the world's nations.
      the city has become ridiculously dependent on parking tickets - at a $110 a pop, with $20 increases every three weeks for late payments, im suprised meter maids aren't murdered in the street by rioting mobs!

      I don't think this is just a Bloomberg problem, much as I hate him and Giuliani. I remember my parents complaining about the same thing in the 80s when *they* worked in NYC. Simple solution for me: don't drive a car in NYC unless I really have to. If I need motorized transportation, take my motorcycle, remove the plate and chain it up in a convenient spot whilst parking. Fortunately the meter maids are lazy and stupid as well as greedy, so I don't think they'd spare the effort to tow it or trace the VIN unless it's parked somewhere for an unreasonable length of time.

      -b.

    2. Re:would never work in nyc by pretygrrl · · Score: 1

      Ha! yeah i take my moto, too! thats funny - i do the same thing. you have to watch out though - i was doing it in the same neighbourhood, on the same bike for like 2 years and this particular cop (not a meter maid, an actual cop) REALLY got it in for me.
      i swear, im not making it up! i guess being a chick on a red F4i on Park Ave every day is kinda asking for it.
      so. he took to waiting for me in front of my bike, i guess waiting to nab me, rather than keep writing tickets to the vin (which they will do, but it doesn't actually work, as in you won't get the ticket in the mail, and there wont be any record of it)
      then, when THAT didnt work (i would just wait him out in the office, always plenty to do w. an extra coupla hours!) he called Emergency Services Unit, and they cut my Forgetaboutit crypto, and took my bike. They did this "under suspicion of criminal activity" which meant i had to go through the DA to get it out of the crime lot. Took about 4 months. Fortunately for me, when this happened I had assumed the bike stolen and bought a new one :)
      God how i hate them! wiggums one and all!!!!

      --
      Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
  21. Estonia started doing this three years ago... by Osrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.usj.com.my/usjXpress/details.php3?table =usjXpress&ID=256

    I travel there on business from time to time, folks that I work with there have been doing something like this using SMS for a while now.

    It is good to see the US catching up.

    1. Re:Estonia started doing this three years ago... by blibbler · · Score: 1

      uhh... from the summary: "Vancouver, Canada"
      Canada is still a separate country from the US. Which is to say: the US isn't catching up.

    2. Re:Estonia started doing this three years ago... by Proteus · · Score: 1
      It is good to see the US catching up.
      Well, it would be, except for the tiny detail that this program is being launched in Canada .
      I never really say "RTFA", but is RTFS(ummary) so difficult?
      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  22. What's good about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see two points to parking meters:

    1. To stop somebody from taking up the space for every, and allow other people to park there
    2. To generate revenue for the town

    Effectiveness of meters is debatable, but doesn't this work against both points? It's not like the town no longer has to hire parking enforcement --- they just have to share some of the revenue!

    I'd be curious to see the financial details after this gets going ...

  23. instead of cellphone... by haroldag · · Score: 1

    I personally don't have a car, but I've heard people complaint about not having enough change. It's a pain in the arse. Why they haven't implemented a credit card system? Beats me! Imagine the scenario: 1. Park your car. 2. Swipe your card. 3. Enter a pin code (make it hard to guess) 4. Go do your thing, forget about the meter. 5. Come back to meter and enter code from step 3. 6. Get reciept printed out of meter. 7. Drive away without a parking ticket. Unless you are a moron and entered "9999" as your code, this could work.

    1. Re:instead of cellphone... by Chirs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We've got something similar in some areas of Saskatoon, Canada. It's more like a preloaded parking card though.

      You swipe your card, meter deducts money from the card equal to the cost of the max amount of time you can park there. When you come back, you swipe again and the meter refunds the unused amount.

    2. Re:instead of cellphone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toronto has been using that system, with solar-powered parking meter ticket stands no less, for a few years.

    3. Re:instead of cellphone... by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      8. Check out ATM and find your account empty. Oops, that wasn't official card reader...

      I'll be carefull any time I enter ATM to check out there is no external readers attached to it. And I use only ones that are mounted on bankwalls.

      With these credit card enabled parking meters, how are you going to know that this would be legal version.

    4. Re:instead of cellphone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have this in toronto, all the street parking is done through a machine located near the parking, and you can pay with credit cards or change. it prints a ticket that u stick on your dashboard and works pretty well.

    5. Re:instead of cellphone... by haroldag · · Score: 1
      With these credit card enabled parking meters, how are you going to know that this would be legal version.

      Well, I guess you really couldn't. You fall into the same problem as online payments... Laws around this would have to be well thought of. The city + credit card companies would have to give you some sort of assurance.

      Also have all those super-friendly "parking ticket officers", who's job just got so much easier, check the meters periodically.

    6. Re:instead of cellphone... by drtsystems · · Score: 1

      This would be great, except get rid of the whole pin code idea. Just swipe your card before you park and then swipe it when you leave.

    7. Re:instead of cellphone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have the exact same thing in Saskatoon. You have been able to pay for your meter via cell phone since late 2005. I got a tee shirt from the company that runs it (New Parking).

    8. Re:instead of cellphone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we have things exactly like this in Saskatoon. Dial a number, bill the meter to your phone number or to a VISA card. You may also use the prepaid swipe card as described above. Woot! Saskatoon Rules!

  24. Tune for the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Tune is "Call Me" by Blondie

    Covering this area, baby
    Coveting your car
    Meter maids a' comin' darling
    I know who you are
    Come up off your attitude
    I target Benzs, M5s, and Suburus

    Call me (call me) on the line
    Call me, call me add another dime
    Call me (call me) oh, fudge!
    Help prevent the boot or ticket stub
    Call me

    Cover me with birdshit, baby
    Cover me with smudge
    Rolled into by shopping carts
    I've really had enough
    Scratches, I really don't know why
    Drive me over to Earl Scheib

    Call me (call me) on the line
    Call me, call me any, anytime
    Call me (call me) oh fudge
    When you're ready we can call in a dime
    Call me

  25. Here is a link to the Estonia story... by Osrin · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Here is a link to the Estonia story... by KiviPall · · Score: 1

      actually, SMS parking started July 2000 in Estonia.

  26. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if you didn't spend so much time posting knee-jerk comments on slashdot, you could study a little geography and learn the difference between "Canada" and "The United States of America".

    Unless you really DO think Canada acts at being the world's policeman. If so, that's quite peculiar.

  27. Been around a while by KavyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wellington, NZ implemented this a while back. I knew one of the IT guys involved. They were happy to get paid for doing the work, but they were sure it wouldn't be a success. After all, who would pay extra for this? Much to his surprise, it's been very successful.

  28. We have that in England :) by jjeffrey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Verrus operate a similar system at the council car parks in York, England. It's great - finding the change was always a pain!

    They get the number of your cell phone from caller ID and store your vehicle registration plate and credit card details against it the first time you call. The next time you call you just tell it how many hours you want and enter the 4 digit code for the car park you are using. For an extra 10p you can get a reminder SMS. You are also free to call again and extend the parking.

    If you don't have your cell phone with you then you can use any phone, and just tap in your cell number and the PIN number you set the first time you called. You also use that PIN if you want to change credit card or vehicle registration numbers.

    The wardens have machines that have details of the electronically issued tickets on them, so they don't clamp you :)

    1. Re:We have that in England :) by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

      Caller ID can be faked. So if I get the phone # of someone I know uses this system, I can route my call via my PBX and get *free* parking?

      Seems to be a flaw in this system.

    2. Re:We have that in England :) by jjeffrey · · Score: 1

      Yes - so long as you either know their PIN number of you have the same vehicle registration number as them....

    3. Re:We have that in England :) by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Anyone that knows what they're doing can spoof ANI (Caller ID) to be from any number they want it to be from.

      A friend recently noticed that his VoIP carrier wasn't filtering the ANI provided from his Asterisk server, and then coupled that information with the fact that huge numbers of his friends don't turn on the "use additional password" feature in their cellular carrier's voice mail boxes for their cell phones made for some interesting "testing" and warning of his friends to turn on their damn PIN numbers on two major U.S. carriers, that DEFAULT to checking ANI to see if you're calling from your cell phone, and drop you straight into your voice mail retrieval menu. (Hint: Cingular, and NexTel)

      A quick reconfiguration of Asterisk to send out THEIR phone number as the number he was calling from, and he was listening to their stored voice mails.

      Seriously, ANI is NOT a good basis for security (authentication of who's calling you) by any REMOTE stretch of the imagination.

      My friend regularly calls me with ANI's that are "funny" to see if I notice. The good one was the White House's switchboard number. I answered, "Good evening, Mr. President."

      Should his VoIP provider be forcing him to use one of the 100 or so DID number he has assigned to his VoIP circuits? Yep. Are they? Nope.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  29. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Canada we're talking about. We're the bully's b!tch, not the bully.

  30. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We learned it from you!

  31. Re:Old News by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
    We Canadians aren't "the world's policeman".

    And yes, we do implement the mobile telephone technology far more slowly than most European and Asian countries - far faster than I really think we should, but hey, I'm a dinosaur from the age of the Amiga.

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  32. Re:Old News by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I do believe this will completely change the parking scene in Vancouver. Anyone who has been downtown and tried to park there knows it is impossible. This means that now, for sure, anyone who gets there first will be there all day. Previously spaces opened up due to people running out of change and leaving or people getting towed. This would also be a good method of topping up at the various Impark parking lots in Calgary and Edmonton. I almost always underestimate the time I need, I think everyone does.

    Of course, Impark won't do this since it makes more money giving tickets than selling parking space. They are vultures! The ticket is already written up by the time you have 1-minute left, just in case.

    The article explains this is the first major city in North America to do this. Not to mention this is in CANADA. I think you have Canada confused with the United States with your comment.

  33. So long, and thanks for the free parking... by dwandy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All my calls come from (202) 456-1414

    --
    If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
  34. It's about the money by ezratrumpet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Man probably doesn't care about temporary parking vs. garage parking. If anything, the Man will encourage more use of temporary (aka parking meter) parking. Meters, when in use, make more money than parking garages. If the Man can keep the metered spaces full, it means more money for governmental projects.

    1. Re:It's about the money by pthisis · · Score: 1

      At least around here (Washington, DC area) the primary purpose of parking meter's isn't revenue. It's to keep people from parking all day, allowing for turnover and giving access to people who aren't there all day. Employees park blocks away or in garages or whatever; people doing grocery shopping, eating lunch, getting their hair cut, etc use the metered spaces.

      If it was about maximizing meter revenues, it would be legal to feed the meter and stay more than the alloted 2 hours. But they've determined turning over the meters gets more revenue coming into the city's businesses (I have no idea if that's a correct conclusion, but it is their rationale).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  35. Its a convenience for the city by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Emptying parking meters is a pretty albor intenstive task, and in big cities they must hold a lot of cash. When i lived in Edinburgh it cost me about $18/day to park in front of my apartment and that was several times less than parking in the city center.

    I'd imagine parking meters are prime targets for drug users and petty theives and i've seen quite a lot of vandalized ones.

    However, they wrap this up as being convenient for the end user (which it is too) and have the user pay the convenience fee.

  36. Not coming to the US anytime soon by jay2003 · · Score: 1

    Since the citizenery of the US doesn't like to pay adequate taxes for the services they demand, US cities are forced to get their revenue from really irrating sources like parking tickets. Cities like San Francisco don't actually want you put money in the meter since that deprives them of the oppurtunity for "revenue enchancement." This is why they make it diffcult to use the meter through tactics like quarters only and not fixing broken meters.

    1. Re:Not coming to the US anytime soon by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      Most municipalities practice creative "revenue enhancement." Parking tickets, Speeding tickets (which really should be called the Velocity Tax), and now camera vans, are nothing more than blatant tax grabs. They have absolutely nothing to do with deterence.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  37. Nothing new! by Nitra · · Score: 1

    Montreal has been doing this for 2 years now.

  38. Quasi-alarming corporate/government programs. by mitchell_pgh · · Score: 1

    While I'm far from an anti-tech alarmist... it seems like another handing over of your personal information to the government, which ultimately ends up in the hands of private companies... all in the name of "convenience."

    While Canadian law is much different than US law... it's somewhat alarming that EZ-Pass http://www.ezpass.com/ information is being used against people in court.

    It's also going to be funny receiving a text that says: "Your car has been towed! $250 has been removed from your account. Your car has been towed to your home. Would you like us to call a taxi for you?"

  39. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may want to brush up on your geography - Vancouver is in Canada, the country known for being the world's peacekeeper (peacekeeping forces being the brainchild of PM Pearson). It will also be hosting the next winter olympics.

    You may be thinking of Vancouver, WA, located in the USA. S'ok, though.

  40. Re:would never work in nyc (FUD a bit) by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
    at a $110 a pop, with $20 increases every three weeks for late payments, im suprised meter maids aren't murdered in the street by rioting mobs!
    Where are you getting $110 from? Last ticket I paid (mailed the check out today) was $65. Different parking violations have different fees -- parking in front of a hydrant or in a handicapped spot certainly deserves a higher fine.

    And as for late payment charges -- you shouldn't even include those, moron who don't pay or file a dispute on time have no one to blame but themselves.
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  41. I have a better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a better idea.

    Fuck parking meters.

    The government nickels and dimes everybody enough as it is.

    Blow them up with pipe bombs.

  42. Hands in your pocket... by anothergene · · Score: 1

    Less Pocket change... 1 step forward.
    Convience charge... 2 steps back.

    Let's all play fuck the consumer.

    --
    Who's leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?
  43. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if you didn't spend so much time playing at being the world's policeman you wouldn't have to play catch up so often.

    Hmmm.... national stock market down more than 25% since May, budget deficit 10% that of your GDP, red ink @ 9% of your economy?

    I give it a year, 18 months tops, before your country is begging the "world's policeman" for monetary support.

  44. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC: Thank you Head Kokgobbler WhiteHatLurker for that insightful post!

    WHL: Gobble Gobble Gobble!

    AC: Um, yeah, that's what I'm talking about. You are trying to say something, but with that kok stuffed down your throat, it's kinda hard.

    WHL: GOBBLE GOBBLE GOBBLE!

    AC: Okay, I think I'll get out of here and let you keep fellating the /. crowd.

  45. Good for students... by vistic · · Score: 1

    This would be especially nice for students at the University here... where the Tues/Thurs classes are usually about an hour and a half long, but the parking meters only let you put in a maximum of 1 hour's worth of coins. And summer session classes can be even longer.

    Would much rather send a text message on my cellphone from in class, and pay a 30 cent convenience charge than have a ticket.

    Then again, I'm sure the University would never adopt these meters... I think they limit the time on purpose so they can rake in more money from tickets.

    1. Re:Good for students... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      That's complete BS! I mean, don't you guys get season passes or something? Back in my alma mater, we had a choice of getting a three-month pass, or parking in two very inaccessible parking lots. We had free shuttle buses running every five minutes from the parking lots.

  46. Catching up to Europe by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Woohoo - North America is proving to lead the high-tech way again. Give it another 5 years and we may be able to buy a Coke at a vending machine and pay by cell phone. Follow us Europe, we are right behind you... ;)

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Catching up to Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this is nothing new, this "feature" has been available in major New Zealand cities for around two years now!

  47. Been Done by ez151 · · Score: 1

    Coral Gables, Fl has been doing this for about a year already. Very convienent when I go bar-hopping. Oh, wait. This /. I mean war-driving and mooching wi-fi....yeah right.

  48. Caller ID?? by mattmacf · · Score: 1

    Pleease don't tell me they plan on using Caller ID as a secure method of verification. Funny enough, TFA doesn't mention caller id at all, but I'd hope that something slightly more secure is actually implemented.

    --
    I only mod funny =D
  49. Assistance Required by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...feed their parking meters with their cell phone
    I'd like to try this, but I can't seem to fit my phone into the coin slot. Maybe if I bought a Razr?
    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  50. In a related study.. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Vancouver, Canada, does not understand the purpose of Parking Meters.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  51. Sounds insecure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Find a meter
    2) Replace number on meter (via sticker) with your own
    3) Wait for Calls
    4) ???
    5) Profit!

  52. I have an even better better idea. by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    Yes, fuck the parking meters, but don't blow them up. Why shouldn't they tax the lazy? I mean they tax the stupid with lottery tickets and the self indulgent with cigarettes.

    No one is forcing you to park at the meters. Blowing them up is way out of line when you can park a few blocks away and walk for free... or better still not drive a car at all. Maybe the extra exercise will help you work through your "anger issues" or at least give you time and oxygen to better understand your priorities.

    How much of a revolutionary would Bobby Sands have been if he had spent his days rotting in the hole for blowing up parking meters? I am not an advocate of any violence, but would anyone have voted him into Parliament?

    You have to pick the right battles and parking meters are not worth it. In fact if you are stupid enough to do something like blowing up a parking meter you deserve what's coming to you. You are not safe for the gene pool.

  53. A better solution? by L0neW0lf · · Score: 1

    This makes me kind of wish for a parking meter with a swipe-slot for an ATM/debit card, much like almost every gas pump has now. I'd rather feed the meter before I walk away from it, and like many, I usually don't have much change on me anymore.

    --

    Never look down your nose at others. Someday, someone is bound to see your boogers.
  54. not sure why you'd make more annoyances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never been quite sure why cities insist on making things more annoying than they have to be. Parking meters/tickets always seemed like pure annoyance - and in some places, even bad for the city. I'd think that many smaller U.S. cities (New Haven, for example) have more problems with encouraging people to visit the downtown than with parking. Putting in meters actively encourages businesses to move away - eg. one art supply store at the corner of the green specifically moved one town over so their customers wouldn't have to deal with metered street parking. But, I'm sure the city would never consider getting rid of meters - too much opportunity to give parking tickets! It just seems like the government has decided it's purpose is to make it's citizens' lives more annoying, not easier.

  55. How about.. by s31523 · · Score: 1

    Using a pre-paid card (like the New York City metro-card) instead?

    or just outfit card readers with good ol' credit card readers?

    Using your cell phone to call in to a third party who then takes car of validating the call and charging you and making sure the meter is happy just sounds a bit complicated, given there are already things in place to provide cash-less payment options. Hell, my college vending machine accepted credit cards...

  56. Sounds like cash money to me by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
    Sounds like a good idea on the surface, but how many transactions do you need to rack up for this system to pay for itself?
    How many transactions do you think happen at a typical parking meter in a day?

    If you set a 2-hr time limit, and your meters are on for 12 hours, you could easily run up $1.50 in revenue or more per day per meter. In some areas, you're talking about $2/day per meter -- overlap time gets billed to two people :) How about places with 1-hr time limits?

    The system itself would be pretty cheap, and is very scalable -- adding new towns would be very simple. I'd also imagine that the municipality is bearing most of the cost of installing new meter equipment as necessary -- after all, they are saving money on enforcement. Who knows if they are also paying the company providing the service.
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  57. sounds like m-parking... by just-a-stone · · Score: 1

    in vienna and some other cities in austria, they introduced a similar service in 2003 based on sms. it's very useful and sends reminder sms 10 minutes before a needed extension.

    german site (google translation)

  58. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've had something similar in Croatia for, uhm, at least 6-7 years now. But we don't have to call a number - we just send an SMS with the car's licence plate number, and that's it. Time is bought by the hour (as with parking meters), though, so if you need three hours of parking, you send three SMS's. This pay-by-the-minute thing seems appealing, I wish we had something like that.

    The people who patrol the parking lot and write tickets, carry a nifty wireless thing and can check any car instantly. It even alarms them the minute the period ends, though they usually give a 5-minute grace period.

    I don't know the exact amount of the convenience fee, but I think it's less than what's mentioned in TFA. The money is deducted straight from your cell phone (prepaid is valid). Obviously, you can pay anyone's parking fee - I usually tell my father to pay when I'm in the city by car, because the money on his prepaid account just keeps on accumulating and there's not much other use for it.

  59. In The Netherlands by earthman · · Score: 1

    In The Netherlands, you call and enter the code when you park, then when you leave, you call again. You only pay for the time you actually parked. If you forget to unregister your car, you get unregistered automatically at midnight.

    Of course there is a fee for each call. There is also a small yearly subscription fee for this service (in addition to the per call fee).

    The alternative is to buy a ticket from a parking machine in advance, usually overestimating the amount of time you need.

    Compared to the actual costs of parking downtown in the major cities, the fees are insignificant. And you don't waste money on buying parking time in advance and then not using all of it.

  60. Re:would never work in nyc (FUD a bit) by pretygrrl · · Score: 1


    $110 is the Midtown Manhattan fee. They vary by neighbourhood, the $65 ticket you got was probably in Brooklyn, Queens or the Bronx.

    --
    Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
  61. wow!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Vancouver, Canada has just become the first major city in North America to allow motorists to feed their parking meters with their cell phone.


    PARKING METERS EAT CELLPHONES NOW?!?! IS THERE ANYTHING TECHNOLOGY CANT DO?!?
  62. Re:Old News by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

    I'll be sure to tell President Harper that you disapprove of his foreign policy.

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  63. Good idea, but one big flaw by Oxyrubber · · Score: 1

    There aren't a lot of elegant technological implementations these days, but this seems extremely simple. If they were to require a credit card entry every time you called, this technology would have been a waste of both the consumer's and the invetor's time.

    On the other hand, there is a huge problem with this (at least in the US). The technology to spoof caller id is widespread (and AFAIK - IANAL - caller id spoofing is legal in the US). If they are depending on the same caller id implementation we here in the US have, I can foresee fraudulent caller id spoofing to offload the fess to innocent phone-owners.

    --
    "If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates." - Jay Leno
  64. no way in hell by nude-fox · · Score: 1

    i'm paying 30 cents for a conveince fee i'll just walk thx

  65. Re:talk about this by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

    Pfft, "new system". Three letters man: I R C

    One server. A channel for each story. Sheesh, top trying to reinvent the wheel.

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  66. Richmond, VA Has This by waldoj · · Score: 1

    Richmond, VA provides this service on many meters. I've never used it, but I couldn't help but notice 'em last time I was walking around downtown.

    -Waldo Jaquith

    1. Re:Richmond, VA Has This by stego · · Score: 1
  67. Old news by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    Auckland City in New Zealand (!!) has been doing this for a fair while now. Given that I'll be amazed if it's not already all over the world. Heck, when I was in France I was able to hire a bicycle with an SMS.

    That's not to say it's uninteresting or not useful (rather the opposite); rather it's just old news.

  68. The hobos will like this by kaufmanmoore · · Score: 1

    Now they will know that you have change.

  69. How do you pay? by LuminaireX · · Score: 1

    I hope they don't take Visa for that 30 cents

  70. Already in Ireland by Vanhal · · Score: 1

    ..This system has been working in Dublin, Ireland for a year or so now.

    1. Re:Already in Ireland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, its been live in Dublin for over 3 years. The same company who launched it, also have it running in Australia, the UK, Germany and the US.

  71. security issues? by g1gg13r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What if I spoof my caller ID, which is relatively easy to do? Will I be able to charge all my parking fees to my coworker's/neighbor's/friend's/stranger's phone bill? Unless they have cameras at each parking meter recording the license plate numbers of cars parked there, how will they track me down before the victim receives their cell phone bill for the month?

    Also, can I do a "chargeback"? What if I charge up my phone bill with parking fees, and dispute the charges at the end of the month?

  72. Caller ID? Too easy to Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats a pretty stupid way to base payment on your caller id, as, with any PBX system (VOIP and and the lot) you can fake your caller ID. Cingular VM is the same way, if the person has there VM set to no password prompt (which was the default setting for my VM from Cingular a while back till i changed it.).

  73. What about Portland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would this work in a city like Portland where feeding a meter more than once is illegal?

  74. Give me the octopus by antarctican · · Score: 1

    As a Vancouver resident, I'd rather a system like Hong Kong, the Octopus Card. Works for transit, parking meters, even buying things in most stores. One card, money everywhere, very convinient. I don't see this as a major step forward.

  75. Re:would never work in nyc (FUD a bit) by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    West Village, Hudson Street across from Jane. Depends on the violation. Anywhere in Manhattan below 96 St has the higher rates, but the difference is not that large.

    Anyhoo, here's a schedule of fines for NYC parking violations.

    Of note, the "meter-feeding" violation is $65.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  76. With link! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  77. Cool Hand Luke by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    So does that mean that hacking a parking meter will net you a few years on a Georgia chain gang (or a SCSI Daisy Chain gang?) with Dragline, Coco, and Babalugats?

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  78. ^BumP^ by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  79. At first I thought "Whats the point?"... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    At first I thought, "Whats the point?"... Replacing change with cell-phone calls doesn't make sense. But the idea of sending an expiration notice when time runs out, and being able to pay while being away from the meter by cell phone, is brilliant. A system like this would probably save me money even with the 30cent fee, because I always overpay parking meters to give me a little extra leeway in case I am running late.

  80. re: Del Taco and drink refills by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    It's not (normally) that someone is too lazy to get up and walk over to the soda fountain to refill their own drink!

    The reason a lot of customers come in and order a larger drink, despite "free refills" is because they want to take a decent amount of soda with them when they leave. If you only order a small drink, sure - you can refill it as much as you like while you're in the restaurant... but many people want to take the cup with them in the car and drink some of it after they get back to work or whatever.

  81. Spoof Caller ID for Free Parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sweet!

    Now one just has to find a phone no. of someone who has used the service, and make a spoofed-caller-ID call using that phone no. to add time to any meter they want!

    Free parking, anyone?

    1. Re:Spoof Caller ID for Free Parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now one just has to find a phone no. of someone who has used the service, and make a spoofed-caller-ID call using that phone no. to add time to any meter they want!

      Extactly what I was thinking. After this has been running for a while it ought to be pretty easy to war dial per say through the phone book grabbing phone numbers to spoof. I'd like to think they have taken this into account, but I suspect that's not the case. Anyone know Sam Sullivan's phone number? (Mayor of Vancouver)

  82. TXT-a-Park by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have had TXT-a-Park for a while here in NZ - http://www.vodafone.co.nz/promos/txt-a-park/txt_a_ park.jsp?item=txt_a_park

    They charge a 50c transaction fee which is pretty steep, especially when you are only paying $3.50 for the actual parking. Having the system txt you when your parking is almost up and email receipts is a great idea which I wish they would implement here.

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
    1. Re:TXT-a-Park by kiwi_james · · Score: 1

      Here's a quick rundown on how Txt-a-Park works in NZ for those who are interested...

      First point is that it is "pay and display" parking (i.e. the machine vends a ticket that you place on your dashboard) - which is the standard parking meter model in most NZ cities.

      Each machine has a built in GPRS modem. The customer presses the "Txt a Park" button on the machine, the modem checks it can communicate, then instructs the user to text a specific numeric code to 7275 (PARK). The numeric code identifies the parking machine and the time duration the customer wants. When the system receives the customer's text it checks they have enough credit and then initiates communication with the vending machine to ask the customer to confirm the purchase (this ensures that the customer is in front of the right machine!). They confirm and it vends the ticket. The customer receives a text confirming receipt of funds from their mobile account credit balance. The entire transaction usually takes six to ten seconds.

      The 50c transaction fee is the same as what you receive if you put your credit card in the machine, so it's the standard fee for a non-cash transaction.

      Interesting things to note about this solution:
        - billing is not done by having differentially rated text messages as other systems do, it's straight against the billing system. This means that if the customer texts the wrong code etc. they haven't just blown $4.
        - the modem inside the machine also allows for credit card processing and machine health checks.
        - it would be possible to add in reminders etc. if desired, but the whole thrust was to keep it as similar to the normal "pay and display" user experience as possible.

  83. 30 cents? thats super cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco bell charges $1.50 "convenience fee" to use your credit card, even if you just purchase a 99 cent taco. 30 cents is cheap.

  84. First MAJOR City?? by katsiris · · Score: 1
    I'm offended! What size of city qualifies it as major, or is it relative to other cities in the region? OK, so I'm not offended, but the implication that Vancouver is the first to have this is incorrect at best. Saskatoon, another Canadian city, has been using the system for almost a year already. See here:

    http://www.city.saskatoon.sk.ca/org/municipal_engi neering/parking_services/index.asp

    1. Re:First MAJOR City?? by Milhouse_ph · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see there's another saskatoon person here to point that out. I was a little confused when I read the article.

  85. Caller ID fraud by andrewman327 · · Score: 1
    How hard is it to pretend to be another phone and charge parking to another person? Spoofing other people's phone numbers to fool caller ID systems is still legal in the United States. Congressman Fred Upton (R, Mi 6) has introduced legislation to outlaw this, but it still has a ways to go before it goes into effect.


    I find it foolish to commence financial operations using a system with the possibility of semi-legal cheating.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  86. Zagreb, Croatia has got SMS parking since 2001. by nikolag · · Score: 1

    Zagreb, Croatia has got SMS parking from september 2001. and in 2002. system was installed in most of the cities in Croatia

    Therefore, that is not-so-new news for us.
    Want to know more? http://www.rao.hr/

    N

    --
    Doing a good job is like spilling coffee on a dark suit, you feel warm all over, but nobody notices.
  87. Fewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fewer pockets. Fewer tickets.

    Not "less".

    Did you go to school?

    1. Re:Fewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. A little part of my inner grammarian died when I read that.

  88. Re:Wrong Number? or Battery Implications by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Seeing as how parking tickets are a major revenue source for many cities, I don't know how widespread this will be in the US.

    It's a good question. Recently, Seattle City Council tried to sneak in evening parking rates for automatic pay meters for parking and was pounced upon by most citizens.

    Still, two years is an awfully long time. I wonder how he keeps the battery from going dead.

    Maybe it's got one of those solar cell rooftop chargers? You'd think they'd tow him given how much grime must cover the car by now, though.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  89. you can't do that by hymie! · · Score: 1

    In many US cities, it is illegal to re-fill a parking meter. That would seem to limit the appeal of this feature.

  90. 6 year behind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You people are about 6+ years behind. :)
    Parking via SMS is like yesterdays news here in Estonia.
    You can also pay for cab, transfer funds, pay food etc via SMS.

    step

  91. Re:Old News by Danga · · Score: 1

    Sorry guys but we have been using a similar system here in Budapest for two years. Maybe if you didn't spend so much time playing at being the world's policeman you wouldn't have to play catch up so often.

    Since when is Canada the world's policemen?

    --
    Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  92. Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The city of saskatoon(200,000 pop) rolled out a system like this in january, but it doesn't have the "convenience fee", You are simply billed once a month for the time you used rounded up to the nearest 20cents for each transaction. Works great, really convienient, and yes, it does tell the meter maid how long you've been parked there, but it will expire your session at the end of the meter time any way. the system is http://new-parking.com/

  93. it's like ticketmaster! by IndieQueen · · Score: 1
    30-cent 'convenience fee'? for putting how much money in the meter? their service charge is almost as rediculous as tickmaster's!
    Burns: And to think, Smithers, you laughed when I bought Ticketmaster. (imitating Smithers) NOBODY'S going to pay a hundred-percent "service charge."
  94. Took long enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the 21st Century, America. We've had this in New Zealand for at least the last three years.

  95. Overtime parking? by rodionpunk · · Score: 1

    This seems kind of moot, because it doesn't necessarily solve the problem. I've gotten a couple tickets for overtime parking -- feeding the meter after the time limit. Basically, if a meter says it's only a two hour meter, you have to actually move your car in two hours. Now if a company could do that for you via SMS, that'd be really terrifying.

  96. Fees are never "convenient" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not really "convenient" to pay them for all the stupid-ass things they have fees for. Maybe this one makes more sense, but they can take their damn cell phone and shove it up you-know-where* for all the BS they currently charge you for. It's one reason I don't have a cell.

    * And if you don't know where, I'll find you some detailed anatomical diagrams on wikipedia.

    1. Re:Fees are never "convenient" by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      No one is claiming the fees are convenient; it's the service that provides convenience for a certain fee. Some companies are a little...optimistic in their claim that their fees are convenience fees, but this doesn't seem like one of them. Refilling a parking meter from half a mile away *is* pretty damn convenient.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  97. Vancouver is not the first city by hectorh · · Score: 1

    Not true. White Rock (another city near Vancouver) removed all their parking meters last year in exchange for a centralized system that you can phone and make your payment over the phone.

  98. Angle-Grinder-Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To Mr RichBastard, paying a fine is no deterrent. Mr RichBastard having to wait an hour or two for the guys with the wheel clamp keys is gonna re-think his parking strategy.

    To Mr RichBastard buying an angle grinder and keeping it in the trunk is no big deal, for the rest of us we have to rely on Angle-Grinder-Man to save the day.

    BTW, the system in Vancouver is designed to refund any unused balance when you finish parking which is a major bonus. Nothing sucks more than only wanting 10 minutes of parking but having nothing but a toonie in your pocket.

  99. fewer parking tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fewer" is used for countable things.
    http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000214.htm

  100. planes w/o cc by zoloto · · Score: 1

    I hand them cash. Sometimes they give me trouble, 100% of the time I win.

  101. Old Tech... by mindwhip · · Score: 1

    Edinburgh,Scotland has had this for over a year now (as have other places in the UK), welcome to 2005 America!

    --
    [The Universe] has gone offline.
    1. Re:Old Tech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Earth, Edinburgh,Scotland. Vancouver is in Canada.

  102. Re:Meter stuffing = bad by Pearson · · Score: 1

    I realize that I'm Johnny-come-lately, but IIRC putting more quarters in a meter that is not expired, and whos time limit you haven't exceeded is OK. But if it has expired, or you have stayed longer than the limit you are guilty and are supposed to turn yourself in or somesuch.

    That's why you get cases like http://www.cincypost.com/news/1998/meters020998.ht ml, where puting coins into expired meters is judged to be obstructing police enforcement. /rolleyes

    --
    I...I'm attacking the darkness!
  103. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sydney has had this type of system for at least a year google "mpark"

  104. Hey, we have this too... by lcllam · · Score: 1
    ... in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. The thing uses texting to get the update. We have to physically sign up first and provide a deposit, then receive a starter kit with a sticker that identifies the vehicle as a participant in mobile parking - this comes in by snail mail. After that, the service provider maintains an account balance, which is topped up periodically (by credit card, I believe). However, the problem is not so much technical - it's ergonomic.

    See, the text message we use requires upwards of 20 characters: identify the town countil (4) (space - 1) vehicle number (7) (space - 1) duration (4) then send it to the service center (5 digit short code). Machines and humans being what they are, any mistake will land you a RM150 fine for a RM0.60 parking fee. Oh, and there's a RM0.20 'convenience fee' too. Personally, I don't use it - I think there are easier (read: single-click) ways to solve this problem.

  105. Hate to break it to you by Inoshiro · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "He thinks this is funny."

    He's not the only one :D

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  106. Lazy? by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    What about where they have this on campuses, where you get to a spot, phone the #, and then walk to your class. Instead of running between lectures (about 10 minutes) back to the car and plugging the meter again, you can just make a quick phone call. Not sure when you're done? Phoning back will refund any unused time, so you only get billed what you use.

    I'd say it's convienent in summer, not lazy. This goes double in winter when it's -40C.

    But I'm sure you'd just say, "don't like frostbite? You must be lazy." Don't confuse ease of use with laziness (much like cheap and thrifty aren't the same).

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  107. Not quite. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    "2. Same thing with cigarette tax: Presumably they want to discourage smoking - but if they wanted to do that they could place a huge tax on cigarettes, maybe $50 per pack or something. The trouble with that, is that everyone would quit smoking if they had to pay $50+ a pack. So they make the cigarette tax as high as possible without actually discouraging smoking, to maximize profits."

    No, I'm pretty sure they'd just bootleg cigarettes the same way they do in when municipalities take cig taxes above 10$ is some provinces. Remember: once you push things too far, you merely build up illegal activity. The mafia got started bootlegging liquor in the US during prohibition.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Not quite. by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. High cigarette taxes would simply leave organized crime to fill the need, and they won't be paying any tax at all. But likewise, I think the people who make the taxes have a pretty good idea of the threshold where the black market starts to come into play, and they also take that into consideration as well to maximize profit.

      My point wasn't that cigarette tax is an effective tool against smoking. I was more trying to say that it is a bad idea for the government to make a profit from something it wants to discourage. I am not sure that it is the governments job to try to fight vice, but assuming it is, having the government profit from vice is not a good way to make sure it combats vice.

      Parking meters are supposed to discourage people from parking, in order to make sure those spots are used by people for only short periods of time so that everyone has a fair share of parking spots and only those with a real need get to use the spot. Parking meters are supposed to be a method for the government to allocate a scarce public resource to the most amount of people. There is a conflict of interest when the government is both trying to allocate the resource and maximize its own profit.

  108. Same thing on campus. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    All campus meters are auto-pay via CC from phone caller ID.

    If you park there (even an the max 2 hour ones), they'll txt you back when you're just about out of time, so you can plug it with more time. When you're done, it'll refund the difference of your current chunk of time. You pay for exactly what you use, which I think is pretty fair.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  109. Can't see them ever adopting this here in NYC by Brooklynoid · · Score: 1

    This makes it too easy to keep in compliance with the law (reminders, ability to reload meter remotely) and would reduce the number of summonses issued for expired meters. While I don't have data to prove it, I'm convinced that NYC makes more money from the fines than from the actual meter charges. The fact that the Parking Violations Bureau is part of the NYC Department of Finance and not the Department of Motor Vehicles says something, no? The only sub-$100 parking ticket I've gotten in the past 5 years was for a crooked license plate (yes, you read that right, a crooked license plate!), and that one was $65.

  110. the point by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    of parking meters was so you can only hog a space for eg 2hrs at a time. now, its just for $ I guess

  111. Hell we even have cellphone loaded meters... by dr_db · · Score: 1

    We've had them in the downtown and broadway area for months now.

  112. Two points... From a guy recently moved to VanCity by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    1) Cellphone minutes over here are not "free" (as in beer, but do not get me started on THAT! ;-) ) in the US sense -- a normal plan would give you like 120 minutes/month -- but they'd be helpful enough to text you a message that you are 75%/100% close to your limit.

    2) In Canada, the smallest bill is $5; rest are coins, loonies and toonies, rather heavy and unpleasant to haul around in your pocket... And it is like $1 CDN for half an hour of parking...

    I guess I should be signing up for this service rather than chattin on /. ... ;-)

    Paul B.

  113. Municipalities won't go for this. by FishinDave · · Score: 1

    The purpose of parking meters is to enable shoppers to find parking spaces downtown. Without meters, a shopkeeper would find the spaces near his business monopolized during business hours by people who aren't buying from him. It's not uncommon to see signs that read, "2 hour parking only, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m." regardless of whether you've fed and re-fed the 2-hour meter. The whole point of 2-hour meter maximums is to increase car turnover; otherwise, the meters would have an "all day" rate just like private parking lots do.

    If the owners of the parking meters don't cooperate, this cell phone gizmo won't be able to talk to the meters. End of business plan.

    1. Re:Municipalities won't go for this. by Sinesurfer · · Score: 1

      yeah, they will 'cos it provides a more reliable income source.

      Visit http://www.vodafone.co.nz/promos/txt-a-park/txt_a_ park.jsp?item=txt_a_park

      Short story is that you TXT the parking meter and park your car. Have had this for about 3 years in NZ so am a bit surprised it isn't widely used elsewhere

      --
      Regards Sinesurfer A Nerd is someone who lives for technology, A Geek is someone who lives for technology and loves it
    2. Re:Municipalities won't go for this. by FishinDave · · Score: 1

      OK, maybe there are cities with underutilized parking meters. Denver, my home town, isn't among them.

  114. grammar correction by Myopic · · Score: 1

    Fewer pockets full of change, fewer parking tickets, seems like a step forward.

  115. Lithuania and Croatia had this years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is hardly news. Croatia and Lithuania had this years ago, and without the excessive transaction fees.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=parking+sms+vilnius

  116. Hardly news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been going on in Croatia for four years now...

  117. already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this system is already implemented in Holland and Belgium, include big cities like Amsterdam, Antwerp and Rotterdam (http://www.park-line.com/en/default.htm)

  118. Croatia by kost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Croatia have that "feature" for years! In almost all towns in Croatia you can pay your parking with cell phone.

    --
    Vlatko Kosturjak - Kost
  119. Here in Norway... by A-Rex · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...many places you can swipe your credit card when you leave your car, and swipe it again when you come back. Very convenient. Alternatively, you can pay with coins.

  120. Facepalms by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    That's the JOKE in "in soviet russia" jokes. Why is there no manual for them?

    Oh, here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_reversal

    By omitting the "in the US" part, the reader, who knows the Russian reversal implication (which I would assume every Slashdotter by now does), does that part (just like you did).

    BUT YOU DON'T SAY IT! :)

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  121. Pilot in Belgrade for some time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Belgrade, Serbia, has this sort of parking payment for a number of years. You just enter a licence plate number, send the SMS and receive confirmation SMS txt message with transaction id number. The parking fee is billed on your cell phone bill at the end of the month. No change, no credit cards... The parking controlers are equipped with wireless handhelds that are online with the central system, and are issuing violation tickets on spot. If you dont have cell phone, you can still buy paper parking ticket at the newspaper stand. If you live in high density residential downtown area, you may buy parking in advance (month, two or six months) at deeply discounted (symbolic) rates. Very convenient. Vancouverite in Belgrade

  122. Easier to steel parking! by UnidentifiedCoward · · Score: 1

    While everyone is whining about how unfair the system is because people will simply park all day, I would be more concerned about theft of service than anything else. Why not get even with the rich "jerks" parking all day and simply bill your parking to them?

    I think the greater concern about such a service is the authentication scheme. What about the services and simple technology that allow you to forge your Caller ID? Simply identify someone with the service and you have instant free parking. Now some Caller ID forging services are expensive, but I can think of a TRIVIAL and hugely inexpensive way to achieve the same effect at almost no cost. While tremendously convenient it is grossly inadequate to authenticate via Caller ID alone. I would be willing to wager that scamming, forgery, and stolen services quickly escalate because while previously confined to private parking lots, the service is now city wide with heavy usage.

  123. A step backwards...the Aussies got it right first. by jedi_gras · · Score: 1

    http://www.abc.net.au/goldcoast/stories/s1340441.h tm

    Check out this article on meter maids.

  124. *yawn* by moeffju · · Score: 1

    We had this in south west Germany for a few years now. There's no "convenience fee", instead we get even better rates (since we pay per second, not by whatever-the-smallest-coin-is). It is quite nice indeed.

    --
    follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/moeffju