Slashdot Mirror


Salon on JWZ/Emacs/Mozilla/AOL and Nightclubs

genehckr writes "Salon has an article about how JWZ has been spending his time since leaving Netscape/AOL/Mozilla -- he's working on buying a nightclub in San Francisco. The article also delves into JWZ's personality, and some of the history behind the JWZ/RMS Lucid Emacs/emacs split -- an interesting read. " Ok, I put it under the Mozilla icon because I don't have a 'San Francisco Nightclub Icon'. Interesting article covering stuff that we don't usually see around here.

168 comments

  1. initials by skank · · Score: 0

    skank/tas...just for future reference...

    1. Re:initials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High time for Slashdot to make a 'San Francisco Nightclub Icon'. Sheesh.

  2. How about a bat? by acb · · Score: 2

    Given jwz's goth/industrial/angstcore leanings musicwise, a bat may be a good icon.

    1. Re:How about a bat? by hikari · · Score: 1

      There's a name for that and it's net.goth...

      BTW, I nominate JWZ for "the most handsome hacker" awards!

      --Hikari

      --

      --Hikari
      "Long distance information/ Disconnect me if you can/ On Detonation Boulevard..."
  3. 3 by Qstyk · · Score: 0

    Score.

  4. hihihihihihihihihihihihihi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    login to studs3.sci.kun.nl studs2.sci.kun.nl studs.sci.kun.nl ssh only username mrelleke passwd garf19field root my box.. and the price is .. root acces.. sparc 2.6 architecture.. and plenty of space in /tmp.. nice trader shell? have fun yall

  5. A programmer buying a nightclub? by jd · · Score: 2
    This is STRANGE! I mean, next thing you know, pop singers might be buying llamas and living in oxygen tents. Ooops! Already done. :)

    On the other hand, I'd love to know if the dance floor is Java 2 compatiable and supports XML.

    Personally, I think we might start to see more of this - people just getting fundamentally fed up and choosing whole new careers. I don't know any of the reasons JWZ has made the switch, beyond those reasons he's chosen to give, but I do know that if I had the resources, I'd get out of the politics, back-stabbing and paranoia that makes up so many companies.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by codemonkey_uk · · Score: 1
      This is STRANGE! [...]

      Not all that strange, I meet loads of techys out clubbing, and loads of the techys I know are into clubbing (or metal).

      On the other hand, I'd love to know if the dance floor is Java 2 compatiable and supports XML.

      Its an escape from tech land, not and extension of it...

      Personally, I think we might start to see more of this - people just getting fundamentally fed up and choosing whole new careers.

      Too late, its already been happening for years. Why else is the industry full of young people? Computing is a burn out industry, most people give up and do something less stressfull instead - I've met plenty of people who used to be programmers (the carpenter that repaired the door after there was a break in where I used to work glanced at the computers we where working on and commented "computers eh? I used own a computer company, but I got sick of it, so I do this now." And go on with his work.

      Thad
      --

      Thad

    2. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by angelo · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I'd love to know if the dance floor is Java 2 compatiable and supports XML.

      Acutally, I've been there. Unless it closes for renovations, the floor as I danced on it was kinda uneven. I tripped over a few nails by the edges. The floor is kinda nailed down and a bit small compared to clubs here in Pittsburgh. They do have a balcony and a pretty big stage. Kinda like Graffiti, but without the smoke.

    3. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by jd · · Score: 2

      Uneven with nails sticking out. Hmmm. So he's using J-Script and ASP. :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by clink · · Score: 1

      Does it strike anyone else that saving the SF club scene is kind of shallow? He can do whatever he wants I guess but geez, I wouldn't go around advertising it.

    5. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      >Personally, I think we might start to see more of this - people just getting fundamentally fed
      >up and choosing whole new careers. I don't know any of the reasons JWZ has made the switch,

      You know, even when your career is in computers, you're allowed to get out once in a while. I'm sure JWZ has been into the clubbing scene for a while now. I have hobbies and interests not related to computers, and if I had the stock option millions, I'd find a non-computer use for it too.

    6. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > (the carpenter that repaired the door after there was a break in where I used to work glanced at the computers we where working on and commented "computers eh? I used own a computer company, but I got sick of it, so I do this now." Many of these people get into the computer biz because of the money, and don't really know what they are doing, and don't really enjoy it. I've known these people too. You really have to enjoy any occupation in order to stick with it. (Not to say this is always the case.. change is good, sometimes.)

    7. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by jonathanclark · · Score: 2

      It's not so strage. I used to live in Austin Texas, home of Origin. Richard Garriot and Chris Roberts the owners of Origin Systems (makers of Wing Commander) bought one of the clubs there. It was cool because all of our product launches happened there at a invite-only party with a drink named after your game. You'd think it was male-only, but I happened to hook up with women at many of the events. I went to one of the Mozilla parties in SF and thought it was pretty happening, but it wasn't a balanced crowd.

      I think it is a smart marketing move by JWZ, if not for a company for his personal image. I'm cracking up trying to image Richard Stallman hanging out at a nightclub. Not so say he doesn't, but it's a funny image.

      Jonathan

    8. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      A nightclub with pulsating lights: the tag...

    9. Re:A programmer buying a nightclub? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't millionaires already pay $6000 a month here in San Fran? If I had that much money I'd buy a private jet and be living in a mansion in Idaho or something and just fly out here when I wanted to.. (which would be quite often) As for another night club, I hope he does a good job and has lots of space to host his dream. I'm all for it.

  6. Java banner adds killing Netscape browsers by Morgaine · · Score: 1

    The appearance of Java in Slashdot banners is *not* a welcome new feature! Not only does it add to the page load times, but it kills off a large proportion of the Netscapes currently in use on Linux.

    I have three different versions of Netscape running on RedHat 5.2, 6.0, and 6.1, and they *all* die during Java loads. (Yes, I *have* fixed the RH font path omission.)

    I know the problem is Netscape's and not Slashdot's, but since Netscape is the browser most used on Linux, the end effect worldwide of this introduction of Java really sucks for Slashdot fans.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re:Java banner adds killing Netscape browsers by tolldog · · Score: 1

      No kidding... and it is a ugly thing on SGI's as well... NO JAVA BANNER ADS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      -I just work here... how am I supposed to know?
    2. Re:Java banner adds killing Netscape browsers by TummyX · · Score: 2

      Works nice and fast here. Oh whoops, I'm using IE5 :P

      Anyway, can't you just disable java in netscape?

    3. Re:Java banner adds killing Netscape browsers by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 1

      I have three different versions of Netscape running on RedHat 5.2, 6.0, and 6.1, and they *all* die during Java loads.

      Must be a RH problem. Works fine from all of my Debian boxes running NS 4.5-4.7.

    4. Re:Java banner adds killing Netscape browsers by Kerg · · Score: 1

      No problems here on Linux + netscape.

      Maybe there's something else wrong with your setup?

    5. Re:Java banner adds killing Netscape browsers by QuMa · · Score: 2

      Netscape 4.7 navigator, on a rh-based box. NP here. Still, I don't like them either. First time I say them I thought: Cool. Second and later times: Argh.

    6. Re:Java banner adds killing Netscape browsers by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      I like it. I have Java off, so I don't have to see the banner ads anymore. The page looks so much cleaner without an ad sitting on top of it.
      --

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  7. This is my motivation.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..for becoming ridiculously loaded.. Screw working..it's all about videogames & nightclubbing.

  8. A nerd haven by tolldog · · Score: 1

    I don't know what would be a bigger draw to me, going to an actively open nerd night club, or going to an actively open nerd night club owned by jwz...

    If only it were in Chicago...

    --
    -I just work here... how am I supposed to know?
    1. Re:A nerd haven by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      I wonder if he needs a nightclub network admin. I'll have to find very sturdy Cat 5 jack mountings...Oh, and I'll need a half-dozen motor-aimed pin spots for marking net abusers.

      There's nothing like keeping a network clean with bouncers...

    2. Re:A nerd haven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicago is cool. was out there for training a couple of times. girlies are nice and easy.

  9. So THAT's what he's up to by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 2
    I had been wondering what jwz was going to do "after AOL."

    I had half expected that he might do something like buying Harlequin, and "open sourcing" Liquid Common Lisp. (Which would have been rather interesting...) Or perhaps seeking to build a Lisp Machine environment to run atop Linux. Or perhaps something more quixotic like building such atop FreeBSD.

    It's very interesting that he has instead proceeded to do "political system" hacking. I expect he'll get back to the computer variety at some point.

    After all, he appears to be a significant participant here; any time major discussions of Motif or Mozilla come up, he's quite visible in the discussions!

    I'm no "clubber," and I'm not entirely convinced he's after something that's unambiguously a good thing, but it's sort of nice to see some action oriented to a local community taking place.

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  10. Re:A nerd haven ... Please god, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not unless they can fit in with the existing industro-goth geeks already there. I'll have to stop going to Dekonstrukt if it turns in to a bad horror movie: 'Attack of the poorly-dressed potato people!'

  11. Not much on the emacs brouhaha by Max+Hyre · · Score: 1

    The article spent a couple of paragraphs on generalities. Does there exist a good, non-judgmental (I should be so lucky) article about what really happened, focussing on the operational differences between emacs & Xemacs? If so, could some kind person post a pointer?

    TIA

    --
    I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
    1. Re:Not much on the emacs brouhaha by kzinti · · Score: 2

      Does there exist a good, non-judgmental (I should be so lucky) article about what really happened, focussing on the operational differences between emacs & Xemacs?

      I doubt if you can find an unbiased account of what happened back in those days; anyone who remembers those events clearly is probably a resident of one camp or another. I liked the other poster's suggestion of "read the accounts and decide for yourself." Unfortunately, I tried following the link and got an authorization failure.

      My camp was the Lucid/XEmacs camp. I had been using the vanilla "FSF Emacs 18", but when I discovered Lucid Emacs 19 I found I liked it much better for many reasons.

      Just one example was "font-lock": its ability to display a file using different typefaces -- like bold for keywords, italics for comments, etc. I seem to remember that this feature was in the works for FSF Emacs 19, but that Lucid Emacs 19 came out first.

      Stallman's version of Emacs 19 eventually caught up with XEmacs and added the font-lock ability, but the underlying mechanism for how to describe when and where the typeface changed was very different. JWZ had done it (correctly, in my opinion) so that typeface was an attribute of the text, so when you cut and pasted a region of text, the font attributes went with it. RMS had a different implementation, so that the text attributes were a feature of the buffer, and didn't get cut and pasted with the text.

      Or maybe it was the other way around, but the point is that the two implementations had different APIs, which made it difficult for any code written on the one Emacs to work on the other. I know, because at the time, I was working on a piece of code called ps-print that would take a fontified buffer and spit out PostScript code so I could pretty-print my code and the printout would look pretty much like it did in Emacs. I eventually worked out a means of supporting both Emacsen and ps-print is now a standard elisp package delivered with each.

      Would life have been a little easier if JWZ and RMS had been able to agree? Undoubtedly. Would I have JWZ back down, given that RMS was never going to agree with him? No way. What Jamie and the Lucid/XEmacs minions produced was simply better for my purposes, and I'd hate to have been without it all these years. Note that I'm not alone in this opinion, at least judging by the fact that XEmacs still has a significant following. Check it out at xemacs.org.

      --Jim

    2. Re:Not much on the emacs brouhaha by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      I feel a little silly getting in the middle of a 7-year-old flame war... I was able to read the discussions from the other poster, so I'd like to comment.

      The issue did not seem to be whether or not lucid/xemacs was "better". Rather, the battle seemed to be over who was harder to work with. RMS accused lucid of not listening and causing delays while lucid accused RMS of not wanting to "let go" of development and making unreasonable demands.

      So there's two camps:

      RMS claimed that emacs 19 was delayed *because* of lucid. If lucid/xemacs was better, it may have been because of troubles they caused at the FSF.

      ---OR---

      emacs 19 was going nowhere because RMS was difficult to work with and lucid/xemacs was better because they stopped working with RMS.

      It's worth noting that they did attempt to work together to merge the two but, by that time, it was too late because of early design decisions made at lucid (specifically the use of an X toolkit).

      Finally, RMS told everyone that it was OK by him if people continue to work and develop on lucid/xemacs because it was free software.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    3. Re:Not much on the emacs brouhaha by kzinti · · Score: 2

      The issue did not seem to be whether or not lucid/xemacs was "better". Rather, the battle seemed to be over who was harder to work with.

      I seem to remember all sorts of technical issues too, including design, usability, appearance and even key bindings. But the issue of getting the two camps to work together was always present. It's worth noting that eventually the two did reconcile somewhat and produced a merged set of elisp code that would work in either Emacs.

      The point about one Emacs being better than the other is purely a personal observation, but it's important because a lot of people felt the same way. Enough people to continue to make XEmacs viable as a separate code base. Forking the code isn't always bad; if it provides enough benefit to enough people, then it not only should happen, it must happen.

      But I'm not trying to pour new fuel on old flames. I didn't get into the flaming then, and I won't now. Just a few observations from the nostalgia department.

      C-g

      --Jim

  12. Slashdot messing with my status bar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Excuse me, but Slashdot seems to be clobbering my status bar. I don't really like that. And the java? Please, where are we, a porn site? What's next, pop-up ads?

  13. hmmm by p0d · · Score: 1

    We have the same issue with afterhours on south beach as they do in san francisco. Maybe jwz can come out here and help us after he's done out there :)

  14. Why Mozilla topic? Not a Mozilla story by shitface · · Score: 0

    The story really was not about Mozilla but about Jamie. The story mentions Jamie and how he deserted Mozilla but that is about it on the Mozilla front. It also talks about how he forked emacs developement because he did not like some things.

    The story is mostly about Jamie's attempt to purchase some club called DNA or something similar. I can't help but remember that Microsoft is touting some "new" technology that they are calling DNA something or another. Think the two are connected?

    --
    Real men dump cores! Read my journal, I am neat.
    1. Re:Why Mozilla topic? Not a Mozilla story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I note a hint of spite here.

  15. New career by Andy · · Score: 1

    I always thought JZW could make it as a Yanni impersonator. It seems that he is not involved with any big hacking project these days. Too bad, the free software community needs him.

    1. Re:New career by the+wub · · Score: 1

      I'd say going against the SFPD and moving local politics is a lot of hacking.
      Ok, so he doesn't hack code right now, but you could say he "hacks minds".
      Greetinx
      Aleks A.
      ---
      For a real millenial disaster, computer glitches cannot hold a candle to global warming.

      --
      For a real millenial disaster, computer glitches cannot hold a candle to global warming.
      (New Scientist)
  16. Out of Curiosity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't say I'm stereotyping, I'm just asking this out of curiosity. But I typically associate San Francisco and the night life there with the gay scene. Is this DNA nightclub a gay haunt?

    1. Re:Out of Curiosity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is, but you'll have to go and find out for me, just go in, bend over drop your pants and report any unusual (or ordinary) sensations!!!

    2. Re:Out of Curiosity! by angelo · · Score: 1

      Though this is obviously a troll, I'll respond: DNA is not a "gay" club currently. It is a venue for concerts (apparently not a much as it used to be) and dance music. It seems to me that the night I was there it was occupied by tourists. I can't be certain. 25 years ago it was a gay club known as "chaps" according to SFgate.

    3. Re:Out of Curiosity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, jwz is a faggot.

  17. jwz == altruistic nerd? by wavelet · · Score: 4
    Maybe altruistic is a bit too generous, but following jwz for a while it seems like he is very true to himself. Much like Linus he seems somewhat unchanged by his fame and money. Ok so he's got more money. His arrogance today seems to be no more than his arrogance several years back.

    Perhaps it's the malleability of code that makes some programmers, especially free software programmers, so optimistic that they can fix things, that problems are solvable, that a solution is always waiting to be found. Software can be fixed. Programmers live in a world where reality can be shaped according to their will -- all they have to do is write another line of code.

    A fairly interesting insite into why hackers are so powerful. Now only do they think they can fix things... in many instances they actually do. All the hub-bub about the freedom on information, ie the state of "the net" is all about hackers knowing they can change things. Shows like Triumph of the Nerds attempts to document this phenomenon. It also seems to celebrate the power and influence of nerddom as if nerds have something to prove.

    1. Re:jwz == altruistic nerd? by HalfFlat · · Score: 1
      His arrogance today seems to be no more than his arrogance several years back.

      Of course, that's still a heck of a lot of arrogance.

    2. Re:jwz == altruistic nerd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jwz can suck my dick. fuck that quitter.

    3. Re:jwz == altruistic nerd? by Adam+Wiggins · · Score: 1

      > A fairly interesting insite into why hackers are
      > so powerful. Now only do they think they can fix
      > things...in many instances they actually do.

      This, perhaps, is what I like best about hackers. Most people in today's world have the attitude that most things they encounter in their life are closed boxes. Your choice is a binary one: you take the closed box and use it as-is, or you reject it. A hacker is someone who wants things to be *right*, and isn't afraid to try to change something to make it better. Moreover, they want to do it themselves, right now.

      I often tell my girlfriend that she's a hacker. She thinks this is funny, because she's certainly not a programmer. But if the switch on her lamp stops working, she breaks out a screwdriver and opens it up. "Do you know how to fix lamps?" I ask. "No," she says, "but it can't be that complicated, can it?"

      This sort of methodolgy works for *anything* in your life. And JWZ is proving that with his political actions. All it takes to change something in this world is for one person (or in some cases, a few people) to stand up and say, "I don't like my choices in this area. I'm going to make my own, and do it the way I think is best." Not only does this benefit you, but it benefits others that agree with you. (Just ask Linus about that one!)

  18. Dont' forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't forget the grits/pants split that I am trying to correct by pouring bowls of hot grits down my pants. thank you.

  19. Stallman... by GNUs-Not-Good · · Score: 0

    will probably insist that it be called a GNU/Nightclub. After all, without him, blah, blah, blah.....It would be fun to see Stallman in a nightclub setting, "I told you it's GNU/Linux, you bitch", as the bouncers are dragging him out the door.

    1. Re:Stallman... by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2
      I just looked over your recent posting history and you seem to have some single-minded hatred of Stallman. You bring him up whenever you can just to flame him. I know if you respond to this it will only be to add one more insult to Stallman. I feel sorry for you.

      Get over it, man! Seek professional help if you must, but don't let Stallman ruin you're life. It's not worth it. You accuse him of being obsessive about the GNU thing, but you appear far more obsessed with him. Maybe you should think of staying off line for a while and maybe getting a new hobby to keep your mind him.

      Here's a couple of links that may help you on your way to recovery:

      http://ocd.mentalhelp.net/

      http://www.ocfoundation.org/ocf1030a.htm

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  20. Re:Slashdot pop-ups by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Before you leave, you will make an entry in Everything.

  21. Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Due to your post, a monkey was locked in a refrigerator for several hours until it had suffocated and died. We videotaped the dead monkey being pulled from the refrigerator for educational purposes.

    Kitchen appliances are not toys, kids!

    1. Re:Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Although this is a little sick. Monkey Moderation is the best Troll control we've seen around here in a while. I like it!

      Hopefully as a result of this post a Monkey somewhere will be given cookie.

    2. Re:Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ate a monkey because of this post!!! (The one from the fridge in another post!!!)

    3. Re:Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long are you going to sit around and do this until I have to tell green peace that the internet advocates the wholesale slaughter of monkeys in responce to immature behaviour? huh?

  22. DNA by DarkClown · · Score: 2

    That will definitely be something to check out in San Fran when they transfer ownership and do whatever it is they're going to do to it. I picture an exploratorium on lsd with a bar.
    How have other clubs integrated technology into the environment to make it fun for hacker/tech types?

    1. Re:DNA by angelo · · Score: 1

      I hope something is done to improve DNA. it is pretty plain (yet so perfect for a goth club -- it's completely black on the inside) some more vid-displays would be nice. and smart drinks at the bar.

    2. Re:DNA by Wah · · Score: 1

      hmmmm, smart drinks....

      --
      +&x
    3. Re:DNA by busman · · Score: 1

      You need to hang out more at 1015 Folsom!

      --
      __
      Sigs are like arse-holes, everybody has one ;-)
    4. Re:DNA by busman · · Score: 1

      You need to hang out at 1015 Folsom!

      --
      __
      Sigs are like arse-holes, everybody has one ;-)
    5. Re:DNA by angelo · · Score: 1

      We almost went there. I don't live in SF mind you. I was visiting on business, and since I paid $1780 for a business round-trip ticket, I stayed from Wednesday to Saturday (it was an open-ended return flight) only checking out clubs on Friday. Walked by it on the way to DNA. We were told to visit DNA as it was recommended. In retrospect, 1015 sounded a lot better when we left DNA. I commend 1015 for trying to stay open, and it seems they are still around. I just hate the fact that they have to be so cold with all the security now that they are being muscled by da man.

      Actually, if they just allowed smoking permits for clubs and bars, they'd have no problem packing them in. It's a very odd situation.

      Here in Pittsburgh, we have a good scene, but it is smoky.

  23. Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No monkeys died as a result of this post. It just simply wasn't worth it.

  24. News update: jwz's wrists don't hurt any more by susi · · Score: 1
    Ok, I put it under the Mozilla icon because I don't have a 'San Francisco Nightclub Icon'

    What? There isn't a jwz icon?

    1. Re:News update: jwz's wrists don't hurt any more by hedgehog_uk · · Score: 1

      XEmacs has a jwz icon (jwz.png). CT could use that.

      --
      Yellow tigers crouched in jungles in her dark eyes.
      She's just dressing, goodbye windows, tired starlings.
    2. Re:News update: jwz's wrists don't hurt any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they have a number of them, CmdrTaco just couldn't decide on which one to use.

    3. Re:News update: jwz's wrists don't hurt any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he is not as big as his code- but that is hard to be a bloated monster.

  25. Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A monkey was tossed into a vat of hot grits where it sank and drowned because of this post.

  26. eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's he talking about? the article seemed fairly superficial to me.

  27. Mozilla M13 runs too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So there.

  28. Re: Buying Harlequin and Open Sourcing Liquid CL by DLPierson · · Score: 1

    Trust me, you don't want him to... been there...

  29. You've got a short memory by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    Remember 3 weeks ago when you were soundly trounced on this same topic? Do you want that to happen again?

    In case you do, here's the first taste: What conceivable claim would Stallman have on jwz's nightclub. Even as a joke this makes no sense.
    --
    Java banners:
    Bad for users because Java kills Netscape

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:You've got a short memory by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

      I don't know; I thought it was pretty funny.

      Stallman will think of a reason to take credit. Mozilla == Free Software == Related to source of JWZ's money == Stallman's nightclub. "Any Nightclub that has been built on the fruits of free software MUST BE called GNU/Nightclub!"

      P.S. For the humor impaired: Yes, I know his fortune was built on Netscape's proprietary software... IT'S A JOKE.


      --

  30. Brown-nosing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jamie Zawinski has a face the camera can only love. Framed beneath lush, long dark hair, his intelligent, expressive eyes and ready, ironic smile draw attention like a magnet. For reporters, his habit of dispensing painfully articulate, often outrageous soundbites is equally attractive -- one reason why the former Netscape programmer steals most of the scenes in "Code Rush," an upcoming PBS documentary that focuses on the hectic lives of a team of Netscape coders during the spring of 1998.

    Does anyone else find this slightly sickening. I mean, how much brown-nosing can an article do?

    1. Re:Brown-nosing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if he's so goddamn photogenic, I'd like to see salon.com explain this photo.

    2. Re:Brown-nosing by Rico_Suave · · Score: 1

      Yep - pretty annoying, and not a good way to start out an article that's obviously targeted towards the geek community.

  31. This is SOOO funny... by coreman · · Score: 2

    Talk about the only thing constant is change...

    This is really so 60s. Suddenly the young, rising rebels discover the changes they're fighting for are so easily done within the system. The ability to fight the establishment, USING the establishment becomes an accepted method and then suddenly they wake up and discover...

    My god, I've turned into my parents!

  32. jwz icon by acb · · Score: 3

    What about the spinning-compass easter egg Netscape showed when pointed at jwz's page? Should be nicely obscure.

  33. And quite well... by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    I'm using M13 as my main browser now. In a week of(fairly constant) use I've only noticed the following problems:

    -Multiple windows don't work independently after about 10 minutes. Refreshing in one window makes both windows unusable.
    -Copy and paste (internally OR externally) is totally non-functional.
    -No https
    -For some reason I couldn't load www.caldera.com
    -Occasionally some pages will have large blacked-out areas. Scrolling usually fixes this. However, I also note that the MetaMod /. page had the same problem under Netscape and that is fixed in Mozilla.
    -Minor editing nitpicks (like why can't I put in double spaces?)

    Other than these relatively minor issues, M13 is awesome. Very quick rendering (I much prefer the "render as you receive" algorigthm. I like it so much I entered a reminder on my Palm to download M14 as soon as it hits the wire (2/18).
    --
    Java banners:
    Bad for users because Java kills Netscape

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  34. You've got no life... by GNUs-Not-Good · · Score: 1

    I was trounced? How? And on what grounds? I love when GNLUSERS like you claim victory when it is not there. Kinda like the cult leader claiming Linux when it is not his.

    Please, stop believing your own hype. You are not that bright. I have a strange feeling you listen to those Tony Robbins motivational tapes. Hmmmm. Sad really.

    1. Re:You've got no life... by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...I guess you really DON'T remember how I finally pinned you down on a claim and you refused to back it up. Search your user history to figure it out.

      As for your more ridiculous claims in the current post:

      -Stallman does not claim Linux is his. Instead of responding "he does too", why not provide a URL where this claim is made?
      -I've got no life? Counteracting FUD is constructive--producing it is not. Which are you doing?
      --
      Java banners:
      Bad for users because Java kills Netscape

      --
      Linux MAPI Server!
      http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
      (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  35. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't seems to find 1 mention of emacs in that article.....
    or xemacs, either. lier.

  36. Re:Can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A monkey suffered a repetitive motion disorder and had his hands amputated because of this post.

  37. The Emacs Split by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2
    Does there exist a good, non-judgmental (I should be so lucky) article about what really happened, focussing on the operational differences between emacs & Xemacs?
    There can't, since the people with first hand knowledge have widely diverging stories. Read them yourself, and form your own opinion, instead of getting them predigested from someone else.
  38. but really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...who gives a shit?
    JZW vanished up his own ass ages ago.
    Geek news...kiss my cack and call me charlie springs to mind....

  39. Hmmm, Lisp... by brianvan · · Score: 1

    Kinda OT, but...

    I've used (and I still have to use) Lisp in college courses. Most of my peers feel that, as a language, it's a waste of time. I always thought that if I'm going to do text-based programming in Unix, it might as well be with something interesting and natural, like Lisp is in ways. C++ for text based programming is an arduous chore, although it makes your life easier in many ways. On the opposite end, I've used Prolog and although I did get the hang of it eventually, I thought learning it was like trying to dry my hair on a frying pan...

    Sadly, I've yet to see anything really practical done with Lisp. I'm not saying that things HAVEN'T been done or CAN'T... they just haven't been called to my attention yet. Specifically, I know that Lisp ain't the fastest car in the garage when it comes to compiled speed, but I think that someone should really try to fancy it up and release a professional IDE/compiler/libraries set that is capable of making real-world appications. (not that you COULDN'T do that kind of stuff already if you really wanted to, but somehow I assume that no one is making any Winamp plugins or network games with it)

    It is kind of ludicrous to think of such an idea... anything called "Visual Lisp" might cause some crying and suicidal thoughts. But I would be SOOO curious to see what might come out of some project like that. After all, the way that information flows within Lisp might make certain applications much easier to code. Also, one of the very nice things about Lisp IMHO is that if you're a decent programmer, you'll save massive amounts of debugging time because generally you won't have to worry about broken functions down the line... I find it easier to debug Lisp functions out of the gate as opposed to C++. Of course, this comes at the expense of coding time, but I think the end tradeoff is worth it. (I hate debugging more than coding, so again this is IMHO) Finally, Lisp is somewhat ideal for AI and logic type stuff, so coding those type of elements into programs would probably be quicker and more natural.

    Of course, making it a bloated language might not have superb results. Specifically, just throwing something like MFC on top wouldn't improve the programming experience. Still, though, I'm very curious, and if anyone knows a direction in which to point me, I'll take a look. Otherwise, this is DIY country, but it might take a year or two before I would be able to accomplish anything like that. Right now my best talent on a computer is getting record times in Minesweeper...

    1. Re:Hmmm, Lisp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just because you don't know about the commercial applications of Lisp doesn't mean there isn't any. There are three bigger Common Lisp vendors, profitable companies employing dozens of people, and another half a dozen smaller outfits providing niche Lisp systems with some special features.

      All the three bigger vendors (Franz, Xanalys and Digitool) provide advanced graphical IDEs. Unfortunately there is no free IDE per se as far as I know, but Xemacs with ILISP makes for a pretty nice environment for the free Common Lisp systems.

      If you'll excuse me ranting for a bit, but I find it baffling how many people seem to think that if they haven't heard about something, it doesn't exist. Even rabid users of obscure operating systems turn their brain off when it comes to programming languages, industrial applications of computers, and what not, and loudly proclaim that the most popular choice is the only choice.

      The world is a big place. There is an enormous number of multi-billion dollar "niche" markets you have never heard about out there.

    2. Re:Hmmm, Lisp... by stevey · · Score: 1
      > but I think that someone should really try to fancy it up and release a professional IDE/compiler/libraries set that is capable of making real-world appications.

      Why, isn't Emacs good enough for you?


      Steve
    3. Re:Hmmm, Lisp... by brianvan · · Score: 1

      Well, actually my inital approach to the question was, I'm curious, I don't know everything, and if it exists I haven't seen it yet but I'd like to.

      Actual quote: "Sadly, I've yet to see anything really practical done with Lisp. I'm not saying that things HAVEN'T been done or CAN'T... they just haven't been called to my attention yet." So I didn't say nothing like this had never existed...

      Either way, my question was well answered...

    4. Re:Hmmm, Lisp... by Rocky · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard, one of the things that has prevented Lisp and similar languages from going mainstream in business and other applications is that it is difficult to write a true optimizing compiler for it. When I say optimizing compiler, I mean a compiler that can produce code as fast as the best C or FORTRAN compilers, using similar optimizations.

      This is because:

      - Lisp is a higher-order language (functions as formal parameters and return values)

      - Many optimizations require the use of a control-flow graph to be effective (e.g. dead-code elimination, common subexpression elimination).

      - It is difficult to create a useful control-flow graph for a higher-order language because variables may contain functions that affect the direction of control flow, and the values of these variables can only be determined at run time.

      There are ways around these limitations, but it is still an area of active research and I don't know of any compilers out there yet that manage to get around the limitations.

      Once you can get a control flow graph, then you can use many more optimizations, and you can write a compiler that will produce very fast code.

      Anyway that's just my take on the situation.

      --
      "I'm an old-fashioned type of guy. I worship the Sun and Moon as gods. And fear them."
  40. Good to see... by Aya · · Score: 1

    ....that some of us geeks DO have lives!

  41. Thanks... by GNUs-Not-Good · · Score: 1

    glad you see it my way.

  42. PBS Documentary? by PenguinDude · · Score: 2

    The article was good readage. Nothing that I didn't already know from visiting jwz home page though.
    BUT, anyone else notice the little blurb about a PBS documentary "Code Rush"? Seems like it's going to air March 30th according to the link.

    "The specific time period captured on film covers a crucial moment in the history of the "free-software movement" -- that frantic couple of months during which Netscape programmers scrambled to clean up the hitherto proprietary source code to the Navigator Web browser so that it could be released as publicly accessible open-source software."

    Hmmm....sounds pretty interesting. I wonder who's going to portray jwz :)

    1. Re:PBS Documentary? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      > I wonder who's going to portray jwz

      If it's a documentary, I assume jwz will be himself. I don't believe it will be a dramatic recreation. Maybe you knew that.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  43. Burn Out by ekidder · · Score: 1

    > Personally, I think we might start to see more of this - people just
    > getting fundamentally fed up and choosing whole new careers.
    I'm doing that. It's not the computer field that I'm fed up with, it's corporations in general. They really really don't mesh with the way my mind goes. And, I've noticed, ever since I started programming professionally, I stopped programming as a hobby - it wasn't fun anymore. Very depressing.
    So, in order to get my Happiness rating back up, I'm going back to school and switching to the psychology field. Freaky, huh?

    Eric

    1. Re:Burn Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, right on - I'm also going back to school to study experimental game theory/decision theory. I'm kind of curious if I'll keep in touch with my dirty programming past :), but I won't regret it too much if I don't.

    2. Re:Burn Out by peterarm · · Score: 1

      i did a double major in psyc and cs (i switched into cs from psyc), and i think that as a programmer the one thing you'll find *really* annoying about psyc is how insanely dumb, imprecise and pc many of your fellow students are... not sure if that gets better in grad school though...

  44. Of course... by GNUs-Not-Good · · Score: 1

    it was a joke. Some people have no sense of humor, and take themselves WAY too seriously.

    Kinda like cult memebers.

  45. Club /. by crosseyedatnite · · Score: 1

    Just think, a place where we can congregate and apply the IRL /. effect on brick-and-mortar businesses. 50 people in line at the quik-e-mart to buy gum!

    CmdrTaco, this is your DESTINY!!!!!

    --
    e to the i pi equals negative one
  46. The Problem With Enforced Disassembly by Effugas · · Score: 2

    [WARNING: THIS SLASHDOT POST WENT UP WITH LUDICROUSLY BAD TIMING FOR ME. THIS IS AN EXTREMELY BITTER RANT. I WILL REGRET POSTING THIS LATER. YA KNOW WHAT? FUCK IT AND ANYONE WHO DOESN'T LIKE IT.]

    Dear Willie:

    Damnit! Are you guys ever going to let guys like me have a life?

    I'm tired of fighting, Mr. Mayor. I grew up in The City. I sat there at age 14, imagining that when 16 rolled around, gee, I'd finally have to stop asking for rides and start <i>going places</i>. But, whoops, 16 wasn't enough, everything was 18 and over. Fine. I waited. 18 rolled around...whoops again! Can't drink, can't party! Better wait 'til 21. Now I'm 21 and live in Santa Clara, and what do I hear but half the clubs in San Francisco are under attack.

    What the hell? Do you own Prozac futures or something? Have you ever stopped for a moment and considered exactly happens when the event economy can support fewer and fewer individuals?

    No, Willie, I bet you haven't. I've heard about your parties--you've thrown kinkfests that put a good chunk of the Castro parties to shame, if only because of the straight laced people you've dragged to them--and I've gotta say, I respect your cojones. But guess what--you go ahead and harass and subject and isolate as many people as possible...

    And you eliminate me, and people like me.

    Take a college town, or take a city spiting its culture to win some votes, and start cracking down. People like me, who used to be more fodder for the party, who might actually turn out to be decently cool, become risk, pure and simple.

    Don't invite the geeks. They'll call attention. Watch who you bring; too many and we'll get busted. Leave them to their toys; screw 'em if they want to look back at their youth without regret.

    And School Administrators wonder aloud where all these cliques are coming from, and why nobody has any school spirit anymore, and how it is that so many students just don't know eachother.

    Man cannot live on bread alone, and geeks cannot survive on mere technology. There's something called a well balanced life, and the systematic limitation of just how many people can enjoy theirs must end.

    If residents are complaining, then the failure is the City's and the Zoning Commissions, not people like me who don't Know Everyone like you do. I want to have fun, Mr. Mayor. Yes, I admit it. I want to look back at a month and say, wow, I met some great people. I let myself go. I stopped being stressed about...everything.

    I don't want drugs. I don't want pot. And I certainly don't want more f*cking technology. Give me loud music, new people, and an edge of unpredicatability without the constant and truly ridiculous fear and loathing of the police and the government and the city councils and the Self Appointed Fun Police and I'll be happy!

    I'll live in your city!

    I'll come home!

    You ruin my hometown as I just turn 21, and while your Prozac futures might skyrocket, I ain't ever going home, save maybe to campaign against your ass.

    Capiche?

    Yours Truly,

    Dan Kaminsky
    DoxPara Research
    http://www.doxpara.com

    1. Re:The Problem With Enforced Disassembly by kinesis · · Score: 3

      Compare San Francisco's night life to Manhattan's. It's pathetic.

      These New Money people move into the city so they can experience it's culture and then they kill it. Well, move the fuck out.

      It's the young crowd that's largely responsible for giving a city its personality. If you take away the outlets for the hipsters, they're going to stop moving in and start moving out. A San Francisco where every district feels like Pacific Heights is not a San Francisco people will be happy with.

      The party crowd can vote, Willie. Take care of us.

    2. Re:The Problem With Enforced Disassembly by angelo · · Score: 1

      Even Pittsburgh's nitelife is excellent compared to SF. The only plus to SF is no smoking. It is also the biggest minus since smokers stay home. Not people == no night life. We have to put up with smoke here, but we pack to capacity at places like Metropol and Laga. We throw raves in a warehouse space that is 1/2 block by 3 blocks, and almost fill that! we have a very live party life.

      It was cool when we went to SF and went to DNA to get a look at what the scene is like. From an outsider: you are not alone. Your scene is dying.

    3. Re:The Problem With Enforced Disassembly by Analog · · Score: 1

      Don't take this wrong, but your post cracked me up. I lived in and around Sacramento for a long time, and Willie Brown was a well known figure, both politically and otherwise. When he decided to run for mayor of SF, I knew he'd win (nobody who was familiar with him could doubt it), but I also had to wonder if SF knew what it was getting itself into. He's a consummate politician, with all the good and bad that implies. He can get anything done, but will only do things that benefit him (and, to be fair, his friends; in that sense, I guess he does 'share the wealth').

    4. Re:The Problem With Enforced Disassembly by kinesis · · Score: 1

      We've got a vestigal rave scene. Very few places get to do the full-blown 10pm to 6am thing. Click here for a calendar of SF raves.

      I'm not much of a smoker, but when you ban smoking, you also ban toking. To have a really active club scene you need three things...

      1) Electronica till sun up
      2) Lots of sexy people in outrageous outfits
      3) Free flowing alcohol and available drugs

      Some will disagree, but whatever's on your list, resident's are probably objecting to it.

      A slightly off-topic rant... Why are all the gay clubs so much cooler than the straight clubs? Where's a hip breeder boy to go when the straight joints feel about as sterile as a cubicle maze?

    5. Re:The Problem With Enforced Disassembly by cherub · · Score: 2

      Actually, Manhattan is having its own problems, nightlife-wise, which with the Quality of Life Regime enforcing antiquated cabaret laws and all.

    6. Re:The Problem With Enforced Disassembly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the cops in Calif. are like the gestapo. I lived in Europe and things are a bit different. You can actually relax and enjoy a night life. Cops really don't care if people party, hell they used to party it up...

      I can now look back and say "I remember in Europe when I went crazy in clubs until 7am" and feel well balanced. Here in sunny California you can't get the same experience, everything is closed after 2pm, the cops are a$$sholes(esp. if you are 30 and having fun. gee don't we pretty much drive the economy? hmm). I feel sorry for those who only know the puritanical USA which I know and hate. :(

      Perhaps us young well-to-do "gen-X'ers" should start some sort of "entertainment lobby"??

    7. Re:The Problem With Enforced Disassembly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, no more hookers by The Tunnel. Oh well, I guess that's what the clubs are for anyway.

  47. Most unfortunate - DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad you know who has a project named DNA - to get a patent on human genomes mayhaps? ("Hey, we own the patent on GREEN EYES so PAY UP!!! Send your payment to: ...... ) Speak of the devil, the article mentioned programmers coding to scratch an itch - it so happens I'm having a very bad MSFT day - so you can call that stuff: "The curse of a thousand unscratachable itches" - yep, that's msft and their legion of minions, alright; bow to the mighty snake god who owns you all. Howard Roark

    1. Re:Most unfortunate - DNA by angelo · · Score: 1

      That would be fine if the club didn't have 25 years of prior art ;P

  48. Great advice... by GNUs-Not-Good · · Score: 1

    coming from someone named Col Klink.

    Seig Heil, eh?

    1. Re:Great advice... by angelo · · Score: 1

      I know nothzing, I hear nothzing.

  49. Nope, sorry, try again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Contrary to popular belief, everyone in SF is not gay.. But apparently they're more tolerant than a lot of the posters here..

    Actually, the club used to be owned by Rob Schneider of SNL fame. The big attraction at that point was the Disco night..I won't say anything more about -that-.

    Ive been to DNA for the industrial night there..it's up & running, the fight was mostly over his request for an after-hours permit, something the police tend to discourage any way they can.

    1. Re:Nope, sorry, try again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The long and short of it for the uninformed:

      Punks and artists and gays move into an industrial district.
      Nightclubs start in the industrial district to attract the punks and gays.

      Multimedia companies (including Wired) start in the industrial district to attract the artists.

      Computer Yuppies want to live in condos in the industrial district to work at the multimedia companies.

      Condo builders donate money to mayor.

      Mayor finds loophole in industrial zoning, condos get built, computer yuppies move in.

      Computer Yuppies complain about the noise and drunks coming out of the nightclubs, donate money to mayor.

      Mayor orders cops to limit nightclub hours.
      Punks and Gays get mad at mayor, but are generally apathetic.

      Computer Yuppie/Punk starts a lobbying organization and buys a nightclub. Presumably donates some money to the mayor to help him change his mind.

    2. Re:Nope, sorry, try again. by angelo · · Score: 1

      Condo builders donate money to mayor.

      Mayor finds loophole in industrial zoning, condos get built, computer yuppies move in. </i>

      Good point. Go south one block, and what do you see? Trendy warehouse-condos pop up left and right. I wouldn't want to live in SOMA or Tenderloin or even Market District west of 5th. Saw some naaasty hookers and too many p0rn0 shops over there. To the west of there, nearer 18th street, it's beautiful though. Very unusual city.

  50. can-I-be-known-by-my-initials-too? by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 1

    Arent you? I could swear there was a German computer publication called C'T.

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  51. You are finally catching on... by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    You probably think you are "blowing the mind" of a "straight", but actually you are not. I'm fully aware you are a troll who does not really believe the things you are saying. I'm also fully aware that if you were confronted in "the real world" you would turn out to be a spineless loser.

    There are two methods for dealing with trolls.

    1) Ignore them. This is usually the best route with trolls that make no sense, even superficially.
    2) Give them enough rope to hang themselves with. This works when the claim has a superficial plausibility but actually makes no sense underneath. That's what I've been doing with you and it worked twice.

    But it looks like you've finally caught on to that and have decided to short-circuit my process by reverted to normal, troll-like, nonsensical behavior. Go ahead, if that amuses you, but you will be losing a playmate when I switch back to strategy #1.
    --
    Java banners:
    Bad for users because Java kills Netscape

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  52. I love you man.... by GNUs-Not-Good · · Score: 1

    Please turn to Tony Robbins tape #4 on having a sense of humor.

    It is obvious that you really do not have any life or sense of humor.

    Nice job there chief. Big talk from a geek with a keyboard.

  53. So turn Java off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    duh

  54. Mmmmm, JavaOne.... by dmorin · · Score: 2

    ...I wonder if he could get it open by June when the next JavaOne rolls around and 20,000+ geeks roll into town? Would they all attempt to show up at jwz's place simultaneously? Talk about a /. effect. ;)

  55. Lisp, Crack, ddt by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

    Dave Taylor (formerly of id, founder of crack.com, currently at Transmeta)'s crack.com game Abuse (now open-sourced, I believe) uses LISP as its scripting/scenario engine... That was *really* cool, but couldn't survive the onslaught of the first-person shooters and real time clickfe^H^H^H^H^H^H^H strategy games during 1995 or so...

    1. Re:Lisp, Crack, ddt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abuse is a cool game. It used to be bundled in the games category of Slackware. Then the Windows box showed up at CompUSA (where I bought it at full retail). Six months later the box was in the $5 bin at CompUSA. Oh well.

  56. Harlequin is in a funny state. by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 2

    Harlequin went into receivership late last year and has been bought out by a firm called Global Graphics, who wanted the Scriptworks Postscript RIP (which I used to work on). GG aren't really interested in selling programming languages, so IIRC that arm of the company has been sold off as a different firm, whose name I forget.

    However, the really interesting story is Dylan. Harlequin put huge amounts of work into a high-quality Dylan implementation; it's one of the things that sunk the company. When GG took over, they decided that they'd have an impossible task selling the product either to end users or to a company - so they made a *gift* of the source to the developers. They've now set up a company, Functional Objects, to develop it further.

    It seems they don't currently plan to open source their implementation; personally I think they're doomed unless they do...
    --

    1. Re:Harlequin is in a funny state. by ebh · · Score: 1
      Well, I guess that explains why Webmaker went into limbo. Now there's something that should be ripe for open-sourcing, since it grew out of CERN's original, but when I asked Harlequin about it, they said they had no plans to. :(

      Ob(Sub)Topic: I seem to remember hearing that AutoCAD is written in LISP. CACT?

      -Ed

    2. Re:Harlequin is in a funny state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup, large chunks of AutoCAD is lisp. It used to be quite a cool environment. Then they went excessively proprietary (they pull the same trick with .dwgs as MS pulls wirh word .docs - lock in with proprietary data interchange formats)
      AutoCAD started out on UNIX, and belongs there - shame they've switched exclusively to NT, AutoCAD 2000 is an abomination compared to the streamlined clarity of r13 and r14.

      These days, though, only the low-end uses AutoCAD - People use IDEAS, CATIA or Pro/Engineer. OpenCASCADE and Varkon on linux are also catching up rapidly.

    3. Re:Harlequin is in a funny state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > However, the really interesting story is Dylan. Harlequin put huge amounts of work into a high-quality Dylan implementation; it's one of the things that sunk the company. When GG took over, they decided that they'd have an impossible task selling the product either to end users or to a company - so they made a *gift* of the source to the developers. They've now set up a company, Functional Objects, to develop it further.

      No, the real interesting thing are the two
      Lisp implementations. Harlequin basically
      gave away Dylan, because it had not that
      much customers.

      Lisp had customers and was
      profitable, so they created a new company
      (Xanalys), which is still owned by Global
      Graphics, and which further develops the
      commercial sucessful Lisp systems.

  57. Hmmm... There are examples of Lisp use... by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 2
    If you've ever played Crash Bandicoot, that is an example of a video game where much of the code is written in Lisp.

    Abuse had at least the game sequencing written in Lisp.

    And a "bloated" Common Lisp implementation looks positively svelte when put beside either a Java or a C++ "IDE" environment.

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  58. https is a big problem ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... i can't jam at www.schwab.com :( got to do NS 4.7

  59. Re:Club /. Nooooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Christ, there's nothing more frightening than coming to your favorite coffeeshop & finding that all the nerds from LinuxWorld scared away all the hip young sexy things...

    I'd be pissed as hell if the same thing happened to a club I liked..

  60. sawmill! by mikeee · · Score: 1

    The sawmill WM and most of the configuration tools for it (and the dotfiles!) are written in rep, which is Yet Another LISP. Architecturally, sawmill is much like Emacs; whether this is a good or bad thing is left to the reader.

  61. PBS documentary on Netscape/Zawinski by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

    Don't miss this - according to the story there's an upcoming documentary on the the who inside Netscape Mozilla coding scene from '98....

    PBS documentary

  62. Re:Can... by Breace · · Score: 1

    Dude, I wish you didn't post these AC. It's hillarious and if I where moderator your Karma would be through the roof! :o))

    However, I don't know if it will work, because I'm even considering trolling now to get more of these out of ya. ;o)

    Thankx for making the best out of otherwise anoying crap.

  63. Lucid Emacs and Open Source and Stallman by daemous · · Score: 1

    On the second page of the Salon article, it mentions that Lucid Emacs was a fork of the original Emacs written by Stallman. This is only partially true.

    Lucid Emacs was a fork of GNU Emacs. But GNU Emacs was not the original Emacs. Stallman did however, obtain large amounts of code from the original Emacs. But this was done illegally.

    The original author of Emacs was James Gosling. Yeah, Oak/Java, etc. He turned the code over to a software publisher called Unipress Software way back in the UUCP-only era (circa 1985). They sold distributions and full source distributions to tons of companies, gov orgs, and universities. They made flenty of feature enhancements, re-writes, etc. They paid Gosling a nice royalty for every sale.

    At some point Stallman picked up one of the source distributions and made some modifications. They were good modifications, IMHO. Some of them were lame (e.g.- simply removing the Copyright tags). And then he started giving it away for free. This is the founder of the Free Software Foundation. I believe at some point he did in-fact completely re-write the code. But this was far more recent than you'd expect.

    PS: What do you think GNU (as in GNU Emacs) stands for? GNU's Not Unix? Or GNU's Not Unipress?

    1. Re:Lucid Emacs and Open Source and Stallman by daemous · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Lucid Emacs and Open Source and Stallman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure this is entirely true..... Stallman wrote the original emacs in Teco on the TOPS-20 (or perhaps TOPS-10) operating system. There were at least three Unix emacs's predating GNU emacs: 1. Gosling's emacs (and then the Unipress version) 2. Montgommery's emacs (out of Bell Labs - ran on System V) 3. JOVE (Jonathan's Own Version of Emacs) by Jonathon Payne. and perhaps others...... GNU emacs is the best, however.

    3. Re:Lucid Emacs and Open Source and Stallman by David+Ishee · · Score: 1
      This quote from the article really gets me:
      Moral of the Emacs story? Programmers can be very stubborn -- Stallman, to be sure, is legendary for his intransigence. But Zawinski is equally difficult to deter -- indeed, it requires a special degree of chutzpah to write an entirely new version of one of the most famous programs in the free software arsenal.
      From what I understand, he didn't "write a whole new version" himself, he took the existing code and modified it. That's not the same as re-writing the whole thing.
      --
      Your password has expired, please login to change it.
    4. Re:Lucid Emacs and Open Source and Stallman by cburley · · Score: 3
      The original author of Emacs was James Gosling.

      Gosling might have been the original author of a particular variant of Emacs, but he did not write the original Emacs.

      Richard M. Stallman wrote the original Emacs, in MIT TECO, for use on MIT's ITS operating system. I know, because I was probably one of the first few people to try it out. (Happened to be hacking in the AI building one night when I saw his "post" about this new set of Editor MACroS. Tried it, thought it was cute, but stuck with TECO.)

      He turned the code over to a software publisher called Unipress Software way back in the UUCP-only era (circa 1985). They sold distributions and full source distributions to tons of companies, gov orgs, and universities. They made flenty of feature enhancements, re-writes, etc. They paid Gosling a nice royalty for every sale.

      At some point Stallman picked up one of the source distributions and made some modifications. They were good modifications, IMHO. Some of them were lame (e.g.- simply removing the Copyright tags). And then he started giving it away for free.

      It's possible, from a historical point of view, that you're right. But I'd like to see a more definitive account from someone I trust -- someone who doesn't think Gosling wrote the original Emacs, for example.

      This is the founder of the Free Software Foundation. I believe at some point he did in-fact completely re-write the code. But this was far more recent than you'd expect.

      I recall hearing about some important rewriting of a disputed module (or set thereof) back in the late '80s or early '90s. The dispute might have been over whether RMS had actually copied from UniPress Emacs vs. an earlier (free?) Gosling Emacs version, the latter having been claimed to be "free" by some. (Perhaps Gosling once told, or was believed to have told, RMS or someone that it was okay for RMS to copy from his Emacs, since RMS invented it, after all, and this "tale" didn't get properly communicated through the UniPress aquisition. I'm really just speculating here, based on some probably-shaky memories of third-plus-hand info. I don't recall ever actually discussing these issues with RMS myself, because it's never seemed important enough to do so.)

      So I disagree entirely with your implicit assertion that RMS and Project GNU got started by illegally copying a proprietary product and then rewriting it to avoid legal hassles, even though some aspects of your story might have elements of truth to it.

      I've found RMS to be many things, but unprincipled about copying other peoples' software without permission is not one of them. And the sort of dispute I think occurred vis-a-vis Gosling's Emacs is exactly the sort of thing that one could reasonably agree could occur without either Gosling or RMS having knowingly done anything wrong, given the ad-hoc nature of communications over such matters (like copying software) back in those days.

      One thing for sure: without RMS, there'd have been no Gosling Emacs and no UniPress Emacs. But without Gosling Emacs and without UniPress Emacs, there'd have still been a GNU Emacs, for the same reason GNU CC was created: because it was so important to have one, it had to be done ASAP, one way or the other.

      (FWIW, ISTR that UniPress Emacs was pretty decent, in terms of speed on a VAX/VMS system, back when I demoed it circa 1986, compared to some other commercial variant -- CCA Emacs? -- and I think we chose UniPress as a result, despite what I recall was a non-full-featured extension facility. It was the second Emacs environment with which I became fairly familiar, the first being Pr1me's Emacs. I haven't yet gotten familiar with GNU Emacs to the same degree, despite having used it for some 10 years now.)

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  64. WHO CARES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a SHIT?? This is not news. It's a link to a stupid article in a shitty magazine.

  65. JWZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please no more articles about this self-obsessed jackass.

  66. Why I have no respect for JWZ by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    I have very little respect for Jamie Zawinski. He seems to have a 'holier-than-thou' attitude about pretty much everything he touches. I'd guess that it was Zawinski's personality more than any technology or license issues that caused the Emacs split. Then his famous 'successful company' rant, which I read as 'anyone who joined Netscape after I did is a wannabe'.

    But my biggest problem is the now-infamous rant he published upon leaving Netscape. He seemed determined to damage the company on his way out. I think he single-handedly did more to hurt public perception of Mozilla than any delay, any change of plans, any setbacks that the project itself ever had. Zawinski set the stage for the trade press to prematurely declare Mozilla a failure.

    I truly hope that JWZ gets attacked by a rabid lizard. His personal vitriol is Mozilla's most significant liability, even though he's not involved anymore.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Why I have no respect for JWZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, you sure have a holier than thou attitude about jwz...

  67. But did you send it to the mayor? by tokengeekgrrl · · Score: 1
    I agree with your rant. I live in San Francisco and am greatly discouraged by the dwindling night life. It is pervasive through every club scene in the city.

    I was at the hearing in support of Jamie. Have you actually emailed your rant to Mayor Willie Brown? If not, then please do. I'm sure my email address has been blocked by now given how many rants I've sent him. ;)

    - tokengeekgrrl

    1. Re:But did you send it to the mayor? by Effugas · · Score: 2

      Tgg--

      Half of me wants to sent it to the mayor; half of me is just wayyyyy too cynical right now to do so.

      A large part of fighting the system is the feeling that it'd matter. I've read what politicians think of e-mail. I'd probably think that same damn thing.

      You want a bottom line? Fun has no value to government. Only taxes.

      Yours Truly,

      Dan Kaminsky
      DoxPara Research
      http://www.doxpara.com

    2. Re:But did you send it to the mayor? by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2
      Half of me wants to sent it to the mayor; half of me is just wayyyyy too cynical right now to do so.

      A large part of fighting the system is the feeling that it'd matter. I've read what politicians think of e-mail. I'd probably think that same damn thing.

      I don't have a sense of what politicians in general, or even city politicians in particular, think of email, but something I've learned recently is that you can approach these people. I mean, you can just call up a city supervisor, make an appointment, and talk to them. That's their job!

      If there's something about your city that you don't like, it is possible for you to go and do something about it. It can be a pain in the ass, but lots of things are.

      If you care about late night culture in particular, join the San Francisco Late Night Coalition. In this case ``join'' means ``come to the monthly meetings.'' There is strength in numbers, and this group has a lot of members who have been doing this for a while and know the things you need to do to get yourself heard.

      You want a bottom line? Fun has no value to government. Only taxes.

      ``Government'' is made up of people, specifically politicians and bureaucrats. To politicians, votes and image are also important. Those are the buttons you need to learn to push.

  68. Doesn't do anything for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he's keeping up appearances by removing his anti-linux comments from his website.

  69. vinyl / staple / audible colors / stompy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not rocket science. There's good shit going on in SF, you just need to find it. Yeah, vsf closed. Yeah, 10:15 is sucking big time. Whatever. Both had long runs, and quite frankly needed to be retired. viva the revival!

  70. San Francisco Late Night Coalition by kinesis · · Score: 1

    Join the SFLNC.

    Their agenda: Save what's left of San Francisco culture before yuppie dot-commers beat the life out of every remaining late night venue.

    1. Re:San Francisco Late Night Coalition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like class-envy/class-discrimination to me...

  71. Thanks jwz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a hacker who lived in Europe and works in California I am dismayed about the "no nothing after 2pm" business that occurs here in California. Maybe JWZ could go even further and lobby the California senate to repeal the 2pm whackiness.

    After 2 pm everyone looks at eachother like "What the hell are we gonna do now!?" It ain't natural.

    As it is, afterhours clubs in LA stay open after 2pm but since they can't serve any alcohol everyone does hard drugs.

    What kind of bullshit puritanism is that anyway!? We need to change this asap!

    Oh and he needs to lobby for pot legalization.

  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  74. The shape of geeks to come by Indomitus · · Score: 2

    I think jwz buying this club is one of the first of what I believe will be a lot of now rich geeks doing a lot of Big weird things with their money. There's only so many cars and houses you can buy before doing something Big becomes the only thing to do with all the money.

    Well, you could always save it but who wants to do that? :)

  75. We are lame by kinesis · · Score: 1

    Now that I think about it, kimflournoy hits the nail on the head.

    The straight crowd is generally more inhibited. We are lame.

    Here's my personal take. If I'm wearing black leather pants and a ridiculously tight muscle shirt, I already look silly. I may as well go the whole nine yards and get my groove on.

    Breeder boys, unite!

    [james-brown-voice]Get up off at thang and dance 'till you fell better![/james-brown-voice]

    1. Re:We are lame by kinesis · · Score: 1

      Sorry for fucking up your lyrics, Mr. Brown. I guess that's what the proofread button is for :-)

  76. JWZ Chose Well by ewhac · · Score: 3

    I'm not what you'd call a club maven, but of all the SOMA clubs I've been to, DNA Lounge was one of the nicest. I was there for Club Slick one year, and was very favorably impressed.

    Frankly, I have very limited sympathy for the new area residents. There was a reason their precious, quaint SF loft was (relatively) affordable. They knew there was an all-hours club nearby when they bought the place; why are they suddenly acting all surprised?

    I've had the same dream as JWZ, except with me, it was a coffee shop up in Marin. I lacked the money and business acumen to realize it. So I'm pleased to see JWZ pursuing the same goal: Preserving what he thinks is important.

    Schwab

  77. The crux... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
    The crux of the tragedy isn't the dwindling nightlife. That's sad enough, but the yups and the "silicon implants" (the silicon valley millionaires with delusions of hipness who buy half-million dollar so-called "live-work" spaces that were originally allowed to be built and purchased with reduced or no property taxes to help *artists*) will keep some sort of nightlife alive. I'm sure that JWZ can sustain DNA with the hordes of paper-millionaire goth-garbed tech-support staff that are now the closest thing SF has to a counter-culture.

    The real tragedy is that actual working artists, especially young ones, simply can't afford to live here. To sustain a true art scene, you need cheap rent paired with some sort of public space for artists to meet and work. End of story. And the growing wage inequities in the Bay Area make it impossible to find cheap rent in any area metropolitan enough to support an art community.

    The situation is escalating, fueled by the "irrational exuberance" and the loss of public funding for the arts, there are no mechanisms for changing it. Artists in the US now work primarily in design and advertising: the invisible hand of the marketplace won't sustain fine arts.

  78. JWZ suffers the same problem as "suits" by JSBiff · · Score: 1
    I'll start off this reply by trying to be generous to JWZ and say that, maybe, AOL was creeping up his butt and that is the real reason he became so frustrated with Mozilla. That said, if you take his original rant about jumping ship on Mozilla, one gets the impression that Jamie has become much more of a suit than he probably realized.

    He wanted to get the technology out the door _NOW_ before it was finished. He wanted to make a marketing "splash" NOW, just like all the marketing guys who want to get software out the door by the 1st of September so that they can market it for Christmas, and won't listen to the engineers when they say it ain't ready. He wanted to do this so he could vindicate his push to get mozilla freed.

    While I greatly admire his (among others) courage in standing up and advocating releasing the source for Netscape, I think he didn't really understand what he was starting. It takes awhile for developers to get comfortable with a new source code base. And some developers want to wait for a "stable" code base before starting to send patches. And their are a million more reasons why it took a long time to get Mozilla out the door. But the point is, it is about to be released, and I'm sure that it will make a splash with its appearance. JWZ just gave up to soon. But in any case, I think he will be vindicated, even if he's gone.

    Jeff

  79. Dead Nightclubber Storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't that where someone just OD'd & they tossed the bod in the dumpster? Or was it Cats'.. God, I love SF..

  80. Here's a clue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Uh, hardly envy.. We're just the dot-commers with money that like to party, still..

    Now, if its J.Crew-wearin' SUV-wearin' marketdroids vs. gothpunkindustrogeeks, then yes sir, yes it is.

  81. Damn cheap monkeys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate monkeys.

  82. Re:The Problem With Straight Clubs by weisserw · · Score: 1

    Another problem my straight (female) friends often complain about is that when they go to a straight club, guys are constantly feeling them up or being generally rude to them. A girl once professed to me that on one occasion she had had at least one hand placed on her ass for literally the entire night. I'm bi, but when I'm looking to meet women I go to gay clubs, because everywhere you look there are eligible women hanging around, just looking to dance and have a good time, not wanting to be pressured or hit on. And of course there's very little competition :). Meanwhile the "straight" clubs are just tons of guys hanging around togther drinking because all the girls have deserted them. Now thats irony for you...

    -W.W.

    --
    "Well it should be obvious to even the most dim-witted individual who holds an advanced degree in hyperbolic topology...
  83. SF Politic by doom · · Score: 2
    Well said, and the point is well taken, but:
    The party crowd can vote, Willie. Take care of us.
    There's a flaw here. Willie Brown was just re-elected. San Francisco has a two term limit on the mayor's office. What does he care about your vote? (Digression: term limits are a really stupid idea.)

    The board of supervisor's on the other hand, they need to worry. They're coming up for re-election, and San Francisco has switched back to district elections, which is to say that neighborhoods in SF now choose their representation on the board much in the same way that States choose their representation in the US house & senate. It's expected that this will cause a shift in power from the downtown/big money crowd out into the neighborhoods, and sucking up to the housing developers isn't likely to play as well as it has in the past.

  84. Trash that icon by Kibbled · · Score: 1

    Ugh, what an ugly mozilla icon. We really need to get that changed.

    --

    shameless self promotion - http://kibbles.org

  85. This is a LITTLE unfair. by morven2 · · Score: 1

    jwz, like most truly talented people, is not a team player. The reason rms and he disagreed so violently, I think, is because they're similar kinds. It wasn't his personality alone that caused the emacs split -- it was BOTH their personalities, and furthermore there was clearly a split in the user base too -- if there hadn't been, then lemacs/xemacs would not have been very popular. Yet everyone didn't go that route either.

    As far as Mozilla goes, I think he got a bit too personally involved there -- personally involved in its success, not just its technical success but its worldly success.

    Reading between the lines, I think Jamie was way past the time he should have left Netscape when the Mozilla thing came along. It was enough to keep him, but when Mozilla turned out to be, in many ways, still business as usual, it drove him nuts.

    Whether he was right or wrong in what he said, he said what he truly thought and felt, IMHO.

  86. Re:A nerd haven? No thanks. by acb · · Score: 2

    I don't know about you, but if I was to go to a nightclub I'd rather the gender ratios didn't resemble those of slashdot.

  87. joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know in San Francisco 33% of it's inhabitants are gay? So if you are walking down the street and the person to your right isnt gay, then the person to your left is gay... if the person to your left isnt gay either, then you are gay. dun dun

  88. Re:race to retire by poopie · · Score: 2

    I don't know about the rest of you, but even though times are good for unix gurus and even though I like my job and salary...

    I'd like to retire as soon as possible and maintain my current lifestyle or better

    I don't want to work 16 hour days 5 days a week when I have kids in highschool. I don't think I can.

    People don't complain about the high salaries that sports figures make, so I think **GOOD** IT people are *STILL* seriously undervalued. (NOTE: underqualified lackeys are IMHO currently waay OVERPAID)

    when I can afford to retire (which is the GOAL), I won't be working on computers anymore... I'll be doing what I choose to do.. I'll have an Aquarium shop that breeds endangered fish. I'll be racing cars at the local racetrack. I'll be diving in Palau.

    Computers are nice, but at some point, I'm going to want my life back!

  89. wanna help? by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2

    So, I've got lots of ideas for what I want to do with the club, but I'm always looking for more. And I could certainly use some help!

    If you or your company have expertise in audio and/or video webcasting, dealing with ASCAP/BMI, micro-radio, installing networks and computer systems in public places, computer-controlled video mixing and light shows, or anything along those lines, then send me mail! I'm at the stage of the game where I've got a lot of ideas, but I'm still trying to work out which ones are practical, which ones I can afford, and which ones I should do first.

    I want to blur the line between real-world and web communities: I want the physical space to be hooked in to the net in a way that hasn't been done before. Most nightclubs, even those that do webcasts, are still just a room, a bar, and a sound system. I want to go beyond that, and make something new.

    If you're interested in helping out, or even if you just have suggestions, let me know! What would you like to see? What do you think would move the concept of ``nightclub'' to a new level?

    Please don't think of this as an ``internet cafe'' kind of deal: in my experience internet cafes aren't even cafes, what they are is terminal rooms or photocopy stores that happen to sell espresso. What I'm building will definitely be a nightclub, with a lot of live music. But it will also be a web radio station, a web music zine, and a heavily wired physical space.

    Help me build it! I think it's going to be a lot of fun...

    1. Re:wanna help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a big fucking dork.

    2. Re:wanna help? by SydBarrett · · Score: 1

      First of all, I don't work for any such company you desire, but since nobody else has responded and I hate to see this un-replied to.

      Hmmm. Theres a fine line between "something new" and "unwanted interference". It all really depends on how visible you what all of this technology to be. You could do the standard video wallpaper with large banks of monitors, but the light output may ruin the overall mood. You could counter this by adjusting the brightness, or limiting the display to mostly black. Or forget that and use dimmed video projectors if you have enough unclutered wall/ceiling space.

      I am not sure how you want this space to be "hooked into the net". Will it be sender, receiver, or both. Web cams, as you mentioned, have been done to death already, as have video confercing tricks, streamed audio from sound system (even though a radio station would be nice, provided you have interesting content). I really can't think of any tricks and candy that your space could provide to the net that hasn't been done before.

      Maybe the key is to distort incoming/outgoing data in a more interesting mannor. Allow users on a site to send anon messages, have the messages scrabbled using some markov-type tricks and then presented. Video would be a more interesting data form, combine both local cam feeds mixed with external video in a pleasing way. This would break the webcam/"internet cafe" image you don't want. The data isn't meant to be studied here (as in a cafe), but be part the scene like the music (visual display of the sound system mixed with the above, maybe?). Keep the "normal and visable" computing element low.

      Don't people go to these places to get away from computers? :)