Domain: sourceforge.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to sourceforge.net.
Comments · 31,462
-
Re:How to get turbo browsing with free software
You could also try the RabbIT compressing web proxy. All this relies on having a server somewhere with a fast net connection that you can run programs on - and this is the service that Opera Software are really providing.
If you want image compression - and are able to run Linux/BSD at the server side - Ziproxy may be a better option.
-
Re:Is it just me...
I wasn't aware Milkdrop was avaialble on Linux (it's a Direc3D plugin). Might you be referring to ProjectM instead?
-
How to get turbo browsing with free software
Back when my net connection was a 56kb/s modem, I used to make an ssh connection (with compression) to a machine at university, and then tunnel through that to the university's http proxy server. That gave a handy speed increase compared to making http requests directly over the modem link. You could also try the RabbIT compressing web proxy. All this relies on having a server somewhere with a fast net connection that you can run programs on - and this is the service that Opera Software are really providing.
-
Re:Q: How do you steal a stream? A:
Streamripper is able to save the stream, and with meta data and silence detection, split it into tracks. Works for mp3 and ogg streams.
Or you can just run Audacity and consult a programming schedule
-
Re:Media player vs VLC
No love for the cross-platform smplayer here, huh?
smplayer is an excellent gui front-end to mplayer. The Windows version packages a very up-to-date version of mplayer as well. On Linux machines with a recent nVidia card you can use the VDPAU driver which offloads H.264 decoding tasks to the graphics hardware.
Ubuntu users can download smplayer from the repositories, but you might want to compile mplayer from SVN. "apt-get build-dep mplayer-nogui" will get you all the devel packages you need. The daily source snapshot is available here (warning: bz2 archive).
-
passes an even tougher test than acid3
Opera passes an even tougher css test than acid3 -- unlike firefox and safari, it renders the titles of slashdot comments correctly.
Yes, that's a joke. To see what I'm talking about, use firefox or safari to navigate to the slashdot homepage, and then click on the "Read More..." link for a story in the news, science, or technology sections. (This Opera article is in the tech section, but if you have your default threshold for comments set high, like I do, you won't get any titles of comments displayed right now, simply because there aren't any highly up-moderated comments yet, so you won't get any comments displayed.) What you'll see is that the titles of stories are displayed in white on a white background.
This comment explains that it's due to a CSS bug in the stylesheets in certain sections. Here is a bug report that I did today in sourceforge. I couldn't find any earlier reports of this problem by searching on sourceforge's bug tracker, but they might exist -- this problem has been around for quite some time now. As a work-around, you can click on the story's title in the threshold form.
It would be interested to hear whether this is universally reproducible with firefox and safari, but please be very careful to follow the exact instructions above. It depends on which section the article is in, and it depends on whether or not you're getting a cached version of the story.
The fact that the slashdot crew hasn't noticed this bug on their own after such a long period of time makes me wonder how much attention they really pay to the site. (This is assuming that the bug really does occur for all firefox users.) We've had dupes and grammatical mistakes in summaries forever, but now that the firehose is handling submissions, it looks like the whole site is just on autopilot.
-
Re:Other sites with support exist as well
Firefox 3.5beta for Ubuntu is here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=195473&package_id=231607
-
Autopsy is the leading free tool for this
I'm not a full time professional in data recovery but I am trained and certified in hard drive forensics.
I'm assuming you're talking about recovering data that is lost from corruption errors, not the drive itself dying.
There's a variety of free command line tools that are used for recovering data from corrupted hard drives that function at various levels (such as inodes), but really, unless you have training in them or need something really specific, the graphic (via web browser) frontend Autopsy is the way to go:
http://www.sleuthkit.org/autopsy/
If I'm looking for a specific type of file, sometimes I'll use Foremost:
http://foremost.sourceforge.net/
As far as commercial software, EnCase commonly used but pricey compared to Autopsy.
http://www.guidancesoftware.com/
The key thing with either the commercial or non-commercial options is to avoid damaging the file system you're working on. This means that if you're attempting to mount the drive from a working machine that you do so read-only (if you get really into this, there are hard drive -> USB mounts that block all writes) and if possible you clone the drive into an image and work on that rather than the original. The free version to do that is dd. Be sure to use the noerror option on it to make sure that a bad sector doesn't cause the process to fail.
Also, clone the entire drive, not just the partition in case there's data that you need outside of the partition. In other words, do this:
dd if=/dev/hda of=/forensics/image.dd conv=noerror,sync
Rather than this:
dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/forensics/image.dd conv=noerror,sync
-
Re:TRK - dd/dd_rescue/ddrescue, Restorer
Well stated and correct. I've unfortunately been thrown the task (as many in the IT world get daily) more than once to recover deleted files from a employee no longer with the company, or just recover files from a damaged system or hard drive. Usually the option of paying a recovering shop $2000 - $5000 to retrieve the data isn't even a consideration for an option, although definitely preferred. First and foremost I make an exact copy of the drive using the dd utility, such as the following: dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=512 conv=noerror,sync Then all recovery is done on the copy made, so worst case scenario and everything including the cat goes south, it's no harm - no foul, since you can just make another copy and try again. Which tool to use really depends on what type of data your trying to recover, as each program targets specific functionality. Many do just try to repair partition tables, which is generally not what you want. I've had great success using ddrescue, and is probably my preferred - again, depending on what your goal in recovery is. Another great tool is http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk (Testdisk) which works well. Others that are a little more involved to operate and setup are http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s042078/magicrescue/manpage.html (magicrescue) and http://www.sleuthkit.org/sleuthkit/ (the sleuthkit) and there is some good information at http://dftt.sourceforge.net/ (http://dftt.sourceforge.net/) which might provide help and insight. No matter how you look at it though, your in for a fun ride, so best to stock up on pain killers and red bull.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
You can try filing a bug, but Slashdot never fixes bugs. Hell, few of the ones I've submitted have even been read:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939528&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939531&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939535&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939538&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939546&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939555&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939558&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1939563&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1949166&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1964699&group_id=4421&atid=104421
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421And of course:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973268&group_id=4421&atid=104421Note that some of those bugs might actually be fixed, but if they are, it's certainly not a result of the bug report in their bug tracking system.
-
Re:/. - are you listening?
doesn't slashdot have any bug reporting tools for us to use?
-
Re:My .02
Something like FreeFileSync has lots of advantages over a batch file:
-
Re:UML FTW!
Or there's always User-Mode Linux.
Good though UML is for some things (particularly its original reason for being created: certain driver/module development and testing work) I wouldn't bring it into a discussion about performance.
While I've seen reports that show UML can beat VMWare-on-a-host-OS arrangements (i.e. the Player and Server products) in some benchmarks where almost all the benchmark is in userspace (i.e. almost no system calls) the performance hit of a system call can quickly bog down most real world VMs. As one anecdotal data point: testing a Zimbra server in a UML VM resulted in much slowness including parts of the admin interface (not always fast at the best of times) being practically unusable, but the same installation in a VMWare VM (using the same set of test data (migrated from one VM to the other) to improve the fairness of the test) was significantly more responsive on the same host hardware+OS despite haivng less RAM allocated (so the VMWare guest OS ended up swapping a little where the UML one didn't). I saw similar results when moving a simple web server (originally a copy of a VM run on linode.com back when they ran on UML not Xen as they do now) from UML to VMWare.
UML has advantages in specific cases and was the best inexpensive option for a time if chroot wasn't right for your needs, but I wouldn't recommend it generally now considering the quality of current freely (and in some cases Freely) available alternatives.
-
Re:Back to the Future?
Running multiple services on one OS requires that when you must reboot a server because of an OS bug or mis-configuration all of the services are brought down... Same if it crashes or hangs. As compelling as that is I've never used a hypervisor in 30 years on 10's of thousands of servers.
I do routinely use chroot jails on thousands of servers to isolate the application from the host OS. This way I do not need to re-qualify any tools when we implement an OS patch.
Check it out: http://sourceforge.net/projects/vesta/
:-) -
UML FTW!
Or there's always User-Mode Linux.
-
Re:Ego
I can build this box, and have the future of media and news, but I'm breaking federal laws to have it work.
So?
The Panacea of information that is seen in every star-trek tv show and movie CAN be a reality today. but rampant greed and control-mongers make it impossible.
It is true. Just ignore your fear and embrace it.
The "free stuff" is either locked to being viewed on a PC, or so low resolution that it's not worth watching.
Bull Shit (I use dvdauthor and qdvdauthor myself when dealing with older systems, having a perverse thing for XML files and pain).
BTW. My country's (Finland) Pirate Party just got enough support to become an official party. It didn't do it in time to make for the EU parliament, so I'll just have to vote for it in the next national parliament elections. What have you done for the bright future today?
-
Re:Ego
I can build this box, and have the future of media and news, but I'm breaking federal laws to have it work.
So?
The Panacea of information that is seen in every star-trek tv show and movie CAN be a reality today. but rampant greed and control-mongers make it impossible.
It is true. Just ignore your fear and embrace it.
The "free stuff" is either locked to being viewed on a PC, or so low resolution that it's not worth watching.
Bull Shit (I use dvdauthor and qdvdauthor myself when dealing with older systems, having a perverse thing for XML files and pain).
BTW. My country's (Finland) Pirate Party just got enough support to become an official party. It didn't do it in time to make for the EU parliament, so I'll just have to vote for it in the next national parliament elections. What have you done for the bright future today?
-
Should - if they want to
I have a small GPL project that's fairly popular in certain circles, but I didn't write it to be popular. I wrote it because it met a need that my company had. Whether no people or a million use it, we'll get the same financial compensation: zero. But again, that's not why we released it! We have gotten back bug reports and enhancement requests that prompted me to make changes we never would have thought of on our own, and those changes have been useful to us. Isn't that compensation enough? It is for me and my boss.
-
Re:Who cares? Quake is on the Nokia E71
Newer s60 (N95-1, N82 etc.) run Quake III Arena with full-screen anti-aliasing, TV out, Bluetooth HID, or the even cooler (with a bit of practice) accelerometer based mouse look:
http://www.noeman.org/gsm/symbian-os-9-1-games/78656-quake-3-arena-accelerometer-support.html
Hell I the x86 binaries of Wolf3d are playable under DosBOX:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/s60dosbox/
Ultima Underworld is slow but would be playable with a mouse, not tried Doom as I already had the native port.
-
Paucity of GUI libraries, for oneTry finding a decent GUI library for Windows, for example. Your choices:
- LablGTK. GTK on Windows. Yuck.
- LablTk. Tk is a toy GUI kit.
- OCaml-Win32. If you have to ask what's wrong with the win32 API, you've never had to use it in a language other than C.
- Some alpha or out of date binding of wxWidgets or Qt for OCaml.
OCaml programs aren't shorter than scripting languages, and they're limited to a curses interface at best. Together with its speed, OCaml gives off the impression of being a language you'd reach for when you write high performance, low interaction programs---like automated financial trading agents. Not many of us do that. And so not many of us use OCaml.
-
libass?
Pull your head out of your GNU/Ass and fix your fucking code.
Gimme the source code for lib0ass. I wanna compile my own.
...I'm lonely
Right here! On a sister site of Slashdot, no less!
-
Re:Can't See Comment Titles
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2797951&group_id=4421&atid=104421 official bug submitted
-
Unetbootin
Yeah, I guess I am kind of boring that way. Hooray for utility over aesthetics!
-
Re:Hm.
Yeah, If I were Microsoft, I would provide the following options
amaya
Maxthon
crazy browser
grail -
Re:Use Qt....
I have no idea why GTK+ is still around since Qt went LGPL.
Qt has better documentation than GTK+.
As an example, you'd be hard pressed to find a widget in the QT documentation that is not documented. GTK+ has rough around the edges documentation for it's Canvas.
I know that RedHat is putting a lot of weight behind Java technology as one of the first and foremost distros for the OpenJDK. I can attest that the QT Java bindings are way better than the GNOME bindings. It would make sense for RedHat to toss weight behind QT. Google already uses QT for Google Earth. And KHTML is, sorta, WebKit which is Chrome. It all makes more sense to put our weight in QT.
I've got nothing but love for the GTK+ people. Also, don't kill QT just because of the KDE 4.0 issue. They've made good on their latest desktop, but don't knock a good Toolkit because of the DE.
My two cents. -
Open Source Competitors
When the submitter referenced "open source alternatives that go by similar names", he was referring to ophcrack. Similar features are also available from Cain and Abel, and John the Ripper.
I maintain a list of top password crackers and sniffers as part of my SecTools.Org site.
While the submitter is correct that they have much more competition now, I still wish to congratulate the former L0pht guys on the new release!
-
Re:Not for me...
As my sibling post said, http://www.fs-driver.org/ is a Windows File System driver drive ext2, and thanks to forward compatibility (as I understand it), ext3 works too. http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsd is another alternative.
You should be warned that whenever I've used the first tool to write to the partition, I've ended up with Ubuntu fscking it on boot. But I've never noticed any problems like data corruption from using it. The second one also seems OK, although when browsing the disk from the Command Prompt it shows entries for . and
.. in the root, which confuses dir. -
Visual Studio
I churn C++ code under VS2005 at work.
All in all, I like the IDE, although free-floating edit windows would be nice.That said, I find Visual Assist indispensable.
It is expensive but if you can get your employer to pay for it, I highly recommend it.I also use Artistic style (free) to reformat code, and PC-Lint ($$$) to find lurking problems.
-
Native code on Android
Android supports native code through the Java Native Interface. Thats how quake and doom http://code.google.com/p/doom-for-android/downloads/detail?name=Doom.for.Android.apk are running on the G1.
http://davanum.wordpress.com/2007/12/09/android-invoke-jni-based-methods-bridging-cc-and-java/DOOM for example is a standard Android ("Java") app which loads a native library, which in turn is nothing else than PRBOOM http://prboom.sourceforge.net/ compiled as a shared library.
-
Re:A Suggestion
..and putty.
-
updated libsvg
An updated libsvg library can be found here http://svg2swf.sourceforge.net/. With a little work the dependencies can be reduced to just expat and uriparser.
-
Re:Yawn
But the BSD has no effect whatsoever on the copyright system, since all that's really required from someone who reuses code from a BSD project is a copy of the copyright notice inside the new source code. Meanwhile, reusing code from a GPL project means that you cannot publish your new program under traditional copyright protection.
I'm not saying the GPL is better -- after all, I published FlacSquisher under the Apache license. If copyright somehow ceased to exist, the GPL wouldn't exist either, but only because proprietary code wouldn't have any copyright protections to prevent it from being released into the public domain.
-
Web rewriting tools
Even AdBlock and NoScript may not be enough. I've read about a recent trend where adverts are hosted directly on the content server. So if your website "requires" JavaScript and/or people have whitelisted it, ads will get through because the scripts and images are hosted directly on your website. Bastards.
In case you are willing to do something about it:
- Greasemonkey (FF|IE)
- Platypus
- Shiftspace
- JetPack
- Chickenfoot
- Privoxy
- Proximodo
the last of which is hosted by... SourceForge.
-
LibBoard?
-
SDL_svg
works for me. http://sdlsvg.sourceforge.net/
-
Re:MPC Home Cinema VLC
I just go for MPlayer. (which almost never fails, but has an even worse UI. Or rather, it has no UI; it's just a box with the video playing in it.
You should take a look at smplayer. It's a GUI for mplayer that makes it much more user friendly.
-
It's called competition, kids...
...and in this case, it's entirely legitimate.
From what I can see, it looks like the premade Linux distro for the device still exists. If it's still preinstalled on the device by default, you have even less to worry about, since that will mean that no matter how much Microsoft try and promote themselves, they will still have inertia to deal with.
Microsoft are doing what they always do; banking on the concept that most people don't want to engage in intellectual activity, personal initiative, or personal responsibility. For the most part, it's nearly always a very safe bet for them; they have human nature on their side, and they know it.
If you want to beat them at this game, what you need to do is promote the advantages inherent in doing something different. That means:-
- Hardware resource efficiency from CLI or light GUI applications that they will never be able to match. Cplay or LXMusic for music, Dillo for limited web browsing, (but enough on an embedded platform) PCManFM for file management, etc.
- Greater security. Microsoft still cannot honestly compete with the root security model, and you can laugh at them if they try. Linux simply does not get viruses.
- As long as the "big two," contemporary desktop environments and ALSA are avoided, Linux also still has infinitely greater robustness.
Microsoft's solutions are vastly technologically inferior to UNIX. Always.
Microsoft cannot hope to compete on technical merit, but where they generally do beat Linux or the BSDs is via exploitation of the most base and/or negative elements of human nature; fear, laziness, reluctance to make choices or assume responsibility for those choices.
Stop fighting amongst yourselves about how best to get the neurotypical population to drink Stallman's Kool-Aid, and then gnashing your teeth when they predictably don't want to. That isn't going to work. Linux can beat Microsoft exceptionally easily on technical merit, and if you confine things to X apps, that is primarily what end users care about.
All Microsoft ever do...all they ever CAN do...is appeal to fear and laziness. They don't actually offer their customers anything better; they just keep said customers in a state of terror about accepting anything better, if said something better is non-Microsoft.
-
It's called competition, kids...
...and in this case, it's entirely legitimate.
From what I can see, it looks like the premade Linux distro for the device still exists. If it's still preinstalled on the device by default, you have even less to worry about, since that will mean that no matter how much Microsoft try and promote themselves, they will still have inertia to deal with.
Microsoft are doing what they always do; banking on the concept that most people don't want to engage in intellectual activity, personal initiative, or personal responsibility. For the most part, it's nearly always a very safe bet for them; they have human nature on their side, and they know it.
If you want to beat them at this game, what you need to do is promote the advantages inherent in doing something different. That means:-
- Hardware resource efficiency from CLI or light GUI applications that they will never be able to match. Cplay or LXMusic for music, Dillo for limited web browsing, (but enough on an embedded platform) PCManFM for file management, etc.
- Greater security. Microsoft still cannot honestly compete with the root security model, and you can laugh at them if they try. Linux simply does not get viruses.
- As long as the "big two," contemporary desktop environments and ALSA are avoided, Linux also still has infinitely greater robustness.
Microsoft's solutions are vastly technologically inferior to UNIX. Always.
Microsoft cannot hope to compete on technical merit, but where they generally do beat Linux or the BSDs is via exploitation of the most base and/or negative elements of human nature; fear, laziness, reluctance to make choices or assume responsibility for those choices.
Stop fighting amongst yourselves about how best to get the neurotypical population to drink Stallman's Kool-Aid, and then gnashing your teeth when they predictably don't want to. That isn't going to work. Linux can beat Microsoft exceptionally easily on technical merit, and if you confine things to X apps, that is primarily what end users care about.
All Microsoft ever do...all they ever CAN do...is appeal to fear and laziness. They don't actually offer their customers anything better; they just keep said customers in a state of terror about accepting anything better, if said something better is non-Microsoft.
-
Re:MPC Home Cinema VLC
WTF would you put a source archive up for download if all the code is in SVN?
Just go here and click "Download GNU tarball" or simply use an SVN client to check out the release_v1_2_908_0 tag.