Slashdot Mirror


What Data Recovery Tools Do the Pros Use?

Life2Death writes "I've been working with computers for a long time, and every once and a while someone close to me has a drive go belly up on them. I know there are big, expensive recovery houses that specialize in mission-critical data recovery, like if your house blew up and you have millions of files you need or something, but for the local IT group, what do you guys use? Given that most people are on NTFS (Windows XP) by the numbers, what would you use? I found a ton of tools when I googled, and everyone and their brother suggests something else, so I want to know what software 'just works' on most recoveries of bad, but partially working hard drives. Free software always has a warm spot in my heart."

399 comments

  1. for fat and ntfs by keeegan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get Data Back works very well.

    1. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I agree - I have a lot of success with this package...

    2. Re:for fat and ntfs by darkvad0r · · Score: 5, Informative

      For a free solution, check TestDisk.
      It has saved my data many times.

    3. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever this question comes up on any online forum I post on, the answer is always the same: GetDataBack for NTFS

      Just make sure, you back up the data to a different drive than the one you're trying to recover.

    4. Re:for fat and ntfs by PFactor · · Score: 1

      I second this. It great for recovering data from pretty much anything: flash drives, memory cards, hard drives. The primary caveat is that the drive itself has to be fully operational. If the drive cannot be mounted/connected (like if the drive electronics are fried) this program won't help you.GetDataBack just does a scan of the disk and offers to 'undelete' any file fragments it finds. Also, the bigger the drive, the longer it takes the process to complete. I suppose this is true of all tools that operate in this fashion so I can't say it's a con to GetDataBack. Also, there's a separate version for FAT and for NTFS.

      --
      Don't believe anything I say. I crash test crack pipes for a living.
    5. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Cleric cast Resurrection on the hard drive.

    6. Re:for fat and ntfs by SputnikPanic · · Score: 2, Informative

      By necessity, I discovered and used this software just last night, and the data recovery process was smoother than I had anticipated. At one point when I was copying the salvaged files to a good drive, Windows took exception with one of the files and started barking one of its usual program-terminating error messages. I was afraid that I'd have to have GetDataBack reread the whole drive and start the whole process all over again, but the program was robust enough to avoid crashing. It just moved on to the next file and kept on going. It's not often that I pay for software but this was $80 well spent.

    7. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used GDB for a long time, and still do occasionally. Nothing bad to say about it.

      However, I find that X-ways' WinHex is even better for recovering file names/structures -- if you've got a big tree to work with, that's a lifesaver versus having to go through hundreds of sequentially-named directories. It's a professional product and they have forensic versions that allow you to preserve evidence chain, e.g. working with a image of the drive, read-only modes, etc.

      It's more expensive, but given the time required to do data recovery on a per file basis it's probably still a sound investment.

    8. Re:for fat and ntfs by pushf+popf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been doing consulting and software development for around 30 years, and when I was young and dumb, thought I could fix anything. Now I know better and have found that in this situation, the phrase "Wow, that's too bad. Where are your backups?" works nicely.

      While there are all sorts of voodoo, data scraping bit-remunging apps available, at the point before you do anything you have no liability. After you "recover" the data, you're on the hook for everything forever.

      All you need is for the customer to come back 2 years later and tell you they were sued into the dirt because something they were required to disclose was missing or incorrect and you'll wish you never took the job.

      And even if they don't sue, there will be a never-ending stream of phone calls about broken documents, files they can't find and all sorts of other "un-tidyness".

      And even if they don't call, there will be eternal uncertainty about the quality of the recovered data. Are their financials correct? What was that number that had the letters nearby really supposed to be?

      My favorite drive recovery method is now BackupPC. You set it up, configure it for an appropriate number of incremental backups each day and let it fly. When a drive craps out, replace it, click the appropriate checkbox on the "Restore" page and press the "go" button. No doubt, no lawsuits, no untidyness.

      Do-it-yourself Data Recovery is great if you like to putter with things and have lots of time and no liability (employees generally can't be sued by their employer) however when actual money is at stake, it's better to just send the drive out and let someone who is actually equipped and staffed to do the recovery handle the work.

      To put things in a different perspective, how happy would you be if the county tried to sell your house for unpaid taxes because billy-bob "who's really good with computers" did their drive recovery and your tax payments were on one of the bad spots?

    9. Re:for fat and ntfs by rinoid · · Score: 1

      I concur ... TestDisk just saved 4gb of pictures from unreadable cards.

      I also use DataRescue but TestDisk just kicked it's bits.

    10. Re:for fat and ntfs by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 4, Informative

      I could not agree more. Just last week I had a designer friend who accidentally deleted the partition his portfolio was on. We tried to recover the partition however the MFT had become lost/corrupted.

      My first attempt to recover his data was with ntfsundelete, however it did not recognize the partition at all. I next used Disk Internals NTFS Recovery program (Commercial) with the same results.

      Finally, I Googled a bit and found the testdisk/photorec package and used that. It took about 40 hours to recover ~225GB data. It was unable to recover filenames, however it did create new directories for each directory it found and recreated the files in those directories, albeit with arbitrary names. Most impressively it did recreate the files with the proper file name extensions. With some creative perl scripting I could have even renamed some of these files based on meta data in the files. This was not necessary in my case.

    11. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely! I love this program.

      It's FREE TO USE TO DETERMINE IF IT WORKS FOR YOU! That sold it to me immediately.

      I was able to look at the files it could recover, decided that yes, it's going to work, and payed for it.

    12. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anpheus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tell them that you don't have a full copy of all their data. Tell them to tell their lawyers that a hard drive failing is equivalent to a small fire occurring in the secretary's desk and while you, the fireman or handy guy with the fire extinguisher can recover a lot of data, there's no way to be certain that it's all the data.

      People like you are a lot of what's wrong with the world. You cover your ass so much that you don't accomplish what your clients really want or need.

    13. Re:for fat and ntfs by pushf+popf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People like you are a lot of what's wrong with the world. You cover your ass so much that you don't accomplish what your clients really want or need.

      Do you know what's worse than "No Data"?

      Bad Data.

      What my clients really need is data they can trust.

      Telling someone "Here's your data, I got some of it back for you, but I'm not sure how much you lost or if the stuff I got back for you is correct" is great for your mother's vacation pictures. It's not great for your bank, insurance company, doctor, school or anybody else that needs to have verifiable, correct data.

    14. Re:for fat and ntfs by bmoorewiz · · Score: 1

      "GetDataBack" Absolutely works perfect.I have used it in many cases.

    15. Re:for fat and ntfs by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      If you have a cleric in the group then shame on him for allowing the death in the first place.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    16. Re:for fat and ntfs by Etrias · · Score: 1

      Snarkiness aside, there's a problem in your methodology. Even the best set it and forget it systems have problems and without monitoring and testing, your data is at risk. The old saying goes your backups are only as good as your restores. If you are not testing the validity of your restore files, what's the point of doing backups? Bad data/no data...what's the difference? It's as good as gone unless you take it to On-Track to recover.

    17. Re:for fat and ntfs by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Not having a backup is great for your mother's vacation pictures. Not having a backup is most likely criminal for the banking, insurance, medical, and academic data world. Bottom line - if you need to have "verifiable, correct data" make sure you have multiple backups in multiple locations. Never rely on data retrieval programs as your "backup plan".

      If your clients don't make regular backups, and are lawsuit happy, I would suggest looking for new clients.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    18. Re:for fat and ntfs by jijacob · · Score: 1

      Hate to beat an already beaten horse (leave him alone already!) but testdisk/photorec works wonders. It's in the Ubuntu software repositories to boot!

    19. Re:for fat and ntfs by HeyBob! · · Score: 1

      GetDataBack (http://www.runtime.org/) saved my butt when 1 drive (out of 4 on a raid 5 array) failed and while a rebuild was occurring the power supply died! The array was toast but I was able to recover everything to another drive (good thing the MB had 6 sata connections!) - It took a few days to get the 800GB back, but I've never been so happy!

    20. Re:for fat and ntfs by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Do you know what's worse than "No Data"?

      Bad Data.

      Consider that partial data may be better than no data. Also consider that any recovered data should be inspected by someone familiar with the data. Since multiple versions could exist on disk (at least based on my home experience dealing with a lost set of email files), verification has got to be part of the recovery process.

      What my clients really need is data they can trust.

      If the data is "that" important, the company better be taking procedures before data loss occurs. DB & file replication, snapshots, backups, off site storage/replication, etc...

      Telling someone "Here's your data, I got some of it back for you, but I'm not sure how much you lost or if the stuff I got back for you is correct" is great for your mother's vacation pictures. It's not great for your bank, insurance company, doctor, school or anybody else that needs to have verifiable, correct data.

      If a company (or your mother) is relying on disk recovery software, the problem isn't the recovery, it is unrealistic expectations of what the recovery software is capable of.

    21. Re:for fat and ntfs by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Consider that partial data may be better than no data. Also consider that any recovered data should be inspected by someone familiar with the data. Since multiple versions could exist on disk (at least based on my home experience dealing with a lost set of email files), verification has got to be part of the recovery process.

      Partial is fine for home, and recovering your CV, music and photos.. However, when you're playing in the commercial world, you can't trust partial. Even though people may be familar with the general data, they can't guarantee that what data is in the database (or storage area) is exactly what it's meant to be. Making big decisions based on invalid data can lead you to a whole world of pain (you believe you know something that is just plain wrong). If the data is missing, you know that you don't know what's meant to be there. So you can base your decisions on that (the first of which is usually 'find me that data, because I need to know'). Basically, you can verify your data, but you can't always validate it.

      Absolutely with you that data needs the extra replication, storage etc. Where I work, I offer periods of data loss against cash spent for systems in my remit. If they part with the cash, I can get them to within a fraction of a second free of data loss on system failure. If they spend less, the period of data loss gets longer. Simple as that. If I ever have to do a recovery, the first thing I let anyone know is that I don't trust what I recover, period. The things I trust are the restores (validated on backup).

    22. Re:for fat and ntfs by glockNine · · Score: 1

      You can also use NTFS Explorer from the same company, which works great in a pinch. You can recover files one by one without having to wait for recovery of the whole drive. Well worth the $70.

    23. Re:for fat and ntfs by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Partial is fine for home, and recovering your CV, music and photos.. However, when you're playing in the commercial world, you can't trust partial.

      Partial can be acceptable in the commercial world too. It is situational though. As an example, at one of my previous positions, I inherited a corrupt/partial road centerline file. The previous owner had corrupted the file and the backup retention period was not long enough to get back to a known state. The entire dataset needed verified, but verifying data is often faster than recreating from scratch. In my case, added an attribute to the spatial features to track that a feature was verified and eventually got the file to a usable state.

      I agree that you can't trust partial but sometimes partial is better than nothing. Any data recovered must undergo verification, but starting a dataset from scratch may be more costly than verifying.

    24. Re:for fat and ntfs by Zoromo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No question with TestDisk as an excellent open source/free recovery option.

      It was the only thing I found (freeware or pay) that relatively easily restored a couple of NTFS logical partitions--and all data--after they were destroyed by an older version (8.0) of Diskeeper's "boot optimization" defragging. The last time I used Diskeeper or recommended it. I continue to use and recommend TestDisk. The author of TestDisk was also responsive to emails when I encountered a unique issue with the drives I ended up needing help with.

      Note that TestDisk is only for recovering lost partitions and making non-bootable partitions bootable again. For those functions, there is no better program out there.

      Its sister program included in its download--PhotoRec--can do file recovery. Its designed mainly for recovery of photos off all media, but it supports many different file formats. So the TestDisk/PhotoRec package may be all you need.

      Other freeware/non-open source file recovery alternatives that are reliable and work well:

      --PC INSPECTOR File Recovery. 100% free & full featured, many options. Been using it for years.

      --Recuva. 100% free, by Piriform, the maker of the very popular CCleaner/Crap Cleaner system cleaner.

      Somewhat less elegant than the above one. But the only freeware option I've studied that can do a "deep scan" of your drives for lost files. Which can take hours, but may turn up more missing data than the other non-PhotoRec options here.

      --EASEUS Deleted File Recovery. A more limited version of their $70 "EASEUS Data Recovery Wizard", but very well designed for basic file recovery.

      There are other freeware file recovery options I've studied, but they are all more limited than the above. Would recommend TestDisk (for partitions) and PhotoRec (for files) first, then the other three (for files) in the order given.

      In all honesty, shelling out for a payware solution is very unlikely to "find" more deleted files on a NTFS partition than the above freeware solutions, unless you have special needs they don't cover. Which is rare. And again, there is nothing better than TestDisk--free or payware--for recovering partitions.

    25. Re:for fat and ntfs by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Tried that. Didn't work because Cthulhu fucked up the client's drive. Client had a copy of the real Necronomicon on it.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    26. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get Data Back works very well.

      I second the recommendation for Get Data Back. It's not very expensive, & is 1 of the few programs I've actually forked over $ for. Last I checked you could get a version for FAT32, the one for NTFS or both for a discount. You've gotta have another drive to use to copy the files the program retrieves off the drive w/ the damaged filesystem... It's a cinch to use...

    27. Re:for fat and ntfs by Denjiro · · Score: 1

      I agree, just three weeks back I had the MBR go bad on my primary HD. Once I had windows running on an alternate hard drive Get Data Back was able to recover everything on the old HD.

    28. Re:for fat and ntfs by Exception+Duck · · Score: 1

      It has saved my data many times.

      Maybe a backup solution would do you nicely as well.

    29. Re:for fat and ntfs by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. GetDataBack (Two versions, one for FAT and one for NTFS) are outstanding. If the drive spins, and the drive is recognised by the BIOS then GDB will..... get your data back.

      Most importantly, disconnect and de-power any drive which suffers any kind of failure, and do not power it back up until GDB is installed, registered and ready to work. Practice recovering data from a known-good drive before trying your dead-drive.

      GDB will recover damaged files as well as undamaged ones. Getting all your porn back might involve some of your images being sliced across the middle with corrupted JPD data... ;)

      One truly great thing about GDB is that it can recover files from a dead drive faster than Windows Explorer will copy them from a good drive!

      Firstly, and most importantly in this whole process: Beat over the head whichever fool forgot to backup correctly.

      --
      How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
    30. Re:for fat and ntfs by LifesRoadie · · Score: 1

      I also agree, a simple (read intuitive) and effective package.

      I used it for some years while running a (small) PC repair business. Good stuff.

    31. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second that - GetDataBack is an excellent tool in the Windows environment. If you have access to Linux, Sleuthkit is excellent and my staple as a forensic tool. Enjoy!

    32. Re:for fat and ntfs by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those people with real world experience really rain on your parade, huh?

      His point is that there are some situations which cannot reasonably be handled, yet our current business/legal climate can create significant risk and liability for the person who tries to be a white night and solve the unsolvable. I think he's got a pretty solid point, which you may appreciate after you get a few more years under your belt.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    33. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THUMBS UP FOR THAT ONE...
      Get Data Back is awesome. I lost a hard drive once (system drive with the OS) and happened to come upon GDB doing a google search. the drive was no longer readable (in the normal way) but I could add it as a slave to a different system. GDB was able to find every file from the current installation PLUS files that I had deleted (no kidding) over 4 years prior. I am a music producer and recording engineer by hobby and I found tons of music that I had lost, deleted or misplaced years ago.

      Get data back is awesome and a bit scary when you think about it. It truly shows you that deleting files doesn't delete files. Now for kicks, after I retrieved my files, I ran one of those defense dept (so called) shredders on the drive and while it did do a pretty good job of deleting and wiping the drive, Get Data Back was still able to recover several files from long ago. So if your drive is at least able to be put into another computer, get data back can be a lifesaver.

    34. Re:for fat and ntfs by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I've been doing consulting and software development for around 30 years, and when I was young and dumb, thought I could fix anything. Now I know better and have found that in this situation, the phrase "Wow, that's too bad. Where are your backups?" works nicely.

      A data recovery job early in my career were Telescope images for the CSIRO that I was told would not be available for imaging for another 25 year. They really appreciated the effort and a lot of unrelated systems work came out of me making the effort for them.

      I acknowledge that that is a perfectly reasonable position to take for say a database or spreadsheet information, when it comes to word processing documents and pictures it's pretty obvious when artifacts are introduced. However the wisdom of your position is undeniable and I will certainly be incorporating it into whether I undertake a data recovery job considering the potential for liability.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    35. Re:for fat and ntfs by jra · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I had a client who had a 200GB IDE drive get scribbled on, probably by a dying cable. It whacked the partition table, the FAT and the root directory of the lower partition, and for some reason, there wasn't a backup FAT.

      GDB found both partitions, rebuilt the table, FAT, and the lower root, and let me copy everything off.

      It's slow (I think each 100GB partition scan took about 11 hours), but aside from making me rename the directories in the root -- another great argument for not putting stuff in the root -- it worked fine.

    36. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      Simple, disclaim any liability. Microsoft and a lot of other vendors do. If you tell them "I can't guarantee the accuracy of any of this data and you should do a full review," and they say "Do it anyway," make sure you get that in writing and you'll be fine.

    37. Re:for fat and ntfs by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Do you know what's worse than "No Data"?

      Bad Data.

      Is that really worse? On what planet do you work where non-techies have perfect data?

      "I'm not gonna restore your accounting data because it could be off by a few thousand dollars. You're better off restarting from scratch, so you have a perfect data set." "I'm not gonna restore your patient records, because some addresses may be wrong. Better off waiting to let them call you and get their information then, rather than going through a suspect data set and verify it."

      I mean, there's always going to be ''bad data'' out there in the real world ( yes, those are air-qutoes). They're trusting that shit data that data entry personnel, sales managers, and every other user on a keyboard is generation. Why would is be any different when a hard drive fails? By your logic, we should wipe every hard drive in existence.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    38. Re:for fat and ntfs by pushf+popf · · Score: 1

      Is that really worse? On what planet do you work where non-techies have perfect data?

      "I'm not gonna restore your accounting data because it could be off by a few thousand dollars. You're better off restarting from scratch, so you have a perfect data set." "I'm not gonna restore your patient records, because some addresses may be wrong. Better off waiting to let them call you and get their information then, rather than going through a suspect data set and verify it."


      Actually, it would be: "I'm really sorry Mrs. Jones died, I guess there must have been some missing data in the 'drug allergies' section. I've never seen anybody swell up like that before! Do you think her survivors will be angry?"

    39. Re:for fat and ntfs by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I guess there must have been some missing data in the 'drug allergies' section.

      The mistake here is not the restoration partial data from a hard disk failure, but rather thinking that recovered data is 100% recovered. You don't "guess" about anything. You use what you recovered as a starting point, and you go from there.

      Really what you would see is "Hello Mrs. Jones, I'm calling from Dr. Schatzmann's office. We recently had a computer crash, and we need to confirm that your medical records with us are still complete. Do you have a moment...?"

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    40. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People like you are a lot of what's wrong with the world. You cover your ass so much that you don't accomplish what your clients really want or need."
                I can see where he's coming from though. I work at a computer surplus and have stopped selling quite a few items; no matter how cheap they are, and how large the signs saying "as-is", people ALWAYS try to bring as-is items back that don't work, even if they are $1. Solution? No as-is items, nope, they go to a recycler. Some areas just have the scheistiest, shadiest mofos ever and I would not do data recovery for them either.

    41. Re:for fat and ntfs by josephcmiller2 · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, contact your representative and request tort reform and liability reform. Nobody prefers covering ass to actually helping someone. Even if the customers don't sue you, their insurance companies will. Anyways, all it takes is one angry customer (many of us have had one like this) threaten to sue before completely redefining business policies. Yeah, I might help a few more people if I don't "cover my ass." But that will be small consolation when my business is sued, becomes defunct, and I'm out on the street. What then am I going to tell my wife and kids? "Well, I was just trying to help the guy. It's not my fault that I got sued." That's not going to be an answer I can live with.

    42. Re:for fat and ntfs by josephcmiller2 · · Score: 1

      Simple, disclaim any liability. Microsoft and a lot of other vendors do. If you tell them "I can't guarantee the accuracy of any of this data and you should do a full review," and they say "Do it anyway," make sure you get that in writing and you'll be fine.

      I agree, except you should claim "I CAN guarantee that the data is NOT accurate and you should do a full review." Don't let them have any expectation that they can rely on it at all.

    43. Re:for fat and ntfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you are a lot of what's wrong with the world. You cover your ass so much that you don't accomplish what your clients really want or need.

      Do you know what's worse than "No Data"?

      Bad Data.

      What my clients really need is data they can trust.

      Telling someone "Here's your data, I got some of it back for you, but I'm not sure how much you lost or if the stuff I got back for you is correct" is great for your mother's vacation pictures. It's not great for your bank, insurance company, doctor, school or anybody else that needs to have verifiable, correct data.

      You are useless.

    44. Re:for fat and ntfs by pushf+popf · · Score: 1

      You are useless.

      I'm happy, my clients are happy and I've been in business since usenet traveled on dial-up modems.

      By some standards that would be considered a success.

  2. Ordinary Kitchen Stuff by Mikkeles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lemon juice and heat!

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    1. Re:Ordinary Kitchen Stuff by Anonissimus · · Score: 1

      take it easy Martha

    2. Re:Ordinary Kitchen Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY! I have a patent on that encryption technique!!!! :-)

  3. I tell the tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That they should have backed up.

    1. Re:I tell the tools by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed Although the number of times I've been called in when the back up was cocked because nobody knew what they were doing make me think this is a little harsh. Good lesson here kids just because the tape was in overnight doesn't mean there's anything useful on it.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    2. Re:I tell the tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too right. I've had too many tape backup systems that will backup and verify without error, but will refuse to recover anything. (Offtopic, but how the fuck does that happen?) Luckily I've never trusted them so I've never been caught out by this when it mattered.

    3. Re:I tell the tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very helpful.
      The premise here is to change the future, not the past.

    4. Re:I tell the tools by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think, when someone replies to a question about data recovery, and the only thing in the reply is "you should have backed up your data", the person who replied should be modded as some kind of hypertroll. If it were combined with a useful answer, it would be okay. But by itself, it's an absolutely useless reply for the person asking the question.

    5. Re:I tell the tools by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      This is why the industry is moving to disk to disk backup for data recovery, and tape only for archival.

      Tape is simply unreliable (not to mention slow and expensive). We've had that argument here before. Tape lost.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  4. GetDataBack by sean_nestor · · Score: 5, Informative

    GetDataBack has worked perfectly for me many times. Very easy interface, works on deleted files as well as formatted disks (provided the data you want to recover hasn't been overwritten, of course). Worth the $79, IMO.

    1. Re:GetDataBack by Alt_Cognito · · Score: 1

      If I had points, I'd mod this up. I've used this as well. It picked up some stuff for me that I had deleted, but I'm not going to complain about "too much" data recovered, and this sort of fits under the "nature of the beast" context.

      Saved my bacon.

    2. Re:GetDataBack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree, getdataback its excellent.

    3. Re:GetDataBack by ramblix2006 · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I have tried many different recovery softwares and I always end up going back to GetDataBack. --Shareef Huddle

    4. Re:GetDataBack by antdude · · Score: 1

      Any free clones?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:GetDataBack by keeegan · · Score: 1

      Not good ones, but there's minipe....

    6. Re:GetDataBack by cixelsyd · · Score: 1

      Another vote here for the EXCELLENT GetDataBack. I've used it successfully MANY times for clients over the past 5 years. I've also had some decent luck with the free (as in beer) Recuva, but it is NOT as capable/in-depth as GetDataBack. It's more intended to be relatively easy to use.

      --
      Take a dollar, divide it by 100, take two and call me in the morning.
    7. Re:GetDataBack by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Another "me too" here.

      Lost a partition to corruption (had extended partition to > 136G without updating W2K service pack to handle it; worked fine for months until I started to fill up the disk). My data was mincemeat, but GetDataBack helped me get what I could.

      Customer service is excellent. The developer is very responsive in the forums.

    8. Re:GetDataBack by node159 · · Score: 1

      I'd agree, GetDataBack (NTFS) has recovered some seriously f*cked HDD's my clients have brought in. It might be slow but it gets the job done.

      --
      GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
    9. Re:GetDataBack by shammyclause · · Score: 1

      GetDataBack has worked perfectly for me many times. Very easy interface, works on deleted files as well as formatted disks (provided the data you want to recover hasn't been overwritten, of course). Worth the $79, IMO.

      Another vote for GetDataBack for NTFS. IT has worked well for me.

    10. Re:GetDataBack by xaustinx · · Score: 1

      R-studio as long a the drive spins it will work..., i've even been able to recover data from drives where were perpetually clicking (although not much, and the user didn't want to pay a data recovery service).... its works 99/100 times for me.. it can recover file names, directory names, etc.. unless the data has been overwritten...in which case it will only recover the part of the data which hasn't been overwritten yet... have retrieved deleted files that were several years old... cannot recommend it enough.

  5. Well by ledow · · Score: 4, Informative

    ddrescue

    But to be honest, if you've hit that point for an "enthusiast" user, then you're already on your last legs. If you ain't got a backup, forget it - the chances of getting one particular file you've lost might be good, the chances of recovering any significant amounts and being able to verify their integrity are bad.

    Plus, with SSD's, flash, memory cards, etc. the chances of being able to recover *anything* from a faulty drive without professional equipment are fast approaching zero. Most USB Flash drives just "die" when they hit their write limits, rather than fail gracefully into read-only mode.

    1. Re:Well by bonehead · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's one that's saved my butt several times.

      Often times when a drive fails it's not the physical mechanism that goes bad, it's something on the circuit board. If you can find an identical drive (should be pretty easy in a corporate environment, could be tricky for a home user), just carefully remove the board from the good drive and install it on the bad one. You'd be surprised how many times that "totally dead" hard drive will start working like new.

      The software solutions are great for some situations, but they can't do anything if the drive isn't even visible to them.

    2. Re:Well by h.ross.perot · · Score: 1

      Today's high capacity drives "tune" them selves in relation to the platter, heads and drive electronics. Years ago you could swap PCB and get your data back 100%. Not today. I know, we do this sort of stuff all day long..

      --
      ... I'll have a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster with a side of Plutonium Nyborg ...
    3. Re:Well by bonehead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When did this start? I had to do this at home not to long ago to save some data from a relatively recent 500GB drive. That worked out fine.

      I'm not doubting you, just curious.

    4. Re:Well by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      So explain to me why the OP method has worked for me as well... In recent history.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    5. Re:Well by _|()|\| · · Score: 1

      If you can find an identical drive (should be pretty easy in a corporate environment, could be tricky for a home user), just carefully remove the board from the good drive and install it on the bad one.

      I gave up on a drive that had a visible burn mark on one of the chips. My brother-in-law, who usually comes to me for advice, found a similar drive and swapped the circuit board, recovering irreplaceable pictures. As impressed as I was by this technical feat, it only encouraged me to be ever vigilant in backing up my data.

    6. Re:Well by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I've had a fairly godo success rate of recovering files from flash media (SD, CF, etc.) in the event of user error. It's happened a couple times where they mistakenly format the card or delete files accidentally. photorec (part of the 'testdisk' package) works wonders; I've only -not- recovered one image file using it (and that was because it was partially overwritten, so I got 2/3 the file).

      Pretty much anything beyond that, though, is a straight suggestion to have it shipped off to a proper data recovery firm without any further tampering. If you've got to muck with the hardware, chances are you need a cleanroom environment. Not much doin' there for even your uber geek variety.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    7. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago you could swap PCB and get your data back 100%. Not today. I know, we do this sort of stuff all day long..

      Why do you do it all day long if it doesn't work?

    8. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have done this and it has worked on many occasions. Before I figured that out I actually pulled the platter out of a drive and put them in an identical drive. It worked but now that I think back at everything that could have gone wrong...

    9. Re:Well by Wintermute__ · · Score: 1

      I'm curious which particular drives you've had trouble with? Because like some others here, I've had success doing this with recent vintage "high capacity" drives.

      You do have to watch out for board revisions, etc. to make sure you're actually using an identical board, not just one that fits.

      Not doubting you, I'm just curious for more specifics. I wouldn't discount this method out of hand, it may be just certain drives that have this problem.

    10. Re:Well by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      I believe you also need to check the firmware version on the drive circuit board to be sure of this maneuver. I've heard if you have the wrong firmware it might not work. Don't know if that's true or how common that problem would be, however. If the data is critical, I'd check or forget it and give it to a recovery outfit.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    11. Re:Well by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      You may have run across a similar issue a friend of mine did. He had the same model # drives and swapped the board with no luck. He checked for any differences and they had different build dates and different firmware versions. He went and found a 100% identical model/month/firmware and it worked just fine. I know from personal experience that different firmware versions in the same model can also have different physical properties. Had fun trying to rebuild an array once where the version I had was a few megs smaller than the ones in use so it refused to rebuild itself.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    12. Re:Well by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      So explain to me why the OP method has worked for me as well... In recent history.

      I suspect you'll find the answer is luck. As the drives age and sectors go bad the drive controller maps the bad sectors as 'bad' and moves the data from them to somewhere else. It used to be a section on the actual drive that contained the bad sector data but I think that it was moved to flash memory on the drive controller to squeeze little extra bits of performance out of the drive. You probably swapped two controllers that didn't have any bad sectors.

      I lost interest in the nitty gritty of how drives work some time ago so I could be wrong.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    13. Re:Well by jra · · Score: 1

      I have done board swaps to recover data back to the 170MB SCSI half-height 5.25 days.

      It is generally much easier on SCSI and corporate drives, since they don't rev the boards as frequently.

      If you're buying a whole bunch of identical drives for a project, buy and bag a few spares for precisely this purpose, and mark them as such.

      There's actually a guy in New Jersey somewhere, can't find his name anymore, who has a warehouse full of drives for precisely this purpose, and will let you *fax him a xerox of the drive board*, and walk his warehouse looking for your drive, and then sell it to you, for 3 or 4 times retail. Saved my ass a couple times...

  6. None! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Real professionals never lose their data.

    1. Re:None! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Real professionals backup their data.

    2. Re:None! by tiggertaebo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm kinda hoping your trying to be amusing here, if you are though its gone under my humour radar today (and I apologise if I seem like an arse)

      Yes most "professionals" will have backups of their data (which is what I presume you are alluding to) however it's not always the case that those backups will be literally up to the minute, and sometimes its just less hassle to recover any lost "recent" data then it is to just cycle to the last backup and deal with the shortfall. Also its not exactly uncommon for "professionals" to be asked to help recover data for NON-professionals.

    3. Re:None! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you can recover any lost "recent" data in less than 20 minutes, then by all means do it.

      Otherwise, tell me which is preferable to management:

      1) Spending 20-30 minutes restoring the file from last night's backup
      2) Spending 2-3 hours, hacking FAT tables on a PC

      Restoring from backup is a known cost (of labor), whereas hacking file tables isn't. Could take hours, during which you are getting less real work done.

    4. Re:None! by Amouth · · Score: 1

      Backups by definition can't be real time - Mirrors can.. but you wouldn't need to recover data if you have a Mirror.

      Out side of experienceing unknown failure of a backup you shouldn't be trying to recover anything.

      When ever you design your backup strategy you have to define the amount of data that is willing to be lost - then design around that and your budget.

      and i don't care what anyone says.. zero loss is never truly achievable.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    5. Re:None! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure why the moderators decided the parent posts were flamebait: at worst, by not recommending some product, they might be considered off-topic.

      But the simple fact is that the surest way to keep your data is to back it up, back it up more than once, and to VERIFY your backups. Of course that doesn't help if we're having to salvage someone else's fuckup, but at least you can say "Everybody told you so".

    6. Re:None! by jon3k · · Score: 1

      "Backups by definition can't be real time - Mirrors can.. but you wouldn't need to recover data if you have a Mirror."

      Not necessarily. A true mirror would also mirror deletes. So, if someone accidentally deleted a file, the delete would be mirrored and then you may still need to recover it.

    7. Re:None! by Amouth · · Score: 1

      recover it from what? a backup maybe

      again you define the time frame for information to be lost.. ours is 12 hours.. if someone deletes a file we give them the previous version from the last 12 mark (noon/midnight) if they created and deleted it within that mark too bad so sad..

      and what you said is the truth a mirror is real time.. it is not a backup .. backup's can't be real time.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    8. Re:None! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real professionals backup their data.

      And REAL professionals know that nothing goes according to plan, and have tools for other contingencies.

  7. I Like Knoppix with a Good BIOS by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not a pro in this department although I've saved a lot of partial data from hard drives for some friends (I'll be very interested in these comments).

    I use a live CD of Knoppix which has really good system repair and troubleshooting. I also have another important tool which is an old Dell Intel motherboard that allows me to set the rotational speed of the drive. Example: my friend's laptop is giving him the click of death so I pop out the IDE drive and hook it up to a 2.5" to 3.5" connector and plug it into the motherboard with a working 1TB 3.5" slaved. On boot up, I hit the BIOS and set the speed as low as it can go or low enough like 1,000 RPM. Then I boot into Knoppix live CD and check to see if I can mount the file system. Knoppix seems to be able to mount a lot of partitions that other more stringent flavors of Linux don't. Sometimes it clicks from the get go and there's nothing you can do. But if it doesn't, then I set a script up to copy their most valuable directories first onto the working 1TB drive. I let it run all night or weekend and check the drive periodically for heat problems. People are surprised what you can save for them doing this ... the downside is sometimes I'm surprised in what I save for people--p0rn is not worth my time.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Like Knoppix with a Good BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your friends drunk at a party, showing off their boobs

      why would you want pictures of manboobs?
      because surely you can't mean you have female friends!? that would just be... weird... and definitely not like most of the geeks on here...

    2. Re:I Like Knoppix with a Good BIOS by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Knoppix is used here as well, and it can help you to save your data in many situations. One suggestion: not every network card is supported by the standard knoppix distributions, so either you burn a custom knoppix CD tailored for your system, or you keep a disk at hand with the appropriate drivers.

    3. Re:I Like Knoppix with a Good BIOS by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      Vote here, too. A few times something got corrupt in the NTFS filesystem on seperate machines. Windows would start to boot, but once the ntfs driver loaded... BSOD! Even WindowsPE discs, same result. If I booted PE fully and attached the drive via USB adaptor ... BSOD!

      Knoppix (or any linux I'd imagine) was able to read the drive & files with no problem.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    4. Re:I Like Knoppix with a Good BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if it is personal p0rn? You can't remake those movies from your twenties when you're sixty. Same as you cannot get back your baby pictures when you are no longer a baby. I have friends with an excellent photo 'collection' of their long life together that they like to share on occasion. It is all quite tasteful by the way, just a little unusual. In retrospect, I wish my wife and I had done the same, though I am not sure I would be so free in sharing the images with friends.

    5. Re:I Like Knoppix with a Good BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is changing the spindle speed the same as adjusting the IDE acoustic mode? I'm looking for an entry in the IDE spec because I had no idea that rotational speed is software selectable on some drives. Thanks...

    6. Re:I Like Knoppix with a Good BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is changing the spindle speed the same as adjusting the IDE acoustic mode? I'm looking for an entry in the IDE spec because I had no idea that rotational speed is software selectable on some drives. Thanks...

      Hitachi's tool for setting speed. If you look at how that works it might point you in the right direction.

  8. Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have had decent results with GetDataBack , R-studio, active@'s software in a few cases

    ddrescue is convenient.

    Trinity Rescue kit may help you.

    I'd get people to make regular backups (force it if i have to) and then restore off the backup though most likely.

    1. Re:Software by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Not free, but I have paid for a copy of Active@Boot (www.ntfs.com - http://www.ntfs.com/boot-disk.htm). It boots into Windows PE and lets you access the drives (as well as the Network/Internet). I restored to a network mounted drive since I was recovering a laptop drive and had no way of physically mounting it into my desktop. Boots from CD or USB. Some other features that you may or may not use, but the drive recovery was very effective (including across multiple repartitions, formats, and installs of windows).

      There is a free trial.

    2. Re:Software by miggyb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. Trinity Rescue Kit is all you need if you're getting your mother's vacations pictures from a hard drive that isn't fully dead yet. That and a fridge

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
  9. R-Studio by CodyRazor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back when most data recovery and disk utility applications didnt work on vista (and many still dont) I found one called r-studio. It managed to recover a whole lot of data of a damaged flaky 5TB Raid 5 array, which is pretty impressive considering it was the only application at the time that could even recognize it as a drive, all the others just call it a damaged volume.

    As far as I know its still the only one that can do Raids, at least as far as I can find. It also allows many customization options of searches and donest over simplify things too much. It takes forever but it finds any potential damaged file systems and then lets you use whichever one you like to recover whichever files you like. It can also be used to recover deleted files.

    As far as I recall its pretty cheap, at least compared to a few out there and worth a try. But with all recovery and security software, I find the information and their website extremely generalized and vague about what exactly you can do, so I always download the software first to make sure it can do what I want, which 90% of the time it cant, and then if it works I buy it. Its not the most legal practice but if they dont offer demos and wont be specific about what their software does its the only practical solution.

    --
    So Skulldilocks threw acid on the schoolchildrens' faces, cause somebody from the bible told her to do it!
    1. Re:R-Studio by mcvickj · · Score: 1

      Another nod to R-Studio. Two weekends ago I plugged in my portable hard drive via eSATA and Vista decided to run a CHKDISK on the drive and it did something to the drive where none of the files were being displayed. I started to really panic because I had almost 400GB of data on this portable drive. After some Google searching I found R-Studio. Ran the scan on the drive in demo mode and it found everything. I paid the $49.99 for the NTFS version and I was able to retrieve all of the data. The price was well worth it IMO.

    2. Re:R-Studio by Adlopa · · Score: 1

      +1 to R-Studio here, too. The NTFS edition has saved my bacon a few times, though the company's refusal to resupply the reg key for my purchased copy (after I lost the email with the original) sent me elsewhere.

    3. Re:R-Studio by bryxal · · Score: 1

      I for one second the R-Studio. I used it and it worked well many times for me especially when dealing with broken RAID arrays. BUT I recently had to use UFS Explorer http://www.ufsexplorer.com/ because of a XFS partition and it was easier to use than R-Studio and supported more file systems, also their website has a whole bunch of tips as to how to identify what ordering the RAID drives are in for RAID 5 arrays and such.

    4. Re:R-Studio by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      I've used "Quetek File Scavenger". It allows you to define a raid array from individual disks, including raid 5 with missing disks.

    5. Re:R-Studio by rivaldufus · · Score: 1

      In addition to R-studio, http://www.runtime.org/raid.htm works on RAID, especially in combination of getdataback.
      I am rather fond of R-studio, though, as it supports UFS and UFS2. Most recovery tools only seem to suppott fat32, fat16, ntfs, and ext3.

    6. Re:R-Studio by EricTheO · · Score: 1

      Twice over the past 10 years I have had to recover data from a hard-drive. I used R-Studio both times. I found it easy to use and very effective at recovering and organizing the data.

      --
      -Eric
    7. Re:R-Studio by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      I accidentally began to format a drive with a lot of important data on it back in college (never try to install an operating system while drunk). I came across R-Studio and downloaded the demo. If I remember correctly, the demo allows you to do everything the full version does short of actually recovering the files. It allows you to get familiar with the program and see what data is recoverable. I immediately bought the full version after that and saved about 95% of my data. Now if I could just find the CD with the installer...

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
  10. Knoppix with a Drive Adaptor by Push+Latency · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For your health!

  11. This question exists on Serverfault.com by Alt_Cognito · · Score: 1, Informative
  12. My .02 by NES+HQ · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not to be a smartass, but...

    For the folks (family and friends) that seem to think I'm a free computer repair store I told them to go buy a cheap USB hard drive and just set up a quick and dirty batch file to back things up nightly (or weekly, depending on how big their files are).

    I've told them to do this or there's a good chance that I won't be able to recover their files if their PC crashes. This is an easy solution, cheap, and requires virtually no end-user interaction. That last bit is especially important since I've found that they typically ignore even the easiest backup procedures (e.g. copy C:\My Documents to D:\).

    As for the original question, I still do attempt file recovery for the stubborn ones who ignore my backup advice. I've had moderate success with various pieces of software. Just Googled "hard disk recovery software." Interestingly enough, different programs have recovered different data on the same HDDs...

    1. Re:My .02 by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Not to be a smartass, but...

      For the folks (family and friends) that seem to think I'm a free computer repair store

      I have way too many people like that in my life.

      I imagine they all think my talents have been dwindling over the years. These days, more often than not, I just tell them that I wouldn't have the slightest clue what to do about their problem (even if it's an easy one).

      When I was young and single, it didn't bother me so much. But now I have a wife and kids that I like to spend my free time with, so I've decided to discourage the behavior by simply being entirely useless anytime anyone calls with a computer problem.

      These days you only get my services if you:
      1) Live in my house
      2) Raised me
      3) Sign my paychecks.

    2. Re:My .02 by NES+HQ · · Score: 1
      Hah, I agree completely. I don't mind good friends and close family, but I get irritated when my best friend's wife's sister calls for tech support, when my friend's parents call for tech support, or when the uncle I see once every two years wanted me to completely analyze his website for SEO (not my normal field, BTW).

      Anyway, I like your policy.

    3. Re:My .02 by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Oh, I almost forgot the most important policy.

      In the rare instances that I do agree to help someone out, NEVER, under any circumstances do I do phone support. I'm not going to spend 10 minutes explaining to someone how to find the information that I need when I could see it in a split second if the computer was in front of me.

      If you want me to work on your computer, and by some miracle I agree, then you will drop it off at my house, and I'll get to it at my convenience. It may be awhile. If you need it in the next day or two, try Geek Squad. If you don't mind waiting, I think I have some free time the weekend after next......

    4. Re:My .02 by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah - learn to make house calls to fix computers. It gets you laid (as in : having sex with a real woman.)

      The trick is, pay attention to the computer for a while (ignoring the woman.) Then set it off doing something that's going to take a half hour or so (defragging the hard drive or backing up to an external) and explain - well, that's going to take an hour ... what can we do that will keep me busy while that thing works? Then the clothes start flying off.

      Hey, it could happen!

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    5. Re:My .02 by NES+HQ · · Score: 1

      Thank you, this almost made me spit my coffee out! Sounds like the plot of this movie I saw on HBO at 2 AM one ti... ah, nevermind!

    6. Re:My .02 by maxume · · Score: 1

      Something like FreeFileSync has lots of advantages over a batch file:

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/freefilesync/

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:My .02 by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is, before I even got to your post I was envisioning this exact scenario and was considering starting a business on the side doing house calls.

    8. Re:My .02 by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work out that way.

      In reality you'll find that she just wants you to get her computer running so she can fire up her web cam and cyber with the dude she met in some chat room a few days ago. And she'll jabber on and on about how great he is the whole time you're there.

      If you're lucky, she'll have beer in the fridge and offer you one or two while you work, but that's about all you can realistically hope for.

      But be sure to get the name of that chat room before you leave! :-)

    9. Re:My .02 by tinkerghost · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sad thing is, before I even got to your post I was envisioning this exact scenario and was considering starting a business on the side doing house calls.

      Even sadder, is I do this for a living - onsite, in home repair & installation - and the reality is they just whine about having to pay you for watching the progress bar. Pickup & dropoff involves so much less whining.

    10. Re:My .02 by bonehead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to do the in-home thing on the side several years back. Even at $100 an hour for regular home users, I had enough business going that I could almost have quit my day job.

      But, you're right. Home users whine way, way too much. They also have no concept of "business hours". They don't think twice about calling you at 10:00 pm to ask why some website won't load. They also seem to honestly and truly believe that their blown power supply is your fault because you installed Office on their computer 6 weeks ago ("Well OF COURSE I expect you to fix it for free! You broke my computer you son of a bitch!").

      In the end, I decided that while the money was pretty decent, my sanity was more valuable.

    11. Re:My .02 by joh6nn · · Score: 1

      experiencing this exact phenomenon has forever changed the way i interact with my mechanic

      --
      i am a loser geek, crazy with an evil streak, yes i do believe there is a violent thing inside of me.
    12. Re:My .02 by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Having done some time in home repair I can only agree with The Onion, It's not as glamorous as the porn movies make it out to be. Different industry but house calls are house calls.

    13. Re:My .02 by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      There was a guy on Craigslist who actually advertised this sort of..."service".

      No, it wasn't me.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  13. Freeware does the job. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Work your way through this list. Unless you're a corporate entity with a large purse, it's probably going to be a freeware app they use too (unless they have a suite which covers many types of media and file systems). They make money from companies, not end users.

    Further Info: I phoned a Tamworth, UK-based company (Google it if you're bothered) regarding recovering a file from a USB drive for a teacher where I tech. They asked what I did so far to recover the file, I said I'd run some freeware recovery tool. They told me that's all they'd do, as they don't make money spending any more than about 5 minutes on it. If that can't find it, and you don't have hundreds / thousands of pounds to spend on engineer time, it's the best you'll get.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Freeware does the job. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hate to reply to my own comment, but some pointers;
      • Clone disks before you work on them.
      • Never work on the original disk
      • Never boot the original disk. Swapping can overwrite data which has been deleted permenantly.
      • "Deep" scans are a nightmare. Often the names are not restored, you get block-by-block groups of sectors instead of contiguous files, and converting them to any useable data structure is why these recovery firms can charge through the nose.
      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Freeware does the job. by Barny · · Score: 1

      Most important thing, don't spend too much time on it, time is money and most people don't like paying.

      I do load the original disk (from a live linux CD) and try mount -oro, if that doesn't work, I tell the cust sorry, no can do, if it does, rsync -Pr to our storage server and write up a bill :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  14. Spinrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spinrite

    1. Re:SpinRite by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
      Disclaimer: this is a redundant posting but I wanted to make sure the author of the comment saw my post which quotes a blog entry by Scott A. Moulton who is a forensic and data recovery expert and currently teaches the SANS 606: Drive and Data Recovery Forensics course.

      Quoted from here:

      Spinrite is not data recovery software. I get many questions about why I left off Spinrite on my recommendations of recovery software. I specifically leave off Spinrite because under the strictest terms it is not data recovery software. Almost every single data recovery package knows, and will warn you not to write the data back to the original source drive. Data Recovery/Forensics software almost always recover from a source to a destination. Spinrite does not do that, it refreshes the surface and controls reads to get the maximum amount of data from the sectors and then puts it back down on the same drive.

      I think it does quite a few things very well and it does an excellent job at reporting and reading the SMART info and refreshing the surface of the hard drive. However, I would like to first try to get the data from the drive before scanning it and trying to rebuild sectors. There are many reasons for this, but the most important one being that the drive can die in the process of running Spinrite. It is possible to do more damage to the drive by doing excessive read and writes. There are times that you only get once [sic] good chance at data and if you use a tool that just goes in and surgically removes the data you want BEFORE doing the scan you will be a lot safer.

      If I was going to use Spinrite, I would get everything I could off the drive to another destination first and then use Spinrite to try to get anything I could not repair (although I never have to with the tools I use). Another horrific story I have seen with drives sent to me, is that if Spinrite it runs successfully, people are under the impression that the drive is repaired and is usable again and continue to use it. Big mistake and it usually dies again shortly. On a Windows Hard Drive I would try NTFSExplorer/FatExplorer first in the hopes of doing a surgical recovery as oppose to spending days rewriting sectors in the hopes that my drive can live though it as Spinrite does. But for $80 it is well worth the attempt if you are going to do nothing else. Good Luck.

      Oct 6, 2008 11:26 PM ~ Scott A. Moulton

      Also, you can find some very interesting papers/presentations/videos here.

  15. Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by argent · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pros make sure they have good backups. Pros tell their users "nothing on your laptop/desktop is backed up", make that corporate policy, and respond to virus infestations by re-imaging the victim's computers to make sure that everyone's too damn scared of Mordac the Preventer to keep anything on local storage.

    1. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by jumpingfred · · Score: 5, Funny

      No the pro install nightly backup tools on the laptops. At least they do on mine.The backup software then uses heuristic algorithms to start the backups when the laptop is being used for meeting presentations in front of many people.

    2. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      That works just fine until a computer illiterate employee didn't back up their files, spent weeks making a file, the HD gives the click of death and your boss says how he read about recovering data from a broken HD and if you can't do it he can "find someone else".

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you're confusing BoFH with Pros.

      --
    4. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      And middle-management tells pros "we don't have budget for backup systems!"

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you have mission critical data, and do not have a backup system, then you are not a professional organization; you are a mom & pop shop.

      just because you earn your paycheck by doing the "IT stuff" for a company does not make you a professional.

    6. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Yup... In this case, an ounce of prevention is worth several tons of cure. I was in this situation, and ended up using AD group policy to redirect everyone's My Docs to a server directory that I could back up. Then just make sure everyone knows that *everything* important has to go in there. Fortunately, most stuff defaults to saving there.

      It only took one round of "oh no, I accidentally deleted X, and spent HOURS on it!!" "Was it in your My Documents?" "No" "Sorry, can't help." for everyone to get the hint.

      Plus it means that any time someone messes up their machine, you can just tell them to get a coffee, and push a fresh image onto it.

    7. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by argent · · Score: 1

      And middle-management tells pros "we don't have budget for backup systems!"

      Pros implement backup systems anyway.

    8. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the grandparent said, the pros tell users "nothing on your laptop/desktop is backed up" ;)

      Save your shit on the server and it gets backed up. Save it on your desktop and your desktop dies, to bad. New drive, new image, you're working again, save your shit on the server this time or next time you might get fired for loosing your shit.

      That's been the corporate policy at every place I've worked. Why spend the time, money, and resources to backup user's workstations when they can be recovered in 20 minutes from an image? Save your data to the server and it gets backed up, period.

    9. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That works just fine until a computer illiterate employee didn't back up their files, spent weeks making a file, the HD gives the click of death and your boss says how he read about recovering data from a broken HD and if you can't do it he can "find someone else".

      Been there, done that, got quotes from vendors, got approval from the CFO, hand-carried the disk over to the top data recovery house in Houston, and they failed to get the files back,

      Professionals don't fight battles they can only lose, and always have a plan B.

    10. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      Yup... In this case, an ounce of prevention is worth several tons of cure. I was in this situation, and ended up using AD group policy to redirect everyone's My Docs to a server directory that I could back up. Then just make sure everyone knows that *everything* important has to go in there. Fortunately, most stuff defaults to saving there.

      This is probably the most important policy you can implement in a business environment. Not only does it make fixing a broken PC trivial, it makes moving people from one location to another equally trivial - they move & log in - problem solved. Add to that the ability to ensure that all the files are backed up on time & life is good.

      As an alternative to having to re-load an image, you can either keep a drive with the image already installed or my preference, a spare PC fully ready to install. In either case, swap it out, change the PC name & rebuild the image at your convenience.

    11. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're confusing BOfH with Pros.

      There's considerable overlap. Some end users will never meet anyone that only fits one of these categories.

      Sometimes because the end user is simply unlucky, sometimes because the end user is a pompous besuited dickhead that only the BOfH are capable of tolerating (and then, only because cats like to play with their food).

    12. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes even real pros with backups, under the influence of pharmaceuticals, will delete naked pics of their exes to please the current psycho girlfriend using military grade delete on the disc and the daily, monthly, and weekly backup. Dangit.

    13. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this scenario I see a major flaw. Either you create a quota for peoples my docs folder, or you wind up backing up mp3s, videos, pictures of their nephews first day at camp etc. Im not certain about you but it gets pretty expensive to assume that all email and all docs and all documents are backed up automatically. Try baby sitting end users and telling them that a 14gb archive is unreasonable, or that 20gb of pictures does not belong on the server or that mail is not the proper repository for file retrieval and storage. Weigh the cost of baby sitting hand holding and arguing about why they need to delete files and, then think about whether or not every file needs to be automatically considered back up worthy.

      Secondly anything that does need to be backed up goes into a limited home folder on the network and they are responsible for placing it there. If they need to access certain files when working from home then this is mapped via gpo, and accessible thru VPN or on the terminal Server..

      Backing Up/Archiving everything is not a realistic option. It is wasteful expensive time consuming and unsustainable form a growth perspective.

      Marcus

    14. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP was making backups of the laptops. His policy was to tell users that "nothing on your laptop/desktop is backed up".
      Also a good way to prevent local data is to explain that hard new drives always break during the the first 3 month or after a couple of years. Yes, your 2 weeks old laptop will probably die tomorrow.
      And don't forget backup rule #0: If you think about backups, you DO NOT finish whatever you are doing before making a backup.

    15. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Or as another option, if you have a decently fast network and lots of room on the servers, you can just setup roaming profiles for the users. That way their desktop follows them where ever they go and if their PC crashes, you can just give them anotehr one and the profile will load itself from the server. The down side is that the profiles tend to grow rather quickly if you have users who are in the habit of saving a lot of files to their desktop.

    16. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you dont have money for backups then you certainly dont have money for me, because the amount of time (and therefore money) that will be required to recover worthwhile data without backups can be exponentially larger than keeping decent backups in the first place. if you work for a company that is too tightfisted to keep from getting themselves fucked, they'll certainly be too tightfisted to get themselves un-fucked. IRL you cant get un-fucked, but if you could how much do you think it would cost? That should begin to give middle management an idea of what they're fucking with.

    17. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my office we run weekly backups on our smaller servers and nightly backups on our vital ones. That way we have a fairly recent reference point, just in case. For specific workstations, we just re-image. Every PC in our two domains has about one local profile, the local admin. Every computer uses roaming profiles instead.

    18. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a GPO redirecting My Documents to U:. I considered redirecting the desktop to U:\Desktop, but I never bothered with it. Unfortunately, I started to learn--the hard way--that nobody listened to me, and it became my fault when users lost stuff they put on the desktop.

      I redirected desktops to U:\Desktop, and one user called me screaming. She had about 10 GB of crap on her desktop, and the copy process was taking a while...

      There were a few extremely stubborn users who intentionally stored stuff in C:\Documents and Settings\username ... and, of course, one of them lost everything. Of course, I got the riot act for it, and nobody listened. Did I mention I don't work there anymore?

    19. Re:Pros avoid having to use data recovery tools. by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      What's a naked pic of an executable look like? Can it be UPX'd?

      Or did you mean ex's?

      LOL

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  16. dd by locofungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    dd if=/dev/sdb of=dump.img bs=512 conv=noerror,sync iflag=direct

    Once a drive has started failing the first thing you want to do is get as good a copy of everything as you can manage. If it's a physical problem, especially if it's a damaged platter, then it tends to get worse as the drive is used. Get everything off and then work on the copy.

    Tim.

    --
    God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    1. Re:dd by greed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the other hand, if it's a thermal problem, you may have to rescue in "chunks". I had a disk go that could only be used for about 10 minutes before it got too warm and shut down.

      On the third hand, you may have something that looks like physical damage, but when you wipe the disk with zeros to confirm the fault and get ready for RMA-time, it all magically comes back. That's a sign you got corrupted data on the disk that the ECC couldn't deal with. (And probably that you've got a drive with questionable firmware, and is reporting the wrong kind of error: Fujitsu, I'm looking at you. Especially for not recording anything in the SMART counters.)

    2. Re:dd by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ddresuce (or dd_rescue) is a better choice here, because instead it will write zeros in place of read errors, so that successfully read block later on are in the right place. You can also set it to retry error block multiple times, and record progress to a log file so you can resume the retries at a later time.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    3. Re:dd by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Good points. I've never tried to recover a drive that fails for thermal reasons. Infact I've never seen a drive fail like this (not saying it doesn't happen)

      I've recovered drives that have had an obvious head crash (computer was dropped down the stairs and certain chunks of the disk became unreadable and spread) and those with just corrupted data where the drive itself was rescued once the corrected sectors were dd back.

      And I've recovered drives where getting the disk to start was the problem. One instance I had to manually twist the drive as violently as I could as I turned the power on to the computer. That was enough to unstick the platters to start them spinning although you could hear them winding up in speed over about 15 seconds once they were going. This seems to be a fairly common problem with disks that are never stopped. Eventually you have to shut down the computer and then the disk won't start again.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    4. Re:dd by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I would do at my old job. I had one hard drive that I used for data recovery, I would dd using the bad drive as the input and the data recovery drive as the output, then you can do all the data recovery you want on the good drive. Sometimes I didn't even need to do anything else, and the recovery drive would have all of the files I needed in a readable form.

    5. Re:dd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you first try to copy a the most recent or important files, and then try to copy the whole disk. Running dd on a problematic drive could kill it before you get the the important files.

    6. Re:dd by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I had a disk that'd do that - start throwing errors shortly after 10-15 minutes of use. It was LOUD (likely dried out silicon lube). I put it in a ziplock in the freezer for fifteen minutes, gave it a whack with the back of a screwdriver, and kept a cold pack (wrapped in a washcloth to prevent moisture from accumulating) on it while I recovered. It was fun. Sometimes tech work is like trying to balance a car on a needle, but when you're able to make it work, man is it satisfying.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    7. Re:dd by prograde · · Score: 1

      Even better, use GNU ddrescue (basically, an intelligent wrapper for dd).

      It will reads larger blocks when it can, smaller ones when it's finding errors, writes a log file and allows resuming.

      I'll go you one better - make a copy, then make a copy of the copy, then recover the 2nd generation copy. That way, you avoid a second pass through the failing drive.

    8. Re:dd by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That doesn't seem like a very good idea. Today's drives are huge and take forever to copy - on the order of hours for dd to do its thing. In most circumstances, with dd you'll be copying 99% worthless crap, like the operating system, installed games, downloaded stuff that can be downloaded again, and lots of empty space - meanwhile the clock is ticking. You'd almost certainly be better off chasing after the important data on the drive right away, which is probably less than a gig, and maybe a few gigs at most.

  17. TRK - dd/dd_rescue/ddrescue, Restorer by millisa · · Score: 5, Informative

    My favorite tools are a combination of the Trinity Rescue Kit linux boot cd and the Restorer tool.

    It depends on the type of failure, but generally, I start with a ddrescue to get an image of the drive, especially if the drive is running bad sectors. Either I set the image to go to a secondary spare drive or I push it across the network. ddrescue is nice in that it doesn't bail when it hits those bad sectors, can run in reverse mode, and eventually it'll get as much as isn't corrupt on the drive into the image.

    After establishing the image, the original failed drives go into ESD bags and aren't touched again unless they are to get shipped to one of the expensive clean room type places for their style recovery.

    Most of the win32 drive recovery softwares out there can handle reading from an image file, so from here on out, I work with the images I took with ddrescue. Restorer has worked pretty well for me on getting things back from hard drives, CF cards, and even raid sets (figuring out the cluster sizes on the raid can be a pain if you don't happen to know them, but the software does support reassembling raid drives from the images you take of the single drives).

    Most of the win32 packages out there have support for making the original images, but I haven't had as much luck with most of them when dealing with severely corrupted drives or with a large scattering of bad sectors. Either they take far too long to make it through the image or they end up failing to get by the bad sectors.

    Regardless of what you end up picking, you don't want to use any of the recovery tools that advertise how they can fix the partition table and such on the drive, live . . . any recovery operation that thinks it is ok to 'fix' a drive with data on it you want to recover has the wrong mindset. The data is important, not making the drive work again.

    1. Re:TRK - dd/dd_rescue/ddrescue, Restorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also use ddrescue and the Rescue Kit. I have added Adroit Photo Recovery to recover fragmented photos from the disk images or memory cards.

    2. Re:TRK - dd/dd_rescue/ddrescue, Restorer by visionbeyond · · Score: 1

      Well stated and correct. I've unfortunately been thrown the task (as many in the IT world get daily) more than once to recover deleted files from a employee no longer with the company, or just recover files from a damaged system or hard drive. Usually the option of paying a recovering shop $2000 - $5000 to retrieve the data isn't even a consideration for an option, although definitely preferred. First and foremost I make an exact copy of the drive using the dd utility, such as the following: dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=512 conv=noerror,sync Then all recovery is done on the copy made, so worst case scenario and everything including the cat goes south, it's no harm - no foul, since you can just make another copy and try again. Which tool to use really depends on what type of data your trying to recover, as each program targets specific functionality. Many do just try to repair partition tables, which is generally not what you want. I've had great success using ddrescue, and is probably my preferred - again, depending on what your goal in recovery is. Another great tool is http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk (Testdisk) which works well. Others that are a little more involved to operate and setup are http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s042078/magicrescue/manpage.html (magicrescue) and http://www.sleuthkit.org/sleuthkit/ (the sleuthkit) and there is some good information at http://dftt.sourceforge.net/ (http://dftt.sourceforge.net/) which might provide help and insight. No matter how you look at it though, your in for a fun ride, so best to stock up on pain killers and red bull.

  18. foremost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out open source tools for 'file carving' like foremost
    https://wiki.remote-exploit.org/backtrack/wiki/Foremost

    its open source and avail on backtrack live-cd's

    1. Re:foremost by techwrench · · Score: 0

      I have used Foremost, and have to agree with the parent. I rescued data off a overburned DVD that nothing else would touch.

      --
      It's You and I against the World... When do we attack?
  19. Great little tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This tool has saved me many times from various issues when it comes to Windows.

    http://www.ntfs.com/boot-disk.htm

  20. EASEUS Disk Copy by dinkdinkdink · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have had success with the *free* EASEUS Disk Copy boot CD - http://www.easeus.com/download.htm [easeus.com]. It will perform a bit for bit copy from the defective drive to a new organ-doner drive. I believe you have the option to continue the copy, even on erroneous sectors. On a recent drive in the early stages of failing, I was able to recover the entire disk after I did the bit-for-bit copy and then performed a error check/fix on boot-up. The standard Windows XP error check tool corrected all of the previously mangled bits.

  21. its the mechanical failures by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    that keep the expensive guys in business

    if all data loss were just a matter of awesome software, then wonderful. but frequently you are dealing with mechanical failures like the write head crashing onto the platters, death of the controller, failing motor, etc.

    no software is going to fix these things. then its to the $100/hr guys in the clean room

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:its the mechanical failures by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      then its to the $100/hr guys in the clean room

      You wish the clean room guys charged $100/hr. Most of them charge a grand or more just to evaluate the disk.

  22. Free Software always has a warm spot in my heart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boot up your favorite LiveCD and have a spare hard drive handy

    dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb conv=noerror,sync

    Of course, hda and hdb may vary depending on what you've got under the hood.
    When all is said and done, your spare hard drive is a great replacement.

  23. I find the most effective tool to be... by nih · · Score: 0

    format c:

    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
  24. Pros restore from backup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject line.

  25. Data recovery for pros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leather straps, thumbscrews, jumper cables... there's plenty.

  26. Spinrite works miracles by stenchcow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Spinrite has worked miracles in the past for me. It's brought back unbootable corrupted windows partitions back to life for me. Supposedly it also fixes physical defects in hard drives as well. It boots off of a image from disc. It costs $89.00 but it's saved my butt in the past.

    1. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as it sounds like snake oil (software that fixes physical defects? wtf?) I have also found it to be good at getting data back from drives that are starting to develop bad sectors.

    2. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Glonoinha · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was using Spinright back in the 90's - it was awesome then, but I wasn't aware they are still around.

      I endorse the package from the 90s and if it is the same guys I'm tempted to endorse them today.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    3. Re:Spinrite works miracles by NetRanger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Same here. At $89, SpinRite is a bit on the pricey side, but I have recovered data from hard drives that I thought I had zero chance of saving. I figure since it saved hundreds of dollars in labor -- several times -- it was worth every penny. Especially in those circumstances where your highly paid datacenter techs thought it was a great idea to construct a RAID 5 from all identical hard drives from the exact same manufacturer lot. Sucks when two of those drives experience the exact same fault within a few minutes of each other. Fortunately I was able to whip out SpinRite and save the day, because otherwise we were looking at days and days of restoring from incremental backup tapes.

      It's an ancient-looking DOS command-line utility, but I definitely give props to Steve Gibson for keeping SpinRite up to date to where it works on modern hard drives. $89 versus days and days of overtime pay for IT guys -- it certainly made me look pretty good come performance review time.

      --
      -- We live in a world where lemonade is artificial and soap has real lemon.
    4. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I can agree with endorsing SpinRite. It is currently in version 6, and development on it continues. I've used it to restore raid arrays, desktop and laptop drives, and every time it has worked well enough to get the drive working to have the data moved off of it.

      Best $89 tool I've purchased in a long time.

      Also, for uber-critical backup data, always throw in some PARity recovery data, as an added layer of recovery security. I've had PAR files save my ass from damaged optical backups.

    5. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpinRite definitely works wonders. I've had recover data for myself, friends and family many times over. Well worth the money.

    6. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Spinrite here, although I'd call it more of a HD necromancer than a data recovery tool.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    7. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll chip in with a thing or two about SpinRite.

      Firstly, I have used it and agree that it's very good and does what it says. It takes advantage of at least some degree of knowledge of the mechanical properties of the actual physical disk, along with extremely low-level access (such as cleverly detecting the temperature of the disk on modern BIOSes and optionally waiting for it to cool down before continuing). Steve obviously knows what he's doing, and it's too bad that all of the technical documentation is written in market-ese; there's clearly a good knowledge of science and technology behind the product, but I can't follow much of it because the explanations of the principles of operation are virtually nonsensical. Obviously his strategy, but a shame for the rest of us (and possibly counter-productive - I almost dismissed it without a giving it a chance on account of its documentation, and only tried it in the end because I've used other programs by Steve that are exactly what he says they are).

      But I'll also add that it works by making modifications to the data on disk. As has been said many times here, it's a very good idea to make an image before you let this program loose. Honestly, if this program can't save it, then I don't know how much luck you'll have on the image, but it's a good habit to be in anyway. And besides, you should try working on the image first and only using SpinRite as a last resort. It's good, but if the disk is faulty then it's probably not going to be fast.

    8. Re:Spinrite works miracles by lcoughey · · Score: 1

      I strongly discourage SpinRite. I recently discussed this with an IT professional who didn't believe me. However, after running SpinRite on a drive that did detect before being run, the program did not complete and the drive no longer detected.

      When the drive was brought in for assessment, it was determined that the heads crashed and that the data was no longer recoverable. If we would have received the drive prior to SpinRite being run, we would have changed the heads and recovered the data. Instead, the end user lost everything.

      ...it only cost the tech $89 to destroy the client's drive. Nice.

    9. Re:Spinrite works miracles by JoeGarvey · · Score: 1

      So one user runs Spinrite on a drive with crashed heads, ruins the data, and this is somehow SpinRite's fault? I've used SpinRite on many (near)dead drives and have had success with it more often than not. My father bought his copy years ago, but it still works. Good program.

    10. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Informative

      SpinRite is no more capable of causing a head crash than Microsoft Excel is. If the heads crashed, they crashed. Don't blame SpinRite for it. That's like blaming a coolant failure for destroying your engine, when it fact it overheated because you ran out of oil.

    11. Re:Spinrite works miracles by eulernet · · Score: 1

      I think that SpinRite reformats and rewrites the sectors.
      That's not something you should use on a damaged hard-disk.
      And it's definitely SpinRite's fault in this case !

    12. Re:Spinrite works miracles by machine321 · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen what a weenie Steve Gibson has become while trying to stay relevant. You can blame him when you have to install WinPCAP just to use nmap or wireshark.

    13. Re:Spinrite works miracles by lcoughey · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that SpinRite is the cause of the final head crash. However, blindly running a program before dealing with physical issues will only lead to disaster.

      "Before using SpinRite on any system for the first time, BACK UPTHE HARD DISK'S DATA!" Page 7 of the SpinRite User Manual

      SpinRite remaps damaged sectors. If there are failing sectors on the drive, it may work, providing that the failing sectors aren't due to failing media or heads. A true data recovery program does not alter the original hard drive and does everything in its power to prevent the remapping of a sector. Once a sector is remapped, you cannot go back.

    14. Re:Spinrite works miracles by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --because otherwise we were looking at days and days of restoring from incremental backup tapes.--

      Always do full backups and then you don't have that problem. I never did incremental ones. A full one every time with plenty of tapes and a big enough tape backup drive.

    15. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpinRite continues to be developed by its original inventor, Steve Gibson. It is now at version 6.0 as of 2http://grc.com is his site.

    16. Re:Spinrite works miracles by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      When set at level 4, it reads, formats, rewrites and rereads all of the tracks on the disk. This is a maintenance mode. In level 2, it does straight reads (and corrections where necessary.)

    17. Re:Spinrite works miracles by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Spinrite here, although I'd call it more of a HD necromancer than a data recovery tool.
      --
      And then I will fuck the remains!

      Wow. Your .sig really goes... well... with your post.

    18. Re:Spinrite works miracles by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      True, if you had a head crash, you should not have used SpinRite... but it still isn't SpinRite's fault. It is likely that ANY repair (as opposed to recovery) software would have trashed data as equally... once a head has crashed you should not use anything that writes to the disk. It's just a matter of using the right tools for the right job.

      Don't misunderstand me: I am aware that it is not always easy up-front to know that you have had a head crash. But ideally, if you suspect mechanical failure of any kind, you should first attempt recovery using software that does not write to the disk. Then, once you have what data you could recover, it is more appropriate to attempt to repair the disk itself. That makes the process much longer, but you are likely to get more good data back if you do in fact have a mechanical failure.

    19. Re:Spinrite works miracles by adolf · · Score: 1

      Do you mean this, or something else?

  27. RStudio by horatio · · Score: 1

    I used to use Norton Tools, until it was bastardized by Symantec. I have had good luck in the last couple of years with RStudio (http://www.r-tt.com/). I used it to recover the pictures from a wiped SD card. I wish I hadn't once I saw the photos, but that isn't the software's fault. Looks like there is a free version for use on ext2/ext3 filesystems.

    --
    There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
  28. Confused by the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/the pros/you guys/

    There are no recovery pros in local IT groups.

  29. I'm hardcore though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notepad ;-)

  30. Midnight... by AioKits · · Score: 1

    Black jump suit, glass cutter, crowbar, can of black spray paint, butterfly knife, pack of smokes, maybe a giant burlap sack with a green $$$ printed on the side because if it said 'data' it might look suspicious...

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  31. TestDisk by sirsky · · Score: 1

    No one has mentioned TestDisk yet??

    http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk

    I've used this plenty of times, restoring 'blank' hard drives (especially USB drives who's partition tables were corrupted) and file recovery works great with NTFS, as well as most other filesystem types...

    1. Re:TestDisk by neogramps · · Score: 1
    2. Re:TestDisk by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      I've used testdisk more times than I can count. I've also used photorec on numerous devices large and small.

      Ironically, we haven't had much luck with the commercial stuff.

      We've also got a silly python script that will run the "file" command on each file and sort them into the appropriate piles.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    3. Re:TestDisk by sirsky · · Score: 1

      I must type slowly, cause it wasn't there when I started my reply...but Slashdot comments work on Lightning Speed.

  32. One time I used Me by TinBromide · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had a drive where the file system was shredded, so I loaded the drive into FTK Imager (its free, about halway down the page), did a search of the raw space of the drive for the file name I needed, found the relevant $i30 reference (its in there), jumped to the relevant sectors on the disk using ftk imager's goto command , carved out the hex with ftk imager's copy hex command, dumped it into a hex editor, and saved the file under the extension. It worked perfectly.

    Uphill, both ways, in the snow.

    This is the ultimate last resort if you absolutely, have to, get a file back.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:One time I used Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah.

      Worst resort I've had to go to at one time (can't specify) was searching for all sectors starting with 0xFF 0xD8 0xFF 0xC0 and then trying to reconstruct what sectors came after it to get a few images off a system. No directory names or indices left at all. Filesystem was irrelevant - wasn't enough of it left to consider using it. No filenames relevant.

    2. Re:One time I used Me by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      William Shatner, is that you?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  33. Yep, I agree by meosborne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree with you 100%. I've done this many times, myself.

    1. Re:Yep, I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too!!

    2. Re:Yep, I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't, but it sounds brilliant!!

  34. EnCase by shadowknot · · Score: 1

    Although it is primarily used as a forensic analysis tool Guidance Software's EnCase is excellent for data recovery and there is extensive support for many filesystems and operating systems. It's darn expensive but if you are really looking to get data back on a large scale then the long-term investment may be worth it.

  35. SpinRite by powerbooklinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does the job when all hope is lost. I've used it many times for myself and clients. $89.00 and worth every penny. http://spinrite.info/

  36. dd, testdisk, foremost by mpapet · · Score: 1

    The chain of tools I used barely a month ago goes like this.

    1. dd to get whatever can be had off the hardware and into a disk image.
    2. testdisk recovers partition information to make the images mount-able.
    3. foremost to recover files. Pay attention to the conf file. There are *lots* of options that will discover all kinds of files in various condition.

    As someone who just went through this with my laptop, the last two things to remember:
    -You will need tons of disk space to work with the disk images and all of the files foremost recovers.
    -check your backup files very, very often. Bacula worked beautifully, but somehow the tar archives it created were corrupt.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  37. Cannot beat RAID by beodd · · Score: 1

    When worst comes to worst there is nothing better than having a RAID. I personally run a RAID5 at home but drives are cheap enough that is should be easy to set up a mirror on any workstation. Most motherboards these days support mirroring strait from the bios but even if it does not windows will do it in the OS as well. It is also my understanding that Linux supports all raid levels in software.
    Now days it is also common place to see laptops with room for multiple drives. There is no reason at all to not have some sort of raid these days, especially if there is critical data on the drive.
    As for OS corruption a raid will not prevent this but there are built in services for configuration "restore" points as well as drive snapshots that will be able to restore a system to a functional state from a "Safe Boot". There really is no reason to use any special software to "Recover" a system if it is configured in a manner that is redundant and secure.

    Joshua

    1. Re:Cannot beat RAID by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree, these days every home PC should be setup for RAID1 (RAID5 for workstations). However, RAID should *never* be a substitute for making backups to external media.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Cannot beat RAID by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Backup is better than RAID.
      Also - RAID 5 is great if you smoke a drive. What happens if you smoke your RAID controller? I've seen it happen.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    3. Re:Cannot beat RAID by beodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, RAID is not perfect but as for restoring data from a failed drive via some sort of recovery software will be useless in the case of multiple failures.
      I work on large SAN/NAS arrays and there is never any full proof way of getting data back. Even if the OS is backed up to tape there is always the chance that the parity will fail, exc.. Most raid controllers are capable of detecting existing RAID configurations so replacing a card should no be that big of a deal. I will give you that it is never full proof and I have even seen data loss on a raid from swapping controllers.
      The most awesome safest configuration I have ever seen was a SAN with dual channel drives connected to dull array controllers in a MESH SAN network. The SAN hardware is capable of dynamic RAID 50 with global hot spares. Then on top of all that the entire configuration was mirrored off-site via dark fibre then weekly full backups and daily incremental backups. Oh, and each workstation was connected to the MESH with 4 fibre controllers. There was no single point of failure in this configuration. Was a honor to work on that array.

    4. Re:Cannot beat RAID by beodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, I forgot, It also had scheduled snapshots on the LUN so it could be recovered to any point at any time.. Was such a beautiful thing..

    5. Re:Cannot beat RAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem, just buy an other one. At least you didn't loose your data. RAID is better than a backup because you don't have to think about keeping it up to date.

    6. Re:Cannot beat RAID by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Best advice ...
      *RAID 1 or 5
      *Regular backups
      *Regular checking of those backups to see they are actually working and can actually be recovered

      Data recovery then only needs to be used when you need to recover data you wrote today and you have had a failure in multiple drives in the RAID array .... and in most cases this is pointless because the data was in memory not on disk ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    7. Re:Cannot beat RAID by beodd · · Score: 1

      I am a big advocate of raid but DigiShaman has a good point. It is always a good idea to have some sort of off-line backup. Another disadvantage of raid is that if something does break the average user is going to be perplexed about what is going on and may not even know something has failed. Getting it back to a redundant state can also be a bit complicated for even the experienced user, which is why desktop systems do not typically ship from vendors in a raid configuration. If I were in a IT support role I would want the systems I support to be in some sort of raid but if I were in phone support or just sending a novice user off with the machine I would not suggest it. I guess the pros and cons need to be weighed.

    8. Re:Cannot beat RAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about when the thing you are trying to recover from is filesystem corruption and RAID just makes it harder to recover from?

      I just don't see the benefits of redundant RAID over regular (as in daily) backups.

      Preemptively addressing probable responses:
      Speedup: don't care, I don't have any performance problems with my old-ass equipment.
      Downtime during restore: I should have no problem keeping myself amused with computers 2 & 3.
      Lost work: If I'm doing something where losing an hour of so of time is going to be crippling, I'll be backing up my work manually anyway (of-system SVN)

    9. Re:Cannot beat RAID by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      How about addressing a crashed drive in your parents computer? I'd rather not drive to their house at 9pm to do an entire system rebuild on a new drive. If it was setup with RAID, I could swap out the failed drive on my own time.

      Working on computers all day sucks. Doing it after hours sucks even more.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:Cannot beat RAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RAID5 is not your best choice. It was designed when drives were still relatively expensive. Due to the "write" penalty of RAID5, I would simply suggest only RAID1 or RAID10 if you need the speed. Drives are so cheap nowadays RAID1 is the simplest way to ensure data integrity. Stay away from RAID5 and you will be happier in life. You can all read up at http://www.baarf.com/

    11. Re:Cannot beat RAID by beodd · · Score: 1

      Raid 5 hardware almost always has an ASIC for each drive. The hardware on the typical mother board may say it will do raid 5 but it is still sharing the same ASICs. Also, any other devices connected to the controller will slow things down greatly. Most motherboards use one ASIC per channel (SATA 1 and 2, SATA 3 and 4, exc..). Same with IDE. If you are using a slow device on the same channel all devices on that channel slow down to the same speed as well as having to share the ASIC.
      It is like comparing apples to oranges. If you want to run raid 5 or 50 you need to fork out the money for a raid controller, 1 ASIC per device. If speed is the only concern then go ahead and put one drive per channel on the motherboard (SATA) and use an IDE CD Drive and an IDE to boot off of. This will prevent any righting to the OS drive while keeping your stripe optimized. Unless you are using the RAID 0 purely as a work disk, stuff like video editing, I would NEVER suggest it. If one drive dies you lose everything and even the best recovery software short of a hex editor will be able to recover your data.

      There are so many solutions out there that can fit whatever needs you may have; it is all a matter of how much you want to spend.

      You do your due diligence and you will be much better off than trying to recover after a drive or OS failure. Plan for the worst hope for the best.

  38. Depends by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    We usually start off with a bootable XP CD. Often there isn't anything really that messed up, and you can read the data that way with no problems. There are a couple of free programs, the names of which I can't remember off the top of my head, that do a fine job for "undeleting" files.

    If it won't read in that, the next step is usually Knoppix. You can tell it to force mount a bad partition. Now that is a mixed blessing since sometimes the data you'll get is garbled which is why you try something else first. However, barring any serious problems, it'll usually mount and read.

    If both of those have problems, the next set it the tools from the drive manufacturer to check for physical problems. You set those to do a full scan. At this point, there are three possible results:

    1) It runs to completion, no errors. Means the physical disk is fine, it is all a logical data problem. Now go back to bootable Windows and run a checkdisk. Reason we didn't do this earlier is the moving of data checkdisk does can screw things up worse if there are physical problems.

    2) It runs to completion, errors found and corrected. Back to Windows or if that doesn't work Knoppix to try and read the disk again. Usually it'll read, checkdisk it if not.

    3) It errors out and gives a a diagnostic code meaning serious, unrecoverable errors. We are now at another juncture:

    a) The data is really important. At this point, time to send it off to a specialist. Gillware.com is who I like. Pack it up and mail it off, you probably get your data back along with a bill for $300.

    b) The data isn't critical, but we'd like to recover it. Run what I call "the magic disk destroyer." It's a program called Spinrite. It is a VERY aggressive recovery program. Because of that it is either going to get the disk readable, or fuck it up so bad nobody will be able to. Hence my nick name for it. Put the disk somewhere that you can have a fan blow on it, fire up Spinrite, and let it go for a day or two. See what happens.

    1. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had Spinrite screw up a drive. I've used it THOUSANDS of times to recover drives. I work at a college with 2000 laptops in student's hands and we would be lost without Spinrite.

    2. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpinRite does not destroy drives. More than likely your drive was already to the point of being unrecoverable before running it.

  39. Add one vote for Handy Recovery by eyal0 · · Score: 1

    Two years ago one of my hard drives started making strange noises like a grinding motor. When trying to read some of the bits on the disk, the hard drive would fail for a minute or two before giving up.

    I used Handy Recovery. It scans the drive and gives a file explorer similar to the one in WindowsXP. Recovery is easy. I've also been able to recover files from an old file system even after formating a disk and putting files on the new filesystem.

    I realize that many tools exist. Are most able to recover files from disks with PHYSICAL malfunctions? That seems important.

  40. A collection of small apps... by xtracto · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree with others about GetDataBack... it indeed is a good app.

    Sometimes however, people have come to me with a hard drive with a FOUND.000 directory full (sometimes about 10GB) of CHK files... for that I recommend:

    http://www.ericphelps.com/uncheck/

    It is free and does a good job recognizing the supported files

    Also, it is worth getting something like mplayer or VLC and try to manually open the biggest CHK files to see if they are some kind of media file.

    Additionally, a Hex editor like xvi32 can be helpful to give a fast glance at the header of the file and see what is it... maybe reading the folder with a Linux distribution (which gets the description of the file based on the content rather than the extension) could also help... but for other more obscure things, a hex editor is good (of course you need to be familiar with several headers... yay I feel 1337!)

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:A collection of small apps... by donak · · Score: 1

      I once found multiple "Found.XXX" directories on a PC that had been infected with adware.
      As far as I can tell, none of the files needed any recovery, seems it was just a way to hide the crapware and associated files.
      Shift+Delete took care of the wasted disk space ... removing the trojan was a bit more difficult.

      --
      Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...
  41. dd, file scavenger by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    I have used file scavenger (windows) with great success. File scavenger has restored files from disks that were unreadable or disks that come up as un-formatted. Even if you accidentally reformat the disk and write some data to it file scavenger will find what ever has not yet been corrupted and copy it to where ever you want it to go. Files that cant be recovered are still written to the backup disk but are given a zero byte size. You can then search for zero byte files and see what was unable to be recovered. Also files that are found but cannot be identified are copied to a "lost and found" folder. These might have been deleted files or partially overwritten files. Its pretty cheap too, about $35 USD.

    The other day I recovered a friends 160GB USB disk (formatted NTFS) using file scavenger after it suddenly came up as unformatted. Every file was restored since the disk had not been tampered with. I then zeroed out the disk using dd under Linux and ran badblocks to see if there were any bad sectors. None were found and I formatted the disk, copied the data back to it and returned it to him. I also keept a backup on my system for him.

    Under Linux I have used dd to grab an entire disk structure from a dying disk (clicking but working) to a server. Then restore the dd image to a new hard disk. I have yet to need to recover any lost data from a Linux system but I hear TestDisk is one of the best. It can locate lost super blocks and undelete files from NTFS, FAT and EXT2. R-linux is also good for ext2/3 recovery.

    1. Re:dd, file scavenger by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I am sure he is happy you kep a backup of his p0rn stuff for him.....just in case....

          ; )

  42. Pros before Hos... by DarthVain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If your a Pro you back up all your important data anyway, so it is a moot point. Likely you even have some remote back up. There are services out there. Use Google, it ain't hard. In a pinch you can just email yourself some attachments in Gmail. Not good for media files or anything large, but if you want to save some key documents or your tax returns etc... Privacy may be an issue, but if your really prickly about that, then just encrypt it (though make sure you can decrypt easily later).

    If it is a friend or family member who has just lost everything: Look very superior, point at them, remind them they should have backed up, and how stupid it is not to do so, then laugh at them for a while. Once your eyes clear of tears, repeat. After 4 or 5 times maybe it might sink in, and you will have done them a great service. Send them a bill in the mail.

    Harsh I know, but come on, this has been cannon for years, get with the program.

    Honestly though most people's computers are totally full of crap. There are some things like Personal files, Photos, and the like that are irreplaceable, but most stuff is just media you can replace, or software you can replace, etc... and if it is important to you, then back it up for god sakes.

    Seriously, if you save their data you are just re-enforcing and rewarding bad behavior.

    1. Re:Pros before Hos... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      also grammar nazi's stay back! I see my mistakes and I like them damnit!

    2. Re:Pros before Hos... by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 1

      And make sure when they get cancer, you stop by every day to ridicule them for smoking. Great bed-side manner, there.

      You're exactly the kind of IT manager I'm glad I don't have to work with -- you look for excuses why it isn't your fault and then provide no real help to anyone. You might have the preventative stuff covered, but when the shit hits the fan, you couldn't care less about others' problems.

      So after they call you a prick behind your back, they'll bring it to me and I'll recover their stupid files; because for some of us, IT is a calling, not a job -- regardless of our job titles.

      You, sir, are an asshole.

      --
      "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
    3. Re:Pros before Hos... by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, you're an asshole.

      Maybe you should just do what you can for your family and then remind them that they should backup with their new drive. You know, as opposed to reinforcing the stereotype that all computer geeks are antisocial bastards that don't care about a person's feelings at all.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  43. MyHardDriveDied.com by 3t3rn4l · · Score: 1
    I've found excellent information on data recovery methodology, software, and physical tools via the free Youtube presentations by Scott A. Moulton at:

    http://www.myharddrivedied.com/

    --
    Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt. (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will
  44. What Data Recovery Tools Do the Pros Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On our "recovery shop" we use a microscope, a piece of paper and pencil.

    Our 2000 monkeys^W recovery experts guarantee your data wil be recovered in 1 month, no mather the size of your drive :)

  45. dd by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    once you have linux up and running the first thing I do is try dd with the "ignore error" setting. this way I cant get a copy of the bad disk onto a good disk. Now I've separated the recovery from corruption from the problems due to intermittency.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  46. SpinRite 6.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    SpinRite 6.0 has worked for me very well for many years now. It's slow, and has very very entertaining graphics. Under 2MB ISO.

  47. simple.. but not free. by Piffer76 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the past I've used SpinRite to check the disk for errors, and it's been a life saver twice. But in the case where there's nothing wrong with the physical drive, which is probably the case most of the time, I've had great success with R-Studio. My 2 cents. -P

  48. Not true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've "accidentally" deleted many files that only had one copy over the years. If you are talking about recovering only a few specific accidentally delelted files, then the best tool is Restoration. It's free too. Enjoy. (As for "disaster recovery," unless you are making regular backups or willing to spend lotsa $$ for a professional clean room recovery, FORGET IT.)

    1. Re:Not true... by argent · · Score: 1

      I've "accidentally" deleted many files that only had one copy over the years.

      Files more than a day old? You must be doing something silly like keeping files you care about on a Windows desktop or laptop.

  49. Funny you mention Linux by memojuez · · Score: 1
    One user's hard drive was making the dreaded "click-click, whir-kerchunk" noises during start-up causing it to lock up.

    I booted the desktop with an old Knoppix 3.4 Live CD and used SAMBA to copy her critical files to another windows computer. Every click and kerchunk of the dying harddrive only momentarily slowed the transfer of data.

    I tried to do the same thing on an Ubuntu drive that had bad sectors, but the security on the files prevented them from being accessed.

    --
    Signature applied for, Patent Pending
    1. Re:Funny you mention Linux by dextromulous · · Score: 1

      I tried to do the same thing on an Ubuntu drive that had bad sectors, but the security on the files prevented them from being accessed.

      Security like... file permissions? Did you try backing up the files as root?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.
    2. Re:Funny you mention Linux by memojuez · · Score: 1
      Yes. As in File Permissions, sorry. I didn't even think about that for some reason, but I'm not really sure how to login as root in Knoppix.

      Booting with Knoppix and using the automatic default logon renders all Windows Security useless so I never worried about it before.

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
  50. PCInspector by CyBlue · · Score: 1

    For a free tool, I've had reasonable success with PCInspector, but File Scavenger seems to do a better job at recovery.

  51. Ontrack EasyRecovery Professional by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ontrack EasyRecovery is the best software I've used. It WILL NOT WORK under Vista, so hopefully you'll have 2k or xp installed somewhere.

    The software, last time I checked, is no longer suported or updated. Ontrack now seems to specialize in data recovery, not data recovery software. I'm sure however you can find the software.... somewhere....

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    1. Re:Ontrack EasyRecovery Professional by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      I'll vouch for this. I've used it ever since it was "Ontrack Tiramisu." It's simple and straightforward, and extremely effective. I've used it over a half dozen times and it seems to pull data from any disk that doesn't outright crash the computer when it's connected (though about 10 years ago I recovered data from a disk that had to be connected after boot to prevent a freeze...)

  52. You get what you pay for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get what you pay for, really. That's why I gave up on Maxtor and any other craptastic HD manufacturers. I've bought only Western Digital HD's for the past 9 years now, and have never had a problem. No crash, no data loss, nothing. I've worked with newer other modeled HD's in these 9, and had the same results of using Maxtor/other manufacturer's HD's as before: random failure with no warning. Undetected bad sectors, but the worst is the sudden failure. I'm happy to report that I haven't had that happen to me and /my/ HD's in almost a decade now. Thank you much, Wester Digital!

  53. Crashed drive with a virtualbox image by ThomasDePaine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last week I crashed drive with a virtualbox image on it. The nature of the crash was a ground loop spike while programming a microcontroller board. This spike blew a big capacitor on the board, fried tracks, wiped out 1 of 2 usb controllers on my laptop and zapped my second hard drive. By murphy's law I had just cleared off the one hard drive that was the recent backup for this vdi file and now I'm left with a two year old backup (after looking through about 50 dvds and 6 old hard drives). I bought an equivalent hard drive on Ebay and swapped out the electronics to no effect. Seeing that people swapped out the heads I tried it but all I get is major clicking. Opening up the drive I see a faint mark where the head was trying to traverse the top of top platter (there are two platters). I'm pretty sure that the spindle motor isn't fried. How screwed am I?

    1. Re:Crashed drive with a virtualbox image by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Its worrying that the drive head came into contact with the surface. This shouldnt ever be physically possible no matter what happens on the drive interface or how bad a current surge you had, so it sounds like you screwed something up when you replaced the electronics or more likely, the heads.

      Given your innate ability to screw hardware up, If I were you at this point I would accept my own limitations and give the drive to a professional recovery service. Make sure you give them the original electronics and heads too.

    2. Re:Crashed drive with a virtualbox image by ThomasDePaine · · Score: 1

      LOL. Yea, it's been a rough couple of weeks.

    3. Re:Crashed drive with a virtualbox image by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      You opened it. You're screwed.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    4. Re:Crashed drive with a virtualbox image by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Truth.

      Only open a drive in a clean room.

      Anyway, you could try the old ghetto trick: place the hard drive in a plastic bag closed as tightly as possible, place said bag into a freezer, take it out a few minutes later and immediately connect it to your PC. You might get a few minutes of use out of it (after which it will be permanently dead, but hopefully you'll have backed up what you need to).

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  54. Ubuntu's Data Recover Page by Innova · · Score: 1

    This page has helped me in the past: Data Recovery

  55. Real pros use: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backups .. no need for recovery tools!

    1. Re:Real pros use: by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Backups .. no need for recovery tools!

      Be sure you can read your backups. I have a 2.0 TB SATA drive that only wants to work plugged into an external USB stage rack. Installed inside the computer, it claims it can't read it. Another drive from the same manufacturer, same capacity, made less than a week later works just fine inside and out.

      For me it isn't so much a backup as a migration to larger drives. The originals become my backups while the new drives get tested.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  56. Circuitboard Repair or Replacement often necessary by TunaPhish · · Score: 3, Informative

    As far as software goes, a combination of dd / ddrescue / strings / fdisk / grep / mount / and the r-studio suite from r-tt.com are what I use. Though, most of the time the drive is physically damaged, and it's not always inside.

    For example, last week I had a laptop come in with no power to the drive. I examined the board with my eyes and my Fluke Multimeter and discovered that the power +5V on pins 41 and 42 wasn't reaching very far into the board and was basically disconnected at the first component. It looked to be a power-protection diode which had blown due to a surge. I was able to bypass it with a dot of solder, and once reassembled the hard drive powered on, I copied the data off. When the customer decided he didn't want to pay, well, I removed that solder dot before returning his drive to him without his data...

    On 3.5" hard drives you'll often see a rectifier diode serving the same purpose, so when you run into a drive that doesn't spin up, check that out first. It's a small black component connecting the power to ground, and it shouldn't be passing electricity (but it will when it fails, so just pop it off to get your drive working again).

    Other times a clicking drive can be fixed by just swapping out the board with an identical one from another drive. Sometimes, similar model number boards will work as well, but not often. It's a lot of fun trial and error. On the plus side, if the drive is totally fubar'd but still spins up, you can pop it open and do some hard drive spin art!

  57. A mix of tools... by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the disk is good, but the OS hosed, try a Vista install DVD. Boot it into recovery mode, and one of the options is "copy files". (Honestly, the recovery tools included with Vista are a good first step). It'll copy the files to a USB hard disk.

    If not, then it's time to boot Knoppix (which can mount NTFS just fine, thanks to ntfs-3g). If the disk is dying, but still good, use something like ddrescue to make an image (ddrescue uses dd to clone the disk, but it'll first do the good parts (fast), then try harder and harder on the parts the disk has problems with - this way you'll get the good parts of the disk off quickly and it can concentrate on the bad parts).

    If you lost your partitions, gpart wourks great at seeking and finding 'em. One of my coworkers had just that problem and gpart managed to recover the partition table...

  58. dd + Advanced NTFS Recovery ($100) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I salvaged a lot of files from an NTFS partition on a badly failing drive by plugging the drive into another computer, making a dd image (it took several days due to all the disk errors), and then using Advanced NTFS Recovery on Windows to recover files from the dd image. You can use dd under Linux and transfer the image to a Windows box or just use the Cygwin version of dd. Advanced NTFS Recovery has a free demo, but it's fairly useless unless you register it (for $100). The demo only shows you the files it would recover, without actually recovering them. I was reluctant to pay that much, but it seemed to recover far more files than any of the other free or commercial demo tools I found at the time.

  59. Repair a clone of a clone by seawall · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Assuming the disk works at all: Work on a clone, not the original.

    If you are working on a 2nd generation clone you can afford to take risks in restoring the filesystem. "Oh it that didn't work, fire up another clone and try something else".

    ddrescue (and other damaged disk oriented cloners) lets you work on a copy (or in my preference: a copy of a copy). This preserves the original disk if it has to go to a specialist lab later.

    SpinRite has also saved my bacon more than once but that's something run on the original drive: not done lightly.

    (Warning: dd_rescue is not Gnu ddrescue and Debian Linuxes rename dd_rescue to ddrescue. dd_rescue is a similar but not identical).

    Finally: I need to add Windows NTFS rescue (built in) impressed me last time I needed it. It trundled for many hours but at the end, I had a mostly intact copy of a filesystem on my 2nd generation cloned drive. The original disk had been a mess.

    1. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I've always thought of SpinRite as a useless gimmick. What does it do, exactly, that you've been able to utilize to save your bum?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by HaloZero · · Score: 2, Informative

      SpinRite works to identify bad sectors on a track on magnetic media. Once it locates a bad sector, it attempts to re-read (repeatedly) the bitmap from that sector. If successful, it will re-write that bitmap to an unused sector, mark the original sector as bad, and provide a pointer in the index of the drive to the newly created sector.

      For me, SpinRite has successfully corrected fubared Windows installations (STOP error at boot, unreadable boot volume, registry .xxx missing at boot time, etc), repairing a disk with a FileVaulted sparseimage (allowing it to mount), repairing a disk that was TrueCrypted (allowing it to mount), as well as repairing a drive enough to the point where I can make an image copy of it and recover atleast some (and in some cases, most) of the data on it.

      SpinRite is also the only tool I'm comfortable running on an encrypted volume.

      It's not voodoo, and I run it quarterly for maintenance purposes.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    3. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by seawall · · Score: 1
      SpinRite:

      It's not so useful from USB (not useless, but not at its best. It does its best work talking to the disk at a low level USB hides).

      It works much better on an IDE/EIDE/SATA/SCSI connection.

      There are several things going on:

      1) It used to be almost my only tool and worked maybe 4/5th of the time on disks that could still spin but had enough hardware problems to be un-mountable. In those days disks were very expensive.

      I am less inclined to use it first because I want to depend on a flaky drive as little as possible. ddrescue does a pretty good job there: get the good data off fast, try to get the flaky data off next, no writes to the flaky hardware and with luck you have the data you need and SpinRite is still available.

      2) Using SpinRite as a repair tool: SpinRite tries to fix things which means depending on copying and writing on flaky hardware. It does an AWESOME job working around that flakiness and it is persistent. It feels like magic when it works and it usually does. I usually run it on the failing disk even if I have a ddrescue copy.

      When SpinRite is done I usually have all the data, when ddrescue is done I often have most of the data.

      3) SpinRite is also good at seeing trouble coming, which is no small thing but you actually have to run it regularly and few people do that.

    4. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by Barny · · Score: 1

      Where I work, if it ain't readable with mount -oro we don't touch it, the amount customers are willing to pay vs the time it spends on a tech bench recovering is not worth it.

      When told labor costs, most customers seem to think $2 an hour is reasonable to fix computers... I wish I was making that up.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    5. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Debian the binary /bin/dd_rescue from Kurt Garloff (Suse) is in the package ddrescue.
      The binary /sbin/ddrescue from Antonio Diaz Diaz (GNU) is in the package gddrescue.

    6. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by Nesman64 · · Score: 1

      I've used SpinRite a few times on drives with unreadable data, with about a 85% success rate. I've seen SpinRite mentioned about a dozen times today, but I have to wonder how many have actually purchased it.

      I swear, I'm buying a copy as soon as I'm out of debt

      --
      coffee | nose > keyboard
    7. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by jra · · Score: 1

      Spinrite will also read a track multiple times, until it's sure it has a clean version, and then rewrite the entire track all at once; it will do this as a refresh process on a working drive so that all your tracks are fresh and cleanly laid out, and this sounds like snakeoil -- and Steve Gibson, the author is a *very* polarizing personality; you either think he is the Second Coming or the worst possible form of snake oil salesman -- but I have had exceptional luck with Spinrite.

      It simply will not give up until it gets a clean read: I once had it take a *week* to get a clean refresh of an ST-512 (yes, 10MB) on a Tandy 1200.

      I borrowed a UPS, cause I knew it was going to take longer to finish than my utility's MTBF. It did. It got every single byte... and we copied it to a 40MB and threw the old one in the trash.

      I haven't seen anyone point that out: a recovered disk is trash, don't try to return it to service, regardless the failure mode.

    8. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by eta526 · · Score: 1

      Assuming the disk works at all: Work on a clone, not the original.

      If you are working on a 2nd generation clone you can afford to take risks in restoring the filesystem. "Oh it that didn't work, fire up another clone and try something else".

      This is what I have done using Ghost. There was an option to take a bit-for-bit copy of the drive. It didn't always work, but it would sometimes let you make a backup of the bad drive and restore it onto a good one, and then take a proper ghost image if necessary and recover your files. Any files which were corrupted on the original would still be corrupted, but anything else on the drive was suddenly readable and writable, meaning you can not only recover your data but even repair Windows if necessary and keep using the same drive image so there was typically no need to completely rebuild the system.

    9. Re:Repair a clone of a clone by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      Agreed to the point of the destruction of the recovered disk. If the disk was still any good, it probably wouldn't have needed SpinRite in the first place. Trash it - GBs are cheap these days.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
  60. Duct tape! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is excellent for fixing a rattling disk, giving you enough time for a complete backup.

  61. ddrescue is dd for bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't wast your time using dd on a bad drive, ddrescue is dd that doesn't barf when it cant read a sector

    1. Re:ddrescue is dd for bad drives by locofungus · · Score: 1

      What do you think conv=noerror,sync and iflag=direct are for?

      I haven't actually used ddrescue and it looks like it has some valuable automatic features, especially if you have more than one damaged copy but I don't think for the raw reading it will do anything different to my dd command.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
  62. Backups by Fuseboy · · Score: 1

    Backups.

    1. Re:Backups by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Backups. Backups. Bees.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  63. prodiscover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    prodiscover works just fine, and it is one of the tools we used in my forensics class. there are many others, but that one has a free version that is reliable. the only catch is that you have to have it plugged into a machine that can boot.

    1. Re:prodiscover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ProDiscover is garbage, it has driver conflicts (Usually results in BSODs) and nearly all of the tools have better and open source alternatives. The only reason why you would use ProDiscover is for the evidence tracking, which is not very useful when the application crashes, losing your recent log entries.

  64. Tandem DXR by ceo4techass · · Score: 1

    I've used LINUX tools and such with KNOPPIX, had mixed success. We like R-Studio too. But a good backup is indeed the best. We now recommend software-less backup solutions like the Tandem DXR or FirstRAID G2 products from Highly Reliable. It makes the whole offsite backup problem as simple as the old Video Surveillance tape systems. Making it easy for the customer ultimately produces the most reliable and frequent backup copies.

  65. My toolset. by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    Testdisk to recover partition & mbr data.
    Windows PE live disc to try to read disc/chkdsk, and/or use HandyRecovery v1 (fw) for undelete/quick format recovery
    Knoppix to read corrupt NTFS
    SpinRite to try and recover/reset bad sectors

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  66. But for Linux... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    I would be interested to hear if anyone has come across GOOD software for ext2/3, ReiserFS or ZFS. Google finds lots of links, but most are non-free, and most related forum posts seem to be shills for the same products.

    But I guess that in my case this is more or less academic. My sysadmin background goes back decades, and old habits die hard, so I keep good, VERIFIED backups. In ~14 years of running Linux, I have never been in the position of being forced to restore from bare metal. But one of these days I'm going to have to deal with a less provident client or acquaintance...

    1. Re:But for Linux... by quadrox · · Score: 1

      I have had very good results with http://www.easeus-linuxrecovery.com/, although it isn't free.

      I tried with the ususal F/OSS tools, but they didn't really do the job very well - but that was probably because I had formatted the drive multiple times. The easeus tool however worked like a charm and I'm happy I could get my data back for a comparatively small price.

      And yes, I did have backups for most of my files, but some of my latest photos and other documents were not on the latest backup, so this was the only way to get them all back :)

  67. XFS by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    Anything out there for XFS? Like...at all?

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    1. Re:XFS by lcoughey · · Score: 2, Informative

      XFS? Try UFS Explorer.

      As an official Data Recovery Professional, most of the over the counter tools work well in various situations. But, most require a stable hard drive with minimal sector damage.

      - The first step in data recovery is to stabilize the drive. (leave this to the pros...and we DON'T use freezers)
      - The next step is to do a sector level mirror. We use very expensive hardware for this step. DD will work, but if the drive has a lot of media damage, it may be still worth getting a professional to do the job before the problem gets worse.
      - The next step is to deal with the file system and recovery. This is where your software tools come in. Again, we use very expensive programs for this step, but we also play with some of the programs mentioned above.

      When I talk to IT professionals about using our services, they have a preconceived idea that data recovery always costs thousands of dollars. This is usually because the IT professional does everything they can think of (freezer, open the drive, tap with a hammer) to recover the data before passing the job over to the data recovery lab. As a result, the data recovery labs tend to charge more because of the added problems caused by the previous attempts. My company does not charge more because of what was done, but we have had to give clients bad news because the data is unrecoverable because of what was done.

      In short, if the data is valuable, don't use the freezer or programs like SpinRite; rather, get a free quote by a data recovery professional. If the price is too high, get a second opinion. If the second opinion is too high, then you have nothing to lose.

  68. The freezer by naturaverl · · Score: 1

    I've had luck with recovery by using GNU ddrescue to first pull everything off the drive I can. AFTER that, if there are still unrecovered sections of disk, it gets a little weird... I have no idea why this works, but... 1) Unplug the drive & let it cool to room temperature. 2) Put it in the freezer. 3) Wait an hour. 4) wrap it in saran wrap (to prevent condensation). 5) Hook it back up. 6) If it doesn't spin up, wait 15 minutes and try again. 7) Once it has spun up, run ddrescue again, using the previously generated log file to recover only the blocks that are still missing from the recovery file.

  69. I concur as well, and have done this too by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    I really should have charged that client a LOT more, but it saved them a ton of $, and it was like $40 on e-bay!

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  70. MAC OS X Recovery? by TheGatesofHell · · Score: 1

    Anybody got any good recommendations for MAC OS X recovery?

  71. if Linux doesn't work by kimvette · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if the tools you can get for Linux don't work, check out R-Studio.

    If you come across a product called "Stellar Phoenix" RUN AWAY. They are the shittiest company in existence. A few years ago I needed a tool and the demo of Stellar Phoenix seemed it would work (it lists the files it said it could recover) so we purchased it only to find that it could not recover them. Come to find out that while they claim support for ALL of NTFS's features, their software WOULD NOT recover files compressed using NTFS compression. This was despite their claims of NTFS5.1 support. They refused to issue a refund and it was a months-long battle so we finally complained to Amex to try to get a chargeback against them but we tried to work it out directly with stellarinfo for too long, so it was too late. They (stellarinfo) claim a 30-day money-back guarantee but DO NOT HONOR IT - or at least they didn't back then.

    We then tried R-Studio, and their trial software listed files it could recover - AND it could recover 64KB chunks to prove it. So for some files I needed immediately I used the trial to decompress and reassemble the files (in 64KB chunks, and then catted them together), and for the rest when we received the key for the full version. We were able to recover every single file. I've used R-studio for clients since then and it has worked every single time, providing the drive will enumerate.

    If the drive will not enumerate you have two possibilities: freezing it in CO2 (I have had success with that), or finding another of the same model drive with the same firmware and swap PCBs, and hope that the problem is with the controller and not the drive itself.

    Why was there no backup? Believe me I asked the same question. :)

    Summary:

    free Linux tools - good
    R-Studio - Awesome
    stellar phoenix from stellar info - snake oil from a shitty company comprised of douchebags

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  72. If you can't find a board to swap by Namlak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try putting the bad drive in the fridge for about 15 minutes. Sometimes it's a thermal expansion problem on the board or in a chip and you can get a few working minutes with the drive to copy files off. If that doesn't work, try the freezer. If that doesn't work, try some gentle heat with a hair dryer. If none of that works, you're back to the board swap or a professional recovery service. If the fridge/freezer thing works, using a USB interface on the drive will buy you some more up time, as you don't waste "cool" time while the machine boots up before you start pulling files off.

    1. Re:If you can't find a board to swap by WindowSux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try putting the bad drive in the fridge for about 15 minutes. Sometimes it's a thermal expansion problem on the board or in a chip and you can get a few working minutes with the drive to copy files off. If that doesn't work, try the freezer. If that doesn't work, try some gentle heat with a hair dryer. If none of that works, you're back to the board swap or a professional recovery service. If the fridge/freezer thing works, using a USB interface on the drive will buy you some more up time, as you don't waste "cool" time while the machine boots up before you start pulling files off.

      I agree about the freezer suggestion but you left out one VERY IMPORTANT precaution! The cold metal being re-exposed to a warmer environment with higher humidity when removed from the freezer will result in condensation on all external AND internal surfaces! The best way to do this safely is to put your internal drive into an external HD enclosure, connect the USB and power cord, then double bag it and tape the ends. You have to make the bag air tight but leave your cables hanging out. This way the drive is cooled with a fixed amount of air (and thus water particulate) surrounding it. As it cools a very small amount of moisture will be locked in the bag but not enough to be of concern. When it is removed from the freezer, this small amount of moisture is all it can/will be exposed to and further moisture from the surrounding air will be isolated. Once the drive has stabilized to ambient temperature it can be safely removed.

  73. Just keep up with your backups by adosch · · Score: 1

    At the gov't facility I work at, we back up everything to prepare for any bare-metal recovery using EMC's Legato Networker; it's expensive, but it works, and tax dollars pay for it. Just depends on your environment, and technological and idealogical approach I guess. Since we do regular, monthly full-server offsites, nightly incrementals and any mission critical data (that's in the hundreds of terrbytes) we have ship it to another computer room which houses a STK tape silo for long-term archive, I've never had the need to use data analysis/recovery tools because just doing regular backups have a 99.9% retention for us to get back anything we want. And it's not just small talk; our datacenter has a UPS backup power failure and took out a few critical servers, one being our operational Oracle database server. With the DBAs cold backups and our bare-metal recovery to repair the awry ext3 filesystem, we had zero data loss other than what wasn't commited journaling and database wise with the power outage hit. A lot of people said it on here; if you back up your important stuff and keep up with the cycle, there should be no question that getting what you need back that has great importance should be anything less than a trivial, minute manner.

  74. PhotoRec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The GPL Free Software tool PhotoRec is a great application. In combination with ddrescue and dd_rescue if needed, it can pull the data off from many drive format types (and images when needed) and it has saved many drives for me and my clients.

    http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
    apt-get install testdisk

    This of course requires that the drive is visible. Too often the drive will make some noise at boot and then fail to show once the OS loads. I've been meaning to get an external USB enclosure to plug the drive in after boot up, but haven't yet done that.

  75. Freeze the drive, seriously... by DomNF15 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We recently had an NTFS drive on one of our Dell servers go partially bad. Windows wouldn't boot or read it. I had limited success using various Linux Live distros along with tools like PhotoRec (http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec) since the drive was part of a Windows logical raid array. Don't be fooled by the website, the tool works for all kinds of files, not just photos, on various file system types. In the end, someone I work with suggested putting the drive in a ziplock bag and freezing it for a few hours. The rest of us were skeptical, but were also at our wit's end trying to recover the files from this drive, so we tried it. Amazingly, we were able to boot the drive normally and recover the needed files before it got back up to normal operating temperature and failed again.

    1. Re:Freeze the drive, seriously... by Etrias · · Score: 1

      I've actually had this work occasionally. It's usually my last ditch attempt to recover items.

    2. Re:Freeze the drive, seriously... by gigoguy · · Score: 1

      This is the last ditch attempt to recover a personal drive. If your donkey is on the line at work, send it to the expensive clean room guys. After all, they're expensive clean room guys - if they can't do it, how can you be held responsible?

  76. How to get past mechanical failures by comrade.putin · · Score: 1

    In my years of a repair shop, I found a bastard workaround in case of mechanical problems.
    First we started freezing the drives, which gave us about half hour to copy files. After that the process would completely stop. To get past that, I created a system.
    Plug the harddrive in. While plugged in, put it into 3 garbage bags. Those seem to have the most trustworthy seals. Place the drive in a bucket of ice, then fill the bucket with cold water. Don't use bubble wrap, since that will insulate the drive from the water, which is counterproductive.
    At this point, the drive will always stay at the temperature of melting ice, ie 32F or 0C.
    We were successful at recovering many drives this way, saving clients money, and making more for ourselves
    Sounds crazy? But it works!

    1. Re:How to get past mechanical failures by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea; I hadn't thought of submerging the drive in water, but I'll likely try it when the opportunity imposes itself.

      Slight (possible) nitpick: while the freezing point of water is 32F, I seem to recall reading at one point that the temperature of melting ice is slightly higher, say 35F (the number I remember) during the physical process due to the heat necessary to catalyze the process being absorbed. Not sure about that, though - I can't find a reference to it online.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:How to get past mechanical failures by treeves · · Score: 1

      Nope. Ice melts at 32F/0C as long as it's pure water. Putting more heat in doesn't raise the temperature above 32F until the ice is melted. Latent heat vs. sensible heat.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:How to get past mechanical failures by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Waterboarding FTW!

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    4. Re:How to get past mechanical failures by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      AHA! That was it. Pure water wasn't what I was thinking of; it was salt. Salt water, or more accurately, when salt is put on water, causes the melting temperature to be higher. Or something like that.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:How to get past mechanical failures by treeves · · Score: 1
      Salts actually *lower* the melting point/freezing point. That's why they put salt on icy/snowy roads, and why an ice/salt mixture is used to make ice cream at home - it's colder than plain water/ice.

      There's a decent description of it at wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freezing-point_depression

      I'm sure that's what you were thinking of...you probably just thought "they put salt on ice and it melts, so it must be getting warmer" - but really the freezing point becomes lower than the current temperature, so it melts.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  77. that's pretty awesome by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    but i was told not to trust comrade putin ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  78. It depends on the failure type of the drive by scum-o · · Score: 1

    I used to do occasional linux recoveries for a place called Reynolds Data Recovery in Colorado. They weren't a mega-huge recovery company, but they got a few dozen drives every day and did good business. They used a collection of software - some proprietary utilities from the drive manufacturers, some commercial utilities. Also, some drives overheated, so they had a freezer that they could put a drive in, so it ran long enough to copy the data off it, also, they had clean rooms, so they could re-seat heads onto platters if they came off somehow, then they'd run the drive "open" until they could copy the data off. Other times, the electronics (controller card on the drive) were dead, so they had a huge shelf of working controller cards from every possible drive that you could think of. They'd pop the old card off, put in a known-working card, then copy the data off. The data would normally be returned on a 'loaner' drive that the customer would return or a new drive that the customer would pay for. RAIDs were hit-and-miss and sometimes they worked and sometimes they didn't. I'm not sure of any of the names of the software that they used, but it varied depending on how difficult the recovery was.

    When I had to do linux recoveries, I slowly built-up a little distro of my own which had tons of tools on it. I'd have my 'distro' on a disk that they could plug in when they needed me to work on a linux disk, then I'd ssh into the machine remotely and work on the disk without having to drive in. I'd fix the partitions or the disk if it was possible and copy the data off onto a backup disk. There are some good tools availble in linux to do recoveries of things, but with the newer filesystems nowadays, it's more and more difficult to get anything off now. I'm not sure about SSD. Never had to deal with them yet. :) ext2, fat, vfat and memory cards, easy. reiserfs & ext3, much more difficult.

  79. FTK Imager by cl0secall · · Score: 1

    FTK Imager from AccessData (download page) is free to download for windows and will carve partitions, files, and even file fragments from disk. It reads NTFS, HFS+, and ext2/3 filesystems. This is the same tool that's used by law enforcement when they image PCs for criminal cases.

    --
    Model 551, Chambered in 6mm
  80. External USB enclosures + UBCD 4win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time here on slashdot, so I'm still Anonymous Coward.

    I typically use external USB enclosures, and the Ultimate Boot CD for Windows + Live Linux distrobutions. They both have their pros and cons,
    The UBCD 4win is great for people who:
    1. don't know Linux
    2. are afraid of Linux
    3 hate Linux
    It has many tools and works great for both diagnostics of the drive, and data recovery. The environment is a bit laggy.

    The Live Linux CD's give you a better interface to work from and better file-system compatibility, Less diagnostic ability. If I know a drive is dying and I just need the data I prefer Live Linux. If I have questions about the Drives integrity I use the UBCD.

  81. For a free solution, check by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    TestDisk.

    Thanks for the link. I have a Linux PC with two drives formated with ReiserFS, one set as the home directory. The mobo failed while under warranty so I took it to the store where I got it for repair. I specifically told them not to format the user drive but the tech reformatted it anyway. I had more than 500GB on it so I've been looking for something to unformat it and recover the data. Looking at the wiki you link to it looks like it can do it. Now if only I can get off my ass, buy a new external drive, and try to recover the data.

    Falcon

    1. Re:For a free solution, check by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In cases like this, when you are bringing your system in to have someone work on a specific component (not the hard drive), I find it is hand to have a small "I don't care about this" drive that you can slap an OS on, then remove and set aside. Then if you ever need a repair, put it back and remove the one with your actual data on it. (Or once I knew someone that had 2 drives in their system - 1 for the OS and 1 for data. I suggested he remove the data one before bringing it in. And of course, they reformatted the one with the OS on it, even though he had requested doing nothing with the hard drive.) After having almost the exact same thing happen to a friend of mine a few years ago, that is what I did for his system, and what i recommend to anyone going to have the systems worked on by "geniuses" or "geeks".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    2. Re:For a free solution, check by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      In cases like this, when you are bringing your system in to have someone work on a specific component (not the hard drive), I find it is hand to have a small "I don't care about this" drive that you can slap an OS on, then remove and set aside. Then if you ever need a repair, put it back and remove the one with your actual data on it.

      Ump, I hadn't thought of that. When my PC failed I had more than 500GB of data and the only way I thought of to back it up was an external drive. But I couldn't afford one then. The only other way would have been to burn DVDs but with more than 500GBs it would have taken more than 100 disks.

      Or once I knew someone that had 2 drives in their system - 1 for the OS and 1 for data. I suggested he remove the data one before bringing it in.

      As my data was on a separate drive, because the PC only came with a 40 GB drive I installed a second 750 GB drive, I could have done that. However I didn't know how to direct Linux to use the second drive as the user directory. I found out later that the fstab file has to be edited, but that's it, I still don't know how to edit it. Now I have two external drives I use for backups, a 500 GB USB 2 drive and a 1 TB Firewire 800 drive. I also stumbled across a USB docking station for internal drives to convert them to external drives. I also got a 1.5 TB internal drive I'll replace the 750 GB drive with. Then I can use the dock with the 750 GB drive as another backup.

      And of course, they reformatted the one with the OS on it, even though he had requested doing nothing with the hard drive.) After having almost the exact same thing happen to a friend of mine a few years ago, that is what I did for his system, and what i recommend to anyone going to have the systems worked on by "geniuses" or "geeks".

      Yea, I'll use one or two of the methods above now. Now I want to recover the lost data. I got back from Best Buy where I picked up a 1.5 TB Seagate FreeAgent/Desk external drive. So now I want to download TestDisk and see if it will recover the data. I'm wondering if I should install and use it on the Linux PC or install and run it from my Mac, I see there are versions for Linux, OS X, and Windows. I'm concerned about the possibility of writing over data if I install and run it from Linux, but I don't have it and the Mac networked and don't know how to set them up so I could read the drive in the Linux PC from the Mac, I have, had in the case of the Linux PC, different user accounts on each.

      Falcon

    3. Re:For a free solution, check by MrKaos · · Score: 2, Informative

      I specifically told them not to format the user drive but the tech reformatted it anyway.

      *idiots*, the only way to be sure is to remove the drive, but I guess it was part of the warranty deal.

      I have a Linux PC with two drives formated with ReiserFS,

      Good filesystem to recover from, I have successfully recovered data from a drive formatted over ReiserFS. For all his quirks, it's a great filesystem. What did they format over it, NTFS I'm guessing?

      I had more than 500GB on it so I've been looking for something to unformat it and recover the data.

      1. get a bigger drive say 1TB. 2. dd the raw image of the target drive onto the new drive *do not attempt data recovery off the original disk*, all data recovery is conducted from the dd image. 3. Do you have the original partition information, this can be handy as if you can get these original figure you can use some of the Reiser tools to restore the journal and recover the data, if you are lucky you will then be able to use fsck which will start to restore the files to Lost+Found as unconnected inodes. You may even be able to mount the image as a loopfs and copy the files off directly. 4. if you can't use 3, you will need to use a tool (magic rescue comes to mind) to recover files from the drive image based on file types in sweeps. I have successfully recovered data from trashed drives this way. Fortunately for you you picked reiserFS which is more forgiving that other filesystems. You have lost data, but I rate you chances as pretty high even if some dolt has formatted right over your file systems. It takes a lot of time to do the recoveries so I usually set them up to run in batches over night.

      Good Luck!!!!!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:For a free solution, check by Rysc · · Score: 1

      However I didn't know how to direct Linux to use the second drive as the user directory. I found out later that the fstab file has to be edited, but that's it, I still don't know how to edit it.

      Get an IRC client, connect to irc.freenode.net and /join the ##linux channel. Someone there will walk you through the process; it's not difficult.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  82. FindPart for non-physical issues on NTFS by jhliptak · · Score: 1

    I've used the free FindNTFS utility twice to pull almost everything off of two bad drives (both corrupted boot disks for Windows XP). A got a lot of points with my father-in-law for that! You can get it for free at http://www.partitionsupport.com/utilities.htm

  83. disk recovery for Linux by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I would be interested to hear if anyone has come across GOOD software for ext2/3, ReiserFS or ZFS. Google finds lots of links, but most are non-free, and most related forum posts seem to be shills for the same products.

    I went through the same thing after I took my Linux PC in for repair, it was under warranty, and the tech reformatted the drives even though I specifically told them not to. Someone in a post above posted a link to TestDisk which works with the formats you list above, my drives are formatted ReiserFS so if I can get off my ass, go buy a new external drive, and try it I may recover my data.

    Falcon

    1. Re:disk recovery for Linux by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      My. If someone reformatted my disk drives despite specific instrictions to the contrary, I'd be taking some moderately immoderate action.

    2. Re:disk recovery for Linux by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      My. If someone reformatted my disk drives despite specific instrictions to the contrary, I'd be taking some moderately immoderate action.

      Right behind the service counter there's a sign saying they are not responsible for lost data. For an extra fee they'll make a backup, but only up to 7 DVDs, and it would have taken more than 100 disks to back up mine. That's why I didn't have a backup. With the size and cost of external drives now I can easily make backups. Heck yesterday I bought a new 1.5 TB external drive for less than $200 to join my 750 GB and 1 TB external drives. Now I want to install the 1.5 TB internal drive I got a couple of weeks ago into my Linux PC and run some recovery software to get my old data back.

      Falcon

  84. Gibson's SpinRite by swschrad · · Score: 1

    if the disk is jangling like a janitor's key ring, it won't work. if the chips are fried, it won't work.

    under any other conditions, SpinRite is just freakin' amazing in what it can do.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  85. EXT3GREP FTW by enhuxley · · Score: 1

    If anyone has any deleted files from ext3 - I HIGHLY recommend ext3grep - http://code.google.com/p/ext3grep/ The developer is amazing, really nice guy too! Personally helped with recovering a deleted 312GB vmware drive image. After 2 weeks of every person I encountered offering only the most arrogant BS response: 'oh you should have had backups' I stumbled upon ext3grep and with the tremendous help of the ext3grep developer, Carlo, was able to get back the entire 300GB vmware image, and boot it and everything.

  86. dd + ice cubes? by Firewing1 · · Score: 1
    You might think it's a bit of an odd combo, but ice cubes and dd has worked multiple times for me when attempting to recover data from a laptop's internal disk. It's a bit trickier with internal disks since you can't get the circuit boards wet, but it's still possible... This is the dd command I use:

    dd if=/dev/sda of="/Path/To/Output/Image.img" bs=512 conv=noerror &
    pid=$! ; while ps $pid > /dev/null;do kill -SIGUSR1 $pid;sleep 15;done

    Gives you a nice status report every 15 seconds. If you're doing this on OS X, use "-s SIGINFO" instead of "-SIGUSR1".

  87. Chkdsk dies... by kubajz · · Score: 1

    On a similar note, I'm stuck with Chkdsk freezing when I let it run on Vista booting... The disk seems to work well so far, but is there any (free) way to find out what might be wrong? I have seen other cases of this problem on the 'Net but no solutions so far :(

  88. Recuva + good controller by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Recuva (http://www.recuva.com/) is free and works pretty well. It has a handy preview feature too, although it doesn't always work.

    To be honest, there isn't really much beyond what Recuva can do. Some paid-for tools support scanning for a few more file types in situations where the filesystem is gone and you have to scan the whole disk, but unless you happen to have files in some unusual format then there is no real advantage.

    The one thing which does make a big difference is the drive controller. Some chipsets are a lot better than others at dealing with knackered disks. You need one which does not lock up for long periods or try to read bad sectors too many times, otherwise your scan will take days or weeks with no improvement in the amount of data recovered. ATI chipsets seem to be best.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  89. Methods used by EcoDataRecovery.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sample drive: 40GB Hitachi 2.5" Laptop IDE, Windows OS
    Equipment: (1) Standard desktop PC, no host operating system, 2 open IDE or SATA ports, floppy drive, (kb/mon) [DRIVE CLONING]
    (1) Standard desktop PC, Windows XP operating system, open IDE or SATA port, (kb/mon/mouse) [FILE RECOVERY]
    Software: Media Tools Professional, RTT R-Studio, Ontrack Easy Recovery Professional

    Step One - Diagnosis: Connect customer drive to first IDE channel and a good, empty drive (previously zeroed) of equal or larger LBA to second channel. If customer drive model is detected by system BIOS, jump to [Step Two - Cloning]. If drive is not detected, check to see if it is spinning or making noises. If drive is spinning and indexing (the brief click-clunking you here after it reaches target RPM), then keep power-cycling drive until it detects. If drive is spinning and not indexing, not spinning, or clacking repeatedly - I can't really cover all that, but you can find HOWTOs on YouTube. As long as it isn't a firmware related problem, you can attempt a physical recovery at home (unless you have major $$). *You do NOT NEED A CLEAN ROOM* - a computer desk with all the junk moved aside and some finger condoms will work just fine. You'd be surprised just how resilient a hard drive is, despite all the horror stories online. A head swap on a 40GB laptop drive takes less than 15 minutes once you've done it a few thousand times. The firmware issue I mentioned above is a problem you aren't going to overcome at home (again, unless you're willing to spend $8k+). Data recovery companies use standard desktop PCs with a special ISA/PCI card to recode the information coming to and from the firmware area of the drive. Some makes/models have firmware information written to the data tracks and others have it embedded on the PCB. This is very different from user-accessible firmware areas you might find on some makes of drives. For more information, contact ACE Labs or DeepSpar and query the PC-3000 drive recovery system.

    Step Two - Cloning: Since you've come this far, you're GOING to get data back. However, this step will determine just how much. Much like painting an automobile, the result here is a direct result of your preparation and attention to detail. The onboard SATA/ATA controllers are often pretty sluggish with this step. If you have the ability, pick up a Promise ATA133/SATA controller PCI card with enough of the corresponding connector type to connect both your source and destination drives to. You might also find that drives which previously wouldn't detect on the mobo SATA/ATA ports will detect on a PCI-based card - sometimes that's just the delay the drive needs to come to life, since the PCI card initializes well after the PC BIOS. Anyway, since you still have everything hooked-up from Step One, insert the Media Tools Professional (MTL) floppy disk and boot from it. This is a much more efficient procedure than using a Windows utility. Work your way through the menu to clone from disk to disk - 'Source' is the customer drive and 'Destination' is your empty drive. Begin cloning from the front to back. If you run into read errors, accept the errors and keep going. There are more advanced methods possible here but we're going to try for minimum effort since the customer paid a minimum fee of $175 anyway...*ahem*.

    Step Three - Recovery: This is the software recovery part. It is pretty much self-explanitory. Connect the copy of the customer's drive to the 'File Recovery' PC and boot into your Windows installation. It is very important that you know what you're doing and how to hook things up so you don't accidently boot off the customer's data drive. If it gives you fits, you can disconnect the drive and boot Windows first, then put the data drive in a USB sled and connect it after Windows has finished loading. Now open R-studio and open the drive contents. Snoop through all their data. Then begin copying user data to a network drive or large

  90. data recovery by FreeBSD+evangelist · · Score: 1

    SpinRite has saved my ass more than once.

    It's not just a checkdisk/fsck type tool, but reads and refreshes all the blocks on the disk, with ECC on and off. It will beat on a sector hundreds of times if needed to get a trustworthy copy.

    So, not for "Oops, I deleted a file" but for "I keep getting read errors on this vital file."

  91. Recovery Studio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used a program called Recovery Studio successfully a few times. One time I formatted my wifes old laptop, gave it to my brothers for a few days to screw around with when she mentioned that she neither backed up nor copied off any of her data from the laptop. Got everything she needed back. I also used ZAR for flash cards. Works great and it's free.

  92. undelete by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Anything short of a physical failure of the drive should be recoverable with a tool like FreeUndelete or NTFS Undelete. I've used both to success, though I've not had to deal with any serious corruption or overt disk failure. Usually, those are a lost cause.

    Seriously, did we bother to STFW? They're the first couple hits for "NTFS undelete" or similar.

    I've also had some luck with photorec, part of the 'testdisk' package on Debian (and Ubuntu) recovering files from memory cards (though it should find lost files, to some degree, in any filesystem type - it's a diverse tool). It sure beats the hell out of manually digging for the file header and trying to reassemble!

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  93. Build your toolkit by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

    Here are a few tools I keep on hand for the less catastrophic problems:
    -Knoppix - live linux boot, can mount NTFS and flash drives and has a number of standard linux tools
    -Gparted - excellent graphical partition tool - useful in setting up a staging disk and in copying partitions, but it's unhappy if your NTFS drive is severely busted
    -Ultimate Boot CD - This disc has many tools (filesystem, hardware, etc) you shouldn't be without

    My recent drive crash (with backups a month old, oops) involved copying one partition with ntfsclone from the gparted disk (manually run to ignore errors). Chkdsk and some other tinkering was enough to restore the clone. In the end, the other partition required commercial software which worked despite my scepticism.

  94. Knowledge and experience comes first by Lawand · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Due to the variety of types of errors and possible causes of data loss, I find that -throughout the recovery process- the more options you set by yourself (requiring knowledge and experience in hard drives and file systems) the more efficient the process is. So, no matter the tool you choose, try to provide as much info to the tool as possible, and don't rely on the software developer(s) to choose a best general case which will always work...

    --
    Your Ad here
  95. Windows Recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had success with PC Inspector File Recovery.

    http://www.pcinspector.de/Sites/file_recovery/info.htm?language=1

  96. Two terms.. by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    CHKDSK and RECOVER

    Hell, it works most of the time on a widows box.

  97. List of data recovery tools by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hello,

    Here is a list of data recovery programs I have put together. Some of them may be a little old, for floppies or optical media only, but should still be useful. Unless otherwise noted, they are all for Microsoft Windows.

    A-FF Labs - NTFS Undelete and Partition Find and Mount
    Access Data - FTK Imager
    Acronis - RecoveryExpert
    Advanced NTFS Recovery - NTFS Recovery (may handle FAT32 as well)
    bitMART - Restorer Ultimate
    Brant, Dmitry - DiskDigger
    BriggSoft - Directory Snoop
    CGSecurity - TeskDisk and PhotoRec
    Convar - PC Inspector File Recovery
    Digital Assembly - Adroit Photo Recovery (pictures only)
    DiskInternals - NTFS Recovery
    DIY Data Recovery - iRecover
    DTI Data - Recover It All
    DataRescue.Com - PhotoRescue (intended for flash RAM cards, which are typically formatted with FAT, may work with other devices as well)
    EASEUS - Data Recovery & Security Suite
    Fsys Software - DFSee
    Gibson Research Corp. - Spinrite
    Gillware - GillWare File Viewer
    Higher Ground Software - Hard Drive Mechanic Gold
    Kato, Brian - Restoration (also here)
    LC Technology -
    [Continued in next message, as for some reason, Slashdot would not let me post in its entirety (too many URLs?). AG]

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
    1. Re:List of data recovery tools by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 1
      --
      Dexter is a good dog.
  98. EnCase and other forensic software by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Most people here will recommend those "one click and you're done" tools. But those tools, and the missing knowledge about file systems and storage, often destroy more than they save.

    Over the years, I gradually went from those colorful one-click things over some different tools, to professional software like EnCase et. al., plus some Linux shell tools. With them, I even save the hard stuff.

    Still, the best "recovery" is prevention with backups, ZFS scrubbing and S.M.A.R.T.. (But beware those virii and disk errors that slowly corrupt the data. When you notice it, all backups are already destroyed.)

    By the way: Wikipedia could have told you this too. ^^

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  99. One Other Thing That Often Works (Don't Laugh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freeze The Drive. Yes, as in put the drive into a zip-top bag with a silicon desiccant thingy and after an hour or so (to dry out the inside of the zip top baggy) gently place the whole thing in the freezer compartment of your fridge. Leave it there overnight. In the morning, open the end of the baggy enough to run in the drive's cables, and place the baggy between two blocks of "Blue Ice" sealed cooler ice packs. Its absolutely AMAZING how often this will allow you to read the entire disk again (at least one time).

  100. Mac OS X options (also: the freezer trick) by kriegsman · · Score: 2, Informative
    For an Mac OS X volume (HFS, HFS+), I've had lots of luck with Data Rescue II ($99) for recovering from serious drive failures. For drives that are still operational but have become borked at the filesystem level, Disk Warrior does a great job of rebuilding a healthy new directory structure. I make it a point to always have a copy of Disk Warrior within 100 yards of my PowerBook.

    Also, a couple of times I've had dying drives that work OK for a few minutes after a cold boot, and then they (heat up and) die. I've had good luck throwing the drive in the freezer (in a ziplock bag) for a day, then powering up it, recovering as much as I can until the drive chokes again, lather, rinse, repeat, until all recoverable data has been copies off to a good drive.

  101. Autopsy is the leading free tool for this by jschottm · · Score: 1

    I'm not a full time professional in data recovery but I am trained and certified in hard drive forensics.

    I'm assuming you're talking about recovering data that is lost from corruption errors, not the drive itself dying.

    There's a variety of free command line tools that are used for recovering data from corrupted hard drives that function at various levels (such as inodes), but really, unless you have training in them or need something really specific, the graphic (via web browser) frontend Autopsy is the way to go:

    http://www.sleuthkit.org/autopsy/

    If I'm looking for a specific type of file, sometimes I'll use Foremost:

    http://foremost.sourceforge.net/

    As far as commercial software, EnCase commonly used but pricey compared to Autopsy.

    http://www.guidancesoftware.com/

    The key thing with either the commercial or non-commercial options is to avoid damaging the file system you're working on. This means that if you're attempting to mount the drive from a working machine that you do so read-only (if you get really into this, there are hard drive -> USB mounts that block all writes) and if possible you clone the drive into an image and work on that rather than the original. The free version to do that is dd. Be sure to use the noerror option on it to make sure that a bad sector doesn't cause the process to fail.

    Also, clone the entire drive, not just the partition in case there's data that you need outside of the partition. In other words, do this:

    dd if=/dev/hda of=/forensics/image.dd conv=noerror,sync

    Rather than this:

    dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/forensics/image.dd conv=noerror,sync

  102. Spinrite works miracles, even on RAID by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

    Spinrite has become a standard part of my workflow. When a PC comes in for maintenance, I run Spinrite on it overnight to remap bad or weak sectors.

    I had to run it on a high end HP workstation with a set of RAID 0 (striped) SCSI320 drives. This was one of those million dollar projects the engineer was working on, and had not copied his latest edits to the server. He needed the performance of his local drives, so he was not being unreasonable in keeping the files local. He forgot to copy the files to the server after a late night work session, and the workstation wouldn't boot the next morning. Major panic.

    Spinrite worked on it for a few hours and everything came right back. Freaking amazing. Easy too.

    I have no association with GRC, I've just used the product since the early 90's. I will not be without this product.

    --
    Place nail here >+
  103. Easus Data Recovery tools... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easus tools have helped me several times and they offer many good data recovery and management tools.

    Some are free, some are not...

    Either way... Easus works, if the drive functions at all...

    PeacE!

    SlavoX

  104. Recuva is very good by wbhorton · · Score: 1

    I have used Recuva - File Recovery http://www.recuva.com/, It worked great I was able to get everything off the hard that i needed plus more that the user didn't need.. I just let them go though it and figure out what they did and didn't want.. it is free and works Great.. :) I hope that this helps

  105. What with a non-starting disk? by cheros · · Score: 1

    I've got one around somewhere that I think had a head crash (it was standing on edge due to the case design, and it fell over). The disk spins up, then spins down again, so I never get to a stage where the disk actually shows up on a system (ISA, in a USB 2.0 cradle). It's not critical, just curiosity, I haven't gotten around to being evil to it and then throwing it away :-).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:What with a non-starting disk? by jschottm · · Score: 1

      Chances are it's gone unless you're willing to spend $2,000 or so on it.

      First, try a different USB adapter - I've had some drives that did the same thing in one adapter but worked in others. The one possibility (short of sending it off to a drive recovery specialist) is swapping the drive's electronics with an identical working drive. But if you suspect physical damage to the platters, that's not going to help, and you run the risk of ruining not one but two drives. The legendary fix that circulates the internet (that I've never used) is that you can bring some dead drives back to life temporarily by freezing them. Like I said, I have no experience with it but if you're going to throw it out, it can't hurt other than wasting a little bit of your time.

  106. how can i fix a drive that won't power on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is there a way? please tell me there is.. please?

  107. A good moment to clean up? by iwein · · Score: 1
    I don't back up (well I do, because I can, but I'm convinced I don't need to). More importantly, I don't recover. Everything of value I produce goes into a repository or to a client. If my disk doesn't crash I usually wipe it after a year anyway. Worst that ever happened to me was the loss of one day of work and the loss of another day to get the new system like I wanted it (meaning without all the crap I installed on it over the months).

    There are plenty good solutions in this thread, but I'd say don't bother recovering, just learn the lesson and move on. I'm pretty sure you'll waste less time that way. Especially since the time wasted will not be yours it looks pretty good to me.

    --
    Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
  108. GHOST and netbootdisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I back up my data by doing the following:

    1. Burn copies of "irreplaceable" data to a DVD and tuck it away someplace safe
    2. Use netbootdisk (www.netbootdisk.com) to create a recovery CD that will boot the computer and allow me to map a network drive (In my case, a network share running on my linux server) from DOS.
    3. run GHOST and create or restore an image.

    That has always gotten me back up and running within minutes. Downside is that I have to keep the GHOST image updated, but that's a once-a-month thing. The GHOST image just prevents me from spending hours doing a clean install.. convenience only. The "real" data is always burned to CD.

    I'm sure there are more elegant solutions out there, but this is what works for me. I've probably done a dozen image restorations and they've always worked flawlessly.

     

  109. you used Windows Me by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    to recover a hard disk?

    your ninja geek skills are truly awesome

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  110. What? A Techie "Ask Slashdot?" by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I thought there was some kind of rule against "Ask Slashdots" questions that technerds actually know how to answer?!

  111. root in Knoppix: "sudo passwd", then "su" by KWTm · · Score: 1

    I'm not really sure how to login as root in Knoppix.

    Someone correct me if I remember wrongly, but the key to Knoppix is that there is a root account, with a password that no one knows; and there's the usual user account ("knoppix") which has admin rights and no password. So you type in a command-line: "sudo password" to set your own password for root, and then "su" to switch-user to root. That will give whatever rights you need.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
    1. Re:root in Knoppix: "sudo passwd", then "su" by memojuez · · Score: 1

      Next time I fire up Knoppix, I will have to give that a try. Thanks

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
    2. Re:root in Knoppix: "sudo passwd", then "su" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about sudo su - instead?

    3. Re:root in Knoppix: "sudo passwd", then "su" by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      first of all "sudo password" does not exist, try "sudo passwd". Second of all, why not just use either "sudo bash" or "sudo -i"?

      Slackware has some nice boot disks as well, you can even specify the desired packages on the site, then download a custom iso file! And for reference, slackware live cd's always have a root password of "toor".

    4. Re:root in Knoppix: "sudo passwd", then "su" by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Or you could just sudo -s

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  112. R-STUDIO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried about 20 different data recovery solutions when I was recovering from a nasty crash. To everyone using GetDataBack & co.: take a look at R-Studio. It supports everything all other popular solutions support (finding and restoring partitions, recognition of directory entries and files by signature, all major filesystems) plus support for virtual disks and RAIDs. Unlike many recovery solutions, you don't need to do a full scan to undelete just one file - you can just browse to the directory and undelete it, which really helps when you accidentally pressed the wrong key. The standard edition is at $80, just as much as GetDataBack.

  113. A streamlined and useful guide "recovery 101" by UberMD · · Score: 1
    This article has some great tips and a ~ stepwise algorithm on data recovery including recommendations on what tools to use and lots of links. I use this every time I encounter someone who comes to me whinning of data loss, it always seems to get the job done. It was made by someone who had the same problem, now he just tells them 'here's a link, stop asking me'...

    http://blog.econtech.selfip.org/2008/05/hard-drive-recovery-101/

    A short preview

    ..."3) Make a copy of the hard drive. Once this is done, we can work on the copy and not worry about messing up the original data. Making a copy of the copy is not a bad idea. This is NOT a copy and paste operation. Iâ(TM)m not sure if the best way of doing this is even possible under Windows. Never fear, though. Just download ubuntu, burn it to disk, and boot it up. We donâ(TM)t need to install it, just run it in âliveâ(TM) mode. If you are using Apple/OSX, this step can also be done with MacPorts. Technically, you can also install in cygwin on Windows, but I find installing cygwin more difficult than just grabbing the ubuntu live cd, so we are going down that path. 1) Enable universe in Ubuntuâ(TM)s repository and update the package database 2) Install GNUâ(TM)s ddrescue (sudo apt-get install gddrescue). Note, this is not the same thing as the original dd_rescue (ddrescue in apt) or dd_rhelp. GNUâ(TM)s ddrescue is like dd_rescue + dd_rhelp, only written in C instead of the sh frontend that dd_rhelp gives you. 3) Figure out which hard drive is the one you want to recover and the one you want to write the copy to. cfdisk and file will be your friends in this area. (Amusingly, it turns out fdisk (which Iâ(TM)ve always used) should be avoided, from the fdisk man page: âoefdisk is a buggy program that does fuzzy things - usually it happens to produce reasonable results. Its single advantage is that it has some support for BSD disk labels and other non-DOS partition tables. Avoid it if you can.â). For now on, assume hda is the troubled device, and that the current directory is a folder on a drive that has the capacity equal to or greater than hda. 4) In your workspace, make a copy of the partition table (cfdisk -P t /dev/hda > hda.part). This will come in handy. I have seen this return non-sense results in OSX. Donâ(TM)t know why, but it is actually less important there (continue reading for why).".......

  114. Re:Spinrite works miracles wout grammar by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    SpinRite's strongest and most unique capability
    quote from their website

  115. USB Keys?? by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have any luck rescuing dead usb flash drives??

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  116. Data recovery tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SpinRite

    www.grc.com

    Nothing better

  117. Sure, I'll recover that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a school sysadmin, there was one particularly clueless/rude teacher who sternly believed that U: was stored on her local hard drive. She told me, that in no uncertain terms, that if her hard drive had a head crash, she would expect me to recover everything that was on her U:.

    Sadly, she never had a head crash. When her U: reappeared, it would be either "told you so", or "I overnighted the hard drive to Taiwan and paid $1000 out of my own pocket for the recovery!" :-)

  118. My tools.... HAMMER AND A FRIGDE !! by deniea · · Score: 1

    How to recover, depends on the state of the device you want to recover things from..

    Most people that come to me to recover stuff from a hd.. We ask what type of recovery they want...
    Corrupt device, corrupt tape, corrupt tapedrive etc..

    Corrupt hd -> Is it a software (filesystem issues)
    -> recover4all does the undelete actions quite well on MS type fs-esses
    -> Partition recovery (any fs)
    -> UFS explorer (linux fs and much more)

    Corrupt tape:
    -> try tar, else rent really expensive professionals

    Corrupt HD hardware (board)
    -> Be sure to never junk old HD's.. swapping a HD PCB can fix tons of problems !

    Corrupt HD mechanics:
    -> Try a Linuxrescue/Knoppix CD.. and use dd_rescue... Goes a long way

    If the HD mechanics problem does not work... Try:
    -> Beers, fridge, rubberhammer, ziplock-bag:
      Cool down the HD quite a bit in a fridge, in a zip-locked bag (keeping it dry). Reconnect, keep it cool. Hit it with a rubber hammer fron the side...
    use dd_rescue.. Then if you can copy it to a working device then use the fs/software tools..

    Over the last 10 years, on about 50 disks like that, I got a 70% ratio. On tons of different disks.. Novell Netware, EXT3, XFS etc formated disks..

    Be sure.. If a customers asks about pricing.. It ain't cheap !! Sometimes it took me 10 hours for a single disk.. (from a no-RAID Netware server, without backups, that was easily over 2000 euro !!) only 4 files out of 50.000 were corrupt... But had to do the whole thing.. (hd replacement board, in frigde , hit it with rubber hammer, dd_rescue etc)

  119. Try this SANS course: Drive and Data Recovery F... by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
    SECURITY 606: http://www.sans.org/training/description.php?mid=1237

    One thing that nobody seems to have mentioned yet is freezer trick. If the drive is just not spinning anymore (and you do not hear a click of death), just throw your drive in a ziplock bag into the freezer for a couple of hours. Often times it will then run long enough to make a bit-to-bit (dd) copy as others already mentioned.

  120. What I do by yochaigal · · Score: 1

    If I can't pull the hard drive out right there, I use a live usb stick of either ubuntu or CAINE/Trinity Rescue CD, then run smartmontools short test to see if it is really dying. I also try mounting the partition and checking dmesg output. If I can see that the hard drive is dying, I pull the drive out and run ddrescue on another machine, until I can pull off a good image. If it's simply a partition issue, and I can't mount it or repair the filesystem right away, then I run testdisk. Of course, a good chkdsk on an NTFS partition can almost always help. DDRESCUE RULES!!! NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH that OTHER DD_RESCUE!!!

  121. Do NOT (easily) use SpinRite! by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
    You can get a very good explanation of why not here.

    I am referring to a blog entry from Scott A. Moulton who is a forensic and data recovery expert and currently teaches the SANS 606: Drive and Data Recovery Forensics course.

    Spinrite is not data recovery software. I get many questions about why I left off Spinrite on my recommendations of recovery software. I specifically leave off Spinrite because under the strictest terms it is not data recovery software. Almost every single data recovery package knows, and will warn you not to write the data back to the original source drive. Data Recovery/Forensics software almost always recover from a source to a destination. Spinrite does not do that, it refreshes the surface and controls reads to get the maximum amount of data from the sectors and then puts it back down on the same drive.

    I think it does quite a few things very well and it does an excellent job at reporting and reading the SMART info and refreshing the surface of the hard drive. However, I would like to first try to get the data from the drive before scanning it and trying to rebuild sectors. There are many reasons for this, but the most important one being that the drive can die in the process of running Spinrite. It is possible to do more damage to the drive by doing excessive read and writes. There are times that you only get once good chance at data and if you use a tool that just goes in and surgically removes the data you want BEFORE doing the scan you will be a lot safer.

    If I was going to use Spinrite, I would get everything I could off the drive to another destination first and then use Spinrite to try to get anything I could not repair (although I never have to with the tools I use). Another horrific story I have seen with drives sent to me, is that if Spinrite it runs successfully, people are under the impression that the drive is repaired and is usable again and continue to use it. Big mistake and it usually dies again shortly. On a Windows Hard Drive I would try NTFSExplorer/FatExplorer first in the hopes of doing a surgical recovery as oppose to spending days rewriting sectors in the hopes that my drive can live though it as Spinrite does. But for $80 it is well worth the attempt if you are going to do nothing else. Good Luck.

    Oct 6, 2008 11:26 PM

    Also, you can find some very interesting papers here.

  122. Do NOT (easily) use Spinrite! by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
    Disclaimer: this is a redundant posting but I wanted to make sure the author of the comment saw my post which quotes a blog entry by Scott A. Moulton who is a forensic and data recovery expert and currently teaches the SANS 606: Drive and Data Recovery Forensics course.

    Quoted from here:

    Spinrite is not data recovery software. I get many questions about why I left off Spinrite on my recommendations of recovery software. I specifically leave off Spinrite because under the strictest terms it is not data recovery software. Almost every single data recovery package knows, and will warn you not to write the data back to the original source drive. Data Recovery/Forensics software almost always recover from a source to a destination. Spinrite does not do that, it refreshes the surface and controls reads to get the maximum amount of data from the sectors and then puts it back down on the same drive.

    I think it does quite a few things very well and it does an excellent job at reporting and reading the SMART info and refreshing the surface of the hard drive. However, I would like to first try to get the data from the drive before scanning it and trying to rebuild sectors. There are many reasons for this, but the most important one being that the drive can die in the process of running Spinrite. It is possible to do more damage to the drive by doing excessive read and writes. There are times that you only get once good chance at data and if you use a tool that just goes in and surgically removes the data you want BEFORE doing the scan you will be a lot safer.

    If I was going to use Spinrite, I would get everything I could off the drive to another destination first and then use Spinrite to try to get anything I could not repair (although I never have to with the tools I use). Another horrific story I have seen with drives sent to me, is that if Spinrite it runs successfully, people are under the impression that the drive is repaired and is usable again and continue to use it. Big mistake and it usually dies again shortly. On a Windows Hard Drive I would try NTFSExplorer/FatExplorer first in the hopes of doing a surgical recovery as oppose to spending days rewriting sectors in the hopes that my drive can live though it as Spinrite does. But for $80 it is well worth the attempt if you are going to do nothing else. Good Luck.

    Oct 6, 2008 11:26 PM

    Also, you can find some very interesting papers/presentations/videos here.

  123. Re:Try this SANS course: Drive and Data Recovery F by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
    Oh, here is a nice video of the click of death.

    Also, there seem to be many other youtube videos about data recovery there as well.

  124. Stellar Phoenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stellar, www.stellarinfo.com has to be the best tool I have used for recovery,

    It provides a great GUI and has heaps of tweakables, supports most common systems (yes there is a linux version too!) and can even recover data from a formatted drive.

    5 stars.

  125. ntfsundelete.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ntfsundelete.com did work for me

  126. Professional data recovery engineer speaking by psychonaut · · Score: 1

    I used to be a software engineer for Ontrack Data Recovery, one of the major data recovery companies. Perhaps not surprisingly, our data recovery tools were proprietary tools custom-written in-house. It's not something that was available to, or marketed to, the average Joe (or even the average Joe Programmer).

    1. Re:Professional data recovery engineer speaking by haruchai · · Score: 1

      You mean aside from EZ Recovery Professional? I worked with a sysadmin back in 2002 who said he paid $500 for
      an Enterprise license.

      Ontrack sells a whole range of file repair / recovery tools directly:

      http://buyonline.ontrack.com/ecom/catalog.asp

       

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:Professional data recovery engineer speaking by psychonaut · · Score: 1

      I last worked there in 2000, so it's possible they've released some Enterprise solutions since then. But I'm sure that even so a lot of the data recovery tools they use are in-house only.

  127. you should get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hiren's boot cd

  128. Project time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised nobody has come up with a dirty simple cheep: "mount a platter, (the cleaner the room the better) find an entry point, and dump the raw data to a target disk/other source"

    it honestly can't be the hardest thing in the world to do, I mean the uses for such a beast would be pretty few and far between, and some sort of track mapping based on the vendor might be required, but it seems feasible to me!

  129. damn newbies by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Get off my lawn before I mow you down with my edlin!

  130. Yeah, any UNIX tool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, anything for unix.

    Unless you meant something with a pretty GUI... then yes, I recommend a linux live cd.

  131. Make the repair shops pay for loss of data by Platinumrat · · Score: 1

    Here's an idea to stop inconpetent repair shops. When you hand over the equipment to be repaired, also hand them a contract to sign saying they will be liable for any costs associated with loss of data or recovery of said data. This contract should specify that it overrides any conflicting "We're not responsible for loss of data" clauses in their standard terms and conditions. PS: Make sure you put **AA inflated values on your data and time. BTW: IANAL but would be interested in one's view on this approach.

    1. Re:Make the repair shops pay for loss of data by robbak · · Score: 2, Informative

      You would never get a technician to sign it.

      I certainly would not, even though I do not reformat hard drives while there are any other alternatives. (I don't think I ever have, apart from when the customer walks in and says "reformat this for me.")

      Hard disk drives dying on the operating table, or power supplies failing and zapping the drive controllers, are just too common for me to take liability for the data.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    2. Re:Make the repair shops pay for loss of data by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I repair a computer, I set the terms, not the customer. I would never agree to pay for an inflated damage cost, ever. As a matter of fact, I tell them flat out I am not responsible for any data loss that would occur. Not that I have ever lost anyone's data, but if I did I want it clear i am not liable for any monetary loss they would suffer. If their data is THAT important, they have multiple backups, right?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Make the repair shops pay for loss of data by niw · · Score: 1

      I agree. I would never accept the liability for data loss on any computer that a customer brought in for repair.

      When I have to send a computer out for repair (normally just laptops) but it also includes towers under warranty I am not authorized to work on. I will, if it seems to be a hard drive failure, image the drive before shipping it, or if it is defidently not a hard drive issue remove the hard drive from the computer and either hold it in store or give it to the customer.

  132. dd_rescue: like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start by putting the bad drive and a blank drive as big or bigger than the bad drive in a DIFFERENT known working PC. Sometimes a bad controller, motherboard, or power supply may be the cause.

    dd_rescue bad-drive to good-drive forward direction writing a sector of zeroes on error (I use direct reads with 4k hard sectors too)

    then again backwards with skip write on error

    repeat as desired with skip write on error and your copy can only get better each time

    when done make a copy of the copy and play with that as many ways as you want.

    the only software thing that might do better than this is a program that does raw reads on the bad sectors and uses that instead of a sector of zeroes.

    After this I usually access the files from a linux mount.

    if that does not do it and you know some text in an important file it is time to search the drive for strings or try different flavors of file system recovery software.

    never write on the original or the first generation copy.

  133. Backups, off-site backups and Spinrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backups, off-site backups and Spinrite - in that order.

    In modern servers, spinrite is a hassle to be avoided since it doesn't work on RAID systems. Individual disks only, so you'll need to swap the failed disk to another machine to run it. In many organizations, it is easier to pull the SMART data and have the drive returned under warranty.

    Nothing replaces a backup - you did say "professional", right? Professionals back up the OS, applications and data - PERIOD.

  134. The NSA by fredbox · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just file a FOIA request with the NSA for my own data. I can usually remember the redacted bits with some context. If I need help rebuilding my iTunes library I can just subpoena that from the RIAA. You're welcome.

    --
    His name was Robert Paulsen.
  135. data recovery methods by amxcoder · · Score: 1

    Like many have mentioned, I've used a Knoppix boot CD for my most intense recovery to date and it worked. It was a corrupted NTFS file system that would cause any windows based computer to crash when it mounted the drive, so using another computer didn't work. Knoppix was able to mount the drive in read only mode. Making a clone of the disk is also a good idea and what the "Pro's" would do for the reasons mentioned already. If it's a physical problem, and the data is important enough, I've seen companies that will go as far as taking the drive to a clean room, and physically disassembling the bad drive and moving the platters over into a new case to get it working, then cloning it, then performing all the software tricks on the clone. You wouldn't want to try this without a clean room though. For damaged/corrupted data (like from a damaged platter) I remember seeing a brief video where some FBI guy was going through the harddrive on a byte level and using error correction software and manually guiding the software to try to rebuild the damaged bytes. I think this would only be effective for single file recovery though, where you know what kind of data 'should be there', and also because going through a 500GB drive byte by byte would be a lesson in futility. I've also heard that some of the more prestigious data recovery companies use proprietary software that will help rebuild missing data using the data that is available. The FBI thing I mentioned may be a similar situation. Remember, that recovering a file and recovering a USABLE file is two different things. You may be able to get the file back, but if bytes within the file were damaged/lost, then the file still might not be usable without some kind of error correction method.

  136. TestDisk by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    2. testdisk recovers partition information to make the images mount-able.

    Yeap, someone near the top mentioned TestDisk and I'll give it a try, maybe. I need to recover data from when my Linux PC threw a fit. The mobo died and because the PC was still under warranty I took it to the store I bought it from. There I specifically told the tech not to reformat or erase the drive I used for user documents, the home folder was on a second hdd. I should have had backups as he went ahead and reformatted the disk anyway. However the disk was 750GB and I had more than 500GB on it. Back then I couldn't afford a big enough external drive and if I had burned the docs to DVDs it would have taken more than 100 disks.

    Falcon

  137. For me it isn't so much a backup as a migration to by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    larger drives. The originals become my backups while the new drives get tested.

    Yea that's what I plan on for my Linux PC. I got a 1.5 TB disk to replace the 750 GB disk in the PC. I also have a USB docking station I can then put the original disk into to use as a backup.

    Of course before I can do that I need to unformat and recover the data on the first drive.

    Falcon

  138. Use ddrescue instead of dd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dd is only good to a point. Gnu ddrescue (not to be confused with dd_rescue) is much better at working with physical errors in that it can work around them and then come back to the missed and try to get more information.

    Run this once:
    ddresue -n /source/drive /target logfile

    Then run this to try to work around any errors
    ddrescue -r -1 /source/drive /target logfile

    The process can be stopped and later resumed thanks to the log file.

  139. Couple of tools I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to throw my support behind 2 tools already mentioned.

    SpinRite is a great tool, and on the occasions where that fails I've had good fortune with a Knoppix Live CD.

    Knoppix is seemingly better than windows at looking as damaged NTFS partitions, and I have managed to recover corrupt partitions using it where windows wouldn't even find the file system.

    If your interested in a good desktop backup tool, a tool I haven't seen mentioned yet is ShadowProtect http://www.storagecraft.com.au/

    I've been using it for a few months now, and it has a minimal impact on desktop performance, and allows incrementals up to every 15 mins.
    I've only needed it once, and on that occasion I had my machine back up and working within 30 mins, and as far as I could tell lost nothing.
    Pretty good result from a complete HDD failure I thought - I was impressed.

    I purchased from Blue Technology in Sydney. They pointed me in the right direction when I needed to do the actual restore, so while I'm at it, a shameless plug for them too :)
    http://www.bluetechnology.com.au/

  140. OnTrack Data Recovery by trelamenos · · Score: 1

    http://www.ontrackdatarecovery.com/ probably one of the best corp in their section... good app choise and also services where you are sending them your hard drive and letting them to do the hard work(only when the hard drive is very dead).

  141. How about Free? by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

    Go disk to disk and carry the drive over to the next door neighbor (or someone that is a safe distance away).

  142. If only it was a data recovery tool by robbak · · Score: 1

    One thing I do not understand is why Spinrite does not write to another drive! If Steve Gibson would add that feature, most of us would use no other tool for data recovery.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  143. Phoenix from the Flames by misterduffy · · Score: 1

    I happened upon phoenix NTFS a little while back. No its not free but if you lack LINUX know-how its a very good option if you're having file system traumas. For recovering deleted or formatted data I've not used anything which works better.

  144. Re:A mix of tools... .. sounds like dangerous adv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. dangerous advice if used on dying disks, IMHO.

    I'd use SpinRite (www.grc.com) on dying disks and then recover the filesystem and files after that with Get Data Back or free alternatives.

  145. Re:A mix of tools... .. sounds like dangerous adv by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Scott Moulton of MyHardDiskDied.com and the YouTube videos on hard disk data recovery says the exact opposite. Don't use SpinRite because it can kill a dying disk. Use ddrescue or something to get the files off into a copy, THEN screw around with SpinRite if you have to. SpinRite alters a disk and on a dying hard disk that can kill it. The goal is to get the data off, not make the hard disk last longer.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  146. Easy Recovery Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very pricey, but it's worth it if you're doing DR on anything Windows for a living. Even if WIndows thinks your disk is unformatted, ERP will still be able to sift through and piece together directory and files.

  147. Recuva by erichsito · · Score: 1

    Well, Recuva from Piriorm (those guys from Ccleaner) has worked for me a couple of times. It's free http://www.piriform.com/recuva/download Hope it helps.

  148. IBM Tivoli Storage Manager by lbalbalba · · Score: 1

    Seriously, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/storage-mgr/, formerly Adstar, is used by many large corporations.

  149. GetDataBack all the way. by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    Despite the somewhat amateurish interface, I've gotten better and faster results with GDB than any other out there. I've done PC repairs for small companies and private persons for over 7 years and I've tried them all, and nothing else gets the job done this efficiently.

    If you're in the same business as me, it's great to introduce victims of data loss to an online backup solution where you get a commission, there's plenty of 'em out there.

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
    1. Re:GetDataBack all the way. by andrikos · · Score: 1

      For a while I thought GDB stood for the GNU debugger

  150. Don't try this at home, kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most recoveries can be done with free tools? Check. Most require minimal sector damage? Check. Most of the time DD will work? Check. File recovery requires mysterious "expensive software tools" when you just said free ones work fine most of the time? OK I'll write a check. You say IT pros hammer on drives before sending them to you? Sorry, tearing up the check now. Hey you should link to your homepage and try to convince readers to use your service. Oh wait...

  151. Definitely by DanielSmedegaardBuus · · Score: 1

    Consistently, hands-down, GetDataBack is the best recovery app I've ever used for FAT and NTFS. It has never failed me. And now, with their RAID Reconstructor, Runtime even help me get my data back from a broken SiI 3115 RAID-5 array. Think your data is safe with RAID-5? Forget it :)

  152. Here's an idea to stop inconpetent repair shops. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    When you hand over the equipment to be repaired, also hand them a contract to sign saying they will be liable for any costs associated with loss of data or recovery of said data. This contract should specify that it overrides any conflicting "We're not responsible for loss of data" clauses in their standard terms and conditions. PS: Make sure you put **AA inflated values on your data and time. BTW: IANAL but would be interested in one's view on this approach.

    I have two problems with this. The first is that the computer was still under warranty. Not only did I not know what was wrong but I would have had to pay for any repairs, and I couldn't afford to. Secondly I didn't then and still don't know of anybody who could repair it. When I bought the PC I also bought a second HDD, the original one was only 40 GB and the one I bought was 750 GB. The store has a repair shop right there and I asked them if they could install the HDD as a second drive and make it the home directory. Not one person there had any experience with Linux and didn't know how to do it. So I tried to install it myself. I got it installed but Linux did not recognize it. I went online and found out Linux had problems with Maxtor drives, which is what it was. So I removed it and returned the drive. I then found another 750 GB drive at Best Buy, the store I bought the PC from was Microcenter. I figured that since the Geek Squad did the computer work at, and was owned by, Best Buy they could install the drive and set it up so it was the home directory for users. Like Microcenter Best Buy didn't have anyone who worked on Linux. So I asked someone that could and was given an address for a Geek Squad. There I was told they would not touch a Linux PC. Back at the Best Buy a tech said he could research it and try to do the install but that I would have to sign a release from damages. An hour later I was headed home with my PC working how I wanted.

    While I had to run around to have a second drive installed in a Linux PC, I now know enough to be able to do the research myself. I know it's the fstab file that needs to be edited to tell the OS where to look for the home directory.

    Falcon

  153. I have a Linux PC with two drives formated with by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    ReiserFS,

    Good filesystem to recover from, I have successfully recovered data from a drive formatted over ReiserFS. For all his quirks, it's a great filesystem. What did they format over it, NTFS I'm guessing?

    The reformat was ReiserFS also. The tech allowed the CD install disk to run automatically and use the defaults, and the default format was ReiserFS. So I'm hoping, though I don't know, that the table was only rewritten.

    I had more than 500GB on it so I've been looking for something to unformat it and recover the data.

    1. get a bigger drive say 1TB.

    I now have 2 1.5 TB drives, an internal one I'll use to replace the older drive and an external drive for backups. Back when this happened I couldn't afford an external drive, I still went out on a limb to buy these two drives.

    2. dd the raw image of the target drive onto the new drive *do not attempt data recovery off the original disk*, all data recovery is conducted from the dd image.

    DD? Does it clone drives or what? Guess I'll look into it.

    3. Do you have the original partition information, this can be handy as if you can get these original figure you can use some of the Reiser tools to restore the journal and recover the data

    I don't know what the "original partition information" is. Or how to copy it.

    4. if you can't use 3, you will need to use a tool (magic rescue comes to mind) to recover files from the drive image based on file types in sweeps.

    Reviews for TestDisk say it can restore partition tables, which may make the data accessible. I may use an external drive to copy it to and I imagine it'd take hours to do. Which would be okay if it works.

    Fortunately for you you picked reiserFS which is more forgiving that other filesystems. You have lost data, but I rate you chances as pretty high even if some dolt has formatted right over your file systems. It takes a lot of time to do the recoveries so I usually set them up to run in batches over night.

    ReiserFS was the default format used by the distro. I imagine it'd take me days to recover my data if I am able to. But I have a lot of tyme and I want the data back so it doesn't matter too much how long it takes.

    Good Luck!!!!!

    Thanks!

    Falcon

    1. Re:I have a Linux PC with two drives formated with by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      The reformat was ReiserFS also.

      That will make things interesting indeed. From memory reiserfs has back-up superblocks and it might be possible to replay the journal to recover the filesystem. If it's been initialised with another reiserfs journal may have been erased and only the backup superblock remains. What that means is the chance of recovery from the filesystem as a damaged item is decreased and you *may* have to fall back on recovery tools. Regardless the first steps will be the same, set them up to run overnight.

      I now have 2 1.5 TB drives, an internal one I'll use to replace the older drive and an external drive for backups.

      Whatever you do do not perform any write operations to the target (damaged, older) disk. The disk must remain as close to it's damaged state to increase the chances of recovery. Even mounting the disk now with a new filesystem is not desirable as it will update the superblocks on the disk. Conversely though, that it is formatted with the *same* filesystem means that the data areas are unlikely to be affected in it's basic initialised state.

      Have your destination drive ready in the chassis. It should be formatted, mounted etc etc so that you can write files to it. There are two schools of thought here, write the damaged drive out as a file (my choice) or as a partition. Go for the file option, it will be simpler for the time being. You will need to use the mount or df command to establish which *device* are present, say as root do

      df -ah > normalDrives

      - checking the file it produces (nomalDrives) will tell you which devices (/dev/sd??) are mounted. You need to know this so you can *exclude* those drives when you dump the data, even so putting in another sata drive may change the *order* of the drives in the system so you should have enough information to establish which device you target drive is.

      ls -l /dev/sd* > normalDriveListing

      is your friend. shutdown your system.

      Put the target drive (sata, I'm guessing) on an internal interface for speed - usb will be too slow and may try to auto mount the fs on the drive. Restart the machine.

      As root check the above two commands against the results now, there is no guarantee that the devices will be the same so use the files generated earlier to compare what you have now. the device that is not mounted is you candidate, you can also check by using fdisk to check the sizer of the partition table, while you are at it check the partion type - if it's Linux LVM you may have other options, if it's Linux keep going - check the fdisk options for partition type.

      DD? Does it clone drives or what? Guess I'll look into it.

      data destroyer, data deliverer or damn dangerous, dd is all these things - http://linux.die.net/man/1/dd. You are concerned with two options 'if=' and 'of=' for now. Basically you want to do this from a root shell

      dd if=/dev/sd_my_disk_letter_here__partitionNumber of=/the/path/to/your/destination/DamagedDiskFile

      insert appropriate replacement parameters. The trick for you is you don't know if the target partition is the same size as it was before (ie /dev/sdc for the whole disk or /dev/sdc1 for the first partition), take a chance that it is and 'data dump' partition 1, you can always go back and start again by reading from the drive as you know this drive does not have some looming hardware failure threatening it.

      Go to bed and check it in the morning - depending on when you start it it may not even be finished by morning 8 or more hours is not unreasonable. if you like you can send dd a kill USR1 dd's_pid to get it to dump it progress.

      Welcome to data forensics 101.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:I have a Linux PC with two drives formated with by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Whatever you do do not perform any write operations to the target (damaged, older) disk.

      I haven't used the PC since I got it back. About all I did was boot it up once or twice. I didn't want to take the change that by using it I would irrevocably lose the data. What I'm thinking of doing is switching the old drive for the new one then booting up. If possible I don't know how to have 3 hard disk drives in the PC so I'd compleatly remove the old one. However I have a USB docking station for sata drives. It will allow me to use the disk as an external drive. Of course using USB will take a long tyme to recover data.

      Have your destination drive ready in the chassis. It should be formatted, mounted etc etc so that you can write files to it. There are two schools of thought here, write the damaged drive out as a file (my choice) or as a partition. Go for the file option, it will be simpler for the time being. You will need to use the mount or df command to establish which *device* are present, say as root do

      You and others have said to use dd to image the old drive then use the image. Does dd or df format disks or require them to be formated? Quickly googling I see OS X Leopard can use both the dd and df commands in terminal so perhaps I can use my Mac to work on the drive. There's also a Mac version of TestDisk I may also be able to use. However I wonder if using these commands and TestDisk on my Mac will work with ReiserFS partitions on an external drive.

      Put the target drive (sata, I'm guessing) on an internal interface for speed - usb will be too slow and may try to auto mount the fs on the drive. Restart the machine.

      Oh, I see you suggest not to use USB but to install it internally. I'd have to do more research to see how to install a third disk if it's possible. I imagine it is because Apple sells Mac Pros with up to 4 hard disks. I imagine I'd have to edit fstab before installing it though so Linux doesn't automatically try to mount the drive. If I use the docking station hooked to my Mac though I can tell it to not mount or dismount the disk.

      I'd encourage you to go for broke and see if you can replay the old journal

      I'd like that. Unfortunately I'll probably have a problem with the next part:

      sure you won't have any file names - just unattached inodes

      A lot of the data and files I have on the disk are webpages I saved on my disks. Though I don't do research as much as I used to when I come across info I want to keep I'll save it. For instance I read in the IEEE's magazine "Spectrum" and article "A Broadband Utopia" about how a group of cities in northeastern Utah joined together to build a broadband infrastructure. I found the article online, you have to be a member or buy it in order to read it online now but it used to be free, so I saved it.

      Because of this if the file names are not recovered it would take a long tyme to rebuild the documents, webpages. Others I saved were how people in various locations, whether Central America or Africa, were able to pottery to decontaminate and kill pathogens in water so it was potable. Being webpages it's likely there will be a number of different files, css, html, and photos among others. That makes for a lot of documents, so I'd like to recover document names. But the big thing is that the docs are recovered, over a period of tyme I could then rebuild them.

      Falcon

    3. Re:I have a Linux PC with two drives formated with by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      You and others have said to use dd to image the old drive then use the image. Does dd or df format disks or require them to be formated?

      No, it reads a stream of 'raw' characters and it doesn't matter what media is being read.

      so perhaps I can use my Mac to work on the drive

      was the drive originally from a Mac?, even so Linux is the way to go as it has support for all the filesystem types in kernel and the distribution should also have filesystem tools like reiser.fsck. Is it from a linux distribution this hard drive?

      Oh, I see you suggest not to use USB but to install it internally.

      yeah, it will take days to read 500Gb via usb - just don't bother.

      Unfortunately I'll probably have a problem with the next part

      That's as far as filesystem recovery goes. It depends on the way the crash happened but if you are lucky enough to pick up the top level directory inodes then you *may* (on a good day, with the winds blowing in the right direction, proper offering to the gods done and a bit of luck) be able to recover the filesystem structure such as

      /lost+found/000753490/websave/funstuff/picturesofdogs

      as an example. Which is why you want to have all the right tools available from the get go and no resistance from the OS. It's crap doing this sort of thing but I totally empathise with you. Stick with the routine and you should be ok, just get ready for a lot of repetitive stuff.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:I have a Linux PC with two drives formated with by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      so perhaps I can use my Mac to work on the drive

      was the drive originally from a Mac?, even so Linux is the way to go as it has support for all the filesystem types in kernel and the distribution should also have filesystem tools like reiser.fsck. Is it from a linux distribution this hard drive?

      No, it was a drive I got for the Linux PC at the same tyme. This PC is the only computer it's been installed in. The original drive that came installed in the PC was only 40GB however I had more than 500GB on the drive in an old PC I was replacing. So I got a new 750GB drive when I got the PC. I could have gotten a PC with a bigger drive but that cost more than getting a second drive.

      Unfortunately I'll probably have a problem with the next part

      That's as far as filesystem recovery goes. It depends on the way the crash happened

      Luckily I think the PC didn't crash while I was using it, instead I did a fresh boot after it was off for a few hours. When I did it didn't boot-up right. Seeing as it was under an extended warranty I paid for when I bought the PC and the store was only a miles and I wasn't in a rush to do anything else I put the PC in my car and drove to the store.

      After they ran diagnostics they told me the motherboard had to be replaced. Now I realize what I should have done was remove the drive before they did any work, perhaps swapped it with a another used drive. I've got a couple laying around. But stupid me, I thought the tech would do what I said I wanted done.

      /lost+found/000753490/websave/funstuff/picturesofdogs

      Some photos of a couple of cats but not of dogs. I do have hundreds of photos though. I took some good shots of wind surfers on a lake during summer and winter. Others were from trips, my garden, and the neighborhood. Still other photos I took for my classes in photography. Luckily I only have a film based 35mm camera and I still have my film, going back more than 10 years. I ordered photocds when I turned in the film for personal use, I turned in the film for my classes in the lab on campus. I now have a film scanner which scans at a higher resolution than the photo shops offer, so I think I'll scan all my film.

      However as I said I've done a lot of research online and whenever I come across a webpage I want to keep I'll save it to disk. For websites that were only a few pages, when I used Linux or Windows, I used HTTrack to save them. There isn't a version of it for OS X though so now I manually save webpages., which brings up something that pisses me off about Firefox, FF doesn't save pages with a standard file name such as the page title nor does it write the url the page is saved from. As much as people gripe about IE at least it saves a page using the title and it includes the url. With FF every page I save I open the html file with an editor so I can paste in the url. There are supposed to be FF add-ons that do these for you but I read reviews for all of them I found and they all have problems.

      Which is why you want to have all the right tools available from the get go and no resistance from the OS. It's crap doing this sort of thing but I totally empathise with you. Stick with the routine and you should be ok, just get ready for a lot of repetitive stuff.

      Okay, I suppose I'll run the commands and software from Linux. Now I need to see how I can install a third hard disk drive in the PC or I'll have to put up with the slowness of USB.

      Thanks.

      Falcon

    5. Re:I have a Linux PC with two drives formated with by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I do have hundreds of photos though.

      You should go after them first - they are the easiest to recover.

      Okay, I suppose I'll run the commands and software from Linux. Now I need to see how I can install a third hard disk drive in the PC or I'll have to put up with the slowness of USB.

      Thanks.

      No problem, get stuck into it - it's a good background task.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.