Slashdot Mirror

What difference does it make whether they were at that house killing that particular innocent guy or at a different house shooting someone else answering the door?

Who we charge for giving them false information.

Never the officers who are the actual danger to the community.

Provably false claim on your part.

In the first link, the officers weren't charged for assaulting a defenseless man laying on the ground.

Your words were, and I quote, "Never the officers who are the actual danger to the community." without such specification.

They got a 15 day suspension, not a criminal charge.

Again, you said never. Never is absolute. And all I need is them being charged which I can provide.

In the second link, the officer wasn't charged for "being a danger to her community".

You were seeking that particular charge, when we were previously discussing charges for giving false information without such requirements?

You really should have specified. It is so easy to disprove you though, it is what happens when you are a shoddy troll.

She falsified paperwork. She was charged for it though.

Exactly what we were talking about. Creating a danger to the community by giving false information.

Paperwork means more to these guys than wanton violence against defenseless citizens.

Yes, I see you're familiar with your history then, your personal history, that is.

I mean really, you do care more about the paperwork than the actual reality of your affairs. If it's not triple-stamped and cross-documented, you don't care.

What difference does it make whether they were at that house killing that particular innocent guy or at a different house shooting someone else answering the door?

Who we charge for giving them false information.

Never the officers who are the actual danger to the community.

Provably false claim on your part.

In the first link, the officers weren't charged for assaulting a defenseless man laying on the ground. They got a 15 day suspension, not a criminal charge.

In the second link, the officer wasn't charged for "being a danger to her community". She falsified paperwork. She was charged for it though.

Paperwork means more to these guys than wanton violence against defenseless citizens.

What difference does it make whether they were at that house killing that particular innocent guy or at a different house shooting someone else answering the door?

Who we charge for giving them false information.

Contribute to a crime, do the time. You know this Kohath, it's your own argument, you made it Tuesday before last.

Now it's coming back to bite you, since it's criminalizing trolling, your favorite activity.

Never the officers who are the actual danger to the community.

Provably false claim on your part.

Of course, last week you were outside protesting the indignity of arresting cops like common criminals, and demanding that they be given medals instead.

Why do you troll so badly? Did you not pass your class in troll school?

3 LSU sports pays for all school sports teams and facility + puts millions into the general fund.

http://www.theadvocate.com/bat...

NCCA
http://sports.usatoday.com/nca...

Actually baseball bats are more commonly used in assaults than rifles.

Most firearms homicides are with pistols of some sort, not rifles or shotguns.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/c...

Further, most firearms deaths are suicides.:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fac...

Further, homicides are a poor indicator of how many crimes are committed with different weapons:
http://blogs.theadvocate.com/b...

Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana, has let Norquist's organization, Americans for Tax Reform, decide state tax policy:

What gives Norquist and his lieutenants the control they clearly have is that Jindal has simply given it to them.

In defending their role, ATR officials like to point out that the pledge reads as a promise to a politician’s constituents, not to the group.

It’s the interpretation of the pledge that’s the rub. As many people who’ve had conversations with the administration have said, and as Jindal and his aides have pretty much publicly admitted, the governor is not just refusing to raise taxes. He’s hewing to ATR’s highly debatable interpretation of the pledge’s terms.

That means refusing to consider anything that would increase revenue unless it’s paired with an equal, explicit offset. That means eliminating only those tax breaks that exceed a payer’s liability so the action can be counted as a spending cut. A couple of years ago, that meant vetoing a 4-cent cigarette tax renewal — 4 cents! — because refusing to let it expire somehow counted as a tax increase.

The interpretation is almost comically strict. That’s not on Norquist, who has no power to enforce the pledge. It’s on Jindal.

When you announce that you are planning on spending $889 billion on the next election politicians stand in line to meet you. The Koch brothers have already held the first audition for their candidate:

A large group of Republican presidential hopefuls will gather for lunch at billionaire conservative David Koch's oceanfront mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, on Sunday and meet face-to-face with some of the party's most influential contributors.

The event at Koch's 30,050-square foot home is being sponsored as a fundraiser for the Republican Governor's Association, one of the many conservative interests Koch supports, reports The Washington Post. It is attracting prospective candidates such as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal.

yes... as a PRIVATE citizen. as a GOVERNMENT official, it screams shady

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

http://theadvocate.com/news/12...

Jeb Bush, Bobby Jindal, Scott Walker, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Chris Christie all used private email as GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

I get where you're going but cash is fungible and what the town spends it on, or if it even bothers to comply with state laws about where the money goes, is less easy to control. And if the "town" doesn't have the fine revenue, they have less money to fund the police, so it makes little difference if the cops hand it to the town to hand back to the police. By which I mean the town often appears to be directing the police to raise revenue.

Then you get ridiculous situations like:
http://theind.com/article-8237...
http://theadvocate.com/news/le...

Where the town is collecting ticket revenue and not passing it along to the state as the law requires, ostensibly via some loophole. Then the state suggests putting up flashing "speed trap" signs outside your town, because that's adult.

Or these guys that were running the police force to fund the town:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fl...
So if they can't have the fine revenue they have no use for police at all!

It's a hypothetical situation.

But not difficult to find news reports of similar shootings, jealous husbands/lovers, accidental shootings, mistaken identity.

For example, death facilitated by "law abiding citizens" with guns.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2083886/Robin-Heidt-Wife-affair-brother-law-drove-gun-family-speaks-time.html
http://www.durhamregion.com/news/crime/article/1610791--documentary-probes-accidental-shooting-of-former-oshawa-teen
http://jonathanturley.org/2013/03/20/homeowner-shoots-and-kills-teen-who-entered-wrong-home-after-party/
http://www.spectacle.org/996/who.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270105/Phillip-Walker-Sailers-69-accused-killing-Rodrigo-Abad-Diaz-22-pulled-driveway-house.html
http://theadvocate.com/home/4109368-125/death-of-exchange-student-painful

I suppose, in the end it depends if you consider those deaths "for the greater good" - an acceptable consequence of liberal gun control.

It's Not 2002, it's really the year 6007, since, as we all (should) know, the Earth, the universe, and everything else was created in 4004 B.C.

tee hee, tee hee.

You have posted a link to a NYT article without saying (free registration blah, blah, blah).

Here is the article on The Advocate, as posted by SlashdotSucks.

http://theadvocate.com/emergency.htm
Here's another news site. (NOTE this is still up, unlike most others !).

http://theadvocate.com/emergency.htm
Here's another news site. (NOTE this is still up, unlike most others !).