Slashdot Mirror

Nuh uh! It has a solid iron surface just below the photosphere. http://www.thesurfaceofthesun....

The average density of the sun is 1410 kg/m^3 and the outer layers are much less dense than that. The density of iron is 7870 kg/m^3. So I don't think so.

But the iron is porous. Didn't you see his pictures? And apparently solid at high temperature, and strong enough to avoid crushing the pores closed. Maybe it's iron from Krypton.

Nuh uh! It has a solid iron surface just below the photosphere. http://www.thesurfaceofthesun....

The average density of the sun is 1410 kg/m^3 and the outer layers are much less dense than that. The density of iron is 7870 kg/m^3. So I don't think so.

It isn't going to touch the Sun; it won't get anywhere near the surface...

The sun is a ball of gas. It does not have a "surface" in any meaningful sense.

Nuh uh! It has a solid iron surface just below the photosphere. http://www.thesurfaceofthesun....

(I can't figure out if that guy is serious or has constructed an elaborate hoax. I'm leaning towards the former.)

This is simply not true. There is in fact a very specific prediction for the Birkeland solar model listed at http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/blog.htm Since it's one of the few models that predicts a mass separated atmosphere, there is a specific prediction related to Neon +4 output from the sun, and the prediction that it originates in the photosphere not the coronal loops. As usual, you're claims about it's predictive capacity are simply false.

This has been floating around the net for a while.. I think I first saw it on slashdot many years ago:

    http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/

Maybe a solid metallic surface would align better with low observed surface wave transfer compared to a soupy plasma.

The sun and all the planets are made of the same stuff. http://thesurfaceofthesun.com/ The gas giants all have rocky cores.

I'd like to know if there was any more evidence for this:
http://www.thesunisiron.com/
http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_sol01.htm
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/sun.htm
http://www.electricuniverse.info/Electric_Sun_theory

If the Rossi/Focardi eCat (a claimed nickel-hydrogen LENR cold fusion device) really works, maybe cold fusion also happens at the boundary of the Earth's nickel-iron crust? And maybe the core even ejects neustrons, as suggested about the sun? And the end result might be abiotic oil and other "food" that could support an underground biosphere? Could life have even started down there (if bacteria did not come from beyond the solar system)? What other scientific dogma remains to be overturned? Related comment by me:
    http://aleklett.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/the-sun-rossi%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Denergy-catalyzer%E2%80%9D-and-the-%E2%80%9Cneutron-barometer%E2%80%9D/#comment-5891

And:
    http://www.thesunisiron.com/
    http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/

The Surface of the Sun. Viewed using a 171 angstrom filter, the sun appears to actually have a solid surface beneath the gas layers. It also seems to be electrically active. This is one of the more fascinating astronomy sites I've seen, mainly because they don't seem to start with a bias of "what we know can't be so". That always appeals to me, especially since "what we know is 100% impossible" is something that's been proven wrong, again and again, although that doesn't seem to stop anyone from asserting that this time we really have it right.

...a solid body: http://thesurfaceofthesun.com/ ...the focus of an electric discharge, which powers it: http://www.electric-cosmos.org/sun.htm ...to be respected. The sun doesn't dodge bullets. Bullets dodge the sun. http://passthebrass.com/2005/12/chuck-norris-owns- you/

You're not the only one scratching your head about the electrical nature of the universe. Professional astronogers routinely ignore electricity in space at their peril. It's astonishing in the twenty-first century that astronogers are still stuck in the gaslight era where they imagine the sun as a huge burning nuclear ball of gas. The sun is not a "gas", it is a solid. http://thesurfaceofthesun.com/

http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/ claims that the sun has a solid "rocky, calcium ferrite surface layer" beneath a plasma photosphere.

The animations / .avi files on that site (like this one: http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/images/T171_0008 28.avi) are strangely convincing. Beneath the turbulently moving filaments of a coronal mass ejection, you can see a layer that has features that remain quite fixed in location relative to each other -- implying a solid surface.

http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/ claims that the sun has a solid "rocky, calcium ferrite surface layer" beneath a plasma photosphere.

The animations / .avi files on that site (like this one: http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/images/T171_0008 28.avi) are strangely convincing. Beneath the turbulently moving filaments of a coronal mass ejection, you can see a layer that has features that remain quite fixed in location relative to each other -- implying a solid surface.

This guy claims the sun has a solid surface... Anyway, there are some nice pictures.
http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/

And yes they'll be using this new warp drive to land on the surface of the Sun. It's solid you know! If it's posted on the Internet it must be true. They'll land at night when it's cooler.