Domain: virtual-estates.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to virtual-estates.net.
Comments · 10
-
Re:new clause?
The OSI and FSF agree that free or open source licenses, respectively, should never have any sort of usage clause in them. Richard Stallman has publicly encouraged everybody to find ways to profit off free software.
Profit is not everything. My little project may be for sale, but I will not sell to anyone owning a Che Guevara T-shirt, for example.
-
Re:Developers don't deserve freedom?!
What can be owned? Software? Oh no it can't.
?? Of course, it can. Microsoft owns Windows... Semantec owns Norton Utilities. I own skem. You can buy the ownership of software (if the current owner is willing to sell), although people usually prefer to license it instead — they get a lot fewer rights, but pay a lot less money.
Probably, this difference between buying and licensing is what got you so confused...
-
Re:My milter reduces spam from fooled computers...
Well, try skem. Maybe, you'll like it better
:-) -
My milter reduces spam from fooled computers...
Whether it is a zombie, which is not supposed to have an SMTP server at all, or a legitimate mail-server fooled into relaying spam to you, my milter will black-list it for a few hours after your spam-detectors issue their first verdict against the relay.
Unlike with most blacklists, though, the damage from a false-positive is merely a delayed, rather than rejected (or, worse, dropped) message...
-
Shameless plugUse SKEM to automatically block IP-addresses, which your spam-filter(s) suspect of spamming.
SKEM (
/usr/ports/mail/milter-skem on FreeBSD) will not eliminate spam, but it will throttle the volume of it arriving from rogue servers and hi-jacked PCs, while the worst effect of a false-positive is delayed (rather than rejected) legitimate e-mail. -
Re:Use RBL for TEMPORARY (4xx) rejections
Most spam engines don't use a mail queue, which is why greylisting works so well.
I was talking about a misconfigured server used by spammers because of ignorance (or complacency) of the owners. A growing queue is likely to make them notice the problem.As for spamd's greylisting, yes, it is another way to implement it. It has an inconvenience, IMHO, requiring a database, whereas my skem keeps the state in a way, that's easy to monitor and alter without special utilities -- relying on the filesystem for efficiency.
You did not really look into it before rushing to "plug" your favorite operating system here, did you?
Try my milter -- it should build on OpenBSD without a problem...
-
Use RBL for TEMPORARY (4xx) rejectionsInstead of rejecting e-mails based on RBLs, how about temporarily rejecting them (with a 4xx code)?
This way the accidentally blacklisted server has several days to straighten things out while the really spammy server gets overloaded with huge mail queue.
Using my skem milter is one way to do that intelligently...
:-) -
Re:just DO IT! (was: Re:That's easy...)
If you use bayesian filter software, like bogofilter or spamprobe, you can turn this into an advantage.
Why limit yourself to bayesian? <plug>With my state-keeping milter, for example</plug>, you can automatically blacklist the relay, that handed this spam to your server. So that you would not waste any CPU nor bandwidth talking to the abusive machine again.
-
I have seen more recent bunkers -- Syriancaptured by Israel.
And I have photos too -- can I get to frontpage now?
-
A shameless plug
stories about RBLs that add people, but never remove them.
My State KEeping Milter maintains temporary blocks and automaticly removes even the "permanent" bans, which are not triggered for a specified period of time....