Slashdot Mirror


A New Elena Story

SwiftBoy writes "Elena, of motorcycling through Chernobyl fame has gone riding again, this time to dig up the history of Kiev's fortifications. Interesting that after 60 years all that stuff is still there."

253 comments

  1. Wasn't she the one by superpenguin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    about whom there was much doubt as to the veracity of her story?

    1. Re:Wasn't she the one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That's the one. I highly doubt there's any such village of "pripyat" that's been "contaminated" by alleged nuclear waste and "abandoned".

      Nobody abandons a city of 60,000 people.

    2. Re:Wasn't she the one by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If this is all fake, this is one damn good fake.

      What was supposedly fake about it anyway?

    3. Re:Wasn't she the one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The photos of so many human bones. There's no chance in HELL these would be allowed to be left about after all this time. 'She' just finds too much good archaeological stuff for this to be real.

    4. Re:Wasn't she the one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      What was supposedly fake about it anyway?
      Supposedly the areas that she was motorcycling in and out of aren't actually open to the public. What was allegedly fake about it was that she'd just taken some pictures of herself on a motorcycle on the highway and then interspersed them with file photos of Cheronobyl's abandoned areas, then presented them as a photo diary of a trip that never happened.

    5. Re:Wasn't she the one by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      You mean people actually read it, too? "wget --recursive --accept=jpg,gif,bmp,png ..."

    6. Re:Wasn't she the one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To be fair that photo was taken from another photo.

      But her comments are quite good. Like those on casualties in the war between Germany and Soviet:

      The figure of 300.000 is a rough estimate, no one ever register a civilians.
      Kind of like a reversed deja vu there...
    7. Re:Wasn't she the one by larry2161941 · · Score: 1

      Is Elena an archeologist by trade or are her travels more of a hobby ? LarryD PS Is it true she falsified the "Motorcycle Trip?

    8. Re:Wasn't she the one by Alomex · · Score: 1

      The photos of so many human bones. There's no chance in HELL these would be allowed to be left about after all this time.

      About ten years back there was an article in the Atlantic monthly about heaps upon heaps of exposed bones in a field just outside Stalingrad, IIRC. The author concluded a priori that it would have taken too long to bury them either during war, or right after during the reconstruction. Hence they were likely to still be exposed, if truly so many people had died in that battle. Lo and behold, the piles of bones were there.

    9. Re:Wasn't she the one by mm0mm · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ... she'd just taken some pictures of herself on a motorcycle on the highway and then interspersed them with file photos of Cheronobyl's abandoned areas, then presented them as a photo diary of a trip that never happened.
      and what's the big deal about it? Maybe she fooled us, maybe not. Even if her roadtrip was a lie, that won't change other facts. If this is a fake story I wish Chernobyl's accident was the one "that never happened."

      Even if her story was fake and she made herself a journalist by doing so, she did a darn good job convincing the readers. Anything presented on the web as the truth can be fake or real. It is viewer's responsibility to examine credibility and authenticity of each story and make most out of it. If you can't provide facts to back up your claims to discredit her story, then your allegation, without any valid proof, can be fake as well.

      Her story being fake doesn't change the history of Chernobyl or the fact the area has been, and will be, abandoned for years. If she's told us lies, it is her stupidity and lack of integrity that made her a lier. Big deal. Maybe she just wanted to be in a spotlight. We believed in her story just like we believed in the allegations of Iraq's WMD programs. I believe there are more dangerous lies than hers, even if her story turned out fake. Her "trip," whether fake or not, revealed very significant and important information about the doomed area, and that's all matters to me.

    10. Re:Wasn't she the one by krokodil · · Score: 1

      Well, this is contemporary history - you
      do not have to go digging into woods to check this. Just type the name of the city into the fucking google!

    11. Re:Wasn't she the one by ErikZ · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      Yeah, lies. Who cares? What's the big deal?

      Just one of the biggest things that make modern civilization possible. Trust.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    12. Re:Wasn't she the one by empaler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the big sticks was what made us more civilized than those with only the small twigs (that we've broken)

    13. Re:Wasn't she the one by mangu · · Score: 1
      Her "trip," whether fake or not, revealed very significant and important information about the doomed area, and that's all matters to me.


      What information? If she's a liar, how can you trust anything she writes? There's a big difference between reenacting some part to make a story easier to understand and faking the whole essence of the story.

    14. Re:Wasn't she the one by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      It sure sounds like there's an active campaign to discredit her, for some reason. Maybe we should explore that whole matter more deeply.

    15. Re:Wasn't she the one by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

      She could be a reporter for the New York Times.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    16. Re:Wasn't she the one by madprof · · Score: 1

      Not in the slightest. Just that the facts were checked and her story seemed deeply suspect.
      Then she admitted she'd made her original story up. Easy really!

    17. Re:Wasn't she the one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, bullshit.

      Next thing you'll be saying is that George Bush isn't that stupid and secretly went to Harvard.

    18. Re:Wasn't she the one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of those moments where I wish i hadn't RTFA first.

      Most of the items she photographed appear like they were purchased from a local market or second hand shop, they appear recently cleaned and polished and show no effects of being buried in soil for 60 years. There is a lot of low value items there, generally stuff worth between a few cents and $10.
      The only things that actually appear like she dug them up are the rifles, garbage and ammunination which have absolute no value at all.

      Buying stuff thats been sitting in peoples homes for 60 years and then showing pictures of it freshly being dug up does say quite a bit about her personality. And then she talks about how they should be in a museum. Her dialog on what happened in battles appears just like she is writting what she remebered a tour guide telling her. If you read her text remeber most of it is BS.

    19. Re:Wasn't she the one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That guy tried to kill my daddy!"

      -Dubya commenting on going to war

    20. Re:Wasn't she the one by tyrr · · Score: 1

      Have you been there?
      Hear from someone who had. I was born and raised in Ukraine. Yes, this is the way it is. And in case you need proff - 800$ two way ticket to Ukraine. Any person with enough curiosity can do it.

    21. Re:Wasn't she the one by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      What information? If she's a liar, how can you trust anything she writes?

      Indeed. One of the things that originally made me suspect her story was her claims about all the people in the outlying areas that had died by the thousands when they failed to heed the warnings to move. That directly contradicts scientific information on Chernobyl which states that the number of deaths was actually small, but that there were a lot of cases of treatable Thyroid Cancer.

      Unfortunately, I thought that she was merely uninformed and had bought into a lot of local tales. (Which was surprising for a "daughter of a nuclear scientist".) Guess I should have been more skeptical.

    22. Re:Wasn't she the one by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Nope. You have to be able to trust that your friends won't hit you with a big stick. And if you think I'm exaggerating, look at primitive societies where the family unit is the largest circle of trust.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    23. Re:Wasn't she the one by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      and I quote: "photo from national museum"

      It is in the caption of the actual picture so you don't even need to RTFA if you dont want to.

  2. and how accurate? by timelady · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i mean, ignoring the eye candy of elena (expressed previously by you guys), is what accuracy does her article have?

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
  3. Wasn't the elana Cheronobyl story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    widely shown to have almost certainly been a fake?

    Why would this one be different?

    1. Re:Wasn't the elana Cheronobyl story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      widely shown to have almost certainly been a fake?

      Why would this one be different?


      Because it is a Friday night and Slashdot editors are short on stories.

  4. Elena was debunked a while ago. by Jason+Scott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is one of a good number of debunkings. Naughty, Naughty!

    1. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Jason+Scott · · Score: 5, Insightful

      God dammit.. who the fuck cares if she didnt really ride a motorcycle alone at chernobyl.. the pics are real and are still powerful.. fuck

      Because riding through Chernobyl on a motorcycle would be inherently risky, dangerous, unlawful and maybe even lethal. When a person claims they are portraying an event, with photographs, they are implying they actually experienced that event, unless of course we're in the realm of fantasy. Which would be fine.

      But if a person neither deliniates the photo essay as a fantasy or indicates in some way that you are not seeing what you are being told, then you're letting your audience down, and you're spreading, basically, lies. It's called bad journalism. Some people might not care, like you, my little profane anonymous friend. But a lot of people do.

    2. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2, Funny

      So she is a 30 year old wife of a con-man, not a 26 year old daughter of a nuclear physicist?

      That sucks.

    3. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by quigonn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because riding through Chernobyl on a motorcycle would be inherently risky, dangerous, unlawful and maybe even lethal. When a person claims they are portraying an event, with photographs, they are implying they actually experienced that event, unless of course we're in the realm of fantasy. Which would be fine.

      Nevertheless, some guys at IAEA had their fun with this website. A close friend of mine knows a few people who work for them in Vienna, and when he showed them the website, they were manically laughing and stating that if it was really true, she would die in about 2 years.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    4. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a reply to the post in your link:

      Is this coming from a confirmed source? It would explain why all of a sudden the site and its content completely disapeared...

      I think thousands of slashbots pounding on the server explain it better :)

    5. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by hfis · · Score: 1

      Fake photo journals can actually be really good if used well: who here has read Ted the Caver?

      For those of you who haven't, it goes on for a while, but gets really interesting/freaky as it progresses.

    6. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      In Post-Soviet Russia, Elena hoodwinks YOU!

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    7. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still dont get the point.. her english is so bad i couldnt care less about her story.. its the pictures that affected me, and those pictures are real

    8. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its the pictures that affected me, and those pictures are real

      I think I'll make a website about me riding through various ghost towns of the American West... but to make it more interesting, I'll make up some story about how the inhabitants were wiped out in some horrific fashion when a secret bioweapon under development by James K. Polk's administration escaped from a laboratory.

    9. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by bluephone · · Score: 1

      It's a good yarn. Too bad the ending it, shall we say, open to interpretation. :)

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    10. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by danila · · Score: 1, Insightful

      She was not a journalist writing for a news publication. She had absolutely no responsibility to present facts and facts only. This is Internet, I can write about my dreams, about my aspirations, fantasies, etc. If I wanted, I could make a photo-gallery of me making a trip to the center of the Earth without any sort of disclaimers and that would not be unethical, that would not be misleading people. You are responsible for judging the validity of the content on the Net, not the author.

      And note that Elena didn't ask for this publicity when the published the photos. It was just a little personal photo gallery for friends (and fellow motorcycle riders), nothing more. I've been in Berlin a few weeks ago and took some photos. My friends took some photos too. If I copy one of their pics (of a building or a monument that I didn't have a chance to photograph) and include it in my album, which I then post online for my other friends and relatives, would that be unethical? Would that be misleading? Now if that album was picked up by Slashdot and major media outlets, would it be right to call me a fake and a liar? I don't think so.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    11. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Don't hold 'journalists' to such high standards. Freedom of the press means anybody can own a press. Sure, there are 'watchdogs' out there pretending that they are objective. But the whole trick is to recognize that everybody has an agenda.

      And the agenda of many 'J-school' cheerleaders is quite bald and obvious.

    12. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      And note that Elena didn't ask for this publicity when the published the photos. It was just a little personal photo gallery for friends (and fellow motorcycle riders), nothing more. I've been in Berlin a few weeks ago and took some photos. My friends took some photos too. If I copy one of their pics (of a building or a monument that I didn't have a chance to photograph) and include it in my album, which I then post online for my other friends and relatives, would that be unethical? Would that be misleading? Now if that album was picked up by Slashdot and major media outlets, would it be right to call me a fake and a liar? I don't think so.

      Well, she does generally mark a picture as not hers often enough to lend credibility to pictures she doesn't say she didn't take.

      I would prefer that if something isn't true, to the best of the author's ability to determine, that they include something saying so. Like "Some of these pictures I took on the tour, some of them are from this photo album or that photo album". Or "This is the story as I remember it", which automatically means it's wrong if I remember it wrong.

      Now, in your specific example, how you present the photo of the monument you saw but didn't get a chance to take yourself is the kicker. Do you say "I saw this monument" and leave it at that? Generally ok if the person looking at the album is already aware that you didn't take every photo in the album (a common question, I hear, when looking at someone's photo album. I don't know, though, because I neither keep a photo album nor look at other people's photo albums). But if you collect a bunch of photos from a bunch of different sources, say you took them all on a motorcycle ride through the zone, and present it as fact, then it is a lie.

      I'm a little disappointed her motorcycle story isn't true, and I did suspect she wasn't being completely honest with the story. What actually irritates me about it isn't that it wasn't true, it's that she turns out to be my age and formerly/currently married to a con-man, and that another researcher turned up the fact that she had posed some of the pictures, but in her photo journal (at least the version that I read) she said she didn't touch anything, she'd left it as it was, and that it appeared to the tour guide woman that Elena had been intentionally posing the pictures for shock value.

      Reason? She could have said all the same things without dressing it up. The event was bad enough. So she had it in her power to be completely honest without burdening the story down with disclaimers, and still say the same thing. Given the choice being saying something and doing it honestly and saying the same thing and doing it dishonestly, what would you prefer?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    13. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And a friend of a friend of my brothers friend took lsd, thought himself as an orange and peeled himself!!! It's all true!!!

    14. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by danila · · Score: 1

      I too have a preference for 100% absolute honesty. This is what somewhat puts me off of various documentary films (including the most popular ones by a certain fat filmmaker). I may like the author, I may agree with his main point, share his feelings, but when I see them twist the truth, that's annoying.

      But at the same time I realise that they have the right to present a story in the way the like. In some cases it's unethical, but in case of Elena I don't think it's her fault. It would be nice to live in a world, where everyone holds the truth in highest regard, but we don't live in such a world.

      P.S. Not to mention the fact that it's natural to forget some things and distort the picture - all humans do it, because it's how our brains work. It is not impossible (though may be unlikely) that when Elena made the gallery, she believed she rode the motorcycle in some of the areas she filmed.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    15. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'm not disagreeing, just pointing out how I was disappointed by it. Some of these other people are wanting to tar and feather her or something. Kinky, but a tad extreme.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    16. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia?
      You mean "In UKRAINE, Elena hoodwinks YOU!"

      Yeah, I know. We Yurpeans are confusing, having several countries and all...

    17. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would your made-up story have to do with this? There was nothing made up about Chornobyl or its history.

    18. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't consider writings of people with a Furry for an Avatar.

    19. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was not a journalist writing for a news publication. She had absolutely no responsibility to present facts and facts only. This is Internet, I can write about my dreams, about my aspirations, fantasies, etc. If I wanted, I could make a photo-gallery of me making a trip to the center of the Earth without any sort of disclaimers and that would not be unethical, that would not be misleading people.

      No, but we can still call you a liar and not believe anything you say. It may be the internet, but the internet is part of real life. What you say on the internet, you say in real life. Likewise, I can tell women at bars that I journeyed to the center of the earth, they probably won't sleep with me.

      And note that Elena didn't ask for this publicity when the published the photos. It was just a little personal photo gallery for friends (and fellow motorcycle riders), nothing more.

      And if I take pictures of myself naked just for my friends, and nothing else, and then post them on the internet?

      I doubt you'd say "it's not her fault, she just posted them on the internet for a few people to see." When publishing on the internet, there's the potential that the whole world will see it. That's what the internet is. A great big bar, where stories tend to get around...

      I've been in Berlin a few weeks ago and took some photos. My friends took some photos too. If I copy one of their pics (of a building or a monument that I didn't have a chance to photograph) and include it in my album, which I then post online for my other friends and relatives, would that be unethical? Would that be misleading? Now if that album was picked up by Slashdot and major media outlets, would it be right to call me a fake and a liar? I don't think so.

      Well let's see, you posted photos that you didn't actually take, and claimed them as yours. Yep, fake and a liar. Most people won't care, of course: your point here is very different. Monuments in Berlin are very easy to visit, anyone can, and nobody will care if you lie about visiting one. Claiming that you visited Area 51 and took some photos would be a better example -- people aren't generally allowed in, your claim that you got in will be of great interest to many people, and you will be de-bunked. At that point, people have every right to call you a liar and a fake, and they probably will.

      Regards,
      Heloise

    20. Re:Elena was debunked a while ago. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Informative

      A close friend of mine knows a few people who work for them in Vienna, and when he showed them the website, they were manically laughing and stating that if it was really true, she would die in about 2 years.

      Your friend was either taking the piss or didn't know much about the effects of radiation exposure.
      To simplify a complicated subject, either you become ill within a few days of being exposed to a high dose or radiation, or if you are below the threshold dose, you live the rest of your life with an increased probability of suffering from some sort of cancer. In either case, the timespan of "2 years" is wrong.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  5. Hot chick by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hot chick riding a motorcycle around in a post-apocalyptic wasteland!

    Now thats some porn I would like to get addicted to.

    1. Re:Hot chick by Atrax · · Score: 1

      so where's the post-apocalyptic element?

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    2. Re:Hot chick by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure what to laugh at most. The original post, or the fact it was modded as redundant.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Hot chick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well she prevented the apocalypse in both movies.
      You cant froget her on a motorcycle jumping off a building with 2 macheine guns.

    4. Re:Hot chick by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

      It's like Akira meets Fallout meets "Cafe Flesh."

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    5. Re:Hot chick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post-apocalyptic element in Tomb Raider
      is the decline of the Egyptian empire. The
      post-apocalyptic element in Elena's travels
      through battle fields are the battle fields
      themselves, where at least 1 million (yes,
      MILLION) Russian troops died in combat.

      (If you RTFA, you'll note she uncovers bones
      when looking for old souvenirs.)

  6. Dang it! by mcknation · · Score: 0


    I knew this had gone live when I clicked next and it took 2 minutes to load the page.

  7. c'mon really by syynnapse · · Score: 5, Funny

    let's all just admit it. this article is only here because 90% of readers love pretty european women.
    war schmore.

    --

    System.out.println(syynnapse.getSig());

    1. Re:c'mon really by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 5, Funny
      let's all just admit it. this article is only here because 90% of readers love pretty european women.

      The other 10% love "Soviet Russia" jokes.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    2. Re:c'mon really by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      > let's all just admit it. this article is only here because
      > 90% of readers love pretty european women.

      >
      > The other 10% love "Soviet Russia" jokes.

      Like: In Soviet Russia, pretty european women love 90% of slashdot readers.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:c'mon really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a better one. Ready? In Soviet Russia, Elena's server slashdots YOU!

    4. Re:c'mon really by Raleel · · Score: 1

      I don't think we're picky about them being European :) I mean, we got Maxim and Stuff too.

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    5. Re:c'mon really by RyLaN · · Score: 1

      The other 10% love "Soviet Russia" jokes.

      In Soviet Russia, 10% of the jokes love you!

      --
      At least the war on the environment is going well
    6. Re:c'mon really by dedeman · · Score: 1
      I, for one, welcome our "Soviet Russia" joke overlords.

      Wait, 10%? Never mind.

  8. Here's the earlier Slashdot story on her by xmas2003 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Previousely discussed back in March/2004

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Here's the earlier Slashdot story on her by cerebis · · Score: 1

      Yep, not a new story. :)

  9. I melt. by UncleJam · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is there nothing more attractive than a girl in a rusty helmet holding a submachine gun? If there is, I haven't found it yet.

    1. Re:I melt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - said girl in rusty helmet holding a mansized cock, shooting spunk on her hands.

    2. Re:I melt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno about you, but I much preffer seeing submachine guns than seeing mansized cocks shooting spunk.

  10. Um, this is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a 4MB panoramic image on the debunking site mentioned in the parent post: http://www.web-axis.net/~pulse/chernobyl/prypyat-p anoramic.jpg

    That's one hell of a case of deja vu for those of us who just spent all day immersed in Half-Life 2.

    1. Re:Um, this is interesting by ksilebo · · Score: 1

      I believe some interview with Gabe Newell said that their inspiration for HL2 was to be an eastern european city. I think they did an awesome job.

    2. Re:Um, this is interesting by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe some interview with Gabe Newell said that their inspiration for HL2 was to be an eastern european city. I think they did an awesome job.

      I'm in the non-Eastern-European Brussels at the moment, but I can't help but see City 17 everywhere. There's even a Combine Citadel in the middle, or perhaps I mean the European Parliament - it's definitely slowly consuming its way through the city anyhow. ;-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    3. Re:Um, this is interesting by Kalak · · Score: 1

      Damn shame his site marked on the picture only has one shot on it. I'd love to see the pictures he's got. I don't care if Elena's story isn't true, the disaster and the Ghost Town is, and I haven't seen any documentuaries on it, so the more picures the better. (More accuracy is nice though.)

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    4. Re:Um, this is interesting by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Half-Life 2 has signs in cyrillic on gates and in some other places and I personally recognize a dozen of vehicles there as being produced in USSR.
      Architecture feels like at home too ;) 9-story boxes looking exactly like ones in my uptown.

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    5. Re:Um, this is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, maybe I'm a little nuts, but that picture really freaked me out for some reason.

      At first I was like, how weird, an abandoned city.

      Then I scrolled more to the right, saw the ferris wheel, and thought okay that's a little surreal with it being there. It really sticks out in contrast to all the abandoned, gray buildings.

      Then I scrolled more, saw those 2 ladies who look like identical twins, and thought WTF??? Not that there's anything wrong with twins, but it just added to the whole strangeness of the picture. It was like something out of a very bad dream or something.

    6. Re:Um, this is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a panorama of stiched together photos... it's the same person, not twins.

  11. What's really amazing... by stretch0611 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's really amazing is that Elena, after motorcycling through Chernobyl, is still there."

    --
    Looking for a job?
    Want your resume written professionally?
    DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    1. Re:What's really amazing... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well.. taken that it's not possible in reality to go and motorcycle the route she said on the page........

      it's not so amazing to cook up some stuff.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  12. Coral link by Bill_Royle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Shame that can't be done automatically for all postings...

    Now watch - someone else will probably have posted this link at the same time...

    Coral Link

  13. Echo by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    We just did to the server what the Chyrnobol reactor did to that Russian town.

    1. Re:Echo by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only it's Ukrainian.

  14. stalker game? by PipoDeClown · · Score: 1

    there is some info here http://www.gsc-game.com/index.php?t=community&s=fo rums&s_game_type=xr&sec_id=6

    1. Re:stalker game? by daniil · · Score: 1
      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    2. Re:stalker game? by prandal · · Score: 1

      For a brief moment I thought you were taliking about a game based on the great Andrei Tarkovsky's movie Stalker, then I awoke and realised this is Slashdot ;-)

    3. Re:stalker game? by daniil · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't played the game, but from what i've read about it, some elements of the game do bear some resemblance to Tarkovsky's movie and/or the book it was based on ("Roadside Picnic" by the Strugatsky brothers). The idea behind the game -- "stalkers" retrieving strange artifacts from a guarded Zone filled with dangers and anomalies -- is most probably borrowed from that book.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
  15. Re:She is hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the OP

    Uh huh, sure. Mod 'im down even further for that one boys.

  16. Yeah, the Ukraine Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    was the first to say "she was not allowed to be there, so she wasn't there...".

  17. Next photo story request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Elena goes to visit Junis in Afghanistan to photograph the Commodore-64s running Linux.

  18. Stuff on the ground by architimmy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually there really is stuff just lying around all over the place in Europe (probably depending on exactly where you are). I know my old landlord in Germany had a museum quality collection (I say this because he loaned it to a museum in Speyer on a couple occasions) of pre-historic artifacts and fossils sitting in the garage. This was all stuff he collected while cutting wood up in the forest. The house I lived in was over 200 years old. He also had a collection of late 19th century farming equipment and a bunch of world war one artifacts which were actually passed down through his family.

    You can still find bullets, shell fragments, peices of old weapons, helmets, and various other things on the ground up around the Maginot Line and also in the countryside around Bastogne (where the Battle of the Bulge took place). Other areas, like Normandy, are more "cleaned up" but still show rather evident signs of historical events of note. Hard to take two steps without bumping your head on something historically relevant.

    Of course that's without even mentioning all of the other "important" historical periods that took place around Europe. With so much history to so little square footage, it's no surprise you can hop on a motorcycle and find cool stuff all over the place.

    I imagine the same amount of history is lying about the americas as well. It's just that there's far more surface area to human history that took place here. So the stuff is all piled up on itself.

    BTW, my eagle project was a food and clothing drive for people living in Belarus (current country where Cherbnobyl is located). They still can't drink milk or eat meat from cows in the area or eat certain foods grown in the soil close to the accident. But people do still live there. I remember having passive radiation detectors in our classrooms in the late 80s... Although that might have been more a product of the cold war, since the military base I lived near was actually a short range nuclear(that's an assumption) missle site(this isn't).

    1. Re:Stuff on the ground by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was always rather amazed with the amount of history available in Europe. A few of the things I saw while stationed just inside the Western border of Germany...

      There was Trier - Northern gate to the Roman Empire. Colusium, bath houses (complete with underground tunnels for slaves to burn fires and heat the in-ground baths).

      Trier also had some base housing for US military personnel. It was located on the side of a rather steep hill. Ironically, all housing units had notices warning residents not to climb down the hill in the woods. The hill overlooks a major railway nexus. During WWII, it was a prime target for allied bombers who, faced with constantly bad weather conditions, had to dump a huge amount of ordinance. Much of it ended up embeded in the hill and remains there today as Unexploded Ordinance.

      These are just two examples of the random bits of history that was everyday life in Germany. One just doesn't see that kind of depth of history Stateside.

    2. Re:Stuff on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes! You are right on! I live in Idaho. Its a low population, large area state. There are very few places in this state that don't have history to them. You can drive through the mountians in centeral Idaho and see all of the indian war sites. You can drive out and see the site of the Teton damn burst. You can see plane crashes all throught the state (I know of over 400 personally). Very little of this is linked to a big event that you learn about in school (or play a game that is based on it) so people just forget the local history. Its really fun to be hiking along a trail and just stumble upon an old grave site, miners shack, or other such historical areas.

      As a side note, we found a front end loaded burried up to the cab in the middle of an area that had no roads. Took almost a year to find out why it was there. Before the wilderness area was founded (Place where no roads are allowed in the middle of Idaho) the owner of the tractor wanted to get it out so he tried to repare the road leaving his farm. Eventually it broke down so he just left it. 50 years later it has sunk into the mud. The road has long since been grown over so it is just a cab sticking out of the dirt in the middle of nowhere.

    3. Re:Stuff on the ground by daniil · · Score: 2, Informative
      Belarus (current country where Cherbnobyl is located).

      Meh? Last i heard, Chernobyl was in Ukraine. What happepened, did they move it to another country or sell it or something?

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    4. Re:Stuff on the ground by architimmy · · Score: 1

      True, although the plant was on the border. Next time I'll check my facts better before posting ancient memories :)

    5. Re:Stuff on the ground by jedrek · · Score: 3, Informative

      I totally agree with you, and this is especially prevalent in the eastern and central, post-Soviet Bloc, parts of Europe. To this day - and it's been almost 60 years since the end of hostilities in Europe - you can find bullet holes in buildings in the poorer parts of Warsaw. It's also not uncommon to see bomb squads called in when a construction crew finds an unexploded bomb or artillery shell buried in the ground. Or to hear about some kid getting their hand blown off after finding an unexploded grenade while playing in the woods.

      World War II also left us with a lot of burial grounds and mass graves, both the Nazis and the Soviets were fast and lose with mass murders. In 1940 the Soviets slaughtered 25 thousand members of Poland's intelectual elite, then blamed it on the Nazis. Their remains weren't exhumed until the mid 1990s, and if it hadn't been for people actively working to find out the truth and getting the bodies exhumed and properly buried, they remains would still be in the ground, buried under a couple of feed of dirt in the middle of a forest.

      There is one factual error in your post - while Belarus did recieve a huge part of the fallout from the Chernobyl disaster, the reactor itself is in the Ukraine.

    6. Re:Stuff on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure you do. Yesterday I saw this Apache on my my to work.

    7. Re:Stuff on the ground by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The area that is now the US didn't have much by the way of empires before the 1500's, but it did have a great many indiginous tribes and cultures, much of which is lost to time or legend because they didn't tend to build massive structures.

      The US didn't have any world wars fought on its soil either.

    8. Re:Stuff on the ground by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention the unexploded WW2 bombs that get found from time to time when construction crews are digging a basement!

      I used to live in Bonn, and it wasn't unheard of to find Roman coins within 6" of the surface if you walked through the parks with a metal detector. Back then, you could get pecuniae and other common Roman coins for one or two marks at the flea markets, since they were so easy to find.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Stuff on the ground by mikael · · Score: 1

      Actually there really is stuff just lying around all over the place in Europe (probably depending on exactly where you are).

      There are old pill-boxes (machine gun emplacements protected by circular/octagonal concrete walls) all over the UK. These were supposed to defend roads leading to cities and villages, should there be an invasion. A few were even built in public parks (the idea being that the enemy would find it easier to travel across the open space of the park, and therefore be an easy target for the defenders).

      The best example I have seen was in Duthie Park in Aberdeen, where there was a whole row of such pill-boxes. Urban legend was that these were connected by an underground tunnel. I remember me and friends (under the supervision of our parents) crawling inside one, and there was a concrete block at the centre, that looked like it led to somewhere. But we never had the chance to explore.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Stuff on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually there really is stuff just lying around all over the place in Europe (probably depending on exactly where you are).

      Goddamnit, how I hate it when some people speak of "Europe" and "Europeans" as if it were a city or something, with a common culture or people or language.
      It's a rather vast continent, with many countries, many cultures, many languages, and diverse history. "We" generally don't refer to ourselves like I just did: "we Europeans". "We" are Swedes, Ukrainians, German, French, Greek...

      If you're talking about what you've seen in Germany, then please say Germany, or even better which part of or city in Germany. No "European" would refer to Normandy as a part of Europe. It's a part of northern France.

      And Tjornobyl (Chernobyl) is a city in Ukraine, not Belarus. Then again, why do people speak of "the Chernobyl nuclear disaster" at all, when "the European nuclear disaster" apparently would suffice?

    11. Re:Stuff on the ground by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Your correct about history lying around, at least in New England.

      There are many places where you can just randomly start walking through woods and suddenly come upon a rock wall. Most of these are well over 200 years old (old farm markers) and it's not uncommon to find arrowheads and other such "knick-knacks" lying around.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    12. Re:Stuff on the ground by xowie · · Score: 1

      Like the harrowing war film (Come and See), which opens with two kids excavating a Belarus battlefield, looking for old German weapons.

    13. Re:Stuff on the ground by pVoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, this also explains a certain amount of the 'arrogance' that is felt by Europe towards America. When you live in a city, such as Rome, or Istanbul or Vienna, and you have monuments that date back *thousands* of years, you can't help but find even New York dull at times.

      I lived in Istanbul for a long time, and a lot of the historical 'relics' are still in use in modern days. Cable pulled "subway" carts from the turn of the century, ferry boats from the 20s. You take it for granted when you're there, until you come to a 'new' country and realize, there's NO historical background at all.

    14. Re:Stuff on the ground by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's an old saying about this:

      In England, they think 200 miles is a long ways.
      In America, they think 200 years is a long time.

      It gets worse in America as you go west. Here in California, a 20 year old house may be "too old" for a bank to consider it loanworthy!! In fact, a lot of why California has the issues it does is a total lack of any sense of history. I don't mean of old places (we have that) but of a sense of continuity back through places and events. A lot of that is because most of the population here are immigrants, either from another state or another country, so hardly anyone here has any "roots". The rest is due to rampant commercialism, the cult of "new is better".

      As to Elena -- yeah, I know her Chernobyl piece was debunked, but it was still powerful photo-journalism. She's young, and kids make mistakes. But hopefully she'll learn better and will fulfill her potential. Her style reminds me a lot of Charles Kuralt.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:Stuff on the ground by Himring · · Score: 1

      Actually there really is stuff just lying around all over the place in Europe....

      I always felt like all the history I took in College could be summed up with such a sentence. My god gump! You're a genius!...

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    16. Re:Stuff on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her style reminds me a lot of Charles Kuralt.

      That's a good point. Charles Kuralt was a liar too.

    17. Re:Stuff on the ground by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
      Here in California, a 20 year old house may be "too old" for a bank to consider it loanworthy!!

      Doesn't that have more to do with updates to the building codes and insurance, to account for earthquakes? It doesn't seem "due to rampant commercialism" or "the cult of 'new is better'", I think.

    18. Re:Stuff on the ground by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Since you posted that A.C., you must have secrets too ;)

      But seriously... I don't care about Kuralt's secret life. I also don't care if Elena has her own sordid secrets. And I don't care if the presentation is slanted or inaccurate or even entirely made up. What interests me is the fact that her work is *effective* as a =visual narrative=. It's essentially an online coffee-table book, designed to be beautiful and evocative. It's not an encyclopaedia or a history text, meant only for dry facts.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:Stuff on the ground by Reziac · · Score: 1

      You'd think so, but it has more to do with resale value in a market where there is a high incidence of defaults on home loans. Banks don't want to get stuck with an older home that may need updating before it's salable. And there is practically a cult of "we only want a NEW house that NO ONE ELSE has EVER lived in" among the yuppie set. Nice older homes, fully remodeled, updated, with real yards and mature trees, typically sell for half what a cheaply-built new house does. :(

      Of course, this is rabidly encouraged by the construction industry and its various subsets; it's their bread and butter. My sister is an architect who handles big housing tracts; I get to see the mentality at work firsthand.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    20. Re:Stuff on the ground by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Yep - My father was born in southern France - in a section of town that was even then called "the antiquities" (Dad is over 80) - for good reason - the house my Grandparents lived in was built by the Romans. Dad went back for the first time in over 60 years about 10 years back - houses were still there, and still lived in

      As one of my friends is fond of saying:

      The difference between England and the US is that in the US 100 years is a LONG time, and in England 100 miles is a LONG way

      The 100 years/100 miles deal holds true for Western Europe - It's much more dense, and has a LOT longer history

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    21. Re:Stuff on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... there aren't many pre-Columbian structures to the north of Mexico. Probably the most impressive are the Cahokia Mounds, and those are only around 1000 years old... hardly impressive compared to what you find in Europe, let alone China, Egypt and the Middle East.

    22. Re:Stuff on the ground by dorsey · · Score: 1

      The first problem I see is your use of the term "vast". Europe is not "vast". At least not when you consider the "many countries, many cultures, many languages, and diverse history" you've got crammed in there.

      When you've got so many countries in a relatively small space, it is rather tempting to group them together.

      The creation of the European Union doesn't really work in your favor in this regard either.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    23. Re:Stuff on the ground by pVoid · · Score: 1
      It's not an encyclopaedia or a history text, meant only for dry facts.

      I agree, and I'd also like to add something here: in North America, people have come to expect all their information input to come from media (mainly TV), and so have come to an otherwise absurd point of view that for example, films should for some reason be 'historically acurate'.

      I just love it for example, when people shat on "The Last Samurai" because it wasn't historically acurate.

      My point is: if you want historical accuracy, you shouldn't be watching a 2 hour Hollywood movie... nor should you be looking at pretty images from a website somewhere on the web. You should be going to your local library and digging up the information - and EVEN there, you should always be cross checking the data to make sure it's accurate and not slanted...

      That's the *only* way to avoid history from 'being written by the victors'. Not by shitting on Jerry Bruckheimer for a distorted portrayal of the events at Pearl Harbor, or Ridley Scott's pro-american view of the Mogadishu events in "Black Hawk Down" (both of which, to be clear, I thought were shit ass movies... but not because they were inaccurate)

      So, if you're gonna shit on Elena, I dismiss any arguments about accuracy as being 'irrelevant'. If anything, I will criticize her comments about how she loves pubs or whatever. I find them out of place. I prefer her (somewhat skewed at times) social commentary and anecdots about people's reactions of the time/place.

    24. Re:Stuff on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chernobyl is in Ukraine, not Belarus.

    25. Re:Stuff on the ground by Mondor · · Score: 1

      Oh my God... How long will it take to reply to every american out there, that Chernobyl is located not in Russia, not in Belarus, but in Ukraine! Look, Ukraine is a big country, it has nuclear weapons, just look at your map! It is really amazing, seems for you the Europe is a Tolkien's world with all it's fairy maps. So, once again, the Chernobyl is in Ukraine, and not in Mordor.

  19. Who by Konster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who cares if she faked it? Who ever really cares if a hot woman fakes it?

    1. Re:Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who cares if she faked it? Who ever really cares if a hot woman fakes it?

      I care. When they fake it, my widdle male ego gets bruised. Almost as much as when they throw their drink in my face when I ask them if they fake it.

    2. Re:Who by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who cares if she faked it? Who ever really cares if a hot woman fakes it?

      But how can you reach international/olympic standards, if you don't get honest and truthful feedback on your performance?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  20. We can't all marry her... by dj245 · · Score: 1

    So therefore I will attract her with my castle in the swamp and save you poor sods the heartache.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:We can't all marry her... by bertas28 · · Score: 1

      Pfft I don't want her, she doesn't have huge ... tracts of land.

  21. No, that's not accurate by JoeBuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There really are tours of the area, and she evidently went on a tour, so the pictures are real. What's fake are her claims that she rides her motorcycle alone in the radioactive zone.

    1. Re:No, that's not accurate by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      How was that known to be fake?

    2. Re:No, that's not accurate by aWalrus · · Score: 4, Informative

      The area is heavily guarded, apparently. Someone stirred up a ruckus when they saw her story on the net and took it up against the guards. Eventually it turned out that she had taken a helmet with her on one of the usual (legal) tours and took pictures with that. She also changed her story after the allegations of fraud surfaced (at first, she claimed that her dad was a worker in the zone, and that she routinely biked there)

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
    3. Re:No, that's not accurate by nukeindia.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Reading through her pages years back, I remember somewhere she said that she was stopped at the entrance and being told no bikes allowed. Then she referred about her connections and also gave an indication of bribing them. And she was allowed in.

      If anyone has still doubt on how easy it is to bribe the Russian guards, please google for a few news coverage on the Chechen rebels and school incidence this year. The most top wanted rebel claimed he bribed his way all through Russia up to Mosko and only stoped when his 30,000 dollars were exhausted.

      She had been telling from day one that tourists do visit this place in bus. And the only people that denied she was permitted in with her bike are the guards at Cheronobyle.

      I trust Elina and her story more than I trust these guards. At least, she was offered a lot of money after her fame (for hosting her site), she declined. She even hated her new found fame. She didn't have anything to gain. Compare it with the gains and losses of the guards and decide.

      The good news is that its not only the USA administration that lies.

    4. Re:No, that's not accurate by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too bad Chernobyl is not in Russia. Perhaps you should look up a map before making gross generalizations about an entire culture.

    5. Re:No, that's not accurate by Himring · · Score: 1

      The good news is that its not only the USA administration that lies.

      oh brother....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    6. Re:No, that's not accurate by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      How was that known to be fake?

      Since she herself appears in several of the photographs.. all taken at head level and mostly in open areas where its unlikely there were 5 1/2 foot high stable structures to place the camera on for a timer shot. Looking at the photos makes it plainly obvious there was at least one other person there taking photos while she was looking through binoculars and looking at her geiger counter.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    7. Re:No, that's not accurate by Kompressor · · Score: 1
      Shinma,

      You may not be much of a photographer, so I'll let you off lightly. However, there are such devices as tripods and a self-timers on cameras. Makes it quite easy to take self portraits.

      Cheers,

      Jordan R. Urie

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    8. Re:No, that's not accurate by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      However, there are such devices as tripods and a self-timers on cameras.

      You may not be much of a motorcycle rider, so I'll let you off lightly. She claims to have been riding a Ninja. Ninjas are crotch rockets with no cargo capacity. Just where would she have put this tripod?

      Besides, it seems a bit unrealistic that she would set up a tripod, set a timer, and take a photo of herself looking through binoculars... unless she's REALLY narcissistic.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    9. Re:No, that's not accurate by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      Touche.

      I cede the point. I havn't looked at the photo-essay since just after it originally broke big.

      I agree, it would be a pain in the ass to haul a Manfrotto around if I was riding a crotch rocket. For some reason I had a mental image of her riding something akin to a goldwing, which would make it a heckuva lot easier to tote gear around.

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    10. Re:No, that's not accurate by Mindcry · · Score: 1

      except she said she rode alone, but someone took pictures OF HER, and she didn't have a tripod... i imagine it'd be hard for me to take pictures of my back, but obviously she can cause you don't trust the guards ;)

    11. Re:No, that's not accurate by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I have a tripod that will fit into my jacket pocket. Granted it is a little baulky but it does slide in there and stays put quite nicley.

      I use it when i'm bow hunting. I usually end up taking video and picture of animals rather then getting my deer.

  22. Fool me once... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The first Elena story was interesting, moving and touching. Much of the comments on slashdot on the original story said much the same thing. There's something very powerful about a photoblog about a lone woman motorbiking through a deserted (sorta) post-apocalpytic town.

    HOWEVER, once I found out it was faked, I was extremely upset. The original impact of the story was immediately gone, and I felt like I was cheated out of those emotions of awe and wonder. There's no way I'm going to go out on a limb again and trust anything that woman says.

    There was a story here previously about the journalistic quality of blogs on the Internet and how they couldn't touch real journalism. I now understand what that's all about. IMHO, /. shouldn't be giving any credence to Elena after her previous scam was unearthed.

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:Fool me once... by empaler · · Score: 1

      The moderators might actually remember when it was debunked.

    2. Re:Fool me once... by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was a story here previously about the journalistic quality of blogs on the Internet and how they couldn't touch real journalism. I now understand what that's all about.

      Bah, real journalism. Real journalists don't have any special kind of knowledge or ability to be factually accurate. They just have more oversight. But even so, imho the editorial oversight in the mainstream press is severely lacking as well because of the slow death of independent investigative journalism. Mainstream press stories get debunked all the time. As long as there is only one independent source for a story, you have to take it with a huge grain of salt, regardless of who that source is. And with most of the mainstream press being primarily a pipe for single-source organizations like the AP, it's kind of inevitable they report a lot of falsehoods as well.

      Besides, despite the lack of factual veracity of that trip, it reminded people there is such a thing as chernobyl, and the region around it. That just because something is no longer in the news it's not still influencing people's lives. That's not a bad thing.

    3. Re:Fool me once... by danila · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Faked is a wrong term. She just made a personal photo gallery for friends, she didn't submit the /. story for publicity. So she has absolutely no responsibility for being factual, just like I don't have that for my LJ diary. I mean, I can write there about my fantasies of having sex with Natalie Portman without adding disclaimers that "this is a work of fiction". I can even intersperse these stories with real facts. There would be nothing wrong with it, and if that diary was featured on Slashdot, I would not be responsible for people thinking it is 100% true. And I would not deserve the "liar" label for that.

      Internet doesn't have a single standard for integrity, truthfulness and lack of fantasies. NEWS.BBC.CO.UK has one standard for truthfulness, WIKIPEDIA.ORG has another, SLASHDOT.ORG yet another, THEONION.COM has another standard too and my personal blog (if I had one) would have yet another. And there is nothing wrong with that, it's not like The Onion is somehow "worse" than The Economist. So it is silly to approach Elena's story with the same standards you have for Reuters. You don't have the right to be upset about anything other than your own gullibility.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:Fool me once... by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      'Real' journalists just have 'degrees.' In many regards, it is just like the 'credentials' that the Wizard of Oz gave out to the Scarecrow, Lion, etc.

      When a mediocre student flunks calculus, and the english department won't admit him, he enrolls in J-School. None of the classic 'journalists' of the past went to J-School. They rose up through the ranks starting as copy-boys.

    5. Re:Fool me once... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      It seems that the biggest problem people have is that they beleived it too readily in the first place, despite it being just some random person's personal webpage, so felt let down when they found out the story was "sexed up", as Alistair Campbell would say. But go back and look at it again. Elena has taken a bunch of otherwise fairly boring photos, and made them interesting by wrapping them in a made up story about riding her bike through the off-limits areas around Chernobyl. She doesn't seem to have invented the details that actually matter in a historical sense, only the overall story of why she was there is made up. That shows that she has creative talent, and I respect her for that.

    6. Re:Fool me once... by SharkJumper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And that would all be fine and good up to the point where she milked the publicity for her own gain: going on the talkshow circuit, getting into magazines, trying to cut movie deals, and now trying to present her new project as some kind of documentary. She may not have presented herself as a journalist in the first place, but when she was mistaken for one, she made no attempt to correct the perception. In fact, she milked it and tried to cover up when her story was shown to be false. For that, she deserves the label "liar" and more. By not immediately admitting that the story was a fantasy, she's romanticizing dangerous and illegal activities that could lead others - more gullible than even your standard /. readers - to harm.

      SharkJumper

    7. Re:Fool me once... by Himring · · Score: 1

      HOWEVER, once I found out it was faked, I was extremely upset. The original impact of the story was immediately gone, and I felt like I was cheated out of those emotions of awe and wonder. There's no way I'm going to go out on a limb again and trust anything that woman says.

      So you've gone through divorce too eh?...

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    8. Re:Fool me once... by khallow · · Score: 1
      You don't have the right to be upset about anything other than your own gullibility.

      So there's nothing wrong with me cheating you out of money as long as I use the Internet to do so?

  23. Bah by El_Gordo_Uno · · Score: 1

    She has no credibility, I really don't understand why people continue to encourage her lack of character by giving her this kind of attention.

    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Funny thing is that she doesn't have any need for credibility. Straight from the front page of www.kiddofspeed.com

      "July 7, 2004

      First let me say that I have nothing to do with this project other than donating the bandwidth to allow the world to see it. When I first saw the site, Angelfire could not handle the amount of traffic the site was receiveing. I knew my server could. Then Angelfire began plastering the site with banner ads shamelessly trying to make money off the site. This is the point at which Elena shut the site down, not because she had anything to hide.

      Regardless of what is true, this site has certainly made people think more about Chernobyl and this tragic disaster.

      However, this story has been there for years and has been primarily forgotten and neglected.

      After "Elena" brought this story to light, everyone that claims to be an expert has come forward identifying it as a hoax or a fraud.

      How ironic that although they would label her a hoax and a fraud, she was able to achieve what they could not even dream of achieving. Bringing this issue the world wide attention it deserves.

      As the only email contact, I have seen each of the moving emails that were directed to "Elena."
      Her words have definitely made the world think about this piece of forgotten history. I have seen every request from news agencies from around the world, each of the big names, begging for interviews.

      "Elena" wanted nothing to do with these interviews.

      I offered to setup a paypal donate account to create a fund for the project and local charities.

      "Elena" Wanted nothing to do with it.

      Did she do it for fame or notoriety or even money?

      Or did she do it in order to bring attention to a forgotten region.

      Read her words and decide for yourself."

  24. At least she's politically correct... by qedigital · · Score: 1

    The highlight of the story for me is the fine example of eastern European cycling prowess ("scooturo") or as she calls it, a "son of a ditch".

    Of course, I would love one!

    Scooturo
    --

    Rapidly approaching the Zener knee...

  25. I wish I never knew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My life is no better knowing the truth. I would have much rather been lied to and enjoyed the fantasy for a long time (um, err, not like that ...)

    Damn you Slashdot! Bring me up, then bring me back down again (um, err, not like that either ...)

    1. Re:I wish I never knew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why religion is still alive even in supposedly enlightened, civilised societies. Yes I was let down by hearing about her story being fake, but since that seems to be the case, and if it is in fact so, then what choice do I have but accepting that fact?

    2. Re:I wish I never knew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does religion have to do with being an enlightened society?

    3. Re:I wish I never knew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does religion have to do with being an enlightened society?

      Nothing whatsoever.

    4. Re:I wish I never knew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha @ AC#2. Three different AC's here, I made the first comment. Sometimes things are so inconsequential (e.g. truthfulness of the elena story) that ignorance really _is_ bliss -- that's not the case when you believe things like, "homos are bad, the bible says so".

  26. She better learn her history by S3D · · Score: 3, Informative

    About Makhno army:
    "The anarchists on the photo, they kept in terror all this region" (Makhno in the center) It was other way around. Makhno anarhist army was composed of local peasants and small core of anarchists. Makhno was hugely pouplar among the locals, mostly because he defended them again devastating communists "food tax". Later soviet propaganda tried to make a common bandit out of Mahno, but havn't succeded much.

    1. Re:She better learn her history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:She better learn her history by frederik · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:She better learn her history by ceplinboston · · Score: 1

      Being from Prague, Czechia, I had to think about general Vlasov and how this double treacher saved the city which is now so beloved for how much its architecture is preserved. Things are always more complicated.

      Matej

    4. Re:She better learn her history by ceplinboston · · Score: 1

      And this may be interesting as well -- Operation Keelhaul. This was always my one issue against Churchill.

    5. Re:She better learn her history by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      There is always somebody trying to give somebody 'better' credit than history deins appropriate. Your romantic notion of 'anarchists' for example.

  27. Re: a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is that a fucking troll you retards? this is a troll. jesus, the guy is being useful.

  28. They have that stuff in Germany, too by goon+america · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting that after 60 years all that stuff is still there

    It's that way in Germany, too. I know that in Hamburg, some of the major bomb shelters were so incredibly massive that they simply never tore them down. They put nightclubs in there now. You can see them pretty easily, they're these huge masses of concrete... one of the most touching things, besides the bombed-out cathedrals left unrestored, and the occasional Kennedyplatze or Eisenhowerstrasse you run into...

    We don't really have a parallel here. This is one of the reasons that I believe that when Americans and Europeans think about war, they actually conceptualize very different things.

    1. Re:They have that stuff in Germany, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't really have a parallel here. This is one of the reasons that I believe that when Americans and Europeans think about war, they actually conceptualize very different things.

      well, you have gettysburg, pearl harbor and ground zero, just imagine how it might be to have the equivalent of this three places in every medium city and you might get an idea of how europeans think about war...

    2. Re:They have that stuff in Germany, too by g0hare · · Score: 1

      The Americans who went to WWII and saw and participated in real horrors of war are the people who came back and started all the programs that the current administration is dismantling. I wonder if they knew something that we are missing.

      --
      Vote Quimby!
    3. Re:They have that stuff in Germany, too by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      This is one of the reasons that I believe that when Americans and Europeans think about war, they actually conceptualize very different things.

      Also, because a bunch of the Europeans fought on the 'wrong side' of said wars, the sides which were responsible for many of the atrocities, and lost the war. (yes, in WWII there were good and evil sides to take)

      There's no reason to be overly noble about it all, or cop a superior attitude.

    4. Re:They have that stuff in Germany, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The winner of war writes history, but don't assume the 'good' side did everything Godly, Noble or whatever. They made their mistakes. They had their own. In fact, any historian who knows about the 3 reasons Germany went to WWII would not argue its totally their fault; look at WWI to find the reasons of the puzzle!

    5. Re:They have that stuff in Germany, too by plopez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All over Europe they still find bodies, unexploded munitions; including mustard gas from WWI; wreckage etc.

      After 2 horrendous wasteful wars most of Europe has learned the futility of Nationalism.

      I liked the qoute in the article "Soldiers graves are the greatest preachers for peace".

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:They have that stuff in Germany, too by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I think part of that is because in Europe (indeed, in most of the settled world) you've had war literally falling on your heads within living memory, and there has seldom been a time when the older generation could not remember having had to personally defend their country, within its own borders. In America, we don't have that -- we've not suffered war on our home soil in modern times.

      So yes, I think you're right -- in Europe it's still a lot more up-close and personal.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:They have that stuff in Germany, too by AvengerXP · · Score: 0, Troll

      U.N. anyone?

      --
      Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  29. old news by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

    dude this is old news; she already had pictures of kiev ww2 battle ruins the last time /. posted about the woman.

  30. Not as dangerous as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    riding through Chernobyl on a motorcycle would be inherently risky, dangerous, unlawful and maybe even lethal.

    Are you refering to dangers from radiological contamination? The danger is real, but it's not as bad as you may think. The other reactors at the site were kept operating after the accident. It was not until December 2000 that the last was shut down.

    This means that over six thousand people worked right next to the containment building, and traveled to and from the site almost every day for several years after the accident.

    A few rides through town on a motorcycle would expose you to a accumulated dose many thousands of times less than what a lot of other people have voluntarily chosen to live with.

    I'd guess that it would be riskier to ride a motorcycle through downtown LA than through the town section of Chernobyl. (If it were allowed to ride through Chernobyl.)

  31. Re:A fascinating ... fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decline? Uh yeah, pre-revolution Russia is just world renowned for morality...

    So did you smoke all of that or did you bring enough for everyone? PS, Stalin et al were *Russians*. Communism did not invade and conquer Russia. Your Moral Russia /home-brewed/ one of the worst dictatorships in history.

  32. Photos remind me of Ozymandias by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ozymandias

    I met a traveler from an antique land
    Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
    Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
    Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
    And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
    Tell that its sculptor well those passions read,
    Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
    The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed,
    And on the pedestal these words appear:
    "My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
    Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
    Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
    Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
    The lone and level sands stretch far away.

    -Percy Bysshe Shelley
    1792-1822

  33. Re:Virtual Tour by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Since it seems that Canada will be filling up with people soon maybe us Americans should look towards Russia as a place to regain our freedoms and avoid the tyranny of Dubya.

    Fuck that "Running to Canada" shit. How about standing up to usurpers like Dubya in order to make life better for the people who live here? That means sticking your neck out for your principles, even if your countrymen hate you for it. They may not thank you for opposing them, but their children might.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  34. Re:She is hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I wasn't the OP :)

    Wow - you cynical modders you. I just find it is good manners to note when one isn't the OP or parent poster, to make it clear to others reading the posts that someone new is commenting in the thread.

    I've always done it this way, as I always post anonymously - and it is sometimes hard to tell one AC from another. (For instance, for all anyone knows I am the AC poster above this as well, and am just suffering from a strange disagreement with myself)

  35. Re:Virtual Tour by ErikZ · · Score: 1


    It seems that the only thing the opponents of Bush are good at are yelling and marching in parades. They'll be just as effective in Canada.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  36. Old www2 bunkers are great fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hills behind the city i live in are lined with bunkers. They make a great location for praties and raves. And every now and again when you walk though the hills you find more bunker complex's that you didn't know existed.

  37. Re:Virtual Tour by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
    How about packing your shit up and leaving so that when the counter-revolution comes we won't have to throw your pansy ass up against the wall with the rest of the lefties and shoot you? To make yourself feel better about leaving you can pretend you're reaching out to Euro-lefties or setting up a revolutionary party headquarters in exile or something like that.

    Ahh, here they come. I call your bluff, my faceless brown-shirted antagonist (now there's a redundancy.) I'd email you my name and address so that you could come visit, but like most of your ilk, you snipe from under cover of anonymity, or attack en masse and never linger to claim responsibility. You construct straw men like "Euro-lefties" for your rhetorical bayonet practice, never entertaining the thought that the object of your hatred isn't a socialist or even a liberal, that he has principled reasons for opposing war and tyranny, and that he loves his country and his people enough to tell them to pull their heads out of their asses when criminals are robbing them and leading them into the abyss. Quit following the herd, man. All of you ultranationalists are being used by "leaders" who despise you as much as the peons (their term) like myself who see through the ruse that war is; pickpockets always need a distraction. And as for "packing my shit up?" I'd rather die. What a pity it is you're so keen on seeing that happen.

    Here. Look this up. Now go look in a mirror.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  38. speaking of pretty european women.. by efextra · · Score: 1

    you should see this. I want to visit this place :)

    1. Re:speaking of pretty european women.. by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

      The linked page is apparently slashdotted, but the goddam popup ads still manage to load. Sometimes the internet really stinks.

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    2. Re:speaking of pretty european women.. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The linked page is apparently slashdotted, but the goddam popup ads still manage to load. Sometimes the internet really stinks

      Yes, your browser. Get a real one.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  39. Faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news... Santa, the Easter Bunny and God are discovered as fakes.

    Seriously, I enjoyed this story the first time it came around, let me forget about my sad little world for a while. Why is everybody so bent on proving that she's a fake?

    Thanks for ruining a good thing.

  40. Fascinating by ewe2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't really care about the Chernobyl issue. Serpent's Wall was far more educational and entertaining, particularly "Elena's" sardonic sense of humour. Probably more honest also. Bring back fertility festivals!!

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  41. Fakeness by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    For anyone who missed something (ie me) can someone explain basically whats fake and whats real? I mean, Chernobyl is real, no-one is disputing that, the pictures of empty buildings and landscapes are real (unless they are empty buildings somewhere else). The big Lenin slogans on walls are real? the checkpoints? which bits were faked? If she didnt ride there alone on a bike then who and how did she get there? anyone?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Fakeness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She went with a tour group on their bus. Got off the bus, took the same photos as everyone else, got back on the bus and continued in that way.

      she suggests to readers and in her photos that shes there alone exploring the land. Something we may respect her for. But then we find out shes not so that respect is gone.

    2. Re:Fakeness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cares? the only ones who care are fanboys who get off on that sort of thing... it was her personal space on angelfire. today we call these "blogs"

      not a damn thing you witness today is real. TV is fake, newspapers are fake... the people walking down the street are phony. their thoughts are everything MTV, CNN, or NBC tells them to think. get a clue, a single person did something quite innocent and you turn her into Hitler.

  42. Obligatory Coralization by QuietRiot · · Score: 1

    Yo. Link with this instead.

    [CORAL-LINK]/serpents-wall/

    Perfect time for CORAL

    1. Re:Obligatory Coralization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coral was really fast for me!

  43. Re:Virtual Tour by bob+beta · · Score: 1

    How about standing up to usurpers like Dubya in order to make life better for the people who live here?

    Sounds like cheap entertainment to me. Please don't break anything important on your adventures.

  44. Re:Virtual Tour by bob+beta · · Score: 1

    I see you've found your windmill to tilt at, dude.

    Don't be such a bloviated turd.

  45. Re:A fascinating ... fake by HBI · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a poster child for my moral decline as I wouldn't kick her out of bed.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  46. When in Germany, take notice by infolib · · Score: 2, Insightful
    of the distribution of new and old buildings in the city centres. In many places you'll find lots of old buildings, and then suddenly 3 or 5 houses in fifties/sixties style. That's a WWII Ground zero.

    Elsewhere downtown is mostly newer houses dotted with small clusters of stuff looking like 1880-1930. That's the hard hit places. I've also walked the wooded hills around Kaiserslautern where you'll often find those little round waterholes size ~4m. (10-15 ft). That's bomb craters - according to an old guy who lived there "they're bigger when new". Kinda tells something about why the idea of war is so repulsive to the average german.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    1. Re:When in Germany, take notice by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      "so repulsive" - the idea of war, or the idea of losing a war you started?

    2. Re:When in Germany, take notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Being on the losing side certainly adds to it, --just ask the Japanese. Yet those who were on the winning side, but had bombs falling on them (from both sides) are not too gung-ho about this war thing, either.

      Most of Europe suffered acts of war (at least bombing or shelling) on their soil during WWII. And those on "right" side did not gain any more land or power. It was loss and humiliation, followed by relief when it was over.

    3. Re:When in Germany, take notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And those on the "right" side did not gain any more land or power.

      Self-correction: Some neighbouring contries got chunks of Germany, so they did gain some land. Finland lost some land to the Soviets, too.

    4. Re:When in Germany, take notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And those on the "right" side did not gain any more land or power.

      Self-correction: Some neighbouring contries got chunks of Germany, so they did gain some land.

      Yeah, like Poland: Hitler and Stalin team up to invade it, the Nazis invade and the Soviets follow shortly to divide the country, after some occupation the Nazis invade the Soviet Union through Poland and after some more time the Soviets invade the Nazis through Poland. Poland ends up forced communistic for 50 years. Total number of Poles left dead: 6 million, more than 5.5 million of them civilians. I'm sure they were happy to "gain" some land (while losing land from the other side!).

      Finland lost some land to the Soviets, too.

      So, you'd say the Soviets were on the "right side"?

      Finland: after Poland Stalin decides to grab Finland but gets a surprising beating, only managing to grab a bit of land before retreating to lick his wounds; the Allies decide to sell out Finland to get the Soviet Union on their side, forcing Finland to seek help from the Nazis, the Nazis attack the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union attacks Finland, Finland takes its land back with interests but ends up beaten in the end, getting the harshest peace terms.

      The Baltic states: first taken by the Soviets, then by the Nazis, then again by the Soviets and ending up in the Soviet Union for 50 years.

      And so on.

      Every little nation caught in between the big was screwed royally in a war that they desperately wanted to avoid. Many people in the little countries (especially Poland) still can't forgive the big for betraying them, screwing them or ignoring their plight to ally with Stalin and yet *still* having the nerve to call themselves some sort of heroes and talk about the "right" sides.

  47. No the joke is... by swb · · Score: 1

    "Why do women fake their orgasms?"

    "Because they think that men care."

    Which is kind of harsh if you think about it.

  48. the people debunking the original story by XO · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are no credible debunkings of this story. All debunkings are potentially just as filled with garbage as the original Elena writings are.

    In any case, she is one hot chick that I would love to go on a motorcycle ride with.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:the people debunking the original story by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you pass by equally or more attractive women every day on your way to the supermarket. Why don't you talk to them instead.

    2. Re:the people debunking the original story by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      because they're less intimidating on the internet, of course...

  49. She got a warn glow at Chernobyl by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    I hear the extra eye she sprouted really helps her frame the photos.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  50. Re:A fascinating ... fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a Ukrainian be a Russian poster child?

  51. Re:Stuff by kidgenius · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I agree. My first clue about this story is the photograph from 1240 that is of an extremely good quality. Unless I am remarkably mistaken, photographs were not around until sometime in the 19th century.

  52. Re:A fascinating ... fake by Seehund · · Score: 2, Interesting

    PS, Stalin et al were *Russians*.

    Actually, Mr. Vissarionovich was a Georgian.

    Communism did not invade and conquer Russia.

    Invasion? That would actually not be a totally inaccurate description.

    Most of the prominent bolshevik/communist leaders were plotting their military coup d'état (a.k.a. "revolution") while they lived abroad. They also received funding, training and support from Germany, who believed that the success of these people would weaken Russia.

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  53. Picture of Elena by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

    http://www.kiddofspeed.com/serpents-wall/_images/p 8-image1.jpg !!! (on page7)

    --
    WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  54. Re:Virtual Tour by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

    Activists do a lot more than that about which you can read on e.g. an action mag or on an online website.

    --
    WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  55. They're fake. So what? by PiGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There seems to be a lot of anti-Elena sentiment here, mostly due to the fact that she didn't really take those pictures on a motorcycle.

    Who cares? I sure don't.

    Her stories, fact or fiction, are a great read, and provide a wonderful thread connecting the photographs. The photographs themselves (which certainly are real) are a great record of the past that tell a story on their own.

    If someone posted a "space log" with lots of beautiful pictures of the planets, and linked the pictures together using a story about flying in a spaceship from one to the next, no-one would think the story was real, but many would still enjoy it. Elena's made-up story just happend to be a lot more down-to-earth and believable.

    She mentioned at one time that she was planning on turning the Chernobyl story into a chapter of a book she was working on (I can only presume that the Serpent Wall story will be another chapter). If such a thing comes about, you can bet I'm buying it! Why pass up such a great collection of photographs and enjoyable stories?

    1. Re:They're fake. So what? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. And she has a wonderful sense of how to maximize impact from the materials she has. Remember Charles Kuralt's "On The Road" segments? That's what she reminds me of.

      If it's not totally factual... well, it's not a history class. It's a travelogue. Its importance lies in "look and feel", not "source code".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  56. Re:Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD parent up. its not flamebait, its informative.

  57. Re:Virtual Tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    opposing which, war or tyranny. Sorry, I went there to stop tyranny, and we're still shooting at the tyrants.

  58. her story was true, the "experts" were fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She made no money from her first story and turned down offers of paypal funds. All the "expert" stories about just a helmet sound completely fake in themselves. And of course they can't get verification, why would anyone in the government admit to letting her in there and lose their job, obviously it was on the slide.

    When people claim scam, I need to see either fame or fortune as the greed. None are present here, it's not like you will ever her on a talk show.

  59. Another good story by gone.fishing · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Elana,

    Thank you for another good story from your homeland. These are things that Americans (like me) never really get to see. When we read one of your stories, it humanizes you and your people far more than any history book could.

    I've read your stories, and am impressed - I hope you keep up your work and that the skeptics don't stop you. In your own way, you have done more to help relations between your people and the rest of the world than your government has. After reading your stories, I feel like I know a bit more about you and your people than I ever have before. It is now easier to understand some of the things about you and your people than before - because I can see some of your roots.

    As a student I studied these wars, but they were abstract. Now they are real. The numbers still astound me, probably even more now.

    Thank you,

  60. I dont care! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell I don't care if she fakes it while I am sliding my cocking in and out of her kitten.

  61. Re:Fool me twice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    HOWEVER, once I found out it was faked, I was extremely upset.

    I
    wasn't! It was great and it was the best history I've seen in a long time. I just now went through two-thirds of the serpent's wall blog (it is slow going---each page takes several minutes to load) and decided to check in at slashdot to see how others viewed it.

    Nice. There is almost no praise for this really moving document. I don't think it's as good as the Chernobyl one, although that is partly because I was alive during Chernobyl, but not during the event this describes, but it really gives me a sense of Ukraine and I know that for many people Kiev is the center of Europe and Asia and it's worth my time to see this perspective on it.

    Plus, I can't help but compare it to Iraq and the 51 casualties we suffered vs. 1000 of the enemy in Fallujah. It's moving to see the many identifying artifacts of the Germans vs. the lack of identity of the Soviets.
  62. good lord lady by Hohlraum · · Score: 0

    if you dig up a grenade or a morter you don't stick around to take pictures of it.. this chick is digging on borrowed time if you ask me :)

  63. "winner writes history" rationalization is bunk by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    The winner of war writes history, but don't assume the 'good' side did everything Godly, Noble or whatever. They made their mistakes. They had their own

    When the victor is the aggressor in a war of conquest that is often true, however in the Second World War context that argument is a load of crap. Primarily because the people who surrendered to the western Allies were not subjugated. West Germany and Japan were quite free to write their own histories, to continue their cultures, to continue their langauges, etc. Hell, the losers are free to claim they were right and being lied about, no shortage of Holocost denial propoganda as far as I can tell. Despite the fact that you probably abhor those idiots and probably do not share their "politics" your moral relevancy nonsense is not too removed from their way of thinking. You merely dress it up better. There was right and wrong in WW2, there was good and evil, this was the historical anomaly. The attrocities committed by US personnel were individual criminal acts, not highly organized state sponsored crimes receiving large scale support from the citizenry as in Germany's case.

    1. Re:"winner writes history" rationalization is bunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I visited East Germany on a school trip back in the early 1980s; yes, it was a pretty grim place. We were shown round the Buchenwald concentration camp, preserved along with many others as a warning. Yes, it was chilling. Visiting these places was, we were told, compulsory for schoolkids. West Germany is similar (relevant now that the Western bit has taken over).

      Some Germans try to make out Hitler wasn't that bad. Not many. If nothing else, everyone else in Europe won't let 'em forget the truth - most especially their immediate neighbours (Austria aside). Ever heard the England football chant `Two world wars and one world cup'?

      Try reading German history books - they don't shy away from the horrors. They do try to explain why people went along with it in a sympathetic fashion, mind. But that's okay: do you want an entire generation growing up thinking `My grandfather was an evil monster', or `My grandad was a poor sod caught up in this insanity, and like a lot of people he didn't do well, but one can understand why'? What will breed a healthier future nation?

      Virtually all Germans were just caught up in the Nazi-driven shit. Why demonize 'em? Sure, they went along with the victimization of Jews and others. So what? It's easy to see that it would have been very hard to fight against it. Would you have done any better yourself? Are you sure? Or should the post-war settlement have been a re-run of Versaille, to punish Germany and repeat the cycle that led from WWI to WWII? Nah, bloody silly idea: the way it's turned out is very good indeed. We still need to keep an eye on the Hun, mind - Germany's full of Nazis and nationalists and even normal Germans still like doing everything the same as everyone else. But as for Germany trying to revise history so that it appears the Nazis were somehow not evil Nazi scum - nah. Only the lunatic fringe tries that on.

      Declaration of faint interest: my dad's best mate (RIP) was a Jewish refugee from Hitler (who was then deported from the UK to Australia as an enemy alien - good, eh?)

      Regarding the US record during WWII: the US execution of hundreds of alleged Japanese `war criminals' after kangaroo court hearings counts as a war atrocity in my book. Not a proud period. A human reaction under the circumstances; I can't summon up great indignation. But just as surely atrocious and it was official policy.

      I'm sure there are other examples. But - well, that US atrocity I'm talking about. People were killed. The RAF killed lots more in just one attack on Dresden. I've seen modern Dresden. It's all new (albeit shabby and crumbling because it was Iron Curtain new). Makes you think a bit. What can one do but shrug and try to avoid a repeat performance because war is quite simply hell that all sane and civilised people wish to avoid?

      `I am the war president.' G.W. Bush.

    2. Re:"winner writes history" rationalization is bunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>Regarding the US record during WWII: the US execution of hundreds of alleged Japanese `war criminals' after kangaroo court hearings counts as a war atrocity in my book. Not a proud period. A human reaction under the circumstances; I can't summon up great indignation. But just as surely atrocious and it was official policy.

      That was new information to me so went and googled it.
      http://members.fortunecity.com/dikigoros/japa nwart rials.htm

      Seems to be only information I can find that would relate to what your talking about. I can see how you came about your opionion but you make it sound a damn lot worse than it was imo.

  64. I have seen more recent bunkers -- Syrian by mi · · Score: 1
    captured by Israel.

    And I have photos too -- can I get to frontpage now?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:I have seen more recent bunkers -- Syrian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to be a cute chick and make dangours sounding story etc.

      I got some great photos from that area to but from syria and lebanon side. Deserted bombed out cities, a kinda empty no mans land telling the story of many wars.

  65. Re:Virtual Tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    opposing which, war or tyranny. Sorry, I went there to stop tyranny, and we're still shooting at the tyrants.

    War and tyranny are two sides of the same coin. War is a social program tyrants such as the now-discarded puppet Saddam Hussein use to get people to obey them. Now he's gone, replaced by another tyrant of our government's choosing. And the people "we're" shooting at happen to be resisting a foreign army, which is what we would be doing given the same predicament. Most of them stayed on the sidelines until they saw or heard about unarmed friends and relatives getting blown to bits, which comes to approximately 100,000 since March of '93, give or take. But hey, what's a few dead ragheads?

  66. Re:Virtual Tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Activists do a lot more than that about which you can read on e.g. an action mag or on an online website.

    Such as what? Terrorism?

  67. It's not that hard to visit Chernoybl by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
    There are tours starting from Kiev. They're not even that expensive. Tours go to within 100m of the damaged reactor site.

    The area isn't totally deserted, nor is it that hazardous for short vists with suitable precautions. Some old residents moved back into the area. Two of the Chernoybl power reactors were operated until 2000. Hundreds of cleanup workers still go in and out. A few vehicles are driven in the area.

    So it's not that tightly closed an area.

    It's not clear exactly how far Elena was able to take her bike. From the pictures, you see her bike in pictures up to the Dytyatky checkpoint, but not thereafter. Her pictures within the exclusion zone are very similar to those taken by others who've taken that tour. She appears in some of those pictures. So the most likely thing is that she rode her bike to the checkpoint and took the tour bus into Chernoybl.

  68. Re:Virtual Tour by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

    Yes such as for example """terrorism""", the buzzword of the 21st century.

    --
    WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  69. Re:Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Haha. Maybe the electric street lighting is another clue? Maybe the COLOR postcard?

    That's not a photograph from 1240. It's recent photograph (obviously) of a recent postcard (also obvious) that shows something similar to what the Mongols saw when they got there.

    Also, the "family" photograph states clearly that the family was killed in 1240 during the siege, and that the photograph shows the remains that were dug up much later, like when photography existed.

  70. Comrade Scooturo wounded, crankshaft problems by Control-Z · · Score: 1


    Excellent article, very interesting. This girl certainly has an interest in anthropology, history, and alcohol!

  71. Re:A fascinating ... fake by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

    Actually he's not Mr. Vissarionovich. He's Mr. Djugashvili... Vissarionovich is his middle name and only indicates his father's name was Vissarion..
    No one in exUSSR uses just a middle name to name men. It'd be Joseph (Iosif) Vissarionovich.

    --
    - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
    - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
  72. Re:She is hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I'll bite.

    Here's the problem with your reasoning. You're contradicting yourself - you're saying that you always write that you're not the OP to avoid confusion, but in the same post you also admit that you can't tell one AC from another. So if you do actually always say you aren't the OP, it is pointless and you realize it is pointless but you do it anyway.

    So no one believes you. You can't prove you're not the OP by saying so in an AC post, by your own reasoning. The only way to show you're someone different is to post under your username, and a one that doesn't have a really high UID so it doesn't seem that you just created another account to try and salvage your karma. Since you aren't posting under aforementioned username, it is likely you are either the OP or some random troll - in either case just a nuisance that gets modded down on principle.

  73. I think I would like her by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    ...this days people forget their history, ask anyone in downtown where is bunkers, they don't have no idea what is bunkers. They can only show pubs and I can show both bunkers and pubs

    (and she knows how to cook, too)

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  74. Re:Virtual Tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100000 dead? A mere drop in the bucket compared to the former leadership. Also, if you haven't noticed, these people that lefties like you seem to think are fighting for their country are killing far more Iraqis than Westerners. They are attempting to get the West to pull out and run so they can make damn sure that they have the population under their boot. Again.

  75. Re:Virtual Tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, their children will hate you too.

  76. Re:A fascinating ... fake by Seehund · · Score: 1

    Oops. Yes, of course there's not supposed to be a "Mr" (gospodin) in front of a middle name.

    But referring to people with their middle name, at least in colloquial/familiar speech, is very common, isn't it?

    (Better keep this OT stuff free from extra karma bonus)

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  77. Europe learned the futility of nationalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hah. That's a funny one.

    If you think Europe all acts as one, try getting two groups of people togehter from two different countries. When things slow down a bit, the sniping will begin immediately.

    People from one country will rarely buy magazizes from another country, even if they are in the right language.

    I think you way overestimate the unity of Europe.

  78. Re:A fascinating ... fake by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

    It was pretty common in ex-USSR among some closed group of friend or colleagues, as you noted... It's more playful/respectful than official. And is usually used as an alias.
    In modern russia it's very uncommon actually.

    --
    - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
    - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
  79. Learn some geography please by Mondor · · Score: 1


    Sorry, but this is absolute bullshit.
    First of all, Chernobyl is not in Russia. The name of the country is Ukraine. If you don't know it, probably you are american.

    I think you read too much yellow papers.

    1. Re:Learn some geography please by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      wasn't ukraine part of the u.s.s.r and rusia was controling the pwer plant? Durring the cold war all USSR was soviet russia.

  80. 25000 of polish elite? :)) by Mondor · · Score: 1


    Look, there are more factual errors in your post, then in the previous, that you are trying to correct.

    I believe Poland never has 25 000 people as their intellectual elite. Soviets killed a few thousands of polish soldiers there. That is - captured soldiers, not scientists. If Poland would have so much intellectual elite, they wouldn't loose a war within 2 weeks.

  81. Fuck you, mods. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    If you had RTFA, you would have noticed that most pics are fake or taken from the web / museums, postcards to make the trip seem "cooler". just like the last time.
    That is considered compulsive lying IMHO.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  82. Re:Virtual Tour by myg · · Score: 1
    Maybe I hate the fucking weather here too. Its hot as fuck. I'm tired of every December having to use A/C every day.

    Canada here I come for many reasons!