Slashdot Mirror

If you do a little searching you can find the Civil Air Patrol message indicating that a message WAS received from Pacific Command indicating that there WAS a missile in the air and it WAS targeting Hawaii.

"The U.S. Pacific Command has detected a missile threat to Hawaii. A missile may impact on land or sea within minutes. THIS IS NOT A DRILL."

http://ipawsnonweather.alertbl...

I have not seen any discussion about the source of the message. The spin is that this all happened internally to Hawaii's Emergency Response infrastructure. The text cited above suggests that the message came from higher up in the food chain - say, Pacific Command - otherwise it would have never been received, the message would have been contained within the Hawaiian infrastructure.

How did the message get from Hawaiian civil government to Civil Air Patrol? There is no path. Only possible explanation is that both parties received it from a third source - Pacific Command.

I found another report (unofficial) suggesting the missile had been backtracked to a submarine and the submarine had been destroyed. Sorry, no URL.

However, I recalled at that moment that, not too long before, a submarine had been "lost".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Some people suggest that it was hijacked.

When thinking about that subject, I was reminded of another story I read, about a fishing vessel finding an Israeli citizen, floating, in the water, off New Zealand. He was offered a ride but he was insistent on not wanting to be picked up. He may have been brought on board forcibly. One wonders what he was waiting for. A submarine? It seems possible.

Coincidentally, a certain ocean-faring nation-state with nuclear weapons, submarines, and a reputation for rogue conduct, up to and including a willingness to kill people who get in the way, just acquired a submarine base not far away from the country that just lost a submarine:

http://www.voltairenet.org/art...

Why would Israel need a submarine base in ... Chile?

If we connect the dots, it would appear that Pacific Command just averted a false flag attack upon the United States by a rogue agent trying to start a war between the United States, and North Korea ... a rogue agent that had a sub they were willing to gamble on losing.

Food for thought, kiddies.

CAPTCHA: "Psycho"

Its obvious that the results of the polls are skewed due to the fact that African countries host substantial Muslim populations. And unfortunately because of lack of education, certain beliefs and superstitions tend to propagate more in Africa.

http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG...

60% of all Christians believe that the Bible should be the official law of the land. 61% believe they're living in the fucking end times.

Sit down, boy.

Let us see if one of these others suit your tastes, lazy idiot.

http://www.voltairenet.org/art...
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/coldw...
http://www.counterpunch.org/19...
http://web.stanford.edu/class/...

You mean like this... or this ?

Ugh.

So people have bought then, hook, line, etc., the total lie that Assad used gas on his own people. He didn't.

http://thiscantbehappening.net/node/1958

http://rt.com/news/turkey-syria-chemical-weapons-850/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2418378/Syrian-hostage-Domenico-Quirico-overheard-rebels-blame-Damascus-chemical-attacks.html

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/504735/20130909/syria-chemical-attack-assad-rebels-blame-hostage.htm

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/08/syria-chemical-weapons-not-assad-bild

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2012/06/syri-j13.html

http://www.mintpressnews.com/witnesses-of-gas-attack-say-saudis-supplied-rebels-with-chemical-weapons/168135/

http://consortiumnews.com/2013/09/06/obama-warned-on-syrian-intel/

http://www.voltairenet.org/article180149.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-military-and-intelligence-officials-to-obama-assad-not-responsible-for-chemical-attack/5348576

http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/29/verify-chemical-weapons-use-before-unleashing-the-dogs-of-war/

Manning was a danger to nobody... except maybe Anna Nicole Smith, who just happens to be dead by the way...

But seriously, the weather... when someone actually has real info that could be what you might call 'embarrassing', we all know the routine.

Government/corporate secrets are quite safe.

Any info from Reporters w/o Borders should be taken with a large grain of salt - is a dubious organization at best, a propaganda mouth piece for special interests. References:

"Reporters Without Borders Unmasked"

"Reporters Without Borders seems to have a geopolitical agenda"

"Source Watch: Reporters Without Borders"

And then this and this if you want to see another point of view about "journalism" and "human rights" organizations (funded by mass-media and the U.S. govt., probably).
It's not like they are angels or something...
And btw, from here:

Also, you CAN have freedom and food at the same time. It happens.

I said No food => No freedom , you said freedom & food.
These are two different statements, and it looks like you didn't even understand what I said.

GM crops can be *better* for the environment. After all, the BT gene is just a way of putting a pesticide only harmful to a narrow range of insects *into* the crop, so only pests that actually eat it will die. This is a whole lot more targeted than crop-dusting the field with something that'll kill anything that moves with more than four legs. Monsanto's abuse of the patent system is another matter altogether, of course.

Modern species are products of (m/b)illions of years of evolution. Their present genetic compositions are a results of a very long history of innumerable evolutionary changes that make them suitable as endemic organisms in their native ecosystems.

Tinkering with genes with the kind of the very incomplete knowledge we have of them, is a dangerous game when played in vivo. For one thing, they often result in the creation of unforeseen transposons, which can wreak havoc and destroy the delicate balance of an ecosystem.

You seem to think highly of the BT gene. Please get acquainted with some of its disastrous effects.

"One problem is that Iranian leaders are trying to delegitimize the reform movement by pretending that they're puppets of foreign powers, so special discretion is required for anyone wanting to help the Iranian people."

Regardless of what one thinks about the Ayatollahs and Ahmadinejad, it is well known that the CIA and other western powers are spending millions stirring up trouble in Iran: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1543798/US-funds-terror-groups-to-sow-chaos-in-Iran.html

This article gives some historical overview of western meddling in Iran: http://www.voltairenet.org/article160670.html

What many of you also fail to understand is that while Musavi is less fundamentalist than Ahmadinejad, his views are hardly one of support for "human rights" and free society. It is sorta like the difference between Republicans and Democrats - a few differences on paper but little substantial difference.

Maybe this will spell the end of Washington's systematic, decades-old state-sponsored terror campaign in Cuba. Nah, who am I kidding?

http://www.voltairenet.org/article132624.html

Oh No! Zionist Propaganda on Slashdot?

Inform yourself first, get another perspective, here are some links for you:

http://www.sandersresearch.com/

http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/105200

http://crossfirewar.com/

http://www.voltairenet.org/en

http://www.intifada.com/

http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/

http://electronicintifada.net/new.shtml

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/index.html

Reporters without borders get paid by the CIA. In consequence, it have no credibility at all. http://www.voltairenet.org/article127688.html

"Venezuela's Finance Minister, Nelson Merentes, presented economic data to the National Assembly yesterday, showing that the country's economy had grown by over five percent during the first quarter of 2005. This is the sixth consecutive quarter that the Venezuelan economy has increased by over 5 percent.

Venezuela, the world's fifth largest producer of oil, has benefited from over fifty dollars per barrel oil prices. In 2004, the country's economy grew by 17.3 percent, the largest growth rate in Latin America, and one of the largest in the world."

http://www.voltairenet.org/article124950.html

Yeah looks Venezuela is doing really badly under Chavez, try harder next time reactionary prick.