Slashdot Mirror


The 13 Enemies of the Internet

Hennell writes "Reporters without borders has just released its annual list of internet enemies, a list of countries 'that systematically violate online free expression.' A couple of countries have been removed, but Egypt has been added. A detailed summary can be read on the BBC Website." From that article: "The blacklist is published annually but it is the first time RSF has organized an online protest to accompany the list. 'We wanted to mobilize net users so that when we lobby certain countries we can say that the concerns are not just ours but those of thousands of internet users around the world,' said a spokesman for RSF. Many of those on the internet blacklist are countries that are regularly criticized by human rights groups, such as China and Burma."

203 comments

  1. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burkina Faso? Disputed Zone? Who called all these weird places?

  2. First Posting..... by Lissajous · · Score: 2, Funny

    the enemy to all of t3h interwebs!!!

    Oh crap......

    1. Re:First Posting..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yer but this list has forgot a BUNCH of countires not to mention United Arab Emirates

  3. Some missing by jackharrer · · Score: 1

    And where is RIAAstate and MPIAcountry?

    --

    "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Some missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the nation of Microsoft? What of King Bill I??

    2. Re:Some missing by Ant+P. · · Score: 0, Troll

      Good point. Where is America on that list? It should be #1.

    3. Re:Some missing by mjhacker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, that makes sense, since America is the reason there IS an internet...

    4. Re:Some missing by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You've just won the "Most Blatant Troll In History" award. Tell me, how does it feel to be a "winner"?

    5. Re:Some missing by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      We should keep in mind that the Internet would likely not be here, or much later, if it won't be for the Sputnik Crisis and the programs it spawned, which includes establishing ARPA. Therefore we can indirectly thank Russians for the Net.

  4. I am not surprised... by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Funny

    that those Uzbek assholes are on the list. Their potassium is vastly inferior to the potassium in the great nation of Khazakistan.

    1. Re:I am not surprised... by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their potassium is vastly inferior to the potassium in the great nation of Khazakistan.

      High five for portassiam! Very nice.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:I am not surprised... by StCredZero · · Score: 1

      Is this the new "In Soviet Union..."?

    3. Re:I am not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Union the Soviet Union makes jokes with 'In SlashDot...'

  5. Why only countries? by MECC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why only include countries? Why not include companies as well? Some of them are gunning for 'the Internet' either intentionally, or just as a side-effect of unethical practices.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Why only countries? by massivefoot · · Score: 3, Funny

      One would hope that large companies would consider close collaroration with the government of a country on the list something of a blemish on their character. However, I doubt this will be the case. What is needed is for consumers to start considering the ethics of those they purchase from. We need to give companies a choice - you may act unethically, however doing so will cause a large number of people or organisations with more moral fiber to cease doing business with you.

    2. Re:Why only countries? by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      really! I can think of two companies I want to add to that list...

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    3. Re:Why only countries? by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you may act unethically, however doing so will cause a large number of people or organisations with more moral fiber to cease doing business with you.

      Moral fiber and psychic powers. There simply isn't enough transparency in corporations to figure out whether they are acting ethically or not in most cases, unless they do something really reprehensible and a government gets involved and compels transparency, or someone on the inside finally decides that having a job is no longer worth it.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:Why only countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the obvious reason is that we cant really know about what what companies do what since there are alot of them with different rules in each country, the good part is just jump onto http://anonet.org and learn how to get around certain _road blocks_ :) unethical practices can also be met with unethical practices. FWIW if you live in Australia now you download the pRon at work!

      win win

      Shame on some of those countries, if only china would stop filtering, perhaps our efforts should be like spammers, create a lot of junk to the point it breaks the effectiveness of the spam filters.

      p

    5. Re:Why only countries? by charlieman · · Score: 1

      They should include congress people and government organizations as well!

    6. Re:Why only countries? by Suzumushi · · Score: 1

      Speaking of "fiber" where is Verizon and AT&T on this list? This list is a joke...

  6. What about the Vatican? by krell · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I spent a day there earlier this year, and could not find a single cybercafe in the place.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:What about the Vatican? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least the ATMs are in Latin.

    2. Re:What about the Vatican? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's right next to the condom machine.

    3. Re:What about the Vatican? by Asrynachs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I went to Antarctica for vacation. I couldn't find a single cybercafe there either.
      They should be on the list too.

    4. Re:What about the Vatican? by krell · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I went to Antarctica for vacation. I couldn't find a single cybercafe there either. They should be on the list too."

      Not surprising, really. The tubes are all frozen solid.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    5. Re:What about the Vatican? by Asrynachs · · Score: 1

      Saying that made you stupid

    6. Re:What about the Vatican? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      How so?

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    7. Re:What about the Vatican? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 2, Funny
      I spent a day there earlier this year, and could not find a single cybercafe in the place.

      They don't need the internet to look at pr0n they have... [ERROR: USER HAS BEEN SMITTED]

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    8. Re:What about the Vatican? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      You mean Argentina?

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    9. Re:What about the Vatican? by Asrynachs · · Score: 1

      You're referring to what penguins call "Holatrianche's Fist" gateway to the vast pickeral clutches of the south Atlantic. I wasn't there.

    10. Re:What about the Vatican? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      On South Park all of the priests had naked little boys on leashes.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  7. What about USA ? by ookaze · · Score: 1

    For the DeCSS code censorship ?
    What is the status of that ?
    I hope it's not applied anymore, or this smells hypocritical.

    1. Re:What about USA ? by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For the DeCSS code censorship?


      You can hardly compare the civil attacks on one piece of software that was designed to allow copying of content which the seller had restricted (no matter how right you might think that is, and I'm not arguing the point) with the systematic censorship of any political or otherwise controversial electronic communication. The fact that you would even bring that up in this context demonstrates that you MUST live in a country which is shockingly low in censorship when compared to the rest of the world.
    2. Re:What about USA ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those guys at Reporters sans frontières sure are hypocrites for not including the US.

      Dumbass.

  8. What,, no US? Cuba? by russotto · · Score: 0, Troll

    I thought journalists thought the US was the root of all evil and Cuba was a paradise with wonderful medical care whose only problems were caused by US oppression? Something's wrong here.

  9. Burkina Faso explained. by krell · · Score: 0

    "Burkina Faso?"

    She played Dorothy in that "Return to Oz" sequel movie.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:Burkina Faso explained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burkina Faso?

      Yeah, you remember Upper Volta, don't you?

  10. Vile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    These countries are so vile...you might just say they are the Axis of e-Vile!

    1. Re:Vile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if you try something to change their regime you'll experience your eBay of Pigs.

  11. Dear Fellow Americans, by xtracto · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Although we know you are sorry [sorryeverybody.com] and even more people than the ones who voted against your current regime are sorry now, now it is the time for you to make the difference.

    Please go out and vote, and if you know someone who does not want to vote please convince him/her to vote. It is on your hands the power to finish the war and terrorism. Vote to remove the totalitarian regime from your beautiful country and to start restoring the rights your government has removed from you.

    I am not from USA, but I KNOW there is good people there. Please go out and vote, we need you, people from the USA, we need you to stop the injustice.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Okay, I fully accept that I'm going to be modded off-topic, too, but...

      Who are we supposed to vote for? Bush is out of office no matter what we do, and you can bet the 2 running for office will be about equals in terms of good and bad. There's no other -serious- contenders out there.

      In short: You're wasting your breath. Go away.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Doug Stanhope, the comedian, is running for President in 08. He's serious and I'm seriously voting for him since he's not going to waffle or lie if he doesn't yet know what to do about an issue. http://www.dougstanhope.com/ for more info and links to his myspace pages that tell more than I can.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    3. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It's easy to take tough stands and be completely clean and truthful when nobody listens to what you say anyway.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      I am not from USA
      And yet you begin with dear fellow Americans? I don't think it means what you think it means. As for the election, pay no attention to the ill informed "progressives" who believe if the Dems take control of the US Congress it will usher in the age of Aquarius. Trust me, Nov. 8, the factions in Iraq will still be fighting for power, Darfur will still be a disgrace, and entitlement spending will still be heading towards a major meltdown. To quote the Who, "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    5. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by avronius · · Score: 0

      You seem to be restricting the term "American" to refer ONLY to those from the "United States of America", and discounting the millions of people from other parts of North, Central, and South America.

      Believe it or not, you are not alone on this planet, nor are you alone in the Americas.

    6. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Glorious nation of Kazakhstan too like the War of Terror very much!

    7. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      Please don't be obtuse. The term 'American', used the world over refers specifically to citizens and residents of the United States. People don't refer to Mexicans, Canadians, Columbians, etc. as Americans, nor do those people refer to themselves that way either.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    8. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by avronius · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken. When it comes to elections - whether they are in Mexico or in the USofA, we are ALL Americans. Your decisions affect us. Our decisions affect you.

      Perhaps you should pay a bit more attention to the theme of the original poster, as I believe that he was trying to help you to understand that very point.

    9. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by break99 · · Score: 0

      To give you a "-1 troll" score on your post is pretty stupid since you're absolutely right. I'm reconsidering the pertinence of being here...

    10. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      I paid very close attention to the parent post. If he was trying to make the point you assign him, he didn't do a very good job, as it came off simply as a pedantic point about the names of continents and the countries they contain. Nevertheless, if that was the intended point, you will find little disagreement from me; obviously decisions one place affect people in others, and American decisions tend to have a disproportionate impact relative to many other countries due to its relative economic and military power, and so people from other countries have the right and the responsibility to be concerned about the decisions America makes.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    11. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Robin Williams tried that. The voting machines glitched and elected him even though that shouldn't've happened.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    12. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by tyler_larson · · Score: 1
      You are mistaken. When it comes to elections - whether they are in Mexico or in the USofA, we are ALL Americans. Your decisions affect us. Our decisions affect you.

      As do the decisions of citizens of Spain and France, but that doesn't make them Americans.

      The purpose of language is to convey understanding; if your words are consistently misunderstood, then you're using the language incorrectly. If you use the word "American," people will almost invariably understand you to mean a citizen of the United States of America. If that's not your intention, then you should consider using a different word instead. That's not to argue the "correctness" of your statement, but rather point out that the message you're trying to convey will be lost in the confusion that you generate because of your ill-advised word choice.

      --
      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
      RFC 1925
    13. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by avronius · · Score: 1

      The person in the original uses English as a second language. You cannot properly interpret a message without taking into consideration the origin of the poster. To do otherwise is simply myopic.

    14. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

      "Ich bin ein Amerikaner"

      --
      Free as in mason.
    15. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only "injustice" done here is the loss of American soldiers' lives. Our President's only error in judgement was in his decision to use restraint.

      In order to accomplish a peaceful world the US should have followed a simple four step plan starting on September 12, 2001:

      1. Draw a line formed by the Mediterranean, Black, Caspian and Red Seas, the Persian Gulf, and any country that ends in *stan.
      2. Use enough nuclear weaponry to reduce every country within those lines to a sheet of radioactive glass.
      3. Drop an American flag in the middle of the freshly cleared land and bomb anyone who tries to reclaim the land.
      4. World Peace (and profit)!

      Posting anon because Slashdot mods are dipshits who wouldn't know the difference between an insightful comment and their own ass.

    16. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Borat! Is that you!

    17. Re:Dear Fellow Americans, by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Maaaybe, but there are a lot of people showing enough support that the Libertarian Party is listening and his message is simple and easy to understand.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  12. Chinese and non-chinese treated the same by cucucu · · Score: 1
    TFA says
    Visitors to the RSF website are also invited to leave a voice message for Yahoo's co-founder Jerry Yang, expressing their views on the firm's involvement in China
    Interestingly enough, you don't have to be a Chinese reporter for Yahoo to give away your private info. For every email you send from Yahoo mail, the IP address from where you sent is is disclosed to the receiver.
    1. Re:Chinese and non-chinese treated the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is entirely normal.

    2. Re:Chinese and non-chinese treated the same by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that, because I tested it with someone last week. Hotmail also does it.

    3. Re:Chinese and non-chinese treated the same by Acheron · · Score: 1

      I would argue that an IP address doesn't really count as "personal information", but lets put that aside for a moment.

      All mail systems include headers which indicate the origin of the message, or at least attempt to do so. A normally-functioning mail server inserts a Received: header line with the ip address it received the message from. With web mail systems such as Yahoo, Hotmail, or Gmail, which are mail services not anonymizing services, the web application generally inserts the originating ip address just as if the originating ip address had sent the mail to an SMTP server. If this were not done, there would be no way to track spam back to the actual source, and people would be forced to just outright blacklist the entire Yahoo service to prevent spam.

      What I said there is important: Yahoo, Hotmail and Gmail are NOT anonymizer services. They provide a free email address, and yes, that email address isn't necessarily completely easy to trace back to you. But they make no claim that they will protect your identity. They might claim to protect your privacy in that they won't sell your name and phone number and address and the content of your emails to a marketing company (or maybe they will), but they're not in the business of hiding who is sending mail through their service. If they were, they'd all be blacklisted by mail administrators worldwide for harboring spammers.

      I also do think that claiming that an IP address is personal information is stretching things a bit. An IP address on an email is personal information in the same way as the postmark on an envelope is personal information: it indicates that someone was at that "location" and put something in the "mail", but you won't be able to know who it was until you go and pull video of the post office to see who came in. On the IP side, you have to go and get ISP logs of who was on that IP at that time.

      So putting the IP address on mails sent through web services is critical for antispam efforts and to protect the resources of companies who provide those web services from continuously having to chase down logs and provide them to courts and other interested parties. It also doesn't personally identify anybody by doing so. There's nothing to see here...

  13. Enemies by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Many of those on the internet blacklist are countries that are regularly criticised by human rights groups, such as China and Burma

    First of all, it's Myannmar, not Burma. Second of all, I hope that the USA is on the list...it's one of the "countries that are regularly criticised by human rights groups" for such things as torture, racism, warmongering, profiteering, and so on. (I can't read the linked article - it appears to be blocked by the Great Firewall of China)

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Enemies by borawjm · · Score: 1

      (I can't read the linked article - it appears to be blocked by the Great Firewall of China)

      Speaking of the Great Firewall of China, I guess we can't criticize what we do now know, right?

    2. Re:Enemies by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They're probably calling it Burma in protest of the military government there, one of whose changes was the name. It's not uncommon. For example, this non-crank author does it.

      And I seriously doubt "human rights groups" put "profiteering" on the same level as e.g. torture and racism. Where are the human rights protests over Microsoft?

    3. Re:Enemies by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      Where are the human rights protests over Microsoft?

      Here:

      More links here: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=windows+refun d+day&btnG=Google+Search

      Though, it appears of late that the movement has lost steam. Apparently George W. Bush, Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong Il are trying to distract the world from Microsoft's barbaric actions.

    4. Re:Enemies by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Let's try again, kid. Those don't look like "HUMAN RIGHTS PROTESTS"; they look like people griping about software sales contracts. See sig.

    5. Re:Enemies by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      Let's try again, kid. Those don't look like "HUMAN RIGHTS PROTESTS"; they look like people griping about software sales contracts. See sig.

      Sorry. I forgot the <SARCASM> tags.

    6. Re:Enemies by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry, I'm bad at that :-/

  14. I feel so.... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    ...Presidential... right now. Just think, ME, Karl Cocknozzle, with my own enemies list! And on Election Day to boot!

    I feel very Nixonian right now. ...Not sure if that's a word or not but there it is.

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:I feel so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are your parents on the list for sticking you with the name "Cocknozzle"?

  15. well.. by thejrwr · · Score: 1

    that makes my moving list just a little smaller

  16. enemies? by darkwhite · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Countries which censor or curtail Internet usage (with the obvious exception of China, with its staggering size and mobility) are hardly "enemies" of the Internet - they can't attack it and expect any degree of success. Instead they're foolishly short-sighted, unable to comprehend the massive technological disadvantage any such action entails in the long run. The problem is, this usually correlates with general incompetence, which means many of these countries will become (or already are) failed states which require outside assistance.

    --

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    1. Re:enemies? by honkycat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A great many of the small countries on the list have detained citizens for expressing themselves freely online. Even if the country is small, that is another part of the world where people are not free to share ideas. That is the basic freedom that made the Internet what it is.

      Individually, it would be difficult for these nations to have an impact on the Internet as a whole. However, it sure puts a damper on it for its own citizens. Many of these people are not free to leave their country to find an unfiltered pipe. For some it's because they can't afford to uproot their family, for many it's because the oppressive government won't allow its citizens to leave.

      Furthermore, the list is not short, and it includes the most populous country on the planet. That could result in the norm world-wide being heavy Internet censorship. Any country, of whatever size, that engages in this behavior is an enemy of the Internet as a whole.

    2. Re:enemies? by icedcool · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      --
      Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
  17. Article Text by loimprevisto · · Score: 3, Informative
    Already slashdotted, here's the mirrordot link (http://www.mirrordot.com/stories/037ac2605c402c45 d6ddcfb790b9ead6/index.html)

    The list of 13 Internet enemies

    Three countries - Nepal, Maldives and Libya - have been removed from the annual list of Internet enemies, which Reporters Without Borders publishes today. But many bloggers were harassed and imprisoned this year in Egypt, so it has been added to the roll of shame reserved for countries that systematically violate online free expression.

    Countries in alphabetical order :

    - Belarus

    The government has a monopoly of telecommunications and does not hesitate to block access to opposition websites if it feels the need, especially at election time. Independent online publications are also often hacked. In March 2006, for example, several websites critical of President Alexandre Lukashenko mysteriously disappeared from the Internet for several days.

    Burma

    The Burmese governments Internet policies are even more repressive than those of its Chinese and Vietnamese neighbours. The military junta clearly filters opposition websites. It keeps a very close eye on Internet cafes, in which the computers automatically execute screen captures every five minutes, in order to monitor user activity. The authorities targeted Internet telephony and chat services in June, blocking Googles Gtalk, for example. The aim was two-fold: to defend the profitable long-distance telecommunications market, which is controlled by state companies, as well as to stop cyber-dissidents from using a means of communication that is hard to monitor.

    China

    China unquestionably continues to be the worlds most advanced country in Internet filtering. The authorities carefully monitor technological progress to ensure that no new window of free expression opens up, After initially targeting websites and chat forums, they nowadays concentrate on blogs and video exchange sites. China now has nearly 17 million bloggers. This is an enormous number, but very few of them dare to tackle sensitive issues, still less criticise government policy. Firstly, because Chinas blog tools all include filters that block subversive word strings. Secondly, because the companies operating these services, both Chinese and foreign, are pressured by the authorities to control content. They employ armies of moderators to clean up the content produced by the bloggers. Finally, in a country in which 52 people are currently in prison for expressing themselves too freely online, self-censorship is obviously in full force. Just five years ago, many people thought Chinese society and politics would be revolutionised by the Internet, a supposedly uncontrollable medium. Now, with China enjoying increasing geopolitical influence, people are wondering the opposite, whether perhaps Chinas Internet model, based on censorship and surveillance, may one day be imposed on the rest of the world.

    Cuba

    With less than 2 per cent of its population online, Cuba is one of the most backward Internet countries. An investigation carried out by Reporters Without Borders in October revealed that the Cuban government uses several levers to ensure that this medium is not used in a counter-revolutionary way. Firstly, it has more or less banned private Internet connections. To surf the Internet or check their e-mail, Cubans have to go to public access points such as Internet cafes, universities and youth computer clubs where their activity is more easily monitored. Secondly, the computers in all the Internet cafes and leading hotels contain software installed by the Cuban police that triggers an alert message whenever subversive key-words are spotted. The regime also ensures that there is no Internet access for dissidents and independent journalists, for whom communicating with people abroad is an ordeal. Fina

    --
    Much Madness is divinest Sense --
    To a discerning Eye --
    Much Sense -- the starkest Madness
    1. Re:Article Text by whiter4bbit · · Score: 1

      I glad to see my native country in first place in this list:) After president voting in our hostel people can't use internet, becouse ... turned it off%\

  18. The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by krell · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Microsoft Internet Explorer 7
    2. The MPAA
    3. The RIAA
    4. Flash
    5. Javascript
    6. Pointless registration screens.
    7. Content blocked for certain regions.
    8. Spammers
    9. Phishers
    10. Senator Orrin Hatch
    11. Nigeria (I mean, come on, how many millionaire spam scams emails have you ever gotten from Belarus or Burma?)
    12. Senator Ted. "Tubey" Stevens
    13. Bears (Not sure on this one, but Colbert insisted it belonged here)

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by ronanbear · · Score: 1

      No 13 is a vicious lie! There's no truth in it whatsoever

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    2. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by karlfr · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot "backhoes".

    3. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >No 13 is a vicious lie! There's no truth in it whatsoever

      Of course. Bears are always the threat number one.

    4. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by nine-times · · Score: 1

      What's so wrong with Javascript? Overused, yes, but not bad. Otherwise I'd shuffle it around a bit, put spammers at the top, and add virus writers in general, Microsoft Windows (particularly pre-Windows XP SP2), IE6, Netscape 4, and ISPs that block port 25 and 80. Oh, and that Fark "HA HA" guy, 'cause I've seen him say "HA HA! I broke the internets!!!!11!eleventy!"

    5. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      You forgot "non-text e-mail". That includes UUE, MIME and HTML. They should be totally disallowed.

      If we hadn't strayed from the path of plain text, practically all of its problems wouldn't exist today. Somehow, I think that not being able to make your text pink is a small price to pay for that. We can scan text for spam, but we sure as hell can't scan images.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    6. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the real list that i expected...

      1. No pr0n
      2. No pr0n
      3. No pr0n
      4. No pr0n
      5. No pr0n
      6. No pr0n
      7. No pr0n
      8. No pr0n
      9. No pr0n
      10. No pr0n
      11. No pr0n
      12. No pr0n
      13. ???

    7. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by CYDVicious · · Score: 1

      I don't see Windows 98 in that list...you know those botnets that the Phishers you to catch their meal. ~CYD

      --
      //Nothing to see here, please move along.
    8. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by Wah · · Score: 1

      4. Flash

      Without flash, there would be no Youtube. Without youtube, the internets would be quite a bit more boring.

      --
      +&x
    9. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by krell · · Score: 1

      "Without flash, there would be no Youtube. Without youtube, the internets would be quite a bit more boring."

      Without Flash, Youtube content could easily be as MOV or other formats.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    10. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by Wah · · Score: 1

      It could have been...it could be...it wasn't...it isn't.

      --
      +&x
    11. Re:The 13 REAL enemies of the Internet by krell · · Score: 1

      ...but Youtube would easily survive if it had to be Flash-free for some reason.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
  19. It's Burma by krell · · Score: 1

    "First of all, it's Myannmar, not Burma"

    For one who is so particular, you mispelled "Myanmar". Burma is actually a legitimate name to call the nation, even if it is not the single "official" name.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:It's Burma by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      "Burma is actually a legitimate name to call the nation."

      Precisely, Burma is its name in English. It's name in Burmese might approximate the sounds "myanmar" but that only matters when you're speaking Burmese.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    2. Re:It's Burma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, silly liberals playing their stupid language games again.

  20. Well guess who didn't make the list? by MikeRT · · Score: 0, Troll

    The United States. God bless our founding fathers for writing the first amendment so clearly. It makes targeting scoundrels that much easier. Anyone who gets fundamentally confused by it is either too stupid to function or evil. Makes fighting back a lot easier because unlike in Europe, if the day ever comes, patriots here could shoot the censors with a clear conscience.

    1. Re:Well guess who didn't make the list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> patriots here could shoot the censors with a clear conscience

      For that to happen, they'll have to understand the second amendment too.

    2. Re:Well guess who didn't make the list? by Jose · · Score: 0, Troll

      thats funny, the US is clearly on the list. they are number 14. I wonder if the page gets filtered if you view it from the States. I was wondering why the headline read "the 13 enemies of the internet" instead of 14!!

      --
      The basic sleazeware produced in a drunken fury by a bunch of UCBerkeley grad students was still the core of BIND. --PV
  21. Befor you criticize... by bogaboga · · Score: 0
    My fellow slashdotters, before you criticize, just remember that the countires on that list are there according to a select group's opinion. It does not mean it's the truth. Even if it were, freedom and liberty also include the freedom and liberty to do as one wishes, even if we might not agree with what a particular entity does.

    That's why for example, China, Iran, Burma and the USA are in the same group of countries that execute "criminals" yet the USA champions itself as a defender of rights...including the right to life!

    On this one thing, Iran, which calls the US "The Great Satan" and the USA, which calls Iran a member of the "Axis of Evil," are in the same group! Ironic? You tell me.

    1. Re:Befor you criticize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom and liberty come at a cost and with responsibility, #sswipe.

    2. Re:Befor you criticize... by bogaboga · · Score: 1
      Freedom and liberty come at a cost and with responsibility, #sswipe.

      Says who? I could also say that Freedom and Liberty come with no appendages whatsoever.

    3. Re:Befor you criticize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with the death penalty, but you're plainly a moron. From the Mirror:

      PENALTIES imposed by Iran's religious mullahs include:

      THEFT: Amputation of hands or feet for persistent offenders.

      ADULTERY: Death by stoning.

      UNMARRIED SEX: 100 lashes.

      CONVERSION TO RELIGION OTHER THAN ISLAM: Death.

      SODOMY: Death for adults, 74 lashes for consenting child.

      LESBIANISM: 100 lashes, or on the fourth occasion death.

      HOMOSEXUAL KISS: 60 lashes.

      RUBBING ANOTHER MAN'S THIGHS OR BUTTOCKS: 99 lashes -- on 4th occasion, death.


      Tell me if there's anything comparable to that in the U.S. justice system.

  22. Awesome by kassemi · · Score: 1

    FTA: Iran today boasts of filtering 10 million immoral websites.

    Seems like a great place to raise a child! /sarcasm

    --
    What the hell's a "gewie?"
    1. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its spelled raze, "a good place to raze children". I guess it is kind of dry.

  23. But I thought? by argStyopa · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wait, I thought that the United States was the world's worst police state? Der Fuhrer George Bush and his Goebbels-analogue Rove, along with their glassy-eyed and jackbooted minions crushing all internal dissent with waves of black helicopters or stampeding Religious Fundamentalists?

    I say: WTF?

    Clearly, they 'got to' RSF and co-opted them. It's a tragedy when attention-whores, er, I mean "journalists" are afraid to 'speak truth to power'.

    I know, I know......-842 Troll.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:But I thought? by RsG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've not yet seen anyone argue that the US is currently worse than China. I've seen the occasional moral relativist argue that it isn't possible to judge the Chinese government, but that isn't the same position to take, and in any case few people these days take moral relativism very seriously.

      What I have seen argued is that the US is slipping. What gives most Americans the high ground when comparing the US government to the PRC's? The fact that the latter espouses censorship, torture, invasion of privacy, strongarm military policies, and general human rights and due process violations. Americans are protected by the constitution and a multitude of checks and balances. Erosion of those protections is the concern.

      If the US loses that high ground, you've got a problem. Do you really want your country to only be no worse than China? It would be one thing if that meant that the Chinese government had decided to treat its citizens better, but it's quite another if the US drops down to their current level of rights.

      America isn't there yet, not by a long shot, and the constant cries of "OMG, Orwell" do grow a little tiresome, but the underlying concern is completely valid. It is easier to protect your rights in the here and now than it is to try and fight for them once they're gone.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    2. Re:But I thought? by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      You think we're slipping? Maybe, but consider our past: black slavery, Red Scares, HUAAC, "separate but equal", Prohibition, and on and on. I think the US is arguably freer than any time in its past. But if you think more clearly-written federal guidelines on the ability to subpoena library records and similar changes are at all comparable to our past, then I guess you're right.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    3. Re:But I thought? by RsG · · Score: 1

      How far back do you want to compare? I'd fully agree that the United States of the 1950's was less free than the US of today, but that isn't the point. To take an arbitrary point in time and say "it was worse then" tells you very little about what progress is being made now. Likewise, to take an oppressive totalitarian regime like the PRC and say "it's worse over there" (an argument I see all too often here) doesn't tell you what it's like at home.

      To reverse the situation, is the US as of 2006 a freer place to live than the US of, for instance 1990? Is the US a freer country than other western democracies? These two examples illustrate what's wrong with the argument; you can cherry pick any place or era that was worse, or better, to make the current situation look good or bad by way of comparison. For the record, I don't think that the two comparisons I just listed are valid ones, but they are no less valid than your own.

      And your examples are frankly a little dated. Red scares? The cold war is long over, and the worst deprivations of civil rights were done by people like McCarthy 40+ years ago. That's history. Slavery? That's been gone for almost a century and a half. Yes, it was indeed worse before, much worse, but it could stand to be better. And the current erosion of rights goes a little bit farther than "library records".

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    4. Re:But I thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Americans are protected by the constitution and a multitude of checks and balances.

      You've got to be kidding. If the constitution was honored as intended by the founders, the US federal government would less than 1/10 the size it is today, measured both in revenue and power over the people.

      As it stands, the US federal government is the most expensive, most powerful government and world empire this planet has ever seen. If the constitution were honored, that kind of growth wouldn't have been remotely possible.

      Of course, the constitution is still good for one thing: lip service. And that's exactly what it gets.

    5. Re:But I thought? by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is the point, because the question wasn't, "Is the US sufficiently free today?" but "Is the US slipping?" If we're slipping, then that means we must be worse than we used to be. I argue that we are not slipping, and use past data points to illustrate. It's certainly possible that we are "slipping" on a relative scale, in the sense that the enormous lead in freedom over, say, continental Europe that we enjoyed in the early 19th century no longer exists. But this is to the credit of Europe, not to the detriment of the US.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    6. Re:But I thought? by RsG · · Score: 1

      True, but my counterpoint still stands. Is the US today freer than it was before the DMCA, PATRIOT act, warrentless wiretapping, etc? Do those not constitue "slipping"?

      If you choose to compare the US of a decade or so ago with the US today, then yes, it is slipping. Compare it to the US of the McCarthy era and it's progressing. It's all in what point of reference you use to compare it to.

      Which is exactly why I said that cherry picking an era to make the current state of affairs look better or worse isn't a useful measure. All you can look at is the current state and the current trend, and reasonably speaking, things are indeed deteriorating. It isn't about what things were like five years ago, or fifty, but what they're like now, and where they're headed. Better to stem the tide now and undo the damage done than wait for it to get worse.

      You'll note that I specifically focused on those things that directly affect US citizens, and that I included the DMCA (which predates the current administration). This isn't a partisan issue, nor is it a foreign policy one, though both play a role; this is a more generalized civil liberties issue.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    7. Re:But I thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I have seen argued is that the US is slipping. What gives most Americans the high ground when comparing the US government to the PRC's? The fact that the latter espouses censorship, torture, invasion of privacy, strongarm military policies, and general human rights and due process violations.

      You seem to have mistaken "latter" for "both". The US censors things all the time (can you say fuck on TV?). It has recently legalized torture and has been known to send suspects to countries where torture is legal to get around its own law. The recent removal of the requirement to receive a warrant for wiretapping, not to mention Carnivore or whatever they call it today, are all invasions of privacy. There's no way you can call the Iraq invasion anything other than a strong-arm military policy. As for general human rights violations, human rights watch groups have been routinely refused requests to inspect American prisons. And as for due process, the US recently removed the right of habeas corpus, a right that has been enshrined in law since the 13th century.

      The main difference between the US and China is that China has not recently invaded another country on false information. When it comes to freedom, the US could learn a bit from China.

    8. Re:But I thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy test - speak out against the powers that be. Denounce them loudly and repeatedly. See if you get arrested (note: getting arrested for anything other than political dissent doesn't count. No hurling bricks at a cop - that's cheating). Repeat until you've either landed in jail, or given up on ever being oppressed.

      If you get result A, congratulations, you're living in a police state. That would likely happen in China. If you get result B, your country isn't there yet. That doesn't mean there isn't cause for concern, and by all means you should continue to speak out against the powers that be, but as long as the test keeps returning result B, you're in the green.

      Pretending that the US is a police state now doesn't help matters. It will make it harder to convince people when and if it does become a police state. The very fact that you can post this, and that you can still fight, is all the proof I need. However, the fact that it is harder to fix a police state than it is to prevent it means that if you are truly concerned, you can and should continue to try and fight for your rights. Just don't pretend you're living in a dystopia; if you were, it would already be too late.

    9. Re:But I thought? by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      OK, I think we mostly agree, but we're assigning different levels of importance to different facts on the ground. Fair enough.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    10. Re:But I thought? by Darby · · Score: 1

      The cold war is long over, and the worst deprivations of civil rights were done by people like McCarthy 40+ years ago.

      Hi, welcome back from your multi decade nap, hope it went well for you.

      As you clearly know nothing about recent events, allow me to bring you up to speed.
      Recently Congress passed and the president signed a bill that allows the president to have any American citizen shipped away to a death camp to be tortured and murdered solely upon his whim with no possibility of recourse to the law.

      So sorry, we are in a far worse position civil (or otherwise) rightswise than at any time in the entire history of this nation.

      The McCarthy era was *nothing* compared to the oppressive power of the current government, the lack of transparancy, or the complete lack of any oversight whatsoever.

      There's no comparison.

  24. Another fun list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anonymously because I have mod points at the moment.

    The list is from the Privacy International site and features the "Leading surveillance societies in the EU and the World".
    http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml? cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-545269
    The original article from the Reg provides some background.
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/06/privacy_us _china/
    If you value your privacy, it looks like Canada and Germany are the places to be.
    Depressing that there are so few places.

  25. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

    You're just trolling by asking about the US, but Cuba is a valid one that I was going to question myself. At the recent UN summit on internet access, it was alleged that "Zero percent of Cubans are connected to the Internet because of the censorship hold that the authorities there have over their people.

  26. Paging mister Thierry Schmurr by TheManFromTheWoods · · Score: 1
    Just wanted to say hello.

    Oh, and wandering why you are sitting naked in your office, with door wide open, if you don't want to be seen in such state of undress by happy men ;-)

    Or are you happy yourself?

  27. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

    Anecdotal evidence, but...

    Recently on USENET, on comp.lang.c++, there was a post by someone claiming to be from Cuba, with a .cu address.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  28. This reminds me by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    If anyone here knows the UK's Channel 4 series 'Fr Ted', then lemme say this: this list reminds me of fr Noel Furlong priest when he goes to put Tony on his little 'list of enemies'. I guess you had to be there at the time,

    Funny funny show

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  29. Can't declare war on companies by msobkow · · Score: 0

    In case you hadn't noticed, there is a heavy overlap between this list and the infamous US "axis of evil" list.

    As I've worked with people from some of the nations on the list, I consider it far more likely to be a fluff piece to get the techies voting for continued US warmongering, given it's fortuitous release on the day of an important US vote.

    Thumbs down on clumsy propaganda.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Can't declare war on companies by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      I consider it far more likely to be a fluff piece to get the techies voting for continued US warmongering, given it's fortuitous release on the day of an important US vote.

      Reporters Without Borders is the organization that keeps downgrading the US on "press freedom" because the US government seems to think that journalists aren't above the law. By its past behavior, they're much more likely to be spreading anti- rather than pro-American propaganda.

      Believe it or not, just because somebody doesn't always call the US the ultimate evil doesn't make them a mouthpiece for the White House.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Can't declare war on companies by operagost · · Score: 1
      In case you hadn't noticed, there is a heavy overlap between this list and the infamous US "axis of evil" list.
      Your grasp of logic is a bit weak.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Can't declare war on companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your grasp of children isn't... lol

    4. Re:Can't declare war on companies by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I guess that depends whether you look at what else happens during significant press events.

      Politicians and corps tend to make interesting moves while the public is distracted. Outrage over "terrorism", "human rights violations", and "think of the children" issues hold the public attention away from other issues. With the right emphasis and spin, they get used to justify actions that the public would normally object to.

      Given the track record on proving WMD, exagerration of China's human rights issues, etc., I tend to consider the various "watch" lists as indicators of who is being pressured next. They're not necessarily honest assessments of risks or evil intent, but they set the stage for further aggrandizement.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  30. Interesting Fact to observe by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    With the exception of Burma (which has long been a pariah military dictatorship), all the countries are either ruled by a communist party (or direct sucessor) or they are from an islamic culture.

    1. Re:Interesting Fact to observe by VolkerLanz · · Score: 1
      With the exception of Burma (which has long been a pariah military dictatorship), all the countries
      As many others have already noted, the USA is obviously missing from the list...

      are either ruled by a communist party (or direct sucessor) or they are from an islamic culture.
      ... so, make your pick ;-)

      Also, what's "pariah military"? Isn't that just a little bit tautological?
    2. Re:Interesting Fact to observe by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And why would the USA be on the list and not Germany or France? Germany outright bans certain speech and political thought (i.e. Nazism). France bans both Nazism and denial of the Armenian genocide. Such bans are unconstitutional in the USA.

      Neither the USA, France, or Germany deserve to be on this list, because their restrictions, such as they are, are rather mild. I think your anti-Americanism has gotten the better of you, or you're trolling.

      And as far "pariah" being a tautology for "military", that speaks for itself. Societies do not ostracize those who sacrifice for the community, but honor them.

    3. Re:Interesting Fact to observe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As many others have already noted, the USA is obviously missing from the list...

      Yes, and that's because the USA does not belong on that list. You have to be a complete bugfuck lunatic and utter waste of air to think the US comes anywhere near the countries on that list.

  31. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Cuba is a great place where every citizen is taken care of. It is the exact opposite of the US under Bush. What is the point of your hateful troll? To show just how little you understand about Cuba?

  32. Need to add one honorable mention by Quila · · Score: 1, Troll

    The United Nations, because censorship will be world-wide if it does get control of the Internet.

  33. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope it was a good one, because you won't be seeing any more posts from that guy.

    Also, please do not mention the service you mentioned in your post on Slashdot again. You know why.

  34. Thats not close to the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats a list for ASIA countries only...

  35. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cuba is a great place where every citizen is taken care of. It is the exact opposite of the US under Bush.

    And the Mafia is a wonderful organization where every squealer is "taken care of."

  36. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    Cuba is a great place where every citizen is taken care of. It is the exact opposite of the US under Bush. What is the point of your hateful troll? To show just how little you understand about Cuba?

    My only question, El Presidente, is where you sent that post from, since your nation has no internet.

  37. No, +1 Funny by aquatone282 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I know, I know......-842 Troll.

    I'd give you a +1 Funny, but I blew all my points down-modding the "Progressive" trolls that flocked to the "HBO's Hacking Democracy Available Online" yesterday.

    Thanks for the laugh though.

    --
    What?
  38. Re:Thats not close to the world by zeromorph · · Score: 1
    Thats a list for ASIA countries only...

    Belarus? Egypt? Tunisia? Cuba? ... Go, buy a new globe!

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
  39. Sorry, _Tristan_ Schmurr by TheManFromTheWoods · · Score: 1

    (n/t)

  40. China by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

    Dude, China says they don't censor the Internet. This list is bogus! Down with the Man!

  41. Avoid the veal. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you may act unethically, however doing so will cause a large number of people or organisations with more moral fiber to cease doing business with you.

    Hello! May I be the first to welcome you to our planet. You may find things here a little unsettling, coming from your obviously very advanced civilization and culture; in the meantime I recommend you don't try to make sense of anything.

    Oh, and be sure to try the pastrami, it's excellent here.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  42. Well that's obvious. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2

    Well, what else do you think Fidel had to do when he was laid up?

    Funny he'd go for C++ though. I always figured him as a C# .NET kind of guy.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  43. Re:What about Livingston? by Asrynachs · · Score: 1

    You can't ask me to elaborate on my unfounded opinions. I say things like that when people don't agree with me. It's funny how stupid you are in that respect.

  44. Question by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do the pyramids' get broadband, or is their wiring too old?

    --
    www.isoHunt.com
    1. Re:Question by rlp · · Score: 1

      Do the pyramids' get broadband, or is their wiring too old?

      Only the Ha'tak class pyramids get broadband.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    2. Re:Question by adyus · · Score: 1

      What, didn't you hear? The pyramids get wireless...

  45. gambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US prohibits gambling on the internet. It arrests people who run gambling sites.

  46. US Not on List by finity · · Score: 1

    I thought for sure we would be.

    1. Re:US Not on List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since CENTCOM and the DoD have done so much to distribute propaganda on the internet in order to cover up the truth about 9/11 and that Google and Yahoo are actively involved in censoring 9/11 truth as well.

      http://www.infowars.com/

  47. Re:Slashdot Subjective "Scoring" = Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You might take another look at the top of the page. Slashdot is about "stuff that matters". Your unsubstantiated rants are not appreciated. In particular, when you deliberately attempt to discredit people who are far better than you'll ever be, using old information that's already been debunked. I'd say "silly", but your posts are simply paranoid delusions based on fantasy, not reality.

    Cite credible sources if you think otherwise. And try to raise the level of discussion, not lower it, by character assasination.

  48. Re:What, no US? Cuba? by vfp_guru · · Score: 1

    Kinda like the former Soviet Union under Stalin, where every citizen that still remains is taken care of?

  49. What about the UIGEA? by QuesoKid · · Score: 1

    The U.S. government recently passed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. In fact they snuck it in at the last minute of the legislative session by attaching it to a port security bill. The UIGEA is meant to impair U.S. citizens' ability to gamble online. This is effectively limiting the freedom of U.S. citizens to do what they want with their own hard earned money, and is ultimately restricting free trade on the internet. For that I think the U.S. should be on this list.

    --
    What does your game room look like? http://gameroomgear.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:What about the UIGEA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A site like this: www.betfair.com can't be hosted in the US.

      It is basically the same as trading in options; futures should be forbidden also.

    2. Re:What about the UIGEA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is effectively limiting the freedom of U.S. citizens to do what they want with their own hard earned money, and is ultimately restricting free trade on the internet.

      Yeah! That's what I said about my heroin-by-mail website too.

      I doubt that you'll find many, if any, nation that is willing to let "anything go" as long as it's on the internet.

      Your arguement holds no weight and is little more than another US-bashing troll.

    3. Re:What about the UIGEA? by QuesoKid · · Score: 1
      I doubt that you'll find many, if any, nation that is willing to let "anything go" as long as it's on the internet.
      Agreed, but I don't think that playing a game of cards is something that warrants government intervention. No government has any business restricting its citizens in this manner.
      --
      What does your game room look like? http://gameroomgear.blogspot.com/
    4. Re:What about the UIGEA? by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      While I agree that the government has no business regulating gambling, that issue exists offline as well and is a business/crime/corruption/taxation issue and not a free speech one.

    5. Re:What about the UIGEA? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      The act in question mainly prevents credit card companies (and banks) from making payments to companies whose sole business is illegal in the US>

      While yes, it is true that usually the business was transacted on the internet, that is a side issue, not the main issue of the bill.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  50. Ooh! A protest! That will be effective! by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    "We wanted to mobilise net users so that when we lobby certain countries we can say that the concerns are not just ours but those of thousands of internet users around the world," ... Many of those on the internet blacklist are countries that are regularly criticised by human rights groups, such as China and Burma.

    Hmm. Let's see what the tradeoffs for China are in this situation.

    On one hand, they have total control of 1 billion human beings if they control what they read, hear, and say.

    On the other hand, they have a few thousand people whom they can ignore simply by not reading some web page.

    I dunno man. Those few thousand people hold a lot of power over the guy who weilds more power than any other person on earth. They might even be able to hurt his feelings and make him look bad to the people who he's controlling, if only he doesn't censor the internet...

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  51. Re:Thats not close to the world by krell · · Score: 1

    "Belarus? Egypt? Tunisia? Cuba? ... Go, buy a new globe!"

    I'm almost willing to spot him Egypt. The Sinai is sometimes, but not usually, considered to be part of Asia, since it is at the continental split.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  52. Re:What about Livingston? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

    Zing!

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  53. This post obviously censored by his government. by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    Obviously the poster lives in one of the 13 countries. I managed to get ahold of the uncensored version, posted below.


    My fellow slashdotters, this article couldn't be more right! The censorship in China is known by everyone, and is largely effective. It's the absolute truth. Freedom and liberty are severly curtailed in China, anyone that speaks out against the government is rounded up and never heard from again. Sorry, I must go now. It took a bit of doing to get past the firewall to even read the slashdot article, but surely they'll plug the hole soon enough.

    --
    AccountKiller
  54. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cuba does have the internet, but its very controlled and access outside of public terminals, universities, and 'computer clubs' is forbidden. It is possible he posted from one of those

  55. A Glaring Omission by Slyfoot · · Score: 1

    There's not a word about Elbonia.

    --
    Professional Dilettante
  56. Also, do we call Germany "Deutschland" in English? by HighOrbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would like to apologize to all the Germans for calling their country Germany (Deutschland). I would like to also appologize to the citizens of Japan (Nihon), Vienna (Vien), Cologne (Koln), Rome (Roma), Bombay (Mumbai), Lisbon (Lisboa), Warsaw (Warszawa), and Leghorn (Livorno). I would also like to apologize to the Dutch (Nederlanders). Please accept my apology on behalf of all English speaking peoples everywhere for using perfectly proper english names for your countries, people, languages, and cities when speaking English. I shall henceforth brush up on my Japanese, Hindi, German, and Polish, and every other languange in the world so I can refere to you in your native language, even when speaking my own.

  57. Next year: Brazil! by rbp · · Score: 1

    If this passes, next year Brazil will make it into the list!

    Sad :(

    1. Re:Next year: Brazil! by operon · · Score: 1

      yeah..thanks to Azeredo and his obscure interests

      --
      ---- Where is my mind?
  58. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1
    Cuba is a great place where every citizen is taken care of.

    And how well they're taken care of indeed!

  59. So while you give me a lecture about freedom... by floppydiskparty · · Score: 1

    You disable the right-click LOL. What a toolish website.

  60. Duh! by ke4roh · · Score: 1

    Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam; spam spam spam egg and spam; spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans spam spam spam; or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and spam.

    --
    I hate call waitin`~+~~~
    NO CARRIER
  61. They forgot by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 1

    They forgot Ted "Series of Tubes" Stevens.

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
  62. Enemys or censors? by kinglink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An enemy means you oppose the device. Reading this list I don't see many that are "we will destroy the internet" (though I'm sure that's they don't love it) This appears more to be enemy of free speech or radical thinking, which winds up with censorship of the internet.

  63. Another cog in the Evil Machine, clearly. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    In case you hadn't noticed, there is a heavy overlap between this list and the infamous US "axis of evil" list. ... Thumbs down on clumsy propaganda.

    Or, in other words, "-1, Doesn't Compare Bush to Hitler".

    As everyone knows, Reporters Without Borders is practically a G.O.P. front group. Those guys are nothing but lock-step, Republican, neocon fascists, all the way.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  64. Yahoo shouldn't forge/delete headers, either. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    For every email you send from Yahoo mail, the IP address from where you sent is is disclosed to the receiver.

    Now, I am not in any way defending Yahoo's reprehensible conduct in China, but the behavior that you describe regarding IP addresses in mail headers is the way things are supposed to work. The address of the originating machine should be listed as the first of the 'Received' headers. This just makes sense -- it's not "Yahoo" that's sending you the message, they're just passing it on behalf of some other person.

    Webmail isn't supposed to automatically be an anonymizing service. It's unfortunate that many people aren't aware of this, and don't understand that many things they consider 'private' on the net are really anything but; however Yahoo shouldn't be faulted for acting according to accepted RFCs and protocols.

    There are plenty of anonymous email systems out there for all your remailing needs; Yahoo Mail, Hotmail, and GMail are not the tool for the job.

    Now, there is a very good argument somewhere in here, for mandating that ISPs either not create, or immediately delete after a short period of time, all their logs that could be used to cross-reference actual people to IP addresses. This would effectively create anonymity at the IP address level. However, since this is not the case, users should seek privacy higher up in the stack, at the messaging-system (application) level, by choosing the correct tool for communication.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  65. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by operagost · · Score: 1
    Cuba is a great place where every dissident is "taken care of."
    Fixed that for you.
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  66. Thanks for the advice by amightywind · · Score: 1

    I voted Republican across the ballot!

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Thanks for the advice by SSCGWLB · · Score: 1

      So did I, again!

    2. Re:Thanks for the advice by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I didn't, but Diebold counted it as such anyways!

      (Okay, my state uses paper ballots, and I'm not old enough to vote anyways, but that's irrelevant)

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Thanks for the advice by Darby · · Score: 1

      I voted Republican across the ballot!

      Fat drunk and stupid is no way to go through life.

  67. The 13 Enemies of the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wes' fingers, both his eyes, 1/2 can of Redbull and his brain. His brain only counts for 1/2 because it only works half the time.

  68. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I posted from my dorm room at Harvard (via a proxy to get around some of the web filters here).

    It's amazing to see the number of personal attacks that people make on those that tell the uncomfortable truth. I spent seven years in Cuba. The people were healthier and happier than they are here in Boston under the Bush dictatorship. The citizens there have many more rights than we do under Bush. Bush has taken away almost every single right in the Bill of Rights. He no longer allows many of the supporters of his opponents to vote. He destroyed a large city that opposed him. He has doubled the price of gas. Gas in Cuba is much cheaper because the government cares about the people. Chavez is a great man, and he is helping to provide cheap gas. The only better thing about the US is the tremendous amount of wealth. Of course only an idiot would trade freedom and security for money.

    To quote Samuel Adams from back when the US was a free country:

    "If ye love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your council or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

    The Bush worshipers have traded liberty for wealth. They are no longer free, but all they care about are their SUV's and gadgets.

    You should visit Cuba to see how much better things are there. The people are happy and nice. They're not the hateful close minded morons that nearly 99% of the people in the US have become. The US is a horrible place to live now. As soon as I get my degree, I'm headed back to my home country of Costa Rica to help make it more like Cuba.

  69. Evil spelled backwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, evil spelled backwards is live.

    Come to think of it, vile is just an anagram of live.

    --Dave Romig, Jr.

  70. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you assume I'm in Cuba or even Cuban? I'm just someone that has spent several years in Cuba and several years in the US. I see how the US has become a police state. I see how the Republicans have destroyed every freedom you people ever had. I see people that hate life and want to kill others simply because they don't want to live themselves. I see people that are so violent that they think they have the right to own a gun! A gun! There are many people in the US that even own weapons of war. Here in Boston there are murders every single day. When I was in Cuba, I don't remember hearing about a single one. In Cuba I saw a few people driving less than safely, but the roads here in Boston are a terror. You can tell the vast majority of people have no respect for life by the way they drive.

    Just think of the horrors that you are defending.

  71. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'As soon as I get my degree, I'm headed back to my home country of Costa Rica'.

    I'm sure you'll be missed.

  72. /. 'em all ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    13 countries beneath your current threshold.

  73. Doesn't seem like much of a threat by pseudorand · · Score: 1

    From the Article: Iran today boasts of filtering 10 million "immoral" websites. Pornographic sites, political sites and those dealing with religion are usually the ones most targeted.

    Judging from my spam filter, 10e^6 seems like it wouldn't even cover all the porn sites.

  74. Re:Also, do we call Germany "Deutschland" in Engli by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

    Um, shouldn't this comment be applied to the poster I was responding to? I was defending the use of the alternate term.

    Of course, even that poster wasn't criticizing the use of a term different from what natives call the country; he was criticizing the use of a term different from the one natives (well, the government there) ask English-speakers to call it.

  75. Re:Also, do we call Germany "Deutschland" in Engli by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    Sorry.. I wasn't addressing you personally. I just find the entire line of conversation preposterous.

  76. Nr 14 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack Thompson. At least, I bet that sooner or later he will be.

  77. You are partially wrong about Burma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's current dictatorship was directly inspired by Mao Zedong's Chinese regime. A high ranking military official was so impressed by the "discipline" he saw in the PRC that he engineered a coup to install a similar regime in Burma. Not exactly a party-run dictatorship, but close enough to support your main point. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burmese_Way_to_Social ism

  78. Missing Countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a frequent traveler to the Middle East, here are some countries that were missed:
    Kuwait
    Qatar
    Bahrain
    United Arab Emirates
    (notice anything in common?)

    They all filter for objectionable content such as pornography, anything pro Israel, anything critical of Islam, anything critical of the Palestinians, and the Mohammed cartoons.

  79. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure you are. You're a snotty college kid who probably doesn't even go to Harvard and the most international experience you've ever had was a drunken frat party in Cozumel. I don't think even you believe the things you're saying anyway.

  80. Stupid BS propaganda by Bloody+Troll · · Score: 1

    What? No Canada, No Germany, no France and no Brazil? But Belarus, only because a couple of websites "mysteriously disappeared" (most likely, done by the American-paid so-called "opposition" itself)?

    1. Re:Stupid BS propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Canada definitely should be on the list of countries that censor the Internet. The CHRC actively harasses primarily young, white, poor people that post opinions that are contrary the Canada politically correct ideologies. Richard Warman, (ex-CHRC employee) initiates most of the 'complaints' that result in fines, or jail time for the offenders.
      See: www.freedomsite.org for details.

  81. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The US is a horrible place to live now. As soon as I get my degree, I'm headed back to my home country of Costa Rica to help make it more like Cuba.

    Perhaps you should have gone to school in Cuba or Costa Rica then? Oh, that's right, they're actually little backwater shitholes that no one with a choice seriously wants to live in.

    Ever hear of biting the hand that feeds you? You've got some huge balls to come to a country, take advantage of it, then talk shit about it. But hey, it's America, you're allowed to do that. Try doing that in Cuba.

  82. Emmanuel Goldstein by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    They forgot Goldstein.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  83. Re:What about Livingston? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What I say is baffling."

    Master Shake

  84. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by russotto · · Score: 1

    He's using an open wireless node in Miami. Hey, he runs his own country, he can use amps and antennas as big as he wants.

  85. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by ssundberg · · Score: 1

    There are a relatively small number of Cubans (vis-a-vis China or Russia) who list themselves on dating (and "dating") web sites and who also have IM addresses. I got the impression one could easily arrange for an escort or other companionship should one decide to include Cuba on their vacation itinerary.

  86. RSF and CIA by Dominique_libre · · Score: 1

    Reporters without borders get paid by the CIA. In consequence, it have no credibility at all. http://www.voltairenet.org/article127688.html

  87. Re:Also, do we call Germany "Deutschland" in Engli by alienmole · · Score: 1

    It gets especially silly when they get into pronunciation. Is Qatar "cutter", "cotter", "gutter", "catarrh", or one of the variations that can't even be spelled out using ordinary English letters? This is important, people. We need the one true proncunciation so that Wolf Blitzer doesn't feel stupid when reading the teleprompter.

  88. The truth gets you marked as troll by Quila · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nice troll moderation, except when you think that all of those countries listed here are in the UN, and some of them have a lot of power and a history of getting on commissions where the don't belong. China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia (all on this list) are currently sitting on the UN Human Rights Council despite rules meant to keep countries with a policy of human rights abuses from being members. You can bet that China and one or more of the others will be on any Internet Governance Council in the future, and they will be deciding what speech is allowed.

    It's a good bet that European countries will be on the council, and their legal philosophy is that "hate speech" is not allowed, even if it is valid criticism.

    Even the United States may be on that council, and you know how we are about freedom of speech when it comes to programming code (DeCSS and crypto exports).

    Basically, the semi-anarchy we have now is quite necessary in order to ensure freedom of speech on the Internet.

    Go ahead, moderate me troll again for telling the truth. I've got karma to burn. However, I believe that since I criticized the US in this post it won't be moderated as a troll.

  89. Point of parlimentary procedure! by amightywind · · Score: 1
    Fat drunk and stupid is no way to go through life.

    ...But you can't hold a whole political party responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole party system? And if the whole political system is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our government institutions in general? I put it to you, Greg - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  90. Re:What,, no US? Cuba? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    Why would you assume I'm in Cuba or even Cuban? I'm just someone that has spent several years in Cuba and several years in the US. I see how the US has become a police state. I see how the Republicans have destroyed every freedom you people ever had. I see people that hate life and want to kill others simply because they don't want to live themselves. I see people that are so violent that they think they have the right to own a gun! A gun! There are many people in the US that even own weapons of war. Here in Boston there are murders every single day. When I was in Cuba, I don't remember hearing about a single one. In Cuba I saw a few people driving less than safely, but the roads here in Boston are a terror. You can tell the vast majority of people have no respect for life by the way they drive.

    Shut up troll.