Slashdot Mirror

Reminds me a bit of this photo tourism application, a neat way of viewing hundreds of photos of a particular landmark:
http://phototour.cs.washington.edu/

Apparently, many airports are planning to use 3 jetway bridges for simultaneous boarding on both decks of the A380

This paper discusses A380 boarding efficiency:
http://www.math.washington.edu/~morrow/mcm/alex_ev an_harkirat.pdf

http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage.html This was the "supercomputer"? A 16 node AMD box? Your local library's computer lab would like to have a word with them.

In the end the calculation took about 77 hours on the supercomputer Sage.

The connection has timed out
The server at sage.math.washington.edu is taking too long to respond.

Exactly. The problem is that SETI is a long shot.

When you participate in gene-folding, or protein-folding (as in the Baker Labs at the University of Washington, which win year after year in best predictions), you know that it's going to useful research that actually helps us understand how things actually work.

Nothing against SETI - I did many packets for them back in the day.

But, practically, it's more fun to do something like cure cancer (UK site) or fold proteins (UW - search for Baker Labs in Biochemistry, my old department) that are used to find cures for malaria, TB, and so on.

http://www.ess.washington.edu/Space/propulsion.htm l

The finding, made by Michael Wysession, a seismologist at Washington State University in St. Louis, and his former graduate student Jesse Lawrence, now at the University of California, San Diego, will be detailed in a forthcoming monograph to be published by the American Geophysical Union.

One of the most dramatic features in our global mantle shear-wave attenuation model is a very low-Q anomaly at the top of the lower mantle beneath eastern Asia. We believe that this is due to water that has been pumped into the lower mantle via the long history of the subduction of oceanic lithosphere in this region. This could result from the dehydration of hydrous phase D from cold lithosphere that has been subducted into the lower mantle. We are very interested in further pursuing the effects of water on seismic attenuation within the mantle. [Lawrence and Wysession, 2006a,b]

fixed the link

reference and here and here's a picture of the spare lander that was never launched the boom on it is the meteorology sensor

reference and here and here's a picture of the spare lander that was never launched the boom on it is the meteorology sensor

"Do a little research on the subject first, will ya."

OK, I'll start. Your turn.

Oh, and that figure I quoted earlier of 11,000 tests already? It's actually over 25,000 according to a more recent source. My bad.

When I was in school, we had a small team which developed, tested, and distributed educational groupware. According to our director who went to collect awards for the good work, the Blackboard people were dumbfounded when he told them that his team was basically a group of sub-$10/hr undergrads plus a few grad students from the biology and sociology depts. Other schools actually offered to buy our software over Blackboards, from what I've heard.

Of course there is a replacement for Outlook and Exchange! It's called sendmail and it's part of every unix-like system. You install an MTA (either the original sendmail or a compatible replacement) and a POP3 server on a machine (an old desktop is fine), configure your firewall to route incoming traffic on port 25 to that machine, log into your DNS control panel, and set its internet hostname as the MX for your domain. Then you run a normal mail client on each desktop. Specify your mail server's inside IP address as the SMTP and POP3 server in your mail client, and away you go.

She's one tough lady!

I think some public schools might disagree.

So, discrimination in hiring should be prosecuted. Ah, but how do you fight something like this? Evidence of discrimination, right? But how could that be shown without doing the sort of controlled survey that the researchers did? How could you counter that? What's your solution?

Ohhh, and we really shouldn't (as microbiologists) mention methane without pointing to the Volta Experiment.

Actually, the athletics department is self-supporting. They don't receive any money from tuition, royalties, etc.

The University policy on IP revenue is here, but after administrative expenses are deducted, it basically boils down to 1/3rd going to the inventor, 1/3rd going to the department the inventor works in, and 1/3rd goes into University-wide research funds.

See http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/publica tions.html for publication with numbers. In particular, http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/73.pdf http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/Krichtafovitch_ESA_June_05.pdf http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/MSEE_Nels.pdf

See http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/publica tions.html for publication with numbers. In particular, http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/73.pdf http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/Krichtafovitch_ESA_June_05.pdf http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/MSEE_Nels.pdf

See http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/publica tions.html for publication with numbers. In particular, http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/73.pdf http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/Krichtafovitch_ESA_June_05.pdf http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/MSEE_Nels.pdf

See http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/publica tions.html for publication with numbers. In particular, http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/73.pdf http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/Krichtafovitch_ESA_June_05.pdf http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfile s/MSEE_Nels.pdf

Now that I'm reading the paper I see it covers basically what I described, but in much further detail and with some models/questions and test results to back it up.

http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/piatek/papers/B itTyrant.pdf

From the 'article' (really just a brief overview), it's clear that it will generally at present improve performance for the BitTyrant user; it will also statistically improve performance for any peer with substantial spare upload capacity, regardless of client used.

This paper http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/piatek/papers/B itTyrant.pdf [cs.washington.edu] goes into considerably more detail, and is well worth reading if you have a nodding acquaintance with the BT protocol and elementary game theory.

It probably will initially hurt performance for users with saturated upload capacity who cannot contribute any more to the swarm than they are at present.

It's not at all clear that this is a bad thing, even if everyone switched to BTyrant. A lot could come down to the social behavior of Tyrant users once they become seeders, for example. If a Tyrant keeps a torrent active as long as s/he presently does, it would clearly be an improvement. For those who say "well a tyrant user may not even seed to 1.0"; fine; that Tyrant user won't really benefit much from the protocol.

Holmwood

• Data availability: Suppose seeders are sending out data at 20 k/sec, and a complete copy does not yet exist in the swarm. Then, even if you start downloading quickly, eventually you will catch up to the data production point and download at no faster than 20 k/sec.
• Luck of the draw: sometimes, you'll get a lucky peer (or seed) from the tracker. Because most trackers only return a subset of the peers available, BitTyrant can't make its peering selections with global information. If one client happens to get several high capacity peers that BitTyrant never sees, relative performance may be worse.
• Seed dominated performance: if there are a lot of seeds for a file, their altruistic contribution might dominate performance. BitTyrant is designed to improve download performance when tit-for-tat controls download speeds. This is typically the case when there are few seeds for a file, but many leechers.

Why shut down your home system? Why not have it available as a server to make your life easier? I agree with other posters about using "offline" mode of Thunderbird and like clients.

In case you're thinking that you have a particularly repressive ISP...

My ISP blocks ports 80 and 25 - particularly irritating, if you ask me. My ISPs TOS, if read to the letter, would mean that multiple browser windows or tabbed browsing are inappropriate because it's more than one session over the broadband pipe.
 
I agree that it would be ideal if I could use every port I want, block the ones I want to firewall - but I'm too cheap to pay for that kind of access.
 
So I work around it. I use dyndns [dyndns.com] to create a pointer to my dynamic IP address. My ISP does not block https or ssh ports, so I leverage those to get what I want.
 
I use cron, fetchmail [berlios.de],
  procmail [procmail.org],
  spamassassin [apache.org], and
  postfix [postfix.org] to bring mail from my ISP to my local system.
 
I use uw-imapd [washington.edu] to share my mail with other computers on my home network
 
I use ssh and pine, or apache+php+MySQL+https (self-signed cert) with roundcube [roundcube.net] to get remote access to my IMAP server.
 
I use WinSCP [winscp.net] to get access to my files at home when I'm at work. My data is *MINE* and I easily back it up (nightly and offsite qurterly - snapshot backups coming soon thanks to rsnapshot [rsnapshot.org], perl and rsync)
 
Every tool that I use is free of charge and as free as the GPL and apache licenses are free (zealots can feel free to argue with someone else about the relative freedom of the GPL, thanks.)
 
I certainly could pay for more open TOS with an ISP - I could even host my applications at an ISP. I'm cheap, and this solution works well enough for me.
Hope you find a solution that works for you!
 
Respectfully,
Anomaly

My ISP blocks ports 80 and 25 - particularly irritating, if you ask me. My ISPs TOS, if read to the letter, would mean that multiple browser windows or tabbed browsing are inappropriate because it's more than one session over the broadband pipe.

I agree that it would be ideal if I could use every port I want, block the ones I want to firewall - but I'm too cheap to pay for that kind of access.

So I work around it. I use dyndns to create a pointer to my dynamic IP address. My ISP does not block https or ssh ports, so I leverage those to get what I want.

I use cron, fetchmail,
procmail,
spamassassin, and
postfix to bring mail from my ISP to my local system.

I use uw-imapd to share my mail with other computers on my home network

I use ssh and pine, or apache+php+MySQL+https (self-signed cert) with roundcube to get remote access to my IMAP server.

I use WinSCP to get access to my files at home when I'm at work. My data is *MINE* and I easily back it up (nightly and offsite qurterly - snapshot backups coming soon thanks to rsnapshot, perl and rsync)

Every tool that I use is free of charge and as free as the GPL and apache licenses are free (zealots can feel free to argue with someone else about the relative freedom of the GPL, thanks.)

I certainly could pay for more open TOS with an ISP - I could even host my applications at an ISP. I'm cheap, and this solution works well enough for me.

Respectfully,
Anomaly

At least in the U.S. (where I'm from), copyright is an "opt out" form of copy protection. I'd rather it was "opt in".

Early physical and psychological development in humans is spurred by, and social behavior is learned through, imitation. We are, it appears, hard-wired to imitate other humans. Art and self-expression are rooted in imitation of others and almost all art forms are taught by imitation (called "technique") and most art is derivative of earlier expression.

In light of all this, it seems absurd to insist that anything I think, say, or do is "original." It seems doubly absurd to insist that because I thought of something "first", that I and my descendants deserve compensation in prepetuity for my "original" idea.

As widely discussed here on Slashdot, the current basis for "Intellectual Property" in the U.S. is patent and copyright. It appears that the framers of the U.S. Consitution shared the same idea that all works are at least in part derivative. They attempted to create a framework wherein people would have an incentive to *share* their ideas, after a *limited* time in which to capitalize on the *expression* of their ideas. I personally take issue with the idea that this conveys "property" rights, in either the legal or practical sense.

In closing, I defy anyone to identify my personal infringement of intellectual "property" that may or may not be contained in the firings of the neurons in my brain, or the unlicensed performances for friends of portions of movies, etc. That's some "property" (*laugh*)...you can't even identify who is currently in possession of it at any given point in time!

I agree, although the article actually says "IT Degree", which probably translates to a degree from DeVry or the like.

What they should be paying for is an Informatics degree -- it includes the technical aspects of hacking (programming languages from a pragmatic standpoint), but combines it with the social and communication elements you mentioned.

Head mounted displays have *not* been fiction. Steve Mann has been building these things for decades. A number of commercial solutions, based on several generations of products exist. I count a total of 17 basic wearable display product lines at Tekgear, a distributor who focuses on wearable computing hardware. This sort of thing is so common that an Open Source toolkit has been developed to deal with the real problems with these displays -- not the graphics display, but the user input. The ArToolkit is an object-recognition system which allows easy, keyboard-less interaction with a computer mediated augmented reality display. It's rather far along.

... here.

(ok... I'm evil to link a 200mb file... I know...)a

The University of Washington's news and information office put together a release that includes an embedded video and a PDF of the research paper: http://uwnews.washington.edu/ni/article.asp?articl eID=28494

The inline video, made by the researchers, is well-crafted and rather entertaining.

Disclosure: I work on behalf of the UW and the technical side of its news operations.

The University of Washington's news and information office put together a release that includes an embedded video and a PDF of the research paper: http://uwnews.washington.edu/ni/article.asp?articl eID=28494

The inline video, made by the researchers, is well-crafted and rather entertaining.

Disclosure: I work on behalf of the UW and the technical side of its news operations.

From University of Washington. And a good writeup from Wired.

I moved to Linux in 1994 as my primary desktop and server OS. About three years ago I decided that I wanted to produce some video content. Video editing was theoretically possible in Linux - I hooked up my camcorder to my Linux box and did some editing, but the tools were primitive and cofiguration was unusually difficult.

Eventually I looked at OS X and iLife. I decided to jump to a Mac. What a great move!

I found that Linux made it possible to do some things, but OS X made it simple to do them.

Fast forward a few years. I now have a few macs at home - their licensing policy makes it affordable to have several machines and a five user license for the OS and tools. My family loves the power and usability of the Mac.

Recently my linux server at home began acting a bit flaky. I did some analysis and determined that hardware replacement was needed. After checking prices for CPU/motherboard/RAM (and potentially hard disk) I figured out that I'd need a few hundred bucks to replace the CentOS box with a new one. After thinking about whether to drop a few hundred bucks or not on this server, it occurred to me that I might be able to move all of the services hosted on linux to OS X.

I found that samba,
  hotwayd,
  dansguardian,
  uw-imapd,
  fetchmail,
  procmail,
  spamassassin,
    rsync,
  rsnapshot,
  apache2,
  MySQL4,
  PHP,
  perl,
  java, and
  squid were all available for OS X.

Most of these are "in the box" with OS X. The only ones that I need to compile from source are uw-imapd and squid! Of course I need the bundled developer tools to get a compiler, and the Apple/BSD startup mechanism and the netinfo wierdness require some tweaks - but since when did Linux *not* require any tweaking?

What this means to me is that after more than a decade of running Linux at home (and work) I am *this* close to shutting down Linux for good at home.

Hope your experience is similar.

Regards,
Anomaly

PS - I share your recent comments about the loss of a pet. :(

http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/chasleep.htm l

Actually, that's not that unusual. Caffeine is a vasoconstrictor, and so it can work to cure headaches in some people (particularly in the case of tension headaches). Heck, painkillers such as ibuprofen are often combined with caffeine, as the two together work even better.

.....That's not an assumption, that's an observation....

The red shift is a primary observation. That was and is still INTERPRETED to be due to the familiar doppler effect, which implies motion. Interpreting the red shift as caused by motion is the primary cause for much of the difficulties currently accepted cosmology is having in trying to make sense out of some of the other observations made. There is also evidence from discoveries such as the fact that the red shift is "quantized", that negate the still "accepted" notion that the galaxies are moving away from us and from each other at astounding speed. In some cases the "speeds" are as much as 70% of the speed of light. The quantization of the red shift is observational evidence that the doppler explanation of its cause is just plain wrong.

http://www.npl.washington.edu/av/altvw68.html

We know that electromagnetic energy propagation speed is strongly affected by the medium it travels through. If we theorize that the red shift is caused by the changing electromagnetic properties of free space and this affects the speed of light and related "constants" then many of the problems and conundrums facing cosmology evaporate. Dark matter and energy are among them. Intrinsically, the electromagnetic interaction is many orders of magnitude greater than gravity and certainly was the predominant force acting upon the components of the early universe. We humans get rather uncomfortable at change, especially in what has long been considered not subject to change.

(.....Cosmologists are not stupid; the current paradigms are accepted because they work better than the alternatives you propose, not because prejudices have prevented them from considering such alternatives........)

No, they are very smart, but still human. Nobody likes their life work demolished and they be proven wrong. It took 50 years for "accepted and established" scientists to believe Danish astronomer Olaf Roemer's measurements of the finite speed of light, rather than the instantaneous travel time dogma of that time. More often than not, the early pioneers of science made observations that went very much against what was accepted dogma by "reputable" scientists of their day.

Light is produced by moving charge. Such motion cannot be continuous, but is quantized. The resultant light will therefore also be quantized. If this light has slowed down greatly since it left is source, the quantization steps become observable. The doppler effect simply is NOT the reason for the red shift and cannot explain its quantization.

Accepting the interpretation of the red shift as being due to electromagnetic phenomena and great changing of the various "constants" associated with them has some very unpleasant philosophical implications for all who insist believing in the vast time scales involved in the origin and evolution of the cosmos and all life within it. That in fact is the primary reason why Tift's observations were received with great skepticism. However if you looked at the link I gave and other's you can Google for, you will learn that Tift's work has been confirmed and strengthened by further explorations.

Washington University != University of Washington

Washington University is in Saint Louis
University of Washington is in Seattle

Two separate schools.

According to the PINE website ( http://www.washington.edu/pine/ ) PINE stands for "Program for Internet News & Email".

I'm not up on the pine scene but why aren't the patches folded into the upstream? Seems if you're checking out, you'd submit them all before you turn off the lights, but perhaps there is some legal reason.

These patches have been around for a long time, and I'm sure the author has suggested them for upstream merger already.

You're on the right track concerning legal reasons, which is why there's so much fuss about Pine patches compared to other software patches. In my understanding, the license forbids the distribution of unofficial versions, except for local use. You can only distribute your own version of Pine as a set of patches against the official version.

Distributions like Gentoo get around this nicely by automatically patching and compiling upon install. But the fact remains that Pine is not Free software in the sense that you would be free to distribute your improvements.

Personally, I'm not too worried as I believe the patches will find another home. I've used Pine since 1998, I think it strikes a very good balance between convenience of use and customizability, and I haven't found a decent alternative.

patches

Oct 1, 2006 - While Alpine isn't quite ready for release just yet, development continues at full speed. Keep checking this page for updates as the release nears.

Because Pine is not GPL/BSD Licensed open source program, it is owned by the Washington University and they allow you to make local changes, distribute free of charge, or charge in a packaged distribution for the packaging of the programs (IE not for pine/pico), but you are not allowed to comercially sell it, and must apply a local tag (L) to the patches or versions you change and distribute. Source

Granted it is a pretty open license, but UW Still owns it.

The change is imminent -- consider Alpine.

Maybe there will be a massive switch to Alpine?

From TFWP : "In late 2005, Computing & Communications at the University of Washington began a project to create a new family of email tools built upon the Pine® Message System. This family of tools is called Alpine. Alpine consists of a UNIX command-line program, a PC version, and a Web version.

Alpine will be licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0."

PINE was my first UNIX mail reader on the now defunct MRC HGMP server circa 1995 (how I miss that account) so I grew to love it. That was around the time I still thought PICO was a neat editor. Then I found vi, them vim, then mutt, and I've not looked back :)

And no, don't tell me what other program I should use instead!

In late 2005, Computing & Communications at the University of Washington began a project to create a new family of email tools built upon the Pine® Message System. This family of tools is called Alpine. Alpine consists of a UNIX command-line program, a PC version, and a Web version. Alpine will be licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. The target date for the release of Alpine is October 1, 2006.