Domain: wisconsinhistory.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to wisconsinhistory.org.
Comments · 8
-
Farm Equipment and how patents once worked...
I look out the window of my building from my cubicle and see a little sliver of Grant Park on Chicago's lake front to the south. On the other side of Grant Park lies Soldier's Field and McCormick Place.
McCormick Place is named after "Colonel" Robert McCormick, staunch anti FDR Republican and owner of the Chicago Tribune. Colonel McCormick was one of the heirs of the fortune made by Cyrus McCormick selling the McCormick reaper.
The reaper was patented. Obed Hussey had patented a reaper as well. They fought in court over the patents, but both were sold for many years under the separate patents. Obed ended up with the "most" ownership of the design, but they were not exactly alike.
Think about the old saying: "Build a better mouse trap, and the world will beat a path to your door."
As a matter of fact, Massey Ferguson, John Deere, Alice Chalmers and many others made reapers, harvesters, tillers, bailers and many more patented farm equipment. Each performed the same functions, but each did it in a slightly different way. They each were building better mouse traps, not the same one. The US constitution supports patents in section 8:
"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."
The purpose must be to promote, not hinder, the "Progress of Science" and "useful Arts". Temporary, and exclusive, rights "to their respective" creations are granted. Not all creations that perform the same function are protected against, but the ones that do it the way you made it work. If someone else makes a golf ball that is different than your golf ball, they get their patent and you get yours. In this way the 'useful Arts' are promoted. "Build a better golf ball and the golfers will beat a path to your door" has become "and the lawyers will beat a path to the Court."
We have come almost 180 (degrees) in patent law from the simple language of the Constitution. Patents should protect an individual, specific design, and those very close to that specific design. However, they should not hinder novel designs. That would be against what the constitution authorizes. Also they must be time limited, or innovation will be destroyed. Manufacturers often tweak products and file for a new patents, then use the current broad, not specific, reach of patent law to hinder innovative competition.
The current interpretation of patent, and copyright, law clearly is in opposition to the clear language of the constitution. We arrived at where we are through multiple small steps, small interpretations of the law that have us now applying laws that grant broad reaching and almost never ending rights. The current state of the law, as interpreted through the lens of many years of collective case law, hinders innovation, competition and free enterprise.
-
Re:ok if your car is new
Actually, governments were worrying about that sort of thing as early as 1875 when Wisconsin offered a prize for a vehicle that would be a "cheap, practical substitute for the horse and other animals". http://www.wisconsinhistory.or...
That is one of the roles of government, to look ahead at potential problems and find ways of mitigating them before they become a problem.
Hopefully, because of the various government actions being taken today (from biofuel to electric cars to renewables) we won't have to worry about it.
-
Re:We NEED to cut our spending.
Who, what, where, when? If you're trying to make an argument you will need to provide more than conjecture.
Why don't you read this URL. There's a nice three paragraph section on why Social Security was created. Let me boil it down for you. US Citizens demanded a safety net after Black Tuesday and the ensuing Great Depression, hence "Social Security". If you're not a fan of it, please feel free to pack up and move to a country without a social contract/compact, mkay?
-
Re:Native Americans are the greedy ones
Native Americans didn't even have calculus when they were discovered, and couldn't even make cast iron, let alone steel.
Native American may not of had calculus but Europeans didn't have "zero".
and couldn't even make cast iron, let alone steel.
American Indians were mining copper before the Americas were "discovered". In 1848 a copper mine was found showing mining was done as early as 3000BC on the shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin.
Falcon -
Has no one mentioned.....
Both were courtesy of Jim Mallon and Leon Varjian, leaders of the Pail and Shovel party at the University of Wisconsin. During their 1978 campaign they promised to raise enough money to buy the Statue of Liberty and fly it to Madison. During transit via helicopter the tow cable cable broke and Lady Liberty plunged into the lake.
-
Wisconsin PoliticsMadison is quite liberal. But it isn't entirely due to a backlash against McCarthy and they aren't the only part of the state that is. Milwaukee has had several socialist mayors. The state's liberalism goes back quite some time. It was the birthplace of the progressive movement (strangely enough, by Republicans). This is a topic I'd like to learn more about as I have recently moved to Wisconsin, but I think its tradition is largely due to many of the German immigrants. They had a strong commitment to public education and I think it has manifested itself in many other ways.
Jack
-
Re:Wisconsin Does Have The Best Stuff!
A few more:
- Garbage (the band)
- The Zucker Brothers (and Jim Abrahams)
- Cray Compter
- The Dells
- The Marquette Golden Eagles... Uh... Gold... Uh... Warriors? Hilltopers? Uh... Dwyane Wade went to school here!
- Fighting Bob La Follette
- Sewer Socialists
- Harley-Davidson
- They brought Arnold Schwarzenegger to America
- Douglas MacArthur
- Bratwurst
- Numbered Highways
- Birthplace of The Republican Party
- Svetlana Alliluyeva (Stalin's Daughter)
- Frank Lloyd Wright
- Heather Graham -
Re:It's called...Funny comment, but in all seriousness, I despair at the number of old buildings I visit that have had enormous, beautiful glass skylights covered over in favor of electric lighting. At an early twentieth-century school building being demolished in my home town, I was shocked to discover that a large, beautiful skylight over one of the main lobby areas had been covered over with a false ceiling! The sunlight was literally shining on the back of the ceiling tiles, while directly below, a fluorescent fixture had been installed. Perverse, and I never would have known but for the fact that the building was being destroyed and the false ceiling torn away.
Another example I noticed recently was the reading room at the Wisconsin State Historical Society (pictured here). All of the fluorescent squares at the top of the picture were skylights, which covered the entire ceiling.