Slashdot Mirror


Sunlight in a Tube

Elitist_Phoenix writes "Scientists are developing a technology to save energy by transmitting sunlight into buildings through tubes. Indoor electric lighting is the largest consumer of electricity in commercial buildings. Their new system. called hybrid solar lighting, would reduce this energy usage with fixtures that supplement or completely replace electric light with sunlight, at times when its available. The system is called hybrid solar lighting (Google)."

463 comments

  1. It's called... by turtled · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's called a Flashlight... =) Light in tubes...

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    1. Re:It's called... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      It's called a Flashlight... =) Light in tubes...

      What's wrong with Lightsabres?

      "Hey, Yoda, back off, ya trying to blind me?"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:It's called... by Steve+Fuller · · Score: 3, Informative

      Feh... that would be recycled sunlight
      Its called a Tubular Skylight

    3. Re:It's called... by theMerovingian · · Score: 1, Funny


      That reminds me of the old patent office joke, about the guy who invented a solar-powered flashlight...

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    4. Re:It's called... by NETHED · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      --sig fault--
    5. Re:It's called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's called a mirror.

    6. Re:It's called... by Mike+O'Hara · · Score: 1

      We sell 'sky tunnels' at work... have done for about two or three years now.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    7. Re:It's called... by schenkzoola · · Score: 1

      Actually I have a flashlight that was nicknamed "Sun in a Tube." It's just a 5 cell mag lite with li-so2 batteries and a 50W halogen lamp installed.

    8. Re:It's called... by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      A bunch of the townhomes and condos I was looking at had them.

    9. Re:It's called... by yiantsbro · · Score: 1

      Back in my day we called them windows. Of course then we were hit by a trademark lawsuit from Microsoft. Bricked them all over and installed elecric lighting.

    10. Re:It's called... by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Funny comment, but in all seriousness, I despair at the number of old buildings I visit that have had enormous, beautiful glass skylights covered over in favor of electric lighting. At an early twentieth-century school building being demolished in my home town, I was shocked to discover that a large, beautiful skylight over one of the main lobby areas had been covered over with a false ceiling! The sunlight was literally shining on the back of the ceiling tiles, while directly below, a fluorescent fixture had been installed. Perverse, and I never would have known but for the fact that the building was being destroyed and the false ceiling torn away.

      Another example I noticed recently was the reading room at the Wisconsin State Historical Society (pictured here). All of the fluorescent squares at the top of the picture were skylights, which covered the entire ceiling.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    11. Re:It's called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah we have a similar thing over here in the uk. Well, theyre not actually tunnels. Theyre only a few inches thick, maybe 2 at the most. The have this material that lets in light and also keeps the weather out. ...We call them 'windows'.

    12. Re:It's called... by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 4, Informative

      These Existing Solar Tube of systems are great for Houses, but they lose a lot of light per metre so there value in using them to pipe light to the lower floor of even a two storey house is limited. also they lack flexibility as the collector needs to basically be above the area the light is wanted.

      The System from the article is not that new either, the basic idea has been around for a while. Although the cost of the Optic Fibre (vs. under priced electric power) has always been a factor limiting the deployment of systems such as the one in the article.

      The Advantage of and Optic Fibre System is that optic fibre can carry light at much lower loss levels per metre. This means a fibre system is good for multi-storey work, like commercial office buildings.

      Where we are trying to push the light 7-8m(21-26ft) horizontally into the building. Vertically allow say +3m(10-12ft) per floor. In an 8 storey building you need to be able to push light around 40m and around many corners.

      An the advantages of using natural light are more than just the power saving. Using Natural light can vastly improve the health of the building. Enclosed areas like fire stairs, toilets, plant rooms will all stay cleaner if lit with natural light.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
    13. Re:It's called... by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "Enclosed areas like fire stairs, toilets, plant rooms will all stay cleaner if lit with natural light."

      I'm not trying to be a troll, I just don't get it. How does light affect how dirty things get?

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    14. Re:It's called... by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

      Well yes light won't decrease the amount of dirt trafficed in to a space. It will effect the growth of mold and bacteria in the space, there are very few of these "nasties" that will survive even low levels of Natural light. Although it's the UV content will do most the work. Natural light still can be effective with filtered uv levels. It has a fuller and constitant range of the light spectrum, where electrical light tends to have spikes in the light spectrum that mix to form something like white light.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
    15. Re:It's called... by Chris+Hodges · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be Windows(TM)?

  2. Oh crap. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    How the hell am I going to maintain my pasty zombie-like complexion if they allow sunlight into the building?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Oh crap. by fluffybacon · · Score: 0

      One word, four letters, starts with Q.

      --
      It's not big, but it's clever!
    2. Re:Oh crap. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Fret not.
      HSL is an insufficiently sexy TLA for market traction.
      We're safe.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    3. Re:Oh crap. by zoefff · · Score: 1

      Just wait for a cloudy day and the performance will be crap, oh.

      Serious, on a cloudy day the amount of candela falling on the recieving part will be very low compared to a sunny day and you will have to switch on the lights again. or have big windows, as only square meters will solve that problem.

    4. Re:Oh crap. by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Do what I do - work nights and sleep through the day...

    5. Re:Oh crap. by mjjohansen · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is yet another effort to fight windows.
      Doesn't matter anyway, since geeks are night animals.

    6. Re:Oh crap. by clonan · · Score: 1

      the difference with this system is that it has electric light along side the sunlight.

      They then monitor the incoming light level and use the electric lights to balance the difference.

      What that means is that the light level is stable and regardless of how cloudy the day is it is STILL cheaper than all electric light.

      I wonder what they do when the sunlight exceeds the desiered level....maybe slide solar cells over part of the sunlight intake...

    7. Re:Oh crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By installing an UV filter.

    8. Re:Oh crap. by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      The fiber optics will probably block UV since they tend to be made out of glass. At least I hope they block it, since I know people who are literally allergic to that stuff.

    9. Re:Oh crap. by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "They then monitor the incoming light level and use the electric lights to balance the difference."

      I didn't read TFA, but if you mounted lights in or next to normal skylights, you would lose 50% of the efficiency of the flourescents -- because you'd be using half their light to illuminate the sky above the building. Perhaps you could install reflective louvers that close above the tubes when the electric lights are on, though this adds to the cost and to the things that can break.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    10. Re:Oh crap. by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "The fiber optics will probably block UV since they tend to be made out of glass"

      Most window glass has a lot of impurities, which is why it's green instead of clear when viewed edge-on (there is a rare and very expensive kind of glass called Starphire, which has much better transparency). I bet the fiber optic stuff is a lot more pure than window glass, or else the data signals would be rather attenuated over a distance. So my guess is that fiber probably doesn't block much UV.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    11. Re:Oh crap. by clonan · · Score: 1

      Or you have a light that is completly covered in reflective material except for one fiber optic cable that then is spliced into the incoming sunlight.

      You will have no moving parts and get 100% of the light from the bulb.

  3. Sunblock? by kanwisch · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what SPF will my employer be required to provide for my balding head?

    1. Re:Sunblock? by welloy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a good point. Would the UV rays make it through the tube?

    2. Re:Sunblock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unless it was quartz.

    3. Re:Sunblock? by JohnAllison · · Score: 2, Interesting
      More than likely the answer is yes. Yet it is important to remember that UV filter material is cheap, think sunglasses.

      Please also note that engineers, presumably like the grandparent, would remember to design such filters if only to save their own skin.

    4. Re:Sunblock? by LionMage · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. As another poster pointed out, only quartz and certain other crystals (e.g., calcium fluoride, which is being investigated as a lens material for next generation chip fabs using EUV for photolithography) transmit UV.

      This technology actually isn't that new. The Japanese were experimenting with piping sunlight into buildings using fiber optics about a decade ago, possibly more. I remember seeing a program about the topic on PBS or Discovery about that long ago. One of the benefits touted by this technique is that it actually filters out harmful UV; they did experiments that showed plants grew healthier under piped-in sunlight than they did out in the open.

    5. Re:Sunblock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could easily be filtered out.

    6. Re:Sunblock? by afxgrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No UV-B (or UV-A) rays would make it that far down the tube - most glass attenuates UV quite well.

      You'd need to get some stupidly expensive glass (like the kind used in photolithography) to transmit the UV down the light pipe.

      I did a quick search on google, and came across this about glass absorbing UV:

      "From: James Richmond (Avatar) 15/02/99 12:39:42
      Subject: re: sunburn and car windows post id: 1216
      As others have said, glass absorbs UV reasonably effectively. I am reminded of a story told by the late Richard Feynman, who was present at the first nuclear bomb detonation. The bomb was mounted on a tower in the desert. Everyone was issued with dark goggles to protect their eyes from the flash as the bomb went off. The goggles were almost opaque, making it difficult to see anything. Feynman figured that the only dangerous thing would be the UV light, and he wanted to get a good look at the explosion, so he sat in a car and watched through the windscreen (without goggles), assuming that the screen would absorb much of the harmful UV. As a result, he probably got the best naked-eye view of anyone present."

      Source

  4. What's the system called? by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their new system. called hybrid solar lighting, would reduce this energy usage with fixtures that supplement or completely replace electric light with sunlight, at times when its available. The system is called hybrid solar lighting (Google)."

    I think it might be called hybrid solar lighting? Not sure though. Could anyone confirm?

    1. Re:What's the system called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats wrong with windows?

    2. Re:What's the system called? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      whats wrong with windows?

      Windows don't have the "bling bling" factor.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:What's the system called? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I think it might be called hybrid solar lighting? Not sure though. Could anyone confirm?

      Dunno, but light wells and tubes aren't anything new. Seems about 7-8 years ago a highrise in Japan had collectors on the roof and ran some variation on fibre optic (on a large scale) through the building. A buddy in architecture showed me the example, but I do not know the name or exact location of the building.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:What's the system called? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 3, Funny

      You asked this on Slashdot?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    5. Re:What's the system called? by Mr.+Frilly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this tech isn't anything new. I remember seeing a building in Japan with this technology on the show "That's Incredible" around 20 years ago. I always assumed it wasn't economically feasible and that's why I haven't seen it since.

    6. Re:What's the system called? by iocat · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the not new front, these work really well. And I'm fairly sure you can pick them up (simple ones anyway) at Lowes.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    7. Re:What's the system called? by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm inpressed. This must be a new, more efficient form of story dupe.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    8. Re:What's the system called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Mr. Trump, hybrid solar ligthing, yes.

    9. Re:What's the system called? by hb253 · · Score: 1

      You are correct. I looked into getting a product called Solatube for my house about 9 years ago. Same sort of concept where you have a rooftop collector that channels light down a super shiny tube.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    10. Re:What's the system called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's called fiber optics, and it's been around for years, but nobody cares.

    11. Re:What's the system called? by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a bloated, unsecure, expensive, unstable piece of...wait, you don't mean the OS do you?

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    12. Re:What's the system called? by malfunct · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows don't work too well on interior rooms. Just ask that guy in the inner-inner office at work how much outside light he gets.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    13. Re:What's the system called? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Funny
      Just ask that guy in the inner-inner office at work how much outside light he gets.

      They don't allow us to talk to him or even look at him directly. Although, I do toss in some raw meat an a cold Mt. Dew now and than just to keep the noise level down.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    14. Re:What's the system called? by notbob · · Score: 0

      Geeks aren't allowed windows.

      I live in florida now for a job with a private office... i have a glass wall but it faces in to the office where I cannot from any vantage point recieve sunlight to my office. I find it messed up truly but hey they gave me a good chair and I get out of here just in time to see sun set cause we start earlier... hrmm yeah wow that sucks...

    15. Re:What's the system called? by El_Servas · · Score: 1

      whats wrong with windows?

      I can't believe someone asked that question here on Slashdot!... :|

      But.. hell! yeah! What's wrong with Windows?! =P
      J/K

    16. Re:What's the system called? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I know I saw them at Home Depot. I was thinking of putting them in my room.

      I suspect this hybrid thing they're working on is a system that would turn on the electric lights in a building if there isn't enough sunlight.

    17. Re:What's the system called? by Grax · · Score: 1

      I knew I remembered this from somewhere.

      When will they release the DVDs of That's Incredible? I miss that show.

    18. Re:What's the system called? by F34nor · · Score: 1

      They also profiled it on Beyond2000. Great show that. Were they Aussies or Brits? I can't remember who ran that show but it was basically Slashdot.tv for physical nerdness.

    19. Re:What's the system called? by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're actually called "Windows".

    20. Re:What's the system called? by phyruxus · · Score: 1
      some buildings sprawl enough that you get interior rooms .. there's another room/corridor whatever between the room and the external wall.

      I thought of this idea myself a year or so ago (although I see I am ~13 years too late anyway according to another poster:) .. my idea was a little different, actually it was based in science fiction... I was imagining a high population density city, where the buildings were so large that most units wouldn't be able to have windows. My idea was to have a small viewport on the outside wall, with optical amplification and a set of pinhole outlets to go to each receiving room. That way interior dwellers would be able to look at a pane of glass and see the outside world, without it being a projected image or a digital representation. You could look through a telescope and check out the horizon, or push a button and have it go back to a blank wall (covered in glass).

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    21. Re:What's the system called? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      The Solartube works pretty well. I put one in for a skylight in the bathroom that has no windows and sits in the middle of the house. Great that now during the day, don't need to turn on a light for the bathroom.

      The hybrid lights are a bit more advanced as they are also solar panels to generate electricity and include electric lights to maintain a general brightness inside.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    22. Re:What's the system called? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Yes, I hear their first contract they're doing before the others is installing an installation for the Department Of Redundancy Department - specifically the PIN Number section. At least that's what I heard.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    23. Re:What's the system called? by soft_guy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My friend's dog was on that show.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    24. Re:What's the system called? by jskiff · · Score: 1

      Netcraft confirms it: The system is called hybrid solar lighting.

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    25. Re:What's the system called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You asked this on Slashdot?

    26. Re:What's the system called? by nolife · · Score: 1

      a system that would turn on the electric lights in a building if there isn't enough sunlight.

      That's not something "hard" to work on, all it takes is a photosensor. You can by the raw parts for pennies or get self contained pre wired and UL approved units that will switch up to like a 1000W resistive load for about $10 USD. Our office has motion sensors built into the switches, stop moving for 15 minutes and the lights shut off, it would proably take an extra few dollars to adapt that controler to also measure and use existing light level into the logic.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    27. Re:What's the system called? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      So how do you make sure the light doesn't fall below acceptable levels before turning on the internal lights?

      What about allowing for different models of lights where warm-up times are different?

      You'll need to develop a sane physical user interface. Do you generally depend on a central computer? What happens if that computer fails? Do emergency floodlights come on, or is their a local manual or automatic override?

      IMO, quite a thought-provoking problem, if you take time to think it through.

    28. Re:What's the system called? by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      the light comes in the wrong way.

      I sit next to some rather large windows, but we keep the blinds down most of the day because the light tends to get in people's eyes, reflect from their screens, or is just too damned hot.

      And of course the room is big enough that even if all the blinds were up, there still wouldn't be enough light in most of the room, so we have to have the lights on anyway.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    29. Re:What's the system called? by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1
    30. Re:What's the system called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well for the last 10 years it was called fiber optic lighting (you put a 'collector' on the roof).

      This concept is so 'new' they can call it whatever they want because most consumers don't know that this technology already existed 10 years ago.

      whats next -- a new home automation communication protocol that communicates over your house wiring? Hell they could even open a website called x10.com to sell this fabeled technology on the internet!!

    31. Re:What's the system called? by nolife · · Score: 1

      I understand your concerns but there really is no need to make this more complex then is needed unless your goal is to maintain a very specific brightness within a certain tolerance. That may seem like a reasonable goal to achieve but you have to consider anyone with a window in a plain old office has changes in light levels throughout the day and it does not seem to cause any issues. Considering this system brings in that same light in relative brightness from the outside to people without an existing window, what would be the difference? I hope you are not impling that people in offices with windows now are effected every time a cloud goes by.
      I have a simple tier light in my living room that I paid $45 at Lowes. It has a light sensor. It comes on automatically when my living room gets to a certain brightness and gets brighter as the ambient light goes down. Nothing tricky, no computers, no central computer required. It only has one adjustment knob to adjust the max brightness. I actually have it adjusted very low so it really only comes on when it is "dark" in the house and it only gives off enough light as a large night light would (so when I get home at night, my house is not pitch black). Of course this is an incendescent light that is dimmable, maybe flourescent lights that are more commmon in the office environment would require something a little more elaborate but not have to be as technically involved that it needs to be computer controlled.

      What lights are you refering to with different startup times? I know of quite a few types myself but I have never seen them used in an office as the primary lighting.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    32. Re:What's the system called? by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "specifically the PIN Number section"

      That's the department over ATM machines with LCD displays, right?

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    33. Re:What's the system called? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I see your point regarding office windows. I've never had a job with a window that wasn't shuttered or blocked by another building.

      By light startup times, I'm referring to different types of lights. Incandescents turn on immediately. Flourescents may flicker a moment before remaining on. At least one type of light I've seen requires a good five to ten minutes to warm up and reach normal brightness. (Really bright lights in my old high school gym. Probably also found at convention centers.)

      A simple brightness-controlled switch won't work well with lights that flicker for a few moments. (Dealing with that flicker every few minutes on a partly cloudy day would be maddening.) Nor would they work well in settings where continual light is ideal, like in a gymnasium.

      The computer-controlled concept stems from integration with weather forecasts. (Partly or mostly cloudy? Increase the delay before the light sensor can turn off the light. Don't want a brief sunbeam to turn off the lights and leave the meeting in darkness.) Also, the ability to schedule light shutdowns by department. Or "rolling blackouts" if lighting expense is a target of the budget analysts. Or even simple monitoring and statistic gathering. I imagine managers of large buildings and complexes wouldn't mind some of these features.

    34. Re:What's the system called? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      It was an Australian show. The original ("Towards 2000") was bankrolled by the ABC (sort of like PBS, I think, only it's (poorly) financed by the government), but the show moved to commercial TV when the production company got a better offer than the ABC could afford.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    35. Re:What's the system called? by eikonos · · Score: 1

      They know that geeks don't like windows (or Windows..), so they tried to make it sound cool with a techy name.

    36. Re:What's the system called? by F34nor · · Score: 1

      What happened to Bush Tucker Man, I loved that show. I need some honey assed ants!

    37. Re:What's the system called? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Les Hiddins is still around, I think running some kind of bush retreat for Vietnam veterans. You can get a DVD of the TV series from the ABC I think.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  5. Nice,,, by MrLogic17 · · Score: 0

    Nice... a story without a "RTFA" possibility...

    -MrLogic

  6. This is nothing new... by qwertphobia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    all the Amish retailers here use the same sort of thing. They can light a supermarket with redirected light during daylight hours, and light up the propane system once the natural light is gone.

    --
    Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
    1. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are cheating: "redirecting light" is some kind of what we call "technology" and we all know it is strictly forbidden! But seriously, at what point do the Amish consider something forbidden?

    2. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If it can be generated, constructed locally it is not forbidden-they are not anti-technology, simply picky about it and have cultural objection to large-scale utilities.

    3. Re:This is nothing new... by qwertphobia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They need to be able to understand all aspects of the design.

      Propane is just a burning gas, but gasoline employs internal combustion engines and refineries and all that.

      They're more relaxed than they used to be, especially for their businesses, but they still try to keep it down to basics where feasable.

      Their buggies need blinking lights by law, so they have no choice but to give in on some technologies.

      --
      Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
    4. Re:This is nothing new... by filmmaker · · Score: 1

      Also, didn't Egyptians who used conduits to direct light deep into the pyramids? At any rate, I remember seeing this in use in ancient architecture. I don't foresee the modern, high tech version of this being implemented widely for a while. In terms of peoples' homes and residences, this green home building guide shows how simple design modifications and materials choices can save energy and (the part people care about) cut heating costs dramatically.

    5. Re:This is nothing new... by Khomar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, this is different than simple redirected light. Check out this link for more information. Basically, it runs the sunlight through fiberoptic cables to light fixtures that work much like our current light bulbs. These means that you won't have to have serious architectural redesigns of buildings to get the same effect. It also will generate electricity that can be used for other applications (powering computers?). It is basically a hybrid approach to lighting.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    6. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If it can be generated, constructed locally


      The Amish are manufacturing fiber in those barns?

    7. Re:This is nothing new... by leenoble_uk · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a Lee & Herring sketch where an Amish type of family had chosen an arbitrary date of 1982 as their cut off point. Everything produced after 1982 was evil.

      They had an atari 2600 console and could play Pong but not Pacman (1983)

    8. Re:This is nothing new... by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually thats not how they evaluate it.

      For instance, Amish are trying out cell phones. They are picky, but the criteria they use is 'will the tech bring us closer together or drive us further apart?'

      For instance, they tried land phones...and apparently the lines got crossed, and someone heard a neighbor badmouthing her...

      They also felt it was rude to leave the people that were in your house to talk to someone who's 'not there.'

      For those reasons, they didn't adpot telephones.

      But they are using computers (powered by their own generators).

      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/7.01/amish.html

    9. Re:This is nothing new... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1, Interesting
      To be honest, I rather doubt that the average Amish would be able to explain, at a fundamental level, how a mirror reflects light, or how propane burns.

      Not that I'm saying anything bad about the Amish; I doubt that the average person on the street, or the average slashdotter understands those either.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    10. Re:This is nothing new... by hazah · · Score: 1

      Propane system

      Funny they should light a match and cause a chemical reaction to produce fire, and avoid another chemical reaction that moves electrons around.

      A little off topic... but I just can't bend my mind around it.

    11. Re:This is nothing new... by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      To be honest, I rather doubt that the average Amish would be able to explain, at a fundamental level, how a mirror reflects light, or how propane burns.
      There is no fundamental level.
    12. Re:This is nothing new... by johnjay · · Score: 1

      "Their buggies need blinking lights by law, so they have no choice but to give in on some technologies."

      Imagine the day when each buggy is required by law to have a black-box recorder, in case of accidents. How weird it would be--lovingly hand-made buggies, with South Korean sensors stapled all over, and a Chinese laptop nailed to the back of the carriage.

      I'm not saying it's going happen, but it would be a strange clash of cultures if it did.

    13. Re:This is nothing new... by Jodka · · Score: 1


      You can learn more about the Amish on their website.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    14. Re:This is nothing new... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Got any cool wooden or goat case mods you want to share?

      I just hope no one misreaeds that and posts his goatse case mod.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    15. Re:This is nothing new... by Washizu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you watch the documentary, Devil's Playground they answer this question specifically. It's not technology they are against, it's the way technology affects their culture. For example, a telephone isn't bad in itself but it takes away from time spent with the family or working. In an emergency, they use them.

      The documentary is mostly about Amish kids when they go on their "rumspringa," but I learned a ton about the Amish in general.

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    16. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something is forbidden if the bishops get toghether and decide against it. They don't have any automatic objections; they decide things on their merit.

      For example, the way to get goods to market now requires a gas or diesel vehicle. They may not own one, but there's nothing wrong with hitching a ride from a neighbor who has one. They would even take a bus to visit a relative or a doctor, however it would not be OK to just take a bus for something like a vacation.

      They could use electric lamps, but don't want to be directly connected to the outside world, so power lines are out. I wouldn't be surprised to see solar-powered Amish, but that's too expensive for most of them. They could use a diesel generator to make electricity to power lamps, but it's simpler to just burn the kerosene in the lamp itself. I can imagine that the Amish wouldn't mind having fiber-optic lighting as long as it was distributing sunlight rather than power-company light.

      dom

    17. Re:This is nothing new... by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      There are already LEED architectural and design standards. Follow them, and you don't need this stuff.

    18. Re:This is nothing new... by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      I operate a retail establishment in a building built in 1899. In this building, which included residential apartments in the 2nd and 3rd floor, there was a radical new design concept. The builders included these new fangled structures that would capture not only sunlight, but also fresh air and direct it down into the building. Each of the interior apartments (that is those which do not abut an exterior wall of the building) had direct access to this high-technology installation. The resident could directly control the flow of air, or the amount of light, by a set of separately operating "shutters" that would open and close with a simple push.

      These contraptions were called light wells.

      The "shutters" were called windows and curtains.

      Amazing technology.

      Now they are "improving" it by making new smaller light wells that don't allow fresh air to flow. I suppose if you're gonna give up your pasty complexion, you might want to breathe some fresh air too... I don't know, maybe I'm just old fashioned.

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
    19. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're more relaxed than they used to be, especially for their businesses, but they still try to keep it down to basics where feasable.

      There are still plenty traditional Amish. OTOH, there are a lot of Mennonites, which have far fewer reservations about electricity, etc.

    20. Re:This is nothing new... by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Woohoo!
      I was just going to mention that, but you beat me to it.
      I'll just sit back and have some of my weak lemon drink instead.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    21. Re:This is nothing new... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It honestly wouldn't be that hard to rig up a system of blinking lights using a rotating disc with a notch cut out of it, and a chemical lamp. You might have to crank it, but it would be easy to turn, and inexpensive. If they have electric blinking lights on their buggies, that smacks of laziness to me :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:This is nothing new... by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      Old news. I saw Popular Science/Mechanics articles on this in the late 80's. It was going to be the next big thing. That and the light pipes were going to change the way we lit buildings. It's nothing new.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    23. Re:This is nothing new... by Zwack · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, Do the lights need to blink while the Buggy is stationary? If so then it will be slightly more complicated (we'll need a flywheel and some form of clutch mechanism I think) But if not then surely all it needs is a cylinder (mirrored on the inside for optimum performance) with a slit in it. A matching cylinder (that doesn't rotate) that fits outside it (so that the light actually blinks and doesn't just rotate like a lighthouse/police car) and a simple gearing mechanism. We could drive it from the wheels of the buggy with a pair of gears. Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    24. Re:This is nothing new... by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I remember reading an article about amish woodworkers and how they use power tools. When they get a large jointer or planer or something, they remove the electric motors and replace them with air powered motors. Then they have a large diesel engine that provides air pressure to drive the motors. The cool thing about this is that turning a valve allows them to control the speed of the motor. It's like getting variable speed for free. That usually requires 3-phase power.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    25. Re:This is nothing new... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You can learn more about the Amish on their website.

      It is not clear if it is "their" website, or a website about Amish. It appears to a personal project that expanded.

    26. Re:This is nothing new... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      How weird it would be--lovingly hand-made buggies, with South Korean sensors stapled all over, and a Chinese laptop nailed to the back of the carriage.

      Hmm, are you sure you didn't steal that line out of a Gibson novel? :-)

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    27. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...use fiber for what it is invented for... transporting light from point a to point b

      Fantastic...

      My brain must be too small to see the great invention in this...

    28. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is different than simple redirected light. Check out this link for more information. Basically, it runs the sunlight through fiberoptic cables to light fixtures that work much like our current light bulbs. These means that you won't have to have serious architectural redesigns of buildings to get the same effect.

      How is that *not* redirected light? Redirected light using fiber optics has been around for decades. Not a new or terribly innovative idea either.

      It also will generate electricity that can be used for other applications (powering computers?).

      Okay, okay. So they added solar panels (which you don't need optic cables for). Sounds very un-economical to me. Only way the whole technology can succeed in market is if the price can be brought down much lower than where it has been for the past few decades.

    29. Re:This is nothing new... by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      My electric drill which plugs straight into the regular mains has variable speed. Why do I need 3-phase power?

    30. Re:This is nothing new... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Still, this, too, is old news. Good to let people know about it, but I remember reading about this exact thing many years ago.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    31. Re:This is nothing new... by srleffler · · Score: 1
      I'm not an EE, but I can take an educated guess. Your drill probably wastes a lot of power. If you run it at a slow speed, it probably still consumes a large fraction of the power it would consume running at full speed. That's fine for a small drill, but not always acceptable for a larger motor.

      I'm assuming it's similar to the difference between an ordinary residential dimmer switch and a variac. The dimmer switch is small and cheap, but it wastes energy. If you turn the lights down you consume less power at the bulb, but you waste a lot in the dimmer switch (it heats up). A variac is much larger, but can reduce AC voltage with little waste. (There are of course other ways to do this.)

    32. Re:This is nothing new... by hey! · · Score: 1

      If you turn the lights down you consume less power at the bulb, but you waste a lot in the dimmer switch (it heats up).

      Not really. If they worked the way you say, they'd be a fire hazard.

      First some preliminaries: power is equal to voltage times current in a resistive circuit. Our household power supply delivers a variable current at a constant voltage. Within normal operating parameters, the lower the resistance of a load, the higher the current and the higher the power dissipation.

      Household dimmers of the modern variety use an active solid state component called a triac. They essentially let a variable fraction of the sine wave through, by having their resistance swing from very high to very low as the sine wave reaches its positive and negative peaks.

      During the ON part of the phase, their resistance is low and power is delivered to the light bulb as normal. Because of the low resistance the triac is almost like a piece of wire -- the voltage across it is low and therefore it doesn't dissipate much power itself. The overall resistance of the circut (triac and light bulb) is at its lowest, so power is at its maximum -- but it's all in the light bulb.

      During the OFF ppart of the phase, the resistance of the triac is very high, so almost no current flows through the circult. Because almost no current is flowing, practically no power is dissipated.

      So, in either state (conducting/nonconducting), the dimmer that controls your light fixture is dissipating very little power, and not getting hot at all. This is easy to confirm. Take a light fixture that gets quite hot on full power, and attach it to a dimmer set nearly all the way down. If your theory was correct, the dimmer would get very very hot.
      actually use

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    33. Re:This is nothing new... by clean_stoner · · Score: 1
      I rather doubt that the average Amish would be able to explain, at a fundamental level... how propane burns

      Burning really isn't all that complicated. I think that if an Amish person wanted to be able to use propane light they could expend the two hours (actually much much less than that) to learn a little chemistry, how the molecules break up to release energy that we experience as heat and light.

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

    34. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living at the bottom of one of these "light wells" in an old building for a while I can tell you you don't want the things open at all if you can help it. They can collect water from weather and litter from all of the adjoining residents and smell dank and collect spiders like crazy. It was nice to open when the apartment was hot, it acted like a chimney flue and pulled air out from the apartment when you had a window open.....

    35. Re:This is nothing new... by srleffler · · Score: 1
      Household dimmers of the modern variety use an active solid state component called a triac.

      Interesting. I assumed they were just a variable resistor in series with the lamp. I'm familiar with triacs, but didn't think they were used in residential dimmers.

      So, in either state (conducting/nonconducting), the dimmer that controls your light fixture is dissipating very little power, and not getting hot at all. This is easy to confirm. Take a light fixture that gets quite hot on full power, and attach it to a dimmer set nearly all the way down. If your theory was correct, the dimmer would get very very hot.

      I have seen older residential dimmers that did get quite warm, and a higher-rated one that actually had a heatsink. This was part of what led to my theory that they were just potentiometers in series. I think you have overestimated how hot the dimmer would get, though, if it were a POT. The power dissipated in a POT in series with a lightbulb varies nonlinearly with the setting. If you turn the dimmer nearly all the way down, you wouldn't dissipate all the power that would normally go to the lamp.

    36. Re:This is nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an amish h4x0r and I find this thread offensive.

      Slashdot is goin down in propane flames.

    37. Re:This is nothing new... by hey! · · Score: 1

      I have seen older residential dimmers that did get quite warm, and a higher-rated one that actually had a heatsink.

      Yes, this could be true of dimmers that are older than twentyfive years or so. Back when I was in school in the late 70s triacs had become common, but they are so superior to rheostats that they'd pretty much taken over as soon as they were available. They are semiconductor devics and probably weren't even available ten years earlier.

      In the circuit you describe, turning the dimmer all the way down would not result in maximizing the power dissipation in the pot. Maximum power dissipation in the pot would be at 50%. On the other hand, as you go above 50% while the total power dissipated in the pot would go down, the amount of power dissipated in the conducting part (per inch ifyou will) of the rheostat would go up. Imagine the rheostat is a resistive wire of varying lengths, and you can see that the wire is most likely to melt when it is short.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  7. I've had this in my office for years by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Funny

    A nifty little invention called a "win-dow".

    1. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but, We don't do windoze here....

    2. Re:I've had this in my office for years by U1timateZer0 · · Score: 0

      You can't say that. I'm sure they would love to use these so-called "Windows," but it seems Microsoft owns that word. . . For that matter, any word that might sound like Windows, or lead the user to believe that they might be bying something similar in appearance.

      --
      Unplug all controller for great reset!!
    3. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > A nifty little invention called a "win-dow".

      You've got windows in your office. I've got Office on my Windows.

      But wouldn't you prefer to have Enlightenment? With a light tube, we'd no longer have to live like gnomWHAMWHAMWHAM, OK, I'll stop now.

    4. Re:I've had this in my office for years by thirteenVA · · Score: 1

      We also have windows but the BSOD doesn't seem to give me he bronze tan I was hoping for... maybe if I had a 21 inch CRT?

    5. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Next thing you're going to do is tell me you've come up with a simple and cheap solution for my new SOTA wind-powered fresh-air cross-ventalation device.

      You dreamkiller.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    6. Re:I've had this in my office for years by BashDot · · Score: 1

      Come now, this is slashdot. We all know Windows = evil!

      *ducks*

    7. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Chalax · · Score: 1

      Actually, this would be great for tall office buildings. I've seen something like this several years ago where they collect the sunlight and using fiber optics, they channel the light into a room. They were also saying that a plant grown using this light turns out healthier due to the lack of UV radiation.

    8. Re:I've had this in my office for years by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      This will deliver light to interior offices too. It sounds like they combined a solar concentrator and fiber optic cables.

    9. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      maybe if I had a 21 inch CRT?

      That would give you a green tan, not a bronze one.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    10. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you feel better having pissed on the campfire?

    11. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Architectural windows are Purebread Solor Lighting

    12. Re:I've had this in my office for years by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      Darn, you stopped before I figured out how you were going to add KDE into the mix.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    13. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      A nifty little invention called a "win-dow".

      I work in a cave, you insensitive clod.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    14. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      You're lucky. The only window in my office just bluescreened.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    15. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny
      Architectural windows are Purebread Solor Lighting
      I guess if you'd proofread your post, you'd have said "D'ough!".
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:I've had this in my office for years by bigpat · · Score: 0

      A nifty little invention called a "win-dow".

      Lucky son of a bitch.

    17. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the Sun emit light in the UV spectrum?

    18. Re:I've had this in my office for years by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      No, that's a constant.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    19. Re:I've had this in my office for years by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      Wrong, that's a constant.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    20. Re:I've had this in my office for years by rjune · · Score: 1

      I finally got an office with windows, but the windows have bars on them.

    21. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Hitch · · Score: 1

      since when can a tan be green?
      isn't a tan, by definition, a shade of brown?

      --
      You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
      http://propheteer.org
    22. Re:I've had this in my office for years by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I beleive that glass reflects (or absorbs a significant amount of) UV while being transparent to visible light. So don't worry about losing the pasty-white complection that makes your "chicks dig nerds" so effective.

      --Ender

      --
      Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
    23. Re:I've had this in my office for years by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      A nifty little invention called a "win-dow".

      That's great if you work along the edge of a building. Unfortunately, that approach has limited bandwidth due to size of window, angle of natural light and desk placement. The rest of us have had to wait for them to get the "mirrors" up.

    24. Re:I've had this in my office for years by identity0 · · Score: 1

      You're KDEing, right?

      This new 'light-tube' technology will put all the Window Makers out of business, and soon they'll be living on the streets of Metacity in a Blackbox! They'll be forced to eat scraps of Sawfish and Ratpoison!

      Sure, maybe light tubes are the NextStep of progress, but that doesn't mean we should throw away our Windows. Some of them have beautiful Motifs, and you can't even OpenLook light tubes, for Khrist's sake!

      - Tom the Windows Manager

      Post Script: iHave heard in a that Quartz windows are the future, anyways.

  8. Efficient(?) by U1timateZer0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What happens on days that are overcast? What about companies that work 24/7, for example tech support or sales companies? In the end, this will probably be more efficient than electric lights, but I imagine electricity will still suppliment it.

    --
    Unplug all controller for great reset!!
    1. Re:Efficient(?) by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I guess we'll find out if techsupport and sales guys are really psychos when they hit sunlight.

  9. Someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just discovered Fibre Optics.

  10. No sun please we're British. by IainMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    I live in Britain you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:No sun please we're British. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you can get your tan from standing in the English rain.

      goo goo a'joob.

    2. Re:No sun please we're British. by irritating+environme · · Score: 1

      Funny... mirrors and lenses.

      --


      Hey, I'm just your average shit and piss factory.
    3. Re:No sun please we're British. by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's not quite true. Britain does get The Sun. Much to the regret of the inhabitants.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:No sun please we're British. by DaFrogg · · Score: 1

      Yes, but is it in a tube? If you were American, you'd realize that it's you sacred duty to buy whatever they tell you! (Yes, I am American. Please don't hate me!)

    5. Re:No sun please we're British. by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      It's all over The Tube, as well =(

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    6. Re:No sun please we're British. by jd · · Score: 1

      The Tube was cancelled by Channel 4. :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:No sun please we're British. by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 0

      You're right. Britain looks much better with the lights off.

  11. cmon by thedustbustr · · Score: 1

    I know you editors aren't supposed to actually read the stories, but can't you at least make an attempt at cleaning up this garbage summary?

    --
    This sig is false.
  12. slashdot effect! by alexandreracine · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...in progress!

    This webpage is probably hosted on a 486 with 9600 baud modem.

    --
    No sig for now.
    1. Re:slashdot effect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising, since yesterday it was Farked ...

  13. this isn't news by Uzik2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can buy them off the shelf:

    http://www.skylights-of-hawaii.com/page13.html

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
    1. Re:this isn't news by Dogers · · Score: 1
      Raybender TechnologyTM is a patented feature in Solatube's UV and impact resistant dome.


      Wait.. They've patented a mirror??
      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    2. Re:this isn't news by MojoRilla · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not the same thing at all. Your link requires a big tube, which is impractical in office buildings. This uses fiber optics, or really little tubes.

  14. This may be the first ever by tabkey12 · · Score: 3, Informative

    entirely content-free story on Slashdot? Look at the Google Cache of the first link!

    1. Re:This may be the first ever by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1

      Don't fill up on those bloated stories that other news sites offer! Try new Diet Slashdot! Zero calories and content-free. Because we care about your health.

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
    2. Re:This may be the first ever by revscat · · Score: 4, Funny

      This may be the first ever entirely content-free story on Slashdot?

      Obviously you don't remember Jon Katz.

    3. Re:This may be the first ever by SoCalChris · · Score: 0, Troll

      Obviously you don't remember Jon Katz.

      Did you know that Jon Katz is a puppy thief?

      Seriously.

      http://www.slate.com/Default.aspx?id=2113564&GT1=6 082

    4. Re:This may be the first ever by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      From the linked article:

      Jon Katz's is the author of The Dogs of Bedlam Farm: An adventure with three dogs, sixteen sheep, two donkeys and me.

      Observation one: Slate needs editors.

      Observation two: Does the title of that book sound like a beastiality extravaganza, or what?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:This may be the first ever by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      *rofl*

      I thought the same exact thing. But I think I missed the part about Katz actually stealing puppies. He wrote about others doing it...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    6. Re:This may be the first ever by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      He's not a puppy thief, but he has knowingly accepted stolen property. Sure it's for a good cause, but if that were my dog I'd sue his ass. (Then again, if that were my dog, I wouldn't tie it to a tree like that.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:This may be the first ever by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      Does the title of that book sound like a beastiality extravaganza, or what?

      Obviously, you do remember Jon Katz.

      I kid, I kid...

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  15. Article already.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    It's already slashdotted but I'm going to go for the one comment these scientists will hate..

    We have light in buildings, it's called windows. We're not living in 1984, it is okay to see the outside world.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Article already.. by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And how do you expect to get window lighting to an office 50 feet from any exterior wall? Unless you think every floor of an office building should have no walls...

  16. New Open-Source Lighting System by johndiii · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's called "Lux-In".

    --
    Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
  17. I have this in my house by HisMother · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have large, rectangular transparent panels installed in many of my exterior walls. They work very well!

    --
    Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    1. Re:I have this in my house by akar_naveen · · Score: 1
      The key for this technology is concentration of the light, probably to the size of our bulbs. Though, as you said, we all have used sun light to lit up our insides for-ever, but to tap the sunlight in to a bulb for everyday use is special. And to integrate it with the electrical system to maintain certain luminosity (like ACs do for temperature) is just too good.

      This is very very useful in tropical places, especially if the 'pipes' can be priced low.

  18. Old news by Snakeman65 · · Score: 1

    This has been around for ages! I saw it used on a program in the uk called Grand Designs about a year ago!

    1. Re:Old news by The+Jon · · Score: 1

      Yup, in the uk here is one of the many companies already selling this "brand new technology"... http://www.light-pipe.co.uk/

      --
      umop apisdn aw pow f,uop aseald :umop aw pow 'dn aw pow
    2. Re:Old news by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      This has been around for ages! I saw it used on a program in the uk called Grand Designs about a year ago!
      Correctomundo. I saw this on Beyond 2000 about ten years ago. And for the benefit of all the smart alecs talking about 'windows,' windows aren't much use in the centre of a building. And before you make another smart alec remark about 'skylights,' they aren't much use when there's another floor above you.
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  19. This isn't new... by loggia · · Score: 1

    They are called sun pipes.

  20. Underworld by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    and soon I can have my ultraviolet bullets to take care of those pesky vampires.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  21. This just in... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Funny

    After Scientists tackled the perplexing problem of getting light through a wall, via what is now called a "window," they moved on to the even more confounding "wheel," "fire," and "walking erect" problems. More news on these stories as they develop.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "walking erect" problems

      I have a solution to this problem: stop buying and using the products offered in spam.

    2. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't call 'em "windows". Microsoft owns that word.

    3. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they moved on to the even more confounding "wheel," "fire," and "walking erect" problems.

      For the latter, I just carry around a huge notebook. It's easy to conceal my status with that, when needed.

  22. What? by kff322 · · Score: 0

    I think they already came up with this you intisive clod!! it called a candle!! idiot!

  23. You can get these at home depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uum, they have been around for years!
    http://www.google.com/search?client=safari &rls=en& q=solar+tube&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

    Home depot sells a version and most good do-it-yourself stores carry them

  24. Um.. by kc0re · · Score: 1

    They already have this. They've had it. Doesn't anyone ever watch Monster House? They used these on a couple projects. I don't know if it's the same design, but it's basically a tube, all reflective polished stainless steel on the inside of the tube with bubbles on either end of the tube (Tube goes through wall),

    1. Install Tube
    2. Sun signs
    3. Pro... LIGHT!!!

    1. Re:Um.. by jridley · · Score: 1

      They're slashdotted so I can't see the article.

      But if that's all they're talking about, well, those have been available in home improvement stores for at least 10 years.

    2. Re:Um.. by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      These are a bit more advanced. There is a filter that splits the visible and infrared spectrums and use the infrared to power solenoid cells. They use fiberoptics instead of a shiny metal tube. And the end of the fiber optics is a light fixture that has regualr electric lights as well. The whole thing is meant to keep light levels constant but save a bit of electricity.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  25. i have two by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.solatube.com/

    one in a windowless bathroom and another in the kitchen, this is not new, mine are over 10 years old...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:i have two by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      Ever have any problems with condensation or leakage?

    2. Re:i have two by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      no leakage, no condensation either.

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    3. Re:i have two by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Interested in hearing about the climate you live in and if there's anything you dislike about them. I'd like to install a few myself, but am concerned about their performance in New Hampshire.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:i have two by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      They work great in Florida. They work better with direct light, but I have one on a western slope of the roof and it still gets a decent amount of light in the morning.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    5. Re:i have two by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 1

      I guess it's too much to ask that you RTFA before you dismiss something as old. Hybrid lighting is entirely different from a Solatube. Solatube is a simple reflective duct that has limited routing potential. Hybrid lighting utilizes fiber optics which can be routed along with the electric cables to ANY light fixture. Furthermore, hybrid lighting uses electronics to maintain a constant level of light, compensating for solar input with traditional electric lighting. Sheesh!

      --
      Not Found
      The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
  26. Is it really something new? by demigod · · Score: 1

    These things have been around for at least a decade.

    --
    "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
    Major Major
  27. Solar Lighting by TheFlu · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Department of Energy has some information on solar lighting available here.

  28. Re:Fibre Optics? by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

    I think that was done something like ten years ago, it never took off presumably due to cost.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  29. University of Minnesota Engineering School by suso · · Score: 1

    At University of Minnesota, they made their Engineering School building mostly underground. The neat thing is that they used a series of mirrors to transmit natual light to a room that is something like 5 stories below ground. If you've ever been in that room before, it is somewhat surreal to think that you are underground, but still seeing natural light. I haven't been there in about 10 years though, so someone may correct me if I'm wrong about something here.

    --
    suso.org website/email hosting, no disk space quotas and personalized support.

    1. Re:University of Minnesota Engineering School by Nasa+Rosebuds · · Score: 1

      Yeah, its the civil enginering school. Link here to some pictures. And it goes 7 stories deep.

    2. Re:University of Minnesota Engineering School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you please put your spam in your sig where it belongs? I'm debating modding you as a troll from now on since I've seen you do this multiple times. The only possible reason is getting around people who don't want to see sigs...

    3. Re:University of Minnesota Engineering School by captwheeler · · Score: 1
      --

      Thanks for putting on the feedbag. Thanks for going all out. Thanks for showing me your Swiss Army knife.

  30. Mid 80's by clinko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This was done in Japan in the Mid 80's.

    It was on Beyond 2000 (The tv show.)

    The roof of the building had the ends of fiber optics and every desk had a tube-like lamp.

    They said it was to freshen up the workers.

    The funny part: In the mid 90's I heard a similar building was sued by an employee for skin cancer!

    Gotta love it.

    1. Re:Mid 80's by gninnor · · Score: 1

      I believe that I saw that program. It was interesting because the optics (accidentally?) filtered out a lot of the harmful sun rays and yet let plants grow well in the rooms (with decent light and fewer harmful rays) I seem to remember the plants growing actually better than the outdoor plants.

      Maybe the technique has finally become cost efficient.

    2. Re:Mid 80's by UNFAIRMAN · · Score: 1

      I remember it too. It was a small dish that sat on top of your building, and followed the sun's path throughout the day. It concentrated the light at the focal point, sending it down a fiber optic bundle. The sunlight was transmitted to a series of desktop lamps, which were able to supplement with incandescent light when the sunlight wasn't strong enough. As someone who loves natural light and works in a cube, I always wanted one of these things.

      I think the skin cancer bit must be a myth; the ones I saw had filters at the top of the fiber bundle to remove the harmful wavelengths.

    3. Re:Mid 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea wasnt that on PBS? I remember seeing that as a kid. IIRC it had a huge honeycomb looking light collector that followed the sun on top of the building and fiber optics feed into the corners of rooms. mid to late 80's at least.

  31. Odd. by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    I've actually been bouncing this one around my head for a few years. Glad someone is putting the idea to use, since I'll never do anything with it.

  32. It's just fiber optics. by peawee03 · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    In the system, a rooftop collector concentrates and sends sunlight through optical fibers, tubes made of special, high-purity material that transmit light by reflecting it down their inner walls.

    I know for a fact that they've been doing this with light bulbs for a while (they collect like 90% of the emitted light from a halogen bulb and then can light, say, a staircase with it). Why nobody's done this earlier with sunlight, I have no idea.

    --
    I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
  33. This stuff has been available for 15 YEARS by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

    This stuff has been available for 15 years.

    Has there been a breakthrough? A cost drop? Or is it just that Oak Ridge started playing with it?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:This stuff has been available for 15 YEARS by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the new part is actually hooking the fiber strands up to light bulbs.

    2. Re:This stuff has been available for 15 YEARS by pitboss8881 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not the same thing. Routing fiber optic cables through ceilings and walls creates much more flexibility that the 8-24" tubes used previously.

    3. Re:This stuff has been available for 15 YEARS by corngrower · · Score: 1

      But routing fiber optics through ceilings and walls has been around for 15 years.

    4. Re:This stuff has been available for 15 YEARS by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      You're missing the critical point. Feeding light down into a building is not innovative. Collecting the light, feeding the visible light down into the building, and using the infrared energy from the light to produce power, is the new development. As the site states, " Independent cost and performance models suggest the overall affordability of solar energy could be doubled or tripled using this new hybrid approach." That kind of improvement in cost-effectiveness could make solar energy a lot more viable as an alternative to conventional power sources.

  34. In Other News... by PeteDotNu · · Score: 1

    ...Microsoft have filed a patent number 234,234,234 for "illuminating things by means of shining lights on them, whilst somebody looks at an XML file in the next office."

    --
    My other processor is big-endian.
  35. RTFA, moron by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article:

    In the system, a rooftop collector concentrates and sends sunlight through optical fibers, tubes made of special, high-purity material that transmit light by reflecting it down their inner walls.

    1. Re:RTFA, moron by temojen · · Score: 1

      It seems the article was written by and for a moron. And still it's not read.

    2. Re:RTFA, moron by macklin01 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod parent up.

      In the fiber optics community, this is called a multimode fiber: a core of material with a higher index of refraction surrounding by a cladding of lower refractive index. The ratio of core radius to cladding radius is high, and so a large number of modes of EM radiation are supported (i.e., most wavelengths of light are transmitted through the fiber.)

      In fact, the language is precisely that of fiber optics: at these scales, the size of the fiber core is much greater than that of the wavelength of the light, and so the ray-like properties of light dominate. (i.e., the light beams "bounce back and forth on the walls".)

      In single-moded fibers, the ratio of the core radius to cladding radius is extremely low: on the order of the wavelength of the transmitted light. At this scale the wave-like nature of light dominates. (You need to characterize the behavior using Maxwell's equations, rather than simpler "bouncing" notions.)

      The downside is that a multimode fiber has a high leakage and is not suitable for long-distance transmission. Fortunately, that's not a problem here, since the light only need to be transmitted on the order of meters to tens of meters. -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    3. Re:RTFA, moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you on about?

      "The ratio of core radius to cladding radius is high" -- so it's very near to 1, i.e. the cladding is very thin compared to the radius of the core... "and so a large number of modes of EM radiation are supported" -- this does not follow.

      "the ratio of the core radius to cladding radius is extremely low" -- OK, so it's a small core surrounded by really thick cladding... "on the order of the wavelength of the transmitted light" -- so let's say that the core radius is 1 unit, and the cladding radius is ten units. This gives a "ratio of the core radius to cladding radius" of 0.1 ... so the light has a wavelength of 0.1 [no units] does it? Very interesting...

  36. Re:Fibre Optics? by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

    That's exactly the first thing that popped into my head when I read this.
    What exactly are they working on? Just stick a lens at the end of an optic cable and a dome on the other and bam free lighting.

    --

    Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  37. This is great and not great by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Great in that I can get cheap natural lighting indoors.

    Not great in that it does nothing to help me with my lighting problems when it's actually dark out, which is when I need light the most. If you think about it, this is an improvement on the window, not the light bulb.

    Also, I bet those tubes present opportunities for leaks.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  38. Re:Fibre Optics? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

    I remeber a story about that on discovery channel's show Beyond 2000. This was back in teh early 90's.

    --
    500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  39. Brand new idea...... works great...... by waterlogged · · Score: 1

    Wanting to get sunlight into an office building, Org, finds out if you burn sand long enough it makes it see through.... He then applys his cave-mind engineering skills to make this new stuff called...."Windows" and puts THOSE on the outside of walls to get the sunlight into his cave. Now he moves on to bigger and better things....like wheels and "Windows" operating systems.
    .
    .
    . well at least wheels.

    --
    I couldn't fail to disagree with you any less.
  40. Is this really a new idea? by Epistax · · Score: 1

    Ok just before some calls this a new idea, why don't we (extremely expensive now, not so bad later) use fiber optics to create windows between windows and route them to inner offices so someone without any wall of the building can have an apparent window?

    I'm just really tired of me thinking of something then seeing it proclaimed as new several years later. :P

  41. now you see the ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Of what happens when Microsoft patents Windows(TM)
    luckily they couldn't patent doors

  42. 1988 Called... by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny

    They want their Popular Science article back.

    (This is not intended to flame the parent post... it's along the vein of "This is nothin new...")

    1. Re:1988 Called... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you think this is old news being recycled, wait for the dupe.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:1988 Called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this has been around for long, the question now remains why this is still not used widely. What (if any) would be the drawbacks of utilizing this system?

    3. Re:1988 Called... by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Japanese came out with a fiber optic system called Sunflower that did the same basic thing. I think late 80's was about the right time frame.

      Fluorescent lights are from the devil. This has to be an improvement over those horrible, glaring examples of last week's technology.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    4. Re:1988 Called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunatly by posting your Mod points go nowhere!!!!!

    5. Re:1988 Called... by temojen · · Score: 1
      1. Design Inertia
      2. The need to lay thousands of fiber optic cables to adequately light a building
    6. Re:1988 Called... by bwy · · Score: 1

      Also, gizmodo.com called, and said that they think it is lame how many slashdot stories are yesterday's news on their site.

  43. TIR Systems by starfishsystems · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A physicist friend of mine named Lorne Whitehead started up a company about twenty years ago to manufacture light pipes based on the principle of prismatic reflection.

    The startup phase has its usual challenges, I'm sure, especially finding markets, but the company has become very successful and very well known.

    It's called TIR Systems .

    (Unfortunately I can't comment on the cited article as it's already slashdotted.)

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
  44. Super Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But can it be used at night?

    My spidey sense says NO!

  45. existed for many many years... by iamhassi · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Daylighting: Bringing Daylight Deeper into Buildings

    Environmental Building News, Volume 8, Number 10 - October 1999

    Imagine a device that sits on the roof of a building and focuses sunlight into cables the size of electrical wire. These cables are run through walls and ceiling plenums into light fixtures that beam natural, full spectrum daylight deep into a building's interior."

    it's called Hybrid Lighting or Daylighting. Been around for a looooooong time.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:existed for many many years... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Daylighting is a little more broad than this. Daylighting, as defined in a regional transit standards Manual that I worked on, is simply using the Sun instead of electricity. It could be skylights, big windows, hybrid lighting, etc.

  46. Lightbulb Manufacturers Beware! by what_the_frell · · Score: 1

    If this ever developed into something serious, the lighting divisions of GE and Sylvania would be up a creek.

    1. Re:Lightbulb Manufacturers Beware! by MattyDK23 · · Score: 0

      If this ever developed into something serious, the lighting divisions of GE and Sylvania would be up a creek. I totally agree. Wait...is that the sun setting? Crap!

  47. Not New by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing this in the 80's when I was a kid. It was developed in Japan using fibre optics.

    Sounds like "Not Invented Here" syndrome.

  48. Investment? Stock Symbols? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What companies can capitalize on this?

    Who's making them?

    Any stock symbols?

  49. Hey, expand that idea... by Havenwar · · Score: 1

    Lets pull a BFT (Big Frikkin Tube) straight through earth, or since the core is so hot and all, pull it around a bit under the surface. Top the opening of the tube with a BFM (Big Frikkin ((Parabolic)) Mirror) and you have sunlight 24/7! Of course, the sunlight YOU receive would have to be taxed by every country the tube passes through, and the BFB (Big Frikkin Bill) would be delivered by way of RFT (Real Frikkin Tired) carrier pigeon from uzbekistan.

  50. So 1998. by deacon · · Score: 1
    Well, other than using expensive fiber optics between the reciever and the transmitter ends (trivially obvious, econimically unfeasable), these have been around for a loooong time.

    Google Link

  51. I didn't RTFA... by Kimos · · Score: 1

    ... but what happens when it's cloudy?

    1. Re:I didn't RTFA... by MattyDK23 · · Score: 0

      .. but what happens when it's cloudy?

      Since it's a hybrid solar / electrical lighting system, I'd just presume the low-power fluorescent lights would come on.

    2. Re:I didn't RTFA... by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

      It's darker

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
  52. Already out there... by jtcedinburgh · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can already buy systems like this - check out this link for an example (no connection to me, incidentally). They work on total internal reflection and they're pretty simplistic beasts. I think the 'new' system is simply extending this concept - but it's hardly new.

    Dearie me, yesterday's news for nerds indeed - architects have been using these systems for at least a few years now...

    [shuffles off back under his stone...]

    1. Re:Already out there... by argent · · Score: 1

      Made me think of light wells, myself. Solar lighting for buildings is new the way bellbottoms and tie died shirts are new... eventually everything old is new again.

    2. Re:Already out there... by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      From the sunpipe homepage: ...using SunPipe's revolutionary super-reflective tube that intensifies all natural light. With adjustable elbows SunPipe can twist and turn to bring daylight to exactly where you need it.

      and

      No limit to length of SunPipe or number of bends used

      Wow!

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    3. Re:Already out there... by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Dearie me, yesterday's news for nerds indeed - architects have been using these systems for at least a few years now

      I saw a lot of Real Life use of it in Japan and that was more than 5 years ago.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  53. Re:Fibre Optics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite dude, you're gonna destroy all hopes of our grant money coming through.

  54. Reminds me of a story ... by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

    Not quite 20 years ago, I was sharing a house in Boston with another hacker. One day, the office manager from work had to come pick up some documents, and was horrified to find how we lived. There was a room, possibly labeled "kitchen" on the architectural drawings, but we had converted into "computer room" (well, with that 240V 50A outlet in there, where else were we going to plug in the VAX?)

    She took pity upon us, and she and one of her girlfriends came to give the place a good de-toxing. She explained, that the two-geeks-in-full-geek-mode funk could be eliminated by opening windows, which she explained were movable devices, and not the transparent-aluminum bricks we had hitherto assumed them to be. (She got mega geek points for the obscure transparent aluminum reference).

    One of the other things I learned in that house, was this:

    A container of Seven Delights from the neighborhood chinese place, turns into Seventh Circle of Hell if you leave it on the counter and fly off the next morning for a three-week project at Stanford.
    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
  55. Wait a Second... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    all the Amish retailers here use the same sort of thing. They can light a supermarket with redirected light during daylight hours, and light up the propane system once the natural light is gone.

    Amish supermarket???

    What is that, like the General Merchantile from Little House On The Prairie, only much larger, with pony drawn shopping carts and several checkout counters (each with an abacus)?

    Those amish, what'll they think of next (oh, wait, they shun technological advancements...)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Wait a Second... by clem · · Score: 1

      with pony drawn shopping carts

      Zebediah, can I get a clean up on aisle 9...and aisle 2. Oops, make that aisle 4 as well.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    2. Re:Wait a Second... by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1
      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
  56. Bad description, but this is old technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, describing the light channels at "tubes" seems to be a poor choice. From TFA it looks like they are using fiber to pipe the light where it is needed.

    Cool, but hardly new. I read about this years ago.

    As far as windows are concerned, they pose a couple of problems. It is hard to get light from a window in the middle of a building. Probably more important is the issue of heat. Using windows for light w/o letting too much heat in or out of the building can be tricky. It is a bad solution to save $0.01 on light at the cost of $0.10 in air conditioning

  57. This IS new technology! by Khomar · · Score: 5, Informative

    All of you who are immediately attacking the idea saying "haven't we done this before" are missing the point. This is not just redirected light. It is transporting the light through fiberoptic cables and transferring that energy through regular light fixtures. This would allow solar power to light internal rooms that don't have windows. It also will generate electricity for other internal applications beyond light.

    This technology would allow businesses to retrofit their buildings with solar light without having to do heavy remodelling to add skylights (the old way of doing it). This can be especially difficult for multi-floored buildings with internal rooms. Please read about the technology before immediately dismissing it as "nothing new".

    --

    I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    1. Re:This IS new technology! by lxs · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it's not the link shows a photo from expo '85 (yes that's 20 years ago) where piped sunlight was first introduced by this company I'm not sure if they were the first in the world to produce these systems commercially.

    2. Re:This IS new technology! by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      the Japanese had something similer over 10 years ago, using optical fiber

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    3. Re:This IS new technology! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      This is so not new, I saw a thing on TV a while ago (at least a decade) about how the Japanese were growing very large tomatoes in shopping malls (go figure) using fiberoptics to bring in light from outside.

      This technology is "nothing new". HTH, HAND.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:This IS new technology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Still isn't new... I read about this (light fixtures and all) in a magazine devoted to living "off the grid" at least a year ago. i think it's called Natural Living, or something to do with nature, living, and homes...(the magazine that is)

    5. Re:This IS new technology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fiberoptic cables are old news.

      Solar power is old news.

      Light sensors adjusting lights is old news.

      Mixing these together is an obvious idea. Sorry, but it's all old technology.

    6. Re:This IS new technology! by Fillymon · · Score: 1

      Damn those Japanese and their advanced tomato technology.

      --
      P.S. - This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.
    7. Re:This IS new technology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't think this is viable. There is only so much light striking a building. Even if you were to capture it all and redirect it inside, there wouldn't be enough to replace all of the lights, or even a significant portion. Consider a corner office with two walls consisting entirely of windows. The light inside isn't overwhelming, at least not around noon. Now divide this amount of light by 10 or so. Would that be enough to replace the fluorescent lighting in a room? I think using more efficient electrical lighting could give much bigger savings.

    8. Re:This IS new technology! by wik · · Score: 1

      Light from the sun is SO 8.3 minutes ago.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  58. old news by Selcitset · · Score: 1

    this is old stuff. used to have a big tube that did this about ten years ago.

    its was called light pipe, made by our friends at 3M.

  59. NOT NEW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever posted this thinking it was some great new idea was dead wrong. This technique has been used in a few commercial buildings built over the past 15 years. Why on earth would scientists (unless they are like most slashdotters [clueluess]) be wasting their time looking at something that is already in use and works?

  60. Oh, so they're bring light INSIDE, eh? by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    Well, I'll wait to be impressed by them bringing light all the way around the PLANET, kind of like Batman did in that movie. Which movie? this movie!

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  61. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    21st century western society finally caught up with 5,000 BC Egyptian technology!

    Another proof that egyptians were ALIENS!

  62. Agreed by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    This one is so not new, it reeks of death and decay. I think we have another case of 'teeny bopper' Slashdot editor doesn't know history, thing going on here again. It was actually done in the early 80's as found in an article in Mother Earth News, just before the Hybrid Electric car article. (I am not kidding you either).

    I am not saying that Mother Earth news is the inventor, just that the tech existed 30 years ago, was published 30 years ago. Heck I am going to scour a few more of the older Mother Earth News articles and see if I can't claim that I invented them for myself too!

  63. (Very) Old idea, new technology by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a pre-electricity invention. The only thing that is new is that they are using fibre optics instead of glass for carrying the light. Here's a LinkTo Shipboard Prisms that was used and patented way back in 1684. A good 331 years ago.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  64. Heating and cooling options.. by nolife · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Off topic here but I have been wondering about an alternate heating/cooling system for a while and have found no information on this concept. Since this article is about energy saving, I assume people interested in that may be reading and may be able insight as to if this method would work...

    Use alternate cooling/heating for the outdoor portions of a freon based cooling/heat pump system with water from underground. Underground temperature is usually quite stable at 55F. Basically, 55F degree water or a different cooling medium like car antifreeze (or some other product more environmentally friendly) at this temperature would be much more efficient at cooling/heating the condenser then using 80+ air or 30- air in the winter or summer. You could have an underground tank with a cooling medium in it that could act as a heat dump and pump the relatively warm or cold fluid up to the the existing outdoor unit for cooling. It would also be much quieter depending on design as you would not need a fan. I assume digging a hole and placing a concrete tank under the ground with a volume required consistent with your heating/cooling needs would be much cheaper in the long run then using a standard heat pump and air cooling. Obviosuly concrete is not the best conductor of heat but a steel tank may be better. Again, I have not calculated anything out so maybe my idea is out to lunch. I know I read a story about Toronto using cold water from the bottom of lake Ontario or Erie for summer cooling so progress has been in that direction, just not for home use or as an addition to typical home heat pump use.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    1. Re:Heating and cooling options.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can't be serious but I'll bite.....

      http://www.google.com/search?&q=water+source+heat+ pump
      Water source heat pump.
      Been there done that for a long time.

    2. Re:Heating and cooling options.. by nolife · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I was looking for...

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  65. Next Step or Beyond 2000 by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

    Who else remembers seeing this on the Discovery Channel on either Next Step or Beyond 2000 back in the mid-90s?

    I miss those shows. So far ahead they beat Slashdot by 10 years.

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
    1. Re:Next Step or Beyond 2000 by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to Beyond 2000? I used to watch that all the time, then I got busy with work for a year or two and the show's gone. In addition to showing some pretty nifty cutting edge stuff, they had some smoking hot reporters. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Next Step or Beyond 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I remember watching that episode of Beyond 2000 which showcased this technology, it was like 10 years ago.

      I think they were able to use this to help grow insanely huge tomato plants.

    3. Re:Next Step or Beyond 2000 by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I remember it on Beyond 2000. I loved that show, always filled me with excitement about the future and the possibilities. And the music was great.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  66. You might want to check Google by mattbot+5000 · · Score: 1

    They just launched a new service today called hybridsolarlighting.google.com which provides on-demand hybrid solar lighting to any terminal with internet access. The hybrid solar lighting competition is effectively dead, as any fool with a hybrid solar light can see.

  67. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I somehow don't see there beng a huge market for this in the UK.

  68. We already have that by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's called "mold".

    1. Re:We already have that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. It's called mould.

  69. Largest Consumption of Electricity? by srobert · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Indoor electric lighting is the largest consumer of electricity in commercial buildings."
    Where is this true? I worked as a stationary engineer in commercial buildings for years. HVAC was, I thought, always the biggest consumption of power. Of course, I'm in Las Vegas where in the summer the power bills are 4 times in the summer what they are in the fall.

    1. Re:Largest Consumption of Electricity? by jskiff · · Score: 1

      Really? I would have thought in Vegas that while the HVAC bill was high, the electrical bill would have to be huge!

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    2. Re:Largest Consumption of Electricity? by ddent · · Score: 1

      Yeah really. Its the only city I've been to where I had to close the curtains to sleep because night had come, and the city had gotten brighter.

    3. Re:Largest Consumption of Electricity? by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      I agree: I work in a semiconductor cube farm. Every office has a flourescent light fixture (ceiling mounted) and a PC: almost 1:1.

      According to their logic an flour. tube uses the same power as a PC.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    4. Re:Largest Consumption of Electricity? by srleffler · · Score: 1
      There are no PC's in the hallways. Or the bathrooms.

      At least, I hope not.

    5. Re:Largest Consumption of Electricity? by corblix · · Score: 1
      ... I'm in Las Vegas where in the summer the power bills are 4 times in the summer what they are in the fall.

      On the other hand, in the winter the power bills are only 2 times in the summer what they are in the fall.

      Weird place, Las Vegas.

  70. You think that's bad. by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about all the programmers who are zombies, vampires and other assorted undead? This was one profession where they had a chance of equal rites because they didn't stand out from the crowd.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:You think that's bad. by dual_boot_brain · · Score: 3, Funny
      zombies, vampires and other assorted undead
      equal rites
      that has to be one of the better freudian slips I've seen in a while
      --
      There is no reset button in life; however, there are bonus levels.
    2. Re:You think that's bad. by Blapto · · Score: 5, Funny
      For those who don't know what Freudian slips are, it's when you say one thing but you mean your mother.

      How many Freudians does it take to change a lightbulb?
      Two! One to replace the bulb, the other to hold the penis.

      No more jokes about Freudian Strips I'm afraid.

    3. Re:You think that's bad. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      It was very funny, but on /. it is more likely that it was just misspelled.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:You think that's bad. by sahonen · · Score: 1

      equal rites

      I thought it was a Terry Pratchett reference. =P

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    5. Re:You think that's bad. by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

      equal rites

      I thought it was a Terry Pratchett reference. =P

      Tne same spelling trick was used in an old Asimov story "Legal Rites"

    6. Re:You think that's bad. by jd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, no, I'm a fan of Terry Pratchett's books. :) Aside from the fact that he seems to do an incredible amount of background research, he is brilliant at coming up with linguistic twists.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:You think that's bad. by jd · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed. You're absolutely right. :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    8. Re:You think that's bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who don't know what Freudian slips are, it's when you say one thing but you mean your mother.

      That joke was even funnier when the Cliff Clavin character used it on "Cheers" ... he lived with his mother, and was also prone to defining terms and presenting other facts and trivia.
    9. Re:You think that's bad. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Two cool coincidences: first, as I was reading your post I was thinking "Terry Pratchett" (it helps that I'm currently on book 23 of the Discworld series and have been reading them from book 1 since about 9 months ago!). Your quote came from the title to book 3, "Equal Rites". ;-)

      Second, the fortune at the bottom of the page says: "Behind every great computer sits a skinny little geek." Quite appropriate for the topic!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    10. Re:You think that's bad. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Misspellings are a way that people's subconscious can express something other than was consciously expected. They're a popular medium for Freudian slips and other unexpected expression of repressed mentation.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:You think that's bad. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I think you're referring to typos, not spelling things wrong. But now we know it was on purpose!

      The Turtle Moves!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    12. Re:You think that's bad. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I love the Latin puns, or at least the ones I can get. Nanny Ogg's "foreign speech" is even funnier.

      The Turtle Moves!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    13. Re:You think that's bad. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      No, typos and misspellings are both examples of subconscious preferences overriding conscious direction in a communication action. "On purpose" means that the action was exclusively the product of the conscious mind. But it's not a lot more relevant to a person's personality than are their subconscious preferences.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:You think that's bad. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I wasn't clear. In this case, the misspelling was on purpose, and the poster knew it was wrong, in order to make a joke.

      A lot of people misspell because they think that's how the
      words are spelled.

      It's so rediculous I'm about to loose my mind!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    15. Re:You think that's bad. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I thought the poster might have known that they were refering to the homophone "rites/rights" to make a pun, but you can't know exactly what's in another person's mind (though it's fun to guess, and we do it all the time). Consider, though, that illiterate misspellings do come from somewhere - they're not arbitrary, or they'd be unrecognizable to the reader. They usually indicate a completely boring trivial fact about a person, like they paid attention in class only during the part where they were taught "re" is a common prefix, not the part where "ridiculous" is pronounced with an initial short "i" sound. Typos are usually even less interesting, because they often indicate only that a person's finger dexterity has a margin of error greater than the separation between keys, or that they're typing a word that contains an infrequently used letter combo, similar to a common combo - and that they don't proofread, even while typing. But among those uninteresting signals can occasionally be found interesting noise.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  71. Deck prisms and SOLF tubes by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sailing ships used compact prisms to convey light to interior rooms without the need for large areas of fragile glass.

    And 3M had a material called SOLF, a vaguely Scotchlite-like material with tiny prism that could be made into tubes with highly efficient nearly-total internal reflection, that could carry light in, say, six-inch pipes over distances of many yards with negligible loss. Not terribly expensive, either.

    1. Re:Deck prisms and SOLF tubes by macklin01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember playing with lots of fun stuff like that at 3M when I had a brief fiber optics internship there. One of my favorites was a longish (maybe 15 feet) solid plastic tube of high refractive index and a translucent cladding, about a half inch in diameter. (Just a big multimode fiber, really.)

      We'd have it all coiled up, point one end at the indoor lights, and point the other end wherever we wanted, and it made a fairly bright spot. It was pretty cool. -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
  72. aside from the automation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    for maintaining light levels in combination with 'light tubes' which have been around for a good while, it's nothing new.

    I have some controllers from a demolished Kmart store that used automatic control in conjunction with skylights.

    Skylights were common in manufacturing buildings constructed in the late 19th and early 20th century.

  73. Re:Fibre Optics? by bogado · · Score: 1

    But do exist large caliber fiber optics? It wouldn't help much have a tiny dot of light coming out of your window.

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  74. Beaten again! by Dewin+Cymraeg · · Score: 1
    I had this very idea yesterday!

    Bugger!

  75. So just 'Total Internal Reflection' then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep that's it! 'Total Internal Reflection'.

    Nothing to see here move along...

    blah blah.

  76. Typical Slashdot... by jamp · · Score: 0

    Anything to avoid using windows.

  77. ??AA tries to ban L2L networks by cheesemp · · Score: 1

    In today's news the ??AA tries to ban the new light sharing networks. According to the ??AA 'the use of these light to light sharing networks will put hundreds of hard working lightbulb manufactures out of business'....

    --
    To Slashdot or not to Slashdot. That is the question (that will cause me to fail an interview)
  78. Now that they've done this, what about by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1
    What about an air tube to take stale air out? I'm talking about in the bathrooms. I have no desire to smell the aroma of other people's number 2s.

    Especially when I want to brush my teeth. Uggh.

  79. Uhm... by timothybward · · Score: 1

    Didn't the Egyptians do this? =) My question is, what other technologies from ancient civilizations are we missing?

  80. No, scientists are doing no such thing by JoeBuck · · Score: 1

    The people working on the solar lighting system are, of course, not scientists, but rather are engineers.

  81. How novell by Gogogoch · · Score: 0

    Yeah,yeah, yeah. You can buy these at Home Depot.

  82. I remember... by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...back in the 80s, there was a prototype of something like this. It was an extremely high quality glass "light tube" that could actually visually carry light and whatever was at the other end of the tube. The experimental set up they were talking about mentioned a basement lab with six of these around the room. They looked like round windows or portals in the wall, but they actually looked straight up to the sky. You could look in one and see clouds going by. Sounded pretty cool. I think it was featured in The Futurist magazine in 88 or 89.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  83. Nice, but by first.last · · Score: 0

    Can they save a rainbow in a jar?

    --
    Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
  84. Or sunpipe.. by PopeAlien · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..and its brand new! well, it was 13 years ago.

    ..and I know T.I.R. systems has been making light-pipe for at least that long.. not that its not cool, its just sort of, you know.. old.

    1. Re:Or sunpipe.. by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What I really would like to see is the "slow windows" of science fiction - where you have a glass-like medium through which the speed of light is EXTREMELY slow, say taking 10 years to travel through the pane.

      Put the window in a field for 10 years, let it soak up the sunlight and the scenery, then hang it indoors on any wall, and get a clear view of what went on 10 years ago.

      Of course, since light goes both ways, at the end of the 10 years, if you unmount the window and look in from the back you'd be able to see what went on in the house 10 years ago. I can see a LOT of people (hello Michael Jackson) "accidently breaking" their slow windows when they expire.

      Oh, well, maybe the next version of Longhorn will give us a similar experience with "slow windows [tt]"

    2. Re:Or sunpipe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have a problem with the optical density differential causing an EXTREME refraction to the point that the light would no longer be visible.

    3. Re:Or sunpipe.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Interesting
      How many people would consent to having a video camera staring at them 24/7?

      Oh, right ... if this technology were possible, the US Government would mandate it in the name of "security".

      BTW: This whole "light pipe" thing is nothing new, as other posters have pointed out. What *is* new is that, finally, energy costs are forcing people to consider alternatives.

      And it's about time.

      However, in many cases, a more energy-efficient alternative would be to have people telecommute where possible. After all, if we can off-shore McDonalds order-takers to India, why can't we come up with a win/win for telecommuting for as many jobs as possible?

      The answer is simple - unlike lighting, the employer doesn't pay the cost of the commute, so there's less of a financial incentive to come up with working telecommuting programs.

      Heck, even more use of flex-time would result in more energy savings, as people wouldn't have to spend as much time sitting in their idling cars in peak traffic conditions.

      But of course that makes too much sense to actually be implemented in most businesses, where middle managers have to justify their jobs by "keeping an eye" on their underlings.

      [tt]

    4. Re:Or sunpipe.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Take 2 prisms, put them back-to-back. Net result == nil.

    5. Re:Or sunpipe.. by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

      wouldn't those windows get awfully hot with all that light trapped inside? plus it would suck having opaque windows for the first 10 years.

    6. Re:Or sunpipe.. by Yazheirx · · Score: 1

      Yeah a view of a nice field would be nice. You might even get some interesting voyeuristic views from time to time... Then again if its an obese unkept couple you may still need window shades.

      --
      More of my thoughts
    7. Re:Or sunpipe.. by pVoid · · Score: 1
      Not true. The light is slowed down to a 'halt' inside the medium, but as soon as it enters a new medium (air), it's back to its original speed (in air).

      It's not like the light that slowed down in the glass can't speed back up. This ain't particle physics, it's wave.

    8. Re:Or sunpipe.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      wouldn't those windows get awfully hot with all that light trapped inside?
      The light energy isn't abosrbed and converted to heat - it just takes 10 years for it to go through the pane.
      plus it would suck having opaque windows for the first 10 years.
      that's why you put them in a nice field, or on top of a mountain, or underwater, or somewhere else with an interesting view (the moon? the space station? I'd like one of THOSE).
    9. Re:Or sunpipe.. by ab762 · · Score: 1

      Bob Shaw wrote many stories, Light of Other Days is one. He did come to the realization that a scary amount of energy is stored. 1 square meter is exposed to about 1 kilowatt of energy - 10 kilowatt years is an impressive bang if you break the window. About 87,650 kWh, 7.5 x 10**10 calories. 1 kiloton is 10**12 calories, so about 100 tons of TNT equivalent. Sure, I'll hang that on my wall!

    10. Re:Or sunpipe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually people at Egypt used similar technology few thousand of years ago. Well it wasn't pipes, but they reflected light using mirrors to share the light with darkest places.

    11. Re:Or sunpipe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the grandparent meant was that if the light goes REAL slow, its refractive index is REALLY high, meaning that serious reflecting effects occur. In other words: it would be difficult to get the light in and out of the windows.

    12. Re:Or sunpipe.. by lgw · · Score: 1

      What *is* new is that, finally, energy costs are forcing people to consider alternatives.

      Why should people consider alternatives when energy costs are low? Why do you sound happy that energy costs are high enough to force people's behavior?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:Or sunpipe.. by lgw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yup, it wouldn't work. The impedance mismatch (around 10^16:1) would be so high that both reflection and refraction would be extreme at both sides of the glass. The window would be quite opaque - in fact, it would be more reflective than anything we could make today.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Or sunpipe.. by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Artificially keeping energy costs low (by not accounting for the costs associated with lower quality of life due to pollution, etc) is just plain stupid. I'm all for $10/gallon gasoline, and a carbon tax - it's better than dieing from environmental degradation.

    15. Re:Or sunpipe.. by lgw · · Score: 1

      So ignoring for the moment the fact that the slow glass would be completely reflective, it would also, it seems, have an energy density so high that it would an opaque plasma. This is actually how the Sun works, BTW, it takes about 170,000 years for radiation to transport energy from the solar core out to a region that is no longer opaque.

      I preferred the mechanism in Clarke and Baxter's version of Light of Other Days - at least it was so far fetched the flaws weren't obvious. ;)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:Or sunpipe.. by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite stories "Slow Glass" I think it was called. The 10 year delay was used as a poigant device to show a person living in the past with a wife and I think a child that he had lost. In the Scotish Highlands I believe where his business was to position "Slow Glass" to soak up the scenery for Urban dewellers to have a country view.

      Wonderful writting. Thanks for the re-memory.

    17. Re:Or sunpipe.. by lgw · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm just as happy to have a high standard of living by paying the actual cost, instead of a low standard of living from paying your imagined cost. ;) Or didn't you notice that we can *greatly* reduce pollution while continuing to use more energy?

      Smog Alerts in the Los Angeles area:
      1975: 118
      1980: 102
      1985: 83
      1990: 42
      1995: 14
      2000: 0

      And what's this obsession with carbon these days? Even if you choose to believe that human activity is somehow causaly related to global warming, it's a bit of a reach to pin the blame on carbon.

      Some math for you:
      • Man-made C02 is about 3.2% of atmospheric CO2
      • Atmospheric CO2 contributes about 3.6% of the greenhouse effect
      • The greenhouse effect accounts for about 45% of the heat at the Earth's surface
      • Man-made CO2 = 3.2% * 3.6% * 45% ~= 0.05% of the heat at the Earth's surface
      Isn't that interesting. One twentieth of one percent of the heat at the Earth's surface is due to man-made CO2.

      But I'm sure it will continue to be fashionable to argue that any mainstream idea is wrong for as long as a counter-culture exists.
      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:Or sunpipe.. by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      I think in the story they talked about tight spiriling molecules that caused the light to spin around an extremly long path on the way through. The best glass was ground to a precise thickness so the you saw the proper season in your stored view always. That glass was the most expensive and the thicker the glass the longer time it recored and was more expensive.

      But that was all technical cover for the central literary tool to show a man caught in the memory of his wife long dead. Not leaving the "Slow Glass" farm because he could still glimpse her in the window of their home which was also slow glass. Cleaver effective writting.

    19. Re:Or sunpipe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I don't read sci-fi; it rots your brain. If ten years worth of light were concentrated in a window pane, then it would be pretty hot, don't you think? Like surface-of-the-sun hot. If the energy of the photons were dissipated as heat, then they wouldn't be visible when they emerged. This wouldn't work.

      BTW, under some conditions light really can travel extremely slow in some materials. I think this happens in Bose-Einstein condensate. Don't quote me on that, though.

    20. Re:Or sunpipe.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Don't be an idiot - there are tipping effects involved. Otherwise, why is the Northwest passage now open for much of the year, when it never was before? And glaciers retreating?

      Fossil fuels are non-renewable on the human timescale. Up until now, the oceans have been absorbing a lot of the surplus CO2, but they're reaching their "tipping point" as well.

      Besides, why would anyone be against conserving energy - in the long run, it puts money back in your pocket.

    21. Re:Or sunpipe.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      This is why I don't read sci-fi; it rots your brain.
      ... or it can make you ask "what if" ... or "why not" ...
      If ten years worth of light were concentrated in a window pane, then it would be pretty hot, don't you think?
      Nope - it wouldn't have to be any hotter than room temperature, as the photons that pass through it are by definition not absorbed by the glass and turned into heat. If the photons were absorbed, the glass would be opaque.
    22. Re:Or sunpipe.. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Otherwise, why is the Northwest passage now open for much of the year, when it never was before?

      Never was? Oh, wait. I forgot it was Troll Tuesday - by all means carry on then.

    23. Re:Or sunpipe.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      The "northwast passage" was ice-locked year-round until recently:
      http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/08/29/no rthwest.passage/
      Will ice melt open fabled Northwest Passage?
      Researchers say Arctic route could thaw in next decade

      WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Rapid melting of the Arctic ice pack may turn a cherished sailor's myth into reality. The Northwest Passage, the legendary shipping shortcut from the Atlantic to the Pacific, could be ice-free in as few as 10 years, many predict.

      A well-documented continuing Arctic thaw is reducing polar ice, a change that is likely to have profound effects on commerce, ecology and native cultures, according to author Richard Kerr, writing in the journal Science.

      The fabled route runs below Iceland and Greenland, through the Arctic archipelago in northern Canada, and along the northern coast of Alaska between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans.

      An ice-free Northwest Passage would let ships traveling between Europe and Asia shave more than 4,000 miles off the route through the Panama Canal and would allow ships to avoid the occasional delays and the passage fees of the canal.

      In addition, many of the largest container and tanker ships cannot fit in the 88-year-old canal, forcing shippers to use smaller vessels or to take the even longer, more treacherous route around South America's Cape Horn.
      Sounds good, but read the article to see the environmental impact, etc.
    24. Re:Or sunpipe.. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      The cool thing about these new ones is that they have automatic light level detectionso that they know whether or not to turn on the integrated electricity sucker.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    25. Re:Or sunpipe.. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      So what happens when one photon runs into the back of another one? Surely if the photon which has just entered the window is going extremely slow, so by the time the next photon gets there, the tail of the first photon is hit by the head of the second photon?

    26. Re:Or sunpipe.. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      The "northwast passage" was ice-locked year-round until recently:

      Yeah, my southwaste passage was blocked until recently too, but fiber fixed it. It seems to me your post compared the presence of ice in the Northwest Passage in human terms while comparing the production of fuels in geological terms. Again, nice troll, but the [tt] stuff is being M2'd accordingly. That might actually help to remove some idiot moderators. It's really interesting that you seem to have started your own little troll troupe. What's your deal? A new generation of Slashdot trolls to waste everyone's bandwidth?

  85. This sounds suspect? by big-giant-head · · Score: 1, Funny


    Back home they used to call moonshine sunshine in a jug. Are you sure we're not talking about home made booze??

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
  86. You're all missing the point ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I agree that the techology is old news. But, as can be seen in the image that accompanies the article, the innovation of tying employees to their desks with fiber optic tubes is a truely inspired idea. I'm sure the CEO's of many hitech companies will find this method more in keeping with company's public image than the traditional employee restraint system.

  87. Old news? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing this years ago, as a little kid on one of those "That's Incredible" or "What will they think of next?" shows, I can't remember which one, as it was a long time ago.

    It was when fiber optics were new, amazing, moon-man technology, and I distinctly remember them showing how real sunlight was being "piped" throughout some Japanese office building via this new moon-man tech.

    This doesn't seem to be too different. It seemed like a great idea to me as a kid, any reason why it hasnt caught on? Fiber optics are down in the price range (ballpark-ish) of romex these days.

    Then again: the big push of the story was how natural sunlight is "better" for you than flourescent light, and build morale and prevents the winter blues, etc. Then sunlight became evil and is no good for anything but causing cancer and the healthiest thing to do is live like a tibetan monk and never go outside.

    Is sunlight good or evil today?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  88. When I was a lad we called these skylights! by wsanders · · Score: 2, Informative

    And we had to walk 10 miles barefoot through the snow in a jungle full of hungry tigers and shuriken-wielding ninjas to get that sunlight.

    The new version they've been installing here in California since the mid-90s has a shiny mirrored duct about 8 in diameter that can carry sunlight about 10 feet and through a couple of 30 degree turns. They are pretty cheap, about $500 each, and work pretty well. You can get models fortitifed with compact flourescents.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  89. Shoot! ... The Moon! by mathmatt · · Score: 1

    If we could only build these tubes long enough to port light from the other side of the world at night...

    ...Wait, even better, we put up several small satellites to bounce the sunlight received in say, Japan to say, NYC...

    ...No wait. Let's build one giant satellite to reflect the light directly from the sun to NYC at night...

    ...Oh, wait.

  90. Hybrid != Light Tube by Jodka · · Score: 5, Informative

    The prevailing opinion here seems to be that this is a stupid story, because light pipes are old news. Two people have even been moderated up to +5 for posting links to light pipe vendors.

    Light pipes are NOT the story here. Hybrid lighting is a NEW lighting system which separates the visible and IR components of sunlight, directing the visible components to room lighting and the IR components to thermo-voltaic generator, which stores electrical energy to light the room after the sun has gone down. Ordinary light pipes do not do that.

    From the U.S. Department of Energy Solar FAQ:

    Q:How does a hybrid solar lighting (HSL) system work?

    A:Imagine being able to light your home or office most of the day, and on most days, with sunlight, but not the kind that comes through the windows. That's what hybrid solar lighting (or HSL) systems are being developed to do. Prototype HSL systems are made up of roof-mounted concentrators that collect and separate the visible and infrared portions of sunlight. The visible portion of the light is distributed through large-diameter optical fibers to hybrid luminaires. (Hybrid luminaires are lighting fixtures that contain both electric lamps and fiber optics to distribute sunlight directly.) Unlike conventional electric lamps, the solar component of HSL produces little heat.

    The remaining "invisible" energy in the sunlight, mostly infrared radiation, is directed to a concentrating thermo-photovoltaic (solar) cell that very efficiently converts infrared radiation into electricity. The resulting electric power can be directed to other uses in a building. When sunlight is plentiful, the fiber optics in the luminaires can provide all or most of the light needed in a particular area. But when there is little or no sunlight, sensor-controlled electric lamps turn on to maintain the desired illumination level.

    Independent cost and performance models suggest the overall affordability of solar energy could be doubled or tripled by using this new hybrid approach. The multidisciplinary R&D effort involved in developing HSL includes several industrial and university partners. Other Resources:

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:Hybrid != Light Tube by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Good point, and if I had any mod points, I'd give them to you.

    2. Re:Hybrid != Light Tube by Peldor · · Score: 1

      IOW, it's a lot cheaper to just pipe sunlight in rather than use a solar panel to make electricity to keep a bulb lit. With the (large) losses of converting sunlight to electricity and then the (almost as large) losses of using that electricity to make light, photovoltaic-powered lights are a bit daft.

  91. Which is hotter? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    These lighting systems or gas tubes? Is there an offset cost for cooling if these lighting systems cause more heat to be generated within the spaces?

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  92. 'Sunlight in a Tube' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least that's what my wife calls it....

  93. Health Benefits? by yrogerg · · Score: 1

    This could have a positive effect on workers as well. Flourescent lighting, which is common in office buildings, is not the best type of lighting to work under. Natural sunlight could produce a boost in moral because people are generally less depressed when they receive more sunlight.

    1. Re:Health Benefits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are also health risks associated with long term exposure to sunlight. Skin cancer is the most well known. Do a search for sun sensitivity and educate yourself.

    2. Re:Health Benefits? by yrogerg · · Score: 1

      Does the optical fibre carrying the light also carry the UV rays that are responsible for said skin cancer?

  94. There's been one of these around for years by kahei · · Score: 1


    There's been one of these attached to the Ark Mori building in Tokyo since way back when. It's got a big array of hexagonal collectors (that track the sun) on the outside, and it pipes the light inside to where it shines on some rather mangy bamboo.

    I heard it was the pet project of the son of someone important.

    Sure gives that impression.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  95. This is a stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like many others have health problems related to sun exposure. Putting systems like this into commercial buildings is a public health threat. Not only are we talking about skin cancer, but lupus patients, and those made sinsitive due to medication and other deseases. And for those who don't know sunscreen is often not nearly enough protection for individuals sensitive to sunlight.

  96. Piping Sunshine by Surak_Prime · · Score: 1

    Whenever I was young and used to get in trouble, my mom used to say something about being put so far under the jail they'd have to pipe sunshine to me - and now someone has gone and made that possible!

    --
    :::The Spear in the heart of the Other is the Spear in the heart of You; You are He - Surak of Vulcan:::
  97. Fibre Optics AND Photovoltaic by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

    I seem to be the only one who found this FAQ

    Yes, it's thick fibre optics. That's not new, as many comments have pointed out.

    The novel trick here is that they're splitting the solar light into visible and non-visible spectrums. The visible is routed to the "hybrid" fixture that also has a light bulb in it and a light sensor to make sure the hybrid fixture is putting out enough light. The non-visible portion of the solar light is used to GENERATE ELECTRICITY with Photovoltaic cells that are specialized to work with infrared.

  98. Old :( by rmadmin · · Score: 1

    This has been around for years. I remember seeing the Japanese doing this with fibre optics probably 5+ or so years ago.

  99. Energy Savings? by stashluk · · Score: 1

    How long does it take to recoup the energy used to manufacture miles of visual light conduit?

  100. Something new under the Sun? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at lightpipes, mirrored conduits which collect light from a skylight into an internal window around corners, through storeys, etc. I wonder why we can't use a lens to a fiberbundle to another lens, for much cheaper versions.

    And where's the photonic battery, an optical medium which can collect sunlight, store it optically, and emit it later in full spectrum, at maximum efficiency?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  101. The Next Step by Karnak23 · · Score: 1

    I believe that we've seen this before on an old Discovery Channel show called,"The Next Step". These were prototyped in Japan more than ten years ago.

    I guess they didn't catch on as quickly as was hoped.

  102. Actually this is new by reggaepubman · · Score: 1

    Lightpipes have been around for a while and you can pick up versions in Home Depot. The difference is this system sending the visible light throughout the building, and splits the IR off and sends it to a PV cell. Since the light is already concentrated, the total cell area is small and the efficiency is good.

  103. aack it burns! it burns! by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    anyone have a ring of light and darkness resistance?

  104. How long before... by whovian · · Score: 1

    Mr. Burns insists on collecting royalities on your sunlight?

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  105. Versus developing LED technologies? by behindthewall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not conversant in the details, but my understanding is that the latest generations of LED technology are making rapid gains. And recently, advances in getting decent white/fuller spectrum light out of them have been made and/or hinted at.

    Given that these things can be installed using current systems, and have very low current draw and heat generation, I'm wondering how well what is essentially an architectural design element, with the implications of same from implementation through to building code (including safety features such and firewalling and the like) will be able to compete against LED fixtures and similar.

  106. translucent concrete by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I've seen concrete and bricks that let in light. You insert optical fiber perpendicular to the surface, before it hardens. You can control the amount of translucently by the amount of fiber.

  107. Great. So we save money on lighting, but . . . by indytx · · Score: 1

    have to spend more on air conditioning. Brilliant!

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
  108. What about the extra heat? by woobieman29 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't these optical waveguides also pipe quite a bit of heat into the room? This would be great in some areas, but I would think that the areas that would most likely have enough sunlight to benefit from this tech would be in hotter climates. would we just be trading lighting bills for cooling bills?

    --
    \/\/oobie
    1. Re:What about the extra heat? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't these optical waveguides also pipe quite a bit of heat into the room?

      Not necessarily, if the infrared region is filtered off.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:What about the extra heat? by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      i have V-Kool(R) on my car windows. it works wonders. it makes the sun feel like a lightbulb.

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    3. Re:What about the extra heat? by drew · · Score: 1

      it probably would have a positive impact, if any. already, most of the load on an office hvac system is compensating for the heat put off by the lighting systems. in all but the coldest climates, many offices dont even have central heating systems, because the lighting systems (and now, in many places, computer monitors) put off enough heat to cover a building's heating requirements.

      if they filter off at least some of the infrared spectrum when they pipe the light in from the outside, which should be a trivial task, i would expect these lights to produce substantially less heat than your typical incandescent bulb or fluorescent ballast.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    4. Re:What about the extra heat? by H01M35 · · Score: 1
      They haven't filtered off the IR exactly, iirc they've actually redirected the IR to some sort of PV electrical generator.

      Therefore - no heat transmitted inside, electrical generation to boot.

    5. Re:What about the extra heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "most of the load on an office hvac system is compensating for the heat put off by the lighting systems."

      If you are using a sensible number of flourescent tubes and a reasonable density of human beings and PCs I'd be very surprised if the lighting system was putting out more heat than the combination of humans and PCs. Humans put out around 100W at rest, PCs when being used for typical word tasks probably still put out 50W, a total of 150W. I have a Philips Brightlight with an input of 110W, and even if everyone in an office had one of those even the input power would be less than the heat output from each human and their PC (and the office would be very bright), and the heat output of a 110W flourescent system is less than 110W. Most offices these days use flourescent lighting.

      The input power for lighting is an issue, though, and improving natural lighting can cut electricity costs all the same, even if the heat output of the lights is not a big factor. Plus people seem to work better and are more productive with natural light, although the light pipes and so on will test if this is due to having a view or a quality of the light itself.

    6. Re:What about the extra heat? by polanyi · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with microwave waveguides, which have a critical frequency below which propagation isn't unsupported. Is this the case with optical waveguides, i.e. fiber?

  109. Not the same as Solar Tubes by flashbang · · Score: 1

    RTFA, these are different - they mix the sun light with regular lamps to produce a constant light source. When there's more sun, there's less electric light. Less sun, more electric light.

    Solar tubes are neat, but they are not the same as solar hybrid light.

    --
    My sig left me for a younger user id.
    1. Re:Not the same as Solar Tubes by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      The Solar Tubes have a lighting kit. The mix isn't automatic, you have to flip a switch on the wall, but they work nicely. I have one in a windowless laundry room. Most of the day we can get by without turning on the light.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
  110. 16th Century by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    English sailors solved this problem 300 years ago with this little gem.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  111. Slow windows by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
    No, MS can't do that. There is prior art (Chicago).

    Oh wait, that *is* MS IP, so I guess they can innovate on that.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  112. This is NEW!? by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    This is old as hell! We've had two of these in our house for 5-10 years now! (I think ours is called a "sun tube") All it is, is a mylar-like tube with a glass ball collector at the top.

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  113. Prison have this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Florence USP, the feds super max facility in Colorado already has something like this. The prison is multiple floors underground and there's a "no humann contact" policy for most of the inmates.

    The mail is projected on TV's in single man cells and the sunlight is piped through some fiber like tube and relflected off a small disk on the table.

  114. Re:scientists are apparently good at...press relea by Animats · · Score: 1
    Yeah. Oak Ridge is a remnant of the Manhattan Project, now in search of a mission.

    There are at least six manufacturers of tubular skylights. They're not too useful, because, as windows, they're small. And you have to clean them, which is hard. They're used mostly by home architects who've managed to create a dark interior area and need to get out of that design mistake.

    Plastic skylights are bigger and more useful.

  115. 125 years ago? by mogwai7 · · Score: 5, Informative

    William Wheeler invented a system to light up buildings with light pipes in 1880.

    1. Re:125 years ago? by panic_paranoia · · Score: 1

      Good point, and one i was about to make. If i may add a bit of info: patent #247229 sept. 20, 1881 W. Wheeler

    2. Re:125 years ago? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Since the patent has long expired, doesn't that mean that any invention covered by that patent is now not patentable? Prior art?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  116. Good innovation. by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Although this technology isn't that impressive (to me at least), it's a great innovation.

    The extra sun-light will also help with office morale, since you will be getting a good dose of daily vitamin D (it's given off when sunlight reaches your bones and helps with your pigment... at least that's what I remember learning).

    If it helps with stress, I'm all for it.

  117. My only dislike by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    The only thing I don't like about this system is its need for an active sun-tracking device in order to pump light into the fibers. I've been trying to fit my brain around a way of performing the same task passively, but it's difficult. Even if it's only 10% the efficiency of an active system, I'd still prefer it, even if it wound up costing a bit more, because I'd rather not have something that was complex and might break down.

    1. Re:My only dislike by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      It is possible to build an "active" tracker in a hydraulic-like configuration - IIRC, it was featured in an old issue of Mother Earth News - basically, it consisted of cylinders which had a liquid in them, heated by the sun, with "shading" plates strategically placed so that as the cylinder heated up (and heated the liquid inside), it would shift the liquid to the other cylinder, changing the angle of the dish (I believe it was used on a solar furnace, or a solar oven of some sort) by shifting the liquid. It would auto-reset at night, and it did all of this without any electricity usage...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    2. Re:My only dislike by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      Eccentually you would put the dish on a clock. Instead of a spring though a larger weight, like a grandfather clock, would turn the dish to always face the sun. You would only need to wind it once a day. You could power it but then you wouldn't get all the good exercise "lighting" the building.
      Or you could have some kind of warped dish that can collect light from different directions at once. A hyperbola or something instead of a parabola.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  118. My brother already has this in his kitchen by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    it's a technique the romans used centuries ago.

    Any bets on how long it takes the USPatentOffice to grant the patent and ignore the prior art?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  119. Only the teensy tiny $$$$$ prob remains by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    Nice in theory. But has anybody costed out the $$$$ to make and install a solor collector of the required size? I'm estimating my office which has 20 80-watt fixtures would need about would need about TEN 1-meter diameter collectors. I can't see these going for much less than $1K installed each. That's an awful lot of $$$, especially when you still need the old lighting system for cloudy times and at night. The current lighting costs about 7 cents an hour, 56 cents a day, about $100 a year. There's no way to pay for the cost of the collectors, not even within a factor or ten.

  120. Think again by N8F8 · · Score: 1
    I've looked into this for my house and there are several limiting factors:

    Punching holes in the roof.

    You are limited in the length of the tube and the bumber of internal reflectors.

    Dust will settle on the reflectors.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  121. Solar Tube by Tylerious · · Score: 1

    It looks like they've improved on the solar tube design?
    http://www.solatubetexas.com/
    It's not a new idea, but it's very cool. It's good to see that similar technologies might spread to non-residential/recreational uses.

    1. Re:Solar Tube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have spread to non-residential uses. Solatube has been doing it for years. Look at this link -

      http://www.solatube.com/commercial.php

      They are in major businesses all over the US and the world.

  122. Even older by DnemoniX · · Score: 1

    I was playing with light pipe back in my highschool days, 16 years ago.

  123. This is SOOO 1881 by CapnGib · · Score: 1

    "Apparatus for lighting dwellings and other structures" us patent 247229

    --
    Beauty is truly in the eye of the tiger
  124. I suppose... by Beefslaya · · Score: 0
    Instead of compensating lack of sunlight outdoors with indoor flourencent bulbs, how about some high intensity (halogen or the like) bulbs at the collection tubes?

    These could be controlled by dimmer or luvres to change intensity to regulate artificial light with the natural light. Producing more of a light "blend". :)

  125. How about refrigeration? by MoxFulder · · Score: 1

    I've often thought that refrigeration costs could be reduced in cooler climates as well.

    For example, in Michigan, for probably 4 months of the year, the outside temperature is cold enough that the refrigerator in my family's garage freezes.

    Why not build refrigerators that have intake/exhaust tubes from the outdoors. When it's cold enough, cold outdoor air could be circulated through the fridge!

    1. Re:How about refrigeration? by Peale · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention this. I just ran across a Yahoo! group for this kind of thing...

      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RefrigeratorAlternat ives/

  126. Again, nothing new. by 955301 · · Score: 1


    I've seen articles about this and how it can be used to grow tomotoes underground back in the 90's. Exact same principle and everything. Parts renamed perhaps to give it a new glow?

    Kris

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  127. Suuuureee.... by Beefslaya · · Score: 0
    "For AIM users who remain distrustful, Uberti pointed out that the application offers Direct IM (aka Send IM Image) and Secure IM in all recent versions......I know this since I designed these features. There are no backdoors; I would not have permitted any."

    mmmmmm....yeaaahhh...suurrree...

    So the Terms of Service don't apply to these either?

  128. Not so new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As an engineer in the lighting field, sorry to tell you this, but light pipes have been around and lighting buildings for over 100 years. Fine on bright sunny days, but not so good otherwise. The main drawbacks have been cost and control. Running the pipes from the rooftop collectors is expensive, much more so than 'standard' fluorescent lighting.

    In the early systems, the pipe was a glass tube filled with water. There was near total internal reflection. The pipes couldn't go to far, as the water would attenuate the light.
    There are current lighting systems for hazardous areas that put the lamps outside the room and use light pipes to bring the light inside. I believe that a couple of Intel plants use this system in the Fluorine and Silane areas. A few aircraft plants do too. It's too expensive for most uses though.

    The systems don't store light well, and can be tough to turn on or off. Dimming is also hard. Still, somebody re-invents it every 15 years or so. Looks like we're on the next cycle.

  129. These have already been invented... by crunk · · Score: 1

    ...and they are called windows

    --
    It's the battle of the minds, and everyone's unarmed.
  130. The tubes are green and edible by rrgmitchell · · Score: 1
    They were working on this nearly 300 years ago.

    Here's a visiting journalist's report:

    The first Man I saw was of a meager Aspect, with sooty Hands and Face, his Hair and Beard long, ragged and singed in several Places. His Cloathes, Shirt, and Skin were all of the same Colour. He had been Eight Years upon a Project for extracting Sun-Beams out of Cucumbers, which were to be put into Vials hermetically sealed, and let out to warm the Air in raw inclement Summers. He told me he did not doubt in Eight Years more he should be able to supply the Governors Gardens with Sun-shine at a reasonable Rate; but he complained that his stock was low, and intreated me to give him something as an Encouragement to Ingenuity, especially since this had been a very dear Season for Cucumbers. I made him a small Present, for my Lord had furnished me with Money on Purpose, because he knew their Practice of begging from all who go to see them.

    Full report here:

  131. Sweet, growers will be happy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sunlight? Wow, the indoor growers will be happy if they only have to use HPS during the times when the sun's not out ;-)

  132. LOL by lakeland · · Score: 1

    That was really very well done.

  133. also used in sailing... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    a small glass pyramid with the flat base on the deck and the sides doing refrection/diffusion in the cabin...

    Only existed for a few hundred years...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    1. Re:also used in sailing... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      This is so crazy, two days before this article was posted, I saw one of those in someone's office. Very neat device.

    2. Re:also used in sailing... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I'm an idiot. When I say "device" I mean neatly-shaped piece of glass. not exactly a "device"

  134. Slow Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You refer to slow glass, the technology responsible for the psychological insights and human drama in the story Light of Other Days by Bob Shaw.
    Rightfully a critically acclaimed story and classic SF.

  135. Wow! Sunlight in a tube! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that like hair in a can?

  136. Links and additional info by gliph · · Score: 1
    After digging around in the google search, here is some additional info and some pictures demonstrating the hybrid system as well as some other applications...

    hmm, 'no officer, i was using this hybrid system to light my house, not grow hybrid plants! ;)

  137. light pollution by sum.zero · · Score: 1

    when people return there used up scenery for a recharge all of the stored up light will get dumped in those nice vistas...

    sum.zero

  138. Fiber lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember seeing a special on this like, uh, maybe 10 years or more ago.

    They were wiring up buildings with these large fiber optic wires that terminated as the light sources. They then would use sunlight (when available) or switch to a central lighting system that used a really frick'in bright light as the source.

  139. their* + city* light by sum.zero · · Score: 1

    jjjjjjjjeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    sum.zero

  140. Solatube Skylights are the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This discussion is simple. Solatube www.solatube.com invented these tubular skylights back in the 1980's and they dominate the market for skylights. I have two if them in my house. To answer some of your questions, they are ENERGY STAR approved and have virtually no heat gain or loss. When people talk about "solar tubes" or tubular skylights, they are talking about Solatube skylights.

  141. beating a dead horse... by revsteban · · Score: 1

    back in 1999, my friend TJ and myself did a science project in high school that sounds strikingly familiar...if anyone cares, the webpage can be seen here. hey, we both passed! behold, science

  142. Wow so smart... by SteveXE · · Score: 1

    Why dont they just use Mirrors...?

  143. Sunpipe over ordinary wiring! by Supercarps · · Score: 1

    I understand a fellow in New Jersey is working on a way to run sunpipe transmissions over wires that are essentially the same as those currently used to transmit our telegraph messages over long distances. Imagine the implications for homes and businesses, in which the mirror-adjusting servants of the modern sunpipe might soon be uncommon like the Dodo. It isn't even required to load these "electric sunpipes" with actual sunlight at the supplying end. According to this Edison, his Electronized Sunlight will be generatable from any heat source, including newly cheap and plentiful petroleum oils, with no concern for whether at the current hour our friend Mr. Sun currently favors the company of good Americans or Chinamen instead. I imagine a day soon where it will even be possible to turn telegraph messages themselves into electric sun, so the shop foreman can stay at his machines, or the tired father in his study chair, "reading" his telegraphs simply by observing the brightening and dimming from his electric sunpipe roomlight! How Almighty God smiles on His children, indeed!

  144. Two alternatives by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    I watched an issue of Deutsche Welt news in a cheapish hotel in Brussels.

    Some crafty Germans use mirrors and reflectors on a mountain to focus light onto prisms in town squares to illuminate dark areas of towns during the day.

    In other news, some crafty people have windows that bend light further into the room, giving more even lighting.

    In other news - I had this idea ages [20yrs?] ago, concentrating the light down fibers and then using technology like this new refractive cheapo flat screens (see /.) illuminate office spaces. and in that film with the unicorn and the devil, that hobbit like chap uses mirrors to send sunlight into hell. good flick.

    What I have realised is that innovation is happening faster, and cheaper to implement and simpler ideas are becoming more commonplace.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:Two alternatives by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      Combined with Mr Burn's sun blocker would there be an explosion? Could he focus light onto the blocker?

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  145. Odd, I thought the name was... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Lin-Lux

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  146. Not New by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

    I saw these on a "home improvement" type show several years ago. I remember on the show they installed these in an office building. They filmed as the inspectors showed up. They were going to fine the builder for having the electricity turned on the wiring was approved. They had to explain in detail that it wasn't electricity running these lights. I've wanted them ever since. I wanted to install them in my house when I bought it, but I've had other more important things to improve first.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
  147. got one by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

    sitting right here on my desk. Has internal nicads, you can also put replaceable batteries, is a flashlight and a radio with am/fm. Has some solar cells integrated with the body, just leave it in a sunny spot in front of a window, keeps it charged. It also has a small crank on the end, has an internal dynamo so you can charge it that way as well, and to top it off, has an external 6VDC jack in. man, you got some options with the power there! One of the better gadgets I ever bought. All it lacks is the bulb is incandescent, I should see about making it LED sometime. Label on it says "Craig Marathon"

  148. Re:... extra heat? Filtered before.focusing by ankhank · · Score: 1

    The heat has to be filtered before the light is concentrated -- or the glass fiber would melt at the focus.

    One way -- long used for microscope illuminators -- is a thin sheet of material at an angle in the light path that reflects (rejects, loses) the infrared, and passes the visible wavelengths.

    The picture from the current article shows a thin flexible glass fiber bundle glowing brightly (presumably they'd wrap it in something reflective? Or maybe it's not losing all that much, or that's how it distributes the light, that wasn't clear).

    I recall early attempts at this failed because of failure to remove the heat -- and at the bright spot where the focused sunlight was to enter the light guide, the glass melted or the optical glue caught fire.

  149. Use for dark fiber optics? by ankhank · · Score: 1

    Is this going to use all that dark fiber optic cable that was put in place just before the dot bomb happened?

    Let's see, break the cables out from the telephone switch box and then dial up the other side of the planet?

  150. Why not just order it? by idlake · · Score: 1

    Sun Dome sells this. They have been around for a number of years.

  151. A better link by Eccles · · Score: 1

    A far better link is this. Reading that, you'll see that it's much different from a window or solartube.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  152. saw these things a while back by Internet_Communist · · Score: 1

    I saw these things on one of those home shows a while back, it was either hometime or something on the DIY channel....the model they had was basically a reflective tube with a opaque lens at the bottom, it also had a lightbulb in it so it acts like a normal light when there's no sun out...it was kinda neat because it pretty much just looks like a normal light fixture, and works just like one when the sun isn't out.

    --

    If you don't want someone to copy something, don't give it to anyone.
    1. Re:saw these things a while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw that too. It was a Solatube Skylight. It was on the DIY and HGTV network.

  153. New news? by Daata · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw a working demonstration of this about 10 years ago. Why the all the noise now?

  154. compared to solar panels? by qleak · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this compares in cost and efficiency to solar panels. My guess is solar panels are less efficient but require less cost to implement (can even make you money if you sell power back to the grid). How much optic fibre does it require to implement? Anyway, good to know we have options should prices lean to favor optic fibres over solar panels.

  155. what about glow in the dark goo? (at night) by pixel+fairy · · Score: 1

    you know that stuff in cereal box toys from the 80s. saves light to glow later....

    yes its a greenish / yellow light, but makes a great night light.just time it when its in the tubes.

  156. More information and picture by springbox · · Score: 1

    The one picture that site has is linked to a AOL user's web site? Ok.. Anyway, more information about solar technology and a picture of a light tube!

  157. Sunlight in a tube by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

    Dracula must be pissed

  158. One problem by nxtr · · Score: 1

    What happens at night?

  159. daylighting isn't cost effective by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    from the Daylighting article:
    "Most residential tubular skylights cost $300 to $500, not including installation. The least expensive we found were about $200 for 8" diameter (200 mm) models.... The best selling 10", 14" and 16" (250 mm, 360 mm, and 405 mm) Solatube units provide up to 3,760, 6,300 and 8,200 lumens, respectively, under ideal, full-sun conditions."

    This is from 1999 so there's probably inflation, but assuming a 8" diameter skylight puts out as much light as a 100w bulb under average conditions (a 100w bulb puts out 1700 lumens), and given that a 100w bulb would cost 4.8 cents to operate for 6 hours at 8 cents kWh, and lets say the skylight provides 16 hrs of light a day on average, that same light would cost 12.8 cents with a 100w light bulb, or about $46 a year. That means it'd take over 4 years for the skylight to pay for itself, to pay back the $200, if you absolutely needed a light on for 16 hours a day during the day.

    Let's not forget the cost of installation, or the fact that you'll still need a light at night, or that you can't turn it off if for whatever reason you wanted to "turn the lights off" like in summer when it's light out until after 10pm, or even the money lost in heating/cooling due to poor insulation since the more holes you punch in a roof the harder it is to insulate, or the fact that those are 1999 prices and in 6 years I'm sure it's more expensive now.

    So it's not an cost effective replacement for incandescent lighting and certainly not fluorescent, however sunlight has been proven to be beneficial, from improving moods to influencing cancer, so it might help in that regard, but it's really not worth it for the money, least not in the short run, I'd bet it'd take at least 10 years to get your money back and then it's only 13 cents a day at current average electricity prices.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  160. Let there be light by prjames · · Score: 1

    I hope this invention's got more bandwidth than it's website, else there's goner be some pretty shady buildings. The usual - /.ed again

  161. Well, here's some unused glass for transmission... by ankhank · · Score: 1

    Look! Here's a source for dark fiber, we can send sunlight wherever it's needed!

    BUSINESS/FINANCIAL DESK | May 21, 2002, Tuesday
    TECHNOLOGY; Metromedia Fiber Files for Bankruptcy

    ABSTRACT - Metromedia Fiber Network Inc, telecommunications company backed by billionaire investor John W Kluge, files for bankruptcy ....

  162. Long distance sunshine piping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if it's evening or cloudy locally, no more prob... one can dial up some sunshine from far away... Hawaii, Australia, etc. As long as there's enough transoceanic and long distance fibre capacity hanging around.

  163. It's about time by SagaLore · · Score: 0

    I'm glad someone is finally getting around to implementing this. It's not just saving on lighting costs, but cooling costs as well, as there won't be any extra heat generated from bulbs (while it's in full mode). Plus this would be a great advantage to our health - it's known that our bodies really do need a full spectrum of light that we just don't get with standard or flourescent lighting.

  164. Tinfoil Goggles by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Keep hitting with the facts, Tom. These Greenhouse Deniers will run out of preprogrammed talking points pretty fast, as the ugly truth outnumbers us all. FWIW, research presented in England this past January indicate that the chances of the Gulf Stream shutting down by 2100 are 45%, and 75% by 2200. Freezing Britain, and plunging Scandanavia and elsewhere into arctic climate.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Tinfoil Goggles by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unfortunately, I think it's going to happen well before 2100. The ocean has a limited ability to absorb CO2. Once it hits a certain point, there's a good chance that a part of the ocean will suddenly inverse, releasing a good chunk of the gases dissolved/accumulated in the deeps, sort of like taking the top off a soda-pop bottle...

      Some of these gases, unfortunately, are pretty toxic to us.

      This has happened before, without our intervention. We're just conducting an experiment on a much larger scale than is "natural".

      We just to look at the death tolls from the heat wave of 2003 http://www.usatoday.com/weather/news/2003-09-25-fr ance-heat_x.htm, almost 15,000 in France alone, to see what being unprepared for more violent temperature swings can do.

      Well, at least Canada will probably have more land that will be useable, so we will be able to take SOME of the burden off other countries. Unfortunately, large parts of the frozen tundra will just be bogs if they thaw out, not really suitable for farming.

      It's going to be u.g.l.y.

    2. Re:Tinfoil Goggles by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When the seas rise an average of 35', forcing billions of people from their homes, I don't think "countries" will be a useful way to describe the world anymore. Combined with all the other upheavals, especially the severe drinking water crisis and the probable end of cheap oil, it's going to be a.p.o.c.a.l.y.p.t.i.c. - and manmande.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Tinfoil Goggles by lgw · · Score: 1

      Follow the advice in your own sig and don't spend too much time chatting with Doc Ruby - he's a troll par excellance .

      I see a lot of arguments like yours "something's changing, so it MUST be CO2". Let's all do the "correlation is not causation" dance. :)

      If you want to argue that human activity contributes to global warming, well maybe. There's a lot of human activity. But arguing for tiping points ... there are SO MANY factors that might be tipping points. If you include as a "possible tipping point" every human activity with an effect on the order of 1/100th of 1% or more on the climate, you'd have more things to worry about than you could keep track of.

      Note that the ocean does not meaningfully have a limit to the amount of CO2 it can absorb, it's the *rate* of absorbtion that's interesting. (The ocean has many times as much CO2 as the atmosphere, and it's nowhere near the saturation point - absorbing all the carbon currently in the atmosphere wouldn't change the carbon level of the ocean much).

      Anyway, that aside, to the genral point: conservation always has a cost. Sometimes the benefits exceed the cost. But to answer your question "how could anyone be against (energy) conservation?" - I'm against paying any cost until I see a demonstration that the benefits exceed that cost. I always consider the gas mileage of a vehicle, when I make a buying decision, but that's not the *only* thing I consider! It must be weighed agianst performance, utility, and price. All engineering involves trade-offs.

      And don't forget about opportunity cost, where by focusing on one thing you can't focus on another. A great bill to reduce NO2 emissions (responsible for half as much greenhouse effect as man-made CO2, BTW) has effectively been shot down by the green lobby because it didn't have a requirement for CO2 conservation. Great, instead of getting useful pollution control, we get nothing. That's progress?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  165. Thank you by Feztaa · · Score: 1

    This is the funniest thing I've read on /. all week.

  166. This just in.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've invented a technology that lets you look right through walls!

    It's called a window.

  167. Would be interesting by TheMadcapZ · · Score: 1

    To see how the lighting looks during a thunderstorm at night.

  168. True Efficiency? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    These things seem esthetically appropriate for bringing sunlight-colored light into buildings. They're better than windows for moving the light around corners and deep inside large structures. But the article touts their energy efficiency compared to electric lighting. How much energy is consumed in their manufacture and installation, compared to electric lighting? How long will the fiber system last, what are its maintenance costs compared with electric lighting? If making the fibers costs (in joules) about the same or less than making the wires, or the lenses last longer than current bulbs, this could in fact save energy. But if the fibers or other components cost more, possibly multiples of their electric counterparts, this system's popularity could rush us towards our energy bankruptcy much sooner. With oil production reaching its inevitable decline as soon as a couple of years from now, we can't afford yet another efficiency boondoggle.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  169. Cover it with colored plastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you could cover the light-collecting thing with something that filters all but a certain color, then the light that reaches the room will be that color - won't it?

  170. Sunlight in a Tube by meejahoar · · Score: 1

    Vee interesting... but is it very different from Parans' daylight in a cable?