Slashdot Mirror


Palm IIIc, IIIxe Released

homerj79 writes, "Palm Computing announced today the release of their next generation Palm's, the IIIc and IIIxe. The IIIc sports 8MB of RAM, PalmOS 3.5 and a very cool 256-color TFT display. The Palm also has a built in rechargable battery that supposedly lasts for two weeks between charges. The IIIxe is much like the IIIx, but doubles the RAM to 8MB. Both also have a new casing on them, with a dark slate colored case rather than the gray of the past. "

44 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Re:MP3 player for the palm by jandrese · · Score: 2

    You must be using Windows. I played MP3s up to 256 kbit (that was the highest one I had) all the time under FreeBSD, with X running and deveoping/compiling GUI applications at the same time. The only time it skipped was when I had to swap something big from memory. Of course running it at -10 niceness helped.

    Heck, I even managed to play a 128 kbit mp3 (in mono mode) on a 486 66 without skipping. The 486 would start skipping in stereo mode however. :(

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  2. The Ultimate PDA... by Millennium · · Score: 2

    The color's a nice touch, and I applaud Palm for adding it (though I wonder why they opted for active-matrix instead of the newer, super-reflective type like in the Game Boy Color; those have much longer battery life because they don't require a backlight all the time).

    But what I'd love to see would be something with the upgradability of a Palm device (via the flashable ROM's) and the Springboard slot. It does lead to the question: why did Handspring take out the Flash ROM's in the first place? Does anyone know?

    Currently my old Palm III is just fine for me. Butr if Handspring puts the Flash ROM's into the next Visor (or I can find a very good rteason that they didn't) I just might switch to the Visors. Particularly if the Linux port can run on them by then :)

    1. Re:The Ultimate PDA... by Bearpaw · · Score: 2
      Bill the Cat and IHateEverybody are both correct, but they miss a point. The lack of flash does not mean that the OS cannot be upgraded! The first Palms didn't have flash, and yes, Virginia, there are upgrades available for them. You just install them like any other piece of software and you're golden.

      True, you probably wouldn't want to do this for anything other than patches or minor enhancements, but like it was pointed out, most major OS changes ain't gonna do squat without new hardware anyway.

      When I had a Palm with flash, it was kinda nice 'cause I could put non-OS software into flash, saving space and making hard resets slightly less annoying. But I don't miss having it in my Visor. Hawkins made the right choice.

  3. Interesting point... by Millennium · · Score: 2

    But I don't buy it. OS upgrades, even on a PDA, aren't just about hardware. Even on a Palm device, there's always room for stability improvements (yes, I have managed to crash my Palm III, albeit only once, ever) and bugfixes. Then there's the fact that if you have the software to do it, you can store programs there for extra memory space (memory space that is preserved even across things which would wipe out the rest of the Palm's memory).

    The Visor is a great little machine. In a lot of aspects it's better than my Palm III. But until they get Flash ROM upgradability into the things, I can't see myself getting one.

  4. WinCE and Linux by acb · · Score: 2

    I am not going to buy/install Windows just to sync a palmtop.

    Is it at all possible to make use of a WinCE machine (i.e., sync it, or transfer files from/to it) from a UNIX machine? Has anybody done anything of the sort, or tried it and failed heroically?

  5. Who cares about colour? by acb · · Score: 2

    What I'd really like to see is a PalmPilot compatible with a larger screen resolution; 160x160 is woefully small; it's hard to fit much information on the screen.

    (In contrast, Microsoft's ill-fated WinCE "palm-size PCs" do 240x320 or so... If they didn't require you to sell your soul to Redmond to be able to sync them, I'd be tempted to get one.)

  6. Re:Color not necessary by Kid+Zero · · Score: 2

    I do have problems with greyscale sometimes, I need all the visual clarity they can give. The latter greyscale ones are cool, and I imagine the color one will be a welcome bonus. It's not like all of them are going color. :)

  7. Oh man...and i just bought my IIIe by SgtPepper · · Score: 2

    The price, in case anyone is wondering and hasn't visited the site is about $450, which puts it...about what, mid-range in the line...when are they going to release the VIIc?

  8. Re:Color not necessary by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 2

    I'm all for color. People in general work better with colors than numbers and greys.

    It's much easier to see a red item on the screen and knowing that it is important rather than having a little number next to it telling you the priority. Sure you can sort them, but that can't be done in all instances. For example, a calendar program can't rearrange the days (without getting confusing). It would be nice to have a color flag to grab your attention -- drawing you towards the more important information.

  9. Re:I want one but..... by binarybits · · Score: 2

    The handwriting recognition is very functional, but it is not hanrwriting recognition per se. It works by requiring you to use a simplified one-stroke-per-character character set called grafiti. Each character is reduced to a single simplified stroke so it can be easily recognized by the software. This is a little awkward at first, but it can be learned in a matter of hours, and afterwards one can do a couple of characters a second. It's not going to replace a keyboard, but it's respectable for a handheld.

  10. Re:When will Handspring follow? by Bearpaw · · Score: 2
    OK, color Palm is cool.

    Cool, maybe, but IMO not worth the extra bucks. An "enhanced color calculator"? BFD. When they can sell it for less than $250US (with a Springboard slot), then they'll have something. Until then, I'll be quite happy with my Visor.

    This might win over a few losers who might otherwise fall for WinCE devices, though.

  11. Re:When will Handspring follow? by Mr.+X · · Score: 2

    The Visor simply lacks the Palm's FlashROM. The OS could still be upgraded via a software patch.

  12. Color not necessary by Darth+Maul · · Score: 2
    The reason PalmOS beat out WinCE was the fact that Palm was sleek and fast. By adding color, all I can see is an increase in program memory footprint and resource usage.

    I like my Palm IIIx just fine. 16 shades of grey works for me. I just hope Palm doesn't go down the road of WinCE by trying to pack everything in when it really isn't all necessary for the purposes of a PDA.

    Sure, it's cool. But is it necessary? As a Palm developer, I think it's great to be developing for a slimmed-down platform. It's like the early days of mono displays trying to concentrate on information density and UI design rather than just throwing everything at the user because you can like in today's machines. More doesn't always equal better.

    Remember, when color film came out, the quality of motion pictures went down. Think about it. The cinematographers and directors no longer had to worry about creating beautiful scenes with B/W; they could just throw color at the screen and hope that would impress everyone. I hope we don't see the same thing here...

    --
    --- witty signature
    1. Re:Color not necessary by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      I disagree.

      Palms are nice machines - I've got a III myself - but I don't think they're that special. I think they won becuase they're more readily available and they're cheaper.

      Over here, I can get Palms from pretty much anywhere that even thinks about selling computers. Not so for CE boxes, though, and when they do the cheapest CE tends to be well clear the price of even a Palm V (as the most expensive model on sale in the UK).

      Palms are good, sure. But so assume that they're the best technically because they won isn't logical. Price and availability are factors, too.

      Greg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    2. Re:Color not necessary by Basje · · Score: 2

      Who moderated this as 'insightful'? I'd rather not call it that. I think shortsighted would be a better qualification, esp. since I doubt that the author has even tried one. But alas, moderation doesn't have that option.

      The palm computing platform is largely graphics-based. I think navigation is helped a lot by color. It also opens the way to new and improved functionality. The website mentions a GPS system, and I think that a color display of maps is way better than a 16 gray tones one. I'm sure there are more examples.

      Of course, battery life may be improved by keeping it to b/w screens. Those use less power, on average. But, right now my palm lasts about 1 - 2 weeks with one set of fully recharged NiCads. It's claimed that the built in rechargeable battery will last about 2 weeks. So that's okay.

      The only drawback that I can think of, is that the battery is built in. That means easy recharging in the cradle, and no fiddling with batteries. But rechargeable batteries wear out rather fast, even modern ones. That leaves some questions to be considered. Can the battery be replaced? Can a replacement be obtained at a reasonable cost? If not, the new models should be considered disposable, which woulnd't be good.

      Right now I'm fully content with my palm IIIx (with some added mem, I admit). I don't think that I'll consider buying one of the new models at this moment. But, given that it'll break down some day, I'd really consider them over the old one.

      ----------------------------------------------

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    3. Re:Color not necessary by dingbat_hp · · Score: 2

      My worry isn't program footprint, but battery life.

      Colour screens are power hungry and one of the Palm's greatest virtues is its enormous battery life. The Palm works by going to sleep even more frequently and more completely than my cat -- if running a colour LCD affects this, then I'd be very concerned. Battery life for colour isn't a trade off I'd want to make.

      As far as footprint goes, then I don't think it's an issue. Colour Palm apps are already out there in beta (BugMe) and they still work just fine on old Palms.

      I'm glad they've released this. It's a review feature point that they no longer have to concede to the WinCE boxes and someone may even find it useful. As far as helping Palm goes, I think it's great. OTOH, I'll not be repalcing my own Palm with one.

  13. And what of... by angelo · · Score: 2
    And what of the IV, the VI and the II. I don't recall a palm pilot 2. If you use their logic:

    Palm Pilot (I)

    Palm Pilot Pro (II?)

    Palm III

    Palm V

    Palm VII

    Palm IIIx

    Palm IIIi

    Palm IIIc

    Palm IIIxe

    A post above asked when the Palm VIIc comes out. They may have some power issues to work on with this one. I presume that they will need to work with a backlight on all the time with this one, and the battery life would be significantly reduced with the packetmodem.

    also, on another note, did anybody else notice that this IIIc has a Li ion battery? This is odd, since the V seemed to be their "rechargable" line. Maybe they should rethink the numbering strategy.

    btw: i have a iiix, and I don't think I could ever fill it up, so iiixe looks a little silly to me.

    1. Re:And what of... by generic-man · · Score: 2
      You forgot:
      • The first model was the Pilot 1000, with 128KB RAM. Then came the Pilot 5000, with 512KB RAM. There's no such thing as a "Pilot 500." There was a 1MB upgrade for these devices as well.
      • The non-Professional PalmPilot is called the Personal. It had only 512KB RAM and had no TCP/IP stack. It could be upgraded to 1MB and TCP/IP capabilities with a different 1MB upgrade. (This upgrade card could also upgrade every prior Pilot to everything except backlighting for the screen.)
      • Palm also recently created a IIIe Special Edition (IIIeSE, for short) that is identical to the IIIe except for the fact that it has a translucent case.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:And what of... by gardenhose · · Score: 2

      The II was the Palm Professional, yes. The first one was actually the "US Robotics Palm Pilot." The IV was skipped *presumably* for Japan's sake, which we also see a lot of in the music technology industry (there's no Akai s4000 or Roland 404..., etc.) The VI was skipped to indicate that the VII was in a completely new class, ahead of its time. Makes sense to me...

  14. Is this necessary? by drfalken · · Score: 2

    The only reason I can think of to have a color palm (besides the obvious cool factor) is for web browsing. Sure I haven't used AvantGo and a Palm VIII, but I suspect that you will only participate in very specialized browsing functions on a screen that small, color or no. Gimme a color web pad, sure, but for my money, the palm should remain in the realm of monochrome and text based...this is why the terminal applications are my favourite X apps.

  15. Re:Goodness... by kaphka · · Score: 2
    battery life, weight/size, ease of use
    I forgot to add, the Cassiopeia is roughly the same size as the Palm IIIc, despite all those other differences. It is about 50% heavier, but I actually kind of like that; it doesn't feel as toylike as the Palm, and I don't really notice the extra three ounces in my pocket. (By the way, I did use a PalmPilot Pro for about two years before it stopped working and I replaced it.)

    I don't know about battery life, but I'm sure it's comparable to the Palm. And I think WinCE is actually much easier to use, given that it tries to do so much more.

    I don't want MP3 (not enough memory to make it worthwhile),
    Actually, the Cassiopeia makes a great MP3 player, after you pop in a 340MB CF hard drive. (Not an option for the Palm.)

    and for damn sure I don't want Windows.
    And of course, that's the real reason.

    And what is the "just in case" scenario on a palmtop that requires multitasking and 65,000 colors?
    Well, let's see... Digital photography (using the camera attachment), listening to an MP3 while doing anything else, killing an app when it goes flaky (and yes, that happens on Palms too)... But really, my biggest reason is just that I like to know it's there. It's a real computer, not an overgrown pocket calculator.

    I'll stop here, because I'm starting to sound like a shill for Casio. I just don't understand why people are going nuts over this "new" Palm IIIc, when it's substantially inferior to stuff that's been around for months.
    --

    MSK

  16. Re:Goodness... by kaphka · · Score: 2
    http://www.palm. com/devzone/docs/palmos/SystemFeatures.html#612908
    Only system software can launch a separate task. The multi-tasking API is not available to developer applications.
    I've never actually written for the Palm (too many resrictive agreements to get the SDK, thought I gather it's easier now,) so I don't know how this plays out in practice, but that's what the documentation says.
    --

    MSK

  17. Goodness... by kaphka · · Score: 2

    I bought a Cassiopeia E-100 (WinCE machine) about four months ago. It cost $50 less (street price is probably equal); it has 16 bit color instead of 8 bit color, a larger and higher resolution screen, 16MB storage vs. 8MB, a standard compact flash slot, a real OS (protected memory, multitasking, etc.), and probably a faster CPU (just guessing on that.)

    Now, don't get me wrong, I know that most people don't need a color screen in a PDA, or multitasking, etc. But if, like me, you like to have those features there just in case... What on earth does the IIIc have going for it? Is it just Palm's monopoly power?

    (Before anyone flames me... Yes, the PalmOS does preemptively multitask, but only when running Palm code. You can't write a multitasked app for it.)

    --

    MSK

  18. Palm VII Palm.Net adds All-You-Can-Eat for $45/mth by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

    Here's a link to their press release.

    "At $44.99 per month, the new 'Unlimited Access Pricing Plan' provides customers access to Internet content and e-mail as frequently as they want for a single, low fixed price throughout the Palm.Net network of 260 metropolitan areas across the USA.

  19. Good Idea by Corrado · · Score: 2
    I'm not really sure color is a good thing for Palm. I realize they _HAD_ to (public perception) but really, what does color buy you? I can only think of a couple of uses: some sort of warning (Battery Life Is Failing! - [due to the color screen, no doubt:]) or maybe some photos of the kids. But with only 256 colors, your kids wont look their best. :(

    Don't get me wrong, I think it is cool and all that. I just don't think I will have that much use for it.

    Later...

    --
    KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
    1. Re:Good Idea by tzanger · · Score: 4

      I don't think you understand their reasoning.

      256 colour is more than enough for what I believe their intentions are. Hell 16 colour would have sufficed in my situation.

      I use a Palm to store data, keep notes, etc. The colour can be used to highlight, annotate or otherwise bring attention to parts of the information contained without requiring mucking up the display by adding underlines or making the text bigger. Just change the colour to red and your eye instantly goes towards it first.

      Want 24-bit colour with alpha, 3D accelleration, 3D surround sound and enough balls to play MP3s? Get a laptop. This isn't meant to replace them. It's meant to be portable and useful.

  20. Still using my Pilot 100 by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2

    Gee, I wonder if it's time to upgrade yet.

    Then again, my USR Pilot 100 (which I upgraded from 128k to 512k memory) is less than half full, stores all my phone + addresses, and plays chess. It doesn't even have a backlit display, but I use it all the time.

    Amazing how the first iteration of a device (before it was renamed Palm Pilot even), which is almost 3 years old, is still very useful.
    Not many companies make hardware with that kind of useful longevity!

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  21. The IIIxe has a flash rom by Fross · · Score: 2

    Looking at the product spec for the IIIxe, available here, it has 2M of Flash ROM as well as its 8M of regular RAM.

    At only $20 more than a IIIx, this seems a great choice for those who aren't such yuppie managers that they need the V. ;)

    Fross

  22. Give us higher resolution!!! by Deslock · · Score: 2

    OK, color is nice. But what Palm should do is increase the resolution to 320x320 (supporting old apps double-pixlated). That would be MUCH more useful than color.

    Better yet, make it 480x320 using the writing area (assuming they use a more scratch-resistant screen) with the option to rotate 90 degrees. Then you could actually use Telnet!

  23. Battery life by dingbat_hp · · Score: 2

    they've /extended/ battery life

    Where do they claim this ? The only quote I could see was a claimed life of "two weeks average use" for the IIIc and "a month" for the V. As they're both rechargeable and I assume are using similar battery technology, then that's makes the IIIc to be twice as hungry as the V.

    Palm power-save architecture is also such that "typical" use is much more efficient than heavy use. As my Palm V currently gives me around a week to two weeks of actual use for my own usage patterns, then the colour lifetime does concern me. If I had one, I'd certainly want a second cradle/cable for charging away from home.

  24. Re:Telnet, are you serious? by radish · · Score: 2


    I found when managing my web server from the beach last summer (yes I am serious!) that having the mini virtual keyboard popped up in the lower half of the screen made life with telnet much easier. Also, the version I have lets you save macros with common things in (like paths, usernames etc) which are just a single-click away. Sure it wasn't great, but it sure beat taking a laptop all the way to spain just for the odd little job!

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  25. Re:black and white vs color by Raindeer · · Score: 2

    I think you're making a crucial mistake here. You say that a PDA should be as simple as possible and you seem to be referring to ease of use and not to technical simplicity. This I derive from your remark on the E-100. It is not the black and white that makes a Palm simple. It is the logic behind the design that makes it simple to use. If the colors on the Palm Pilot are just as useful as the colored cases of a Handspring Visor, then there is no reason for them. But if they can add functionality throught the use of colour, then it is worth it for sure. (offcourse managers just buy it for the colour screen) :-)

  26. Re:MP3 player for the palm by (void*) · · Score: 2

    Checkout MiniJam. A Handspring add-on module.

  27. Re:Color not necessary.... Maybe not for you... by bons · · Score: 2
    Color is a necessity to me. I've resisted buying a Palm for years, but I'm planning on finding a way to get enough money together to get one of these. Why?

    I do web page design, programming, and have a number of outdoor interests. Since I haven't replaced my last digital camera (stolen), I'm in the market for a new one.

    With Kodak offering a VGA camera (a.k.a. the Palm Pix) I see an all in one solution.

    With the two combined I can take photos of a disc golf course or event, label them, make notes about the photos and upload the page as soon as I get home. Using a portable keyboard makes the whole thing much easier and allows me to carry the whole production on the course.

    One final comment:
    "Remember, when color film came out, the quality of motion pictures went down." - Yeah, the Wizard of OZ sucked until Pink Floyd released a new sountrack... :)

    -----

  28. Re:Numbering scheme? by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 2

    Their numbering scheme is not off, at least as far as they're concerned. I think it's based on the outer case shape (among a lot of other things most likely).

    All the III's have the same basic shape, and they are only incremental upgrades to the previous III. The new ones have a different case colour, but that about it as far as I could tell from its general appearance.

    Now the V, and the Vx (which is basically a V w/8Mb ram) have a completely different shape. The case is aluminum, etc. Not only that, but it tries to appeal to a completely different market than the III series, even though on the inside they are pretty much identical (I could never get CPU speeds, but I'm assuming they're not too different)

    And the VII, it looks different, again and it also has wireless communication built-in. It _is_ the most advanced of the Palms, or at least was untill the IIIc and IIIxe came out.

    My point is that basically the new III's are a lot closer to the III-series than any other of the palms, bfor the only thing different about them is the colour screen and black case. So that's why they've named then accordingly.

  29. Re:When will Handspring follow? by \.org · · Score: 2

    Yah I totally agree that color is VERY cool. But I mean come on, how much more functionality is there in a color palm? The answer is none. Black and white is fine with me and my handspring visor. I love this thing, color or not. They have a list of all the modules coming out now too on their website with the distributer's websites etc... Buy a visor, and wait about 6 months, this thing is going to be every the palm isn't and more. http://www.handspring.com (handspring website) http://www.sem.samsung.co.kr/eng/product/digital/p da/index.htm (a color linux PDA that looks amazing) -Devin-

  30. 256!?!?!? by Electric+Angst · · Score: 2

    That's just not enough color!
    Why must Palm torment us so! Teasing us with these medium-grade color options. We want to see our telephone organizer and callendar in 32 bit True-Color, damnit!
    Okay, I've been up way too long. This will seem far less funny after a cup of coffee...

    --
    Feminism is the wild notion that women are human beings.
  31. black and white vs color by mmoin · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one who likes the idea of a black and white display on a PDA? In my opinion, a PDA should be kept as simple as possible. I mean, most likely, the reason to buy a PDA is to make you more efficient. Microsoft lost sight of that with their whole multimedia initiative with CE, and I hope that Palm isn't going down that path. I used to own an E-100, but sold it because I was finding that it was really no better for organization than my old Palm Pilot.
    -Andrew

  32. Look close... by Matts · · Score: 3

    If you look close at the two pictures: color and b/w you'll see that the color screen is quite a bit smaller (or it certainly appears to be to me - either that or the color palm is much bigger overall). That's got to suck readability-wise. I know it's quite comfortable reading a long text on my Palm V, but anything smaller would make it a real eye strain. Anyone got one yet who can give a review?

    --

    Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
    1. Re:Look close... by Malic · · Score: 4

      According to the PDF's...

      Palm IIIxe = 4.7" x 3.2" x 0.7", 6.0 oz.
      Palm IIIc = 5.06" x 3.17" x 0.67", 6.8 oz.

      ...so, the color model is *slightly* narrower and shorter, but a bit longer. It's a bit hard to tell what the screen size difference is without having one in front of me.

      Still, color is "nice but not necessary". I think a paper white high res grayscale Palm V would be the coolest personally.
      --

      --
      I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
  33. Accessories by bgdarnel · · Score: 3

    Palm also released some new accessories today, including the folding keyboard discussed here a while ago (made by Think Outside but sold under the Palm brand) and a digital camera attachment. They've also added an unlimited-use plan for the Palm VII.

  34. An Active Matrix screen makes it less useful by deusx · · Score: 3

    I don't know about you, but I actually use my Handspring a lot while I'm outside and out & about. I also use it in a lot of highly-lit areas. In fact, I *love* my Handspring's new reflective screen (versus my old Palm III's murky screen), and that it's pretty much readable under the same conditions as a book.

    Now... my laptop and the WinCE PDA my boss just took back to Best Buy both have active matrix screens. You can't see either of them in sunlight outside, bright overhead light inside, or anywhere where the ambient light is brighter than that of the screen.

    That sucks. Because a PDA is meant for quick, always available use. Not at your desk, but Out There when you get your ideas and make your meetings.

    And as far as I'm concerned, and active matrix screen hampers that.

  35. Re:When will Handspring follow? by rde · · Score: 3

    OK, color Palm is cool. Perhaps; that's what they said about the colour game boy. Have you tried playing tetris in low light on a colour gb? It's damn difficult. I love my palm (so to speak), and I can't really imagine life improving because of colour. It's indispensible, but only for text and books. Game-boy-off-topic-aside: upon buying the aforementioned GB, the sales drone insisted that I needed a copy of Pokemon. The conversation went something like this: SD:Pokemon is only IR30. ME:I don't want pokemon. I want tetris. SD:But Pokemon is really popular. YOu can use it to play against other players. ME:I'm thirty fucking years old. How many ten-year-old pokemon players do you think I know. SD:BUt it's very good. ME:Look, I'm only buying this because I want something portable that I can play tetris on. I'm buying tetris, not the game boy. SD:But you can still play Pokemon. ME:Are you getting a commission? Or are you secretly working for Team Rocket? SD:What? ME:Never mind. Just give me tetris. SD:Okay. Are you sure you don't want pokemon as well?

  36. Re:RAM vs Color by noeld · · Score: 3
    In the meantime, its nice that PALM is putting more RAM into the PDA's. But on the other hand, isn't 2MB more than you will ever need?

    I have a Handspring Visor with 8MB of memory and have had no problem filling this up. 2MB would be plenty for todo lists phone numbers etc. But is soon used up when you start putting books and reference materials on it.

    I would want more memory much more than color. What does color give you? With more memory I can have more indormation in my pocket.

    What made me buy one of these things is that it that they are more than an organizer they are a pocket sized computer.

    I am however looking forward to the pocket sized, voice controlled linux box. (That is cheap enough that I can stick it in my pocket without having nightmares.)

    Noel

    RootPrompt.org -- Nothing but Unix