Slashdot Mirror


White House E-Mail Hidden From Justice Dept.

TheSimon writes: "A former White House contractor, Betty Lambuth, alleged in court papers unsealed Friday that she was threatened not to reveal a problem with the White House e-mail system that concealed thousands of messages from the Justice Department and congressional investigators. Here's the full story from foxnews.com." This makes an interesting counterpoint to the calls for eliminating Internet anonymity by the same adminstration.

107 comments

  1. White HAUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're the proud -
    The few -
    Descendents rockin' alone tonight
    We're the proud -
    The few -
    Descendents pickin' our butts tonight

    We're looking for a few good men...degenerates need not apply

    also important is the shipment of HOT GRITS due in today.

  2. Re:Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll give you a reason (and a damned good one, at that):
    There's no such thing as anonmymous.
    However, there is such a thing as HOT GRITS.

  3. I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this post deserves a -1.

  4. fox news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fox news? The "real" story? Since when? This is Fox, people. When was the last time you believed and/or trusted their sensationalized crap?

    1. Re:fox news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox news has tendency to report the truth more than any other media agency. They don't care about impressing politicians, just reporting the facts.

    2. Re:fox news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox News is better than most.

    3. Re:fox news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which sure ain't saying much.

  5. Re:Clinton Administration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only change is going to be if George W. Bush is elected, I think that he'ld be the best person for the presidency, other than me of course. Al Gore will just continue on his path of pathological destruction and eventual overthrow by his cabiniet due to his inevitable obvious insanity.

  6. Re:Some additional articles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, and the Washington Times is a highly unbiased source of news. ;-)

    BTW for all you people who keep posting that the Clinton administration is engagiing in all this "illegal activity", _every_ administration does lots of things that aren't perfect. Not saying that's good, but its true. And the republicans have been digging up everything they can possibly find against the Clinton administration, so that's the only reason these probably minor things look so bad.

  7. HaHa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The number of emails exceeds 100,000, and it includes stuff written by Clinton, Gore, Hillary, and stuff directing Linda Tripps' personnel files to be given to the press. Love letters to Monica, and other neat stuff.

    This is as bad for Gore as it was for Ollie North. Shades of deleted Profs messages!

    What it means is Janet Reno LIED to a judge. Not only that, Reno threatened to jail the discovers with trumped up charges if they talked.

    Two of the discovers' tales are on the drudgereport.com as of 3pmEST Sat.

    You know what the lame excuse was? The mail server was really labelled MAIL2 when they were looking for Mail2. Ha ha. See how this one is covered up.

  8. What? Politicians are two face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG I could have never believed it. I thought if you could trust anyone it would be the White House. I am so fucking devastated. My whole value system is in shock. I do not know what to believe anymore....

    1. Re:What? Politicians are two face by bob2cam · · Score: 1

      Me too! To think that someone would do something like this...And right in the middle of the primaries. I think I'll just go out and shoot myself...

  9. OLD NEWS ..no shit I submitted this in May 99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THEY ARE STEALING MY BRAIN!!!!

  10. Politicians...crooks...hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS IS NOT FUCKING NEWS
    News would be an honest politician that doesnt lie or speak out of two sides of his mouth...
    GET A FUCKING GRIP!!!!

  11. Re:Clinton/Gore == so many lies, so little time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you will be voting for another crook, who perhaps is even more dangerous then Bill, Al Tipper, and Billary. Better read up on your President Bush's son before you press that voting button. George W. Bush Jr. - The Republicians Bill Clinton.

  12. OT - What a shitty movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah, i saw it last night, and it sucked more than suck can suck.
    And what the hell is up with that jetpack/fuel scene? i was under the impression that since there is no air in space, there is no friction either. so one wouldn't have to continuously fire their jets to maintain speed. am i correct or what?

  13. Just a quick reminder: Bill Clinton is a rapist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Clinton raped and battered Juanita Broaddrick in 1978. Obviously, he is willing to obstruct justice and withhold subpoenaed evidence too.

    1. Re:Just a quick reminder: Bill Clinton is a rapist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one of many...

    2. Re:Just a quick reminder: Bill Clinton is a rapist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only two people know for sure. Personally I think Ms. Broaddrick is more credible.

    3. Re:Just a quick reminder: Bill Clinton is a rapist by Mike+A. · · Score: 1
      With all due respect to Juanita Broaddrick, I can't just accept this as the gospel truth. Yes, Clinton may have a history of being lying scum, but he's still innocent until proven guilty. I can't see how anyone not immediately and personally involved in this alleged rape can ever expect to know what "really" happened.

      I can only hope that the guilty party, whichever one it is, gets what's coming to them in the afterlife, because justice is unlikely to be served in this one.

      --

      --
      Do I look like I speak for my employer?
    4. Re:Just a quick reminder: Bill Clinton is a rapist by Mike+A. · · Score: 1

      If we weighed the two on an even balance, I'd be inclined to agree; although I'd rather say that Ms. Broaddrick is (to me) an unknown who gets the default level of credibility, whereas Mr. Clinton has a history which drops his credibility below that level. When it comes to matters of law, though, the balance is put in favor of the accused; and I tend to follow that particular balance in my day-to-day judgments. That's all I'm saying - innocent until proven guilty.

      --

      --
      Do I look like I speak for my employer?
  14. "campaign finance reform" hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can hypocritical can liberal Democrats get? They want "campaign finance reform" to overturn the First Amendment and outlaw participation by corporate America in the political process, yet they turn a blind eye to illegal campaign contributions to their own party from the communist Chinese government! And what did the Chinese get in return? Ever heard of the Cox Report--or do you get your news from the Clinton News Network?

    Just because the Injustice Dept covered it up, that doesn't mean it didn't happen, folks. The $64,000 question this fall will be whether the American public is ignorant enough to fall for this duplicity.

    Russ P.

    1. Re:"campaign finance reform" hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I seem to remember reading it was one of these American corporations that recently tranferred all sorts of missile technology to the despotic, totalitarian regime in China.

      Democracy has to be based on individual participation. Multinational corporations are only too eager to sell out the home country in order to boost profits.

    2. Re:"campaign finance reform" hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrespective of the personalities involved (and I'd be the first to agree Bill Clinton is a despicably crooked politician), don't you see a problem with the `participation by corporate America in the political process', which basically amounts to legalised bribery? It's already allowed advanced American military technology (which is way ahead of anything anywhere else) to fall into the hands of one of the most evil and dangerous regimes in the world today.

    3. Re:"campaign finance reform" hypocrisy by Zico · · Score: 2

      Yes, but the American corporation that you're talking about is Loral. The head of Loral, Bernard Schwartz, was the single largest contributor to Bill Clinton's 1996 re-election campaign.

      Cheers,
      ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

  15. Re:Election-time scandals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    NASA made the announcement on the day the scientific papers were published. This is the acceptable practice in the scientific community.

    So you better extend your X-Files conspiracty theory to include the publishers of Science (AAAS) and Nature. Note: Nature is a British Journal so you better extend your theory to include the Brits.

    dork

  16. looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you were wrong! (so far)

  17. Re:Interesting timing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yours is a fair comment as far as it goes, but it leaves out an important point. Iran-Contra was a cover-up of actions perpetrated in the interest, if completely misguided, of national security. Dutch was fight gang-gum commies. Clinton's transgressions are driven by the need to cover his ass.

  18. Re:Interesting timing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Clinton scandals didn't get traction only because he has the mainstream media in his back pocket. Of the dozen or so major Clinton scandals, about half a dozen of them would have been sufficient by themselves to bring down a Republican administration. Remember Jaunita Broaddrick? How about "Chinagate," not to mention "filegate," "travelgate," and of course "Paulagate." That's just the beginning. Russ P.

  19. Re:Interesting timing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, try these on for combination:

    * Columbian Drug War
    * Sale of intact computer systems from nuclear
    facilities to China.
    * Chineese foreign nationalists buying the DNC.

    I think that covers the drugs, weapons, and
    espionage. You can count the tax burden as
    hostage deals if you wish

  20. Re:anonimity? what's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are tons of compelling evidence out there. Just got to look for it.

  21. Lambuth and Lamberth ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anybody notice that???? weird....

  22. Suspicious Clinton suicides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.everwonder.com/david/suspicious.html

  23. Re:Over-Sensationalized Journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me see, emails from 1996 don't concern you much. Hmmm, let me see. You're a Unagore fan right? Do you also endorse the Clipper chip and a federal crypto key escrow program as the Unagore does? If you want to you can check out the crypto stuff for yourself at that this right wing hate site: www-s wiss. ai.mit.edu/6095/articles/clipper/short-pieces/gore -july20.txt
    After you're done there go take the test: Unabomber or the Unagore?

  24. Re:Interesting timing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You my friend haven't looked very closely at this administration. Sandy Berger the National Security Advisor, you know what his job was before he was appointed by Clinton? He was a lobbyist for the Chinese! You wonder why he never listened to the security experts at the Dept. of Energy when they came to him and said that the Chinese were stealing nuke plans? Hazel O'Leary Clinton's original appointee to the DoE was actually giving out plans to the W-87 warhead. No kidding! She actually gave one to a Newsweek reporter. And get this, she hired a 3rd party security firm to watch DoE labs. Hmm, the security company was a foreign company and you guessed it, owned by the Chinese oligarchy. And you'll never guess, she now works for that particular company. And before you go off on the usual techno-dweed, all the world's a wonderful place and only we are evil, check out the Newsweek archive and look this stuff up yourself. And don't forget about SGI getting slapped for exporting supercomputers to China. Whoops! Here comes Clintoon to the rescue... he signed waivers getting them off the hook. And before you go crazy, frothing at the mouth screaming about the terrible export regulations you have to understand that the Chinese used those supercomputers not to predict the weather but to actually test and build the neutron bomb which they stold/purchased? from this administration. The United States has never even built that design! We know they've tested it. Their testing showed up on USGS seismology reports. Just as India's and Pakistan's testing. We could also talk about North Korea and how Madeline Nobright assured us that N. Korea stopped developing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. Turns out that they haven't stopped development. Infact they're stepping it up. With the missle technology disseminated from China they're upgrading their Taepo Dong II ballistic missle creating a new class.. The Taepo Dong III. This missle will be able to reach the mainland U.S. Oh, we can't forget that this same tech used to put up sattelites from China came from Loral and Hughes. You know, they're the companies that Clinton signed the Executive Orders to allow such exports. You may have forgotten about Johnny Chung and John Huang. Both have testified that Clinton signed waivers and orders in exchange for Chinese money. If you don't believe me go check out their sites yourself. Oh, almost forgot, the Taepo Dong missle is the one N. Korea fired over Japan. Don't forget that Kim Johg Il, president of North Korea is a psychopath. That's not just me saying that but profilers from the British Intelligence Agencies, the CIA and the FBI. I know what you're going to try, who can trust those guys?! Well, don't get your panties in a bunch, I'm sure you don't have anything to prove to the contrary. His people are starving and dying by the thousands daily from hunger and he develops nukes and missle tech to support his two million man army. Oh yea, forgot Regan's administration was so corrupt.

  25. What if MS did the same thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if, instead of the Tainted House refusing to cooperate with investigators, it was MS doing the same? Would the same people trying to excuse it by saying "no big deal" or "everyone does it" say the same?

    Despite the problems in this world, I do try and come down on the side of fairness: all consipiring monopolies should be taken to task, especially when they refuse to cooperate in an investigation.

  26. Submitted this on 2000-03-10 19:28:19 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As well as another rejected article that was posted today. Oh well, guess it was not important yet.

  27. stupid republican lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is slashdot being used to spread Bush campaign lies? If Bush gets elected you can count on the economy going to hell- republicans always screw up the economy. Say goodbye to your high-paying jobs.... once the republicans wreck the economy wages will go back to crap again.

    1. Re:stupid republican lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who let this Unagore troll in here?

    2. Re:stupid republican lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you honestly think a president simply goes round sprinkling his pixie dust to create jobs and manage the economy? Economies are primarily managed my central banks, and when the central bank is independent (as the Federal Reserve is in the USA), the politicians are largely powerless. They can still spend recklessly (forcing the central bank to raise interest rates), but in the American system, the legislative branch controls taxation and spending, so, apart from the fact that he appoints members and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, the president is basically irrelevant.

      Alan Greenspan, the current Chairman of the Federal Reserve (appointed by Ronald Reagan, I believe), has had only a minor recession (1990-91) during his fairly lenghty term of office, and even that was a result of the spike in oil prices caused by the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Under his stewardship, the American economy appears to be doing very well indeed. Unfortunately, it also shows all the signs of being affected by an asset bubble, of the sort the Japanese ran into in the 1980s. Some of us would say Mr Greenspan has let this bubble economy roar out of control, with inflation artificially held down by the Asian financial crisis. Of course, if he has, the hapless individual who happens to be president when the bubble bursts will almost certainly take the blame for it.

  28. NOT INFORMATIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Washington Times" is a right-wing republican mouthpiece.

  29. Re:anonimity? what's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now that you've proven you know, you're next. Watch your back my good man. Have a nice night.

  30. Re:Interesting timing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main reaon that Nixon put our forces on alert was tha Israel was threatening to nuke the Arabs and the USSR was threatening to nuke Israel. Nixon had far more reason to do what he did than Clinton did. IMHO Archibald Cox should have laid low while the '73 war was going on.

  31. Re:Factory in Sudan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was a pharmaceuticals factory. Was Osama making heroin there?

  32. Re:Dirt and Drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > What's to stop anyone from recovering the same data before it was encrypted?

    If you use filesystem-level encryption (e.g. NTFS encryption in Windows NT/2000), the information is encrypted before its written. I don't know if you can encrypt the page file, though, so it might still be possible to recover information that was paged out at some point prior to being written to an encrypted file.

  33. Re:Clinton Administration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why yes, Tweedle Dee is ever so much better than that nasty old Tweedle Dum.

  34. Some additional articles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    A few articles from the Washington Times:

    White House e-mails are verified

    "Officials at Northrop Grumman Corp. have confirmed that thousands of White House e-mails containing information on "Filegate," campaign finance abuses, "Chinagate" and Monica Lewinsky were never turned over to a federal grand jury or three congressional committees despite pending subpoenas."

    White House issued threats

    "Five Northrop Grumman employees were so intimidated by White House threats of jail that one was nearly fired when she refused to tell her own bosses about the administration's failure to turn over thousands of e-mail messages under subpoena."
  35. Overheard Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    "It's good to be the King."
    --Bill Clinton
  36. The "Clinton deaths" have been debunked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For a critical analysis of this oft-forwarded spam, check out this page.

    1. Re:The "Clinton deaths" have been debunked by finkployd · · Score: 2

      This is interesting reading. The list HAS gotten out of control and yes, some of it is most likely fake. However, there is a good portion that CAN (and has been) verified. Sure, the extreamists have added (on some lists) just about everyone in Arkensas who has died!

      Like any politically motivated document, it must be taked with a grain of salt. I've personally looked into some of the names and found the claims to be baseless, others have been supported by traditional media and court and/or medial records. The strange claims of the Clinton appointed medical examiners is well covered in their local paper (decapitations ruled as "death by natural causes", people with multiple gunshot wounds to the body and head ruled as suicides, etc.)

      Last, Vince Foster's case is strange in that almost everyone associated with the investigation has a different story of what happened. Only the FBI believes it to be a suicide, the park police began investigating it as a murder given that there was no weapon near the body. When the FBI took over, they announced the discovery of a gun and a suicide note (verfied by handwriting experts and his family as not being from him)

      Ron Brown is an even stranger case. The Tribune Review (a major Pittsburgh paper) ran a story on the Air Force medical examiners where they told that he had a gunshot wound to the head and a "metal storm" of bullet fragments inside that hole. Their findings were taken by investigators higher up and they were told to forget what they saw. Now these are MDs with the Air Force, not some redneck militia guy who carries a gun for when the UN invades us :)

      Like any story of this nature, it's to be taken with a grain of salt. Many of what I've read about the Iran-Contra scandel has been blown way out of proportion on the web also, that doesn't mean that it didn't happen.

      Finkployd

  37. hmm... by rbf · · Score: 1

    They should hire me to do the work, I'll put Debian GNU/Linux and FreeBSD on everything! :)

    rbf aka pulsar

  38. Hypocrisy by dattaway · · Score: 2

    So its ok for the elite to have private email, but encryption might be dangerous in the hands of law abiding citizens.

  39. Re:Old news again by N8F8 · · Score: 2
    You are preaching to the choir. What I don't get is what all the big fuss is about since with all that I have read about this beyond a potential abstruction of justice charge against a former WihteHouse employee. The actual content of any withheld e-mails has yet to be released. If none of them are relevent then what is all the fuss about. Even worse, just as I hated to see Ollie Notrh go down because of the orders of the Commander in Chief, I don't like to see a Whithouse employee get burned for the sins of the President. If I were working for Reagan and he said, "Make sure noone hears about these new e-mails" I wouldn't whistleblow. Not that I could ever feel loayaly to a scumbag like Clinton.

    But if you think Bush will be any better take a look at this website: GeorgeBush2000.com. I'm sure a bunch of it is fudging statistics and judging his record based on the current conditions in Texas versus Texas before he became governor. But the insider trading stuff is a little scary and has a ring of thuth to it.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  40. Old news again by N8F8 · · Score: 3

    This has been on the Drudge Report for days. I'm still having a hard time deciphering what the point is. I have yet to see a calculation of the number of E-Mails discovered vs the number turned over to the special prosecutor. Not to mention the number with relevent content.

    Without knowing if any of the e-mails had relevent content I'd say this is just a case of drudging up more dirt to use against Gore. As far as this being relevent to a discussion of anonymity it will never be allowed for official government correspondence. There are requirements for retaining documents and security regulations. On the other hand, the use of internet e-mail services would have to be curtailed.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Old news again by pnatural · · Score: 1

      >I'm still having a hard time deciphering what the point is.

      could it be OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE? i.e., the same thing that nixon did?

      the clinton/gore whitehouse has repeatidly acted as if the laws of the US do not apply to them, and when caught, have used every means possible to keep themselves in power.

      THAT'S the point.

    2. Re:Old news again by HancockDC · · Score: 1
      Old news again (Score:2) by N8F8 on Saturday March 11, @04:18PM EDT (#8) (User Info) This has been on the Drudge Report for days. I'm still having a hard time deciphering what the point is. I have yet to see a calculation of the number of E-Mails discovered vs the number turned over to the special prosecutor. Not to mention the number with relevent content.

      Without knowing if any of the e-mails had relevent content I'd say this is just a case of drudging up more dirt to use against Gore. If I read the AP story correctly, the issues are:

      1. A number of messages were kept on a system that was not part of the global backup/indexing system, and thus not subject to a full-text search.
      2. The contract employee was allegedly notified that the existence of these files was NOT to be divulged, and some specific threats of dismissal, arrext, and prosecution were made.
      3. Some of the messages in question are said to relate to Gore's fundraising, Lewinsky, and other sensitive topics.
      Is any of this true? Who knows?

      Is it worthy of discussion? Ask your self what the answer would be if the players were different.

      Consider the ramifications if Alexander Butterfield had been told by Haldeman and Ehrlichman to keep his bloody mouth shut about the existence of a White House taping system back in 1973.
      -----------------------------------------

      --
      -----------------------------------------
      Computeri non cogitant, ergo non sunt
  41. Re:Over-Sensationalized Journalism by timotten · · Score: 1

    Every once in a while I need a swift kick in the ass to remind me why, for political news, I don't turn to slashdot, Fox News, the Drudge Report, or any of a dozen other sources frowned upon by my friends. That disturbing picture was just the kick I needed.

    According to everybody's favorite 'lynx -source http://... > grep Gore', Gore is mentioned five times on that page

    1) The indep clause of the lead: "Al Gore's 1996 campaign fund-raising was back in the news Friday."

    2) The caption: "Some of the e-mails allegedly involve Vice President Gore's involvement in campaign finance controversies."

    3) Once in the article: "Lambuth claims a subordinate told her some of the e-mails deal with 'Vice President Al Gore's involvement in campaign fund-raising controversies' ...."

    4) The phrase "Clinton-Gore re-election campaign"

    5) The phrase "Clinton-Gore White House"

    Very little of the article's substance is actually about Al Gore. Instances four and five are superfluous because "Clinton White House" and "Clinton re-election campaign" are more common phrases. Instance two is a copy of instance three, and both are based on hearsay. Instance one is meaningless media-reporting-on-media fluff.

    Certainly, a connection between lost email about legal misconduct and Al Gore would be important, but -- despite all the author's implications -- the article hardly deals with Al Gore on a substantive level. The point may seem obvious, but it must be understood if we are to interpret the picture.

    The picture shows an ugly image of Al Gore waving and looking to his right. The blue backdrop suggests that he is speaking at some event to some "Puerto Rican/Hispanic" group. (Of course, you can't actually tell, and the caption doesn't explain the picture.) The article does not tell me a blessed thing about Al Gore's relations with Puerto Ricans or Hispanics, about the event, about hand-waving, or about looking to the right. The picture has absolutely nothing to do with the article, except this: The article weakly references Al Gore a few times, and the picture tells us what Al Gore looks like. And boy does he look ugly!

    Thank you Fox News, but I see Al Gore's picture all over the place. I don't really care how long you can sift through wired images to find an unflattering shot.

    There are lots of useful ways to avoid gray matter, and that picture was not one of them. Betty Lambuth is a new person to me, and I'd like to know how she looks. I'm not sure I understand who Lambuth's boss is, or how she fits into that strange buraucracy of White House officials and extra-governmental contractors. A diagram would really help. Heck, a timeline comparing the email system to allegations of misconduct would be nice.

    Tim

  42. Re:Dirt and Drives by PD · · Score: 1

    Drilling a hole through the drive will not destroy your data. Even if you chop your hard drive into little one inch squares, with the densities of media nowadays, each chunk will contain a few gigabytes of data. Believe me, those little chunks can be easily read.

  43. Hehehehe by DavidTC · · Score: 1
    He is not a bad president like Nixon. If he were they would have impeached him by now.

    Am I the only who cracked up laughing when I read this? Hey, pay attention, they did impeach him...sheesh, these kids today. :)

    -David T. C.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  44. Election-time scandals by VValdo · · Score: 2

    Myself, I'm very skeptical of scandals which bubble to the surface during elections...just as I'm skeptical of the fact that NASA announces a new major "discovery" about Mars on the same day a Mars-related movie (for which NASA was a consultant) is making its premiere.

    Timing, timing.

    W
    -------------------

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  45. Re:Over-Sensationalized Journalism by finkployd · · Score: 1

    look at the picture of Al Gore in the Fundraising article. That's just offensive.

    Sorry to offend you, but that's what he looks like. It's not written anywhere that every photo a news org prints has to be of you best side.

    Emails from 1996 don't concern me much.

    Me neither, considering that there are many more recent alligations of illegal campaign fundraising.

    Finkployd

  46. Re:anonimity? what's that? by finkployd · · Score: 1

    Some 70+ of clinton's business partners and "close" friends have died in very strange events. Would you come forward without being very carefull about it? Besides, perhaps she just waited until election time to come put with this on purpose, does that make what the clinton whitehouse did any better?

    Finkployd

  47. Re:anonimity? what's that? by finkployd · · Score: 2

    Don't forget that David Letterman almost died after Hillary visited. :-)

    She must have planted some anthrytax in his coffee :)

    Finkployd

  48. Re:anonimity? what's that? by finkployd · · Score: 2

    I wonder why the documents were unsealed. I wonder why they were sealed.

    As to why they werer unsealed, I have no idea. That is something I would like to have learned in the article, but they made no mention.

    As to why they were sealed, I also don't know, but it's in keeping with this administration's policy of complete secrecy. Of course, they are also the most investigated admin in history (assumption), so I'd imagine I'd be sealing stuff too, knowing that everyone is coming after me. However, the actions on each side just fuel the actions on the other.

    I still don't see any connection to Internet anonymity (timothy's claim, not yours).

    I don't either, I suspect Timothy just wanted to post this and somehow justify it :)

    Finkployd

  49. Old news by finkployd · · Score: 3

    If you in any way suprised that the Clinton Whitehouse got caught hiding documents from investigators, then you must not have been paying attention for the last 7+ years.

    If there has been any consistancy in this administration at all, it has been their willingness to destroy/lose/play dumb about every document that has been requested in their back to back illegal activities. But they tell us the economy is good, so let him do what ever he wants right?

    Finkployd

  50. Re:anonimity? what's that? by finkployd · · Score: 5

    Instead, substantiate your claims with facts. Care to provide references?

    Foster - (Suicide, right)
    Ron Brown

    Now for the ones you don't know about

    Kevin Ives & Don Henry: Initial cause of death was reported to be the result of falling asleep on a railroad track in Arkansas on August 23, 1987. This ruling was reported by the State medical examiner Fahmy Malak. Later it was determined that Kevin died from a crushed skull prior to being placed on the tracks. Don had been stabbed in the back. Rumors indicate that they might have stumbled upon a Mena drug operation.

    James Milam: Milam had information on the Ives & Henry deaths. He was decapitated. The state Medical examiner, Fahmy Malak, initially ruled death due to natural causes.

    Paul Tully: Tulley was on the Democratic National Committee. He was found dead of unknown causes in his hotel room on September 24, 1992. No autopsy
    was ever allowed.

    Steve Willis, Robert Williams, Todd McKeahan & Conway LeBleu: Died Feburary 28, 1993 by gunfire at Waco. All four were examined by a pathologist and died from identical wounds to the left temple. All four had been body guards for Bill Clinton, three while campaigning for President and when he was Governor of Arkansas. They also were the ONLY 4 BATF agents killed at Waco.

    Sgt. Brian Haney, Sgt. Tim Sabel, Maj. William Barkley, Capt. Scott Reynolds: Died: May 19, 1993 - All four men died when their helicopter crashed in the woods near Quantico, Va. - Reporters were barred from the site, and the head of the fire department responding to the crash described it by saying, "Security was tight," with "lots of Marines with guns." A videotape made by a firefighter was seized by the Marines. All four men had escorted Clinton on his flight to the carrier Roosevelt shortly before their deaths.

    John Wilson: Found dead from an apparent hanging suicide on May 18, 1993. He was a former Washington DC council member and claimed to have info on Whitewater.

    Jerry Luther Parks: Parks was the Chief of Security for Clinton's national campaign headquarters in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car on September 26, 1993 near the intersection of Chenal Parkway and Highway 10 west of Little Rock. Parks was shot through the rear window of his car. The assailant then pulled around to the driver's side of Park's car and shot him three more times with a 9mm pistol. His family reported that shortly before his death, they were being followed by unknown persons, and their home had been broken into (despite a top quality alarm system). Parks had been compiling a dossier on Clinton's illicit activities. The dossier was stolen.

    Barbara Wise: Wise a 14-year Commerce Department employee found dead and partially naked in her office following a long weekend. She worked in the same section as John Huang. Officially, she is said to have died of natural causes.

    Jim McDougal: Bill and Hillary Clinton friend, banker, and political ally, sent to prison for eighteen felony convictions. A key whitewater witness, dies of a heart attack on March, 8 1998. As of this writing allegations that he was given an injection of the diuretic lasix has not been denied or confirmed. Died on March 8, 1998

    There are dozens more, look on the web. Yes, most of this is from right wing sites, but some of the better ones provide news paper and offical document links or images to back this up. Not that Clinton is to blame for any of this, it's just he has had more friends die in suspicious circumstances than I have friends.

    Assuming she believed the alleged threats to be credible, what has changed? If there was something for her to fear then, there is surely something for her to fear now. Why the sudden change of mind?

    She gave this deposition several years ago (if you read the story), only recently have then been unsealed. She hasn't "come forward" publicly at all. Please read the story before you assume this is just an opportunist trying to hurt Gore, she had nothing to do with the timing of the unsealing of court documents.

    Anyways, in this instance, what exactly did the Clinton whitehouse do?

    Allegedly, they hid evidence (nothing new). Other than that, I'm not sure what you mean.

    Finkployd

  51. Uh huh... by Graymalkin · · Score: 3

    the large number of ...'s in the article make me suspicious about the accuracy of some of the statements. Here is an example:
    I had heard rumours that we had threated to format the staffer's hard drives, this is simply untrue.
    Now after a legal edition:
    "... we had threatened to format the staffer's hard drives ..."
    Two entirely different statements with entirely different connotations.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  52. Re:Factory in Sudan by Zico · · Score: 2

    Here's a link to a New York Times article which raises serious doubts, including the doubts within the administration itself, about the legitimacy of the Sudan bombing raid.

    Cheers,
    ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

  53. I could clean that drive quite easily. by Otto · · Score: 1

    the NSA can recover data 16 rewrites or formats deep on a HDD. I know firsthand of eight layers, while in the Navy we had a HDD with data from two crash investigations stolen by a contractor, who used it for 2 months before it was recovered. We sent it in (I was told later to the NSA labs), and the data was recovered through 8 format/rewrites. Has to do with track edges and the head mechanism not tracking perfectly every time.

    Yes, that's a normal method. You can do it with diskettes too. Even broken ones (as in pieces).

    However, give me half an hour with a disk that I want to be sure no-one will ever see, and it will never be seen by any means whatsoever. Could be as simple as running it thru an alternating magnetic flux (with a nice big coil and a lot of juice), depending on the disk. Might even have to build some minor circuts to do some wacky stuff with magnetic fields, but it's not hard to do, if you really really want to. And hell, there's always the rotary sander. Grind that sucker into dust. Let 'em try to read those pieces. :-)

    Anyway, the point IS that anyone can remove electronically stored evidence if they want to remove it.

    Ah well. I'm rambling now..


    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:I could clean that drive quite easily. by RancidPickle · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, you are totally correct in that anyone can truly kill a HDD so noone can recover it. My favorite is the belt sander then Davey Jones locker approach. Most folks, however, want to save the HDD if it works, so they'll think that they can get away with just reformatting /U and reloading opsys. Those are the ones who get caught :)

      Zapping it with huge mag fields will usually kill the drive, at least that's my experience when killing drives with confidential info. Spark-gapping it also works, but kills the drive. When trying to re-use the drive, start with encrypted and stay with it if it's something you want to keep secret, unless you live in the United Kingdom, where it'll now be illegal to not turn over the decryption key (even if you really forgot it).

      --
      "First things first, but not necessarily in that order."
      - Doctor Who
  54. AP, right wing? by roboneal · · Score: 1

    The photo credit attributes this not to Fox News but to the Associated Press, hardly a bastion of the "vast right wing conspiracy".

    The fact I thought it was funny as hell also doesn't make me a card carrying member of the conspiracy, but I've been to a few of the meetings. :)

    -- Rob O'Neal

  55. Re:Interesting timing. by Mike+A. · · Score: 1

    All I can say is, just because people can blow a lot of smoke doesn't mean there's a fire.

    --

    --
    Do I look like I speak for my employer?
  56. Re:Over-Sensationalized Journalism by ChadN · · Score: 1
    This is undoubtably the most corrupt administration we have ever had.


    That is a bold statement... Just look at the last few administrations. I can still not believe Bush (Sr.) could pardon his co-conspirators and not have received a public lashing. (At Christmas time... BRILLIANT!)


    As for Gore... Well, I weep for the future. We'll see how well he does without help from the Federal reserve.


    And Bush jr.? Why not just eliminate the middleman and vote for Texaco as president?

    --
    "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
  57. Re:anonimity? what's that? by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    Don't forget that David Letterman almost died after Hillary visited. :-)

  58. Re:Dirt and Drives by tiny69 · · Score: 1
    Secondly, the NSA can recover data 16 rewrites or formats deep on a HDD. I know firsthand of eight layers,

    [ snip ]

    Remember, encryption of drives works better if you don't want to be caught.

    If they can recover information after eight formats, do you really think that encrypting your HD will stop them?

    --
    Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
  59. Correct use of the apostrophe(OT) by e-gold · · Score: 1

    The decline of English teaching has coincided with the rise of the internet, and it's probably possible to get through "journalism school" and get hired without even being as good at writing as I am (and I'm not great, believe me). It's sad.
    JMR

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  60. Re:Old news >> is REALLY OLD NEWS by Kool+Moe · · Score: 1

    Ya, ya, ya...
    Look everyone, I agree that the Clinton administration is FAR from honest. I'm sure they're being as sneaky and underhanded as they can get away with (or can't) in order to do what they feel they 'have' to do -whether you or I believe it's in the country's best interest or not.

    Thing is, what has changed? Certainly NOT the integrity of the Presidency (aside from public view of), nor the federal government in general. I have no way of proving this, but history surely indicates that the Fed. Gov't has done such sneaky and underhanded deals since its inception!

    What HAS changed is our ability to learn about such things. With all the high-handed morality of the 50's, you think that JFK's mob connections and philandering WOULDN'T have caused national scandal?

    Iran/Contra. Watergate. Viet Nam. McCarthyism.Slavery..all the way back to when our government cheated, lied, and mass-murdered the Native Americans two centuries ago...

    And fill in here _______ the wrongful government behavior you like to comment on.

    Perhaps the ability of our traditional and NONtraditional media will have the effect of restoring the integrity of our government. But until that's true, I'm pretty sick of people saying 'well, THIS administration takes the cake!'. Whatever. They're just as sneaky as everyone else, with better tools. Our job is to make sure our tools counter that as often as possible to keep the balance.
    Clinton's Admin sucked, Reagan's Admin sucked, (Carter was a god), Ford/Nixon's Admin sucked...before that I was too young to care ;)

    And here's to AL GORE's Admin sucking- but at least it'll keep our water drinkable and air breathable.
    ---

    --
    Kinda like Moe, but just a little more Kool
  61. Re:anonimity? what's that? by aufait · · Score: 1
    How come she has only come forward now, during an election year?

    According to the article, her testimoney was unsealed. There was no mention in the article of when she actually made the statements.

    --
    I feel like picking a fight with everyone who thinks they are right. - Rainmakers
  62. Re:Interesting timing. by aufait · · Score: 1
    he difference between that scandal and the so-called "Clinton scandals" is that Iran/Contra ended up amounting to more than a hill of beans. Power was truly abused in the Iran/Contra scandal.

    I think the bombing of the factory in Sudan ranks up there, as abuse of power, as the stuff done during Watergate and Iran/Contra.

    When all ther reporters were making "Wag the Dog" analogys, Clinton said that he would shortly release information showing that the factory was used to make nerve gas. I am still waiting.

    During Watergate, Nixon put the military on alert in hopes of taking the pressure off the investigation. He was severly taken to task for the measure. At least he didn't kill innocent third parties.

    --
    I feel like picking a fight with everyone who thinks they are right. - Rainmakers
  63. Accountability vs. anonymity by soldack · · Score: 2

    Is your position that there should be a total lack of anonymity for all people or just people in power? I always think of the , "With great power comes great responsibilities line." Do you mean that one of those responsiblities is a lose of privacy? What a goverment employee's personal life? The press seems to follow the idea that high level goverment employees (senators, independent councils, etc.) are like celebreties and have choosen a public lifestyle that precludes privacy. Is this fair? If so, does this include Internet transactions like e-mails and web browsing? Do we have a right to know what is in George W.'s bookmarks?
    I agree that people need to have more information about what their government but perhaps the amount isn't the problem. It is the difficulty in getting it. Who really researches voting records? Who watches CSPAN? All of these things take time. I have always wondered why even during an election, the only way to find a simple summary of a canidate's voting record is to check out his competition and then you only see the bad. This ends up making the decision trying to choose the lesser of two evils.
    We really need a new style of press that is beholden to no one and gets the answers that people need. The Associated Press is pretty good but all to often many of their stories and others like them are not noted by the major distributers (CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, ect). We have a public television channel and although it has news we need more. We need a public news channel/web site that has all the information sorted and catagorized for easy searching.

    --
    -- soldack
    1. Re:Accountability vs. anonymity by kevin805 · · Score: 2

      The thesis of Transparent Society seems to me to be that to some degree, there is a tradeoff between privacy and freedom. That is, when people can operate in secret, it is easy to e.g. plant stories about your political opponents. Brin does exempt "private lives", saying that there is no purpose to be served by monitoring people when they are not "in public". If you think this sounds like 1984, remember that the government will be watched even more carefully. I didn't read his book very carefully, so it is possible I have misstated aspects of his position. But the book isn't really an argument so much as a pointing out of questions that need to be answered.

      I don't fully agree with Brin, because as a libertarian, I can't see how you can say "you don't have a right to secrets" (not that Brin actually says this). My position is that:

      1. anyone in government, in their capacity as a government official, should be monitored to the fullest extent feasible. That means running recorders going into voice recognition software and posting it all to the internet for all activities as a part of the government. Since this isn't totally technically feasible, I'd settle for all internal memos, and corrospondence with outside agencies. Because someone working for the government freely accepted that job, and because we, the people, are delegating our power to the government (this is Hobbes account of the origin of government power), we are free to hold our employees accountable in any way we please.

      Secrecy, as in military secrets, I haven't considered.

      2. Corporations should be subject to this, but at a lesser level. Incorporation is a special exemption from certain laws. The government sells special legal status for favors. One of these favors is corporate income tax. We can add another, that all memos must be preserved, all business plans and contracts, etc. must be kept for like 20 years. Depending on the type of information, it can be required to be released after a certain time period.

      Realistically, we may have gotten to the point where there is a need for different degrees of incorporation. (Which protects against lawsuits, is the main thing, but also gives an existence to the company longer than any of the people.)

      3. Private citizens, non-incorporated businesses, and anyone not covered, should be totally exempt. Of course, if they work for a corporation, they will know that stuff they write to their boss will become public record in X years, and if they work for the government, it will be public record tomorrow. To answer your specific question -- no I have no right to know what's in George W.'s bookmarks, or Al Gore's, if we're talking about his home computer.

      We would probably need an agency more or less separate from the government (not controlled by any existing agencies or branches) to monitor the government. Should be directly elected by the people.

      --Kevin

  64. Re:Dirt and Drives by sh_mmer · · Score: 1

    If they can recover information after eight formats, do you really think that encrypting your HD will stop them?

    um, yes.

    i could leave it at that, but what makes you think that the ability to read old stuff on a HDD has anything to do with breaking cryptography? of course, it may be the case that NSA can in fact break all of the known ciphers, but their ability to read old drives hardly provides evidence of this.

    cheers,

    sh_

    --
    Interested in learning Chinese or Japanese? check out Chinese/Japanese-English Dictiona
  65. Re:Is it just me... by anonymous+cowerd · · Score: 1

    What do you expect from Rupert Murdoch's Fox News? All the major U.S. news media companies are biased but Murdoch's stuff is so nakedly and vertiginously biased it leaves you dizzy and disoriented. Fox News should not be used while driving or operating heavy machinery.

    Yours WDK - WKiernan@concentric.net

  66. Re:Over-Sensationalized Journalism by aquarium · · Score: 1

    So you think that if Clinton/Gore can hide subpoenaed documents for 4 years then they are no longer relevant? This is undoubtably the most corrupt administration we have ever had. But hey, the economy is good.

    --

    That's why you're the judge and I'm the...uh...law-talkin' guy. - Lionel Hutz, Attorney at Law
  67. Transparent Society by kevin805 · · Score: 4

    Just wanted to take this moment to recommend David Brin's The Transparent Society, a well supported argument about why accountability is even more important than anonymity. Think about it -- this is a case where a government agency was investigated, and still they missed a lot of stuff. If they were a little better at it, they wouldn't have been investigated at all.

    What can we do? Public, highly intrusive, monitoring of all aspects of government. If we (the people, you know) are delegating power, we need to watch how that power is used.

    --Kevin

  68. Clinton/Gore == so many lies, so little time by Money__ · · Score: 1
    The problem with hearing stories like this is I just don't care anymore. I just wish Bill, Al Tipper and Billary should go back to selling used cars or slither back under their rock. What they put this country through is inexcusable, and they still don't get it. The Clintongore trainwreck will soon be over and I, for one, won't be rushing out to read their book.

    I will, however, smile from ear to ear while I vote Republican.
    _________________________

  69. Re:Balanced Journalism by Money__ · · Score: 1
    ...the article hardly deals with Al Gore on a substantive level.

    Doing so would require a person of substance, something Algore clearly is not.
    _________________________

  70. Law = hill of beans . . by Money__ · · Score: 1

    . . and I expect elected offiacials to obey them like the rest of us. This is something ClintonGore has yet to fully grasp.
    _________________________

  71. anonimity? what's that? by matticus · · Score: 4

    big brother is watching you-but you can't watch him back. what's the deal? do they have any idea how hypocritical this makes them look? i am all for internet anonimity, and it appears they are not-unless it deals with themselves. go figure.

    1. Re:anonimity? what's that? by Yardley · · Score: 1

      Not to belabor the point, but the emails under question do not pertain to anonymity. We know whose emails these are.

      I'm not sure why people who have been threatened not to do something will often resurface *years* later to tell about it. How come Lambuth didn't go to the authorities when these events happened 5 years ago? How come she has only come forward now, during an election year?

      --

      --
      He lives in a world where those who do not run the client software of the omnipresent meme are unacceptable.
    2. Re:anonimity? what's that? by Yardley · · Score: 1

      We don't need no mind control. Instead, substantiate your claims with facts. Care to provide references?

      Only two of Clinton's close associates have died in anything close to strange events, one a plane crash, the other a suicide. On reflection, these are not such strange events as people die every day. When you know as many people as our president does, you will be subjected to loss on a fairly routine basis. It comes with the job.

      If Lambuth had come forward, supposing she thought to back in 1996, it seems rather unlikely anything would have happened to her. The media's attention quickly shifts to anyone who has something bad to say about our president. These people's lives fall under rather intense scrutiny, much like the president himself, and if anything unexpected occured we would know about it. I just don't buy Lambuth being scared. Scared of what?

      Assuming she believed the alleged threats to be credible, what has changed? If there was something for her to fear then, there is surely something for her to fear now. Why the sudden change of mind?

      Anyways, in this instance, what exactly did the Clinton whitehouse do?

      Please, be clear on that last part.

      --

      --
      He lives in a world where those who do not run the client software of the omnipresent meme are unacceptable.
    3. Re:anonimity? what's that? by Yardley · · Score: 1

      Cool. Thanks, that was what I was looking for.

      Yeah, I have my biases and tend not to look too closely at right wing sites. Could you provide some specific web links? Your firm laying out of the dead associated with Clinton does make more credible your assertion. I wonder how many were taken out by the administration versus how many were taken out by the enemy camp? That many with those strange of circumstances does look suspicious.

      One of those circumstances where it would be nice to have more info.

      I did read the article. She learned about the problems in May 1998 before leaving the White House in July 1998. Apparently the problems were reported in the December 1998 issue of Insight. You are right about the coming forward. I was wrong. I wonder why the documents were unsealed. I wonder why they were sealed.

      Allegedly, they hid evidence (nothing new). Other than that, I'm not sure what you mean.

      I asked the question because the reporting of these circumstances does not seem very newsworthy. It does seem unfair that the right wing has been routinely able to review the private communications of a presidential candidate. When the other side has full knowledge of your activities, it makes putting on an effective campaign a difficult task.

      I still don't see any connection to Internet anonymity (timothy's claim, not yours).

      --

      --
      He lives in a world where those who do not run the client software of the omnipresent meme are unacceptable.
  72. Interesting timing. by TimTaylor · · Score: 1
    Thus far the Clinton administration has nothing in its scandal history as glorious as the Iran/Contra affair. That was a Clancy-esque mix of drugs, weapons, hostage-dealing, and espionage. Reagan couldn't remember what happened, Bush Sr. was out of the loop, Ollie North and Fawn Hall shredded and smuggled documents.

    The difference between that scandal and the so-called "Clinton scandals" is that Iran/Contra ended up amounting to more than a hill of beans. Power was truly abused in the Iran/Contra scandal.

    Let's see how this new scandal plays out. Frankly, Clinton's Republican opposition has gone off half-cocked so often that they have no credibility left. They are just sore losers, IMHO. Also, let's get off the administration's back on encryption and CDA. A lot of techies just have the most absurd knee-jerk response to that. Even if these initiatives are hopeless, they still must be tried. It's just a no-brainer.

    Suppose, for example, Clinton had just openly done nothing WRT export restrictions on encryption. The very first time a terrorist used strong encryption in an e-mail, the administration would have been hung out to dry by the same yahoos who now attack him every time he adjusts his tie.

    Sure, we all know that such export restrictions are futile, but that's, unfortunately, beside the point.

    Don't even get me started on star wars.

    1. Re:Interesting timing. by cburley · · Score: 2
      I think the bombing of the factory in Sudan ranks up there, as abuse of power, as the stuff done during Watergate and Iran/Contra.

      Perhaps, but, in my view, what distinguishes Iran/Contra from those other episodes is that the raison d'etre for the "sins" included the attempted return of American hostages and the defense of the American hemisphere against the encroachment of Soviet-supported communists.

      Disagree with the effectiveness or desirability of either of these motives all you, dear reader, might want, but you're unlikely to convince me that they in any way approach the seething selfishness of the motives for Watergate or, even worse (since Nixon was covering up for others at first), the various Clinton scandals.

      (More and more, I'm amazed this country managed to elect someone as comparatively uninterested in obtaining and wielding personal power as Ronald Reagan to President. As we all do -- something we're always reminded of when discussing Clinton but somehow by people who inevitably chime in contrariwise vis-a-vis Reagan -- he had his faults, but constantly representing himself as everyone's personal source of happiness wasn't even close to one of them. And that seems to explain, more and more, the confusion of so many historians/biographers, who are thoroughly accustomed to the sort of egos that typically seek high office, as well as the seething hatred directed towards him by those on the Left, who resent his "demonstration" that, indeed, it is the sincere efforts of each and every free citizen, rather than a comparatively small ruling intellectual elite designated as infallible, that is needed for our species to survive and prosper.)

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  73. Re:Dirt and Drives by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
    There is no safe way to dispose of data on a hard drive.

    Formats, encryption, anything. As you say, the data was recovered 16 re-writes deep. What's to stop anyone from recovering the same data before it was encrypted?

    Personally, I've seen drives that were involved in a house fire recovered. I had experience with someone who's doctoral thesis was on his computer, and his machine was in his house when it burnt down. The case, everything was melted! It was soaked from all the water and foam. We sent it off, and it was recovered - completely!

    The only way I've seen to totally destroy data, is to take a 3/8 steel bit and drill through all the platters. That is the way my company handles sensitive data. In certain departments, such as HR, if there is a problem with a users machine that requires removing the box from their office, we can ask if they want this to be done. And we do it, on the spot, in front of the user.

    No arguing with the fact that the data is G O N E!

    Off topic - Navy eh! The best part about being in the Navy is never having to say you're Air Force!

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  74. Re:Dirt and Drives by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    They also can recover ancient paintings from under many coats of paint. Burning, however, helps alot if you want something to be completely destroyed.

  75. Clinton Administration by NatePWIII · · Score: 1

    Nothing new about the Clinton Administration will surprise me. Its all been lies built upon lies.

    The fact that these e-mails were covered up probably has something do to with the Lewinsky affair among other things. The Clinton Admin is all about cover ups... Of course, its only natural considering all the illegal and immoral things they are involved in.

    I'm sure the American Public would love to get their hands on this stuff, I know I would.

    Let's just hope the next administration will be an improvement over this last one.


    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    NPS Internet Solutions, LLC
    www.npsis.com

    --

    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    www.haidacarver.com
  76. Over-Sensationalized Journalism by Yardley · · Score: 1

    FOXNEWS is known for sensationalizing just about everything. I just watched Sean "Puffy" Combs' attorney being interviewed by O'Riley. O'Riley spent the entire five minutes trying to get the attorney to say something bad about the N.Y. city police department. The P.D. is not the issue, what happened in Sean's particular case is. O'Riley seemed uninterested in hearing about the matter, he wanted dirt. He didn't get any.

    As for sensationalism: look at the picture of Al Gore in the Fundraising article. That's just offensive.

    It would be nice if they would do some real reporting for once. Emails from 1996 don't concern me much.

    --

    --
    He lives in a world where those who do not run the client software of the omnipresent meme are unacceptable.
    1. Re:Over-Sensationalized Journalism by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      Documents from 1996 should concern you. The past actions of people are a good indication of what they'll do in the future. The Clinton/Gore adminstration has been nothing but lies, coverups, and screwing of this once-great nation. Do you think what they did so much in the past will never happen again? The BEST way to guage how well a person will perform is how they have performed in the past. We MUST not let the clinton/gore admin continue or this will only get worse. Maybe this event has been over-sensationalized, but it had to start somewhere. There must be some truth to it. It's just sad and angering.

      --Error: Bad mood or funny name. Hit any user to continue

  77. Re:Dirt and Drives by Ray+Yang · · Score: 1

    Who wants to bet that applying "military" methods for data recovery is strictly against the law, so a reformatted hard drive will be considered off-limits? (unless that is, it's not the White House which is being investigated). ;-)

  78. Is it just me... by AgentRavyn · · Score: 0

    or does the picture of Vice-Lamer Al Gore look really fsckin' stupid?
    _________________________________________ ___

    --
    ___
    I'm an exhibit on the mounted animal nature trail.
  79. I RESENT THESE ALLEGATIONS by .Bill.Clinton. · · Score: 0

    I have never knowily told a lie to my sheep...err I mean the American public.

    --

    This sig will bend over for a dollar!
  80. Hey I resent that comment!! by .Bill.Clinton. · · Score: 0

    I been nothing but completely honest with my american sheep.
    Geroge W. Bush is my bitch.
    Al is gonna make that fucker squeal like a piggy...you just watch .
    Your negativity will not bring me down....

    --

    This sig will bend over for a dollar!
  81. SHE TOLD ME SHE WANTED IT ROUGH!!! by .Bill.Clinton. · · Score: 0

    If I had know she would pull this stunt I would have never fucked the bitch.
    Juanita was a Republican whore, do not believe her....

    --

    This sig will bend over for a dollar!
  82. Re:Dirt and Drives by RancidPickle · · Score: 1

    Say, can't you say that since it's encoded on the drive, it's protected by the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, since you cannot access it without getting around the encoding scheme (which is totally weak since slapping it to any IDE port will allow access). Hmmm.... maybe I gave the White House an easy out!

    --
    "First things first, but not necessarily in that order."
    - Doctor Who
  83. Dirt and Drives by RancidPickle · · Score: 5

    First off, that pic of Gore is a riot...

    Secondly, the NSA can recover data 16 rewrites or formats deep on a HDD. I know firsthand of eight layers, while in the Navy we had a HDD with data from two crash investigations stolen by a contractor, who used it for 2 months before it was recovered. We sent it in (I was told later to the NSA labs), and the data was recovered through 8 format/rewrites. Has to do with track edges and the head mechanism not tracking perfectly every time. Remember, encryption of drives works better if you don't want to be caught.

    So... if drives were reformatted, they could have the data recovered. More emails about illegal crap. Hell, you'd think Gore would've thought of this, since he did invent the internet :)

    I wonder if they will ever get to going through the emails to find the real dirt. If they do, it'll get classified as secret so it won't get released to the press. They'll stand by the "it's about national security, stupid" approach, so we'll never get the real story.

    I hope the lady who was fired sues, at least she'll get some vindication.

    --
    "First things first, but not necessarily in that order."
    - Doctor Who
  84. Anonimity by pealco · · Score: 1

    Give me one good reason why the internet shouldn't be anonmymous.