Slashdot Mirror


Yet Unuzeer Internet Treckeeng Ixplueet

Um de hur de hur de hur. Ununymuoos in Indy vreetes: "Su yuoo'fe-a shoot ooffff yuoor cuukeees, blucked thuse-a bunner-ed seetes, und instelled Joonkbooster. Hurty flurty schnipp schnipp! Feeleeng secoore-a in yuoor ununymeety? Vell, Merteen Puul et Leenooxcere-a Oostreleea knoos a vey zeey cun steell treck yuoo vhee yuoo soorff: By useeng zee HTTP ceche-a-cuntrul heeder. Hurty flurty schnipp schnipp! It's fer mure-a defeeuoos thun cuukeees, und mure-a deefffficoolt tu bluck, tuu. Hees erteecle-a Zee Meunteeme-a Ixplueet veell geefe-a yuoo a descreepshun und a demunstreshun." Es a bunoos, Merteen's vreeting is foonny und cleer. Hurty flurty schnipp schnipp! Velcume-a tu Stunderd Perunueea Teeme-a.

29 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. eesnt 3 jukes unuf by at0m · · Score: 2

    uh theenk three eepril feewls jukes eez enuf.

  2. Ummm... guys? by HerrNewton · · Score: 2

    Are we going to have to deal with this all day? I know you're editors, but it really seems to seem a bit unoriginal and quite annoying after the first April Fools post.

    DON'T be a "First Post" troll!

    ----

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  3. Andover.net seeks injunction against Advogato by raph · · Score: 5

    I know this is offtopic, but Slashdot readers have a right to know, and they're sure as hell not going to post it on the front page.

    Maybe some of you have heard about the legal battle brewing between Andover.net (slashdot's corporate parent) and Advogato. Well, today the shit hit the fan - Andover filed an injunction to shut the site down. The full story is on PRNewswire. I'm pissed and I'm going to fight this, but I don't have the resources for a protracted legal battle.

    Thanks to everybody who's sent me letters of support.

    --

    LILO boot: linux init=/usr/bin/emacs

    1. Re:Andover.net seeks injunction against Advogato by nate · · Score: 2

      Nice try. Had me going for a couple of minutes -- right down to the patent on "getting a community together and selling out to a company that IPOs months later" :-)

      Definitely worth a read and a laugh ;-)

    2. Re:Andover.net seeks injunction against Advogato by The+Dakota+Kidd · · Score: 2

      If you read the PR Newswire story, you'd also find:

      RedHat and VA are in a bidding war for "Harry Potter"

      Verisign acquires Proctor and Gamble

      Al Gore announces new initiative to "Open Source the Internet"

      Personally, I'm taking this with more than a few grains of salt. If this is a joke, its a pretty stupid one.

    3. Re:Andover.net seeks injunction against Advogato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

      The patent that was supposedly infringed was "US5876324: Penile stimulator device using turbulent water flow and method of use". Uhh, I didn't want to see pictures...

      Anyhow, nice one guys. I considered removing Slashdot and Freshmeat links from my home page before I realized which day it was!

    4. Re:Andover.net seeks injunction against Advogato by David+Ham · · Score: 2

      adsl-63-196-208-222.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net is the site this is hosted on. how annoying that people have the time to write this shit.
      --
      DeCSS source code!

      --

      --
      you must amputate to email me
      i read all replies to my comments

    5. Re:Andover.net seeks injunction against Advogato by RTMFD · · Score: 2

      My friends, The action being taken by Andover.net is simply irresponsible and morally wrong. I will personally protest the action by setting myself on fire in front of the courthouse and running around screaming curses against the traitorous CmdrTaco. I may die, my body may be consumed by the hot flames, but my memory will live on in the hearts of all /.ers everywhere.

    6. Re:Andover.net seeks injunction against Advogato by Surak · · Score: 2

      My traceroute log for the "PRNewswire" story:

      traceroute to 63.196.208.222 (63.196.208.222), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets

      [--stuff deleted--]

      13 adsl-63-196-208-222.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (63.196.208.222) 77.370 ms 79.593 ms 78.165 ms

      Nice job faking the prnewswire site... nearly had me fooled. :)

  4. Last year = good, this = dubioous by RaveX · · Score: 3

    The User Friendly/Segfault scam was amusing, this year's /. jokes are terrible. I'm officially "complaining about lack of options," just in case there's ever a poll.
    ---sig---

  5. Translation by Tim_F · · Score: 2

    For those not fluent in Swedish Chef speak:

    Yet Another Internet Tracking Explot.

    So you've shut off your cookies, blocked those banner ads (...?), and installed JunkBuster. Feeling secure in your anonymity? Well, Martin Paul at Linuxcare... etc.

  6. Oh, and not just that either by kuro5hin · · Score: 2
    Welcome to the jungle. Advogato wasn't the only one. See this article for what they're doing to kuro5hin.org as well. Looks like it'll be "One World, One, Web, One News Site" if slashdot and andover have their way. If you'd like to join the boycott of andover-owned media, you may discuss this issue on kuro5hin.

    I urge you all to spread the word about this heinous tripe, and to boycott this site and all andover holdings until they stop trying to sue the competition out of existence.

    --

    --
    There is no K5 cabal.
    I am not the real rusty.
    1. Re:Oh, and not just that either by kuro5hin · · Score: 2

      Andover tried to use that patent on me, but I just laughed and laughed and laughed. Do you know what it's like to laugh like that? :-)

      --

      --
      There is no K5 cabal.
      I am not the real rusty.
  7. Violation by HerrNewton · · Score: 3

    Slashdot is a news portal for geeks. Slashdot's mission is to post links to relevant news around the net. Slashdot's primary mission is to spread information.

    Posts such as this, masking news in some twisted, somewhat racially slurred (it can be read into it), is violating a primary rule of communication: Communicate, damnit, or shutup. (Specifically it violates Paul Grice's {philosopher} Rule of Manner:)



    ----

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
    1. Re:Violation by HerrNewton · · Score: 2

      My... aren't we a tisch crabby? I didn't say anything was irrelevant. I said I couldn't make heads or tails of the post because it had been so obfusicated.

      ----

      --

      ----
      Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
    2. Re:Violation by Hobbex · · Score: 2

      Posts such as this, masking news in some twisted, somewhat racially slurred (it can be read into it), is vioPosts such as this, masking news in some twisted, somewhat racially slurred (it can be read into it), is violating a primary rule of communication: Communicate, damnit, or shutup. (Specifically it violates Paul Grice's {philosopher} Rule of Manner:) lating a primary rule of communication: Communicate, damnit, or shutup. (Specifically it violates Paul Grice's {philosopher} Rule of Manner:)

      I couldn't agree more. Being Swedish myself, I find the whole Swedish Chef concept insulting, prejudice, and demeaning. I am preparing a multi billion dollar class action law suit, against not only Slashdot but the Jim Henson company as well, on behalf of my nine million irreparably harmed Swedish brothers and sisters.

      Or I might just go after Timothy with a wooden spatula... :-)

      -
      We cannot reason ourselves out of our basic irrationality. All we can do is learn the art of being irrational in a reasonable way.

  8. Thoughts from OOG by OOG_THE_CAVEMAN · · Score: 5

    Timothy, while I understand that this the initial day of April, also regarded as the prank day April Fool's, I still must question the intentions of your article.

    You see, we at slashdot try to respect this forum as a posting area where the intelligent, wise, and technologically saavy can exchange valuable information and even discuss ponderous philosophical issues. Indeed, in my own posts, I work exceptionally hard to present my arguments in clear, crisp, and coherent manner such that others my understand and benefit from what I have to share intellectually. I expect and recieve the same treatment from the other fine members of the slashdot community.

    While, I again would like to reinforce that the aforementioned post does have its moments in jest, the crude and garbled presentation only takes away from slashdot and its respectability. I expected more high brow, intellectual humor from people like you and this site. And to be honest, any relevance contained in the actual article is lamentably lost because of the coarse summary of it that you display. I implore you, sir, to consider the levity of such a practical joke and to present your humorous intentions in other ways so that we readers may enjoy and comprehend your humor instead of simply staring a the screen with a baffled haze on our faces.

    I realize that many of my slashdot peers, including the moderators who evaluate and critique the posts of slashdot, may consider this plea a troll or offtopic or such, but I must butress my current argument by saying that timothy's presentation of the article fully justifies my heated response. Humor is humor, and a joke is a joke, but I really cringe at the thought of deciphering such babbling, nonsensical language. I, for one, never have and never will speak in such confusing tongues, and I feel it benefits the quality of my posts and allows others to glean from it. And I respect my aquaintances at slashdot for doing so as well.

    In conclusion, I would like to ask that you, timothy, would reconsider the obvious impulses to perform such a chilidish joke before the deed is done. Indeed, I have managed to see some humor in your joke, but the cost is at the quality and respectability of this fine web site. I trust your good judgement and am fully assured that you will make the correct decision should the thought present itself in the future. And if you do not, I am afraid that I, OOG THE CAVEMAN, may find myself compelled to approach you and rupture your cranium.

    Cheers and Happy April Fool's Day,
    OOG THE OPEN SOURCE CAVEMAN

    OOG SAY YOU APRIL FOOL!!!

    --
    OOG THE OPEN SOURCE CAVEMAN!!! OOG BREAK HEAD WITH OPEN SOURCE CD!!!
    1. Re:Thoughts from OOG by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      .

      ROTFLMFAO!!!!! This post is by far the best and funniest item I have seen all April Fools day.

      Oh, and I love the OOG postings. They are a perfect example that the message is what is important, not the format of education level of the writer.

      (For those who don't follow OOG, this guy has been posting some of the most insightful, intelligent comments on /. lately IN ALL CAPS, 'CUZ OOG TALKS LIKE THIS. And so, on April Fools, when /. is now anslatedtray unnyfay, this.)

      A wonderful commentatry on the spelling and grammer flames - the message and point are whats important. :~) Damn funny, this.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  9. Tranlation:Yet another tracking exploit by addbo · · Score: 2

    Ok Happy April fools day... I was bored so I thought I would translate this for people who don't speak this special language! =)

    Anonymous in Indy writes: "So you've shut off your cookies, blocked those bannered sites, and installed Junkbuster. Hurty flurty schnipp schnipp! Feeling secure in your anonymity? Well, Martin Paul at Linuxcare Australia knows a way we can still track you while you surf: By using the HTTP cache control heeder. It's far more devious than cookies, and more difficult to block, too. Here's the article The Meantime Exploit will give you a description and a demonstration." It's a bonus, Martin's writing is funny and clear. Welcome to Standard Perunueea?? Time.

  10. Yet another tracking exploit by The+Musician · · Score: 4
    Here goes trying to make the discussion slightly useful...

    The original BUGTRAQ post is here. Taken from the post, the summary reads:

    HTTP cache-control headers such as If-Modified-Since allow servers to track individual users in a manner similar to cookies, but with less constraints. This is a problem for user privacy against which browsers currently provide little protection.

    Essentially, instead of giving you a cookie (which many people refuse/block) they give you a unique "cache freshness" timestamp, which your broswer nominally sends back with the conditional-GET request [see the HTTP RFC esp. sections 9.3 and 13.3.3 for description].

    Note that the site would have to use the same thing linked from every page to track you, e.g. a 1x1 transparent gif. Also note that this becomes pretty useless for them if you block the REFERER header, which you should be doing any.

    If this kind of thing bothers you, you should be using the Internet Junkbuster anyway.

    --

  11. New slashdot rules... by fluxrad · · Score: 2

    New rules going into effect on April 1st.

    1) All posts concerning Natalie Portman, or the word "goat" will be automatically moderated up to a score of at least 3:Interesting.

    2) Anyone mentioning or participating in a troll, or troll based thread will be givin a score of 2:Insightful.

    C) Comments containing logical thought, or insight that had not previously been discussed will be summarily dismissed as Flamebait!...now, on to my real post:

    (Score, 4: Insightful)
    YOO AL AHVE WEERd HAR3! N4t4LeE P0TRMAN RULLLLEEEZZZZZ!!!!! B00\/\/ 2 D3 GOOT1!!1!!1@1@




    -FluX
    -------------------------
    Your Ad Here!
    -------------------------

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  12. The world seeks injunction against Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    for sucking

  13. Re:This is so stupid by pmc · · Score: 2

    I agree - the humour isn't the story, but the reaction. Which is really funny - I have never seen so many people so upset over the Swedish Chef filter.

  14. Gee, and it seems like only a year ago by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    yes, exactely 1 year, oddly, that Microsoft took legal action against segfault and userfriendly.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  15. Don't forget to set your clocks back 1 hour tonigh by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    so you won't be late for work Monday...
    This is especially important if you've just moved to Arizona or Indiana

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  16. I'm Sorry.... by Accipiter · · Score: 3
    That post should have ended in 'Bork Bork Bork!'

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  17. Stop it damnit! by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Will you stop jargonizing the goddamn articles...it's really annoying already.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  18. Re:From the author by The+Musician · · Score: 2
    Yes, your general point is well taken... if I could mod you post up, I would.

    To give an example for other readers, too: Presuming you are blocking referer, the site would use the cache-timestamp to link your (possible changing) IPs addresses as "one person", and then track your sessions from the IP you are coming from.

    Of course, one can battle back and forth with client workarounds, but it always does come back to that general point.

    --

  19. Update by Martin+Fitzgearld · · Score: 2

    The Internet has been unclogged. If you still don't see an increase in bandwidth please consider upgrading to a faster connection. Thank you for your cooperation, and please remember to mark this date on your calendar for next year's spring cleaning. Thank you, Management