Slashdot Mirror


Oil Slick Threatens African Penguins

An oil slick in South Africa is threatening the third-largest colony of Jackass penguins, which are about to enter their breeding season. This is the second major oil pollution disaster to hit Cape Town's penguins. Sanccob is leading the rescue effort. Donations can be sent here.

45 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. Nooooo! by lambda · · Score: 5

    Will this delay the 2.4.0 kernel release?

    1. Re:Nooooo! by mrdlinux · · Score: 5

      I'm afraid so. This oil slick will greatly affect penguins at C.

      --
      Those who do not know the past are doomed to reimplement it, poorly.
  2. Jackass Penguins? by SClitheroe · · Score: 5

    I just found a new nickname for the clueless Linux Zealots at work...cool!

  3. Offtopic? by susano_otter · · Score: 2

    So my question is: how appropriate is it for people to use their website as a medium to raise consciousness and solicit donations for whatever cause they are currently supporting?

    Follow-up: does it matter if the purpose of the website typically excludes stories about that particular topic, moving though they may be?

    And another one: are there some issues which are so important that they should headline any/all forms of media, regardless of the subject matter usually addressed by that media? If so, is this one of those topics?

    I ask only because I'm willing to look like a nitpicking, heartless jerk in order to satisfy my curiosity.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Offtopic? by BilldaCat · · Score: 2

      Dude, screw you. This site is about what the posters are interested in, which is stated -every single time- a non-linux topic is posted, and if you don't like it, shove it.

      --
      BilldaCat
    2. Re:Offtopic? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      So my question is: how appropriate is it for people to use their website as a medium to raise consciousness and solicit donations for whatever cause they are currently supporting?

      I think you answered your own question here. It isn't, its their website.

      Follow-up: does it matter if the purpose of the website typically excludes stories about that particular topic, moving though they may be?

      No, it's their website, they make the topic.

      And another one: are there some issues which are so important that they should headline any/all forms of media, regardless of the subject matter usually addressed by that media? If so, is this one of those topics?

      Yes, there are such issues. Yes, us killing this planet and being forced to recognize it, and change our ways "before it's too late", is one of those topics.

      I ask only because I'm willing to look like a nitpicking, heartless jerk in order to satisfy my curiosity.

      The issue comes down to whose site is it which we have already concluded that since it isn't yours, and it is theirs, they make the topic, and you simply don't.

      If you don't like this style, might I suggest, what I think anyways, is a more cutting edge way of news reporting and involving the audience or there is always the option of starting your own site.

      -- iCEBaLM

    3. Re:Offtopic? by carlfish · · Score: 2

      So my question is: how appropriate is it for people to use their website as a medium to raise consciousness and solicit donations for whatever cause they are currently supporting?

      It is entirely appropriate. Slashdot's mandate is to post stories that interest the editors. It has no responsibility beyond that. "Hey, cool, the penguins need our help" is just as valid a story as "Hey, cool, the DeCSS authors need our help." If there's anyone out there who's so impressionable that they'll think "Hey, Hemos said I should donate, where's my cheque book!" then they deserve our pity.

      Slashdot has become popular because the story selections that the editors make is generally of interest to its community of readers. That doesn't mean that every story has to interest every reader, I certainly don't read more than 25% of the stories myself. All it means is that on an average day, there are enough slashdot stories that interest me for me to return the next day. I read the penguin story because it was different.

      If you watch a news-hour on TV, there's usually a cute animal story or something of that ilk. They're not there because they're news, they're there because they're _relief_ from news. Similarly, the penguin story is a relief from Yet Another Copyright Article, or Yet Another Obscure Technology.

      Follow-up: does it matter if the purpose of the website typically excludes stories about that particular topic, moving though they may be?

      You are working from an incorrect assumption. You're assuming that the "purpose" of this website is more concrete than it is. "News for Nerds" doesn't mean "News about technology", although there is a correlation between the two.

      And another one: are there some issues which are so important that they should headline any/all forms of media, regardless of the subject matter usually addressed by that media? If so, is this one of those topics?

      I doubt the injury of penguins will "headline" news worldwide. It headlines slashdot purely because the penguin-linux connection makes it a fun real-news/nerd-news crossover. Similarly, if there were a bunch of BSD daemons being held hostage in the middle-east, I expect that would show up on the slashdot front page too.

      Charles Miller
      --
      --
      The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.
    4. Re:Offtopic? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      But /. does have a stated purpose of covering (usually) a particular type of news.

      The only stated purpose is News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters. It's quite up to them what they think is news for nerds, and what they think matters. If they think that a press release from Royale bringing to market the first 8 ply toilet tissue is "news for nerds, stuff that matters" than who are you to judge? Do you pay for their bandwidth or server space at exodus?

      -- iCEBaLM

  4. 575? by psm · · Score: 2

    Penguins in trouble
    Slashdot readers quick response
    Kills the webserver

  5. Conspiracy. by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Hmmm... Symbol of the Democratic Party (US), symbol of the Linux movement. Coincidence? The Truth is Out There.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  6. Oil Slick Threatens Linux? by rothwell · · Score: 5

    Must be a new Microsoft tactic... I suppose they chose the "linux" topic because there is no "penguins" topic. Or "enviro" topic -- which would be nice, btw.

  7. Penguins... a good cause? by CokeBear · · Score: 5
    I've already read several flames from people who don't think that this is a good cause, and Slashdot should not be wasting our time with non-Linux stuff. To the critics I can only say grow up.

    The world is filled with good causes... thousands of them. There are hundreds of endangered species, people dying of diseases and starving in almost every part of the world, and we are destroying our environment in so many different ways. It would be impossible -- even in a community the size of Slashdot -- to even begin to address these problems. We can, however, do our small part to help with one of them. The penguin is our mascot, and that makes it as good a cause as any to get behind.

    Even if you don't help save the penguins, you can give a dollar to a homeless guy, or buy an acre of land in the rainforest, or give to the American (or Canadian) Cancer Society. The point is, do something. As a collection of individuals with above average intelligence, we have a responsibility to this world to do something, anything, to make it just a little bit better.

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
    1. Re:Penguins... a good cause? by fluxrad · · Score: 3

      i think the reason there are 'flames' about this (most of what i'm seeing is just "hey - this isn't slashdot fodder") is that there really is no need for this to be posted on slashdot.

      I would argue two points against your post:

      1 slashdot is a geek web-site. It's for geeks, it's by geeks. While there is no sense in denying that this oil spill sucks. I would rather read about it on CNN.com or BBC.com, etc. I come to slashdot for my tech news, period. The mapping of the human genome is signifigant too, but i don't expect to see news of that on planetquake.com.

      2Much as another poster has mentioned. This isn't being posted just because it's a tragedy, or a worthy cause or whatever, it's being posted because it's an article about penguins....which is related to linux. If the oil spill had happened in say, Alaska, and a bunch of seals died, there would be no news of this on slashdot. THAT is probably one of the most hypocritical aspects of this story.

      Either way, as i said before, i come to slashdot for one reason alone. Geek news. When there's something on here that's totally irrelevant, (traditionally) news-worthy or not...if it's got nothing to do with technologoy/geeks/nerds/what have you...then it's got no business being on slashdot.


      FluX
      After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    2. Re:Penguins... a good cause? by aonifer · · Score: 2
      Either way, as i said before, i come to slashdot for one reason alone. Geek news. When there's something on here that's totally irrelevant, (traditionally) news-worthy or not...if it's got nothing to do with technologoy/geeks/nerds/what have you...then it's got no business being on slashdot.

      It's a story on the dark side of our technology obsessions. How many of your geekly products are made from petroleum?

      But even so, why are you reading an article that you have no interest in and find is clearly in violation of some mythical topic regulation? Is someone holding a gun to your head?

    3. Re:Penguins... a good cause? by thogard · · Score: 3

      The last time this happened in Australia, /.ers donated quite a bit to help out the effort here.

      And if your too lazy to send money to .za the hard way, but you want to help the little birds, you can send it to the Penguin Hospital in .au at http://www.penguins.org.au/media/helpinghand.html

  8. Poor penguins by zavyman · · Score: 5

    You know, this kind of stuff would have never had this kind of attention paid to it had it not been for the linux use of the penguin logo. Oil slicks suck, and yet we still demand cheap gas prices. Here in the Midwest, people are bitching about how they are getting screwed by the gas companies, so corners are cut and accidents such as this are more likely to occur.

    <rant>
    And of course there are already those posters complaining that this is not News for Nerds or that kind of ranting. Come on, this seems to be Sengan's second post, and this kind of news interested him. If you were also an author, you would have a right to complain.
    </rant>

    A site showing pictures of the penguins before the slick can be found here, and the google cached link of the slashdotted link is right here. CNN is also covering the story.

    So the next time that you pump your gas or drive down the freeway to work, ask yourself whether you really need to do this. Public transportation is usually powered by much safer power sources, so maybe these kind of accidents won't happen anymore.

    -zavyman

    1. Re:Poor penguins by MattXVI · · Score: 2
      No. He banned dissent by disabling comments in a politically provacative story he (foolishly) posted. That is bullshit, and was rightly criticized.

      "When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood."

      --
      When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood.
      -Tom Jones
    2. Re:Poor penguins by Detritus · · Score: 5

      The problem isn't the demand for cheap gas or people not using public transportation, it is the lack of internationally enforced standards for maritime safety. A ship can be registered in Liberia or other countries with low standards. A large number of ships are lost every year, 96 ships over 500 tons in 1998 alone. If these were airplanes falling out of the sky, the public would demand action. Too many ship owners cut corners on safety, crew training and quality, and maintenance. The public doesn't care, unless it involves the death of passengers or cute animals.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Poor penguins by ContinuousPark · · Score: 2
      You know, this kind of stuff would have never had this kind of attention paid to it had it not been for the linux use of the penguin logo

      Yes, so maybe there should be more open source projects using endangered animals (whales, seals) as their mascots if that's what it takes to be Slashdot-worthy. Last time I checked, camels and Gnus were doing just fine =)

      Seriously though, I believe being environment-conscious is quite compatible with the geek nature so maybe we could have these environmental posts more often. Who better and more capable than the /. community to raise awareness and maybe donate some money for these good causes?

      --


      "All the things one has forgotten scream for help in dreams". Elias Canetti
    4. Re:Poor penguins by bughunter · · Score: 2
      Here in the Midwest, people are bitching about how they are getting screwed by the gas companies, so corners are cut and accidents such as this are more likely to occur.

      Hmmm... if anyone had read the coverage, it wouldn't have taken a whole day for someone like me to inform you that the oil spilled was fuel oil for an iron ore cargo ship, owned by a shipping company with a notorious reputation for operating decrepit vessels on the verge of sinking. Your characterization that the reader's demand for gas is responsible for this accident smacks of the worst kind of radical environmentalist FUD.

      If you really have to lash out, do so at the major petroleum refining and distribution companies, who are making windfall profits by artifically limiting refinery capacity, lobbying for the government to pressure OPEC to increase production, and doing nothing to stave off the eventual hyperinflation that will occur when the wells do begin to run dry and inflate the cost of everything from cornflakes to computers that depends on petrochemicals and cheap energy to manufacture.

      How's that for a rant?

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  9. I HATE OIL.... by Electric+Eye · · Score: 2

    Every time I read of a story like this, I feel sick. Literally. Just another reason we should be using alternative energy sources and all ships should be required to have double hulls *and Linux). This is the 21st century. Why is everything still so backwards?

    As a species, we are such failures in protecting our own planet...

    Long live the penguins!!!!

  10. Personally... by Wah · · Score: 4

    ..I prefer my penguin baked rather than deep fried in oil. Whatever, as long as some Africans get food.

    --

    --
    +&x
  11. Re:lmfao by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    i'm not going to bother defending my post to you - since you obviously didn't get the point of it in the first place!

    Why don't you defend your post to me? I have karma to burn, I got the point of it, and I, quite frankly, thought your post was tasteless, irrelevant, and a waste of bandwidth and hard drive space.

    -- iCEBaLM

  12. United Penguin Care Coalition by Seumas · · Score: 5
    [ We fade into a full shot of Linus Torvalds standing on an iceberg. ]

    "Hi, I'm Linus Torvalds and this is my friend, Tux."

    [ Adorable little penguin waddles over and lays a flipper against Linus' leg, snuggling up against him. ]

    "Oil slicks can be a messy, dangerous and often deadly disaster. Just a couple years ago, my friend Tux here was near death due to the after-effects of just such a slick, but thanks to caring contributions from people just like you, Tux is alive and well today [ Tux smiles, sweetly at the camera ]."

    [ Shot widens to show Linus standing in front of a virtual sea of oily penguins. ]

    "Right now, there are hundreds of penguins -- just like Tux -- who need your help. Won't you find it in your heart to share your good fortune with those less fortunate than yourself? Please contribute to the United Penguin Care Coalition. Little lives, like Tux's, depend on it."

    * United Penguin Care Coalition substitued for the South African National Foundation for the Conservation of Coastal Birds. Why? Duh, that would have sounded too fruity in the commercial.
    ---
    seumas.com

  13. Someone should get these guys set up on SSL... by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 4

    I would be much more likely to donate to the cause if they took credit cards online. Can't they appeal to some large, greedy oil company looking to do community service by donating a server, SSL, and a Merchant Account (say maybe someone who could symphathize... like maybe Exxon??)

    I was thinking - yeah I might chip in some cash for this - I like penguins, hate oil slicks - what the hell?

    Oh... but you got to fax your credit card number or send them a *snail mail* with your info... sorry but you lost me there. Make it easy to donate online and maybe more people would give.

    1. Re:Someone should get these guys set up on SSL... by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 2
      I would be much more likely to donate to the cause if they took credit cards online.

      Social resposibility is not a commodity-- it requires actual work and effort. You can't buy or sell social justice and/or the well-being of the biosphere. People need to actually make coordinated efforts to make that happen.

      Can't they appeal to some large, greedy oil company looking to do community service by donating a server, SSL, and a Merchant Account (say maybe someone who could symphathize... like maybe Exxon??)

      No, because these companies have precisely the opposite interests they do.

      I was thinking - yeah I might chip in some cash for this - I like penguins, hate oil slicks - what the hell?

      Look a centimeter beneath your shallow surface, and you'll realize you can't be bothered to even send a fax or letter in favor of penguins and against oil slicks.

      Oh... but you got to fax your credit card number or send them a *snail mail* with your info... sorry but you lost me there. Make it easy to donate online and maybe more people would give.

      I hope you enjoy the taste of silicon, cash, concrete and oil, because thanks to people like you, we'll all end up eating and drinking that.

      On the other hand, maybe I shouldn't be so harsh, and give you a break. I'll tell you something. Try taking up as a hobby something really useful-- no, not writing yet another trivial free program, but soemthing like volunteering for a soup kitchen. I won't even expect you to give any money-- just go there, help cook, serve and clean up in a regular basis. No amount of money you could ever give will be more significant than something real, like this.

    2. Re:Someone should get these guys set up on SSL... by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but you are simply wrong--oil companies have no interest in spilling their oil all over the ocean.

      Where the hell did I claim that it is the interest of oil companies to spill oil? Can you point out the precise words that say that?

      Oil companies are simply not interested in preventing oil spills to the max degree possible, since that would cut a big bite off their profits. They simply want the biggest profits, and if that means spilling their oil regularly out of unsufficient precautions, they are happy with that.

      [on social responsibility] For the best results, it should be as streamlined and simple as possible. That would be known as a Good Thing.

      No. That would be known as selling peace of mind to smug and clueless gringo yuppies who don't really care about anyone or anything but themselves. This kind of attitude needs to go, if any good is to come.

  14. geek environmentalism by sg_oneill · · Score: 5
    I have noticed more than a few people complaining that penguins in danger isn't a suitable Slashdot topic. I would beg to differ;

    Slashdot has always been Geek news, and it's always seemed to me fairly activist.

    I would like to suggest we keep in mind the original promise of the computer...paperless. Indeed Enviromentalism is an *excelent* geek thing to engage in. Biology rocks in a completely egg-based geek way, and it's really really interesting. Us boffins are the future, and if we don't use our ,often, priveleged positions to fight for stuff that really matters than were all doomed

    Case in point in Australia is SIMCOA's use of Old Growth Jarrah woodchips in the silicone smeltering process. Jarrah is one of the largest trees in the world, and it also produces fan-bloody-tastic furniture. It's endangered too. Currently SOTICO, the logging company is selling this priceless wood as woodchips at $14 a tonne. There are many enviro-friendly alternatives for it. As end users we should be complaining bitterly that our comps are trashing forrests unneccesarrily. Put preasure if you want to on intel/amd/motorolla etc to use enviro friendly processing methods.

    Either way. It's verry geek. Let's do something for those penguins. It's important. Tux'd agree too methinx.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  15. Re:lmfao by fluxrad · · Score: 2

    if you get the point...then how could it possibly be irrelevant?

    there's something inordinately mundane about posting "jeepers. that penguin article just doesn't seem to have anything to do with the subject matter of slashdot."

    but, then again, you already knew that.


    FluX
    After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  16. Offtopic on offtopic. by Speare · · Score: 5

    So the next time that you pump your gas or drive down the freeway to work, ask yourself whether you really need to do this. Public transportation is usually powered by much safer power sources, so maybe these kind of accidents won't happen anymore.

    I agree that humans and their feigned needs for fossil fuels at low costs led to this sort of tragedy. I don't agree that public transportation uses safer power sources. They use either (1) electricity created at central fossil-fuel burning facilities, or (2) fossil-fuels in other forms.

    Not to mention the mode of transportation itself. Cars crashing on the highway are the number one dangerous mode. But think of the number of San Francisco Muni bus accidents, New York subway derailments, airline disasters, AMTRACK derailments, freight trains with toxic chemicals spilling, train derailments in Turkey and Germany and everywhere else.

    Diesel smoke from public buses also cause more pollution per person, in areas where ridership is too low to amortize the damage. Sure, if the route runs half-full, then say thirty people use twenty times the fuel of cars. During off-peak and mis-arranged routes, then four people use fifteen times the fuel.

    Diesel truck lobbying groups and the engine producers don't let you into the dirty secrets: tests are rigged to measure idle-power emissions instead of typical loads. Diesel engine improvements far outweigh the efficiencies demanded by the solo car driver; a car in 1998 emitted 4% of the toxins that a car in 1978 did, while diesel has hardly budged.

    Yep, people's priorities are skewed pretty badly.

    Rainforests burn daily for farming acreage, eradicating dozens of species of primates, countless other animal and vegetation species, and we devote to the cause of some penguins caught in a one-time disaster.

    More money was spent on the making of Jurassic Park than had ever been spent in the history of dinosaur paleontological research. The USPTO has a few hundred million dollars siphoned off in appropriations committees, since they don't really need those patent fee proceeds; announced the same day that NASDAQ:MSFT nears its 52week low, representing a drop of over a hundred billion equity because of uncertainty in a single massive litigation.

    And while I'm off-topic,

    When is O'Reilly going to create a wildlife fund for all the cute animals featured on the covers of *nix utility references?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  17. It really does matter ... YOU should know that! by fransdw · · Score: 4

    Coming from South Africa, I have a tendency to actually read some of the stuff that pops up about it. I read this and I realized that is serious. Most of you played this off as something which should not be posted on Slashdot, even kindof flaming them for daring to put it on the site. Like it or not, our mascot is a penguin and any pengiuns should be close to our hearts.

    Lets be hypothetical a little... would you say that a Swedish hacker is less of hacker than an American hacker? They are both hackers and from what I have seen on the newsgroups some of them make the news with more pizaz than many others ;-)

    Back to being a bit more serious. EVERY nut in the world knows that the conservation of a species is VERY important, since the loss of a species has several impacts on the environment that are only fully realized years after it has happened. These pengiuns off the South African coast are part of a penguin species that do not exist anywhere else in the world. Apart from the fact that the oil spill arrived during their breeding season, the impact of the oil spill will only be seen next year when hundreds, if not thousands of penguins are lost.

    So, be serious for a moment and realize that if oil spills happen a few more places in the world, and not just in SA, the pengiun mascot we have may be the only living pengiun in the world by 2020.

    It disturbs me to see "brainy" geeks be so unbelievably STUPID as to play off the importance of a species being in trouble. Drop that arrogant shithead approace to life and be better people. Perhaps you might even be a real software engineer then, and not just a hopeless script kiddie.

    That is my two cents worth ...

    --
    Life's like that ...
  18. Re:lmfao by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    there's something inordinately mundane about posting "jeepers. that penguin article just doesn't seem to have anything to do with the subject matter of slashdot."

    And just who do you think you are dictating what the subject matter of slashdot is? Do you write the articles? Do you do site maintenance? Do you pay for the sites bandwidth or colo space at exodus? Do you have anything remotely to do with the site other than being a reader posting stupid comments wasting everyones time? Whats that? No?

    -- iCEBaLM

  19. The two key words by cje · · Score: 2

    So my question is: how appropriate is it for people to use their website as a medium to raise consciousness and solicit donations for whatever cause they are currently supporting?

    The two key words in the above sentence are:

    "their website"

    This is not your Web site, nor is it mine. It is the Slashdot crew's Web site, and the last time I checked, it is both legal and appropriate for them to post material as they see fit. If they post something that you find to be objectionable, you are under no obligation to either read or respond to any of it. You do not have a service agreement with Andover or Rob or any of the crew, nor do you pay them a plugged nickel for the use of their resources. Therefore, you do not have a leg to stand on when you complain about the material that they decide to post, particularly when you can simply ignore it completely.

    The Slash code is publicly available; if you wish to start up a Web site where solicitations of any kind are not posted, then you have more than enough tools to get you on your way. Until then, I would encourage you to keep reading and contributing to Slashdot, but ignore that which bores or offends you.

    That said, I am going to add some DeCSS-related material to my home page .. that is, if it's all right with you.

    :-)

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
    1. Re:The two key words by fluxrad · · Score: 2

      i think one of the things that's being overlooked here...or perhaps a question that wasn't asked is: do the proprieters of a site, such as slashdot, as popular as it now is, have an implied duty to the 'consumer' to provide a relatively on-topic set of media?

      My answer to that question would be yes. I'm not blasting the folks at slashdot for posting this. While i disagree with the decision to go ahead with it. I do agree it is a valid cause. That being said, news for nerds: stuff that matters, does not encompas every thing news worthy. Elian is a good cause, however, that heart-warming child's story has nothing to do with a wireless lan :)

      Slashdot is a company, or at least a subsidiary, and as such, i do believe they have some inkling of a duty to the consumer to provide timely, and on-topic stories to their reader base. No one is saying that they don't feel for the penguins. I personally think it's a tragedy, but i don't believe it has a place on slashdot.

      BTW - when you speak of CmdrTaco and Hemos, and the rest of the crew, it's not their website - it's Andover's website, which is in turn owned by VA Linux. So - maybe someone should ask the guys at VA if this is a slashdot worthy story. not that they would really give a shit either way.


      FluX
      After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    2. Re:The two key words by fluxrad · · Score: 2

      lol - i just thought i would reply that i do in fact know how much work goes into a site like this. I work for a "site like this" - not necessarily a news related site. But if you asked me how much of a pain in the ass it was to come in on weekends to rack new boxes, having to involve yourself in the hassle of a semi-ungrateful user base, or getting in at 8 or 9 in the morning, only to find out that you have to stay 'till midnight or later because of someone's screw up or a DDOS or what have you (and then do it again the next day, and the next, and the nex....) ....i would know.

      Slashdot gets an A for effort - but so does just about every other company i've ever seen, or had the privelege to work for.

      i think what disturbs me, is that every time i post an unpopular opinion on slashdot, i get flamed. I didn't post "Natalie Portman With hot grits down her pants!" - and still i get moderated down and flamed because of it. That, i think, is the saddest part of all.


      FluX
      After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  20. Re:lmfao by fluxrad · · Score: 2

    And just who do you think you are dictating what the subject matter of slashdot is?

    i, sir, am the consumer. If slashdot wants to turn itself into a nature-conservatory, or what have you...that's all well and good. That is their perogative. I didn't email anyone about it. i didnt call Hemos at his honeymoon hideout and bitch at him for allowing one of his co-workers to post the story. I simply stated that i felt it was an off-topic story in a publicly accessible forum.

    If the guys at slashdot want to turn it into a generic news source for any and all news-worthy articles, e.g. Elian, Gore, and whatever else passes for news these days, that's fine with me. I'll take my readership elsewhere - as will a signifigant portion of slashdot's user base. Then we'll see if Andover, or VA, or whoever else, wants to pay for /.'s colocation facilities, bandwidth, et. al.

    Sorry, but Hemos, CmdrTaco, and the rest aren't my fearless leaders. I don't hang on every word the say, or post as the case may be. And i'm certainly not 'unquestioningly loyal' like some of the people i've seen posting. This is my tech source, when it ceases to be that, i'll go elsewhere.

    I eagerly await your "well why don't you go elsewhere NOW! asshole" reply.


    FluX
    After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  21. Re:lmfao by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    I eagerly await your "well why don't you go elsewhere NOW! asshole" reply.

    Consider this to be it.

    i, sir, am the consumer. If slashdot wants to turn itself into a nature-conservatory, or what have you...that's all well and good. That is their perogative. I didn't email anyone about it. i didnt call Hemos at his honeymoon hideout and bitch at him for allowing one of his co-workers to post the story. I simply stated that i felt it was an off-topic story in a publicly accessible forum.

    You stated nothing of the sort, you wrote a useless mock story about Linus taking a dump. It wasn't even half funny, it was an absolutely retarded thing to do. If you had simply stated your opinion about it being an off-topic story (which, by definition is an impossibility here anyways, as the authors make the topics) then I wouldn't have even wasted my time replying as I already brought up my thoughts about it elsewhere in the comments.

    Sorry, but Hemos, CmdrTaco, and the rest aren't my fearless leaders. I don't hang on every word the say, or post as the case may be. And i'm certainly not 'unquestioningly loyal' like some of the people i've seen posting. This is my tech source, when it ceases to be that, i'll go elsewhere.

    They aren't my "fearless leaders" either, I don't even like Rob from my dealings with him, I'm definately not loyal to them, but to even suggest that a story they post on their website is somehow off-topic is simply ludicrous. It's "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters", it's NOT simply tech news, it's NOT simply what YOU want it to be. I quite think the story is very much on-topic, as it shows us just how careless we are with the environment, we need to change or we're all going to suffer the consequences like some poor penguins off the coast of south africa. If you somehow think this isn't "Stuff that Matters" then "well why don't you go elsewhere NOW! asshole"?

    -- iCEBaLM

  22. Sending donation from U.S. via money order by bfan2 · · Score: 2

    Apparently, one way to send money from the United States to South Africa is through an International Postal Money Order. They can be purchased at U.S. post offices.

    As I understand it, you fill out a form including how much (in USD) you want to send, pay for the amount of the money order, plus a fee of $8.50 USD, and then mail the form to a processing center. Eventually the U.S. Postal Service sends the info to the foreign country's post office, and the foreign post office sends the money order to the recipient. The recipient can then cash the money order at local exchange rates.

    Does anyone have any experience with this? Is using an International Postal Money Order preferable to simply sending a personal check? Do the exchange fees make this method not worthwhile? Obtaining and sending drafts in foreign currencies seems so difficult.

    Ben

  23. Re:lmfao by fluxrad · · Score: 2

    It wasn't even half funny, it was an absolutely retarded thing to do

    you realize you flamed me because you didn't think i was funny. i think that makes you the retarded one. or at least the intolerant one. oh well...i guess i'll just thank god that i'm only subjected to your opinions on a relatively obscure environmentalist-geek website.

    btw - as far as 'on-topic' is concerned. if i go to hear a person speak at a convention on linux...and they start to digress about how they hate cheeseburgers or some such gobledeegook, is that not 'off-topic'? even if they organized and funded the convention? - you can approve of whatever they do at slashdot. - that's your right....just fucking admit the story was digressionary. Maybe if sengan had actually posted more than 2 stories in the long history of slashdot you'd have a leg to stand on with that 'it's whatever they want the topic to be' argument.


    FluX
    After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  24. Re:lmfao by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    you realize you flamed me because you didn't think i was funny. i think that makes you the retarded one. or at least the intolerant one. oh well...i guess i'll just thank god that i'm only subjected to your opinions on a relatively obscure environmentalist-geek website.

    Actually, I flamed you because I, quite frankly, thought your post was tasteless, irrelevant, and a waste of bandwidth and hard drive space. Does this make me intolerant? Perhaps. Maybe I'm justified in my intolerance however as you seem to be lowering the median IQ of the human race I belong to.

    btw - as far as 'on-topic' is concerned. if i go to hear a person speak at a convention on linux...and they start to digress about how they hate cheeseburgers or some such gobledeegook, is that not 'off-topic'? even if they organized and funded the convention?

    These are not quite parallel. The only thing slashdot claims to be is "News for Nerds, Stuff the Matters." and I find it rather insulting that us "nerds" would not think the environment matters.

    you can approve of whatever they do at slashdot. - that's your right....just fucking admit the story was digressionary.

    I admit no such thing. I suppose if the only thing you want to read about on slashdot is the latest release of KDE, maybe you need to start going to freshmeat.

    Maybe if sengan had actually posted more than 2 stories in the long history of slashdot you'd have a leg to stand on with that 'it's whatever they want the topic to be' argument.

    I really don't see how that hinders my argument, whether it's hemos, emmett, cliff, or sengan posting the penguin article, whats the difference?

    -- iCEBaLM

  25. Re:lmfao by fluxrad · · Score: 2

    Actually, I flamed you because I, quite frankly, thought your post was tasteless, irrelevant, and a waste of bandwidth and hard drive space. Does this make me intolerant? Perhaps. Maybe I'm justified in my intolerance however as you seem to be lowering the median IQ of the human race I belong to.

    i'm glad you're of the opinion that because i don't have specifically the same taste in humor, food, or whatever else we would most likely disagree on, that i am A)Dumber than you are, B)Not qualified to share my views with whomever i wish.

    i shudder at the thought that there are others as intolerant as you allowed to freely roam this planet. THAT my friend is something that scares me more than oil spills!

    and with that. I give this thread to you. You have won. I am beaten. Now let's both shut up!


    FluX
    After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  26. Sad by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2
    It's a great cause and all to save penguins - you gotta love them. However, why do we concern ourselves with things like this, spending millions to save animals, while there are people in India and many 3rd world countries that are starving. Many children haven't had a decent meal in weeks, even months.

    Or if not over sea, there are many people in the US that need help.

    While I'm not saying "dont' help the penguins", I am saying that it disturbs me that people are very frequently more interested in "save the whales" or "save the penguins" as is the case here, than helping fellow humans.

    -------
    CAIMLAS

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  27. Jackass penguins by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    Will the Jackass penguin be the logo for Microsoft's Linux distribution?

    --

  28. One Thing Penguins Have Over Demons by EXTomar · · Score: 2

    Slashdot has no qualms about posting stuff to save peguins from an oily drowning death but I think they would hestitate if demons were being hunted down and destroyed by the Vatican!

    Could this be yet another Linux vs BSD Slashdot issue? Kind of makes you think. ^_^

    ps. What the heck is that cute demon called anyways?

  29. Currency and non South African contact details by mrBlond · · Score: 2

    South African Rand (ZAR)
    Currently
    1 US$ = 6.87 ZAR
    1 UK£ = 10.33 ZAR
    1 Euro = 6.44 ZAR

    SA's international telephone/fax code is +27, and add "South Africa" to the postal address.

    --
    CowboyNeal for president!
    "Hit any user to continue."