Slashdot Mirror


Grosse Pointe Quickies

Nostradumbass told us about HandHeldCrime. This is cool for people that like to read on their Palm. jleader shared a link to a revolutionary new airplane design being built at the Van Nuys airport in Los Angeles. As if you couldn't tell from his name, linuxsucks_dot_com thinks that Linux Sucks! Use it as a tool, not as flamebait. SEWilco told us about a little cyber kid-leashing, and while you?re making sure the kids are where they need to be, kawlyn told us about the x86 Still. Beinoni shared a link to some interesting nonlinear emergent phenomena. An Anonymous Coward sent in a link to an interesting Scientific American story about anti-aging. dolanh sent in a cool question: What was your first computer? Okay, you caught me. My first real computer of note was an Apple //c. Still have the monitor. Zeitgeist gave us a link to a tool for the paranoid, Mindguard.

47 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. What's wrong with Linux sucks? by taniwha · · Score: 2

    why after I turned my monitor upside down the web page look just like any other Linux web page ....

  2. Wasn't the traffic stuff already on Slashdot? by rkmath · · Score: 2

    I think this is similar to an earlier story on Slashdot - about studies at Los Alamos that used phase-change stuff from physics to model traffic flow.

    Here is the Slashdot story link, but the original article link seems to be dead.

    http://slashdot.org/articles/99/08/05/1656256.sh tml

    PS: And would someone add the site referred to in the quickies to the list of sites which disable the "back" button" ...

  3. Thoughts by Shaheen · · Score: 2

    My first thought is that the Traffic Waves site has been posted to Slashdot before. After an initial search, I couldn't find it. Anyone else want to try?

    My second thought is this: My first computer was an IBM PS/2. Wow did that thing kick ass - 386 SX @ 25 MHz, 2 MB RAM (I upgraded to 10 YEAH!), 130 Meg HD, and a 12" monitor that you'd swear was frying your brain.

    One of the first things I learned how to do was start the example BASIC games that came with that thing - SNAKE being one of them. Ahh, snake. It ruled yesterday's computers, and it rules today's cell phones.

    Another thing, that computer came with the most documentation I've seen for any personal system. It came with the ENTIRE IBM DOS manual! It had every utility's switch, option, and description right there! If only modern computers came with such things. But then again, not much you could do in the way of a manual for a GUI driven system.

    Ah well, rant mode off..

    --
    You should never take life too seriously - You'll never get out of it alive.
  4. This is sooooo wrong... by MostlyHarmless · · Score: 2

    A wristband company called Vertex RSI... that is just NOT RIGHT in the slightest.

    That's like calling a cruise ship the Titanic; you can if you want, but it's something you just DON'T DO...

    --
    Friends don't let friends misuse the subjunctive.
  5. Traffic waves by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 3

    Interesting site. I haven't thought about it to the depth he obviously has, but I do something similar when I'm driving (even short distances). Try to keep a constant pace and put on your brakes only if you MUST (and do it as late as possible). One effect he left out was the psychological one of seeing brake lights ahead of you. When people see brake lights, they put on their brakes (often causing the stop waves). So if you don't use your brakes unless you absolutely must, the people behind you are less likely to, leading to fewer traffic waves.

    As soon as he mentioned his hypothetical friends helping him out, I thought of the state trooper idea that he mentions two paragraphs later. But I may have a twist on that: Don't get a "rolling barrier" of cops, just put one or two a few miles out from the slowdown/jam. Have them drive 5 miles below the speed limit. Everyone else will slow down to keep from passing the cop and the effect will be achieved. Experiments will be necessary to determine real distances and speeds for specific cases, of course.

    Another idea is to have continuously updated speed limit signs. When there is a jam ahead, the previous 5 miles of signs can say "65 MPH" instead of "70 MPH".
    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:Traffic waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
      Another idea is to have continuously updated speed limit signs. When there is a jam ahead, the previous 5 miles of signs can say "65 MPH" instead of "70 MPH".

      That's a fine idea, but what is really needed is a intelligent sign that flashes SPEED THE FUCK UP LOSERS! to the sluglike columns of traffic rubbernecking at the fatal accident in the opposite lanes.

    2. Re:Traffic waves by anticypher · · Score: 2

      It works quite well apparently.

      Apparently, you haven't been stuck on the M25.

      Theory has it the variable speed limits are more for regulating the flow heading towards the main spoke roads like the M1 and M4. Practice has it the rapidly changing speed limits are for revenue generation. When you see the limit change, you will see a dozen cops sitting on the side of the road after the next exit. Worse than those damnable cameras.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    3. Re:Traffic waves by fcw · · Score: 2

      I regularly drive on the section of the M25 where the variable speed limits are imposed, and I've never seen 'a dozen cops sitting on the side of the road'. I can't see why they'd bother, since the gantries above the lanes that display the speed limits have digital speed cameras built into them. Last I heard, they're set to trigger if you're doing 10mph above the posted limit (and at 90 when there's no limit posted).

  6. Scientific American re: ALT-711, the age breaker by Zoyd · · Score: 2
    From the a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/2000/0700i ssue/0700scicit2.html">SA article:

    Perhaps more exciting is [Anthony] Cerami's recent discovery of a molecular "breaker"--a drug that may actually reverse the aging process by cracking sugar-protein links once they form. "Instead of looking for prevention, we can now administer a compound to reduce the stiffness we see in diabetes and aging," Cerami reported at a recent Novartis Foundation symposium in London. The breaker, dimethyl-3-phenacylthiazolium chloride, or ALT-711, can tear tough AGE bonds apart. Diabetic animals, old dogs and elderly rhesus monkeys given the compound daily for three weeks yielded spectacular results. "The heart and major arteries, which were quite stiff, became more pliable and elastic. So the heart could pump more blood--similar to what you'd see in a young animal," Cerami stated.


    This is pretty exciting stuff. Anyone with access to Medline should check out the ALT-711 research being done. Here are the abstracts from the latest two studies:

    An advanced glycation endproduct cross-link breaker can reverse age-related increases in myocardial stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) 2000 Mar 14; 97 (6): 2809-13

    Decreased elasticity of the cardiovascular system is one of the hallmarks of the normal aging process of mammals. A potential explanation for this decreased elasticity is that glucose can react nonenzymatically with long-lived proteins, such as collagen and lens crystallin, and link them together, producing advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs). Previous studies have shown that aminoguanidine, an AGE inhibitor, can prevent glucose cross-linking of proteins and the loss of elasticity associated with aging and diabetes. Recently, an AGE cross-link breaker (ALT-711) has been described, which we have evaluated in aged dogs. After 1 month of administration of ALT-711, a significant reduction ( approximately 40%) in age-related left ventricular stiffness was observed [(57.1 +/- 6.8 mmHg x m(2)/ml pretreatment and 33.1 +/- 4.6 mmHg x m(2)/ml posttreatment (1 mmHg = 133 Pa)]. This decrease was accompanied by improvement in cardiac function.

    Improvement by aminoguanidine of insulin secretion from pancreatic islets grafted to syngeneic diabetic rats. Biochem Pharmacol (BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY) 2000 Jul 15; 60 (2): 263-8

    Prolonged hyperglycemia inhibits B-cell function by mechanisms that are largely unclarified. We investigated the involvement of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), using aminoguanidine as well as the AGE-breaking compound ALT-711 in a transplantation model. Islets from Wistar-Furth rats were transplanted under the kidney capsule of syngeneic streptozocin-diabetic recipients. Aminoguanidine was administered as 1 g/L in the drinking water. Graft-bearing kidneys were isolated and perfused to investigate insulin secretion, and grafts were excised to measure preproinsulin mRNA contents. In all transplants to diabetic rats, insulin responses to 27.8 mM glucose were abolished and aminoguanidine failed to correct this abnormality. However, aminoguanidine treatment for 8 weeks following transplantation increased preproinsulin mRNA contents of the grafts (P less than 0.05). In addition, treatment with aminoguanidine enhanced the insulin secretory response to arginine (P less than 0.05). Arginine-induced insulin secretion was also enhanced when aminoguanidine treatment was started after an initial 2-week implantation period rather than immediately after transplantation. On the other hand, treatment with ALT-711 (0.1 mg/kg by gavage) for 8 weeks completely failed to affect B-cell function of grafts, and ALT-711 was also ineffective under in vitro conditions. Our findings indicate that aminoguanidine effects in vivo are to a major extent not coupled to AGEs or nitric oxide synthetase inhibition, but possibly to oxidative modifications accomplished by the guanidine compound.
  7. Death and dying and stuff by truelight · · Score: 3

    Hey, about that anti aging article... I recently e-mailed the about.com biology guide on this, and she responded with this extremely interesting response:

    "Hello Mattias,

    Death is a part of life. In fact one of the characteristics of living things is that all living things die. Sleep would not prevent death from occurring.

    As scientists find out more and more about the body, they have discovered that our cells are genetically programmed to die. Cells have structures called telomeres that shorten as the cell ages.

    Studies have been performed to see if researchers can prevent the telomeres from shortening and thus prolong the cell's life. See:

    The Real Fountain of Youth http://biology.about.com/library/weekly/aa012298.h tm

    -- Regina" /Mattias

  8. My Computer Firsts by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    The first computer I used (that I remember) was a DEC 10.

    The first computer I had at home was a Kaypro II

    The first computer I owned was a 19MHz XT with 1MB of EMS that I used as a drive cache so I could run Windows 3.0 on it. Only took 2 minutes to start windows from a DOS prompt.

  9. JeffK's version of "Survivor" by pnevares · · Score: 3

    The quickies seem the best place for something like this. =)

    SMARTY MAN GAEM DESIGNEAR "SURVIROR"
    (be sure not to miss John Carmack's profile!)

    Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".

    --

    Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".
  10. Linuxsucks.com by pheonix · · Score: 2

    Actually, just briefly reviewing the site, I would recommend that EVERY SINGLE linux developer spend some time there.

    Many of the complaints listed are the same complaints I have, and the same complaints of anyone that I've exposed to linux. It would be nice if the list of "why linux sucks" was done in a more easily followed manner, but the raw language of it tends to help get the point across.

    Oh, and my first computer was a Tandy TRS-80 with the analog tape system...I still have it, although I haven't had it out of it's box in nearly 2 years.


    -Jer
    1. Re:Linuxsucks.com by Azog · · Score: 4
      Another book that Unix developers should all read is the Unix Haters Handbook. It comes with the Unix Barf Bag, a cool desktop accessory for the budding Unix guru!

      It has a lot of well reasoned, well documented complaints about the suckage of various Unix flavors. It is mostly pre-Linux, (and Linux and friends have fixed a lot of the problems) but many of their complaints are applicable.

      Top Unix problems, IMHO:
      • X Windows. bleah. Too many sacrifices were made for the network transparency. Still no anti-aliased fonts! Font handling in general sucks, because the client and the server have no standard way of communicating font metrics.

      • Printing, and What You See Is What You Get. This was the most significant improvement of Windows 3.x over DOS. The driver of the desktop publishing revolution was Macs and the LaserWriter. In comparasion, printing sucks on Linux. Don't tell me about TeX, or troff - I know. (shudder).

      • Basic local area networking and file sharing. This is sooo simple in Windows. You right click a folder... share as... change the default permissions... and a few seconds later all the other windows machines can see it. On Linux I'm often reduced to using ftp. What about NFS you say? Not a File System. NFS is fundamentally broken. The idea behind it was a stateless protocol - the problem is, a file system is nothing BUT state. Plus you have to edit configuration files... groan.

      • Web Browser. Mozilla is getting there... slowly... please...

      • The "Everything is A Text File" attitude. This is great for quick hacks, but a lousy way to build software. Think I'm wrong? Read the book. At least Gnome and KDE are abandoning this for actual component systems.

      But hey. For a lot of things, Unix is great! I run my home server with Mandrake 7.1, but my workstation usually runs Windows 2000. At work I use FreeBSD, and my firewall is OpenBSD.

      And, free software is slowly but surely fixing most of those problems. Just don't forget: it isn't there yet. For some people, and some things, Linux still sucks.


      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
      --
      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
      "HTML needs a rant tag" - Alan Cox
    2. Re:Linuxsucks.com by matman · · Score: 2

      I love textual conf files! It makes backups of my configuration quick and simple and is especially helluh for playing around with the configs. Thats the thing that i hate with windows, configuration is scattered between files with proprietary layouts, the registry, and ini files - who knows what to backup?! How would I backup the entire system config? its hard! Linux lets me do this modularily. Now, the registry isnt a bad idea, and I think that a central configuration registry would be a cool thing for linux - even just a few SQL databases even?

    3. Re:Linuxsucks.com by Azog · · Score: 3

      Yes, that would be nice. Now that MySQL is GPL, it would be possible to do something like the Windows Registry, but properly.

      I like text config files too... sometimes... but it can be so damn confusing finding the file you need. Especially when you go back and forth between several flavors of Unix. On FreeBSD, the Apache config file is... um... I think /usr/local/etc/apache/apache.conf. But under Linux it's... um... /usr/etc/apache.conf. Or is it? Damn! time to run find again...

      And where was that php3.ini again? ARRRGH!

      Unfortunately, it's too late to change things. Although it would be possible to make a distribution of Linux with all the settings and configurations stored in a nice MySQL database, with a nice text mode tool for editing it (or just run mysql -u root -p config if you are the command-line type...)

      it's too late. It would be incompatible with all the other stuff out there, and as soon as Apache, or PHP, or Bind, or ifconfig, or ANYTHING was revised, you would be in a race to keep up.

      No, Unix is stuck with a zillion text mode files, all with incompatible syntax, different naming conventions, and poor documentation.

      The only glimmer of light is the File System Standard. Maybe, eventually, all the Free Unixes of the world will agree on it, and at least I will know WHERE to find the file I want.

      (not that NT is always an improvement... who can remember where the hosts file lives on an NT system? Somewhere under \system32\drivers, I think?)


      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)

      --
      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
      "HTML needs a rant tag" - Alan Cox
    4. Re:Linuxsucks.com by matman · · Score: 2

      maybe it could be used in the hurd or something? hehe.

      the big issue would be that not all conf files work like 'key = value'. otherwise, you could have some daemon keep some sort of flat file/database equivilance.

      the idea is that once such a system exists, people may be inclined to use it. hehe. it could be something like the proc filesystem. where you have files, which arent really files. you can change them, but the changes really get made in the database. I'd go for that :)

    5. Re:Linuxsucks.com by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2
      • X Windows. bleah. Too many sacrifices were made for the network transparency. Still no anti-aliased fonts! Font handling in general sucks, because the client and the server have no standard way of communicating font metrics.
      Yeah, there's always room for improvement. But network transparency is incredibly important for some of us. Moreover, "no AA fonts" is not such a big problem as certain people like to portray it. Right now, for example, I can spot exactly two cases of the jaggies on my desktop (the "AM" in my clock).

      All in all I appreciate X a lot, in spite of several years of using Win 9x exclusively.

      • Printing, and What You See Is What You Get. This was the most significant improvement of Windows 3.x over DOS. The driver of the desktop publishing revolution was Macs and the LaserWriter. In comparasion, printing sucks on Linux. Don't tell me about TeX, or troff - I know. (shudder).
      Again, not so big a problem as often protrayed. For nicety-nicety documents, I whip them out in LyX, gen them up as PostScript, inspect them in the previewer, click a button to print them, and - presto! - what I saw is what comes out on my printer. (Not even a PostScript printer, thanks to the wonders of GhostScript.)

      • Basic local area networking and file sharing. This is sooo simple in Windows. You right click a folder... share as... change the default permissions... and a few seconds later all the other windows machines can see it. On Linux I'm often reduced to using ftp. What about NFS you say? Not a File System. NFS is fundamentally broken. The idea behind it was a stateless protocol - the problem is, a file system is nothing BUT state. Plus you have to edit configuration files... groan.
      NFS works fine by me. If I want others to see a file, chmod fixes it in an eyeblink.

      I admit that ACLs would be nice in certain circumstances, though as a former VAX admin I can testify that in business environments they can be an enormous amount of headache for little tangible gain. (Think "office politics".)

      • Web Browser. Mozilla is getting there... slowly... please...
      This is a favorite thing for trolls and astroturfors to bring up. No, I don't think you fit into either category, but you still get the same answer they do: this is not a problem with Unix. So long as 90% of the desktop belongs to a single platform, 99.99% of the for-profit programming work is going to go toward perfecting products for that platform.

      • The "Everything is A Text File" attitude. This is great for quick hacks, but a lousy way to build software. Think I'm wrong? Read the book. At least Gnome and KDE are abandoning this for actual component systems.
      And making a very big mistake, IMO. One of the few things that ticks me off about GNOME is that they are GNOMEifying things rather than having GNOME pick up what you already have installed on your system. I haven't looked at 1.2 yet, but under October... if you upgrade xscreensaver, GNOME doesn't get the new goodies. Also, some menu items are actually easier to fix with an editor than by clicking 100 times on the panel (e.g., ssh terminals to all your other machines/accounts), but when you go to do it the easy way, you find that you have to edit separate files in separate directories rather than a single flat file like FVWM offers. Grrr.

      > Just don't forget: it isn't there yet. For some people, and some things, Linux still sucks.

      I can deal with that. If Linux isn't "there" yet for someone, that someone simply shouldn't use Linux. Or should dive in and fix it.

      But for the rest of us, it's absurd to hear a blanket condemnation that "Linux sux" when we are able to use it to do so many fine things that we were not able to do with our previous systems.

      --
      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  11. Fix the link to HandHeldCrime by imac.usr · · Score: 2

    it's showing as "http://slashdot.org/www.handheldcrime.com".

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  12. Re:Anti-aging = Overpopulation! by ucblockhead · · Score: 2

    Most religions allow sorts of unnatural things, like antibiotics, contraceptives, etc.

    But anyway, I'd just like to point out that in the rich countries where anti-aging treatments are most likely to occur, the birth rate is at, or below, replacement value and falling.

    (Even if we could stop aging and all disease, your life expectency would still be in the ~250 range, because of accidents, etc.)

    --
    The cake is a pie
  13. This is much more interesting than Linux Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
  14. First computer: TRS-80 Model 4 by Claudius · · Score: 2

    Man did that thing ever rock! Two, count em, two floppy disk drives, a whopping 64k of ram, and a great big red power button on the keyboard. Sure it had sucky games, but then again it helped me learn assembly language programming (Z-80) in 6th grade. I didn't own an assembler (couldn't talk the parents into springing for one) so I hand-assembled everything with a hex calculator and entered it directly into memory with the debugger.... Ah, the good old days. I loved the thing--a throwback to when computers cost about as much as an automobile and weighed about the same too.

    Btw., whatever happened to Scripsit, the greatest word processor of all time?

  15. Linuxsucks... by LongShip · · Score: 2
    No flames please...

    But I kind of like the linuxsucks site.

    The guy has a sense of humor. I dropped in and had a good laugh at myself and many other Linux advocates.

    We need to laugh more at ourselves. Kudos to the linuxsucks webmaster.

  16. Re: Older traffic story ... by stripes · · Score: 2
    You are right - something related to the traffic thing was on Slashdot earlier.

    And if you search in it for "waves" about the forth one has a link to the same page the quickies article talks about. I knew I had seen it on slashdot before :-)

  17. IBM convertable laptop by ostiguy · · Score: 2

    My father works for Prudential, and they naturally were all over Big Blue. I donno how close it was to being the first laptop, it had a blue tinted monochrome screen, and must have weighed 15 lbs. To expand it, one added 4inch/3inch/15 inch units to the back; I think this is how it got extra comm ports. You could keep adding units until the thing was aboutthe size of a surfboard (there was a printer module).

    My first real computer was a PS/2 model 80, which was a 386 with I think 4 mb ram standard, but I had that sonuvabitch rocking with a Kingston 486 upgrade and a Kingston memory MCA board, fully populated with 16mb of ram. It was on this I ran WFW 3.11 and used Prodigy, so I was on the net relatively early, when I was 16 or so (5.5 yrs ago). True geekdom didn't come until I had worked for Pru a couple summer, and got interested in networking.

    I still have a *^%#load of various MCA NICs in my basement, the Model 80 is still down there. I should really put Linux on it, or something, just for the memories. I have had Model 77, 56, 57, 60, etc all flow thru, but just that one original PS/2 remains.

    matt

    1. Re:IBM convertable laptop by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      rocking with a Kingston 486 upgrade and a Kingston memory MCA board, fully populated with 16mb of ram
      Hardware upgrades really used to rock. Systems didn't dead-end back in the day anywhere near as frequently as they do now. Thank std_deity.h for companies like Powerleap and Evergreen still keeping the innovative hardware upgrade alive. I've already turned my Pentium75 into a K6-2 300. Soon I'll be upgrading my company's old NT server from a PPro 200 to a Celeron 600 without having to take it down for a week.

      Does anyone else know any other companies with a flare for such upgrades?

  18. Ant's first computer... TI-99/4A by antdude · · Score: 2

    More information right here: here.

    Now, if I could just get game ROMs for the emulators :(.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  19. existing program suitable for simulating traffic? by orpheus · · Score: 3

    [BTW, Driver Psychology is a useful link for those who are interested in the other major component of traffic -- or simply have a friend they want to keep from killing themselves on the highway]

    I used to take my friends to a cabin in Laconia, NH for Thanksgiving each year. One year, (early 80's) we brought several (Apple II) computers with us and attacked this problem, coding and discussing it as we conducted our usual festivities. The joke was that we'd win a Nobel Prize (The Peace Prize, we decided) and the undying gratitude of the Billions in the Next Millenium.

    Alas, coding/modifying the digital automata took most of our time , and none of us had more than a couple of years driving experience. (Yikes, I can't believe it even ran in something like real time on a 64K machine with 191K floppies (this was before hard drives for personal computers) running on a 8/16 bit CPU at a true speed of 1/2 MHz) We never made our breakthrough -- and the hangovers on the last day of that trip made several of us repress the memory of the entire weekend.

    Well, here we are, hard upon the next millenium, and I was wondering what software is out there that could implement a digital automata traffic simulator. We had notebooks full of elaborate scenarios - traffic light synchronization, types of accidents, ambulances, cars going in/out os various types of commercial parking lot entryways, etc. It was a low-res SimCity of traffic. -- much more fascinating than it sounds. (And hey, if a million late night hackers can't solve traffic, then we should go back to the single wheel and start over)

    Can anyone suggest a program - perhaps Object Oriented - that would let me repeat and expand on my original experiments? I *still* drive differently because of what I learned (At last! Driver's Ed that means something!)

    --

    If you can go to bed, knowing you did a valuable thing today, you're very lucky. If you can't... it's not bedtime

  20. HeHe... wanna start a betting pool? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2
    That's particularly ironic, because pretty much EVERY complaint that guy has about Linux applies equally to BSD!

    So whaddya think... start a betting pool...

    Is he:

    An "anti GPL RMS is a dirty hippie commie BSD license is "more free"" type?

    A Berkeley student/alum who is disgruntled that Linux gets so much mindshare?

    A hipocrite, plain and simple?

    john
    Resistance is NOT futile!!!

    Haiku:
    I am not a drone.
    Remove the collective if

    --
    Imagine all the people...
    1. Re:HeHe... wanna start a betting pool? by pheonix · · Score: 2

      He could actually be simply someone like me; someone who uses Linux/BSD but still sees that there is a great deal that is NOT good about it and a great deal that Windows/MacOS still have over linux (ouch, that's going to hurt my Karma). He might just be using a humorous "linux sucks" forum to get his point across.

      With all that having been said, I still vote for "hypocrite" with my $5 of pay-pal cash :P
      -Jer

  21. The hound says I'm ranting by h2odragon · · Score: 2
    ...so I'll rant to a more receptive audience. Warning, partially coherent frothing follows, just skip to the next if yer easily offinded.

    Read linuxsucks. the top reasons especially; specifically, the last comment on the page (as I write this, "Luke from [IP address]).

    OK. The PhD in AI. I've done x86 assembler, bare metal stuff, and I've done and read quite a bit of AI... informal but I have some knowledge. I've done and am doing some AI-ish stuff. The two DO NOT mix. There's brains in AI work, there's brains in OS work; I don't think the two can co-exist. If you think they can, please tell me your brand, I could use a shot. In short, I laugh. VMS bigot anyway.

    Next up, Chris 2/17. Damn. Anybody know a "chris" at microsloth? Perhaps a high-up in marketing? The editor's note helps confirm my suspicion that I wants a shot of his brand.

    The screed above that, well, that's sorta suspiciosly like my (semi-illiterate) 14yr old nephew would write after an evening of stoking up on, say, Ziff Davis publications. Really, the shameless propaganda with no redeeming social value has got to stop. Will no one think of the children?

    And I'd love to rant a bit more about that page, but that's it. How long has this been up? Granted I'll say these comments are probably worth reading, but 3? That's it? What kind of criticism is that? Any propaganda meister worth his salt ought to know that the key principle is REPITION... I'm sure you've got it in you somewhere.

    ... Ahh, that feels better. But really, ya'll, is bombing the form gonna do any good? Lookit this forum; we knows there's dipshits abounding who happen to be around, do we need to prove it yet again?

  22. Re:Some History by Schnedt+McWapt · · Score: 2

    Cool hack.

    I remember back in the old times when I got deleted from a large multi-line BBS. It was an Oracomm board, and if you were the one who originated a discussion thread you had the ability to also delete it completely. So one night for fun I spooled the whole thread into a text file, ran the textfile through the Jive filter, deleted the thread, and posted the new 'jive' version as if it were the original thread.

    Boy were people pissed.

  23. Linux Sucks? by Rinikusu · · Score: 5

    Okay, this is pretty funny.

    First off, Let me start off by saying that I'm a Win2K user. I used to run NT 4.0, but replaced it with an errant install of Redhat 6.2 (see some of my previous postings for that). So, I more or less tried to use Redhat 6.2 for about a month.

    Now, why am I back to Win"blows"?

    Simple:

    1) The applications I use are here today, not tomorrow, not next year. I got tired of trying out really beta software for Linux for the stuff I use, and the stuff that wasn't beta was very unpolished, very cluttered, very unfocused. Think GNUCash vs. Quicken or even Money and you'll see what I mean.

    2) X is slow and crappy and unresponsive. I run a dual CPU system and it annoys the hell out of me. X likes to crash, taking my whole system with it, usually. It just sucks balls. I stated before that the client-server architecture inherent in X is NOT NEEDED for typical home/end users. BeOS does the GUI right. You want to beat the GUI experience that Win2K gives? Ditch X and come up with something new.

    3) I've not *touched* my registry since installing Win2k. I had to "touch" all kinds of config files weekly under Linux, just to install stuff.

    4) Who cares about freedom to do with the software? Can't you see that RMS wants you to be paid MINIMUM WAGE for your work? How dare you code for money! nono, that was a rant, sorry. Rather, most users don't give a rat's ass about GPL or whatever. They want to install a software package and then use it. They don't want to have to search freshmeat.net for some obscure graphics lib or a specific version or whatever. Win2K at least halfway has this right. how many updates have I done to Win2K? Two or Three, the security update patch, couple drivers. And they installed *smoothly* with a double click. Every week I was scouring for the latest glibc or whatever to get whatever to work. Too much of a hassle.

    4. Linux just felt too beta to do anything that I would want to do. The feel is not right on the OS. I don't care how smooth the architecture is or how stable it is (to an extent). Think of it this way: My Ti Graphing Calculator I had for engineering never crashed on me, but you don't hear me extolling it's stability virtues. Win2K didn't crash on me until I installed EverCrack.

    5. i won't go into the games rant, because games are not important to me.

    Does Linux suck? Hell fuck no. I've got two linux machines in my living room routing mail, etc. They are *great* for that. But for everyday using, Win2K provides me with the best experience, freedom be damned. BeOS has a better "experience" than linux, and I'd really like to see it take off. Will I ever use Linux as my everday OS again? If they can fix X so it doesn't run so slow and get some real apps that don't require 3 hours of searching to find that obscure library (hey, freedom has its price), then maybe. Until then, I'm sticking with something I know and somewhat trust. Fuck, guys, it's just a goddamned OS. Go outside and see the real world every once and awhile.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Linux Sucks? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3

      > The applications I use are here today, not tomorrow, not next year.

      Yep, applications are an issue. But you should blame the vendors, not Linux.

      > X is slow and crappy and unresponsive. I run a dual CPU system and it annoys the hell out of me. X likes to crash, taking my whole system with it, usually.

      This makes me wonder whether you've actually used it. I find it faster and more responsive than the Win9x GUI on the same machine (though the WinGUI is probably being dragged down by that boat-anchor excuse for an operating system that it's integrated with).

      I also find that recent versions of X crash only extremely rarely, and even if you include older versions of X, I have never seen it take down the whole system.

      > I stated before that the client-server architecture inherent in X is NOT NEEDED for typical home/end users. ... You want to beat the GUI experience that Win2K gives?

      So. Is W2K what home/end users should be running?

      > I've not *touched* my registry since installing Win2k.

      Oh, boy. Wait until it gets corrupted, and then see what you get to touch.

      > I had to "touch" all kinds of config files weekly under Linux, just to install stuff.

      OK, but under Windows you "touch" a bunch of clickies to configure your new software. Some of us find text files more user friendly.

      > Who cares about freedom to do with the software? Can't you see that RMS wants you to be paid MINIMUM WAGE for your work? How dare you code for money! nono, that was a rant, sorry.

      Even in the unlikely event that RMS actually wants that, what has it got to do with using Linux? Sorry, but you have revealed yourself as a troll by including this one.

      > Rather, most users don't give a rat's ass about GPL or whatever. They want to install a software package and then use it. They don't want to have to search freshmeat.net for some obscure graphics lib or a specific version or whatever. Win2K at least halfway has this right. how many updates have I done to Win2K? Two or Three, the security update patch, couple drivers. And they installed *smoothly* with a double click. Every week I was scouring for the latest glibc or whatever to get whatever to work. Too much of a hassle.

      I don't find this much of a hastle at all. Particularly compared to dll hell. When a program needs a particular version of something, you can at least find out which version it needs. Then just visit the appropriate site and download it. (I get mine as RPMs from rufus.www.org, where you can list them by name, distro, etc.)

      At least with Linux kits you can see what they are going to change before you install them, and most of them can be installed beside older versions as well. Yeah, you have to look at it before you install, but IMO that's much better than trying to clean up the mess after one of those two click installs you're bragging about.

      > Linux just felt too beta to do anything that I would want to do. The feel is not right on the OS.

      That's a perfectly reasonable opinion. So why did you have to bring up all the other fluff arguments? If it's not for you, don't use it. Unlike a certain other OS I could name, no one is trying to make you use Linux.

      > I don't care how smooth the architecture is or how stable it is (to an extent). Think of it this way: My Ti Graphing Calculator I had for engineering never crashed on me, but you don't hear me extolling it's stability virtues.

      Ah, but unlike Windows, calculators are not in the habit of crashing. Think of it this way: if other calculators crashed in the middle of exams, wouldn't the engineering students be extolling the virtues of one that didn't?

      For some installations, crashing computers simply are not an option. And even for the rest of us, there's no reason to put up with it. I've got better things to do than wait for my system to reboot so I can see how much work I've lost. The pity about the "desktop revolution" is that it has trained people to think losing time and work is normal.

      > Win2K didn't crash on me until I installed EverCrack.

      Wow. Looks like you're doing better than lots of other W2K owners.

      > Fuck, guys, it's just a goddamned OS.

      Increasingly, the favorite way of justifying settling for something that's overpriced and second rate.

      If your calculator habitually crashed during an exam, would you shrug it off with "fuck, it's just a goddamned calculator"? If your car frequently broke down on the way to a job interview or hot date, would you shrug it off with "fuck, it's just a goddamned automobile"? When an airplane falls out of the sky, does the FAA shrug it off with "fuck, it's just a goddamned airplane"?

      No, whether at work or at play, quality matters. Lots of people want to spread the myth that this shouldn't apply to OSes, just like they want to spread the myth that anti-trust law and consumer protection law shouldn't. But I don't buy it.

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  24. Re:Say it ain't so! by rodgerd · · Score: 2

    Because Microsoft products use a different encoding to iso-8859-1, which is standard in the UNIX world - and, indeed the standard to which most moders specs are written. Windows encoding has several extra characters encoded in undefined areas, which contain not-so-smart quotes (the typeographers' quotes).

    The shouldn't be a problem, because when translating to HTML, one should either use non-smart quotes (' and "), or one of the HTML entities (&ldquo;, &lsquo;, <q>) that deal with this problem. Instead, MS products use &# entities, specifying numbers which are meaningless on non-Windows encoded systems.

    Of course, it isn't all Microsoft's fault. While Lynx and IE 4 & 5 both recognise and render the various quoting entities and markup correctly, stupid old Netscape, and worse yet, Mozilla don't, even in their latest incarnations. (Netscape 4.72 not doing so is bad enough, IMO, but mozilla has no excuse, since the extneded entities are part of the HTML 4 standard. So much for claims gecko is a standards-compliant rendering engine).

    At any rate, the most correct thing to do would be to use dumb old typewriter style quoting in HTML. But Microsoft products don't do that, sadly.

  25. Linuxsucks runs Linux/Apache by Hollins · · Score: 2

    Actually, their webhosting provider (hypermart.net) runs Linux/apache (guess they're not up to setting up their own server).

    hypermart.net is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) secured_by_Raven/1.4.2-dev ApacheJServ/1.0 g2am/1.36 adutil/1.7 g2ad/1.63 on Linux

  26. DIGI-COMP 1 by Detritus · · Score: 2
    My first computer was a DIGI-COMP 1, a 3-bit mechanical computer. It was built out of pieces of plastic and wire.

    In high school, I learned how to program on the school district's RCA Spectra 70 mainframe that was connected to a 110 bps KSR-35 teletype in each high school via modem. The RCA Spectra 70 was a clone of the IBM 360, except for the reliability bits. It crashed all the time. It offered Dartmouth BASIC, COBOL, WATFOR FORTRAN and RPG.

    My first electronic computer was a Radio Shack TRS-80 Model 1 (AKA Trash-80) with 4K of DRAM. I really wanted an Apple II but I couldn't afford one.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  27. Traffic Jam Simulator by markfive · · Score: 2

    A Traffic Simulator Applet written by Cay Horstmann

  28. now I know you all probably read linuxsux.com... by vyesue · · Score: 4

    ...but I have nothign to say about that.

    Instead, I thought I'd comment on the nonlinear emergent whatevers - if you did not take the time to read that because it looked like some wierd math thing you couldnt understand, I urge you to read it. In fact, shame on the /. crew for not giving this the big, bold, badass headline that it deserves. this is probably one of the most important things that you will ever read on /., and it's somethign that every human over 16 in the US sould be forced to read.

    I suffered through weeks of drivers education classes and learned nothing. if driver's education taught you NOTHING other than the contents of this link, america would be reshaped permanently, forever.

    Go read the link. now. seriously. do it.

    99% of traffic problems in this country can be SOLVED by following one simple rule - LEAVE SOME FUCKING ROOM BETWEEN YOU AND THE GUY IN FRONT OF YOU. enough room for some jackass to jump in between without you getting all hot an bothered about it. traffic sucks in this country for the simple fact that people ride each others' asses everywhere they drive. well, that and retards driving slow in the fastlane, but tailgating is a far more terrible problem.

    go read this link. learn to drive like this. spread the word; spread this link. let's use the slashdoteffect for the powers of good just once, mmkay?

  29. Yeah, over 30 years ago... Wait! It wasn't /.! by joel.neely · · Score: 3

    I ran across this idea over 30 years ago. Some guys at IBM were working on simulating traffic flow thru city streets and came to the conclusion that the best description of the available data had the same mathematical form as that of fluid flow in pipes. From that key observation, many interesting analogies followed directly: standing waves, shock waves, the congestion resulting from an abrupt narrowing (lane closure or step down to a smaller diameter pipe), etc.

    Fascinating to contemplate how often a new discovery could be found by going back and looking at some of those outdated materials in the dusty old dead tree libraries!

    A couple of years back there was a flurry of excitement about a couple of high-school kids who used some math software to come up with a "new" geometric construction for dividing a line into an arbitrary number of equal divisions. Their teacher had them present a paper at a math teaching conference, and they were even written up in the Wall St. Journal. Meanwhile, I found exactly the same bit of geometry in an old book on typography and book design, and a newer one (but older than their "discovery") on Fontographer. Seems this same construction had simply been a well-known tool in the printing and book layout field even though the math teachers had forgotten it.

    All of this raises the question... In our rush to assume that anything not on line (and easily found by a search engine) is no longer relevant, how much real information are we in danger of losing? (And the problem itself isn't new -- remember the Venetian stained glass that nobody knows how to make any more?)

  30. My First Computer?? by Port+Forlorn · · Score: 2

    My first "computer" was an IBM 407 Calculating Punch, programmed by placing jumper wires on a board about twice the size of today's mobos. By the time I went to college, I found they had a Clary DE-60, also programmed with jumper wires and a General Precision LGP-30. Back in '65, this computer had 64K bytes - of rotating drum memory, no RAM, not even "core" memory. I/O was only through the Freiden Flexowriter, a huge typewriter (85 lbs.) with a paper tape punch. And it was programmed in hex machine language. I'll never forget debugging hex where the codes were 0-9,F,G,J,K,Q and W. (They represented the codes from the Flexowriter for 10-15.) Finally, the school got an advanced computer, a CDC-8090 with 4K 12 bit words of core memory. But it came with tape drives, a punched card reader and a FORTRAN compiler! So we really coded up a storm!!

    My first operating system was tape based because there wasn't any room left in memory after that compiler loaded its run time libraries for the execution. (It took two of us three weeks to write.) And it was reloaded after every job! The OS was really just a job control system but it was designed to interpret only the first two characters of each word on the job control card so we had contest to come up with the weirdest sentences that would still specify the right job parameters.

    After graduation, I got to work on an IBM 1401 and one of the custom machines (AN/FSQ-31) IBM built for the military just before they designed the 360. By the time I bought my own home computer (a Commodore 64), I'd already been programming for over 15 years. But that C-64 was capable of graphics and sprites that the mainframe at work couldn't touch. When the C-128 came out and offered CPM, I though it was a wonderful alternative to OS/360.

    My favorite magazine was Dr. Dobb's Journal but that was back when it was titled "Dr. Dobb's Journal of Computer Calisthenics and Orthodontia; Running Light Without Overbyte". Things have changed a bit since. I'm playing with Beowolf clusters at home and designing distributed comm networks for world wide deployment now but thanks for the opportunity to stroll down Memory Lane!
    ----
    VP Unmarketing, Product Confusion and Linux Distributions

    --
    VP Unmarketing, Product Confusion and Linux Distributions
    Megadodo Publications, Ursa Minor Beta
  31. Re:Anti-aging = Overpopulation! by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Death is the price we pay for the orgasm.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  32. x86 still could kill you! by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    I don't know what the guy who built the x86 still used to solder the still shut, but if he used standard Drat Shack solder, the result of the still could kill you with lead poisoning. Use lead free solder, like plumbers use.

  33. A Boy's First Computer by Darguz · · Score: 2

    The first computer I ever worked on was a DEC PDP 11/70, in 1975. Then our school sprung for a state-of-the-art TRS-80. The first computer I owned myself was a 286 clone from American Semiconductor.


    --

    --


    --
    What? WHAT?!! Oh.
  34. Re:VMS ACLs by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    > I admin VMS for a living and I detest ACLs - they just generate work and complication. Thankfully, here they are verboten unless there is No Other Way. And there is ALWAYS Another Way.

    Yeah, I used to work in a shop where the secretaries wanted to use ACLs to share their files with specific other secretaries. Problems, problems.

    They would request an ACL, we would set it up, they would forget they requested it, and then get pissed off when someone read something they weren't supposed to know.

    Or they would come around when someone was out of town, wanting us to set up ACLs to let them see the absent party's files. And we had no guidelines whatsoever as to who was actually supposed to be able to see what.

    Or two would disagre on how an ACL should be set up, and we'd have to go to the boss to see which secretary had more clout that week, so that one could have her way... until the next round.

    Then there were the technically clueless secretaries who convinced some manager that they should be given system privileges so they could manage the ACLs, after which things got really screwed up, both technically and in terms of legitimacy of access.

    All in all, the problem was more political than technical. We tried scripts to let them manage their own and leave us out of the loop, but that didn't work because they were so clueless about what they wanted and so forgetful about what they had actually granted.

    And in addition to the politics, you could hardly get anything done for the phone ringing with someone demanding access to someone else's files.

    I'm glad I'm out of that game.

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  35. Re:Scientific American re: ALT-711, the age breake by The+Apocalyptic+Lawn · · Score: 2

    They mention that high sugar levels are bad. THC drops your sugar levels - would this mean that stoners stay younger?

    --
    't used to be LawnMOWER, really...
  36. Re:FINALLY, SOMEONE I DON'T HAVE TO FLAME by GRAMMERSoft · · Score: 2

    Oh yeah, and your moderation notwithstanding, I still do not consider myself a troll. Yeah, I've had a few troll moderations, along with every other type of moderation (except insightful, *sigh*). And my karma is always around zero. If I was trying to be a troll, I could easily do a lot better than that...

    --
    That said, I think it's time I changed my .sig (again)