Groening Says The Simpsons Movie Planned
Alex T-B writes "Matt Groening in a news conference revealed that a film based on The Simpsons is planned [Woo-hoo!], although no deals have been struck yet [D'oh!]. (WARNING, geeky Simpsons reference: A film about The Simpsons? That is unpossible!)"
Here is a link describing all the various rumors and reoprts of a Simpsons movie.
FYI: Fox purchased the simpsonsmovie.com a few years back. Currently it's just used as a placeholder housing ads for 20th Century Fox films and video releases.
The "story" would have to have some Very Special Episode quality to it, of course. Kind of like the Transformers movie--the show itself was one thing, and then the movie came out and Whoa--BIG plot! Big themes! Major cast changes! etc etc etc.. not that the Simpsons would do such, necessarily--but I'm sure there's some sort of Comedic equivalent. (I believe the same sort of thing happened with the GI Joe movie, no?)
I guess the moral here, is that there's a pretty good history of animated shows going to feature length film, that, well, hey.. I have faith in the Simpsons Crew to pull it off.
What might be a problem is balancing the need to draw in the average fan and the need to make the Devoted fan excitedly happy...I mean, you know they're going to need to make ALLLL sorts of references to past shows.. they need to balance that against getting the Occasional viewer to have fun with the movie, too.
I hope they get $10,000 for this movie. Why? Because with $10,000, they'd be millionaires.
--
Linux MAPI Server!
http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
(Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
SNPP.COM has a 1998 interview with Mike Scully, executive producer of The Simpsons. He basically states that animation is the only way to go.
Here's an excerpt from the interview:
"It would have to be animated. I don't see how we could ever do a live-action movie as funny as the animated series. The animation allows so many creative liberties that you just wouldn't be able to acheive with live-action. I think it would be impossible for a set of actors to portray these characters. The audience likes to see them the way they are, and if you tried to turn, say, John Goodman into Homer, then it ultimately has to be disappointing to everyone, including John Goodman. Obviously, he could never live up to Homer."
. . . like reusing the backgrounds.
Here's my prediction (if the movie comes out)
1. Tons of people will see it immediately.
2. Tons of people will bitch about how it sucked and was nowhere near as good as the earlier episodes.
3. 2 years later, after seeing the movie a few times, the same people will say that the movie is brilliant.
4. A year after that, when the sequel is released, tons of people will say that the first movie was better.
If Phil Heartman were still able to work his magic for us we'd some day be able to hear, "Hi! I'm Troy McCluer. You might remember me from other films such as _The Simpsons: The Movie_ and _The Simpsons II: More Money For Us_." Though, it's Lyonel Hutz I miss even more.
--
Shopkeeper: This monkey's paw will grant you three wishes, great or small,but...
...that there will finally be a Simpsons movie!
Matt: Cool! I'll finally get a Simpsons movie!
Shopkeeper: Yes, but each wish may carry dire consequences...
Matt: They can't stop me if I use the paw!
Shopkeeper: You're not listening! Without Conan or your other old writers it won't
Matt: I wish...
Shopkeeper: No! Don't do it!
Matt:
*whoosh*
...Well, I hope it turns out to be a good film, but I'm a little skeptical. Five or six years ago would have been a much more opportune time, and they're not making episodes up to the quality of the old days. But, time will tell, I suppose...
-- I'll be more enthusiastic about thinking outside the box when there's evidence of thinking going on inside it.
"Vaporware is a victimless crime. Kind of like punching someone in the dark."
No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?
What's everyone griping about? Unpossible is a perfectly cromulent word.
It reality this might wind up like a Money Python movie - a bunch of gut-busting sketches all tied together. Except that, with the Simpsons, one of their best techniques are the subtle plot twists that almost go unnoticed. The episode never starts out having anything to do with the actual plot. (Case in point.... Springville demolishes the Burns Casino, and the episode is about Homer teaching Flanders to live a little.)
Anyway, I just don't know if a longer, uncut Simpsons episode would really be entertaining. It will be interesting to see what it's rated though.
I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.
A movie certainly would embiggen the show...
Ha! I kill me!
The robotic Richard Simmons.
Oh my god, his ass is gonna blow!!!
Double J. Strictly for the . . .
"However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
--
--
Groening has had almost nothing to do with the Simpsons over the past few years. He has devoted the vast majority of his time to getting Futurama off the ground and left the Simpsons to others...have you noticed his credit on the show lately? Something like "creative consultant". I know it's always gonna be his baby, but I wonder what role he'd really have in a movie.
(In the voice of the comic store guy)
With a production as large as a full-scale animated movie, I have to say this sounds more like wishful thinking than anything very real. So far it sounds like they have no ideas, no script, no backing, no firm plans, just Matt saying that they'll be doing one. I'd personally love to see it, but my guess is the show will be off the air before there's a chance to do the movie...I've been watching it less and less as it seems to be running out of steam.
Simpsons fans have been waiting for this since '93!
Check out SNPP.com's info concerning the Simpsons movie which has been collected over the years.
If you've seen the early episodes written by Matt you'll be glad he isn't around. Its not that he's a terrible hack, but the magic of the Simpsons was more or less developed by Fox with their assortment of really talented comedy writers. Remember Matt's Homer Simpson? The stern father? That's not the Homer you've fallen in love with, you love the Jerkass Homer.
Like all television The Simpsons is a huge production, lots of people and lots of work. Matt certainly is the creator but it wouldn't be fair to call him the author. He's a great figurehead, but the less influence he has the better. I'd much rather see Conan attached to this than Matt.