Slashdot Mirror


Sonique To Come To Linux

chrisbolt writes: "Check this out ... according to DMusic, the FAQ for the next version of Sonique says Sonique 2 will run on Linux! On top of that it will run on BeOS and MacOS, making it the most cross-platform mp3 player available." I'm still in love with XMMS, but have been playing around with other players recently -- and I've heard good stuff about Sonique.

43 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. Sonique has it's problems by jon_c · · Score: 3

    If you remember a while back it was exposed that winamp has a bug in it's "nitrone" engine that f*cks up mp3 decompression. Well from a link (i can't find offhand) Sonique has the similare problem; it doesn't decode the audio correctly.

    It's supprising that the two most popular mp3 players in the world can't do this correctly. XMMS which uses mpg123 works flawlessly, a dozen or so players based of the Xing Decoder or Xaudio decoder work fine. Why they use there own faulty mpeg decompression is beyond me.

    Another interesting thing about Sonique is it's visulazation SDK, it's being used or memiced is Real Jukebox and Windows Media Player 7. From what i understand you create a function that formats an array based of PCM data. that way it's platform, and format independet (if not a little slower). also the client app can host it in it's own window. Winamp by contrast simply gives you the PCM data and expects you to make a window and draw stuff on the screen. Personally i like winamps approch better, sience it opens up optinos for the plug-in writer like using directX or fullscreen mode, with Sonique and the like you don't have that control.

    On the other hand, porting a Sonique plugin to Linux may just mean recompiling it. so we'll see.

    I don't think Sonique will be better then XMMS, it's MP3 decompression is flawed, and is less open, (from a plug-in point of view, as well as OpenSource(tm)). XMMS is bassicly a winamp clone, it just needs more people to develop for it, make more DSP and visulation plugins. otherwise Sonique may be the one to use.

    -Jon

    --
    this is my sig.
    1. Re:Sonique has it's problems by jon_c · · Score: 2

      This is not true, the lawsuit was from Justin Frankel using his modified 'amp' engine without licencing. That is actually why he sold Nullsoft to AOL - to bail him out.

      Winamp 3.0 however will use the fronhoffer's engine.

      -Jon

      --
      this is my sig.
    2. Re:Sonique has it's problems by jon_c · · Score: 2

      This is most likely due to the first MP3 frame not being at the begining of the file. I've seen difference decoders handle this differently. I've seen Winamp mess up, and mpg123. It's a shame most don't really search for the valid MP3 header.

      This doesn't have anything to do with decodeing though, just finding the MP3 frame segments. mpg123 will do this correctly. Nullsoft's engine does not.

      -Jon

      --
      this is my sig.
    3. Re:Sonique has it's problems by Cuthalion · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, porting a Sonique plugin to Linux may just mean recompiling it. so we'll see.
      That is correct. Also our package format will allow what ammounts to fat binaries for plugins. (one package can contain the plugin for a couple of platforms) Also note that there's nothing stopping a Sonique vis author from creating his own directx window, but that's not necessary to make them work fullscreen. (there's a "full screen" button in the Visual Mode screen)

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
  2. Re:Why not LinAmp? by AFCArchvile · · Score: 2

    It just rolled out of my mind and off my tongue once I read that.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  3. mp3 Decoder Tests Call Sonqiue "Terrible" by pbryan · · Score: 3
    According to an extensive set of quality tests (see here), Sonique's results are terrible.

    Among the anomolies:

    • Skips samples during the first second of file, resulting in audible click.
    • Audible low frequency glitches in many files.
    • Faults in the decoding engine itself include audible mistakes below 15 kHz and a few mistakes above too.
    • The right channel is decoded correctly (only occasional 1-bit difference from l3dec), but the left channel is destroyed...
    • Sonique HQ decode mode also inverts the signal.
    It's overall recommendation:

    "Until the mp3 decoding is fixed, Sonique is a player to avoid. If you're using it to decode mp3s, stop!"
    --

    My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!

  4. Re:I don't get it. by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2
    Otherwise, I'll continue to use the mpg123 engine for all my mp3 decoding needs.

    mpg123 is great, but it doesn't seem to support variable-rate MP3s. As these are the majority of what one seems to be able to download from MP3.com these days, I'm finding it really annoying to have to start X just to play some tunes, especially since I do all of my development work in console text mode.

    --

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  5. Re:BeOS? by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 2

    Isn't Sonique also closed source? Why would anybody be interested in seeing it on linux then?

  6. The BeOS version will suck... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 2

    Given that BeOS does not support arbitrary-shaped windows, a BeOS port of Sonique will either be using the BeOS port of X11 (which would suck), or it will not be using those cool morphing windows (which would suck too). Sonique and BeOS are both very nice, but I'm afraid a combination of the two won't make anybody happy...

  7. Re:Sonique: love it or hate it by Pope · · Score: 2

    In which case, use SoundJam.
    It decodes, encodes, has alpha-transparent skins, and IMHO, a *way* better UI than Audion. And is about to be released for OS X again (they pulled their earlier version to make sure it's compatible with the new Beta)
    Then again, I think a lot of these damn skins are friggin ugly and mostly useless: I mean ask yourself: how many time do I sit there *just looking at my MP3 player*?! I always load up the playlist and hide it.

    Pope

    Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  8. sucks by austad · · Score: 2

    Sonique sucks. I downloaded the windows version, the executable is tiny, but when it runs, it uses over 32MB of memory. Not to mention it was buggy as hell and the visualization crap used tons of resources. You know it's bad when the girlfriend complains.... :)

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  9. Incredible flexibility and customization options? by Frac · · Score: 2
    Incredible flexibility and customization options (like nothing ever done before).

    Oh yeah? I hereby present my own mp3 player, the Foo(TM).

    Where is it? Well, it's actually a blank text file. By offering you to program whatever you want into the program, it offers you incredible flexibility and customizations. One of the features that you can decide right away is "will it compile or not compile?" Foo can even be customized to be a word processing application if you want, or even an OS if you try really really hard.

    I bet no other mp3 players offer THAT kind of flexibility. The sky's the limit yo!

  10. X Audio by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 2

    The best MP3 player for Linux is X Audio Runs on lots of other platforms too. It's not free though.....

  11. Note to moderators. by TheReverand · · Score: 3
    That was not a troll. That was flamebait. Please moderate it accordingly. Here is an example of a troll (for future reference)

    Well now that Sonique is on Linux, We can look forward to RMS screaming about how their source license violates the GPL. I'm tired of his communist antics. That bastard.

    Note, I am not a very good troll, for better ones, see the troll homepage.

    Thank you.

  12. YAMP3P by Eil · · Score: 2


    Time for me to suit up, it's troll time...

    I've played with Sonique on windows, and best as I can tell, it is Yet Another MP3 Player, although with prettier skins. In a way, I dislike XMMS for being so heavy on the superficialities (that a word?), but I can't ditch it because I like it's functionality.

    Hey, I'll be porting my C-based wrapmail program to FreeBSD and Linux! Think that'll make it to /.? Didn't think so.

  13. well by TheReverand · · Score: 2
    Here is the sonique faq.

    1. Re:well by pen · · Score: 2
      Heh... how did I miss the day when Lycos bought Sonique?

      --

  14. Here's one approach for the RIAA to take re: mp3 by Froid · · Score: 3

    Why don't they declare mp3 encoding to be a form of encryption, thereby making all mp3 players (like Sonique) an illegal device whose sole purpose is to circumvent that encryption and decode the RIAA's copyrighted works? Since there are no legal definitions of what a legitimate encryption standard must entail, and since we're all aware that mp3s are entirely effective at preventing people with old Linux boxes from decoding them (less so for PCs and Macs, but the principle holds), it just might work. And more importantly, it would give the RIAA a legal leg to stand on in criminalizing all those copyright violations occurring right now, where non-DMCA law has been slow to act.

    Cheers,
    Froid

  15. Re:"Ported to Linux"? by weave · · Score: 2
    What libc libraries, X libraries, KDE, Gnome, MS-Linux-Extensions, what? Is there some sort of "standard" configuration that one should have so that most of these ports will work?

    "In order to bring the product to the linux market faster, Sonique will require a special modified version of WINE to run in, and will have a memory footprint of 37.5 megs and require at least a P3-500..."

    Only kidding.... I hope....

  16. Wow. Multi-platform==Linux! by be-fan · · Score: 3

    You really do know what the appropriate title for this article should have been, don't you? Sonique to become multi-platform. I'm sure it wouldn't have been accepeted had it read like this...

    Sonique to come to BeOS:
    .......
    ....
    .....
    ......
    .....
    .....
    .....
    Oh, yea, and it will run on Linux and MacOS too.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Wow. Multi-platform==Linux! by Cuthalion · · Score: 2

      We are also planning on supporting Windows. =)
      -cuthalion@sonique.com

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
  17. Re:Not all closed source is bad... by AFCArchvile · · Score: 2
    There's a simple alternative when it's closed source: talk to the developers. I always give feedback to Paul Jaquays when I think something in Q3 could be improved upon. However, I hate the Unreal engine, and Tim Sweeney is too damn arrogant to change anything in it.

    I say you should try the program first. If something seems very wrong with it, contact whoever the company lists as a developer. If they list no one, then get that binary scum the hell off your hard drive!

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  18. plugins by grappler · · Score: 2

    I'd like to know how it'll handle modularization. I know that Sonique has a very fast, modular mp3 decoder, and I was wondering if that will be used (ported if necessary) or if it will use mpeg123. I hope it's the former. Also, will all the skins and visualization plugins be cross platform? That'd be sweet. I hope it has good ogg support...

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  19. What about Freeamp? by Dirtside · · Score: 2
    Maybe I'm the only one to realize this, but Sonique is NOT OPEN SOURCE. It is CLOSED SOURCE. The source is NOT AVAILABLE on their website, if anywhere. Sonique, in fact, is owned by Lycos.

    Freeamp, on the other hand, is a completely open source, GPL'd MP3 player, and it's already available for Linux and Windows. Plus, the themes are entirely controlled by an XML-based description file and a few bitmaps. I stopped using WinAmp when AOL announced it was going to include anti-piracy measures of some kind.

    Do the right thing. Use Freeamp instead. Yes, it's not perfect, but it's getting better daily, and it's OPEN SOURCE and FREE SOFTWARE, so you can do whatever the hell you want with it!

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:What about Freeamp? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Yes, it's not perfect, but it's getting better daily,

      Actually, I'd have to say it's near perfect - the only real programming task for a player is a nice song management unit, something that many players completely ignore.

      FreeAmp may support skinning and visualization and other pretty features, but I leave it in the default look, it can get small, stay on top, and listen to those sterio buttons on the new keyboards. Pretty good...

      But the playlist and MP3 file management works great. Scan your HD, or a directory tree, and it sorts them via your ID3 tags. Create, combine and drag and drop playlists.

      I went through just about every MP3 player on the Wintel platform about 3 months ago. Played with them each for about three days. FreeAmp has great sound, the best file management, and (as a real nice bonus now that I've relegated Windows to a corner desktop processing machine), looks exactly the same across OSes.

      My Linux install of FreeAmp looks *and* feels the same as the Windows version.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  20. Re:I've never used Sonique... by Wah · · Score: 2

    Sonique is pretty nice. The interface is very tight, smooth, and much more "artsy" (stuff slides and fades). The skins and vis are also dumb easy to install (with the player running) and full screen dancing shit is only a click away. There's also a cleary marked "save to disk" toggle, and you can switch between three different views to maximize screen use. It also has auto restart if you lose your stream cache.

    A couple caveats. I haven't found the "bookmark streams" button, and it doesn't seem to be connected to the cddb. I use it more often on my winbox now that winamp likes to report to aol whenever I fire it up.

    --

    --
    +&x
  21. Re:Umm, yeah... by be-fan · · Score: 2

    God dammit! Why the fuck do we need ANOTHER OpenSource UNIX clone when *BSD is already available!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  22. Re:File Formats by Cuthalion · · Score: 2

    We're not going to like implement every multimedia compression standard known to man. We only have like 6 coders, you know.

    --
    Trees can't go dancing
    So do them a big favor
    Pretend dancing stinks!
  23. Re:I don't get it. by paRcat · · Score: 3

    I'll continue to use the mpg123

    only thig is, most mp3 players that use mpg123, including xmms, are memory hogs.

    Most good graphical players support WinAmp skins...How will Sonique be different

    Try taking a look at Sonique. It's nothing like what you've probably seen if you think WinAmp is all there is. Sonique's interface is much prettier. And personally, I like it's UI better than any other player out there. It does have support for skins, but I'd rather leave it at the default.


    _______________
    you may quote me

  24. Re:Incredible flexibility and customization option by Frac · · Score: 2

    Of course it's not vaporware. I can send you the blank file right now if you want. just cut and paste it to "foo.c" --> begin "foo.c" -- end "foo.c" see? I told you so.

  25. Skinning by Mike1024 · · Score: 2
    Hey,

    the skinning system will make you "WET YOURSELF."

    Oh Good. Another MP3 player is availiable. With a skinning system. Now I can make sure that my MP3 player definately doesn't colour-coordinate with any of my other apps, all of which are done in Gray. Hopefully I'll be able to make the entire program display shadows-only on top of a background photograph of my choice, allowing me to stare at a photo all the time my MP3 player is the top window on my screen, me not being busy doing anything else.

    Hurrah!

    Michael

    ...another comment from Michael Tandy.

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  26. Shipping Linux Player w/ SONG IDENTIFICATION, Vis by NortonDC · · Score: 2

    My company, eTantrum, ships a free player for Linux (and Windows) that (right now) does song identification as well as audio visualization, and it ships with a variety of killer skins.

    http://www.etantrum.com/index.php?section=downlo ad

    Also check out our GPL'ed Songprint song identification SDK at:

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/freetantrum/

  27. "Ported to Linux"? by pen · · Score: 4
    I've seen my share of "we're porting it to Linux" press releases, claims, and announcements. Does anyone know what this generally means? What libc libraries, X libraries, KDE, Gnome, MS-Linux-Extensions, what? Is there some sort of "standard" configuration that one should have so that most of these ports will work? The latest version of RedHat at the time, perhaps?

    It seems to me that one of Linux's strong points, its wide array of choices and openness, also happens to be one of its weak points at the same time. Please note, that I'm not trying to say that Linux sucks, or even anything remotely resembling that.

    What I want to ask is: Does anyone have any ideas on how to get rid of the bad aspects of that quality, while preserving its good aspects?

    --

  28. My thoughts regarding Sonique by DsElMiNk · · Score: 2

    Sure I thought the same thing before - "An mp3 player is an mp3 player - right?" But Sonique actually has BETTER sound quality than Winamp, or K-jöfol. A friend of mine pointed this out, but I didn't believe him until I sat down and compared the three. Sonique really had better sound quality(k-jöfol just plain sucked:p). On the visual side, the fact that the Sonique skins aren't restricted to a rectangular shape AND the fact that the buttons don't have to be in one specific place makes for some inventive designs - and I'm all for that. So stop whining about this new fancy mp3 player invading your system, if you don't want to use it - DON'T, it's as simple as that. Just my two cents

  29. I've never used Sonique... by AFCArchvile · · Score: 2
    ...because Winamp has been great from the start. There's always MacAmp, the winamp port for the mac. And with XMMS, I feel right at home. Sorry, but I do like the oscilloscope/spectral analyzer output that Winamp gives to plugins. Also, Winamp fits into a nice 274x114 space. Sonique looks as if it takes up over 400x400. When all I care about is the sound, I want something nice and compact.

    P.S.: Ever notice how NONE of the new programs for X can ever be executed properly in 640x480, yet ALL of the programs in Windows can? (or at the very least they tell you if they can't.)

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  30. well, sonique's ok... by Lx · · Score: 2

    But like most mp3 players, it seems to have problems doing really simple things - like (gasp) dropping a bunch of files onto it and having them end up in the correct order (sorted by track). Sonique can't do it, WinAmp can't do it, the only ones I've seen that can are XMMS and SoundPlay for BeOS. I'll probably end up installing Sonique for BeOS, but mostly just for eyecandy - nothing can match the feature set of SoundPlay.

    -lx

  31. File Formats by Nailer · · Score: 3

    Sonique currently does MP3, plus a number of more closed file formats like WMA [Windows Media Audio].

    How will Linux Sonique support these file formats under Linux? Currently thes best technology has been the open soucrce reverse engineered version of Microsofts AviFile [http://divx.euro.ru/], which uses a small part of WINE and TWIN to call Windows-based media codecs, for MS MPEG 4, Intel Indeo, Cinepak, DivX, and other Windoes based file formats.

    Will Sonique port these file formats, or create a similar implementation to AviFile, or soemthing else?

  32. uh huh... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
    And KJofol works really well on Linux too.


    (For those too young to remember, two years ago, KJ was supposed to be ported to linux too.)


    - A.P.

    --
    * CmdrTaco is an idiot.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  33. I've got the player for you.. by damm0 · · Score: 2

    There does happen to be an MP3 player which is fully functional yet does not use skins.

    Also, its playlist is extremely flexible.

    find -name '*.mp3' | while read filename; do mpg123 -b 1024 $filename

    Doesn't that just scream functionality!? Note the hyper-flexible playlist generator.

    No frills at all.

  34. Clarification by Cuthalion · · Score: 4
    Note: I am a coder at sonique. (proof)

    Let me clarify this a bit..
    1. Sonique2 is extremely portable and modular.
    2. We have had linux and BeOS versions compiling and running in the past. I think it's been a month or two since the BeOS version worked.
    3. We're not even going to try to support MacOS versions prior to MacOS X. Hell, the memory management isn't even thread-safe in MacOS 9!
    4. The linux version does not rely on libwine or anything dumb like that. Since we're doing all the Window stuff ourselves pretty much (except for the final blit to the screen) keeping things portable isn't so bad.

    Given our current user base, obviously the main development work happens on Windows boxes. However, we are all committed to portability.

    Oh, and WRT opening the source: We'd like to, but don't own the IP (when Lycos bought Sonique, well that made them own it.) so that question is not ours to decide. :(
    --
    Trees can't go dancing
    So do them a big favor
    Pretend dancing stinks!
  35. Re:I don't get it. by mikpos · · Score: 2
    Most of the Linux demosceners have more or less taken the TBL approach: give up on the whole "bare metal" idea and just make some cool look effects nonetheless. It's certainly not anywhere near as cool. You could try this site for an example.

    OpenCP would be very cool, though. MikMod is pretty good I must say, but a player just isn't a player without a few (dozen) FFTs.

  36. BeOS? by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2

    Mmmhhh, BeOS has native mp3 support, last time I checked. You can even drag'n'drop mp3 files into the CD-Burner app and they're automagically (and on the fly) converted into regular audio-CD tracks. Bah, one more cool app won't hurt!

    BeOS is really, really cool with media files. Being able to play as many mp3 files as you want *simultaneously* isn't bad, albeit not very useful. But it proves BeOS's multitasking excellence, since you can have several video feeds running along with 25 mp3's, with no apparent slowing down.

    With OpenGL, Java and BONE (BeOS Network Environment) coming, I *really* wish more software vendors would port their apps to BeOS. IMHO, BeOS is near perfect for a desktop OS. Boots in 10 seconds, is fast, doesn't crash, has friendly and polite advocates... but isn't Open-Source.

    Heck, half of /. is drooling over OS X, which isn't really GPL compliant either. Get some community support for BeOS, please! Port your apps!

    /max

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  37. Re:Sonique.... by pen · · Score: 2
    Personally, I'm still dreaming of an MP3 player with standard widgets, good keyboard controls, and no skins! I've started hating WinAmp the day they switched to the new playlist. The old one didn't look nearly as pretty, but was much easier to work with. Now, they've all but forgotten that people out there use different character encodings.

    That's different from Winamp, where all basic layouts look the same square (boring).

    Not that I'm into skins, but does anyone know whatever happened to a0? At one point, the WinAmp crew was working on a cool-looking dynamic skin thingy called a0 for WinAmp, which came as a general purpose plugin for WinAmp. Anyone know what's up?

    --