Slashdot Mirror


Aussies Put Old Pay-TV Dishes To Use -- As A LAN

Insane Hardware writes: "If you thought the olympic show the Aussie's put on was pretty tops, then this will blow your socks off. Insane Hardware sends in word about a group of people in the country's capital, Canberra (just south of Sydney), who are setting up a wireless air network for game play amoungst many other things (pr0n trading???). So how are these guys doing it and doing it cheaply? Well they are using satellite dishes from an old defunct Pay-TV system Australia had some years back called Galaxy, and are using some standard old full-length WaveLAN ISA cards which operate in the 2.4GHz range to hook up to these ol dishes. " (More below.)

Mr. Hardware continues: "Although not the best speeds, approximately 2Mbps with a 2.2ms round trip latency isn't too shabby when you consider the cost and implementation of this. Hell, you can even learn how to make a reciever dish at this site! So how is it powered? Linux of course! Check out www.air.net.au for more info."

Check out the mailing list archives to see how much progress they've made, too -- perhaps some friendly (and entrepreneurial) Slashdot reader can hook a few Canberrans up with wireless cards for cheaper than they can get them down there?

44 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Just south of Sydney? by imroy · · Score: 2

    Just south of Sydney is.....Wollongong!

    I haven't been to the 'gong for a while, but it most definetely is not our nations captial! I thought Canberra was mostly west from Sydney. Where's my map...

    Nitpick: *sigh* The only place here in Oz that most people know about is the now cliched "Sydney, Australia". Canberra would be better described as "central NSW, where it's bloody cold and only fat-cat pollie's want to stay" :)

  2. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by titus-g · · Score: 2
    The Lopht peeps were setting up something similar as well, and there are quite a few others around as well.

    There was an article at technocrat.net about it, but the search seems to be down so can't find it now, also possibly it was posted on /.?

    Nice if someone could set up a group/site/thing to coordinate things a bit more, save running into IP conflicts (quite a few seem to be going for IPV6) if they get linked together (even if only tunneled through the internet) and to get some linking going of cos :).

    --

    ~ppppppppö

  3. Other Dishes? by mini+me · · Score: 2

    I have an old Bell Expressvu dish kickin around (with the old hardware before the upgrade to the new satellite) anyone get it working with one of these? How about dishes from other vendors? For some reason I cannot load the link so maybe that info is on thier site?

    This could be a good way for people in the country to get higher speed net access. If you can find a near-by friend with high-speed access that is.

  4. Sounds like.. by mindstrm · · Score: 3

    They are simply using the dishes as 2.4Ghz directional antennas.

    Sounds cool, right? Might want to check local regulations for the 2.4Ghz ISM band. You can only have so much gain for so much power... if you try this in the US you might be violating FCC.

  5. "Canberrans"? by OlympicSponsor · · Score: 2

    Surely they call themselves "Canberries"...
    --

    --
    Non-meta-modded "Overrated" mods are killing Slashdot
    (Hey Ryan! Here's your proof!)
  6. I wonder what the FCC would say... by zonker · · Score: 2
    I wonder what the FCC would say about this if someone did it in the US? The 2.4 Ghz stuff wouldn't be a big deal I guess, but the propagation of the signal may... I dunno, what do you think?

    (Just thinking out loud...)

    / k.d / earth trickle / Monkeys vs. Robots Films /

    1. Re:I wonder what the FCC would say... by homebru · · Score: 2

      I would suggest a Amateur radio license

      And I would recomend that the hams leave this one alone. You see, if it takes a ham license to run the transmitter, then non-hams can't legally join the fun.

      So, if someone wants to play with this, go read Part 15 of the FCC regulations ("License-free operation and frequencies") and do it there. Legally unlicensed and available to everyone who wants to play.

  7. YES! Satellite TV Piracy is coming back! by kirwin · · Score: 2

    If you can make a wireless LAN out of old satellite dishes, then you can surely transmit satellite TV from them also, can't you?

  8. FCC rules on 2.4 Ghz by rho · · Score: 3

    There's an EETimes article about it here. To sum up:

    It allows frequency-hopping signals in the 2.4-GHz band to operate at 1, 3 or 5 MHz, with at least 15 non-overlapping channels spread out over a total span of 75 MHz. The average time of occupancy on any frequency shall not be greater than 0.4 seconds, within a 30-second period. The maximum output power is 125 mW at 5 MHz, vs. the 200 mW the HomeRF group had requested.

    This mostly concerns the battle between HomeRF and 802.11, but does give some good info.

    --
    Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    1. Re:FCC rules on 2.4 Ghz by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Of course all Slashdot readers should remember that the FCC has no authority in Australia, so this only applies to people trying to do the same thing in the US.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  9. Re:Is this even legal? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Actually.. it isn't directly related to range.
    Directional antennas will let you go quite some distance with standard 2.4Ghz stuff, still within regulations. We've set up some 18 and 19 km links using yagi and sectoral antennas. Of course, caluclations were done to make sure we didn't exceed the acceptable limits.

  10. Re:Fosters... by CukO · · Score: 2

    Funnily enough, Australians don't drink fosters.I am Australian and have lived/been to all of the major cities and regional centres and not once have I seen anyone (with the exception of a few tourists) drink fosters.
    In fact most of the pubs in Sydney don't have it. Fosters was labeled as piss by Australians a long time ago, so they decided to spend a pretty penny on international marketing to get everyone else to drink it.

    If you want a good Australian beer try Cascade Premium, and if you want the beer that we all drink get VB or XXXX. They won't win any competitions but they do the job, and don't completely taste like piss.

    In regards to the wireless lan I am interested as too whether our FCC will nab them for it.

    Cheers :)

    Now where did I leave the keys to my kangaroo?

  11. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by dgibson · · Score: 2

    Galaxy wasn't a satellite system. It was a surface pay TV system based on microwave transmissions from Telstra tower on black mountain.

    All that the air.net.au people are using are the now disused microwave antennas - they can often be collected free from people who used to have Galaxy. That makes a very cheap way of getting an ~18dBi antenna.

  12. Re:This uses satellite DISHES people, not satellit by dgibson · · Score: 2

    Actually the Galaxy antennas in question do include a downconverter/preamplifier which needs to be ripped out before they can be used for transmission.

  13. Re:Remote access by dgibson · · Score: 2

    Not really. In order to get the distances, you need to use fairly highly directional antennas. So the restaurant would have to be very well located, and then you'd have to get your dish in to line of sight of another antenna and carefully line it up.

  14. Uhhh... by Torak- · · Score: 2

    Not that it would matter whether the FCC allowed it or not, since the FCC HAS NO AUTHORITY OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. Fucking insular Americans.

  15. Dell's wireless solution by Fervent · · Score: 2
    Somewhat "offtopic", but not really, has anyone tried the solution Dell offers for wireless? I bought a laptop from them a few days ago and decided to opt for their wireless cards and base station. Thank god for payment plans.

    Is it is as good as Airport?

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    1. Re:Dell's wireless solution by Fervent · · Score: 2
      That's it. "True mobile". Hopefully it'll be worth the purchase.

      It should also be interesting to see if I can get it to play nicely with Linux. I'll keep a Windows 98 partition around just in case.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    2. Re:Dell's wireless solution by ostiguy · · Score: 2

      It probably is Airport, which is all still Lucent gear, from what I have read.

  16. Re:Fosters... by RedX · · Score: 2

    I read recently during the pre-Olympic hype that Fosters only has something like 2% of the beer market in Australia. Fosters was also actually started by 2 Americans who opened a brewery in Australia.

  17. Questions, questions, too many questions! by Mikeytsi · · Score: 4

    Since there's a whole bunch of questions on this, and I've got some experience in this arena, I'll impart some of my knowledge.

    No, it's not illegal. The 2.4Ghz band is a public band, so it's not tightly regulated by the FCC. It's a real pain in the ass when you've got a whole bunch of people running in the frequency range in the same area though,... (Guess how I know this?)

    Provided you could get a signal, you'd be able to connect to the network from anywhere. All you need is a wireless ethernet card, and the information on how to connect to the network. (I currently have two different wireless PCMCIA cards, and should be getting a third soon). An actual "dish" is not necessary.

    "Rain Fade" isn't really an issue, unless you're talking HEAVY rain. Rain Fade is a lot more of a problem when you're actually going through the cloud cover (a-la Satellite). The wireless stuff they're doing doesn't work that way.

    That about covers it. BTW, the company that I work for is getting into this technology REALLY heavy in the US. Especially since Cisco bought Aironet, which has a wirless system that communicates at 11Mbps. That's pretty damn fast for radio, people.

    --
    I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
  18. Re:They would say "no" and fine you by Tassach · · Score: 2
    Actually (IIRC) The 2.4GHz spectrum slice is globally unregulated -- anyone can use it for whatever they want to use it for. Of course this means you can't complain to the FCC (or it's equivilent) if somebody else is causing interference on that frequency. There are a bunch of unregulated (or semi-regulated) frequencies that can be used for consumer products. The frequencies used by cordless (handset) phones are one example; WaveLAN is another. Some of these frequencies are totally fair game; others have a cap on the amount any one station can broadcast (Like CB radio, which is limited to 3 watts, IIRC).

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  19. Re:no guys, not sattelite dishes by dgibson · · Score: 2

    It most certainly is point to point. There's no way you'd get the distances covered here with omnidirectional within the legal power limits. The Galaxy antennas aren't "satellite dishes" as such (Galaxy was a surface system), just directional microwave antennas.

  20. Don't forget by mattbee · · Score: 2

    Seeing as nobody seems to have mentioned it, there's a similar initiative being started by consume.net, aiming to do much the same thing around London in the UK. The first masts are going up at the moment, and apparently you can get quite a good range from the `Sarah Lee antenna', i.e. made out of a cake tin and coathangers :-) Maybe somebody who's actually used one can fill me in here, but the mention of it on the mailing list made me laugh.

    --
    Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
  21. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by nathanh · · Score: 3

    You don't need an actual satellite. You just use satellite dishes. The dishes point at each other. They don't point into the skies. They're all pointing at somebody elses dish nearby.

    The Galaxy "satellite" dishes didn't point at a satellite either. They pointed at a local transmission tower (Telstra Tower, or as all the locals call it, Black Mountain Tower).

  22. Re:Fosters... by jbrw · · Score: 2

    I didn't realise people really drunk XXXX, except in rural Queensland?

    For Australians in the UK (such as myself), here's some happy news: VB distribution seems to be improving. It's imported from Oz, and Sainsburys is stocking it (at some stores in London, at any rate) at a reasonable price.

    Woo!

    The pubs i've seen it in seem to charge about £2.50 (~AUS$6.25) for a can...

    ...j

  23. We're doing it in the UK by MadMax · · Score: 2

    www.tele2.co.uk

  24. Re:This uses satellite DISHES people, not satellit by Tassach · · Score: 3
    An antenna dosn't really do anything by itself. It all depends what you hook up to it. If you connect a receiver to an antenna, all you can do is recieve stuff. If you hook a tranciever up to it, you can transmit & receive.

    There's no real technical difference between the antenna a radio station uses to broadcast it's signal and the antenna on your car that you use to pick up that signal. The difference between a dish antenna and a linear antenna is that the dish is fairly directional whereas the linear antenna is omnidirectional.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  25. Remote access by Flounder · · Score: 2
    Can this network be accessed with a portable dish? Sit in an outdoor cafe, setup your laptop and a collapsible 1 meter dish and surf at some decent speeds. And no mobile phone charges. Man, I'd pay for that.

    Besides, how cool would it be to be sitting in a restaurant with a satellite dish?

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  26. Runs on Linux by Swede2048 · · Score: 2

    I'll probably get Troll -1, or flamed for saying this, but does anyone really care about the "oh, and it runs on Linux!" tagline lately? It's getting to the point where if Joe Q. Schmuck's shoelace has Linux running on a 2" chip that suddenly this is a Slashdot-worthy article.. This is not news for nerd.. It's news for lamers. Now if you're going to put up a tutorial on writing a driver for this dinky little device, or one of the "making-of" type pages (as with the mega-cooled systems, the atari-handheld thing, etc), then I don't mind. But can we stop with the, "OOOOH! The article mentions the letters l-i-n-u-x in succession, let's post the sucker!!" stories? Just my thoughts

  27. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by Devil+Ducky · · Score: 2

    This type of system would require an existing Satelite system, such as "Galaxy." Other cities could put a satelite up simply for this purpose, but that would take away the economics of it all.

    Would be much cheaper to run digital lines (phone/cable), and then you wouldn't have to have a sat-dish.

    But it's still cool, just doesn't make sense in somewhere like NYC.

    Might work in rural areas though, they usually have sat-dishes already (for TV) and with the new dishes most places in hicksvilles have a large unused dish and a smaller one for TV.

    Devil Ducky

    --

    Devil Ducky
    MY peers would get out of jury duty.
  28. Fosters... by FortKnox · · Score: 4

    A scene of a man eating a steak, and hooking an old dish into his 8088 computer
    An aussie voice with aussie accent: Local area network

    A can of fosters smacking the floor...
    An aussie voice with aussie accent: Beer... Fosters... Australian for beer.


    -- Don't you hate it when people comment on other people's .sigs??

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  29. Is this even legal? by jandrese · · Score: 2

    I don't know about Australia, but here in the US there are strict limits on what you can do with te 2.4GHz band, including rather low caps on the total transmitting power which limits the range of any sort of home network.
    Does anyone with experiance in the aussie equivelent of the FCC have any insight into this?
    Oh, and the link in the article should point to www.air.net.au.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Is this even legal? by driftingwalrus · · Score: 3

      To my understanding, the limits are only on the outer edges of the band.

      2.4GHz is an ISM band(Industry, Science, Medical), so it gets used by microwaves, X-Ray machines, etc. It's not a licensed band, and is mostly kept open for noise generated by these devices.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    2. Re:Is this even legal? by simong · · Score: 2

      2.4GHz is the assigned band for wireless networking in the UK and assumes a mean range per device of about 300 metres. By extension it's probably the same in Australia.

  30. If you can make a wireless LAN out of old satellite dishes, then you can surely transmit satellite TV from them also, can't you?

    You can beam it into another user's satellite receiver, if he happens to be pointing at you (unlikely) or you're right off the edge of his dish (where most parabolic reflector antennas have a minor lobe.)

    You'd have a tough time uplinking to the satellite. I understand the receivers are at a very different frequency from what the little piepans handle.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  31. This uses satellite DISHES people, not satellites by Tassach · · Score: 3
    Did everyone here fail 3rd grade reading comprehension?

    The network described in the article uses WaveLAN cards connected to old dish antennas. You could do the same thing with just about any other parabolic antenna you might have access to (DirecTV, anyone?). At no time does the signal bounce off a satellite -- this is all line-of-sight between two or more ground-based nodes.

    Please stop talking about Iridium or anything else in orbit. You are only making a fool of yourself by doing so.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  32. Canberra also has 51 Mbps Fiber To The Curb ! by ccomfort · · Score: 2

    Canberra has also been rolling out 'high capacity optic fibres to within 300 metres of individual homes. The last segment of the connection to the home consists of copper wires, similar to those used in office local area networks. The total bandwidth to every home is a massive 51mbps downstream and 1.6mbps upstream.' I think this is supposed to be a world first. I'm sure this must have already been covered. http://www.csu.edu.au/special/raiss99/papers/cvivi an/

  33. 2.4 GHZ Internet access does exist in my Apt!!! by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

    Courtesy of the rock-solid and easy-to-setup Apple AirPort.. I have an Orinoco (nee WaveLAN) board in my W2k laptop (ProntoEdit and the TrueSync on my fone only work with Win32 :() and my signal is outstanding..

    At work we demo'd a point2point wireless installation between 2 buildings using 14dB Yagi directional antennae. Solid connection even without direct line of sight (a couple of buildings in the way).. Very impressed..

    Now I just have to get a nice amplified omnidirecitonal antenna for my apt (and hack into the airport to solder the antenna connection ;) so I can compute out on the shared patio..

    Your Working Boy,

  34. Necessary to mention Linux by Fervent · · Score: 4

    Not to be hypocritical, but did the poster just mention the word "Linux" to get the article accepted more easily? I would have thought the hardware news would've carried on its own.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  35. We're sort of doing this in Lithuania by Ainis · · Score: 2

    Academical and Research Network in Lithuania (LITNET) is widely using wavelan technology. For example radio network covers entire Vilnius city (it's our capital with ~700'000 population).

    Check out the map of this network (I'm very lucky to live on one of those small red dots :)). We've recently upgraded most of our wavelans in Vilnius from 2mbit/s to 10mbit/s. It's a pitty this network has only 2mbit connection to the world.

    If you wish to learn more about technology we use go here, to learn more about Litnet go here

  36. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by Kickasso · · Score: 2
    This type of system would require an existing Satelite system, such as "Galaxy."

    More precisely, this type of system would require a defunct Satelite system, such as "Galaxy". Or a hardware hacker willing to show you how to make a 2.4GHz antenna.
    --

  37. They're already sort of doing this in the US by blazer1024 · · Score: 4

    Here in New Mexico, a company called LoboNet uses 2.4GHz LAN/WAN radios from BreezeCOM with outdoor antennas to businesses in the more rural areas. (Near Albuquerque and Santa Fe, but too far for DSL or ISDN)

    They have around a dozen customers, and there's no problem with the FCC, since the 2.4GHz spectrum is an non-license spectrum. As far as power levels go, I don't know. But it works quite nicely.

    (Although for some reason LoboNet doesn't have any mention of it on their site... strange. But I know it's there! Maybe there's some mention at the Integrity Networking Solutions site, since many of the wireless networking customers go through them.)

  38. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by pallex · · Score: 2

    Or a software hacker willing to show you how to make a working satellite system defunct!