CNET Says CueCat Restrictions Are Bogus
Barondude writes: "Steve Fox at CNET Insider wrote The CueCat: When Free Isn't Worth the Price. Besides mentioning Slashdot, he brings to the general public many of the points that have been made here."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
http://www.cnet.com/insider/ 0-1 21949-7-3304007.html
Cheap enough for free?
Bah, look at all the cool stuff you get..
A barcode scanner
A marital aid
A good time harassing the Radio Shack employee
Thousands of minutes spent thinking, "What can I waste my time doing with this thing?"
Hours of Slashdot stories updating the idiocy of DC and their marketing strategy
Being embraced by DC's approach of loving the linux hackers
heh.. I found that it just looked to ridiculous to use it myself.. but it has provided me with a lot of laughter.
Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
Yeah, they mention Slashdot alright... but, erm..
:)
from the article:
(For an extensive, often impassioned discussion of the issues, check out Slashdot, at www.slashdot.com )
I know. It works, but still
Don't throw your computer out the window, throw the Windows out of your computer!
It's doubtful, but someone may have missed the previous 6,000 cuecat stories.
If you're seeking more information, I have a lot of links to news stories, info on the hardware (including disabling and reprogramming the serial number), and software for Linux, Windows and the Mac at http://www.flyingbuttmonkeys.com/foocat/
________________________________________
Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
> a handheld scanner fetchingly shaped like a cat
http://www.popbeads.org/Software
If you watch TV news, you know less about the world than if you just drank gin straight from the bottle.
or DC for that matter. This event is just one example of a seemingly rising trend of revocation of consumer rights. I personally have no desire to take apart a cue cat. But I am an electrical engineer. What if I did? What if I wanted to figure out how it works, then put it to good use in some other barcode related application?
I think whats important here is what precedent gets set. If DC wins and is able to prevent us from investigating objects in our possession, it sets a legal precedent for another company to do the same thing.
Another reason why Slashdotters have latched onto this story is because it is a very good example for us. The ability to circumvent copy protection schemes to pirate movies is morally hazy. Hacking the cue:cat doesn't harm anyone, and is thus a prime example of situations where the DMCA and like legislation are a bad idea.
I'm relatively new to Slashdot, but I think I've captured the gist of it. Any veterans care to add / respond?
Captain_Frisk
At least the stuff that they add is so poorly edited that it's clear that it is not part of the true, professional Slashdot site.
"We will compete with anybody."
- Michael Risse, general manager at a company that complains that all antitrust complaints are instigated by competitors
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
And you STILL posted the article?