Slashdot Mirror


640 Gig HD in 1U Of Rack Space

I'm running for prez writes "Network Engines just announced two products that ruin Maxtors previous record of stashing 320 GB in 1U. They are called StorageEngine (4 drives) and StorageArray (8 drives), that both run Ultra160 SCSI (hot swappable). Check out the specs." 640 gigs would be about 192 hours at the top quality tivo record. I could store all my DVDs, all my MP3s, and still have enough room for every episode of South Park and the Simpsons!

36 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Re:... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Thank you, captain obvious

  2. Price? $/Mb? by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but how much are they?

    Is anyone else getting really pissed off seeing /. articles for news toys without prices quoted anywhere?

    It's almost like /. is becoming a re-broadcaster of press releases rather than a "news" site.

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  3. Record-breaking? Nope... by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

    From the specs...
    <BR><BR>
    <I>With the Voyager(TM), you get up to 144 GB of data in 1U (1.75 inches), and an additional 288 GB of storage in a 1U optional disk array called StorageArray(TM), for a total of 432 GB in 2U.</I>
    <BR><BR>
    So, you get 144 GB in 1U from these guys, and Maxtor give you 320 GB. Not exactly a broken record...
    <BR>

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
    1. Re:Record-breaking? Nope... by tolldog · · Score: 2

      Also, you should know that on real RAID systems (real as in real fast) not all of the HD is used. This being the case, if it was worth getting that system and you put 160 GB drives in the machine, I doubt that they would be formated at 160 GB. The access time that is saved by not using the end of the drive is amazing.

      --
      -I just work here... how am I supposed to know?
    2. Re:Record-breaking? Nope... by Nicodemus · · Score: 2

      The site contradicts itself so much that there is no way to tell. On one page it says that it holds 4 disks in 1u, on another it says it holds 432 gig in 2u, and on yet another page it says it holds 8 disks in 1u (which would give you your 640 gig with 8 80 gig drives).

      Do a little research yourself and see that there is not humanly possible way to understand the product (or products?) from the website. Don't just start with your tyrannical "slashdot sucks" sh*t. You obviously are far from perfect. And if you don't like slashdot, then don't read it. what are you trying to prove anyways?

      troll

      Nicodemus

    3. Re:Record-breaking? Nope... by levendis · · Score: 2

      Not quite.. on the fastest RAID, RAID 0, you use the entire drive (assume they are all the same size). You must be referring to RAID 5, which does use at least on parity drive, but is not as fast as RAID 0 (all else being equal).
      ----

      --
      ---- I made the Kessel Run in under 11 parsecs.
    4. Re:Record-breaking? Nope... by DrWiggy · · Score: 5
      Funnily enough, I was about to mention that. Nowhere on their website that I can see does it mention the figure 640Gb. Anywhere. What's more, I can't even see it in the original submitted article. Is CmdrTaco on crack or something? Here is the spec sheet. If you can see where it says 640Gb, please point it out to me. I had considered that /. is using a new numbering convention whereby 640Gb == 432Gb but I don't remember seeing the announcement. If somebody could just find the article and let me know. It doesn't even work if you convert into octal or anything, even if you do it really badly. :-)

      Configuration
      • Intel processor
      • 512 MB DRAM
      • Solid state RAM boot device
      • Four hot-swap SCSI 10,000 RPM hard disks, 18GB or 36 GB
      • Maximum storage capacity of 432 GB with 36 GB disks
      • Single-channel Ultra160 RAID controller with 32 MB DRAM and battery back-up
      • Dual 10/100BT auto-configuring Ethernet ports
      • Redundant hot-swap fans
      • System Maintenance Bus for out-of-band management, Cluster Maintenance
      • Bus external connection for easy integration with a Network Engines management cluster
      • Sliding rails for both Telco and cabinet racks
      So, the only thing I can consider is that somebody has worked out that this thing will take 4 SCSI hard drives, and that if they could lay their hands on some disks in the 160Gb region, they could them in here and they would have 640Gb of storage. Mmmm'kay? So, in actual fact there is no commercial product on the market from these people on sale right now, ready to go, with that storage. What's more, even if I do buy this hunk of crap, and I do manage to lay my hands on disks that size (and my bank manager allows me to pay for them), I'm going to have to invalidate any support/warranty agreements with them. Fantastic.

      There are times, when I really want to give up on /. when stories like this appear. This isn't news (it hasn't been researched), it's not even cool (because it's not true), it's not even lame (because it might lead to a conversation about cheap storage arrays), it's just.... just... so *slashdot*...
  4. Sorry about the broken HTML... by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

    I thought I'd hit the preview button...

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  5. ... by Evangelion · · Score: 4


    Bah. 640 Gigs should be enough for anybody.


    --

  6. That's not 640 GB in 1U! by Chris+Tyler · · Score: 2

    C'mon, do the math... 8 drives * 36 GB/drive = 288 GB in 1U. That's the add-on box, the main box has half that. Where did the 640 GB figure come from?! The vendor's web site only claims 432 GB in 2U.

    (Still, it's impressive to have multi-TB storage along with a beowulf cluster in one rack :-)

  7. 900G in 5U by sidetrack · · Score: 2

    Ok, it's not that impressive, but we pretty much did it with off the shelf parts, and it was very cheap. 12x 75G 7200RPM IBM IDE drives, BX chipset board, redundant hot-swap power supplies, 1G ECC RAM, and 2x PIII-850, Kingston low-profile UDMA66 hot-swap enclosures, and 2 3Ware 6800 RAID controllers. In an ACME 5U case, with just 16 strips of 80mm x 15mm metal (with three holes drilled in each), as the custom hardware ;-)
    I forget the exact cost (this was a few months ago), but it was under $10,000

  8. And how are you going to back it up?? by Bazman · · Score: 3

    Okay, so you've got your 640G of space, better get a DLT drive to back it up. Ooh, an 80GB drive costs 3000 pounds. And then you need eight tapes at 50 pounds a go to do one backup. Might as well get a robot arm to do tape handling. Lets get ten sets of backup tapes and budget for a quarterly archive copy...

    You do backup your hard disk dont you?

  9. crime?? by Jose · · Score: 2

    In what way is it a crime to have mp3's/dvd's?
    Who wants to sit there and swap CD's in and out of a piddly little 6 disc changer...when you could simply rip them on to hard drive, and relax with a remote?

    Same deal with DVD's...

    The first thing I do when I get a new CD is rip it. As soon as you get a couple of little scratches on a CD, it'll skip to no end...what if you leave that CD somewhere, or someone steals it...it is much nicer to have a backup, so you don't have to worry about....you just burn it.
    This is such a good idea, that the Canadian Gov't is charging you for the privilege!

    --
    The basic sleazeware produced in a drunken fury by a bunch of UCBerkeley grad students was still the core of BIND. --PV
  10. All that space.... by BRock97 · · Score: 5

    ...and you still couldn't do a full install of Mandrake 7.2.

    Bryan R.

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
  11. how can anyone have 640gb of mp3s?? by redd · · Score: 2

    As someone who's interested in the future of private, anonymous file sharing and mp3, I take offense at people who break the law by pirating mp3s.

    I have mp3'd my (read: "my") entire album collection of 150 CDs, and it's using 17GB. Either you have several thousand CDs, or you're doing damage to the filesharing case by stealing music.

    If you listen to a piece of music, and you want to keep listening to it, buy it. If you don't like it, delete it. Prove to the RIAA that we're good customers, not pirates.

    bye.

    1. Re:how can anyone have 640gb of mp3s?? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      I have mp3'd my (read: "my") entire album collection of 150 CDs, and it's using 17GB. Either you have several thousand CDs, or you're doing damage to the filesharing case by stealing music.

      Idiot. Your purchacing profile may not match the next persons. I've almost filled my third Sony 500 disk changer.

      Also, what speed are you encoding at? Me, I can't stand MP3 artifacting, which can be heard loud and clear on my mid-end Kenwood system, so when and if I convert, it will be for the sake of creating quick playing playlists, not compression, and will be at 256k. (A friend is upset that I pointed out the very audiable artifacting in places like Dennys and IHOP music... it now drives him nuts).

      On the other hand, of course, my truck sound system is good, but not great, and I'll take the hit in quality to get 10 hours of music onto one CD.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  12. Absolutely Enough by powerlord · · Score: 2

    640 K^HGigabytes should be enough for anyone...

    ;)

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  13. I work with people who could use it... by Raleel · · Score: 3

    It was really a scary experience for me when I started my job at the national lab. It was like a whole other world of computing. I came from a small school where we cleaned off 10 megabytes of cache to preserve disk space. Here, I had a guy look me in the eye and say, quite honestly, that he needed 10 TB (terabytes) of storage to get his work done "adequately" and he could really use 70 TB. I just could not believe that. We recently purchased a 2TB array, and it's not even remotely enough. Those damn scientists and all their data ;)

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
  14. Re:That's nothing by textral · · Score: 2

    Neither design is either very revolutionary or very reliable from the looks of their respective websites. I still don't see where whomever posted the /. note got 640mb, because the math simply doesn't add up. The only thing I can figure is if they are releasing a StorageArray with 72gb drives and haven't gotten around to posting it yet.

    As for that ExaDrive 3U unit, it looks extremely sketchy at best. I mean, I don't know how far I trust the combination of Fibre Channel and IDE in the first place, but they aren't even using ATA100 drives, you can't hot swap ONE drive at a time, you need to remove the 2 drive tray to do it, which leaves me at a loss as to how it would even work. There are no specs on the drives themselves other than the fact that they're ATA66. And how can you trust a company to build a reliable SAN-ready array when they can't even build a website?

    Ugh, IDE is NOT the way to go for any type of serious storage solution, I don't care how cheap you need it.

  15. 432GB in 2U by drassinower · · Score: 2

    From http://www.networkengines.com/st ora gengine.htm


    Highest density Internet storage available!
    With the Voyager(TM), you get up to 144 GB of data in 1U (1.75 inches), and an additional 288 GB of storage in a 1U optional disk array called StorageArray(TM), for a total of 432 GB in 2U.


    I'm not sure how 432 GB in 2U is equal to 640 GB in 1U. The press release for the StorageEngine again only mentions the 144 GB in 1U/432 GB in 2U.

    VA Linux and IBM both have a partnership with Network Engines for their 1U server box. This article has more info.

  16. Re:SAN vs NAS by levendis · · Score: 2

    Right, but for pure hard-core geek factor, the bad ass 3U, 24 drive, dual fibre channel exadrive is what i want in my living room :)
    ----

    --
    ---- I made the Kessel Run in under 11 parsecs.
  17. That's nothing by levendis · · Score: 3

    Here's a nifty product - 1.8 Tb (thats 1843 gigs, kiddies) in 3U. And its got dual Fibre Channel ports (as opposed to Network Engine's single U160 SCSI), for a max throughtput of about 200MB/s. I don't thinks its released yet, but I've seen some beta units and this thing rocks.
    ----

    --
    ---- I made the Kessel Run in under 11 parsecs.
    1. Re:That's nothing by tshak · · Score: 2

      At least the exadrive doesn't look like a toy. What's up with the Network Engine's Fisher-Price like case? Pretty soon where going to have iStorage racks!

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  18. It must glow in the dark by selectspec · · Score: 5
    on the side the label reads:

    Warning: Do not stand within 6 feet of StorageArray. Keep StorageArray away from small children or pregnant mothers. Handle StorageArray with extreme caution. Always were saftey goggles when working with StorageArray. Do not taunt Storage Array.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  19. url for ordering the deluxe version? by drfireman · · Score: 3

    I wanted to order the CmdrTaco version, with all those DVD's, MP3's, Simpsons and South Park episodes pre-loaded, but I couldn't find the ordering page on CmdrTaco.net. Please advise.

  20. Re:Just think by IO+ERROR · · Score: 2
    if you put those in a Beowulf cluster.

    No way, I want to fill a rack with them. Let's see, 42 of these, 640GB each... that works out to 26.25TB. Terabytes. That's enough space for Rob to store TEN MONTHS of music...
    ---

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  21. Re:Just think (correction) by IO+ERROR · · Score: 2
    That's enough space for Rob to store TEN MONTHS of music...

    Ooops. That should read TEN MONTHS of TiVo.

    You could also store a copy of almost every DVD ever made. Might need two racks to get them all. Suddenly the idea of being able to watch any movie you want, anytime you want, doesn't sound so farfetched.
    ---

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  22. Re:I don't... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2

    Nope - it's a lame attempt at very subtle humour.

  23. That's using 36 gig drives... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2

    ...do the math with bigger drives...

    Heck drives are up over 70 gigs now...

  24. You could always... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2

    ...get an inverter and put it in your car.

    I have one for my laptop that works quite nicely. Plug it in to the lighter - and 120V AC comes out...

  25. I find it Interesting... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 3

    ...how some people relate storage space to their lives.

    Some people think about it in number of CD's (or even floppies) it is worth... Others think about the database it could hold.

    Rob thinks about how much music he could fill it with.

  26. Re:Just think by sid_vicious · · Score: 2
    Wow... so will we be replacing the Library of Congress with a single rack any time soon?

    :)

    Sid

    --
    If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.
  27. There is nothing wrong with to much storage! by QuiK_ChaoS · · Score: 2

    So, 640GB huh? how much $$$? I seem to have a habbit of using my HD space whether I have and interest in what I am downloading or not. Oh c'mon, I know you are out there. The space just disappears and the next thing you know you are archiving like 60GB of crap, but you don't delete it? This is the PC Packrat's dream. The question is, how many banks must I rob for something like that eh?

  28. I think I understand Taco by Mtgman · · Score: 2

    And it's scary, believe me. Check this out, from the original submission.
    "Network Engines just announced two products that ruin Maxtors previous record of stashing 320 GB in 1U.

    Let's say that again with the proper emphasis.
    "Network Engines just announced two products that ruin Maxtors previous record of stashing 320 GB in 1U.

    See? Two Products 320 GB in 1U. A product is the result of multiplication, right? Two (times) 320 GB in 1U = 640 GB in 1U.

    Now you too understand CmdrTaco. Welcome to my nightmare.

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  29. null data by neuneu · · Score: 4

    640 gigs would be about 39321600 hours of unused space. I could store all my blank files, and still have enough room for every empty directories!

  30. Torque that thing by SanLouBlues · · Score: 3

    I'm still waiting for a raid unit full of hard drives that develop enough torque to lift the entire unit off of the ground. Just think, density will matter less because none of your storage takes up floorspace!