Slashdot Mirror


Stormix Bankruptcy

An Anonymous Coward writes: "So has the news that Stormix has filed for bankruptcy been covered? I was surprised to get a form letter in the mail today from Deloitte & Touche saying they filed for bankruptcy on Jan. 17. And they owe me $20." The Stormix users mailing list has some information, and Newsforge has a summary. I'm typing this on a Stormix system right now, so I hope someone picks it up and maintains the distro.

43 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Hard Facts Please? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Could we please have some hard facts? There is no real reporting at the newsforge link. At least not a scan, or a verification of the letter. Hello, when I want unsubstantiated rumours, I'll just read /. It appears newsforge just copied the text from the Storm discussion boards.

    Now, I'm not saying that Storm is going into the crapper; I'm just saying that as of yet, all I've seen is two copies of the same letter typed in by some yabo on the internet (I'm sure there is a good chance you are legit, so don't bother flaming. But until I see a scan with the DeLoitte and Touche stationary, I'll keep holding my breath.)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  2. Re:Oooh... BIG surprise! by amccall · · Score: 2
    I disagree with this.

    Stormix did a lot for Debian. They created a *nice* installer, put some good setup and administration tools with it. Wrote the *best* manual I have ever seen come with a Linux distribution, and provided excellent commercial support.

    I ran stormix for quite a bit, and it was definatly one of the better distros out there.

    --
    ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
  3. Darwinism at Work by jester-tx · · Score: 2

    This is what it's all about really - Darwinism and survival of the fittest. If Stormix had totally kicked ass to the point that everyone took notice and lots of began actually using it, it would still be around. Common sense. Some distros are bound to go the way of the toilet while others flourish.

    Thank god for what we do have - a plethera (sp?) of distributions left to choose from. Unfortunately the same rule is working against the open source community in the kingdom of the web browser. I personally believe that is our biggest hurdle to overcome, not faltering distros of Linux. Redhat, Debian, Slackware and Mandrake aren't going down anytime soon. AFAIK.

    --
    -= jester =-
  4. StormPKG by Raindog · · Score: 2

    StormPKG is in Debian unstable right now and works like a charm...I would like to see SAS too, but some parts of Storm are making it over.

    It would be nice if some people picked up the other storm parts and became maintainers from them in Debian....are their any other nifty storm software other than stormpkg, SAS and the installer (which I wouldn't think Debian would want as they are working on their own)

  5. Re:Debdrake by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    Most of that stuff is already available in Debian. KDE is now included, but of course you can choose KDE or GNOME. Apache, sure. Apache mod_ packages for ssh, perl, python, ruby, tk, and DAV. There is a menu utility, yes. I didn't notice webmin and mod_php, but of course anyone could package these for Debian.

    Thanks

    Bruce

  6. I liked stormix :( by rednix · · Score: 2

    hmm, I really liked stormix. I have been using SuSE since 4.4.1 and debian always seemed kinda strange to me, but Stormix looked like a good distro with a nice installer and a few config tools. The only thing that stopped me from using Stormix was that their box costs money and I could get SuSE for free from my university's ftp server or through their beta-tester program... I am using progeny now on my vaio and it seems to be a nice replacement for stormix...

  7. Re:This is good news ... maybe. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
    Timothy,

    I did not mean to imply that Stormix was substandard. Having never run it, I would not know. When I said "second tier", I was referring to its share of the market, third-party support and books, press attention and reviews, etc.

    Maybe that's part of the problem: There are so many distros that many are not getting the attention that they deserve. That, in and of itself, may point to the need to thin the herd.

  8. Re:Stormix down, but not out - read the fine print by Minupla · · Score: 2

    Unless I'm sadly mistaken I believe that phrase has always been the formal leagalize for the process in Canada. We don't file chapter 11, we "seek protection from creditors". Frankly it's at least more descriptive then filing chapter 11, which is simply obscure :)


    --
    Remove the rocks to send email

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  9. You're wrong on the KDE part. by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    While Mandrake is pretty pro-kde (not that there's anything wrong with that)the installer and config tools are written in Perl with Gtk bindings.

  10. Direction by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    If you think something's lacking from Debian unstable and you would like to fix it, start here.

    Thanks

    Bruce

    1. Re:Direction by benmhall · · Score: 2

      Sorry Bruce,

      That's a nice theory, but I've just recently read about how it takes something like 16 months just to become an official debian contributor.

      That's a longe time.

      The other thing is that no matter how noble Debian's goals are, the community as a whole isn't overly focused on the end-user experience.

      I love Debian, but I've read too many arguments on how it should remain techincally difficult to install just to keep the barrier of entry high enough to ensure the "assume smart user" mentality og Debian.

      You know what, that's cool. If that's how Debian wants to run I support it 100%. I think that Debian's goal IS servers and experienced users. That leaves a place for the Progeny's, Corel's and Stormix.

      Cheers,

      Ben

      (A happy Debian GNU/Linux user for my PC and Alpha..)

  11. Re:This is good news ... maybe. by ArtDent · · Score: 2

    However, I have to defend the quality of Stormix, and disagree that it's a 2nd-tier vendor in quality. (In market success is another matter -- guess it sounds like they're having at least some serious trouble right now ... fmaxwell is completely correct in noting that a *combination* of factors is really what matters) Stormix (along with Mandrake) is one of the easiest distros to install, gets X working quickly, has intelligent disk tools, and seems to have an overall *clean* approach -- not as software heavy as SuSE or many others, it's true, but the result is a nice, useable system.

    A common view seems to be that Storm's financial failure came in spite of its technical excellence, but I would suggest that it actually came because of it.

    Let me explain: Stormix was basically Debian plus a newbie-friendly installation and some GUI configuration front-ends. In my opinion, this was a great idea for a project...but maybe not for a company.

    You start with Debian, a system that automagically updates and configures itself, and then you make it accessible a broader range of users with pretty GUI tools.

    What you end up with is a very happy user with a very nice system who has absolutely no need to ever purchase an upgrade or support.

    To make it worse, Storm lacked a target market and the marketing ability to reach that market. RedHat is the server distribution, Mandrake is the newbie/desktop distribution, SuSE is the lots-of-software distribution, Debian is the Free distribution. What is Stormix?

    Storm's existence was a big benefit to the larger Linux community. The consolation for us is that their GPL'ed work can continue...hopefully it will quickly make its way back into Debian. The big losers, I suppose, are the excellent technical people who worked at Storm. They certainly didn't deserve this fate. Their contributions are appreciated; best of luck to them.

  12. Re:Its evolution in action by Bastian · · Score: 2

    Except that new versions of windows aren't distros any more than Slack 4 is a different distro from Slack 7.1. It's all Windows, and it's all Slack. Then again, with M$'s fscked up versioning system, where the number jumps from 3.11 to 95 when it should've been to 4.0, then to 98 when it should still be 4.1 or 4.2 (sorry, kids, but I just can't consider a driver update a new version.) It's hard to tell what's what in the Windows world anymore. . .

  13. Sad news, great distro, fantastic home-grown apps by benmhall · · Score: 2

    Man, Most embaracing typo yet. And in the title too.. Guess I fit right in here..

    Anyway, I've proof-read it now, and am reposting:

    REPOST:

    This is really sad.

    While the original Storm Linux was a little rough, and had many installation issues, their newest version (Rain 2.0.6) is absolutely fantastic.

    The installer is very slick, and SAS and StormPkg are great tools! I use them all the time. I installed Stormix and immediately upgraded to Woody without a hitch.

    My question is why doesn't the Debian community pick up their great stormpkg apt front-end and run with it? All of their stuff was GPL'd. To be honest, I really can't see the difference between what Stormix was and what Progeny is hoping to be.

    As for someone else picking it up and maintaining it, I really hope that Debian takes a close work at the work they did. It was great.

    Stormix was what got me on to Debian. Since then I've taken the time to get accustomed to it, and I honestly believe that I'll stick with a Debian based distro forever.

    This is very sad. They had a very good product. I wish the people well in their future endeavours.

    Nice T-shirt!

    Ben

    END REPOST

    Now, a question: I'm thinking that it might be interesting to try to grab their distro and make a new one out of it, similar in concept to Corel's in that it only uses the best of Linux software be default.

    Would anyone out there be interested in working with me on it?

    I'm thinking Stormix (So Debian) based with the newest versions of the following apps:

    - Linux Kernel
    - XFree
    - KDE
    - Gimp
    - XMMS
    - Some development tools
    - Gnometoaster for CDR creation
    - Not much else

    We could cover all of the bases with only the best available, and add a few custom tools where needed.

    Maybe I'm crazy for suggesting this on Slashdot, but it's just an idea. I'm honestly not looking for a flame here... I'm getting to the end of my degree and am looking forward to what I might do afterwards..

    Cheers,

    Ben

  14. Re:Life sometimes sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    And the people who point to that problems that linux companies are having are missing one very important thing:
    Two-thirds of all small businesses fail within the first three years. So it looks to me that we're seeing exactly what we should be.

    Shalon Wood

  15. This is good news by fmaxwell · · Score: 4
    In the early 1900s, there were dozens, if not hundreds, of U.S. automobile manufacturers. As the market for cars became larger and competition between brands became greater, that number shrunk to the few that we have today. Brands that were weaker because of price, engineering, or marketing, went belly-up. I think that we are seeing the same thing in the Linux distro market. The big players (RedHat, Mandrake, SUSE, etc.) are still solid while the 2nd and 3rd tier distributions are starting to fade away.

    While competition in the marketplace is a good thing, confusion is not. A customer deciding which OS to use has two current choices from Microsoft (Me and 2000). If he is a home user, he gets Me and if he is a business user, he gets 2000 (or so says Microsoft). This same customer is faced with a confusing array of Linux distros, each claiming to be the best. SUSE, RedHat, Mandrake, Corel, Caldera, TurboLinux, Debian, Slackware, and Storm Linux all spring to mind. And there are many more. Unfortunately, these distributions are not all compatible with one another. Someone familiar with Mandrake might struggle with Debian, for instance, and not be able to find utilities and applications that he has come to rely on. Installing a sound card on RedHat is not done in the same was as installing one on Caldera. This type of problem frustrates and confuses end users.

    While my sympathies go out to the employees and creditors of Stormix, I think that this is a natural solidifying of a market and is a sign that Linux is becoming a mainstream product.

  16. Re:Stormix was not a parasite by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4
    No, Stormix was not a parasite. They GPL-ed their software and their package manager is now part of Debian. They had real, shipping product, not mock-ups like LinuxOne. It happens that they had one really bad executive, and an otherwise good team. But that's not what sunk them, the capital market did.

    Bruce

  17. Re:Sorry to hear, but the Software will Go On! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    No, that's not what they said. But there's some truth in there. Unix got fragmented and didn't have a license like the GPL to make it possible to merge fragments. It got sold from company to company like a pork belly on the commodity market, which hardly gave business users confidence. And it was expensive, and proprietary.

    Now, aren't you glad that Linux isn't Unix? :-)

    Thanks

    Bruce

  18. I like the Debian philosophy...but.... by Polo_Pony_Guy · · Score: 2

    I actually do like the concepts behind Debian, and the fact that it's not as commercial as some of the other releases. Unfortunately, it doesn't measure up to the pure level of usability that other distributions are at. I tried it last week for 2 days and it didn't want to cooperate.

    I installed it from a local FTP mirror. The installation went fine and dandy. I would have preferred an ISO image, but I didn't find one on the local FTP mirror. Anyways, that wasn't a major problem and the system was installed within a fairly short time.

    Everything went fine until I tried to set up the XFree86 system. Then everything seemed to fall over. I have the i810 chipset at work where I was attempting to install the Debian system...the version of XFree86 they had didn't support it. I knew this from dealing with the same problem under Red Hat. But unfortunately, Intel only provides Red Hat specific patches. somehow on their site.

    The next step was to change what the Debian folks call the "/etc/apt/sources.list"...so I changed it to unstable and downloaded all of the updated packages, including XFree86 4.0.2 which has support for i810. Unfortauntely half the the deb packages failed to install, so I went into the archives directory manually and installed all of the packages which were showing failed dependencies. That seemed to work and after running apt-get update-dist a few times more, all the packages were sucessfully installed.

    So I tried the new XFree86 system....but all I got was "Waiting for X11 to accept connections ..............(screen was soon full of dots). Note that this was several hours later. I reinstalled and tried everything again the next day, but I didn't have any luck.

    In retrospect, I have had much better luck with Mandrake, Red Hat and SuSE.
  19. Reason for Bankrupcy protection by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    It goes beyond risk. If you let the creditors suck a dying company dry, then they'll get pennies on the dollar and shut the company down.

    If you can convince a judge that you might get your act together, you can get bankrupcy protection. That means that you can help off from the creditors and try to make money, then you work out a system to pay them back.

    This is in the lenders best interests (you didn't think the laws were to protect commoners). For example, say I am one of 10 creditors for a company that owes $10m, and has $1m on hand. They might have money coming in (could pay back in two years). Protection helps us all.

    Why can't we do this independently? There is a hold-up problem. Say that I am owed $5m, and cut a deal to be paid back. Someone owed $250,000 demands payment, and they'd get paid in full, (while I get nothing). A few of those situations, and the $1m on hand could be sucked out, leaving the company unable to make payroll and going under.

    Even if there weren't people that could be paid, we'd have a problem. Imagine a company with 2 creditors for $10m. They owe one of them $8m, and one $2m, and they have $1m on hand. The $8m agrees to hold off payments so the company can try to pay in full. The $2m company now decides to collect, forces the company into bankrupcy and takes the $1m (because the big boy agreed to put off payments). This would be a mess. The lesser debtor could blackmail the big debtor into transferring debt, because all they can get is $800,000 from them both filing, or $0 from not filing, and that isn't right.

    The courts protect creditors from each other more than protecting those that lost it all.

  20. damn shame by SonofRage · · Score: 2

    It would be a damn shame, maybe some of their GUI tools could be made part of Debian.

  21. Real OS vs. collection of stuff by Eric+Green · · Score: 2
    The problem with Red Hat Linux -- and all current Linux distributions -- is that Linux is not an operating system. Linux is a kernel. Lots of people have thrown together a bunch of random tools on top of that kernel and sold it as "Linux" (it should probably be called GNU-MIT-BSD-Linux), but it remains a set of random tools tossed on top of that kernel. The problem with a bunch of random tools gathered from all over is that keeping them up-to-date and working well together becomes exponentially harder as the number of tools grow. That, amongst other reasons, is why many commercial software vendors choose to re-invent the wheel rather than use the many available Open Source software libraries such as OpenSSL and libgmp. My own bigmath module may suck compared to libgmp, but I can at least insure that it will continue to work with my application. I have no such assurance with libgmp (and libgmp is hairy enough to compile that I can't assure that old versions of libgmp will continue to work with new versions of the various operating systems we support -- how will it work on an IA-64, for example?).

    The wonder is that Red Hat Linux/SuSE Linux/etc. continue to be usable. The fact that they have bugs is undeniable and unavoidable, given the fact that they are random grab-bags of Open Source software, rather than being an operating system. If you want an operating system, get FreeBSD. Of course, this does not assure bug-free operation either (FreeBSD has had some rather annoying spontaneous reboot problems as of late, that keep coming and going), but you'll probably be more stable.

    I, of course, run Red Hat Linux 7.0 on my personal system. That's because I love playing with a bunch of unstable bleeding edge software, I'm a techie, it's my curse. That does not mean I would implement Red Hat 7.0 on a production system though.

    -Eric

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
  22. Not a good month for Debian-based distributions by locutus074 · · Score: 3
    So this month, we receive news that Stormix is declaring bankruptcy while Corel is selling off their operating system division. Not a good month. :)

    I hope that people don't get the wrong impression about Debian from this. It's really kick-ass; but I'd prefer a little more eye candy. What I'd really like to see is something like a Debian-based Mandrake. That'd be really cool.

    It's a damn shame; I used Stormix for a bit, and it showed promise.

    --

    --

    --
    We have fought the AC's, and they have won.

  23. Life sometimes sucks. by pc486 · · Score: 3

    The fact that Storm Linux seems to be going bankrupt is not something that should seem unusual. There is quite a bit of competition in the distro world of Linux for a relitivly small market; RedHat, Slackware, SuSe, Turbo, Debian, and other distros provide stiff competition. The good news is that bankruptcy isn't the end of a company. I'm just hoping that Storm Linux will contiune to put out products. Competition is more often than not good for an industry as it premotes the growth of Linux by providing selection of a product that meets one's needs.

  24. Sorry to hear, but the Software will Go On! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4
    Stormix is a Debian derivative. Right now it is being very difficult to get capital, which is what probably sunk them. However, Progeny is doing well, and with Ian Murdock (the Debian founder) and a number of the lead Debian developers there, Progeny will carry the torch for Debian in the business world. I am associated with the company and am thus prejudiced, although I am not their official spokesperson and I don't work for them - this oosting is opinion.

    Reviews of the Progeny install have been very good (go to ftp.progeny.com/pub/progeny/ and download the CD image), and this ease-of-use addition will be a real boost to Debian.

    I'm sorry to hear about Stormix, but there's been an ex-Storm person at Progeny for a while, and I hope the other good people from Storm get to move over.

    Thanks

    Bruce

  25. Stromix Linux by gordzilla · · Score: 2

    How come a company like Stormix, with a real product can be so unfortunate to have this happen to them, yet fly-by-night LinuxOne can continue to exist?

  26. Re:Stormix down, but not out - read the fine print by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
    They are just seeking protection from their creditors.

    What a sick notion. You make it sound like the creditors are evil, greedy attackers rather than the people and institutions that trusted Stormix and loaned them money. What would you think if you lent someone money and they went to court to try to keep from repaying you? Would you view the court as a "protector"?

  27. Stormix Message Board by alexburke · · Score: 2

    For more information, please see the Stormix-users mailing list. Scroll down a bunch to get to the bankruptcy threads.

    You might find this message thread particularly interesting...

    --

  28. Re:It's not that freakin hard to make your own dis by octothorpe · · Score: 2

    I guess that the obvious thing to say would be, OK if its so easy, have you done it? But a more useful thing to point out is that packaging is one of the harder things to do in Software Development. I work in software testing of enterprise middleware and really a big percentage of bugs come from packaging mistakes and 3rd party compatability and not in coding mistakes. Think about all the issues with compilers, interpreters, virtual machines, orbs, etc. that seem to change daily. And then think about getting ever last little header file and config file in the right place and at the right version. And then for an OS think about hardware support; multiply the number of CPU types, motherboard chipsets, BIOSs, bus types, sound cards, video cards, network cards, protocals, CDRs, Tape Drives, etc, together and you get a huge number of combinations.
    Yes I'm sure it's easier to come up with an OS when you start with such a well designed system as Debian espesially because it has the deb/apt package system but I can't see how you whould think that that was a trivial project. And I havn't even gotten to the subject of Support, even if you do throw out your own distribution are you going to support it and fix bugs and solve customers problems with it?

  29. Lack of option by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3
    I was just thinking today how much I was looking forward to the next installment of Stormix while helping someone fdisk their windows partition and install Mandrake 7.2. While KDE2 looks as slick as penguin poo, I had some issues with it in general. Dependancies. This individual had found a program on freshmeat that he wanted to install, in RPM form. Ok, good so far - he doesn't have to compile it. That's a big roadblock for beginners who are used to foolish click-click-click-done installations. So, we 'rpm -Uvh' the program, and we get dependancy errors. A pain in the butt, but we get through it. But the point is, it's a huge pain - there was a tree about 3 or 4 deep of dependancies I had to pull from the CD. I couldn't just 'apt-get install libpng' (for example) I had to find everything that that paticular item needed, etc etc. It turned him off slightly.

    Now, Stormix didn't really have that issue. IMO, the main issue that Stormix had was that you had no option on initial install via the penguin-poo slick GUI to install, say, more advanced programs. You had to find them on the CD afterwards and install them, and there wasn't a large array of programs available via initial install. IMNSHO, they could have simply had the 'extra' programs under a second sub-menu, say, as 'extras', or 'more programs', with a notice that the main programs would not be enough for most people, and then go on to label the 'extra' programs under a category as say, "CD Burning Tools" and install them all in that manner. I'd say that was quite possibly the biggest fallacy of Stormix, as far as usability is concerned.

    I was thinking today that, if Stormix realeased, say, Stormix 2001, they would likely base it off Mandrake, but base it off of apt, possibly with their own custom db of packages. (i586, anyone? I certainly notice a huge speed difference with optimized packages.)

    If that were to be done - a apt based Mandrake distro with a more sensical installer for beginners (keepin' it technical for us geeks at the same time) I think everyone could be happy. (RedHat wouldn't have much to hold to that - what got them in the lead was their RPM w/ early acceptance of X and such.)

    *sigh* Well, I hope Stormix continues to be worked on by someone. If for no other reason, that boot logo was tatz. ;)

    -------
    CAIMLAS

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  30. Linux Linux Linux... by mindstrm · · Score: 3

    Just my note to all those burgeoning 'linux admins' out there..... especially those who argue over what the 'best' distro is all the time, or what one they will use 'forever' or 'from now on'.

    Some facts:

    1) There have been several linux distros over the years, and have had a rise and fall (and rise and fall etc...) in popularity. lsl. mcc. slackware. debian. redhat. Suse. + all the spinoffs/oneoffs...

    2) There's more to unix on the x86 than Linux... and more platforms than x86.

    Now.. really, instead of all these efforts.. why not put some effort into some actual computing instead of arguing about what's a better distro, or tweaking your desktop for the 1000th time? Do a bit of code. Ever installed FreeBSD before? OpenBSD? NetBSD? Go scam a copy of Solaris x86 and learn what it's all about... I'm not saying any are as 'good' as linux at the things you probably expect them to be.. but...

    What I'm saying is.. it seems to me a lot of pro-linux people nowadays are getting to be as bad as any other OS-worship crowd.. they paint themselves into a little corner instead of looking at computing in general. You think it's a big linux world.. but it's not.. there is a lot more out there.

  31. I'm on nothing.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    The point is, they should learn something outside of just 'linux linux linux'. Use those neurons to expand their horizons.

    I mentioned Sol x86 because I doubted a lot of kids in their basements would have a sparc laying around... and sol x86 is basically free ($20).
    Oh. And experience with it might really help them if they ever actually have to use solaris/sparc.

    I'd go on a tear about the 'parents basement' thing.. but it's not worth it ;)

  32. If you want to be a Debian-based distribution... by knghtbrd · · Score: 2

    ...you have to be at least as good as Debian, or nobody will notice you until the Slashdot headline says you're gone.

    Consider Corel a moment. Can you really take a distribution seriously that installs a network-connected machine without a root password? If they can't even get such a basic security feature right, what else didn't they do right?

    The last version of Stormix I looked at wasn't very impressive either.&nbsp I really only looked at the installer and this was back in October, however the install was very choppy and unnatural.&nbsp I actually believe Debian's potato installer is more friendly.

  33. Sad news, great distro, fantastic home-groen apps. by benmhall · · Score: 3

    This is really sad.

    While the original Storm Linux was a little rough, and had many installation issues, their newest version (Rain 2.0.6) is absolutely fantastic.

    The installer is very slick, and SAS asn StormPkg are great tools! I use them all the time. I installed Stormix and immediately upgraded to Woody without a hitch.

    My question is why doesn't the Debian community pick up their great stormpkg apt front-end and run with it? All of their stuff was GPL'd. To be honest, I really can't see the difference between what Stormix was and what Progeny is hoping to be.

    As for someone else picking it up and maintaining it, I really hope that Debian takes a close work at the work they did. It was great.

    Stormix was what got me on to Debian. Since then I've taken the time to get accustomed to it, and I honestly believe that I'll stick with a Debian based distro forever.

    This is very sad. They had a very good product. I wish the people well in their future endeavours.

    Nice T-shirt!

    Ben

  34. We need to start a fund by CobesTheGreat · · Score: 2

    StormLinux is the Mandrake of Debian, it is really a great OS for those who can't understand Debian's complicated installation, or use. It really is a shame. StormLinux2k had the power of potato, and the ease of use of Mandrake. We should seriously take up a fund, send them a check with a note and just say thanks.
    --------------------------------------
    I'm a karma whore, mod me up damn you!

    --

    --------------------------------------
    58.0% slashdot corrupt
  35. Re:Sad news, great distro, fantastic home-groen ap by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2
    I'm with you on this one. I got a free Stormix cd w/MaxLinux last year, and it was great. I'd been using Slackware before that, and the ease of installation was enough to take me away from it. The introduction to Debian was great too -- I abs. love apt-get install.

    Weird thing is that I really wanted to work for them (I live in Vancouver), but never got around to sending a resume...guess it was for the best.

  36. this is not written in stone by small_dick · · Score: 2

    some of their gui installers and enhancements were very cool.

    but it was all kde, and i could not seem to get it properly gnomeified...so i switched to debian.

    some of the stuff was broken...but they sure had a great support list.

    BTW, I think they are still seeking an infiusion of cash, and are close to breaking even, so I don't think I'd write them off just yet.

    Maybe we should slashdot the stores and rescue them? Just kidding.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
  37. Too bad... by Tom7 · · Score: 4

    Too bad... they had a nice, uh, logo.

  38. Re:Stormix down, but not out - read the fine print by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
    I know how bankruptcies work and and why they make sense. What bothers me is the terminology of "protecting" the company against the creditors. We have become a country that views bankruptcy as just another form of financial planning. The shame has gone out of filing for bankruptcy. Rather than it being a last-resort, companies hire accountants and attorneys to accelerate the process and maximize the amount

    Everyone wants to think of the creditors as being a bunch of rich venture capitalists. In many cases, the creditors are small businesses that have extended credit. They are office supply stores, office furniture stores, mom & pop copier sales companies, electricians, and so forth. They are the ones that need protection.

    I have seen how bankruptcies are often handled. The financially-troubled company gets the courts to step in and creditors are paid pennies on the dollar -- while the company executives keep earning 6-figure salaries.

  39. Wait a minute! That's old data! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    It no longer takes 16 months. That info is about a year old. They were not accepting new maintainers for a long time (when a volunteer organization gets up to 500 developers, expect growing pains). They put in a lot of automation to help them manage new maintainers as well as the existing ones.

    Thanks

    Bruce

    1. Re:Wait a minute! That's old data! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      P.S. actual statistics regarding the time to become a Debian maintainer are at nm.debian.org .

  40. Good Heavens! don't use unstable! by hawk · · Score: 2

    It hasn't been a good idea for a regular machine for four or five years now (since 1.1 came out, iirc).

    There is no guarantee, nor even a tendency, for packages in unstable to get along, or stay in synch. They really mean "unstable"

    With weekly updates, I found that an unstable machine becomes completely unusable about twice a year, requiring a day or two to get back up.

    The solution is to use "testing," which is lagged two weeks from unstable so that the bombs can be removed . . .

  41. Debdrake by Wokan · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure what packages Debian comes with, but the typical Mandrake install involves a KDE2-centric set of configuration tools (though other desktop managers are available in the distro), Webmin, Apache's Adv. Extranet Server, Mod_SSL, Mod_PHP (v4.0.4pl1), Perl/Mod_Perl, OpenSSH.
    Plus there are other niceties in Mandrake, such as a utility for importing your Windows TTF fonts, the menu utility that keeps the app menu across desktop managers consistent, and I guess what would end up renamed as Debdrake Update. :)
    Just some ideas for anyone up to the challenge.
    Digital Wokan
    I wanted to spend 8 years defending the US constitution.