Slashdot Mirror


Cheap Linux PDAs

An anonymous reader says: "With all the talk of the dreamcast port I figured I'd post a link to This deal - a "developer" model Agenda Linux PDA for $179 -- a bit more expensive than the DC, but it'll fit in ya pocket ;)" Apparently a soon-to-be-released color version of this PDA was being shown at LWCE (I missed it). I finally got my hands on an iPaq, so hopefully I'll have time soon to try PocketLinux (which sadly lacks a calandering app), as well as getting X11 on it. I still want to use an iPaq as a wireless X11 terminal. But first I must complete my MAME cabinet. One project at a time ;)

37 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. I'm not proud of this, by Shoeboy · · Score: 4

    But I'd like to get 8 PDAs and install linux on them.
    Then I'd configure them in a wireless beowulf cluster.
    It wouldn't be useful for anything, but can you imagine the bragging rights?
    Most of my friends would look at me with newfound respect.
    Which says more about my friends than it does about beowulf clusters of PDA's, but hey, what can you do?
    This idea really appeals to me.
    Maybe I should seek professional help.
    --Shoeboy

  2. X over wireless? - you must be joking by Sanity · · Score: 2
    X is an extremely inefficient protocol when it comes to network usage, it works great when the X server is on the same machine as the client, and works tolerably over a 10 megabit network, but even over broadband it is too slow, and over a wireless connection - you must be joking.

    VNC works much better over slower connections than X, and there are clients for most popular platforms (although I am not aware of one for the Palm pilot).

    --

    1. Re:X over wireless? - you must be joking by MustardMan · · Score: 2

      no, silly, that's what grad students are for, writing the code. However, I am an undergrad and hence do not recieve grad students, so I will focus my efforts on the science until I am accomplished enough to warrant my own lackie grad students to do my coding while I concentrate on the important stuff.

    2. Re:X over wireless? - you must be joking by MustardMan · · Score: 2

      actually we have an 11 mbps wireless network throughout campus, which is what i'd use. Tolerable over slow ethernet = tolerable over wireless. Plus VNC doesn't really fit my needs, I don't want complete control of the system, just a small dialog window updating to my display. I realize I could just have the thing post data and write my own protocols and whatnot but X is quick and easy for me. It give me more time to code simulations and not worry about display issues

    3. Re:X over wireless? - you must be joking by MustardMan · · Score: 2

      writing my own client would naturally be more efficient, but I am a scientist, not a programmer. To me, reinventing the wheel is pointless when something exists that fits me needs. I already do this on a laptop, using a small chunk of the screen and a wavelan card. Being able to immediately, cheaply, and most importantnly, quickly, move this to a smaller platform is very appealing to me

  3. VNC for Palm by Qube · · Score: 3

    here.

    PocketPC version here.

  4. My Review by Kristopher+Johnson · · Score: 4
    I've had mine for a little over a week. Here are my impressions:
    • The size is nice. You can't tell from the web site photos, but it's about the size of the Palm m100, but with a larger screen. The screen provides 160x240 pixels.
    • The kernel (2.4.0), device drivers, and basic utilities are still under development. But it's good enough to use as a development platform--very stable in my experience.
    • It's "real" Linux, with an X server, TCP/IP stack, etc. It's not a dumbed-down "embedded Linux".
    • It's slow. Part of this is due to lack of FPU. The developers are working on this.
    • FLTK is the primary API for doing GUIs. There is an FLPDA library that provides common look-and-feel across apps.
    • The handwriting recognition is not usable. You'll have to use the on-screen keyboard (or telnet in from a desktop machine).

    There's a SourceForge project, http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/agtoys, that will provide an area for developers to post their stuff. You may want to pay attention to see what people are doing. (The site is new, so there's nothing there yet.)

  5. Re:That's not cheap. by jaysones · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and used cars are cheaper than new ones.

  6. Re:The future of PDA's, and a possible cloud. by Moofie · · Score: 2

    Nonsense. I use my PDA for humanistic goals only. Look at my schedule for tomorrow:

    8:30 - Fight The Man
    9:45 - Throw wooden shoe in grinding gears of capitalism
    11:00 - Sing "We Shall Overcome" on lawn at local IBM installation
    12:00 - Lunch with Greenpeace

    See? It wouldn't do to forget any of this stuff, so I put it in my Palm. Don't worry...I'll protect you from the big bad technology slavers.

    (\sarcasm)

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  7. Re:I have a helio now... by RevAaron · · Score: 2

    That's the way it works on PocketLinux. But loading an application takes a 2-10 seconds, when you run it for the first time since you booted. After an app has been initally loaded, it comes up faster, but it's still a painful experience at this point.

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  8. Re:Be Aware of the powerdrain !!! by sbaker · · Score: 2

    The powerdrain has gotten MUCH better with
    more recent versions of the system software.

    Two AAA's now last about two weeks with the
    machine in 'hibernation' mode - and 6 hours
    or so if you leave it fully turned on.

    For the usage most people have for PDA's, that's
    not *too* bad.

    Note that the version that's out now is for
    developers - it is NOT the final consumer version.

    This version has more memory and more flash than
    the consumer unit will have/need - and that may
    have an impact on the battery life too.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  9. Re:vaporware? by sbaker · · Score: 2

    It's DEFINITELY not vaporware. I bought one
    just after Xmas - and I have it in front of
    me right now - I've been happily writing
    programs for it for several weeks. It runs
    Linux and Xfree - as advertised - for real.

    You can run PPP on it - so you can telnet into it
    or out of it, use NFS with your PC and it's little
    flash memory 'disk drive', etc, etc.

    Most PC/Linux programs can be compiled to run
    on it - although the 160x240 monochrome screen
    is going to be a bit limiting and most GUI-based
    programs need some UI tweaking to make them
    usable.

    You can even run 'bash' on it's little screen.

    **BUT** the software is still pretty raw...this
    is good hardware - but the community needs to
    help out with getting the software together.

    The handwriting recognition really sucks - but
    it has a 'soft keyboard' that's moderately usable.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  10. Couldn't Be Happier by mchappee · · Score: 3

    I received my Agenda about three weeks ago and I must say that I couldn't be happier. I'm not really using it as a PDA, but as a Mobile Linux Box. For less than $200 I can use it to dial into a network, mount drives via NFS, run just about an X app locally or from a remote Xserver, send/receive e-mail, and many, many other things. The convenience factor of running Linux is amazing. Don't like to use rsync to back it up? Fine, NFS mount the Aganda's drive and tar it up! Don't like using the tiny keyboard for Agenda administration? Fine, telnet to it and do anything that you like. ftpd, httpd (Apache and smaller), fetchmail, and other daemons have already been ported.

    The "YoPaq" is nice, I'm sure, but it's too expensive. We can deploy these little guys to our entire sales force without batting an eyelash.

    Matthew
    Orasoft.org

    --
    /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
  11. Re:The future of PDA's, and a possible cloud. by Wheel+Of+Fish · · Score: 2

    There are so many things wrong with that posting, I'm not sure where to start.

    First of all, PDA users are no more "beholden" to a time schedule than users of good old date books and pocket calendars. They serve the same exact function, with the PDAs offering advantages in ease of use.

    Second, tracking devices have been around for quite a while now. UPS and FedEx track ground shipments via GPS and cell technology, as do many other private shipping companies. The technique is not at all exclusive to Europe. And as for tracking individuals, cops can already track people by cell triangulation. How would PDAs make a difference?

    And what does this have to do with Linux on PDAs?

    BTW, if you're gonna use big words, you might want to consult a dictionary first.

    Oh crap, did I just feed the troll? Dammit.

    -Gabe

  12. vaporware? by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2

    Has anyone actually been able to buy one of these Agenda things? I've been hearing off and on about it since fall of '99, always it's "coming soon" or "prerelease" or "blah". Screw that, tell me about it when it's shipping. All the linux-running coolness doesn't count for Jack Shit if you can't actually, physically, right-now-not-next-quarter-or-"soon" buy the thing.

    Side notes to some previous posters: why linux instead of (PalmOS/WinCE/other-commercial-OS): because we said so. ;-) Why linux instead of BSD? difference is epsilon small, so if you don't like linux, quitcherbitchin' and port. whining = less time to code! (the NetBSD port proliferation in particular seems a likely avenue for a BSD-on-PDA approach)


    --
    Fuck Censorship.
  13. dumb question by British · · Score: 2

    I just acquired an old US Robotics 1 meg "Pilot"(that's what it sez on the case) that doesn't even have the backlit display. Can I still use the latest palmOS apps on it without worry? I have no clue on how to upgrade the PalmOS, or even know if I can.

  14. Re:It's an organizer? by MustardMan · · Score: 2

    a simple pager system with pretty graphics, maybe a chart, and the ability to interact with the dialog window. not quite the same

  15. Is there... by Vladinator · · Score: 2

    One of these yet with a PCMCIA slot in it? It would be really cool to be able to connect to the net with one of these and surf. I had a buddy at SBC who had this, but it wasn't running Linux.

    Fawking Trolls!

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

    1. Re:Is there... by flynt · · Score: 3

      Ipaq's need adapters to plug stuff in like this. But there is both a PCMCIA one and a Compact flash one. There are ethernet adapters for CF slots too. There are tons of Internet apps already, besides browsers. There are IRC clients, icq clients, telnet clients, even ssh clients. It is cool to go to the library and plug in and be on IRC :)

  16. Re:Whats the point? by Teferi · · Score: 2

    Why not?

    "If ignorance is bliss, may I never be happy.

    --
    -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  17. Be Aware of the powerdrain !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I bought one last year. It blows royal dick. The two AAA cells last about overnight even if you turn the device off. There is a major power drain on the board, period. In case you don't believe me, go to http://www.agendacomputing.com and check the discussion board. My personal verdict - this thing is a waste of money. I had my whole team ready to order and we had to opt out after the first one showed up. Maybe in five more years.

    1. Re:Be Aware of the powerdrain !!! by tolldog · · Score: 3

      I see... so your *developer* eddition didn't work out for you. You mean that it looks like some work could be done on it?
      I too have been a little frustrated with mine, but I understand that the system isn't final. People are still working on it, writing apps for it, tweaking the kernel for it.
      Is it a finsished product, no. But if you read the developers information, it will not be a big supprise or dissapointment.

      --
      -I just work here... how am I supposed to know?
  18. It's an organizer? by Ravagin · · Score: 3

    so hopefully I'll have time soon to try PocketLinux (which sadly lacks a calandering app)

    Well... uh... I certainly hope that's in development.
    Hmmm, I know that one of the most valuable parts of my Palm for me is the Datebook app... the point of a handheld at this point seems to be that it is an organizer. Now, I'm no fan of the PocketPC, but I'd rather use that than a handheld OS that lacks basic PDA functions.
    I thnk that Palm may be the best handheld OS out there in terms of functioning as a basic PDA with a flexible platform. PocketPC is good for trying to squeeze a desktop into your pocket.

    Now, I ask this question with total honesty and openness: Besides the "hey that was a cool accomplishment" factor, what is the point of having linux on a handheld?

    -J

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

    1. Re:It's an organizer? by MustardMan · · Score: 5

      So you can use it to run X applications wirelessly, and easily display anything from a monitor for your seti@home progress, to a instant message session, to the GIMP, to anything else that needs more processor power than a PDA has, but can still be used in a pinch on a small screen.

      In my personal experience, one thing that I plan to use something like this as is a portable monitor for the simulations I have running on a remote supercomputer, doing nonlinear dynamics calculations for my senior research. I can easily use X to display a progress monitor/dialog/error popup box on something I can take with me, so I can monitor my simulation at lunch, or while in a class, or on the bus.

    2. Re:It's an organizer? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      The point is that it's ZERO cost. Because the manufacturer has to charge nothing for the OS means, to me anyway, is that they can include better hardware becuase they do not have to actively work too hard on the OS. It also means they don't have to pay X amount of dollars to Microsoft or Palm. All they might have to do is write a few apps and that's it.

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:It's an organizer? by SEWilco · · Score: 2

      The point of having Linux is so there's a chance that you can make the thing more useful to you. If you get a black box which you can't change, you're stuck with it and its current bugs. If you can change it, you (or someone you hire) can improve it.

  19. The future of PDA's, and a possible cloud. by Urban+Existentialist · · Score: 2
    PDA's are becoming ever more ubiqitous. They are spreading everywhere, and no self respecting businessman is without one. Technologically speaking, they are marvellous, and in this respect they van only improve when better screen technologies, better batteries, better processors and better OS's, especially Linux based ones, arrive on the scene. They could become mobile desktops.

    However, what of the social implications? PDA's represent a sort of slavery, as the user of the PDA is beholden to a time schedule and can never have any excuses. The electronic brain he carrys around with him has become a millstone, as it keeps him on the straight and narrow. This is not such a concern now, as PDA's are still simple, but in the future when they are web annabled they could be used by businesses to keep an eyes on their employees at all times, much like long distance lorry drivers in Europe are watched constantly by satellite. Is the employee of the future, and indeed today, to have to privacy at all? It is surely the right of the employee that he be able to do as he wish when not at work, and even to have privacy and time to think while at work, but PDA's are an incipient threat to this state of affairs. The most insidious thing about PDA's is that everyone see's them as benevolent. I am not saying that they need be dangerous for sure, I am just saying that it could well become an important issue. If I were a betting man, I would say that PDA's are the next major civil liberties issue.

    You know exactly what to do-
    Your kiss, your fingers on my thigh-

    --

    You know exactly what to do-
    Your kiss, your fingers on my thigh-
    I think of little else but you.

    1. Re:The future of PDA's, and a possible cloud. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      Is the employee of the future, and indeed today, to have to privacy at all? It is surely the right of the employee that he be able to do as he wish when not at work,

      The problem isnt with PDAs. This problem you describe is based on Class Slavery and the erosion of democracy being replaced by the new idea of "Corporate Rights". Ie the Right to ask you what you do in your own time, the right to own ideas/words/symbols/colours, the right to remove any/all percieved barriers to profit at any/all times.

      Think about 'root causes' when you look at privacy issues, pollution, individual stress, bad television, corrupt politics etc etc. Usually you find Capatalist Profit Motive as being *the* major "Root Cause" of most modern problems.

  20. I have a helio now... by SurfsUp · · Score: 4

    Simple, cheap. I paid $140 and they cost less now. 8 MB, 2B flash, re-flashed with linux+kaffee. Specs here. Java is just wrong for this - it takes about 30 secs to start, and 15 secs to load an app. I want to put in Python instead and see if that makes it usable. I can think of a lot of things I'd do with this, with a decent software infrastructure. Java is a dead weight holding this thing down, I hope that Python will be more like wings.
    --

    --
    Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
  21. another one with a free compiler by Fat+Cow · · Score: 2

    here's another one

    It's at a similar stage to the agenda, but has the advantage of an MMC slot

    --
    stay frosty and alert
  22. Re:Whats the point? by iapetus · · Score: 2

    10PRINT"Hello, world!"

    18 bytes. Runs under RISC OS perfectly.

    Do I win a prize? :^)

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  23. Don't drop it by doorbot.com · · Score: 3

    Where's the quality industrial design? It looks like one of those cheap iMac-inspired PCs: They use the colors from the iMac, but don't take even the smallest bit of the industrial design behind the iMac. At least the iMac looks sturdy.

    Drop your Agenda PDA and watch it shatter as it hits the ground... it looks like if you hold it with a bit to much zest you'll crush it and it's bubble-gum flavored insides will spill out. Steve Jobs would probably like it, because not only is it lickable, you probably could actually take a bite out of it.

    There are many people who dislike the iMac, but most people have to agree that at least it has quality industrial design. So why is it, that when everyone decides to copy the iMac, that they leave out one of the most important parts of it's design?

    And let's get away from the fruity colored PCs/accessories. They don't appeal to larger corporate buyers, for one. Especially in a PDA, where the buyer is probably going to be someone a bit computer savvy, they are highly unlikely to be attracted to it because of the color. In fact, they might very well not buy it (when the would have otherwise) because of the iMac-inspired colors. Then again, die hard computer guys and gals would just paint it themselves. :)

    If only all my PCs were jet black like my ThinkPad 570... there's some quality industrial design, in a color that matches everything.

    1. Re:Don't drop it by lizrd · · Score: 2
      There are many people who dislike the iMac, but most people have to agree that at least it has quality industrial design.

      So that's the term for that keyboard and mouse. I'd always figured that there was a more business oriented term than "GODDAMNED MOTHERFUCKING HUNK OF FLAMING SHIT WHAT KIND OF MUMBLEFUCK CAME UP WITH THIS FUCKING SHIT ASS STUFF DAMNIT FUCKING SHIT", that I usually hear people say when encountering the iMac keyboard and mouse.

      I think that apple really missed the mark with that one. There are only 3 parts to a computer that really matter to the non computer person, the mouse, the screen and the keyboard. Everything else is the "hard drive" that most people don't understand at all anyway, but people can tell when they're holding a cheap piece of plastic and don't like it.
      _____________

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
  24. Re:this is ridiculous.... by oldmanmtn · · Score: 2
    If you don't value your freedom that much, then I see why you think it is ridiculous.

    To put it bluntly, that's just stupid. This is a PDA we're talking about - it's not a freakin' political system!

    Do you refuse to shop in any store that has a "proprietary" (oh no! not that!) point-of-sale system running on their cash registers?

    Are you boycotting VCRs until you can get a Linux-based TIVO? (so, does anybody have the source code to the "application" that runs on the oh-so-Free TIVO? Are y'all forking out the monthly fee to the Man for the "proprietary" scheduling information?)

    Are you refusing to drive until the auto manufacturers start using Embedded Linux to control all the CPUs scattered around the car?

    I'm all in favor of Ideals. But you're not working with Ideals - you're just mindlessly bleating the latest KoolRad jingoism.

    --
    - Old Man of the Mountain ---- "I want to disturb my neighbor"
  25. That's not cheap. by Bilestoad · · Score: 2

    Cheap? If any number of 2nd hand Palm IIIe organizers are available on eBay for about $130, how is $179 "cheap"? Especially considering the software base, quality of developer tools and resale value? For slightly more money, go IIIx or a Handspring Visor.
    Call it a fun opportunity to hack on a Linux-based PDA for not an exorbitant amount, but don't call it a cheap PDA.

  26. Since the posted link doesn't go anywhere... by PhatKat · · Score: 5

    Here's the site:
    Agenda VR3.

  27. Agenda VR3d by Rambo · · Score: 5
    I got one of these units back in December, and it is a nifty little gadget... However, anyone who buys these should go into it with their eyes open. At this point, I don't consider it ready for the masses by any stretch of the imagination, so please don't buy it to replace your Visor/Palm/etc with the thought that it will be ready "out of the box". Current units (with the help of the community) are now able to auto-sleep, although there is still no way to meter the battery voltage or have it shut itself automatically when the batteries get low. Speed is still an issue, as is handwriting recognition, etc.

    I'm not trying to knock the unit, but I would hope that people who are serious about developing for the device would purchase it (hence the "developer edition"). It seems like a lot of people show up on the mailing list expecting a fully functional unit, when there is still a lot of work to be done.