Slashdot Mirror


Vote in 5K Contest

antidigerati writes: "The annual 5k website contest is closed and in the voting stage! Some impressive entries this year. Take a look and vote for your favourites!" Slashdot will take first place in its little-known cousin, the 500K contest.

28 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. Back in the good ole punch card days... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    ...on an IBM 1620 decimal machine (made in late 1950s), I had 120 digits of instructions on a single 80 column card (which could be run as a boot loader card directly from the card reader). Overlapping instructions, donchaknow. Printed out THIMK over and over on the system console, one sense switch changed the speed, another halted it. The M in THIMK was the halt instruction, which is why it wasn't THINK. Think was of course the IBM (pseudo?) motto of the times.

    --

  2. Thanks Stewart! by KFury · · Score: 2

    As a participant of last year's 5K contest, I just want to say thanks to Stewart for making this more than just a one-shot wonder. By the entries I've seen so far, the first 5K served as the thrown-down gauntlet, and it's great to see so many people take up the challenge, and doing such an admirable job.

    It's also wonderful to see the5k.org doing so well. The whole site was made quite a while after the 5k contest ended, and a lot of people would have been loath to put in the effort.

    Thanks Stewart!!!

    Kevin Fox
    --

  3. Re:Slashdotted? Nope! by hey! · · Score: 2

    According to netcraft they're running IIS or Win2K with ASP. Betcha they're running SQL Server too.

    They have a nice lean design; it really ought to fly. How much to you want to bet everything including the front page is dynamically generated for each and every request?

    Maybe there ought to be a web design contest for minimizing server end loads with dynamic content.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. Easy Winner and Loser by brianvan · · Score: 2

    Judging by votes and sheer coolness, the 5k Chess is the big winner. Hell, it beat me. If something under 5k can beat me at chess... well, my TI-85 has 32kb, maybe I should let it think for me on a more frequent basis.

    The big loser? Skadden Arps Recruiting site. Arriving at the entry itself is sort of like buying a car in the classified ads and then finding out that it's a tiny plastic model of a car. The joke is barely funny until you realize someone submitted that entry for real, and that the entry was posted on the list anyway.

    Timepiece is pretty funky, I have to say.

    By the way, I have made websites under 5k before, and I've found them highly entertaining. They consist mostly of ranting text about my high school from about 5 years ago. Oh well, maybe my tastes are unique to the world...

  5. irony by pipeb0mb · · Score: 3

    a.> they use active server pages
    b.> their own images are 5k plus
    c.> their pages are bland and slow

    1. Re:irony by DeadSea · · Score: 2
      Otherwise I would say that it would be hard to slashdot something that is 5k.

      Did they have a zip of all the entries and did anybody mirror it?

    2. Re:irony by mblase · · Score: 2
      a.) they use active server pages

      So? The site couldn't work without server-side scripting. Most sites today can't, for that matter. But the first reason for restricting contestants from using ASP should be obvious: security.

      b.) their own images are 5k plus

      No, they aren't. The site is highly optimized as it is, if you check out the HTML source code, but they couldn't provide you all that information even in plain text for under 5k.

      c.) their pages are bland and slow

      Their pages are cleanly designed and they're being Slashdotted. Chill.

  6. Just as slow as ever. by Fross · · Score: 2

    Currently as the site is slashdotted i'm getting an amazing 17 bytes/second from them. So these 5k sites will still take minutes to download :D

    now THAT's web karma for you.

    fross

  7. 5k chess by gargle · · Score: 2

    http://entries.the5k.org/352/index.htm

    By far the niftiest entry of the bunch.

  8. Re:Slashdotted? Nope! by eric.costello · · Score: 3

    Nice smirky attitiude! My name is Eric and I built the site.

    >Betcha they're running SQL Server too.
    We are indeed running SQL2k. The server is doing fine, btw, though we seem to have maxed out the pipe with the recent /. traffic.

    >How much to you want to bet everything including
    >the front page is dynamically generated for each
    >and every request?
    I will take your bet! I am using an XML caching system I built so that calls to the DB are minimized, which means that the front page is not dynamically created every time (unless you count an XSL transformation). Each entry description page, and even the list of all entries are pulled from cached XML now (the list /was/ created dynamically so as to show up to the second stats for the entries, but it was a matter of changing few lines of code to have it used the cached XML.)

    Anyway, thanks for your interest in the contest.

  9. Re:WTF *is* it?? by -brazil- · · Score: 2
    Er, did you read what I wrote? My point is that nowhere on that exact "about" page is there a direct explanation! There is a short quote about the "idea behind" the contest, and much history, but nowhere does it outright state what the awards are given for! Only because I have a technical background can I suspect that they are for the best website that's no larger than 5 kilobyte.

    You really ought to look a little harder.

    --

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
    --Henry Kissinger

  10. WTF *is* it?? by -brazil- · · Score: 3
    How ironic that this site, too, is victim to the "insiders only" pitfall: nowhere on the site can you easily find an explanation of what "5k" actually is: even on the about page, they explain what the purpose of the competition is, but not what the competition itself is! And people who don't have a technical background most likely couldn't deduce it either.

    I've seen this several time, and it's quite frustrating: people write their website with themselves in mind, assume that everyone who visits it will have a certain knowledge base to make sense of it, and never think of those who don't.

    --

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
    --Henry Kissinger

    1. Re:WTF *is* it?? by LordArathres · · Score: 2

      I agree with you on that one. I mean a 5kb contest of what? It doesnt make sense really. The only reason I knew what it was, was reading the slashdot posts. At least they could put a About link, or What the Hell is this site about? link.
      I love my iBook. I use it to run Linux!

  11. Add 2 more kB by panopticon · · Score: 2

    There's also the 7 kB web competition in Germany, and the winners have been announced.

    rb

  12. Cheap by slashdoter · · Score: 2
    Not to be picky but, next year new rule, it has to be useful in SOME way. none of this 5k race crap. just my $0.02


    ________

    --
    Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
  13. The only plain html entry... by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 2

    I only saw one entry that was pure html...the sad sad story of the armadillo. I didn't get the joke, but I do want to know what that guy is doing in bed with an armadillo.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  14. Chuckle by JosephMast · · Score: 2

    I just love the "ask your site" entry....
    I put in www.slashdot.org with the title "news for nerds" and It came up with forrest gump

    I can only imagine slashdot playing forrest and kiro5shin playing bubba whenever slashdot posts a link...

    kiro5 - I can't feel my webpages...
    /. - Thats causes bubba.. they ain't there!

    *chuckle*

    --
    (define the-question (or (* 2 b) (not (* 2 b))))
  15. the point is... by mblase · · Score: 2
    ...to prove that good design and interactivity is possible without heavy downloads. Simple as that.

    Perhaps the geek community would understand this contest better if it's explained as an optimization contest. You're given a 5120-byte limit on your entire Web site. Produce the best thing you can, with the best functionality and the best design, under that constraint.

    My own entry ("Puzzle Cube") was a fantastic exercise in JavaScript optimization to this end. Make the code as functional as I can. Okay, now remove the whitespace and linebreaks. Retitle the variables and functions with single-letter names. Remove unnecessary braces. Replace array declarations with .split() methods to save a few more characters. Trim the fat. Make it lean. And oh, make it still work for 95% of the browsers.

    Of course it's a gimmick -- but more accurately, it's a challenge. Or a proof-of-concept. Whichever you prefer.

  16. What is up with some of these posts???? by linuxrunner · · Score: 2

    I'm reading a lot of people saying that 5k is not enough or 5k is not realistic....! Sure understandably, hey it's a challenge, not a walk in the park. You actually have to work at creating a page that's either entertaining, useful, and under 5k.

    My next comment is, "Have you actully gone to the site and seen the 5k submissions?" Some are unbelievable! You've got to check out the flash dolphin submission near the bottom of the page. Or the chess game, or the useful yearly calander!

    With out people trying to make java and/or scripts as small as possible we would have nothing left but bloated / slow web pages.
    Give these guys a break, they worked their butts off and deserve tons of credit.

    Linuxrunner

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  17. 5K in real life please by Codeala · · Score: 3

    As many posters already pointed out the the5k.org itself is extremely bloated. You have to jump through so many hoops just to look at a couple pages... Wouldn't it be nice if the 5k principle is applied more often in real life.

    Size does matter, even if you have a fast connection (at the server AND the client side). Don't use FONT tags, don't specific "Arial, Verdana, sans-serif". Instead use Style Sheet and "sans-serif". Remember "Dynamic Font" from Netscape? "You want me to download some fonts just to look at your text page?" How silly is that?

    I like to consider web programming, with HTML, CSS, images and other sources, an art form. An elegant programmer can (and will) create a well layout page using minimum amount of code. Not some hacks that know how to convert a .doc file into a "web" page or make an image map with DreamWeaver.

    So yeah the 5k contest was interesting, but I would rather see more real examples of people writing good clean web page.

    ====

    --

    Codeala - Just another mindless drone
  18. 500K contest? by lilchris · · Score: 2

    Isn't 512K a much rounder number? With winners being a member of the 'helf-meg club'?

  19. How about htis award... by RavStar · · Score: 2

    The "You have Been Slash Doted and Survived Without A Crash" award? That would really mean something to a web admin...


    Plug for my website:
    Wireless Networking Systems
    Network over a 15 mile radius!
    Create your own Wireless ISP!
    www.techsplanet.com/wlan/

  20. Short code by raymondlowe · · Score: 2
    Makes me remember the days of "how much code can you get into one line". I remember running a shooting "video games" in one line of PET BASIC - that was 80 characters!

    Of course we could do amazing things in the long lines that Applesoft BASIC gave us - 127 char I think?

    I understand the APL programmers were the real stars at "one line of code" though.

    As they say - the Lord created the world in 6 days, but an APL programmer could do it in on line.

    R.

  21. 5K? by ooze · · Score: 2

    How about a 5k operating system contest?

    --
    Just because I can imagine doing a hippopotamus, doesn't mean I'd like to do it.
  22. 5k bandwidth competition by RotateLeft4Bits · · Score: 2

    Are you sure it isn't a way to make you cringe, by waiting for 5 minutes to download a 5k website?

    --
    I'm not a Troll i prefer to be called a Goblin.
  23. More looking at our own navel by OpenSourced · · Score: 2
    All this kind of contests are just another way of slapping ourselves on the backs. I know this kind of thing has a glorious tradition, starting with the "Oscars" circus. But other contests let you, at least, know new sites that can possibly be useful to you. This one shares not that virtue. What's the point of it, anyway?

    It's efficiency? I'm all in favour of efficiency, but when the useful information is near zero, you get a very bad ratio, no matter how little resources you used.

    It's a way of reflecting about the design, by adding constraints? That would be a wonderful idea. If they stated a goal, lets say design a web site with the periodic table of elements, and some strong size limitations, and let people use their minds on it, that would be something, IMHO. That perhaps would provide us with useful insights. But with no goals, it's only a collection of nonsense. I'm not particularly interested in how somebody solved a problem of his or her own invention, where the specifications could be changed at will.

    It has no point, it's simply a fun site? Well, I have seen funnier.

    So for me it's just another self-congratulation site. I have no time for it now, I must contemplate my navel, I think...Oh my! Isn't it interesting?...I think I'll forget everything about the outside world...ohmmmmm...

    --

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  24. whats the point... by powerlinekid · · Score: 2

    Look i don't want to take anything away from this competition but what is the point of manipulating you page to be less than a certain size. I'm all for small pages, without stupid graphics, java applets, flash, etc... but this seems more like a gimmick than anything else. As someone said before, if this was the 5k & useful poll then maybe it would mean something. (Hell, i know hundreds of sites that are less than 5k... too bad they're all crap :-) )

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me