Slashdot Mirror


A Host Of Star Wars Bits

BIGJIMSLATE writes: "Maybe these should be considered quickies due to the number of them, but they're all Star Wars. *Warning* There may be spoilers here for some of you, so read at your own risk. Anyways, here I go." Read on below for an interesting, eclectic (not to say, oh, I dunno, "obsessive") pile of links. Sheesh, the next one won't even be out for a while!

"First off, I'm sure many of you noticed that the Official Star Wars site has been completely redesigned. In addition to the Episode II Select picture number #40 (finally) being released, there's also some new pictures of some of the characters, specifically Ewan McGregor as Obi-Wan, Hayden Christensen (as Anakin), and (yowza!) Natalie Portman (as Padme Amidala). There are also small pics for Christopher Lee (as Count Dooku) and Temuera Morrison as "a bounty hunter" (read: Jango Fett).

"The official site has the first (of what appars to be many) "Making of Episode II" shorts. Although it mainly shows George, Rick, and some others talking about minor stuff, as well as "the camera" and the "Courscant street set".

"TheForce.net has some nice concept pictures of what the Clone troopers look like with a doctored pic, a fan-made rendering, and painting that looks almost like one of Ralph McQuarrie's.

" Also, The Criterion Collection is releasing Akira Kurosawa's classic, The Hidden Fortress (also known as Kakushi toride no san akunin) on May 22nd, with an anamorphic 2.35:1 transfer. What does this have to do with Star Wars? This IS Star Wars. George Lucas has (admitidly) taken this film, added some touches of Flash Gordon and WWII dogfighting films, world religions, and *bam*, Star Wars: A New Hope. It also contains an interview with George Lucas (or as I like to call him, "The Plaid One") describing the influence of The Hidden Fortress on Star Wars.

"One final bit is still a rumor at this point, but its by far the best rumor, from the most reliable sources. The Episode I DVD rumors have been kicked around for a while, but we finally have unofficial confirmation from the top "spies", as well as Rick McCallum himself!. I usually wait for the official press release myself, but these rumors are coming from the best of the best, and even Rick himself implied that they've been completed. Still no word on the "classic trilogy" or Special Editions though...

"Hope that'll keep you busy until the trailer is released (estimated by November)."

182 comments

  1. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anna Paquin in a penguin suit.

    Carrying a PIII Dell laptop, loaded with SuSE.

  2. Re:Genetics of breasts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    Your manboobs are nobody's fault but your own.

  3. Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by alewando · · Score: 4

    Let's overlook the racism and the poor acting, for a moment. (True fans are busy awaiting Episode2 and aren't still making excuses for TPM.) On a much deeper level, StarWars sends a shocking, frightening, and sickening message to America's youth.

    StarWars portrays space as a site of warfare between different species and even between rival human factions.

    When A New Hope was released to theaters thirteen years ago, America was at peace. The Vietnam War had recently been brought to a close, and Americans were looking forward to a new era of prosperity and at friendly relations with their neighbors.

    But within a few short years, America invaded Grenada, Nicaragua, Panama, Iraq, and Haiti. What had happened? What had become of our message of peace? What could have transpired in the interim to bring about this cruel turn of events?

    I'll tell you what: StarWars was released to thronging masses of American youths. In their orgiastic rush to imbibe their new-found cultural icons, they discarded all the wisdom we had acquired through the blood and sweat of our recent military conquests.

    It's no surprise, of course. Even the name "StarWars" itself conveys a message of conflict and carnage. A New Hope is, at bottom, a story about armed rebellion by rabble against a benevolent legal order, precisely the sort of communistic message we had come so close to defeating in Vietnam.

    Perhaps it would've been different if we had won the Vietnam War. Perhaps then we would've witnessed the fall and destruction of communism and all its bastard progeny (socialism, yuppyism, the Home Shopping Network, etc.). Unfortunately, the world will never know.

    George Lucas, I think I can speak for everyone here on slashdot, and indeed with the entire breath of humanity: you should be ashamed of yourself for what you have wrought.

    Disgraceful.

    1. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by TommyP · · Score: 2

      movies about peace are boring. what the hell do you want a love story in space. jeeze. explosions are inhernetly cooler in zero g.

    2. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by artdodge · · Score: 3
      StarWars portrays space as a site of warfare between different species and even between rival human factions.
      Which sounds a lot more realistic to me than the crackpot utopianism of ST's vision for "The Federation".

      Hate to have to say it, but we are still talking about humans here... and whatever you believe about alien species, it seems unlikely to me that most of them would be thoroughly benevolent.

    3. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Felix+The+Cat · · Score: 1

      A New Hope is, at bottom, a story about armed rebellion by rabble against a benevolent legal order

      Um, are you sure you saw the same movie I did? Lessee, blowing Alderaan to smithereens because one of its Senators wouldn't give up the location of the Rebel base. And I wonder why the Imperial Senate was no longer a "concern" to the Emperor. Just the way Tarkin said it brought to mind Palpatine having all of the Senators summarily executed.

      Yup. Sounds real benevolent to me....

      (I know, I know, this is probably a troll, but sometimes a cat just can't resist having something like this dangled in front of him.)

      Meow. Puurr.

      --
      Windows is the Acme of computing -- in the Wile E. Coyote sense.
    4. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by st.+augustine · · Score: 1
      It's no surprise, of course. Even the name "StarWars" itself conveys a message of conflict and carnage. A New Hope is, at bottom, a story about armed rebellion by rabble against a benevolent legal order, precisely the sort of communistic message we had come so close to defeating in Vietnam.
      *LOL* Good one. And The Phantom Menace is, of course, a story about a heroic rebellion by desperate patriots against a decadent oligarchic regime, precisely the sort of fascistic message we came so close to achieving at Munich, right?

      Maybe this is a good time to bring up David Brin's Star Wars despots vs. Star Trek populists again.

      --

      -- Some things are to be believed, though not susceptible to rational proof.
    5. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by sammy+baby · · Score: 2
      George Lucas, I think I can speak for everyone here on slashdot, and indeed with the entire breath of humanity: you should be ashamed of yourself for what you have wrought.
      Mod +1, Funny.
    6. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he was only joking.
      --

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    7. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > True fans are busy awaiting Episode2

      I'm no longer a True Fan after E1, but I'm eagerly awaiting E2 anyway, 'cause I heard that it will include a graphic depiction of the slow dismemberment of Jar Jar Binks.

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

      A New Hope is, at bottom, a story about armed rebellion by rabble against a benevolent legal order, precisely the sort of communistic message we had come so close to defeating in Vietnam.

      Yeah, this is America. We would never encourage people to rebell against the legal order. Unless theyre King George III. Moron, read some history before you troll.

      --
      All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    9. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by ajs · · Score: 1

      I just want to quickly point out that when I responded to it, this was moderated up, not as funny, but as insightful. The fact that it is now moderated as funny makes me re-think. There was no indication that the original was intended to be funny, but if it was, I applaud the dry and deceptively sly humor of it, and appologize for not "getting it". Perhaps in the future a couple of smileys would go a long way.....

    10. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by ajs · · Score: 2

      However, few can argue that the startling Japanese portrayal of the Trade Federation

      The accent seemed vaguely asian (Japanese, I don't think so, I'd say Korean or Vietnamese). Certainly the behavior was a mix of cartoony cowardice and a sort of European attitude (German, Itallian, perhaps Portugese) toward imperialism. The ships were very odd, probably something I'd expect to see come out of South America, if anywhere. Not exactly the "startling Japanese portrayal" that you saw. I guess you just walked into it with some baggage....

      or the Black Face commedy that characterized Jar Jar

      Jar Jar was a ploy to draw kids by having someone speak "funny". I never saw anything particularly "black" about him. I suppose every culture will see the class that has traditionally had the most fun made of them.

      Many of us have preexisting notions of what a ruthless capitalist empire should look and act like. Many who remember the booming Japanese economy of the 1980s equate the Japenese with this.

      Hence the baggage comment. I don't think anything in that movie was so clearly hurtful or pointed as to be called racism. If you see a butterfly in the Rorshach, cool.

      Similarly, slapstick commedy has its roots in the racist black face commedy of the old south.

      So, all slapstick is racist? I'm missing something.

      Jar Jar's bizarre accent sounds just southern enough to make his strange humor seem racist.

      Funny, I've heard him refered to as "Carribian" and "South American", but never "Southern". Ok, glad to hear that they did such a good job of creating a new accent that it can't be classified.

      Did Lucas intend it? I doubt it... nonetheless, the message is there.

      So, whose message is it? Personally, I think it's yours. Look for racism where people deny basic human rights and freedoms based on race. Look for racism where race is portrayed unevenly. Don't look for racism in a popular movie because it's popular.

    11. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by ajs · · Score: 5

      Let's overlook the racism and the poor acting, for a moment.

      Let's not. What racism and poor acting? Granted, I will never claim that ANH, TESB, RotJ or TPM have the best acting that hollywood has ever seen, but TESB was, IMHO, one of Ford's best roles. TPM featured some excellent acting on the parts of McGregor (who, I will readily concede has done even more accomplished work elsewhere) and many others. I'm not going to go into child actors like Portman or the boy, because they're children. They were both better than Shirley temple, but you just don't expect an adult's range of skill from a child.

      As for racism, I think you're grasping for straws. There are racial stereotypes certainly, but it's hard to establish a never before heard of race and not stereotype it as "agressive" or "funny" or "ill tempered". It's one of the limitations of the medium. However, in order to classify as "racism", I think you would have to actually introduce an *existing* racial stereotype or clearly attempt to sway the audience to hatred on the basis of race alone. SW never does this, AFAICR.

      StarWars portrays space as a site of warfare between different species and even between rival human factions.

      Please cite a period of human history that suggests that warfare is likely to ever stop being a part of our lives. Once you come up with that example, you can tell me why we should portray it, the exception, instead of the other 99.9999999 percent of human history as the rule.

      Of course, we're not talking about humans here (it being a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away), but I'll give you that much as a rhertorical point of common ground.

      George Lucas, I think I can speak for everyone here on slashdot, and indeed with the entire breath of humanity: you should be ashamed of yourself for what you have wrought.

      Don't go speaking for me. I'm not just a fan of the Star Wars movies (though, I am that), I'm a fan of the genre made up of hero-epic stories. Joseph Campbell has it right, we tell stories in order to explore our nature, and the hero quest is the aspect of our nature which we portray the most universally (though, you could argue that it's a particularly male point of view). Star Wars helps a new generation of viewers to explore that story in a time when Beowulf, Greek myth, Exodus, Robin Hood and the other classic Hero tales are considered pase. I applaud George Lucas and all of the others who have helped to bring Star Wars to fruition, and deeply urge anyone with the talent to try to further the quest in new stories about humanity's quest for enlightenment.

      Disgraceful.

      No, what's disgraceful is that such a poorly thought out post would be moderated up to a 5 just because it was cranked out before there was much to moderate.

    12. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by jguthrie · · Score: 1

      The first run lasted considerably longer than 8 weeks. I can recall watching "Star Wars" at the Raintree Cinemas during the last week of the first run more than a year after it opened.

    13. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by notfancy · · Score: 1
      TPM featured some excellent acting on the parts of McGregor (who, I will readily concede has done even more accomplished work elsewhere)

      The Pillow Book Yummy, McGregor, yummy.

    14. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by nobody69 · · Score: 1

      Quyite a lovely little troll, you had me going until you referred to yuppies and the Home Shopping Network as the 'bastard progeny' of communism. HAND.

      --
      "Bugger this, I want a better world." - Jenny Sparks
    15. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Beafsteak · · Score: 1

      There was a very interesting article on salon.com about this when Episode I was released. Although it somewhat compared Star Wars to Star Trek, it showed some of the grotesque morals implanted in the SW-movies.

    16. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by seanmeister · · Score: 4

      Or maybe it's just a movie.

      --

    17. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by big_cat79 · · Score: 1

      How can you blame a movie(s) that includes 7' tall hairy creatures, swords made of lights, some kind of octopi as an Admiral, etc., etc., etc. for war-mongering? That is absurd. It's science fiction. To me, it's closer to fantasy. Some how I just don't see George the I watching The Empire Strikes Back and deciding to go bomb Baghdad. What utter BS.

      BigCat79

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
    18. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

      smilies would ruin the whole troll =P

    19. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      Quick -- get this guy back in front of his Star Trek TNG reruns...+ as an added bonus we can get Katz on the case and see if we can get a piece that describes the not so absurd rants that maybe star wars did launch the true decline of western civilization....

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    20. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Paradigm+Lost · · Score: 1
      What racism and poor acting?
      Go rent Chasing Amy.

      "You got cracker farm boy Luke Skywalker, Nazi poster boy, blond hair, blue eyes. And then you got Darth Vader, the blackest brother in the galaxy, Nubian god!"

      --
      -Dead Lesbian Witches! Think about it!
    21. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Ghost_5316 · · Score: 1

      yea, last time I checked it was a movie too...

    22. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      Second, the first Star Wars was a cult classic. Meaning it bombed in the theater, but became a classic on video...
      What the Hell are you smoking? The original Star Wars release was the highest grossing film of all time. It was passed by E.T. in 1982. When the Special Edition was rereleased in 1997 it regained the top spot.
    23. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      It was while reading that article that I first realized what a loser Brin is. I think there was just a little bit of jealousy going on there, or perhaps he is a determined troll... (His Uplift War books are still just as good of course.)
      I lost a lot of respect for Brin after that outburst.
    24. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by BillWilliams · · Score: 1

      Damn, things like the parent make me wish that (+1, Troll) was an option.

    25. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by TGK · · Score: 1

      As for racism, I think you're grasping for straws. There are racial stereotypes certainly, but it's hard to establish a never before heard of race and not stereotype it as "agressive" or "funny" or "ill tempered". ... However, in order to classify as "racism", I think you would have to actually introduce an *existing* racial stereotype or clearly attempt to sway the audience to hatred on the basis of race alone. SW never does this, AFAICR.

      I agree and disagree. I don't think Lucas intended anything racist in his recent debacle. However, few can argue that the startling Japanese portrayal of the Trade Federation or the Black Face commedy that characterized Jar Jar does not characterize "an existing racial sterotype." Many of us have preexisting notions of what a ruthless capitalist empire should look and act like. Many who remember the booming Japanese economy of the 1980s equate the Japenese with this.

      Similarly, slapstick commedy has its roots in the racist black face commedy of the old south. Jar Jar's bizarre accent sounds just southern enough to make his strange humor seem racist. Did Lucas intend it? I doubt it... nonetheless, the message is there.

      I guess what I'm saying is that TPM is unquestionably racist in its outlook. Does that make Lucas racist? Oddly no. But he should have been more carefull.



      This has been another useless post from....

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  4. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by Geoff · · Score: 5

    Perhaps if she should eat the hot grits instead of pouring them down her pants.

    --

    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso

  5. What about the "Jedi religion?" by mholve · · Score: 2

    In New Zealond, a bunch of fans are claiming "Jedi" as their religion on the census! If enough people do it, it must be declared as a viable religion... Food for thought, young Jedi.

    1. Re:What about the "Jedi religion?" by scrutty · · Score: 1
      Actually, I thought the aim was to rebuke the government for asking about matters that are none if its business.

      In the UK, the religious question on the census form is quite clearly marked as "optional"

      --
      -- Oh Well
    2. Re:What about the "Jedi religion?" by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      If the aim is really to establish a Jedi religion

      Actually, I thought the aim was to rebuke the government for asking about matters that are none if its business.
      /.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    3. Re:What about the "Jedi religion?" by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      In New Zealond, a bunch of fans are claiming "Jedi" as their religion on the census! If enough people do it, it must be declared as a viable religion... Food for thought, young Jedi.

      It's a hoax, read this story regarding the same thing when it was tried in Britain. (note the author of the story, I don't know if this is a coincidence, or part of the hoax).

      If the aim is really to establish a Jedi religion, then why not go about it through the normal channels, have regular meetings of the followers, write some authoritative tome, then begin hating and warring with practicioners of other religions. That's how all the other 'great' religions started: Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Linux, etc.

    4. Re:What about the "Jedi religion?" by big_cat79 · · Score: 1

      I just saw an article about this. Its an email hoax. The email said if at least 8,000 people listed Jedi as their religion, it would be an official choice on the next census. It got repeated in the UK as needing 10,000 people needed. A UK census official listed it as complete nonsense.

      BigCat79

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
    5. Re:What about the "Jedi religion?" by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      "was tried in Britain"?

      Interesting, because we haven't HAD the census in Britain yet...

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
  6. DVD releases by heroine · · Score: 1

    After 2 years most people figured out by now that the DVD rumers are just to get kids to shut up. I doubt George has any intention of releasing anything on such a high quality format which can be copied so easily.

    1. Re:DVD releases by WesBiggs · · Score: 1

      Actually, I heard he wanted to turn it into DivX and host it on Gnutella...

      [snort]
      _______________________________________ __________

      --
      QWxsIHlvdXIgQmFzZTY0IGFyZSBiZWxvbmcgdG8gdXMh
  7. Re:I hate to agree with Bill Waterson by jafac · · Score: 2

    In my observation, those Star Wars Lego Technics sets have been selling like hotcakes. From where I sit in my cubicle, I see at least 4 displays of Lego Technics Star Wars sets built by my coworkers.

    If you ask me, any person who can dedicate space on their desk (not covered with papers and books) for Legos is a SLACKER!

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  8. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by dangermouse · · Score: 1

    It was called "Star Wars - Episode IV: A New Hope".

  9. One Paragraph. by Forge · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has since it's inception limited fruntpage stories to a single paragraph. Usualy with only a few sentences. In other words, not longer than the 1st paragraph of this story.

    Why the suden shift and when will Rob corect it by moving that extra gunk to a side page.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  10. Re:Ask Slashdot: Best Star Wars costume to get gir by Glytch · · Score: 5

    Wear Princess Leia's metal bikini. The girls will see that you're a sensitive new age guy who isn't afraid to be himself in public.

    Either that, or dress up as Admiral Ackbar and start singing "Fish Heads".

  11. Re:Hidden Fortress by armb · · Score: 1

    > make the evil twin pick up the name of his slain brother) to make it work, but that seems like an ugly kludge.

    I know of at least one book where something similar is done _very_ well, but naming it would probably be too much of a spoiler for anyone who hasn't read it yet. I don't think the construction of that book could work for a movie though.

    --

    --
    rant
  12. Javascript error.... by CMiYC · · Score: 1

    Anyone else get a Javascript error when they go to the new starwars main page? Hmmm.....

    ---

    1. Re:Javascript error.... by Rogain · · Score: 1

      no I got a jawascript error......

      --
      The current Slashdot moderation system is made by gay communists!
  13. Star Wars is NOT a remake of Hidden Fortress! by Thag · · Score: 5

    The Hidden Fortress was mainly the inspiration for the two droids and their bickering comedy-relief relationship. That's just about it.

    The Hidden Fortress largely follows the misadventures of two camp followers, who are basically scavengers, scumbags, and comic relief. They encounter the hero, a lone samurai general (Toshiro Mifune) travelling incognito, and get pulled along with him out of greed as they try and find a stash of gold in a (dum-dum-dum!) hidden fortress, really a kind of hole-in-the-wall hideout located in a rugged wasteland. There is also a bunch of bad guys, and a princess. There are a lot of twists and turns and treachery, and some nice sword and spear fighting at the end.

    The two movies just don't fit together as neatly as people seem to believe. Star Wars has a lot of plot threads going: saving the princess, saving the rebellion from the Death Star, Luke losing his old life and becoming a hero and proto-Jedi, Han Solo demonstrating that he's not just a mercenary, Obi-wan coming out of seclusion and moving towards his final confrontation with Vader. In contrast, The Hidden Fortress is just about Toshiro Mifune's character accomplishing his quest, and, to a much lesser extent, the two camp followers trying to reap a reward through treachery and survive the results of their own actions.

    Lastly, the tone of the two movies is very different. Star Wars is a saturday matinee romp, whereas The Hidden Fortress was a straightforward samurai flick with two offbeat characters for comic relief.

    In short, you can see the influences, but they're really two different movies.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    1. Re:Star Wars is NOT a remake of Hidden Fortress! by Johnathon+Walls · · Score: 1

      It is strangely coincidental, though, that the Hidden Fortress has the word "akunin" in the Japanese title, and probably the most influential and important character of all six movies is named "Anakin".

    2. Re:Star Wars is NOT a remake of Hidden Fortress! by xTown · · Score: 1

      Thanks, Jon. I was going to ask about this same thing, since I saw Hidden Fortress a while ago, and don't recall it being anything like Star Wars. Whenever I hear this comparison I just have to go "huh?".

    3. Re:Star Wars is NOT a remake of Hidden Fortress! by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the first time I saw Hidden Fortress I realized how annoying Luke Skywalker was. I guess that's the price you pay for having a film that was attractive to kids and adults. I can't really picture getting my 10-year old cousin to sit through Hidden Fortress. That being said, noone said Star Wars was a REMAKE of Hidden Fortress. They said HF was the inspiration of it.

      --
      Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    4. Re:Star Wars is NOT a remake of Hidden Fortress! by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      I tend to look at it this way: Hidden Fortress is quite similar to Star Wars - it's just that there is no Luke Skywalker character, and Han Solo and Obi Wan Kenobi are essentially combined together into one utterly cool character (Mifune's - the man is a genius). For me, as a film, that structure works a lot better than Star Wars. Of course Lucas did his version a lot later and managed to get things like colour, and fancy special effects...

      Jedidiah
      --

  14. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by tuffy · · Score: 1
    I feel your pain. Growing up, it was always "Star Wars", followed by "the Empire Strikes Back", followed by "Return of the Jedi". The whole "you can't call it just 'Star Wars' now, it's 'A New Hope'" strikes me as a bit over-revisionist. If I say to anyone I know, "I'm gonna watch 'Star Wars' now", they'll know I mean the original - whereas saying "I'm gonna turn on 'A New Hope'" will draw confusion.

    So, I'm gonna keep calling it "Star Wars" until Lucas' troops force me to call it otherwise.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  15. Re:Hidden Fortress by Sleepyguy · · Score: 1

    You're thinking of the Seven Samurai(akira kurosawa, 1954) and The Magnificent Seven(John Sturges, 1960).

    It's no secret that The Magnificent Seven is a derivitave work.

    Now go ahead and watch Battle Beyond the Stars (Jimmy T. Murakami, 1980)

    _

    --
    b
  16. Portman's Coustume by Sleepyguy · · Score: 2

    is it just me or does that look like a hand-me-down from Cassiopia from Battlestar Galactica

    --
    b
    1. Re:Portman's Coustume by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > Here's a picture of Cassiopa and Sheba (from Battlestar Galactica)

      > Here's a picture of Athena (from Battlestar Galactica)

      > Here's a picture of colonel Wilma Deering (from Buck Rogers)

      Your catalogue sure has a lot of nice stuff in it, but I don't see the prices anywhere. How much for three (3) of the brunette in white and one (1) of the older blonde?

      > Compare the Buck Rogers one with this photo of Natalie (on the right)

      Ah, thanks for pointing her out. I thought the one on the left was Natalie, and I couldn't understand why the kiddies were in such a froth over her!

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Portman's Coustume by eclectro · · Score: 5

      Here's a picture of Cassiopa and Sheba (from Battlestar Galactica)

      Here's a picture of Athena (from Battlestar Galactica)

      Here's a picture of colonel Wilma Deering (from Buck Rogers)

      Compare the Buck Rogers one with this photo of Natalie (on the right) and this one from above.

      The similarities have not been lost on a lot of people;
      http://www.chud.com/board/ubbhtml/Forum1/HTML/0015 45.html

      IMHO - Natalie still seems much like a girl, compared to the others above that seem like women. Maybe it's because I grew up with them ;-))

      Also it seems Battlestar Galactica is making a comeback;
      http://www.kobol.com/revival/index.html

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:Portman's Coustume by TGK · · Score: 1

      IMHO - Natalie still seems much like a girl, compared to the others above that seem like women. Maybe it's because I grew up with them

      Maybe that's because the ones you grew up with didn't have to live in an era where a woman over 120 lbs is considered fat. Of the nations top female models, something like 2/3 are considered "malnourished" under the UN guidelines for nutrition and human rights. Just a random factoid, but somewhat telling about our society eh?

      This has been another useless post from....

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  17. Re:Forthcoming DVD options... by KFury · · Score: 1

    Following this logic, they would probably put out the barebones DVD, then come out with a 'collectors edition' 6 months later, ala American Beauty and so many other DVDs. It's almost a standard practice.

    Then again, George already got us, releasing the trilogy on video when the remastered versions were in the theater, then releasing the remastered in letterbox VHS 8 months later...

    Kevin Fox
    --

  18. Forthcoming DVD options... by KFury · · Score: 5
    George has said they waited on the DVDs so they could put time into them and add the special features they deserve.

    Some of the features I'm looking forward to:
    • Anamorphic wide aspect-ratio non-Jarjar edition.
    • 5.1 remastered Home-THX with Grover voiceovers for Yoda.
    • Deleted Natalie Portman scenes in multi-angle.

    Kevin Fox
    --
    1. Re:Forthcoming DVD options... by JWW · · Score: 2

      What'd be best part (for the distributors of the DVD's) is that there would be no difference between the grover voice over and they regular Yoda. ;-)

    2. Re:Forthcoming DVD options... by CoachS · · Score: 2
      I guess I'll take George's word for it, but I've always suspected that they waited on the DVD so that the real fans would buy the VHS first. If they released the DVD right away, folks who have DVD would just buy the DVD. If they wait a year then the fans who don't want to wait will buy the VHS immediately and then buy the DVD also (for the higher quality and extra features) when it finally releases.

      Maybe I'm a cynic. :)

      -Coach-

      --
      Perhaps the world's greatest tragedy is that ignorance is not impotence.
    3. Re:Forthcoming DVD options... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
      "no difference between the grover voice over and they regular Yoda"

      smacking forehead

      Grover = Frank Oz
      Yoda = Frank Oz

      No shit they sound the same! And, if you think about it, Yoda sounds an awful lot like Miss Piggy, too! That's because 90% of the Muppets you see today are part of Henson's maniacal scheme to develop a mutant strain of Frank Oz clones. Where do you think the idea of the "Clone Wars" came from?

      ... while the real Frank Oz has been consigned to a life of obscurity, last seen as an employee of the Illinois Department of Corrections. "One unused prophylactic, one soiled..."

  19. Re:Lords of the Sith by DuckWing · · Score: 1

    That was an excellent film. I loved the use of the multiple panes so you can see concept art, the blue screen, and then the final product. Very well done. They should seek parts in an upcoming movie ;-)

    -- DuckWing

    --
    -- DuckWing
  20. Re:Hidden Fortress by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    > I remember seeing another japanese samuri film, and recognizing that it was identical with an early Clint Eastwood spaghetti western. Camera angles and all, just transplanted from Japan to the Italian version of the American west.

    And interestingly enough, Italy is half-way between China and the American West.

    I'm sure there's some deep meaning in there somewhere, though I haven't quite pinned it down yet.

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  21. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    More on SW variants can be found at the IMDB

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  22. I hate to agree with Bill Waterson by the_tsi · · Score: 4

    Since I hate his stand on merchandising, but I definately think that the overwhelming wave of *crap* being put out for Episode I has destroyed (as if the movie didn't do it alone) my faith in Star Wars.

    I used to be a theforce.net junkie, I used to get all the action figures (you know, when you had to fight other kids at Toys R Us to get your hands into the first shipment of Boba Fett and Lando Calrissian), and I used to watch at least one of the videos roughly weekly. Yeah, I'd just put it on in the background while I wrote reports, played Quake or brushed the dog.

    But ever since the flood of sub-par Episode 1 merchandise (I mean, Lucas used to only allow COOL stuff that was fun to have and looked nice both on the shelf and on the battle scene in the middle of the floor), my interest has waned.

    While I did join a team of people to take turns camping out for Phantom Menace tickets, I wasn't one of the folks who was expecting it to be a life changing event -- I wanted to be pleasantly surprised when I got there instead of disappointed. But I guess I had a bad experience or something, because when I saw this list of quickies I thought "Oh great, stuff about that next star wars movie. Where's the technology news?" And then I thought, "what the hell? This used to be a religious thing for me, why don't I care." And then I realized it. And then I realized I could post about it for lots of karma. :)

    Anyway, here's to hoping that Episode II delights more than I did. Maybe I'll see it in the first week. Probably not.

    -Chris
    ...More Powerful than Otto Preminger...

    1. Re:I hate to agree with Bill Waterson by Bimble · · Score: 1

      But ever since the flood of sub-par Episode 1 merchandise...

      What the heck are you talking about? The Phantom Menace gave us some of the best movie merchandise ever! I mean, how can you top products like "Talkin' Hungry Hero Jar Jar", a plush doll with a retractable tongue that not only comes with little frog things with velcro that sticks to said tongue, but that also talks when you squeeze his hand? And I'm talking great lines like "Meesa wuvs you" and "Maxi big...da Force"!

      There's also the Jar Jar Binks tongue candy (push a plunger, Jar Jar's mouth opens, and a candy tongue pokes out for children to eat), and the Queen Amidala inflatable chair! And don't forget the horde of merchandise that was released for the original trilogy to create interest for the new movie - without Episode I, we might never have received such bounty as "Jabba Glob", the Jabba doll that pukes slime when you push on his head!

      I, for one, am praying that George Lucas will grace us with another merchandise bonanza when the next movie is due to be released. His merchandising creativity far surpasses anything I could ever hope to achieve - there's no way I could make this stuff up. Even better, you can pick up most of the really cool Episode I merchandise dirt cheap at toy stores right now - there's no better feeling than finding "Jabba Glob" for 3 bucks.

      --
      Naked.
    2. Re:I hate to agree with Bill Waterson by crivens · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you - Episode I was crap. I'm in no hurry for Episode II. I wonder if there will be the same kind of craze as its release approaches.

    3. Re:I hate to agree with Bill Waterson by MrBogus · · Score: 2

      Har - The toy companies also paid Lucus a ridiclous amount of up-front money to get licence this crap. Since the movie turned out to be not as titanically popular as everyone assumed (especially among kids, who were supposedly the target audience), merchandise sales were actually pretty poor and the toy companies took a huge bath on all that crap. The only thing that really sold was the little dolls for the "adult collector" (aka stupid loser) market.

      So, expect to see less Episode II junk on the shelves.

      --

      When I hear the word 'innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    4. Re:I hate to agree with Bill Waterson by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      Yogurt: Merchandising, merchandising, where the real
      money from the movie is made. Spaceballs the T-shirt.
      Spaceballs the lunchbox. Spaceballs the coloring book.
      Spaceballs... the flame thrower! Kids love it. And my
      favorite, Spaceballs the Doll -- me!
      [Pulls string]
      Doll: May the schwartz be with you!

      Classic Brooks, absolutely what you said.

      --

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  23. Re:Hidden Fortress by Moofie · · Score: 1

    You've got it backwards. The spaghetti westerns (Magnificent Seven &c) lifted EVERYTHING from Kurosawa (Seven Samurai &c). I believe Kurosawa returned the favor with some of his movies.

    I like the Japanese versions MUCH better than the Italian ones...regardless of which came first.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  24. Re:George Lucas is an idiot... by Johnny+O · · Score: 1

    If you are impatient, get the LaserDisc version.

    I am still basking in the THX glow and the Dolby Digital 6.1 soundtrack for the Phantom Menace! :-)

    The original THX editions and the "Special Editions" of 4, 5, and 6 look and sound (DD again but 5.1) quite nice too on LaserDisc.

    DVD's are cool, but I take what I can get! :-)

  25. Let's not be U.S.-centric... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    Slowly, across the world... allowing for folks on the dark side of the planet to wake up and check /.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:Let's not be U.S.-centric... by KurdtX · · Score: 1

      Hey, who said I was talking about the US?

      Kurdt

      --

      Kurdt
      I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
  26. Re:hey mods by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I mod down named crap flooders whenever I get the chance. I don't touch an AC unless it's something really offensive, like racist slurs or goatse.cx ascii art.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  27. Re:hey mods by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Actually some of us do read at 0 threshhold to catch the rare insightful AC post. I mod down some of the worst stuff at 0, like racist slurs or obscense ascii art, but I typically just ignore the three word nonsense. I don't read at 0 because I think trolls are funny. I read at 0 to catch the people who can't or don't want to use a login to post good stuff.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  28. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by qqaz · · Score: 1

    hey man hook me up!!

    --
    sup :cool:
  29. Old Jedi mind trick by Stavr0 · · Score: 2
    "You will give me access to the Quicktime video"
    "I will give you access to the Quicktime video".

    "It is not necessary to gather demographics to let me view the video"
    "It's okay, you don't have to register to view the video."

    But seriously, any mirrors for that making-of video? Akamai perhaps?
    ---

    1. Re:Old Jedi mind trick by jaacen · · Score: 1

      This isn't a mirror ... but will allow you to save ... I think that is what you were asking for. ... Never mind Slashdot aparantly thinks the URL is too long and encounters a lameness filter. Go to Jaacen.com (useless site I know) and right click on the "right click here to save to hard drive." link.

  30. stormtroopers by asdren · · Score: 1

    Seems will look "cooler" and more modern than ep4-6 troopers. Even thought they're supposed to be earlier models in the Star Wars universe timeline.

  31. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by buzzword · · Score: 1

    That's kinda the way I feel. More so since I saw the uncut version of said film

    --
    The universe is bad enough without people poking it. -Mustrum Ridcully
  32. Need Know Star SW Pic by Drath · · Score: 1

    Why does that shot of Natalie Portman look like
    she's wearing a costume I used in a Star Wars
    home move I made when I was 12? Comeon George,
    when the CGI clothing looks better than the actual
    stuff, your in trouble.

  33. Re:Hidden Fortress by snubber1 · · Score: 2

    You forgot one of the most copied scenes *ever*. The bandits in seven samuari that come cresting over a hillside at the start of the attack. That whole scene of them pouring over the hill was INVENTED by Akira Kurosawa and copied by just about every battle film ever since.

    --
    I don't really mind double posts on //..
  34. nice revisionist history by operagost · · Score: 1

    Funny, but I seem to remember a lot of Christians being persecuted and hated, both now and in the first centuries of their existence.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  35. Re:Lords of the Sith by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    First of all its Troops not Troopers and I think duality is very well made but if you can't figure out the ending I can see why you'd think it had a bad plot.

    Seriously, these are very short films, you can't have character development and a long script in 2 minutes.

  36. Re:inspiration for death star trench battle? by hengist · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it's true, but an old war movie I remember called 633 Squadron had Mosquito aricraft flying down a valley to hit a hidden target.

  37. Re:inspiration for death star trench battle? by IrnMonkey · · Score: 1

    I'm not too sure but it could have been "The Dam Busters"

    --
    .sit back and chill out with the finest high-grade 100% pure Colombian pixels.
  38. Re:Hidden Fortress by jidai · · Score: 1

    The blockbuster i shop at has quitea few kurosawa flicks.

  39. Another Sacred Cow by selectspec · · Score: 2

    Go ahead and mod down, but StarWars seems to me to be another one of those sacred cows. I loved the original movie as a kid, and the sequels were entertaining, but as I got older I began to realize that the acting, storyline, writing, directing, etc, really were nothing special. Clearly, the original StarWars will stand out as a groundbreaking special effects piece as well as cultural filmpiece. Reinforcing my erroding faith, Lucas with his renovated re-releases of the first trilogy, insults us with the Jaba scene in episode IV. Also, to be blunt, Episode I completly sucked as a movie. I mean, the light sabres were cool and the darth mul guy was pretty cool, but the rest sucked (except that big fish, that was neat). Midocondrians? What the hell? Explaining the force? That is like when stupid fantasy books try and explain magic. What a stupid premiss. And as for JarJar, enough said. Of course JarJar is no worse than the Ewoks or Yoda. The Episode I script has less depth than one of Bill Shattner's tech war books. The "political" dramma is oversimplified rediculousness. The bad guys are too bad and the good guys are too good. Look, I am not saying these movies are terrible, they are very entertaining, but they aren't worth all of this iconification.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

    1. Re:Another Sacred Cow by Apotsy · · Score: 2

      The pod race scene was an almost shot-for-shot ripoff of the chariot race from 1959's "Ben-Hur". Fun to watch, but hardly original.

    2. Re:Another Sacred Cow by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

      Actually, what I think the first two Star Wars movies had, and the last couple didn't, were the knowledge that the world is a scary place for kids. Think about recent movies made for kids, and they all run down the Jar Jar path. It seems like lately we're so overzealous about protecting children that we've forgotten that they can percieve evil in the world. And sure, kids can be entertained by bright shiny things and squeaky voices, and there's nothing particularly wrong with that, but they also enjoy seeing things that speak to their fears.

      --
      Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    3. Re:Another Sacred Cow by Hassman · · Score: 1
      Objection...the pod race scene was pretty cool

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  40. C-3P0 by Shook · · Score: 1

    if you remember, there are several protocol droids in the SW movies that look exactly like threepio. In Empire Strikes Back, there is even a scene where he says "Oh look! Another protocol droid! How nice to see a familiar face." or something like that.

  41. inspiration for death star trench battle? by Matt · · Score: 1
    A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away (to coin a phrase), I read that the death star battle scene, specifically the "flying down a trench to hit a target" part, was inspired by an old war movie.

    Anyone know if this is true, and which movie?

    1. Re:inspiration for death star trench battle? by Konovalev · · Score: 1

      Both 'The Dam Busters' and '633 Squadron' have a sequence with bombers flying along a narrow and heavily defended valley to hit a very small target at the end - a dam or a heavy water factory. But AFAIR 633 Squadron looks more like SW. Mosquitos are more agile than Lancasters, and there's more flak, trick flying etc.
      Apparently George Lucas used old WW2 film footage when pitching SW to the studio - which film, I wonder?

  42. Re:Slashdot posts news on Star Wars! by Cplus · · Score: 1

    or maybe, 'instantly acccross the nation'.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  43. George Lucas in Love by puppet10 · · Score: 2

    is also quite funny for the true story on how some of the charcters in Star Wars: A New Hope evolved ;)

    --
    -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  44. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by passion · · Score: 2

    Remember, she *is* supposed to be the mother of Princess Leia. Carrie Fisher's portrayal didn't necessarily make her look buxom, nor voluptuous.

    --
    - passion
  45. Fan films - have a look at "Troops" by Jens · · Score: 1
    Have you guys (and gals :) had a look at "Troops"? It's available here (http://www.accessdenied.net/troops.htm). Blurb:

    "This is a spoof of the Fox show COPS, but set in the Star Wars universe. Hillarious and well done. Made with less than $2,000, a video camera and a home computer."

    View it. It's worth it.

    1. Re:Fan films - have a look at "Troops" by Forrestina · · Score: 1
      mod this up :)

      troops had me laughing for a good hour one day. course, then again, maybe it was the coke.

      -------

      --

      -------
      "don't smoke, don't drink, don't fuck
      at least i can fucking think"
      Minor Threat

  46. Lords of the Sith by kevinank · · Score: 5
    One master, one apprentice, no less.

    I was just about to submit this as a news article, but since my submissions never get accepted anyway...

    Fanfilms.com has several very good amateur short films set in the starwars universe. The one that really caught my eye though is the six and a half minute long film Duality about the final test of a new apprentice Lord of the Sith. The film makers put up some very good information about amateur film-making at their site, including modelling hints, costuming, storyboards, and script notes.

    I'm really impressed with the quality of this amateur film; and if there are any more out there like this, I'd like to see them.

    --
    LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
    1. Re:Lords of the Sith by Beowulfto · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I am spoiled because I have friends that are professional filmmakers, (I tend to pick up this and that), but all the Star Wars fan films that I have seen have been pretty crapy, including Duality.

      Oops, I just remembered Troopers, that one was very good!

      However, while many of the fan films contain very nice animation or FX, they all (with the exception of Troopers) lack a quality script. You might like to look at some pretty pictures, but I like to have a nice story as well.

      OTOH, the fan films are exactly like The Fantom Menace!
      ----

      --
      There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes. -- Dr. Who
    2. Re:Lords of the Sith by Beowulfto · · Score: 1
      FYI, Duality was 6 minutes long. And in any short story or film, one can't waste time with pointless scenes. Over half the film was wasted with "beauty" shots. While it was some nice animation, it did not serve the story. Once again, everything depends on a good script. While the FX in The Matrix was superb, had the script been sub-par, I would not have been crazy about it.

      Don't get me wrong. I am not trying to bash these guys. I am just saying, if you are going to put this much effort into something, base it on a quality script. This seems to be the problem with most amateur film makers. They pour their heart and soul into a project, but since it begins with crap, it ends up as crap.Oh, and yes, I do understant the ending. I just am looking for something better.
      ----

      --
      There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes. -- Dr. Who
    3. Re:Lords of the Sith by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I Posted it, it was rejected, I posted an article where it was obtusely relevent and got moderated into a black hole. You're posting it where it belongs, may da force be with yuz.

      --

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  47. Re:Hmm by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

    i noticed that myself, but after a quick refresh, it's not there, you have to click on the link to see the whole story...(one of the hazards of being on the cutting edge, is that you're on the cutting edge...;-)

  48. Re:Hmm by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

    when it was first posted, the whole story was on the front page. After aprox 5-10 min, only the synopsis was on the front page.

  49. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 2

    The full title is

    Star Wars: Episode 4: A New Hope



  50. Re:Hidden Fortress by Sorklin · · Score: 2
    but that seems like an ugly kludge.

    Would that be uglier than the kludge where Darth Vadar constructs a robot and fails to recognize same robot from that point onward?

    Lest it be forgotten... Starwars SUCKS.

  51. Re:I feel a great disturbance in the Force... by isaac_akira · · Score: 1

    don't you mean:

    I feel a great disturbance in the Work Force...

  52. Re:Hidden Fortress by isham · · Score: 1

    The Kurosawa film you're thinking of is Yojimbo. The Eastwood film is 'a Fistful of Dollars'. It was also done by Bruce Willis as 'Last Man Standing'.

  53. If only.... by Xenex · · Score: 1
    If Slashdot worked like the real world:

    *** timothy (timothy@monkey.org) Quit (Excess Flood)

    Umm, what?! What do you mean IRC is not the real world?!

  54. Offtopic huh? by Xenex · · Score: 1
    Well, if the moderator actully read the site (or previous comments), they would have been aware of the fact that when the story was first posted, on the front pages the entire thing was showing.

    It looked to me like the /. equivalent of an IRC excess flood.

    It was a joke. Perhaps not the funniest thing ever to grace a /. post, but an ontopic joke all the same.

    Sad day when you have to explain why your post is not offtopic...

  55. Re:Starwars sends the wrong message... WHAT? by Christianfreak · · Score: 2
    I can't believe I'm replying to this troll but with moderators on CRACK today I feel I must.

    Let's overlook the racism and the poor acting, for a moment.

    Acting is your opinion but where did you get racism? If you are refering too the whole trade federation is the Japanese thing that was said when Episode 1 came out well maybe George Lucas is a genius and wanted to make an evil trade federation empire and people assumed that he was making a statement about the Japanese because thats how they see them. The statement was made that various aliens look "obviously" look like various races well OBVIOUSLY no one has ever seen an alien and our human minds relate to what is unfamiliar to what is familiar.

    On a much deeper level, StarWars sends a shocking, frightening, and sickening message to America's youth. StarWars portrays space as a site of warfare between different species and even between rival human factions.

    1. What's different about that description of space and an accurate description of the way the world/society is? 2. Who's to say that space isn't that way?

    . . .But within a few short years, America invaded Grenada, Nicaragua, Panama, Iraq, and Haiti. What had happened? What had become of our message of peace? What could have transpired in the interim to bring about this cruel turn of events?

    In other news the government has also built the matrix and we are keeping another race of humans subject to us in a virutual world ... come-on this is a very very poor example of life immitating art. These actions were brought on because of America's insistance on policing the world. Korea, Cuba, Vietnam happened before this movie came out and the gov is still doing it today.

    I'll tell you what: StarWars was released to thronging masses of American youths. In their orgiastic rush to imbibe their new-found cultural icons, they discarded all the wisdom we had acquired through the blood and sweat of our recent military conquests.

    Ummm maybe news to you but America got their butts kicked in Vietnam. And you contridicted yourself, you said war was bad now you are saying conquests are good? Troll troll troll

    I can't believe this was modded up.


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

  56. Re:Slashdot posts news on Star Wars! by skwog · · Score: 1

    You mean 'rapidly accross the nation'.

    --


    You can laugh without eating a sandwhich, but you can do both if bring one.
  57. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by Gorbie · · Score: 1

    Anna Paquin. Mmmmmm.

  58. The first movie was just Star Wars. by haystor · · Score: 1
    Is it just me, or was the first movie only called "Star Wars", and not some crap about a new hope.

    After the crap put forth just recently, I refuse to recognize anything outside of the trilogy.

    --
    t
    1. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by iainl · · Score: 1

      ok, so my other post was a bit hard; just because there is one detail (the exact timing of the placement of 'A New Hope' onto the print) doesn't mean there are some important pieces of info.

      Although, these changes are as nothing compared to the hack job that makes up the Special Editions - thank heavens for laserdisc!

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by iainl · · Score: 2

      err, thats where you're wrong. Only just however; let me explain.

      1977: Star Wars released. As suggested, no sign of 'A New Hope'.

      1978: Work starts on Empire and to some extent Jedi, thanks to the amazing success of the film.

      1979: Star Wars re-released to cinemas, with 'A New Hope' added to the title scroll, in anticipation of...

      1980: Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back hits the cinemas.

      So while its true that 'A New Hope' was only added once Empire was a definite go, the release was out there before we actually got to see the film. I don't doubt that there are plenty who didn't see the re-release, since they had already seen the film, however.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by MrBogus · · Score: 1

      Actually, the thing to do if you were a nerdy kid was to see Star Wars over and over and over again and then brag about it. (I think I saw it something like 5 times, older kids saw it 20 or more).

      The 1979 version was a re-release, but in truth the movie had only barely left the second run theaters from the original 1977 run.

      Anyway, everyone noticed that they added "Episode IV: A New Hope" to the scrolling text. I also believe that the content of the text changed (the original was more goofy scifi).

      --

      When I hear the word 'innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    4. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by jaydub99 · · Score: 1

      There are some semi-reliable sources who claim that "A New Hope" was added some time during the first run of the movie, but was not there during the first little while (weeeks?). I think "the crawl" always showed Episode IV though.

      --

      Please mod me up. My grandma might not make it to the weekend and she always wanted me to hit karma cap.
    5. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by Ereth · · Score: 4

      Actually, the Episode IV: A New Hope title was not added until the re-release AFTER Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back. In fact, there was much confusion when Empire opened with Episode V and many casual moviegoers wandering around wondering where episodes 2,3, and 4 had gone (assuming Star Wars to be episode 1). Lucas had explained that he always wanted it to be part of a trilogy, but that he had had so much trouble getting financing and had no idea how successful it would be (there were articles announcing it would be the greatest dud of all time), that he had left the subtitle off, in case he could only make the one. As we all know, it turned out bigger than anyone expected, and he was able to make the sequels and add the Episode IV: A New Hope title when re-released. There were other subtle changes. Obi-wan, when first meeting Luke and being told that R2-D2 claimed to belong to him originally said "I don't recall ever owning a droid. Leastways not one of these modern ones." The "modern" line was removed for the first re-release after Lucas had decided the entire storyline would be told from the perspective of the droids, and so R2-D2 couldn't be a modern droid, if he were to be in Episodes 1, 2 and 3. And in case you wonder what my source is: it's me. I saw these films on their first run release, over and over and over. The interviews with Lucas were mostly taken from Starlog magazine, which we devoured for any information about the upcoming movie, long before we had a World Wide Web. I knew "The Empire Strikes Back" was Episode V when I went to the first showing in town, but most of the other people who were there did not, and there was a loud outcy of confusion when the opening scroll went by. It was several YEARS after "Star Wars" premiered that the film contained "Episode IV: A New Hope", though Lucas had always wanted it to be part of a serial (like the Saturday afternoon serials of his youth).

    6. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by CoachS · · Score: 1
      The scrolling text at the beginning of the "first" movie says "Episode IV, A New Hope..."

      -Coach-

      --
      Perhaps the world's greatest tragedy is that ignorance is not impotence.
    7. Re:The first movie was just Star Wars. by Colonel+Hakker · · Score: 1

      No this IS something that should be modded up.

      --

      Proof that I can not spell - just look at my handle
  59. Sorry, not true by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

    The "Jedi as a religion" issue is not true. It was already tried in New Zealand and, more recently, in the UK. Even if everyone in the country claims it, it still won't be a religion.

  60. I've got mod points, but nothing to spend them on by criticalrealist · · Score: 1
    People,

    I've got two mod points. My philosophy (at the moment) is to never mod down, only to mod up. I'm cruising this discussion for something thoughtful, something original, something funny. . . anything! But you are posting nothing but a bunch of worthless goatsex troll hot grits crap. Could someone please just post one original, interesting paragraph, so I could mod something up?

    Get it gear, people.

    --
    I am not a lawyer.
  61. Re:I've got mod points, but nothing to spend them by criticalrealist · · Score: 1

    Shhhhtt. Now I can't mod this thread.

    --
    I am not a lawyer.
  62. Re:Hidden Fortress by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

    Just for the hell of it: "Last Man Standing" and "Fistful of Dollars" were both based on "Yojimbo(the Bodyguard)" Which was not an inspiriation for the Costner movie, so don't go blaming poor Kurosawa.

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
  63. Genetics of breasts? by Galvatron · · Score: 2
    Anyone know? Is this an x linked trait, or just a regular one? Are larger sizes dominant, recessive, or co-dominant?

    Inquiring minds need to know.

    The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:Genetics of breasts? by Vuarnet · · Score: 2

      Are larger sizes dominant, recessive, or co-dominant?
      Not recessive... but rather impressive.


      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
  64. Great Star Wars rumor site! by JimTheta · · Score: 1

    Check out the great Star Wars: Episode 2 Information Center at Pointless Waste of Time.

    Be sure to check out the leaked script pages... they're off-the-hook. And while you're at it, ckeck out the rest of the site too.

    (Didn't I make nearly the same post a couple days ago under a Matrix story?)

    -Grant


    ---
  65. Re:Hidden Fortress by donglekey · · Score: 1

    The movie Last Man Standing with Bruce Willis and Christopher Walken is another example of a movie made off of an old japanese samurai movie.

  66. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by ZoneManSPW · · Score: 1

    Dude I watched Janet Jackson on Different Strokes and Good Times when she was a kid (so was I) - and I'd still do her.

  67. It's my fault.! by Some12 · · Score: 1

    I thought it appropriate for this article to be displayed on the front page. I used an old Jedi mind trick and manipulate the servers from here. May the force be with you!

    Someone bent my wookie =-(

  68. Wow... by slashdoter · · Score: 1
    is it just me or did we slashdot the Starwars site? Hehehe I wonder who the site will take the movie release, they only have a year :(


    ________

    --
    Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
    1. Re:Wow... by lmd · · Score: 1

      They don't care if we slashdot them. Their servers can handle just about anything. I also noticed that every time you reload the homepage the images change to something new. Go on and try it yourself.

      --


      Just my $0.04 (adjusted for inflation)
  69. Re:Hidden Fortress by cfleming · · Score: 2

    "Fist Full of Dollars" with Clint Eastwood was a shot-for-shot remake of Akira Kurosawa's "Yojimbo". That was the movie that really started the Spaghetti Western movement.

    "Last Standing Man" with Bruce Willis was also a remake of "Yojimbo", but not shot-for-shot.

    "The Magnificent Seven" was a remake of Kurosawa's "Seven Samurai".

    And finally Kurosawa's "Ran" was a remake of Shakespear's "King Lear".

    The irony in all of this is that Akira took Western ideas and used them to make samurai movies, which then got remade into Westerns.

    And to add one more interesting thought. Lots of classic shots in anime fights are taken from Kurosawa's work. Like the striken enemy not falling over until a delayed few seconds after the blow a.k.a. "Seven Samurai", and the great gyser of blood a.k.a. "Sanjuro"

  70. Re:George Lucas is an idiot... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    But rabid fans will want there own copy, not some crap on the internet.
    And lets face it, there are a ton of rabid star wars fan (I'm one!).

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  71. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    Only one for me...
    Jessica Alba (Dark Angel)

    Excuse me while I drool...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  72. Re:Slashdot posts news on Star Wars! by Fervent · · Score: 2

    Unless, of course, you are like myself and think George Lucas is the biggest candy stealer from young children in the history of modern cinema. In that case you don't give two shits on a monkey's ass that a new Star Wars movie is going to come out.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  73. Re:George Lucas is an idiot... by jvj24601 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, like I haven't already seen the VHS version already DiVX-encoded on Gnuetella...

  74. the emperor... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    the Emperor is pleased...

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  75. Hidden Fortress by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    So now we get to all go out and rent Japanese movies, and then criticise SWII when it comes out, because it is not as good as the original.

    I remember seeing another japanese samuri film, and recognizing that it was identical with an early Clint Eastwood spaghetti western. Camera angles and all, just transplanted from Japan to the Italian version of the American west. You could almost run them side by side.

    I hope SWII doesn't turn out like that. I still think it would have worked out better writing if young Darth had turned out to be identical twins. The possible plot twists would have been wonderful. (For example - who turns to the dark side - the one who goes for training, or the one who does not?) Audiences would have been second guessing all along.

    Now it feels less like genius and more like a marketing machine. [shrug]

    Check out the Vinny the Vampire comic strip

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Hidden Fortress by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
      I still think it would have worked out better writing if young Darth had turned out to be identical twins. The possible plot twists would have been wonderful. (For example - who turns to the dark side - the one who goes for training, or the one who does not?)

      That's a little too easy to answer -- obviously, it would be the one named "Anakin". I suppose you could then add some contrived situations (either twins named "Annakin" and "Anakkin" or make "Anakin Skywalker" yet another alias that he's gone through or make the evil twin pick up the name of his slain brother) to make it work, but that seems like an ugly kludge.

      On the other hand, it would've been neat if they went on to draw parallels between this set of twins and Luke/Leia.

    2. Re:Hidden Fortress by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
      As far as I can remember, the closest they ever came was in the sky city -- but 3po was disassembled early in that sequence, and they never met face to face.

      I heard from a friend that in one of the recent non-movie adaptations of this (comic book, maybe?), they actually attempted to add some tie-in to Episode 1 by having Vader notice the disassembled c3po and instructing one of his subordinates to give the parts to the wookiee.

    3. Re:Hidden Fortress by Carpathius · · Score: 1

      At which point in which movie did Vader ever come into contact with C3PO? (Well, in episodes 4, 5, and 6.)

      I admit the possibility of being wrong, but I just went through each film in my head and I can't figure out any time when they came together.

      As far as I can remember, the closest they ever came was in the sky city -- but 3po was disassembled early in that sequence, and they never met face to face.

      Sean.

    4. Re:Hidden Fortress by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Local chain (read: Blockbuster) video stores don't carry the old japanese classics (i.e. hidden fortress, seven samurai) they carry pap. This is why you owe it to yourself to support locally owned video stores which do cater to other than Top Ten mentalities.

      --

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Hidden Fortress by sojiro · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of the great Westerns were inspired/based on Japanese films--Mag. Seven from Seven Samurai and Fistful of Dollars from Yojimbo, to name a few. Then again, Kurosawa based some of his movies on English epics, such as King Lear. I think both the Westerns and the Japanese films are great examples of what can go right in cross-culture art!

    6. Re:Hidden Fortress by tb3 · · Score: 2

      Fist Full of Dollars and Last Man Standing from Yojimbo; The Magnificent Seven and Battle Beyond the Stars from Seven Samurai.
      Kurosawa based Ran on King Lear.
      The quality of the work (Ran, Magnificent Seven) just goes to prove the old adage: "Good artists copy, great artists steal".
      -----------------

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  76. All I can say by jmu1 · · Score: 1

    is
    /me drools
    /me drools alot
    /me sounds like Homer Simpson

    1. Re:All I can say by jmu1 · · Score: 1

      This is a troll...
      How was the post above this offtopic?
      Ban bad moderation!

  77. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by jmu1 · · Score: 1

    Well, I agree with you... in theory. It is perfectly possible for her to become 'more human-like' but unfortunatly, the eyes of the world are still on the waifs who can't seem to keep their food down.
    Me, I am all about curves, I like them on my women just as much as my cars, stereos, computers... i'm just curvy! lol

  78. Re:George Lucas is an idiot... by sulli · · Score: 1

    No, they'll be on Gnutella in Divx the next day. He wants to make money on selling his videos!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  79. Definitely... by Quila · · Score: 1

    Since they used the Ben-Hur chariot scene as a model in making the pod race scene, as well as watching F1 crashes to make the pod break-ups more realistic.

  80. Re:terms of use for official website by Quila · · Score: 1
    And I'm sure totally unenforceable. What's next, terms of service on TV shows?
    "By watching this show, you agree not to tape it or use TiVo, not to tell everyone how bad it sucks, and we will sue you if you go to the bathroom during the commercials."
  81. Slashdot posts news on Star Wars! by KurdtX · · Score: 4

    And slowly, across the nation, work grinds to a halt for all Slashdot'ers...

    Kurdt

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    1. Re:Slashdot posts news on Star Wars! by blair1q · · Score: 2

      And slowly, across the nation, work grinds to a halt for all Slashdot'ers...

      Slashdot has been Starwarsed.

      --Blair

  82. Aaarg I can't stop myself!!!! by graveyhead · · Score: 1

    All your jedi are belong to us!

    --
    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
  83. May the Shwartz be wid Youse by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    I'm waiting for Spaceballs 2!

    --

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:May the Shwartz be wid Youse by semifamous · · Score: 1

      I heard they were skipping 2 and going straight to "Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2"...

      But I'm wrong a lot...

  84. How about a 'Theforce.net' Slashbox? by Bonker · · Score: 3

    Hmm? As an average geek who plans to enjoy Ep2 when it comes out, but is not obsessing about it, or particularly horny for Natalie Portman, can we get a slashbox for Theforce.net to get some of the more pointless SW news off the main page? Huh? It can't be that hard to set up, guys, espcially if you've got one for Sluggy Freelence.

    That's right, Mod me down, karma-boy.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:How about a 'Theforce.net' Slashbox? by darthcleo · · Score: 1

      it's actually in the making... shhhh

    2. Re:How about a 'Theforce.net' Slashbox? by darthcleo · · Score: 1

      It's now available ...

  85. Maybe not. by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

    just a continuation of the alienation of his fanbase. yes, /. IS more vocal than the rest, but it's still happening with the rest of them.

    1. Re:Maybe not. by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      >Perhaps - do you really feel alienated because >the DVD isn't already on the shelves

      no, no. i'm not at arms, or anything like that, but it puts me off a bit. i've always considered alienation to be a more subtle thing.

      >I don't know that George has any obligation to >provide a DVD edition of his movie on any >particular timeframe.

      he doesn't. the delay doesn't bother me, it's the fact that he can get more money from us if he waits. and considering his stance on toys :) i think it's more of a money issue than adding special effects. jesus, i mean how long does it take to re-add all the out-takes, maybe add an already produced documentary, and engineer for DVD? skywalker ranch is one of THE supreme places for mastering. i don't think they'd really sweat it.

      >George is a producer and a businessman. I don't >begrudge him the ability to make money.

      i don't either unless it interferes with my enjoying of the final product. i am not just a marketing statistic, and would like more "creative visionaries" to treat us as such. (note: i'm biased. my g/f worked in marketing for a while, so we get into arguments all the time about such a subject ;> )

      >If he REALLY wanted to make his fans happy he'd >give away free DVDs of the movie to everybody as >they exit the theater. That seems like an >unreasonable expectation, however. :)

      naah, never been done before, perfect time to start!

    2. Re:Maybe not. by CoachS · · Score: 1
      Perhaps - do you really feel alienated because the DVD isn't already on the shelves? I don't, but that's just my opinion. I haven't bought the VHS; probably will buy the DVD when it becomes available, assuming the price is reasonable.

      If it was that important to me to have the movie, I'd just buy the VHS copy. Which is exactly what George would like me to do. It's not that important to me, so I'll wait for the DVD.

      I don't know that George has any obligation to provide a DVD edition of his movie on any particular timeframe. I also doubt that Star Wars fans are likely to not buy the DVD, or not go to see Episode 2 when it comes out, as a protest over its delay.

      George is a producer and a businessman. I don't begrudge him the ability to make money. If he REALLY wanted to make his fans happy he'd give away free DVDs of the movie to everybody as they exit the theater. That seems like an unreasonable expectation, however. :)

      -Coach-

      --
      Perhaps the world's greatest tragedy is that ignorance is not impotence.
    3. Re:Maybe not. by CoachS · · Score: 1
      i think it's more of a money issue than adding special effects. jesus, i mean how long does it take to re-add all the out-takes, maybe add an already produced documentary, and engineer for DVD?

      [AOL]I agree. [/AOL]

      I'm skeptical of the explanation that the delay is because of adding content. I think it's all about money.

      -Coach-

      --
      Perhaps the world's greatest tragedy is that ignorance is not impotence.
  86. "(aka stupid loser)" by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

    here here! too bad my parents fall into that category with collecting :/... still beats beanie babies, i s'pose.

  87. terms of use for official website by Proud+Geek · · Score: 2
    I don't like to rain on anyone's parade, but Lucasfilm is a big media corporation, and you can't just go assuming they are good guys because they make cool movies. Read the terms of use of their website. After all, you've already accepted them. Even worse, there isn't so much as a splash box asking me to accept them or leave; come on, even Microsoft says these are the terms, take them or leave them, BEFORE installing Office XP.

    Anyway, for anyone who is too lazy, or doesn't want to accept them before reading them, here are a few key points:

    "By using this site, you signify that you agree to these Terms of Use." By the time you've read them, you've already agreed.

    "The sale, auction, lease, loan, gift, trade or barter, or use of any of the text, graphics, photographs, audio and/or video material or stills from audiovisual material or any other materials contained herein, for any other purpose, in any form, media or technology now known or hereafter developed, including the use of any of the aforementioned materials on any other Web site or networked computer environment, without a prior written consent from Lucasfilm, is expressly prohibited." You can't give the pics to your friend, in fact, you can't even email them to yourself, should you be so inclined.

    "The creation of derivative works based on the materials contained herein including, but not limited to, products, services, fonts, icons, link buttons, wallpaper, desktop themes, on-line postcards and greeting cards and unlicensed merchandise (whether sold, bartered or given away) is expressly prohibited. You may download one copy of the materials on any single computer for your personal, non-commercial home use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices." Hmm, one copy only (I hope my browser's cache doesn't count as a second copy!), and I'm not allowed to create a derivative work, like a desktop wallpaper. God forbid anyone should actually like Star Wars, apparently Lucasfilm doesn't allow it.

    "If at our request you send certain specific submissions (e.g., postings to chats, surveys, message boards, contests, or similar items) or, despite our request that you not send us any other creative materials, you send us creative suggestions, ideas, notes, drawings, concepts, or other information (collectively the "Submissions") shall be deemed and shall remain the property of Lucasfilm Ltd. in perpetuity. By making any Submission, the sender automatically grants, or warrants that the owner of such material expressly grants, Lucasfilm the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, and distribute such material (in whole or in part) throughout the universe and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or hereafter developed, for the full term of any copyright, trademark or patent that may exist in such material for any purpose that Lucasfilm chooses, whether internal, public, commercial, or otherwise, without any compensation, credit or notice to the sender whatsoever. " Two sentences of leglaese. I think it says that anything you say to them, or on their site, belongs to them. Sounds good to me; if episode III is as bad as episode I, they can just steal some fan fics and use them. They've already said they own them and can do whatever they want without giving you credit, or even telling you.

    "We reserve the right, at our discretion, to change, modify, add, or remove portions of these Terms of Use at any time. ... Your continued use of this site after the posting of changes to these terms will mean you agree to abide by those changes." And best of all, they can change them without telling you. That makes me especially confident in their privacy policy.

    I have my doubts that this policy would be worth the bits it was sent with in court, but I sure hope it isn't. I'm pretty sure I violated it just by viewing the site in my browser. What a load of crap.

    --

    Even Slashdot wants to hide some things

    1. Re:terms of use for official website by MeltyMan · · Score: 1

      "You may not, without express written consent, at any time Slashdot this website."
      Hee hee...

      --
      "Ummmm..." ...The programmer's "Om."
  88. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by typical+geek · · Score: 1

    Oooh, I forgot about her!

    Yeah, Jessica Alba!

  89. Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by typical+geek · · Score: 5

    It may be troll heresy to admit, but I think Nat's a little too thin.
    I prefer woman with a few more curves, maybe Tiffany Amber-Theissen, or even Rene Zellweger (as Bridget Jones).

    1. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by blair1q · · Score: 2

      >>Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso

      Pablo never programmed one.

      --Blair

    2. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by tb3 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I remember first seeing Natalie Portman as a twelve-year-old girl in "Leon" (AKA "The Professional"). Thinking about her in any other way makes me feel like a dirty old man.
      -----------------

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    3. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by UltraBot2K1 · · Score: 2

      Thin is good. There's less of her to petrify!

      --

      Slashdot: Open Source, Closed Minds.

    4. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

      Heresy, probably not.

      But, since I'm a bit of a troll afficinado, I'll bite:

      Ms. Portman could very well be the sexiest woman who's ever lived, too-thin or not. A damn sight fine, and edible to boot.

      Whoops, did I say that outloud?

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    5. Re:Heresy, but Natalie Portman is too thin by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

      Lying next to a scantily clad, sunburning Ms. Portman, with a Palm VIIx, Terminal, ircing from the comfort of the beaches of Europe.

      Damnit, was I drooling the whole time?

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
  90. Re:Jesus Built My Hotrod by Libster · · Score: 1

    Is it by any chance a love affair between Jesus and your car?

    --
    Australianus Geekus
  91. Here's the correct titles by BIGJIMSLATE · · Score: 1

    Akira Kurosawa's Yojimbo (The Bodyguard) was almost exactly copied for both Clint Eastwood's "Fistful of Dollars" and Willis' "Last Man Standing".

  92. George Lucas is an idiot... by mancxvi · · Score: 1

    for not releasing his films on DVD. He needs several boots to the head.

    1. Re:George Lucas is an idiot... by mancxvi · · Score: 1

      Yes, but he acts as if EVERYBODY is going to obtain them that way. Gnutella isn't so widespread that nobody will buy DVDs.

  93. Maybe smarter than you think... by CoachS · · Score: 2
    If he releases the DVD immediately how many VHS copies does he sell? The real fans will buy the VHS because they can't wait and then buy the DVD when it finally releases. More money for George.

    -Coach-

    --
    Perhaps the world's greatest tragedy is that ignorance is not impotence.
  94. I feel a great disturbance in the Force... by Flying+Headless+Goku · · Score: 1

    It was like a million keyboards clacking in unison, suddenly silenced.
    --

    --
  95. Damn... Wish I'd thought of that. by Flying+Headless+Goku · · Score: 1

    Err, I mean, damn slashcode, it must have eaten half of my joke...
    --

    --
  96. GREAT!!! by madhatter256 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad that you guys post something that is great!! Although I'm a bit disappointed from the 1st episode cause of JarJar!!!!! But keep in mind that the 2nd episode will be more of a love story and the 3rd episode will be a good one because that is when all of the jedi's will start to disappear and become "extinct" and a lot of battles take place. P.S. They are soon going to start casting for 3rd episode.

    --
    Previewing comments are for sissies!