Slashdot Mirror


What Formula Would You Tattoo?

My_Skin_As_A_Cheatsheet asks this potentially painful question: "I have a friend/colleague who is planning on getting a tattoo in the next month or so. She has decided that this tattoo will be a mathematical or statistical formula, and has been scouring the web and books in recent weeks looking for a cool formula to put on her upper back/shoulder. If you could tattoo a single formula, axiom, etc. (from math, statistics, or any other similar field) on you, what would it be and why? Are there any you think are particularly profound or important? Cool symbols are a plus." Do you have a formula that means so much to you that you would get it tattoed onto your skin? If so, please share it with us. Please try to do you best in HTML (and I wish there was MathML support in something other than Mozilla...of course, Slashdot won't accept those tags anyways...yet!).

37 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Infinity by cameloid · · Score: 2

    1 / 0

    --
    -- Cisk for the Cisk God
  2. What you are looking for... by jdybnis · · Score: 2
    1. Re:What you are looking for... by grammar+nazi · · Score: 4
      Take your pick:

      Algebraic fundamental formula: Although Euler's formula is very beautiful, I would opt for, the more algebraic, Lagrange's Theorem...

      |G|=|H|[G:H]

      Where H is a subgroup of a finite group G. Here is a theorem that is at the very basis of algebra and numbers.

      Number thoery cool formula: Another equation that would be good for a tattoo is Hardy and Ramanujan's equation for the number of partitions of a number n, p(n). I will TeX the equation since I can't do it justice with HTML. If you don't use LaTeX, then refer to Number Theory, by George Andrews, p. 150 (it's a Dover book so it's $6.95 and excellent).

      p(n)=\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{2}}\frac{d}{d n}\left{ \frac{\exp \left( \frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{6}} \sqrt{n-\frac{1}{24}} \right) }{\sqrt{n-\frac{1}{24}}}

      An interesting thing about this equation is that it doesn't actually converge. You can make it converge to an answer by replacing the exp with a sinh and remove the 2 in the very first denominator, but Hardy and Ramanujan never figured that out.

      Simple Chaotic Formula: One of the simplist equations to display a period 3 orbit, and hence chaotic behavior, is the logistic map:

      f( x(n+1) )= 4 x(n) ( 1- x(n) )

      I would recommend using subcripts in place of (n) and (n+1).

      Fourier Series: Finally, nothing in mathematics is more beautiful and elegant than Fourier series. The following equation is at the heart of the MP3 piracy debate and it is responsible for most video and sound encoding. I don't know any equations for Fast Fourier Transforms, but here's one for the general Fourier series (in complex form, because that makes a better tattoo).

      \Phi(x)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty} c_n e^{in\pi x/l}

      For further reading in Fourier series (at an undergraduate level), I recommend Partial Differential Equations, an Introduction by Strauss

      This slashdot story has inspired me to get a tattoo!

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  3. this one is nice... by Jose · · Score: 4

    e^(pi*i) + 1 = 0

    that has always been one of my favourites. (mostly because it brings several important numbers into one small formula)

    --
    The basic sleazeware produced in a drunken fury by a bunch of UCBerkeley grad students was still the core of BIND. --PV
  4. My personal favorite.. by cmowire · · Score: 5

    I would tattoo the following:

    Integral(E^x) = f(u^n)
    Which becomes, when you look at it,
    Sex = Fun

    That would be my suggestion. ;)

    1. Re:My personal favorite.. by geophile · · Score: 2

      Big deal. Leonard Wheat already pointed that out in his 2001 book.

    2. Re:My personal favorite.. by __aasfhc1949 · · Score: 2
      At the University of Chicago, we altered that and put it on a shirt to read:

      The limit as u -> u(c) of the integral(e^x) = 0.
      Rajiv Varma
  5. Pre-algebraic Existentialism by timotten · · Score: 2

    Everything comes down to:

    x = x

    If your friend likes non-sequitors, she might prefer:

    x != x

    If she's intrigued by Zen, she might like:

    x = x != x

    Though I suppose a more experienced Zen master would just say:

    x

    1. Re:Pre-algebraic Existentialism by Haeleth · · Score: 2

      y?

  6. Several options: by cperciva · · Score: 2

    The most obvious candidate would be e^{i \pi} + 1 = 0. Everyone agrees about the beauty of this formula, and it also has the advantage of compactness.

    Another option would be \pi = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}{(\frac{1}{16})^i(\frac{4}{8i+1 }-\frac{2}{8i+4}-\frac{1}{8i+5}-\frac{1}{8i+6})}. While this dates back only six years, and is rather less compact, it is arguably very beautiful because it relates Pi to the simple polylogarithmic constants.

    If you want something statistical, how about \sqrt{\pi} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{e^{-x^2} dx} ?

    OTOH, if you have lots of space, the Peano axioms (or, even better, the axioms of ZF set theory) would be really cool...

    1. Re:Several options: by SnatMandu · · Score: 2

      Find a nice compact expression of the Axiom of Choice. One of the most interesting math objects ever. But is it true?



    2. Re:Several options: by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2

      Axioms are supposed to be obviously true. You have to start Mathematics from somewhere!

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  7. Re:Tattoo by grammar+nazi · · Score: 3
    Ouch! Normally I'm the grammar nazi, but for this post I'm going to play stick-in-the-mud Nazi.

    You're link is to an article that talks about hepititus. You can avoid this 100% by going to a reputable tattoo artist and not a hole in the wall place.

    Finally I think that your comment about seeing a psychiatrist is a little overboard. I would hardly refer to a tattoo as currently cool and trendy.

    Tattoos have been cool and trendy for hundreds of years now. They are here to stay. Hard mathematics has been accurate and around for hundreds of years. Thus, tattoos of hard mathematics are not a temporary fad.

    Okay, my logic isn't 100% sound, but you get the point. Now shove off, pal!

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  8. The traditional by Grey · · Score: 2
    In peusdoTeX:
    \intragel_0^\infinity \Delta\hartsuit dt = 0
    Which is loosely:" and in the end the love you take is equal to the love you make"

    But personally I prefer Euler ($e^{i\pi}+1=0$) or Fermatewith but my &lt body part&gt is to small for the eligante proof.

    --
    Grey (Chris Lusena)
  9. And don't forget by cperciva · · Score: 3

    \int{\frac{1}{cabin} d(cabin)} = houseboat.

    (For those who haven't seen this before, the left side evaluates to log cabin + C.)

  10. Not really a formula, but... by Quay42 · · Score: 2

    I've been planning for a while (and this would work for anyone with 8 characters in their last time) to get a tatoo of my last name in binary digits in the form of an 8x8 matrix. Thought this would look damn cool. A tad obscure, but hey.

    --
    "Has anything you've done made your life better?" - American History X
    1. Re:Not really a formula, but... by Myrcurial · · Score: 2

      I've got a stylized @ that appears to be built with blue cat5 - the bare wires showing out of the tail of the circle with my nick (first three letters) in binary below that - I used all caps to make it easier for people to decode. At this point, there is only one person to have successfully decoded it - a female geek behind me in line at a waterslide thing - the other attemptees - a gang of Novell programmers at Brainshare 99 couldn't figure it out at all.

      :)

  11. Re:Maxwell's Equations by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    "Excuse me, my shoe phone is ringing..."

  12. The Schroedinger Wave Equation by Alik · · Score: 2

    Pretty much everything in quantum mechanics is hiding somewhere in the damn thing, nobody can actually solve it for all cases, and it's complex enough to boggle the minds of 99.9% of mortals (yours truly included).

    There's a good example (LaTeX->image) here.

  13. Good lord by Jethro · · Score: 2

    This has got to be the dumbest question I've ever heard.

    If you HAVE to get a tattoo, shouldn't you like something a lot and THEN decide to get it tattoos permanently on your skin?


    --

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  14. Well.... by Fencepost · · Score: 4
    I may come off sounding like a conservative old fart, but if this is her first tat and she doesn't already have something personally meaningful that she wants to use then perhaps she should reconsider getting (semi-)permanently inked.

    Of course if she already has other tats and wants to add a formula as another but doesn't have anything particularly meaningful to her in mind, I think it'd be hard to beat Grey's suggestion or something patterned after it. Failing that, there are all sorts of interesting things to use from the simple, compact fundamentals to larger "unexpected" items. Ask one of the math faculty or a calculus student about curves where the area under the curve is infinite but the volume of the solid created by spinning it is finite.

    If nothing else, she should keep in mind that she's likely to be asked semi-regularly what it means, and if she can't explain it she's going to end up feeling stupid. "Hey, what's the math tat mean?" "Um, I can't really explain it, I just thought it looked neat..."

    -- fencepost

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  15. Re:I got it... by paulywog · · Score: 2
    ACK!!! Far better choice along the same line would be:


    1 + 1 = 11


    And this one is actually right!

  16. My vote by AstroJetson · · Score: 3

    Well, as others have pointed out, you can't beat the sheer elegance of Euler's Formula. But if her pain threshold is pretty high another worthy candidate would be...

    In the beginning God said:

    [insert Maxwell's equations]

    ...and there was light.

    --
    Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
  17. Re:Maxwell's Equations by joib · · Score: 2

    Yeah, quantum field theory is full of interresting equations and operators. Turns out you can develop most of quantum mechanics from the commutation relations of the creation and annihilation operators and some group theory. So these would be an obvious choice. But seriously, this is _very_ difficult stuff. Do you really want to lecture a course in QFD to that jerk on the beach with a mental capacity barely exceeding the ability to sell burgers at Burger King? Personaly, I would think twice about the idea to tattoo any formula. It stinks of some kind of "I'm smarter than you" attitude. It's the kind of attitude that alienates the intellectual people from the "normal" people out there. The first reaction when seeing a formula as a tattoo might very well be: "What a loser. Get a life!".

  18. If you're into karate... by sjbe · · Score: 2

    The equations for Force (F=MA), Momentum (P=MV) or Kinetic Energy (KE=(1/2)MV^2) would be appropriate. (geeky but appropriate)

  19. Re:FLT by Toliaro · · Score: 2

    "I have the most elegant proof of this proposition, but my epidermis is too small to contain it."

    --
    Cheers, Toliaro
  20. Limit function by MarkPinTx · · Score: 2

    Another good one possibly, the engineering students (us) put together a tshirt as a limit function: the limit, as GPA approaches 0, of engineering = Business Best done in the sigma form methinks Could do the same for Microsoft Limit as IQ approaches 0 is MS or something

    --
    In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey . . .
  21. wouldnt it be easier... by holzp · · Score: 2

    wouldnt it be easier to just tattoo, "please kick my ass, and ladies, stay away."

  22. DeCSS. Drake Equation by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    What about DeCSS code?

    And there's the Drake Equation about the number of extraterrestrial civilizations. Quite transcendental, if not mathematical:
    N = R* × fp × ne × fl × fi × fc × L

    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  23. Do any Math Geeks have an opinion? by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2
    on who is the greatest mathematician ever?

    I've often heard of Gauss being it but I've always admired Euler more than Gauss. Euler may have published more mathematics than anyone else as I read in a math textbook once plus he was rumored to have incredible mental calculating ability which would of course have come in handy since he lost sight in one and then the other eye as he grew older.

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  24. Re:Schematics by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2

    How about a Op-Amp with a feedback loop?

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  25. Re:Axioms "obviously" true by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    What happens when obviously true axioms turn out not to be true?

    I'm not an expert, so I hope not to insert foot into mouth. (Although certian other body parts are fine.)

    For example. An obviously true axiom: two lines which are parallel to each other can be extended infinitely in either direction, and the two lines will never meet. Problem however. If our universe is the three-dimensional "surface" of a four dimensional sphere, then the parallel lines will meet -- twice -- at each point, halfway around the universe, until each line goes all the way "around" the universe back to it's starting point. Just like Mr. A Square's universe might seem 2D, it might really be the 2D "surface" of a 3D sphere. If Mr. A Square extneds a line far enough, it eventually meets it's starting point. Our line is curved in the fourth dimension all the way "around" the universe, just like Mr. A Square's line is curved in the third dimension, which he cannot percieve.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  26. Re:Axioms "obviously" true by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2
    Axioms must be specified with regard to a particular geometry.

    Geometries

    Euclidean-->Spherical-->Hyperbolic

    One of the basic axioms of Euclidean geometry is that a point not on a line contains a line parallel to the line. This kind of sounds like what you meant to say in terms of axioms.

    It is true that "world lines" in Spherical geometry are "parallel" to each other and perhaps that is what you are really referring to? IIRC parallel lines in this geometry are indeed parallel since the end points are at +/- Infinity. The lines technically do not ever meet.

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  27. wave-state equation by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2

    findable in any physical chemistry text (usually in the first chapter (maybe second) dealing with quantum). The nice thing about it is that it would be "tunable" for the subject's pain threshold, and it has cool greek letters in it (I say tunable because the form of the Hamiltonian operator depends on what dimensionality system yer lookin' at (hint: if they like to pour hot wax on themselves for kicks give them the 3d polar coordinates version, which expands quite a bit with that lambda thingy (the Lambertian? something like that, I can never recall the name) that ends up in the Hamiltonian).

    But make sure they understand what the equation means, like a previous poster said. Covering yourself with Greek gibberish is just as bad as the fools that had the Hip'n'Trendy(TM) Kanji tats done when they don't speak Japanese. I've thought about getting my fav russian quote done, but that's only becuase I'd know if the tattoo artist decided to write "I am a stupid American" rather than "pravda harasho, a chaste luche[1]", which is not idle speculation as a local shop had/has a big flashy kanji tat offering that translates as "I have no fucking clue what this means becuase I'm an idiot." according to my Japanese-speaking friends.

    [1] "The truth is good, but happiness is better.", and what I wrote up there is of course just a mangling of english letters to sort of produce the same sounds as the cyrillic/russian words.


    --
    News for geeks in Austin: www.geekaustin.org
  28. Union of M with m by Bazman · · Score: 2

    I've seen lots of people with this tattoed on them
    Its the union of the set M with the set m. It looks like this:

    M u m

    I can't think why it's so popular.

    Baz

  29. Re:Axioms "obviously" true by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    One of the joys of mathematics is proving the consistency of a set of axioms. In other words, start with a set of statements and prove that none of them can be disproved by using the other axioms. If one of them can be, then you have to throw some axioms out.

    In short, given a consistent set of axioms, NONE of them are false. They can't be. If any of them were, then the axioms are not consistent, and that flies in the face of what I told you in the first sentence of the paragraph, doesn't it?

    HOWEVER (and this, perhaps, addresses your concerns), when you try to apply mathematics to reality (as you do by asking if lines REALLY ARE PARALLEL) you don't have mathematics anymore; you have physics. You can have a beautiful, consistent set of axioms that describe no reality that ever existed.

    BTW, note that, in reality, points and lines don't exist - or at least, they've never been observed. I've seen graphite deposited on paper, I've seen glowing phosphors on a piece of glass, I've seen calcium carbonate dust on slate. But I've never seen a point or a line. Therefore, all of geometry is false. :)

  30. Re:Area by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    As was said earlier; it's not worth having some hugely complex formula on your shoulder if you have to explain it to everyone that sees your shoulder on a beach.

    I don't see how this is any different from having a mystic sigil tattooed onto your body. A friend of mine delights in explaining what the eye of Ra is.