Slashdot Mirror


Las Vegas's Seedy Technical Underbelly

An unsigned submission notes: "Kevin Poulsen's new article on cybercrime in Vegas features tons of cool stuff from pimps, prostitutes, and Gambino family mob hits to an explanation of Sprint's telephone infrastructure. Check it out at SecurityFocus ..." This stuff is worthy of a book.

10 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. How about the *cool* tech stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    You know, for a place that hosts Comdex and DefCon, a lot of computer people don't seem to realize how tech-driven Las Vegas really is.

    I'm not even going to go into the major stuff-- like the huge video billboards, the amazingly cool video poker games (looks like a ghost with gloves is dealing your cards, etc.), or what controls all those modern roller coasters and animatronics shows. Oh, no. I'm going into the seemingly mundane stuff that is STILL cool.

    For one thing, consider the accounting methods. The State of Nevada has some *tough* requirements on pay-out, odds-tracking, etc. for slot machines and other games. Not only are we talking about ledgers, here, but also advanced statistical bookkeeping. So it isn't surprising that there's a booming mini-industry in accounting and statistical packages specifically targetting the casino business.

    Not only that, but usage statistics become critical (hey, why does everybody play poker in the evening, slots in the morning?). If a game isn't playing well (nobody likes it), a casino will dump it in favor of a more popular game. So software to track usage is a big deal, too. And demographic information is used a lot, too(old people like slots, right?).

    Then we can talk about the various shops and attractions. Ever visit the forum shops? Ever imagine how much goes in to making the lights all dim or brighten at the same time? How about turning the sky from day into night? And let's not forget the fountains and other novelties.

    Vegas really has some cool tech under the hood. That's mainly because casino owners are smart folks-- they know how to use technology to their advantage, and don't mind paying for the privilege.

  2. In a nutshell by verch · · Score: 5

    All Your Hookers Are Belong To Us

  3. Re:Tech in Las Vegas by sharkey · · Score: 5

    Las Vegas if you want to keep the money you make.

    Huh? Last time I went to Vegas, I LOST almost all the money I made. They don't call it "Lost Wages" for nothing.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  4. Went to the website by StevenMaurer · · Score: 5

    It was close to being slashdotted. Still, I found a unique banner ad, which read:

    File exists, but access forbidden by user

    Boy, those security focus people sure do take their security seriously!

  5. need...redesign....badly by denshi · · Score: 5
    Security focus uses 9 frames per page. Take your average /. traffic, then multiply it by 9. Somewhere in that company is an engineer trying to convince them to change the site, but they 'like the look'.

    And you wonder why the dot.coms went down in flames??

  6. Phone Piracy Wanted by Tebriel · · Score: 5

    I wish my phone calls to tech support got rerouted to a rival who wanted my business and would get their people on the job first. So, where do we sign up?

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  7. Is it my imagination.... by Mtgman · · Score: 5

    or did we just DDoS a security website? You would think they'd have some process in place to stop things like this.

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  8. A synopsis of the article by Mtgman · · Score: 5

    Here's a synopsis of the article.

    Pimp: Some jerk is buying/threatening/hacking the telco so they'll redirect my calls to some other pimp! Wah!

    Telco: We've spent time and resources on these complaints and we haven't found any foul play. Most test calls go through fine and the ones which don't look like ordinary errors.

    Kevin Mitnick: The Telcos are so freaking stupid it's not funny. I blackmailed some poor schmoe into giving me some info that should have been protected, then called some other fool and pretended I was an employee to get more "secret" data. I cracked the system and used it to steal services from other people or to hide my real location.

    The Mob: Yea, we tried to set up a phone-redirect-to-our-pimps scam. Our guys got busted and spent years in jail. The enforcer we sent to horn in on some local pimp's business got busted and died in jail.

    My analysis? Pure sensationalism in it's style, but has some valid points.

    Any large company is going to be vulnerable to these kinds of exploits. It's just impossible for the right hand to always know what the left hand is doing. What Mitnick says may well be true.

    I have no doubt that prostitution is big business in Vegas, but just because one or two pimps aren't getting the kind of business they used to doesn't imply a conspiracy. Maybe jons got smarter and started using the net to look up hoes?

    As far as the conspiracy? I would be very suprised if they privy enough to Sprint's info to avoid detection. Not doing something illegal when the boss is looking is a lot harder if you don't know when the boss is looking. As we've already established, the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing, how is a third party supposed to be on top of test schedules and investigations?

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  9. Re:Occam's razor needed by baptiste · · Score: 5
    Well, perhaps, but...

    Why is everyone concentrating on Sprint? All these hotels have monster PBXs - heck a few probably have DMS-100 class systems given the # of lines they require - a bit much for all but the beefiest PBXs.

    It would be trivial for them to redirect the calls - either manually or even automagically with routing tables. Since they own it - they can easily do it and I honestly can't imagine it would fall under the jurisdiction of the PUC since it ain't a public utility! THey own the PBX, you use their phones, and as long as they meet various requirements (you can reach 911, etc) no problem. I honestly wonder if doing in on a PBX would be illegal! And eve nif it was - and they did - Sprint would still be out of the picture.

    --

  10. In case of Slashdotting... by TDScott · · Score: 5
    The Register has the article here.

    For the HREF paranoid:
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/18950.html