Slashdot Mirror


Surfing With Your Commodore 64

Anonymous Squonk writes: "Computer Workshops Inc. has released a web browser for the Commodore 64! Sure, you have to have a UNIX shell account to use it, but this is the first time I've seen a C64 browse the web with full HTML 1.0 and GIF/JPEG support. I hear that Java and Javascript support is just around the corner..." And Flash! And VRML! Well, maybe not.

61 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Apple // has had this for awhile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The Apple //GS has had TCP/IP and a web browser for a couple of years now. When I submitted a story about these events, Slashdot didn't think it was worth posting - yet, they do for the 64. For serious retro-computing with the Apple //, check out these sites. http://sourceforge.net/projects/marinetti http://sis.gwlink.net/ http://www.btinternet.com/~ewannop/sp.html http://www.a2central.com/

    1. Re:Apple // has had this for awhile.... by Jonathan · · Score: 2

      But one would *expect* the //GS to have a web browser -- it was a GUI-based computer with at least 256K of memory, after all, Now, a web browser for the traditional Apple ]['s (][, ][+, //e and //c) with their small memories and lack of native GUI, would be a worthy challenge.

  2. Re:My error in strategic judgement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    I recommend Atari servers and Commodore clients to all my customers. Igonre the ideology and use the tool that works best, that's what I say.

  3. Re: Who cares? by The+Man · · Score: 2

    Microsoft hates Java because Sun put one over on them with it. Everyone else hates Java because it's a piece of shit. *shrug* It's all the same...

  4. wouldn't be new. by hawk · · Score: 2
    In 1988 or 1989, I found a Tandy 102 bbs in the san diego area. For those of you under 30 or so, the Tandy 100 and 102 had a 2.5mhz 8085 (=1.25mhz 8080), 8-32k of ram, 40x8 display (but you could flip up to the prior 40x8), and an internal 300 baud modem with pulse dialer.


    the bbs, of course, was running on a 102, and had a couple of useful files (including one that let you use your pc clone as a disk over the serial port [which was how the 50k 3.5" disk connected anyway]).


    hawk, who still has his 102

  5. why? by hawk · · Score: 2
    if we were supposed to be looking at pictures while browsing, lynx would rendeer them into ascii . . .


    hawk

  6. don't need to modify lynx by hawk · · Score: 2
    my little brother once had a browser that used lynx on a shell account to fetch files. I never understood why he didn't just use lynx . . .


    hawk

  7. uhh, your timeline is *really* bad by hawk · · Score: 2
    >If Jack Tramiel (Commodore's CEO) had given a
    > little bit more attention to improving the C-64 (by adding good disk drives and slots),
    >the Apple II would not have become as popular as it did.


    that's just plain silly.


    The C64 is *much* later than the Apple II. The apple II had achieved it's popularity long before the Vic-20. By the time the 20 had come out, the move away from 8 bits was already underway; it used newer technology to build an old-style machine cheaply.


    THe apple was geared for both home and business; the vic-20 and C64 were toys from beginning to end. Popular toys, but thye never had any spirations at other markets.


    Also, part of the cost reduction was by removing slots and not having drives. The Vic was *not* a new design; it was a stripped down PET with color. The C64 was a vic with 64k.


    hawk

    1. Re:uhh, your timeline is *really* bad by King+Babar · · Score: 2
      The apple was geared for both home and business; the vic-20 and C64 were toys from beginning to end. Popular toys, but they never had any aspirations at other markets.

      Well, Commodore might not have had any aspirations at other markets, but readers of (say) Compute! magazine would know that many peripheral add-on companies did not have the same limitations in vision. :-) So I know you could get "accounting" software for at least the 64, which pretty much boggles the mind.

      But I think my favorite item along these line was the really fast mobius strip casette loop as a replacement for RAM product (primarily for the Vic 20, as I recall). If this sounds completely nutty to many readers that's because it was. You really had to have been there.

      The Vic was *not* a new design; it was a stripped down PET with color. The C64 was a vic with 64k.

      Bzzt! The C64 was a lot more than a vic with 64K. For one thing, the C64 had something almost like real sound, and not just a way to buzz the speaker. :-) The color graphics were also much more capable; 98% of vic 20 graphics were generated via special characters from the keyboard.

      For all six of you who really want to know more on the technical specs of these machines, you might try this page full of Commodore "Business" Machines trivia

      --

      Babar

  8. apple had about 6 colors by hawk · · Score: 2
    iirc, you set an 8 bit color, but 2of the cdolors were duplicates.


    APple used 7 bits for on/off, and the other bit did a half-bit shift to tinker with the color trap. Add that to which bits next to one another were used, and an 8 bit byte produced 7 bits in six possbile colors (though most pattern/color combos didn't exist). This was done with almost no hardware about 10 years before the C64.


    hawk

  9. Foul! by hawk · · Score: 2
    How can you use "Apple //GS" and "serious retro-computing with the Apple //" in the same paragraph? Most of what made the ][ fiendishly clever didn't make it into the watered down mac called //GS. . . .


    hawk

  10. The C64 ROCKED as a hacker maschinen! by pedro · · Score: 2

    Oh, man! Where do I start?
    How about all the hardware features that went virtually unused by practically everyone, Commodore, included?
    There was that REALLY neat synchronous serial port built into the VIA chip that was pulled out the back IO connector.
    I was doing C64<>Apple II game ports at the time, and needed to transfer files back and forth. I cobbled together a cable that linked the C64 and the apple game connector and wrote assembly routines that shook hands at either end.
    I got transfer speeds of about 50kbaud both ways over that sucker. Not too shabby for 1mhz processors
    And how about running fastloader code *in the disk drive*? And diddling the interleave factor when formatting to speed things up even further? Or storing data in unused directory sectors to save space?
    Whoa. Getting a woody just thinking about it!
    Then there's all the neat things you can do with a vertical blank or scanline interrupt!
    Of course, there's the SID chip also..
    Oh, gawd! Somebody stop me!

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
  11. VMware is your friend by acb · · Score: 2

    You could always buy a copy of VMware, and use it to run Windows 98 or so under Linux, for running MS Internet Exploiter. That's what I do when I need anything Nyetscape/Mozilla can't do.

    Sad to say, that's probably your best bet for getting a decent browser under Linux.

  12. Re:flash?? by acb · · Score: 2

    I've seen some really annoying flash adverts. You don't want flash...

    Especially if you're using the brain-damaged Linux Flash plug-in. It has the nice feature that, when it starts, it grabs the audio device. If it can't get it, it blocks on it, wedging Nyetscape solid until it gets its way.

    Having to stop your MP3 player because some site has a Flash ad on it is not the sign of a well-designed system.

  13. Computer Workshops INC?? by roystgnr · · Score: 3

    As in Incorporated? Didn't anybody tell them that the time to blow your venture capital releasing goofy products with no real revenue potential ended last year?

  14. OT: Posting and the Slashdot effect by tekan · · Score: 5

    One possible idea for curbing the slashdot effect, especially on bandwidth limited websites, would be to have some mechanism whereby when you post such a story about a website that the story submitter could check an option that would allow for "Google" style mirroring of the page(s) to be stored on slashdot for the time that the story is on the homepage. Once the story goes to the archives or just falls off the homepage, then the cached pages are dumped. Just an idea.

  15. Another is "The Wave" (C-64 graphical web browser) by joetee · · Score: 2

    Last weekend, I went poking around at the Spring Commodore Expo 2001 in Louisville, Kentucky USA.
    I got a peek at many C-64 and 128's running GEOS, and even better: "Wheels"
    That GUI ran another program, a browser called "The Wave" See: http://www.luckyreport.com/expo.html

    "Now you can enjoy graphical web browsing on your Commodore 64 or Commodore 128."
    http://www.ia4u.net/~maurice/gbrowse/wave.html
    http://videocam.net.au/~colinjt/wave.html

    Naturally the above code is tight and efficient assembly language.
    Most C-64 programs are smaller than the icons above.
    The Wave browser is smaller than the banner ad!!!

    Alas, few on Slashdot will ever run this kind of code, let alone generate it. :^)
    But such code would easily fit in thier Cache!

    --
    Joe Torre - X - HardwareEngineer @ Amiga Inc & ZapMedia Amiga, AmigaDE, BeOS, Linuxz, QNX, Rebol, Windoze, ZME: So
  16. Re:And not only that... by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    Yup, Abacus "Anatomy of the C64" ruled, mainly due to the comment ROM disassembly appendix.

    I bought Merlin on July 2nd 1984, and it was the best 37.95 + tax I ever spent. Fun story: about a year and a half later, I was at high school and a teacher wanted to use an Apple IIe to display a timer on the screen so that he could drop things in front of it and take slow-motion movies showing the motion with a time index running on the IIe's screen in the background (for a physics class, I guess?) So I volunteered and then said, "Hm.. I need an assembler." Someone coughed up a pirated program called Big Mac and I dived in. No one was shocked that I knew 6502, but how the heck did I learn Big Mac's line editor so quickly? The secret: it was the same program as Merlin. Glen Bredon was a cross-platform dude.

    Oh yeah, as for the timer: the IIe's Green Screen's phosphors were too persistant, so each frame's final digits just looked like blurred eights. Whoops. :-)


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  17. Re:Java is not available already? by color+of+static · · Score: 2

    Ahhh, the good old days when there were some programs that were quicker to write than to load from your media. Atleast we weren't saying, "This &%$#ing paper tape broke again", or "Oh &%$@ I spilled my box of cards" :-).

  18. Re:Java is not available already? by color+of+static · · Score: 2

    You have to re engineer your abacus is all. Replace all of the beads with Java rings.

  19. Java is not available already? by color+of+static · · Score: 5

    What do you mean my java code isn't write once and run ANYWHERE? Geez, now I guess you're going to say it won't work on my Timex Sinclair either.

    1. Re:Java is not available already? by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 2

      I agree, I have a hard time trying to get Java to run on my abacus as well.

    2. Re:Java is not available already? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2

      Once the Z-80 Java runtimes are ready on cassette, we'll let you know...

      --
      Yeah, right.
  20. Re:All I need... by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Man, you have the datassette player? Lucky bastard. I never could afford that. Anyone know where I can get a ROM cart with this on it?

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  21. The glory of the C64 by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 3

    If you're interested in doing bizzaro stuff with your C64, you might want to check out these links:

    LUnix (Fully functioning SLIP-TCP/IP stack for C64)

    GeckOS/A65 (Multitasking Unix-ish OS for C64s)

    Lemon for a good stockpile of C64 warez. :)

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  22. My error in strategic judgement... by Sun+Tzu · · Score: 5

    Here I sit staring at my unnetworked Atari 800. Finally, I understand why I should have bought a Commodore!

  23. Re:And not only that... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    Meanwhile, back in the present, I've probably spent more than a thousand bucks on software and PC documentation over the last 10 years without ever getting anything that resembles a complete description of the hardware.

    A complete description of a modern computer in all its complexity would likely fill a bookshelf. Just the latest draft of the ATA specification is about the same thickness, when printed double-sided, as the Apple IIe Technical Reference Manual I got back in 1987, which provided complete schematics, specifications, and even source code for the ROMs (except for the BASIC interpreter, and if Apple hadn't gotten that from M$, it probably would've been published too).

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  24. wow by British · · Score: 2

    First a kid builds a nuclear reactor out of household parts, and now people are making web browsers for the C64.

    There are some people with WAY too much free time on their hands, and I salute you.

    I gotta get back to working on my Honda CVT entirely out of LEGO now.

  25. Don't laugh by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2

    The C-64, the VIC-20, (and the Pet before that) are the ancestors of the incomparable Amiga. The graphics chip-set of all of them was designed by the same engineeer, who I believe, is no longer among the living. If Jack Tramiel (Commodore's CEO) had given a little bit more attention to improving the C-64 (by adding good disk drives and slots), the Apple II would not have become as popular as it did. The C-64 had 10 times better graphics capabilities than the Apple II.

    I am fascinated by the early history of the microcomputer. Does anybody out there still remember the Rockwell AIM-65 computer, a single board 6502 machine with a 20-character LED readout, a keyboard and a calculator roll-printer all attached to the board?

    1. Re:Don't laugh by Pig+Bodine · · Score: 3

      The custom chip set for the Amiga was designed by Jay Miner who also did the graphics chip set for the Atari 8-bit machines. I don't think he had come over to Commodore when the C64 was being designed, but I'm not sure and can't turn up anything on a web search. I also don't know if he is still alive. The Atari 800 and the Amiga were great machines in their day. If he is dead, I'll belatedly mourn his passing.

  26. Holy moses! by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    "I've seen a C64 browse the web with full HTML 1.0"

    No way! FULL HTML 1.0 support? Way to bring the C64 into the early 1990s! Where's my copy of Netscape Mosaic 0.9.2?
    --

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  27. Re:How's this work? by jkonrath · · Score: 2

    Cool. I can turn my $2000 PC into a disk drive for my 20 year old piece of shit Commodore 64. Sign me up baby! Will this work on the Vic-20?

    To answer your sarcastic question, yes it works for the Vic-20 also. The 1541 drive uses a serial interface that was present on most of the 8-bit Commodore machines. So you could use the same drive on the 128, PET, VIC, and so on.

    As far as the general attitude of "why the hell don't you work on something more important?", I think people that still hack old machines are like people that still restore classic cars - they do it because they can. People who want to do stuff like port a Web browser to a machine that has no practical purpose are like people who climb mountains for no reason other than to say they did. Don't knock it - someday you'll be pining for the old days, too.

    -J

  28. Re:How's this work? by jkonrath · · Score: 5

    Most people still hacking at C64's use a cable that goes from the printer port on a PC to the drive cable on the 64. It's called an x1541 cable. You run a small bit of software on your PC, and then your C64 thinks your PC is a disk drive. The PC program lets you load and save image files of 1541 disks. So you could pull down a bunch of disk images from the 'net to your PC's drive, and your C64 would treat them as floppy disks in the 8 drive or 9 drive or whatever. It's pretty cool, especially considering about a million of those tiny little SS/SD disk images could be downloaded in seconds on a 56K modem...

    -Jon

  29. All I need... by selectspec · · Score: 5

    is a store where I can buy a Cassette Tape with this program on it and I'm on my way!

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  30. Re:SuperCPU by nlh · · Score: 2

    From the site...

    It must not be compared with a PC which just runs a bit faster after an upgrade. A P300 only runs about 3 times faster than a P100. A SuperCPU-C64 runs 20 times faster than a stock C64!

    Wow!! That's amazing! If these guys are as good at making CPUs as they are at math, then we're in for some fun......;)

    nlh

  31. Impressive? I have my doubts... by Lion-O · · Score: 2
    The last time I actually used a terminal program on my old C64 was to get an old database from the C64 onto my laptop. I merely needed my RS232 interface (small box which goes into the userport and contains one small chip to translate all the data to a full blown RS232 connection) and a null modem cable.

    After I was done I skimmed around in my (dusted) software archive and stumbled across NovaTerm; a completely modular build terminal program for the C64 which offered anything you'd need. You need one side of a 5.25" disk for it (it will take up aprox. 80%) and the other side can be used as a datadisk. Because it was modular its functions expanded; right up to full ZModem support.

    Taken that into consideration and the total size of the ppp stack in the Linux kernel I must admit not being very impressed by this project. I'm sure that if the novaterm developers we're still at it there would be a lynx style Internet access for the C64 ages ago. Maybe it could even evolve into full blown graphical support, who knows.

    Basicly; this looks nice but I'm sure the C64 can do much more.

  32. Surfing Moral Equivalent by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    This has got to be the moral equivalent of impressing Real Surfer Dudes by hanging ten off one of those dinky 2 ft styrofoam dog paddle boards (like I used in the kiddie pools.)

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  33. Dammit... by chegosaurus · · Score: 3

    On hearing this news I have reluctantly decided to abandon my C64 port of Mozilla.

  34. flash?? by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 2
    Since Macromedia can't get their sorry asses going with Flash support for Netscape 6 (or more importantly, mozilla) under *Windows*, I can't see them supporting tbe C64 just yet...

    And how 'bout a Shockwave player for Linux, huh?

    --
    Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
  35. Just submit the Google cached version by yerricde · · Score: 4

    story submitter could check an option that would allow for "Google" style mirroring of the page(s)

    A very frequent suggestion. Here's how to implement it: When you're submitting a story that links to a low-monthly-bandwidth web site, insert www.google.com/search?q=cache: right after the http:// in the URL. That way, viewers get a Google cached version with a link at the top to the most current version.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  36. Re:sigh... by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Guess I'll have to go and find one from somewhere - maybe some museum will have one :)

    In fact, a museum does have one, but they are saying totally wrong things about them.

    It makes me wonder who payed for that exhibit cough! Intel cough!.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  37. Suicide case. by tcc · · Score: 3

    That's pathetic, my Commodore 64 will end up having java support but not my classic amigas.... god damn it I knew I shouldn't have switched when the amiga 500 came out.

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  38. Great. by yellowstuff · · Score: 2

    One more client web developers have to support.

  39. Re:Sure... by suss · · Score: 2

    Sure the C64 is great, but my hostname at work says it all... -- i.wish.my.vic20.had.more.than.fivek.com

    Maybe you should've gotten the 16K expansion module? I still have one laying around here...

  40. Re:C-64? by MrBogus · · Score: 2

    There was the TRS-80 Model I (my first computer!) - 4K, and a Z-80. It wasn't really a business computer -- that was the much more pricey Model II, which I think ran

    Then there was the Tandy Color Computer Model I - Much later and with a 6809 and entirely incompatible with the original Trash-80s.

    --

    When I hear the word 'innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  41. Re:Quick! by Maddog_Delphi97 · · Score: 2

    Umm... NeXT was the very first platform to have a world wide web client...

    http://www.w3.org/History/1994/WWW/Journals/CACM/s creensnap2_24c.gif

  42. Sure... by CodePoet82 · · Score: 2

    Sure the C64 is great, but my hostname at work says it all... -- i.wish.my.vic20.had.more.than.fivek.com

  43. Re:C-64? by guinsu · · Score: 3

    I've seen a card that lets you add IDE to a C-64, is that good enough?

  44. Re:C-64? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

    He's differentiating between the Color Computer (CoCo) (a TRS-80) and the TRS-80 model 1... another TRS-80 model.

    One was aimed at the home computing market, the other was a "business machine" (with accompanying price tag)

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  45. Re:C-64? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

    So, uh, what was that you were saying about not trying to fake old-school cool???

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  46. Re:C-64? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

    There was no difference between a CoCo and a Model 1?

    uh....

    In some ways, sure... but not so in others. The TRS-80 series (Mod 1, etc) were a different class than the CoCo. No chicklet keyboards on the Mod series, for starters...

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  47. I wonder... by shumacher · · Score: 2
    I can't seem to get at the manual, but I wonder if it's just a terminal program "adjusted" to work with a modified version on Lynx....

    Of course, it's a neat idea, but with what computers are going for today, I wonder what I could reasonably use it for. (Don't believe me, go to ebay and search for "IBM Thin Client") Personally, a web server would be better. It would then be really useful for various embedded applications. I could put one in a robotic lawnmower or my refrigerator. I even have an old children's book lying about that details the building of a robot that interfaces with the C64 - in other words, it's dead easy.

    Oh, and ahem.... "Could you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?"

  48. Photoshop for the TRS-80 by tenzig_112 · · Score: 5
    Sure, it's a little hard to see what you're doing (what with the 128x48 screen on the Model I). But 6.0 rocks! I have to save all of my multi-layered graphics onto audio cassettes, which can be a bit of a pain. It's at least faster than that paper tape drive that came with it.

    Gotta go. I've got to make some hard copies with my snazzy thermal-transfer printer.

    I've gone nuts with Photoshoppery

  49. Re:They must be using one for their Web hosting to by jacklf · · Score: 2

    Strange enough, I guess that's possible:

    "Some of LNG's key features (unordered)...
    * A simple web server (experimental)"

  50. SuperCPU by sparcv9 · · Score: 5

    Here's a link for the SuperCPU the article mentions. For the hyperlink-wary, you can find it at http://www.cmdweb.de/scpu.htm. It plugs into your C64 or C128 and boosts it from 1MHz to a whopping 20 MHz, and lets your Commodore support up to 16MB of RAM.

    --

    This is not a Fugazi .sig
  51. C-64? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2

    Huh? There are actually people who still have one? What's next? DVD players for the Vic-20, Media editors for the Coco and a Web server for the TRS-80 (mod 1, natch!)????

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:C-64? by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 2

      ack? my TRS-80 web server is almost complete!
      now somebody else will complete it first!
      Well, alot of people still have C64s, they were a nice computer.

  52. And not only that... by localroger · · Score: 2
    You could go to B. Dalton and slam down twelve buks and get a manual which told you everything you needed to know about the C64 to write professional grade applications -- every hardware register (and there were a lot of them for a machine of its era), the entire memory map, every plug and socket pinout, details of the 1541 disk drive interface, and quite a few useful ROM hooks.

    Meanwhile, back in the present, I've probably spent more than a thousand bucks on software and PC documentation over the last 10 years without ever getting anything that resembles a complete description of the hardware.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  53. Assembly Language Rocks by localroger · · Score: 2
    And nobody seems to have interest in assembly language.

    Too true. It's not really that much harder to code a sizeable project in Assembly, if you have a bit of discipline about it. The hardest thing is defining your data structures and sticking to them. You build the "language" as you need it in the form of purpose-built subroutines. I just got finished doing a 12,000 line project for an embedded controller. I socially engineered the manufacturer into giving me a few hooks -- which added about 2 pages to the firmware source code I'm told -- and then supplemented their well-designed but miserably slow BASIC variant with blazingly fast background Assembly. Now this gizmo which can only execute 100 lines or so of BASIC per second is weighing and sorting 150 pieces per minute, doing true weight conversions at 60Hz (the firmware only manages 10Hz due to the use of floating-point math) and doing accurate 60Hz timing which BASIC cannot do.

    As one of the engineers said after seeing the video, "Well, I guess you've been telling us this was possible since 1995."

    This controller uses a 20 MHz 80186. Its replacement introduced last year uses a 40MHz 80386DX, and my code still runs an order of magnitude faster on the old hardware than BASIC code does on the new board. Another thing I told them back in 1995 -- you may spend a lot of time to write software, but you only have to write it once. When you up the CPU specification it increases the cost of every unit you produce.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Assembly Language Rocks by localroger · · Score: 2
      The problem with his line of reasoning is how complex the damn processors are nowadays.

      You miss the point. You are looking at the micro scale; I am looking at a higher level of abstraction -- though not much higher.

      I've looked at quite a bit of object code over the years and I am still looking for this compiler that is anywhere near as efficient as a human -- not at stuff like loading the pipelines, but at stuff like figuring out when to use register vs. memory variables and which registers to use (especially important in x86 architecture). Pipeline loading inefficiency is nothing compared to the fact that you used a 16-bit integer variable and did error checking on the subtract operation when the CX register and LOOP would have done the same thing. It is possible to instruct modern compilers to make very tight code but it's almost as much effort as writing the Assembly yourself and very few people know how to do it (or even know that it can be done, or might be worth doing).

      Most projects don't warrant being done entirely in Assembly -- my project had to because it was piggyback on a proprietary embedded system and there was no OS and no reasonably fast higher level language to draw on. (Still, about 2,000 of those lines are in the controller's miserably slow BASIC; no use coding user interfaces that don't have to be fast anyway, etc.)

      In a more reasonable environment my experience has always been about 80/20, that is 80% of the code in any old high-level language that's available plus 20% really fast assembly, is about as good as 100% assembly. Unfortunately, in Windoze it is a blazing pain in the posterior to use assembly at all.

      Which is unfortunate, because I've found that most projects have a few things that happen so often that not doing them in Assembly is really stupid. The engineers on the device I hacked said they had done some statistical analyses and found a few routines that were called so often they bore looking into. One of them was named EVALUATE_KEYWORD. No duh. You don't code the inner loop of an interpreted language in C++; it's only a page or two of Assembly and that will literally give you an order of magnitude improvement. It also helps if you don't use double-precision floating point math throughout regardless of whether it's necessary.

      --
      Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  54. They must be using one for their Web hosting too by localroger · · Score: 5

    Only 9 comments and the site is already slashdotted.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]