Slashdot Mirror


Barney vs. Right to Satire

blkros writes "Looks like Barney isn't so lovable after all, or at least his lawyers aren't, as this article at Wired shows. They are starting to bring action against web sites that disparage the "lovable", purple dinosaur." The specific case they talk about is a page listing a hundred ways to kill a purple dinosaur, which strikes me as pretty fair satire (and a justifiable cause).

27 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. Amazing. by Glytch · · Score: 3

    After the recent distribution conflict, the battle of the languages, and the horrific Great Editor War, something comes along to completely unite all Slashdotters in mutual hatred against a single menace...

  2. Re:Lets boycott the purple scoundrel by unitron · · Score: 3
    "Barney tapes (not to mention other paraphanalia) are off of my shopping list for good."

    Don't tell us, tell Lyons. Write them a letter and tell them why.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  3. They shut down my site months ago by BigJimmy · · Score: 5
    Mr. Carlin (the lawyer on the Barney side) sent me a similar letter in January. A few months earlier, my Geocites site was removed without any explanation from Geocities.

    It seems that they went for higher profile sites first, particularily the ones that criticized the educational content of the show. I just decided to take the site down and not try to bother fighting it as I'm in Canada and don't have the time or the resources to fight this.

    You can view the whole letter here. Maybe if enough people protest, I'll put the site back up somewhere else. However, if you look through Yahoo's Barney section here, you'll see plenty of infringement on the fan pages. The fan pages are much more blantantly infringing than any of the stuff I put up. Don't they have to threaten everybody that infringes, or else it won't hold up in court?

    Yahoo has delisted many of the now removed sites under the "Anti-Barney" category. At one time there were close to 20 of them.

  4. Re:It makes you think by CokeBear · · Score: 4

    > Somebody tell me where I can donate to the cause.

    Three letters:

    EFF

    (My monthly charitable donation goes to them, and they get everything in my will. Kids want money? They'll have to work for it just like I did. *That* is capitalism.)

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
  5. Cool reply by rde · · Score: 5

    I read this a couple of days ago on OverLawyered; they focussed more on Cybercheeze's reply. This is how we should all react to spurious lawsuits.

  6. Not quite. by rjh · · Score: 5

    Lawyers are actually a minority in Congress; there are more businessmen there now than lawyers.

    Not only that, the government is made up of the people--and it's not true that 90% of the people are lawyers.

    If the American public really wanted that sort of legal reform, rest assured, the American public would get it. When the American public wakes up from its slumber and tells the politicians, very clearly, what they're going to do or else, politicians scurry to obey the great Leviathan that's the body politic.

    Unfortunately, 90% of Americans can't be bothered to give a damn about anything in law or government.

    That's where the real tragedy is.

  7. Re:On the stand by Tackhead · · Score: 5
    > I would pay to see Barney take the stand in a court of law claiming defamation of character. "I love you, You love me... wait, why can't you love me?"

    I sue you, you sue me,
    You can't afford our lawyers' fee,
    With a nasty letter from Dewey, Cheatem, Howe,
    Up your ass our landsharks plow!

    (Gotta problem with that, you big fat purple fuck? Bring it on, motherfucker, bring it on...)

  8. But... by bconway · · Score: 3

    Barney Doom was one of the original reasons I got into FPSs in the first place! How sad.

    --
    Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
  9. Let's piss EVERYONE off... by ktakki · · Score: 5

    I love you,
    You love me,
    Let's recite from OT III


    Uh, oh! There's a nasty cluster of Body Thetans on you, Barney!

    Let's kill them with a Tom Cruise Missile!

    Holy Xenu! You killed Barney! YOU BASTARDS!

    Aw, too bad. Anyway, here's the Teletubbies to sing you the DeCSS source code song. Let's
    all sing along!


    k., before coffee.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people
    are really good at heart." - Anne Frank

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
  10. What's really sad... by camusflage · · Score: 5

    What's really sad about this is that in 95% of cases, they'll be going after people who haven't the resources to fight this. Satire is protected speech, but only when people want to protect it. Most ISP's will roll over and take it when they get a nastygram, rather than keep the site up while their customer fights it.

    It will be interesting to see the first site that moves to rotten.com. My guess is they'll let it stand, knowing they haven't the legal stump of a leg to stand upon to take it any further than nastygrams.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    1. Re:What's really sad... by InsaneGeek · · Score: 3

      Maybe you can enlighten me, but I've never quite understood the reasoning that people think that ISP's that they are paying 20 dollars a month (or less) should open themselves up to a possibility of massive expense (how much money can you get out of an individual, compared to how much money could you get out of a national ISP).

      Being realistic a webhoster deals in quantity, thousands of sites and dropping off a couple of customers to this is MUCH less expensive and doesn't really touch the bottom line; than dragging up log files, going to court, etc. Also being realistic if the ISP has good prices, good service, good performance, etc. with their only fault being that in a legal case they wash their hands of the problem... well that's not going to cause a mass exodus and kill them off.

      Just being a bit realistic, in what $20/month buys you, if you want your ISP to take on some of that risk you had better make it financially attractive to the ISP.

    2. Re:What's really sad... by GemFire · · Score: 3

      Politicians, Judges, lawyers, and, indeed, regular American citizens all need to share the blame for allowing ridiculous lawsuits to occur. Two excellent books on the subject were written by Philip Howard - "The Death of Common Sense" and "The Lost Art of Drawing the Line."

      People don't want Judges to judge - that much power in a single pair of hands scares Americans. And everybody is out for himself, not caring how a decision might affect the rest of the people - only thinking of getting money from a settlement or judgement.

      Lawyers only fall in the blame through the fact of the kind of cases they will take and argue. If no lawyer would take a frivolous case (like against Barney insults - an obvious Freedom of Speech issue) then frivolous cases would not exist.

      Judges, even when they're allowed to exercise their authority (which isn't all the time) are unsure of how much authority they actually have and generally let the jury take responsibility for judgements.

      Politicians get the blame for everything (of course) but here, since law originates in the political process, they have the capability to instill reason - not rules, but reason - and they don't. That's why laws keep getting longer and longer. Take those IP laws that these Barney proponents are using in their scare tactics - the original copyright law took less than a single page. Current copyright law is something like 150 pages, most of which is devoted to the details of how the rules work, precisely. Such laws do not easily move through time - old technologies fade away, making entire portions obsolete and new technologies require new additions.

      Law is not supposed to be a cancerous growth that chokes the life out of a society. It is supposed to be a guideline, set out in generalities, reflective of the people agreeing to its tenents.

      --
      Don't just complain - DO something about it!
    3. Re:What's really sad... by mikethegeek · · Score: 5

      "What's really sad about this is that in 95% of cases, they'll be going after people who haven't the resources to fight this. Satire is protected speech, but only when people want to protect it. Most ISP's will roll over and take it when they get a nastygram, rather than keep the site up while their customer fights it. "

      That's the problem these days. Society is so litigious, to the point where you really DO have no rights unless you get a lawyer and go to court. None at all...

      Why? Because of two things.

      1. The lack of common decency. For some, unknown reason, it seems all people and especially corps feel that no one has the right to make fun of them or criticise them, Corps especially. And lawyers lack any sense of morals.

      2. The legal system does NOTHING at all to discourage this. From judges on down to the bar.

      We need some kind of Federal SLAPP law, one that imposes HARSH penalties on lawyers, and even JUDGES who become parties to such harassment. Unforunately, this is about as likely as Jack Valenti asking for the repeal of the DMCA.

      Why? Who benefits from such threats and suits?

      Lawyers.

      Who makes up 90% of our government?

      Layers.

      Case closed.

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  11. Don't joke about killing Barney... by smirkleton · · Score: 3

    ...if he was killed, scientists might be forced to re-engineer him in a laboratory using his genetic material, filling in missing gene sequences with that of a nearby relative (perhaps H.R. Puf-N-Stuf?).

    In short, there's a palpable risk that he could could be re-engineered into a species infinitely more corny and terrifying than we could possibly imagine.



    (p.s. - if any of you Internet comedians steal my idea about making a Jurassic Park parody with scientists building a theme park populated with genetically-engineeried enhancements of Barney, H.R. Puf-N-Stuf, the Banana Splits, or whatever... I'll sue for infringement.... In the spirit of this news thread...)

    (well, maybe not. but could you at least throw CATS into the mix somehow?)

  12. Re:The Pseudo Pro-Children Argument by Stonehand · · Score: 5

    Dungeons and Barneys
    Barney by AD&D Rules

    Barney

    Climate/Terrain: Nine Hells, Gehenna, Hades, The Abyss, PBS
    Frequency: Very rare or daily at 4 pm
    Organization: Solitary
    Activity Cycle: Day
    Diet: Little children's minds
    Intelligence: Insipid (-12)
    Treasure: Merchandising contracts
    Alignment: Purple evil

    No. appearing: 1 (may be attended by 1-100 Barney zombies, see below)
    Armor class: 10 (big and plush)
    Movement: 3
    Hit dice: 8
    THAC0: 12
    No. of attacks: 2
    Damage/attack: 1-10 (x2)
    Special attacks: Hug (damage 3-30)
    Special defenses: Aura of intolerable idiocy
    Magic resistance: 90%
    Size: L (8' tall)
    Morale: Stupid (30)
    XP value: 4,000

    Barney is a demon from the lower planes, a great purple and plush deformed dinosaur. It is the enemy of intelligent lifeforms, eternally seeking out small children and feeding on their natural intelligence and curiousity.

    Combat: Barney will normally attack with it's two great paws, each inflicting 1-20 points of damage. If a victim is struck with either paw and fails a saving throw versus paralyzation, they are dragged to Barney and may be hugged next round. A hug inflicts 3-30 points of damage each round until the victim or Barney is killed.

    Barney may also utter a 'Power word "I love you"' once every three rounds. Any adults hearing the power word must save versus spells or flee in terror for 1-6 rounds. Any child hearing the power word must save versus spells or be controlled by Barney. He or she will thereafter follow Barney's commands with a delightful smile, and is subject to continued brainwashing. Each day that a child is in Barney's control they may be taught another lesson by Barney, decreasing their intelligence and wisdom by 1. When either stat reaches zero, the child becomes a mindless Barney zombie! Barney zombies follow his commands with love and a delightful smile, and eagerly spend gold coins on Barney merchandise.

    Barney is constantly surrounded by an aura of intolerable idiocy. Any individual within 20' must save versus spells once per round or lose 1 point of intelligence. When intelligence reaches zero, the victim falls to the ground in a quivering, gibbering wreck. Intelligence may be regained at the rate of 1 point per day afterwards. In addition, the aura tends to make spells go awry, tactics to fail, and mundane items to become intelligent with their own insipid personalities.

    Habitat/Society: Barney resides in a great temple and television studio on the lowest plane of the Abyss, with areas extending into every lower plane and prime material plane via transdimensional gates. He is constantly surrounded there by 1-100 Barney zombies clutching plush dolls and lollipops, which they may use as +2 maces in combat.

    -From CyberLost, via AOL; original Bitnet post by Hellraiser

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  13. Hey Kids! We Have a New Song Today! by Greyfox · · Score: 5
    I sue you, you sue me,
    You'll get it if you diss Barney!

    Hey kids! Our word of the days is "Lawsuit!" Later on in the show you'll watch me use some lawyers to stick my giant purple dick in some people in court! Won't that be special? Everyone's doing it! Got a problem with a bully on school grounds? Get a lawyer! Did your sister take that 5 cents you had in your piggy bank? Get a lawyer! Someone call you some names? Get a lawyer! It doesn't matter if you win or lose if you're a giant corporate dinosaur! You can bankrupt them with legal fees and the results are about the same!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  14. Re:Not so cool reply! by briancarnell · · Score: 3

    Actually, if you read this carefully it seems clear that this applies only if you are going to link using their logo.

    This paragraph is the confusing part,

    You are granted permission to link up CyberCheeze from your Web site, as long as you use only the Logos provided. All use of other graphical elements for linking to the CyberCheeze Web site without explicit prior permissions is illegal. By downloading the Logo, you fully agree to the Policies set herein.

    The first sentence is very poorly written, but I interpret this to mean that if you want to link to this site using a graphic logo, you have to user their logo and you have to abide by the policies set down here. This says nothing about text links.

  15. More Barney abuse by dingbat_hp · · Score: 3

    Mr Cranky. Another film review site.

    Funny, bitchy, and beating on Barney.

  16. satire by daevt · · Score: 5

    judge: clerk?
    clerk: yes judge?
    judge: do we still have that first amendment
    thingy hanging around?
    clerk: we do.
    judge: case dismissed.

  17. The Pseudo Pro-Children Argument by clyons · · Score: 3
    Anyone who would parody or threaten Barney must be against children. You're not against children, are you? Do you want children seeing depictions of Barney and Baby-Bop doing the nasty?

    BTW, the above is sarcasm. However, I could quite easily forsee that at least part of the argument made by the lawyers on behalf of the trademark owners would be that kids looking for Barney stuff on the web could possibly come across disictions of violence against Barney, Barney and Friend in adult situations, etc.

    Unfortunatly, if you get a jury pool full of soccer moms, this may easily work. There are many who do want to sanitize every corner of the world so they don't have to do any actual parenting, because otherwise they wouldn't have time for Amway and Starbucks Coffee between running their kids to soccer practice and holding Tupperware parties. After all, it takes a village, and we're all part of that village whether we want to be or not. :-(

    --

    --

    --
    Intelligence is definitely a recessive trait.

  18. Re:Now you've gone and done it! by iainl · · Score: 3

    He didn't say he wanted Barney to be dead, he merely expressed that if Barney were reach the state of death the site in question explains how to achieve that he would love the strangely toned dinosaur. Legally, a world of difference, I'm sure you'll agree.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  19. Slumbering, dundering, wandering... by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 5

    modern propaganda no longer is concerned with lying to all the people all of the time. modern propaganda has no need to convince all of the people that A is also not-A. modern propaganda does not even need to lie, explicitly. modern propaganda consists of portraying information in so many different ways that one group of people think A is A, one group thinks A is not-A, another group thinks A could be either, and another thinks that A is just another government fabrication anyway so why bother...

    the american public in the late eighteenth century did not awaken in righteous anger and throw off the oppressive chains of the United Kingdom. there was no spontaneous consciousness-raising en masse. rather, the intellectuals of the time -- businessmen, public servants, lawyers -- published many persuasive texts over a period of time that provided an ideological foundation upon which vast amounts of human resources could be laid, body stacked upon body, to forcefully settle the argument.

    the People, as conceived by dreamy-eyed libertymongers, simply does not exist. the People is a convenient fiction called into being at various times in history to suit the whims of intellectuals [who worship ideas above the People], revolutionaries [who worship violence above the People], and large-scale social forces [which serve the interests of nobody and nothing save survival probabilities]. the People is variously hardworking, honest, stupid, delusional, downtrodden, longsuffering, lazy, avaricious, hopeless, helpless, heartless, and directionless. the People is a blind golem. it knows neither what it wants nor how best to obtain the few things it can coherently conceive. numberless infinities of cells flake off your body and die every day as part of natural functioning. oppression, genocide, deception -- these are operational processes of the Body Politic which you idolize so zealously.

    there will be no Great Awakening of the American Public.

    ---

    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  20. Not so cool reply! by AndyMouse+GoHard · · Score: 3
    I too followed the link to Cybercheeze's reply, and was fooled into thinking what a cool reply too. And then, I read the legal blurb on Cybercheeze's website about linking to them.

    http://www.cybercheeze.com/info/logolink.html

    It seems you can't link to them without using their logo. Does that make the above link illegal? I guess so. So while I liked the intent of Cybercheeze's reply, they're also pulling some lawyer crap of their own. Am I wrong? Is it illegal now to link to a site without permission?

    Seriously, what's happening to our civilization when everything needs to be so regulated?

    --
    Upon seeing the box was too small, Schrodinger's Elephant breathed a sigh of relief.
  21. Re:Big Bird by OpCode42 · · Score: 3

    Why haven't sesame street sued over Bert Is Evil? Maybe they are too busy laughing at it....

  22. Re:How about... by mikethegeek · · Score: 4

    "A site with 100 ways to kill a purple dinosaur's lawyers?"

    That's a HELLUVA idea! I think I'll start such a list up on my personal home page tonight.

    One thing's for sure, there IS no bad way to off a lawyer ;)

    --
    === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  23. It makes you think by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3
    This whole thing kinda makes you think (as we all knew) that Barney(ftm [frivolous trademark]) has always been about how much money they could make rather than what kind of message they could impart to kids. For those with the knowledge, I have a few questions.

    • Do they have a trademark on "Barney?"
    • If so, will that even hold water? Barney is a name. It's also commonly given to animals.
    • Even if the trademark holds water, doesn't law allow you to pretty much say anything about "Barney" you want, as long as you acknowledge the trademark? I would think anything otherwise would be a violation of our right to Free Speech.

    Quite frankly, if such a case could be won, it would set a dangerous precedent. Imagine if you couldn't participate in M$ bashing on your website. Or for that matter, imagine if you couldn't participate in Linux-bashing. No trolling intended. Just two examples I thought would appeal to slashdot readers. But seriously: Some time ago, companies were given the right to advertise on TV that "their product was better than {insert specific brand name}." Would winning such a court case undo all of that?

    I would think their case would hold water if we were talking about slandering a real person. But this is a "fictional" character on a TV program, and one that seems to almost invite animosity (for some inexplicable reason). What makes them think that we should give up our rights to free speech?

    Somebody tell me where I can donate to the cause.

    GreyPoopon
    --

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  24. On the other hand... by Richard+Bannister · · Score: 5
    One of those nastygrams says:

    and have concluded that it incorporates the use and threat of violence towards the children's character Barney without permission from Lyons Partnership
    Is the logical implication of this that Lyons Partnership are prepared to give those who ask permission to brutally savage Barney? :)
    --
    http://www.themeparks.ie